Tag: bankruptcy court

DISCHARGE FROM BANKRUPTCY CANADA: OUR DETAILED STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 10, 2022

discharge from bankruptcy canada

What are the implications of discharge from bankruptcy Canada?

If you are experiencing financial troubles and can’t pay your debts, you can file for bankruptcy in Canada. This legal process lets you off the hook for your debts and start fresh. Once you’re discharged from bankruptcy, you’re no longer responsible for those debts (other than for a few exceptions noted below). Filing for bankruptcy is stressful. We understand how difficult and stressful the bankruptcy process can be, so we hope that this will be a helpful resource for you.

Once the Trustee has completed their duties under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) with respect to the administration of your property and the bankruptcy estate, the next step in the bankruptcy process is they must apply for a discharge. This will occur after the Trustee has applied for your discharge from bankruptcy Canada, even if you did not get an absolute discharge.

This Brandon’s Blog is for people who have made a bankruptcy filing but have not yet been discharged. If your Licensed Insolvency Trustee has been discharged or is otherwise unable to help you with a second discharge application, this blog will provide you with the information you need to get through the process on your own.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: What are the implications if you are not discharged from bankruptcy?

If your previous application for discharge was unsuccessful, you remain an undischarged bankrupt and your Trustee is not obliged to make another application on your behalf. However, you should check with your Trustee first as they may or may not be prepared to do so.

We often receive calls from individuals who claim that their Trustee has been discharged, but they have not been. They express confusion as to why their Licensed Insolvency Trustee will not make an application for their discharge from bankruptcy. A quick search reveals that in these cases, the individual received a conditional discharge, but has not yet fulfilled all of their conditions to get a bankruptcy discharge. That is why their conditional discharge has not yet been converted into an absolute discharge.

If you filed an assignment in bankruptcy and are still an undischarged bankrupt, you may be able to apply for discharge from bankruptcy. An insolvency Trustee only needs to make one application on your behalf. Once the Trustee obtains their discharge, they do not need to make your application for discharge on your behalf again.

The Licensed Trustee cannot be discharged until all bankruptcy administration requirements have been met, including making the first discharge application on behalf of the bankrupt person.

discharge from bankruptcy canada

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: How do you obtain a bankruptcy discharge in Canada?

Automatic discharge from bankruptcy is typically granted unless there are exceptional circumstances. If there is opposition to the automatic discharge, the discharge application must be brought before the court for a hearing.

If you did not complete all of your bankruptcy duties as the bankrupt person, such as providing income and expense statements, attending required financial counselling sessions, and/or paying surplus income, your Trustee had reasons to oppose your automatic discharge and scheduled a hearing with the court.

The Report of Trustee on Bankrupt’s Application for Discharge sets out the reasons for the insolvency Trustee’s opposition to a bankrupt’s application for discharge. This document is on file with the court.

If a bankrupt does not receive a discharge at the time of the court application, it is usually because they have not yet done what is required. The associate justice/registrar who heard the application at court may have therefore adjourned the application (i.e. stated it was to be heard at a later date, which may or may not have been set).

The court may have adjourned your discharge application or imposed conditions that must be met before you are entitled to a discharge. The disposition sheet from the hearing will state what the court decided in this regard.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: What are the steps to clear my bankruptcy?

It’s not unusual for people who didn’t do what they were supposed to at first to try and get back on track and do what’s required to get their discharge. You must comply with your duties during bankruptcy to the best of your ability and be prepared to explain to the court any deficiency in doing so.

For example, to get your discharge, you must be able to provide details and evidence of your income and expenses during bankruptcy. You probably recall that you were required to provide the Trustee with your monthly income and expense reports. If you’re unable to provide the court with those details, the court may want to review your income tax returns for that period. If you want the court to rescind or vary the conditions imposed, you must show that you complied with the conditions to the best of your ability.

There are many examples of trying your best to meet the conditions but maybe not perfectly. If the court orders you to pay a certain sum of money to the Trustee by a certain date, you can make the court-ordered additional payment but not by the specified date. If you were required to make surplus income monthly payments but didn’t make them all, that’s one reason there were conditions attached to your discharge. You can apply to the court to change the date and get your discharge.

Another one is that you didn’t finish all your required credit counselling sessions. You could finish them and then provide proof of completion to the court.

discharge from bankruptcy canada

Completing your own application for discharge from bankruptcy Canada

Making your own application to be discharged from bankruptcy can be a bit daunting, but don’t worry—just follow a few simple steps and you’ll be all set. Here are some tips to help you get your application ready and submitted without the help of a bankruptcy trustee or a bankruptcy lawyer.

To begin, you’ll want to locate your bankruptcy file at the court office. Once you have your file, be sure to look through it thoroughly to find:

your bankruptcy court file number;
the Report of Trustee on the Bankrupt’s Application for Discharge under section 170 of the BIA;
any order issued by the bankruptcy court at the original discharge hearing; and
the court’s disposition sheet from any previous discharge hearing identifies what the court previously ordered or decided.

You will need copies of these documents. You can ask the court office to make copies for you. They will charge you a fee for photocopying. You should check the Report of the Trustee, the court’s disposition sheet, and any court order to see what you failed to do and what conditions the court has imposed. Also, it is not a bad idea to find out who attended your last application for discharge.

You should check the Report of the Trustee, the court’s disposition sheet, and any court order(s) in the file to see what you didn’t do and what conditions (if any) the court has imposed. Lastly, you need to schedule a date for your discharge hearing with the bankruptcy court.

You will be required to prepare the following documents and file them with the court:

a notice of hearing for a bankrupt person’s application for discharge;
your affidavit explaining why you believe you are entitled to the discharge order sought;
an affidavit of service; and
a draft of the order sought.

The Associate Justice/Registrar in Bankruptcy hearing your application for discharge may make any order he or she sees fit. If the order you are seeking is made, he or she may accept and sign it in court on the day you appear, which may save you a period of time later on.

Requisition – Notice of hearing for bankrupt’s discharge from bankruptcy Canada hearing for discharge

The first step in obtaining a discharge in bankruptcy is to file a Notice of Hearing for Bankrupt’s Application for Discharge with the court. That document would have first been filed by the Trustee when the Application for discharge is first scheduled. If you have a copy of it, it will be a good precedent for you to follow.

A requisition must be filed again by you in order to have the matter brought back before the court.

discharge from bankruptcy canada

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada:The Affidavit

An affidavit is a formal, written statement that provides key information in your legal case. Any evidence you want the court to consider in your application must be submitted in an affidavit. Your affidavit should describe the events leading up to your bankruptcy, and your current financial situation.

You must swear or affirm your affidavit before a notary public or commissioner of oaths. Make sure that your affidavit only includes evidence that is relevant to your application for discharge.

The court is familiar with a standard form of affidavit for discharge applications. You should familiarize yourself with that normal format. You should also include:

additional information about why you did not seek a bankruptcy discharge earlier;
is this a 1st-time bankruptcy, 2nd-time bankruptcy or more;
why you have not been able to comply with the bankrupt’s duties or the requirements of an earlier court order; and
state the reasons you are wanting to be discharged now.

You will need to attach any relevant documents to your affidavit in support of your application, including a statement of your current income, expenses, assets, liabilities and any previous bankruptcy information.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada:Affidavit of Service

To serve documents, you must provide a written copy to the party to be served. You need to obtain a signature or other confirmation, such as an email, to confirm that the document was properly served. You will need to serve the filed Requisition and all filed Affidavits and documents on:

any creditor filed an opposition to your discharge;
creditors who attended an earlier discharge hearing;
your Licensed Insolvency Trustee; and
Office of the Superintendent in Bankruptcy.

These parties may attend your hearing and make submissions.

In order to provide proper service within the required time period before your discharge hearing, you must familiarize yourself with the rules. You must also provide proof of service at the hearing, especially if no one else attends. This proof of service can be the signature of everyone served to show the date they were served.

An Affidavit of Service can also be filed with the court. This Affidavit of Service is separate from the Affidavit filed with the court regarding your reasons for entitlement to anabsolute bankruptcy discharge certificate.

discharge from bankruptcy canada

At the discharge from bankruptcy Canada hearing

When you appear in court for your discharge hearing, you will be able to present your case to either an Associate Justice or Registrar in Bankruptcy. If your application is being opposed, the creditors opposing your discharge need to file a notice of opposition. In this case, the hearing will be in front of a bankruptcy Judge. This is the normal process followed:

You explain why you believe you are entitled to the order you are seeking, for example, an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.
Anyone opposing your application explains his or her position.
The Judge or Registrar may ask questions relating to the affidavits and documents you have filed and make suggestions or give directions.

When presenting your position at the hearing, remember to:

Clearly state what order you are seeking from the Registrar in Bankruptcy or Judge.
Outline the facts supporting your application in a concise manner.
Explain the law on the subject and how it applies to the facts of your case.

Your conduct before and during bankruptcy will be taken into consideration when making a decision on your application for discharge. The Trustee’s report will provide information on your conduct before and during bankruptcy, which will be taken into account. if you did not attend the required financial counselling
sessions, did not file required statements of income and expense, and/or did not make the required surplus income payments to the Trustee for the benefit of your creditors.

The court will consider the relevant factors and make the appropriate order, or it may adjourn the hearing for further information or conditions to be met. Some of the types of orders the court may make are:

An order of discharge that is absolute and therefore you are immediately discharged from bankruptcy.
A conditional discharge may be granted. Examples of conditions are:
- if the debtor pays any unpaid surplus income,
- the debtor pays the outstanding balance for any asset that was agreed to be paid for; or
- if the debtor pays a sum of money to the Trustee toward their debt obligations, as decided by the court.
A discharge that has been suspended.
The court may refuse to issue a discharge order if it is not satisfied that you have made full and adequate disclosure, or if there are issues with your conduct.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: Order for discharge

The Judge or Registrar in Bankruptcy will grant a discharge order at the end of the hearing. The type of discharge will be one of the kinds indicated above. If you prepared a draft order and the Registrar in Bankruptcy or Judge finds it acceptable, they will sign it and you can then have it filed with the court. However, if your application was opposed, keep in mind that one of the opposing parties may choose to appeal the discharge order.

If you have not prepared your order before the hearing, you should do so after the hearing and submit the order in duplicate to the court. The court office will then send the order to the Registrar in Bankruptcy or Judge who heard your application for signing. Once you receive your copy of the signed order, your discharge will be official.

