Tag: consumer proposals

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT OF CANADA TR1ES TO GIVE EVERYONE UNDENIABLE EQUITABLE TREATMENT

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada
bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada

What is the purpose of the Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act of Canada?

With all the talk of the economy, supply chain problems and the uncertainty of the future these days, it’s no wonder that many people aren’t sure how they will end up when things become “normal” again.

For Canadian people and businesses with too much debt, an insolvency proceeding under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada might just be the answer to getting back to a healthy stress-free life. Notwithstanding that using this federal statute can be a very effective strategy for managing financial difficulties, it is a very scary one that people do not like to talk about.

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada is based on the principle of balancing fairness, equity and a fresh start. A recent court decision in Saskatchewan exemplifies these principles. In this Brandon Blog, I describe a little bit about the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada, explain the court decision and how the court used these principles in reaching its decision.

What is in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada?

Canadian citizens, businesses, and companies who run into financial difficulties can turn to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada for assistance. This federal legislation contains the laws, rules, and guidelines that all involved parties must abide by. It details how different financial options work legally, and defines the roles of the various stakeholders – the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, the Licensed Insolvency Trustees, the debtor, and the secured creditors and unsecured creditors (both preferred and ordinary).

Despite the fact that provincial legislation in Canada may overlap or affect stakeholder rights, federal bankruptcy legislation has priority over provincial legislation in insolvency matters. Therefore, provincial governments cannot do indirectly what is prohibited directly. However, there are cases where provincial laws will still apply. The laws surrounding property exemptions and enforcement of court orders differ from province to province and territory to territory. These provincial and territorial regulations continue to apply even under bankruptcy laws.

It is the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada that governs all bankruptcies and proposals (either Division I or consumer proposals) in Canada. Receiverships are also governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada. The Laws of Canada – Bankruptcy and Insolvency, are meant to give the honest but unfortunate debtor, be it a person, business or company, a fresh start in life.

bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada
bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada

Growth in consumer proposals and business proposals

A person who files for the personal bankruptcy process submits an assignment in bankruptcy and related documents to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. These documents outline the person’s assets, liabilities, income, and expenses. An insolvent person’s reason for insolvency must also be included in the documents. Individuals typically give the reason for not being able to pay their bills in a timely manner. Consumer proposals require very similar documentation as bankruptcy, except for the assignment in bankruptcy document.

In order to file a Division I Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada, insolvent companies must describe their assets and liabilities and provide a realistic cash flow statement documenting how they intend to operate under the proposed insolvency process. They must also explain how they became insolvent. Personal insolvency is less complex than corporate insolvency.

Despite a long-term decline in individual bankruptcy filings, consumer proposals have gained in popularity among individuals. The decrease in bankruptcy filings and the increase in proposals can be attributed to several different reasons. Under a proposal, a financial reorganization or restructuring is what is done. Bankruptcy is simply a liquidation.

Regardless of whether it is a consumer proposal, a Division I proposal, or bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada governs these proceedings. The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, another federal government statute, governs reorganizations of very large corporations. This is especially true if there are separate insolvent corporations under the corporate umbrella in different countries, requiring foreign proceedings.

Why does one choose a consumer proposal instead of filing for bankruptcy?

A consumer proposal has many advantages over bankruptcy proceedings. By filing a consumer proposal, you’re able to retain the property you own such as your home, car, boat, etc. and extinguish all of your debts while only paying back a portion. A consumer proposal doesn’t require any of those items to be sold, as long as you can afford them with the monthly payment made under the proposal and your other living expenses.

Changing your lifestyle can help you get out of debt more quickly with a consumer proposal. Bankruptcy means losing everything, except for some assets that are exempt under provincial laws. You have equity if you do not fully encumber your assets by way of secured loans from financial institutions, your house, car, boat, furniture, clothing, jewelry, or anything else of value. You can keep this equity in a consumer proposal, but you will lose it in bankruptcy.

The main reason why people should attempt to perform a successful consumer proposal instead of going straight into bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada is because of this. As you will see in the recent court case I am about to describe, if you don’t pay close attention to how you conduct your affairs once you declare bankruptcy, you might be exposed to another minefield even after receiving your discharge.

bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada
bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada case

This judgment of the Registrar in Bankruptcy of the Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan was released on October 6, 2021. It is a relatively simple case, but it described so well the equitable nature of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada.

In this legal process case, there are two unsecured creditors who are the Applicants. They jointly loaned money to an individual debtor, who is now an insolvent debtor and a bankrupt individual on an unsecured basis. They also filed their proof of claim for this debt with the insolvency trustee. They then applied for an order pursuant to s. 69.4 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada lifting the bankruptcy stay that is in effect with regard to the bankrupt.

The purpose of section 69.3 is to prevent bankruptcy creditors from initiating or continuing enforcement proceedings against a bankrupt debtor. In bankruptcy, a creditor has no recourse against the debtor or the debtor’s property, and may not commence, continue, or seek any action for the recovery of money for a claim that is provable in the bankruptcy.

Nevertheless, Section 69.4 allows a court to lift the stay if it decides that the applicant has established that the continued operation of the stay is likely to cause material harm to him or her, or if there are other equitable grounds for lifting the stay.

The case: How the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada works for fairness and equity

The bankruptcy process generally compromises the debt obligation of the bankrupt, resulting in creditor claims run through the bankruptcy claims process. Generally, unsecured creditors lose their right to enforce their types of debts and, as a result, realize less than 100% of their debt. Some creditors do not receive anything from an estate in bankruptcy.

There are two major objectives of bankruptcy (and consumer proposal or commercial proposal) proceedings under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada. For one thing, it provides an equitable system for distributing the proceeds from the estate in bankruptcy among the bankrupt’s unsecured creditors. According to the laws Of Canada – bankruptcy and insolvency, unsecured creditors are expected to be treated predictably and fairly. However, it does not guarantee that creditors will receive a dividend in all cases.

Secondly, it is intended to give an honest but unfortunate bankrupt an opportunity to be freed from the crushing burden of debt and receive financial rehabilitation to become a contributing member of society. That is one reason why every person who does an insolvency filing must attend two financial counselling sessions.

In bankruptcy, an automatic stay allows the bankrupt to re-establish himself or herself financially and restart his or her financial affairs so that he or she can meet his or her credit obligations moving forward without being hampered by debt enforcement proceedings.

bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada
bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada

The case: Role of unsecured creditors trying to lift the stay of proceedings

The Registrar, in this case, followed the reasoning of a 2001 decision from the Court of Appeal for Ontario. It is far from routine to lift the stay, and therefore the court has to make sure that the reasons for lifting the stay are sound and consistent with the objectives of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada.

In the case of Mcculloch (Re), 2021 SKQB 259 (CanLII), the two creditors were alleging that Ms. Mcculloch induced them to loan her the money on a fraudulent basis. It was their argument that they should be allowed to continue legal action against the bankrupt so that they could prove in a separate court action that the debt was a result of fraud and that, therefore, their claim would survive the bankruptcy and her discharge. In addition, they stated that they would be more severely affected than the commercial creditors if the bankruptcy stay bars them from taking action against McCulloch.

According to the Registrar:

  1. Bankruptcy often disproportionately affects individual creditors over commercial creditors. Generally, creditor relationships are based more on trust than on cost-benefit analysis. When advancing a loan, the commercial creditor such as a credit card company, unpaid suppliers, or a sophisticated secured creditor, generally assesses the risk and determines whether it can absorb the loss in the event of default. Individual lenders do not usually do this.
  2. If this form of prejudice is sufficient to support lifting the stay, other individual creditors may be able to apply to lift the stay merely on the basis of relative disadvantage to individual creditors. Lifting the stay on this basis is inappropriate.
  3. The Trustee objects to this application on the grounds that it will significantly increase the costs of bankruptcy administration at the expense of other creditors. In this case, the Registrar sided with the Trustee.
  4. According to the lawyer representing the bankrupt, the creditors have not established any material prejudice or other equitable grounds for lifting the stay. The Registrar agreed.
  5. Due to the potential cost increases to other creditors, the equities are opposed to lifting the stay.
  6. However, these 2 creditors still have rights in the bankruptcy. The court still has the right to hear their submissions at the discharge hearing. Additionally, they continue to have the right to pursue Ms. McCulloch once the bankruptcy proceedings are over.
  7. At this time, lifting the stay would not benefit the applicants or their creditor claims since during the bankruptcy, Ms. McCulloch’s either the bankruptcy vests her assets in the Trustee for the benefit of the creditors or remain exempt from execution under Saskatchewan law. This disposition of property makes it simply impossible for these creditors to realize much from this stage, prior to the bankrupt’s discharge.
  8. In this case, the equity does not support the court’s exercise of its authority to declare that the bankruptcy stay, established under section 69.3 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada, does not apply to this litigation.

As a result, the Registrar denied the applicant’s request for what they thought was their legal rights in lifting the stay. Clearly, the Registrar was guided by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada‘s aims of fairness and equity to all stakeholders.

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada summary

I hope you enjoyed this Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada Brandon Blog post. Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

THE CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT EASY BEGINNER’S GUIDE

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

What is in the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act?

Canada’s bankruptcy and insolvency laws are governed by two major pieces of federal legislation: the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. Additionally, provincial legislation intersects with the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. During bankruptcy, a debtor can keep certain types of property based on provincial legislation. Details may differ amongst each Canadian province. Provincial governments and territories have their own laws regarding property exemptions, court orders, and debt collection.

The Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (often referred to as the “BIA” or the “Bankruptcy Act“) is a federal government statute that sets out the rules and procedures governing insolvency proceedings in Canada. These rules and procedures will apply to all corporations, individuals and partnerships that are parties to an insolvency filing. The whole point of bankruptcy legislation is to allow the honest but unfortunate debtor to shed themselves of their debts and to allow for the sale of assets or reorganization and refinancing of insolvent persons so that there is also fairness for the different claims of creditors.

Under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), financially troubled corporations are given the opportunity to restructure their affairs in order to avoid bankruptcy. A corporation must have debts of at least $5 million to qualify for the CCAA.

The Canadian insolvency landscape is a complex one, with many different insolvency proceedings being used to deal with many different types of debtors. In this Brandon Blog, I provide an easy beginner’s guide of the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, as a primer into Canadian insolvency legislation and the administration of estates.

This Brandon Blog is not about the nuts and bolts of filing for bankruptcy. Other blogs I have written cover that topic and more. You can use the search function above to search for those Brandon Blog topics.

What is the purpose of the Canadian Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act?

Everyone knows you should do your best to stay out of too much debt, but for many people, it’s an impossible feat. When you’re over your head in debt, you’re having to keep up just to pay the interest on your debt. When you are spending more than you are making, you can’t pay your bills on time, or your assets when liquidated are worth less than your total liabilities, you are insolvent. Insolvency is the main test to see if you, or insolvent companies, qualify to start a bankruptcy process or a formal restructuring process, either under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act or the CCAA.

The Bankruptcy Act was designed to help Canadians who find themselves in financial difficulty. It is the main piece of Canadian insolvency legislation that governs bankruptcy proceedings, receivership and personal and corporate restructuring proceedings through consumer proposals and commercial proposals. Commercial proposals are also available for those people with consumer debt levels greater than the amount allowed to qualify for a consumer proposal. All Canadian bankruptcies, proposals and receiverships are governed by the Act. It contains bankruptcy laws, rules and guidelines for all stakeholders: the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (which is part of Industry Canada) the Licensed Insolvency Trustee, the debtor, and the creditors.

