Tag: restructuring

CLOSING A BUSINESS DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN AN ALARMING BANKRUPTCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 18, 2020

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

At the end of this blog, we have a special gift for you!

Closing a business introduction

Many times I am consulted by an entrepreneur about closing a business. This may sound odd coming from a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (Trustee), but not all business closures involve a formal bankruptcy. In fact, there are more business closures that do not involve bankruptcy

Now with so many businesses hurting due to a slowdown or complete destination due to the result of the coronavirus pandemic, I expect more entrepreneurs are going to want to know about closing a business.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I provide the reasons why. I also go through the various steps in closing a business that you can use as a checklist.

Closing a business that does not have many (free) assets

Many times I get a call from someone whose business is not doing well. They probably cannot afford to pay the business rent next month and it does not make sense to stay open. They think bankruptcy is the only way they have for closing a business. The business does not have many assets, or all the assets are secured by a bank that loaned the corporation money. Think of a business where the assets were bought through a bank loan. The funding may or may not have been under a government small business loan program.

The entrepreneur gave a personal guarantee to the bank ranging from 25% to 100% of the total loan amount. The entrepreneur may also have provided a personal guarantee to the landlord. The business may or may not be current in its employee source deduction remittances and harmonized sales tax (HST) payments. The entrepreneur does not believe the assets have any value above the amount of the secured loan and wishes to place the company in bankruptcy as the answer to closing a business.

Here is why bankruptcy will not help:

The assets are fully secured by the bank.
Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) may have a trust claim over the assets because of unremitted source deductions.
A corporate bankruptcy will not solve the entrepreneur’s personal debt issues under the personal guarantee to the bank for any shortfall claim and the landlord for any claim due to the failure of the corporate tenant.

In this type of situation, there is not much I can do. I tell the entrepreneur that if they are going to shut the business down before the first of the next month, they should do so. Then, they should go to the bank, advise them and cooperate with the bank to allow them to realize their security. I tell them to make sure that they follow the steps for closing a business that I outline below.

I tell the entrepreneur that when the bank and the landlord each make a demand for their obligations under the respective personal guarantees to call me. We will then work together on their personal situation. Perhaps a consumer proposal will be possible. I also tell them that it is not worth spending the money they don’t have in order to bankrupt the company.

That is why in this case a corporate bankruptcy will not help an entrepreneur in closing a business. I call this the self-help remedy.

The business is still operating – will anyone buy it?

Before making any decisions about closing a business, you should first think in terms of is your business worth anything? You have spent many years building your business. It may be insolvent because it has suffered losses for several years, cash flow is weak and the corporation cannot pay its debts generally as they come due.

Although the current corporate body may be weak, you need to determine if your business is still viable. Does the marketplace still have a need for the service or product you provide? Are there competitors who seem to be doing well? Your business has a customer base and trained staff. One of your competitors may find your customer base and some or all of your staff something they want to amalgamate into their existing business.

If that is the case, you need to understand what your business might be worth. The selling prices of similar organizations in your geographical area or market will be a good barometer of what you can anticipate getting for your company. Innovative buyers might evaluate your business on the basis of projected cash flow for the next few years. They may very well mark down the worth of that cash flow to mirror the perceived threats and risks inherent in your business.

In the case of an insolvent but viable business, it may be that an insolvency process is necessary to allow the purchaser to buy the assets it wishes to purchase and take on all or some of your employees, maybe even including you.

The range of options available includes:

So with the right insolvency process, the assets of the business can be put back to good use and be very productive. It may very well help get a good M&A deal done.

I have written before many blogs on how these insolvency proceedings could help in getting the healthy parts of a business into a purchaser while leaving the sick parts behind and then be used for closing a business. Those details are beyond the scope of this Brandon’s Blog.

**When does corporate bankruptcy make sense in closing a business?**

Corporate bankruptcy is not a simple process. An entrepreneur needs the advice of their lawyer and also needs to retain a Trustee. This costs money. More often than not, there are no free assets in the company. That means the entrepreneur needs to personally fund the cost of the bankruptcy process for closing a business.

A bankruptcy of the company may make sense in several situations. Some of the most common are:

Certain government claim priorities need to be reversed and that only can be done in bankruptcy. The most common one is unremitted HST. Absent a bankruptcy, the HST obligation is a trust claim and will come before the claim of any other creditor, including a secured creditor. As probably the sole director of the corporation, the entrepreneur may be willing to bankrupt the company to put the HST behind the bank. The director may very well choose as part of closing a business, to take their chances on the claim for unpaid HST as a director liability, rather than increase the bank’s shortfall by the amount of that HST claim.
There may be value in the premises lease. If the rent under the lease is below market and can be sold, a bankruptcy will be necessary. That is because the combination of the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) Trustee has certain rights to sell the lease that the corporation tenant does not have. So, bankruptcy may be a good idea in that case.
The security of a lender for which no personal guarantee has been given is invalid against a Trustee. The corporation may be able to restructure with that liability moved from secured to unsecured. Alternatively, a bankruptcy will allow for assets to be better protected for the secured creditors first and then provide some value for the unsecured creditors if there is a bankruptcy.

**My closing a business checklist**

This is what I tell any entrepreneur for a self-help remedy for closing a business that is most appropriate:

Advise the utilities that they should do a final meter reading and shut down the account.
Prepare and issue all records of employment to the former employees.
Remove the books and records (probably computerized) from the business premises so that the information can be secure.
Advise your bank lender that the business is shut down and that you are delivering the keys to the banker so that they can get their security.
If there is no bank lender, and no trust claims over the assets, hold a going out of business sale.
Tell the landlord the business is over and deliver the keys.
Cancel insurance policies. There may be an unearned premium refund coming back to the business.
Redirect the business mail to a different address. Most of the mail will be bills, but there may also be cheques you don’t want to miss so you can deposit them into the bank account.
Cancel any corporate credit cards.
Deal with the termination and return of any business license and permits.
Deal with your business social media accounts, website, and any other digital or intangible assets. You will have to decide when it comes up for renewal if you wish to retain the URL in light of your closing a business decision. The URL may have a value that you can unlock.
Make sure that the final financial statements and tax returns are prepared. File the tax returns with the government. If there is a balance owing, don’t worry about it as the business cannot pay and corporate income tax owed is not a director liability.
Prepare and issue final T4 statements of remuneration paid. Issue them to the former employees. Figure out if there are any employee source deductions owing. If there is and you can pay them as it is a director liability.
Calculate, prepare and file the final HST return. If there is a balance owing and you can pay the amount as it is also a director liability.
Maintain the books and records as CRA may want to perform an audit.
Send a letter to all creditors advising of your closing a business decision was due to financial problems, express your gratitude for the relationships you have built, tell them that there is no money for them and let them know that you have also lost money.
Mail a letter to your customers/clients advising of the closure of the business and thank them for their loyalty and patronage over the years.

Closing a business summary

I hope you have enjoyed this closing a business Brandon’s Blog. A sick insolvent company’s business might be saved by a debt restructuring.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

CLOSING A BUSINESS INFOGRAPHIC. CLICK ON THE INFOGRAPHIC TO DOWNLOAD YOUR OWN COPY

Tags Bankruptcy, bankruptcy trustee, Canada Revenue Agency, closing a business, Corporate Bankruptcy, CRA, hst, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, liquidating proposal, proposal, receivership, restructuring, restructuring proposal, small business, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

CEWS APPLICATION: OUR COMPLETE CEWS EXTENSION PRIMER TO GREATLY HELP YOUR BUSINESS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 11, 2020

CEWS Application introduction

The expansion of the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) until June 2021, is one of the last few remaining Canadian government subsidies for business as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The subsidy that a CEWS application can be made remains at the current subsidy level of a maximum of 65% of qualifying payroll until December 19, 2020. This measure is the government’s dedication to producing over 1 million jobs and hopefully bring back employment to the degree it was before the COVID-19 pandemic.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to provide you with our CEWS extension primer to answer what we believe are the most common questions regarding the CEWS application program extension.

CEWS application: What is the CEWS?

The federal government is providing organizations with wage help towards worker wages if they are able to reveal a decrease in earnings as a result of COVID-19. Businesses will be eligible to receive the subsidy for the wages they have actually paid their staff members from March 15th, 2020 to June 2021.

Most of CEWS guidelines stay the very same– except for:

The computation for the top-up, which had actually been based upon a 3-month standard, will now be calculated upon the existing month’s revenue loss to supply more help to those employers needing to close down again.
The subsidy rate will be capped at 0.8 times the income reduction (max of 65%), until December 19, 2020.

As indicated above, the program runs until June 2021.

CEWS application: Who is an eligible employer?

A lot more types of employers have been added as eligible employers, including seasonal operations and also amalgamated companies. For a complete list of who qualifies, check out the Canadian government CEWS application website.

The program does not look at the number of staff on the payroll. Rather, the main requirement is that the business had a CRA payroll account as of March 15, 2020. If your business did not have a CRA payroll number since your third-party payroll provider made remittances for you under their number, you can create one now and still be considered eligible.

**How do I calculate my gross revenue drop for the CEWS application?**

A revenue decline is the percent of gross revenue shed in a month in comparison to a pre-COVID-19 time frame. To determine your gross revenue, you can pick between two accounting techniques. You can choose to record revenue when received and expenditures when paid (the cash approach) or you can pick to recognize revenue and expenses in the period they are incurred (the accrual method).