When you receive a copy of the signed order, you must provide a copy to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. They will in turn notify the credit bureaus and Canada Revenue Agency of your discharge.

When you have received your absolute discharge, you are no longer legally responsible for repaying debts that you incurred before your assignment in bankruptcy. You will get rid of debt with some exceptions set out in Section 178 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. They are:

payment of child support or alimony;
student loans, if you have not been a full-time or part-time student for less than 7 years;
a fine or penalty imposed by the court; or
debt resulting from fraud.
discharge from bankruptcy canada

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: Are you tired of being in debt?

Bankruptcy law and the bankruptcy process can be complex, so it may be worth retaining a bankruptcy lawyer to help you apply for your discharge. Ultimately, it is up to you, but hopefully, this guide to discharge from bankruptcy Canada will lay out the steps you need to take if you wish to apply for a discharge yourself.

I hope that you found this discharge from bankruptcy Canada Brandon’s Blog informative. If you’re sick and tired of carrying the burden of debt and ready to live a much better life, we can assist. We know exactly how it really feels to be in debt as well as feel like you’re never going to get ahead. We have actually helped lots of people and businesses that were in your position reach financial stability, so we understand it’s feasible for you to prosper in your objective of ending up being debt-free. Nevertheless, it will certainly require some work on your part. We’ll be right here to assist you with every action necessary.

The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too many personal unsecured debts , Credit card debt, income tax debt liability, unsecured loans or personal obligations from the running of your company or from being a business owner. These are all types of debt we can help you eliminate. We are aware of your financial difficulties and understand your concerns. Filing bankruptcy is the last option we explore only after we have exhausted all other options to avoid bankruptcy, such as financial restructuring through a debt repayment plan.

It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to give you the best management advice to get you out of your outstanding debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We are sympathetic to the financial difficulties you are experiencing and would like to help alleviate your concerns. We want to lighten your load by coming up with a debt settlement plan crafted just for you.

We realize that people and businesses in financial difficulty need practical advice and a workable solution in an easy-to-understand financial plan. The Ira Smith Team knows that not everyone has to file for bankruptcy in Canada. Most of our clients never do, as we are familiar with alternatives to bankruptcy. We assist many people in finding the relief they need.

Call or email us. We would be happy to give you a no-cost initial consultation. We can find you the perfect solution to tailor a new debt restructuring procedure specifically for you, based on your unique economic situation and needs. We provide a full range of services to people and companies. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you’re serious about finding a solution, let us know. We will get you back to living a happy life, whether or not there is an economic recession in Canada.

Call us now for a no-cost initial consultation. We are licensed professionals.

Brandon Blog Post

WHAT DOES BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGED MEAN FOR 1 BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE AND SOMEONE WHO IS SERIOUSLY BANKRUPT?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 28, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: Restrictions placed on undischarged bankrupts

By enabling debtors to file an assignment in bankruptcy or consumer proposal, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) provides relief to an honest but unfortunate debtor. Garnishment of wages (other than marital support) ceases, legal actions and collection calls cease, and the debtor receives some breathing space. If a bankrupt fails to fulfill his or her obligations, what happens? Can they receive a discharge from bankruptcy?

This Brandon Blog examines a recent case from Nova Scotia dealing with what does bankruptcy discharged mean for both a bankrupt person and for the licensed insolvency trustee. I also describe what does it mean for an undischarged bankrupt if the bankruptcy trustee gets its discharge when the bankrupt person does not have their bankruptcy discharge.

I will eventually get to the Court case, but there is first some background information that I will provide which sets the stage for a better understanding of the Court decision.

What does it mean to be an undischarged bankrupt?

In the event, you were unable to fulfill your obligations under your personal bankruptcy proceedings, your Trustee, and maybe a creditor or two would have opposed your discharge from bankruptcy. A bankrupt who has not been discharged poses many potential problems. Therefore, if you are an undischarged bankrupt, it is because you have failed to fulfill one or more of your obligations as a bankrupt.

what does bankruptcy discharged mean

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: Debts eliminated by bankruptcy discharge

A bankruptcy discharge means that you have completed your personal bankruptcy process and are no longer legally liable for any outstanding debt you included in the bankruptcy filing (with the exception of a few which I will describe soon). Upon receiving an absolute discharge from bankruptcy (we’ll get to that shortly), you are no longer responsible for any discharged debts.

The discharge in bankruptcy eliminates most of your debts, including unsecured debts such as credit card bills, medical bills, and payday loans. When you are discharged from bankruptcy, not the fact that you filed for bankruptcy, is what eliminates your debts. You need your discharge to get rid of your debts, which explains why it’s so important. That is what does bankruptcy discharged mean, really means.

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: Bankruptcy law can resolve tax debts

As well as the usual unsecured debts mentioned above, if you owe Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) money because you were not able to pay your whole personal income tax obligation when you filed your taxes, then a payment arrangement makes sense.

Collections officers from the CRA contact taxpayers regarding outstanding income tax debt arising from their tax filings and notices of assessment. They attempt to collect from delinquent taxpayers. When you say that you cannot pay the full amount at that time, they will offer you the option of a payment arrangement. The interviewer will ask you about your financial situation and may ask you to submit documents to support your income and expense claims.

They recommend a settlement plan after evaluating the information. Only if all attempts at collection have failed will legal action be taken. You must send the CRA postdated cheques to cover the agreed-upon monthly payment to participate in such a plan. Additional payments can be made if you have money to spare. The interest clock does not stop with a CRA payment plan. Be certain that all your cheques clear the bank as well. The entire payment plan can be cancelled if only one is returned NSF.

Should you enter into a payment plan? Yes. You should demonstrate to CRA that you want to work with them, and avoid tax debt collection activities that will disrupt your life. The most common enforcement activity involves freezing and taking money from your bank accounts, as well as garnishing your salary or wages if you’re employed. If you are a proprietor, they can notify your customers and claim your receivables. Furthermore, a federal judgment can be obtained without your knowledge to place a lien on your home.

You do not need to experience CRA’s more drastic collection methods. Be sure to pay your obligations on time. A tax garnishment, third-party assessment, or an asset lien is never pleasant. The consequences are severe and disruptive. In most cases, CRA only takes this step if you fail to comply with their efforts to enter into and maintain a CRA payment arrangement.

CRA tax debts can be discharged under bankruptcy law if no payment plan can be arranged. If bankruptcy is successfully discharged or a consumer proposal is fully completed, the income tax debt can be eliminated. We assume that CRA hasn’t already obtained a judgment against your interest in your home and registered it against it. Upon doing so, the CRA has successfully turned an unsecured debt into secured debt, and bankruptcy law no longer applies.

Several other things to keep in mind are:

A bankrupt who owes more than $200,000 in personal income taxes and whose personal income tax debt represents at least 75% of their total unsecured proven claims is considered a high-tax debtor. In this situation, you cannot be automatically discharged. It is unavoidable that the Trustee will object to your discharge and there will be a discharge hearing before the Bankruptcy Registrar in the Bankruptcy Courts. Additionally, the CRA will oppose your discharge and will make submissions at your hearing. I am certain you will receive a conditional discharge, at least with the condition that you pay a portion of your income tax debt to the Trustee for distribution among your creditors.
Unremitted employee source deductions owed by a proprietor or partner of an unincorporated business will not be helped by bankruptcy law. Generally, bankruptcy will eliminate HST obligations. For now, CRA ranks the debt as unsecured in a consumer proposal, but as CRA provides the accommodation, it is not a part of bankruptcy law. If the outstanding HST is extremely large, the CRA may argue that since you held the HST in trust for them, it still remains a claim even if you declare bankruptcy. Under Canadian bankruptcy law, they can do this, but I have not seen them do it yet.
Director liability for unremitted employee source deductions or HST is an unsecured claim against you for your personal liability as a Director. Bankruptcy and a properly worded Proposal will both eliminate that debt.
what does bankruptcy discharged mean

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: Debts never discharged in bankruptcy

In personal bankruptcy, there are certain types of debts that are not discharged. Section 178(1) of the BIA outlines the following debts that are nondischargeable debt:

Any type of fine, penalty, restitution order, or other order similar to a fine, penalty or restitution order, imposed by a court for an offence, or any kind of debt arising from a recognizance or bond;
Damages awarded by a court in a civil case for:
- bodily injury intentionally caused, or sexual assault, or
- wrongful death as a result of these acts;
the payment of spousal support or an alimentary pension;
any financial obligation or liability arising under a judgment establishing an association or regarding support, maintenance, or an agreement for maintenance and support of a spouse, former spouse, previous common-law partner, or child who is not living with the bankrupt;
a financial obligation or liability that results from fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation in a fiduciary capacity or, in the Province of Quebec, while acting as a trustee or administrator;
apart from debts and responsibilities arising from equity claims, any debt or liability resulting from getting property or services by false pretenses or fraudulent misrepresentation;
unless a creditor had notification or understanding of the bankruptcy and didn’t take reasonable action to prove a claim, the liability for the dividend that a creditor would have received on any provable claim not disclosed to the trustee; or
student loans if the bankruptcy occurred before the bankrupt stopped being a full- or part-time student or within seven years of the date the bankrupt stopped being a full- or part-time student.

***What does bankruptcy discharged mean:* *Absolute discharge vs. conditional discharge and so on and so forth***

In order to obtain a discharge, a bankrupt person must have fulfilled all of their bankruptcy duties. These personal bankruptcy duties include:

providing all books, records or documents to the Trustee that identify the assets and liabilities of the debtor;
prepare and submit to the Trustee within 5 days after filing for personal bankruptcy, unless the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada extends the time, a sworn statement of affairs detailing the person’s assets and liabilities, and for each of the bankrupt’s creditors, their respective names, addresses and the amount owing;
disclose to the Trustee complete details of all dispositions of property within 1 year before the date of the bankruptcy;
make a disclosure to the Trustee of all the details of property disposed of by gift or settlement without adequate valuable consideration within a 5 year time period before the date of bankruptcy;
if a creditors’ meeting is called, attending it;
making any required surplus income payments to the Trustee;
participating in two mandatory financial counselling sessions; and
offering whatever assistance is requested by the Trustee.

