Tag: licensed insolvency trustee

4 PILLARS LAWSUIT GETS GIGANTIC APPROVAL TO PROCEED FROM COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 24, 2021

NOTE: On January 13, 2022, three settlement agreements were approved by the Honourable Justice Mayer of the British Columbia Supreme Court on January 29, 2021, and November 15, 2021. As a compromise of disputed claims, these settlements are not an admission or finding of liability by the settling Defendants. You can read all about the Settlement Administration Plan and how to file a claim by CLICKING HERE to read our latest 4 Pillars blog.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

**The 4 Pillars lawsuit class-action**

In my November 25, 2019, Brandon Blog titled “HOW DOES DEBT RELIEF WORK: APPARENTLY NOT GREAT 4 EVERYONE“ I wrote about the litigation involving 4 Pillars Debt and Credit Restructuring Company, 4 Pillars Consulting Group Inc. and other entities (4 Pillars or the 4 Pillars lawsuit), Pearce v 4 Pillars Consulting Group Inc., 2019 BCSC 1851.

Mr. Pearce is suing for damages for the fees billed by 4 Pillars to all persons that paid fees to it in British Columbia in connection with: (i) a consumer proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA); or (ii) an informal debt settlement negotiation proposal with the individual’s creditors, all after April 1, 2016.

Mr. Pearce claims that it is appropriate for the refunding fees paid, damages for alleged losses stemming from breaches of the provincial Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act (BPCPA) and BIA, and damages based upon the claim that the fees billed were unscrupulous under section 8 of the BPCPA.

In this Brandon Blog, I describe what the 4 Pillars lawsuit is all about and why the Court of Appeal for British Columbia has allowed it to proceed as a class action proceeding, dismissing the 4 Pillars objections.

4 Pillars lawsuit: What is a class action proceeding?

As part of that litigation, Mr. Pearce applied to the BC Court to have his litigation turned into a class action proceeding. The Court ruled that there were enough grounds for his legal action to move forward as a class-action claim. As can be expected, 4 Pillars objected to that motion. They also unsuccessfully argued that certain sections of the claim should be stricken.

4 Pillars appealed that decision to the Court of Appeal for British Columbia. On May 17, 2021, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia released its decision. In this Brandon Blog, I discuss the appeal, what the appeal court had to say and what it decided in the 4 Pillars lawsuit appeal.

Debtor Warning – Debt Consultants Sometimes Not What They Appear

**What 4 Pillars say their organization’s role is**

4 Pillars states that they are professionals who provide a variety of services specific to individuals in debt. They say they outline the choices readily available and also walk people through the procedure. They say that your financial debt settlement will likely be one of the following, which they will manage on your behalf:

informal debt settlement
consumer proposals
bankruptcy

They also say they will work with the person on their aftercare. They also say that their role ranges from providing individual debt settlements on behalf of debtors with collection agencies and their creditors to negotiating with Licensed Insolvency Trustees (individually a Trustee, Bankruptcy Trustee or LIT) on behalf of a debtor in determining the terms of a consumer proposal.

What the Court of Appeal for British Columbia says about the role of 4 Pillars

The Court of Appeal described them this way:

4 Pillars sell their debt restructuring services as debt advisors to individuals on the brink of insolvency who are seeking debt restructuring. They are unlicensed and charge fees above those professionals who are licensed and regulated.
Their debt consulting business is not licensed or registered, and they charge customers fees up‑front for services regardless of whether the appellants actually achieve any debt relief.
Their debt consulting services are:
- to meet and work with consumers who are struggling with debt;
- to help them draft a consumer proposal to present to a LIT:
- and to engage in back and forth discussions with the LIT in efforts to have the LIT agree to a consumer proposal that is favourable to the debtor.
All of these services are provided with the goal that the LIT will then present the consumer proposal to the debtor’s creditors.
4 Pillars may then provide input, on the debtor’s behalf, on any response or request from the creditors.

4 Pillars lawsuit: What do the 4 Pillars debt consultant’s services actually involve?

Just to remind you, this is what the lower BC Court and the Court of Appeal for British Columbia found the 4 Pillars services to be:

to meet and work with consumers who are struggling with debt;
to help them draft a consumer proposal to present to a LIT:
and to engage in back and forth discussions with the LIT in efforts to have the LIT agree to a consumer proposal that is favourable to the debtor.
Provide input, on the debtor’s behalf, on any response or request from the creditors.
They charge customers fees up‑front for services regardless of whether the appellants actually achieve any debt relief.
Charge fees above those professionals who are licensed and regulated.

This is very common amongst all the debt restructuring businesses. It is questionable what value they provide if any at all. Their business model preys on people’s fears of getting advice straight from Licensed Insolvency Trustees.

The services described above a LIT provides at no additional cost above and beyond what the government-approved tariff fee is. The reality is that you do not need the 4 Pillars Consulting Group Inc.

