Categories
Brandon Blog Post

UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES OF INSOLVENCY MEANING: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE FOR LAWYERS AND ACCOUNTANTS

Insolvency Meaning: Introduction

In a vibrant economic environment where change is the only constant, legal and accounting experts have to be fluent in insolvency laws to be able to supply their clients with some basic advice they require to navigate tough financial situations. To use reliable guidance, lawyers and accounting professionals require a basic understanding of the complexities of Canadian bankruptcy regulations.

In this first in a series of blog posts, Brandon’s Blog undertakes to encourage legal and accounting professionals not familiar with insolvency techniques to help clients navigate the Canadian bankruptcy system. Understanding essential principles and vocabulary about bankruptcy is essential before working together with experts in this area. We will discover the complexities of the insolvency meaning, and take a look at the varied forms of insolvency identified in Canada.

Insolvency Meaning: Key Concepts and Terminology

Insolvency Meaning: Insolvency Is A Financial Challenge

Financial distress, or insolvency, describes a scenario where a person or company is incapable of satisfying their financial commitments. This can transpire when they have a lot more liabilities than assets or when their cash flow is inadequate to cover their financial obligations. Because of this, people might have a hard time paying their bills, personal loans, or mortgages, while businesses might discover it testing to satisfy payroll, vendor payments, or difficult financial debt obligations.

Insolvency vs. Bankruptcy

While insolvency and bankruptcy are frequently used interchangeably, they have distinct definitions. Insolvency is a financial state where an entity or individual cannot meet their financial obligations as they end up being due. On the other hand, bankruptcy is a legal declaration under federal government bankruptcy law resulting in a bankruptcy filing. It includes the restructuring of financial obligations or the liquidation of assets under the supervision of the court.

Insolvency is an economic condition, whereas bankruptcy is a legal process to deal with that problem. Comprehending this difference is necessary for people and companies and their legal and financial advisors when dealing with financial obstacles.

An image of a female lawyer and a female accountant superimposed over a complex maze representing the professional advisors helping an insolvent debtor determine if bankruptcy protection in order to restructure their massive debt load or filing for a liquidation bankruptcy is the right option to resolve their debt problems.
insolvency meaning

Insolvency Meaning: Forms of Insolvency in Canada

In Canada, there are several forms of insolvency that individuals and businesses may encounter. The most common way of describing the different forms of Canadian insolvency procedure is:

  • Personal Insolvency: When an individual is unable to repay their debts, but their debts and financial situation are either large, complex or both. These individuals may look to either a bankruptcy restructuring of their debts or in certain cases, a bankruptcy to liquidate assets and discharge their debts to allow them to get a fresh start. This type of insolvency also includes a business in the form of a sole proprietorship or partnership.
  • Corporate Insolvency: Limited companies facing financial distress may opt for restructuring where the business is viable. This is done through either the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) or the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). In some cases, where the business is no longer viable, liquidation through bankruptcy is the only option.
  • Consumer Insolvency: This refers to the financial challenges faced by consumers, often leading to paying a portion of their debts to discharge all their debts through a consumer proposal under the BIA and avoiding bankruptcy. In other situations where a consumer proposal is not feasible, then bankruptcy would be the necessary filing.

Each type of insolvency possesses its distinctive qualities and procedures, underscoring the paramount significance of seeking guidance from seasoned professionals amidst financial problems. In every circumstance, the main goal remains to avoid bankruptcy.

Within the Canadian realm, solely licensed insolvency trustees bear the capacity to oversee affairs falling under the jurisdiction of either the CCAA or BIA. These professionals are bestowed with licenses and subject to the vigilant supervision of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada.

Insolvency meaning: Canadian Insolvency Laws and Framework

When it comes to insolvency in Canada, two key legislations govern the process: the BIA and the CCAA. These federal bankruptcy laws provide a framework for dealing with financial difficulties faced by individuals and businesses.

The BIA provides provisions for debtors, be they individuals or corporate entities, encountering financial difficulties to seek respite through either a debt restructuring mechanism or the declaration of bankruptcy. These prescribed legal avenues empower debtors to effectuate the eradication or modification of their financial liabilities, subject to the oversight of a duly authorized licensed insolvency trustee. The BIA delineates the specific entitlements and responsibilities bestowed upon debtors, creditors, and insolvency trustees, thereby guiding the intricate course of bankruptcy restructuring or liquidation proceedings.

On the other hand, the CCAA is specifically designed for larger corporate restructurings. It provides a mechanism for insolvent corporations with debts exceeding $5 million to restructure their affairs and debts while continuing to operate under court protection. The CCAA aims to facilitate the rehabilitation of financially distressed companies and maximize returns to creditors.

Debtors under the BIA have the right to seek debt relief through bankruptcy or a restructuring proposal, which is a formal agreement to settle debts with creditors. Creditors have the right to receive payments as per the priority set out in the BIA and participate in the insolvency proceedings. Licensed Insolvency Trustees play a crucial role in administering the insolvency process, ensuring compliance with the legislation, and facilitating communication between debtors and creditors.

Under the CCAA, companies facing financial difficulties can apply for court protection from their creditors to restructure their operations and debts. The court appoints a monitor to oversee the restructuring process and ensure that the interests of all stakeholders are considered. The CCAA process allows companies to negotiate with creditors, develop a restructuring plan, and seek court approval for its implementation. There is a similar process for company restructuring under the BIA. Each process has its advantages and disadvantages.

In conclusion, the Canadian insolvency laws set out in the BIA and CCAA provide a structured approach to dealing with financial distress for individuals and corporations alike. By understanding their rights and obligations under these laws, debtors, creditors, and LITs can navigate the insolvency process effectively and work towards achieving a fair resolution for all parties involved.

An image of a female lawyer and a female accountant superimposed over a complex maze representing the professional advisors helping an insolvent debtor determine if bankruptcy protection in order to restructure their massive debt load or filing for a liquidation bankruptcy is the right option to resolve their debt problems.
insolvency meaning

Insolvency Meaning: Key Indicators Of Insolvency

Key indicators and examples of insolvency typically include:

  1. Trouble in Paying Financial Obligations: Among the key signs of insolvency is when a person or business constantly battles to make debt payments on time, such as paying bills, personal loans, mortgages, or suppliers.
  2. Cash Flow Insolvency: Insolvency commonly materializes through cash flow difficulties, where there is insufficient cash handy to cover expenses as they come to be due. This might cause constant overdraft accounts, NSF cheques, or late payments to financial institutions.
  3. Balance Sheet Insolvency Through Increasing Debt Levels: A significant increase in debt levels compared to income or assets is a warning sign of approaching insolvency. Rising debt amounts integrated with a restricted capacity to pay indicate financial distress.
  4. Declining Earnings: For organizations, decreasing profits or continual losses over time indicates underlying financial problems. Gross margin tightening or vanishing leads to an inability to generate adequate revenue to cover expenditures.
  5. Balance Sheet Insolvency Through Asset Erosion: Balance sheet insolvency can also happen due to a decline in the value of assets while liabilities stay relatively flat or rise. When assets are not able to cover liabilities because of substantial impairment, that is a classical insolvency meaning.
  6. Lawsuits by Creditors (and maybe even customers): Legal action taken by lenders and/or suppliers, such as lawsuits, collection initiatives, or repossession process, can be a clear indication that financial troubles have reached a critical point and the insolvency of the debtor.
  7. Unable to Obtain Credit: Difficulty in getting brand-new credit or protecting favourable lending terms happens when lenders or suppliers see the specific person or business as a higher credit risk, most likely because of underlying financial instability.
  8. Use of Short-Term Funding for Long-Term Obligations: Relying upon short-term financings, such as credit cards or payday advances, to cover longer-term commitments, such as making payroll or normal monthly expenses, shows financial stress and prospective insolvency.
  9. Non-Financial Signs of Distress: Beyond money metrics, non-financial indicators of distress, such as management turnover, decreasing client base, or distributor concerns, can additionally suggest underlying financial issues leading to insolvency.
  10. Credit Rating Downgrades: A downgrade in credit ratings by credit score firms indicates perceived economic weak points and boosts borrowing costs, intensifying financial problems for individuals or businesses.

Spotting these key signs of insolvency is something that anyone should be able to do, whether you practice in the insolvency world full-time or not at all. At the onset lawyers and accountants can assist in proactive actions for people and enterprises to deal with economic obstacles and seek professional help. Lawyers and accountants can do so before getting into an irreversible state of insolvency requiring the retainer of a licensed insolvency trustee.

Insolvency Meaning: Types of Insolvency Proceedings

People and companies dealing with their economic problems have options regarding insolvency proceedings. Each option tackles one or more particular issues and the solution utilized must be able to satisfy the individual’s or business’s special scenarios. Here are the primary Canadian insolvency procedures:

Individual Bankruptcy

Personal bankruptcy is a legal process developed to assist individuals who are incapable of paying off their debts. Through this bankruptcy proceeding, people can get rid of or reorganize their financial obligations under the guidance of a Trustee. The procedure entails selling off assets to pay off creditors as established by the BIA and getting relief from frustrating financial responsibilities to get a fresh start.

Corporate Restructuring

Company restructuring is a financial procedure that allows companies encountering economic distress to restructure their business operations, financial debts, and frameworks. This kind of bankruptcy protection case intends to help companies end up being economically feasible once again by renegotiating financial obligations, selling redundant or no longer needed assets, or carrying out functional adjustments to the business. Business restructuring can help companies prevent bankruptcy and get back to running successfully and profitably. It can occur under either the CCAA or BIA.

Consumer or Division I Proposals

Consumer proposals and Division I proposals are formal arrangements discussed between a debtor and their creditors to work out unsecured debts without filing personal bankruptcy. In either type of proposal, the debtor promises to pay off a part of the debt over a prolonged period, not greater than 60 months, using monthly payments or with a lump-sum payment. In return for doing so, when they are finished paying the portion of the total debt stated in the proposal, the full amount of debt is extinguished. This insolvency remedy enables people to stay clear of the preconception and lasting repercussions of bankruptcy while still resolving their financial problems.

Those who owe $250,000 or less, apart from any financial obligations secured by a registration against the debtor’s home, can use a consumer proposal. For those other people with higher financial obligations, or companies, the Division I Proposal process is readily available. Both kinds of proposals are administered under the BIA.

Key Points to Remember:

  • Personal bankruptcy means that assets will be liquidated to repay debts.
  • Corporate restructuring focuses on rearranging company operations to end up being financially and practically viable.
  • Consumer proposals are a debt solution that allows people to negotiate payment plans with their creditors.

Understanding the different sorts of bankruptcy proceedings is crucial for people and businesses encountering financial difficulties and their legal and accounting professionals. By discovering these alternatives and seeking suitable specialist suggestions, debtors can navigate their financial difficulties and work in the direction of a fresh financial and stress-free start.

An image of a female lawyer and a female accountant superimposed over a complex maze representing the professional advisors helping an insolvent debtor determine if bankruptcy protection in order to restructure their massive debt load or filing for a liquidation bankruptcy is the right option to resolve their debt problems.
insolvency meaning

Insolvency Meaning: Roles of Lawyers and Accountants

When it comes to navigating the complex world of insolvency matters, the roles of lawyers and accountants are crucial in providing expert guidance and support to individuals and businesses. Let’s delve into the specific responsibilities and contributions of these professionals in handling financial challenges:

Lawyers play a vital role in supplying legal advice and representation to clients with insolvency concerns. They are educated to analyze and use the laws related to personal bankruptcy, financial debt restructuring, and various other insolvency procedures. By having a legal expert on their side, people and companies can make informed decisions regarding their financial situation and lawful rights. For those lawyers who do not practice insolvency, knowing the basics at the very least gets the conversation started.

In corporate restructurings, the role of the company lawyer is vital. The company’s legal firm will have extensive expertise in specific special assets, such as patents, trademarks and specialized licenses.

Proficiency in Preparing Financial Statements and Developing Restructuring Strategies

Accountants bring important financial knowledge to the table by helping clients in preparing accurate financial statements and creating reliable restructuring strategies which need to consist of comprehensive budget plans and cash-flow estimates. They possess the required skills to analyze financial information, determine essential areas for improvement, and develop detailed strategies to deal with economic difficulties. By leveraging their knowledge, clients can get clarity on their financial standing and chart a path toward economic stability. Regular tax compliance and filings, along with the income tax result of numerous restructuring plans, is likewise an essential part of the restructuring that can be carried out by the firm’s exterior accountant.

By doing this, accountants can be an indispensable part of the restructuring process assisting the licensed insolvency trustee.

Insolvency Meaning: Helping Clients Facing Financial Difficulties

Both lawyers and accountants play a collective role in helping clients who encounter monetary challenges. Whether it’s bargaining with lenders, representing clients in court proceedings, or offering strategic financial suggestions, these professionals collaborate to sustain their clients facing insolvency. Their combined efforts can assist clients work through the intricacies of insolvency and emerge more powerful.

The roles of lawyers and accountants are crucial when it pertains to dealing with insolvency matters and leading clients through economic chaos. By offering legal advice, financial knowledge, and undeviating support, these professionals play a critical role in aiding people and businesses to overcome economic obstacles and lead the way to a brighter economic future.

Insolvency Meaning: Typical Insolvency Issues Dealt With by Clients

Facing insolvency can be a daunting and frustrating experience for individuals and companies alike. It generally includes a variety of financial difficulties and stress that can significantly affect one’s economic stability and future. Below are some common insolvency concerns dealt with by clients and exactly how to address them:

Increasing Debts, Creditor Pressure, and Cash-Flow Obstacles

One of the key indications of insolvency is the accumulation of increasing debts that become progressively difficult to pay off. This circumstance is usually intensified by creditor pressure, where creditors might start demanding loan repayment or starting lawsuits to recover what they are owed. Additionally, cash-flow obstacles can better exacerbate the economic pressure, making it tough for people or companies to cover their expenses and financial debt responsibilities.