If the bankrupt fulfill all of their duties, then the Trustee will not have a reason to oppose the discharge. If no creditor opposes, then the bankrupt is entitled to an absolute discharge. As already stated, the discharge is what eliminates unsecured debts.

In addition to an absolute discharge, there are other types of discharge under bankruptcy law available to a bankrupt person upon having a discharge hearing:

conditional discharge;
suspended discharge; and
refused discharge.

To read more on the different kinds of discharges available to be applied to a bankrupt person, and for what does bankruptcy discharged mean, take a look at my August 2021 Brandon Blog “A BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGED IS THE KEY TO HEARTWARMING DEBT ELIMINAT1ON“.

what does bankruptcy discharged mean

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: At long last, the Nova Scotia case

The Nova Scotia bankruptcy case deals with the discharge of the Trustee in a personal bankruptcy matter. Once the Trustee brings on the bankrupt’s application for discharge and a discharge Order is made by the Court, and the Trustee completes the rest of the administration of the bankruptcy estate, the Trustee is entitled to a discharge. If the bankrupt did not receive an absolute discharge and has not completed his or her duties, including complying with a conditional discharge order, eventually, the Trustee can still apply for its discharge. Upon the Trustee’s discharge two things occur:

The bankrupt goes into bankruptcy purgatory. No discharge occurs. The Trustee has fulfilled its obligation to present the bankrupt’s discharge request to the court and the court has issued an Order. Whenever the bankrupt wants to prove they have fulfilled all their obligations, obeyed the discharge order, and now deserve an absolute discharge, he or she will need to retain a bankruptcy lawyer and apply to the Bankruptcy Courts.

On the day the Trustee is discharged, the stay of proceedings that had protected the bankrupt from any enforcement action by creditors whose debts were owed at the date of bankruptcy no longer applies. As a result, creditors can now pursue the bankrupt person since the debts have not been eliminated and the stay of proceedings is no longer in place.

It is interesting to examine how far the Registrar in Bankruptcy directed the Trustee in this Nova Scotia bankruptcy case to ensure that all creditors understood that they still had the right to pursue the bankrupt.

The decision in Frost (Re), 2021 NSSC 296 can be boiled down to the following facts:

Mr. Frost went bankrupt.
He failed to fulfill his duties and moved to the UK permanently.
He didn’t inform the Trustee of his new address and telephone number.
His actions left his Trustee and other stakeholders to fend for themselves, explicitly telling the Trustee he wasn’t going to fulfill those duties and didn’t intend to do so.
A hearing was held for the bankrupt’s discharge and Mr. Frost was refused discharge.
The Court previously directed the Trustee to appear before it to be heard on the Trustee’s application for discharge.

The Court concluded that the Trustee completed the administration of the bankruptcy estate and gave the Trustee its discharge. However, the reason why the Registrar in Bankruptcy wanted the Trustee to attend such a hearing was so the Registrar could take things one step further. In the normal course, the Trustee sends out a notice to all those whose proof of claim was admitted of the results of the bankruptcy administration and of the Trustee’s discharge. However, the Registrar wanted to make sure that it was crystal clear to all creditors.

The Registrar wrote a cover letter for the Trustee and directed the Trustee to send it along with the normal statutory notice to creditors (or their debt collectors of record). Here is a copy of that letter:

what does bankruptcy discharged mean

What does bankruptcy discharged mean summary

I hope you found this what does bankruptcy discharged mean Brandon Blog post informative. Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? If it is too much debt for any reason, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Brandon Blog Post

EASY COMMERCIAL RENT RELIEF CANADA: THE SECRET TO CREATING A CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 5, 2020

The Ira Smith Team is totally operational and both Ira and Brandon Smith are here for a telephone consultation, conference calls and virtual meetings.

Keep healthy and safe everybody.

Commercial rent relief Canada introduction

Commercial rent relief Canada is one of the biggest needs of Canadian businesses. This is a result of the COVID-19 induced economic shutdown. I have written before on this problem and about the Canadian government Canada Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance (CECRA) Program.

This program is part of Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan. The CECRA has been updated from its original version which I also wrote about. You can view the updated discussion in my blog – COMMERCIAL TENANCIES ACT ONTARIO: NEW FIX FOR YOUR UNRULY LANDLORD’S COVID-19 COMMERCIAL LEASE TERMINATION.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to discuss how “unused” leased premises have been treated differently so far under both US and Canadian corporate restructuring. I will also fill you in on the secret to get commercial rent relief Canada for Canadian bankruptcy protection and financial restructuring. Unfortunately, as you will see, it isn’t much of a secret!

Commercial rent relief Canada – The US version

The US bankruptcy courts have been generous and pragmatic in cutting companies who filed under Chapter 11 some slack in relation to leased premises that were unused due to the economic shutdown. There were two cases in particular that I previously wrote about.

Modell’s Sporting Goods, Inc. et al Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings

On March 12, 2020, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court District of New Jersey issued the Order authorizing the Chapter 11 bankruptcy application of Modell’s Sporting Goods, Inc. et al (Modell’s) submitted on March 11. Modell’s is America’s earliest, family-owned ran store of sporting items, sports footwear, clothing and equipment. It was founded in 1889.

On March 27, 2020, the court granted Modell’s court application making an order attending to both a bankruptcy suspension and an operational suspension. The bankruptcy suspension maintained the bankruptcy protection proceedings until April 30, 2020 (the Suspension Period). The operational suspension enables Modell’s to shut down all shops and also not operate. The judge additionally gave Modell’s the right to apply on brief notice to the court to extend the Suspension Period. The order went on to state the stay of proceedings holds throughout the suspension.

As part of their application, Modell’s submitted a modified budget to show what sources of cash it would have and also what expenditures it would pay during the Suspension Period. It likewise showed what expenditures were being incurred, but not paid. Commercial rent on every one of its shops was among the expenditures being accumulated but left unpaid.

Modell did not put any of the commercial lease payments in its amended spending plan. They needed to shut down every one of their stores as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. Shops shut suggests no sales. They were not going to pay rent at the same time the stores were not generating cash.

The court order accepted the modified budget plan. It also verified that the only payments that Modell’s would make were those indicated as most important. The business considered payments to every one of its landlords as non-essential. The court order did indicate that the accumulated and overdue commercial rent payments were not and also were not deemed to be waived or not payable.

Pier 1 Imports took a page from the Modell playbook

In February 2020, Pier 1 Imports, Inc. (Pier 1) declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as part of trying to find a purchaser of its operations. It then closed all of its shops in Canada and most in the United States.

On Tuesday, March 31, 2020, following the Modell’s precedent, Pier 1 applied to the court to stop paying commercial rent on its US retail locations on a temporary basis. Pier 1 had to shutter all of its shops as a result of the COVID-19.

Following the Modell’s model, the court provided its approval. It is interesting to note that no commercial rent relief Canada was sought from the Canadian court.

commercial rent relief canada

Could this commercial rent relief Canada occur under Canadian bankruptcy protection?

So the concern is, could a business get this new Modell’s/ Pier 1 precedent to take place in a Canadian bankruptcy protection restructuring? Put another way, could Canadian companies being formally restructured get commercial rent relief Canada?

Under the CECRA program, landlords and tenants need to cooperate and agree with each other to apply for that commercial rent relief Canada. However, what if the landlord plays hardball? Can a Canadian firm declare bankruptcy protection in Canada and be successful in having the court order commercial rent relief Canada?

The two corporate restructuring statutes in Canada are the Part III Division I section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

There are no express arrangements in either statute to conjure up commercial rent relief Canada. Actually, the reverse is true. In either a restructuring or liquidation, the case law says that if a leased premise is being used then rent must be paid to the landlord. Fairness is part of the Canadian bankruptcy landscape. There are years of cases on this problem and they all wind up the very same. You don’t even have to be open for business. If you are tying up the location and preventing the landlord from the right of reentry, the rent needs to be paid.

However, there are two comparable sections in each of the BIA and CCAA. Section 183( 1) of the BIA says:

“183 (1) The following courts are invested with such jurisdiction at law and in equity, as will enable them to exercise original, auxiliary and ancillary jurisdiction in bankruptcy and in other proceedings authorized by this Act…”.

The wording has been interpreted by the courts to imply that the bankruptcy court in each province has the sole responsibility to supervise and approve all acts needed to be done for the correct administration of the Canadian insolvency system. This holds whether it is bankruptcy protection restructuring or straight-out bankruptcy liquidation.

The CCAA offers more adaptability in an insolvency business restructuring than the BIA does. Generally, the court will reach its decisions in a CCAA restructuring on the basis of fairness and also reasonableness. The court is required to be worried that what is being recommended is not prohibited and there are cogent reasons regarding why what is being proposed serves to benefit all or most of the creditors affected by the restructuring.

Until recently, a Canadian court has not published a decision in response to an application for commercial rent relief Canada due to the coronavirus pandemic shutdown in a BIA or CCAA restructuring.

We now have a commercial rent relief Canada answer from British Columbia

The case is Quest University Canada (Re), 2020 BCSC 921. Quest University Canada (Quest) filed for CCAA bankruptcy protection in January 2020. It had several motions between January and May to extend the restructuring proceedings.

Also in May, Quest premised its request for a boost in its restructuring interim loan facility, somewhat, on it deferring lease payments on four of its university residences from June-August 2020. Southern Star Developments Ltd. (Southern Star) is the owner of the residences and also Quest’s landlord. Southern Star and its mortgagee Bank of Montreal (BMO), objected to any lease deferment. The court had to figure out whether it is appropriate to allow Quest to delay rent payments to its landlord, Southern Star.

Quest mandated that as part of the educational experience, all students going to Quest were required to reside on campus in the residences. A significant percentage of Quest’s students (some 75%) were international students. In addition, some faculty members resided in the residences.

Effects developing from the COVID-19 pandemic, as experienced in BC, across Canada and all over the world, are well known. On March 12, 2020, Quest’s board of governors declared the closure of Quest to the general public. Students had to leave the campus and finish the springtime and summertime semesters online. All occupants vacated the residences. Only a small number of personnel stayed behind for security purposes.

Then the BC government issued a Ministerial Order whereby it declared a state of emergency. The federal government prohibited the entry of foreign nationals into Canada, initially except the United States under the Quarantine Act. The Canadian government then extended the ban to most travellers from the USA also.

The timing of the pandemic as well as its extreme repercussions couldn’t be worse for Quest in regards to its restructuring efforts.

