Tag: bankruptcy law

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM 31: ESSENTIAL TIPS TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE NEW CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY FORM 31

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date June 24, 2024

Form 31 Proof of Claim Introduction

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) published several amended Forms under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) to promote a more efficient and effective insolvency system, removing some outdated elements and ensuring better data integrity for all stakeholders. These amended Forms were originally set to come into force on July 15, 2024. One of those new forms is the Form 31 proof of claim. This morning, the OSB announced that the effective date has now been pushed back to September 16, 2024.

In this Brandon’s Blog, given the new proof of claim form coming into use effective July 15, I feel I need to update my October 2018 blog titled: FORM 31 PROOF OF CLAIM: HOW TO PROPERLY COMPLETE THE PROOF OF CLAIM. I will compare the new form to the old one as there are substantial changes and advise on how it should be properly completed as we walk through the new form.

Background Information on Form 31 Proof of Claim

Purpose of Form 31 Proof of Claim

Claims of creditors in bankruptcy or restructuring proposal cases are made on a very specific proof of claim form. The purpose of the form is to furnish information about the claim by the creditor against the debtor. It asks for such things as the contact details of the creditor and permission to represent it if it is a corporate body. Additionally, there are interrogatives on debt aspects like the amount due and supporting papers.

The types of claims section encompasses unsecured claims, lessor claims, secured claims, farm or wage earner claims, plan administrator’s claims, director’s liability claims and client claims against their bankrupt securities dealer.

It also inquires whether or not there has been any relationship between the debtor’s recent transactions with the creditor such as recent payments.

One can obtain information regarding an insolvent person’s financial condition and their application for discharge from bankruptcy. There is a caution at the end of this document concerning penalties for making fake claims or giving false statements. The creditor must sign it himself or through the representative. If an affidavit is attached thereto, then it must be sworn by a person who is authorized by law to administer oaths.

Importance of Properly Completing Form 31

The proper completion of Form 31, Proof of Claim, is crucial in the claims process for creditors with substantiated claims. This form serves as a critical document for creditors looking to assert and potentially recover owed debts. Providing accurate and thorough information on this form is essential for creditors to establish a strong foundation for their claims.

Failure to provide complete or accurate information on Form 31 can lead to delays, rejections, or the disqualification of the claim. Therefore, it is imperative for creditors to closely follow the instructions and guidelines stipulated in Form 31. By doing so, creditors can ensure that their claims are accurately documented and processed efficiently within the specified timelines.

Section 1: Understanding the Basics of Form 31 Proof of Claim

Definition of Provable Claim

Section 2 of the BIA contains the definitions. In that section, a provable claim is defined:

“includes any claim or liability provable in proceedings under this Act by a creditor“

What does this mean? it means that a provable claim refers to a debt or obligation owed by a debtor that can be verified and substantiated through documentary evidence. For a claim to be considered provable, it must meet certain criteria established by the Act, including an amount that can be determined, is due and payable at the time of the bankruptcy or within a reasonable period after that, and not be contingent on some other event or unliquidated.

Difference Between Provable and Unliquidated Claims

An unliquidated claim under the BIA refers to a claim for a specific amount of money that has not yet been determined or quantified. This type of claim typically arises when the exact amount owed to a creditor is uncertain or requires further investigation to establish.

In the context of bankruptcy proceedings, unliquidated claims present a challenge as they may complicate the distribution of assets to creditors. To address this issue, mechanisms for resolving unliquidated claims include negotiations, mediation, a disallowance of the claim by the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) (the “Trustee”) or court proceedings to determine the appropriate amount owed.

Properly handling unliquidated claims is essential for ensuring fair and efficient bankruptcy proceedings under Canadian law.

Identifying False Claims

Ensuring the validity of claims in Canadian bankruptcy proceedings is a crucial element in safeguarding the integrity of the bankruptcy system. Baseless claims hinder the fair distribution of assets to rightful creditors and undermine confidence in the process. The proliferation of meritless claims can result in delays, increased expenses, and potential financial harm to creditors.

It is essential for Trustees to thoroughly evaluate the authenticity of claims to prevent manipulation and dishonesty. Implementing rigorous verification procedures and penalties for unsubstantiated claims are essential strategies for upholding the fairness and transparency of Canadian bankruptcy proceedings.

Section 2: Required Information for Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

Completing and returning a Form 31 proof of claim is an important phase in the bankruptcy process. They are one of the documents included with the notice of bankruptcy documents sent out by the Trustee to formally notify the creditors of the bankruptcy.

Personal Details of the Creditor

For proof of claim to be properly completed, the creditor must furnish their contact information, encompassing their mailing address, fax number, and email address. Moreover, the creditor must substantiate their legitimacy as a creditor of the debtor and exhibit a thorough understanding of all pertinent details related to the claim. This takes you from the top of the new Form 31 proof of claim down to numbered paragraph #2.

Details of the Claim

It is incumbent upon the creditor to clearly outline the total sum of the outstanding debt owed by the debtor, in addition to any potential counterclaims, accompanied by relevant documentation or substantiating evidence. The new proof of claim form now requires a creditor to verify that the debt remains within the statutory limitations stipulated by the pertinent provincial laws and regulations. In other words, the claim is not statute-barred.

Those details are covered by paragraphs 3 through 5 of the form.

Priority of the Claim

Paragraph 6 is where, as an unsecured creditor, you need to insert the amount for what you believe to be your claim provable in the actual restructuring proposal to creditors or bankruptcy of the person or company. You must also declare whether you do or do not claim a right to a priority. If you do not, this means that you are an ordinary unsecured creditor.

If you are claiming a right to a priority claim as an unsecured creditor, you are stating that you are entitled to a priority of payment ahead of the ordinary unsecured creditors. The new Form 31 proof of claim requires you to identify what type of priority you are claiming.

The various types of unsecured claims that can have priority over ordinary unsecured claims, which are called preferred claims, are, in order of priority:

For a deceased bankrupt, reasonable funeral and testamentary costs.
The claims for wages by a wage earner employee for unpaid wage claims and certain other amounts treated like remuneration for services rendered during the period beginning on the day that is six months before the date of the initial bankruptcy event or the first day on which there was a receiver. This claim is limited to a maximum payment of $2,000, less any amounts paid for their services by the licensed insolvency trustee.
Any shortfall to a secured creditor as a result of the claim for employees’ priority above.
Any shortfall to a secured creditor as a result of the claim of employees paid out for unpaid amounts regarding prescribed pension plans.
Alimony or support payments payable by the bankrupt person under either a court order or an agreement made before the date of the initial bankruptcy event.
municipal taxes levied against a bankrupt’s real property within the two years immediately preceding the bankruptcy not registered as a lien against the property. This preferred claim cannot exceed the value of the bankrupt’s interest in the property.
A lessor for rent arrears for no more than 3 months before the date of bankruptcy and only if stipulated in the lease, a claim for accelerated rent for no more than an additional 3 months. This claim is limited to the amount realized by the Trustee from the property of the bankrupt on those premises. Further, any payment made by the licensed insolvency trustee for accelerated rent shall be credited against any amount the Trustee may owe the landlord for the Trustee’s occupation of those leased premises.
One bill of costs of a lawyer for a judgment creditor who is the first to have garnished or otherwise executed against the property of the bankrupt, but only to a maximum of the amount obtained by the Trustee from the realization of assets from the sale of such property.
Certain government debts.
Claims from injuries to employees of the bankrupt where workers’ compensation legislation does not apply, but only if there is an insurer or surety guaranteeing damages from injuries and up to the maximum guaranteed.

Section 3: Additional Considerations for Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

There are also specialized claims that a creditor may qualify for.

A Claim of Lessor For Disclaimer of a Lease

In a corporate restructuring under the Proposal provisions of the BIA, the insolvent company can disclaim or resiliate a commercial lease. The insolvent debtor must be able to show that it cannot successfully restructure if it still has to be responsible for that commercial lease. Upon the disclaiming or resiliation of the commercial lease, the landlord is allowed to calculate its claim using the formula and provisions laid out in the BIA.

Valuing a Secured Claim

Secured creditors have the option, though not a mandatory requirement unless stipulated by the licensed insolvency trustee, to file their claim. This process involves the secured creditor completing the proof of claim form, where they estimate the value of the assets linked to their security. Any outstanding amount owed to the creditor beyond the assets’ value is also specified on the proof of claim, thereby converting it into an unsecured claim.

Secured creditors must exercise caution when determining the value of their secured claim. As per subsection 128(3) of the BIA, a Trustee may opt to redeem a security by reimbursing the secured creditor with the security’s assessed value, as indicated by the secured creditor in the proof of claim. A licensed insolvency trustee would only proceed with redemption if they ascertain that the actual value of the assets surpasses the value assigned by the secured creditor to its security.

Moreover, a Trustee must seek an independent legal opinion on the security documents. That is why a Trustee will always ask for proof of security.

*Claim by Farmer**, Fisherman or Aquaculturist*

Claims of farmers, fishermen, and aquaculturists are granted specific privileges for claims under the BIA legislation. This particular category of creditors is entitled to certain rights. In addition to the standard revindication rights, farmers, fishermen, and aquaculturists have a 30-day window following the initiation of bankruptcy proceedings or the appointment of a receiver to submit their claim for products supplied within 15 days before the bankruptcy event. Once the claim is successfully filed, these creditors are granted a primary lien on all the inventory of the insolvent debtor, excluding any inventory that may be subject to another party’s repossession rights.

Claim by Pension Plan for the unpaid amount

I alluded to claims in respect of an unpaid pension amount above. In 2008 the BIA was amended in reaction to several high-profile corporate restructurings and bankruptcies where there were pension payment amounts deducted from employee wages but not remitted to the pension plan. When the employer went bankrupt, the employees’ pension entitlement was negatively affected (think Sears Canada). Pension entitlement is an important component of the overall employees’ remuneration.

Therefore, Parliament mandated a reform where a super-priority is created for claims for unremitted pension contributions outstanding when an employer becomes bankrupt. The kinds of amounts given this super-priority are pension payments deducted from an employee’s wages but not remitted to the pension plan administrator, amounts owed by the employer for the cost of benefits paid by the pension plan and employer contributions to a defined benefit pension plan. What is excluded from this super-priority is any amount needed to reduce an unfunded pension liability.

Claims Against Directors

This kind of claim comes into play when a BIA corporate restructuring proposal provides for the compromise of claims against directors. The kind of claims against directors that a corporate proposal can compromise must have a very specific set of characteristics:

A claim against directors is being compromised in the corporate Proposal.
Arose before the filing of the Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal or the Proposal itself.
Relate to corporate obligations that are director liabilities by operation of law.

They do not include any corporate liabilities that one or more directors may have personally guaranteed as individuals.

Claim of a Customer of a Bankrupt Securities Firm

The BIA delineates precise protocols for the allocation and distribution of cash and securities within a securities firm customer pool fund. The intricacies of this process are highly technical and exceed the purview of this blog post on completing a Form 31 proof of claim. It is essential to understand that distinct provisions are in place for companies of this nature that have filed for bankruptcy.

Complicated or Contingent Claims

There are a variety of claims that by their very nature, produce complications. Just because a claim might be complicated, it does not mean the proof of claim should not be fully completed and filed with the Trustee. It also does not mean that the licensed insolvency trustee does not have to review it to determine if it is admissible or not.

Examples of complicated claims are unliquidated claims discussed above and contingent claims. In a Canadian insolvency case, a contingent claim is a claim that is not yet due and payable but may become due and payable in the future. Contingent claims are often referred to as “contingent debts” or “contingent liabilities.”

A contingent claim may arise in various situations, such as:

A lawsuit or legal action that has not yet been resolved, but may result in a payment or settlement in the future.
A contract or agreement that provides for payment or performance in the future, but only if certain conditions are met.
A guarantee or indemnity that may become payable in the future if a specific event occurs.

When a contingent claim is filed in a bankruptcy or proposal case, the licensed insolvency trustee must handle it in a specific manner. Here are the key steps:

Initial Review: The Trustee reviews the contingent claim to determine its validity and the likelihood of it becoming due and payable in the future.
Assessment of Likelihood of Payment: The Trustee assesses the likelihood of the contingent claim becoming due and payable, considering factors such as the strength of the underlying legal claim, the likelihood of a settlement or judgment, and the potential for future payments or performance.
Valuation of the Claim: The Trustee values the contingent claim, taking into account the likelihood of payment and the potential amount of the payment.
Inclusion in the Statement of Affairs: The Trustee should include a contingent claim in the sworn Statement of Affairs, which is the document that outlines the insolvent debtor’s assets, liabilities, and financial affairs. The creditor would be listed as a contingent creditor. Because at this stage the Trustee has not received a proof of claim to review, it is wise to list the amount of this contingent debt either as “unknown” or with a value of just $1.
Monitoring and Follow-up: The Trustee monitors the contingent claim and follows up with the creditor to ensure that any future payments or performance are made following the terms of the agreement or contract.
Distribution of Funds: If the contingent claim becomes due and payable in a specific amount and the creditor has filed the proof of claim properly, the Trustee needs to include the valued claim in calculating a distribution to the unsecured creditors.

Creditors are required to furnish the licensed insolvency trustee with all essential documentation and information to substantiate their contingent claim. Subsequently, the Trustee will work with the creditor to ensure the appropriate handling of the claim.

Section 4: Procedural Requirements for Submitting Form 31 Proof of Claim

As a creditor, it’s crucial to understand the procedural requirements for submitting a Form 31 Proof of Claim in a Canadian insolvency case. In this section, we’ll delve into the key issues that creditors should be aware of when submitting their Proof of Claim.

Deadline for Submitting Proof of Claim

The deadline for submitting a proof of claim is a critical aspect of the insolvency process. In Canada, creditors have a specific timeframe to file their proof of claim. Until a creditor files a proof of claim with the Trustee, the creditor cannot participate in the insolvency process. Creditors should ensure they submit their proof of claim well within the deadline to avoid any potential issues.

The First Meeting of Creditors in bankruptcy or the Meeting of Creditors in a restructuring proposal takes place 21 days after the date of filing. If a creditor who has a provable claim wishes to vote at the meeting of creditors, then it is important to have filed the fully completed proof of claim, with all supporting backup documentation, in time for the Trustee to be able to review it.

At the meeting of creditors, it is up to the meeting chair to admit or disallow any claim for voting purposes. In a bankruptcy, the creditors vote on several matters, including the appointment of Inspectors. The Meeting of Inspectors normally immediately follows the meeting of creditors. So if a creditor wishes to nominate an Inspector, it has to have filed its claim to be able to vote. To be able to vote for or against a consumer proposal or corporate restructuring proposal, the proof of claim must be filed.

The only other real deadline to file a proof of claim is before the Trustee is going to make a distribution. A Trustee must send each creditor listed on the Statement of Affairs who has not yet filed a proof of claim notice to file a claim before making a final distribution. That notice will have a deadline in it. If the creditor misses that deadline then they are not entitled to receive any dividend from the insolvency estate.

Properly Filing the Form 31

Properly filing the Form 31 proof of claim is a critical step. Creditors must ensure they complete the form accurately and thoroughly, providing all necessary information, including the amount of the debt, the date the debt was incurred, and any relevant documentation. It’s also essential to sign and date the form, as well as attach any supporting documentation. Creditors should also ensure they file the form with the correct office, as specified in the bankruptcy notice.

*Notice of Intention**To Make A Proposal*

In some cases, the insolvent individual or corporation may file a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal, which provides creditors with advance notice of the impending restructuring proposal. At the Notice of Intention stage, there is not a specific deadline for submitting a proof of claim. A proof of claim is not sent out at this notice stage. After the Proposal is filed and the Trustee sends out the Proposal package to the known creditors, in that package the proof of claim form 31 is provided. Creditors should carefully review the Proposal package and ensure they submit their proof of claim by the specified deadline.

I was involved some time ago in a corporate restructuring case where a financial institution creditor filed a proof of claim and a voting letter using their form at the notice of intention stage. The form was improperly completed and I warned the creditor that its proof of claim was not being accepted and that they must file a new one, properly and fully completed, after they receive the Proposal package from our Firm.

They ignored my warnings and did not do so. I therefore disallowed their claim which meant their vote did not count. They appealed my decision to the Court. The Court agreed with the Trustee. Not only did their vote not count, but because they lost the appeal, they also had to pay our lawyer’s costs!

Notice of Bankruptcy Process

The bankruptcy notification is a crucial document that provides creditors with essential information about the bankruptcy proceedings, including the timeline for submitting a proof of claim. This notification is distributed by the licensed insolvency trustee managing the bankruptcy process and offers creditors a detailed overview of the procedures involved, including the deadline for submitting proof of claims.

To ensure the accurate and complete submission of the claim form, it is advisable to follow the guidelines outlined below in Section 5. Submitting a Form 31 proof of claim is a critical aspect of the bankruptcy process. Creditors must meet the submission deadline, correctly file the form, and provide all necessary information. Understanding the procedural requirements for submitting a proof of claim helps creditors protect their rights and ensure their interests are properly represented throughout the process.

Section 5: Ensuring Accuracy in Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim – A Step-by-Step Guide to Filing a Proof of Claim

As a creditor, it’s essential to know how to complete Form 31, also known as the Proof of Claim, when dealing with bankruptcy or proposal proceedings. The only way for creditor claims to be registered properly is through the filing of a properly and fully completed proof of claim form.

Let me walk you through the step-by-step process of filling out this crucial document.

