Categories
Brandon Blog Post

PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY IN ONTARIO CANADA: THE SOLUTION TO YOUR NAGGING DEBT?

Declaring personal bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Introduction

Facing serious financial difficulties is devastating, especially if you believe that declaring personal bankruptcy in Ontario Canada is your only option. In fact, many people mistakenly believe that dire financial problems automatically mean personal bankruptcy.

If you are having problems meeting your financial obligations or have stopped meeting those financial obligations as they come due you are actually insolvent, not bankrupt. Insolvency is a financial condition; bankruptcy is a legal state.

Bаnkruрtсу is a legal рrосеѕѕ under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (“BIA”) that help you to resolve уоur debts if they have become unmanageable. If you have relatively few assets and low іnсоmе and dесіdе to file for bаnkruрtсу, you will probably fіlе under the streamlined Summary Administration part of the BIA.

If you have realizable assets that will produce a value greater than $10,000, then your bankruptcy would be administered under the general administrative provisions. Don’t worry about these distinctions right now. For now, just know that the summary administration rules are shortened. The cost of this type of bankruptcy administration is fixed by a tariff set by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy.


Declaring personal bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: A summary of the bankruptcy steps

In either case, you will turn over to your Licensed Insolvency Trustee (“LIT”) all of уоur рrореrtу that is not exempt (protected) by law. The LIT will sell your property and use the proceeds to рау for the bankruptcy administration and then distribute to уоur сrеdіtоrѕ.

If you have very little property, all of it may be рrоtесtеd. In that case, you will not lose it. How much уоur сrеdіtоrѕ will get in this process dереndѕ on how much уоur unрrоtесtеd property can be sold fоr and whether you will be required to pay “surplus income” to your LIT (more on
this later).

The final step of your bankruptcy process will be to get your discharge from your debts. This means that you will not have to рау them (with certain exceptions).

Declaring personal bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Know the basic rules BEFORE filing for bankruptcy

Gеnеrаllу, going through bankruptcy helps реорlе with debts get a fresh start. Hоwеvеr, many реорlе have false ideas about how it can help them. Bеfоrе deciding you need to fіlе for bаnkruрtсу, you should know some of the bаѕіс rules. That way you will know what bankruptcy can and cannot do for you.

Declaring personal bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: What bаnkruрtсу may do for you, dереndіng on your sіtuаtіоn

  1. Dіѕсhаrgе уоur unѕесurеd debts; depending on your assets and income, you may not рау or lose anything. If you do, you will рrоbаblу рау less than you owe.
  2. Give you a short-term “аutоmаtіс stay” аgаіnѕt уоur сrеdіtоrѕ.
  3. As opposed to bankruptcy, one of the bankruptcy alternatives under the BIA will help you work out a repayment plan that lets you take longer to рау your debt and/or рау less than you owe. If your budget allows for this approach, the (consumer) proposal, allows you to keep property that ѕесurеѕ a debt. Examples of such assets would be your home or car. It can also allow you to keep nоn-еxеmрt аѕѕеtѕ that you would рrоbаblу lоѕе in a bankruptcy filing. This is one bankruptcy alternative.

Declaring personal bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: What bankruptcy does not do for you

Getting a dіѕсhаrgе of уоur debts through the bankruptcy process will not discharge:

  1. Any award of damages by a court in civil proceedings in respect of:
    1. i) bodily harm intentionally inflicted, or sexual assault, or
      ii) wrongful death resulting therefrom
  2. A debt or liability for alimony or alimentary pension.
  3. Any debt or liability arising under a judicial decision establishing affiliation or in connection with support or maintenance, or under an agreement for maintenance and support of a spouse, former spouse, former common-law partner or child living apart from the bankrupt.
  4. Debt or liability arising out of fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity or, in the Province of Quebec, as a trustee or administrator of the property of others.
  5. Any debt or liability resulting from obtaining property or services by false pretenses or fraudulent misrepresentation, other than a debt or liability that arises from an equity claim.
  6. Liability for the dividend that a creditor would have been entitled to receive on any provable claim not disclosed to the trustee unless the creditor had notice or knowledge of the bankruptcy and failed to take reasonable action to prove his claim.
  7. Any debt or obligation in respect of a loan made under the Canada Student Loans Act, the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act or any enactment of a province that provides for loans or guarantees of loans to students where the date of bankruptcy of the bankrupt occurred:i) before the date on which the bankrupt ceased to be a full or part-time student, as the case may be, under the applicable Act or enactment, or
    ii) within seven years after the date on which the bankrupt ceased to be a full or part-time student;
    iii) any debt or obligation in respect of a loan made under the Apprentice Loans Act where the date of bankruptcy of the bankrupt occurred: a. before the date on which the bankrupt ceased, under that Act, to be an eligible apprentice within the meaning of that Act, or

    b. within seven years after the date on which the bankrupt ceased to be an eligible apprentice; or
  1. Any debt for interest owed with an amount referred to in the above list.declaring personal bankruptcy in ontario canada

Declaring personal bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: More things bankruptcy does not do for you

  1. The bаnkruрtсу court can refuse to dіѕсhаrgе your debts if it finds that you are abusing the рrосеѕѕ. Thеrеfоrе, you cannot run up debt just before filing for bаnkruрtсу and automatically have it forgiven. The Court will look at what you ѕреnt the money on and can deny you a discharge if it finds that you have abused the ѕуѕtеm. You must be truthful and not try to hide аѕѕеtѕ.
  2. Will not help you with any debts you take on during and after you begin the bаnkruрtсу рrосеѕѕ.
  3. Will not give you a clean slate on уоur credit report (except to show what debts have been dіѕсhаrgеd). Bankruptcy reduces your credit rating to R9. This rating remains on your record for 6 years after your discharge for the first time bankrupt. These ratings are set by the relevant credit bureaus whose rules may vary.
  4. Will not protect some kinds of іnсоmе and рrореrtу you get during the соurѕе of the bankruptcy until you are discharged (such аѕ іnhеrіtаnсе, tax refund, gifts, lottery winnings).
  5. May not dіѕсhаrgе all of уоur debts without some ѕасrіfісеѕ. If you have very few аѕѕеtѕ and little іnсоmе, you may not lоѕе anything. Debtors with more assets and income above the poverty line can lose some of their assets and have to pay surplus income.
  6. Will not allow for your discharge after 9 months if you are required to pay surplus income. A first time bankrupt must pay surplus income for 21 months and a second or more time bankrupt will have to pay surplus income for 36 months. Whether or not a first time bankrupt will be entitled to an automatic and absolute discharge after paying the required surplus income depends on the specifics of your circumstances.
  7. A second or more time bankrupt is not entitled to an automatic absolute discharge and there must first be a Court hearing to decide what form of discharge is most appropriate given your circumstances.

Filing fоr bаnkruрtсу is a big deal

Declaring personal bаnkruрtсу in Ontario Canada is a big deal. It can be a trеmеndоuѕ rеѕоurсе for the honest but unfortunate debtor who needs a new start. However, there are rules, rеѕtrісtіоnѕ and fіnаnсіаl rаmіfісаtіоnѕ to соnѕіdеr before jumping in hеаdfіrѕt.

That is why the Ira Smith Team always looks first to see if one of the bankruptcy alternatives would be a better fit for you. The alternatives we look at with you include:

The Ira Smith Team has 50+ years of cumulative experience dealing with issues just like the ones that you’re facing. Give us a call today and let us give you back peace of mind Starting Over, Starting Now.

declaring personal bankruptcy in ontario canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY LAW: WHAT TO THINK ABOUT BANKRUPTCY

320efcd005100f3ee3522fefba70f917 4

Introduction

The holiday gift buying season is over. Next month the credit card bills will be arriving. Maybe you overspent on holiday gifts this year. Maybe you had too much debt to start with, and you know this new spending will put you over the top. Perhaps you already have questions about Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law.