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act

What options are available under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act?

The Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act provides a number of ways to deal with a financially troubled company or person. Most involve a court-supervised process. The options for a person or business in financial trouble and not able to right themself or itself are:

  • Consumer proposal

It is an offer to your creditors to repay a portion of your unsecured debt obligations in exchange for their elimination (with certain limited exceptions as laid out in the Bankruptcy Act). You can qualify if you owe $250,000 or less, excluding any debts registered against your home, such as mortgage debt or secured home equity line of credit debt.

A person proposes a plan to make monthly payments to the Licensed Trustee acting as the consumer proposal Administrator. The total amount offered to your unsecured creditors must be agreed upon by them. Within 60 months, you must pay off the entire amount accepted. Creditors typically accept a total payment of 25% or less of your total unsecured debt. Individual situations vary, however.

A successfully completed consumer proposal allows the insolvent person to eliminate their debts and avoid an assignment into bankruptcy.

  • Commercial proposal

Commercial proposals are also known as Division I proposals. The reason for this is because it is provided under Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, Part III, Division 1 (consumer proposals are found under Part III Division II). An insolvent corporation or person can use it for restructuring proceedings. When a consumer’s debt exceeds the limits of a consumer proposal, a “commercial proposal” would be filed. If a definitive commercial proposal cannot be immediately prepared but the debtor needs to file in order to invoke the stay of proceedings (discussed in the next section), they can get the immediate protection they need by first filing a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal.

A commercial proposal works in a very similar way to a consumer proposal, except for some differences as follows:

    • A commercial proposal may have various classes of creditors. A consumer proposal normally does not.
    • Unlike for a person, there is no streamlined reorganization process for companies. Therefore, even if its debt is $250,000 or less, a company cannot file a consumer proposal.
    • A meeting of creditors must be held as part of a commercial proposal. If the Official Receiver (being a representative of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy), doesn’t wish to chair the meeting, it can be delegated to the Trustee. A creditor who has filed a valid proof of claim has voting rights. They have the right to vote ahead of the creditors’ meeting by using a voting letter or in person. An official meeting of creditors is only held in a consumer proposal if 25% of the proven creditors’ claims request one.
    • In a consumer proposal, if a meeting is not requested, the consumer proposal is deemed approved and there are no voting rights to be concerned about. If a meeting is requested, then the creditors who attend the meeting can vote by ordinary resolution for the acceptance of the consumer proposal. In a commercial proposal, it is a two-pronged test: 3/4 of the $ value voting AND a majority in the number of those voting.
    • If the commercial proposal is voted down, the person or company is immediately deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy. There is no such automatic bankruptcy if a consumer proposal is not accepted.

As soon as the commercial proposal is accepted by the creditors and approved by the court, the debtor starts making the payments promised in the proposal to the Insolvency Trustee. Once full payment has been made, the trustee in bankruptcy will issue to the person or company their Certificate of Full Performance. At this point, all provable claims, regardless of whether they filed a proof of claim or not.

As part of a successful restructuring process, the Trustee will run a claims process, vet every proof of claim to ensure that they are valid and that only an allowable claim is considered for distribution purposes. The Trustee will then comprise a scheme of distribution in order to distribute the funds promised to the creditors in the commercial proposal.

Restructuring under either the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act or CCAA becomes possible for companies with debts greater than $5 million.

  • Receivers and Secured Creditors

Receiverships are remedies for lenders who have loaned money out and taken security over the debtor’s assets. It is most common in Canada for financial institutions to be lenders to Canadian businesses. As long as their loan documents, including the security agreement, allow for it in writing, a secured creditor may appoint a receiver when a debtor defaults on secured debt. Secured creditors and receivers are subject to certain requirements under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

Receivership relies both on provincial laws and federal legislation. The Bankruptcy Act specifies several main requirements for receivership, including:

    • It is not permissible to enforce a security interest on the business assets of an insolvent person unless the secured creditor has given 10 days prior notice in the prescribed form and manner.
    • Only a Licensed Insolvency Trustees (formerly called Trustees in Bankruptcy) can act as a receiver.

The secured creditor can appoint the receiver privately or with court approval.

A private receiver’s primary responsibility is to the secured creditor who appointed it. A court-appointed receiver is an officer of the court who protects the interests of all creditors of the debtor company.

Private receivers usually have from the security documents the power to run the debtor’s business and sell the debtor’s assets through auctions, tenders or private sales.

A court appointment is also preferred over a private appointment when there are significant claims against the debtor or its property as well as litigation or a threat of litigation. It is according to the provincial rules of court and s. 243 of the BIA (National Receiver) that a court may appoint a receiver.

The receivership order normally stays proceedings (discussed below in the next section) against the receiver, the debtor, and its property. In terms of its purpose, it gives the receiver authority to manage the assets of the debtor, to borrow money against the assets to repay a loan, to sell the assets of the debtor with the approval of the court, and to commence and defend litigation on behalf of the debtor. A privately-appointed receiver does not enjoy a stay of proceedings.

  • Bankruptcy

If a personal or commercial restructuring is not possible, then the insolvent person or company has no choice but to file for bankruptcy. The first step in dealing with insolvency is to consult an insolvency trustee. You can learn about the bankruptcy administration process and your legal rights from Trustees in Bankruptcy so you can make an informed decision. A candid discussion about how much you earn, what assets you own, and what types of debts you have can help you decide if bankruptcy is the best choice for you.

Here is what the Canadian bankruptcy procedure is all about. After the bankruptcy assignment has been completed, the Trustee submits it to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada. All legal obligations will be handled by the Trustee once the assignment has been filed. Your credit­ors will no longer receive payments directly from you.

The Trustee administers your bankruptcy. No more lawsuits or wage garnishments for you. Depending on your province’s law, some of your assets will certainly be exempt. The bankruptcy vests your non-exempt assets in the Trustee. The Trustee will sell them. According to the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the proceeds will be for the benefit of the bankrupt estate and there could be a scheme of distribution among your preferred creditors and ordinary unsecured creditors.

In the administration of bankruptcy, the Trustee will send your creditors a notice of bankruptcy. You must attend a creditors’ meeting if one is called. Additionally, you will need to attend two counselling sessions. Canadian insolvency legislation in Canada includes rehabilitation programs to help individuals regain financial stability.

Finally, you may need to make payments toward your debt. “Surplus income payments” ensure that people who declare bankruptcy and have sufficient income contribute to paying back a portion of their debt. Your debts will eventually be discharged, relieving you from the obligation of repaying most of the debt you had on the day you filed for bankruptcy.

Despite the fact that most debts can be discharged, some cannot, namely:

  • alimony and child support;
  • court fines and penalties;
  • debts related to fraud; and some
  • student loans.

You will suffer credit damage for several years after filing for bankruptcy. After your debt is discharged, you can start rebuilding your credit. Although it’s not ideal, it will lift the burden from your shoulders and solve the debt problems you couldn’t resolve on your own.

Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act: Can bankruptcy protect you from creditors?

In addition to bankruptcy, any filing listed above under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act will protect you from creditors. In fairness to all stakeholders, the filing calls for a “time out” after which no claims for money, lawsuits, or collection efforts are permitted. In legal jargon, we call this a stay of proceedings.

By virtue of the individual’s bankruptcy or insolvency, you may not terminate, amend, or accelerated pay, or claim the term of any agreement. When an insolvent person files a notice of intention or a proposal, a similar provision is made.

Just like in bankruptcy, if you file a notice of intention or a Division I proposal or Division II proposal, all proceedings automatically stay and no creditor is entitled to take any action against the debtor or to pursue any execution or other proceeding for the recovery of a claim provable.

Commercial proposals are normally worded so that Directors of insolvent companies who have filed notices of intention or proposals enjoy similar protection.

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act

A word on cross-border insolvencies

Many of the large CCAA reorganization filings in recent times have been cross-border insolvencies. Canadian courts prefer that cross-border insolvencies proceed as a single process with one jurisdiction acting as the primary entity. The Canadian court examines whether the Canadian case should be considered the main proceeding in order to determine whether it is significant and connected to Canada.

The other jurisdiction (most often the U.S.) usually recognizes the Canadian court’s authority when the court believes the insolvency action should be handled, for the most part, in Canada. Likewise, the opposite is also true.

Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act: Personal bankruptcy

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act

Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act summary

I hope you found this Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Brandon Blog informative. With too high household debt levels and not enough wealth, you are insolvent. You can choose from several insolvency processes to get the debt relief that you need and deserve. It may not be necessary for you to file for bankruptcy.

If you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help, and you assume bankruptcy is the only option, call me.

If you’re thinking about bankruptcy, you’re probably in a situation where you’re overwhelmed, frightened, and feel like you’re alone. That’s natural and it is not your fault.

It’s good that you’ve come to this site, where you’ll find answers to your questions, sort through your options, and discover that you can get help. You’re not alone, and the professionals at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. are committed to helping you find a debt solution that’s best for you.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

You are under a lot of pressure. Our team knows how you feel. You and your financial and emotional problems will be the focus of a new approach designed specifically for you. With our help, you will be able to blow away the dark cloud over your head. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

Because of this, we can develop a new method for paying down your debt that will be built specifically for you. It will be as unique as the economic problems and discomfort you are experiencing. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSUMER PROPOSAL AND BANKRUPTCY: THE PROVEN CANADIAN WAY TO GET DEBT FREE

difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy
difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click play on the podcast.

Difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy: Know your options

Regular readers of my Brandon Blog know that there are a lot of steps you need to go through to financially reorganize your life. I have written before different blogs on various aspects of both consumer proposals and bankruptcy. The purpose of this Brandon blog is to discuss in one place, the difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy.

Many people opt for one of these options because life has thrown them a curveball, they no longer have the cash flow to pay off their debts and want to start fresh. There are some great benefits to filing bankruptcy. They include eliminating creditors and debts, getting control over your personal finances, and having a stress-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now. But if you’re considering a first-time bankruptcy, or the bankruptcy option even if you are familiar with the Canadian bankruptcy process from a prior time, you should consider the pros and cons of a consumer proposal, the only government-approved debt settlement plan in Canada. It will be good for you to know the options that I explain below.

Consolidation loans vs consumer proposals

What’s the distinction between a consumer proposal and a debt consolidation loan? The consumer proposal process is an insolvency procedure that allows you to resolve all the amounts you owe to your unsecured creditors via an arrangement with your creditors. It does this without needing you to file bankruptcy. A consumer proposal can only be carried out by a licensed insolvency trustee. A consumer proposal allows you to get rid of all the amount owed by repaying only a part of your financial obligations over time.