As a LIT, I provide financial advice regarding your unmanageable debt and if you are a candidate for informal debt settlement, I will tell you exactly what to do in our no-cost initial consultation. If you have too much personal debt and are not a candidate for an informal settlement, I have many times prepared consumer proposals that work. As part of that process, I also act as a licensed credit counsellor.

Is Debt Settlement Really Worth It?

Debt settlement is really worth it. Going to one of these unscrupulous debt settlement companies, instead of a licensed insolvency trustee for debt settlement is NOT.

If you’ve been struggling with debt, it’s time to consider debt settlement through a consumer proposal with the services of a LIT. It likely won’t sound appealing at first, and you may feel that you are taking a gamble, but the process of debt settlement can be incredibly beneficial to you. Keep in mind that even 4 Pillars introduce you to a LIT in order for you to relieve yourself of your debts, hopefully through a consumer proposal process.

A consumer proposal is the only government-approved debt relief program. A LIT can get you a true debt settlement, without having to pay extra unnecessary fees to any of the debt relief companies.

Now let’s see what the Court of Appeal for British Columbia had to say about this 4 Pillars Consulting debt restructuring services business’s appeal from the lower court decision.

Class action waiver not effective to resist class action certification

The Court of Appeal of British Columbia believes the class action waiver clause is unenforceable as being contrary to public policy. The class action waiver significantly interferes with the administration of justice. It would have the effect of precluding class action lawsuits.

It has the impact of precluding Mr. Pearce, and class participants, from having access to justice and to a dispute resolution procedure in accordance with the law for claims developing from the connection between these parties. Therefore, the class action certification was upheld.

Other grounds of appeal in the 4 Pillars lawsuit

Having reviewed the evidence filed in respect of 4 Pillars’ applications for summary dismissal and after considering their arguments, the lower court judge was not satisfied that Mr. Pearce’s arguments in the 4 Pillars lawsuit, that 4 Pillars was acting for, or representing, a debtor in arrangements or negotiations with their creditors is bound to fail.

The evidence suggested that 4 Pillars had a role in the negotiations between a debtor and their creditors regarding a consumer proposal – even if they were not directly engaged with creditors.

The lower court’s view was there is a genuine issue to be decided at trial on a full evidentiary record. Accordingly, the judge dismissed the 4 Pillars attempt to strike the portions of the pleadings in respect of the Plaintiffs’ claims under the BPCPA.

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia agreed that it will be necessary to have a trial to figure out if claims can occur from offences of the BIA. Therefore, 4 Pillars was likewise unsuccessful in getting this issue stricken from the 4 Pillars lawsuit.

Trouble ahead for 4 Pillars in Ontario and elsewhere because of the class action in British Columbia?

It will be very interesting to see how this class action 4 Pillars lawsuit winds its way through the BC court. Absent an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, it is now game on. Mr. Pearce and all members of the class have the green light to continue the litigation. If successful, it goes to the heart of the 4 Pillars business model. Every franchisee across Canada needs to worry.

I hope you found this 4 Pillars lawsuit Brandon Blog informative.

Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Brandon Blog Post

LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE FOR BANKRUPTCY SIMPLE STEPS ON HOW TO AVOID BANKRUPTCY AND SAVE YOUR BUSINESS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 12, 2021

licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy on why businesses go bankrupt

In my last Brandon Blog, Business Bankruptcy In Canada: Discover The Causes Of Business Insolvency And Bankruptcy, I described the causes of business insolvency, the types of business entities normally found in Canada and tips on how to pull your business around back from insolvency.

Numerous businesses are battling to survive today, not to mention stay lucrative. They are scaling down or just closing their doors. They are accessing the available government support money for a business. Most entrepreneurs hesitate to seek the advice of a licensed insolvency trustee due to the fact that they are afraid all the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee or a trustee in bankruptcy) wants to do is be a trustee for bankruptcy.

In this Brandon blog post, I want to continue from the suggestions from my last blog, to show you exactly how that the last point I push for is to be a trustee for bankruptcy. I first look to reorganize your business. If your business or company remains in danger because of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, it will certainly be advantageous for you and also your organization to do so.

I will also show how sometimes, a trustee for bankruptcy or receivership, can actually help save parts of your business. The only other alternative could be to let all the business parts fail, which is the worst possible outcome.

The role of a debtor in bankruptcy or insolvency

Remember, I previously defined insolvency as a financial condition, where bankruptcy is a legal condition and a legal process. You will also recall that in my last Brandon Blog, I described the three common types of business structures in Canada; proprietorship, partnership and corporation. Just as these three business structures are different in form, they are also treated differently in insolvency vs bankruptcy. Here is how I differentiate the role of each debtor.

Proprietorship – Sole proprietorships are a type of business structure in which one individual is the sole owner of the business, which gives that person control over everything related to the business. This includes the business’ name, structure, accounting, legal obligations and tax responsibilities.