Perhaps you spent wisely but modestly because you were acutely aware of your financial problems. Maybe you never were an uncontrollable spender. Perhaps a specific damaging event outside of your control caused you to wind up deep in the red. So far you have worked hard to overcome the financial challenges, but for the first time you are thinking that you should read up on Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law.

Either one unfortunate life issue or one foolish monetary choice is all it could take. Despite how you arrived, there is no simple escape, except perhaps winning the lottery or an unexpected inheritance.

Bankruptcy is one alternative

If you’ve fallen under just what seems like impossible financial debt and you have no chance to get out of it, bankruptcy is one alternative. It’s not constantly an excellent one– and never ever one to be taken gently.

Below is exactly what you should understand prior to making any kind of choices about filing personal bankruptcy.

Long-term results

Almost 63,372 people declared bankruptcy in 2016, an action that will certainly have an effect on them for a long time to come. They have certainly started learning about the Canada bankruptcy and insolvency law regime.

While declaring bankruptcy relieves debt pressures caused by decisions and/or issues of the past, it could adversely influence your future. The record of your filing for bankruptcy will certainly stay on your record for up to 10 years.

Numerous companies run a credit check on job applicants. The record of your bankruptcy will come up. Potential employers have either their own bias or unique interpretation about this. Perhaps the job you are applying for requires you to be bonded. Faced with many qualified applicants, a potential employer may very well choose the person who does not have a bankruptcy on their record. As I have previously written, it can likewise have an influence on insurance coverage costs.

The Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law system is designed to financially rehabilitate the honest but unfortunate debtor. As a licensed insolvency trustee, I certainly believe in our system. However, it is also my role to point out to anyone considering personal bankruptcy, there are many issues to consider before taking this choice.

Evaluating your alternatives

For some people bankruptcy many not be the only option. Just how do you recognize its the right one for you? What are the options under Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law?

Prior to making any type of choice about filing for bankruptcy, you should first contact a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT) in your area for a free consultation. The LIT will review with you your current financial situation and ask you various questions. The purpose is for the LIT to gain an understanding of your current financial position and how you got there. Based on this information, the LIT will be able to give you a preliminary opinion about what your realistic options are.

In general, the options available to someone experiencing difficulty in paying their debts on time include: (i) credit counselling; (ii) debt consolidation; (iii) (consumer) proposal; and (iv) personal bankruptcy.

3bestaward
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law

The proposal option used for half of all personal insolvency filings in 2016

I am using brackets around the word “consumer” when talking about the proposal option. A consumer proposal is available to anyone who owes the amount of $250,000 or less, not including the amount you owe on loans registered against your home. If you owe more than this $250,000 threshold, a proposal may still be the most viable option for you. That proposal process just falls under a different section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). It is not called a consumer proposal, but rather a Division I proposal. The BIA governs Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law.

As I mentioned above, in 2016, 63,372 Canadians filed personal bankruptcy. However the total number of people who filed an insolvency proceeding in 2016 in Canada was 126,843. So what did the other 63,471 people do? They filed a proposal. So roughly half of the people who filed an insolvency proceeding in Canada in 2016 to solve their debt problems, were able to avoid bankruptcy.

In 2016, 63,471 individuals filed a (consumer) proposal. This bankruptcy alternative is an organized settlement of your financial debts for an amount less than the total you owe. You can take up to 60 months of regular monthly payments to complete your (consumer) proposal.

The proposal provisions of Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law allow those people “in the red” to keep their assets they can afford to continue paying for, including their home. At the same time, they made a monthly payment to the LIT to be distributed to their creditors for their past debts that they could not afford to repay.

Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law: Beginning the insolvency filing process

If you believe that bankruptcy may be for you, your first action is to speak with a LIT. Remember, you are not only looking to them for solutions. The LIT is not only interviewing you. You are also interviewing the LIT to decide if this is someone you feel you can work with.

If you don’t feel comfortable after speaking to that first LIT, there is nothing wrong with you getting a second opinion from a different LIT. Not only is that not anything wrong with that, I urge it. You are going to be working with your LIT for quite some time. Make sure that you believe it will be a comfortable relationship for you.

The bottom line is if you got in over your head with money, you do have alternatives. Get an expert viewpoint on just what your options might be under Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law. If you can’t make your monthly payments, you need professional help; and you need it now. Contact a professional Toronto bankruptcy trustee.

The Ira Smith Team has a cumulative 50+ years of experience helping people who are facing a financial crisis and we deliver the highest quality of professional service. Make an appointment for a free, no obligation appointment today and Starting Over, Starting Now you’ll take your first steps towards financial freedom.

We wish all of our readers and subscribers a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year 2018.

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ONLINE BANKRUPTCY SEARCH: THIS CANADIAN INSOLVENCY RECORDS SEARCH RENEWAL (IRS) WON’T CHASE YOU FOR MONEY!

2

Online bankruptcy search: Introduction

This blog is about the Canadian government’s plan to update its online bankruptcy search function. It is an update to our November 15, 2017 Brandon’s Blog titled: “BANKRUPTCY FILINGS FREE PUBLIC RECORDS: WILL FREE SEARCHES TURN YOU INTO A PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY RECORDS SLEUTH FOR THE TRUTH”.

As you can imagine, I have a schedule for creating Brandon’s Blog. I created the above-mentioned blog and related video on the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) insolvency records search renewal (IRS) program and posted it for publishing on November 15. After doing so, the OSB published an update on its IRS program. The purpose of this blog is to give you the updated information.

The OSB November 2017 update offers more information about the IRS post it published in August 2017.

Online bankruptcy search: Updating the technology

The OSB has stated that its updated IRS system will consist of modern-day safeguards. The new IRS will secure the private information of people or companies who have either filed or become bankrupt or who have filed a consumer proposal or Division I proposal.

Online bankruptcy search: The legislative need

Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), the Superintendent of Bankruptcy is required to keep and make available a public document of all personal and corporate bankruptcies and proposals. The public document, includes the names of the insolvent debtors given statutory stay of proceedings from the commitment to pay their financial debts.

This record consists of vital information needed to administer the bankruptcy system. It is also important for the running of an efficient and well-functioning Canadian marketplace.

Online bankruptcy search: The purpose of the current system

The current Bankruptcy and Insolvency Records Search data source offers Canadians with access to search the public database for specific people or companies that have submitted a (consumer) proposal or bankruptcy, as the case may be. It is also for creditors to see if any party applying for credit are in an insolvency proceeding.

Online bankruptcy search: Uses of the current system

The OSB’s database allows for searches for:

  • creditors to take necessary activity with respect to specific insolvency filings;
  • insolvent debtors, either an individual or Directors of a company, to acquire information about their bankruptcy or proposal;
  • Licensed Insolvency Trustees (LIT) to properly administer insolvency estates;
  • people and companies making informed credit choices on people or organizations applying for loans or trade credit.

Online bankruptcy search: How many times a year is the current system searched?

Each year the current database, (which has a cost of $8 each search for public users), is searched about 800,000 times by individual Canadians, including LITs (for whom there is no charge). Any member of the public who pays the charge could browse the government insolvency records. The present system does not limit access in any other way.

Online bankruptcy search: The proposed new IRS

The OSB will be changing the current system. It is outdated by today’s privacy standards. The OSB will create a new IRS. While still attending to the legislative needs to give access to a public document of bankruptcies, it will substantially make individual information of debtors more secure.

As compared to the old system, the IRS will consist of many steps developed to particularly restrict the disclosure and use of the individual’s details of the debtors who file for an insolvency proceeding.

3bestaward
online bankruptcy search

Online bankruptcy search: New IRS protections

Examples of the brand-new protections which are not available in the current system, to shield disclosure of individual information, are:

  • Individual information entered will just be confirmed, not offered in a search result.
  • Searchers will need to recognize the first, last name, as well as date of birth of a debtor. This is required to get verification of an individual in bankruptcy or who has filed a (consumer) proposal.
  • The new system will no longer supply access to bankrupts’ documents that do not match the search requirements. The new IRS will be search specific, and not providing a complete list of names matching search criteria.
  • For every right search, a decreased measure of individual information will certainly be returned in the public search results page. Home addresses and complete postal codes will no longer be included in search results.
  • The public document search retention will be lower. The duration for the storage of details will be 10 years post-discharge.
  • The new system will consist of innovations designed to decrease the possibility for unexpected uses of the information. For example, machine-based searches.