A consolidation loan means that you still have sufficient assets and income and a good enough credit score, in order to borrow the total amount you owe. The loan must carry an interest rate lower, and hopefully much lower, than the average interest rate of your combined total debt. You use the loan proceeds to repay 100% of your debts. You now have only one loan with a monthly payment you can afford. Taking out a consolidation loan is not an insolvency process.

difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy
difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

The main difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

The consumer proposal is a fundamental part of our personal insolvency system. It is an insolvency procedure controlled by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) that allows individuals who owe $250,000 or less (not including any financial debts secured against their principal home). It permits you to pay a portion of your financial debts with time, yet eliminate all of them if fully executed. It is an alternative to declaring bankruptcy. It is an alternative to bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy is also a fundamental part of our insolvency system under the BIA. However, rather than restructuring, in personal bankruptcy, the person surrenders all of their non-exempt assets to the licensed insolvency trustee for the benefit of the person’s creditors. Once the bankrupt person has fulfilled all of their duties, they are entitled to receive a discharge from bankruptcy, subject to the Trustee or a creditor opposing it.

Personal bankruptcy involves the liquidation of the bankrupt’s assets in return for the eventual elimination of their unsecured debts. It is not considered a restructuring like a consumer proposal is.

Difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy: The process of filing a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy

You start by talking to a Trustee who will provide you basic guidance on both a consumer proposal and also bankruptcy. The Trustee will likewise inform you specifically just how each process functions. If at the end of that discussion you inform the licensed bankruptcy trustee that you really feel good in wanting to take the next steps with them, the Trustee will provide you with their intake form. When the form is completed, you send it to the Trustee, including supplying any kind of backup documents asked for, the Trustee can then provide you advice for your unique financial difficulties.

If you choose a consumer proposal, the licensed insolvency trustee will prepare the necessary filing documents for you to sign. This includes assisting you with preparing the best possible proposal that works for both you and your creditors. You then meet with the Trustee to sign the documents. The Trustee then files the documents electronically with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). The OSB then issues the Certificate evidencing the filing and the formal process begins.

After seeing your completed intake sheet, the Trustee will advise on whether or not a consumer proposal would work for you, or if your best or only option is filing for bankruptcy. Similarly, in bankruptcy filings, the Trustee prepares all the required filing documents for your signature. The Trustee explains all of them to you, you sign them and the Trustee then electronically files the filing documents with the OSB. The OSB then issues its Certificate evidencing the bankruptcy and that formal process begins.

You initially meet with the licensed bankruptcy trustee, in-person, by video or phone, to share details of your personal situation, and working together, you determine whether a consumer proposal, an alternative to filing bankruptcy, or personal bankruptcy is the best option for you. With COVID-19, we have been holding all of our no-cost consultations and meetings by phone and video. We can do the sign-up process by video and email. We have found this is very convenient for our clients as they are not required to take the time to attend our office in person.

As you can see, the process of filing a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy is not that different. For filing, there is not really a difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy.

difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy
difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

Major difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

Is there a major difference between consumer proposals and bankruptcy? Yes. So far in this discussion, there have not really been major differences. But there really are as the consumer proposal is akin to filing for bankruptcy protection while the other is bankruptcy. Both provide legal protection from creditors. But a consumer proposal gives a person what the media calls filing for bankruptcy protection. When you file for bankruptcy, that calls for the liquidation of non-exempt assets.

Both bankruptcy and a consumer proposal can be excellent options for somebody who is experiencing a challenging financial position. A consumer proposal is an excellent choice for individuals who have the ability to make monthly payments to their creditors totalling less than the amount they owe, yet eliminating all their debts, while keeping the equity they have in assets they wish to keep. Bankruptcy is an excellent choice for those who are bewildered by their financial obligations, and who don’t have a consistent income, making it actually hard or impossible to manage making payments at any level to their creditors.

While both bankruptcy, as well as a consumer proposal, can supply a financial clean slate, there are a few vital distinctions.

In a consumer proposal, you normally get to keep all of your assets. In a bankruptcy, if you have equity in assets that you want to keep, you or someone friendly to you has to pay that equity to your Trustee for the benefit of your creditors. Otherwise, you need to surrender all non-exempt assets to the Trustee for the Trustee to sell them and then put the cash towards the claims of your creditors. The assets covered by your bankruptcy exemptions do not need to be surrendered.

In bankruptcy, you also have the issue of needing to obtain your bankruptcy discharge. If either the Trustee or one or more creditors object to your discharge, then you will not get your automatic bankruptcy discharge and you will have a discharge hearing in Court. You may also be subject to surplus income payments in a bankruptcy, which you will need to make to your Trustee (21 months for a first time bankrupt, 36 months for a second time or more bankruptcy).

The amount to offer your creditors in a consumer proposal has to be a better amount than they would receive from your bankruptcy. After doing the calculations I spoke about above, including any surplus income obligation, you will better understand what amount needs to be offered to your creditors.

Another difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy is that there is a benefit of a consumer proposal in that you can spread the monthly payments for the amount determined over a term of up to 60 months, interest-free. In a bankruptcy, you are typically required to make any required payments over the term of your bankruptcy, which is much shorter than in a proposal. Therefore the consumer proposal allows you to term out a slightly higher settlement over a longer period of time. This makes the monthly repayment less complicated on your cash flow as well as your budget plan.

Once your consumer proposal is (deemed) accepted by the creditors and (deemed) approved by the Court, you just need to make your promised monthly payments to the Trustee. The Trustee handles making payments at regular intervals to your creditors. Once you have completed the payment promised under the consumer proposal, you receive your Certificate from the Trustee showing that you completed the consumer proposal. That is it. No discharge hearing can be opposed and no extra surplus income payments. It is already accounted for in the amount offered to your creditors in your consumer proposal.

The cost difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

When doing a consumer proposal, the fee of the licensed insolvency trustee is included in the payment you negotiate with your creditors. As I mentioned above, the calculation of what to offer in a consumer proposal does not include what the fee and costs are. Rather, it is compared to what the unsecured creditors can expect in bankruptcy.

However, if you were to file bankruptcy, the fee is based on the surplus income you may have to pay (based upon a criterion that includes income and family size) and also any assets that you are required to assign over to the Trustee. You might also have to make month-to-month contributions to cover the fee and costs if your income and non-exempt assets are insufficient to pay for the bankruptcy proceedings.

If there is no surplus income or assets, you, or someone on your behalf, will need to pay the bankruptcy fee which will be approximately $1,800 plus HST.

difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy
difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

Difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy: What’s worse? Credit rating impact of a bankruptcy vs consumer proposal

Both a consumer proposal and bankruptcy are insolvency proceedings under the BIA. Therefore both will negatively affect your credit rating. In a consumer proposal, your credit rating will show as an R9 on your credit report while you are making payments. Once you have completed your consumer proposal, your credit rating will be an R7 for 3 years after completion.

For a first-time bankrupt, if you were to file for bankruptcy, your credit report will show an R9 rating for 6-7 years after being discharged.

The difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy summary

I hope that you found this difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

6 DISADVANTAGES OF CONSUMER PROPOSAL ARE NOT ENOUGH TO STOP A HEALTHY RETURN TO ENJOYING LIFE

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Disadvantages of consumer proposal: What is a consumer proposal?

As regular readers of Brandon Blog know, I have written many blogs about consumer proposals. I normally focus on the advantages of a consumer proposal. As I have never written about the disadvantages of consumer proposal, I thought I would do so now. There are many more advantages than there are disadvantages; however, there are a couple of points you should know. Some people may see them as drawbacks or disappointments. It depends on your unique situation.

Consumer proposals can be called an individual’s insolvency debt settlement agreement in Canada. It is a proposal to your unsecured creditors to pay off a portion of your frustrating unsecured debts over a set period of time. If you successfully complete the consumer proposal by making all the needed payments, the total amount of your unsecured financial obligations are forgiven at the end of the settlement period. Consumer proposals are created to get the debt freedom to consumers who cannot afford to pay off their total debt. It is a legally binding contract between the debtor and the unsecured creditors to eliminate debt carried out under the Bankruptcy and also Insolvency Act (Canada).

So consumer proposals are the best alternative to bankruptcy. To find out about all the advantages of consumer proposals, I recommend my recent blog post, CONSUMER PROPOSAL FAQ: ANSWERS TO 10 TANTALIZING CONSUMER PROPOSAL QUESTIONS.

Disadvantages of consumer proposal: When is a consumer proposal appropriate?

Consumer proposals are appropriate for individuals that:

  • Have a secure income flow, such as from full-time employment.
  • Are insolvent.
  • Are serious about getting rid of all of their unsecured financial obligations by paying only a portion of the total owed.
  • Wish to stay clear of bankruptcy.

To discover if a consumer proposal is an appropriate selection for you, set up a no-cost conference with a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee or a trustee in bankruptcy) (LIT or Trustee) to discuss your personal scenario. The LIT will examine your monetary situation and see if you have the economic capacity to efficiently complete a consumer proposal. The Trustee will certainly describe the pros and cons of the various options that might assist you to resolve your financial troubles.

If you choose to submit a consumer proposal, the LIT will work with you to develop a proposal that benefits both you as well as your unsecured creditors. If you file a customer proposal, you have to:

  • give the LIT a complete list of your assets and liabilities;
  • attend the first meeting of creditors, if one is requested by your creditors;
  • participate in 2 counselling sessions;
  • keep the LIT updated of any change of address; and
  • help the LIT in administering the proposal.

Disadvantages of consumer proposal: When is a meeting of creditors held?

The first disadvantage to talk about is when is a meeting of creditors held? The only time a meeting of creditors is called in consumer proposals is if creditors representing 25% or more of the proven claims filed request it. This would mean that at that point, you do not have a great relationship with creditors. They do not like the original consumer proposal you have submitted for their consideration.

A request for a meeting must be made by the creditors within 45 days of the filing of the proposal. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) can also direct the LIT to call a meeting of creditors at any time within that same period.

The meeting of creditors must be held within 21 days after being called. At the meeting, the creditors vote to either accept or refuse the proposal, or any amended proposal tabled at the meeting.

If no meeting of creditors is requested within 45 days of the filing of the proposal, the proposal will be deemed to have been accepted by the creditors regardless of any objections received.

disadvantages of consumer proposal
disadvantages of consumer proposal

Disadvantages of consumer proposal: How will a consumer proposal affect my credit rating?

The disadvantages of consumer proposal include the fact that it will have a negative impact on your credit rating. Generally, a person who declares bankruptcy is assigned the lowest possible credit score. Normally, with proposals, you are assigned a rating of R7. With bankruptcies, it is a worse rating of R9, the lowest possible. With proposals, The record of your consumer proposal will show up on your credit report. It will certainly be there for possibly 3 years after you have actually fully finished making all the payments. This is less than how long it will stay on your credit report because of bankruptcy.

Your ability to obtain and make use of credit after a consumer proposal relies on encouraging lenders of your personal financial maturity as well as the capability to repay the credit you are requesting. There are no guarantees and nobody is required to extend credit to you.

Once you have fulfilled the terms of your consumer proposal, you will receive a “certificate of full performance.” To make sure your credit record is updated, send a copy of that document to the major credit-reporting agencies, TransUnion Canada and Equifax Canada. Be sure to keep all of your proposal-related documents for reference by future lenders.

Disadvantages of consumer proposal: Why are consumer proposals rejected?

Adding to the disadvantages of consumer proposal is the possibility that the creditors will decline it. Consumer proposals are commonly the last option for creditors, other than for consumer bankruptcy. In most cases, creditors accept a well thought out debt settlement plan since they wish to recuperate some of the funds that would otherwise be lost forever. Consequently, LITs who prepare well-drafted and properly explained consumer proposals get them approved by creditors.