To address these issues, it is necessary to take a positive strategy by analyzing the total financial obligation load, working out with creditors better and realistic credit terms and payment strategies, and applying techniques to improve cash flow. Looking for licensed insolvency trustee recommendations or credit counselling can additionally be advantageous in working through these difficulties and establishing a sustainable financial debt monitoring strategy.

Identifying Warning Signs of Insolvency Early On

Early discovery of insolvency warning signs is crucial in taking prompt rehabilitative actions to prevent more economic deterioration. Some typical indications consist of persistent cash flow issues, missed payments to lenders and suppliers, declining sales or income, enhancing dependence on credit products and short-term loans, and lawsuits such as court judgments or liens against assets.

By acknowledging these warning signs beforehand, people and businesses can look for ideal assistance from their accountants, lawyers, or insolvency professionals to discover practical solutions and prevent much more severe effects such as bankruptcy.

Exploring Alternatives for Debt Relief

When dealing with insolvency, discovering debt alleviation options becomes crucial to attaining financial security and staying clear of overwhelming financial obligation burdens. Some usual financial debt alleviation solutions include debt consolidation using a debt consolidation loan, financial debt settlement, debt restructuring, debt forgiveness with formal financial debt restructuring and even filing bankruptcy (as a last resort).

Each choice has its advantages and negative aspects, depending upon the individual’s or company’s financial situation and goals. It is crucial to assess the readily available alternatives very carefully and look for experienced advice to identify which one will be the most proper insolvency fighting technique that lines up with your client’s demands and conditions.

An image of a female lawyer and a female accountant superimposed over a complex maze representing the professional advisors helping an insolvent debtor determine if bankruptcy protection in order to restructure their massive debt load or filing for a liquidation bankruptcy is the right option to resolve their debt problems.
insolvency meaning

Insolvency Meaning: Ethical Issues To Consider In Insolvency Administration

Maintaining Client Privacy and Preventing Conflicts of Interest

Among the core moral factors to consider in insolvency practice is the obligation to preserve client confidentiality and avoid conflicts of interest. Insolvency experts are handed over a large amount of delicate information regarding their client’s financial affairs, which need to continue to be private. The only exemption is if the court directs the Trustee to disclose the info.

Although there is not the very same expectation of privacy as there remains in the client-lawyer relationship, by vigilantly safeguarding client confidentiality, lawyers play a crucial and distinct role for an insolvent debtor who requires a guarantee of confidentiality when seeking insolvency recommendations.

Performing in the Very Best Interests of Clients

Performing in the very best interests of clients is a basic concept that underpins an ethical insolvency practice. Insolvency practitioners have a fiduciary responsibility to prioritize the well-being of their clients and make decisions that advance the client’s interests rather than serve their own interests.

By approaching each situation with a dedication to advocating for the client’s wellness, insolvency specialists can show their devotion to honest conduct. This involves making choices that align with the client’s needs and functioning towards accomplishing the best end result in challenging economic situations.

Transparency and Integrity Throughout the Insolvency Case

Openness and integrity are crucial components that need to penetrate every stage of the insolvency process. Insolvency professionals must perform with honesty, justness, and transparency to preserve the trust of all stakeholders involved. By promoting transparent interaction and maintaining high moral requirements, insolvency professionals can make certain that the insolvency case is conducted with integrity. This not only improves the reliability of the professional but also instills confidence in the fairness and integrity of the entire process.

Insolvency Meaning Frequently Asked Questions

This Brandon’s Blog has tried to address the most frequently asked questions about insolvency meaning. The FAQ checklist is as follows:

  1. What is insolvency?
  2. What are the essential signs of insolvency?
  3. Is there a difference between insolvency and bankruptcy?
  4. What are the differences between individual and corporate bankruptcy?
  5. What laws govern bankruptcy in Canada?
  6. What are the duties of licensed insolvency trustees in the Canadian insolvency process?
  7. What are the possible ramifications of insolvency for both creditors and debtors?
  8. What options are available for solving financial debt problems in cases of insolvency?
  9. What ethical factors should be thought about in a Canadian insolvency process?
  10. Exactly how can professionals help clients facing insolvency concerns?

You can utilize the above frequently asked question as a type of self-test. You will find all the answers above in this Brandon’s Blog.

Insolvency Meaning: Conclusion

Understanding Canadian insolvency laws is essential for effectively handling financial distress situations. By gaining a solid foundation in these laws, professionals can better serve their client’s needs and guide them through complex insolvency matters with confidence and competence. One of the key benefits of having a comprehensive understanding of insolvency laws is the ability to provide tailored solutions that align with the client’s specific circumstances. This enables professionals to offer personalized guidance and support, ultimately helping clients address their financial challenges strategically and effectively.

By assisting clients in navigating insolvency matters proficiently, lawyers and accountants can empower them to take proactive steps towards a brighter financial future. This includes providing insights on debt restructuring, bankruptcy options, and other relevant strategies that can improve financial sustainability and stability. Ultimately, the goal of leveraging a foundational understanding of Canadian insolvency laws is to facilitate positive outcomes for clients, equipping them with the knowledge and resources needed to overcome financial obstacles and achieve long-term success. This also allows them to remain your client!

I hope you enjoyed this insolvency meaning Brandon’s Blog. Individuals and business owners must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties, consumer debt and company debt and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses with debt problems that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns and more associated with your company debt are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these overwhelming debt financial health concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual who has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own and it does not mean that you are a bad person. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now! We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring. We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel. Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, to begin your debt-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

An image of a female lawyer and a female accountant superimposed over a complex maze representing the professional advisors helping an insolvent debtor determine if bankruptcy protection in order to restructure their massive debt load or filing for a liquidation bankruptcy is the right option to resolve their debt problems.
insolvency meaning

 

 

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DEMYSTIFYING COMPANY LIQUIDATION: MASSIVE INSIGHTS FROM ONTARIO’S LEGAL JOURNEY

company liquidation

Company Liquidation: Introduction

Company liquidation involves navigating a myriad of legal and financial obligations, particularly when a company is deemed insolvent. This process requires a thorough understanding of the duties and responsibilities of company directors, legal obligations in insolvency proceedings, and the roles of licensed insolvency trustees and the Court. Identifying insolvent companies and differentiating between secured and unsecured creditors are also fundamental aspects of the liquidation process.

In the fast-paced and competitive world of business, trust and collaboration are often the key ingredients for success. The recent legal case of Srivastava v. DLT Global Inc. 2023 ONSC 7103 (CanLII) serves as a powerful reminder of just how crucial these elements are in maintaining a thriving business. By delving into the details of the case, I explore the consequences of a breakdown in trust and collaboration and highlight the lessons that can be learned from this real-life scenario.

Join in this Brandon’s Blog Post as I explore the decision-making process in company liquidation, from understanding the options to implementing the liquidation strategy. We will also discuss the personal and legal ramifications, covering topics such as personal liability for business owners and directors, voluntary versus compulsory liquidations, and the voluntary liquidation process.

Whether you’re a business owner facing insolvency or a professional seeking insights into company liquidation, this article will provide valuable information to navigate the complex landscape of liquidation proceedings in Ontario.

Company Liquidation: Understanding the Basics

Company liquidation is a critical process for closing a limited company that either can no longer meet its financial obligations or if solvent, cannot continue due to other reasons. When a business undergoes liquidation, its assets are sold off, and the proceeds are used to pay back outstanding creditors.

There are two predominant types of company liquidation: voluntary and compulsory. Voluntary liquidation, which may be initiated by the shareholders or a court order, is often chosen when a company is solvent but burdened by debts. Compulsory liquidations happen through a court order when a company can either no longer pay its debts or, management is dysfunctional and can no longer work together to properly wind up the corporation and its business.

Liquidation proceedings are typically overseen by a licensed insolvency trustee. Company directors must comply with legal obligations during this process to avoid personal liability, particularly if they have given a personal guarantee for business debts.

A common cause for company liquidation is a significant drop in business, such as the loss of a major contract. Although liquidation can entail substantial costs, options exist even for companies without assets. Business owners must seek expert advice to ensure a smooth transition during the liquidation process. Here’s a simplified overview of the liquidation process:

  1. Decision to liquidate (voluntary or court-ordered)
  2. Appointment of a licensed insolvency practitioner
  3. Asset liquidation
  4. Settlement of debts with creditors
  5. Redemption of shares to the extent there is cash to do so
  6. Dissolution of the company
image of a company owner sitting in the middle of his professional advisers and he is worried because his debt ridden company must now enter a company liquidation
company liquidation

Company Liquidation: Understanding Insolvency in Canada

In Canada, insolvency is a legal term indicating a company’s financial distress, where a business is unable to meet its obligations as they come due, or ceases to pay current liabilities during normal operations. This situation often leads to company liquidation or other forms of bankruptcy proceedings governed by various statutes, including the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), the Winding-up and Restructuring Act, and the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

Conversely, insolvent companies are subject to the aforementioned insolvency laws, which set out the protective legal framework allowing for a fair and orderly process of winding up a company’s affairs and distributing its assets. Insolvency laws in Canada are designed not only to adjudicate the distribution of company assets but also to provide possible recovery pathways for financially distressed businesses.

Identifying Insolvent Companies

Insolvent companies are characterized by their inability to discharge their financial liabilities as they become due. A more comprehensive view of insolvency includes the scenario where the total liabilities of a company exceed the fair valuation of its assets, suggesting that even the sale of all its assets would not cover the outstanding debts.

It is therefore essential for business owners and company directors to recognize the early signs of insolvency and to understand the consequences it may have for the future of their ventures. Identifying an insolvent company promptly is critical as it enables directors to take necessary action to either revive the company or initiate an appropriate exit strategy.

Duties and Responsibilities of Company Directors in Insolvency

When a company is facing insolvency, directors hold increased responsibilities and must pivot their focus to prioritize the interests of their creditors. This can involve refraining from incurring additional debt, avoiding transactions that undervalue company assets, and ensuring that no further detriment is caused to the financial standing of the creditors. Failure to act responsibly in the face of insolvency can result in allegations of wrongful or even fraudulent trading, potentially leading to personal liability for the directors. Timely, responsible action by directors is essential for limiting potential damages and preserving the trust and rights of creditors involved.

The liquidation process for insolvent companies in Canada involves stringent legal obligations and is closely monitored by the courts. Directors must comply with laws set forth by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act or engage in processes like Company Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings, which offer an alternative to outright liquidation. In practice, the process is administered by a court-approved licensed insolvency practitioner (IP) who oversees the liquidation of assets, repayment of creditors, and an investigation into the reasons for the company’s failure, including examining the conduct of its directors.

Commencing company liquidation does not automatically cancel existing contracts; however, the entity in liquidation has statutory provisions under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act to terminate agreements that are no longer viable or beneficial.

Directors must understand their legal obligations and the procedural steps involved to ensure that they comply with the law and mitigate any risk of personal liability. The role of IP is pivotal in managing the process to achieve an equitable outcome for all parties and to facilitate a lawful and orderly conclusion to the company’s affairs.

Company Liquidation: The Role of Insolvency Practitioners

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) are professionals licensed, authorized and supervised by the Federal Government to act concerning an insolvent individual, partnership, or company. These specialists take control of businesses that face financial difficulties to achieve the best possible outcome for shareholders, board of directors, employees, and – most significantly – creditors. Their expertise is essential in navigating the complex process of business liquidation including the sale of assets.

LITs meticulously itemize business expenses and assess the value of remaining assets when a business is ending. This is a vital step in determining how best to distribute assets among creditors. They are also responsible for conducting thorough investigations into why a company failed, examining the conduct of its directors, and sometimes reviewing the actions of third parties, like creditors.

The process they oversee – whether it’s a voluntary company liquidation or an involuntary liquidation – adheres to a strict legal hierarchy for repaying creditors. This ensures a clear and equitable distribution of assets, even though unsecured creditors may receive little to no return. The ultimate aim of an insolvent liquidation, guided by the LIT, is to provide a dividend to all classes of creditors to the extent that the company’s assets allow.

The Official Receiver and their Role in Liquidation Proceedings

The Official Receiver is a local public official within the Federal Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. They play a pivotal role in managing the insolvency process in Canada. This includes setting standards, providing directives to LITs on how to proceed in certain situations and overall supervisory responsibility of LITs.

Secured Creditors vs Unsecured Creditors: What You Need to Know

In the hierarchy of repayments during a company liquidation, understanding the distinction between secured and unsecured creditors is crucial. Secured creditors are those with a legal claim on assets, often due to a lien or a security interest that guarantees their investment. Should a company dissolve, these creditors are prioritized to receive payment from the sale of the secured assets. Examples include lenders who financed company property or equipment.

On the other hand, unsecured creditors do not have this collateral backing. They include entities like credit card companies or suppliers with outstanding invoices. Once the secured creditors are paid, unsecured creditors fall next in line for any remaining funds, though often recovery rates are low or nonexistent.

Employees, as stakeholders, are also categorized as unsecured creditors, but may be prioritized differently depending on the jurisdiction and specific liquidation laws. In bankruptcy, secured creditors may take control of pledged assets to offset their losses, while unsecured creditors must wait to see if there are any funds left after the liquidation of unpledged assets.

