Tag: licensed insolvency trustee

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DECLARING BANKRUPTCY: REAL ESTATE COMPANY LOSES CHALLENGE ON CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY APPEAL

Declaring bankruptcy: Business insolvency

When the corporate finances are such that the business has an insufficient cash flow to cover its operating expenses and pay its debts when they come due, these financial difficulties create the financial condition of insolvency for the business. Another indicator of insolvency often exists at the same time: if you were to sell all of the company’s assets, you would not be able to raise enough money to pay off its outstanding debt.

Medcap Real Estate Holdings Inc. (Medcap) is an Ontario corporation that owns certain commercial real estate. Medcap’s principal, through other companies which he owns or controls, operates various fitness facilities.

Several creditors made a bankruptcy application to the Court to wind up Medcap’s business through a corporate bankruptcy. In December 2021, the Judge released his decision to issue a bankruptcy order and place the company in the legal position of bankruptcy. Medcap appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I discuss the two ways there are for declaring bankruptcy and highlight the reasoning of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in dismissing this company’s appeal for its corporate bankruptcy.

Declaring bankruptcy: An overview of corporate bankruptcy

In Canada, a company is a separate legal entity from its shareholders or Directors and Officers. So a company can go into corporate bankruptcy, as opposed to a person entering personal bankruptcy, also known as consumer bankruptcy. There are two ways a company (or a person) can go bankrupt.

The first way is that a company (or person) files for bankruptcy by filing an assignment in bankruptcy with a licensed insolvency trustee. This is called a voluntary assignment into bankruptcy. The second way, which is what happened to Medcap, is that they are pushed into bankruptcy.

To push a limited company (person) into bankruptcy, one or more creditors, each owed at least $1,000, make a bankruptcy application to the court. The application will include a sworn affidavit from the people with knowledge of the situation providing evidence as to why the company (the person) is insolvent, what acts of bankruptcy the business (person) committed within 6 months preceding the date of the application and requesting that a bankruptcy order be made against the debtor.

Regardless of the types of bankruptcy proceedings that may be involved, these are the only two ways for companies with crippling debt to become bankrupt. It is either voluntary or an involuntary one.

declaring bankruptcy
declaring bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy: Types of Corporate Bankruptcy

A company that ends up declaring bankruptcy may be doing so for a variety of reasons, all of which relate to significant financial losses. In Canada, there are two primary types of bankruptcy filings under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

Once the company is insolvent and no longer viable, declaring bankruptcy in order to have liquidation of assets and end the business in that legal entity is the next step. In this situation, there may be certain business debts that are also a personal liability of the corporate Directors. Unremitted source deductions and HST and unpaid wages and vacation pay fall into this category.

Bankruptcy is a tricky topic. Many people tend to fear it, thinking of it as the end of the road. Given my description above of bankruptcy being for liquidating the company assets, that is understandable.

But what about the company that is insolvent but the business is very viable if the bad parts are cut out? In this kind of situation, filing under the BIA using the restructuring provisions of this federal statute, or for larger companies, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), is a legal way for the company to restructure its debts to get its finances back in order. In a successful restructuring, the good parts of the business are restructured and preserved, the company’s finances are right-sized and most if not all jobs are saved. This form of declaring bankruptcy is what is referred to in the media as bankruptcy protection.

So in Canada, declaring bankruptcy is one type, but declaring bankruptcy protection is also possible. That is why I suggest in Canada, there are 2 types of business-specific options in corporate bankruptcy filings.

Declaring bankruptcy: Does corporate bankruptcy affect personal assets?

The legal separation of personal and corporate assets is clear. However, a company declaring bankruptcy may have an impact on the personal assets of certain people. There are situations where personal assets may be at risk. If you are concerned about your personal assets, you should consult with a legal professional to assess your individual case.

Before making any business or investment decisions, is when you should get that professional advice. Once a corporate bankruptcy filing has been made, it will be too late to properly plan for that situation. Personal assets could be at risk if it is a bankruptcy liquidation and not a successful restructuring.

Examples of when personal assets may be at risk because of business bankruptcies include:

  • the entrepreneur who had to give a personal guarantee of certain corporate debt financial obligations to the company’s primary secured creditor lender and in a liquidation of the company’s assets, the lender suffers a shortfall;
  • there is not enough money left over from the liquidation after any trust claims and secured creditor claims to pay the outstanding wages and vacation pay so the Directors’ personal assets may be at risk;
  • the liquidation value of the assets is essentially zero so the Directors are called upon by Canada Revenue Agency to repay any unremitted employee source deductions or HST amounts;
  • in bankruptcy liquidation, there is generally nothing available to repay investors or shareholders so the money an individual investor or shareholder loses certainly affects their personal assets and personal property. The stock of companies that liquidated their assets after declaring bankruptcy is worthless; and
  • any creditors that are unincorporated, being either a proprietorship or partnership who lose some or all of the amounts owed to them as ordinary unsecured creditors clearly affect the personal assets of those business owners.

Declaring bankruptcy: The Medcap case

With this discussion of corporations declaring bankruptcy, there are some interesting points to be learned from the Medcap appeal case and the bankruptcy process. The application judge dismissed the bankruptcy applications of all but one of the applicants. He issued the bankruptcy order and appointed the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy or bankruptcy trustee) which began Medcap’s administration of bankruptcy.

The Medcap company appealed the bankruptcy order on only one ground; the judge who made the original order failed to exercise his discretion on whether or not to dismiss the application. Medcap did not appeal the application judge’s finding that the prerequisites to the making of a bankruptcy order – a debt owing to an applicant of at least $1,000 and the commission of an act of bankruptcy within six months of the commencement of the application – had been met!

The most interesting part of the Court of Appeal’s decision is the discussion of the two factors that a court could look at where a judge could exercise discretion to justify refusing an otherwise proven bankruptcy application.

declaring bankruptcy
declaring bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy: Appealing a bankruptcy order

As mentioned previously, Medcap did not contest the judge’s conclusion that the creditor whose bankruptcy application was allowed had met the requirements under s. 43(1) of the BIA. This is that Medcap owed them a debt exceeding $1,000 and that Medcap committed an act of bankruptcy within 6 months before the filing of that bankruptcy application.

The application judge found that Medcap had failed to pay that creditor’s debt, for which a judgment was issued, despite demands. This is defined as an act of bankruptcy in s. 42(1)(j) of the BIA. In its appeal, the Medcap company argued that, even though the debt and the act of bankruptcy were proven, the application judge made a mistake by not using his discretionary power under s. 43(7) of the BIA to dismiss the application.

Medcap made three arguments to support its appeal: (i) that the trial judge erred in finding that Medcap was unable to pay its debts; (ii) that he erred in finding that the application was brought for an improper motive; and (iii) that he erred in finding that the bankruptcy order would serve no purpose.

Let’s see what the Court of Appeal for Ontario said about this.

Declaring bankruptcy: Unable to pay its debts

This is the first of the three bankruptcy issues that the Court of Appeal looked at. Medcap argued that the application judge dismissed the applications of all applicants but one because there was potential that they were not creditors. Medcap also stated that the application judge had not taken into account that Medcap had reached a settlement with the one creditor whose application was allowed to be heard. Medcap submitted that the application judge erred in not taking this into account as there was no debt owing because of the settlement and the payment of that settlement.

The appellate court found that the lower court judge did not err in rejecting Medcap’s argument. An application for bankruptcy is not solely for the benefit of the applicant creditor, but for the rights of creditors, ALL creditors. Further, the arrangements between the applicant creditor and the debtor will not be able to justify the withdrawal or dismissal of a bankruptcy application, unless the court is satisfied that the debtor is solvent and that other creditors will not be prejudiced by the withdrawal or dismissal.

To be able to pay debts as set out in the BIA, the evidence must be provided for all debts owed, as well as the debtor’s ability to pay them. In other words, the debtor must prove that they are solvent. Medcap did not provide such evidence. Therefore this ground of appeal was dismissed.

Declaring bankruptcy: Bankruptcy application for improper motives

Medcap argued that in cases where a creditor has an ulterior motive for filing a bankruptcy application, this can be sufficient cause for dismissal of the application. The Court of Appeal said that the existence of a motive is a question of fact, and the application judge considered and rejected the suggestion that there was such a motive in this case.

The Court of Appeal found that the application judge was within his rights to reject the argument based on the record. Therefore, the Court of Appeal for Ontario found no justification to interfere and dismissed the appeal on that ground.declaring bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy: There is no purpose for this bankruptcy

Medcap argued that the application judge erred in failing to find that no purpose would be served by bankruptcy. He ought to have dismissed the application on the basis that there was nothing to be gained by making a bankruptcy order.

The Court of Appeal emphasized that safeguarding creditors is crucial to insolvency proceedings. A debtor who has (a) committed an act of bankruptcy by not paying debts when they come due, and (b) failed to provide evidence to the court demonstrating the ability to do so, carries the burden of proving that bankruptcy would be pointless. The judge was correct in finding that Medcap had not met that burden.

The three-panel judge went on to say that, in order to demonstrate that there is no purpose for the Medcap bankruptcy, they would need to show that a better result would be achieved for creditors if it were allowed time to restructure under the commercial proposal provisions of the BIA or the provisions of the CCAA.

Medcap did not argue that doing either would have the requisite creditor support but rather suggested that leaving it up to them would be best.

The three appellate court judges hearing this case unanimously rejected Medcap’s appeal, upholding the lower court’s ruling and allowing the bankruptcy process legal proceedings to continue. At this point, the licensed trustee named in the bankruptcy order begins administering the bankruptcy legal process.

Declaring bankruptcy: The final word

What fascinated me most about this case was the nerve of Medcap to argue that the application judge should have declined to make the bankruptcy order, regardless of all the evidence against it.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario soundly rejected the appeal of the bankruptcy order being issued after analyzing the bankruptcy application process in Canada. It concluded that only a real possibility of a successful restructuring under either the BIA or CCAA to avoid bankruptcy liquidation would be a reason to do so.

I hope this Brandon’s Blog on the Medcap case was helpful to you in understanding more about declaring bankruptcy, corporate bankruptcy and how the Ontario court would decide if it was appropriate to issue a bankruptcy order. Hopefully, you have also gained insight into how a corporate bankruptcy decision is made and how a successful corporate bankruptcy protection filing and restructuring can be beneficial.

We understand how you feel. You’re stressed out and anxious because you can’t fix your or your company’s financial situation on your own. But don’t worry. As a government-licensed insolvency professional firm, we can help you get your personal or corporate finances back on track.

If you’re struggling with money problems, call the Ira Smith Team today. We’ll work with you to develop a personalized plan to get you back on track and stress-free, all while avoiding the bankruptcy process if at all possible.