Once you have picked your accounting approach, you will need to use that same bookkeeping approach for all periods. If you decide to change from one accountancy method to the other, you will then need to refile for all previous periods. That way, you will still only be using one method in your CEWS application.

To calculate the level of the revenue decline you will need to choose between:

contrasting current month revenue to the same month in 2019 (the general method); or
comparing current month revenue to your average revenue in January and February 2020 (the alternative method).

Whatever strategy you use, you will need to continue to make use of that exact same method for Periods 1 to 4. The only time you will be able to change your approach from one to the other will be Period 5, after which you will need to use that very same approach for the remainder of the CEWS application periods.

**What is the safe harbour CEWS application regulation?**

The safe harbour regulation allows organizations who would have been eligible for the 75% wage subsidy under the old CEWS application rules, to still obtain a minimum of 75% under the brand-new regulations for Periods 5 and 6 only.

So, an eligible employer with an earnings reduction of 30% or more in Periods 5 and 6 will be able to receive at the very least a 75% subsidy, or possibly much more under the new rules if their revenue reduction is very high.

**How do I determine which employees’ wages are eligible for the CEWS application?**

Eligible employees must be those employed only in Canada to qualify for the wage aid under a CEWS application. On top of that, for Periods 1 to 4 only, they can’t lack pay for 14 or more consecutive days within a CEWS application period. This guideline does not apply from Period 5 and beyond.

You will then have to figure out whether the staff member is arm’s length or non-arm’s length (usually household members/owners) and if they are on a paid leave or not.

**How do I calculate the pre-COVID payroll amount for the CEWS application?**

For Period 7 onwards, the baseline (pre-crisis) pay is just required for workers that are on leave with pay, and also staff members who are non-arm’s length. That baseline pay is the average wage paid from a specific payroll period before COVID-19.

To optimize your staff member’s baseline pay, you will need to establish which prior period offers your worker the biggest average wage. After that, add up all the amounts paid to the employee during the chosen base CEWS application time period.

**What is the deeming rule for the CEWS application?**

Phase 1 qualification for 75% CEWS application wage support required a decline of 15% from compared period revenues for Period 1 (March 15– April 10). It also needed a 30% decline in revenue throughout each of the three subsequent Periods (2, 3 & 4) through to July 4.

The only exemption to this was a deeming rule that said that if you receive the subsidy from your CEWS application in any one Period, you do not have to prove revenue decrease in the immediate succeeding Period. Essentially, this meant that any business that qualified would automatically get CEWS application wage assistance for eight weeks. It would after that need to requalify through a new CEWS application for any kind of later Period.

This guideline is being adjusted to be a more flexible offering because of the developing assistance levels under the guidelines for Phase 2.

Any Phase 1 CEWS application subsidy period, which ended on July 4, provided a single degree of wage assistance, i.e., 75%. Those calculations and CEWS application decisions made are unaffected by the new guidelines.

**The CEWS application calculations are complex**

You are right. The CEWS application process in Phase 1 was somewhat confusing and complex. For CEWS 2.0, the government has developed a better online CEWS calculator to make the calculations easier.

The CEWS calculator has actually been updated to do more of the complicated CEWS application computations for you.

Before using it, please understand that the calculator does not accumulate or keep the info you input. Also, making use of the calculator itself does not cause an audit or for alarm bells to ring at the tax authorities.

It is recommended that you utilize the calculator in one sitting so as not to lose your calculations. It is likewise suggested that you print/save your computations in case the Canada Revenue Agency does ask sometime in the future to see just how you did the numbers in your CEWS application.

**Business is slow. What should I do to keep my business going besides a CEWS application?**

Regrettably, this is happening to lots of businesses. The government has revealed a number of programs to aid businesses through this difficult COVID-19 pandemic time. There are additional actions you can take to plan for your business’s future.

Look at your income and expenses. Are you able to pay your fundamental business expenses? If not, can you get any relief from your vendors? Speak to your accountant/bookkeeper about your alternatives and whether it makes good sense to stay open, temporarily stop your business, or shut it down waiting for better times.

Redo your business plan, budgets and cash-flow statement for this new reality. Things are tough. Make certain you have a plan as to how your business is going to survive. Does and can your business model change to help you weather this storm?

You may need to sit down with both your accountant and a licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee). The Trustee can run through the various options available to restructure your business. Hopefully, a restructuring can be done to allow for either refinancing or the opportunity to bring in an investor. Maybe a sale of the business is possible and the purchaser will want to keep senior staff on for continuity under a multi-year employment contract.

There are many possibilities for the viable but insolvent company to avoid bankruptcy. You can call me today if your company is experiencing difficulties and you don’t know which way to turn.

CEWS application summary

I hope you have enjoyed this CEWS application Brandon’s Blog. Hopefully, you have better insight now into the CEWS program extension.

We know that people facing financial problems need realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags Bankruptcy, canada emergency wage subsidy cews, cews, cews application, cews calculator, covid-19, eligible employer, how do I calculate my gross revenue drop for the CEWS, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, pre-COVID payroll amount, restructuring, safe harbour CEWS rule, trustee, what is the cews, which employees' wages are eligible for the CEWS, who is an eligible employer

Brandon Blog Post

EARNOUT DEALS AND INSOLVENCY: THE BOLD WAY THEY NEED TO INTERSECT DUE TO TORONTO CORONAVIRUS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 26, 2020

If you would like to listen to the audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Earnout introduction

Our firm has recently started consulting with a business that has been deeply negatively affected by the Toronto coronavirus. I cannot tell you what it is, but I can confirm it is not in the food and beverage industry. Their cash flow budget shows they are going to soon run out of cash. That is bad news. The good news is that they are being courted by a company that wants to acquire them. The purchaser is proposing to pay a certain amount of cash on closing with an earnout deal as an upside.

The question they asked us, and the retainer that we will get, is to review the various options available to the target company. They want recommendations in case an insolvency process must be used to get either a refinancing deal with their banker or the sale completed.

We have had a very high-level discussion so far. It was immediately obvious to me that an insolvency process was not just a potential, it was a necessity. Not because the target company is going to crater tomorrow. Rather, for a different reason.

The business is currently viable but insolvent. That is the perfect combination in order to do a debt settlement plan combined with a corporate debt restructuring. My initial impression was that we can enhance either the refinancing or the sale by doing a corporate restructuring of debt.

Such a combination will enhance either option because:

In a refinancing, the restructuring will allow for a finite amount of money to go towards discharging all of the company’s unsecured debt, with the majority going to future operations.
For the sale, the purchaser will not be taking on many liabilities which will allow for a higher negotiated selling price.

You might think that the purpose of this Brandon’s blog is to focus on corporate restructuring, but it isn’t. Rather I want to focus on giving a basic primer on earnout deals.

**What is an earnout structure?**

An earnout structure is the combination of all the components which add up to the negotiated earnout sales agreement (merger agreement or earnout agreement). These elements consist of the purchase price, monetary and/or operating targets to be met or exceeded, upfront payment, as well as contingent payment.

The framework of the earnout agreement will have the earnout formula spelled out. The formula and full arrangement will be described in the particular clauses within the earnout agreement

Earnout clauses are part of the legal contract between the seller and the buyer. They normally contain 7 essential elements in the merger agreement: (1) overall acquisition price (2) the amount to be paid on closing (3) what the total potential additional purchase price contingent payment is based on the earnout formula (4) the length of time that the earnout deal applies for (earnout period) (5) what the financial and operational targets are (6) how the performance will be measured, and (7) the earnout cash payment formula and time frame each measurement period to make the calculated payment.

**Why agree to an earnout arrangement?**

When the buyer and seller have a difference of opinion on what the purchase/sale price should be, earnout clauses can bridge that void. It is a way to attempt to negotiate a deal that will be a win for both parties.

A remedy can be found through earnout payments. The buyer agrees to a purchase price which includes both a set payment on closing and a variable amount over a defined amount of time. It is computed depending upon the future growth of the target business. The earnout payments come to be due if the targets (both in performance and time frame) are met by the target business.

**How does an earnout work?**

As indicated above, there is an earnout formula in the agreement of purchase and sale. The earnout formula will be based on certain milestones being met in the future over the earnout period. Examples of earnout milestones can include on or more of:

sales revenue of brand-new modern technologies or products;
certain accomplishments with a predefined client base;
meeting or exceeding specific key financial results; and/or
hitting a minimum level of financial performance measured by earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA).

It is not uncommon in earnouts in m&a transactions, if the targets are not met, the seller gets absolutely nothing. This is notwithstanding there may have been performance improvement. That is because the target business did not meet the defined milestones. When putting together an earnout agreement, very close attention must be paid to both the computation and the definitions in the earnout clauses for the earnout payments. The parties must ensure that the language is as clear as it can be. If not, then disputes and probable litigation will be inescapable.

earnout

Earnout milestones and the good faith of the parties

When looking at any contract, there is a basic question. Does Canadian legislation place a duty on parties to a contract to carry out those duties honestly and in good faith? Must there be fair dealing between the parties? I believe the leading case on this topic is the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) in Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 494.

The answer to that question, as decided in that case, was yes. There must be fair dealing.

Nonetheless, in doing so, the SCC stated that the buyer does not act in the capacity as a fiduciary for the seller. The court also stated that there is nothing to prevent one party to legitimately obtain an economic benefit from the merger agreement over the other. The court was not asked to, and therefore did not, express any views on if a party goes out to frustrate or prevent a milestone from being met, does that constitute bad faith? It obviously won’t be fair dealing, but the court did not opine on the issue.