Nevertheless, creditors can reserve their right to reject them. When consumer proposals are rejected, it’s commonly a result of the belief of the creditor that the proposal is in reality, not a better realization than in a bankruptcy process. Conversely, creditors see that they may need to wait as much as 5 years to receive what they deem a paltry reward. They prefer to finish the pain now and get nothing in the individual’s bankruptcy than have to carry holding and administering the account for 5 years to get next to nothing, notwithstanding it is a better outcome than the borrower’s filing for bankruptcy.

Disadvantages of consumer proposal: What happens if you miss a consumer proposal payment?

As long as you are following the agreed terms of your proposal, your creditors cannot take any further action against you. If you fail to meet the agreed terms of your proposal and/or miss three months of payments, the proposal will be deemed annulled. If this happens, you are barred from filing another consumer proposal.

However, there is a temporary COVID-19 special accommodation now allowed for by the OSB. A Trustee can explain what the special rules are.

So, subject to certain temporary COVID-19 accommodation, one of the disadvantages of consumer proposal is that if you default by missing 3 months of payments, your proposal is deemed annulled. The only thing left would be a bankruptcy filing.

disadvantages of consumer proposal
disadvantages of consumer proposal

How long does it take to rebuild credit after a consumer proposal?

Another one of the disadvantages of consumer proposal is that you will need to rebuild your credit. Although it is difficult and takes time, it is not impossible. To begin rebuilding your credit after a consumer proposal, work with your Trustee to make sure that everything you do is reported to the credit bureaus. The more positive reports that you have on file with TransUnion and Equifax, the better your credit score will be.

I always advise clients that the first thing they should do is get a secured credit card. Not the kind you buy at the drug store. Rather, it is a credit card from one of the banks. You put up a sum of money that the bank will keep as a security deposit, They then issue you a credit card with a limit equal to the deposit you put up. Each month, when you pay the credit card off in full on time, the bank reports this to the credit bureaus. Every month they report favourably is another month that you are working on improving your credit score.

The next thing you can do is take out a small loan to invest the funds in an RRSP. Use your tax refund or the extra tax you did not have to pay, to pay down the loan. Make sure that you pay off the balance of the loan within 1 year. Make your monthly payments on time. Again, your proper use of this credit will be reported to the credit bureaus and will work in your favour.

It will take a few years, and initially you may pay a higher rate of interest than if you didn’t need to file a consumer proposal. After a few years of using credit properly, you will find that your credit is now rebuilt.

Disadvantages of consumer proposal: Are consumer proposals bad?

In my view, the disadvantages of a consumer proposal are not enough to ever stop anyone from entering into the only government-approved debt settlement plan. To summarize, I see the disadvantages as:

  • The possibility that it may take a lot longer and be more expensive than you hoped for to reach a deal with your creditors if 25% or more of the dollar value of the proven claims vote against your initial offer.
  • Negative impact on your credit rating.
  • Rejection by your creditors and no agreement on an amended proposal forcing you into bankruptcy.
  • You miss 3 payments causing you to default on your consumer proposal. Again, if this happens, your only real option is to file for personal bankruptcy, which is what you tried to avoid.
  • It will take you time to rebuild your credit.
  • It only allows you to wipe away your unsecured debt. If you have secured debt that you cannot afford to continue paying, your LIT will counsel you on the best way to deal with that secured debt BEFORE you file.

Disadvantages of consumer proposal summary

I hope you enjoyed the disadvantages of consumer proposal Brandon Blog post. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

disadvantages of consumer proposal
disadvantages of consumer proposal
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DECLARING BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: NEVER WORRY WHAT TO DO AGAIN WITH THESE AWESOME TIPS

declaring bankruptcy in canada
declaring bankruptcy in canada

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this declaring bankruptcy in Canada Brandon Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast.

Declaring bankruptcy in Canada: Introduction

Declaring bankruptcy in Canada is a legal process through which you may be discharged from your financial obligations (with certain minor exceptions). Its purpose is to permit an honest but unfortunate debtor to obtain a discharge from many financial debts, based on affordable conditions.

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) is charged with the administration of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) and their respective rules. All documents associated with filings under either of those Acts can be found at the OSB’s internet site. The OSB likewise licenses and supervises the actions of licensed insolvency trustees (LITs ). LITs are accredited to:

When can you declare bankruptcy in Canada?

Any insolvent person in financial difficulty can declare bankruptcy in Canada any time through a bankruptcy assignment after they have seen a licensed insolvency trustee and made suitable arrangements for the Trustee to administer handle the bankruptcy administration. The bankruptcy trustee prepares the necessary documents for the debtor to sign for filing for bankruptcy.

The licensed trustee then files certain legal documents with the OSB. The OSB then issues its Certificate to evidence the bankruptcy of the person or company. The date and time indicated on the Certificate are when a voluntary bankruptcy starts.

If you are not able to get a LIT to accept your data, or if you cannot afford to work with a LIT in order to declare bankruptcy in Canada, the OSB’s Bankruptcy Assistance Program might have the ability to help. This is provided that you are not and have actually not just recently been, involved in commercial activities or you are not in jail.

What happens when you declare bankruptcy in Canada?

There are three different avenues that can have someone declare bankruptcy in Canada:

  1. Voluntary assignment – A financially troubled insolvent person or company can make a voluntary assignment in bankruptcy. This is where they voluntarily make a general assignment in bankruptcy for the general benefit of all of their creditors.
  2. Bankruptcy application – A creditor who is owed at least $1,000 on an unsecured basis submits an application to the court for obtaining a bankruptcy order against the debtor and the debtor’s property.
  3. Deemed bankruptcy – When a debtor who has made the choice to start an insolvency process under the BIA to gain debt relief through trying to restructure their unsecured debt, has fallen short to satisfy the requirements for:
    1. submitting a Division I proposal;
    2. gaining the necessary votes in favour of the proposal from the unsecured creditors; or
    3. obtaining court approval for the proposal.

Under a deemed bankruptcy, the moment the debtor fails in one of these ways, the BIA says that the debtor is deemed to have made an assignment in bankruptcy.

The bankrupt is able to earn a living after filing for bankruptcy. For this objective, the bankrupt can work or run a company, after the bankruptcy event. However, an undischarged bankrupt cannot be a director of a company. Also, upon the onset of the bankruptcy, the debtor must turn over to the licensed insolvency trustee, any shares of companies owned by the bankrupt.

The Trustee will send a notice to your creditors informing them of the bankruptcy. If there needs to be a meeting of creditors, the Trustee will hold it. The Trustee will also provide the bankrupt person with two credit counselling/financial counselling sessions with an individual who is an OSB qualified credit counsellor from the Trustee’s office, as part of the overall bankruptcy administration.

As you can see, not every way of declaring bankruptcy in Canada is totally voluntary.

declaring bankruptcy in canada
declaring bankruptcy in canada

Declaring bankruptcy in Canada: What assets do you lose in bankruptcy?

One of the most important tasks a Trustee has in the entire personal bankruptcy process or corporate bankruptcy process after the debtor chose declaring bankruptcy in Canada is to:

  • take an inventory of the debtor’s assets;
  • make sure they are physically secure and insured;
  • formulate a plan to sell the assets for the most amount possible under the circumstances;
  • review the financial affairs of the bankrupt, including the household income and financial situation of the bankrupt in a personal bankruptcy filing, and prepare a report to the creditors; and
  • then pay a dividend to the creditors.

There are however certain exemptions allowed for people. Few are based on federal law. Most are based on provincial law. So exempt assets may differ from province to province. In Ontario, assets that are exempt, and therefore not subject to seizure by a Trustee, are:

  • The equity in your home of no greater than $10,000.
  • A vehicle with an equity value of no more than $6,000.
  • Garments and medical/dental aids.
  • Household furnishings up to a worth of $13,100.
  • Tools of the trade with a value of no greater than $11,300.
  • Pension plans, RRIF, RRSP (other than any kind of RRSP payments made within 12 months of the date of bankruptcy).
  • Farmers– no greater than $29,100 for animals and also tools & equipment.

Even though someone has decided that filing bankruptcy is the route they must go, there are certain assets they will not have to give up.

Declaring bankruptcy in Canada: Does Bankruptcy clear tax debt in Canada?

The short answer is yes. Income taxes payable calculated on your tax return but not paid is a type of debt that is released when a person gets their bankruptcy discharge. However, you should know that there is a wrinkle for anyone who owes $200,000 or more in income tax debt and if that debt to Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) equals 75% or more of the total unsecured proven claims in the bankruptcy. If that is the case, then that affects the bankrupt’s ability to get a discharge after declaring bankruptcy in Canada.

If it is the person’s first time filing bankruptcy and they do not have to make surplus income payments, then they are still entitled to a discharge after 9 months from the date of bankruptcy. If it is their first time but they do have surplus income payments, then they cannot apply for a discharge until after 21 months.

If this is the person’s second time filing bankruptcy, if they do not have any surplus income payments, then rather than being able to apply for a discharge after 9 months, they must wait 24 months. If they do have surplus income payments, then it is extended to 36 months.

If someone has been bankrupt more than one time before and has at least $200,000 of income tax debt representing 75% or more of the total proven unsecured claims, then regardless of their surplus income payment situation, they must wait 36 months.

Such a bankrupt is called a high tax debtor. A high tax debtor is not entitled to have the Trustee issue an automatic bankruptcy discharge when the time has expired. Rather, there must be a court hearing for the bankrupt’s application for discharge.

CRA will oppose an absolute discharge at least on the basis of the fact that they are a high tax debtor. The Trustee does not have to oppose the discharge on this basis. However, if the bankrupt has failed to live up to any of their duties, including making the required surplus income payment, the Trustee will oppose.

The court will make a conditional order of discharge. At least one of the conditions will be to pay a certain amount to the Trustee for the benefit of the unsecured creditors. The amount depends on the unique circumstances of that bankrupt, but you can assume that the amount will be about 25% of the income tax owing.

So anyone how has income tax debt and is contemplating declaring bankruptcy in Canada, needs to look at their total liabilities carefully. If at all possible, you do not want to be a high tax debtor when declaring bankruptcy in Canada.

Declaring bankruptcy in Canada: What debt does bankruptcy not cover?

Some people think that in a personal bankruptcy filing, the bankruptcy filing itself is what eliminates the person’s debts. That is wrong. At the moment of declaring bankruptcy in Canada, nothing actually happens to your debts. It is the person’s discharge from bankruptcy that “discharges” the person from their debts.