Call us today and get back on the path to a healthy stress-free life.

declaring bankruptcy
declaring bankruptcy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT DOES A LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE DO TO HELP IN YOUR MANAGING DEBT FOR A PROFOUND QUALITY OF LIFE?

what does a licensed insolvency trustee do

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do?: What is a licensed insolvency trustee?

Frequently I am asked what does a licensed insolvency trustee do? How is it different from a bankruptcy trustee? The answer is it isn’t different. The term bankruptcy trustee is dated.

The new title is Licensed Insolvency Trustee. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) changed it in 2015. Among the reasons for the name change were the submissions made by the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals. As the name suggests, a licensed insolvency trustee can offer a wider array of financial solutions.

This Brandon’s Blog is intended to describe what does a licensed insolvency trustee do and to provide useful information for you to help you better understand the debt relief advice that a Trustee provides to people, entrepreneurs, and their companies experiencing financial trouble.

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do?: Licensed insolvency trustees are professionals who are federally regulated

There are many terms in the insolvency field that the average person isn’t familiar with, which is why it’s important to understand what the licensed insolvency trustee does. Trustees are licensed and supervised by the federal government through the OSB to act as personal and corporate insolvency administrators. This means they act to protect the interests of all involved parties while assisting debtors, acting as a debt counselor, a restructuring advisor, and if required, overseeing the bankruptcy process.

Licensed insolvency trustees are professionals with a background in finance, law, accounting, and insolvency. They assist businesses and individuals who are struggling financially. Typically, licensed insolvency trustees meet with clients to discuss their financial situation and offer advice and recommendations to help get the client out of a financial bind.

what does a licensed insolvency trustee do
what does a licensed insolvency trustee do

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do?: The credit counselor or a debt management program as an alternative

Financial guidance is offered by licensed insolvency trustees, credit counselors, and debt management programs. These services differ greatly from each other.

A licensed insolvency trustee can simply offer you financial advice and help you plan on how to repay your debts if that is all you need. A trustee is also the only person who can file a bankruptcy or consumer proposal for you. A Trustee will provide you with an initial no-cost confidential consultation to see if there are alternatives to bankruptcy for you. Credit counselors, credit counselling companies, and debt management businesses can give you financial advice and information. They can help you make a budget and make plans to repay your debt.

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do when you have debt but do not need to resort to one of the insolvency processes? During the free initial consultation, if a consumer proposal or bankruptcy is not right for you, the Trustee will refer you to see a community organization-based credit counselor who will be able to help you and also will not charge you a fee.

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do?: The Consumer Proposal Process

Consumer proposals to creditors are made by debtors and are legally binding agreements. You group all your debts into a consumer proposal to creditors. This is a debt solution to avoid bankruptcy. Your creditors agree to accept a reduced amount as full payment. The consumer proposal is a legal alternative to bankruptcy. Only a licensed insolvency trustee can administer it.

The only consumer insolvency restructuring proceeding regulated by the Canadian government is referred to as a consumer proposal (which is the only one of the consumer insolvency government-regulated insolvency proceedings that allow debt consolidation, debt settlement, or debt adjustment). In the end, your creditors write off the remainder of your debt, and you are released from those legal obligations.

If you owe $250,000 or less (not including any personal mortgages) and are insolvent, then you can qualify for a consumer proposal. Month-to-month payments over no more than 60 months need to be made to the Trustee. You pay just a part (generally 25%) of your total financial obligations gradually to the Trustee and when ended up, the rest of the balance owing to your unsecured creditors is written off.

what does a licensed insolvency trustee do
what does a licensed insolvency trustee do

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do?: The bankruptcy process

Canadian bankruptcy is a process whereby a person or company can declare itself bankrupt. The bankruptcy process starts in the provincial or territorial office of the OSB where the debtor is located.

In Canada, personal bankruptcy entails a number of stages. The debtor must be insolvent, meaning that they cannot repay their debts with the assets that they own or the income they earn. With the help of the Trustee, they must file statements of affairs and a statement of current income and expenses. There are other obligations on an undischarged bankrupt but that is not the purpose of this blog.

Upon receiving their discharge from bankruptcy, that is the moment that the debtor’s debts are forgiven or discharged.

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do?: The assignment of assets

When people file assignments in bankruptcy, what does a licensed insolvency trustee do with the assets? Any assets not charged by a secured creditor are available for the Trustee to take possession of. Those assets are usually things like real estate, cash, and vehicles. When assets are seized in bankruptcy the proceedings usually lead to them being sold and the proceeds are shared with creditors.

This is the main difference between a consumer proposal and bankruptcy. In a consumer proposal, there is no assignment of assets to the Trustee like in a bankruptcy. The debtor in a consumer proposal keeps their assets and makes monthly payments. It is the total of the monthly payments that the Trustee distributes to the creditors in a consumer proposal. In a bankruptcy, it is the proceeds of the asset sales.

what does a licensed insolvency trustee do
what does a licensed insolvency trustee do

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do?: Opting for a consumer proposal

Many people I deal with have significant debt problems. However, a consumer proposal may not be the best option for everyone. Opting for a consumer proposal means not only do you qualify under Canadian insolvency legislation to use one. It also means that it is a better alternative for you than personal bankruptcy. It means that you are able to restructure and not need bankruptcy services from a licensed insolvency trustee.

A consumer proposal is a way to get out of debt without declaring bankruptcy. If you are having trouble paying back credit card bills, medical bills, rent payments, and you don’t want to declare bankruptcy, a consumer proposal might be right for you.

Before opting for a consumer proposal, you must meet the following requirements:

  1. Total liabilities of $250,000 or less.
  2. Monthly payments can be made to your creditors, but not 100% of the total amount due.
  3. You cannot repay all of your debts with the money you have.
  4. If you work and are able to budget, you can pay your budgeted monthly expenses and have money left over for regular monthly payments to the Trustee. Under a debt management plan, your creditors will agree to write off a portion of your debt if you pay a fraction of what you owe.
  5. You may also be lucky enough to have a relative willing to put up a lump sum of money that represents a fraction of what you owe so that your unsecured creditors will accept it instead of all that you owe. This means that you can be in and out of your consumer proposal fairly quickly if you are in this fortunate position.

To summarize, consumer proposals are best suited to people with a sufficient disposable income. Consumer proposals offer the best way of restructuring, eliminating your unsecured debts, and avoiding bankruptcy.

There are restructuring provisions in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) for people who owe more than they can discharge in a consumer proposal or in business insolvency. Despite some differences in the rules, the overall theme of restructuring remains the same.

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do?: Going the bankruptcy route

Given the above, what can a person do to eliminate their unsecured debt if they cannot qualify for filing a consumer proposal as an alternative to bankruptcy? Going the bankruptcy route will probably make the most sense.

Bankruptcy is when a person cannot pay their bills. They file Canadian personal bankruptcy to get a fresh start. Filing a consumer bankruptcy must be your last resort after exhausting all other options to avoid bankruptcy. Bankruptcy means debts are written off when the person receives their absolute discharge from bankruptcy. The bankruptcy law in Canada protects people from dishonest, unfair, or abusive practices by creditors.

However, in return for getting the relief of eliminating debts through bankruptcy, an undischarged bankrupt also has certain responsibilities.

These include:

  1. Making full disclosure to the Trustee.
  2. With the assistance of the Trustee, preparing the sworn Statement of Affairs and Statement of Income and Expenses.
  3. Delivering all assets and properties to the Trustee to be sold (other than for certain provincial exemptions).
  4. Attending the First Meeting of Creditors if one needs to be held.
  5. Attending two financial counselling sessions with the Trustee or a member of the Trustee’s staff. Attendance at credit counseling sessions is also the case in a consumer proposal.
  6. Providing monthly statements of income and expenses while an undischarged bankrupt.
  7. Generally providing any assistance requested by the Trustee.

In providing debt-relief options, the Canadian bankruptcy system is designed to provide fairness to both debtors and creditors while allowing the person to financially rehabilitate themselves.

what does a licensed insolvency trustee do
what does a licensed insolvency trustee do

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do?: Final thoughts

What does a licensed insolvency trustee do? Licensed insolvency trustees are insolvency practitioners. They are debt professionals who deal with and provide services to individuals and businesses with debt problems that are experiencing financial issues that can only be resolved through an insolvency process. Licensed insolvency trustees are professionals, offering affordable solutions to financial struggles.

I hope you found this what does a licensed insolvency trustee do Brandon’s Blog about helpful. Sometimes things are too far gone and more drastic and immediate triage action is required.

Do you have too much debt? Are you in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt. You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.

It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

what does a licensed insolvency trustee do
what does a licensed insolvency trustee do
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY: SHOULD CANADA ADOPT A SATISFYING COMPLETE USA-STYLE PROCESS FOR SMALL BIZ RESTRUCTURING?

 

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

Business bankruptcy: Insolvency for business

Hundreds of thousands of small businesses around the world have been affected by the lockdowns caused by the Coronavirus pandemic. There have been many company closures, and others have been forced to restructure. Although restructuring may be painful, it is necessary if you want to come out from under crippling debt and grow your business.

Many businesses experiencing financial difficulties simply shut their doors rather than restructure. Most small businesses cannot reorganize their company debts under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) due to the high costs of administration. A small business owner does not benefit from spending money to have a business bankruptcy. It is therefore only possible to lock the door and give the key to one of the secured creditors, usually the bank or to the landlord.

Globally, small and medium-sized businesses play an important role. In 2019, I wrote a Brandon Blog post about business bankruptcy issues that US bankruptcy experts identified as problems for small business bankruptcy restructuring with Chapter 11 restructurings. This process was not working for these businesses. Chapter 11 restructurings are expensive, ineffective, and impractical. The US insolvency system therefore could not help many businesses in need of restructuring in the USA.

In this Brandon Blog, I provide an update on the successful experience and unanimous calls to extend the US subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, I revisit the question as to whether such a small business bankruptcy tool should exist in Canada.

Business bankruptcy and Insolvency at a glance

Congress passed the Small Business Reorganization Act (SBRA) on July 23, 2019. On August 1, the Senate passed the bill. In August 2019, it became law.

SBRA makes business bankruptcy protection easier for small and medium-sized enterprises. Chapter 11, subchapter V of the US Bankruptcy Code (Title: Small Business Debtor Reorganization) is the result. Increasing its affordability will help save otherwise viable owner-managed businesses.

SBRA defines a small company as one with non-contingent debts of $2,725,625 or less, leaving out financial obligations to affiliates or parties not dealing at arm’s length, and which elects to be dealt with under the SBRA. A new subchapter V to Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code is included in the Act. In this new approach, small companies are able to restructure efficiently with greater ease and at a lower cost.