***Earnout* and *Toronto coronavirus***

The coronavirus pandemic has created so much uncertainty in all of our lives. The economy is just one of them. It has created a financial crisis for many. Entrepreneurs who had prepared to put their company up for sale in 2020 have been thrown a curveball. Buyers are of course looking to take advantage of the current financial crisis conditions to pay less for a viable business than they would have just 9 or 10 months ago. Sellers want to value their business on a historical average basis so that when the coronavirus financial crisis is over and the economy returns to normal, they will be fairly compensated. Buyers are looking for an advantage based on today’s economic realities.

An earnout clause may just be the way to bridge the gap. Perhaps both an earnout and a reverse earnout may be a way to go. The business gets valued on a historical average basis, but part of the purchase price is held in escrow invested. Over the agreed-upon earnout period, if the milestones are reached, including getting back to historical average earnings, then the earnout is paid out, in whole or part, to the seller. If not, the invested escrow funds are returned to the buyer.

Earnout deals and insolvency

In the current situation, we are being retained on, the viable but insolvent company has too much unsecured debt. Nobody is going to offer them new financing in order to pay off old debts. Financing is realistically available for go-forward expenses only.

The potential purchaser is not going to agree to assume the unsecured debt. The purchaser wants to buy assets of the target business, not the shares. They are going to want to make sure that if they purchase the assets, unsecured liabilities are not going to tag along. They will not want to just rely on common law. They are going to want a court order authorizing the purchase and getting proper title through a vesting order.

An insolvency process will accomplish both. It will be a debt settlement corporate restructuring. The merger agreement or earnout agreement will give both the seller and buyer certainty. The process will be conducted under either the proposal provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA).

A portion of the purchase price will be held back and used to create a proposal fund to offer a settlement to the unsecured creditors. If the sale does not take place and the company goes into bankruptcy, our current assessment is that the unsecured creditors will receive nothing. So, an offer through a restructuring plan to the unsecured creditors will get them a better result than in the bankruptcy of the company.

With a willing buyer and seller, both in fair dealing with each other to get an agreement of purchase and sale done, I am certain that we will get the debt settlement corporate restructuring done.

Earnout summary

I hope you have enjoyed this earnout deals and insolvency Brandon’s Blog. Hopefully, you have better insight now into the fact that a sick insolvent company’s business can be saved by doing a sale of its assets to a healthy organization.

We know that people facing financial problems need realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags corporate restructuring, debt restructuring, earnout, earnout agreement, earnout clauses, earnout formula, earnout payments, earnout period, earnouts in m&a transactions, fair dealing, insolvency, insolvency process, Ira Smith Trustee, merger agreement, restructuring, target business, target company, toronto coronavirus

Brandon Blog Post

CCAA CANADA: OUR EXTRAORDINARY GUIDE TO 2020 TROUBLED CANADIAN COMPANIES SEEKING BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 10, 2020

The Ira Smith Team is totally operational and both Ira and Brandon Smith are here for a telephone consultation, conference calls and virtual meetings.

Keep healthy and safe everybody.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast.

CCAA Canada introduction

We are now about 5 months into this COVID-19 pandemic since the state of emergency was announced in Canada. There has also been a lot of media coverage of the many negative effects it has had on Canadians and the Canadian economy. I thought it might be interesting at this point to do some review on CCAA Canada. Now I am not talking about the Canadian Collegiate Athletic Association. Rather, I am going to look at the companies that have so far filed for creditor protection under one of Canada’s insolvency statutes. The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

When a company tries to reorganize under CCAA Canada – What does CCAA mean?

When Canadian companies who owe more than $5 million experience financial problems, they might go to court to seek creditor protection, filing under the CCAA Canada. That’s federal legislation that primarily offers a company time to try to work out its financial troubles with those to which it owes money.

As I have written before in various Brandon’s Blogs, if the company owes less than $5 million it can file under the Part III Division I reorganization section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). Although it is the other Canadian federal insolvency statute and some procedures are more streamlined and handled slightly differently, the net effect is the same as the matters I explain below about the CCAA Canada.

What does CCAA Canada protection mean? CCAA vs Chapter 11

“Bankruptcy protection” is a term closely associated with a US company filing under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. That term has been adopted into the Canadian insolvency dialogue. In Canada, it most likely means that the Canadian company has applied to a Canadian court to look for protection from their creditors by filing under CCAA Canada.

A firm files under CCAA Canada for consent to come up with a restructuring plan strategy that would certainly provide it time to rearrange its financial affairs to make sure that it can keep operating.

As long as a CCAA order continues to be in place, creditors are not allowed to start or continue any kind of action to recover money owed to them. They can’t try to confiscate the firm’s property or try to petition it into bankruptcy, without the prior approval of the court. This is called the CCAA stay of proceedings.

Considering that a CCAA Canada filing is made because a business is deeply in the red, the initial order of business is to strike some kind of satisfactory arrangement with its creditors. That includes secured creditors, unsecured creditors and shareholders.

Can CCAA Canada protection be extended?

Yes, under CCAA Canada, court-ordered protection can be extended. After Algoma Steel filed under CCAA Canada in April 2001, the firm had gotten eight extensions prior to emerging with a new ownership framework.

Who gets priority under a CCAA Canada filing?

Not all creditors are treated equally. There is a priority generally established for the ranking of creditors and the order in which they might be paid by a debtor.

First in a CCAA Canada restructuring, will be any government claims that rank as a priority deemed trust claim. Next will be any new charges ordered by the court as part of the restructuring. Examples of such court-ordered security charges are Key Employee Retention Plans, financing the company needs in order to survive during the restructuring period and the costs of the professionals involved in the restructuring for the company.

Secured creditors, including lenders and bondholders, usually head the list next when it concerns getting back their money. Secured creditors might hold security such as a general security agreement and/or a mortgage as security for their debt held.

Unsecured creditors follow next on the list of creditors. Unsecured creditors have supplied goods or services on credit to the company without being given any security. In the many retailer filings that have been in the news recently, even customers who have paid deposits for items not yet picked up or who have gift cards are also unsecured creditors. Last on the list are the shareholders.

What happens if the court doesn’t approve a CCAA Canada application or the sides can’t agree on how to restructure debt?

If a restructuring effort is not successful, or if the court does not approve it, a company can be placed right into receivership or bankruptcy. The main difference between a CCAA Canada filing and the options of receivership or bankruptcy, suggests that the company can no longer be a going concern and will be liquidated.

The choice between receivership or bankruptcy depends on the nature and extent of the creditors. If there is a major secured creditor who is owed more than the assets are worth, on a failed restructuring, the court will allow that secured creditor to appoint a receiver (or the court will appoint the receiver). The receiver will then liquidate the company’s assets and repay the secured creditor as much as possible. If there are no secured creditors (which is highly unusual), or there will be money left over from the liquidation after full repayment of the secured creditors, then there will be bankruptcy. The licensed insolvency trustee acting as the bankruptcy trustee will make a distribution to the unsecured creditors.

Sometimes the type of company or industry will require both receivership and bankruptcy. Retail liquidations are a good example. The reasons are outside the main topic of discussion for this CCAA Canada Brandon’s Blog, but, one day, I will do one on that topic.

What happens to shareholders in a CCAA Canada restructuring?

Holders of common stock generally come last. On a regular basis in a CCAA Canada restructuring, they tend to get wiped out. Their old shares come to be worthless. Usually, brand-new shares are issued in the restructured company.

Holders of preferred shares rank ahead of common shareholders (for this reason the title “preferred”) yet more often than not do not get back the full value of their shares.

Public company shares in a company if it enters CCAA Canada protection and all trading is halted

When a public company announces that it has filed under CCAA Canada, a trading halt is applied. The listing exchange notifies the marketplace that trading is not taking place. While the stop is in effect, brokers are forbidden from publishing quotations or signs of interest in trading. The listing exchange will end the trading stop by taking the actions called for by its rules. Generally, the marketplace is alerted that a trading halt is about to end either at the same time the halt finishes or a few minutes before.

When a company gets on the edge of bankruptcy, its stock value mirrors the danger of a CCAA Canada administration becoming liquidation. Purely as an example, a business that used to trade at $50 might trade at $2 per share as a result of the bankruptcy environment. After entering into a CCAA Canada filing, the company’s stock price might be up to $2.10. This value is composed of the potential amount that shareholders might get after liquidation and also the possibility that the firm might restructure and run effectively in the future. Investors can buy and sell these $2.10 shares in the market. The actual value does not reach zero unless the likelihood of restructuring is so low that liquidation becomes a certainty.

While the company is in a CCAA Canada restructuring, its stock will certainly still have some value, though it will likely plummet. The regulatory authorities will watch it very closely and shut down trading if any anomalies are encountered where investors could get hurt. This was recently seen in the United States in the Hertz Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection administration.

Nonetheless, if the business restructures and emerges from CCAA Canada reorganization as a solvent going-concern, its share price might start to rise again. How much will depend on the unique restructuring issues. If a business rises from its restructuring stronger than ever, investors can take advantage of the turnaround, as old stock may get cancelled during the insolvency process, and new shares issued.

List of CCAA filings under CCAA Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic so far?

There have been many media reports about companies filing under CCAA Canada during this coronavirus pandemic. I thought it would be useful to look at which companies have filed and what industries seem to be most affected between the calling for the state of emergency and the last date for which these statistics have been published, July 31, 2020. All of this information comes from statistics published by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada.