Yet, there is still a category of debts that are not covered and not discharged when a personal bankruptcy discharge occurs. The debts that are not covered or discharged, are outlined in section 178(1) of the BIA. These such debts are:

  • any type of penalty, fine, restitution order or other order comparable in nature to a penalty, fine or restitution order, enforced by a court in regard of an offence, or any kind of debt developing out of a recognizance or bond;
  • any damages award by a court in civil process for:

    ( i) physical injury intentionally caused, or sexual assault, or

    ( ii) wrongful death resulting therefrom;
  • any type of financial debt or responsibility for spousal support or alimentary pension;
  • any kind of financial obligation or liability developing under a judgment establishing an association or about support or maintenance, or under an agreement for maintenance and support of a spouse, former spouse, previous common-law companion or child not living with the bankrupt;
  • any type of financial obligation or liability occurring out of fraudulence, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity or, in the Province of Quebec, as a trustee or administrator of the property of others;
  • any financial debt or liability resulting from getting property or services by false pretenses or fraudulent misrepresentation, apart from a debt or responsibility that arises from an equity claim;
  • liability for the dividend that a creditor would have been qualified to receive on any kind of provable claim not disclosed to the trustee unless the creditor had notification or understanding of the bankruptcy and fell short to take reasonable activity to confirm the claim; or
  • student loans if the bankruptcy filing happened before the person stopped being a full or part-time student or within seven years after the day on which the bankrupt stopped to be a complete- or part-time student

Declaring bankruptcy in Canada summary

I hope you enjoyed this declaring bankruptcy in Canada Brandon Blog post. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of this seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL VS BANKRUPTCY ONTARIO: THE BEST INFO YOU REALLY NEED

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario introduction

What is the difference between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario is a question people calling me up these days are asking. No doubt the looming end of the various COVID-19 government support programs is now sparking this interest. People and businesses were given a reprieve with Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan and the courts being closed. Now fear is creeping back into everyone’s minds about their debts that essentially were put on hold for the last 6 months.

So, since people are asking me the question, I want to answer the consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario question in this Brandon’s Blog.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: Who qualifies for and what is a consumer proposal?

A consumer proposal is different from bankruptcy. Consumer proposals are available to individuals only whose overall financial obligations do not exceed $250,000, not including debts secured by their principal residence.

Division 1 proposals are offered to both companies with any debt level and people whose debts go beyond $250,000 (omitting the mortgage or any other debts secured by their primary residence).

Consumer proposals are official methods regulated by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) readily available to individuals. Collaborating with a licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee) serving as the consumer proposal administrator, you make a proposal to:

  • Pay your creditors a percentage of what you owe them over a certain period not exceeding 60 months.
  • Expand the time you need to settle those debts.
  • Or a mix of both.

Payments are made via the Trustee, and the Trustee utilizes that cash to pay each of your creditors their pro-rata share. The consumer proposal must be completed within 5 years from the day of filing.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: Who qualifies for bankruptcy?

You can declare bankruptcy if you:

  • Live in Canada.
  • Continue business or have assets in Canada.
  • Have financial debts totalling a minimum of $1,000.
  • Are insolvent.

There are different tests for insolvency laid out in the BIA. They are:

  • for any reason, you are unable to pay your financial debts as they generally come to be due;
  • you have ceased paying present debts in the regular course as they usually are due; or
  • the complete worth of your property is not, at a reasonable valuation, enough, or, if sold at a sale under legal process, would not be sufficient to make it possible for repayment of all your financial obligations.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What is bankruptcy?

A consumer proposal is an excellent option for you if you can afford to make payments towards your financial debts monthly. If you are entirely unable to make enough payments for a consumer proposal, then bankruptcy is probably your only other alternative.

By statute, the offer you make your creditors via a consumer proposal must be a much better option than what your creditors would certainly get in your bankruptcy. I help people make that analysis during our initial no-cost consultation prior to them selecting the ideal insolvency process for them. We discover the choices readily available, including a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario. Bankruptcy is an alternative when you cannot afford to fund a consumer proposal to your creditors.

If bankruptcy is the selected alternative, you work with me, as the Trustee, to complete the needed documents. I then submit them with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB). When the OSB issues its Certificate, after that you are formally bankrupt.

From that point on, the Trustee will deal directly with your creditors in your place. As soon as you are bankrupt:

  • you will stop making payments to your unsecured creditors;
  • any type of garnishments against your wages or bank account will stop; and
  • any lawsuits for money against you from your creditors will also be stopped.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What are the advantages of a consumer proposal?

The benefits of a consumer proposal vs. bankruptcy Ontario are:

  • You maintain all of your assets.
  • Actions against you by creditors, such as wage garnishments will quit.
  • Unlike informal financial debt settlement, the consumer proposal is a legal forum where every one of your creditors has to deal with your restructuring.
  • You do not have to think any more about the “B” word.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What are the differences in credit score?

The person that files for bankruptcy will absolutely get an R9 rating. This is the lowest credit rating possible. It will continue to be on their record for at least 7 years. An individual that submits a consumer proposal will have an R7 credit score which is less extreme. It will certainly remain to be on their record for around 8 years overall, from the moment of filing.

You will absolutely pay less than the total you owe with a consumer proposal. Commonly as much as 70% less. All your unsecured financial obligations will be combined right into a simple regular month-to-month payment. This number will be based upon what you can afford.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What are the costs and fees of a consumer proposal versus filing for bankruptcy?

When doing a consumer proposal, the Trustee’s charges are paid for out of the repayment you bargain with your creditors. For example, if your consumer proposal has you paying a total amount of $20,000 over 5 years, the Trustee’s fee and disbursements are drawn from those funds. The cost of the consumer proposal is likewise regulated by the BIA. The expense does not go up or down based upon the amount you are required to pay in your consumer proposal.

However, if you were to file for bankruptcy, the cost is once again controlled by the BIA. The Trustee is paid out of the funds available in your bankruptcy. Examples of sources of funds in personal bankruptcy are any surplus income you might need to pay as well as any assets that are available to the Trustee to sell.

If there are not expected to be any type of funds in your bankruptcy, the regulated cost to be funded either by the debtor or a third party guarantor will be around $2,000. This is one more difference between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: Are assets treated differently between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy?

If you do a consumer proposal, you can keep your assets whereas in bankruptcy your assets in most cases are affected. This includes the equity in your home if greater than $10,000, an auto or other vehicle worth greater than $6,600 (without liens against it), investments, tax refunds, as well as any RRSP contributions made in the 12 months immediately before filing for bankruptcy.

This distinction between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario is huge.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What if I default on my consumer proposal vs bankruptcy payments?

If you do not keep up your payments on a consumer proposal, and drop 3 months behind, you have defaulted and the consumer proposal is void. You additionally are unable to submit a brand-new consumer proposal. Collection activity by your creditors will begin again.

In bankruptcy, if you do not complete all your obligations, you will not have the ability to get your discharge from bankruptcy. As soon as the Trustee gets its discharge, your creditors will certainly return to collection activities too.

This is one more consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario difference.

consumer proposal vs bankruptcy ontario
consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: When is a meeting of creditors held in a consumer proposal?

A meeting of creditors in a consumer proposal is held if one is requested by creditors that are owed at least one-quarter of the total amount of proven claims filed.

An ask for a meeting needs to be made by the creditors within 45 days of the declaring of the consumer proposal. The OSB can additionally ask for the Trustee to call a meeting any time within that same duration.

The meeting of creditors must be held within 21 days after being called. At the meeting of creditors, they vote to either accept or reject the proposal.

If no meeting of creditors is requested within 45 days of the declaring of the proposal, the proposal will be considered to have been approved by the creditors no matter any kind of objections made later.

How long does it take to complete a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario?

A consumer proposal is ended when the individual has made the call for payments over the amount of time stated in the proposal itself. In a bankruptcy, the discharge relies on a selection of different aspects, including whether it was the very first time the debtor filed for bankruptcy and if they need to make surplus income payments.

If the borrower has never proclaimed bankruptcy and they do not need to make surplus income payments, then they are entitled to be discharged 9 months. However, if the bankrupt has surplus income, then a first-time bankrupt will need to pay for 21 months before when they can be discharged

If this is not the person’s first bankruptcy, and they do not have surplus income, they cannot get a discharge before the expiry of 24 months. If that person has a surplus income requirement, then they must pay for 36 months before being able to be discharged.

This is another distinction between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What do consumer proposals and bankruptcy have in common?

Both a consumer proposal and bankruptcy are lawfully binding treatments that are administered by a Trustee. If you are thinking of a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario, it is vital that you consult with a Trustee to ensure that you completely understand what’s involved, and the costs. You can talk with friends or family that might have applied for one or the other before. It is also important that you get referrals from professionals you trust.

Declaring bankruptcy or doing a consumer proposal are both issues of public record. That means there will be a permanent public record concerning your insolvency that can be accessed by anyone. If your debts are joint or co-signed or guaranteed by someone else, the other person is liable for the debt. That is the case even if you file for either a consumer proposal or personal bankruptcy.

Even these similarities still point out differences between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario.

How do I choose between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario?

As you can see, when you consider a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario, there are most definitely differences between the two. But they are both formal insolvency processes to eliminate your debt. What’s essential, though, is that you discover the best method to get yourself back on the right track in such a way that will assist you to achieve your long-term goals.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: How to file for bankruptcy?

In order to take advantage of either a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario, you must involve a Trustee. This is a person or company licensed by the OSB to provide the insolvency process. The 10 actions listed below are a guide to the bankruptcy procedure.

  • Call a qualified Trustee and go to a meeting with him or her to talk about your personal circumstance and your alternatives including if it is possible for you to prevent bankruptcy.
  • Deal with the Trustee to complete the needed forms. The Trustee will after that submit the bankruptcy with the OSB.
  • The Trustee notifies your creditors of the bankruptcy.
  • You participate in a meeting of creditors if one is called.
  • You participate in 2 counselling sessions.
  • Based on your personal exemptions, the Trustee markets your available assets; you may additionally need to make surplus income payments to the Trustee.
  • In certain circumstances, you might need to participate in an examination held by an OSB representative.
  • The Trustee prepares a report describing your actions throughout the bankruptcy.
  • You go to the discharge hearing if needed.
  • You obtain your discharge from your bankruptcy.

Afterward, the Trustee completes the administration, including paying a dividend to your creditors, if offered.

Consumer proposals and bankruptcy Ontario aren’t the only ways of obtaining debt relief and consolidating debt

There are additionally other ways of fixing debt problems that do not include a formal process or paying a fee. If you honestly wish to thoroughly and objectively take a look at all your options, contact a Trustee, and meet with him or her. They’ll pay attention to your scenario and concerns and advise you on what will work best for you even if you do not need to file for either a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario. Their assistance is normally cost-free and non-judgmental.

At my Firm, declaring bankruptcy is only encouraged until all other potential solutions have investigated. A consumer proposal is the only government-approved financial debt settlement strategy and is always the far better bankruptcy alternative.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: Move on with your life

I hope you have enjoyed this consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario Brandon’s Blog. Both a successfully completed consumer proposal or obtaining your discharge from bankruptcy lets you get back on the road to financial health, relieve the stress you face, and bring you:

  • Freedom from lawsuits and garnishments;
  • The ability to live better than just hanging on one payday to the next;
  • Improved credit scores; and
  • Better health and well-being.

Do you have too much debt? Are you in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.
It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.
Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

consumer proposal vs bankruptcy ontario
consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSALS IN ONTARIO UNFORTUNATELY TEST POSITIVE SADLY FOR COVID-19

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and both Ira, as well as Brandon Smith, are right here for a telephone appointment, conference calls and also virtual meetings.

Stay healthy and safe everybody.

<h2

Consumer proposal in Ontario: Introduction

The Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) went to Court in Toronto on April 24, 2020, to see if consumer proposals in Ontario tested positive for the coronavirus. The Honourable Chief Justice Morawetz issued his decision on Monday, April 27. He put it to the test and it came out testing positive. The OSB is making similar applications in all the different provinces to obtain the same relief. In this Brandon’s Blog, I explain everything.