As I described last week, in Canada, the person, the sole proprietor, is carrying on business in their personal name, operating as the business name. You can register a sole proprietorship with the provincial government by completing an application form.

A sole proprietorship is the simplest kind of business structure. It permits an individual to sell goods or run a service with complete control of it on their own. Nonetheless, a sole proprietorship is not considered a separate legal entity from the owner. This means that any liabilities incurred by the business are also personal financial obligations of the owner.

So in an insolvency situation, all of the sole proprietor’s assets come into play as do all of his or her debts. It is not just the business assets and business liabilities. It is everything. This is the worst-case scenario for an entrepreneur.

So if the business is viable, and the personal assets and liabilities lead to the sole proprietor being in the situation where they can do a debt settlement plan, they can choose one of two options to restructure their entire personal financial situation. This assumes they cannot resolve their financial issues informally to bring their financial situation back to being solvent.

Partnership – A terrific way to begin a new business is teaming up with one or more people. All of you should enhance the group’s abilities as well as energy. Nonetheless, you also wish to be with people that are trustworthy, industrious and have a certain expertise that will help the business grow. Just like the way a proprietorship is one person, a partnership is made up of two or more people.

A partnership agreement is crucial. This is an agreement between the partners, describing the rights as well as obligations of each partner in the business. The same way a sole proprietor is personally responsible for the debts of the business and is putting all of their personal and business assets at risk, the same is true for partners in a business partnership. The partners are each liable for 100% of the business debts in case of insolvency. The partners cannot limit their liability to only their partnership share of the business.

Corporation – When you incorporate a business, it is a corporation. The company is a different legal entity from its owner shareholders. Shareholders are not responsible for the unpaid debts owed to financial institutions (normally a secured creditor), suppliers to the firm (normally an unsecured creditor) or the government. There are only two exceptions: (i) certain government liabilities that are a personal liability of a Director; and (ii) if the entrepreneur directly guarantees a financial debt of the company, such as a company loan, then that individual will have a liability with respect to such debt.

If the company’s financial future becomes bleak because it is insolvent, there are options. In my last blog, I talked about self-help remedies senior management of a company whose business is viable can try to informally bring the company back to a healthy financial state. You can re-read that blog to see the options available. If the self-help remedies do not work yet then we must look at more formal proceedings.

Licensed InsolvencyTrustee for bankruptcy: Settle with creditors and debt collectors without bankruptcy

In a proprietorship or partnership, if the underlying business is viable, then there are a variety of options to try to turn the business around yourself. You would use the self-help methods I described in my last blog. If the self-help options do not work, there are debt settlement options available to the individual(s) under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). They would be the only government-sanctioned debt settlement plan available in Canada. Either a consumer proposal or a Division I Proposal. You can read about how each one works by clicking on the following links:

In a successfully completed debt settlement program, the bankruptcy trustee would not be a trustee for bankruptcy. Rather, the trustee in bankruptcy would be an Administrator under a consumer proposal or a Proposal Trustee in the Division I Proposal.

If the business is not viable or the circumstances are such that a debt settlement plan is not feasible, then personal bankruptcy would be the only other option. You can read about how personal bankruptcy works by looking at our top 20 bankruptcy FAQs section. Upon the bankruptcy of the person, the sole proprietorship is automatically terminated.

Since a partnership is a way of carrying on business personally, then the same insolvency options available to the partners to the business debtor are also available. A restructuring is always preferred over a bankruptcy when the partnership is in financial difficulty.

For a debt settlement insolvency filing, the licensed trustee is not a trustee for bankruptcy. That is the case only if there is an actual bankruptcy assignment. Under provincial law, if a partner goes bankrupt, the partnership is automatically dissolved.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: Ask creditors to help you avoid bankruptcy of the corporation

Without wanting to sound like a broken record, you can review my prior blog to go over the self-help remedies for turning a business around, even if it is a corporation. A self-help remedy is always a great alternative to bankruptcy. If that isn’t appropriate, or just plain does not work, then you must get in touch with an insolvency trustee.

Again, if the company’s business is viable, then there are financial restructuring alternatives. these alternatives will be within a government-regulated insolvency proceeding. There are two formal restructuring statutes in Canada:

Division I Proposal under the BIA.
A restructuring Plan of Arrangement under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

In both cases, a company should retain the services of both a licensed trustee for bankrutpcy and a bankruptcy lawyer. The lawyer acts as legal counsel to the company. The licensed trustee will be both a financial advisor and steer the company through the restructuring process. The CCAA option is for companies with $5 million or more of debt. A BIA Proposal is for a company with any amount of debt. The main difference between the two processes are:

In a failed BIA Proposal, the debtor is immediately deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy. This is not the case in a failed CCAA Plan of Arrangement.
A CCAA proceeding is more costly as there are many more court appearances in that forum than in a BIA restructuring.