Understanding these classifications is paramount for anyone involved in a company liquidation, as they dictate the order of payments and potential recovery. This knowledge can influence decisions made prior to and throughout the liquidation process, impacting all parties involved, from the business owner to the smallest creditor.

Creditor Type

Description

Recovery Source

Priority in Company Liquidation

Secured

Creditors with a legal claim on assets (e.g., banks have taken a security interest for their loan, property liens)

Sale of specific collateral

High

Unsecured

Creditors without a claim on assets (e.g., suppliers, credit card companies)

Remaining business assets after secured debts are paid

Lower

By managing secured and unsecured creditors efficiently, Insolvency Practitioners can ensure a fair and lawful distribution of a company’s remaining assets, while acknowledging the varying levels of risk each creditor assumed.

image of a company owner sitting in the middle of his professional advisers and he is worried because his debt ridden company must now enter a company liquidation
company liquidation

The Company Liquidation Process: From Decision-Making to Implementation

The journey of company liquidation begins with a crucial decision-making phase, a stage where the future of a business and its stakeholders hangs in the balance. Whether a company opts for voluntary liquidation as part of a strategic exit strategy or faces the harsh reality of insolvency, the liquidation process demands a careful, planned approach to implement.

A solvent company considering voluntary company liquidation might be doing so for reasons such as the directors’ retirement or a strategic decision that the business has run its course. On the contrary, a liquidation of the assets of an insolvent company is triggered when a company cannot meet its financial obligations and must cease operations. In both cases, engaging professional advisers, being a LIT and a lawyer early in the process, can offer guidance through each phase, from the planning stages to the final dissolution of the company.

When the voluntary liquidation process is chosen, a company can prepare in advance, making for a more orderly and manageable closure. This method is less intrusive compared to a court-imposed compulsory liquidation following a creditor’s application. Throughout the process, the appointed insolvency practitioner works to sell off assets and settle debts, culminating in the formal winding up of the company.

In the event of an involuntary company liquidation, the proceedings begin following a winding-up petition from creditors. Legal mandates spell out the steps to be taken, from appointment of a liquidator to notifying and paying out creditors. The process may differ slightly from province to province where specific local laws affect the liquidation process.

In either scenario, the overarching goal is to handle assets and debts in conformity with legal and ethical obligations, and ultimately, to provide clarity and closure to all parties involved.

Making the Decision to Liquidate: Understanding the Options

When the decision looms to liquidate a company, it’s paramount for business owners to understand their options. A company’s status—solvent or insolvent—plays a pivotal role in determining the path taken in liquidation. Solvent companies generally have the luxury of choice, where directors may opt for a company liquidation as an exit strategy when the business has fulfilled its purpose or due to retirement.

Alternatively, for insolvent companies, the decision is less voluntary and often more urgent. Directors may initiate a liquidation to preempt spiralling debts and legal actions by creditors, or they may find themselves in the throes of a bankruptcy protection filing, where a court determines what will happen with the business.

The voluntary initiation of a company liquidation before reaching a crisis point can be less traumatic for a company and its personnel, allowing the liquidator to manage a planned and orderly process.

Company Assets and Outstanding Debts: Navigating the Financial Obligations

Once a company enters the liquidation phase, addressing the financial aspects follows swiftly. This involves a comprehensive accounting of company assets and a thorough evaluation of outstanding debts. The liquidator’s role here is integral. They’re tasked with the identification and valuation of all company assets, assessing business assets like inventory, property, and machinery. Following the liquidation sale, they oversee the distribution of proceeds to creditors, prioritizing secured over unsecured creditors, with any excess then directed to shareholders or the owner.

The focus shifts to the company’s debts, with secured creditors receiving payment first due to their collateral backing. Unsecured creditors, such as trade creditors, are then considered. Insolvency practitioners navigate these waters, ensuring a fair and legal conclusion is reached, even as unsecured creditors may recover only a fraction of what is owed if anything at all.

The Sale of Business Assets and the Exit Strategy

The culmination of a liquidation process lies in the sale of business assets—an exercise aimed at converting the company’s holdings into liquid capital to settle its liabilities. Whether the liquidation is voluntary or a compulsory measure, the end goal remains the same: to conclude the business’s affairs in an orderly and effective manner. For company stakeholders, this can often mean selling off all components of a business—stock, fixtures, equipment, and even intellectual property.

Business owners may mark the liquidation of assets as a significant part of their exit strategy. Especially in a voluntary company liquidation, it allows them to retire, recalibrate, or move on from the company in a structured and anticipated way. Conversely, in an insolvency scenario, liquidation acts as a critical means to mitigate the impact on creditors, shareholders, and the business reputation.

By converting assets into cash, liquidation can fulfill outstanding financial obligations and, in some fortunate cases, result in a surplus for the company’s shareholders. Regardless of the circumstances, the conclusive act of selling off assets and settling the company’s affairs offers a clear yet often bittersweet period of transition for those involved. Whether it will be a long or shorter period of transition depends on the complexities of the business in company liquidation.

image of a company owner sitting in the middle of his professional advisers and he is worried because his debt ridden company must now enter a company liquidation
company liquidation

Company liquidation, whether voluntary or involuntary carries significant personal and legal ramifications that extend beyond the immediate dissolution of business operations. Directors and business owners need to be cognizant of the implications of liquidating their company, as the consequences of failing to adhere to legal requirements can be severe.

Understanding Personal Liability: The Impact on Business Owners and Directors

In the event of a company’s insolvency and subsequent liquidation, the directors’ conduct leading up to this point comes under scrutiny. Directors of insolvent companies must adhere to high standards of corporate governance, and failing to do so may result in personal liability. This scrutiny is aimed at uncovering any wrongful or fraudulent trading activities. If discovered, directors can be compelled to contribute to the company’s outstanding debts, significantly impacting their finances.

Moreover, if directors have provided personal guarantees for company borrowing, they can also be held accountable for these debts. This risk heightens the importance of seeking professional legal advice before initiating any company liquidation proceedings. A proactive approach, including ensuring that all debts and obligations are satisfied, protects business owners from the pitfalls of personal liability.

Finally, directors are liable for any unpaid salary or wages and any statutory withholdings not remitted to the government.

Voluntary vs Compulsory Liquidations: Factors to Consider

Understanding the difference between voluntary and compulsory liquidation is paramount for any business owner or director contemplating the end of their company’s operations. In voluntary liquidation, which requires a special resolution and the consent of shareholders, the business can be wound down in an orderly fashion, assets sold off, and creditors paid in an agreed-upon order. This option puts the business in control of its exit strategy.

Compulsory company liquidation, on the other hand, is not within the company’s control and occurs when economic conditions, company regulations, and financial distress lead to a court order forcing liquidation. Such unfavourable circumstances often stem from insolvency and more often than not, failure to fulfill legal obligations. Compulsory liquidation subjects the company to a court-appointed liquidator’s oversight, who will distribute assets to satisfy creditors without the company’s input in the order of repayment.

The voluntary liquidation process is initiated by a company’s shareholders via a special resolution and is a methodical path toward winding down company affairs. It begins with a formal decision to cease operations, involves reaching out to a licensed insolvency practitioner, and requires calculated steps to manage the cessation of business affairs.

After shareholders’ approval, company assets are assessed and sold to pay debts. Secured creditors are prioritized, followed by unsecured creditors. Any remaining funds are then distributed among stakeholders or redirected towards the business owner’s subsequent ventures. Once all financial obligations have been met, the company is formally dissolved, marking the completion of the company liquidation process and providing a clear endpoint to the company’s existence.

image of a company owner sitting in the middle of his professional advisers and he is worried because his debt ridden company must now enter a company liquidation
company liquidation

Company Liquidation: The Importance of Trust and Collaboration in Business – Lessons from the Srivastava v. DLT Global Inc. Case

I won’t go into all the details of the case, but rather, provide an overview of the important points to be taken away from this legal battle. You can read the entire judge’s decision by clicking on this link. The case revolves around Neeraj Srivastava, a co-founder and former director of DLT Global Inc., and his application to wind up the company. The court ultimately dismissed the application, but the underlying issues uncovered shed light on the critical role of trust and collaboration in business relationships.

Background

Mr. Srivastava’s application was based on the argument that DLT Global could not continue its business due to significant liabilities. He claimed that they faced financial difficulties, had an unsustainable burn rate, and engaged in extensive litigation. These issues, according to Mr. Srivastava, justified the winding up of the company.

Trust and Collaboration

A breakdown in trust and collaboration between Mr. Srivastava and his co-founder, Loudon Owen, emerged as a central issue in the case. Mr. Srivastava alleged that his reasonable expectations as a co-founder and shareholder were not met and that he was unfairly treated by DLT Global. On the other hand, DLT Global argued that Mr. Srivastava engaged in misconduct and threatened to harm the business.

Lessons Learned

1. Clear Communication and Expectations: The Srivastava v. DLT Global Inc. case underscores the importance of clear communication and setting realistic expectations from the outset of a business venture. It is crucial for all parties involved to have a shared understanding of their roles, responsibilities, and the direction of the company.

2. Building and Maintaining Trust: Trust is the foundation of any successful business relationship. It requires open and honest communication, transparency, and a mutual understanding of values and objectives. Without trust, collaboration becomes challenging, and the business may suffer as a result.

3. Resolving Conflicts Effectively: Conflicts are inevitable in any business relationship. However, it is how these conflicts are resolved that can make or break a partnership. By adopting a collaborative and problem-solving approach, parties can find mutually beneficial solutions and prevent the escalation of disputes.

4. Seeking Alternative Remedies: The Srivastava v. DLT Global Inc. case highlights the importance of exploring alternative remedies before considering the drastic step of winding up a company. Parties should consider mediation, negotiation, or other dispute resolution mechanisms to address their grievances and protect their interests.

Company Liquidation: Closing Thoughts

The Srivastava v. DLT Global Inc. case serves as a cautionary tale for businesses about the criticality of trust and collaboration. It emphasizes the need for clear communication, building and maintaining trust, effective conflict resolution, and exploring alternative remedies before resorting to extreme measures. By prioritizing these aspects, businesses can foster a healthy and productive environment that enables growth and success.

In conclusion, the lessons learned from this case remind us that trust and collaboration are not just buzzwords but essential components of any thriving business. By embracing these values, entrepreneurs and business leaders can create a solid foundation for long-term success, even in the face of challenges. Let us take these lessons to heart and build businesses that prioritize trust, collaboration, and mutual respect.

I hope you enjoyed this company liquidation Brandon’s Blog. If you or your company are struggling with managing overwhelming debt in this high-interest environment, don’t worry – there are some things you can do to take control of the situation.

Individuals and business owners must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties, consumer debt and company debt and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses with debt problems that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns and more associated with your company debt are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these financial health concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual who has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own and it does not mean that you are a bad person. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

image of a company owner sitting in the middle of his professional advisers and he is worried because his debt ridden company must now enter a company liquidation
company liquidation
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADIAN RECEIVERSHIPS: SECURED CREDITOR’S CHALLENGE TO BLOCK APPROVED BUYER TOO LATE TO THE PARTY

Receiverships introduction

Step into this week’s edition of Brandon’s Blog! Our topic this week explains the complicated landscape of Canadian receiverships. Our journey into a world where secured lenders sometimes grapple with their unhappiness with a receiver’s recommendation for a certain court-sanctioned buyer, wanting to buy the holdings of an insolvent enterprise.

Simplifying your journey, I shall use a recent, tangible case study to unveil how secured creditors can endeavour to wield influence in court-supervised receiverships. I will deconstruct the technical terms and explain every nuance in a manner that you will easily understand.

Canadian receiverships are a pursuit of balance, entwined with the rightful entitlements of secured creditors through the prism of procedural clarity and the scales of impartiality, as demanded by the court in the realm of Canadian receiverships.

Understanding Canadian receiverships and approved buyers

Within the legal landscape of Canada encompassing matters of commercial contention, there is the intricate notion of receivership. This process entails the designation of one of the two types of receivers; either a privately-appointed receiver or a court-appointed receiver. A receiver is vested with the authority to assume dominion over a business’s array of assets and properties. This authority arises from situations of monetary default on their secured loans.

It is prudent to retain awareness that the role of a receiver can only be filled by a licensed trustee for assuming the mantle of a receiver within the confines of Canada’s legal expanse.

The fulcrum upon which the inception of the receivership mechanism pivots is usually the inability of secured creditors to recoup their financial outlay from a debtor, who in turn is incapacitated in discharging its pecuniary obligations.

The receiver becomes vested with the possession and control of the assets, affects their liquidation, and subsequently allocates the ensuing sale proceeds among the cadre of creditors within the hierarchy delineated by the legal ladder of priority of claims.

As an instrumental constituent of the commercial legal architecture in Canada, the receivership process endeavours to safeguard the vested interests of both creditors and debtors. It offers creditors the avenue to recoup either the entirety or a portion of their outstanding amounts due.

Concurrently, beleaguered commercial entities are afforded the prospect of either orchestrating a financial reconfiguration that extricates them from the quagmire of their fiscal problems or alternatively, facilitating the divestiture of assets with the aspiration of facilitating the uninterrupted continuity of the business, but under new ownership. It, therefore, emerges as an indispensable instrument within the gamut of the Canadian legal paradigm, upholding the equilibrium of economic constancy.

Who is an approved buyer in the context of a receivership sale?

In the detailed context of a receivership sale, an approved buyer describes an individual or entity that has effectively met the specific requirements stated by the designated receiver. These standards encompass a variety of variables, including financial disclosure, a shown understanding of the sale’s terms and conditions, and the tried and tested capacity to finalize the purchase quickly. Usually, the recognition of an approved buyer takes place within a defined bidding procedure, in which potential purchasers compete to meet these developed requirements.