Quest’s commercial rent relief Canada application like Modell’s and Pier 1

Without referencing the US bankruptcy protection court orders I discussed above, Quest made a similar application to the court. Quest was looking for commercial rent relief Canada just like was given to the US companies in the Chapter 11 cases.

On May 18, 2020, Quest advised Southern Star that it would not be making rent payments for the residences starting in June 2020. Quest said it needed to conserve cash due to the fact that the residences could not be used (the same argument as the Modell’s and Pier 1 cases). Quest mentioned the continuous restructuring process, the closure of on-campus learning and the unpredictability of what academic instruction it would be able to offer in fall 2020 as reasons for the deferral.

The court had so far accepted and approved interim financing to permit the restructuring to continue. Quest told Southern Star that it wished to discuss a rent deferral arrangement over the following numerous months. Quest hoped that Southern Star would be accommodating given their history of working together and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Unfortunately, Southern Star right away showed its unwillingness to do so. Southern Star stated that, without receipt of lease payments from Quest, Southern Star will certainly not have the ability to make its mortgage loan payments to BMO. For apparent reasons, that is not an enviable situation for Southern Star, nor obviously, BMO, to be in.

In late May 2020, Quest sought and obtained an increase in the approved interim financing by $3 million. The cash-flow forecast that supported that application, included the Monitor‘s Second Report, did not reference any kind of rent payments by Quest to Southern Star until October 2020. Accordingly, the accepted interim funding is not adequate to fund Quest’s lease payments over the summer season.

Quest contended that it is critical to preserve the use of the residences and its relationship with Southern Star. Quest says that its ability to restructure and continue as a university depends on it. They also content that Southern Star and BMO will not suffer any prejudice if the rent deferral is allowed. Quest believed that it would be able to make up the deferred payments sometime in the future.

Southern Star and BMO opposed the court granting that relief. They contend that they will be prejudiced if Quest does not have to make the rent payments.

The court’s decision in Quest’s commercial rent relief Canada application

The court’s analysis was very detailed. The BC court reviewed precedent decisions from various provinces, including Ontario. For Quest, an important question that it wanted the court to answer was were the residences being used?

Quest suggested that it left the residences because of safety issues and provincial health and wellness orders relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. It stated that it is only allowed to make use of the residences for student housing. The court did not equate this absence of physical use of the leased facilities by students with a total absence of “use”.

The court concluded that Quest is “using” the residences within the CCAA restructuring because:

Quest is allowing some staff members to live there.
It is insisting, as against Southern Star as landlord of the residences, according to its right to quiet enjoyment of the residences. Simply put, Quest is exercising its right to “use” the residences, as usual, notwithstanding they are mostly vacant.
Certainly, since June 2020, Quest was able to populate the residences with students or other persons safely. This would be consistent with what they have done every past summer season.
The court did not see the use over the summertime as being irregular with the specified and allowed use of the residences.
As of June and proceeding right into July and August 2020, the principal reason the residences are vacant is no different than from previous summers. In previous summers, Quest had to pay rent to Southern Star because it was still “making use of” the residences.
Quest has actually not chosen to disclaim the (Sub)leases. On the contrary, Quest’s evidence is that the residences are essential and it must maintain them to advance the possible restructuring options available to them. The existence of the residences, and Quest’s legal rights to their use, remain a crucial marketing factor in relation to possible financial partners.

Fairness is a typical touchstone in CCAA and all insolvency proceedings. In the court’s view, substantial indicia of unfairness arise by permitting the rental fee deferment. The court stated that it had the option to allow Quest to choose to pay the rent. The court stated however that it did not have the right to prevent Southern Star from requiring payment and taking action in the face of any kind of default.

The court found that it was not appropriate to grant the rent deferment sought and dismissed Quest’s application. In doing so, the court followed the long line of cases in both CCAA and BIA restructuring cases as well as bankruptcy liquidation cases. By not granting the commercial rent relief Canada requested, it differentiated the Canadian insolvency system from the US system as seen in the Modell’s and Pier 1 cases.

A word of caution:

There is no discussion in the decision that Quest attempted to claim or rely upon a force majeure argument.
Notwithstanding how detailed the court’s analysis is, this BC court decision is not binding on courts in other provinces.

So as I said at the beginning, the secret to getting commercial rent relief Canada in a formal restructuring simply based on this court decision is either reach a deal with the landlord on your own or just hand the premises back to the landlord. Those are the only ways!

Commercial rent relief Canada summary

I hope you enjoyed this commercial rent relief Canada Brandon’s Blog. The Ira Smith Team family hopes you and your family are staying safe, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person who has been affected either through inconvenience or personal family tragedy.

We are all citizens of Canada and we have to coordinate our efforts to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Family members are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when things can return to something close to normal and we can all be together again physically.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has always employed clean and safe habits in our professional practice and continues to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Should you take advantage of the CEBA? I say a resounding YES!. I just wanted to highlight all of the issues that you should consider.

If anyone needs our assistance, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

Are you now worried just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. This pandemic situation has made everyone scared.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Team is totally operational and both Ira and Brandon Smith are here for a telephone consultation, conference calls and virtual meetings.

Keep healthy and safe everybody.

Tags bankruptcy court, bankruptcy liquidation, bankruptcy protection, BIA, canada emergency commercial rent assistance, CCAA, CECRA, chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, commercial rent relief, commercial rent relief canada, coronavirus, corporate restructuring, covid-19, COVID-19 Economic Response Plan, financial restructuring, force majeure, Ira Smith Trustee, Modell’s Sporting Goods, Pier 1 Imports

Brandon Blog Post

ZOOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE TORONTO BANKRUPTCY COURT

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 13, 2020

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Rules of civil procedure introduction

Today’s blog is taking a lighter look at new rules of civil procedure for a Zooming video conference world. These are my somewhat tongue in cheek suggestions for the Superior Court of Justice Toronto bankruptcy court.

I did not make these up. I am taking it from an actual Standing Order For The Conduct of Evidentiary Video Conference Hearings. It was issued by the Honourable D. H. Lester, Circuit Judge in the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, Clay County Florida. It was sent to me by a Florida bankruptcy attorney friend of mine. I have just amended them for the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Toronto bankruptcy court context.

I have not seen any such pronouncements from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Toronto Bankruptcy Court (and doubt that I will!). Below would be my proposed amendments to the R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194: RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (Rules of Civil Procedure) under the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43. Everything I am suggesting below was actually in the Florida Standing Order.

New rules of civil procedure 46.02

Rules of civil procedure 46 through 51, sets out the rules of civil procedure for pre-trial procedures. I propose a new rule, number 46.02, to read:

46.02 Prior to any video conference hearing, all counsel, parties and witnesses shall familiarize themselves with the operation of Zoom and its capabilities. Instructions on Zoom operation may be found at https://zoom.us/resources. The following procedure will be followed:

(a) Enter your name on your Zoom profile so that you can be identified by the Judge.

(b) Devices must be fully charged prior to the hearing with a charger accessible in the event it becomes necessary.

(c) Devices must remain muted unless the participant is speaking. All participants must be in a location that is free of extraneous noise or visual distraction.

(d) A virtual background is not permitted.

(e) Hearings are court proceedings. Appropriate courtroom attire for counsel, parties and witnesses is expected.

It is too bad that virtual backgrounds would not be allowed in the Toronto bankruptcy court. I personally would want to attend a bankruptcy court hearing with this background:

rules of civil procedure superior court of justice toronto bankruptcy court — Photo courtesy of Zoom.us rules of civil procedure

As far as appropriate courtroom attire, I asked my friend if a judge has made him stand up yet to see what he was wearing below the waist. He said he has not yet been asked to do so, but it could happen.

New Superior Court of Justice rules of civil procedure for witness testimony

Rule 53 of the Rules of Civil Procedure deals with evidence at trial. I propose a new rule 53.01.1 which would go something like:

53.01.1 (a) At least three business days prior to hearing, the parties shall e-mail to the court a list of all witnesses expected to be called, with full names, e-mail addresses and cell phone numbers. Real names must be used. Court reporters are meeting participants. If a court reporter will be present, the reporter’s name and e-mail address shall be provided along with the witness list.

(b) After any opening statements, when a witness is called, the judge will admit the witness from the waiting room. After testifying, the witness will be removed electronically from the hearing.

(c) Witnesses must be alone. Prior to testifying and after testifying, witnesses shall scan the room to confirm they are the only person in the room. However, if an interpreter is necessary, interpreters may be either in the room with a witness or a meeting participant. The parties list of witnesses should indicate whether a witness will be testifying through an interpreter. The interpreter’s name and e-mail address must be provided to the judge in the list of witnesses.

(d) Passing of electronic notes during testimony and recording of the proceedings is forbidden.

(e) All other electronic devices must be turned off.

(f) A lawyer and a party may be in the same room. However, the camera must capture both. No one else may be present in the room.

New rules of civil procedure for documents in writing in Superior Court of Justice proceedings

I propose new rules of civil procedure number 4.01.1:

4.01.1 (a) At least five days prior to hearing, the lawyers shall confer

to disclose exhibits and other documents in writing expected to be used and to stipulate to as many as possible.

(b) All documents in writing must be delivered, e-mailed to the judge or e-filed at least three business days prior to the hearing. They should be pre-marked, identifying the party and exhibit number. Exhibits over ten pages in the number of pages shall be either delivered to the judge or e-filed in searchable PDF format with computer-generated page numbers. The parties must also provide an index that includes the number of pages.

(c) All lawyers, the judge and the court reporter must have a copy of all documents in writing. Witnesses must have a copy of all documents in writing to which they will testify or for which they will lay the predicate for admission.

(d) Documents in writing can be shared during the video hearing using a shared screen on Zoom.

Rules of civil procedure for the Superior Court of Justice

So this is what was in the Florida Standing Order for a Zooming video environment. I hope you enjoyed this somewhat light-hearted Brandon’s Blog.

The Ira Smith Team family hopes that you and your family members are remaining secure, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person that has been affected either via misfortune or inconvenience.

We all must help each other to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Families are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when life can return to something near to typical and we can all be together once again.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Income, revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs, their companies and individual Canadians. This is especially true these days.