The primary purpose of this legal process is:

  • Secured creditors and unsecured creditors cannot lodge a Chapter 11 restructuring plan that it is prepared to support. Only businesses with debt problems can. In most cases, the company’s plan must be filed within 90 days of when it filed for bankruptcy protection.
  • To manage each case, trustees similar to those selected in a personal restructuring (Chapter 13) situation will be selected.
  • A creditors committee will not be established.
  • If the home loan/mortgage secured by the home was used to fund the business, the Chapter 11 plan can change the legal rights of the lender.
  • It is possible for a Court to approve a small business bankruptcy restructuring plan without the approval of any class of creditors. If the court is satisfied that all creditors are treated fairly and no creditor class is prejudiced, it will approve the restructuring plan,.
  • A restructuring plan must ensure that all earnings received during the restructuring will be available to fund the restructuring for a period of 3 to 5 years in order to be fair and equitable.

Consequently, it is the responsibility of the creditors to carefully review all cases filed under SBRA. The creditors should consult bankruptcy experts for guidance. Their role will be to ensure that restructuring cases are fairly examined by courts and that all creditors are treated equally. For those without the support of their creditors, this will be particularly true.

It will be very interesting to see if this new legislation accomplishes its goal of simplifying and reducing the costs associated with business bankruptcy restructuring for small businesses.

business bankruptcy
business bankruptcy

Business bankruptcy: The bottom line on the SBRA

This tool was successful in protecting small businesses from bankruptcy liquidation. Republicans and Democrats alike have embraced this obscure federal program that allows small-business owners to shed debt in bankruptcy protection so much, they are now considering extending it. Republican and Democratic agreement on anything is very rare these days.

In a Subchapter V bankruptcy, closely-held businesses can file for bankruptcy much more quickly and inexpensively than they would in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The government appoints a trustee with limited powers who assesses the company’s finances and helps reach a consensus with creditors. Rather than official creditor committees, there is only a trustee appointed by the government. Furthermore, company owners don’t risk losing control of their companies to creditors, a common outcome in bankruptcy.

When the pandemic ravaged thousands of small businesses, the government raised the debt threshold to qualify for Subchapter V to $7.5 million from $2.7 million and extended it an additional year. In the absence of another renewal, the higher limit will expire next month, shutting out thousands of companies that could benefit as they deal with new challenges such as supply chain issues and higher interest rates.

The main benefits of the SBRA business bankruptcy protection

Quick response

Since the program began, more than 2,800 cases have been filed. Restructuring advisers predict that number will rise as banks and landlords become more aggressive in collecting overdue loans and back rent.

Government assistance and eviction moratoriums have enabled small businesses to exist in limbo but that won’t last. Experts predict that more subchapter V filings will take place in 2022.

The American Bankruptcy Institute studies bankruptcy statistics. They state that the quick turnaround time of Subchapter V has attracted and will attract more filings.

Corporation envy

Some distressed corporations are so envious of Subchapter V that restructuring advisers are hunting in vain for strategies that might let their bigger clients qualify. For example, there was a company with 130 company-owned locations that filed for bankruptcy protection in 2020. It initially attempted to file individual brick-and-mortar locations under the program, before switching to a chapter 11 proceeding.

This business bankruptcy restructuring statute has proved to be a lifeline for smaller companies and should be extended.

business bankruptcy
business bankruptcy

The Canadian business bankruptcy and restructuring landscape

Canada lacks an equivalent streamlined corporate insolvency restructuring statute. There are two Canadian insolvency regimes: the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) and the BIA. For large corporations, the CCAA applies. The process is heavily governed by the courts. In my opinion, it would not be possible to sufficiently streamline the CCAA for small businesses to have enough staying power during restructurings under the CCAA to survive.

A streamlined restructuring process is possible under the BIA for small and medium-sized businesses. There was a streamlined restructuring process for individuals so that consumer bankruptcies can be avoided. These consumer proposals are found in Part I Division II of the BIA. So why not a special restructuring proposal section for smaller companies? I called it a new Part I Division III of the BIA in my earlier Brandon blog I referred to above – a general scheme for small business proposals (SBP) section of the BIA. The aim is to provide small businesses with the opportunity to restructure business debts on a cost-effective basis rather than to make Canadian bankruptcies the only real option to consider.

In the US, using a streamlined restructuring model has been so successful. That’s why I am bringing back my idea from 2019. I won’t repeat everything, however. You can see what my recommendations were by reading my blog – BANKRUPTCY EXPERTS WEIGH IN ON US & CDN SMALL BIZ RESTRUCTURING.

Business bankruptcy: The debtor (owes money) not the creditors (are owed money) would control the reorganization

An insolvent corporation, sole proprietors, or partnership that is set up to conduct business should be able to access the new SBP. The total amount of their debt should not exceed $1.5 million. Such a number is not based on any scientific calculations.

In order to determine an appropriate debt level, Statistics Canada could assess the average debt load of Canadian businesses. In this discussion, I’ll use the $1.5 million amount.

Loans from affiliates or from people with a non-arm’s-length relationship would not be excluded as in US law. A Canadian company’s first funding is usually provided by its owners. Chartered banks require owners to make a commitment with their personal assets before they are willing to lend. To get the business off the ground, the owners sacrificed their own money. Because they had to finance the company that way, I would not exclude that debt from the calculation.

The Canadian business landscape differs from the American one. We tend to be smaller in size. For non-arm’s-length debt to be excluded, the debt threshold would have to be lowered. Keeping that debt threshold in mind, let us include all debt, whether it’s secured or unsecured, related, or arms’ length.

This new SBP would not be applicable to people who are not conducting business in their own name. Those people will fall into either Division I or Division II restructuring proposals which include two mandatory credit counselling sessions.

Restructuring proposals can currently only be administered by a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee). A licensed insolvency trustee is known as the Proposal Trustee under Division I Proposals. As part of Division II personal restructurings, they are known as the Administrator.

Therefore, I will call the Trustee the Small Business Administrator for the new SBP. As a result, it is obvious that it is the restructuring of a business that qualifies under Division III. The use of the word “administrator” is consistent with the words used by Parliament for consumer proposals. Again, this means that the Trustee is administering a streamlined restructuring for small businesses.

The main points I recommended in my earlier blog in a Canadian small business streamlined restructuring statute include:

  • Currently, it is possible for a company or person to begin the restructuring process by filing either a Notice of Intention to Make A Proposal (NOI) or a Proposal itself. Regardless of the filing method, there is a 10-day limitation period under which the debtor must submit a cash-flow statement that has been reviewed and approved by both the company or person and the Trustee. A company or individual filing an NOI then has an additional 20 days (30 days after the filing date of the NOI) to file a Proposal (unless the court extends the time).

I propose extending the deadline for filing a Proposal from 30 days to 90 days after the filing of an NOI, without the need to go to the Court for an extension. As a result, the business should have enough time to get all of its tax and corporate filings up to date and, hopefully, avoid the need to adjourn the meeting of creditors.

  • A creditor would file a proof of claim in the same way they do now in a BIA Proposal.
  • There is a concept of deemed creditor approval and deemed court approval in the current consumer proposal legislation. A creditors’ meeting is not necessary unless creditors holding 25% of the proven claims request it. In addition to the proof of claim process, creditors receive voting letters to cast their vote when they submit a proof of claim. If there is no obligation to convene a meeting, a consumer proposal is considered accepted.If a consumer proposal is either accepted or deemed accepted by the creditors, the Trustee Administrator will probably not need to seek approval from the Court. There are no deeming provisions in corporate restructuring, either for creditor acceptance or for court approval. The new SBP section should include similar provisions regarding creditor acceptance and court approval. This would save time and money, thus enhancing efficiency.
  • The Meeting of Creditors if required, would be held 21 days after the Trustee Administrator recognizes that the small business restructuring did not receive deemed approval.
  • When creditors fail to vote in favour of a Division I Proposal or when the court does not approve it, it is automatically deemed an assignment in bankruptcy. This does not apply to consumer proposals. Debtors return to their normal state without creditor protection after an unsuccessful consumer proposal attempt.For the new streamlined business restructuring proposal law, if creditors fail to accept or the court does not approve the restructuring plan, then that does not automatically mean there is a bankruptcy. The debtor small business would simply return to its normal unprotected insolvent state and must defend itself against creditors.A voluntary assignment into bankruptcy may result, but not automatically. A bankruptcy proceeding does not make sense in certain corporate situations. If a chartered bank holds security over all assets it will enforce its security through a receivership, this is especially true.

Business bankruptcy summary

A streamlined small business bankruptcy protection section is working in the US and both Republicans and Democrats want it extended and made to be able to handle even more bankruptcy cases. So why should we not have one in Canada too? I know that it could work.

I hope you found this business bankruptcy Brandon Blog informative. Although nothing is guaranteed, managing your debt in a way that will allow you or your company to be able to afford it, will lead to your financial success. It will also give you the best shot at having a financially stress-free life.

Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation or a crushing debt load and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are your credit cards maxed out? Are you worried about what will happen to you? Do you need to search out easy-to-understand debt solutions and realistic ones for your family debt problems? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a Government of Canada-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

business bankruptcy
business bankruptcy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADIAN DEBTORS ASSOCIATION URGES ESSENTIAL CHANGES TO BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues,ce hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

The Canadian Debtors Association was formed to fix this problem

Many people have faced a difficult time in their life and experienced many problems as a result. We all know that the human spirit can be tested, and it can be tested hard, whether they have lost their jobs, suffered serious injuries, or just needed to trim their spending. Financial hardships can lead to feelings of hopelessness, depression, and anxiety.

A national non-profit organization serving Canadians with debt problems is the Canadian Debtors Association. It was established a few years ago. They advocate exclusively on behalf of debtors who face economic hardship and insurmountable debt. Their belief is that debtors need someone they can call their own, someone who is willing to help them resolve their debt problems and support them unconditionally. A future where Debtors have the support of their own advocates is seen by the Canadian Debtors Association, which has created a Debtor Bill of Rights as a framework for the protocols that Debtors should be entitled to.

In this Brandon Blog, I describe the problem that the Canadian Debtors Association has identified and their preferred method of fixing it. I also provide my comments on their plan.

Canadian Debtors Association motto: Join us as we build a better Debtor experience

The mission of the Canadian Debtors Association is to reduce the number of financially vulnerable Canadians facing a financial crisis and overwhelming debt loads. This is a very good thing. Canadian Debtors Association has identified a real problem in credit reporting. That problem is that the Canadian credit reporting agencies do not really differentiate on someone’s credit report between them completing a successful consumer proposal or Division I Proposal and avoiding bankruptcy, and those who file an assignment in bankruptcy. It is true that those who avoid bankruptcy should be able to clear their record than someone who went into bankruptcy.