Using one of these two statutes to gain what is called in the media “bankruptcy protection” in order to work out a successful restructuring with your unsecured creditors is always preferable. The company will pay less than it owes while keeping its viable but insolvent business alive. Don’t underestimate the power of preserving jobs in the eyes of a court. A bankruptcy trustee can be very helpful in obtaining great results.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: When to consider an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors

If the business is not viable and is insolvent, then the only thing left to consider is an assignment in bankruptcy filing. It is definitely a last resort if everything I have already spoken about in this Brandon Blog just won’t work and you have run out of options. Trustees in bankruptcy always consider the alternatives to bankruptcy, but sometimes filing bankruptcy is the only option available.

In the case of a proprietorship or partnership, it is the individual sole proprietor and one or more of the partners who will be meeting with a trustee in bankruptcy and filing for a personal type of bankruptcy. the personal bankruptcy trustee will administer the personal bankruptcy estate. Again, you can read up on personal bankruptcy by looking at our top 20 personal bankruptcy FAQs section.

In personal bankruptcies, it will be either a streamlined system called a Summary Administration and if not, it is then an ordinary administration bankruptcy. Unlike a company, a person is ultimately entitled to a bankruptcy discharge.

When it comes to the administration of bankruptcy for a corporation, it is always an ordinary administration bankruptcy. The purpose of this Brandon Blog is not to run through all the steps in a personal or corporate bankruptcy process. Above I have provided some links to read up on debt settlement restructuring and personal bankruptcy. For corporate bankruptcy, I recommend that you read our corporate website page on corporate bankruptcy.

Alternatively, you can also read my previous Brandon Blog Bankrupting a Limited Company: Canadian Corporate Bankruptcy Process.

A trustee for bankruptcy administers the bankruptcy process for the benefit of unsecured creditors. Sometimes, it is a secured creditor who needs to enforce their security. They do not necessarily need the company to meet with a trustee for bankruptcy. Rather, the secured creditor needs the appointment of trustee to act not in a bankruptcy administration, but rather, to act as a receiver or receiver-manager to enforce the secured creditor’s position by taking control of the assets subject to the security and ultimately selling them. To read the receivership process, you can read the receivership section of our corporate website.

You can also read my Brandon Blog titled What Is A Receivership? Our Complete Guide To Receivership Solutions.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: How to avoid bankruptcy and save your business from closing

I hope you enjoyed the licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy Brandon Blog post. Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. As you can see from this blog, we are not just a trustee for bankruptcy. We believe every person and business should first explore debt settlement to avoid bankruptcy.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Brandon Blog Post

EQUALIZATION PAYMENT DIVORCE ONTARIO: THE BASIC RULE FOR MARITAL PROPERTY AND BANKRUPTCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date April 26, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click on the podcast.

Bankruptcy and divorce: Equalization payment introduction

The pandemic has taken a toll on couples both financially and psychologically, which has actually triggered many to consider going for separation and maybe even filing for bankruptcy. This is not to say that every bankruptcy causes a subsequent divorce, or that every separation will certainly necessitate the declaring of bankruptcy.

In my Brandon Blog dated March 2, 2020, titled “DIVORCE DEBT: NOT ALL EQUALIZATION ISSUES ARE EQUAL IN BANKRUPTCY” I described a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) where the court decided that the claim for an equalization payment is “personal as between the spouses” and cannot be started by the licensed insolvency trustee. However, if the claim was already started by the spouse prior to his or her bankruptcy assignment, then it is a claim for property that the Trustee can continue to advance.

I thought that was the end of the matter, but apparently not. The bankruptcy trustee, who could have left well enough alone, did not. The trustee in bankruptcy appealed the court’s decision to the Court of Appeal for Ontario. Recently, the three-judge panel released their decision of the appeal that was heard last November.

In this Brandon Blog, I discuss this recent Court of Appeal for Ontario decision dealing with an equalization payment, marital property, divorce and bankruptcy in Ontario.

Bankruptcy and property: Insolvency 101 on what happens to property in a personal bankruptcy

It is a fact that when someone files for personal bankruptcy, the bankruptcy provisions states that all of their property vests in the licensed insolvency trustee administering the file. There is a discrete list of assets set by every province in Canada that is exempt from seizure and therefore cannot be sold by the Trustee. Technically, the licensed insolvency trustee gives back to the bankrupt that property. In practical terms, the Trustee never seizes it. But whenever the topic of bankruptcy under federal bankruptcy laws gets mixed in with the Ontario Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3 (“FLA”), the discussion on matters about bankruptcy always starts to get murky.

A claim for an equalization payment by one spouse against the other in Ontario family law proceedings meets the definition of property. So if the spouse entitled to the equalization payment files an assignment in bankruptcy, that entitlement is their property which now vests in their licensed insolvency trustee. When collected upon, it is available to the bankruptcy estate and its creditors. However, what if that spouse has yet to make the equalization payment claim and goes bankrupt? Does the Trustee have the right to assert that claim?