Step 1: Gather Required Information

Before starting to fill out Form 31, make sure you have the following information readily available:

The name of the bankrupt individual or corporation
The amount of the debt owed to you
The date the debt was incurred
Any relevant documentation, such as invoices or contracts

Step 2: Complete the Header Information

Begin by filling out the header section of the form, which includes:

The name of the bankrupt individual or corporation
The file number assigned to the bankruptcy proceeding

Step 3: Furnish Creditor Details

In this step, kindly provide the following details as the creditor:

Your full name and mailing address
Your business name and registered address (if applicable)
Your contact information, including phone number and email address

Step 4: Specify the Debt

Specify the debt you’re claiming:

The amount of the debt owed to you
The date the debt was incurred
A brief description of the debt, including any relevant details
Completing whether or not you are a secured, claiming a priority or an ordinary unsecured creditor
Make sure that you include the entire claim

Step 5: Provide Supporting Documentation

Attach any relevant documentation to support your claim, such as:

Invoices or receipts
Contracts or agreements
Bank statements or other financial records

Step 6: Sign and Date the Form

Once you’ve completed the form, including completing the proxy form section if the creditor is a corporation, sign and date it in the designated areas.

Step 7: File the Form

Submit the completed Form 31 to the professional trustee administering the bankruptcy, along with any supporting documentation. You can submit the proof of claim by fax, email, snail mail or delivery. The most important reason of course is that if there is going to be a distribution to the creditors, you want to make sure that you have submitted your claim for dividend purposes.

Additional Tips and Reminders

Ensure to maintain a copy of the completed form for your records.
If you’re unsure about any part of the process, consider consulting with a bankruptcy lawyer or the Trustee handling the bankruptcy case . In case of any uncertainties regarding any aspect of the process, it is advisable to seek advice from a bankruptcy lawyer or the Trustee overseeing the bankruptcy case.
File your claim on time to safeguard your rights as a creditor.

By adhering to these guidelines and furnishing precise information, you will complete Form 31 and safeguard your creditor rights throughout the bankruptcy or restructuring proceedings.

Section 6: Common Mistakes to Avoid when Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

When engaging in the intricate process of submitting a proof of claim to the Trustee, it is imperative to steer clear of common errors that may result in delays, rejections, or potential dismissal of your claim. This section will outline three crucial errors to avoid when completing Form 31 for the proof of claim.

Providing incomplete or inaccurate information on your proof of claim: This can significantly hinder the processing of your claim or result in its rejection. To mitigate this risk, it is crucial to take the following steps:

- Thoroughly review your claim amount to ensure it aligns with your records.
- Verify the accuracy of creditor information, including names, addresses, and account numbers
- Organize your documents coherently and logically to facilitate efficient processing and evaluation.

By paying close attention to these details, you can enhance the accuracy and efficiency of your claim submission process.

Failure to include supporting documentation: This is a significant oversight that can result in the rejection or delay of your claim. To mitigate this risk, it is imperative to adhere to the following guidelines:

- Attach all pertinent supporting documents, including invoices, receipts, and contracts.
- Ensure that all documents are clear, legible, and easily readable.
- Organize your documents in a clear and logical order

Missed Deadlines for Submission: Be sure to allocate extra time for any unforeseen delays or complications when submitting your proof of claim before the deadline. To minimize last-minute stress, make sure to submit your claim well ahead of the due date. By being proactive and avoiding these typical errors, you can streamline the filing process and increase your chances of a successful outcome. Remember to thoroughly review your details, attach all necessary documentation, and submit your claim with ample time to spare. Finally, missing deadlines for submitting your proof of claim can have severe consequences, including dismissal of your claim.

To ensure a successful filing process, it’s important to avoid these common mistakes. Make sure to thoroughly review your information, attach all necessary supporting documents, and submit your claim with ample time before the deadline.

Section 7: Form 31 Proof of Claim FAQs

In this section, we’ll address some frequently asked questions about completing Form 31 proof of claim.

Q1: What is Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A1: Form 31 Proof of Claim is a prescribed form that creditors use to indicate their claim against a bankrupt estate or in a formal restructuring under the BIA. It is a crucial step in the process, as it allows creditors to assert their rights and receive a portion of the available funds.

Q2: Where can I find Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A2: Form 31 Proof of Claim may be obtained from the office of the Trustee or downloaded from the official website of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada. Make sure you get the most up-to-date version of the form as the new one goes into effect on July 15, 2024.

Q3: What information should I include in Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A3: When completing Form 31 Proof of Claim, you should provide accurate and detailed information, including your name and address, the debtor’s name, the amount of your claim, and any supporting documentation.

Q4: Are there any specific formatting guidelines for completing Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A4: While there are no strict formatting guidelines, it’s important to ensure that your form is neat, legible, and organized. Use clear and concise language, and avoid any unnecessary details. Attach supporting documents in a logical order and label them appropriately.

Q5: Can I submit multiple claims using Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A5: Yes, you can submit multiple claims using Form 31 Proof of Claim. However, you must separate each claim clearly and provide all the necessary information and supporting documentation for each claim.

Q6: Can I make changes to my submitted Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A6: Once you have submitted your Form 31 Proof of Claim, it depends on the change. If it is something very minor, like your phone number, the Trustee will make that change for you. If it is a major change, like the amount you are claiming, it is recommended that you file an amended claim. Therefore, reviewing your form carefully before submission and ensuring its accuracy is crucial. If you need to make corrections or updates, contact the Trustee’s office immediately.

Remember, completing Form 31 Proof of Claim accurately and on time is essential to assert your rights as a creditor and receive a fair distribution from the estate. By following these tips and guidelines, you can navigate the process successfully.

Conclusion

Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim is crucial for creditors seeking to assert their rights in a bankruptcy case. By avoiding common mistakes, including providing inaccurate information, failing to include supporting documentation, and missing submission deadlines, creditors can enhance their chances of a smooth filing process. Remember to double-check all information, attach relevant supporting documents, and submit your claim on time. By doing so, you can ensure that your claim is properly considered and increase your chances of a successful outcome.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY AND CRA DEBT STRATEGIES: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE ON NAVIGATING DEBT MANAGEMENT AND TAX RELIEF

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 6, 2024

bankruptcy and cra debt

bankruptcy and cra debt

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt Introduction

Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland introduced the 2024 Federal Budget on April 16. During her presentation in Parliament, she advised that Budget 2024 will include that any capital gain will be taxed from the current 50% to two-thirds. April 30 was the last day for most Canadians to file their 2022 personal income tax return.

At the end of April, Ms. Freeland announced that Budget 2024 would not include the capital gains tax change. Rather, she will ask Parliament to approve a stand-alone Bill which will include the capital gains tax change, no doubt combined with other initiatives such as more Federal money for access to housing, in a crass move to try to score voter points when the Conservatives vote against the Bill because of the tax increase. So income tax owed to the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) is on everyone’s mind.

Canadian entrepreneurs are up in arms over the Budget 2024 capital gains taxation change. People are concerned over the level of taxation disclosed in their personal income tax returns. Some Canadians do not have the money to pay their calculated income tax payable.

This Brandon’s Blog discusses the complex world of Canadian bankruptcy and CRA debt, along with other potential options, to achieve financial stability. I aim to equip people with the necessary knowledge and strategies to make informed choices.

Definition of Bankruptcy and CRA Debt

Bankruptcy is a legal condition where consumers or companies admit they are unable to pay their outstanding debts. The bankruptcy process is a supervision and administration process overseen by a licensed insolvency trustee and the court. Under the bankruptcy legislation, people and businesses can either: (i) restructure to eliminate their debt by only paying a percentage of the amount owing; or (ii) liquidate most of their assets for the proceeds to be paid to the creditors in priority as outlined in the legislation.

CRA debt is one kind of debt that individuals or companies may owe for unpaid taxes, penalties and interest. Understanding the workings of bankruptcy and CRA debt will help people owing taxes they cannot repay make informed decisions on how to deal with their debts to get back to a financially healthy and stress-free life.

bankruptcy and cra debt

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt: Importance of Debt Management and Tax Relief

Effective debt management and tax relief are crucial aspects of financial stability for individuals facing Canadian bankruptcy and CRA debt. By implementing sound strategies for managing debt and seeking relief from tax obligations, individuals can regain control of their finances and work towards a brighter financial future.

Debt management techniques such as budgeting, debt consolidation, and credit counselling can help individuals navigate the complexities of bankruptcy and CRA debt. Additionally, exploring tax relief solutions such as deductions, payment plans, and professional assistance can alleviate the burden of tax liabilities. Prioritizing debt management and tax relief is key to overcoming financial challenges and achieving long-term financial well-being.

Bankruptcy and *CRA Debt**: Understanding Bankruptcy in Canada*

What is bankruptcy?

Having a solid grasp of how bankruptcy can affect a person is vital for those experiencing financial difficulties. Things such as the different types of bankruptcy, the procedure for initiating bankruptcy proceedings, and the real-life impact it has on a person’s daily life are crucial for anyone considering personal bankruptcy to understand. By examining the intricacies of bankruptcy, I hope you will gain valuable insights into how to effectively navigate this intricate legal process.

Whether contemplating personal or corporate bankruptcy, understanding critical aspects such as which assets can be liquidated by a Trustee, how your debt gets discharged, and creditor negotiations is essential. With the appropriate knowledge and assistance, people can make well-informed choices to manage their debts to head towards a new financial beginning.

*Bankruptcy law**s in Canada*

Bankruptcy laws in Canada are a set of legislation and regulations that govern obtaining bankruptcy protection and the subsequent handling of a person or business’ financial affairs. These laws are designed to provide individuals and companies with a second chance to manage their debts and start afresh.

In Canada, the main governing legislation for bankruptcy is the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), which outlines the procedures and requirements for obtaining relief to restructure debts under either a consumer proposal or a Division I proposal.

If restructuring is not a possibility, the BIA also covers the procedures for what is always the last choice, a liquidating bankruptcy. The BIA also covers the rights and responsibilities of debtors, creditors and insolvency trustees. Additionally, each province has its legislation that may impact the result of bankruptcy under federal laws.

In the case of larger and more intricate corporations, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) presents an additional federal statute to be considered. This legislative provision enables such substantial entities to effectively reorganize their operations and financial matters, thereby ensuring their sustained business activities and provision of employment opportunities for Canadians.

Individuals and businesses alike must gain comprehensive knowledge of these legal frameworks and diligently seek expert counsel before undertaking any bankruptcy-related determinations.

bankruptcy and cra debt

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt

Overview of the CRA

The CRA is entrusted with the pivotal responsibility of overseeing the execution of tax laws and programs on behalf of the Canadian government at the federal level. From 1867 until 1999, the Department of National Revenue, commonly referred to as Revenue Canada bore the responsibility of overseeing tax services and programs. However, in 1999, a comprehensive reorganization took place, resulting in the establishment of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (CCRA).

Subsequently, in 2003, the CCRA underwent further transformation, giving rise to the inception of the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), thereby altering the agency’s core focus and subsequently prompting its name change to CRA.

The CRA’s mandate revolves around the proficient and equitable collection of taxes, diligent administration of benefits, and rigorous enforcement of tax laws. Additionally, they extend their services to taxpayers by disseminating pertinent information and offering assistance to ensure that Canadians have accurate comprehension and adherence to tax obligations.

Upholding the utmost integrity of Canada’s tax system while fostering voluntary compliance through educational outreach and enforcement measures remains at the forefront of the agency’s priorities. Backed by a devoted team of professionals and leveraging cutting-edge technology, the CRA is steadfastly committed to delivering superlative and exemplary services to the Canadian populace.

Types of debt owed to the CRA

Unpaid taxes result in individuals or businesses facing substantial CRA debt financial obligations. It is important to understand the ramifications associated with such indebtedness, given that it can give rise to severe repercussions including wage garnishment, bank account freezing, or legal repercussions. To mitigate the weight of this debt and avert penalties, it is always highly recommended to stay current in your obligations to CRA.

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) collects a range of debts from both individuals and businesses. Among these debts, the most prevalent is income tax owed, which represents the unpaid tax on an individual’s or business’s income. Another significant debt includes the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) or, in provinces without sales tax, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) owed. These taxes apply to most goods and services supplied within Canada. CRA may also assess the individual Directors for GST/HST and employee source deductions not remitted by the corporation.

Furthermore, individuals and businesses may also encounter debts such as payroll remittance, excise tax, and penalties or interest charges resulting from late or erroneous filings. To ensure compliance and avoid further penalties or potential legal consequences, individuals and businesses must promptly and accurately address these debts on time.

Consequences of CRA debt

Noncompliance with the CRA and the resulting indebtedness can lead to serious problems for both individuals and businesses. Failing to pay your tax obligations to the CRA results in penalties, interest charges, and legal repercussions. These ramifications extend beyond mere financial burdens, encompassing wage garnishments, bank account seizures, seizure of amounts owing to the taxpayer from third parties, and property liens.

The CRA can freeze your assets and conduct audits to recover outstanding debts. The detrimental consequences of indebtedness to the CRA can have far-reaching implications, impairing credit ratings and impeding access to loans or mortgages. It is of utmost importance for individuals and businesses to expeditiously address and resolve any outstanding debt owed to the CRA to avert these severe consequences. Retaining a tax professional to assist in dealing with CRA is always advisable.

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt: Exploring CRA Debt Solutions in Canada

Informal Debt Settlements

When you seek an informal debt settlement option with CRA, absent formal insolvency proceedings, you will be disappointed. Without an insolvency proceeding, the CRA representative has no authority to accept anything other than 100 cents on the dollar – payment in full of the assessed tax, penalty and interest.

You can apply for a fairness hearing to see if you can get all or a portion of the penalty and interest eliminated, but the CRA person you speak to can only talk about the full amount that shows up on their computer screen.

*Debt Re**payment Plan*s

CRA will enter into a debt repayment plan, but depending on your situation, again, you may be disappointed. Normally, CRA will only agree to have you pay the full tax debt balance, plus penalty and interest, in 12 monthly instalments over the 1 year. That means that you need to repay the full amount in one year.

If you default on even one payment, then the whole deal is off and CRA will pursue you for the full amount to be immediately repaid. For some, this may be just the breathing room they need and they will be able to repay the full amount of the CRA debt over 12 equal monthly payments. But what if you cannot afford to do that?

Bankruptcy as a Debt Relief Option

Bankruptcy presents a potential solution for individuals or businesses grappling with substantial financial difficulties, especially those brought on by owing a substantial amount to CRA. By discharging most unsecured debts and providing a shield against creditors, it offers a pathway to financial renewal.

Nonetheless, it is crucial to approach bankruptcy as a final option due to its enduring impacts on credit rating, employment in areas that require bonding, and today to a much lesser extent, personal standing. Before making a decision, it is advisable to seek guidance from a qualified licensed insolvency trustee to gain a comprehensive understanding of the ramifications and to evaluate alternative strategies such as debt consolidation, a consumer proposal or corporate financial restructuring.

bankruptcy and cra debt

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt: The Bankruptcy Process in Canada

The bankruptcy process involves a diverse array of stakeholders, each playing a crucial role. Among the key participants are:

The insolvent individual or company, referred to as the debtor, has undergone financial failure and is now also known as the bankrupt.
The licensed insolvency trustee, formerly known as a trustee in bankruptcy, is responsible for managing the bankruptcy proceedings.
The creditors are owed financial obligations by the debtor.
The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB), holds the mandate to regulate and oversee all administrations governed by the BIA within Canada.

Preparing for Bankruptcy

To prepare for bankruptcy, the debtor, being either the individual or the Director of the company, must make full disclosure to the licensed insolvency trustee about all assets and liabilities and all other information requested by the Trustee. This allows the Trustee to provide the debtor with advice on the realistic available options for the debtor to overcome their debt challenges and hopefully find a solution other than bankruptcy.

The Trustee will want to ensure that the debtor has filed all overdue income tax returns. That way, the debtor, the Trustee and CRA will have a good estimate of all the tax the person owes, subject to review and assessment by CRA of course. At least there will not be any outstanding filings as this can slow down an insolvency process. CRA will want a pause in the insolvency proceedings until they are certain they understand the full amount owed.

If it is decided that an insolvency process is required, such as bankruptcy, then the information also allows the Trustee to prepare all the necessary filing documents.

Filing for Bankruptcy

Filing for bankruptcy is a legal process that allows individuals or businesses to seek relief from overwhelming financial obligations, including CRA debt. It involves filing an assignment in bankruptcy document which is prepared by the Trustee, and reviewed and signed by the debtor. The bankruptcy filing discloses all assets, liabilities, and income and expenses.

Personal bankruptcy can be a complex and emotional decision, but it can provide both a shield against CRA debt collection activities and seizures and simultaneously a fresh start for those individuals struggling with overwhelming debt.

It is crucial to seek the guidance of a licensed insolvency trustee to get the advice necessary to ensure a smooth and successful filing. Bankruptcy is not a decision to be taken lightly, but it can offer a solution to individuals and companies facing insurmountable financial challenges.

Duties and Responsibilities during Bankruptcy

The focus of the BIA in personal bankruptcy is for the honest but unfortunate debtor to a society free of his or her debts. The premise is that the bankrupt, or the officer of the bankrupt corporation, will fulfill their duties with integrity and honesty. The duties are outlined in the OSB’s Directive No. 26. If you are interested, you can read them HERE.

But what if they don’t? What if the individual bankrupt does not fulfill all of their duties and essentially absences themself from the process once they have filed their assignment in bankruptcy? In that case, the Trustee must oppose the bankrupt’s application for discharge and bring the matter to court. With CRA debt, there are times when CRA will automatically oppose a person’s discharge from bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt Discharge Considerations

Corporations do not receive a bankruptcy discharge; individuals do. When it comes to CRA debt, there are times when CRA automatically opposes a person’s discharge or when a Trustee must.

If an individual filing for bankruptcy has personal income tax debt exceeding $200,000 and if the personal income tax debt accounts for 75% or more of the total unsecured proven claims, they are not eligible for automatic discharge under section 172.1 of the BIA. GST/HST payable is not factored into the determination for high-tax debtors, but taxes on additional income resulting from shareholder loans, draws, or dividends are included in their assessment.