Thousands of Canadians file for bankruptcy or submit a consumer proposal to manage their debts every year. Over one million Canadians used the insolvency system from 2012 to July 2021. Regarding the accurate recording and reporting of bankruptcy and consumer proposal information on consumer credit reports, there are no specific references, standards, accountability, or provisions for insolvency reporting through Canadian credit bureaus.

Ms. Henrietta Ross, President, and CEO of the Canadian Debtors Association released through the CNW Group a statement asking all stakeholders in the credit, debt, and insolvency industries to work together on modernizing Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) in order to assist Canadians facing financial hardship.

canadian debtors association
canadian debtors association

Canadian Debtors Association agrees that everyone deserves a fresh start

The insolvency law and policy in Canada are based on the principle of providing a “fresh start” for people who are drowning in insurmountable debt and who suffer a financial breakdown. Legislators, stakeholder groups, academics, and insolvency experts all accept this principle. Debtors seek relief from existing debt in order to regain control of their finances.

The BIA intends to implement a fresh start, but debtors experience problems because, after undergoing a BIA debt relief solution, they encounter problems from the debt industry due to inaccurate insolvency-reporting information on their credit reports. By sabotaging the fresh start Canadians deserve and expect, inaccurate reporting undermines the very fundamental tenets of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. The Canadian Debtors Association proposes that this dilemma can be resolved by amending federal legislation that stipulates the appropriate representation of insolvency-related information on consumer credit reports.

The use of consumer credit has had explosive growth over the past several years, so the utilization of credit reports and personal credit histories has also seen a massive expansion. Canadians’ daily lives are impacted by these monumental changes in the number and use of credit reports.

The responsibility for this information’s integrity and accuracy is not explicit. There is no regulated authority in credit reporting under the BIA. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) oversees the administration of the insolvency system, including maintaining public records and statistics; however, the OSB does not specify how BIA debt relief options of bankruptcy and consumer proposals should be described or interpreted on credit reports. It simply is not their job!

Canadian Debtors Association explain this problem

A person who finds themselves facing economic hardship and in financial difficulty is allowed to use a BIA-subscribed debt relief solution to eliminate their debts through the fresh start process. When filing either for bankruptcy or a proposal is entitled to a stay of proceedings, which prevents creditors from initiating or continuing legal action against the debtor.

Providing inaccurate and misleading information for credit reports, sometimes through simple mistakes and sometimes because there are no differentiation codes for credit reports. So creditors doing a credit search may mistakenly believe that some debts remain delinquent and unaddressed. This undermines the legal stay. The Canadian Debtors Association feels this causes debtors who are otherwise discharged from their past debts, to continue to suffer within the Canadian credit system which is therefore not a total “fresh start”.

Canadians can also suffer the consequences of inaccurate insolvency information on their credit reports. The misapplication of delinquency ratings, the incorrect labeling of bankruptcy, and the mingling of insolvency terms constitute layers of misinformation that are misleading. Often, even third-party companies that obtain credit reports from a major credit bureau, such as TransUnion, erroneously list “bankruptcy” on reports of debtors who never declared bankruptcy.

The consumer is hurt badly and unnecessary suffering is caused, such as the loss of employment opportunities, refusal of a lease from a landlord, increase in costs Rejection of employment opportunities, refusal of a lease from a landlord, increase in costs services such as attempts by debtors to correct their credit reports are in vain. This unintended negative impact is not the debtor experience envisioned by the BIA. Such negative impact does not lead to a better quality of life for those relieved of their financial burden.

canadian debtors association
canadian debtors association

Canadian Debtors Association urges changes to Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act

Consumer credit reports wield enormous power, with significant implications for an individual’s livelihood and well-being, so accuracy is extremely important. It is also imperative to have accurate information since a bankruptcy or consumer proposal is a closely scrutinized part of a consumer’s credit history.

To solve this problem and the negative impact on Canadians otherwise freed from their past financial hardship, the Canadian Debtors Association says that the BIA must be updated to help Canadians have correct representation in credit reports. The BIA is the key piece of Canada’s debtor and creditor balanced legislative framework. It is the only personal insolvency legislation in Canada that provides a fresh start for those in debt. We must ensure its continued effectiveness by making it easier to use and by modernizing it to reflect current credit reporting realities.

Canadian Debtors Association has identified a real problem but the wrong solution IMO

Most provinces in Canada have enacted laws that outline the practices that credit reporting agencies and users of consumer credit information must follow in order to protect consumers’ rights. Federal regulations do not govern credit reporting agencies but provincial laws do. Canada’s insolvency legislation and the Canadian insolvency system are under the control of the federal government. So in my opinion, it would be unwise to try to fix a problem that falls under provincial jurisdiction with federal law.

Second, it is very difficult to pass a Member’s Bill to amend federal legislation through the House of Commons and the Senate. There is always a focus on matters of extreme federal importance or those that will win votes, rightly or wrongly. My view is that people having their insolvency process mislabeled, and therefore taking longer than they should to regain and take on additional credit, does not fit into the category of national significance or vote-getting.

Canadian Debtors Association states they are debtor industry advocate professionals and have honed their skills of debtor advocate work. They should take a more direct approach, in my opinion. Talk to the Canadian credit bureaus directly. In Canada, there are only two credit reporting agencies – Equifax Canada and TransUnion Canada.

Team up with insolvency industry players, such as the national association representing licensed insolvency trustees in Canada, the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals. Together, they can advocate directly on behalf of debtors with the credit reporting agencies to make that aspect of consumer credit reports more accurate and meaningful. If their advocacy is not heard, then lobby the provincial governments to enact further legislation, as it is their responsibility to do so.

That would seem a much better solution.

canadian debtors association
canadian debtors association

Canadian Debtors Association summary

The Canadian Debtors Association is calling on the federal government to modernize the BIA to better serve Canadians in financial difficulty. However, their only issue is that provincially supervised credit reporting agencies are not differentiating between successfully completed proposals and bankruptcy. Above I have suggested what I believe is a much easier route for them to go in their advocacy to accomplish the same thing.

I hope you found this Canadian Debtors Association Brandon Blog informative. Although nothing is guaranteed, managing your debt in a way that will allow you or your company to be able to afford it, will lead to your financial success. It will also give you the best shot at having a financially stress-free life.

Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation or a crushing debt load and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you? Do you need to search out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a Government of Canada-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

canadian debtors association
canadian debtors association

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RECEIVER APPOINTED BY COURT: 16 KEY INGREDIENTS TO ENSURE COURT APPROVAL OF A RECEIVER

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

A receiver appointed by court: What is a receiver in Canada?

In the event that a company has financial difficulties, a Receiver may be appointed to take over its assets and manage them until its assets can be sold. The receivers are third parties appointed to supervise the liquidation process and remit the proceeds in accordance with legal priorities. A judge appoints a court-appointed receiver, and a secured creditor appoints a privately appointed receiver under a simple appointment letter. In Canada, for a court-appointed receivership, a receiver appointed by court must be a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee).

In this Brandon Blog, I focus on the factors to be considered by the Court when determining an application for a receiver appointed by court.

receiver appointed by court
receiver appointed by court

The receiver appointed by court: What happens when a receiver is appointed?

The licensed trustee acting as receiver’s first duty is to take possession and control of the assets covered by the secured creditor’s security, or of all the assets identified in the court order in a court appointment. The receiver can decide if it can sell the assets for a higher price if it operates the business.

Senior management and the Board of Directors lose most of their decision-making authority when the company goes into receivership. Their advice and assistance are only needed if requested by the receiver.

The source of authority for the receiver appointed by court is appointed in Ontario under two statutes:

  • Section 101 of the provincial Ontario Courts of Justice Act; and
  • Section 243(1) of the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada).

The receiver appointed privately has a duty of care to only the appointing secured creditor. Court-appointed receivers are responsible to all creditors.

receiver appointed by court
receiver appointed by court

Receiver appointed by court: When can a court appoint a receiver?

Under Section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act (Ontario), the court considers whether the appointment “is just or convenient” under the circumstances. When deciding the origin of authority on whether or not to appoint a receiver as the court-appointed officer, the court must consider a variety of factors. Among them leading to the authority for decision making when there is an application for authorization for the appointment of a receiver are:

  1. in spite of not having to prove it, will there be irreparable harm if the court does not appoint a receiver?;
  2. the risk to a secured creditor and the equity the company owns in the assets, while litigation continues;
  3. types of assets that would be subject to possession with respect to the receiver’ acts in its appointment;
  4. it is necessary to balance the interests of the parties and to consider their rights;the preservation and protection of the property through the receivership proceeding pending judicial determination;
  5. under its security, the creditor has the right to appoint a receiver;
  6. when a creditor expects that the debtor will resist the enforcement of its security agreement;
  7. it is an extreme measure which should be authorized sparingly, but less so if the applicant is a secured creditor who has that right under its security document;
  8. in order to allow the receiver to perform its duties more effectively, a court appointment is necessary;
  9. effects of the receivership order on the various parties;
  10. actions taken by the parties and the litigation against properties;
  11. duration of the Court-Approved receivership;
  12. the costs incurred by each party;
  13. it is likely that the receiver appointed by the court will maximize the return to the parties when the assets are sold under a receivership asset purchase agreement with the purchaser of assets;
  14. facilitating the receiver’s duties and activities for its asset plan by a court order; and
  15. a secured creditor’s good faith, the commercial reasonableness of the proposed Court-Appointed receivership and any equity questions.

A decision will usually turn on whether it is necessary to incur the expense and formalities of naming the third party to exercise neutral, transparent, and accountable stewardship of the debtor’s assets, while interested parties argue about the merits of the dispute and the receiver, attempts to maximize the recovery under an asset purchase agreement.

The court will usually intervene if the parties’ dispute puts the business assets at risk or where realizing the debtor’s assets or indemnifying a private receiver could impair the secured creditor’s recovery options. Often, simple default on the secured debt will be sufficient to attract a receivership where the risk to the business is implicit in the nature of the business or the dispute between the creditor(s) and the debtor(s). However, as with all equitable remedies, context is everything and each case turns on its own facts.

receiver appointed by court
receiver appointed by court

A receiver appointed by court summary

I hope you found this receiver appointed by court Brandon Blog informative. Although nothing is guaranteed, managing your debt in a way that will allow you or your company in a way to be able to afford it, will lead to your financial success. It will also give you the best shot at having a financially stress-free life.

Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation or a crushing debt load and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you? Do you need to search out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a Government of Canada-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

receiver appointed by court
receiver appointed by court

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

4 MAIN REASONS FOR BUSINESS FAILURE: INSPIRING WAYS ENTREPRENEURS AND COMPANIES FIX THEIR BUSINESS PROBLEMS

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

Main Reasons for Business Failure: Introduction to reasons for failure

There are many reasons why businesses fail. One of the things a company needs to continue operations well into the future is a strong management team. Business owners should be comfortable with how each manager understands the business’ operations, current and future employees, and products.

Entrepreneurship is inherently risky; it is not for the fainthearted. Before offering products or services to customers, a company’s business model and infrastructure should be formulated, and revenue streams should be realistically projected well in advance.

In this Brandon Blog, I discuss the 4 main reasons for business failure that I have seen over the years in my role as a licensed insolvency trustee dealing with corporate restructuring and corporate business failures.

Main Reasons for Business Failure: Why do most businesses fail?

What percentages of businesses fail? About 66 percent of new businesses survive for two years or more, half survive for four years or more, and only 40 percent survive for six years or more. Many of these issues are overlooked, ignored, or neglected, resulting in them becoming just another statistic. It does not matter how many times you failed before you had a huge success. Failure teaches you what to avoid.

Building a substantial business is no easy feat. Businesses are built on value. It is best to find a way to under-promise but over-deliver in order to add value to any business.

Among the most common reasons businesses fail are:

  1. not having sufficient funding;
  2. having a poor management team with a lack of experience;
  3. a flawed business model; and
  4. a flawed marketing plan and/or a failure to market effectively to existing and potential customers.

    main reasons for business failure
    main reasons for business failure

Main Reasons for Business Failure: Financing Hurdles

Chances are if you’ve been in business for a few months or longer, you’re experiencing some financial challenges and a lack of business funds. Marketing, sales, and customer service may require more capital. Payroll, inventory, and other expenses may require additional working capital as well.

A business loan from a bank can solve financing issues. Before applying for a loan, make sure you know your company’s financial situation. If you can’t accurately estimate where your business will be after a loan, this poor financial management will probably make your business end up worse off than if you hadn’t taken the loan.

Despite the availability of angel investors, venture capitalists, and conventional bank loans for small businesses, not all companies have the revenue stream, positive cash flow or business growth trajectory to secure financing from them. This is the 1st of the main reasons for business failure.

Main Reasons for Business Failure: Inadequate management

The managers of a business will quickly lose credibility with their staff, their suppliers, their customers, and even the general public if they are incompetent. Even if a manager receives training, mentoring, coaching, etc., before he or she starts managing people and money, if he or she doesn’t master the trade, chances are the person won’t have a successful business.

A business can fail due to poor management. Business failures are primarily caused by inadequate management, in my opinion. Management is inadequate if it does not understand the needs of the business. A lack of passion within management is a sure business killer.

It is inevitable that there will be an error the first time management delegated a major task. One person cannot handle all the decisions. The tendency is to assume that others will take care of the details while we delegate responsibility. You can use this for simple tasks like making coffee, cleaning toilets, and filing taxes. Business planning, cash flow modelling, establishing business plans and marketing plans are ineffective with this program.

Failing businesses are frustrating. It takes a lot of time and effort to build a business from scratch. It can be devastating to suddenly lose everything. Even your dreams might be dashed.

You must learn how to manage yourself and your business if you want to avoid this 2nd of the main reasons for business failure. Many business owners don’t realize how crucial it is to understand all aspects of running a business.

main reasons for business failure
main reasons for business failure

Main Reasons for Business Failure: Ineffective Business Planning

Having come up with your business idea and have already started your business, you should focus on developing quality relationships with your clients and employees. Understanding each employee’s strengths and weaknesses and discovering what motivates them is key. You will then be able to create a work environment tailored to the specific skills of each member of your team.

In order to achieve success, a team must have individuals who share a common goal; however, you must determine if your employees possess the right mix of qualities. Creativity, analytical skills, interpersonal skills, motivation, and communication abilities are among them.

Do you know what makes your business unique? What makes your customers choose you over your competitors? A good business plan must take all of these factors into account.

It is common for businesses to attribute their failure to external factors, such as competitors, the economy, and regulations. Although these factors are important, they are not the only causes of business failure. This 3rd of the main reasons for business failure is internal.

Businesses fail for a variety of reasons. A poor business plan, or a total lack of planning, can easily lead to it, but it is harder to prevent it completely. Business failure comes in many shapes and sizes. You could lose money, customers, your business, your product, your market, or you could fail to launch. It can all be the result of misunderstanding your product and market, caused by poor business planning.

Main Reasons for Business Failure: Marketing Mishaps

The 4th reason of the main reasons for business failure that I wish to discuss is marketing mishaps. A business needs to plan ahead for marketing. A marketing budget and return on capital should be considered by marketers and form part of every marketing strategy and business plan. Any business should allocate a budget for marketing if they hope to succeed. Getting this wrong is the 4th of the main reasons for business failure.

The success of marketing campaigns is also dependent on realistic projections for target audience reach and sales conversion ratios. In the long run, businesses that fail to understand and implement these aspects of sound marketing strategies concerning their potential customer base will be less successful than those that do.

Your business will fail if you can’t connect with your target audience. Without the ability to connect with your demographic, you are not only unaware of your potential consumer’s wants and needs, but also oblivious to how to best help them. You want to know what they want, rather than just what they need. What are they really looking for? Are they looking to evoke an emotion? Are they looking to achieve a certain status? Do your products or services help them solve a problem?

If you’re not addressing their pain points, then you probably do not understand the consumer very well. You cannot sell until you truly understand what they need. Take advantage of focus groups, market surveys, email campaigns, and direct phone calls to understand and connect with your target audience. Discover them in every detail. By doing so, your marketing plan will succeed.

main reasons for business failure
main reasons for business failure

Main Reasons for Business Failure: Summary

I hope you found these main reasons for business failure Brandon Blog informative. Although nothing is guaranteed, guarding against these 4 main reasons for business failure will increase your chances for business success. It will also give you the best shot at having a sustainable business model.

Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation or a crushing debt load and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to search out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

main reasons for business failure
main reasons for business failure
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY SEARCH ULTIMATE GUIDE: WHAT KIND OF BANKRUPTCY RECORDS DO YOU WANT TO SEARCH

bankruptcy search

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

Bankruptcy search: What bankruptcy records exist in Canada?

Records of bankruptcy exist in Canada in four different forms. A party can use three of them to determine whether a specific company or person has filed for bankruptcy or some other form of insolvency.

There are, however, two methods to do a bankruptcy search that cost money, and one of those methods also requires the permission of the individual or company who is involved in the insolvency proceeding. It is not well known that there is another paid way. Only licensed insolvency trustees, attorneys, and credit grantors use it.
There is a 4th type of bankruptcy record that can only be accessed by a select few people. In this Brandon Blog, I will discuss the various ways to do a bankruptcy search, discuss each one and focus on an unreported court decision involving one of them.

If you need to file for bankruptcy or to file a consumer proposal or a full restructuring proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), you may be distressed. Their main concern is who will know about my bankruptcy and who can see my bankruptcy records? As I will explain, there is a very small probability that anyone who is not a creditor of yours will find out about an individual insolvency filing by the methods it is made public, notwithstanding they are public records.

There are 6 different kinds of official bankruptcy records that you might want to search. These include:

  1. Personal bankruptcies
  2. Business/corporate bankruptcies
  3. Corporate/business receivership.
  4. Consumer proposals
  5. Full BIA proposals
  6. Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) bankruptcy protection filings

Personal bankruptcies are those which are filed by individuals. Business bankruptcies are those which involve businesses.

Insolvency filings in Canada are available through the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Records Search database of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). In order to search by name, enter the search criteria information you know in any order and click “Search.” If you are not entitled to a search account like a licensed insolvency trustee is, a minimum fee of $8 will be assessed for each set of 10 (or fewer) records.

A lot of people don’t know about this database. Furthermore, nosy neighbours are not going to pay $8 to do a search of bankruptcy records and spend time in front of the search screen to find out whether a person or company has filed for bankruptcy, whether a consumer proposal has been filed, whether a full BIA proposal has been filed, whether a company has filed for bankruptcy protection under the CCAA, or whether a business is in receivership. It is really only licensed insolvency trustees who need to do frequent searches. There is no other internet search tool or online search service in Canada.

bankruptcy search
bankruptcy search

Bankruptcy search type 2: How long do credit bureaus report consumer bankruptcies?

Insolvency and bankruptcy records for all Canadians maintained by the OSB can be accessed by credit reporting agencies such as Equifax and TransUnion. Additionally, they have access to the names and addresses of individuals who have declared bankruptcy. Since it pertains to consumers, they call the information they collect about insolvency filings “consumer reports” or “credit bureau records”.

If you don’t consent in writing in advance, no one can pull your credit report. Most likely, when you apply for a credit card or a loan, you authorize the credit card company or financial institution to pull your credit report. You may also authorize a credit report to be obtained when you apply for insurance or rent an apartment.

If you don’t give written permission, that person won’t be able to get your credit report. An insolvency filing on your credit report is not visible to a friend, relative or neighbour. Depending on whether it is a personal bankruptcy or another type of personal insolvency filing, these companies keep a record of the past insolvency filing on file for varying amounts of time. In the case of consumer bankruptcy, the credit report will probably show the past bankruptcy for seven years after the discharge is granted. Upon completion of a consumer proposal, it takes slightly less time.

Bankruptcy search type 3: Will my bankruptcy be published in the newspaper?

In the past, I have written about the differences between a summary administration consumer bankruptcy and an ordinary administration personal bankruptcy. Under the streamlined summary administration rules, a bankrupt person’s assets cannot have an expected liquidation value greater than $15,000.

Notice of bankruptcy does not have to be published in a summary administration bankruptcy. The Trustee must publish a notice in the prescribed form in a local newspaper as soon as possible after the bankruptcy and no later than five days before the first meeting of creditors in any ordinary administration personal bankruptcy or corporate bankruptcy (which is, by definition, an ordinary administration).

Newspapers publish bankruptcy notices in the legal notice section. Lawyers, trustees, and bankers are the only people who regularly look in that section. To find your name, someone would have to read all the local newspapers every day for the bankruptcy notice of you or your company. The chances of someone you know seeing the notice of bankruptcy published in the newspaper are extremely slim, but not impossible.

bankruptcy search
bankruptcy search

Bankruptcy search type 4 is only available to a select few

In contrast to the previous three types of bankruptcy searches, this type is only available to a select few. Furthermore, it is the subject of this unreported Ontario court decision I am going to tell you about. I am talking about the bankruptcy search of records and files kept by licensed insolvency trustees who handle bankruptcy filings for individuals and corporations.