What are equalization payments in divorce?

In Canada, each province sets their own family law statutes. When it comes to family property and divorce, there are two different possibilities in Canada. The province can elect for those divorcing spouses to have to split their property equally. This would make them a division of property province under family law.

Alternatively, rather than looking for a division of assets, the province can mandate that each spouse calculate their respective net family property. Then the spouse with the higher net family property value has to either pay money or transfer property to the other spouse so that they end up being equal. Hence the money that would be paid over from one spouse to another is called the equalization payment. This is what happens in Ontario. Ontario is not a property division province but rather is an equalization jurisdiction.

The application for equalization and the equalization payment is totally separate from the claim for and determination of spousal support and child support to the other. The equalization claim falls into the category of non-support-related spousal claims.

Rusinek & Associates v. Arachchilage & Baliah, 2020 ONSC 1090 (CanLII)

In my March 2020 blog referred to above, I described this Ontario family law case combined with the insolvency situation of bankruptcy. You can certainly read it if you want all the details. However, the bottom line of that decision is that under the FLA, the post-separation equalization claim is “personal as between the spouses”.

This means that if a spouse who subsequently becomes bankrupt had not yet made that claim, his or her Trustee cannot start the claim for the determination of equalization on the basis that the claim is a property that vests in the Trustee. However, if the claim had already been made and the equalization process litigation has already begun, and then that spouse becomes bankrupt, the Trustee does take over the right to advance that litigation against the non-bankrupt spouse for the equalization payment which stands in lieu of property rights. Whatever payment comes from it goes to the Trustee for the general benefit of the creditors.

Bankruptcy and equalization payments: Court of Appeal for Ontario says the timing of the bankruptcy matters

From what I have told you so far, you can see that the timing of the person’s voluntary assignment into bankruptcy or the Bankruptcy Order being made (from the filing of a Bankruptcy Application) does matter. For the trustee in bankruptcy to be able to assert that equalization payment claim, the bankrupt spouse had to have already made that claim prior to becoming bankrupt.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario considered the Trustee’s appeal of this lower court decision. It considered the laws around bankruptcy and the FLA and dismissed the appeal. I will now tell you why.

The Court of Appeal stated that a spouse’s claim for equalization becomes property of the bankrupt if that same spouse then declares bankruptcy. The action vests in the trustee in bankruptcy and the Trustee has control over the claim together with the right to get any unpaid equalization payment.

There is no restriction in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), under the FLA or in the common law, preventing the trustee in bankruptcy from going after it after the now-bankrupt spouse had already started that part of the Family Law litigation.

[NOTE: This bracketed portion is not part of the case heard by the Appeal Court, but this is the appropriate place to share this information with you. I think it is obvious that the bankrupt spouse would not start the equalization claim litigation while being an undischarged bankrupt. Otherwise, the Trustee would be entitled to the proceeds.

Also, presumably, the bankrupt spouse might do better if the non-bankrupt spouse only paid support instead of both support and equalization. I would advise the bankrupt’s family law lawyer to not make an equalization claim, and in return, negotiate for a larger support claim, in lieu of both.

A Trustee cannot directly attach to a support claim. The Trustee would just have to assess that information, along with whatever other income the bankrupt spouse has, to determine if there is any surplus income obligation.]

The Court then went through a thoughtful analysis of whether the entitlement to equalization can be initiated by the licensed insolvency trustee. The Court of Appeal concluded that because the action for equalization is “personal as between the spouses”, only spouses can bring claims for equalization. The Trustee cannot.

It is for these reasons that the Court of Appeal for Ontario confirmed the lower court decision, dismissed the Trustee’s appeal and awarded costs of $10,000 against the Trustee in favour of the non-bankrupt spouse respondent.

I will now go on to provide you with some extra information about divorce proceedings and bankruptcy.

How does an unpaid equalization payment intersect with bankruptcy?

In a bankruptcy, if the non-bankrupt spouse still owes the bankrupt spouse an unpaid equalization payment, the bankruptcy plays no part. That spouse still has to make the payment. Only now, it has to be made to the Trustee.

However, if the spouse who files for bankruptcy owes the non-bankrupt spouse an unpaid equalization payment, that liability is caught in the bankruptcy. The non-bankrupt spouse has a provable ordinary unsecured claim in the bankruptcy of the spouse. As stated above, the bankrupt spouse no longer has to make the equalization payment because it is an unsecured debt and will be discharged from that person’s discharge from bankruptcy.

What happens to spousal and child support payments during bankruptcy? Nothing. Any liability for support, either spousal support or child support, is not eliminated by filing bankruptcy. The bankrupt spouse still has to make those payments. Just like any other spouse, if the bankrupt spouse does not make the support payments, the spouse that is entitled to receive support can obtain collection assistance from the Ontario Family Responsibility Office.