The number of companies and the industries that these companies engage in is allocated as follows:

Cannabis	6
Charity	1
Construction	4
Energy	4
Entertainment	1
Hospitality	1
Manufacturing	1
Media	1
Mining	2
Pulp and Paper	1
Real Estate	2
Retail	8
Technology	1
Travel	1

	34

The following chart shows the filings by the province in this same time frame:

ccaa canada graph

CCAA Canada summary

I hope you enjoyed this CCAA Canada Brandon’s Blog. The Ira Smith Team family hopes you and your family are staying safe, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person who has been affected either through inconvenience or personal family tragedy.

We are all citizens of Canada and we have to coordinate our efforts to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Family members are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when things can return to something close to normal and we can all be together again physically.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has always employed clean and safe habits in our professional practice and continues to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Should you take advantage of the CEBA? I say a resounding YES!. I just wanted to highlight all of the issues that you should consider.

If anyone needs our assistance, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

Are you now worried just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. This pandemic situation has made everyone scared.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Team is totally operational and both Ira and Brandon Smith are here for a telephone consultation, conference calls and virtual meetings.

Keep healthy and safe everybody.

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY PROCESS: RIDICULOUS BUT TRUE BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 11 CASE AND ONTARIO RESTITUTION LAW DEBT

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date June 17, 2020

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Bankruptcy process introduction

This week two totally unrelated items caught my attention when thinking about the bankruptcy process. The first is about Hertz Global Holdings Inc. (Hertz) bankruptcy Chapter 11 case in the United States. An update to my recent blog about Hertz titled HOW HERTZ TEACHES US MODERN AND RISKY RULES OF BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA AND THE USA.

The second item that caught my eye is a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. The decision really didn’t have anything to do with bankruptcy. However, the Court of Appeal did reference the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) in its decision. It really is about restitution law and the resultant debt.

The zany twist to the Hertz bankruptcy Chapter 11 case

In my June 8 blog about the bankruptcy process used by Hertz, I wrote about the irrational behaviour of investors in trading Hertz stock. Legendary investor Carl Icahn sold his entire Hertz holdings at $0.72 per share. The stock had touched a low of $0.40. For some reason, investors bid the stock up to $5.53. The stock at the time of writing this blog is just under $2.

This made no sense at all. The only thing I can attribute it to is that investors saw an opportunity to buy in during upward momentum, sell-off with a profit, and leave someone else holding the bag. Hertz debentures are selling for pennies on the dollar. The assumption being that those creditors will largely get wiped out as part of the bankruptcy chapter 11 case. If creditors get next to nothing, then for sure shareholders are going to get wiped out. That is what happens in these bankruptcy process cases.

This activity did not escape Hertz’s attention. Now the restructuring team got an idea. What if we could sell more stock, given the interest in our shares. If we sold $1 billion worth, while telling everyone it was worthless, then we would have the necessary cash to fund our restructuring. Better yet, Hertz would not have to borrow money with high rate debtor-in-possession financing. All they needed was to convince the court to approve it. It sounds like a Mel Brooks comedy script!

June 19, 2020 UPDATE: Late yesterday, Hertz announced that it has determined to end a questionable stock sale of as much as $500 million since the Securities and Exchange Commission questioned and put a hold on the insolvent company’s plans. Hertz is currently in talks for a debtor-in-possession bankruptcy loan of up to $1 billion to fund its business reorg.

On June 11, 2020, Hertz filed its motion for court approval to issue more of its common stock. Since the common shares are being actively traded, Hertz filed its emergency motion to seek emergency relief from the court to allow the Debtor to try to capture value for the unissued Hertz shares for the benefit of the bankruptcy process Estate.

The approval sought from the court was approval to participate in a sale arrangement with Jefferies LLC (Jefferies), to act as the sales representative. Under the sale contract, Hertz might offer and sell common shares of Hertz having an aggregate offering value not to surpass $1 billion. Hertz has 246,775,008 unissued common stock shares. Jefferies will use its best efforts to market, as the sales representative the unissued shares of common stock.

In support of their motion, Hertz advised the court that:

The recent market prices of the trading quantities in Hertz’s ordinary shares creates a special possibility for Hertz to raise funding on terms that are much superior to any kind of debtor-in-possession funding.
If successful, Hertz might possibly offer up to and an aggregate of $1.0 billion of ordinary shares.
Unlike regular debtor-in-possession funding, the issuance of the ordinary shares would certainly not enforce restrictions on Hertz or its bankruptcy process restructuring efforts and would certainly not hinder any of the creditors.
Additionally, the stock issuance would bring no repayment obligations to Hertz.
Other than the Jeffries fee, there would be no other significant costs to obtain the funding through the sale of shares.
Hertz would include disclosure in any prospectus for the sale of the unissued common shares highlighting that a financial investment in these Hertz’s shares involves substantial dangers. This includes the danger that the common stock can inevitably be worthless (emphasis added).

What the court said

After deliberating on the issue, on June 12, 2020, Judge Mary F. Walrath of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware granted Hertz’s motion. She ordered that:

Hertz is allowed, but not required, to enter into the Sale Arrangement with Jeffries and perform all obligations called for in the agreement.
Hertz may, but again is not required to, market the unissued common shares.
Jeffries may earn its fee in accordance with the Sale Agreement.

This is truly novel, yet whacky. Anyone who would buy these shares must be gambling on the fact that market activity will remain hot and that they will be able to sell the shares for a profit.

As I mentioned above, creditors are going to be given a haircut. So how can shareholders expect a return on their investment? Any savvy creditor being asked to agree to a bankruptcy process restructuring plan certainly will insist that creditors must receive payments on account of what they are agreeing to give up, should funds become available, before shareholders see one penny.

Lots of people are going to be left without a chair when the music stops. It will be fascinating to see how this all works out.

Restitution law

This matter is totally unrelated to the Hertz bankruptcy process. It is in Ontario and I found the Court of Appeal for Ontario’s decision very interesting. Especially so because it really didn’t have anything to do with insolvency or bankruptcy either.

On June 11, 2020, the appellate court issued its decision in a matter dealing with restitution law. The case involved a 32-year-old man with high school education. In between September 30 and November 6, 2018, he went on a drug-fuelled rampage, that included the robbery of 10 businesses. He was sentenced to 4.5 years in jail and subject to a restitution order in the amount of $15,000. It was the restitution payment that was appealed.

His lawyer argued that the sentencing judge erred by not taking into consideration whether he had the ability to make restitution before imposing the restitution. They also argued that it will likely hinder his possibilities of rehabilitation. They said that the restitution order ought to be vacated.

The appeal court agreed. In allowing the appeal, the appeal court stated that the purpose of a restitution order is not intended to undermine the culprit’s chance for rehabilitation. The appeal court then went on to equate the rehabilitative aspects of restitution law with the rehabilitation intention of Canadian bankruptcies laws in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). The Court of Appeal for Ontario also correctly stated that a restitution order made by a sentencing judge will survive through any type of bankruptcy of the criminal. This suggests it is there for life and restitution is not meant to be a life sentence.

That is what caught my attention. I never would have equated restitution with bankruptcy or rehabilitation.

Summary

The Ira Smith Team family hopes that you and your family members are remaining secure, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person that has been affected either via misfortune or inconvenience.

I hope you have found this bankruptcy process Brandon’s Blog interesting. I will eagerly watch what happens in the Hertz common share sale and the subsequent trading in the shares. I also never thought of criminal restitution as part of rehabilitation. I also for sure never thought of it in the area of bankruptcy and insolvency.

We all must help each other to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Families are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when life can return to something near to typical and we can all be together once again.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Income, revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs, their companies and individual Canadians. This is especially true these days.

If anyone needs our assistance for debt relief Canada COVID, or you just need some answers for questions that are bothering you, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy process, BIA, canadian bankruptcies laws, common shares, common stock, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Debt, debt relief, Hertz, Hertz Bankruptcy (Re), Hertz Global Holdings Inc., Ira Smith Trustee, restitution law, restructuring, restructuring plan

Brandon Blog Post

HOW HERTZ TEACHES US MODERN AND RISKY RULES OF BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA AND THE USA

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date June 8, 2020

The Ira Smith Team is fully operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Stay healthy, well balanced and safe and secure everyone.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this business bankruptcy in Canada and the USA Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast.

Business bankruptcy in Canada Introduction

Late in the day on Friday, May 22, 2020, Hertz Global Holdings Inc. (Hertz) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware. The filing gives Hertz some breathing room to operate its business. During this time, Hertz also needs to come up with a business turnaround plan and a debt restructuring plan that creditors can support. The movement of Hertz stock last week teaches us some modern and risky rules of business bankruptcy in Canada and the United States.

Corporate bankruptcies and the Hertz investors

Hertz stock closed on the NASDAQ exchange on May 22 at US$2.84. It dipped to a low of US$0.40 on May 26. Legendary investor Carl Icahn sold all of his Hertz shares at an average price of $0.72. He dumped his 39% stake in Hertz at a loss of nearly $2 billion. Last Friday Hertz shares closed at US$2.57 per share. This morning, the trading touched US$3.40 per share.

So Hertz is up handsomely since May 26. Hertz has filed for bankruptcy protection. It doesn’t make sense that investors should be pushing the stock up. Hertz is selling off its fleet and further depressing the used car market. So far there is no indication that a business plan and debt reduction plan has been developed, let alone accepted by the creditors.