Online bankruptcy search: Meeting the needs of LITs

The OSB has talked to the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP) as part of developing the IRS. The OSB has dealt with comments received thus far. The IRS layout will certainly make best use of technology to protect personal information. The new system will fulfill the specific needs of LITs, in meeting their insolvency estate management and legal requirements.

It must be kept in mind that the OSB has no plan to remove the $8 charge from the current system before its being retired. The first introduction of the fee was designed exclusively to sustain the OSB’s operating expenses in developing and keeping the existing system.

The new IRS will consist of many measures to appropriately reduce disclosure and increase the defense of personal information of debtors. The OSB says that it has no proof that a service charge with the brand-new IRS would better safeguard debtor information against improper use.

Online bankruptcy search: This IRS won’t chase you for money!

As a result, the OSB says it will look at and suggest getting rid of the historic governing arrangement which permitted the charging of a cost to get access to the public record. The OSB states that this will align with Treasury Board Policy. That is why this IRS, is not planning to ever chase you for money!

Online bankruptcy search: What to do if you think you might need an insolvency process

Are you or your company insolvent and in need of restructuring? Are you scared to become another entry in an online bankruptcy search? If so, the worst thing you can do is procrastinate and not take positive steps to remedy your situation. Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Team. If we meet with you early on, we can create a restructuring and turnaround strategy designed specifically for you.

online bankruptcy search 1
online bankruptcy search
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SEARS CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN SHORTFALL: MP SCOTT DUVALL COMES THROUGH ON HIS PROMISE IN CANADIAN PARLIAMENT

2

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Introduction

On November 6, 2017, Hamilton Mountain NDP MP Scott Duvall rose in the House of Commons for leave to introduce Bill C-384. It is titled “An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (pension plans and group insurance programs)”. Mr. Duvall’s motivation was the Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall introduces Private Member’s Bill C-384

Here is what Mr. Duvall said:

“Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this time to thank my seconder, my colleague who has done great work and works very hard in this House, and who has also helped me a lot on this bill.

I rise today to introduce a private member’s bill titled, an act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. This bill will amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the CCAA so that companies will have to bring any pension plan fund to 100% before paying any other secured creditors. It also makes amendments to require companies to pay any termination or severance pay owing before paying any secured creditors.

Other amendments will prevent a company from stopping the payment of any post-retirement benefits during any proceedings under the BIA or CCAA. These amendments will inject some fairness into a process that often sees the interests of workers, retirees, and their families placed behind all others.

We must fix the imbalances in current legislation and provide Canadian workers, retirees, and their families with the protection they expect and deserve. I am hopeful that all my colleagues in Parliament will put aside their partisan differences and support this bill. Canadian workers, retirees, and their families deserve no less.”

Although he did not mention it specifically by name in the House of Commons, Mr. Duvall has said that he would introduce such a Bill as a result of the Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall walks the walk

In our September 27, 2017 blog, TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: NDP WANTS FEDERAL INSOLVENCY LAWS CHANGED SO THERE IS PENSION PLAN SECURITY WHEN FINANCIALLY TROUBLED BUSINESSES FAIL, we told you that Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall, the NDP pension plan critic, informed a group at the United Steelworkers’ Hall that he will present a private member’s bill to secure employees’ pension plans and benefits, and pressure business to offer termination or severance pay, prior to paying secured lenders.

With his Bill C-384, Mr. Duvall has lived up to his promise.

3bestaward
sears canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: This is actually the second Bill attempting deal with this problem

In our November 1, 2017 blog, SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING, we reported that Bloc Québécois MP Marilène Gill’s Private Member’s Bill C-372, passed First Reading. That Bill is titled “An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (pension plans and group insurance plans)”. In that blog, we described the provisions included in that Bill.

Like Mr. Duvall, Ms. Gill is trying to pass legislation to avoid another Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall insolvency situation.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: What does Bill C-384 actually say

The purpose of this blog, is to describe the terms of Mr. Duvall’s Bill.

Mr. Duvall’s Private Member’s Bill C-384 passed First Reading. It is very similar to Ms. Gill’s BIll C-372. He wishes to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) as follows:

  • In order to be approved by the Court, a corporate restructuring proposal under the BIA, for a company with a prescribed pension plan, the Proposal must include payment in full of any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency. The amount is calculated at the time of the filing of the Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal (NOI) or the Proposal if there is no NOI filed.
  • New section 69. 7 be added to the BIA that in the restructuring proposal of an employer, upon filing, until the discharge of the Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT), or the insolvent employer becomes bankrupt, all amounts that the employer must contribute under any arrangement for the benefit of the employees, must continue throughout the restructuring period. This would cover any pension plan, health, injury or accident plans and group insurance coverage.
  • The unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency calculation is called “special payments” in Bill C-384. The calculation is by section 9 of the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985.
  • In a receivership, the receiver is personally liable for paying any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency. However, the receiver’s liability is only from the proceeds of the sale of current assets.
  • In either a receivership or corporate bankruptcy, the charge for any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency would rank ahead of the charge of any other secured creditor. It is interesting to note that the Bill does not attempt to provide such a security ranking to anything other than the pension liability or solvency deficiency.
  • The Officers and Directors of the company are not entitled to the benefit of this secured charge. Even if they are participants in the pension plan that has the unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency.
  • New subsection 136(1) (d. 001) to the BIA, creating an extra class of preferred creditor. A preferred creditor is an unsecured creditor who ranks ahead of the ordinary unsecured creditors and ranks after the secured creditors. The Bill states that it would say that the amount of any termination or severance pay owed to an employee by a bankrupt employer, less any amount previously paid by the LIT, would rank in priority right after the wages owed to the employee.
  • There are also proposed amendments to the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) in Bill C-384. It is to bring the same changes in that statute as those to the BIA described above. The intent is that the treatment under both statutes is the same.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Now it is up to Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party

We will now have to wait and see what happens to both Ms. Gill’s and Mr. Duvall’s Private Member’s Bills. As we previously reported, it is unusual that a Private Member’s Bill becomes real legislation. As the Liberals hold a majority in Parliament, if they don’t want it, or a revised Bill for the same purpose, to pass, it won’t.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Does your company need a restructuring and turnaround plan?

Is your company insolvent and needs to restructure? Is your business viable but can only employ people and carry on business if it can restructure its debt? Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Team. If we meet with you early on, we can create a restructuring and turnaround strategy. That way your company won’t have to be like Sears Canada closing.

sears canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall 0
sears canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING

2

Sears Canada Closing: Introduction

Following the Sears Canada failed restructuring, is the Sears Canada closing of all stores. It is leaving 16,000 retirees unclear about the future of their underfunded pension plan. Support is expanding for brand-new laws to better protect Canadian workers during a company’s collapse.

Sears Canada Closing: What CARP has to say

CARP, a nationwide not-for-profit group formerly called the Canadian Association for Retired Persons, was recently on Parliament Hill to meet dozens of MPs as it lobbies for law adjustments.

Wanda Morris, vice-president of CARP, stated that CARP is requesting for the unfunded pension liability be provided priority position so it goes to the front of the line.

Pensioners hold no priority when it pertains to dividing up assets through a bankruptcy, and Ms. Morris wants protection for retirees for underfunded defined benefit pensions when the company goes through a restructuring or into bankruptcy.

Ms. Morris stated that along with the practically 16,000 retirees at Sears, CARP estimates that there are about 1.3 million workers in Canada that possibly could be in danger with defined advantage pension. Sears Canada closing all stores has made the plight of retirees a front and centre issue for CARP.