For high-tax debtors seeking discharge, the licensed insolvency trustee will present the bankrupt’s discharge application to the court for a hearing, which the individual must attend. The court’s considerations and the type of discharge order granted for high-tax debtors differ from those in cases of bankruptcy filed by non-high-tax debtors. To avoid this scenario, a high-tax debtor should consider filing an alternative to bankruptcy, such as a restructuring proposal.

Dealing with Bankruptcy and CRA Debt

Outstanding Tax Returns

Unremitted Canadian tax filings mean tax returns that are either outstanding or incomplete within the specified filing deadlines for Canadian taxpayers. Such delinquent filings will incur penalties and interest charges, requiring individuals and companies to prioritize their tax responsibilities with utmost care. It becomes the duty of each taxpayer to ensure the prompt and accurate submission of their tax returns, to avoid negative repercussions.

Tax accountants and lawyers help their clients in fulfilling their tax obligations. Timely resolution of outstanding Canadian tax returns is essential to sustain compliance and avert any future complexities.

As stated above, any person or company contemplating either trying to reach an accommodation from CRA or invoking an insolvency process to deal with their CRA debt must bring all their filings up to date.

Bankruptcy and *CRA Debt**: Discharge in Bankruptcy*

I discussed the issues for an individual high-tax debtor trying to get their discharge from bankruptcy. The Trustee must bring the application to court. At the discharge hearing, subject to any other problematic issues with the debtor’s conduct before or during the bankruptcy administration, CRA will send a lawyer from the Department of Justice to the discharge hearing to request a condition be placed on the bankrupt before they can obtain their discharge.

The condition that the CRA will request is that the debtor pay 25% of the total proven CRA debt to obtain their bankruptcy discharge. Even if the person is not a high-tax debtor, there may be other reasons why CRA will oppose the person’s discharge from bankruptcy. If the CRA file is replete with instances of failed promises, ignoring the CRA representative requests over some time and general “trouble-making” by the taxpayer, the CRA will oppose the discharge.

These are all considerations that a person must discuss with the licensed insolvency trustee up front to end up using a process that is most advantageous to the taxpayer in eliminating their CRA debt.

Rebuilding Your Finances After a Canadian Bankruptcy Discharge

Reestablishing your financial standing following a Canadian bankruptcy discharge may seem like a challenging endeavour. However, with strategic planning and commitment, it is feasible to recover from financial setbacks. The initial step involves developing a budget and adhering to it meticulously, guaranteeing that essential expenses are met while unnecessary spending is curtailed.

Next, it is important to start rebuilding credit in a few different ways:

Obtain a secured credit card. Not the drug store variety, but the kind where you put down a cash security deposit and then you are given a credit card limit equal to your cash deposit. When you make your credit card payments, it gets reported to the credit bureaus. If you make your payments when due, over time, this will increase your credit score.
Take out a small 1 year RRSP loan and pay it off on time. This will also improve your credit score on your credit report.
The two Canadian credit bureaus, Equifax and TransUnion, are now beginning to track residential rent payments. If you are a renter and you make your rent payments on time, this too will increase your credit score.

It is also recommended to seek guidance from a financial advisor or credit counsellor to develop a solid financial plan. With patience and discipline, it is possible to rebuild your finances and secure a brighter financial future.

bankruptcy and cra debt

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt FAQs

Here are the most frequently asked questions and the answers regarding bankruptcy and CRA debt:

Is it possible to file for bankruptcy solely for CRA debt?

When initiating bankruptcy proceedings, it is imperative to include all debts owed. Notably, CRA debt related to income taxes and Director liabilities is treated comparably to other unsecured debts within the scope of bankruptcy proceedings.

What happens to my CRA debt in bankruptcy?

In bankruptcy, CRA debt is included as part of your unsecured debts (the exception being a proprietorship or partnership debt for unremitted HST or employee source deductions). Keep in mind that the CRA may oppose your discharge and the court may make a condition of you paying a portion of the CRA debt to obtain your discharge from bankruptcy.

How does bankruptcy affect my tax refunds?

Tax refunds may be affected in bankruptcy. It’s important to consult with a professional to understand the specific impact on your tax refunds.

Can I include tax debt in a consumer proposal?

Yes, tax debt can be included in a consumer proposal. A consumer proposal offers a structured repayment plan to creditors, including the CRA. It can be a more favourable option than bankruptcy for negotiating repayment terms with the CRA.

What if my tax debt exceeds $200,000 and makes up over 75% of my unsecured debt?

Individuals with personal tax debt exceeding $200,000, constituting over 75% of their total unsecured debts, may not qualify for automatic discharge in bankruptcy proceedings. In such instances, a bankruptcy court hearing will be convened, and potential conditions for discharge may be mandated, such as contributing a specified amount to the bankruptcy estate.

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt Conclusion

I hope you have enjoyed this bankruptcy and CRA debt Brandon’s Blog. Hopefully, you have better insight now into the ways of dealing with CRA debt and what some viable options are.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

An image of a woman holding her head in her hands with an image of a building with a Canadian flag behind her to represent a woman worrying about her bankruptcy and CRA debt. — *bankruptcy and cra debt*

Brandon Blog Post

UNVEILING THE RUDY GIULIANI LEGAL PUZZLE: A MASSIVE RUDY GIULIANI-STYLE DEBT CHALLENGE IN CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY LAWS!

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date March 4, 2024

Rudy Giuliani

Rudy Giuliani: Introduction

Rudolph Giuliani, formerly revered as a prominent figure in American governance for his commendable response during the September 11th attacks, has encountered a series of legal predicaments in recent times. Notably, his entanglement in the Ukraine scandal on behalf of Donald Trump to discredit Hunter Biden and his father Joe Biden, which led to the first impeachment of President Trump. From there, Rudy Giuliani, on behalf of Donald Trump, embraced all the conspiracy theories with his active role in disseminating baseless election claims and election-denier allegations of electoral malpractice during the 2020 Presidential election because of Trump’s election loss. These have significantly marred Giuliani’s once esteemed standing.

Rudy Giuliani’s post-election activities following Donald Trump’s loss in the 2020 election have stirred significant controversy. The actions taken by Giuliani against individuals such as Freeman and Moss have led to legal repercussions and personal ramifications. Understanding the sequence of events provides insight into the aftermath of the false allegations and subsequent legal proceedings.

Now, given the multiple lawsuits and legal challenges, Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy to escape accountability for his actions. However, it is important to note that his US Chapter 11 bankruptcy is not a foolproof method to avoid legal consequences.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I will also look at this from the perspective of what would be the case if Rudy Giuliani was Canadian.

Background on Rudy Giuliani’s legal issues

Rudy Giuliani’s False Allegations

After the contentious 2020 election, 79-year-old Giuliani, a prominent figure in Trump’s legal team, made false claims and damaging statements about two Georgia election workers, Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. These unfounded allegations attacked their character and integrity, creating controversy and misinformation. The impact of Giuliani’s words reverberated through the media and public consciousness, tarnishing the reputation and physical safety of Freeman and Moss.

Background on Rudy Giuliani’s legal issues

In response to the baseless claims made by Giuliani, Ruby Freeman and Wandrea’ ArShaye (“Shaye”) Moss took legal action by filing a defamation lawsuit. The lawsuit aimed to hold Giuliani accountable for his reckless statements and the resulting harm caused to their reputation.

Rudy Giuliani

After the due legal process in the defamation trial, a default judgment was issued in favour of Freeman and Moss, highlighting the severity of Giuliani’s bad faith actions and the court’s acknowledgment of the harm inflicted. A jury awarded Freeman and Moss over $148M in damages from Rudy Giuliani, including $75M in punitive damages, $33,169,000 in defamation damages, and $40M in total damages for infliction of emotional distress. The defamation lawsuit sought to restore the damaged reputation of Freeman and Moss. The default judgment and jury award underscored the gravity of Giuliani’s false allegations. Legal recourse was instrumental in addressing the defamation and seeking justice for the impacted parties.

Explanation of why Rudy Giuliani filed for bankruptcy

Following the issuance of the default judgment and the jury award in favour of Freeman and Moss, Rudy Giuliani’s legal troubles escalated. Just three days after the final judgment was entered, Giuliani unexpectedly decided to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Giuliani’s bankruptcy filing added another layer of complexity to the already tumultuous legal saga. The decision to file for bankruptcy so soon after the judgment raised eyebrows and sparked speculation about Giuliani’s financial state and made many suspect that he was in a state of financial ruin.

The timing of Giuliani’s bankruptcy filing about the legal ruling underscored the interconnected web of consequences resulting from his false allegations. The filing hinted at potential financial repercussions for Giuliani and opened avenues for further examination of his actions.

Definition of bankruptcy protection and how it can help individuals in financial distress

Rudy Giuliani

Bankruptcy is a legal process that allows individuals or businesses to seek relief from their debts and reorganize their finances. While filing for bankruptcy can provide temporary protection from creditors and halt legal actions, it does not erase all obligations or shield individuals from all types of legal liabilities. Bankruptcy allows honest but unfortunate debtors to discharge themselves of their debts in return for surrendering most of their assets to the Trustee.

The Rudy Giuliani Bankruptcy Protection and its Limitations

In Giuliani’s case, bankruptcy may not protect him from lawsuits related to his alleged involvement in various illegal activities. If he is found guilty of misconduct, bankruptcy will not absolve him of criminal or civil penalties. Additionally, bankruptcy courts have the authority to reject deemed abusive or fraudulent filings.

Moreover, Giuliani’s reputation and standing in the legal community, whatever is left of it, may suffer further by his using his Chapter 11 bankruptcy to evade accountability. Ultimately, using bankruptcy as a strategy to escape legal accountability is not a guaranteed solution. Giuliani must face the consequences of his actions and address the legal challenges against him transparently and responsibly. Only by taking accountability for his actions can he begin to rebuild his reputation and credibility in the eyes of the public and the legal system.

The Allegations Against Rudy Giuliani

Giuliani’s purported defamation campaign has garnered widespread attention and scrutiny, leading to a legal showdown that could reshape the contours of US bankruptcy law. The lawsuit argues that the damage inflicted by Giuliani was not incidental but calculated, seeking to tarnish the reputation and livelihood of the plaintiff.

The allegations against Giuliani paint a compelling narrative of deliberate harm and a blatant disregard for the consequences of his actions. Such intentional and malicious conduct, if proven, could have significant ramifications on the dischargeability of debts incurred as a result. In essence, the lawsuit thrusts the spotlight on the intersection of personal liability and financial obligations in a high-stakes legal arena.

A significant legal battle unfolded in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, revolving around the dischargeability of debt in a high-profile case involving former New York City mayor, Rudy Giuliani. The lawsuit focuses on the implications of Giuliani’s alleged defamation campaign and raises crucial questions about the nature of the debts incurred. Let’s delve deeper into the details of this complex legal dispute.

Rudy Giuliani

The core of the lawsuit lies in the determination of whether the debts stemming from Giuliani’s actions are dischargeable under U.S. bankruptcy law. The plaintiff has taken the stance that Giuliani’s defamation campaign was not just a casual misstep but a willful and malicious injury, causing severe harm and repercussions. Giuliani has stated that he intends to appeal the defamation verdict, to get the relief granted to Freeman and Moss substantially lowered.

The Unforgiving Nature of U.S. Bankruptcy Law

Under U.S. bankruptcy law, debts arising from willful and malicious injuries are subject to special treatment, reflecting the seriousness with which such actions are viewed. The rationale behind this provision is to prevent wrongdoers from evading accountability through the shelter of bankruptcy, ensuring that victims are not deprived of recourse and justice.

Debts stemming from intentional torts, such as defamation, fall within this category of nondischargeable obligations, highlighting the stringent standards applied in such cases. The law recognizes the inherent harm caused by deliberate misconduct and aims to uphold the principles of fairness and justice in the realm of debt resolution.

The lawsuit represents a crucial juncture in the legal landscape, setting a precedent for similar cases in the future. It underscores the importance of accountability and responsibility in the realm of public statements and actions. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for how defamation and intentional harm are treated in bankruptcy proceedings.

Giuliani’s debt represents more than a financial obligation; it is a tangible symbol of the repercussions he must bear for his intentional and malicious conduct. The pursuit of non-dischargeability underscores the gravity of his actions and the commitment to holding him answerable for the harm caused. It serves as a potent reminder that accountability transcends monetary concerns, encompassing the broader spectrum of ethical and moral responsibilities.

Rudy Giuliani’s Bankruptcy Implications and Beyond

The outcome of this lawsuit has the potential to shape the legal landscape surrounding the dischargeability of debts in cases involving intentional harm. It raises fundamental questions about the boundaries of free speech, the responsibilities of public figures, and the consequences of malign actions.

Rudy Giuliani

As the legal proceedings unfold, the intricacies of the case will be scrutinized, setting a precedent that could reverberate across similar disputes. Ultimately, the lawsuit encapsulates the inherent tension between individual rights and societal interests, underscoring the complexities of balancing personal freedoms with the consequences of one’s actions. Stay tuned as this legal saga unfolds and sheds light on the intricate tapestry of law, ethics, and justice.

Rudy Giuliani Bankruptcy: What If Rudy Giuliani Was a Canadian Living In Toronto, Ontario Canada

What is defamation in Canada?

In Canada, defamation is any intentional or negligent false communication, whether written or spoken, that harms a person’s reputation or exposes them to ridicule, belittling, or contempt. The concept of defamation can have two possible parts; libel and slander. There is a distinction between libel and slander.

Libel is defamation either in writing or some other permanent form, while slander is defamation that is not left permanently. Section 298(1) of the Canadian Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46) defines a defamatory libel as any published material that is likely to injure someone’s reputation or make them the object of hatred, contempt, or ridicule, without lawful justification or excuse. Slander is more commonly associated with an oral statement. With slander, there generally will always be a fight waged between slander and freedom of speech.

Defamation is an act of harming the reputation of another person through a false statement or many of them. In the real world, defamation can lead to severe consequences, including damages to one’s reputation and livelihood. The criminal code and being found guilty of the criminal offence of criminal defamation is one thing. But in the real world, the possibility of imprisonment is not going to provide any real satisfaction to the wronged party. The way to get compensated for the suffered damages because of the defamation of character is to start a civil suit action for a defamation claim.

Are All Debts Discharged Through A Canadian Bankruptcy

To see if all potential debts can be discharged through bankruptcy, we need to look at section 178(1) of the BIA. This section enumerates the debts that are not released by an order of discharge from bankruptcy. As you may recall from earlier Brandon’s Blogs, I have explained that it is not the bankruptcy itself that clears a person’s debts, it is the discharge from bankruptcy.

Notwithstanding that a discharge from bankruptcy is what clears out a person’s debts, the BIA lists several specific debts that cannot be released by an order of discharge. I looked at the list contained in section 178(1) and there is only 1 item that relates to judgment debts. That is section 178(1)(a.1) which reads as follows:

(a.1) any award of damages by a court in civil proceedings in respect of

- (i) bodily harm intentionally inflicted, or sexual assault, or
- (ii) wrongful death resulting therefrom;

A person’s bankruptcy discharge releases them from all claims provable in bankruptcy that are not listed in section 178(1). The question is, does a Rudy Giuliani-type judgment award for damages in defamation cases survive the bankruptcy of the party against whom the judgment is?

For that claim to survive the person’s bankruptcy, the judgment creditor offended party would have to show that:

the award of damages is for bodily harm; and
was intentionally inflicted.

When it comes to the tort of intentional infliction of bodily harm, the law does not recognize any mental states that fall short of a provable injury. The requirements for this tort are:

The defendant’s conduct must have been extreme and outrageous.
The defendant must have intentionally or recklessly caused the plaintiff emotional distress.
The plaintiff must have suffered a visible and provable injury as a result of the defendant’s conduct.

Therefore, it is not a clear-cut answer if the Freeman and Moss judgment award would survive a Canadian bankruptcy protection filing. They would have to prove having suffered a visible and provable injury. Cleary being scared to step outside your home and being unable to work could very well be the kind of injury that would make the debt for such an award not dischargeable in a Canadian bankruptcy protection filing. An award for infliction of emotional distress and loss of reputation could very well be discharged through a Canadian bankruptcy protection filing.

Rudy Giuliani: Conclusion

I will be watching closely the ongoing case of Rudy Giuliani and his U.S. Bankruptcy filing. As individuals navigating the complex world of personal finances, it is crucial to be aware of the legal framework surrounding Canadian bankruptcy protection. Understanding the Canadian bankruptcy legislation and the authority and discretion of the courts empowers us to make informed financial decisions and ensures the integrity of the bankruptcy system.

Individuals and business owners must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties, consumer debt and company debt and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses with debt problems that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns and more associated with your company debt are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these financial health concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual who has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, to begin your debt-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

A picture of Donald Trump's former lawyer, Rudy Giuliani after he filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection — *Rudy Giuliani*

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY LAWYER: IS ONE ESSENTIAL TO FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY IN ONTARIO?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 7, 2023

bankruptcy lawyer

Bankruptcy lawyer: Introduction

Step right into this week’s edition of Brandon’s Blog, where we’re embarking on a profound exploration. Our focus today delves into a crucial theme that carries substantial weight within the psyche of a myriad of Canadian consumers grappling with financial adversity, as well as Canadian business owners navigating their enterprises with too many business debts through fiscal quandaries. The question at the forefront: do the circumstances warrant enlisting the expertise of a bankruptcy lawyer when contemplations of insolvency filings in Canada take center stage?

Venturing through the intricate landscape of insolvency and the realms of personal or corporate bankruptcy has the potential to stir feelings of frustration and helplessness. This sentiment amplifies mainly when the trajectory of your personal or corporate fiscal destiny hangs in a precarious balance, swaying like a delicate pendulum. The gravity of making prudent choices during this trying juncture cannot be overstated. At its core, lies the quintessential need to not only identify the right course but also to discern the adept professional from whose wellspring of wisdom guidance should be sought.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I will outline the scenarios in which consulting with a bankruptcy lawyer is highly advised, but as you will see, it is not essential in every circumstance. Whether you are taking into consideration submitting a restructuring proposal or seeking bankruptcy protection, recognizing who to turn to for specialist assistance for legal and financial advice can substantially affect the result of your financial journey.