As far as assets, they have locations and a database of customers. But every major rental car company also has locations and a database. Whenever business and leisure travel resumes to pre-COVID-19 levels, if you can’t rent a car from Hertz you will rent it from a different company. So what are the non-fleet assets worth?

So on the surface, the investor money finding a home in Hertz stock and pushing up the stock price doesn’t make sense. So, are there savvy investors getting into Hertz or are they all just following the herd and will all end up losers?

Why Hertz filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection

Since 2014, Hertz has had four different CEOs. It is difficult to develop and implement a cohesive business strategy with such turmoil in the senior management ranks. As the coronavirus pandemic brought travelling to a sudden halt, Hertz suffered dramatically as a mass of its revenue depended on business travellers and vacationers renting vehicles when arriving at their destination airport. Nobody knows how long it will take until travel gets back to where it was and what Hertz needs it to be.

Hertz’s debt has been increasing as it invested heavily in its vehicle fleet. They may have also missed the mark in the mix of vehicles consumers want, requiring it to take on even more debt to make further fleet purchases. Hertz could no longer afford to make the interest payments on its debt load. At the time of its bankruptcy filing, Hertz had US$1 billion of cash and US$13 billion of debt.

The $13 billion in financing Hertz made use of to acquire its fleet of 500,000 automobiles. The financing was done via what is known as asset-backed securities. These are connected straight to the value of the vehicles. When the value of the cars drops, Hertz must make up the difference in cash within about three months, unless values rebound before that time.

However, with the coronavirus pounding the brakes on the economy and eliminating employment for so many, the drop in the value of used vehicles is expected to remain that way for a long time. Hertz knew that it could not make up the difference to its lenders when they made a demand, which was their right. Hence the bankruptcy filing.

The modern risky rules of investing in business bankruptcy in Canada and the USA

Normally, in a public company restructuring, it is not only the creditors that take a hit. Shareholders usually get a good drubbing. Share values fall and new shares are issued to raise capital. This further dilutes the holdings and value of those holdings for shareholders. But investors must believe that Hertz will come back. How else can you explain the surge in the share price?

Before this year, the company had ten consecutive quarters of positive growth. They were still losing money, just not as much. Investors must believe that Hertz will be able to survive. They must believe that the company although leaner and smaller, this is the time to jump on an opportunity to make money.

I am not a financial advisor, I am not saying whether this is a good or bad investment. It certainly is a very risky one. All I am saying is that as a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) administering business bankruptcy in Canada, this does not make any sense to me.

I guess only time will tell if these investors pushing up the stock price are insightful risk-takers or losers. Carl Icahn doesn’t believe it.

Business bankruptcy in Canada and the USA summary

I hope you have found this business bankruptcy in Canada and the USA Brandon’s Blog helpful.

We all must help each other to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Families are separated from each other. We look forward to the time when life can return to something near to typical and we can all be together once again.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. This is especially true these days.

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Stay healthy, well balanced and safe and secure everyone.

Tags Bankruptcy, bankruptcy filing, bankruptcy protection, business bankruptcy, business bankruptcy in canada, carl icahn, chapter 11, chapter 11 bankruptcy, company restructuring, corporate bankruptcies, covid-19, Hertz, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, restructuring, trustee in bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

THE TORONTO CORONAVIRUS EXTRAORDINARY PLAN TO BUSINESS RECOVERY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 27, 2020

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Stay healthy, well balanced and safe and secure everyone.

Introduction

For businesses having a hard time enduring the Toronto coronavirus pandemic, insolvency may very well be the outcome. General insolvency filings were down in April, this is mainly because everyone has a built-in stay of proceedings right now.

Banks, credit card companies and collection agencies are not making a name for themselves right now during the Toronto coronavirus lockdown by harassing people who cannot afford to pay their regular monthly payment. However, that will not last too long.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I discuss options available to the entrepreneur if the Toronto coronavirus lockdown and quarantine wreaks havoc on your business.

Telltale signs from the United States

We have already seen the variety of companies that submitted to Chapter 11 insolvency. They did so in order to attempt to reorganize their financial obligations while trying to stay in business. This has been especially true for the large retail business sector. Their business problems were not caused by COVID-19. However, the pandemic merely accelerated where they were heading anyway.

The American Bankruptcy Institute reported that Chapter 11 filings in April 2020 represent a 26% boost from April 2019.

I have previously written about Modell’s Sporting Goods and Pier 1. Now we can add Neiman Marcus, JCPenney and J.Crew. Outside of the retail sector, Hertz Car Rental, Gold’s Gym, Foodora and Virgin Australia are also recent restructuring filings. I also really believe that it won’t be long before the floodgates open up to subject an excess of small firms looking for relief from their financial problems, in North America and the rest of the world. That is probably obvious to you, it really can’t be called a Toronto coronavirus news update!

Entrepreneurs are doing whatever they can

I have definitely noticed an uptick in telephone calls from people scared about their personal situation and from worried business owners in the past 4 weeks. They aren’t all set to throw in the towel right now. They are attempting to do whatever they can through the shutdown to stabilize their company. So for now, they are trying to take advantage of various federal government programs to help them stay afloat. The programs include:

Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS)
Temporary 10% Wage Subsidy
Business Credit Availability Program (BCAP)
Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA)
Large Employer Emergency Financing Facility (LEEFF)
Canada Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance (CECRA)

However, the people I am talking to are also realists. They all understand that if what they are doing now doesn’t work, they will either have to try to restructure the company or have it go bankrupt. So for now, there is somewhat of a pause in remedies such as distraints, repossessions, terminations of leases and financial institution collections.

The moratorium won’t last forever

Right now the Canadian federal government is taking the lead. They have extended timelines for filing income tax and HST returns and paying amounts owing. They have also extended certain relief programs from their original expiration date of June 30. Right now, subject to a further extension, of course, it looks like the feds are shooting for September 30 to end the COVID-19 assistance programs.

Ultimately, the patience for non-payment being shown right now by landlords and creditors won’t last permanently. I expect business bankruptcy protection and bankruptcy filings to climb after the “all clear” is sounded on this Toronto coronavirus state of emergency and the government assistance ends. The pent up collection activity will go into full flight.

The floodgates will open. I expect one of the worst offenders to be the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). There will be so many companies in default of their tax payment obligations. The government is spending trillions of dollars to prop up the Canadian economy. Those programs will have to be paid for and all the IOU’s will be called in.

It seems that everybody I have spoken with is simply waiting until this Toronto coronavirus period quiets down. The pool of business problems is overflowing right now.

Corporate bankruptcy is not the only option for a company battling its financial demons. There are going to be three categories of insolvent companies:

Those who are too small and it just does not make sense for them to do anything other than paying the employees their final salary, wages and vacation pay. Then file their final corporate and income tax files. Then, turn the key in the door and walk away.
A company that has just a few creditors and all or some of the business operations remains viable. They can negotiate with their creditors for a reduction in each amount owing on a creditor by creditor basis. The reason this does not work if there is a large group of creditors is because of human nature. Everyone is worried that the next person is getting a better deal. By the time you get the last person to say yes, the first person may have changed their mind. There is no way to independently satisfy all the creditors that nobody is getting a better deal. In reality, some are getting a better arrangement than others. It will be based on the negotiation ability of the creditor and how essential maintaining the supply of their product or service from them is.
Businesses where all or some of their operations remain viable. However, the company can only survive if it can chop off the sick parts and eliminate however much debt they need to so that the newly restructured company is solvent.
Companies with complex issues needing to assign their assets to a licensed insolvency trustee through a bankruptcy or whose secured creditor will enforce on their security by appointing a receiver, either a private receiver or court-appointed receiver.

Toronto coronavirus induced restructuring

If you anticipate your entire business or certain business units will remain viable but require relief from its creditors and debts, the first look at restructuring. This route enables a company to stay functioning while renegotiating its financial obligations. This process includes looking critically at all business units and determining how operations can be made more efficient in order to improve profitability. Many hard decisions will have to be made.

Companies have two choices in Canada for restructuring. For the larger restructurings, the kind that you read in the newspaper, the restructuring statute is the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA). In order to qualify for restructuring under the CCAA, the company has to owe its creditors at least $5 million.

All other companies restructure under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) restructuring provisions. It is called Part III Division I of the BIA. Regular readers of Brandon’s Blog will know that I have written several blogs before on aspects of both the CCAA and restructuring under the BIA.

In my blog, BANKRUPTCY EXPERTS WEIGH IN ON US & CDN SMALL BIZ RESTRUCTURING, I lamented the fact that the Canadian insolvency system does not have a streamlined restructuring process for smaller companies. We have the consumer proposal restructuring under the BIA for smaller personal insolvent debtors trying to restructure.

The United States has the Small Company Reorganization Act (SBRA) of 2019, also known as “Subchapter 5”. The SBRA is aimed at simplifying restructuring procedures for small companies by boosting efficiency, lowering costs, and easing the restructuring plan confirmation process. I believe this would be a great addition to the Canadian insolvency system. It may very well move some companies from my #1 category listed above into #3.

There is no sense dwelling any longer on what we don’t have. The Toronto coronavirus news today has affected so many companies. Many will just not survive. Others will be able to come out of the other side of this Toronto coronavirus pandemic but will need major surgery to stay alive.

The first step for any entrepreneur is to get professional advice in order to strategize and make a decision on what plan to put into place. You should speak either to a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (Trustee) or a lawyer who has experience in insolvency matters.

Most licensed insolvency trustees will provide a one-hour no-cost strategy session.