Once identified, an approved buyer ends up being subject to the terms and terms laid out within the sale arrangement. It is the receiver’s responsibility to ensure that the sale is carried out with a commitment to fairness and transparency. This consists of the duty to pick an approved buyer who not only has the capacity to efficiently wrap up the transaction but also has the ability to enhance the overall value of the assets that are being sold.

The fiduciary responsibility of the receiver is paramount throughout this process. The receiver is obliged to act in the very best interests of all parties, which encompasses lenders and other stakeholders. For that reason, the receiver’s duty surpasses the simple identification of an approved buyer; it includes securing the integrity of the sale, guaranteeing fairness for all parties, and ultimately maximizing the value that can stem from the assets being sold within the context of the receivership.

Image depicting a dramatic clash between a gavel symbolizing secured creditors' rights and a fading corporate logo, representing distressed companies. A ticking clock and courthouse backdrop emphasize urgency and legal battles in Canadian receiverships.
receiverships

The role of secured creditors and their rights in receiverships

In the world of Canadian receiverships, secured creditors play an essential function in identifying the destiny of troubled companies. Recognizing their rights is essential in going through this complex landscape. Secured creditors have the legal authority to take enforcement proceedings against the assets covered by their security and have a higher priority in payment contrasted to unsecured creditors. They can either privately appoint or apply to the court for the appointment of a receiver.

The court-appointed receiver acts as a neutral party in charge of taking care of and selling the assets. The secured lenders have the right to challenge court-approved buyers if they think the receivership sale process is unfair or if they have a better deal. Nonetheless, safeguarding their legal rights within receiverships calls for a detailed understanding of the legal complexities and efficient timing associated with receiverships.

A secured creditor plays a crucial duty in the sale process. As the main financial stakeholder given their claim against the secured assets, the secured creditor has a vested interest in the end result of the sale procedure. The court-appointed sale procedure includes the marketing and sale of the debtor’s assets and properties, which inevitably establishes the amount of funds that will be available to pay over against the secured debt.

For that reason, the secured lender has a significant interest in guaranteeing that the sale procedure is conducted in a way that optimizes the recuperation of funds. The secured creditor’s beneficial interest in the sale procedure is shown in their capability to approve or reject the sale of assets in a private appointment and carries a level of weight with the court for a court-approved sale. This power allows them to protect their economic interests and ensure the very best feasible result from the sale process.

The timelines and stages of a receivership sale: The role of the approved buyer in Canadian receiverships

In Canadian receiverships, the role of the approved buyer is essential to the successful outcome of a receivership. In a court-appointed receivership, approved buyers are court-approved purchasers who typically offer the highest and most beneficial bid for the debtor company’s assets. They play a crucial role in maximizing the value of the distressed company and ensuring the best outcome for all parties involved. Their timely participation in the receivership process is instrumental in achieving sale finality and ultimately shaping the fate of the distressed entity.

In the world of Canadian receiverships, the involvement of court-approved buyers functions as a cornerstone in supporting an equitable and clear process. This essential process makes certain that every interested party has the possibility to take part in the bidding process for the assets being sold. The result of this bidding process finishes with the choice of the best overall bidder. This mechanism of operation is rooted in concepts of justness, striving to eliminate any type of unnecessary benefit that a solitary party might have over others.

When a company is placed into receivership, the assigned receiver assumes command over the assets as well as operational elements of the business. The purpose behind the orchestration of a receivership sale revolves around the liquidation of the firm’s holdings to get them out of the insolvent troubled company and into the hands of a buyer who can maximize their value. The timing and stages integral within receiverships have a level of fluidity depending upon the intricacy and complexity of the business’s operations and assets.

Generally, the receiver’s starting point is the meticulous groundwork and strategy in setting up the sale procedure. Typically, the initial stage involves the preparation and marketing of the sale of the assets. This is followed by the negotiation and acceptance of offers from interested parties. In court-appointed receiverships, once an offer is accepted, the sale is subject to court approval and then the transfer of ownership is completed.

As this complex process unravels, the receiver must follow rigid lawful as well as regulatory requirements, thereby promoting an environment of impartiality and transparency that emphasizes a fair sale process. In its totality, the underlying purpose of a receivership sale opens up as the optimization of the company’s asset values, a pursuit carried out in the service of all stakeholders’ well-being.

Image depicting a dramatic clash between a gavel symbolizing secured creditors' rights and a fading corporate logo, representing distressed companies. A ticking clock and courthouse backdrop emphasize urgency and legal battles in Canadian receiverships.
receiverships

When is it too late for a secured creditor to challenge an approved buyer in Canadian receiverships?

Within the intricate realm of Canadian receiverships, those holding the mantle of secured creditors find themselves navigating through a myriad of intricate challenges, especially when confronted with the task of contesting a buyer approved by the court. The genesis of these challenges emerges from the imperative to harmonize the rights of stakeholders with the irrevocability of a sale.

Timing emerges as an eminent concern for any actions by creditors, as secured creditors must expeditiously interpose to thwart the endorsement of an approved buyer. Such a stance necessitates astute contemplation encompassing not only the exigencies of insolvency statutes but also the jurisprudential lineage of past cases, in tandem with an astute assimilation of the considerations that judiciaries deliberate upon while adjudging the legitimacy of an opposition. The effective surmounting of these multifaceted impediments serves as the crucible through which a secured creditor’s sway attains its zenith, eventually moulding the denouement of an entity’s restructuring endeavour.

In Canadian receiverships, it is very important for secured creditors to understand when it is far too late to challenge an accepted buyer. A secured creditor has the status of a major stakeholder to object to the sale of property by a receiver. However, this objection needs to be made within an appropriate timespan. Normally this would be on the receiver’s motion to approve a specific buyer under an agreement of purchase and sale to buy the company’s assets in receivership.

If the creditor stays silent at the hearing, after being served with the receiver’s motion record, or worse, consents to the relief the receiver is requesting, it will be near impossible to change the outcome. Also, if the secured creditor waits too long to appeal the court’s decision on the approval of the buyer, it may be too late to overturn the accepted buyer.

The courts normally take into consideration variables such as the timing of the objection, the factors for the opposition, as well as whether the creditor had knowledge of the receiver’s motion recommending the sale. Therefore, it is essential for secured creditors to act without delay as well as seek legal advice in receiverships to ensure their rights are preserved and protected.

The Role of Investment and Due Diligence by Approved Buyers in Canadian receiverships

When potential investors turn their gaze toward the prospects of allocating resources in assets emanating from Canadian receiverships, a paramount imperative takes center stage—none other than the meticulous practice of due diligence. Embarking on this voyage entails a profound plunge into the annals of financials, operational intricacies, assets, and liabilities of pivotal suppliers—a linchpin to the enterprise’s continuity. Moreover, a comprehensive appraisal of the corporate entity’s visage within the tapestry of market conditions unfurls before them—an intricate matrix to fathom.

This immersive exploration fosters an enriched cognizance of the assets that conflate to shape the enterprise’s essence and the latent perils entwined. Concurrently, an assessment of the enterprise’s fiscal robustness commences, bifurcating between the financial vitality of the business itself and the overarching corporate infrastructure. This evaluation, ranging from debt metrics and asset portfolios to revenue inflows and the embryonic promise of future profitability, unfurls a tapestry conducive to ascertaining a judicious valuation, commensurate with inherent realities.

The compass of scrutiny extends further to encompass the realm of legality and regulation—a vista often overlooked yet of paramount significance. Engaging in a bout of legal due diligence emerges as the prudent course, an endeavour aimed at unearthing dormant legal quandaries or impending obligations that might cast a pall over operational congruence or intrinsic valuation.

As the due diligence crescendo navigates onward, an avenue laden with promise unfurls—plummeting into the corridors of potential betterment and restructuring, the twin gateways to magnifying operational yield. This orchestration, calibrated to fortify profitability, occupies a pivotal niche within the mosaic of considerations.

In the vanguard of this multifaceted expedition looms the bastion of market research—an indispensable edifice buttressed by industry ebbs and flows, the throes of competitive dynamics, and the overarching symphony of market demand. The synthesis of these nuanced factors culminates in an orchestration of knowledge that infuses sagacity into investment choices, ensuring an informed voyage into the tapestry of Canadian receiverships.

Within the realms of court-overseen receiverships in the Canadian context, the focal point unfailingly revolves around the paramount virtue of transparency. The bedrock of establishing confidence and credibility in the transaction resides in a meticulous and exhaustive due diligence endeavour. This endeavour, in its multifaceted essence, serves the dual purpose of ensuring equitability in pricing, commensurate with the genuine valuation of the assets on offer—an aspect that assumes cardinal significance for all stakeholders vested in the proceedings.

Furthermore, the inclusion of endorsed purchasers injects a paradigm of impartiality and impartiality into the entire procedural tapestry. Let us not be remiss in accounting for the aspect of legal conformity—a facet woven intricately into the fabric of this process. Said purchasers are vested with the task of scrutinizing potential legal conundrums, thereby preempting any semblance of post-sale imbroglio. An additional boon surfaces in the form of expedited procedural swiftness—a byproduct of the exhaustive due diligence undertaken.

Essentially, the realm of Canadian court-supervised receiverships beckons our attention to several pivotal considerations. First, and foremost, lies the meticulous endeavour undertaken by prospective buyers, involving an intricate choreography of research and analysis preceding their bids. This diligent preliminary inquiry manifests as a testament to their authenticity and competence, encapsulating an acute grasp of their enterprise. This facet’s significance stems from the heightened assurance it instills across the spectrum of participants, nurturing faith in their aptitude to consummate the transaction while adroitly managing the assets set to come under their aegis.

Segueing onwards, the confluence of comprehensive insights gleaned through rigorous due diligence serves as a compass directing prospective purchasers toward sagacious choices. These choices burgeon from the assimilation of manifold data points, sculpting a strategy to mitigate perils and optimize trajectories—calibrating the optimal approach for the assets earmarked for takeover. Additionally, negotiations unfurl as a canvas, where a nuanced comprehension of the distressed entity’s predicament acts as the brushstroke guiding buyers toward terms consonant with their aspirations. Simultaneously, the custodian of the proceedings—embodied by the receiver—meticulously orchestrates a harmonious equilibrium, ensuring equity persists as a recurring motif, safeguarding the interests of all implicated parties.

Collectively, the crux of the matter revolves around sanctioned buyers channelling their energies into a judicious exploration, culminating in a discerning investment stance. This virtuous circle of scrutiny and prudence furnishes a bastion of probity, where parity prevails and stakeholders’ interests find refuge within the tapestry of these exigent corporate circumstances. The intricate interplay of variables emboldens distressed entities’ myriad stakeholders, engendering optimism for recuperation within the contours of an intricate, multifaceted milieu.

Image depicting a dramatic clash between a gavel symbolizing secured creditors' rights and a fading corporate logo, representing distressed companies. A ticking clock and courthouse backdrop emphasize urgency and legal battles in Canadian receiverships.
receiverships

In the detailed tapestry of Canadian receiverships, the dissection of legal criterion and court decisions emerges as an essential core, important for the understanding of the detailed inflections that accompany the decisions of secured creditors in their search to overturn the approval of a purchaser. This case study, being a current decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, offers a fascinating look at the factors the appellate court takes into consideration when a secured creditor attempts to overturn a lower court decision on an accepted buyer and the approval of their offer to purchase assets from receiverships.

Scrutiny of cases bestows enlightenment rich with insights and strategies, unfurling before practitioners an intricate bouquet of knowledge encapsulating the symphony between legal principles and commercial actualities. Within this continuum, the equilibrium between safeguarding the prerogatives of creditors and the unalterable finality of an economic transaction assumes a role of pivotal prominence. By charting the trajectory of these paradigms, individuals of the legal craft glean invaluable insights that serve as compasses guiding their navigation within the intricate choreography of corporate metamorphosis.

The decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario on August 21, 2023, I wish to discuss is Rose-Isli Corp. v. Smith, 2023 ONCA 548 (CanLII). It was on appeal from the order of The Honourable Madam Justice Kimmel of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, dated February 2, 2023.

Overview of the case

Certain parties, including a secured creditor, appealed the authorization and vesting order released by the lower court judge that appointed the receiver and approved the sales process to be used to sell the property in receivership, in addition to a relevant ancillary order.

The appellants had actually initially sought the appointment of the receiver over the property. One of the applicants, 2735440 Ontario Inc. (“273 Ontario”), held a second mortgage on the real property. The order appointing the receiver contemplated 273 Ontario would certainly participate in a sales process for the property. The receiver received court authorization for a sales procedure, performed that approved sales process, and then sought court approval of the recommended bid.

When the receiver came to court for approval of the buyer and the sales agreement, the appellants opposed the proposed sale and, rather, looked for an order that 273 Ontario could pay out the first mortgage or, be acknowledged as a successful creditor bidder. The court approved the receiver’s recommendations of who the buyer should be and approved the sale as well as dismissing the applicants’ cross‑motion to redeem the 1st mortgage. The appellants submitted that the motions judge made an error by issuing the order that she did.

At the time of the issuance of the appointment order, the judge who issued the appointment order described the lay of the land at the time the applicants asked for the appointment of a receiver. That judge said that the relationship between and amongst the parties had irrevocably broken down. The evidence for that was the receivership application itself. That judge kept in mind that one way or the other, all stakeholders that day agreed that the Rosehill condo real estate project should be sold and that the sale process needed to be done by a court-appointed officer.