Consumer proposals in Ontario: The issue

In Ontario, an emergency was proclaimed on March 17, 2020, and the Courts were closed, except for proven emergency situations. This emergency status was extended from April 14 until May 12, 2020, subject to further review. The clock on any provincial limitation period for any proceeding in Ontario was stopped, retroactive to March 16, 2020 (Suspension Period). Ontario is not unique in this. All other provinces have taken similar action.

The closure of the Courts was to assist in slowing the spread of COVID-19. Emergency applications are being held only by conference calls either by telephone or online video. This unprecedented action has created delays in every Court hearing that is not an emergency. This included most insolvency or bankruptcy court cases.

All licensed insolvency trustees (formerly called bankruptcy trustees) (Trustee) started to review all of their cases to see which files were affected. It was not just what cases were scheduled for a court hearing. It actually had more to do with stipulated timelines in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). Various sections of the BIA layout time frames by which certain actions need to be taken.

The emergency situation created by COVID-19 and its containment procedures is impeding the ability of insolvency specialists, borrowers, financial institutions and other stakeholders to meet the timelines of the BIA. This is especially true of all the people in Ontario who chose to avoid bankruptcy by filing consumer proposals in Ontario.

The most important thing that allows someone to perform a successful personal debt restructuring plan is the fact that they are employed. They put their best foot forward and file for personal bankruptcy protection by making a personal debt settlement offer to their creditors. The creditors accept it and the person is making his or her monthly payments on time. Now because of COVID-19 they are laid off and don’t have their salary or wages they have been relying upon both to live and to fund their consumer proposal.

Although there are many timelines in the BIA, such as when a meeting of creditors needs to be held after bankruptcy or debt restructuring filing. However, the OSB helped alleviate certain of the impediments caused by the coronavirus pandemic by allowing Trustees to hold meetings by either telephone or online video meetings.

One timeline that could not be fixed by a telephone call or video chat is an insolvent debtor, either a person or company, making the debt restructuring payments on time. With no job, no income or not much corporate revenue for a business that had to shut down, those debtors were at serious risk of defaulting on its debt restructuring plan caused by these never before experienced issues facing all of us.

Trustees across Canada, both individually and through the two professional organizations, brought the issues forward to the OSB to seek clarification and a solution. That led to the OSB’s Court application. Of particular concern is the section of the BIA that states that a consumer proposal goes into default once three payments are missed.

consumer proposals in ontario
consumer proposals in ontario

Although the Court was asked to consider various issues, I am focussing on the necessity to keep up the monthly payments under a consumer proposal (or a Division I proposal).

Effect of COVID-19 on consumer proposals in Ontario

The OSB’s position was that COVID-19 associated interruptions have both increased economic pressures on consumer debtors and made adhering to legal demands for creditor protection more difficult. When consumer debtors fail to pay in accordance with their consumer proposal, it can be considered annulled under the BIA.

In that case, the consumer debtor then loses the bankruptcy protection from his or her creditors. Upon default and annullment, the legal rights of creditors get revived. While the Courts are closed, this may only result in harassing phone calls from collection agencies. However, when the Courts inevitably reopen, then the lawsuits can either continue or start flying. Remember, the Suspension Period halted the time clock, so, no one loses their rights because of the passage of time.

More importantly, because of the default, the consumer debtor is banned from filing another consumer proposal without court approval. If the person is bankrupt and is trying their best to annul their bankruptcy through a BIA debt settlement proposal, the default causing the debt restructuring plan to be eliminated as if it never happened, keeps the person in bankruptcy.

The OSB also submitted evidence to the Court that lots of people who filed consumer proposals in Ontario were already in arrears in their payments before COVID-19. It further stated that it expects that the defaults in payments are set to rise significantly because of this unique situation..

Consumer proposals in Ontario: The Court’s analysis and decision

Mr. Justice Morawetz went through a very detailed analysis of both the submissions and the law. He noted that what he was being asked to approve was “extraordinary”. He agreed with the OSB that these are unusual times.

The Court first defined two specific terms:

  1. The “Period of the Emergency” starts on March 13, 2020, and ends on June 30, 2020.
  2. The “Suspension Period” begins on the date of the Court’s Order, being April 27, 2020, and ends on June 30, 2020.

The Court then went on to say that its Order applies to:

  1. All active Division I Proposals are those filed with the OSB up to the end of the Period of the Emergency.
  2. All active consumer proposals in Ontario (Division II proposals) are the ones filed with the OSB or revived by the BIA up to the end of the Period of the Emergency. They exclude all those that were already deemed annulled, annulled or that were completely performed on or prior to April 27, 2020.
  3. All active bankruptcies are defined as all bankruptcies filed with the OSB up to the end of the Period of the Emergency. For further clarification, all bankruptcies where the bankrupt received his or her discharge before April 27, 2020, are not included. This makes sense because a discharged bankrupt is no longer subject to laws for undischarged bankrupts. The only party left to abide by timelines is the Trustee.

The Court then ordered the following concerning Commercial Proposals, consumer proposals and bankruptcies:

  • Division I or Commercial Proposals – the time for holding the meeting of creditors that is to take place during the Period of the Emergency, is expanded by the time of the Suspension Duration.
  • Consumer proposals in Ontario –
    • the time for holding the meeting of creditors that needs to be held during the Period of the Emergency is extended by the time of the Suspension Period.
    • an active consumer proposal will not be regarded as annulled unless the consumer debtor remains in default of:
      • When payments are to be made on a regular monthly basis or faster, the day on which the consumer debtor is equal to more than the amount of three payments and an extra amount equal to up to another three payments for defaults that occurred during the period of March 13, 2020, to December 31, 2020.
      • For payments are to be earned less often than on a regular monthly basis, the day that is 3 months after the day on which the consumer debtor is in default in regard of any type of payment except for those due between March 13, 2020, to December 31, 2020, will be the day that is 6 months after the day on which the consumer debtor defaulted.
  • Active bankruptcy matters –
    • The Trustee’s commitment to applying for a court hearing in the Period of the Emergency is to be extended by the time of the Suspension Period.
    • The time for the holding of the meeting of creditors scheduled to take place during the Period of the Emergency is expanded by the time of the Suspension Period.
    • The period fo time for setting up a mediation appointment that needs to happen during the Period of the Emergency is lengthened by the time of the Suspension Period.

      consumer proposals in ontario
      consumer proposals in ontario

Consumer proposals in Ontario: What about the major creditors in an insolvency filing?

In most personal insolvency filings, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is a creditor. In fact, it is quite normal for CRA to be the majority creditor. In order for consumer proposals in Ontario to be successful, the first step is to get the support of your major creditor.

Debtors have suffered a loss of employment or a reduction of earnings as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak. People are scared that they will default on their proposals. So the CRA is taking an approach consistent with the position of the OSB. It wishes to make sure that all Canadians are supported if they are experiencing economic challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

So where the CRA is the majority creditor and the debtor is suffering financial hardship, CRA has advised that:

  • For Commercial Proposals, the CRA is providing a waiver of the default and providing a deferment of payments to September 1, 2020. The waiver and extension also apply to amounts owing to unremitted source deductions.
  • For consumer proposals in Ontario, the CRA supports the approval of an amended proposal that requires a deferment of settlements up to September 1, 2020.

Ideally, this will offer debtors the time to concentrate on other facets of their lives and wellbeing without having to go bankrupt. The September 1, 2020 date ties into other COVID-19 programs the government is running to help Canadian taxpayers during this crisis. For example, HST and income tax payments which would otherwise come due between March and July 2020 also have an extended payment program to this same September date.

Consumer proposals in Ontario: Summary

The Ira Smith Team family hopes that you and your family members are remaining secure, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person that has been affected either via misfortune or inconvenience.

We all must help each other to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Families are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when life can return to something near to typical and we can all be together once again.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses.

If anyone needs our assistance, or you just need some answers for questions that are bothering you, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

Are you now worried just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. This pandemic situation has made everyone scared.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and both Ira, as well as Brandon Smith, are right here for a telephone appointment, conference calls and also virtual meetings.

consumer proposals in ontario
consumer proposals in ontario

Stay healthy and safe everybody.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY EXPERTS WEIGH IN ON US & CDN SMALL BIZ RESTRUCTURING

Introduction

Small and medium-sized businesses play a vital role in all worldwide economies. Bankruptcy experts in the USA identified problems. The Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection process for these companies was not working. It is pricey, usually ineffective and impractical. So, many businesses in the USA in need of restructuring could not have access to the US insolvency system.

On July 23, 2019, the US Congress passed the Small Business Reorganization Act (SBRA). On August 1, 2019, the Senate passed the Bill. On August 23, 2019, President Donald Trump signed it to enact it.

The purpose of the SBRA is to make business bankruptcy protection much less troublesome for small and medium-size ventures. The result is Chapter 11, subchapter V of the US Bankruptcy Code (Titled: Small Business Debtor Reorganization). The aim is to make it more affordable and will serve to save otherwise viable owner-managed businesses.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to discuss the new US legislation. I will also comment on an approach for the Canadian insolvency system. Can we streamline restructuring under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) for small business?

Changes made by the SBRA

A small company is defined in the SBRA as a person or company whose non-contingent debts (leaving out financial obligations to affiliates or people not dealing at arms’-length) are $2,725,625 or less and which chooses to be dealt with under the SBRA. The Act includes a new subchapter V to Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. The purpose of this new approach is to make it simpler and more economical for small companies to efficiently restructure.

The main thrust of the Act is:

  1. A creditor cannot lodge a Chapter 11 restructuring plan that it is prepared to support. Just the business can. The company’s plan must be filed within 90 days of the day it filed its bankruptcy protection application, other than in specific conditions.
  2. A trustee comparable to those selected in a personal restructuring (Chapter 13) situations will be selected to manage each case.
  3. A creditors committee will not be developed.
  4. The Chapter 11 plan can change the legal rights of a lender registered against an individual’s primary home if the mortgage/funding secured by the home was used in the person’s business and was not financing used to purchase the property.
  5. The Court can approve a small business’ restructuring plan without the approval of any class of creditors. The Court must be satisfied that the restructuring plan treats all creditors fairly and does not prejudice any creditor class.
  6. To be fair and equitable, the restructuring plan must offer that all earnings received throughout the term of the restructuring plan will available to fund the restructuring for a duration of 3 to 5 years.

So the onus is on the creditors to carefully review all cases filed under the SBRA. Creditors will need to retain bankruptcy experts to advise them. Their role will be to make certain that Courts appropriately examine restructuring cases for fairness and that they treat all creditors equitably. This will be especially true for those that do not have the support of the creditors.

It will be very interesting to see if this new legislation accomplishes its goal of making it simpler and less costly for small businesses to restructure and continue.

The Canadian business restructuring landscape

There are two federal statutes that legislate business restructuring in Canada. They are the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA) and the Part III Division I of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA).

To qualify for restructuring under the CCAA, the insolvent corporation must owe at least $5 million. The CCAA is only for insolvent companies or income trusts to restructure. It is not for:

  • proprietors or partnerships
  • banks
  • telegraph companies (do people still send telegrams?)
  • insurance companies
  • companies to which the Trust and Loan Companies Act applies

Proceedings under the CCAA are a very heavily Court-driven process.