You need to understand whether or not you have a viable business and company. Then, you need to have a sensible plan to increase your chances of success based on the viability analysis.

Both Ira and I have been doing many such strategy sessions over the telephone and video meeting since the Toronto coronavirus self-quarantine lockdown came into effect. I know that we will be doing many more as the city and the province begin to open up.

The goals of the entrepreneur have to be the driving force. For example, if the entrepreneur is adamant about staying in business, then you have to hope that business viability can be proven so that the likelihood of a successful restructuring is enhanced. On the other hand, if you can prove business viability but the entrepreneur has had enough and wants out, then you look at the restructuring and sale of the viable business parts.

Once viability is established, then a restructuring plan can be developed. The restructuring will take place either under the BIA or CCAA. Depending on the circumstances and the goals of the entrepreneur, either a refinancing of the restructured company of a sale of the business is part of any restructuring plan.

Business not viable

If the business is not viable, then pure restructuring is not possible. However, that does not mean that the assets that form the business unit cannot be used by someone else to efficiently run the business. I am not just talking about hard assets. Things such as patents, trademarks, processes, experienced workforce and the customer base before they go off to find a new supplier are all valuable parts of a business.

Perhaps the tangible and intangible assets can be sold to someone that can bring them into their existing operation and run the business profitably. Jobs can be saved also if this were to happen.

When this is the case, then you are into some form of liquidation. A secured creditor will move for the appointment of a receiver. As I have written before on this topic, the appointment can either be by way of a private appointment or an application to the court for a court-appointed receiver.

If there are no secured creditors, the security taken is invalid, or there are other factors that make a bankruptcy necessary, then the company can assign itself to bankruptcy. It isn’t every day you find this, but in a recent corporate bankruptcy filing that I am administering, I found that the security of the purported secured creditor was invalid as against us as Trustee.

Then either the receiver or Trustee can take possession of the assets, run a well-advertised and managed sales process and hopefully find a buyer for the assets to comprise all or many parts of the operating business. If such a buyer does not exist, then it will be a straight liquidation of individual assets. Obviously, higher values can be achieved when selling what amounts to a business rather than just individual assets in a liquidation.

Personal guarantees and director liabilities

In any corporate or business insolvency, the exposure of the directors has to be taken into consideration. This is not Toronto coronavirus news. It is normal for entrepreneurs to have to give a personal guarantee to a lender in addition to the security taken. Such a guarantee can be backed up by specific personal assets as collateral, or be an unsecured guarantee. Or, an entrepreneur has to indemnify the landlord as part of the corporation leasing premises.

Directors also have certain liabilities under provincial or federal law. Generally, directors will have personal liability for:

Unpaid salaries, wages and vacation pay.
Unremitted source deductions.
HST/GST that has been collected but not paid over to CRA.
Any other liability that a director has personally guaranteed.

The exposure of directors must be recognized and taken into account in any restructuring attempt.

Toronto Coronavirus Summary

Businesses all over will look different due to the Toronto coronavirus pandemic and lockdown. The current environment is unprecedented and is teaching all of us things we have never seen before.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. This is especially true these days.

If anyone needs our assistance, or you just need some answers for questions that are bothering you, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. During this Toronto coronavirus state of emergency, we are doing telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences that are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Stay healthy, well balanced and safe and secure everyone.

Tags Bankruptcy, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, CCAA, chapter 11, court appointed receiver, covid-19, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, pandemic, receiver, restructure, restructuring, toronto coronavirus, toronto coronavirus news, toronto coronavirus news today, toronto coronavirus news update, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

HOW TO USE DEBT RELIEF CANADA COVID TO ACHIEVE THE BENEFIT OF MORE TIME

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 25, 2020

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Stay healthy, well balanced and safe and secure everyone.

If you wish to listen to the audio version of this debt relief Canada COVID Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast

Debt relief Canada COVID introduction

I have written before many blogs about debt relief in Canada and debt relief Canada COVID. I have written about:

Personal insolvency –

Corporate insolvency

Bankruptcy protection restructuring, both under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada)
Receivership
Liquidation
Bankruptcy

Debt relief Canada COVID specific:

Personal insolvency
Corporate insolvency
Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) going to court in every province to get timelines extended.

Now the federal government has drafted legislation to guarantee that Canadians, as well as Canadian companies, have the ability to meet governing time frames and target dates found in federal statutes. Some key target dates for debt relief Canada COVID found in the BIA and other statutes, such as the Canada Labour Code, given the COVID-19 pandemic and the courts essentially being shut down and only hearing emergency matters.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I discuss the proposed Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19). The purpose of this proposed statute will aid debt relief Canada COVID.

Canadian Department of Justice concerns

On May 19, 2020, the Canadian Department of Justice unveiled draft legislation. The government has posted it online and is allowing 10 days for any comments to be submitted on the proposed Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19). The federal government is concerned about debt relief Canada COVID and all other issues federal legislation deals with.

As I previously wrote, the OSB, went to court in each province to get certain deadlines suspended so that debt relief in Canada would not suffer. The OSB ensured that the system would work for debt relief Canada COVID. The federal government believes that so many Canadians, as well as Canadian companies, could be impacted in other federal statutes not designed for financial restructuring or debt settlement. The government is concerned that they may encounter possible legal jeopardy if, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, they fall short to meet target dates.

Consequently, the Government of Canada published draft legislation, which outlines prospective remedies that the Federal government might apply to deal with these essential problems. The draft legislative proposal for dealing with debt relief Canada COVID is online for 10 days. Interested stakeholders are invited to share their comments by May 29.

What the draft legislation is designed to do

The draft legal proposal is designed to suspend specific time frames as well as enable government ministers to prolong or put on hold other time limits consisted of in government regulations to:

Ensure that Canadians, as well as Canadian companies, are able to satisfy governing time frames and deadlines found in federal statutes, such as some key due dates found in the BIA for debt relief Canada COVID and under the Canada Labour Code during the coronavirus pandemic.
Protect Canadians’ rights and access to justice in the context of civil proceedings before the courts, by making sure that people and companies are protected to assert their rights and not miss a time limit or deadline during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The draft legislation includes stipulations to make certain that short-term extensions or suspensions cannot be made after September 30, 2020, and could be retroactive to March 13, 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic officially began.

What the draft legislation says

As already mentioned, the draft relief is designed to protect Canadians under federal statutes designed for debt relief Canada COVID and other federal laws. So here are the highlights of what the draft Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19) currently proposes.

Section 3 defines a time frame. It says such time periods that are either suspended or prolonged under this Act, then, during the period that the suspension or extension holds, every mention in any Act of Parliament to that time restriction or duration is to be read as referring to the time limit or period as it is suspended or expanded.

Section 4 states that the Act does not refer to any time frame or any other duration related to the investigation of an offence or a proceeding arising from an offence.

Sections 6 and 7 deal with time limits related to proceedings. The proposed legislation purports to:

Put on hold, as of March 13, 2020 as well as until September 13, 2020, or an earlier day set by the Governor in Council, certain time frame certain proceedings, aside from proceedings from offences, before the courts.
Allow courts to adjust the suspension within particular limits and take measures regarding the results of a failure to satisfy a put on a hold time limit.
Allow the Governor in Council to waive such suspensions in particular scenarios.
Permit ministers, in respect of defined regulations, to put on hold or prolong time limits and also prolong other durations for no greater than six months, as well as to offer such suspensions or extensions retroactive to March 13, 2020.
A time frame might be put on hold or extended and also a time duration might be expanded for a total maximum period of 6 months.
permit ministers in the case defined in the previous point to give specified persons, bodies or tribunals some adaptability in applying these suspensions or expansions.
Prevent these powers from being exercised after September 30, 2020.

This draft Act would certainly permit the Governor in Council to restrict or enforce conditions on the powers provided to ministers. Having a federally mandated “time out” will certainly aid debt relief Canada COVID.

Summary

It appears that the federal government realizes that there are many federal laws where time periods must be met. During the coronavirus emergency shutdown of the courts, it may not be possible to meet all the deadlines. So, this omnibus proposed legislation aims to suspend or expand time frames to September 13, 2020. The hope is that it will allow for more orderly conduct for debt relief Canada COVID under the BIA and for other purposes different federal legislation allows.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. This is especially true these days.

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Stay healthy, well balanced and safe and secure everyone.

CONSTRUCTION LIEN ACT: CAN YOU TRUST AN INSOLVENCY PROCEEDING?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 6, 2020

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and both Ira, as well as Brandon Smith, are right here for a telephone appointment, conference calls and also virtual meetings.

Stay healthy and safe everybody.

Introduction

Matters involving the Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30 ( formerly known as the Construction Lien Act) is very complex. In this Brandon’s Blog, I will use the term that laypeople are most familiar with, being the former name of the provincial legislation.

Construction law is a specialty unto itself. It gets even more complex when a company involved in construction enters insolvency proceedings. There is normally a conflict in these kinds of files between:

the contractors who did work claiming a construction lien trust claim in the project;
any secured creditors; and
the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) administering the insolvency file.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I describe a recent 5 member panel decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario who had to decide whether a trust created under section 9(1) of the provincial Construction Lien Act survives a sale by the Monitor in an insolvency proceeding under the federal Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

The case is Urbancorp Cumberland 2 GP Inc. (Re), 2020 ONCA 197 (Urbancorp). The matter was heard on October 3, 2019. The unanimous decision was recently released on March 11, 2020.