If anyone needs our assistance for debt relief Canada COVID-19, or you just need some answers for questions that are bothering you, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags bankruptcy court, courts of justice act, Ira Smith Trustee, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, rules of civil procedure, Superior Court of Justice, toronto bankruptcy court, witness testimony

Brandon Blog Post

GAMBLING DEBTS HELP

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 30, 2019

Gambling debts: Introduction

The Canadian insolvency process is geared to deal with gambling debts or any debt resulting from addiction. It does not only deal with the debts caused by borrowing money to feed an addiction. The insolvency process is uniquely positioned to deal with the person’s total rehabilitation. When the person hits rock bottom with debts they cannot repay and no more credit to keep borrowing to feed the addiction, a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or Trustee) (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) is positioned to help not only with the debt issues but also the rehabilitation issues. Let me explain.

My firm has been involved in helping people out of their debt problems arising from addiction issues. The most common are gambling, alcohol and drug addictions. Professionals have referred us their family members suffering because of an addiction. In my January 31, 2018 blog, GAMBLING DEBT BANKRUPTCY: CAN GAMBLING DEBT BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY?, I discussed from a procedural view the issue of gambling debts and bankruptcy. In this blog, I want to focus on how the insolvency process, especially bankruptcy, can deal with overall rehabilitation.

I will draw on my own personal case studies and specifically refer to a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Bankruptcy and Insolvency in Donaldson (Re), 2019 NSSC 33.

Gambling debts: What the LIT is expected to do

The free consultation provided by a LIT to an insolvent person pre-filing is where a LIT would find the addiction issues. It will also be noted on the person’s initial filing documents in filing either a consumer proposal or for bankruptcy. The Canadian insolvency system is geared towards giving the honest but unfortunate consumer a fresh start.

In cases of addiction, the LIT must also point the person to community resources to aid in healing the person with the addiction to lead a sober life. This must be a pre-condition for any LIT to support the addicted person’s consumer proposal or discharge from bankruptcy. This is how my practice works. It is also the view of the Court in the Donaldson case.

Gambling debts: The Donaldson facts

Gloria Donaldson and Wayne Donaldson are fourth-time bankrupts. This is their 5th experience with the Canadian insolvency process as one of their filings was a consumer proposal. They made separate filings. The Court found that it really should have been a joint filing.

Gloria and Wayne were 65 and 73, respectively. The Court holding their discharge hearing found both Gloria and Wayne to be forthright, honest and trustworthy. Yet, this is the 4th bankruptcy and the 5th use the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c. B-3, as modified (BIA).

They declared the source of this bankruptcy as an overextension of credit on real house improvements. They did not list gambling. However, Registrar Balmanoukian found that there is no doubt on the evidence before him that gambling was a significant factor to at least speed up driving the Donaldson’s to this 5th insolvency filing.

The Donaldson’s filings spanned a duration of nearly 40 years. They are seniors. Their future income is restricted, by age and health.

Gambling debts: The bankruptcy discharge will not be easy

A 4th bankruptcy is a really major issue. Without a doubt, also for applications including third-time bankrupts the Courts have revealed an unwillingness in providing the bankrupt’s discharge. At the very least not without an extensive suspension or similar burdensome terms.

Coming to Court for a discharge as a 3rd-time bankrupt is a serious matter. The Court must be satisfied that the insolvent understands and has made enough adjustments in his/her life. The Court wants to know it won’t be possible that an additional bankruptcy will take place.

By the time a person has actually gotten in a 3rd bankruptcy, the objective, as well as the intent of the Act, changes from its restorative function of helping sympathetic yet unfortunate debtors to a shielding culture, and protecting innocent possible creditors. The most effective intents and hopes of such bankrupts is no longer the main issue. The main issue is that creditors be shielded from the insolvent’s shown economic inexperience, carelessness and negligence.

In a 4th bankruptcy, the Court has to pay cautious interest in creating a suitable yet custom treatment when determining what is right in the bankrupt’s application for discharge. The Bankruptcy Court is not just there to be a financial car wash. The truth is that these bankrupts are not rogues. That, however, is not enough of a reason to approve a discharge.

A 4th bankruptcy is a clarion call to the Court and its officers that these people should never come before the Bankruptcy Court again. The issues need to be fixed.

Gambling debts: The bankruptcy discharge must serve a purpose

The proof is clear that Mr. and Mrs. Donaldson did not have the possibility of having sources with which to pay any kind of meaningful amount on their much debt. The passage of time and their health and wellness have actually prevented this. Nevertheless, that does not imply that the Court can only enforce a token wag of the finger and a reprimand “do not do it ever again”.

What the Registrar decided is frankly, something that the LIT should have already done. When I am faced with potential bankrupts whose debt has arisen as a result of spending money they did not have on their addiction, this is what I tell them. I say that if they wish to have any chance of having a discharge from bankruptcy, then they need to get themselves into a rehab program immediately. Gamblers Anonymous and AA are two that we regularly refer clients to. We also tell them that for discharge purposes, they will need to have their sponsor verify to us, in writing, that they have regularly attended and continue to attend meetings to help themselves.

This way, by the time we come to Court, we can prove rehabilitation has already begun. Real rehabilitation helps the person get back on to a clean, healthy life. We have many examples of people we have helped overcome drug, alcohol and gambling addictions, as part of cleaning up their financial debts. In some cases, these people have even become leaders and sponsors themselves in the rehabilitation program that helped them so much. I have great pride in hearing years later from such former addicts I have helped when they tell me that they have saved up enough to buy a home, now have a better job and their family is in a better place because of my help.

The Donaldsons need to get themselves resolved to live within their earnings. They also must learn to stop gambling if they wish to have a chance of surviving this bankruptcy.

Gambling debts: The Registrar’s decision

So the Registrar ordered that the Donaldsons:

Shall attend such counselling for gambling abuse and/or addiction for such period as is necessary to get an opinion from a qualified counsellor or medical professional that both of the Donaldson’s are able to conduct themselves without going back to gambling in any way.
Refrain from gambling in any form, and further that they enrol and stay enrolled in the voluntary exclusion program with Casino Nova Scotia;
Absolutely stop obtaining credit from any lender in any form, except as approved in advance and in writing by the Trustee.
Disclose and subject to any provincial exemptions, turn over to the Trustee any property of either or both that comprises “property of the bankrupt” within the meaning of the BIA between the date of the Donaldson’s’ bankruptcies and their discharge.
Upon compliance with the foregoing for a period of at least five years from the date of the decision, the Donaldson’s may make a further application for discharge.

The Registrar’s decision is right. The Donaldsons will finally get the help they need to fight their gambling addiction. They will come clean with their LIT about handing over any non-exempt assets. They will not be able to borrow money for gambling again. Once they have been “clean” for 5 years, they may reapply to their discharge from bankruptcy. Hopefully, by then, they will be able to live a healthier life without the stress of gambling debts.

Gambling debts: Do you have too much debt?

Do you have too much debt because of an addiction or otherwise? Are you worried that the future interest rate hikes will make presently affordable commitments entirely unmanageable? Is the discomfort, tension and anxiousness presently detrimentally affecting your health and wellness as well as health?

If so, speak to the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies looking for financial restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only experts licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide insolvency services.

Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation and to make sure that we can begin assisting you to return right into a healthy, balanced, hassle-free life.

Tags addiction, alcohol, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy court, bankruptcy trustee, Consumer Proposal, counsellor, Donaldson (Re), drugs, gambling, gambling debt, gambling debts, gambling debts help, insolvency services, Ira Smith, licensed insolvency trustee, registrar, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

INSOLVENT DEFINITION: A NEW FOCUS FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 28, 2018

JUNE 17, 2019 UPDATE: The Court of Appeal for Ontario reversed this lower court decision. You can read all about it in our blog update – INSOLVENT DEFINITION RESTORED IN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Insolvent definition: Introduction

The basis of the Canadian insolvency system is to assist the honest but unfortunate person or company shed their debt (with certain limitations) and start over fresh. There are many terms defined in the Canadian insolvency legislation. The most basic one is the insolvent definition.

Last week I reviewed a decision of the Ontario bankruptcy Court that really did give me a new focus. It doesn’t change the bottom line of the advice I would give an insolvent debtor, but it did change my focus. That is one of the things I love about being a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee). I never stop learning.

Insolvent definition: Two examples

The Oxford dictionary definition is:

“insolvent

ADJECTIVE

Unable to pay debts owed.

‘the company became insolvent’”

Section 2 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) defines an insolvent person as:

“insolvent person means a person who is not bankrupt and who resides, carries on business or has property in Canada, whose liabilities to creditors provable as claims under this Act amount to one thousand dollars, and

(a) who is for any reason unable to meet his obligations as they generally become due,

(b) who has ceased paying his current obligations in the ordinary course of business as they generally become due, or

(c) the aggregate of whose property is not, at a fair valuation, sufficient, or, if disposed of at a fairly conducted sale under legal process, would not be sufficient to enable payment of all his obligations, due and accruing due;”

Insolvent definition: The concept of net worth

Insolvent person refers to both people and companies. The BIA definition incorporates the common English definition. The BIA definition also incorporates the accounting concept of net worth. Net worth = Assets – Liabilities. If the difference is positive, you have a positive net worth. If the difference is negative, you have negative or no net worth.

For those that want to read more about the concept of net worth, look at the Addendum I wrote which is at the bottom of this blog. Since many of you already have an advanced understanding of net, I don’t want to insert it in here.

When giving our free first consultation, my advice to anyone with lots of debt but positive net worth is that in bankruptcy, they will lose their non-exempt assets. If the major asset providing the positive net worth value is their home, I advise the person that they will lose their equity in their home which is not a good outcome. So, my first advice is always to see if the person can either refinance the home or sell it. Then they can use the funds to pay off their debts. In a sale, any balance can be used as a down payment on a smaller home or can set them up nicely to rent.

I normally don’t think of part (c) of the BIA insolvent definition as being mutually exclusive. However, after reading the Court decision and looking again at the BIA definition, I am reminded that it really is. Let me describe the Court’s decision to explain.

Insolvent definition: Kormos v. Fast, 2018 ONSC 6044 (CanLII)

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos got a judgment against their neighbours, Mr. and Mrs. Fast. The Small Claims Court at St. Catherines issued the judgment for $25,565.64. This judgment comes about from problems arising from flooding in their home which was triggered by the Fasts.