The appellants proclaimed that the lower court judge had made an error in not allowing the appellant’s cross-motion. They submitted that as the second mortgagee, they held the right to redeem the first mortgage at any conceivable juncture, even in the face of the implementation of a carefully run court-sanctioned sales procedure and the request for the approval of a sale to the approved buyer.

The appellate court analysis

273 Ontario, as one of the applicants seeking the appointment of a receiver, extended their consent to the issuance of the Appointment Order. Paragraph 9 of the Appointment Order made it clear that the entitlement of any kind of encumbrancer to effectuate the redemption of a mortgage pertaining to the property was now trapped under the jurisdiction of the appointed receiver.

Within that section was the affirmation that all privileges as well as remedies against the project or its assets or the receiver, or that impact the property, are currently kept in abeyance and suspended, unless the receiver concurred with the proposed action, in writing, or if the court made such an order.

The appellate court found that the motions judge deliberately acknowledged that the subject for adjudication did not orbit around whether 273 Ontario had a legitimate claim for redemption, yet instead, she focused on the much more practical query as to whether 273 Ontario ought to be given the authority to implement that preserved benefit once the process of court-sanctioned sales process had been carried out and the receiver coming to court seeking the approval of the sale of assets under that process. After all, the sales process carried out by the receiver followed the Appointment Order requested by the applicants, which included 273 Ontario.

The Court of Appeal found this to be an astute reframing of the concern and made certain that the heart of the matter was aptly described: (i) the appellants had requested for the appointment of the receiver; (ii) the receiver, in accordance with the approval of the court, had undertaken a methodical sales procedure; and (iii) most importantly, the period of the Receiver had yet to be discharged.

Therefore, the vital scope of 273 Ontario’s ability to obtain court authority to redeem the 1st mortgage was undoubtedly coloured by the plain reality that the property stayed within continuous control under an active receivership. The court supervising the receivership and the sales process status was beyond the redemption rights of the 2nd mortgagee.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario said that, when confronted with the petition of an encumbrancer looking to redeem a mortgage on a property in receivership, the court has to meticulously ponder upon the far-reaching repercussions that might unfurl should the encumbrancer be allowed to exercise its right of redemption.

This philosophy extends to incorporate any kind of and all stakeholders who have purposes of disrupting a court-sanctioned sale process, that has been properly performed by the receiver, all while bearing in mind the prospective purchaser who followed all the rules and waits to complete the acquisition. This principle is not restricted only to a mortgage redemption; it is a guiding beacon for any kind of stakeholder who attempts to disrupt a properly performed court-approved sales process.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario said that the following principles must be adhered to:

  • Usually, if a court-approved sales process has been carried out in a manner consistent with the principles set out in Royal Bank of Canada v. Soundair Corp., (1991), 1991 CanLII 2727 (ON CA), 4 O.R. (3d) 1 (C.A.), a court should not allow a subsequent endeavour to redeem to disrupt the consummation of the properly carried out sales process. From its perspective, the appellate court stated the rationale behind the Soundair principles applies in scenarios wherein an encumbrancer aspires to redeem a mortgage. Once the judicial machinery has been set in motion to oversee the sale of assets controlled within the confines of a receivership, that process must be allowed to play out. The court’s supervision of receiverships will give due regard to the intricate web of economic interests intertwined with the assets under the receiver’s control. In court-supervised receiverships, it is no longer the exclusive purview of a single creditor, but rather the collective interests of all economic stakeholders, that must be considered in this court-supervised process.
  • When addressing this issue, judicial deliberation should embark on a meticulous journey of ensuring balance. The court must delicately weigh the sacrosanct right to redemption against its potential repercussions of blemishing a fair, unbiased and transparent court-sanctioned receivership procedure.
  • A mockery would be made of the practice and procedures relating to receivership sales if redemption were permitted at that stage of the proceedings. A receiver would spend time and money securing an agreement of purchase and sale that was, as is commonplace, subject to Court approval, and for the benefit of all stakeholders, only for there to be a redemption by a mortgagee at the last minute. This could act as a potential chill on securing the best offer and be to the detriment of stakeholders.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario makes its decision

The Court of Appeal held that the appellants repeated the numerous complaints they made in the lower court about the lack of fairness in the sales process. The motions judge canvassed those complaints in considerable detail and found no merit in any of them. Her conclusion that the conduct of the sales process met the Soundair criteria was reasonable and free of palpable and overriding error, anchored as it was in the specific evidence before her.

Finally, the appellate court found no reversible error in the motions judge’s conclusion that the balance favoured protecting the integrity of the sales process over 273 Ontario’s request to redeem. The appeal was denied.

Image depicting a dramatic clash between a gavel symbolizing secured creditors' rights and a fading corporate logo, representing distressed companies. A ticking clock and courthouse backdrop emphasize urgency and legal battles in Canadian receiverships.
receiverships

Factors considered by courts in evaluating the timing of secured creditor’s challenge: Balancing creditor rights and sale finality

In evaluating the timing of a secured creditor’s challenge to block an approved buyer in Canadian receiverships, courts consider several factors. Firstly, they assess whether the creditor had sufficient notice and opportunity to challenge the sale. Timing is crucial, as courts look at whether the challenge was brought promptly and diligently.

Additionally, courts evaluate the potential impact on the sale process, including the harm to other stakeholders and the feasibility of an alternative solution. The creditor’s reasons and supporting evidence for the challenge are also scrutinized. Overall, the courts aim to balance the interests of the creditor with the need for finality and the preservation of the distressed company’s value.

Strategies for secured creditors to maximize influence

Testing a court-approved buyer too late in Canadian receiverships carries substantial prospective repercussions for secured creditors. The timing of these challenges is a vital variable that can considerably influence the outcome.

Leading among the dangers is the prospective loss of the opportunity to challenge the sale. Canadian courts value the finality of sales and receiverships while seeking to maximize the value of distressed company assets. Late legal challenges can interrupt this procedure and may not be viewed positively by the courts.

Secured lenders additionally risk forfeiting the chance to produce better offers or bargain for extra beneficial terms for themselves. Waiting too long to test an approved buyer can limit their capability to draw out the very best offer from the sale.

Additionally, late opposition can stain the integrity of secured creditors in the eyes of the court. This loss of reputation can have long-term consequences, potentially limiting their influence in future restructuring cases.

Secured creditors dealing with the intricate terrain of Canadian court-supervised receiverships, especially when opposing an approved buyer, are without a doubt confronted with an awesome challenge. To obtain the most favourable result for themselves, these creditors can carry out a variety of tactical techniques.

First and foremost, partnership emerges as a potent technique to reach an agreeable outcome. Secured lenders ought to take part in useful discussions with various other stakeholders and also the borrower, cultivating a joined front. This unity can significantly affect the selection of a receiver that understands their interests and intentions.

Moreover, direct engagement with the receiver is essential. By proactively participating in conversations with the receiver, secured creditors can make sure that their concerns and objectives are appropriately taken into consideration throughout the process. This interaction might also entail discovering different avenues, such as finding an approved buyer they support or offering financing to their preferred buyer, which can be advantageous in securing ideal end results.

A focus on detail cannot be underrated. Secured lenders should carefully inspect all essential documentation, leaving no rock unturned. Looking for experienced legal advice is critical to guarantee they are knowledgeable and supported to make sound decisions that will ideally safeguard their interests.

In summary, a mix of calculated planning, efficient interaction, as well as professional support is important for secured creditors seeking to navigate the elaborate landscape of court-supervised receiverships in Canada successfully. By embracing these approaches, they can boost their impact as well as maximize their opportunities to accomplish the most beneficial results.

Image depicting a dramatic clash between a gavel symbolizing secured creditors' rights and a fading corporate logo, representing distressed companies. A ticking clock and courthouse backdrop emphasize urgency and legal battles in Canadian receiverships.
receiverships

Canadian receiverships conclusion

I hope you enjoyed this receiverships Brandon’s Blog where I explored the dynamic realm of Canadian receiverships as secured creditors navigate the race against time to challenge court-approved buyers. The court must weigh the balance between creditor rights and sale finality that shapes the fate of distressed companies.

Individuals and business owners must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses with debt problems that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these financial health concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual who has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own and it does not mean that you are a bad person. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Image depicting a dramatic clash between a gavel symbolizing secured creditors' rights and a fading corporate logo, representing distressed companies. A ticking clock and courthouse backdrop emphasize urgency and legal battles in Canadian receiverships.
receivership

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADIAN INSOLVENCY CASES: DECODING THE DETAILED TAXATION PROCESS FOR SUCCESSFUL COURT OFFICER FEES APPROVAL

Canadian insolvency: Introduction

As Canadian insolvency laws progress, so do the regulations surrounding the taxation of court officer fees. These fees often make up a considerable proportion of the expenses incurred during insolvency proceedings. It is absolutely essential for insolvency practitioners, legal professionals, and other parties involved in such cases to comprehend the critical factors that affect the taxation of court officer fees.

Knowing the taxation procedure for court officer fees in Canadian insolvency cases that are supervised by the court is significant for various reasons. The following points highlight some of the crucial aspects to consider:

  1. Promoting Transparency and Accountability: The taxation procedure guarantees transparency and accountability in the assessment of court officer fees. It encompasses an autonomous evaluation of the charges imposed by court-appointed officials, such as trustees, receivers, monitors, or liquidators. By comprehending this procedure, interested parties can ascertain that the fees are reasonable and justified.
  2. Safeguarding Stakeholder Interests: Insolvency proceedings encompass multiple stakeholders, including lenders, borrowers, and stockholders. The taxation process aids in safeguarding their interests by scrutinizing the fees imposed by court officers. It ensures that the charges align with the services rendered and prevents exorbitant or unwarranted levies.
  3. Fostering Confidence in the System: By establishing a robust taxation process, the court-supervised insolvency system in Canadian proceedings instills confidence among stakeholders. They can place their trust in the fact that the fees imposed by court officers undergo independent scrutiny and are not arbitrary. This bolsters the overall credibility and integrity of the Canadian insolvency process.
  4. Alleviating Financial Burdens: Insolvency proceedings can present financial hardships for both debtors and creditors alike. Familiarizing oneself with the taxation process enables stakeholders to identify any potential excessive fees and seek recourse if necessary. This helps mitigate additional financial burdens on parties already grappling with financial difficulties.
  5. Facilitating Efficient Resolution: The taxation of costs process fosters efficiency in resolving disputes pertaining to court officer fees. In the event of a disagreement over the charges imposed, a taxation hearing is conducted to settle the dispute. By grasping the intricacies of the process, stakeholders can navigate it adeptly, leading to a prompt resolution and averting unnecessary delays.

To provide a comprehensive overview, it is of utmost importance to grasp the intricacies of the taxation procedure pertaining to the fees charged by court officers in Canadian insolvency proceedings under court supervision. Such understanding not only ensures transparency but also safeguards stakeholder interests, fosters confidence in the system, mitigates financial burdens, and facilitates the efficient resolution of disputes related to fees.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I delve into the multifaceted aspects that shape the taxation of costs. Through this exploration, my aim is to offer valuable insights that will assist you in navigating this intricate domain. Come join us as we embark on an exploration of the nuanced intricacies of Canadian insolvency law and the myriad factors influencing the taxation of court officer fees.

Understanding The Role of Court Officers in Canadian Insolvency Cases

Definition and Role of Court Officers

Within the framework of a Canadian insolvency proceeding supervised by the court, a crucial role is fulfilled by the Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT). Acting as a court-designated official, the LIT plays an integral part in facilitating the management of the case and ensuring a fair and efficient process.

Endowed with accreditation from the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB), LITs as insolvency professionals are highly skilled experts possessing extensive expertise and experience in the realm of bankruptcy and insolvency. They act as unbiased and autonomous professionals, tasked with overseeing the insolvency proceedings in compliance with legal norms and regulations.

As a court-appointed officer, the LIT’s responsibilities are multifaceted and encompass a wide array of duties. These may encompass:

  • When confronted with the financial circumstances of a debtor, it becomes imperative to adopt a comprehensive methodology. Licensed Insolvency Trustees (LITs) excel at appraising the debtor’s assets and ascertaining the optimal strategy for disbursing them among creditors. Through meticulous evaluation of the debtor’s fiscal position, LITs can contribute to guaranteeing a just and impartial allocation of assets to all relevant parties. With their proficiencies in debt and asset administration, LITs serve as invaluable for individuals confronted with financial problems.
  • Facilitating meetings of creditors: LITs organize and conduct meetings where creditors can voice their concerns, vote on important matters, and provide their consent or objections regarding the insolvency process.
  • Developing a proposal or managing bankruptcy proceedings: Depending on the type of insolvency proceeding (such as a consumer proposal or bankruptcy), LITs may assist debtors in developing a proposal to settle their debts or administer the bankruptcy process if the proposal is not viable.
  • Investigating the affairs of the debtor: LITs have the authority to investigate the debtor’s financial affairs, including examining their records, transactions, and conduct, to identify any fraudulent activities or preferences that may impact the distribution of assets.

The above is the case regardless of whether it is a personal insolvency administration or a corporate insolvency one.

canadian insolvency
canadian insolvency

Types of Court Officers in Canadian insolvency cases

In the course of Canadian insolvency proceedings, the court possesses the authority to carry out diverse designations involving a LIT to supervise and manage the operation. These designations hinge upon the nature of the insolvency instance and the particular circumstances. Here, I present the normal kinds of designations that a court could enact:

Bankruptcy Trustee

In scenarios of personal or corporate bankruptcy, the LIT acting as the trustee of the bankrupt estate is automatically an officer of the court. The trustee assumes the responsibility of administering the bankruptcy, handling the assets, and disbursing the proceeds to creditors in accordance with the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

Interim Receiver

In certain Canadian insolvency cases, the court may opt to appoint an interim receiver under the BIA, who will serve as a temporary custodian. The primary goal of an interim receiver is to safeguard and preserve the debtor’s assets during the insolvency process.