Some background matters

Before getting into the actual case, there are two background matters that I should first explain. When I thought of these concepts and then the decision this way, it made it easier for me to understand.

The first issue is the types of insolvency proceedings. There are essentially four types of insolvency proceedings. Some are not mutually exclusive. Each one of them can be used for the assets of the insolvent debtor to be sold. I break down the insolvency proceedings list in this way:

Using the restructuring provisions of either the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or CCAA.
A bankruptcy administration under the BIA.
A secured creditor taking enforcement proceedings on the assets subject to its security through the security itself by privately appointing a Receiver or Receiver and Manager.
A secured creditor making an application to the Court that it is just or convenient for the Court to appoint a Receiver to act on behalf of all creditors in stabilizing an insolvent debtor situation and to come back to Court with recommendations on how to proceed, including the sale of assets.

The second issue has to do with trust claims under the Construction Lien Act. There are several sections in the legislation dealing with trust claims. As I stated above, it is a very complex topic. So, I am going to only focus on the one that is the subject matter of this case. That is section 9(1) of the Act. That section deals with a trust claim against the vendor of the construction assets. It states:

“9 (1) Where the owner’s interest in a premises is sold by the owner, an amount equal to,

(a) the value of the consideration received by the owner as a result of the sale,

less,

(b) the reasonable expenses arising from the sale and the amount, if any, paid by the vendor to discharge any existing mortgage indebtedness on the premises,

constitutes a trust fund for the benefit of the contractor. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30, s. 9 (1); 2017, c. 24, s. 9, 70.

Obligations as trustee

(2) The former owner is the trustee of the trust created by subsection (1), and shall not appropriate or convert any part of the trust property to the former owner’s own use or to any use inconsistent with the trust until the contractor is paid all amounts owed to the contractor that relate to the improvement. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30, s. 9 (2).”

The distinction here that I want you to keep in mind is the words in the very first line “Where the owner’s interest in a premises is sold by the owner…”(emphasis added).

Now for the case.

The Urbancorp Construction Lien Act case

This case deals with Urbancorp and related companies that developed and was building a residential condominium project. Urbancorp was insolvent and filed first a Notice of Intention to Make A Proposal under the BIA. The proceedings were later converted by the Court into proceedings under the CCAA. The insolvency proceeding was in both cases under a Federal restructuring statue. The Court appointed a Monitor to oversee the insolvency administration. Through various Court applications and court orders, the Monitor was given the authority to market and sell the condominium assets. The Monitor did so.

Now the cash the Monitor received from the sale stood in place of the original condominium assets. Subcontractors brought an application before the lower Court claiming they had a valid trust claim under the Construction Lien Act. The lower court judge carefully reviewed the evidence and prior decided cases and came to the conclusion that the subcontractors did not have a valid trust claim against the assets. The subcontractors appealed the lower court’s decision.

In addition to appealing the lower court’s decision, they also raised with the Court of Appeal a constitutional question that comes up many times. The constitutional question is, does federal law always take priority, or trump (with a small “t”!!) provincial law. This is otherwise known as the concept of paramountcy. Stated slightly differently, the issue can be stated as does section 9 of the Construction Lien Act remain to have application after a bankruptcy or initial order under the CCAA? The Attorney General of Ontario also stepped in on that part of the case.

The Court of Appeal accepted this constitutional question to be decided so there were now two issues before the Court of Appeal; the issue of paramountcy and the trust claim issue.

The constitutional question

The Court of Appeal went through a very thoughtful and careful analysis. It confined the constitutional question to the facts of this case. The court concluded in this case:

The trust created under section 9(1) of the Construction Lien Act is a valid trust under provincial law.
The BIA excludes from property available to the creditors any property held in trust.
Therefore, this provincial trust can be effective when there is an insolvency proceeding under the BIA.
Similarly, with the CCAA legislation, it follows that a section 9(1) provincially created trust might be effective when the insolvency administration is subject to the CCAA.

Now for the actual appeal

The Appeal Court now turned to the lower court judge’s decision that a section 9(1) of the Construction Lien Act trust did not apply in this matter. The five-member panel again went through a careful analysis of the statute and the case law. They spent a lot of time reviewing an earlier Court of Appeal for Ontario decision which the lower court judge relied upon in his decision.

The Court of Appeal highlighted that in that decision the lower court relied upon, the owner, being the insolvent debtor, had no interest in the asset that the subcontractors were claiming a trust claim against. The reasons were:

The asset was part of a package of assets sold.
There was a secured creditor who had security over all of the assets of the developer.
The proceeds less the expenses to produce the sale were less than what was owed to the secured creditor.
The court allowed the cash from the sale to stand in place of the assets.

Using this framework, the Court of Appeal stated that a s.9( 1) trust only arises if the value of the consideration received by the owner from the sale of assets, which have actually been enhanced by the work or materials of the contractor, surpasses the amount of the mortgage debt. A trust will not occur if the value is zero, or if the mortgage debt is equal to or above any kind of sale proceeds.

Therefore, the decision that the lower court relied upon in disallowing the trust claim does not stand for the suggestion that control by a CCAA Monitor of a sales process, or the receipt by the Monitor of the proceeds of the sale by itself, avoids a s.9( 1) trust against the proceeds of the sale of the enhancement are shown to have a positive worth that surpasses the mortgage debt on the asset. That fact pattern was absent from the case relied upon.

The decision

Now, you remember at the beginning of this blog I went through the essentially four types of insolvency proceedings. The Court of Appeal also considered the various types. The court drew a distinction in them as it relates to section 9(1) of the Construction Lien Act. Also remember that from my quotation above of this section, it starts with “Where the owner’s interest in a premises is sold by the owner…”(emphasis added).

In a receivership or bankruptcy, the owner loses control of the assets. The vendor in a sale is either the receiver/receiver and manager or the trustee in bankruptcy, respectively. In those examples, it is not the owner selling its own assets. It is the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) selling its right, title and interest, if any, in the assets of the debtor. So the vendor is the licensed insolvency trustee in its specific capacity.

The Urbancorp matter started out as a restructuring under the Proposal provisions of the BIA and was then converted by the Court and continued under a different restructuring statute, the CCAA. In an insolvency administration under the restructuring provisions/statue, the owner does not lose control of its assets. True that the Monitor is given court authority to make decisions, market and then sell the assets. However, one of the cornerstones of the appointment of a Monitor is that the owner does not lose control of the assets and the Monitor does not become the owner of the assets.

Rather, the Monitor gets its powers from the court. The Monitor is actually selling the insolvent company’s assets as the company’s representative or agent. So even though it is the Monitor doing the selling, it is doing so on behalf of the owner. This is very different than a sale by a receiver/receiver and manager or trustee in bankruptcy.

In the Urbancorp situation, the value of the consideration received by the owner from the sale of assets, which have actually been enhanced by the work or materials of the contractor, surpasses the amount of the mortgage debt.

Highlighting these distinctions, the Court of Appeal for Ontario overturned the lower court decision and upheld the subcontractors’ trust claim. It substituted the lower court decision with an order that a s.9( 1) trust under the Construction Lien Act applies for the sum of $3,864,429 held in the accounts of the Monitor on account of the Urbancorp companies, for the benefit of the subcontractors, pro-rata in accordance with the amount owing to each of them.

Summary

I hope you found this case review helpful. It should be of particular interest to contractors, developers and builders in Ontario.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. This is especially true these days.

If anyone needs our assistance, or you just need some answers for questions that are bothering you, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

Are you now worried just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. This pandemic situation has made everyone scared.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and both Ira, as well as Brandon Smith, are right here for a telephone appointment, conference calls and also virtual meetings.

Stay healthy and safe everybody.

Tags Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, CCAA, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, construction lien act, corporate restructuring, Court of Appeal for Ontario, insolvency, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, monitor, proposal, restructuring, secured creditor, trustee, trustee in bankruptcy, urbancorp

Brandon Blog Post

INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE TORONTO NEWFANGLED COVID-19 BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING PLAN

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date April 16, 2020

The Ira Smith Team is totally operational and both Ira and Brandon Smith are here for a telephone consultation, conference calls and virtual meetings.

Keep healthy and safe everybody.

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has upended our world. Everyone is scared, has many questions and there is a lot of misinformation out there. So many businesses have shut down and do not know if they will ever be able to start up. As a licensed insolvency trustee Toronto, I fully understand the fear and panic that has set in.

First, I hope you and your family are safe and healthy. The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to show a newfangled business restructuring approach that recently occurred in the United States. As far as I can tell, there is no reason why this kind of restructuring plan could not work in Canada also.

Modell’s Sporting Goods, Inc. et al Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings

On March 12, 2020, U.S. Bankruptcy Court District of New Jersey Judge Victor Papalia issued the Order approving the Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection application of Modell’s Sporting Goods, Inc. and related companies (Modell’s) filed on March 11.

Modell’s is America’s oldest, family-owned ran store of sporting products, athletic footwear, active clothing and fan gear. It was founded in 1889 by Morris A. Model. The initial Modell’s store was located on Cortlandt Road in lower Manhattan, New York City. Four generations of the Modell household have run and grown the family company into a chain of over 150 stores throughout the Northeast.

Mitchell Modell, the company’s CEO and President said the company’s poor financial performance resulting in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection filing was because of many reasons, including:

unseasonably warm winter season;
six fewer days in the shopping season this year between Thanksgiving and Christmas;
competition from Amazon;
the futility of NYC’s sports franchises business like the Knicks, Jets and Giants has not helped either; and
the coronavirus pandemic

I personally doubt the losing records of the local sports franchises was a reason for Modell’s failure. How many years were the Toronto Maple Leafs awful but you always saw lots of Leaf fans with jerseys, caps and flags?