I will discuss the intricate details surrounding insolvency as well as bankruptcy law in Canada. By diving into the significance of professional assistance and support, I intend to equip you with the understanding needed to make enlightened decisions during this difficult phase. Join me as we decipher the secrets of insolvency and bankruptcy and empower ourselves to safeguard a better financial future.

Bankruptcy lawyer: Overview of the insolvency and bankruptcy process in Canada

The bankruptcy procedure in Canada is governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). It is a legal statute developed to supply relief to people and companies that are unable to pay their financial obligations. The process always includes the services of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee that is responsible for administering the insolvency process.

The Licensed Insolvency Trustee is first required to assess the debtor’s entire financial situation, including the causes of the insolvency, the current financial position and the nature of the assets and liabilities of the debtor. The Licensed Insolvency Trustee then needs to make recommendations to the debtor to solve their current financial crisis. Once agreed on, what insolvency or bankruptcy process will be implemented, the BIA and the restructuring consumer proposal, Division I proposal or the bankruptcy, is put into operation to offer a fresh start for the debtor while making certain there is fair treatment for the creditors.

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee is the only professional licensed in Canada by the federal government to administer the Canadian insolvency process chosen. In many cases, the process can be carried out without the advice of a bankruptcy lawyer.

bankruptcy lawyer

Bankruptcy lawyer: Formal insolvency options in Canada

Navigating the intricate labyrinth of bankruptcy within Canada unfurls as a legal undertaking of profound significance, extending its benevolent embrace to both individuals and enterprises ensnared within the inescapable clutches of their fiscal commitments. This orchestrated progression finds its regulatory compass in the venerable BIA, its vigilant guardianship entrusted to a duly licensed sentinel of fiscal adversity, recognized as a Trustee.

Commencing this odyssey, the debtor sets forth to formally lodge their supplication for bankruptcy, an entreaty promptly received by the Licensed Insolvency Trustee, who, in turn, undertakes the judicious scrutiny of the debtor’s economic constellations. From this intricate appraisal blooms a stratagem, a masterwork designed to navigate the undulating terrain of debt repayment, fostering equilibrium amid the ranks of creditors.

Through the procession of this intricate ballet, the debtor finds sanctuary from the clamorous onslaught of creditor collections, an ephemeral respite nestled within the folds of the overarching process. This respite, however, is not a sojourn of idle reprieve; it entails the debtor’s obligatory participation in the convocations of credit counsel, a didactic interlude intended to illuminate the labyrinthine corridors of fiscal wisdom.

Once the intricacies of this design garner the seal of approval, the gears of asset liquidation are set into motion, unfurling a cascade of transactions wherein the debtor’s holdings metamorphose into liquid currency, a tribute disseminated among the consortium of creditors who await their apportioned spoils.

The culmination of this voyage heralds the debtor’s liberation from the shackles of residual indebtedness, a phoenix rising from the embers of fiscal duress, reborn into a realm unburdened by the obligations that once ensnared them.

The formal insolvency options in Canada are described below.

Insolvency and debt relief solutions for individuals –

Restructuring by making monthly payments under a consumer proposal for those who owe $250,000 or less (not including any debts secured by and registered against a person’s residence).
Financial restructuring under a Division I proposal, for those who owe more than $250,000.
Personal bankruptcy.

Insolvency and debt relief options for companies –

Financial restructuring under a Division I proposal as an alternative to bankruptcy.
Sale of assets through a receivership enforcement process initiated by a secured creditor.
Restructuring for companies that owe $5 million or more under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).
corporate/business bankruptcies..

How a bankruptcy lawyer can assist you: Importance of seeking legal advice in certain situations

In certain situations, looking for the advice of a Canadian bankruptcy lawyer is of utmost significance. An insolvency or bankruptcy filing is an intricate legal process that needs careful consideration of an individual’s financial scenario. A bankruptcy legal representative can assist with whether corporate or personal bankruptcy, as the case may be, is the best option, the kinds of insolvency processes readily available, and the connected lawful obligations and effects.

Furthermore, individuals can seek assistance from a bankruptcy lawyer to guide them through the legal procedures. It is highly recommended that consumer debtors seek advice from both a licensed insolvency trustee and a bankruptcy lawyer in certain circumstances. Some typical scenarios that warrant additional counsel from a bankruptcy lawyer well-versed in insolvency law include:

They are involved in complex family law proceedings.
There are one or more legal actions against you that allege unlawful behaviour, such as fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation or the conversion of someone else’s property, such as funds held in trust.
The bankrupt’s application for discharge from bankruptcy is being opposed and therefore there will be a court hearing.
Their financial situation is intertwined with other issues where confidential consultation with legal advice is required and that advice must be protected by solicitor-client privilege.
There are special asset considerations where a privileged discussion with a bankruptcy lawyer is essential before seeking advice and assistance from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee.

In corporate insolvency situations, we always recommend that the Directors obtain legal advice from a bankruptcy lawyer in addition to the corporation obtaining legal assistance.

A bankruptcy lawyer can provide customized guidance in such touchy situations as well as representation to guarantee the most effective feasible outcome for their clients.

bankruptcy lawyer

Can I file for bankruptcy without a bankruptcy lawyer in Canada?

While it is possible to declare bankruptcy without a bankruptcy lawyer in Canada, it is recommended to seek legal counsel for complex corporate and personal filings. Hiring a bankruptcy attorney supplies several advantages, including knowledge of insolvency legislation, assistance in more complex proceedings and guidance on unusual issues, specific unique creditor issues or claims and personal liability under any personal guarantees.

In addition, a bankruptcy lawyer can represent you in court proceedings such as with litigants who have obtained approval of the court to continue litigation against the debtor and on a personal bankruptcy discharge hearing. This will guarantee that your legal rights are safeguarded throughout the process. Therefore, in these kinds of consumer and corporate insolvency matters, it is smart to talk to a qualified bankruptcy lawyer to ensure a smoother and much more successful bankruptcy process in Canada.

Determining the necessity of enlisting the services of both a bankruptcy lawyer and a Licensed Insolvency Trustee: Is a bankruptcy lawyer required to initiate bankruptcy proceedings in Canada?

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada can be a complex as well as stressful process, however, as defined above, it is feasible to do it without the help of a bankruptcy lawyer. A bankruptcy lawyer cannot launch the bankruptcy process in Canada. In Canada, bankruptcy, as well as any other insolvency process, is launched and administered by Licensed Insolvency Trustees that are qualified and also supervised by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). So when someone files for bankruptcy, it is done with a trustee in bankruptcy (this is the old name for a Licensed Insolvency Trustee).

Trustees are accountable for overseeing and handling the Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency procedures, including the liquidation of assets and the distribution of proceeds to creditors for unsecured debts. They additionally offer debtors financial counselling, therapy and support on how to handle their financial resources in the future. To end up being a Trustee, people need to satisfy particular educational and professional requirements, consisting of completing specialized training, courses and examinations. Thus, Canadians can trust that their insolvency, as well as personal bankruptcy procedures, are being managed by qualified and also experienced professionals.

Regardless of the guidance and aid regarding your financial affairs from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee before and also after the initiation of a financial restructuring or personal bankruptcy process, a Licensed Insolvency Trustee practically acts on behalf of the unsecured creditors. So, for circumstances like those described above, if any debtor has an extra complicated scenario, is associated with sticky scenarios or is concerned about the director or personal responsibility as a result of a business restructuring or bankruptcy, then the recommendations of a bankruptcy lawyer should be acquired before entering into any insolvency procedure.

bankruptcy lawyer

Bankruptcy lawyer and a Licensed Insolvency Trustee: Determining the necessity of enlisting the services of both a bankruptcy lawyer and a Licensed Insolvency Trustee

There arise certain junctures where the imperative of engaging a proficient bankruptcy lawyer to adroitly navigate the intricate labyrinth of the Canadian bankruptcy process becomes unequivocal. As expounded upon earlier, should your fiscal panorama manifest intricacies reminiscent of a Byzantine tapestry, replete with an entanglement of debts and creditors, the tutelage and expertise proffered by a bankruptcy lawyer morph into an invaluable compass.

The determination of the exigency to enlist the services not only of a bankruptcy lawyer but also of a bankruptcy trustee constitutes a pivotal crossroads for both individuals and enterprises ensnared in the throes of financial quandaries. While a bankruptcy lawyer adroitly dispenses legal counsel and advocates in the corridors of justice, a bankruptcy trustee’s role expands to encompass the labyrinthine realm of debt reorganization, proposal filings, and the art of debt alchemy. Their convergence encapsulates a holistic stratagem in the pursuit of resolving the monetary labyrinth.

Grasping the complexity inherent in bankruptcy law is tantamount, and a seasoned bankruptcy lawyer deftly steers through the legal firmament, charting a course that aligns with the best nexus of legal tenets. Conversely, a Licensed Insolvency Trustee proffers a detached analysis of the financial constellation, endowing clients with an array of options extending beyond the binary realm of bankruptcy and answering any questions about bankruptcy you may have.

At its essence, the verdict to summon forth both the prowess of a bankruptcy lawyer and the sagacity of a Trustee should hinge upon the unique tapestry woven by individual circumstances and the crystalline aspirations of the client. Ultimately, it comes down to the complexity and sensitivity of the person’s or company’s overall situation.

How to find a qualified bankruptcy lawyer or Licensed Insolvency Trustee in Ontario

When confronted with financial troubles in Canada, it’s important to make informed choices. If you’re thinking about bankruptcy, it’s smart to seek guidance from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. These professionals can assist you through the intricate procedure and also give important understanding.

For those with especially complicated financial circumstances, or who is a corporate director of an insolvency company, it might be essential to employ the help of a seasoned bankruptcy lawyer.

Starting your search for trustworthy professionals can be frustrating. Nonetheless, a calculated strategy can aid. Begin by discovering the Law Society of Ontario’s website, where you’ll discover a comprehensive list of competent legal experts that concentrate on bankruptcy and insolvency.

To locate a bankruptcy trustee near you, explore the computerized database of the OSB. This will certainly give a list of bankruptcy trustees in your locale to seek insight, advice and assistance. For both a bankruptcy lawyer as well as a Trustee, it is essential to engage in a comprehensive conversation with any prospective advisor, delving into their specialist background, navigational technique, and cost structure.

Efficiency is not the only aspect to think about; reliability and also the personal vibe you get from that person to see if you make a connection are likewise essential elements that need to inform your decision. By locating an ally who can give adept support throughout this challenging period, you can navigate this hard juncture with greater ease as well as confidence.

Finally, check out Google and other online reviews. There is nothing better than reviews from people who were in your shoes before and sought assistance from a Licensed Trustee, bankruptcy lawyer or both. Their experience and insight into specific professionals will help you immensely. Things to look for include:

What service did they perform for the person?
Does the reviewer live in your general area?
Did the professional do a good job?
What were some of the reviewer’s favourite things in working with that professional?
Did they work with any specific people in the firm that they highly recommend?
How did the Licensed Insolvency Trustee or bankruptcy lawyer they chose to compare to others they may have consulted with?
Are there any tips the reviewer offers to others?

Bankruptcy lawyer: Conclusion

Looking for legal advice when considering bankruptcy is not needed in every scenario. However, it is necessary when it concerns complicated plans. Hiring a qualified bankruptcy lawyer can provide countless benefits. They have the proficiency as well as knowledge to advise you before embarking on a bankruptcy process and afterwards to assist you with the whole procedure.

When considering filing an assignment in bankruptcy in Canada, it is crucial to comprehend the complexities of the process and also the potential effects. While it may be possible to navigate through it without an insolvency lawyer, talking to one will supply the specialist expertise necessary to guarantee a smooth and efficient process when you have complex or unique issues in your situation.

From evaluating your financial situation to exploring alternatives such as a restructuring proposal, a bankruptcy lawyer can direct you through the legal puzzle and also suggest the most ideal strategy. When it concerns matters as substantial as bankruptcy, seeking expert help is a sensible choice to secure your best interests and also secure a fresh financial start.

I hope you enjoyed this bankruptcy lawyer Brandon’s Blog. Problems with making ends meet are a growing concern in Canada, affecting individuals of all ages and income levels.

Creating a solid financial plan can be the key to unlocking a brighter and more prosperous future. By taking control of your finances, you can prioritize your expenses, set clear financial goals, and build a strong foundation for your dreams to come true. With the right mindset and approach, financial planning can empower you to regain control, eliminate this issue as a source of stress in your life and find peace of mind.

Individuals must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

The Ira Smith Team understands these financial health concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own and it does not mean that you are a bad person. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

Brandon Blog Post

WHEN TO FILE BANKRUPTCY: OUR COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE ON WHEN IS THE RIGHT TIME TO FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 13, 2023

when to file bankruptcy

When to file bankruptcy to get a fresh start

Definition of Bankruptcy

Are you feeling overwhelmed by unmanageable debt? Then bankruptcy might be the perfect solution
for you. Bankruptcy can be defined as a legal process that can help people and businesses get out of their financial binds.

Though the thought of filing for bankruptcy may be daunting, it can be the best option when you’re facing unexpected expenses or other emergency situations.

To make sure you’re making the right decision, it’s important to understand when to file bankruptcy and what you can expect. Bankruptcy allows a person to get back on top of their finances and start fresh. Weighing the pros and cons of filing for bankruptcy can be an alarming task, but it can ultimately be the best when your back is against the wall with debt. This Brandon’s Blog lets you find out when to file bankruptcy, what you should expect and what the bankruptcy alternatives are.

What is Bankruptcy and How Does it Work?

Bankruptcy in Canada is a liberating process for those who have found themselves under a burden of debt. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) provides debtors with a discharge from most debts, allowing them to have a fresh start in their financial lives. The process is designed to help those who cannot pay their bills as they come due, and have no way of paying back their debt load. By taking advantage of the bankruptcy discharge, individuals can find themselves free from the chains of debt and start anew. On the other hand, unlike a person, a company that files for bankruptcy will not survive in the long run, and thus, there is no discharge process for a company.

when to file bankruptcy

When to File Bankruptcy?

Don’t let debt take the life out of you! Bankruptcy law can give you the fresh start you need. Although not to be taken lightly, a bankruptcy filing can be an absolute lifesaver when the debt becomes too much to bear.

Filing for bankruptcy is no small decision and has the potential to drastically alter your financial future. It’s essential to be informed on when to file bankruptcy and the process involved to ensure that your credit and ability to access money in the future are not adversely affected.

Start the legal process off right by filing for bankruptcy with the help of a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (LIT or Trustee). The LIT will submit all the documents at once and get the ball rolling.

When an individual has too much consumer debt and files for bankruptcy, the LIT takes possession of their property and assets (subject to provincial government exemptions). The Trustee is the appointed authority in charge of liquidating the assets and depositing the proceeds into a trust account that will eventually be distributed among the creditors in the priority laid out in the BIA.

It is crucial to understand when to file bankruptcy and the process involved to make informed decisions about one’s financial future.

When to file bankruptcy: Identifying signs of financial distress

Here are 5 common signs of financial distress:

Consistent inability to pay bills – Consistent inability to pay bills can be a difficult and stressful situation for individuals and companies. There are various options for managing late bill payments, however, missing bill payments can have negative financial impacts. It is important to be proactive in finding a solution, as missing bill payments may result in consequences such as eviction, cutting off of necessary supplies and financial penalties. Options for managing late bill payments vary, depending on the type of bill, such as rent or mortgages as opposed to suppliers of goods or services.
Increased collection activity and legal threats – Balances in collections are the result of outstanding debts that have not been paid. The collection process and the behaviour of debt collection agencies and debt collectors are stressful. Provincial law dictates the rights of consumers when it comes to debt collection and debt collectors.The statute of limitations to collect a debt is also a matter of provincial jurisdiction. Debts are statute-barred after the period prescribed by the law for bringing legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. A debt is considered time-barred if the applicable statute of limitations has expired.
Are you buried in debt and feeling overwhelmed? A hefty burden of financial obligations without a plan of attack can lead to a seemingly never-ending cycle of debt, with high-interest payments and a lack of hope. Alternatively, an overly ambitious plan can leave you feeling like freedom from debt is unattainable. The stress of debt can have a major toll on your mental health. It’s time to take control and devise a sensible debt repayment strategy to ultimately become debt-free and reduce the interest you pay.
Tempted to use a credit card for all your needs? Be careful; it can be easy to go overboard and put yourself into financial hardship. When you use credit cards, you risk overspending, inflating your credit utilization ratio, and even opening yourself up to identity theft and credit card fraud. Don’t take the chance – think twice before swiping!
Increasingly relying on personal loans from friends and family – The dangers of relying on loans from friends and family include broken promises or agreements. There may be confused assumptions about the loan, which can lead to misunderstandings.Additionally, not setting up clear and defined terms for repayment could lead to problematic personal relationships. A loan from friends and family could also provide tax problems depending on how it is set up and how interest payments, principal repayments and/or loan forgiveness are treated on tax returns, or not, as the case may be.
when to file bankruptcy

When to file bankruptcy: The process of filing for bankruptcy

The process of filing for bankruptcy in Canada is handled by a Trustee under the supervision of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) under the BIA. The time to complete the bankruptcy process for a 1st time bankrupt with no surplus income, where neither the Trustee nor any creditor opposes the individual bankrupt’s discharge is 9 months. If a first-time bankrupt gets a discharge at the 9-month point, then they have received an automatic discharge from the LIT. During bankruptcy, the creditors can no longer harass the bankrupt person or carry out legal proceedings or wage garnishments.