Under the BIA, the Trustee must allow the OSB, the bankrupt, or any creditor access to the bankruptcy administration’s books, records, and documents. Trustees’ books and records are available only to them.

Now for the unreported decision. You may recall that I previously wrote a Brandon Blog titled “TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY: CERTAIN ACTIONS AGAINST TRUSTEE CAN BE UNLEASHED WITHOUT FIRST REQUIRING COURT PERMISSION“. During a period of 13 years, Mr. Flight filed for bankruptcy 4 times! Over and over again, he filed the same type of bankruptcy. According to him, the defendant Trustee in bankruptcy is responsible for his financial situation. In a lawsuit filed against the trustee in bankruptcy, Mr. Flight claims negligence, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and conversion. Allegations are made that the accused failed to identify and correct a fraud perpetrated by a bookkeeper for Mr. Flight’s sole proprietorship business.

Recently, they appeared in court. M. Flight’s motion was decided by the Judge on December 7, 2021. The motion was for:

  • the delivery of all the records pertaining to all four bankruptcies involving Mr. Flight, including the records related to the action commenced by the Trustee against the bookkeeper; as well as
  • to examine Mr. Flight’s Trustee to investigate the administration of the 4 bankruptcies.

Mr. Flight’s counsel claims the Trustee has returned some but not all of the documents with respect to the last bankruptcy filing in 2016. That was the focus of the hearing. Other filings occurred in 2004, 2006, and 2011, all outside the statutory period of four years during which the Trustee is obligated to keep the records.

Counsel for the Trustee asserts that copies of the records have been produced and that the request for an examination is an improper fishing expedition with the collateral purpose of bolstering a separate lawsuit brought by Mr. Fight against the Trustee.

Bankruptcy search: The Judge’s analysis

As per the Judge, a Trustee must maintain proper books and records when administering estates under the BIA. It is directed that the Trustee allow the bankrupt as well as those I mentioned to inspect and copy those books, records, and documents. A Trustee is required to retain records related to estate administration for at least four years following discharge under Rule 68 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency General Rules.

Moreover, the Judge noted that based on the Trustee’s evidence, no books or records from Mr. Flight’s first 3 bankruptcy cases are in the Trustee’s possession. The Judge found that the Trustee made an effort to provide copies of the documents sought. Due to the submissions by both sides leads to a discrepancy between the number of pages sent by the Trustee and those received by Mr. Flight, the only practical solution is to perform a review and reconciliation of what was sent by the Trustee and what is still in its possession, with those documents received by Mr. Flight.

bankruptcy search
bankruptcy search

Bankruptcy search: The Judge’s decision

Within 60 days of the court’s order, counsel for Mr. Flight or its representative may arrange and attend the Trustee’s office or as directed by Trustee’s counsel to examine the file as produced and do their bankruptcy search. The Trustee shall be permitted to designate a representative to facilitate and oversee the examination of documents.

At that time, Mr. Flight’s counsel or his representative may scan an electronic copy of the documents using a scanning device provided by Mr. Flight’s counsel or his representative. All the documents involved in the proceedings shall be made available as may be necessary to provide a complete account of the Trustee’s administration of the estate.

If the parties disagree over whether certain documents should be allowed to be viewed and copied, they can go back to court. According to the Judge, an examination of the Trustee was not appropriate at this time. A Trustee examination is premature until the final determination has been made as to whether all documentation has been provided.

As I have already stated, this kind of bankruptcy search is not one of the normal ones you think of.

Bankruptcy search: Summary

I hope you found this bankruptcy search Brandon Blog informative. Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation or a crushing debt load and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to search out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

bankruptcy search
bankruptcy search
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RESTRUCTURING OF COMPANY: SOMETIMES AN UNPOPULAR CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY IS NEEDED TO RESTRUCTURE YOUR COMPANY TO IMPROVE PROFITS

restructuring of company

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Restructuring of company introduction

Following its bankruptcy, Canadian retailer Le Château announced that it would relaunch online under new ownership. Although extreme, in certain unique circumstances, corporate bankruptcy could be used to restructure a company’s debt and operations.

Often, companies realize they need to restructure too late when fewer options remain and saving the company is more challenging. A restructuring process started on a voluntary basis can generate greater value than a company restructuring done under the imminent threat of bankruptcy.

A restructuring plan is more likely to succeed when managers understand the fundamental business/strategic challenges their company faces. In a corporate restructuring, creditors are often required to make significant concessions, which have significant implications for them as well as for the company.

Using the Le Château case as an example, this Brandon Blog discusses certain aspects of the restructuring of company debt, assets, and operations.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company

Restructuring of company: Le Château relaunches online following bankruptcy

Following its filing for bankruptcy protection last year, Le Château, now run by Suzy’s Inc., announced its comeback from bankruptcy by launching an eveningwear collection online before the holidays. YM Inc., which owns many brands including Suzy Shier, acquired the intellectual property assets and certain merchandise and other assets.

Herschel Segal founded Le Château Inc. in 1959 as “Le Chateau Men’s Wear”, a menswear store in downtown Montreal’s Victoria Square. Le Château began selling imported clothes from Europe when it added women’s clothing in 1962. As time passed, Le Château sold more fashionable imports to young people instead of its original traditional clothing style. Since then, Le Château has designed, imported, and retailed apparel, accessories, and footwear for women and men.

Its 240 locations at its peak made the Canadian retailer a staple of nearly every mall and shopping district in the country. Le Château Inc. (and its US subsidiary Château Stores Inc.) filed for bankruptcy protection in October 2020 under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”). It also announced it would close all 123 stores in Canada. The Court granted the companies permission to run a liquidation process in November 2020. It used the CCAA to liquidate its assets rather than for the restructuring of company operations and finances.

To adapt to new retail industry trends, the company implemented efforts to right-sized its brick-and-mortar locations. 122 of its 243 stores were closed during the eight years prior to filing for bankruptcy. The Company’s right-sizing efforts and its important investment in its e-commerce platform helped mitigate the decline in brick-and-mortar revenue, but not enough to compensate. During the three fiscal years prior to its insolvency filing, the Company lost about $130 million in net income. As COVID-19 arrived in March 2020, the end of Le Château was sealed. Proms, weddings, galas, and parties were cancelled, decimating the retailer’s dress sales.

Le Château began liquidating its 121 stores in November 2020, as well as its transactional website. In December 2020, the licensed insolvency trustee acting as CCAA Monitor was also appointed Receiver because all assets were secured by loans to various financial institutions. A court granted the Company’s request to approve a sale transaction with Suzy’s Inc. in June 2021. Le Château’s intellectual property, merchandise, furniture, fixtures, equipment, and signage were purchased by Suzy’s. At that point, the inventory liquidation was completed. Before the Canadian company filed for bankruptcy, the companies changed their names to plain numbered companies as part of the sale of the intellectual property.

A bankruptcy filing was made by the company formerly known as Le Château Inc. on September 2, 2021. Le Château, now run by Suzy’s Inc., has announced its comeback from bankruptcy with the launch of an eveningwear collection ahead of the holidays.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company

Restructuring of company: Reasons for corporate restructuring

If the company is both insolvent and not viable in its existing form, the normal insolvency process would be receivership, bankruptcy or both. Instead of using the provisions of the CCAA to liquidate a major retailer, a Court-appointed receiver appointed under Quebec law as well as the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) would have accomplished the same thing as the CCAA process used.

In the example of Le Château, selling assets out of a financially sick corporation to a new owner who will operate the assets in a similar business is actually a form of restructuring of company operations. Because the old corporation has too much debt and too many operational problems, it cannot continue. However, as Suzy Shier has shown, there was a good business reason for them to buy certain assets, and they now plan to run a new Le Château business. A new owner was responsible for the restructuring of company operations and finances.

As a result of a financial crisis, a company may undergo restructuring to change the financial or operational aspects of its business. Restructuring can occur for several reasons, including:

  • deteriorating financial fundamentals;
  • a lack of profitability;
  • disappointing sales revenue;
  • debt that is too high; and
  • an industry with too much competition or the company is no longer competitive.

Under financial duress, a company engages in restructuring when it makes significant changes to its financial or operational structure. In reorganizing internally, a company’s operations, processes, departments, or ownership may change, enabling it to be more integrated and profitable. If shareholders and creditors reach an agreement on a reorganization of assets, issuance of equity to reduce debt, or bankruptcy as long as the business maintains operations, the company may sell its assets.

Restructuring a company usually involves cutting costs, such as payroll, or shrinking the company through asset sales. After restructuring is completed, the business operations should become smoother and more economically sound.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company

Restructuring of Company: The company restructuring process

Restructuring a company has many benefits, as well as many reasons for a company to restructure. The benefits of corporate reorganization can be summarized in two words: survival and success. The right financial advisory firm can help business owners deal with these challenging issues, whether they are reorganizing for survival or strategic repositioning for the future.

Your company should select restructuring professionals who are experienced in your specific industry as well. As soon as major problems are discovered, the company should begin restructuring its operations and finances. Early diagnosis allows a company to fully evaluate its options and avoid being cornered.

Corporate business restructuring can be divided into several stages:

  • assessing the organizational restructuring needed;
  • implementing the organizational restructuring;
  • identification of weaknesses;
  • developing detailed plans to correct these weaknesses through restructuring;
  • calculating and securing funding;
  • raising private equity to help improve operations and balance sheet;
  • evaluating the impact of implemented strategies and amending them as necessary;
  • comparing actual financial results to the budget to ensure the restructuring remains on track; and
  • making necessary corrections.

Companies often do not allow enough time to plan and implement restructurings. A successful restructuring of a company’s finances and operations depends on how much upfront assessment work was done, how detailed the plan is, and how well the restructuring strategy is implemented.

Reorganizations can take a long time depending on whether they are reactive or proactive. An example of a reactionary restructuring is when bankruptcy proceedings force a company to make changes within a specified period. A corporate executive officer who recognizes a change in consumer preferences and positions their company to be a leader in tomorrow’s market is an example of being proactive.

In today’s economy, companies face many challenges, and company restructuring can be a short- and long-term answer to maintaining company viability. Company restructuring concerns vendors and consumers, stockholders and financial relationships, employees and inventory, quality control and environmental impact, equipment and technology, and management and marketing.

In addition to the reasons for restructuring, every major restructuring has some of these common elements:

  • an improved balance sheet;
  • reduced tax obligations;
  • divesting underproductive assets;
  • Outsourcing some functions that can be more cost-effectively done by outside suppliers rather than by company employees;
  • reducing debt loads;
  • relocating operations;
  • restructuring marketing, sales, and distribution;
  • renegotiating employment contracts;
  • refinancing debts; and
  • changing the company’s public image.