What happens to joint debt if you file for bankruptcy?

Joint debt in a divorce is hard enough to sort out. Layer a bankruptcy on top of that and things may become much clearer, but also potentially unfair. When you file for bankruptcy and have joint debt, it is important to know what happens to the debt. The most common type of joint debt couples share is from joint credit cards. Next would be if one spouse co-signed for or otherwise guaranteed the debts of the other spouse. Other common examples are joint mortgages and joint lines of credit.

A creditor can collect the debt from both you and your co-signer, but in your bankruptcy, the law does not protect your non-bankrupt co-signer from your joint debt. If you file for bankruptcy, your creditors can still come after your co-signer for the debt.

If your estranged spouse is considering bankruptcy as a last-ditch effort to eliminate their overwhelming unsecured debt, it could spell trouble for you if they file for bankruptcy. When they file for bankruptcy, they are trying to erase their unsecured debt. Unfortunately, you will be saddled with the sole responsibility to repay those joint debts. You will have to try as best you can to be protected financially through the divorce process.

You need to decide how you will deal with these debts that your spouse won’t have to pay because of their bankruptcy. If you cannot afford to pay them on your own, in addition to your other living expenses, you may have to consider either bankruptcy or a consumer proposal as an option to save you from this catastrophe.

Are the bankruptcy rules fair, especially given the discussion above about the equalization payment? The BIA is the set of regulations and rules that govern a bankruptcy or insolvency in Canada. The BIA governs both people and companies that have come to be incapable to pay their financial debts. It handles the regulations for the time duration both leading up to insolvency and the declaring of bankruptcy.

The policies established by the BIA have a substantial impact on the lives of debtors and creditors. They are extremely crucial for the survival of the business or person. The rules are fair for everyone. But the effect they have on different stakeholders in an insolvency file may not be very fair.

Equalization payment and Ontario divorce and bankruptcy summary

I hope you enjoyed the equalization payment Brandon Blog post. You may be very frustrated and angry over your marital and financial situations. The entrepreneur may be very frustrated that the company can no longer pay all its debts as they come due.

There may be sufficient value to take care of the secured creditor, but nothing for anyone else, including the unsecured creditors. There may be some business units that should not survive, but if cut out, the business will be viable. A receivership might very well accomplish the goals for the entrepreneur also. I have many times structured a receivership process, in order to meet the goals of the entrepreneur, while satisfying the requirements of the secured creditor.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

equalization payment

Brandon Blog Post

FALSE PRETENCES: OUR STEP-BY-STEP NEW APPROACH CREDITORS MUST TAKE FOR THEIR CLAIM TO SURVIVE A BANKRUPTCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date April 12, 2021

If you would prefer to listen to this Brandon Blog’s audio version, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

False pretences and bankruptcy introduction

Just because you have filed for bankruptcy, doesn’t mean you are free and clear of your debts. In fact, some debts, such as those obtained with the use of false pretences, may not be discharged through bankruptcy at all.

A creditor can file a form 31 proof of claim for a debt incurred by false pretences. However, it takes more than just stating it in a proof of claim. A court must have made that determination. If not, the debt can be ruled as dischargeable through bankruptcy. But if the court has made that determination and it is the basis of the claim, that debt will not be discharged upon the bankrupt receiving his or her bankruptcy discharge.

I have discussed the topic of false pretences and bankruptcy before, but based on a recent Ontario court decision, I need to break down the basics of this type of debt and how it relates to a person’s bankruptcy.

What is a false pretence?

A false pretence is a false claim or statement made to induce a person to part with property or to give some valuable thing or advantage. It is a criminal offence in Canada. False pretences are the main element of the crime. The essence of this common law offence is that a person knowingly makes a false statement of fact, intending to induce the victim to act on it to his/her detriment. The reason why the false pretence is punished is that it is a fraud on the public.

Some people choose to give false information when they apply for credit or an extension of credit to make their financial situation look better. This is often done by people who have no intention of repaying the debt and therefore use certain fake information with the intent of deliberately misleading the creditor. They are hoping that the potential creditor will not verify all the information. They can get away with this when they are not required to prove false information with the creditor.

Crimes of Dishonesty: What is the criminal offence of false pretences?

The offence of false pretences is a criminal offence that occurs when a person obtains property from another person by deceiving or defrauding the other person. This can be done either by a false representation of existing facts or by a false promise. The person must intend to defraud and in doing so possess the intent to commit an offence. This is a fairly complex offence under paragraph 362(1) of the Canadian Criminal Code and includes a wide variety of possible scenarios. More often than not, it involves obtaining personal property under false pretences.