The LIT provides an information form for the person to complete, and uses that information to prepare and then file the bankruptcy paperwork. The LIT needs personal information (name, address, birth date), a list of creditors and a list of assets. The LIT then files the bankruptcy documents electronically with the OSB and then they will issue a Certificate confirming the acceptance of the bankruptcy filing. It is the day and time of the issuance of the OSB’s certificate that marks the beginning of the bankruptcy process.

When to file bankruptcy: What is the impact of filing for bankruptcy?

Once your bankruptcy is filed, there is an immediate stay of proceedings. This means that unsecured creditors cannot begin or continue lawsuits, wage garnishees, or even contact you to request payment. Within five days of the bankruptcy starting, the LIT will send a copy of the bankruptcy paperwork to creditors so they can file a claim.

Overview of the bankruptcy process

Can I keep my assets when I file for bankruptcy? In most cases, yes. However, the trustee may sell some assets to pay off your creditors. The assets you can keep will depend on your province’s exemptions. The Trustee’s job is to manage the sale of the bankrupt’s assets and place the proceeds into a trust, safeguarding them for the creditors. In other words, the Trustee is a guardian of funds, making sure everything is handled properly.

Are you worried that filing for bankruptcy will destroy your credit? Don’t fret – while bankruptcy will certainly leave its mark on your credit report, it’s far from a death sentence. Once your bankruptcy is approved, you can start taking steps toward restoring your financial health. A fresh start is waiting – be smart and make decisions that will get you back on the right track!

Wondering just how long you’ll be in bankruptcy? That all depends! If it’s your first-time bankruptcy filing with no surplus income, it should only last nine months. But if you’ve filed for bankruptcy more than once and don’t have surplus income, it will take 21 months. For those who have surplus income, this process will take longer.

2 financial counselling sessions. In a consumer restructuring or bankruptcy administration under the BIA, the debtor is required to go through two financial counselling sessions with the LIT. The reason is that one of the objectives of the BIA is financial rehabilitation. Financial education and teaching financial literacy tips are important parts of that rehabilitation.

Requirements for filing bankruptcy

To be eligible to file for bankruptcy in Canada, you must meet certain requirements. You must owe at least $1,000 in unsecured debt and be unable to pay your debts as they come due. You must also be insolvent, meaning you owe more than the value of the assets you own. Additionally, you must either reside, do business or have property in Canada. There are other acts of bankruptcy contained in the BIA, but the normal requirement is as I just described.

Role of Trustees in the bankruptcy process

The role of a LIT in Canada is to assist individuals or companies in the bankruptcy process as laid out by the BIA. They help to explain to the debtor the various options in dealing with their debt and provide advice on the best course of action. The Trustee also prepares the necessary paperwork, including reviewing the debt and completes the process from start to finish. One of the key responsibilities of the Trustee is to take possession of the property not exempt under provincial law, or subject to a trust or secured claim. The LIT then does this by selling the available assets and depositing the funds in trust for the creditors in the bankruptcy administration.

when to file bankruptcy

When to file bankruptcy: Alternatives to Bankruptcy

There are several alternative solutions that a LIT can recommend to a debtor in solving their debt problems. Bankruptcy is always the last resort and is to be avoided if at all possible. The main alternative solutions are:

Debt consolidation and debt management plans

In Canada, consolidation loans are available to assist individuals in reducing their high-cost debt payments. If you qualify for such a loan, it is an advantageous solution. These debts may include credit cards, payday loans, and unpaid tax obligations. By consolidating higher-interest-rate debts into one lower-interest-rate loan, it is possible to make affordable monthly payments and work toward eliminating debt.

If you’re in need of financial help, a Debt Management Plan (DMP) may be the answer. A DMP is an effective way to repay credit card debt, and with the help of a non-profit, no-cost credit counselling agency, you can get the support to make it work. The agency will assess your situation to ensure that a DMP is the best option for you. Put your debt worries to rest and take the first step towards a sound financial future with a DMP.

Both debt consolidation and debt management plans aim to help individuals in Canada manage their debt effectively.

Credit counselling and financial planning

Credit counselling and financial planning can help someone who has many debts. The services are provided by accredited credit counsellors working for non-profit credit counselling organizations. A credit counsellor will assess the financial situation of an individual and provide tips on dealing with debt. Financial planning and budgeting will be an important part of the process.

If the individual decides to sign up for a DMP, the counsellor will contact creditors on their behalf to request reducing or eliminating the interest rate or fees on their debts. In some cases, the creditors may agree to these requests.

Debt settlement, restructuring and negotiation with creditors

Debt restructuring, also known as debt negotiation, is the process of negotiating the terms and conditions of debt repayment with creditors. This process can be carried out by the consumer or company themselves seeking alternative repayment options. The goal is to reach a mutually agreed-upon arrangement that is more manageable for the consumer or company to repay their debt. It can involve the forgiveness of interest, stopping the interest clock and even the forgiveness of principal. If the company or consumer handles the discussions themselves, or with the help of their accountant, it is called an informal restructuring.

When a consumer or company restructures their debt with the help of a LIT under the BIA, they would file either a consumer proposal or a Division I proposal restructuring. A large company could also restructure under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

When to file bankruptcy: Conclusion

Personal bankruptcy or corporate bankruptcy, and when to file bankruptcy, is a big decision, but it can be the right one when you’re overwhelmed with debt. You can make an informed decision by understanding the basics of bankruptcy, including when to file and what to expect. If you’re struggling with debt and considering bankruptcy, it’s important to speak with a professional who can help you assess your options. Bankruptcy can be a fresh start for your financial future, but it’s important to understand the consequences and work with a professional to determine if it’s the right choice for you.

I hope you enjoyed this when to file bankruptcy Brandon’s Blog.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are now worried about its economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Brandon Blog Post

OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS: NAVIGATING THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES IN AN INSOLVENT CANADIAN CORPORATION

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 6, 2023

officers and directors

officers and directors

Officers and Directors: Introduction

In Canada, it is essential that the individual orchestrating any criminal activity must have the necessary competency to commit the offence before any corporate responsibility can be assumed. The executives and board members of the enterprise are viewed as the ultimate custodians of the company’s ethical obligations.

Welcome to Brandon’s Blog! Here I’ll be discussing the court’s ruling on fraudulent intent by officers and directors, and how it affects the transfer of assets at undervalue in insolvent corporations. I’ll be focusing on the 2022 Court of Appeal for Ontario decision in the Bondfield Construction Company Limited (“Bondfield”) and Forma-Con Construction (“Forma-Con”) case as creating new law.

After two court decisions over nearly two years, the Supreme Court of Canada has delivered their decision on the Court of Appeal’s decision upholding the lower court decision, granting the application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Officers and Directors: What is the “directing mind”?

The term “directing mind” in the context of Canadian corporations refers to a natural person who holds a high level of authority within theand can be considered the “alter ego or soul” of the corporation. The term “alter e organization go” or “soul” of a corporation refers to a person who holds significant authority within the organization. According to the web search results, this person can be considered the embodiment or representation of the corporation.

Federal legislation uses a more familiar expression for the directing mind “senior officer”. This includes individuals who have an important role in setting policy or making important decisions within the corporation. A “senior officer” is a person in a position of authority or seniority over others. They are responsible for leading and overseeing a group or organization.

officers and directors

The duties of Officers and Directors

Fiduciary Duty

In Canada, the phrase “directing mind” is used to refer to a top-tier individual, an officer or someone on the board of directors in a company who can be thought of as its “alter ego” or “soul”. This individual holds a great degree of influence and power within the corporation, making them its symbolic heart and soul.

Duty of Care

Officers and directors are expected to exercise the same degree of prudence, attention to detail, and knowledgeability that any reasonable individual would in similar scenarios. This means that they must stay abreast of the corporation’s financial well-being and make informed decisions using that information. Beyond the necessity of performing their fiduciary duty, they also have a duty of care to the company and its stakeholders.

Insolvency and the Obligations of Officers and Directors in Canadian Corporations

As a corporation’s liabilities come due and it finds itself unable to pay, insolvency looms large. This can be a stressful period for corporate officers and directors, as they are tasked with making crucial decisions that will affect the company and its stakeholders in the long run. It is paramount that they keep the corporation’s best interests in mind as they navigate these difficult waters.

Officers and directors of Canadian corporations have two significant legal obligations to fulfill: a fiduciary duty and a duty of care. Failure to uphold either of these duties could result in personal liability for them.

officers and directors

Navigating Responsibilities in an Insolvent Corporation: Do officers and directors owe a duty to creditors

When an enterprise finds itself insolvent or close to it, the officers and directors of the company accept a nerve-wracking assignment. These decision-makers are required to make authoritative choices that will determine the fate of the corporation and of all those involved.

Officers and directors of an insolvent company must jump into action to protect as best as possible the corporation and its stakeholders from added losses. This could include negotiations with creditors, liquidating redundant assets, and reorganizing the firm’s procedures. It’s not a simple task, but it’s a necessary one.

It’s necessary to protect the corporation and its stakeholders by focusing on the company’s important resources and operations. Decisions must be made to stave the loss of assets needed to operate and make sure that all of its transactions are in the corporation’s best interests.

Aside from their approved responsibilities, officers and directors need to be alert to their obligations and the repercussions that may arise from negligence. They need to be very careful to ensure that their fiduciary responsibility and duty of care are not abandoned and must correct any missteps.

With this perfect segway, I now wish to describe a very important recent decision from the Court of Appeal for Ontario upholding the lower court decision on the duties and responsibilities of officers and directors of an insolvency company. This decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. It is such an important decision for officers and directors, corporations and especially insolvent ones for the entire country, that the Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear the appeal.

Officers and directors: Ernst & Young Inc. v. Aquino, 2022 ONCA 202 (CanLII)

On March 10, 2022, the Court of Appeal made a landmark decision in Ernst & Young Inc. v. Aquino, which delved into the corporate attribution doctrine – the idea that the actions of a corporation’s controlling figure can be attributed to the firm itself. The ruling was especially pertinent in the bankruptcy and insolvency context.

John Aquino was the directing mind of Bondfield Construction Company Limited (“Bondfield”) and its affiliate Forma-Con Construction (“Forma-Con”). He and his associates carried out a false invoicing scheme over a number of years by which they siphoned off tens of millions of dollars from both companies.

The monitor and the trustee challenged the false invoicing scheme and sought to recover some of the money. The participants argue that they did not intend to defeat any actual creditors and that John Aquino’s intent cannot be imputed to either Bondfield or Forma-Con.

Bondfield was a full-service group of construction companies that operated in the Greater Toronto Area and Southern Ontario starting in the mid-1980s. Bondfield was in financial trouble in 2018 and started proceedings under the CCAA on April 3, 2019.

After a careful investigation, the monitor and the licensed insolvency trustee administering the bankruptcy (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) uncovered a shocking discovery: Bondfield and Forma-Con had deceitfully dispersed a staggering sum of money to or for the benefit of John Aquino and others via a fraudulent invoicing system!

In cross-examination, Mr. Aquino admitted that the suppliers who falsely invoiced Bondfield provided no value for the transfers, but denied intent to defraud, defeat, or delay Bondfield’s actual creditors.

officers and directors

Can section 96 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) be used by the monitor and the trustee to recover the money officers and directors took from Bondfield and Forma-Con?

Section 96 of the BIA allows trustees to seek a court order “voiding transfers at undervalue” which are a transfer by the debtor to another party at no or undervalued consideration, which is an improvident transaction from the debtor’s perspective. The policy of the BIA goes beyond the modest origin of the law, which prohibits insolvent debtors from giving away assets to third parties instead of using those assets to repay their debts.

This section of the BIA is a remedy to reverse an improvident transfer that strips value from the debtor’s estate, but the trustee must nevertheless meet the requirements of the specific words used.
The monitor and the trustee had to prove two elements to require John Aquino and the other beneficiaries of the false invoicing scheme to repay the money they took under s. 96(1)(b)(ii)(B) of the BIA. The application judge bridged the gap by imputing John Aquino’s fraudulent intention to the debtors, Bondfield and Forma-Con.

The legal analysis of the false invoicing scheme was no longer in active dispute. John Aquino and his associates dispute liability under s. 96 on the basis that their fraudulent acts were not carried out at a time when Bondfield and Forma-Con were financially precarious.

John Aquino and his associates asserted that Bondfield and Forma-Con were financially healthy, so they did not intend to defraud any actual creditors. When assessing the intention of a debtor, a court must look at the information known at the time of the transfer or transaction, and the reasonableness of the debtor’s belief in light of the circumstances then existing.

In order to require John Aquino and the other beneficiaries of the false invoicing scheme to repay the money they took under s. 96(1)(b)(ii)(B) of the BIA, the monitor and the trustee had to prove two elements: first, John Aquino and the other participants were not dealing with Bondfield and Forma-Con at arm’s length; and second, at the time they took the money (during the statutory review period), they “intended to defraud, defeat or delay a creditor” of Bondfield or Forma-Con. The first element is amply established by the evidence. This case turns on the second element.

The lower court judge’s reasons for the timing of the transfers

The Court of Appeal found that the lower court judge decided correctly based on the legal principles that were presented. John Aquino and his associates presented their case of Bondfield and Forma-Con’s solvency when they received the funds. However, the judge decided that the affirmation of fraud provided an abundant base for deciding that Bondfield and Forma-Con had the purpose of deceiving, obstructing, or delaying their creditors.

The judge concluded that the presence of badges of fraud creates a presumption of fraudulent intent and that John Aquino had not rebutted the presumption. The judge also concluded that the true financial condition of Bondfield and Forma-Con at the time of each impugned transaction cannot be determined on the record before the court.

Based on the totality of the evidence, documents and information, the judge held that at the time of the fraudulent transactions, Bondfield and Forma-Con were already experiencing mounting financial difficulties, and their creditors were imperilled by the transfers. John Aquino continued on nonetheless, and the court found that the transfers were intended to defeat those creditors. The application judge took a pragmatic view of the evidence, found that John Aquino carried on with the false invoicing scheme knowing that Bondfield and Forma-Con were experiencing increasing financial difficulties, and inferred that he did this with the intent to defeat creditors.

John Aquino didn’t care if his scheme had the potential to defraud, defeat or delay creditors according to section 96 of the BIA. His recklessness was enough to show the intent needed to make the fraudulent transfers stand. It’s clear that he wasn’t concerned about the interests of the companies’ creditors.

Forma-Con paid over $11 million to certain purported suppliers under the false invoicing scheme during the time period of review allowed under s.96 of the BIA. For the Bondfield 5-year review period, the court found that the total amount of $21,807,693, are transfers at undervalue. The court ordered Mr. Aquino and associates, to repay this amount on a joint and several basis.

officers and directors

Officers and Directors: Uncovering the Impact of Fraudulent Intent on Transfers and Undervalue in Bankrupt Corporations

The application judge was able to uncover John Aquino’s scam involving false invoicing by Bondfield and Forma-Con, giving the trustee the green light under the BIA to reclaim the funds stolen by the fraudsters.

The appellants argue that the lower court judge erred legally because John Aquino’s fraudulent intent cannot be imputed to Bondfield or Forma-Con as a matter of law, even though he was one of their directing minds. They assert that the binding principles of the common law doctrine of corporate attribution set out in Canadian Dredge & Dock Co. v. The Queen,[55] do not permit the imputation of his intention to either defrauded the company. Accordingly, s. 96(1)(b)(ii)(B) of the BIA cannot be used to require John Aquino, or his associates as “privies” to the impugned transactions, to repay the money they took.

This intriguing argument brings up a difficult issue concerning the relationship between the stipulations of the BIA and common law doctrine. When can a court use common law in interpreting and putting the BIA into effect? I will start by presenting the judge’s rationale for the application. After that, I will tackle this legal inquiry and then consider its effects regarding the implementation of the corporate attribution doctrine in this appeal.

The lower court judge reasoned that common law doctrine can be enlisted by a court to interpret and supplement the BIA where necessary to better achieve its purposes, one of which is to protect the interests of the bankrupt’s creditors. She believed that common law can add content to the terms of the bankruptcy law not otherwise defined. In particular, the common law doctrine known as the anti-deprivation rule and its purpose of preventing fraud on the bankruptcy is especially pertinent in this case. The use of common law doctrine must respect the policy of the BIA.

The BIA is no stranger to the use of common law doctrines- though it has yet to officially codify ‘good faith’, the Supreme Court has nonetheless held that Parliament is expected to remain true to the traditional understanding of the common law unless there is some explicit and unmistakable indication of deviation. Consequently, when it comes to interpreting the BIA, the concept of good faith unquestionably plays a role, but it is not codified.

The fraud on bankruptcy law principle exists to protect creditors from unscrupulous parties who might otherwise try to remove value from an insolvent debtor’s assets. Corporations, being distinct from natural persons, necessitate the corporate attribution doctrine, which provides a link between the entity and the individual whose “guiding hand” propelled the corporation into action.

This kind of insolvency officers and directors case was novel in Canada

The corporate attribution doctrine has been applied in the fields of criminal and civil liability. Before this case, courts in Canada had yet to consider the doctrine in the bankruptcy and insolvency context under s. 96 of the BIA. The court recognized that the attribution exercise is grounded in public policy. These principles provide a sufficient basis to find that the actions of a directing mind be attributed to a corporation, not a necessary one.

Accordingly, as a principle that is grounded in policy, and which only serves as a means to hold a corporation criminally responsible or to deny civil liability, courts retain the discretion to refrain from applying it where, in the circumstances of the case, it would not be in the public interest to do so.

After thorough deliberation, the Court of Appeal sided with the lower court to declare that this case had implications for the public interest. It was determined that the invoicing scheme had been used as a way to fraudulently, obstructively, and detrimentally transfer funds to avoid payment to Bondfield’s and Forma Con’s creditors. The Court seeks to reverse these transactions and recover a total of $11,366,890 on behalf of Forma-Con’s creditors. For Bondfield’s creditors, the amount of $21,807,693,

officers and directors

The bottom line of Ernst & Young Inc. v Aquino

The lower court found and the Court of Appeal affirmed that decision that under s. 96 of the BIA, the payments by Bondfield and Forma-Con made in respect of the false invoices during the 12-month review period totalling for Bondfield, $21,807,693, and for Forma-Con, CDN$13,985,743 CAD and US$35,030 Are transfers at undervalue. Those that received these funds were ordered to repay them on a joint and several basis.