The novel court Order

On March 27, 2020, the Honourable Justice Papalia granted Modell’s court application making an order providing for both a bankruptcy suspension and an operational suspension. The bankruptcy suspension froze the bankruptcy protection proceedings until April 30, 2020 (the Suspension Period). The operational suspension, allows Modell’s to shut down all stores and not operate. The judge also gave Modell’s the right to apply on short notice to the court to extend the Suspension Period. The order went on to state the stay of proceedings is in effect during the suspension.

Novel times call for novel solutions. As part of their application, Modell’s filed a modified budget to indicate what sources of cash it would have and what expenditures it would pay during the Suspension Period. It also indicated what expenditures were being incurred, but not paid. Commercial rent on all of its stores was one of the items being accrued, but not paid.

The reason Modell did not include any commercial rent payments in its modified budget was simple. They had to close down all of their stores as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. Stores closed means no sales. They were not going to pay rent on stores that were not generating cash.

The court order approved the modified budget. It also confirmed that the only payments that Modell’s would make were those indicated as essential. The company deemed payments to all of its landlords as non-essential. The court order did indicate that the accrued but unpaid expenditures were not and were not deemed to be waived or not payable at some time.

Pier 1 Imports took a page from the Modell playbook

In February 2020, Pier 1 Imports, Inc. (Pier 1) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as part of looking for a buyer of its operations. It then closed all of its stores in Canada and many in the United States.

On Tuesday, March 31, 2020, following the Modell’s precedent, sent a request to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to temporarily stop paying commercial rent on its retail locations along with certain payments to suppliers, shippers, and distributors.” Pier 1 has now had to shutter all of its shops as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Judge Kevin Huennekens throughout the hearing provided approval of these activities while allowing for it to be reassessed each month. Judge Huennekens additionally provided authorization to hold off on any motions anyone other than Pier 1 may wish to file up until at the very least 45 days after Pier 1 returns to normal operations and payments.

Could this happen in Canada?

So the question is, could an insolvency trustee Toronto help a company get this newfangled Modell’s/Pier 1 precedent happen in a Canadian bankruptcy protection restructuring? Right now landlords are reeling from their commercial tenants telling them that rent for April is not going to be paid due to the business closures. No doubt this will be the same story for every month that the closures continue.

Most landlords should be willing to work with their tenants. The reason behind the non-payment is from forces outside of everyone’s control. But what if a commercial landlord plays hardball. Can a Canadian company file for bankruptcy protection in Canada and obtain a Court order approving the non-payment of rent?

The two corporate restructuring statutes in Canada are the Part III Division I section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

There are no express provisions in either statute to invoke a bankruptcy or operational suspension. In fact, the opposite is true. In either a restructuring or liquidation, rent is calculated on a per diem basis for as long as the company in a restructuring or the insolvency trustee Toronto in a corporate bankruptcy, is using the premises. Fairness is part of the Canadian insolvency landscape. There are years of cases on this issue and they all end up the same. If you are in occupation, the rent must be calculated and ultimately paid.

However, there are two similar sections in each of the BIA and CCAA. Section 183(1) of the BIA reads as follows:

“183 (1) The following courts are invested with such jurisdiction at law and in equity, as will enable them to exercise original, auxiliary and ancillary jurisdiction in bankruptcy and in other proceedings authorized by this Act…”.

The words “auxiliary and ancillary” has been interpreted by the courts to mean that the bankruptcy court in each province has the jurisdiction to sanction and authorize all acts required to be done for the proper administration of the Canadian insolvency system. This holds whether it is a bankruptcy protection filing or outright bankruptcy.

The CCAA offers more flexibility in a bankruptcy protection corporate restructuring than the BIA does. In general, the Court will reach its decisions in a CCAA restructuring on the basis of fairness and reasonableness. The court needs to be concerned that what is being proposed is not illegal and there are cogent reasons as to why what is being proposed serves to benefit all or the majority of creditors affected by the restructuring.

The CCAA, therefore, offers more judicial discretion than the BIA. Courts err on the side of giving the CCAA statue a large and liberal interpretation. The court supervising a CCAA restructuring will exercise its equitable jurisdiction. The application of equitable jurisdiction can be interpreted to mean equity considers done what ought to be done.

The judge in a CCAA bankruptcy protection case overseeing the CCAA proceeding is in a unique position. He or she is in the best position to determine whether or not an agreement should be suspended in the face of overly aggressive creditors who if allowed to act, would upend the entire CCAA process. Finally, Section 11 of the CCAA allows a judge to “…make any order that it considers appropriate in the circumstances.”.

So, to answer the question as to whether a Modell’s or Pier 1 type order could be made under a BIA or CCAA corporate restructuring in Canada, my answer would have to be yes. It is possible. I don’t believe it could be gotten on a regular basis, but, in this COVID-19 pandemic world, I can see it being obtained in the face of an aggressive and uncooperative commercial landlord. It would, of course, be uncommon, but these are unique times.

So the answer for a large Canadian retailer facing an unreasonable and aggressive landlord when the commercial rent is not being paid may be to file for bankruptcy protection under either the BIA or CCAA, as appropriate.

Insolvency trustee Toronto summary

The Ira Smith Team family hopes you and your family are staying safe, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person who has been affected either through inconvenience or personal family tragedy.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has always employed clean and safe habits in our professional practice and continues to do so.

Are you now worried just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. This pandemic situation has made everyone scared.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

The Ira Smith Team is totally operational and both Ira and Brandon Smith are here for a telephone consultation, conference calls and virtual meetings.

Keep healthy and safe everybody.

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, BIA, CCAA, chapter 11, chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, commercial rent, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, coronavirus, corporate restructuring, covid-19, insolvency trustee toronto, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee Toronto, modell's, pier 1, restructuring

At the end of this blog, we have a special gift for you!

Closing a business introduction

Closing a business that does not have many (free) assets

The business is still operating – will anyone buy it?

When does corporate bankruptcy make sense in closing a business?

My closing a business checklist

Closing a business summary

CLOSING A BUSINESS INFOGRAPHIC. CLICK ON THE INFOGRAPHIC TO DOWNLOAD YOUR OWN COPY

CEWS Application introduction

CEWS application: What is the CEWS?

CEWS application: Who is an eligible employer?

How do I calculate my gross revenue drop for the CEWS application?

What is the safe harbour CEWS application regulation?

How do I determine which employees’ wages are eligible for the CEWS application?

How do I calculate the pre-COVID payroll amount for the CEWS application?

What is the deeming rule for the CEWS application?

The CEWS application calculations are complex

Business is slow. What should I do to keep my business going besides a CEWS application?

CEWS application summary

Earnout introduction

What is an earnout structure?

Why agree to an earnout arrangement?

How does an earnout work?

Earnout milestones and the good faith of the parties

Earnout and Toronto coronavirus

Earnout deals and insolvency

Earnout summary

CCAA Canada introduction

When a company tries to reorganize under CCAA Canada – What does CCAA mean?

What does CCAA Canada protection mean? CCAA vs Chapter 11

Can CCAA Canada protection be extended?

Who gets priority under a CCAA Canada filing?

What happens if the court doesn’t approve a CCAA Canada application or the sides can’t agree on how to restructure debt?

What happens to shareholders in a CCAA Canada restructuring?

Public company shares in a company if it enters CCAA Canada protection and all trading is halted

List of CCAA filings under CCAA Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic so far?

CCAA Canada summary

Bankruptcy process introduction

The zany twist to the Hertz bankruptcy Chapter 11 case

The Hertz bankruptcy process application for share sale approval motion

What the court said

Restitution law

Summary

Business bankruptcy in Canada Introduction

Corporate bankruptcies and the Hertz investors

Why Hertz filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection

The modern risky rules of investing in business bankruptcy in Canada and the USA

Business bankruptcy in Canada and the USA summary

Introduction

Telltale signs from the United States

Entrepreneurs are doing whatever they can

The moratorium won’t last forever

Toronto coronavirus induced restructuring

Business not viable

Personal guarantees and director liabilities

Toronto Coronavirus Summary

Debt relief Canada COVID introduction

Canadian Department of Justice concerns

What the draft legislation is designed to do

What the draft legislation says

Summary

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Stay healthy, well balanced and safe and secure everyone.

Introduction

Some background matters

The Urbancorp Construction Lien Act case

The constitutional question

Now for the actual appeal

The decision

Summary

Introduction

Modell’s Sporting Goods, Inc. et al Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings

The novel court Order

Pier 1 Imports took a page from the Modell playbook

Could this happen in Canada?

Insolvency trustee Toronto summary

**When does corporate bankruptcy make sense in closing a business?**

**My closing a business checklist**

**How do I calculate my gross revenue drop for the CEWS application?**

**What is the safe harbour CEWS application regulation?**

**How do I determine which employees’ wages are eligible for the CEWS application?**

**How do I calculate the pre-COVID payroll amount for the CEWS application?**

**What is the deeming rule for the CEWS application?**

**The CEWS application calculations are complex**

**Business is slow. What should I do to keep my business going besides a CEWS application?**

**What is an earnout structure?**

**Why agree to an earnout arrangement?**

**How does an earnout work?**

***Earnout* and *Toronto coronavirus***