After the judgment was given, the Fasts were contacted by Mr. Kormos’ licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee). The Trustee advised that Mr. Fast had submitted a consumer proposal under the BIA many months previously, on August 24, 2016. Mr. Fast did not previously mention anything about his consumer proposal or his later filing of an assignment in bankruptcy.

Fifteen days after the Kormos plaintiffs started enforcement of the judgment by serving a notice of examination on Mrs. Fast, she made an assignment in bankruptcy under the BIA on April 25, 2017.

In their different bankruptcy filings, each of the Fasts attested in their respective sworn Statement of Affairs, that their home in Queenston, Ontario (Home) was worth $630,000.

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos provided evidence by way of an expert witness appraisal who also testified in Court, showing that the Home was considerably underestimated in the BIA filings by Mr. Fast on August 24, 2016, and Mrs. Fast on April 25, 2017, when she made an assignment in bankruptcy.

The Kormos’ lawyer stated that when a reasonable value is designated to the Home, neither Mr. Fast nor Mrs. Fast was insolvent when their corresponding filings were made under the BIA. They were obviously relying on the fact that each of Mr. and Mrs. Fast really had a positive net worth.

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos were looking for an Order under the BIA (i) annulling Mr. Fast’s consumer proposal as well as, if required, his 2014 bankruptcy; as well as (ii) annulling Mrs. Fast’s bankruptcy.

Insolvent definition: The Court’s analysis

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos wanted:

An Order according to s. 66.3(1) of the BIA annulling the consumer proposal submitted by Mr. Fast.
Since an outcome of such an annulment would be that Mr. Fast is considered to make an assignment in bankruptcy under s. 66.3(5) of the BIA, they also were looking for an annulment of his bankruptcy on the ground that Mr. Fast is not presently insolvent.
An order according to ss. 181(1) as well as 187(5) of the BIA annulling the bankruptcy of Mrs. Fast.
An Order according to Rule 60.07 of the Rules of Civil Procedure issuing a writ of seizure and sale of the Home.

The Fasts did not challenge the expert appraisal opinion. The Court accepted the expert’s appraisal as being the value of the Home on the relevant dates of Mr. and Mrs. Fast’s respective filings under the BIA.

The Court looked at the insolvent definition in the BIA, which again is:

(a) who is for any reason unable to meet his obligations as they generally become due,

(b) who has ceased paying his current obligations in the ordinary course of business as they generally become due, or

In her bankruptcy filing, Mrs. Fast filed her statement of monthly income and expenses. According to the statement, her monthly expenses exceed her monthly income by $2,010. When looking at the definition of an insolvent, the Court concluded that Mrs. Fast was unable to meet her obligations and had stopped paying her current obligations. Notwithstanding that the Court found that Mrs. Fast probably understated the value of her interest in the Home, the Court was not persuaded to annul her bankruptcy as she met the definition of an insolvent person.

As for Mr. Fast, the Court decided it would not annul his consumer proposal. The Judge went on to say that even if he was persuaded to do so, Mr. Fast was still a bankrupt and the Judge had no evidence for the proposition that his bankruptcy should also be annulled.

So, the Judge did not grant the application, the Fasts are under their respective BIA proceedings and Mr. and Mrs. Kormos can file their claim with the Fasts’ Trustee.

Insolvent definition: The Trustee

Now the Trustee has an interesting situation. The Trustee is now aware of the expert valuation of the Home. The Trustee will have to use that information to decide if the Fasts have equity in their home. If yes, then as far as Mrs. Fast, her equity will have to be realized upon because she is bankrupt. Her equity in the Home devolves to the Trustee as an asset (if it is more than the minuscule provincial exemption).

Is Mr. Fast’s consumer proposal has already been (deemed) accepted by the creditors and (deemed) approved by the Court. If yes, then he will just have to keep making the agreed payments to fully complete his consumer proposal and get out of bankruptcy. If not, the Trustee will now have to take his real equity in the Home into account. The Trustee will have to decide if the consumer proposal can still be recommended to the creditors, or if it must be improved because of the increased total asset value.

Insolvent definition: Are you insolvent?

Are you unable to pay your debts as they come due? Are your bills past due and you don’t know how you are going to pay them? If so, then you are insolvent, and we can help end your pain.

Licensed Insolvency Trustees (formerly called bankruptcy trustees) are the only experts accredited, licensed and supervised by the federal government to handle debt restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee, our personalized strategy will assist you to know all your alternatives. The alternative you choose based on our recommendations will take away the stress and pain you are feeling because of your debt problems.

The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience people and companies in financial trouble. Whether it is a consumer proposal debt settlement plan, a larger personal or corporate restructuring proposal debt settlement plan, or as a last resort, bankruptcy, we have the experience.

Our approach for each file is to create a result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life. Call us today for your free consultation.

Insolvent definition: NET WORTH ADDENDUM

Regularly monitoring your finances reveals invaluable lessons. A most important aspect of building wealth is to find it. People that constantly increase their net worth track it to direct it. So, the starting point is understanding what the net worth definition for a person is.

Seeing the measurable results of your spending and investing decisions is the first step to take control of them. Contrarily, people in the worst monetary shape have no concept where their money is spent and are too afraid to know what their net worth might be since it will not be pretty.

Which extreme more closely matches your mindset? You can’t handle what you don’t measure. Consider it: if you were seriously rich, you’d invest a long time weekly handling some element of your finances.

A beginner variation of a financial tracking approach is needed to begin improving your financial condition.. In addition, the more money you build up, the more financial assets and liabilities to keep an eye on. I ‘d wager that you won’t own them for long if you don’t have your financial tracking system set up before you acquire them. If you don’t see and feel the gains and losses of your monetary choices–you are playing the complex money-game of life without any scorecard.

This is how so many people with good income still find their way into financial trouble. You need to have navigation reference points to know if you are going toward developing wealth or ruining wealth. It is by monitoring your net worth that you’ll begin to discover the monetary impact and effects of your decisions.

The beginning point for financial measuring is a simple statement of net worth (or balance sheet). It is a list of the current market price of whatever you own and what you owe to others. Your net worth is the difference between these 2 numbers. This is the number that you want to measure and increase every month. As with a business, as soon as you start determining the monetary repercussions of your habits you can begin making your own individual financial guidance. Basic insights and rules like these will help increase your net worth. This will lead to bigger insights and develop into bigger gains.

If you find that you have a lot of debt that is reducing your net worth, or possibly a negative net worth, then what guidance about debt are you going to develop for yourself? Think about including a guideline to read a new personal finance book each year. Your money rules and net worth statements can be as advanced or as basic as you wish to make them.

When you have computed your calculation of net worth, you begin having the ability to plan for purchases and payments. As an easy example, if your auto insurance coverage costs get paid annually, you can calculate just how much cash that you must to set aside monthly to easily pay it when the bill arrives. Or if you are getting a new car, you’ll be a lot better prepared for the first costs before you get squeezed at the end of the month and wind up paying a couple of bills late.

After you get comfortable with a net worth statement, you can move on to an income & expense sheet. How much net worth will you need by when? The answer is based upon the financial routines, tools and education you will establish. However, it can all start with your very first net worth statement.

JUNE 17, 2019 UPDATE: The Court of Appeal for Ontario reversed this lower court decision. You can read all about it in our blog update – INSOLVENT DEFINITION RESTORED IN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), bankruptcy court, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, Consumer Proposal, Debt, debts, insolvent, insolvent definition, Ira Smith Trustee, lawyer, licensed insolvency trustee, Net worth, personal finance book, Small Claims Court, toronto, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

DEBT FORGIVENESS CRA: CANADA REVENUE AGENCY BEATS DONOVAN BAILEY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date June 18, 2018

Debt forgiveness CRA: Introduction

Last week we told you about professional athletes who earned enormous fortunes and blew it all on lavish, unsupportable lifestyles. The end result was bankruptcy. There is another group of professional athletes who also earned millions and ended up using a bankruptcy alternative to avoid bankruptcy, but not because they blew it all. They were trying to shield their money from taxes through complex offshore tax structures. However, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) reassessed them and now they had a huge tax bill and needed debt forgiveness CRA.

CRA debt forgiveness: Donovan Bailey tries to race Canada Revenue Agency

This is certainly not a new phenomenon. The newspapers and tabloids often feature stories about famous people who the tax department reassesses for using complex tax structures designed by agents, managers, accountants, and lawyers. In this case, our very own Olympian, Donovan Bailey, had to file a proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada), as a result of an offshore tax scheme to try to beat the CRA. And, sadly, he’s not the only one.

Debt forgiveness CRA: Her Majesty outruns the offshore tax scheme

The offshore tax scheme that nearly bankrupted Donovan Bailey was designed to lessen the amount of income tax to be paid. Donovan Bailey made a “charitable donation”. It went through a complicated series of transactions. The money made its way back to Mr. Bailey, through an offshore account. It was supposed to come back in tax-free.

The problem was that the tax authority reassessed Donovan Bailey. They said the charitable donation was no more than a sham to avoid paying taxes. Instead of tax-free money Donovan Bailey found himself in debt to the CRA to the tune of $2.3 million in unpaid taxes and ended up in bankruptcy court.

Debt forgiveness CRA: CRA gets tough

The CRA has vowed to get tough on tax evaders and the tax professionals who help them. CRA threatens with increased fines and jail sentences. They have a strategy to root out high-risk wealthy Canadians and corporations that stash cash in offshore accounts to avoid taxes. And, they’re spending $444 million on these measures, and expect to recoup $2.6 billion in added revenue over five years.

Debt forgiveness CRA: What to do if you have too much debt

No one likes to pay taxes, but trying to hide money from the CRA could land you fines, jail time and/or bankruptcy. If you’re considering bankruptcy because of income tax debt or for any reason, we can show you bankruptcy alternatives to get CRA debt forgiveness. We can end your debt pain through a consumer proposal, debt consolidation, and credit counselling. Contact a professional that you can trust – Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.

The Ira Smith Team has a cumulative 50+ years of experience dealing with diverse issues and complex files. We deliver the highest quality of professional service. Don’t settle for less. Give us a call today and Starting Over, Starting Now you can overcome your financial difficulties.