Restructuring company operations and finances are expected to result in long-term survival, profitability, and viability, regardless of the reasons and the specific steps taken.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company

Restructuring of company summary

I hope this restructuring of company Brandon Blog post was helpful for you. Are you worried about your financial situation because you are dealing with substantial debt challenges as a business owner or as an individual? Call me if you have too much debt. It is not your fault. To deal with financial problems, you have actually only been shown the old ways. These old methods no longer work.

The Ira Smith Team employs new modern methods to get you out of debt while avoiding bankruptcy. Let us help you obtain the relief you deserve.

You are under a lot of pressure. We understand your discomfort. A new approach will be designed for you that is as unique as you and your issues, both financial and emotional. Your burden will be lifted and the dark cloud hanging over you will be blown away. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We are confident that we can assist you right away.

People and businesses facing financial troubles need a realistic lifeline. There is no one-size-fits-all approach with the Ira Smith Team. Even though we are licensed insolvency trustees, we have found that not everyone has to declare bankruptcy in Canada. Most of our clients never declare bankruptcy. We help people and companies avoid bankruptcy.

This is why we can create a new restructuring process for paying off debt that will be custom-built for you. You’ll have a unique experience, just like the economic difficulties and discomfort you are experiencing. If any of these describe you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. Let us get you or your business back on track, driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and eliminating the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

THE LUCRATIVE RESP BANKRUPTCY PLAN TO DEBT RELIEF

resp bankruptcy
resp bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click play on the podcast.

RESP bankruptcy introduction

Parents contribute to their child’s Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) in order to save for their children’s post-secondary education. In contrast to Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs), RESP contributions, or the total amount of all contributions made by the parent(s), is a property that is available for seizure in bankruptcy of the owner of the RESP.

In this Brandon Blog, I explain why an RRSP, unlike an RESP, is mostly exempt from seizure in bankruptcy. RRSPs and a Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF) are exempt from seizure based on a balancing act between federal and provincial laws. The RESP bankruptcy is not exempt. Since I practice in Ontario, I will only comment on the situation there.

Will I lose my RRSP in bankruptcy?

An RRSP’s exemption from seizure in bankruptcy was determined solely by provincial law before 2008. The bankruptcy treatment of RRSPs was not outlined in federal insolvency law. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), being the federal bankruptcy law in Canada, other than the exception described in the next section, exempted assets contained in either an RRSP or an RRIF from seizure as of July 2008.

Inequality among RRSPs was the reason for changing the BIA. If your RRSP was held at a financial institution, it would not be exempt from seizure if you filed for bankruptcy. But if you held it:

  • at an insurance company; AND
  • the beneficiary designation of your plan was irrevocable as your spouse, child, parent, or grandchild in the event of your death

under the Ontario Insurance Act, the entire RRSP or RRIF was exempt from seizure.

The reason for amending the BIA was twofold:

  • all RRSPs and RRIFs should be treated the same, regardless of which institution holds them; and
  • retirement income should not be lost as a result of financial problems for Canadians who have gone bankrupt, since their fresh start is made possible by the bankruptcy system.

In other words, before July 2008, people who were going to file for bankruptcy and who had a sizeable RRSP with a chartered bank would transfer the RRSP to an insurance company and designate one or more beneficiaries accordingly. In Canada, bankruptcy courts heard many cases about transactions designed to save an RRSP from seizure in bankruptcy.

An insolvency trustee or bankruptcy trustee could replace the named beneficiary of an insurance policy or retirement investment, including RRSPs or RRIFs, with the Estate and then collapse the plan so as to obtain the funds if the beneficiary designation of the policy was revocable. Trustees cannot collapse investments if the beneficiary is irrevocable; such plans constitute exempt assets. A Trustee would have to use it as one of the reasons for opposing a bankrupt’s discharge. Since the person, aware of their insolvency, transferred the asset for no value, the creditors are unable to pursue them. This was is known as a settlement.

The leading case on this issue, which was eventually followed by other jurisdictions, including Ontario, is Royal Bank of Canada v. North American Life Assurance Co., 1992 CanLII 4696 (SK CA), also known as the Ramgotra case. Dr. Ramgotra was bankrupt. A lower court decision regarding what should be done with the RRSP funds, turned into an RRIF, prior to his bankruptcy but when he knew he was in financial trouble, was appealed by the Royal Bank of Canada, having received Court approval to appeal the case instead of the Trustee appealing. The Court of Appeal found that the property had an irrevocable interest in Mrs. Ramgotra despite the transfer of the RRSP being a settlement.

So effective July 2008, the Canadian government amended the BIA so that regardless of which of the financial institutions an RRSP was held, only the contributions made within 12 months of the date of bankruptcy were subject to being lost to the licensed insolvency trustee in bankruptcy.

resp bankruptcy
resp bankruptcy

Registered Education Savings Plans (RESP) and bankruptcy: RESP bankruptcy is not exempt

It is fairly simple to understand why RESP contribution funds are not exempt from seizure in bankruptcy. Since the parent can collapse the plan before maturity, the child does not receive a property interest in the RESP funds. There is therefore no trust or transfer of property to the child. In an RESP bankruptcy, the bankrupt parent’s Trustee can therefore collapse their RESP.

A Trustee must make satisfactory arrangements with the parent, or another relative, to have them pay the Trustee the equivalent amount of funds in the RESP at the date of bankruptcy. This way the Trustee will have recovered on the asset for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate and the bankrupt’s creditors. The bankrupt parent will have done what is necessary in order to avoid the RESP collapsing, losing the government contributions money and not having the plan value go forward for the child.

MP Dan Albas introduced his private member’s bill, An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (property of bankrupt registered education savings plans), on June 3, 2019. In this bill, the purpose was to amend section 67(1)(b.3) of the BIA, so that RESPs receive the same treatment as RRSPs and RRIFs. Like many other private member’s bills that die, this bill has not made any progress.

The thrust is obviously to make sure that other than for contributions made in the 12 months before the date of bankruptcy, a parent should not lose the RESP benefits for their child’s post-secondary school education because of their bankruptcy.

No matter how well-intentioned, one societal reason this Bill C-453 initiative will fail is that an elementary or high school student’s college tuition differs from that of a retiree whose earning years are behind him or her. So to date, there is no federal law that provides creditor protection for a Registered Education Savings Plan.

How to preserve an RESP bankruptcy

Your RESP’s liquidation cash value can be determined by contacting the financial institution holding the funds. The liquidation value does not include the government grant portion of the funds that are only available if the child attends a qualified educational institution.

You can instruct your Trustee to contact the financial institution holding the RESP funds to have the plan cashed out and remit the proceeds (net of government contributions) to the Trustee. This way the asset of the bankruptcy estate will go for the benefit of your creditors if you are not interested in keeping your RESP, which is unlikely in almost every case.

Preserving an RESP bankruptcy can be achieved in two ways. The first is to avoid bankruptcy. No, I don’t mean to tell you not to deal with your financial problems because like it or not, you are in an insolvency scenario. Just don’t use bankruptcy. If your debts not secured by your primary residence are $250,000 or less, you should consider a consumer proposal. You may use the large debtor proposal provisions of the BIA if the debts exceed this amount.

Second, the nonbankrupt spouse, or another relative, can buy the Trustee’s right, title, and interest in the RESP for an amount equal to its liquidation cash value. Thus, the purchaser becomes the owner of the RESP, and the child will continue to benefit from it. In acting in the best interests of unsecured creditors, the Trustee will have recovered the liquidation cash value.

resp bankruptcy
resp bankruptcy

RESP bankruptcy: A very recent divorce example

Having just dealt with this issue last week in one of our personal bankruptcy filings, I am writing about the RESP bankruptcy treatment today. I am the insolvency trustee in a bankruptcy filed by a divorced mother who is now on her own. The failure of her restaurant caused by the COVID-19 pandemic caused her to go bankrupt because of her high debt load.

Her ex-husband and she owned a registered education savings plan for their only child. As part of the no-cost session I provide to anyone contemplating insolvency, I discussed what might happen to an RESP bankruptcy if a bankruptcy is filed.

It was an upsetting experience for the mother. It was clear that she was upset at the prospect of losing half the liquidation proceeds if the plan collapsed. In addition, it was part of the divorce agreement that the jointly owned RESP would be continued for the benefit of the child. We had to create a plan to keep the RESP afloat in the event of RESP bankruptcy. I had no trouble coming up with the plan. What was tricky were the technical details.

This is what we came up with. First, we told her to contact the financial institution where the funds were held and obtain a written statement of the plan’s liquidation cash value. After receiving the written statement from the financial institution, we told her to pass it along to us. She did, and it turned out that the total liquidation value was approximately $26,000. She, therefore, had a half-interest valued at $13,000. We then got her permission to contact her ex-husband and explain the situation.

The ex-husband was informed that his ex-wife would be filing for bankruptcy by us. There would be an RESP bankruptcy. He knew that he had to maintain the RESP. When his ex-wife went bankrupt, we told him that if he purchased our right, title, and interest in the RESP, he would become the sole owner, and the fund would be preserved in an RESP bankruptcy and they could continue contributing to it. It was no problem for him, thankfully.

Because she had actually not yet filed for personal bankruptcy, we had not yet been designated as the licensed insolvency trustee. Our objective was to make sure there wouldn’t be a change of mind despite the divorce condition. Based on Canadian bankruptcy legislation, we scheduled the ex-husband to offer a $13,000 third-party cash guarantee to cover the costs of carrying out the personal bankruptcy.

Furthermore, we agreed that upon the bankruptcy, subject to the approval of the Inspectors, if any were appointed in this summary administration bankruptcy, we would then convert this third-party guarantee into the right, title, and interest as the licensed insolvency trustee of the RESP.

A bill of sale would be issued to him, and we would confirm jointly with the financial institution that he is now the sole owner of the RESP, and they would need to amend their records accordingly. This RESP bankruptcy would have been fully realized as we had gotten the full value of the mother’s half-interest in the RESP. It was a win-win situation for everyone involved.

resp bankruptcy
resp bankruptcy

RESP bankruptcy: What about you?

Hopefully, you see from this Brandon Blog, there are ways to deal with an RRSP both in bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy situations. I hope you found this RESP bankruptcy Brandon Blog informative. Are you in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you worried about any RRSP or RESP contributions? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to find out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

resp bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: THE UNDENIABLE BEST THING YOU NEED TO KNOW TO CASH YOUR INSOLVENT CUSTOMER’S CHEQUE SAFELY

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Bankruptcy protection: What happens if a company gets into financial trouble?