Sears Canada Closing: Private Member’s Bill C-372 passes First Reading

On Oct. 17, Bloc Québécois MP Marilène Gill suggested a member’s bill, C-372. The intent is to change the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

The change attempts to correct the injustice dealt with by retired workers whose pension as well as group insurance policy benefits are not secured when their company declares bankruptcy or undergoes restructuring. The changes are a result of the Sears Canada employees and retirees treatment, as a result of Sears Canada closing locations.

Sears Canada Closing: What the NDP has to say

Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall plans to introduce his very own private member’s bill to try to solve this problem. While he notes he has actually had talks with Gill, he claimed his suggestion will be a bit different.

Mr. Duvall specifies that his bill will amend the regulations from where it’s worded currently. He wishes that when a company goes into bankruptcy protection, the pensioners will be a secured creditor. He is also responding to the process which has led to Sears Canada closing store locations,

Sears Canada Closing: Bloc MP Marilène Gill and her Bill C-372

On October 17, 2017, MP Marilène Gill rose in Parliament and stated:

“Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to introduce my first bill in the House today, a private member’s bill that seeks to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

This bill seeks to correct the injustice faced by retired workers whose pension plans and group insurance plans are not protected when their company goes bankrupt or undergoes restructuring.

I will do everything in my power to ensure that this bill receives royal assent, that way, we can help prevent retirees, like those from my riding who are here today to support me, from losing their pensions, and improve the existing legislation by giving pension plans’ unfunded liabilities preferred creditor status, among other things. I hope my colleagues will be supporting this bill.”

Sears Canada Closing: Can it get Royal Assent?

BILL C-372 which passed First Reading on October 17, 2017 is named “An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (pension plans and group insurance plans)”.

Private member’s bills such as this one rarely pass the House. However, I thought it would be useful to describe what Ms. Gill’s views are as a result of Sears Canada closing.

Below is my analysis of how BILL C-372 proposes to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA). The impetus of course is certain high-profile corporate restructurings/failures with underfunded defined benefit pension plans. With Sears Canada closing, Ms. Gill put forward her private member’s bill.

The most recent corporate failure which initiated her private member’s bill of course was a result of Sears Canada closing.

Sears Canada Closing: Bill C-372 proposed BIA and CCAA amendments

Bill C-372 wishes to amend the BIA as follows:

  • In order to be approved by the Court, a corporate restructuring proposal under the BIA, for a company with a prescribed pension plan, the Proposal must include payment in full of any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency calculated at the time of the filing of the Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal (NOI) or the Proposal if there is no NOI filed.
  • The unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency calculation is by section 9 of the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985.
  • In a receivership, the receiver is personally liable for paying any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency but only from the proceeds of the sale of current assets.
  • In either a receivership or corporate bankruptcy, the charge for any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency would rank ahead of the charge of any other secured creditor.
  • The Officers and Directors of the company are not entitled to the benefit of this secured charge. Even if they are participants in the pension plan that has the unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency.
  • In a corporate restructuring proposal or bankruptcy, the amount not paid under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (Canada) (WEPPA). It is the amount to adequately indemnify the beneficiaries in the event the employer ceases to take part in a group insurance plan. Such a plan is one that provides for the payment of benefits to, or in respect of, employees or former employees for, among other things, life, disability, health or dental insurance is a preferred claim. It will be a preferred, but still an unsecured claim.
  • The amount equal to the difference between any severance pay or compensation in lieu of notice owed by an employer to an employee and any amount previously paid by the trustee for that severance pay or compensation in lieu of notice.

There are also proposed amendments to the CCAA in Bill C-372. It is to bring the same changes in that statute as described above. The intent is that the treatment under both statutes is the same. I won’t repeat those again.

3bestaward
sears canada closing

Sears Canada Closing: Will Bill C-372 become law?

As I stated above, it is very rare that a private member’s bill becomes real legislation. The other reason is that the Liberals hold a majority in Parliament. If they don’t want it to pass, it won’t.

On October 25, 2017, Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains said the Liberal government has no plans to change laws to protect pensioners in the wake of Sears’ bankruptcy. That is a pretty definitive statement.

So right now it seems there is a lack of political will to make the proposed law amendments. I suspect that on a financial basis, there will also be opposition for the following reasons:

  • In most cases, it will be impossible to have a successful large corporate restructuring if 100% of unfunded pension liability must be paid. Therefore, jobs will not be saved if we have more corporate bankruptcy filings instead of restructurings.
  • Lenders will have to now ignore current assets in the borrowing base of corporations. This will make corporate borrowing much more difficult for solvent corporations with pension plans to carry on business.
  • Lenders may have to reserve the entire amount of any unfunded amounts. They will rank ahead in a receivership or bankruptcy.
  • Severance pay or compensation in lieu of notice will now be a claim ranking ahead of trade suppliers in a corporate restructuring or corporate bankruptcy. This may alter the amount of an unsecured credit line a supplier will be willing to give to a customer.
  • It will cause more chaos to normal lending and trade practices which will be a problem for any government.
  • Claims under the group health indemnity provisions may not result in any real benefit to employees of a company going through either a corporate restructuring or bankruptcy. There is rarely funds left over after the claims of secured creditors.

We will keep monitoring this important issue. We will update you when MP Scott Duvall puts forward his private member’s bill and as other matters arise.

Sears Canada Closing: What To Do If You Or Your Company Need A Financial Restructuring?

It is now Sears Canada closing time. If you’re attempting to discover a means to restructure your firm’s debt, so that you can avoid a Sears Canada closing scenario, call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. If we meet with you early on, we can create a restructuring and turnaround strategy. That way your company won’t have to be like Sears Canada closing.

Our strategy for every person is to create a result where Starting Over, Starting Now occurs, starting the minute you walk in the door. You’re simply one telephone call away from taking the crucial steps to go back to leading a healthy, balanced and tension free life.

sears canada closing 8
sears canada closing

 

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY: NDP WANTS PENSION PROTECTION

320efcd005100f3ee3522fefba70f917 1

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Introduction

The federal NDP party recently met in Hamilton, just outside of the Greater Toronto Area. There was a rally to argue for federal government regulation changes to safeguard pensioners in business bankruptcy and restructuring administrations.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Proposed NDP private member’s bill

Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall, the New Democrats’ pension plan critic, informed a group at the United Steelworkers’ Hall that he will certainly present a private member’s bill to secure employees’ pension plans and benefits, and pressure business to offer termination or severance pay, prior to paying secured lenders.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: The U.S. Steel Canada saga

The concern has actually been a lengthy simmering one with unions and created significant debate throughout the almost three-year, court-supervised restructuring of U.S. Steel Canada. The company exited from its business bankruptcy protection proceedings with a brand-new owner– Bedrock Industries– as well as an old name, Stelco.

Pensioners were smarting. The court permitted the firm to put on hold health benefit repayments for a year and a half while the business was under bankruptcy protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

Generally, these advantages have been maintained by the reorganized business. Pensioners are fretting that a financing system to maintain the pension plan solvent will ultimately fail. It calls for, inter alia, extra Stelco land to be cleaned up, marketed and sold for the net sales proceeds to cover future pension plan commitments.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Sears Canada too

Duvall, with NDP leader Tom Mulcair, claimed one more instance of exactly how the regulations are unfair to employees. They cited the Sears Canada situation. Sears Canada remains in business bankruptcy protection. Its employees are encountering a potential decrease in their pension plan benefits.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Fairness for employees

They say this should have to do with justness for employees. The NDP wants to see a Canada that benefits every person as well as seeing to it that companies, including multinationals, cannot take the pension plans their employees have earned.

They state that the existing regulation permits funds that ought to go to employees’ pension plans to be given to the secured creditors instead. The NDP is especially concerned when the secured lender is the financially troubled or creditor-protected company’s parent company.

Stelco’s biggest secured lender was U.S. Steel in the United States. The $500 million restructuring saw the American firm get $130 million.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Pension plan funding should have first priority

The Duvall proposed private member’s bill would call for pension plans to be 100 percent funded prior to secured lenders being paid. Firms would certainly not be permitted to put on hold retirement benefits in court-supervised restructurings, which occurred with U.S. Steel Canada.