Tags bankrupt, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy alternative, bankruptcy alternatives, bankruptcy court, Canada Revenue Agency, Consumer Proposal, CRA, cra debt forgiveness, credit counselling, debt consolidation, debt forgiveness cra, declare bankruptcy, donovan bailey, Ira Smith Trustee, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

STALKING HORSE ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT: THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY GALLOPS INTO A COURT SUPERVISED SALES PROCESS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date April 4, 2018

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: Introduction

In my July 2015 blog, “STALKING HORSE BID: DO YOU REALLY WANT TO STALK YOUR HORSE ANYWAY?”, I defined and described the stalking horse bid process in the Canadian insolvency context. In my November 2017 vlog, “FILING FOR BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY RETAINS ATTORNEYS FOR POSSIBLE BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION FILING”, I described the (then) financial condition of The Weinstein Company (TWC) and correctly predicted that it would have no choice but to ultimately file for bankruptcy protection. The purpose of today’s vlog is to provide an update on TWC’s bankruptcy protection filing. My expectation that on April 6, 2018, the US Bankruptcy Court will approve a stalking horse asset purchase agreement.

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: Stalking horse agreement definition

As a refresher, the stalking horse bid process is, an effort by a company to look at the marketplace ahead of an auction. The intent is to make the most of the value of its assets. This is done as part of normally what is a court supervised public auction sale. It is common to being used in a bankruptcy case. stalking horse bidder

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: How a stalking horse bid works

The insolvent company in bankruptcy protection, canvasses the marketplace. It comes up with what it determines to be, under the circumstances, the best possible offer. The insolvent company and the potential purchaser, enter into a stalking horse asset purchase agreement. The potential purchaser allows its stalking horse bid to go public.

While entering a stalking horse asset purchase agreement, the company can use bidding process protections. An example is breakup charges. This protects the stalking horse bidder prior to the public auction sale. These incentives improve the worth of the offering for the stalking horse buyer. This process may bring about a far better offer before the public auction starts. This greater deal is currently the beginning deal for the public auction. The aim is to produce the best possible offer.

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: How did the stalking horse offer process get its name?

This type of bidding process gets its name from the use of a stalking horse in hunting. The hunter uses a horse, or a screen made in the shape of a horse. The hunter stays concealed when stalking prey.

The stalking horse bid becomes “the stalking horse”; the “animal” used to attract the “prey”, being other bidders.

The terms of the sales process would show by what minimum amount any other bid must beat the stalking horse bid. That minimum amount would have to be at least the amount of the break fee. The break fee is compensation for stalking horse bidder. It attempts to compensate for due diligence time and costs if they don’t win the deal.

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: TWC bankruptcy case

In the evening of March 19, 2018, TWC filed for bankruptcy protection in a Delaware Bankruptcy Court. The reasons for the filing were twofold: (i) TWC had canvassed the marketplace and had obtained an offer to purchase its assets by a stalking horse buyer, Lantern Capital; and (ii) to have a Court supervised forum so that both a sale and transfer of the assets can take place and all claimants can make a claim against the resulting cash. TWC announced that anyone subject to a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) was now released. No doubt this will lead to more allegations and claims.

stalking horse asset purchase agreement

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: The stalking horse purchase agreement

Variety reported that Lantern Capital, a Dallas based private equity firm, entered into the stalking horse asset purchase agreement with TWC. Variety stated Lantern’s bid offers $310 million in cash, plus assuming up to $114.5 million in liabilities connected with TV and film projects, for a total stalking horse bid of $424.5 million.

If approved by the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, this will serve as the floor for other bidders. There is a hearing scheduled for April 6 in Delaware, at which time the Bankruptcy Court is expected to approve this stalking horse bid and the entire stalking horse process. As currently drafted, all other bids must be submitted by April 30. The bids will then be vetted, discussions will take place and TWC will then appear again in Bankruptcy Court to recommend which offer is deemed to be the best and be approved and completed. No further information is available at this time.

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: Does your company have a buyer but might need a Court-supervised process to finish a sale?

In next week’s vlog, I will provide a case study of how we used a stalking horse asset purchase agreement Bankruptcy Court supervised process to sell the assets of an insolvent company. The successful sale also continued employment for many people.

Is your company facing financial hardship, yet its assets are attractive to multiple potential purchasers? Perhaps you need to be thinking of using bankruptcy protection to maximize the value of the company’s assets through a sale. This process can also continue employment for both you the entrepreneur owner and for many of your current employees.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. Team understands the pain you are going through trying to keep your company alive while trying to negotiate with potential purchasers. We understand that you are playing beat the clock, and the pain and stress you are feeling thinking that you may just run out of time. The bankruptcy protection process can ease this stress and provide a level playing field so that no potential purchaser takes advantage of you.

The Ira Smith Team has a great deal of experience in running a stalking horse stalking horse asset purchase agreement. The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points. Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation. We can end your pain and put your company back on a healthy profitable path, Starting Over, Starting Now. stalking horse bidder

Brandon Blog Post

COMPANY RESTRUCTURING PROCESS CASE STUDY: HOW WE USED BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING IN CANADA TO SAVE THE BUSINESS AND JOBS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date March 28, 2018

Company restructuring process: Introduction

Over the last two weeks, we have provided you with real case studies from our files. This week’s case study is about our involvement with a company restructuring process so its business could continue to serve its clients and maintain most of the jobs.

Two weeks ago we described a personal insolvency case study, CLAIM BANKRUPTCY IN ONTARIO CASE STUDY: SHE REALLY WANTED TO BUT WE STOPPED HER AND SOLVED HER PROBLEMS, was about the surgeon who became insolvent because of a failed business venture and a divorce. The events leading up to the doctor’s insolvency convinced her that she had to go bankrupt. We then described the steps we took to restructure her affairs so she could avoid bankruptcy. She completed a successful Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). More importantly, she regained her confidence, we eliminated her pain points and she is once again thriving emotionally, physically and financially.

Last week, we described a situation where we used our skill set in a different way. In our case study, COURT APPOINTED ESTATE TRUSTEE CASE STUDY: IF IT WAS EASY YOU WOULDN’T NEED US, we described how we ended a war between the two beneficiaries under a Will and monetized the assets for their benefit. In that situation, the Court appointed us as the court appointed estate trustee.

The company was a social media agency. Their clients were some of the largest household names in North America. The company made sure that their clients’ websites were eye-catching, technologically advanced using leading search engine optimization (SEO) and search engine marketing (SEM) techniques. In short, their clients had to show up on page 1 of an online search and that their websites were eye-popping and functional. The company was a Canadian and North American leader.

Company restructuring process: Life got in the way

The sole shareholder and Director experienced some health issues with a family member; that required her attention. She was tending to that emergency and it took her away from the business for lengthy periods of time. Experienced senior staff ran the business in her absence. The entrepreneur felt she could deal with business matters by telephone. They established a process where she signed documents and cheques prepared by staff members using couriers.

Company restructuring process: Senior staff were not trustworthy

WRONG!! Although she trusted the senior staff, they turned out not to be trustworthy. They made mistakes and assured the owner that the documents and cheques they prepared were correct.

They also provided her status reports assuring her that all client activities and projects were all on schedule. The reality was that certain senior staff were plotting to establish their own agency, to steal clients. The sole Director felt something was not right, but she could not pinpoint from afar what the issues were. She returned to the office and discovered that her worst fears were her new reality.

Company restructuring process: How bad was it?

Things were very bad. Billings were way behind. Cash flow had dried up. As a result of the lack of cash flow, the company was now behind in rent and had collected but did not remit source deductions totalling over $300,000. The unremitted source deductions formed a trust claim over all the company’s assets, ahead of the company’s bank. Learning all this information made the bank very uneasy and unwilling to lend any more money.

Company restructuring process: The short-term steps in financial restructuring

The sole Director and shareholder of the company contacted us. She was operating in panic mode. We assessed the situation. Our preliminary assessment was that catching up on the billings and the clients paying them in the normal course, good cash flow would return. There was also a good book of projects to start on; just not as many as normal. Thankfully, no clients had left yet.

The short-term plan we developed had 7 steps:

Fire the staff involved in the attempt to start-up their own firm and steal clients. Pay their normal wages and vacation pay, but not pay in lieu of notice.
File immediately a Notice of Intention To Make a Proposal (NOI) to invoke the stay of proceedings (Stay Period) so that no creditor could take action against the company.
Immediately bill all unbilled projects and begin collection efforts on any outstanding invoices.
Reach out to all major clients to reassure them that the entrepreneur was in control after returning from the family emergency and that she would personally be supervising all work performed.
Prepare a crisis cash flow model that thankfully showed that the company could cash flow itself since the amounts owing to the unsecured creditors was not caught in the restructuring.
The company required fresh capital. Luckily, the entrepreneur had enough funds to inject.
Meet with the company’s banker to explain the situation and share the emergency cash flow to show that the company did not need any new funds from the bank and that the principal was going to inject the temporary funds necessary. This gave the banker the assurance that the bank line would not be pressed any further, and that the entrepreneur was willing to put her money where her mouth was.
company restructuring process

Company restructuring process: The long-term plan

Now that the situation was stabilized, we worked with the company to look at longer term restructuring needs. It needed a business debt restructuring process. We determined that the company had too much space. As it did not need to immediately replace the terminated staff, it now did not need as much space. Certain space could be given up without affecting the main space and the business.

The landlord of course was not happy about this, but was willing to work with the company. If the landlord was not cooperative, the backup plan was to repudiate the unnecessary space through the formal restructuring plan.

The terminated employees retained legal counsel, who made himself known. Various issues arose from this. Were they going to seek leave of the bankruptcy court to launch litigation for damages against the company? What counterclaim could the company prove? Should we agree to attempt to value what claims they may have without litigation and include them in the restructuring plan?

Company restructuring process: The need for more time

Upon the filing of the NOI, the company obtained a first 30 day stay where its creditors could not pursue it and to file the real restructuring proposal. The company had to run for at least a few weeks to assess if the real performance was similar to the cash flow forecast developed on day 1.

Therefore, the company’s lawyers went to bankruptcy court to seek a 45 day extension for the company to file its bankruptcy protection restructuring plan. As Trustee, we had to prepare and file our report with the court to attest to the fact that:

an extension of the Stay Period is required to enable the company to continue to run in the ordinary course and complete its restructuring proposal;
the company continues to act in good faith and with due diligence; and
no creditor would be materially prejudiced by the extension of the Stay Period.

The Court granted the extension for this company restructuring process.