They are authorized to take control of the debtor’s property and make necessary arrangements to ensure its proper management and security. Typically, an interim receiver is appointed when:

  1. there is a risk of asset dissipation before the court hears an Application for Bankruptcy Order; or
  2. when the debtor intends to sell some or all of its operating assets during a Division I Proposal administration and requires court approval for the sale, with the LIT who is acting as Proposal Trustee also assisting in the sale.

Proposal Trustee

In cases where an insolvent debtor files a consumer proposal or a corporate proposal under the BIA, the LIT acting as the proposal trustee of the insolvent debtor is automatically an officer of the court. The proposal trustee is accountable for evaluating the proposal, conducting meetings with creditors, supervising the restructuring process and the implementation of the approved proposal and making the necessary distribution to the unsecured creditors.

Monitor

In larger corporate insolvencies under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), the court designates a LIT to act as a monitor. The monitor acts as an independent third party and oversees the affairs of the debtor, ensures adherence to the CCAA procedure, and reports to the court and creditors. The monitor also oversees the restructuring process and the implementation of the restructuring plan.

Receiver

In the course of a Canadian insolvency proceeding, a receiver appointed by the court assumes control and oversees the management of a debtor’s assets. The receiver’s principal purpose revolves around the preservation of creditors’ interests and the facilitation of an organized administration process.

The appointment through a court-ordered receivership commonly occurs in situations where the debtor has defaulted and has no capacity to fulfill its financial obligations or when the need arises to safeguard and conserve the value of the debtor’s assets.

The receiver possesses extensive authority granted by the court to competently execute their responsibilities. These authorities encompass aspects such as assuming possession and control of the debtor’s assets, managing and liquidating assets, collecting outstanding debts, investigating the debtor’s financial matters, and disbursing proceeds to creditors in alignment with the court’s directives.

Liquidator

The court can appoint a liquidator in the case where the debtor company is solvent but the business is no longer viable. The company, with the assistance of the LIT who is the court-appointed liquidator, can collect on and sell its assets and there will be sufficient funds to pay off all the creditors and have money left over to distribute to the shareholders.

What do all of these court officers have in common?

All of the above various court officer appointments have one thing in common. To ensure an impartial and equitable process, the LIT appointed as the court officer assumes the role of an autonomous entity separate from the debtor and the creditors. They remain accountable to the court and bear a fiduciary duty toward the stakeholders involved.

The appointment of a court officer aims to facilitate the systematic resolution of the Canadian insolvency case (or in the case of a liquidation, the liquidation administration) while safeguarding the interests of the stakeholders involved, by entrusting the responsibilities to the LIT acting as an independent party possessing the requisite expertise in asset management and the resolution of financial disagreements and predicaments.

The appointments will differ depending on the specific circumstances of each case. The court possesses the discretion to enact appropriate designations with relevant powers granted to the LIT as the court officer to ensure the efficient administration and safeguarding of the rights of the debtor and creditors.

canadian insolvency
canadian insolvency

Understanding court officer fees in Canadian insolvency cases

In the realm of Canadian insolvency procedures, the proficiency of court-appointed officers is paramount and unswerving, as they assume a pivotal and irreplaceable function in the management and safeguarding of assets to benefit creditors. LITs bear the weighty responsibility of overseeing the course of insolvency proceedings, ensuring an impartial allocation of assets, and facilitating intricate financial resolutions.

As a testament to their outstanding contributions, court-designated officers are rightfully entitled to specific remunerations, acknowledging their unwavering commitment and specialized expertise. This section of the article aims to embark upon a comprehensive exploration of the diverse fee structures associated with court-appointed officers within the Canadian insolvency administration framework.

Initial retainer fee

Prior to their appointment and as a condition of consenting to act, court-appointed officers may necessitate an initial retainer fee. This fee acts as an upfront payment for their services and covers the preliminary expenses associated with commencing the insolvency administration process. The determination of the retainer fee typically hinges on the intricacy of the case and the complexity of the estate. The retainer amount is credited against the total fees earned as approved by the court.

Fee for administrative purposes

The administration fee constitutes an additional classification of court officer fees. Its objective is to cover the continuous administrative expenses accrued during the process of insolvency administration. This is the professional fee of the court officer, calculated by the hours worked by each level of staff of the court officer, at their standard hourly rates. This is the most common type of court officer fee.

Asset Realization or performance-based fee

It is possible in unique situations where the sale of assets will be very complex, the court officer earns an asset realization fee. It is earned only if the LIT is successful in disposing of the assets belonging to the insolvent estate or obtains a value above some pre-determined threshold amount. The court officer’s hard work in assessing, marketing, and selling assets is crucial to ensuring that creditors receive the best possible returns. Generally, the asset realization fee is calculated as a percentage of the total value of the realized assets or as a percentage of the revenue generated above the pre-determined threshold from the sale of assets.

Disbursements

In addition to the aforementioned fees, court-appointed officers are entitled to charge for their reasonable disbursements incurred during the course of their duties. Disbursements may encompass expenses relating to travel, professional services, legal fees incurred by the court officer, court filings, third-party valuations or appraisals, and other essential costs directly associated with the administration of the insolvency proceedings. The court officer is obligated to maintain meticulous records and furnish comprehensive accounts of the disbursements (and fees) for scrutiny and approval.

Significance of the checks and balances in the court taxation process for court officer fees

In all of the above cases, it is crucial to underscore those court-appointed officer fees and disbursements are subject to judicial oversight and scrutiny to ascertain their reasonableness and justifiability in light of the services rendered. The court possesses the authority to review and endorse these fees, factoring in elements such as the complexity of the case, the qualifications of the court officer, the scope of work performed, and the benefits conferred upon the stakeholders involved.

Court-appointed officers engaged in Canadian insolvency administrations are entitled to a potentially diverse array of fees, commensurate with their indispensable role in the management and preservation of assets. These fees encompass the initial retainer fee, administration fee, asset realization fee, performance-based fee, and reasonable disbursements. By duly compensating court-appointed officers for their unrivalled expertise and unwavering commitment, the insolvency administration process can proceed seamlessly, instilling confidence among creditors regarding the equitable and effective management of the insolvent estate.

canadian insolvency
canadian insolvency

Taxation process for court officer fees

The intricate procedure of taxing court officer charges in Canadian insolvency cases is a multifaceted framework that is influenced by numerous pivotal elements. Grasping these elements is of utmost importance for court officers and stakeholders alike, as it directly affects the amount of remuneration received by court officers for their labour and what is accessible to be allocated to the creditors in the priority of their ranking.

By conducting comprehensive evaluations of numerous Canadian insolvency cases, the court has established a series of benchmarks for the taxing process in scrutinizing and endorsing the fee and disbursements of a court officer. The taxing process is impelled by a variety of distinctive elements that necessitate meticulous attention to detail.

In essence, by acquiring a lucid comprehension of the taxing process and its implications, court officers can ensure that they obtain equitable compensation for their labour, while concurrently providing clients with a valuable service. Here are the elements that a court scrutinizes when determining the appropriateness of the fee and disbursements levied by its court officer.

Canadian insolvency cases: What are the factors that the court considers in the taxation of costs process for court officer fees

Preparation and submission of taxation of costs materials

The court officer’s application for the approval of its fee and disbursements is like any other court application. There needs to be the proper legal documents and evidence. The evidence is normally the court officer’s report to the court accompanied by invoices and detailed time dockets, sufficient to show what steps were taken in the administration for the specific date range, by who and at what professional hourly rate. This would be the case not only for the court officer but also for legal counsel providing legal services to the court officer.

This evidence would be accompanied by a sworn affidavit from an official from the court officer’s firm and the legal firm providing legal advice to the court officer, attesting to the accuracy of the time kept and that the hourly rates charged were the standard hourly rates. This would be for the administrative fee described above. If the court officer or its legal counsel feels they are entitled to any other type of fee, that evidence would also have to be put forward. An example would be a signed and accepted engagement letter between the court officer and the applicant in the original litigation that resulted in the appointment of the court officer.

The remaining procedures and documents are the ones that the lawyer acting on behalf of and providing legal advice to the court officer normally does such as obtaining a court date and preparing the notice of motion, factum and draft order, filing it with the court, effecting service on all interested parties and providing proof of service.

canadian insolvency
canadian insolvency

The Ontario court pays close attention to and follows several significant legal cases regarding the taxation of court officer fees when assessing the amounts in issue. These cases are:

Bank of Nova Scotia v. Diemer, 2014 ONSC 365 at paragraph 3, citing Re Bakemates International Inc., [2002] O.J. NO. 3659 (Ont. C.A.) – These cases establishes the essential principle that court officers must provide evidence to support the fairness and reasonableness of their requested compensation when seeking approval from the court. The court acknowledges its power to modify the fees and charges imposed by court officers, ensuring a just outcome is achieved.

Re Nortel Networks Corporation et al, 2017 ONSC 673 at paragraph 15, quoting Bank of Nova Scotia v. Diemer, 2014 ONSC 365 at para. 19, aff’d 2014 ONCA 851 – The court is not obligated to scrutinize the intricate details of dockets, hours, explanations, or disbursements. Instead, it has the authority to take into account all pertinent factors and make a more comprehensive assessment when awarding costs or fees. The Court of Appeal has emphasized that the primary focus should be on the achieved results, rather than the amount of time expended in achieving them.

Jethwani v. Damji, 2017 ONSC 3524 at paragraph 49 quoting HSBC Bank Canada v. Mahvash Lechcier-Kimel, 2014 ONSC 1690; aff’d 2014 ONCA 721.- In the context of a court-supervised Canadian insolvency case, if the actions of the court officer are considered imprudent and/or unreasonable, the fees and disbursements for the amounts in issue resulting from such conduct may be deemed unfair and unreasonable. This means that the court officer may not be entitled to receive full compensation for their services if their actions during the administration are deemed inappropriate or unreasonable.

Analyzing the prudence and reasonableness of the court officer’s conduct entails subjective interpretation, usually falling within the purview of the supervising court in Canadian insolvency proceedings. The court will consider an array of factors, including the accomplishments of the court officer, the encountered challenges, and the alignment of actions with the court’s directives and the best interests of all parties involved.

Should the court determine that the court officer’s actions were imprudent or unreasonable, they possess the authority to make appropriate adjustments to the fees and expenses. This adjustment is rooted in the notion that compensation ought to correspond to the level of performance and reasonableness demonstrated throughout the entire Canadian insolvency case.

What will the court specifically consider during the taxation process?

Based on the above cases, the Canadian courts will consider a non-exhaustive list of factors in determining whether a Court officer’s fees are fair and reasonable, including the:

  • nature, extent and value of the assets handled;
  • complications and difficulties encountered;
  • degree of assistance provided by the company, its officers or employees;
  • time spent;
  • court officer’s knowledge, experience and skill;
  • diligence and thoroughness displayed;
  • responsibilities assumed;
  • results of the court officer’s efforts; and
  • cost of comparable services and service providers in the jurisdiction when performed in a prudent and economical manner.

    canadian insolvency
    canadian insolvency

Canadian insolvency court officer best practices: Enhancing performance and safeguarding interests

In my view, court officers should adopt a set of best practices that can greatly contribute to their effectiveness. These practices should include the implementation of a signed engagement letter in Canadian insolvency court proceedings.

The Importance of a signed engagement letter

The signed engagement letter holds immense significance as it meticulously outlines the extent, nature, and expenses associated with the tasks to be undertaken by a court officer in Canadian insolvency court proceedings. By formalizing the agreement between the court officer and the Applicant, this document sets clear expectations and offers a wide array of benefits to both parties involved.

1. Ensuring clarity and defining the scope of work

With a signed engagement letter, the responsibilities and duties of the court officer become unambiguously clear. It provides a precise delineation of the work’s scope, encompassing specific tasks, deadlines, and deliverables. Such lucidity fosters a mutual understanding between the court officer and the Applicant, effectively minimizing potential misunderstandings or future disputes.

The possession of a signed engagement letter serves as concrete legal protection for both the court officer and the Applicant. It acts as tangible evidence of the agreed-upon terms, substantially reducing the likelihood of contractual conflicts. In instances of disagreements or misunderstandings, this engagement letter stands as a binding agreement, effectively safeguarding the interests of both parties.

3. Transparent cost structure

The engagement letter offers a transparent overview of the expenses associated with the court officer’s services. It explicitly outlines the fee structure, payment terms, and any additional costs that may arise throughout the court proceedings. This transparency enables the Applicant to aptly plan their budget, effectively averting any unforeseen financial surprises.

4. Aligning expectations

By explicitly defining the nature of the work to be performed, an engagement letter ensures a shared understanding between the court officer and the Applicant. It empowers the Applicant to comprehend the services they will receive and the level of assistance they can expect from the court officer. Simultaneously, it grants the court officer the opportunity to clarify their role and set realistic expectations for the Applicant, thus fostering a productive and harmonious working relationship.

5. Professionalism and credibility enhancement

When a court officer provides a signed engagement letter, it showcases their professionalism and credibility. This letter is proof that the officer is dedicated to upholding ethical standards and providing high-quality services. It also reassures the client that they are working with a skilled and responsible court officer. Overall, a signed engagement letter is a crucial element that enhances the court officer’s reputation and builds trust with their clients.