The NDP is calling their proposal “End Pension Theft”. It focuses on altering CCCA legislation as well as the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) to stop companies from placing investors, financial institutions and other lenders ahead of their staff members when they go into bankruptcy protection.

3bestaward
business bankruptcy

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Is there a comparable precedent for such an amendment

Yes there is – the enactment of the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA). From 1975, proposals were proactively taken into consideration for the facility of a wage protection plan for when the bankruptcy, liquidation or receivership of a company. The many choices gone over for just how this could be attained consisted of:

  1. very top priority for wages;
  2. acknowledgment of existing provincial/territorial concerns within the BIA structure;
  3. a waiver of the waiting time for EI benefits; and
  4. a wage earner protection fund financed either from basic tax revenue or as a part of the EI coverage regimen.

In November 2003, the Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce examined the background of these conversations and chose

the alternative for a super priority be taken on. Although the BIA was amended in 2005, these changes did not quickly come into force, as many technical amendments were required to be passed in 2007. The WEPPA came into force on July 7, 2008.

The reason for the timing of creating the WEPPA was a result of NDP pressure put on the minority Liberal government of Prime Minister Paul Martin. The Liberals agreed to the NDP proposal as part of obtaining continued NDP support for the minority government.

So there is precedent for a significant amendment to Canadian insolvency legislation.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: How likely is such a pension reform in restructuring proceedings to succeed?

At this time, I believe there are certain obstacles from seeing such a significant overhaul being successful. The reasons I say this include:

  1. Today there is a Liberal majority government in power, so the support of the NDP party is not required for the government to pass the legislation it wishes to.
  2. Providing a super priority for all pension shortfalls would dramatically alter the way lending is done in Canada. Banks would be required to include pension plan actuarial shortfall calculations into their borrowing base calculations. It may end up that when there is a pension plan shortfall, there is no borrowing room available at all for a business. This would increase the number of insolvencies.
  3. If the number of business insolvencies increased, that could lead to an increase in job losses. That would hurt employees which would hurt the same group the private member’s bill would be trying the protect.

However, the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has shown that it does try to play to whichever group the government feels it can gain votes from. So, it is not out of the realm of possibilities that the government would try to enact some legislation to give a limited super priority to a part of an underfunded pension plan liability. Time will tell whether such a proposal has any chance of success at this time.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Does your Toronto area business require restructuring proceedings to survive?

If you’re company is struggling with too much debt, give the Ira Smith Team a call. We can help with refinancing and restructuring so that your business can get back on track Starting Over, Starting Now.

UPDATE: CHECK OUT OUR NEW VLOG BY CLICKING ON:

SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS

toronto business bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE: MY CHEAT-SHEET OF THE TOP 8 THINGS THE BANKRUPTCY COURT CONSIDERS

Bankruptcy discharge introduction

A bankruptcy discharge is when the bankrupt is released under Canadian bankruptcy law from his or her debts as part of the bankruptcy process. Some people think that it is the act of filing bankruptcy that releases the bankrupt from liability. This is not the case. It is the discharge from bankruptcy process that “discharges” the bankrupt’s debts.

We explain in this vlog the procedure when a bankrupt’s outright discharge is opposed. We discuss the top 8 things that the Bankruptcy Court will consider in determining just what outcome the bankrupt could expect.

The primary benefit of the bankruptcy process for the insolvent person

The bankruptcy discharge is among the primary benefits of relief under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). The discharge is vital to the bankruptcy process. Debtors, after bankruptcy, can wipe the slate clean and start over, which is a central principle under the BIA statute.

Not all debts may be released

A bankruptcy discharge offers the discharge of many unsecured debts. Credit card debts, personal income tax debt, unsecured personal loans and under certain conditions, some student loan debt are all dischargeable debts. Financial debts, which will not be discharged include:

  • support payments to a previous spouse or to children;
  • fines or financial charges imposed by the Court;
  • debts emerging from fraudulent behaviour;
  • student loans if fewer than seven years have passed considering that the bankrupt quit being a full or part-time student.

    ontario bankruptcy court discharge certificate
    bankruptcy discharge

It can be opposed

An insolvent’s bankruptcy discharge application may be opposed by one or more unsecured creditors or the Licensed Insolvency Trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (LIT). A creditor opposition is created when the creditor files the required notice of opposition, setting out the reasons for opposing.

This happens if the insolvent has not met all of his/her responsibilities under the BIA. Making full disclosure, attending the required two financial counselling sessions and making all necessary surplus income payments are all duties of the bankrupt that must be fulfilled if a discharge is to be considered.

It can also happen if the individual bankrupt has actually committed a bankruptcy offence. Those are acts listed in section 173 (1) of the BIA. In this case, there needs to be a bankruptcy discharge hearing in Court and the Court will after that evaluate the LIT or creditor opposition as well as give its decision on the discharge from personal bankruptcy.

There are four types of discharges possible

There are 4 types of discharges:

  1. Absolute discharge— The bankrupt is launched from the legal obligation to pay off financial obligations that existed on the day of bankruptcy, except for certain types of debt identified above.
  1. Conditional discharge— The bankrupt must fulfill certain conditions, additional payments into the bankruptcy estate, to get an absolute discharge. Once all conditions have been fulfilled, an absolute discharge will certainly be granted.
  1. Suspended discharge— An absolute discharge that will be granted at later on a specific date determined by the Court.
  1. Refused discharge— The Court has the right to decline a discharge.

If there is no opposition to the discharge from bankruptcy of the bankrupt by a creditor or the LIT, then the LIT is able to provide an automatic discharge by issuing the appropriate certificate. There is no need for attendance in Court.

after bankruptcy discharge canada
bankruptcy discharge

The opposition process

When a debtor’s bankruptcy discharge application is opposed by either an unsecured creditor or the LIT, the Trustee needs to secure a Court day. This will be for a Court hearing on the insolvent’s application for discharge. The LIT must then tell all creditors who have filed a proof of claim of the opposition. Details are also provided about the date, time as well as place of the Court hearing.

The Trustee needs to also file a report with the Court on the conduct of the bankrupt both prior to as well as after applying for bankruptcy. The report will as well give a summary of the financial results of the bankruptcy administration. If a creditor has opposed the bankrupt’s discharge, then that creditor likewise needed to send a notice of opposition.

Does the bankrupt need a lawyer on an opposed discharge?

When going to Court for his/her discharge application hearing, a bankrupt would be well advised to come with a skilled bankruptcy lawyer to represent his or her interests. Sometimes the discharge hearing is less formal than various other types of Court hearings.

However, the Court follows all the proper regulations of civil procedure. It is sometimes tough for nonprofessionals to put their best foot forward without an attorney’s aid.

There have been many Court cases on applications for discharge. A Court decision released recently from the Queen’s Bench of Saskatchewan supplies an exceptional walk-through of the points the Court will take into consideration. For those interested, the reference is Hertz Bankruptcy (Re), 2017 SKQB 224 (CanLII).

bankruptcy discharge 3
bankruptcy discharge

The top 8 things the Bankruptcy Court will consider

The concerns the Court thought about, in determining what type of bankruptcy discharge certificate to issue, which is the same in all bankruptcy discharge hearings, were:

  1. Do the conditions of the bankruptcy filing and the bankrupt’s conduct sustain an order discharging the Bankrupt’s unsecured debts?
  2. The Court’s problem is to make sure that within a choice the policy purposes of the BIA are fulfilled. The bankruptcy, including the insolvent’s discharge, should act as a deterrence for the person not to duplicate the very same behaviour.
  3. If the circumstances of the bankruptcy support an order discharging the bankrupt, what terms of discharge are proper under the distinct circumstances of the bankruptcy?
  4. What were the conditions of the insolvent when the debts were sustained?
  5. What efforts did the insolvent make to pay the creditors?
  6. Did the bankrupt pay in respect of certain other debts but not all of them and particularly not the debt of the opposing creditor?
  7. Exactly what are the insolvent’s monetary opportunities for the future?
  8. Is there any other conduct or reality that needs to be factored into with the regard to discharge?