The Court of Appeal delved into some critical legal matters in their ruling, exploring the responsibilities insolvency practitioners must uphold, how much creditors should be able to expect, as well as the rights of everyone involved in bankruptcy proceedings. They also delved into the interpretation of the BIA and the reality of its application.

The Court decided that the BIA has to be implemented in a way that meets the expectations of the Act, and that insolvency professionals are to be held to a high standard of both expertise and responsibility.

At the beginning of this Brandon’s Blog, I mentioned this monumental case will be heard in the Supreme Court of Canada. As you can imagine, it will be a highly anticipated event in the insolvency world. And it won’t disappoint!

The ruling so far has had major implications for the insolvency industry, including the rights of creditors, officers and directors and insolvency practitioners. All in all, it was a groundbreaking decision that will shape the industry for years to come – and will no doubt be further shaped once the Supreme Court of the land hears the case and issues its decision.

Obligations and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and Officers: Conclusion

The Ernst & Young Inc. v Aquino case was an important one for the insolvency industry and had far-reaching implications for the obligations of insolvency practitioners and the rights of creditors and other stakeholders. The Court of Appeal’s decision in the case was a clear and definitive ruling on a number of key legal issues, and it will likely have a lasting impact on the insolvency industry for many years to come.

I hope you enjoyed this officers and directors Brandon’s Blog.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are also now worried about its economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Tags bankrupt corporation, bankruptcy law, bankruptcy proceedings, Board of Directors, Bondfield Construction Company Limited, corporate attribution doctrine, corporation directors, court of appeal, duties of officers, Ernst & Young Inc. v Aquino, Forma-Con Construction, Ira Smith Trustee, liabilities of directors, personal liability, section 96 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, time period, trustee in bankruptcy, voiding transfers at undervalue

Brandon Blog Post

THE COMPLETE CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA GUIDE: WHAT EVERY BUSINESS OWNER NEEDS TO KNOW

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 30, 2023

business bankruptcy in canada

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: Introduction

Are you a business owner with company financial difficulties and apprehensive about the possibility of corporate bankruptcy and is it something that you will have to seriously consider? Corporate bankruptcy in Canada process can be complex and overwhelming, but understanding it is necessary for making authoritative decisions about your business.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I will analyze the ins and outs of corporate bankruptcy in Canada, including the different types, the steps in filing for corporate bankruptcy, the impact on creditors and shareholders, and alternatives to consider. By the end of this Brandon’s Blog, you will have a better understanding of corporate bankruptcy in Canada and be able to understand how to make the best decision for your business.

Explanation of what corporate bankruptcy in Canada is

The corporate bankruptcy process in Canada – otherwise known as commercial bankruptcy or incorporate business bankruptcy – is a legal means by which an incorporated business that is unable to pay its debts can be liquidated, and its liabilities discharged. This process allows the business to liquidate its assets and redistribute the value among its creditors. The process is intended to give an honest, but unfortunate corporate debtor a discharge from most debts while ending the business of that corporation.

It is important to note that corporate bankruptcy is different from personal bankruptcy which is a legal process through which an insolvent individual can substantially reduce debt and hopefully restructure. Unlike an individual who files for personal bankruptcy, it is not intended that the bankrupt corporation will come out of bankruptcy through a discharge process.

If single individuals are operating businesses and are considering business bankruptcy, then we are talking about the bankruptcies of sole proprietorships. If more than one person is operating a business partnership, then we need to think of the issues in a partnership bankruptcy. Either way, we have insolvent persons, which means personal bankruptcy, which is not the subject of this Brandon’s Blog.

It’s important to note that the process of corporate bankruptcy in Canada is complex and can only be handled by a licensed insolvency trustee. The Trustee will help you understand the process and the options available to your corporation and then prepare the documents required to submit the bankruptcy filing.

In Canada, if a corporation is bankrupt, it is subject to both the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (“BIA”) and relevant provincial regulations. The BIA outlines the procedure for managing a corporate bankruptcy, while provincial law governs other aspects of the business such as labour laws.

corporate bankruptcy in canada

A brief overview of how the process of corporate bankruptcy in Canada begins

Navigating corporate bankruptcy in Canada can be complicated, as there are numerous steps that need to be taken. To begin, it is important to consult with a licensed insolvency trustee to review the financial details of the company, including income, profits, liabilities, and any personal guarantees. From there, the next step is to determine the misogynist options.

The board of directors needs to hold a meeting, in order to pass a resolution permitting the corporation to file for bankruptcy. This process is initiated by a director, or the single director, who will then execute the necessary bankruptcy paperwork.

Types of corporate bankruptcy in Canada

There are two types of corporate bankruptcy in Canada: liquidations and reorganizations. Although a reorganization is not an actual bankruptcy, the phrase “bankruptcy protection” is used to describe a formal reorganization. So for the purposes of this Brandon’s Blog, we will consider both as types of bamkruptcy.

The type of corporate bankruptcy in Canada proceedings can often provide a good indication as to whether the unsecured creditors will get all, a portion, or none of what they are owed.

corporate bankruptcy in canada

An overview of the 2 types of bankruptcy proceedings available to Canadian businesses

Liquidation

The process of corporate bankruptcy involves a business ceasing operations as it is unable to fulfill its financial obligations and the demand for its goods and services has become obsolete. This form of corporate bankruptcy is commonly referred to as liquidation.

Canadian bankruptcy proceedings must adhere to Canadian bankruptcy law under the BIA. This law contains similar liquidations to Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Commencing the process of bankruptcy liquidation in Canada is the initial step.

It all starts with the board of directors of the corporation getting together and deciding to file for bankruptcy. One of the directors, or a single director, will then have to sign the official documents for the bankruptcy process.

Once the liquidation process has been initiated, the corporation’s assets, subject to the rights of any creditor having security over all or some of the assets, are taken over by the Trustee. The Trustee will sell the corporate assets and the proceeds will be distributed among the creditors according to the priority established by law. The corporation will then be laid to rest, as it will no longer operate as a legal entity.

Reorganization

Corporate reorganization is one of the alternatives to bankruptcy. It is a process in which a process for a company that is facing financial difficulties is able to restructure its outstanding debt and its operations in order to improve its financial situation. In Canada, the primary statutes for corporate reorganization are the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) and the BIA. These laws are similar reorganizations under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

The CCAA provides a thoroughfare of debt reorganization for corporations on a larger scale, as the amount owed by the company must exceed $5 million. Through this federal legislation, the debtor corporation can still operate while reaching an approved plan of arrangement with its creditors.

For corporations that do not reach this $5 million threshold, the Division I Proposal under the BIA can be utilized. The BIA provides for the restructuring of insolvent corporations and individuals.

The CCAA is a federal statute that allows for the sale of an insolvent business, with a reach that transcends the wideness of the whole Canadian nation and even extends beyond its borders.

The process of corporate reorganization under either the CCAA or BIA begins with the corporation filing for protection under the appropriate Act. In the case of the CCAA, the filing is with the court. Under the BIA, the filing is with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada.

The debtor will then be safeguarded with all its possessions. Then, the corporation will be allotted a specified value of time – typically 30 to 45 days – to present a plan of arrangement. This plan must be approved by the creditors and the court in order to move forward. When the plan of arrangement is given the thumbs up, it can be set into motion.

So corporate reorganization in Canada is a process in which a company that is viable but is facing financial difficulties is allowed to restructure its business debts and operations in order to modernize its financial situation. The CCAA is mainly used for larger corporations and the BIA for smaller ones. Both legislations provide a process to restructure a company while under the protection of the court and it’s intended to be a way to save a company while protecting the rights of the creditors.

Advantages and disadvantages of corporate bankruptcy in Canada

Liquidation

Advantages of corporate liquidation using corporate bankruptcy in Canada:

Allows an incorporated entity that is unable to pay its debts to file for bankruptcy, as per the BIA.
Allows for the liquidation of resources and redistribution of that value among creditors, which can provide relief for the corporation and its creditors.

Disadvantages to bankruptcy and corporate liquidation using corporate bankruptcy in Canada:

The Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) prevents a company in bankruptcy from seeking dissolution under the CBCA.
Unfortunately, specific liabilities or obligations of the corporation are passed to its directors. This would put personal assets at risk.
The process is time-consuming and may also be expensive.
Unfortunately, the director’s reputation may moreover be tarnished in the process.

Reorganization

Advantages of reorganization under corporate bankruptcy in Canada:

Can uplift profits and increase efficiency.
Can extend the life of the business.
Can modernize strategy and financial arrangements.
Could be done informally without a court process by agreement between the debtor and its creditors or formally under either a proposal as outlined in part III of the BIA or a plan of arrangement under the CCAA.

Disadvantages of reorganization under corporate bankruptcy in Canada:

It may not work.
Decreased employee morale and concern among customers.
Can be a significant time investment with potential setbacks in cash flow
If the financial matters are so dire that a reorganization is not viable, the remaining option is full bankruptcy, which results in the liquidation of resources to pay creditors.
corporate bankruptcy in canada

Filing a voluntary assignment into bankruptcy for corporate bankruptcy in Canada

Overview of steps involved in filing for Corporate Bankruptcy in Canada

Finding a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) (LIT) and retaining the LIT to make an informed decision about proceeding with bankruptcy.
One of the directors (or sole director) will be required to execute corporate bankruptcy papers
Upon bankruptcy assignment, the LIT will notify business creditors of the bankruptcy proceeding.
Hold a meeting of creditors.
Conduct a sale of assets.
Carry out its other duties in accordance with the BIA.

Note: The above steps are a general outline and the specific process may vary depending on the case. It’s advisable to seek guidance from a licensed insolvency trustee and a legal professional to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations.

Essential paperwork and information

In order to file a voluntary assignment for corporate bankruptcy in Canada, and get to the point of holding the First Meeting of Creditors, the following documentation and information are typically required:

Provide the LIT with the corporate minute book, seal and accounting records.
Fully signed minutes of a validly held meeting of directors resolving that the corporation file an assignment in bankruptcy and appointing either a director or senior management person to be the Designated Officer to sign all bankruptcy documents and attend the First Meeting of Creditors.
A completed Voluntary Assignment of the corporate debtor, prepared by the LIT and signed by the Designated Officer.
The LIT prepared statement of affairs, reviewed, approved and sworn/confirmed by the Designated Officer, which includes information about the debtor’s assets and the names and addresses of all known creditors and the amounts owing to each of them.
The LIT will take the necessary steps to lodge the paperwork with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, who in turn will give the Certificate of Bankruptcy – marking the very beginning of bankruptcy proceedings in Canada. The moment the Certificate is issued will be the exact time the corporate bankruptcy in Canada is activated.
The LIT then prepares the statutory notice to creditors which is mailed to all known creditors with a notice of the time and place of the First Meeting of Creditors will be held and also includes a proof of claim form for the creditors to complete fully and file with the LIT.
The LIT will also prepare the bankruptcy notice to be placed in a local newspaper to advertise for creditors to contact the Trustee.
The LIT prepares its Report on Preliminary Administration to provide necessary information to the creditors about the causes of the corporate bankruptcy in Canada, the available assets to be sold, if any and other important information. The LIT’s report is distributed at the First Meeting of Creditors.

In a voluntary assignment, the LIT is picked by the debtor. In an involuntary assignment, the LIt is suggested to and chosen by the court. In issuing the Certificate, the LIT choice is confirmed by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. However, it is ultimately up to the creditors attending and voting at the First Meeting of Creditors to either confirm the appointment of the LIT or substitute the LIT with another one (don’t worry about the mechanics for now!). The LIT will be responsible for overseeing the administration of the debtor’s estate and distributing the proceeds to creditors.

It’s important to note that the above list is not exhaustive and additional documentation and information may be required by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy(OSB) or the appointed Trustee. It’s recommended to seek professional advice from a LIT, a lawyer or both, before filing for a voluntary assignment in bankruptcy.

The OSB plays an important part in the area of insolvency

The OSB is tasked with keeping orderly standards for the supervisory oversight of stakeholders within the insolvency process, creating an accessible archive of public records, compiling and analyzing data, and enforcing the BIA and CCAA regulations. Furthermore, the OSB is devoted to facilitating an effective and efficient insolvency framework in Canada.

The OSB in Canada is responsible for the supervision and regulation of the Canadian insolvency system, and overseeing the administration of all insolvency proceedings described as bankruptcies, commercial reorganizations, Division I commercial proposals, consumer proposals and receiverships.

The effects of corporate bankruptcy in Canada on creditors and stockholders

How corporate bankruptcy affects the distribution of assets among creditors

Divvying up resources among those owed money in a corporate bankruptcy in Canada can be quite intricate and can be affected by various elements, such as the kind of bankruptcy declared and the company’s ownership and organizational setup.

When a company files for bankruptcy, its day-to-day operations will typically come to a halt. All of the corporation’s assets will be sold off and the proceeds will be divided among its creditors. In Canada, this process can have a major impact on how the assets are divided up among those who are owed money.

The BIA requires the LIT to take control of all the unencumbered assets, sell them and assigns orders of importance to the many claims against the debtor. The net sale proceeds are then doled out to creditors depending on the priority of the claims.

In a nutshell, the types of creditors and the order of priority is:

Trust claims, including unremitted employee payroll withholdings.
Secured lenders.
Preference is given to certain kinds of unsecured debt.
Ordinary unsecured creditors are last.

In Canada, though the assets of a company are distinct from the owners’ individual wealth, banks will always take security on the company’s assets when loaning funds and anticipate the entrepreneur to provide some kind of collateral. It bears mentioning that this is a standard requirement.

Should the proceeds of the company assets fail to cover the bank debt in the event of a Canadian bankruptcy, the owners will be called upon to make good on their personal liability and may be faced with the liquidation of some or all of their personal belongings to make up the difference.

What sort of ramifications does corporate bankruptcy in Canada have on the equity holders and their privileges?

Generally, when it comes to bankruptcy proceedings, it’s usually shareholders who are left holding the shorter end of the stick. Most often, they don’t get anything back after all other creditors have been taken care of– leaving them with nothing but the realization that their investments have gone down the drain. Furthermore, they forfeit any rights they once held with the company.

If any of the shareholders are also in a director position, then they will have the added worry about whether there are any debts that are also a director liability. Legal advice is always required by directors of an insolvent company. In next week’s Bradon’s Blog, I will talk about recent developents arising from an Ontario court decision about the directing mind of a bankrupt corporation.

The one small solace they may have is that Canada Revenue Agency will acknowledge the corporate bankruptcy in Canada as a legitimate means of allowing shareholders to deduct the value of their shares as a loss on their tax return.

corporate bankruptcy in canada

Alternatives to Corporate Bankruptcy in Canada

For a business that is viable yet unable to pay off its debts, there are 5 alternatives to corporate bankruptcy in Canada that must be explored:

Implement tighter controls over spending and create a cash-flow budget to see if costs can be cut or eliminated, freeing up funds to pay off debts.
Refinance existing debt in order to consolidate it into more manageable payments.
The shareholders provide a fresh injection of funds.
Informal out-of-court debt settlement through direct negotiation with creditors.
Selling redundant or no longer-needed assets to raise cash for debt repayment.

Rather than going through the effort of reorganizing debt under the CCAA or BIA, a corporate workout is an amicable arrangement between the company and its creditors that allows them to come to a mutually-satisfactory resolution without resorting to legal proceedings and a reorganization court case. This is seen as an advantageous alternative to a formal filing.

If all other solutions fail to prevent a company in Canada from going bankrupt, then the CCAA or BIA’s restructuring provisions should be carefully considered to potentially save the company, its jobs and business assets.

If the company is not viable or profitable and is in a state of financial distress, then a secured lender can exercise their rights through a receivership process. This could be used in conjunction with a corporate bankruptcy in Canada if the situation calls for that.
The reasons why bankruptcy and receivership may be needed to work in tandem are complex and are best left as a topic for another day.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: Conclusion

I hope you enjoyed this corporate bankruptcy in Canada Brandon’s Blog.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are now worried about its economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

corporate bankruptcy in canada — *business bankruptcy in canada*

Brandon Blog Post

DISCHARGE FROM BANKRUPTCY CANADA: OUR DETAILED STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 10, 2022

discharge from bankruptcy canada

What are the implications of discharge from bankruptcy Canada?

If you are experiencing financial troubles and can’t pay your debts, you can file for bankruptcy in Canada. This legal process lets you off the hook for your debts and start fresh. Once you’re discharged from bankruptcy, you’re no longer responsible for those debts (other than for a few exceptions noted below). Filing for bankruptcy is stressful. We understand how difficult and stressful the bankruptcy process can be, so we hope that this will be a helpful resource for you.

Once the Trustee has completed their duties under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) with respect to the administration of your property and the bankruptcy estate, the next step in the bankruptcy process is they must apply for a discharge. This will occur after the Trustee has applied for your discharge from bankruptcy Canada, even if you did not get an absolute discharge.

This Brandon’s Blog is for people who have made a bankruptcy filing but have not yet been discharged. If your Licensed Insolvency Trustee has been discharged or is otherwise unable to help you with a second discharge application, this blog will provide you with the information you need to get through the process on your own.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: What are the implications if you are not discharged from bankruptcy?

If your previous application for discharge was unsuccessful, you remain an undischarged bankrupt and your Trustee is not obliged to make another application on your behalf. However, you should check with your Trustee first as they may or may not be prepared to do so.