6. Documentation for effective record-keeping

The engagement letter assumes a pivotal role as an indispensable document for meticulous record-keeping purposes. It ensures that all pertinent details regarding the court officer’s engagement and the scope of work are meticulously documented in writing. This comprehensive documentation becomes invaluable when the need for future clarifications or reviews of the work arises.

In summary, incorporating a signed engagement letter into court proceedings is an indispensable best practice for court officers. It fosters clarity, safeguards legal interests, establishes transparent cost structures, aligns expectations, enhances professionalism and credibility, and facilitates effective record-keeping. By adhering to these practices, court officers can significantly enhance their performance and effectively safeguard the interests of all parties involved.

Advantages of meticulous record-keeping for fee statements in court-supervised Canadian insolvency proceedings

Within court-supervised Canadian insolvency proceedings, the court officer assumes a pivotal role in managing the intricate financial aspects of the process. The presence of comprehensive and precise documentation of fee statements yields substantial advantages for both the court officer and the stakeholders involved. Let’s delve into these benefits in greater depth:

1. Transparency and accountability

Thoroughly documented fee statements establish transparency and accountability concerning the financial transactions carried out by a court officer. They empower stakeholders to obtain a lucid comprehension of the imposed fees and the corresponding services rendered. By upholding meticulous records, the court officer can manifest their unwavering dedication to impartiality and ethical conduct, fostering trust among the stakeholders.

2. Justification of fees

Court officers are entitled to receive fair compensation for the provision of their services. By diligently documenting fee statements, court officers can substantiate the fees they levy. These records delineate the precise tasks undertaken, the invested time, and the intricacy of the involved work. Such comprehensive details enable stakeholders to grasp the value that the court officer brings forth and diminish the likelihood of fee-related disputes.

By ensuring the scrupulous documentation of fee statements, court officers can mitigate the risk of legal issues and the need for additional legal services stemming from erroneous or incomplete records. Given the exacting financial reporting requirements within court-supervised Canadian insolvency proceedings, precise and comprehensive fee statements contribute to adherence to regulatory standards, thereby minimizing the potential for legal entanglements.

4. Augmented stakeholder confidence

Stakeholders, encompassing creditors, the debtor being the insolvent company, and the court itself, repose profound trust in court officers’ ability to navigate the intricacies of insolvency proceedings. Meticulously documented fee statements act as tangible evidence of the court officer’s professionalism and dependability. This documentation instills stakeholders with the assurance that the court officer conducts their duties transparently and diligently, cultivating confidence in the overall process.

5. Efficient resolution of disputes

In situations where fee disputes or disagreements arise, the presence of thorough documentation becomes invaluable. Detailed records provide a foundation for resolving conflicts through negotiation or formal channels. They serve to facilitate discussions, clarify any misinterpretations, and reach mutually agreeable solutions. This expedites the resolution of disputes and upholds positive relationships between the court officer and stakeholders.

6. Adherence to reporting requirements

Court-supervised Canadian insolvency proceedings necessitate compliance with various reporting obligations, including financial disclosures. Meticulous documentation of fee statements ensures adherence to these reporting requirements. Accurate and well-documented fee statements streamline the preparation of essential reports, facilitate the maintenance of audit trails, and fulfill regulatory obligations. This enables court officers to fulfill their responsibilities effectively and ensures the smooth progression of proceedings.

7. Cultivation of professional reputation

Maintaining meticulous documentation of fee statements contributes to the cultivation of a court officer’s professional reputation. Accurate and organized records serve as a testament to the court officer’s unwavering commitment to professionalism and attention to detail. This meticulousness resonates positively within the legal and insolvency communities, potentially opening doors to future opportunities and referrals.

canadian insolvency
canadian insolvency

Advantages of timely and effective communication for court officers and stakeholders

Timely and effective communication plays a vital role in the court officers’ quest to maintain transparency and foster positive relationships with stakeholders. By giving due importance to clear and consistent communication concerning their actions, activities, and fees charged, court officers bring forth numerous benefits for themselves and the stakeholders involved. Let’s delve into these advantages in detail:

1. Improved comprehension and trust

Timely and effective communication empower court officers to articulate their actions and activities in a manner that stakeholders can readily grasp. By providing regular updates and reports, court officers ensure that stakeholders possess a comprehensive understanding of the progress and status of the proceedings. This level of transparency nurtures trust and instills confidence in the court officers’ capabilities, thereby fostering a productive and harmonious working relationship.

2. Heightened collaboration and cooperation

Maintaining open channels of communication enable court officers and stakeholders to exchange relevant information and actively engage in the proceedings. Effective communication facilitates seamless collaboration, leading to improved decision-making and problem-solving. This collaborative approach streamlines the legal process and paves the way for a more efficient resolution.

3. Timely resolution of issues

Timely communication empowers stakeholders to promptly address any concerns or issues that may arise. By promptly sharing information and seeking feedback, court officers can identify and resolve potential challenges or conflicts in a timely manner. This proactive approach minimizes disruptions, reduces delays, and ensures that the proceedings stay on track.

4. Transparent cost structure and budget management

Effective communication regarding fees charged equip stakeholders with a clear understanding of the costs involved in the legal process. Court officers can provide detailed explanations of the fees charged, including any additional expenses. This transparency empowers stakeholders to effectively manage their budgets, enabling them to anticipate and plan for the financial aspects of the proceedings.

5. Mitigation of misunderstandings and disputes

Clear and timely communication acts as a safeguard against misunderstandings and potential disputes. By providing comprehensive explanations of their actions and activities, court officers can address any questions or concerns that stakeholders may have. This proactive approach reduces the likelihood of conflicts and ensures a smoother legal process.

6. Stakeholder satisfaction and retention

When court officers prioritize effective communication, stakeholders feel valued and actively involved in the proceedings. Regular updates, timely responses, and clear explanations contribute to stakeholder satisfaction. Satisfied stakeholders are more likely to continue working with the court officers in the future and may even provide valuable referrals, thus enhancing the court officers’ reputation and expanding their professional network.

Timely and effective communication ensures that court officers adhere to legal and ethical standards. By providing regular updates and accurate information, court officers demonstrate their commitment to transparency and accountability. This adherence to standards upholds the integrity of the legal process and instills confidence among stakeholders.

Canadian insolvency: Conclusion

I hope you enjoyed this Canadian insolvency Brandon’s Blog on the issue of the taxation of a court officer’s fee and disbursements. Managing your personal or business financial affairs in today’s ever-challenging and changing business landscape is no small feat, but with the right plan in place, it’s possible to stay or get back on track.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

canadian insolvency
canadian insolvency
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: THE UNDENIABLE BEST THING YOU NEED TO KNOW TO CASH YOUR INSOLVENT CUSTOMER’S CHEQUE SAFELY

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Bankruptcy protection: What happens if a company gets into financial trouble?

A Canadian company seeking bankruptcy protection has two choices when it is financially troubled and wants to reorganize. By hiring insolvency legal counsel and a licensed insolvency trustee to get both insolvency and bankruptcy law advice and financial advice, they can protect themselves from their creditors, either by:

  • using the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) to file for bankruptcy protection; or
  • working with an insolvency trustee and filing a Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) you can obtain bankruptcy protection.

In order to reorganize in Canada, an insolvent company files for bankruptcy protection. If you are insolvent in Canada, then you must file for bankruptcy protection, which is equivalent to Chapter 11 in the United States. The process is called financial restructuring or financial reorganization. By doing this, the company will try to restructure while it continues to operate to come up with a restructuring plan that allows the company to survive while satisfying the needs of the creditors to some degree.a

This Brandon Blog discusses a recent court decision that demonstrates that there is a risk to creditors who receive payments from the insolvent company under bankruptcy protection for goods or services supplied if the restructuring fails.

What happens to the company that files for bankruptcy protection?

An organization that files for bankruptcy protection, or as it is sometimes called, creditor protection, differs from an organization that files for bankruptcy. A pure bankruptcy procedure consists of a liquidation. The company ceases to operate unless the Trustee sees value in continuing to operate the company for a limited period of time.

The trustee in bankruptcy takes possession of all assets that are either not subject to valid claims by secured creditors (typically financial institutions) or that belong to third parties (for example, equipment under lease or goods undergoing repair that are in the company’s possession). A licensed insolvency trustee then formulates a plan for selling the unencumbered assets of the company to maximize the proceeds. Afterwards, the Trustee distributes the funds in accordance with the BIA.

In the case of a company filing for bankruptcy protection, this is one of the alternatives to bankruptcy. The intention is to continue operating while it tries to restructure. Most of the time, this entails downsizing. A plan will be devised to repay some of the remaining debt in exchange for the creditors writing off the balance that is owed. With success, the company can retain employees and continue to operate. Creditors will be able to earn money by supplying the reorganized company in the future.

The CCAA allows companies that owe at least $5 million to their creditors to file for bankruptcy protection. Either the business will be restructured and continue to exist on new financial terms or a wind-down will be supervised to pay back anyone owed money by selling assets. BIA restructuring provisions can be used by companies that owe less than $5 million.

In other words, a company that goes bankrupt will shut down. Those who file for bankruptcy protection want to keep operating. As disruptive as bankruptcy and restructuring are, they can be beneficial for businesses, individuals and the economy since they preserve value and prevent assets from being wasted.

As soon as the company enters bankruptcy protection (or bankruptcy), proceedings against it are stayed. As a result, all collection rights for creditors are suspended. A “time-out” gives the company a chance to restructure, or the Trustee can handle its duties in bankruptcy without interference from creditors. Additionally, it “freezes” all creditors at the time of the filing, so that one cannot gain an advantage over another.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection

A record number of companies have sought creditor protection under COVID-19 and more are on the way?

The list of large Canadian companies with outstanding debts looking for bankruptcy protection from creditors got to a decade high in May and June 2020. Numerous financial commentators believed there would be a full-blown financial crisis and that a lot more would certainly file as a result of COVID-19 caused the economic downturn. Despite this, the number of corporate insolvency filings appears to have stabilized and also slowed down in 2021. One main reason is the number of government programs supporting Canadian business. In the same way as the virus itself, COVID-19 has actually taken a hefty financial toll on companies with pre-existing conditions.

Some familiar Canadian corporations in the list of companies that filed in that time due to their financial situation were:

  1. Reitmans
  2. Frank & Oak
  3. Aldo
  4. DavidsTea
  5. Cirque Du Soleil
  6. Mendocino
  7. Bow River Energy
  8. FlightHub
  9. Christian charity, Gospel for Asia
  10. Cequence Energy
  11. Delphi Energy
  12. Sail

Twenty-two major Canadian companies sought creditor protection in May and June 2020, almost four times the usual rate. The list obviously does not include major U.S. names such as Chesapeake Energy, J Crew, Neiman Marcus, Brooks Brothers, Pier 1 and Boy Scouts of America.

The bankruptcy protection court case facts

I want to tell you about Schendel Mechanical Contracting Ltd (Re), 2021 ABQB 893. On November 9, 2021, the Honourable Mr. Justice Douglas R. Mah released his decision.

Schendel Mechanical Contracting Ltd. (Schendel) was one of three associated companies that at one time collectively formed a major construction concern in Alberta under the Schendel name. As a result of financial difficulties, it was an insolvent entity and it filed a Notice of Intention to Make A Proposal under the BIA on March 22, 2019. Schendel continued operations as part of its restructuring effort. On various Schendel projects, Schendel bought HVAC equipment from the supplier between April 2018 and May 2019.

Ultimately, Schendel’s debt restructuring plan failed. Schendel was deemed to have filed for bankruptcy when it failed to implement a successful BIA Proposal restructuring. Schendel went bankrupt immediately. Its secured creditor applied to the Court for the appointment of a Receiver, which was granted.

As a result of reviewing the company’s books and records, the Receiver found and disputed the legality of a $40,000 payment from Schendel, an insolvent company, to one of its suppliers. According to the Applicant Receiver, the payment was prohibited for a number of reasons and the funds should be returned. The recipient supplier asserted that the payment was both innocent and validly received and that it was entitled to retain it.

In this case, a cheque dated July 8, 2019, to make the payment. Due to an unknown reason, the supplier did not negotiate the cheque until 11:48 AM on July 19, 2019. Schendel was also deemed to have filed for bankruptcy and the Court made the Receivership Appointment Order all on the same day, July 19, 2019. The Court had, however, no evidence regarding the exact moment the receivership and bankruptcy decision was made on that same day.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection

The bankruptcy protection case: The Receiver’s position

It is noteworthy that the action to recover the $40,000 was brought by the Court-appointed Receiver and not the insolvency trustee of the bankruptcy estate. According to the Receiver, the funds should be returned on the following grounds:

  • the automatic stay under section 69(1) of the BIA was in effect at the time of filing and throughout the extension of the proposal period, so the supplier was without recourse against Schendel;
  • the Court-ordered stay contained in the Receivership Appointment Order of July 19, 2019, as well as the concurrent stay imposed by a deemed bankruptcy under the BIA, deprived the supplier of all collection remedies as of that date;
  • as an alternative, the payment may be prohibited under the Fraudulent Preferences Act; or
  • it may be in violation of the Statute of Elizabeth (see note below).

NOTE: The English Parliament passed this statute in 1571 with the purpose of prohibiting transfers that would defraud creditors or hinder their collection efforts. As a result of widespread fraudulent transactions designed to defraud creditors, the 13 Elizabeth Statute was passed. It is still in effect in Alberta today.