The Court will take lots of variables into account. The conduct, previous income, education and age of the bankrupt are all important factors. The Court will certainly likewise trust the Trustee’s report to Court on the bankrupt’s application for discharge. The Trustee’s report assists in determining facts about the conduct of the insolvent and his or her future prospects.

bankruptcy discharge

Is the bankrupt young or old?

Prevention is always a consideration. It is however very important to remember that Courts tend to be extra conventional when dealing with older bankrupts. A more youthful bankrupt with years of income-making opportunities could be needed to make an extra significant repayment. Less respect is given to the instant ability to pay.

An older bankrupt with some surplus income but fewer working years might be needed to pay less surplus income obligations into the bankruptcy estate.

Bankruptcy discharge: Is my bankruptcy case over when I get a discharge?

You should by this point in my Brandon Blog realize that when you receive an absolute discharge from your bankruptcy, at that point, you are discharged from your unsecured debts.

A discharge shows that you have finished with your bankruptcy legal process and your personal liability for unsecured debts has ceased. It’s not a separate thing from bankruptcy; it happens either automatically or by an Order of the Court, as I have described above.

At that point, the LIT still has some duties to fulfill. They include:

  • if there is going to be a dividend paid to the creditors, making sure that all proofs of claim have been reviewed and allowed for dividend purposes;
  • resolve any uncertainties the LIT may have concerning certain filed bankruptcy claims, including the issuance of Notices of Disallowance if any;
  • preparing the bankruptcy administration Final Statement of Receipts and Disbursements;
  • getting approval from the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy to the Final Statement
  • getting the Final Statement, including the LIT’s fee and disbursements, approved by the Court;
  • issuing the dividend bankruptcy payments, if any
  • getting the discharge of the LIT

It is then that your bankruptcy case is closed.

Bankruptcy discharge: Do you have too much debt and want to avoid bankruptcy?

Do you have too many debt obligations and debt payments and have no idea how to deal with them? Act before you find yourself in the throes of an emergency financial situation. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has assisted many Canadian businesses and people throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) in dealing with debts that need a plan for Starting Over, Starting Now. Don’t postpone. Give us a call today. Financial problems can be solved while avoiding bankruptcy with timely activity as well as our excellent strategy tailored just for you.

bankruptcy discharge

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL ONTARIO PROCESS: YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE A MVP TO DO ONE

Consumer proposal Ontario process: Livan Hernandez now

Livan Hernandez made a lot of money as a pitcher in major league baseball. Yet, according to court documents, in July 2017 he applied for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Florida. He filed in federal court at Fort Lauderdale. The purpose of this blog is twofold: 1. to show that even if you have made millions in your career, you can still get into debt trouble; and 2. the consumer proposal Ontario process (Proposal, Plan or CP) which are similar to Chapter 13 US bankruptcy filings.

Hernandez, according to Baseball Reference, made more than $53 million in his job. He states that he owes up to 49 lenders between $500,000 and $1 million and he has $50,000 or less in assets.

The court documents show that most of the creditors he owes are banks and credit cards. He also owes the IRS.

Hernandez pitched for 17 years in the majors, on 9 teams. He played in 2 World Series, winning and making Series MVP honours with the Florida Marlins in 1997 and losing with the San Francisco Giants in 2002.

Consumer proposal Ontario process: Chapter 13 trustee office

Mr. Hernandez would have attended at the Chapter 13 trustee office to file under the US Bankruptcy Code. A chapter 13 bankruptcy is also called a wage earner’s plan. It enables people with regular income to develop a plan to repay all or part of their debts. The Canadian equivalent is our CP.

Consumer proposal Ontario process: The rich and famous have problems too

We have written about the rich and famous having debt problems before. Our previous blogs on this topic include:

  1. FAMOUS CELEBRITY BANKRUPTCIES HAPPEN TOO – July 30, 2013
  2. HIGH EARNERS LIVING PAYCHEQUE TO PAYCHEQUE – October 21, 2014
  3. 40 PARK LANE CIRCLE, 44 PARK LANE CIRCLE TORONTO FOR SALE: ARE FINANCIAL PROBLEMS CONTAGIOUS? – March 31, 2015
  4. BANKRUPTCY ALTERNATIVE: THE CLINTON PORTIS LIST FOR TURNING $40 MILLION INTO A BANKRUPTCY – January 11, 2016
  5. CONSUMER PROPOSAL PROCESS FOR LOTTERY WINNERS? BUT WHY? – January 18, 2016
  6. BANKRUPTCY OPTIONS: DO YOU REALLY NEED A $100K PERSONAL ASSISTANT? – August 22, 2016
  7. #VIDEO – SOMEONE STARTED A KANYE DEBT GOFUNDME: MY THREE CRUCIAL TACTICS TO SOLVE KANYE’S DEBT PROBLEMS# – January 25, 2017

Consumer proposal Ontario process: Just what is a consumer proposal?

This vlog offers the answer to one of the most asked Plan questions. A CP is available to people under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). Teaming up with a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT) offering to administer your Plan you make an offer to:

  • pay your creditors part of what you owe them over a period not greater than 60 months;
  • lengthen the time you have to pay back your debts; as well as
  • stay free from bankruptcy

Payments are made to the LIT. The LIT uses that cash to pay each of your creditors. The CP must be finished within 5 years.consumer proposal ontario process

Consumer proposal Ontario process: Who qualifies?

To meet the BIA requirements for a CP, you need to be an individual, not a company. Your overall financial debts need to not exceed $250,000 (not consisting of debts from a home mortgage, home equity line of credit or line of credit, secured by your principal residence).

You should also meet the insolvency requirements. This implies that:

  • your debts are greater than the value of your assets;
  • if you sold your assets you would not have appropriate funds to repay your monetary commitments totally;
  • you are unable to pay your debts as they come due

Making simply the minimum monthly payment as disclosed on your credit card statements do not count as repaying your debts.

Consumer proposal Ontario process: What is the cost of a consumer proposal?

Your Plan repayments cover the expense for the consumer proposal. There are no different prices either for doing a consumer proposal or fees paid to the LIT to administer your Plan. The fee the LIT earns is calculated per the BIA.

Consumer proposal Ontario process: How long will my consumer proposal take?

A CP can last for no more than 5 years. Nonetheless, you can reduce the term either by 1. increasing the amount of your month-to-month repayment agreed to with your creditors in your Plan or; 2. by giving a round figure settlement all at once (if you could get an adequate amount from either a financial institution or family).

Consumer proposal Ontario process: What are the actions involved in a consumer proposal?

A CP allows you to pay all or part of your unsecured debt in regular monthly payments over an established period (again, not exceeding 60 months).

In composing your Plan, the LIT has to make sure that your CP provides a better outcome for your creditors compared to what they could expect to receive in your personal bankruptcy.

The typical actions of a LIT assisting you in your CP are:

  • learn from you about your assets and liabilities;
  • work with you to create a strategy that you both believe will serve the requirements of both you and those you owe;
  • draft the Plan;
  • send the Plan to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy;
  • mail out the CP to your creditors who will have 45 days to accept or reject it.

The creditors can accept or reject your consumer proposal at a meeting of creditors if such a meeting was held. Usually, under a Plan, there is no need to hold a meeting.

Consumer proposal Ontario process: Can a consumer proposal stop debt collection agencies as well as prevent my wages from being seized?

Yes. As soon as the filing of a CP happens, all creditors must stop all legal action against you, including seizure activities (aside from any family law responsibilities under a proper settlement arrangement or court order).

Consumer proposal Ontario process: In a consumer proposal, will I turn over my residence as well as my auto?