Section 362(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada states:

“Every one commits an offence who

(a) by a false pretence, whether directly or through the medium of a contract obtained by a false pretence, obtains anything in respect of which the offence of theft may be committed or causes it to be delivered to another person;…”

If you have been charged with a criminal offence under subsection 362(1)(a) of false pretence in Canada, you need to ensure you have a good defence. Sometimes, it is a difficult offence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The only thing the Crown really needs to prove is that you made a false representation to obtain the property of another and that the other person believed you (and was therefore defrauded). It is up to you to ensure that you have a good defence.

But I am not writing this Brandon Blog to focus on criminal behaviour. Rather, I want to discuss this concept from the perspective of someone who might file an assignment into bankruptcy.

Debt arising from false pretences not released by the bankrupt’s discharge

Section 178 (1)(e) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) states that an order of discharge does not release the bankrupt from any type of financial obligation or liability arising from obtaining property or services by false pretences or fraudulent misrepresentation other than a debt or liability that arises from an equity claim.

In the past, it was quite customary for a creditor seeking judgment for recovery of a debt who is alleging that the debt arises from circumstances caught by section 178(1)(e) of the BIA to also seek both the civil judgment for the money and also a declaration in the judgment that the debt is one of the debts that falls into the category of not being released just because the bankrupt received his or her bankruptcy discharge. This relief was sought even though the defendant was not involved in any bankruptcy proceeding.

In the past, the courts have provided such relief where the evidence before the court substantiated it, notwithstanding the defendant was not an undischarged bankrupt. There are now two cases in Ontario that say such a dual judgment, both the civil award of money plus the BIA debt declaration will not be made anymore where there is not an actual bankruptcy proceeding.

The most recent false pretences released decision in Ontario – *Bank of Montreal v. Mathivannan, 2021 ONSC 2538***

On April 6, 2021, the Honourable Justice Kurz of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released his decision in this case. The Bank of Montreal (BMO) was attempting to get a summary judgment against a defendant for $35,723.71 plus pre as well as post-judgment interest as a result of an unpaid conditional sales contract.

BMO alleged in its statement of claim that the claim arose because the defendant had fraudulent intent by purposely misrepresenting her employment and employment income in her application for credit, being a statement in writing, under a conditional sales agreement for an automobile. The false document application was made to the dealership for financing to purchase a vehicle from it. The conditional sales agreement was then assigned to BMO as a normal financing business practice that is used.

The defendant was noted in default. Under the rules, when noted in default, it is as if the defendant admitted the allegations of fact contained in the statement of claim. However, the opposite is not true. The plaintiff is not necessarily entitled to a judgment merely because the allegations of fact are deemed to have been admitted. They actually must be proven.

The deemed admissions of fact that come from the statement of claim are that:

Defendant made certain representations as to her employment and her employment income.
BMO relied on those representations and provided the defendant credit.
Those details supplied by the defendant were false.
That false information was created solely for the objective of defrauding BMO to advance credit for the purchase of the vehicle.
BMO gave the credit based on those representations.

The court’s decision regarding the false statements in the credit application document

The court determined that BMO’s statement of claim:

Falls short to state how the false statements meet the test for false pretences or fraudulent misrepresentation.
It did not say whether they were significant or not.
The affidavit evidence used to support the statement of the claim simply offers the verdict that they were false and illegal.
With those non-inclusions, the pleadings in the claim do not support a finding of fraudulent misrepresentation or false pretences.

The court had no problem in giving BMO judgment for the civil claim for money, being the $35K plus pre and post-judgment interest. Where the court had a problem was in the evidence of the fraud. Therefore, the request for the additional relief of stating that the debt is one not released by the defendant’s discharge when she obtains her discharge from bankruptcy has not yet taken place.

The court did not grant the additional relief to protect this claim in the event the defendant ever declared bankruptcy. But there is another, and in my view, deeper reason, which all plaintiffs finding themselves in the position of BMO and seeking the same kind of two-phase relief must keep in mind.

The court should not issue hypothetical decisions even with deceitful conduct

The court did not doubt that the defendant made the false statement. What the court said, following the decision of the trial judge in Royal Bank of Canada v. Elsioufi, the Honourable Mr. Justice Dunphy, that there was not an essential legal basis to determine fraud to approve the civil monetary judgment requested. Justice Kurz followed the thinking of Justice Dunphy by stating that even if a positive finding of fraud were called for to release a judgment, he would certainly refrain from doing so.

That is because it would stand for a theoretical declaration applicable to a bankruptcy case before that proceeding beginning. Justice Kurz also concurred with Justice Dunphy that courts ought to make decisions based on examined evidence and not only based on admissions or even on consent.

So the old-fashioned method in Ontario of bringing to court the request for not only a civil monetary judgment, but also a declaration that the debt falls under s.178(1) of the BIA and therefore not discharged upon the discharge of the bankrupt is over. In the words of Justice Dunphy:

“I am moved to issue this brief endorsement for publication purposes as I have noticed a growing practice of some to request such declarations on a routine basis. I may even have signed one or two before giving the matter further thought and research and I have concluded that the practice is to be discouraged.”