The bankruptcy protection case: The supplier’s position

The recipient supplier said that it received the payment both innocently and legally and that it is entitled to retain it. In addition, the recipient supplier said:

  • besides some routine questions about payment, the supplier had not engaged in any activity to try to collect the debt;
  • the relationship with Schendel was arm’s-length;
  • both of the last two extension orders for the NOI define a process by which Schendel may pay, and the Receiver has fallen short to prove that the procedure was not followed when it comes to the subject payment; and
  • for either the Fraudulent Preferences Act or the Statute of Elizabeth, the required intent cannot be shown.

Since the bankruptcy trustee was not involved in this case, nobody was claiming that the payment was a preference or transfer under value under the BIA.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection

The bankruptcy protection case: The Judge’s decision

The Court was not presented with evidence on whether the $40,000 payment in question was approved within the proposal extension process or whether it was not approved. There was evidence to support Schendel’s compliance with approved procedures. In the post-NOI period, the supplier was found to have provided goods to various Schendel projects worth $34,476.75.

There was evidence that the payment was not just a payment on account of a pre-filing debt without further transactions post-filing. According to the Judge, the stay would not apply to indebtedness arising from goods or services supplied to Schendel after the filing of the NOI. This is because such indebtedness would not be a claim that could be a proven claim in the bankruptcy.

The Judge further stated that it is the Receiver’s responsibility to prove that the payment violated the stay. Schendel and the supplier did continue to do business together after the NOI was filed, according to the evidence. During the hearing, the Judge said that he should not simply assume facts in the Receiver’s favour. Additionally, the evidence indicated that some of the $40,000 payment was applied to the post-NOI supply of goods. A total of $34,476.75 worth of product was supplied to Schendel after the NOI was filed.

As a result, the Judge rejected all of the Receiver’s arguments and dismissed his Application in its entirety. Consequently, the supplier kept the $40,000.

Bankruptcy protection: How to cash your insolvent customer’s cheque safely

Companies filing for bankruptcy protection, whether under the CCAA or BIA, are reorganizing to stay in business. Businesses require purchasing goods and services and paying for them. It’s possible that some pre-filing debts will be paid after the filing date even though the debts are frozen from a collection perspective.

The stay does not necessarily prohibit every post-NOI payment by an insolvent company to a creditor. Such payments are valid when they are necessary to enable the company to move forward with restructuring. For example, a creditor may require payment of all or a portion of its pre-filing debt in order to supply post-filing.

Parties can agree to repay past debts in order to secure future supplies. First and foremost, the BIA process aims to encourage a debtor to reorganize as a going concern. Both creditors and debtors benefit from the debtor’s continued operation during this critical time. The BIA’s stay provisions and preference provisions give debtors breathing room to reorganize their finances. Setting up legitimate agreements with key suppliers is an integral part of that process.

In the end, it is critical to determine whether the payment of past indebtedness is a valid condition of post-NOI supply, which is required for restructuring to proceed. In that case, the post-filing payment of the pre-filing amount will be valid. If not, the insolvency trustee can recover it from the supplier.

Creditors seeking to recover pre-filing debts must make the payment as a condition of a post-filing supply arrangement. Additionally, because all of this is playing out in real-time in higher-risk settings, a supplier is free to amend the pricing post-filing. Similarly, if the supplier can secure it, there is no reason for them to not try to go from an unsecured creditor to a secured creditor on the post-filing supply by taking security or requesting a letter of credit. This would all be done out of an abundance of caution because as stated above, unpaid post-filing debts are not a claim provable in the company’s bankruptcy if the restructuring is unsuccessful.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection

Bankruptcy protection summary

I hope you found this bankruptcy protection Brandon Blog post informative. Are you worried because you personally or as business owners are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? If it is too much debt for any reason, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Even though we are licensed insolvency trustees, we have found that not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

REDWATER ALBERTA NEWS: $1.7B TO CLEAN UP ORPHANED WELLS DUE TO COVID-19

redwater albertaThe Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and both Ira, as well as Brandon Smith, are right here for a telephone appointment, conference calls and also virtual meetings.

Stay healthy and safe everybody.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom of this page and click on the podcast

Introduction

When it went insolvent in 2015, Redwater Energy Corp. (Redwater Alberta or Redwater) might have been a small business, with only 19 generating wells and 90 dormant wells. However, a relatively small oil producer was responsible for a huge Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) decision.

Basically, the SCC decided in the Redwater Acase, that if a business goes belly up, its environmental obligation needs to be paid before secured creditors. I have written before on the Alberta Courts’ decisions and the SCC decision. As a result of COVID-19, the Canadian government just announced a $1.7 billion fund to create jobs in the Canadian oil patch.

Redwater Alberta history of cases

In my previous blogs, I described the Alberta court decisions. The Alberta Courts concurred with the receiver and held that the regulator’s enforcement activities to force Redwater’s adherence to its previously agreed requirements to clean up and permanently cap its oil site, in bankruptcy was not enforceable.

The Courts stated that given the bankruptcy of the company (in addition to a receivership), the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) took paramountcy over the provincial law. The provincial Courts said that the BIA took paramountcy because:

  1. Allowed the receiver protection from the promises of Redwater Alberta as the licensee in connection with the Redwater properties disclaimed by the receiver/trustee, according to s. 14.06(4) of the BIA.
  2. The priority for the distribution of a bankrupt’s assets is regulated under the BIA, not provincial legislation. If the provable claim of the Regulator, an unsecured creditor, was paid in advance of the claims of Redwater’s secured creditors, that would not be the regime laid out in the BIA.

The SCC decision

In the SCC 5 to 2 judgment in the Orphan Well Association v. Grant Thornton Ltd. case, the SCC ruled that financially troubled companies like Redwater can no longer disclaim or merely bow out of properties they don’t want. In this situation, non-producing oil wells, when abandoned or orphaned, leave the resulting ecological cleaning to Alberta’s Orphan Well Association. It is a non-profit operating for the Alberta Energy Regulator.

What the SCC decision in the case of the Redwater Alberta receivership means is that the costs of properly and permanently sealing an oil well that is to be abandoned is a first ranking charge against the producer’s assets. In the Redwater case, the receiver had to turn over the proceeds (about $600,000) from the asset sales to the Alberta regulator. There was absolutely nothing left for any other creditor, either secured or unsecured.

This case was obviously difficult and contentious, given that it was a 5-2 decision and not unanimous. The majority decision stated that:

  • The regulator’s use of its provincial powers is not in conflict with the BIA to trigger the doctrine of federal paramountcy.
  • Section 14.06(4) of the BIA deals with the personal liability of receivers and trustees and does not let a trustee ignore the environmental liabilities of the estate.
  • The regulator is not asserting any claims provable in the bankruptcy.
  • There is no attempt by the regulator to upset the scheme of priorities stipulated by the BIA.
  • There is not a conflict by the regulator tagging the Redwater receiver as a licensee under Alberta legislation.

The Supreme Court decision goes on to say that the rules cannot be ignored just because there is a bankruptcy. Insolvency professionals must abide by valid provincial laws in administering corporate bankruptcy. It also found that receivers and trustees must:

  • conform with non-financial requirements the insolvent company must still adhere to that do not create a provable claim in the insolvency administration; and
  • Adhere to the parts of the provincial legislation that does not go against the BIA, notwithstanding that it might prove harmful to the position of one or more groups of creditors.

COVID-19 and orphaned wells

Near the end of March 2020, Finance Minister Bill Morneau said that help for the oil and gas industry would be announced. This industry has been hit by two different factors:

  1. Reduced demand due to people self-quarantining because of COVID-19 and therefore there is less demand for oil and gas.
  2. The price battle between Russia and Saudi Arabia. Oil on the world market is at an all-time low. At one point, a barrel of Canadian oil was selling for less than $5. The industry cannot operate with oil prices that low.

As a result, there have been massive job losses in British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Alberta oil patches. As well, the regulators do not have the money to reclaim and permanently seal off the abandoned orphaned wells. It is currently estimated that the total cost could be in the $8 billion range.

On Friday, April 17, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that the federal government will invest at least $1.7 billion to the orphaned well cleanup. The money is to be used to create oil patch jobs to allow for the environmental cleanup.

So COVID-19 or coronavirus, has forced the Canadian government to create this support for the Canadian oil and gas industry. It will create jobs badly needed and allow for the cleanup of some orphaned oil wells.

Details of the support package have not been released. Presumably, the legislation will have to be drafted and passed in the House of Commons. No doubt, more information will come out in the coming days or weeks.

Summary

The Ira Smith Team family hopes that you and your family members are remaining secure, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person that has been affected either via misfortune or inconvenience.

We are all citizens of Canada and we need to coordinate our initiatives to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Families are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when life can return to something near to typical and we can all be together once again.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly use clean, safe and secure routines in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses.

If anyone needs our assistance, or you just need some answers for questions that are bothering you, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

Are you now worried just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. This pandemic situation has made everyone scared.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and both Ira, as well as Brandon Smith, are right here for a telephone appointment, conference calls and also virtual meetings.

Stay healthy and safe everybody.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

STALKING HORSE ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT: THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY GALLOPS INTO A COURT SUPERVISED SALES PROCESS

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: Introduction

In my July 2015 blog, “STALKING HORSE BID: DO YOU REALLY WANT TO STALK YOUR HORSE ANYWAY?”, I defined and described the stalking horse bid process in the Canadian insolvency context. In my November 2017 vlog, “FILING FOR BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY RETAINS ATTORNEYS FOR POSSIBLE BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION FILING”, I described the (then) financial condition of The Weinstein Company (TWC) and correctly predicted that it would have no choice but to ultimately file for bankruptcy protection. The purpose of today’s vlog is to provide an update on TWC’s bankruptcy protection filing. My expectation that on April 6, 2018, the US Bankruptcy Court will approve a stalking horse asset purchase agreement.

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: Stalking horse agreement definition

As a refresher, the stalking horse bid process is, an effort by a company to look at the marketplace ahead of an auction. The intent is to make the most of the value of its assets. This is done as part of normally what is a court supervised public auction sale. It is common to being used in a bankruptcy case.stalking horse bidder

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: How a stalking horse bid works

The insolvent company in bankruptcy protection, canvasses the marketplace. It comes up with what it determines to be, under the circumstances, the best possible offer. The insolvent company and the potential purchaser, enter into a stalking horse asset purchase agreement. The potential purchaser allows its stalking horse bid to go public.

While entering a stalking horse asset purchase agreement, the company can use bidding process protections. An example is breakup charges. This protects the stalking horse bidder prior to the public auction sale. These incentives improve the worth of the offering for the stalking horse buyer. This process may bring about a far better offer before the public auction starts. This greater deal is currently the beginning deal for the public auction. The aim is to produce the best possible offer.

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: How did the stalking horse offer process get its name?

This type of bidding process gets its name from the use of a stalking horse in hunting. The hunter uses a horse, or a screen made in the shape of a horse. The hunter stays concealed when stalking prey.

The stalking horse bid becomes “the stalking horse”; the “animal” used to attract the “prey”, being other bidders.

The terms of the sales process would show by what minimum amount any other bid must beat the stalking horse bid. That minimum amount would have to be at least the amount of the break fee. The break fee is compensation for stalking horse bidder. It attempts to compensate for due diligence time and costs if they don’t win the deal.stalking horse bidder

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: TWC bankruptcy case

In the evening of March 19, 2018, TWC filed for bankruptcy protection in a Delaware Bankruptcy Court. The reasons for the filing were twofold: (i) TWC had canvassed the marketplace and had obtained an offer to purchase its assets by a stalking horse buyer, Lantern Capital; and (ii) to have a Court supervised forum so that both a sale and transfer of the assets can take place and all claimants can make a claim against the resulting cash. TWC announced that anyone subject to a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) was now released. No doubt this will lead to more allegations and claims.

ISI 4
stalking horse asset purchase agreement

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: The stalking horse purchase agreement

Variety reported that Lantern Capital, a Dallas based private equity firm, entered into the stalking horse asset purchase agreement with TWC. Variety stated Lantern’s bid offers $310 million in cash, plus assuming up to $114.5 million in liabilities connected with TV and film projects, for a total stalking horse bid of $424.5 million.

If approved by the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, this will serve as the floor for other bidders. There is a hearing scheduled for April 6 in Delaware, at which time the Bankruptcy Court is expected to approve this stalking horse bid and the entire stalking horse process. As currently drafted, all other bids must be submitted by April 30. The bids will then be vetted, discussions will take place and TWC will then appear again in Bankruptcy Court to recommend which offer is deemed to be the best and be approved and completed. No further information is available at this time.

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: Does your company have a buyer but might need a Court-supervised process to finish a sale?

In next week’s vlog, I will provide a case study of how we used a stalking horse asset purchase agreement Bankruptcy Court supervised process to sell the assets of an insolvent company. The successful sale also continued employment for many people.

Is your company facing financial hardship, yet its assets are attractive to multiple potential purchasers? Perhaps you need to be thinking of using bankruptcy protection to maximize the value of the company’s assets through a sale. This process can also continue employment for both you the entrepreneur owner and for many of your current employees.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. Team understands the pain you are going through trying to keep your company alive while trying to negotiate with potential purchasers. We understand that you are playing beat the clock, and the pain and stress you are feeling thinking that you may just run out of time. The bankruptcy protection process can ease this stress and provide a level playing field so that no potential purchaser takes advantage of you.

The Ira Smith Team has a great deal of experience in running a stalking horse stalking horse asset purchase agreement. The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points. Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation. We can end your pain and put your company back on a healthy profitable path, Starting Over, Starting Now.stalking horse bidder

Call a Trustee Now!