Typically lending institutions who register a mortgage or various other security for financing are outside the CP procedure. It is the equity you have in your residence or auto that must be considered when you initially work out a budget and what type of Plan strategy you are going to make with your LIT.

If you have enough earnings to keep paying the mortgage against your home and/or your car loan as well as you wish to maintain the properties, you can do so. Again, your equity needs to be taken into consideration in the offer you make to your creditor. Also, your income, as well as costs, need to be evaluated to make certain you can pay for all these expenditures plus the regular monthly payment under your CP.

KEEP IN MIND: If you were to surrender your home or auto after declaring your Plan, you will not be spared the responsibility for any shortfall on your mortgage or auto loan given that the surrender took place after the filing of your CP.

Make certain that if you are giving back your home or auto to your lender, you await the bank to acknowledge that you have turned them over. Additionally, wait till they have begun their enforcement BEFORE you file your CP. That way any shortfall they experience will be a debt caught in your Plan

Consumer proposal Ontario process: Will I need to surrender my charge cards?

Typically, you must be prepared to give each of your charge cards to the LIT and you will not be able to ask for a brand-new credit card till after your Plan is completed. You can take advantage of a guaranteed/secured charge card.

If my creditors reject my CP or I fail to fully do it, will I automatically become bankrupt?

We highly recommend you to put your best foot forward when submitting your CP. We also recommend that you make your payments constantly on time. If your Plan is rejected by your creditors or you drop 3 payments behind, your CP will go into default. If that were to happen, you will no more have protection from your creditors and their collection initiatives.

Consumer proposal Ontario process: What should I do if I have too much debt?

If you’re thinking of a debt settlement program or are seeking methods to solve your debt problems and avoid bankruptcy, call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. Our method is for every single person is to create an outcome where Starting Over, Starting Now comes true, starting the minute you walk in the door. You’re simply one call away from getting back on the road to leading a healthy, balanced and tension free life.consumer proposal process ontario

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

HOW TO SOLVE THE BIGGEST PROBLEMS WITH BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION MEANING

Bankruptcy protection meaning: Introduction

The Cambridge English Dictionary gives us the bankruptcy protection meaning as follows:

bankruptcy protection noun [ U ]

UKUS ​ also bankruptcy-law protection

​LAW, FINANCE laws that limit the amount of money a bankrupt company (= one that owes more money than it can pay) must pay to those it owes money to:

The firm filed for bankruptcy protection after a massive accounting scandal.

We have filed for bankruptcy protection from creditors.

It’s the second time the company has sought bankruptcy protection in 25 months.

The Chicago-based business, already forced into Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, said that a complete collapse is now a “distinct possibility”.

See also

Chapter 11

Bankruptcy protection meaning: Bankruptcy protection meaning

The above definition is helpful, but, I would make one small change to it. There is a difference between a company that does not have enough cash to meet its expenses, or whose assets are worth less than the value of its liabilities. Such a company is insolvent. Such a company is only bankrupt if it has filed an assignment in bankruptcy or a Court has issued a Bankruptcy Order against it. Insolvency is the financial condition; bankruptcy is a legal state.

So, I will give you my bankruptcy protection Canada definition:

Bankruptcy protection is a legal state where the insolvent company (or person) has filed under the country’s bankruptcy laws to restructure and avoid becoming a bankrupt.

Bankruptcy protection meaning: How does it begin?

A company starts to go into “bankruptcy protection” by putting together its motion to the Court to tell that:

  1. they are admitting that they cannot pay their debts generally as they come due;
  2. their assets are worth less than the amount of their liabilities;
  3. they cannot continue in business in their current financial and business condition;
  4. there may be come calamity about to befall them if they do not have the time and breathing space to focus only on a restructuring and running of their business to regain profitability;
  5. and they’re asking for the Court’s help and protection while they formulate a proposal or a plan of arrangement to present to the creditors.

The company is not seeking “bankruptcy protection”. Rather, it is seeking protection from its creditors. It is seeking a “time out” from the Court so that the company’s creditors cannot begin or continue legal action against the company. It wishes to be protected from such outside influences so that nobody can tip it over.

Management is saying that if given time, it believes that it can come up with a plan to restructure the company so that it can emerge a better and financially healthy company. It wishes to take the opportunity to see if its creditors, and the Court, will agree to a restructuring plan. It wishes to continue in business to continue to buy and sell goods and services and to continue to be an employer.

Bankruptcy protection meaning: We have all heard about Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection

We have all heard about Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection proceedings. This refers to the restructuring provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A case filed under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code is often called a “reorganization” bankruptcy.

The Chapter 11 filing provides bankruptcy protection to the company and allows it to restructure itself and its assets to attempt to maximize creditor and shareholder value and avoid bankruptcy. A Chapter 11 case begins with the petition being filed with the bankruptcy court serving the area where the debtor can show a domicile or residence. A petition may be a voluntary petition, a debtor filing, or it may be an involuntary petition, a filing by creditors that meet certain requirements.

You have probably just heard about Chapter 11 this week, as Takata Corp., the Japanese company that made faulty airbag inflators and is now the subject of many lawsuits in the United States and elsewhere just filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection proceedings this week.

Bankruptcy protection meaning: Does Chapter 11 exist in Canada?

Chapter 11 is not a Canadian term or provision. In Canada, there are two federal statutes that a company wishing to reorganize can rely upon. Because they are federal statutes, they apply across the country. So, it does not matter if you are applying for bankruptcy protection Ontario Canada or in any other province.

The first statute is the Part III Division I Proposal restructuring provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA). The second, and today more common statute large companies file under, is, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA).

There is no such thing as a bankruptcy protection act Canada. The BIA and CCAA are also not new bankruptcy laws in Canada. They have been on the books for some time and form part of the corporate bankruptcy laws in Canada . This vlog does attempt to give a bankruptcy protection Canada definition.

Bankruptcy protection meaning: The Canadian restructuring laws

Both companies and people can file under the restructuring provisions of the BIA. Only companies that meet the test can file under the CCAA. The CCAA is a relatively brief statute which allows a company the time for them to restructure their affairs. The CCAA is more flexible than the BIA and that is why it is the restructuring statute of choice for large and complex Canadian corporations. It has often been called the Canadian Chapter 11.

The reason for filing under the restructuring provisions of either the BIA or CCAA, is for the company to avoid bankruptcy. So there is a big difference when considering bankruptcy protection vs bankruptcy. That will be a topic for another blog or vlog.

A company would file for restructuring if management believes there is a viable business to be saved. Management believes that it has a viable business within the corporation and the corporation can be nursed back to good health by taking certain steps, including:

  1. reducing debt;
  2. preparing and implementing a new business plan;
  3. reducing expenses; and
  4. perhaps shedding redundant assets and/or unsuccessful business units.

3bestaward

Bankruptcy protection meaning: What happens to the company when it is in restructuring mode?

The premise is that management remains in control of the business, its assets and operations while restructuring. As part of the plan, there may be senior management changes if confidence has been lost in the old management. However, management remains in control and the company continues to run.

The further assumption is that the company has enough cash flow, and/or enough lines of credit while in reorganization mode, to run and ultimately emerge from its restructuring proceedings. The Court needs to know that there will not be prejudice to any creditor by providing the bankruptcy protection to the company. Ultimately, the creditors and the Court will consider the company’s restructuring plan and decide whether to approve it.

Bankruptcy protection meaning: Some examples please

There have been many CCAA filings over the last few years. Some very well-known household names in fact, such as:

  1. Sears Canada Inc. – June 22, 2017
  2. Express Fashion Apparel Canada Inc. and Express Canada GC GP, Inc. – May 04, 2017
  3. Grafton-Fraser Inc. – January 25, 2017
  4. Performance Sports Group Ltd., Bauer Hockey Corp. – October 31, 2016
  5. Urbancorp Group of companies – May 18, 2016 and October 6 and 18, 2016
  6. Golf Town Canada – September 14, 2016
  7. Victorian Order of Nurses for Canada – November 25, 2015
  8. Verity Energy Ltd. – May 1, 2015
  9. Target Canada Co., et al – January 15, 2015 (this was just a liquidation, not a restructuring, but they used the CCAA)
  10. U.S. Steel Canada Inc. – September 16, 2014

Bankruptcy protection meaning: What to do if your company cannot carry on because of too much debt

If your company has too much debt and insufficient cash flow, you need your plan and strategy in place NOW. Contact us now. The Ira Smith Team is here to solve your debt problems and help you carry out that winning strategy, no matter the reason. We’re here to help and get you back on solid financial footing Starting Over, Starting Now. We’re just a phone call away.