Company restructuring process: The corporate debt restructuring process

We could now finish the real corporate restructuring proposal through this bankruptcy protection process. Given the unknown of the final valuation of the terminated employees’ claims, if any, we had to build in further protection for the company. We decided that the company’s bankruptcy protection plan would be what is known as a “basket proposal”. The amount of funds available for the unsecured creditors would be a fixed amount. So, whatever the claims ended up being, the size of the pot never changed.

Under the bankruptcy laws in Canada for a corporation undergoing a corporate restructuring, we had to ensure that there were sufficient funds for the unsecured creditors to share in “the pot”. The amount had to be realistic, to get the required majority of unsecured creditors voting in favour of the corporate restructuring plan. We also had to ensure that the bank was not being compromised in the proposal and that we communicated that clearly to the bank.

Company restructuring process: The government trust claim

As stated above, the unremitted source deductions were a trust claim. The restructuring bankruptcy laws in Canada state that such a claim has to be repaid in full within 6 months of Court approval of the restructuring proposal. We revisited the company’s cash flow. Although the company was on track, over the next year, money was needed to reinvest in the business.

The entrepreneur had no more money from her own resources. Therefore, after allowing for operations and the payment of the past unremitted source deduction amount of about $300,000, we could only offer the unsecured creditors roughly 5 cents on the dollar of the proven claims from future operations. The company promised to pay that amount within 6 months of retiring the government trust claim amount. So, within 1 year of Court approval, the unsecured creditors would get their money from the corporate restructuring plan.

Company restructuring process: Solving the terminated employee claims

Seeing this, the terminated employee group did not wish to spend funds on litigation, only to receive 5% of whatever claim they may have from the restructuring plan. We ended up agreeing to a very modest amount to represent their claims in the proposal.

The meeting of creditors was held and we obtained the required majority of creditors voting in favour of the business restructuring proposal. The creditors realized it was a better outcome than if they voted the company into bankruptcy. They voted in favour of the company restructuring process. We then obtained the necessary Court approval.

Company restructuring process: The result

The company turned its operations around. It survived the coup by the terminated employees. The company produced enough cash profits to retire the government trust claim debt within 6 months of court approval. It also paid the proposal fund amount to us as Trustee on time, to be distributed to the unsecured creditors.

The company successfully restructured and operated profitably afterwards. The entrepreneur was able to sell her company several years later and retire.

Company restructuring process: The financial restructuring process

The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex corporate restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur. You are worried because your company is facing significant financial challenges. Your business provides income not only for your family. Many other families rely on you and your company for their well-being.

The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your company’s problems; financial and emotional. The way we dealt with this problem and devised a corporate restructuring plan, we know that we can help you and your company too.

We know that companies facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a company restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain it is facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get your company back on the road to healthy stress free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

COMPANY RESTRUCTURING PROCESS 11 — company restructuring process

Tags Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy court, bankruptcy laws in Canada, bankruptcy laws in Canada for a corporation, bankruptcy protection, bankruptcy protection process, bankruptcy protection restructuring plan, basket proposal, business debt restructuring process, business restructuring in canada, cash flow, cash flow forecast, cash flow model, company restructuring process, corporate debt restructuring process, corporate restructuring, corporate restructuring plan, corporate restructuring proposal, debt restructuring process, financial restructuring, financial restructuring process, financial restructuring process is complex, formal restructuring plan, Ira Smith Trustee, meeting of creditors, noi, notice of intention to make a proposal, restructuring, restructuring bankruptcy laws, restructuring bankruptcy laws in Canada, restructuring plan, stay period, unremitted source deductions, unsecured creditors

Brandon Blog Post

FILING FOR BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY RETAINS ATTORNEYS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 15, 2017

Filing for bankruptcy protection: Introduction

As claims against Harvey Weinstein transform from a few into an avalanche, several of the loan providers backing his named firm have actually started speaking to bankruptcy advisors about filing for bankruptcy protection, say sources knowledgeable about the issue. They are concerned that The Weinstein Company (TWC) may be filing for bankruptcy protection. Why do you ask? I will explain below.

Everyone is lawyering up

A team of The Weinstein Company’s financial institution loan providers have involved restructuring lawyers from Sidley Austin to work as advisors in case of a filing for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. They have actually likewise held pitches to work with an economic consultant to give calculated restructuring guidance.

TWC has retained the law office of O’Melveny & Myers, while Moelis & Company is acting as an economic consultant to the board. The firm has involved FTI Consulting, a financial advisory and restructuring firm.

filing for bankruptcy protection

Can The Weinstein Company borrow any more?

TWC has actually been attempting to raise money. It has also tried to offer itself totally to a brand-new financier. Talks have not yet produced a deal. Also if it locates a purchaser, a sale might have to be applied in the context of a bankruptcy, to “clean” the assets from the mounting claims against TWC.

What are its chances of a successful restructuring?

The Weinstein Company has long shot of restructuring, however, filing for bankruptcy protection would certainly provide possible purchasers with the chance to buy its movie collection and other assets free from the claims against both Harvey Weinstein and TWC.

TWC might use bankruptcy court-approved public auctions to discover purchasers and after that make use of those sale proceeds to establish a fund against which claims can be made and sorted out by the bankruptcy trustee. TWC is certainly going to meet claims over its failure to stop Harvey’s transgressions.

Is The Weinstein Company brand too toxic for it to survive?

TWC has borrowed millions of dollars in the last few years. It now faces the real possibility that its now-toxic brand name will materially influence future company chances of survival in the longer term. The cases associated with Weinstein’s alleged sex-related criminal offences will probably result in adverse annual report reporting obligations. This will further worry TWC’s lenders.

Filing for bankruptcy protection: Watch for all the lawsuits – even the ones not involving sex!

Harvey Weinstein has actually currently filed a claim against the business, looking for accessibility to his earlier company e-mail account to strengthen his defence against the sexual harassment claims against him. A bankruptcy would likely leave behind just a shadow of the firm that might really well have no choice but to file a claim against Harvey Weinstein for sinking the company. In other words, what we have here is The Weinstein Company horror movie.

Filing for bankruptcy protection: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company insolvent and needs to restructure? Is your business viable but can only employ people and carry on business if it can restructure its debt? Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Team. If we meet with you early on, we can create a restructuring and turnaround strategy. That way your company won’t have to be like The Weinstein Company.

filing for bankruptcy protection

Tags Bankruptcy, bankruptcy court, bankruptcy protection, chapter 11, filing for bankruptcy, filing for bankruptcy protection, harvey weinstein, Ira Smith Trustee, restructuring, restructuring and turnaround, the weinstein company, the weinstein company horror movie, turnaround, twc

What are the implications of discharge from bankruptcy Canada?

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: What are the implications if you are not discharged from bankruptcy?

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: How do you obtain a bankruptcy discharge in Canada?

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: What are the steps to clear my bankruptcy?

Completing your own application for discharge from bankruptcy Canada

Requisition – Notice of hearing for bankrupt’s discharge from bankruptcy Canada hearing for discharge

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada:The Affidavit

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada:Affidavit of Service

At the discharge from bankruptcy Canada hearing

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: Order for discharge

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: Are you tired of being in debt?

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: Restrictions placed on undischarged bankrupts

What does it mean to be an undischarged bankrupt?

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: Debts eliminated by bankruptcy discharge

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: Bankruptcy law can resolve tax debts

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: Debts never discharged in bankruptcy

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: Absolute discharge vs. conditional discharge and so on and so forth

What does bankruptcy discharged mean: At long last, the Nova Scotia case

What does bankruptcy discharged mean summary

Commercial rent relief Canada introduction

Commercial rent relief Canada – The US version

Modell’s Sporting Goods, Inc. et al Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings

Pier 1 Imports took a page from the Modell playbook

Could this commercial rent relief Canada occur under Canadian bankruptcy protection?

We now have a commercial rent relief Canada answer from British Columbia

Quest’s commercial rent relief Canada application like Modell’s and Pier 1

The court’s decision in Quest’s commercial rent relief Canada application

Commercial rent relief Canada summary

Rules of civil procedure introduction

New rules of civil procedure 46.02

New Superior Court of Justice rules of civil procedure for witness testimony

New rules of civil procedure for documents in writing in Superior Court of Justice proceedings

Rules of civil procedure for the Superior Court of Justice

Gambling debts: Introduction

Gambling debts: What the LIT is expected to do

Gambling debts: The Donaldson facts

Gambling debts: The bankruptcy discharge will not be easy

Gambling debts: The bankruptcy discharge must serve a purpose

Gambling debts: The Registrar’s decision

Gambling debts: Do you have too much debt?

JUNE 17, 2019 UPDATE: The Court of Appeal for Ontario reversed this lower court decision. You can read all about it in our blog update – INSOLVENT DEFINITION RESTORED IN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Insolvent definition: Introduction

Insolvent definition: Two examples

Insolvent definition: The concept of net worth

Insolvent definition: Kormos v. Fast, 2018 ONSC 6044 (CanLII)

Insolvent definition: The Court’s analysis

Insolvent definition: The Trustee

Insolvent definition: Are you insolvent?

Insolvent definition: NET WORTH ADDENDUM

Debt forgiveness CRA: Introduction

Debt forgiveness CRA: Her Majesty outruns the offshore tax scheme

Debt forgiveness CRA: CRA gets tough

Debt forgiveness CRA: What to do if you have too much debt

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: Introduction

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: Stalking horse agreement definition

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: How a stalking horse bid works

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: How did the stalking horse offer process get its name?

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: TWC bankruptcy case

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: The stalking horse purchase agreement

Stalking horse asset purchase agreement: Does your company have a buyer but might need a Court-supervised process to finish a sale?

Company restructuring process: Introduction

Company restructuring process: The social media agency

Company restructuring process: Life got in the way

Company restructuring process: Senior staff were not trustworthy

Company restructuring process: How bad was it?

Company restructuring process: The short-term steps in financial restructuring

Company restructuring process: The long-term plan

Company restructuring process: The need for more time

Company restructuring process: The corporate debt restructuring process

Company restructuring process: The government trust claim

Company restructuring process: Solving the terminated employee claims

Company restructuring process: The result

Company restructuring process: The financial restructuring process

Filing for bankruptcy protection: Introduction

Can The Weinstein Company borrow any more?

Filing for bankruptcy protection: Does your company have too much debt?

***What does bankruptcy discharged mean:* *Absolute discharge vs. conditional discharge and so on and so forth***