Restructurings under the Part III Division I proposal provisions of the BIA are available to both companies, proprietors and partnerships. It is also available to people who owe $250,000 or more, not including any mortgages or loans secured by the person’s principal residence.

For people who owe less than $250,000, a more streamlined restructuring process is available under Part III Division II of the BIA. These are called consumer proposals.

Restructuring under the proposal provisions of the BIA is not a heavily Court-driven process like the CCAA. Under consumer proposals, if all goes smoothly there is never a Court application.

So we have a simpler and streamlined version for people who have a smaller debt level but are still in need of restructuring their financial affairs. The same is also true for people with fewer or no assets that need to start over through the bankruptcy process. However, there is no equivalent streamlined version in Canada for small to medium-size businesses.

Could such a streamlined business restructuring model be developed? Not only do I think it could be, as one of the bankruptcy experts in Canada holding the designation of licensed insolvency trustee, I think it must be.

The statute for a streamlined Canadian business restructuring model

The CCAA is designed for large corporations. As I already stated, it is a heavily Court-driven process. Therefore, I think this eliminates the CCAA from developing a more streamlined version. It is not the case that it could not be done. It is just that a new section designed for simpler and more cost-effective CCAA proceedings goes somewhat against the purpose of the CCAA.

Therefore, I propose that CCAA legislation should remain available only to larger companies. Especially because the BIA, another federal statute, already includes restructuring provisions. It already has a streamlined version for bankruptcy and restructuring to avoid bankruptcy. So, why not a streamlined business restructuring section?

What would BIA streamlined business restructuring look like?

You might ask, why is this even necessary? Many small and medium-sized businesses are family-owned. There are even very large family-owned businesses. The Financial Post reports that “Family businesses own a bigger chunk of Canada’s economy than you think — way bigger”. They report it is a significant business sector contributing 35 percent of Canada’s real gross domestic product.

So with such an important business sector, it would make sense to allow those businesses on the smaller scale to qualify to have a simpler and more cost-effective way to restructure when they hit a financial bump in the road. If the viable parts of the business can be saved, it will continue to employ people, allow families to have a good quality of life and contribute to Canada’s GDP. It does not make sense to essentially kill off these smaller businesses because the cost of the restructuring will use up all the resources necessary to run the business.

I am not talking about family-owned businesses Bombardier Inc. and Loblaw Cos. Ltd. Rather, I am talking about the majority of Canadian entrepreneurial companies in the mid to small size range.

So here is what I propose for a streamlined restructuring process for small and medium-sized businesses. I will call it a new Part III Division III of the BIA. I will call it the General Scheme for Small Business Proposals (SBP) section of the BIA.

Size matters

The new SBP should be available to corporations, proprietorships and partnerships that are set up to conduct business. Their total debt should not be more than $1.5 million. There is nothing scientific about this number.

Statistics Canada could do an analysis as to the average debt load of Canadian businesses and an appropriate debt level could be picked based on it. For purposes of this Brandon’s Blog, I will use the $1.5 million amount.

I would not exclude loans from affiliates or people not dealing at arms’-length such as in the US legislation. In Canada, it is normal for the first funding of a company to come from the owners. Our chartered banks want to see a commitment from the owners before they will lend. Owners have sacrificed their own money to get the company off the ground. Just because that is how they had to finance the company, I would not preclude that debt from counting in the calculation.

The Canadian business landscape is different from that in the USA. Our numbers are generally smaller. In order to exclude non-arms’-length debt, you would probably have to lower the debt threshold I have mentioned. So, let us keep that debt threshold for discussion purposes and include all debt; secured or unsecured, arms’-length or related parties and owners.

If a person is not conducting business in his or her name, then this new SBP would not be for them. They would fall under either Division I or Divison II restructuring proposals.

Administration of restructurings under the SBP

Currently, only a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (LIT) can administer restructuring proposals. Under Division I Proposals, the LIT is called the Proposal Trustee. Under consumer proposals, Division II personal restructurings, the LIT is called the Administrator.

So, for the new SBP, I will call the LIT the Small Business Administrator. It makes it obvious that it is the restructuring of a business qualifying under the new Division III. The use of the word “administrator” ties nicely into the word chosen already by Parliament for consumer proposals. So again, it makes it obvious that the LIT is administering a small business streamlined restructuring.

Since we are not talking about personal restructuring that falls under the consumer proposal provisions in this Brandon’s Blog, my suggestions for a streamlined business restructuring applies only to Part III Division I of the BIA Proposal restructurings to avoid bankruptcy.

Time to restructure

Under a Division I Proposal restructuring, the company or person can begin the restructuring process by filing either a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal (NOI) or the Proposal itself. Under either filing, the debtor then has 10 days to file its cash-flow statement reviewed and approved by both the company or person and the LIT. Under an NOI filing, the company or person then has an additional 20 days (30 days after the NOI filing date) to file a Proposal (unless the time is extended by Court Order).

Most times with small to medium-sized businesses, the debtor is not current in all of its filings with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). This includes payroll remittances, HST and perhaps even income tax returns. In any restructuring where CRA is a creditor, they need to have the most current information from the debtor’s business filings, to be able to know the full amount owing by the business. They will not be able to properly assess the Proposal until they know the proper amount owing to them.

Also in any Proposal restructuring, we want to have a provisional income tax return prepared by the external accountant for the business. The provisional return is to show if any further tax liability exists for the fiscal year up to and including the date of filing of the Proposal.

Books and records will first have to be brought up to date. Then the accountant will need time to prepare and file the income tax return. There is a reason for this. We want CRA to know if there is a further liability.

Although there is no statutory provision allowing for this, CRA so far on an administrative level will allow for a split tax year in a restructuring. The liability for the fiscal year up to and including the Proposal date will be included as a debt in the restructuring. This is to the company’s or person’s advantage in the business.

Once the Proposal is filed, the meeting of creditors has to take place within 21 days of the Proposal date. In my experience, there is never enough time for the business to do all the necessary filings for CRA that I just mentioned. So, CRA always requests an adjournment of the meeting until such time as all the filings are up to date.

So, in my proposed streamlined version, I would propose to extend the filing of a Proposal after the filing of an NOI from 30 days to 90 days, without the need for the expense of going to Court seeking an extension. This should give enough time for the business to get all of its filings up to date and hopefully avoid the need for an adjournment of the meeting of creditors.

Creditors

There really is nothing that needs to be changed on how creditors file their claims. The same is true for the rules of how the LIT must assess all claims. I do like the idea in the new Chapter 11 subchapter V. That is the ability to change the legal rights of a lender registered against an individual’s primary home if the mortgage/funding secured by the home was used in the person’s business and was not financing used to purchase the property.

In Canada, it is very rare, if not unheard of, for an entrepreneurial business to get a bank loan without the owner giving a personal guarantee. Many times the personal guarantee has to be backed by a hard asset, such as a pledge of the personal residence. If the secured debt can be restructured, shouldn’t the pledge agreement on a personal asset also be part of that restructuring?

So, I propose that in the new SBP, there should be the ability to change the legal rights of a lender registered against an individual’s primary home if the funds were used for the business or if the pledge was in support of a personal guarantee for funds borrowed by the business.

The types of changes to the security pledge will be unique to the individual restructuring. It has to make business sense and common sense. It is always up to the secured lender to vote against the plan if they don’t like it. In that case, the restructuring will fail. There will be great pressure on the business to bring forward the best possible restructuring plan and not go crazy on what changes the owner wants to make to the pledge of security.

Deemed acceptance and approval

Without going into all the rules, under the current consumer proposal legislation, there is the concept of deemed creditor approval and deemed Court approval. Unless creditors holding 25% in value of the proven claims request it, there is no need to hold a meeting of creditors. Creditors are asked to vote by way of voting letters when they file their proof of claim. If no obligation to call a meeting arises, then the consumer proposal is deemed accepted.

If a consumer proposal is either accepted or deemed accepted by the creditors, then there is probably never going to be a need for the LIT administrator to formally seek approval by the Court. The BIA reads that after the acceptance or deemed acceptance, the consumer proposal is deemed accepted by the Court unless the Official Receiver or “other interest party” requests it within 15 days after the date of (deemed) acceptance.

Currently, under a Division I Part III restructuring Proposal there are no deeming provisions for either creditor acceptance or Court approval. I would like to see in the new SBP section, that similar deeming provisions for both creditor acceptance and Court approval be implemented. This will save time and cost thereby being much more efficient.

No deemed bankruptcy

In a Division I Proposal, if the creditors do not accept the restructuring, or the Court does not approve it, then the debtor is automatically deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy. There is not a similar provision for consumer proposals.

If the creditors do not accept a consumer proposal, then it just dies then and there and the debtor goes back to their normal unprotected state.

My proposal for the new SBP is that if the creditors do not accept or the Court will not approve the restructuring plan, that does not produce a corporate or personal bankruptcy. Rather, the debtor just goes back to their normal unprotected insolvent state and they have to fend off their creditors as best as possible.

It may lead to bankruptcy, but that will not be automatic. In some corporate situations, the cost of a bankruptcy proceeding just does not make sense. This is especially true if a chartered bank has security over all of the assets and will be enforcing its security through a receivership.

Directors/Owners

Right now a corporate restructuring Proposal allows for Directors to be released from debts that arise prior to the date of filing the Proposal. The kinds of debts that a Director can be released from are those solely resulting from their role as a Director. In other words, generally statutory claims they would be legally liable for.

As I already mentioned, more often than not, the only way a small or medium-sized company can get a bank loan is if the entrepreneur personally guarantees the debt. There are times where a corporate restructuring can be done, but the secured debt arrangements will have to be amended. If the lender is not willing to amend the personal guarantee security arrangements in place, then, the corporate restructuring does not make sense.

So in my dream of the SBP, if a secured lender agrees to a restructuring of their debt, then the Director(s) who may be personally liable will now be responsible for the revised secured lending arrangement. This would also go hand in hand with my proposed change to the ability to change the legal rights of a lender registered against an individual’s primary home if the mortgage/funding secured by the home was used in the person’s business and was not financing used to purchase the property.

Bankruptcy experts summary

So there you have it. The US government saw fit to add to its Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection statute to allow smaller companies to restructure. My vision for a Canadian version is the SBP section to form a new Part I Division III for the BIA.

To summarize, the changes to allow for a more efficient and less costly way to restructure smaller businesses would include:

  1. The brand-new SBP will be offered to companies, proprietorships and partnerships that are established to run a business. It will be available to businesses with any kind of debt not greater than $1.5 million.
  2. A LIT who will be called a Small Business Administrator, will oversee and be responsible for the business restructuring.
  3. The time for the filing of a Proposal after the filing of an NOI will be extended from the current 30 days to 90 days. This will be without the need and cost of a Court application.
  4. There ought to be the capability to transform the rights of a lending institution who has taken an entrepreneur’s home as security for a business loan or personal guarantee of such financing and the funds were put into the business.
  5. Deeming provisions for both creditor acceptance and Court approval be implemented. It is already done in consumer proposals, so why not in streamlined business proposals? This will result in more efficient and less costly restructuring.
  6. If the creditors’ decline or the Court will not approve the restructuring, that will not generate a corporate or personal bankruptcy. Instead, the debtor simply returns to their vulnerable financially troubled state and they will need to deal with their creditors as best as possible. In some cases it may lead to either bankruptcy or just a closing down of the business. Where there is a secured creditor, it will lead to the enforcement of their security. Either way, it won’t be an automatic bankruptcy.
  7. A Director of a corporation can be released not only from statutory obligations arising from their office of Director. That person, or any other person, can have their guarantee of a debt to a lender be amended if the related business debt is amended in the restructuring.