A Canadian company seeking bankruptcy protection has two choices when it is financially troubled and wants to reorganize. By hiring insolvency legal counsel and a licensed insolvency trustee to get both insolvency and bankruptcy law advice and financial advice, they can protect themselves from their creditors, either by:

  • using the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) to file for bankruptcy protection; or
  • working with an insolvency trustee and filing a Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) you can obtain bankruptcy protection.

In order to reorganize in Canada, an insolvent company files for bankruptcy protection. If you are insolvent in Canada, then you must file for bankruptcy protection, which is equivalent to Chapter 11 in the United States. The process is called financial restructuring or financial reorganization. By doing this, the company will try to restructure while it continues to operate to come up with a restructuring plan that allows the company to survive while satisfying the needs of the creditors to some degree.a

This Brandon Blog discusses a recent court decision that demonstrates that there is a risk to creditors who receive payments from the insolvent company under bankruptcy protection for goods or services supplied if the restructuring fails.

What happens to the company that files for bankruptcy protection?

An organization that files for bankruptcy protection, or as it is sometimes called, creditor protection, differs from an organization that files for bankruptcy. A pure bankruptcy procedure consists of a liquidation. The company ceases to operate unless the Trustee sees value in continuing to operate the company for a limited period of time.

The trustee in bankruptcy takes possession of all assets that are either not subject to valid claims by secured creditors (typically financial institutions) or that belong to third parties (for example, equipment under lease or goods undergoing repair that are in the company’s possession). A licensed insolvency trustee then formulates a plan for selling the unencumbered assets of the company to maximize the proceeds. Afterwards, the Trustee distributes the funds in accordance with the BIA.

In the case of a company filing for bankruptcy protection, this is one of the alternatives to bankruptcy. The intention is to continue operating while it tries to restructure. Most of the time, this entails downsizing. A plan will be devised to repay some of the remaining debt in exchange for the creditors writing off the balance that is owed. With success, the company can retain employees and continue to operate. Creditors will be able to earn money by supplying the reorganized company in the future.

The CCAA allows companies that owe at least $5 million to their creditors to file for bankruptcy protection. Either the business will be restructured and continue to exist on new financial terms or a wind-down will be supervised to pay back anyone owed money by selling assets. BIA restructuring provisions can be used by companies that owe less than $5 million.

In other words, a company that goes bankrupt will shut down. Those who file for bankruptcy protection want to keep operating. As disruptive as bankruptcy and restructuring are, they can be beneficial for businesses, individuals and the economy since they preserve value and prevent assets from being wasted.

As soon as the company enters bankruptcy protection (or bankruptcy), proceedings against it are stayed. As a result, all collection rights for creditors are suspended. A “time-out” gives the company a chance to restructure, or the Trustee can handle its duties in bankruptcy without interference from creditors. Additionally, it “freezes” all creditors at the time of the filing, so that one cannot gain an advantage over another.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection

A record number of companies have sought creditor protection under COVID-19 and more are on the way?

The list of large Canadian companies with outstanding debts looking for bankruptcy protection from creditors got to a decade high in May and June 2020. Numerous financial commentators believed there would be a full-blown financial crisis and that a lot more would certainly file as a result of COVID-19 caused the economic downturn. Despite this, the number of corporate insolvency filings appears to have stabilized and also slowed down in 2021. One main reason is the number of government programs supporting Canadian business. In the same way as the virus itself, COVID-19 has actually taken a hefty financial toll on companies with pre-existing conditions.

Some familiar Canadian corporations in the list of companies that filed in that time due to their financial situation were:

  1. Reitmans
  2. Frank & Oak
  3. Aldo
  4. DavidsTea
  5. Cirque Du Soleil
  6. Mendocino
  7. Bow River Energy
  8. FlightHub
  9. Christian charity, Gospel for Asia
  10. Cequence Energy
  11. Delphi Energy
  12. Sail

Twenty-two major Canadian companies sought creditor protection in May and June 2020, almost four times the usual rate. The list obviously does not include major U.S. names such as Chesapeake Energy, J Crew, Neiman Marcus, Brooks Brothers, Pier 1 and Boy Scouts of America.

The bankruptcy protection court case facts

I want to tell you about Schendel Mechanical Contracting Ltd (Re), 2021 ABQB 893. On November 9, 2021, the Honourable Mr. Justice Douglas R. Mah released his decision.

Schendel Mechanical Contracting Ltd. (Schendel) was one of three associated companies that at one time collectively formed a major construction concern in Alberta under the Schendel name. As a result of financial difficulties, it was an insolvent entity and it filed a Notice of Intention to Make A Proposal under the BIA on March 22, 2019. Schendel continued operations as part of its restructuring effort. On various Schendel projects, Schendel bought HVAC equipment from the supplier between April 2018 and May 2019.

Ultimately, Schendel’s debt restructuring plan failed. Schendel was deemed to have filed for bankruptcy when it failed to implement a successful BIA Proposal restructuring. Schendel went bankrupt immediately. Its secured creditor applied to the Court for the appointment of a Receiver, which was granted.

As a result of reviewing the company’s books and records, the Receiver found and disputed the legality of a $40,000 payment from Schendel, an insolvent company, to one of its suppliers. According to the Applicant Receiver, the payment was prohibited for a number of reasons and the funds should be returned. The recipient supplier asserted that the payment was both innocent and validly received and that it was entitled to retain it.

In this case, a cheque dated July 8, 2019, to make the payment. Due to an unknown reason, the supplier did not negotiate the cheque until 11:48 AM on July 19, 2019. Schendel was also deemed to have filed for bankruptcy and the Court made the Receivership Appointment Order all on the same day, July 19, 2019. The Court had, however, no evidence regarding the exact moment the receivership and bankruptcy decision was made on that same day.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection

The bankruptcy protection case: The Receiver’s position

It is noteworthy that the action to recover the $40,000 was brought by the Court-appointed Receiver and not the insolvency trustee of the bankruptcy estate. According to the Receiver, the funds should be returned on the following grounds:

  • the automatic stay under section 69(1) of the BIA was in effect at the time of filing and throughout the extension of the proposal period, so the supplier was without recourse against Schendel;
  • the Court-ordered stay contained in the Receivership Appointment Order of July 19, 2019, as well as the concurrent stay imposed by a deemed bankruptcy under the BIA, deprived the supplier of all collection remedies as of that date;
  • as an alternative, the payment may be prohibited under the Fraudulent Preferences Act; or
  • it may be in violation of the Statute of Elizabeth (see note below).

NOTE: The English Parliament passed this statute in 1571 with the purpose of prohibiting transfers that would defraud creditors or hinder their collection efforts. As a result of widespread fraudulent transactions designed to defraud creditors, the 13 Elizabeth Statute was passed. It is still in effect in Alberta today.

The bankruptcy protection case: The supplier’s position

The recipient supplier said that it received the payment both innocently and legally and that it is entitled to retain it. In addition, the recipient supplier said:

  • besides some routine questions about payment, the supplier had not engaged in any activity to try to collect the debt;
  • the relationship with Schendel was arm’s-length;
  • both of the last two extension orders for the NOI define a process by which Schendel may pay, and the Receiver has fallen short to prove that the procedure was not followed when it comes to the subject payment; and
  • for either the Fraudulent Preferences Act or the Statute of Elizabeth, the required intent cannot be shown.

Since the bankruptcy trustee was not involved in this case, nobody was claiming that the payment was a preference or transfer under value under the BIA.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection

The bankruptcy protection case: The Judge’s decision

The Court was not presented with evidence on whether the $40,000 payment in question was approved within the proposal extension process or whether it was not approved. There was evidence to support Schendel’s compliance with approved procedures. In the post-NOI period, the supplier was found to have provided goods to various Schendel projects worth $34,476.75.

There was evidence that the payment was not just a payment on account of a pre-filing debt without further transactions post-filing. According to the Judge, the stay would not apply to indebtedness arising from goods or services supplied to Schendel after the filing of the NOI. This is because such indebtedness would not be a claim that could be a proven claim in the bankruptcy.

The Judge further stated that it is the Receiver’s responsibility to prove that the payment violated the stay. Schendel and the supplier did continue to do business together after the NOI was filed, according to the evidence. During the hearing, the Judge said that he should not simply assume facts in the Receiver’s favour. Additionally, the evidence indicated that some of the $40,000 payment was applied to the post-NOI supply of goods. A total of $34,476.75 worth of product was supplied to Schendel after the NOI was filed.

As a result, the Judge rejected all of the Receiver’s arguments and dismissed his Application in its entirety. Consequently, the supplier kept the $40,000.

Bankruptcy protection: How to cash your insolvent customer’s cheque safely

Companies filing for bankruptcy protection, whether under the CCAA or BIA, are reorganizing to stay in business. Businesses require purchasing goods and services and paying for them. It’s possible that some pre-filing debts will be paid after the filing date even though the debts are frozen from a collection perspective.

The stay does not necessarily prohibit every post-NOI payment by an insolvent company to a creditor. Such payments are valid when they are necessary to enable the company to move forward with restructuring. For example, a creditor may require payment of all or a portion of its pre-filing debt in order to supply post-filing.

Parties can agree to repay past debts in order to secure future supplies. First and foremost, the BIA process aims to encourage a debtor to reorganize as a going concern. Both creditors and debtors benefit from the debtor’s continued operation during this critical time. The BIA’s stay provisions and preference provisions give debtors breathing room to reorganize their finances. Setting up legitimate agreements with key suppliers is an integral part of that process.

In the end, it is critical to determine whether the payment of past indebtedness is a valid condition of post-NOI supply, which is required for restructuring to proceed. In that case, the post-filing payment of the pre-filing amount will be valid. If not, the insolvency trustee can recover it from the supplier.

Creditors seeking to recover pre-filing debts must make the payment as a condition of a post-filing supply arrangement. Additionally, because all of this is playing out in real-time in higher-risk settings, a supplier is free to amend the pricing post-filing. Similarly, if the supplier can secure it, there is no reason for them to not try to go from an unsecured creditor to a secured creditor on the post-filing supply by taking security or requesting a letter of credit. This would all be done out of an abundance of caution because as stated above, unpaid post-filing debts are not a claim provable in the company’s bankruptcy if the restructuring is unsuccessful.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection

Bankruptcy protection summary

I hope you found this bankruptcy protection Brandon Blog post informative. Are you worried because you personally or as business owners are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? If it is too much debt for any reason, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Even though we are licensed insolvency trustees, we have found that not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

bankruptcy protection
bankruptcy protection
Call a Trustee Now!