UPDATE: CHECK OUT OUR NEW VLOG BY CLICKING ON:

SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS

bankruptcy protection meaning 4

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CURRENT INSOLVENCY ASSIGNMENTS: A WARNING TO ALL CREDITORS TO STAY IN THE PRESENT TO PRESERVE YOUR RIGHTS

Current insolvency assignments: Introduction

One of our current insolvency assignments teaches creditors a valuable lesson if they wish to take part in a debtor’s restructuring proposal. Every licensed insolvency trustee maintains a website listing their current insolvency assignments that are noteworthy or of public interest. Today I want to tell you about a recent case of ours. It is not of public interest, but it is noteworthy, especially for trustees and lawyers practicing in the insolvency area. Notwithstanding the large volume of receivership and bankruptcy case-law, the issue we came across was novel and never decided in Court before.

Current insolvency assignments: Mr. and Mrs. R

Mr. R was the sole shareholder of a company that serviced the construction industry. Both Mr. and Mrs. R were both Officers and Directors of the company. The company became insolvent, could not continue and ceased operating. Mr. and Mrs. R., in addition to their personal debts, which were significant, were now also faced with extensive claims against them in their capacity as Directors.

Current insolvency assignments: Consultation with Mr. and Mrs. R

Mr. and Mrs. R’s litigation lawyer referred them to us. We advised them that they should not declare bankruptcy, but rather attempt to avoid bankruptcy and restructure by filing a joint proposal under Part III Division I of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). Their had a complicated situation and they required an immediate stay of proceedings to deal with all the lawsuits against them.

Therefore, we first filed a joint Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal (NOI) on June 8, 2016. This first step provided Mr. and Mrs. R with a first 30-day grace period, where no creditor could begin or continue legal proceedings or enforcement against them while we were working with them to finish developing their restructuring proposal.

Current insolvency assignments: A certain creditor’s reaction

As Trustee, we served the NOI on all known creditors by ordinary mail, as we are required to under the BIA. We served one creditor, Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) at two addresses: i) legal counsel for RBC; and ii) BH, an agent for RBC that we regularly deal with. At the time of mailing out the NOI, we did not know if this agent would be on the file, but we provided them with notice out of to be extra cautious. We mailed the NOI on June 9, 2016.

The NOI sent to the creditors, including RBC, did not contain any proposal whatsoever, because it had not been written yet! This is standard for the filing of an NOI before the proposal.

In response to the NOI, by letter dated June 20, 2016, we received, from another agent for RBC that we had never dealt with before and who was not on our original mailing list, two proofs of claim, each in the amount of $438,434.31; one proof for each of Mr. and Mrs. R, individually.

This agent also sent a voting letter. It asked the Trustee to count RBC’s vote “with respect to the proposal” of Mr. and Mrs. R “against acceptance of the proposal made as of the 08th day of June, 2016.”

Current insolvency assignments: The Trustee’s reaction

On June 22, we wrote to the agent advising that the Trustee’s position was that because no proposal was yet in existence, the RBC “vote” was invalid and that RBC would have to offer a proper voting letter once it received the proposal. This was also sent to RBC’s counsel. The Trustee received no response to this communication.

Current insolvency assignments: The joint proposal of Mr. and Mrs. R

The debtors, Mr. and Mrs. R, filed a proposal July 7. We served the proposal on all creditors. The Trustee served RBC three ways to: i) RBC’s counsel; ii) RBC’s agent BH; and iii) the agent who wrote us the June 22 letter with enclosures. Our package included not only the proposal but notice of the first meeting of creditors and forms for proof of claim and a voting letter.

We received nothing further from RBC. The meeting proceeded on July 27. RBC did not attend. One creditor, with a claim of $278,561.29, attended and voted for the joint proposal. The joint proposal was deemed to have been accepted. Consistent with our position, as Trustee, we did not count the RBC June 22 “vote”.

 (2017), 2017 ONSC 4234, 2017 CarswellOnt 12497, Rizzo, Re

Current insolvency assignments: Off to Court for approval

After the acceptance of a proposal by the requisite majority of the creditors, a licensed insolvency trustee must make application to Court, for approval of the proposal. The proposal is not binding until there is a valid and subsisting approval order of the Court.

Our motion for approval of the joint restructuring proposal of the debtors, Mr. and Mrs. R, was heard on August 9, 2016. RBC opposed. RBC opposed on the basis that its vote against the joint proposal was not counted. RBC’s vote, if counted, would have defeated the proposal and Mr. and Mrs. R would be bankrupt.

Our lawyer made various submissions, including, that the “vote” of RBC:

  • was not valid;
  • that RBC was advised of this and did nothing to file a valid vote; and
  • RBC failed to attend the meeting of creditors.

As indicated above, only one creditor voted; it voted in favour of the joint proposal.

RBC claimed its vote was valid and ought to have been counted. The Court did not go so far as to say a creditor could never lodge a valid vote against a proposal before receiving it. In this case, the Court agreed with us and found the vote was not valid. The Court went on to say that the Trustee was correct in not counting it.

Current insolvency assignments: What the Court said

The threshold question was whether the Trustee was right to reject RBC’s purported “vote.” Section 53 of the BIA permits a creditor to assent or dissent “from a proposal” before a meeting. Section 54 says the creditors may accept or refuse “the proposal” at the meeting. However, the statutory scheme for creditor voting assumes there is a proposal.

The Court found that:

  • the agent’s purported “vote” was on its face defective;
  • there was no proposal of June 8;
  • RBC or its agent had never seen the joint proposal when it voted;
  • the Trustee was right to reject an obviously defective “vote”;
  • the Trustee made its position abundantly clear to RBC’s agents; and
  • RBC had every opportunity to cure the defect and it failed to do so.

Current insolvency assignments: What the Court ordered

The Court found that:

  • the Trustee was correct in rejecting the June 22 “vote”; and
  • RBC was not denied due process.

The Court granted our motion for approval of the joint proposal and awarded us our costs.

Current insolvency assignments: What does this mean?

What this means is very simple. Make sure that in anything you do, you understand what the rules are, don’t take your eye off the ball and never fall asleep at the switch. If this creditor’s agent and legal counsel had merely reacted to the mailing of the joint proposal and cast a proper vote, we never would have ended up in this situation.

There was nothing wrong with the proof of claim (although it was filed unnecessarily in duplicate). All RBC’s agent or lawyer had to do when it received the joint proposal mailing, was take 2 minutes to complete a new voting letter and send it in to the Trustee. If they had done this simple step, assuming they voted against the joint proposal, Mr. and Mrs. R would now be bankrupts. Instead, they are making their proposal payments to the Trustee to restructure themselves and avoided bankruptcy.

Mr. and Mrs. R have each secured full-time employment, and are making more money than in the last few years of running their company.

Current insolvency assignments: What to do because of too much debt

Being a Director of a corporation can be risky business. If the corporation is insolvent and continues to carry on business, and you continue to act as a Director, it can land you in a personal financial mess.

Are you experiencing financial distress because of acting as a Director or otherwise? Is your business struggling and you can’t seem to find a way out?

If you’re struggling with debt for any reason Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can help. We’re experts in dealing with debt. Give us a call today and take the first step towards conquering debt Starting Over, Starting Now.

2016 CarswellOnt 21774, 2016 ONSC 8192, IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF MARCO RIZZO AND ANGELA RIZZO

Call a Trustee Now!