There no doubt will be other areas that would need amending once all the relevant sections of the BIA were looked at. These are my ideas of the major amendments that could be made to the BIA, to allow for a more streamlined and cost-efficient restructuring for small and mid-sized businesses.

What about your business?

The financial restructuring process for either a large or small business is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex corporate restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur. You are worried because your company is facing significant financial challenges. Your business provides income not only for your family. Many other families rely on you and your company for their well-being.

The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your company’s problems; financial and emotional. The way we dealt with this problem and devised a corporate restructuring plan, we know that we can help you and your company too.

We know that companies facing financial problems need realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a company restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain it is facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

bankruptcy experts
bankruptcy experts
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSALS: HOW MANY ARE REJECTED?

Introduction

When people with high debt come to see me for their free consultation, many times I shock them. They are shocked when I tell them that bankruptcy might not be required. I then tell them about consumer proposals. I also explain why I think they would be able to successfully complete a consumer proposal (CP) and therefore avoid bankruptcy.

What are consumer proposals?

I have written on the topic many times. In summary, a consumer proposal is a streamlined process under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). This process allows insolvent people to make a formal deal with their creditors. This government approved debt settlement plan is to repay only a portion of what you owe and you can take as long as 5 years of regular monthly payments to do so.

To qualify, the person must be insolvent and owe $250,000 or less to all creditors, other than for any debts secured by way of registration against your principal residence, such as a mortgage.

The person will then ask me how many we have done were rejected. They are trying to determine what the odds are for their deal to be accepted by their creditors. What I tell them is that I first do an assessment and tell them what amount of offer I think they need to make to gain the approval of their creditors. I also tell them that so far, anyone who has followed my advice has had their consumer proposal accepted by their creditors. Therefore, the number of those rejected by people who follow my advice is ZERO.

The benefits

There are benefits to submitting a successful debt settlement payment plan sanctioned under the BIA. The benefits include:

  • Unlike an informal debt arrangement, the CP develops a forum where each of your unsecured creditors has to participate in for your debt restructuring.
  • You maintain your assets and don’t have to give them up.
  • Lawsuits against you or your property and financial debts, or enforcement actions such as wage garnishments, cannot proceed.
  • You do not need to submit an assignment in bankruptcy

The process

Once prepared, the CP is submitted to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB), the government department that controls Licensed Insolvency Trustees (formerly called bankruptcy trustees) (Trustee). The Trustee acts as the Administrator of the CP.

Once it is submitted, you will quit paying your unsecured creditors for past debts. The Trustee will send a notice of the filing along with a copy of the CP to all creditors affected by the CP. This includes anyone suing you or garnishing your earnings. Those activities against you will stop also.

Your creditors will have 45 days to accept or decline the debt settlement CP deal. If your unsecured creditors are disappointed with the proposal, they can vote against. In that case, the Trustee will discuss modifications with you that the Trustee believes the creditors might accept. That discussion will take place prior to the against vote counting. Usually, this means offering more money to them over the maximum 5 year period. The key is that you have to be able to afford to make those higher monthly payments. It will still be only a portion of the total you owe.

In order for consumer proposals to be accepted, a simple majority of your creditors by dollar value who has filed a proof of claim must approve it. If creditors who have filed a proof of claim choose not to vote, that is considered a vote in favour. You also may not even need to have a meeting of creditors. Unless creditors holding 25% in dollar value of the claims filed to request a meeting, or the OSB requests a meeting, there is no need to hold one. If a meeting is not requested, the proposal is deemed to be accepted by the creditors. This is all part of the streamlining.

Acceptance and performance

If your CP is accepted, the OSB (or any type of other interested parties) has 15 days to ask the Trustee to go to court to have the deal court approved. If no such demand is made, the debt plan is deemed to have actually been accepted by the court. More streamlining.

After acceptance and approval, the person is then accountable for making the regular monthly payments to the Trustee that was promised in the debt management plan. There will also be 2 counselling sessions for the person to attend with the Trustee to help them with their financial issues and behaviour.

If you miss 3 monthly payments, or you are greater than 3 months overdue since your last payment, the proposal will be considered annulled. This indicates to your creditors that they are now able to either resume or begin collection actions against you. Not a good thing.

Full performance

As I previously mentioned, the person must successfully complete the debt management settlement plan by making all the required payments and attending the 2 counselling sessions. When completed, the person is entitled to receive a Certificate of Full Performance. This means that you have successfully completed the CP and that all debts caught by it are discharged.

The Trustee will then finalize the administration of your debt settlement plan, get the necessary OSB approval and distribute the money to all the creditors who have filed a proof of claim. The Administrator also is entitled to the government approved fee.

Summary

Consumer proposals must provide your creditors with a better outcome than what they would get in your bankruptcy. I have never had a consumer proposal rejected for someone who took my advice and made all the payments required.

Are you in financial distress? Do you not have enough funds to pay your bills as they come due?

As a Trustee, we are the only professionals acknowledged, accredited and also managed by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and services. A consumer proposal is a federal government licensed debt settlement approach to eliminate your debt. We will certainly help you to pick what is best for you to clear your own debt issues.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can eliminate the stress, anxiety, discomfort and pain from your life that your cash problems have produced. With the distinct roadmap, we develop just for you, we will swiftly return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

We have years and generations of experience assisting people and companies looking for debt restructuring to PREVENT bankruptcy. You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you to fix your financial troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

consumer proposals

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DEBT SETTLEMENT OR CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA: REPORT SAYS CONSUMERS HARMED

debt settlement or consumer proposal canada

Debt settlement or consumer proposal Canada: Introduction

In this Brandon’s Blog on debt settlement or consumer proposal Canada, I want to tell you about a recent Government of Canada study. On April 28, 2017, the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB), released its report of its investigation. The investigation began in May 2016, of Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) business practices in administering consumer insolvencies. The report is titled: “Review of Licensed Insolvency Trustee business practices in relation to administration of consumer insolvencies”. The OSB was becoming increasingly concerned about debt settlement vs consumer proposal Canada and the influence debt settlement companies may have had over certain LITs. I must say that after reviewing the report, I found it shocking.

The purpose of the investigation arose out of concerns over the relationship between debt settlement companies and certain LITs. The OSB wished to decide if LITs were practising per the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), associated policies and OSB Directives. In 2016 they made up over half of all consumer insolvency cases filed.

The aim of the OSB’s evaluation was to recognize as well as analyze possible threats related to the honesty of some elements of the consumer bankruptcy procedure. Specifically in situations where LITs have become part of companies’ connections (or, other inappropriate business relationships) with fee-charging debt management companies.

Prior blogs

We have warned you for years about the dangers of using these types of companies, including:

We, however, had no idea the harm caused to those most vulnerable consumers by a debt management company.

debt settlement or consumer proposal canada

What relationships did the OSB investigation find?

The OSB report indicates that in 2016:

  1. 17 % (9,660) of all consumer proposal filings, the borrower reported having spent first for liability counselling advice from a debt settlement company before being guided to a LIT.
  1. 57 % (5,500 of 9,660) of the consumer proposal filings for which earlier settlement advice was obtained from LITs that had connections with 2 large-volume debt management companies. These 2 companies represented 64 % of the overall LIT fees reported in 2016 consumer insolvencies filings for debt settlement advice before filing an insolvency proceeding with a LIT.
  1. Thirteen LIT companies, which included one national-level company, were discovered to have several LITs running in a constant and continual partnership with large-volume liability management companies.
  1. For roughly 50 individual LITs within these 13 companies, greater than 40% of their consumer proposal filings were sourced from these settlement companies. For roughly 20 of those LITs, greater than 90% of their consumer proposal work comes from with these 2 companies.

Insolvent debtors sourced through these third parties

Insolvent debtors sourced via these settlement companies had the tendency to go after consumer proposals instead of bankruptcy. On the surface, this is a good thing. As you will read further and in next week’s vlog, you will see the reason was so that these companies could charge in many ways the unwary consumers more money than they should be paying.

The OSB’s investigation showed that the debt settlement companies wrote up the necessary documents. The LITs never met the debtors beforehand.

The OSB investigation determined that:

  1. Before the LIT meeting, consumer borrowers connected and had 2 to 4 conferences with the management companies.
  1. The LIT relied upon the settlement companies’ staff to do all the work relative to the gathering, evaluating as well as confirming the borrower’s information and reviewing and recommending on the bankruptcy alternatives.
  1. In situations where the LIT had a regular relationship with the settlement companies, all facets of the procedure before declaring were normally executed at the offices of the management companies.
  1. Information needed for the filing was typically sent straight from the settlement companies’ management team to the LIT’s management team, usually soon before the meeting at which the consumer proposal filing was to occur.
  1. Debtor conferences with the LIT (a variety of which included the settlement company) varied in the period from 5 to 30 minutes. In some circumstances, the meeting took place just after submitting the proposal with the OSB.
  1. LITs normally met the borrower to file at the settlement companies’ premises.
  1. Sometimes, the authorizing of legal papers likewise happened in many casual areas as well as cities where the LIT did not have an authorized workplace.
  1. Interaction with borrowers on legal obligations, creditor meetings, evaluations by an Official Receiver, proposal changes and voting by creditors, was practically solely performed by the settlement companies’ management staff, that communicate with the debtor.
  1. The debtors reported that succeeding interaction throughout the management of their consumer proposal was additionally with the debt settlement company as opposed to with the LIT.

It appears that these LITs who had these close relationships with the debt settlement companies may have shirked some of their responsibilities under the BIA. These LITs had to sign off confirming to the OSB that they had done the necessary work. By relying upon the work done by unlicensed debt settlement companies, did the LIT really do the work that they are signing off for?

Debt settlement or consumer proposal Canada: So what does this mean?

In next week’s vlog, we will go into detail about what the effect was of all this. For now, you should know that a summary of the results for the consumer included:

  1. Consumers paid thousands of dollars more than they needed to.
  1. Unscrupulous debt management companies (and their cooperating LIT firms) talked consumers into high rate loans under the guise of shortening the time they were under an insolvency administration and improving their credit score.
  1. The debt settlement companies had no certification or experience to give the type of insolvency guidance they were providing.
  1. Legal documents contained countless errors and false attestations.
  1. Creditors received less than they were otherwise entitled to.
  1. Debtors had no idea of either their responsibilities under the process they were undertaking. They were not given the opportunity to experience one of the most important aspects of the Canadian insolvency system, financial rehabilitation.

Debt settlement or consumer proposal Canada: What should you do if you have too much debt?

Consult a LIT first and don’t go to one of the debt settlement companies. There is no federal government approved debt settlement companies. The only government approved debt settlement program is a consumer proposal.

We are debt professionals who will evaluate your situation and recommend which debt relief options are right for you. A consumer proposal is one option; there are others as well.

Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for a free consultation. There is no need for you to pay fees to a debt settlement company when you can get the same information from us for free.

You’ll be in good hands and Starting Over, Starting Now you can be well on your way to living a debt free life.

Call a Trustee Now!