We often receive calls from individuals who claim that their Trustee has been discharged, but they have not been. They express confusion as to why their Licensed Insolvency Trustee will not make an application for their discharge from bankruptcy. A quick search reveals that in these cases, the individual received a conditional discharge, but has not yet fulfilled all of their conditions to get a bankruptcy discharge. That is why their conditional discharge has not yet been converted into an absolute discharge.

If you filed an assignment in bankruptcy and are still an undischarged bankrupt, you may be able to apply for discharge from bankruptcy. An insolvency Trustee only needs to make one application on your behalf. Once the Trustee obtains their discharge, they do not need to make your application for discharge on your behalf again.

The Licensed Trustee cannot be discharged until all bankruptcy administration requirements have been met, including making the first discharge application on behalf of the bankrupt person.

discharge from bankruptcy canada

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: How do you obtain a bankruptcy discharge in Canada?

Automatic discharge from bankruptcy is typically granted unless there are exceptional circumstances. If there is opposition to the automatic discharge, the discharge application must be brought before the court for a hearing.

If you did not complete all of your bankruptcy duties as the bankrupt person, such as providing income and expense statements, attending required financial counselling sessions, and/or paying surplus income, your Trustee had reasons to oppose your automatic discharge and scheduled a hearing with the court.

The Report of Trustee on Bankrupt’s Application for Discharge sets out the reasons for the insolvency Trustee’s opposition to a bankrupt’s application for discharge. This document is on file with the court.

If a bankrupt does not receive a discharge at the time of the court application, it is usually because they have not yet done what is required. The associate justice/registrar who heard the application at court may have therefore adjourned the application (i.e. stated it was to be heard at a later date, which may or may not have been set).

The court may have adjourned your discharge application or imposed conditions that must be met before you are entitled to a discharge. The disposition sheet from the hearing will state what the court decided in this regard.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: What are the steps to clear my bankruptcy?

It’s not unusual for people who didn’t do what they were supposed to at first to try and get back on track and do what’s required to get their discharge. You must comply with your duties during bankruptcy to the best of your ability and be prepared to explain to the court any deficiency in doing so.

For example, to get your discharge, you must be able to provide details and evidence of your income and expenses during bankruptcy. You probably recall that you were required to provide the Trustee with your monthly income and expense reports. If you’re unable to provide the court with those details, the court may want to review your income tax returns for that period. If you want the court to rescind or vary the conditions imposed, you must show that you complied with the conditions to the best of your ability.

There are many examples of trying your best to meet the conditions but maybe not perfectly. If the court orders you to pay a certain sum of money to the Trustee by a certain date, you can make the court-ordered additional payment but not by the specified date. If you were required to make surplus income monthly payments but didn’t make them all, that’s one reason there were conditions attached to your discharge. You can apply to the court to change the date and get your discharge.

Another one is that you didn’t finish all your required credit counselling sessions. You could finish them and then provide proof of completion to the court.

discharge from bankruptcy canada

Completing your own application for discharge from bankruptcy Canada

Making your own application to be discharged from bankruptcy can be a bit daunting, but don’t worry—just follow a few simple steps and you’ll be all set. Here are some tips to help you get your application ready and submitted without the help of a bankruptcy trustee or a bankruptcy lawyer.

To begin, you’ll want to locate your bankruptcy file at the court office. Once you have your file, be sure to look through it thoroughly to find:

your bankruptcy court file number;
the Report of Trustee on the Bankrupt’s Application for Discharge under section 170 of the BIA;
any order issued by the bankruptcy court at the original discharge hearing; and
the court’s disposition sheet from any previous discharge hearing identifies what the court previously ordered or decided.

You will need copies of these documents. You can ask the court office to make copies for you. They will charge you a fee for photocopying. You should check the Report of the Trustee, the court’s disposition sheet, and any court order to see what you failed to do and what conditions the court has imposed. Also, it is not a bad idea to find out who attended your last application for discharge.

You should check the Report of the Trustee, the court’s disposition sheet, and any court order(s) in the file to see what you didn’t do and what conditions (if any) the court has imposed. Lastly, you need to schedule a date for your discharge hearing with the bankruptcy court.

You will be required to prepare the following documents and file them with the court:

a notice of hearing for a bankrupt person’s application for discharge;
your affidavit explaining why you believe you are entitled to the discharge order sought;
an affidavit of service; and
a draft of the order sought.

The Associate Justice/Registrar in Bankruptcy hearing your application for discharge may make any order he or she sees fit. If the order you are seeking is made, he or she may accept and sign it in court on the day you appear, which may save you a period of time later on.

Requisition – Notice of hearing for bankrupt’s discharge from bankruptcy Canada hearing for discharge

The first step in obtaining a discharge in bankruptcy is to file a Notice of Hearing for Bankrupt’s Application for Discharge with the court. That document would have first been filed by the Trustee when the Application for discharge is first scheduled. If you have a copy of it, it will be a good precedent for you to follow.

A requisition must be filed again by you in order to have the matter brought back before the court.

discharge from bankruptcy canada

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada:The Affidavit

An affidavit is a formal, written statement that provides key information in your legal case. Any evidence you want the court to consider in your application must be submitted in an affidavit. Your affidavit should describe the events leading up to your bankruptcy, and your current financial situation.

You must swear or affirm your affidavit before a notary public or commissioner of oaths. Make sure that your affidavit only includes evidence that is relevant to your application for discharge.

The court is familiar with a standard form of affidavit for discharge applications. You should familiarize yourself with that normal format. You should also include:

additional information about why you did not seek a bankruptcy discharge earlier;
is this a 1st-time bankruptcy, 2nd-time bankruptcy or more;
why you have not been able to comply with the bankrupt’s duties or the requirements of an earlier court order; and
state the reasons you are wanting to be discharged now.

You will need to attach any relevant documents to your affidavit in support of your application, including a statement of your current income, expenses, assets, liabilities and any previous bankruptcy information.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada:Affidavit of Service

To serve documents, you must provide a written copy to the party to be served. You need to obtain a signature or other confirmation, such as an email, to confirm that the document was properly served. You will need to serve the filed Requisition and all filed Affidavits and documents on:

any creditor filed an opposition to your discharge;
creditors who attended an earlier discharge hearing;
your Licensed Insolvency Trustee; and
Office of the Superintendent in Bankruptcy.

These parties may attend your hearing and make submissions.

In order to provide proper service within the required time period before your discharge hearing, you must familiarize yourself with the rules. You must also provide proof of service at the hearing, especially if no one else attends. This proof of service can be the signature of everyone served to show the date they were served.

An Affidavit of Service can also be filed with the court. This Affidavit of Service is separate from the Affidavit filed with the court regarding your reasons for entitlement to anabsolute bankruptcy discharge certificate.

discharge from bankruptcy canada

At the discharge from bankruptcy Canada hearing

When you appear in court for your discharge hearing, you will be able to present your case to either an Associate Justice or Registrar in Bankruptcy. If your application is being opposed, the creditors opposing your discharge need to file a notice of opposition. In this case, the hearing will be in front of a bankruptcy Judge. This is the normal process followed:

You explain why you believe you are entitled to the order you are seeking, for example, an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.
Anyone opposing your application explains his or her position.
The Judge or Registrar may ask questions relating to the affidavits and documents you have filed and make suggestions or give directions.

When presenting your position at the hearing, remember to:

Clearly state what order you are seeking from the Registrar in Bankruptcy or Judge.
Outline the facts supporting your application in a concise manner.
Explain the law on the subject and how it applies to the facts of your case.

Your conduct before and during bankruptcy will be taken into consideration when making a decision on your application for discharge. The Trustee’s report will provide information on your conduct before and during bankruptcy, which will be taken into account. if you did not attend the required financial counselling
sessions, did not file required statements of income and expense, and/or did not make the required surplus income payments to the Trustee for the benefit of your creditors.

The court will consider the relevant factors and make the appropriate order, or it may adjourn the hearing for further information or conditions to be met. Some of the types of orders the court may make are:

An order of discharge that is absolute and therefore you are immediately discharged from bankruptcy.
A conditional discharge may be granted. Examples of conditions are:
- if the debtor pays any unpaid surplus income,
- the debtor pays the outstanding balance for any asset that was agreed to be paid for; or
- if the debtor pays a sum of money to the Trustee toward their debt obligations, as decided by the court.
A discharge that has been suspended.
The court may refuse to issue a discharge order if it is not satisfied that you have made full and adequate disclosure, or if there are issues with your conduct.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: Order for discharge

The Judge or Registrar in Bankruptcy will grant a discharge order at the end of the hearing. The type of discharge will be one of the kinds indicated above. If you prepared a draft order and the Registrar in Bankruptcy or Judge finds it acceptable, they will sign it and you can then have it filed with the court. However, if your application was opposed, keep in mind that one of the opposing parties may choose to appeal the discharge order.

If you have not prepared your order before the hearing, you should do so after the hearing and submit the order in duplicate to the court. The court office will then send the order to the Registrar in Bankruptcy or Judge who heard your application for signing. Once you receive your copy of the signed order, your discharge will be official.

When you receive a copy of the signed order, you must provide a copy to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. They will in turn notify the credit bureaus and Canada Revenue Agency of your discharge.

When you have received your absolute discharge, you are no longer legally responsible for repaying debts that you incurred before your assignment in bankruptcy. You will get rid of debt with some exceptions set out in Section 178 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. They are:

payment of child support or alimony;
student loans, if you have not been a full-time or part-time student for less than 7 years;
a fine or penalty imposed by the court; or
debt resulting from fraud.
discharge from bankruptcy canada

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: Are you tired of being in debt?

Bankruptcy law and the bankruptcy process can be complex, so it may be worth retaining a bankruptcy lawyer to help you apply for your discharge. Ultimately, it is up to you, but hopefully, this guide to discharge from bankruptcy Canada will lay out the steps you need to take if you wish to apply for a discharge yourself.

I hope that you found this discharge from bankruptcy Canada Brandon’s Blog informative. If you’re sick and tired of carrying the burden of debt and ready to live a much better life, we can assist. We know exactly how it really feels to be in debt as well as feel like you’re never going to get ahead. We have actually helped lots of people and businesses that were in your position reach financial stability, so we understand it’s feasible for you to prosper in your objective of ending up being debt-free. Nevertheless, it will certainly require some work on your part. We’ll be right here to assist you with every action necessary.

The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too many personal unsecured debts , Credit card debt, income tax debt liability, unsecured loans or personal obligations from the running of your company or from being a business owner. These are all types of debt we can help you eliminate. We are aware of your financial difficulties and understand your concerns. Filing bankruptcy is the last option we explore only after we have exhausted all other options to avoid bankruptcy, such as financial restructuring through a debt repayment plan.

It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to give you the best management advice to get you out of your outstanding debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We are sympathetic to the financial difficulties you are experiencing and would like to help alleviate your concerns. We want to lighten your load by coming up with a debt settlement plan crafted just for you.

We realize that people and businesses in financial difficulty need practical advice and a workable solution in an easy-to-understand financial plan. The Ira Smith Team knows that not everyone has to file for bankruptcy in Canada. Most of our clients never do, as we are familiar with alternatives to bankruptcy. We assist many people in finding the relief they need.

Call or email us. We would be happy to give you a no-cost initial consultation. We can find you the perfect solution to tailor a new debt restructuring procedure specifically for you, based on your unique economic situation and needs. We provide a full range of services to people and companies. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you’re serious about finding a solution, let us know. We will get you back to living a happy life, whether or not there is an economic recession in Canada.

Call us now for a no-cost initial consultation. We are licensed professionals.

Brandon Blog Post

CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY FAQ: USE OUR HACK TO SOLVE YOUR CHALLENGING INSOLVENT COMPANY ISSUES

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 23, 2022

Corporate bankruptcy: An overview

Corporate bankruptcy is a legal process by which businesses can reorganize their financial affairs or liquidate their assets. Although bankruptcy can be complicated and stressful, it can provide businesses with a fresh start.

When it does happen, the corporate bankruptcy process can be complicated. Insolvency can take a toll on your company’s employees, customers, and shareholders. A solid understanding of corporate bankruptcy can help you properly restructure and reorganize your company using an insolvency process without killing your business.

Last week, I gave my best FAQ answers to common questions about personal bankruptcy services. A business partnership or sole proprietorship means that the individual(s) operate the business in their personal name. Answers about business bankruptcies for those forms of business would fall under the personal bankruptcy process that was covered in last week’s personal bankruptcy FAQ blog.

When a corporation conducts business, some of the questions, and answers, are different. In this Brandon’s Blog, I answer the most frequently asked questions about corporate bankruptcy.

**Can a business declare corporate bankruptcy?**

As stated previously, only a corporation can declare corporate bankruptcy. A corporation is its own legal entity. A “person” is eligible for relief under federal bankruptcy law. A “person” is typically defined in the Canadian bankruptcy legislation to include an individual, part of a partnership, a proprietorship, a company, an unincorporated association, a cooperative society, or a cooperative organization. corporate bankruptcy canada

What are the different types of corporate bankruptcy in Canada?

There are 2 different types of bankruptcy that a company can file for under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada (BIA). They are:

Liquidation: This is when the insolvent company is unable to pay its debts and its business is no longer viable. The only real option for it is to sell off its assets to repay its secured creditors and unsecured creditors as best as possible since it files for bankruptcy in the priority outlined in the BIA.
Restructuring: This is when the company is insolvent and is incapable to repay its debts due to its financial difficulties, yet all or a sufficient portion of the company’s business is still viable. So, the company negotiates brand-new terms with creditors to lower its financial obligations and also might have the ability to sell some assets to settle its financial debts. Restructuring is the most well-known alternative to bankruptcy. Restructuring under insolvency legislation is also described in the media as bankruptcy protection.

**What factors lead to corporate bankruptcy proceedings?**

A company always shows signs of trouble before it needs to file for corporate bankruptcy. Some of the early danger signals are:

continued history of losses;
dwindling cash position;
the departure of key management or employees;
difficulty meeting loan or lease obligations;
the breaking of loan covenants; and
difficulty meeting payroll.

Corporate bankruptcy: What does it mean for a company when it liquidates?

As stated above, when a company liquidates it means that the company is unable to pay its debts and its business is no longer viable. The only real option for it is to sell off its assets to repay secured creditors and unsecured creditors as best as possible through bankruptcy and then shut down. corporate bankruptcy canada

**What happens to debt in corporate bankruptcy?**

If the purpose of the corporate bankruptcy is to shut down and have liquidation of business assets, then we first need to see what the net proceeds of sale from those assets are. The BIA describes the order in which funds must be distributed by a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) in bankruptcy. The order in which the debts must be repaid, in whole or in part, is called the priority.

The priority of the rights of creditors to be repaid in a corporate bankruptcy is:

Trust and deemed trust claimants – These are parties whose property is being held or is deemed to be held in trust for them by the bankrupt corporation. The most common type of deemed trust claim in a corporate bankruptcy is Canada Revenue Agency for unremitted employee source deductions.
Secured creditors – Creditors who hold valid security over the assets of the company get paid next. There could be more than just one secured creditor. Within the secured creditor group, the order of priority is based on the ranking of the security registration dates.
Preferred creditors – These are unsecured creditors who have been given certain priority in a corporate bankruptcy under federal bankruptcy laws. The most common examples in a corporate bankruptcy would be Trustee fees, the Trustee’s lawyer’s fee, the levy payable to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada on any distribution made by the Trustee to a creditor and certain salary, wages or commissions due to employees.
Ordinary unsecured creditors – This group comes after the preferred creditors. They are all creditors who have supplied goods or services and do not hold any security and do not fit into the definition of a preferred creditor.

The balance of any unpaid debt ends up getting written off on the books of the creditors because there are no assets left in the company to claim against.

**How does a company get into corporate bankruptcy and what happens to the company?**

The way a company gets into bankruptcy is the exact same way an individual can. For a liquidation, either the company can file a voluntary assignment into bankruptcy. If it is one or more creditors owed at least $1,000 trying to push the company into bankruptcy, then they would file a Bankruptcy Application with the court requesting the court to make a Bankruptcy Order. corporate bankruptcy canada

**Why might a company choose to file for corporate bankruptcy protection and restructure under a BIA proposal?**

Corporate bankruptcy protection and restructuring under a BIA proposal can provide a company with financial difficulties a much-needed relief and a chance to return to profitability. When a company files for protection, the BIA proposal offers an orderly and reliable process for restructuring, which can be appealing to businesses that have a good chance of a turnaround.

A corporation that has a viable business and can return to profitability after restructuring, with support from creditors, has all the right ingredients for a successful restructuring. This is why a company might choose to file for corporate bankruptcy protection and restructure under a BIA proposal. The company will survive and jobs will be saved.

Who is responsible for developing the reorganization plan for the company?

Reorganization is the restructuring of a business to gain efficiency, improve workflow, and drive profits. Reorganization plans vary in length and detail and take a certain period of time to properly develop. They generally describe desired outcomes and final goals. Sometimes a company will undergo a complete reorganization, while other plans focus on aspects that require reorganization, such as a business unit or department.

The reorganization plan of a company is essential to ensure its smooth transition. The reorganization plan involves restructuring various departments of the business, reducing operational costs, and streamlining the workflow. Writing a reorganization plan requires a lot of time, effort, and money.

When a business downsizes, it reduces its workforce to a smaller number. Such a reduction can be a painful process that even threatens to collapse the business. The company needs to have a plan in place to accomplish this reorganization while still running the business. When downsizing occurs, businesses require reorganization plans. Involving and informing employees of the process makes them more likely to follow new plans and less resistant to change.

All of the various individual department organization plans and product sales plans need to be combined into an overall business plan. This overall business plan must also include financial information to show how the company, emerging from restructuring, will operate profitably.

Now that the overall plan is set, senior management must work with its outside financial and legal restructuring professionals to establish the restructuring commercial proposal or plan of arrangement to be presented to the creditors to be voted upon. An excellent communication program must be put into place so that creditors can understand the benefits to them of supporting and voting in favour of the restructuring proposal. Normally negotiations with certain creditors or creditor groups must take place in order to come up with a final and successful restructuring plan that will gain both creditor support and pass through the legal proceedings of court approval. corporate bankruptcy canada

**What becomes of a corporation after corporate bankruptcy?**

Going through corporate bankruptcy means your company’s assets have been sold to pay off some portion of its debts. Bankruptcy also by operation of law terminates all of the employees. So the corporation is left with no assets and no employees. All it has is debt and a deficit equal to the total debt less the amount that is shown on the balance sheet for the company’s preferred and common stock.

Therefore, the corporation, as a legal entity, is then left to just float away into the stratosphere. There are only 2 ways that a company can survive a corporate bankruptcy:

from the sale of the corporate assets, pay off 100% of all of its business debt plus interest; or
file a BIA proposal, obtain creditor support and court approval and successfully complete it.

The first way will almost never happen. The second way can happen if there is a good reason to try to make sure that the corporation as a legal entity survives. A reason for doing this might be that there is value to the shares. After becoming bankrupt, a successfully completed proposal annuls the bankruptcy. By definition, the proposal will discharge all of the company’s outstanding debt. The company is now debt-free.

The common stock may have value because it is a public company and the shares can be relisted on the stock exchange. Now the corporate shell is attractive to a private company that wishes to go public and can do so by amalgamating with this public shell. Alternatively in a private company, or in a public company, there may be significant tax loss carryforwards available for use if this corporate shell is merged with the right kind of profitable company. the only way to use the tax losses is first by owning all the shares.

This is all possible, but, the normal outcome for a company that has gone through a corporate bankruptcy is just to fade away, never to be heard from again.

**When a company declares corporate bankruptcy, what will happen to your stock or bond?**

When you invest money in a company by investing your capital, your money is legally represented by the stock or bonds that you purchased. When you see a company declaring bankruptcy, it means the company can no longer afford to pay its debts.

If a company just liquidates its assets during corporate bankruptcy, the existing shares will likely be worth very little or nothing at all. For a private company, a successful corporate restructuring might increase the value of the shares as the company will emerge from its restructuring with much less debt than before.

The value of a company’s shares is most likely to lower if it effectively restructures its financial affairs. It might have to issue brand-new stock to creditors that will not be paid back in full, watering down the value of the business’s shares.

As far as corporate bonds are they secured or unsecured against the company’s assets? If secured, they could be repaid in whole or in part depending on where they stand in the secured assets pecking order. If unsecured, then it just becomes part of the larger unsecured creditor pool. In a corporate bankruptcy that is a liquidation, those bondholders will receive their share of any distribution made by the Trustee to the ordinary unsecured creditors if there is such a distribution made.

Corporate bankruptcy and insolvency at a glance

In conclusion, bankruptcy and insolvency of course go together, although many people prefer to think of bankruptcy as an economic failure while insolvency is more accurately a sign of a business’s financial failings.

In the same way I hoped last week’s personal bankruptcy blog helped your understanding, I hope this Brandon’s Blog on corporate bankruptcy was helpful to you in understanding more about the corporate bankruptcy system in Canada.

If you or your company has too heavy a debt load, we understand how you feel. You’re stressed out and anxious because you can’t fix your or your company’s financial situation on your own. But don’t worry. As a government-licensed insolvency professional firm, we can help you get your personal or corporate finances back on track.

If you’re struggling with money problems, call the Ira Smith Team today. We’ll work with you to develop a personalized plan to get you back on track and stress-free, all while avoiding the bankruptcy process if at all possible.

Call us today and get back on the path to a healthy stress-free life.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FREE HOW TO CLOSE YOUR BUSINESS WITHOUT BANKRUPTCY OFFER

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: THE UNDENIABLE BEST THING YOU NEED TO KNOW TO CASH YOUR INSOLVENT CUSTOMER’S CHEQUE SAFELY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 12, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Bankruptcy protection: What happens if a company gets into financial trouble?

A Canadian company seeking bankruptcy protection has two choices when it is financially troubled and wants to reorganize. By hiring insolvency legal counsel and a licensed insolvency trustee to get both insolvency and bankruptcy law advice and financial advice, they can protect themselves from their creditors, either by:

using the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) to file for bankruptcy protection; or
working with an insolvency trustee and filing a Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) you can obtain bankruptcy protection.

In order to reorganize in Canada, an insolvent company files for bankruptcy protection. If you are insolvent in Canada, then you must file for bankruptcy protection, which is equivalent to Chapter 11 in the United States. The process is called financial restructuring or financial reorganization. By doing this, the company will try to restructure while it continues to operate to come up with a restructuring plan that allows the company to survive while satisfying the needs of the creditors to some degree.a

This Brandon Blog discusses a recent court decision that demonstrates that there is a risk to creditors who receive payments from the insolvent company under bankruptcy protection for goods or services supplied if the restructuring fails.

What happens to the company that files for bankruptcy protection?

An organization that files for bankruptcy protection, or as it is sometimes called, creditor protection, differs from an organization that files for bankruptcy. A pure bankruptcy procedure consists of a liquidation. The company ceases to operate unless the Trustee sees value in continuing to operate the company for a limited period of time.

The trustee in bankruptcy takes possession of all assets that are either not subject to valid claims by secured creditors (typically financial institutions) or that belong to third parties (for example, equipment under lease or goods undergoing repair that are in the company’s possession). A licensed insolvency trustee then formulates a plan for selling the unencumbered assets of the company to maximize the proceeds. Afterwards, the Trustee distributes the funds in accordance with the BIA.

In the case of a company filing for bankruptcy protection, this is one of the alternatives to bankruptcy. The intention is to continue operating while it tries to restructure. Most of the time, this entails downsizing. A plan will be devised to repay some of the remaining debt in exchange for the creditors writing off the balance that is owed. With success, the company can retain employees and continue to operate. Creditors will be able to earn money by supplying the reorganized company in the future.

The CCAA allows companies that owe at least $5 million to their creditors to file for bankruptcy protection. Either the business will be restructured and continue to exist on new financial terms or a wind-down will be supervised to pay back anyone owed money by selling assets. BIA restructuring provisions can be used by companies that owe less than $5 million.

In other words, a company that goes bankrupt will shut down. Those who file for bankruptcy protection want to keep operating. As disruptive as bankruptcy and restructuring are, they can be beneficial for businesses, individuals and the economy since they preserve value and prevent assets from being wasted.

As soon as the company enters bankruptcy protection (or bankruptcy), proceedings against it are stayed. As a result, all collection rights for creditors are suspended. A “time-out” gives the company a chance to restructure, or the Trustee can handle its duties in bankruptcy without interference from creditors. Additionally, it “freezes” all creditors at the time of the filing, so that one cannot gain an advantage over another.

bankruptcy protection

A record number of companies have sought creditor protection under COVID-19 and more are on the way?

The list of large Canadian companies with outstanding debts looking for bankruptcy protection from creditors got to a decade high in May and June 2020. Numerous financial commentators believed there would be a full-blown financial crisis and that a lot more would certainly file as a result of COVID-19 caused the economic downturn. Despite this, the number of corporate insolvency filings appears to have stabilized and also slowed down in 2021. One main reason is the number of government programs supporting Canadian business. In the same way as the virus itself, COVID-19 has actually taken a hefty financial toll on companies with pre-existing conditions.

Some familiar Canadian corporations in the list of companies that filed in that time due to their financial situation were:

Reitmans
Frank & Oak
Aldo
DavidsTea
Cirque Du Soleil
Mendocino
Bow River Energy
FlightHub
Christian charity, Gospel for Asia
Cequence Energy
Delphi Energy
Sail

Twenty-two major Canadian companies sought creditor protection in May and June 2020, almost four times the usual rate. The list obviously does not include major U.S. names such as Chesapeake Energy, J Crew, Neiman Marcus, Brooks Brothers, Pier 1 and Boy Scouts of America.

**The bankruptcy protection court case facts**

I want to tell you about Schendel Mechanical Contracting Ltd (Re), 2021 ABQB 893. On November 9, 2021, the Honourable Mr. Justice Douglas R. Mah released his decision.

Schendel Mechanical Contracting Ltd. (Schendel) was one of three associated companies that at one time collectively formed a major construction concern in Alberta under the Schendel name. As a result of financial difficulties, it was an insolvent entity and it filed a Notice of Intention to Make A Proposal under the BIA on March 22, 2019. Schendel continued operations as part of its restructuring effort. On various Schendel projects, Schendel bought HVAC equipment from the supplier between April 2018 and May 2019.

Ultimately, Schendel’s debt restructuring plan failed. Schendel was deemed to have filed for bankruptcy when it failed to implement a successful BIA Proposal restructuring. Schendel went bankrupt immediately. Its secured creditor applied to the Court for the appointment of a Receiver, which was granted.

As a result of reviewing the company’s books and records, the Receiver found and disputed the legality of a $40,000 payment from Schendel, an insolvent company, to one of its suppliers. According to the Applicant Receiver, the payment was prohibited for a number of reasons and the funds should be returned. The recipient supplier asserted that the payment was both innocent and validly received and that it was entitled to retain it.

In this case, a cheque dated July 8, 2019, to make the payment. Due to an unknown reason, the supplier did not negotiate the cheque until 11:48 AM on July 19, 2019. Schendel was also deemed to have filed for bankruptcy and the Court made the Receivership Appointment Order all on the same day, July 19, 2019. The Court had, however, no evidence regarding the exact moment the receivership and bankruptcy decision was made on that same day.

bankruptcy protection

**The bankruptcy protection case: The Receiver’s position**

It is noteworthy that the action to recover the $40,000 was brought by the Court-appointed Receiver and not the insolvency trustee of the bankruptcy estate. According to the Receiver, the funds should be returned on the following grounds:

the automatic stay under section 69(1) of the BIA was in effect at the time of filing and throughout the extension of the proposal period, so the supplier was without recourse against Schendel;
the Court-ordered stay contained in the Receivership Appointment Order of July 19, 2019, as well as the concurrent stay imposed by a deemed bankruptcy under the BIA, deprived the supplier of all collection remedies as of that date;
as an alternative, the payment may be prohibited under the Fraudulent Preferences Act; or
it may be in violation of the Statute of Elizabeth (see note below).

NOTE: The English Parliament passed this statute in 1571 with the purpose of prohibiting transfers that would defraud creditors or hinder their collection efforts. As a result of widespread fraudulent transactions designed to defraud creditors, the 13 Elizabeth Statute was passed. It is still in effect in Alberta today.

**The bankruptcy protection case: The supplier’s position**

The recipient supplier said that it received the payment both innocently and legally and that it is entitled to retain it. In addition, the recipient supplier said:

besides some routine questions about payment, the supplier had not engaged in any activity to try to collect the debt;
the relationship with Schendel was arm’s-length;
both of the last two extension orders for the NOI define a process by which Schendel may pay, and the Receiver has fallen short to prove that the procedure was not followed when it comes to the subject payment; and
for either the Fraudulent Preferences Act or the Statute of Elizabeth, the required intent cannot be shown.

Since the bankruptcy trustee was not involved in this case, nobody was claiming that the payment was a preference or transfer under value under the BIA.

bankruptcy protection

**The bankruptcy protection case: The Judge’s decision**

The Court was not presented with evidence on whether the $40,000 payment in question was approved within the proposal extension process or whether it was not approved. There was evidence to support Schendel’s compliance with approved procedures. In the post-NOI period, the supplier was found to have provided goods to various Schendel projects worth $34,476.75.

There was evidence that the payment was not just a payment on account of a pre-filing debt without further transactions post-filing. According to the Judge, the stay would not apply to indebtedness arising from goods or services supplied to Schendel after the filing of the NOI. This is because such indebtedness would not be a claim that could be a proven claim in the bankruptcy.

The Judge further stated that it is the Receiver’s responsibility to prove that the payment violated the stay. Schendel and the supplier did continue to do business together after the NOI was filed, according to the evidence. During the hearing, the Judge said that he should not simply assume facts in the Receiver’s favour. Additionally, the evidence indicated that some of the $40,000 payment was applied to the post-NOI supply of goods. A total of $34,476.75 worth of product was supplied to Schendel after the NOI was filed.

As a result, the Judge rejected all of the Receiver’s arguments and dismissed his Application in its entirety. Consequently, the supplier kept the $40,000.

Bankruptcy protection: How to cash your insolvent customer’s cheque safely

Companies filing for bankruptcy protection, whether under the CCAA or BIA, are reorganizing to stay in business. Businesses require purchasing goods and services and paying for them. It’s possible that some pre-filing debts will be paid after the filing date even though the debts are frozen from a collection perspective.

The stay does not necessarily prohibit every post-NOI payment by an insolvent company to a creditor. Such payments are valid when they are necessary to enable the company to move forward with restructuring. For example, a creditor may require payment of all or a portion of its pre-filing debt in order to supply post-filing.

Parties can agree to repay past debts in order to secure future supplies. First and foremost, the BIA process aims to encourage a debtor to reorganize as a going concern. Both creditors and debtors benefit from the debtor’s continued operation during this critical time. The BIA’s stay provisions and preference provisions give debtors breathing room to reorganize their finances. Setting up legitimate agreements with key suppliers is an integral part of that process.

In the end, it is critical to determine whether the payment of past indebtedness is a valid condition of post-NOI supply, which is required for restructuring to proceed. In that case, the post-filing payment of the pre-filing amount will be valid. If not, the insolvency trustee can recover it from the supplier.

Creditors seeking to recover pre-filing debts must make the payment as a condition of a post-filing supply arrangement. Additionally, because all of this is playing out in real-time in higher-risk settings, a supplier is free to amend the pricing post-filing. Similarly, if the supplier can secure it, there is no reason for them to not try to go from an unsecured creditor to a secured creditor on the post-filing supply by taking security or requesting a letter of credit. This would all be done out of an abundance of caution because as stated above, unpaid post-filing debts are not a claim provable in the company’s bankruptcy if the restructuring is unsuccessful.

bankruptcy protection

Bankruptcy protection summary

I hope you found this bankruptcy protection Brandon Blog post informative. Are you worried because you personally or as business owners are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? If it is too much debt for any reason, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Even though we are licensed insolvency trustees, we have found that not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Form 31 Proof of Claim Introduction

Background Information on Form 31 Proof of Claim

Purpose of Form 31 Proof of Claim

Importance of Properly Completing Form 31

Section 1: Understanding the Basics of Form 31 Proof of Claim

Definition of Provable Claim

Difference Between Provable and Unliquidated Claims

Identifying False Claims

Section 2: Required Information for Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

Personal Details of the Creditor

Details of the Claim

Priority of the Claim

Section 3: Additional Considerations for Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

A Claim of Lessor For Disclaimer of a Lease

Valuing a Secured Claim

Claim by Farmer, Fisherman or Aquaculturist

Claim by Pension Plan for the unpaid amount

Claims Against Directors

Claim of a Customer of a Bankrupt Securities Firm

Complicated or Contingent Claims

Section 4: Procedural Requirements for Submitting Form 31 Proof of Claim

Deadline for Submitting Proof of Claim

Properly Filing the Form 31

Notice of IntentionTo Make A Proposal

Notice of Bankruptcy Process

Section 5: Ensuring Accuracy in Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim – A Step-by-Step Guide to Filing a Proof of Claim

Step 1: Gather Required Information

Step 2: Complete the Header Information

Step 3: Furnish Creditor Details

Step 4: Specify the Debt

Step 5: Provide Supporting Documentation

Step 6: Sign and Date the Form

Step 7: File the Form

Additional Tips and Reminders

Section 6: Common Mistakes to Avoid when Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

Section 7: Form 31 Proof of Claim FAQs

Conclusion

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt Introduction

Definition of Bankruptcy and CRA Debt

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt: Importance of Debt Management and Tax Relief

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt: Understanding Bankruptcy in Canada

What is bankruptcy?

Bankruptcy laws in Canada

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt

Overview of the CRA

Types of debt owed to the CRA

Consequences of CRA debt

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt: Exploring CRA Debt Solutions in Canada

Informal Debt Settlements

Debt Repayment Plans

Bankruptcy as a Debt Relief Option

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt: The Bankruptcy Process in Canada

Preparing for Bankruptcy

Filing for Bankruptcy

Duties and Responsibilities during Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt Discharge Considerations

Dealing with Bankruptcy and CRA Debt

Outstanding Tax Returns

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt: Discharge in Bankruptcy

Rebuilding Your Finances After a Canadian Bankruptcy Discharge

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt FAQs

Is it possible to file for bankruptcy solely for CRA debt?

What happens to my CRA debt in bankruptcy?

How does bankruptcy affect my tax refunds?

Can I include tax debt in a consumer proposal?

What if my tax debt exceeds $200,000 and makes up over 75% of my unsecured debt?

Bankruptcy and CRA Debt Conclusion

Rudy Giuliani: Introduction

Background on Rudy Giuliani’s legal issues

Rudy Giuliani’s False Allegations

Background on Rudy Giuliani’s legal issues

Explanation of why Rudy Giuliani filed for bankruptcy

Definition of bankruptcy protection and how it can help individuals in financial distress

The Rudy Giuliani Bankruptcy Protection and its Limitations

The Allegations Against Rudy Giuliani

The Unforgiving Nature of U.S. Bankruptcy Law

Rudy Giuliani’s Bankruptcy Implications and Beyond

Rudy Giuliani Bankruptcy: What If Rudy Giuliani Was a Canadian Living In Toronto, Ontario Canada

What is defamation in Canada?

Are All Debts Discharged Through A Canadian Bankruptcy

*Claim by Farmer**, Fisherman or Aquaculturist*

*Notice of Intention**To Make A Proposal*

Bankruptcy and *CRA Debt**: Understanding Bankruptcy in Canada*

*Bankruptcy law**s in Canada*

*Debt Re**payment Plan*s

Bankruptcy and *CRA Debt**: Discharge in Bankruptcy*