Justice Kurz refused to grant BMO any sort of special costs in its motion, as it did not need to make that kind of motion merely to get the civil monetary claim in a judgment.

***False pretences*: A new creditor blueprint is needed**

Now that at least in Ontario, if the old way will not work anymore, what is a creditor to do now? It is not only for a claim falling under false pretenses or fraudulent misrepresentation but potentially many other of the classes of debts falling under section 178(1) of the BIA including false pretences or fraudulent misrepresentation.

The above-noted court decisions can be instructive. First, if a plaintiff believes that the debt was incurred because of a type of fraud, including false pretences or fraudulent misrepresentation, hard evidence should be provided to the court. Proof using genuine documents, a copy of original documents proving breach of trust, is evidence that should be included.

It should not merely be a deponent’s or plaintiff’s conclusion given the known facts being deposed. It should support a finding of the fraud, even though the court may refrain from making a finding of fraud to deliver a civil monetary judgment in favour of the plaintiff. Providing this evidence will be important later on.

Next, there must be an actual bankruptcy. Either the person must have recognized their financial condition of insolvency and filed an assignment in bankruptcy or a creditor have the court issue a Bankruptcy Order against the person. It could even be the judgment creditor able to prove that the person ought to be adjudged bankrupt.

Third, once bankrupt, the judgment creditor should file a proof of claim with the licensed insolvency trustee administering the bankruptcy estate. Proof of the debt would be the judgment which would be attached to the proof of claim and marked as “Schedule A”.

Fourth, does the plaintiff continue to believe that the claim falls under one of section 178(1) of the BIA exclusions and would survive the person’s discharge from bankruptcy, such as false pretences? If so, then the creditor can make an application to the bankruptcy court to lift the stay of proceedings against the bankrupt, for the creditor to attempt to obtain a judgment from the court that the claim of that creditor is not released by the discharge of the bankrupt.

Fifth and final, the creditor having obtained such leave, can then make a new application to the court for the specific finding that the court refused to make in both of the cases I discussed above. The original evidence supplied by the creditor in its original application will now become very important for the court to review. That is why I said it should be pleaded, with evidence when the civil monetary judgment was sought so that it could be relied upon now.

False pretences summary

I hope you enjoyed the false pretences Brandon Blog post. Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags Bank of Montreal v. Mathivannan, bankruptcy and insolvency act canada, common law offence, crimes of dishonesty, false pretence, false pretences, false pretences and bankruptcy, false statements, form 31 proof of claim, fraudulent intent, fraudulent misrepresentationi, licensed insolvency trustee, personal property, proof of claim, Royal Bank of Canada v. Elsioufi, Section 178 (1), what is a false pretence, what is the criminal offence of false pretences

Brandon Blog Post

How Much Does A Consumer Proposal Cost: We Show You Our Rules To Make It FREE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date April 5, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Only pay a Trustee for consumer proposal services

This Brandon Blog answers the question “how much does a consumer proposal cost?”. There is one thing that I want to get out of the way first, that directly impacts the cost of a consumer proposal. The only party authorized by law to administer a consumer proposal in Canada are licensed insolvency trustees (formerly called bankruptcy trustees).

There are many firms that advertise that they will settle your debts without you having to see a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy). They sell you on the sizzle of staying away from a licensed trustee implying that visiting a reputable bankruptcy trustee will immediately mean that bankruptcy will be your only option.

These firms promise a lot but deliver little or nothing. In return, you need to pay the high fees. Then, when they have charged you everything they can, they walk you down the street to a licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee) to administer a consumer proposal for you. So they end up taking you to the exact professional they first told you to avoid when they cannot charge you any more fees. Why can’t they charge you any more fees? Because by then, you have wised up to their game!

So do yourself a favour. The easiest way to know how much does a consumer proposal cost is to make an initial Trustee visit for a no-cost initial consultation to learn all your debt relief options and forget about the non-licensed debt management company.

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Getting rid of debt

When you are buried in debt, things like saving for the future can seem impossible. This is because you are trying to climb up a hill with a heavy backpack on your back, making it hard to take a step forward. You may even be tempted to stop trying when you hear everyone else talking about how they are able to save so much, but you wonder why you can’t.

If you’re looking at a pile of unpaid bills and thinking, “I just can’t afford to make those payments” or “I can’t believe I’m falling so far behind,” you’re not alone. But you’re not hopeless. It is possible to get out from under crushing debt and start getting ahead. The first step is to stop making the situation worse with missed payments and late fees. To do this, you need to make a plan.

Managing your debt is a lot like dieting – it looks easy and straightforward on the commercials, but when you get down to doing it, it’s a whole different story. There are hundreds of books and websites out there, each with different tips and techniques that you can follow to help you get a handle on your debt. Here are a few things to consider:

As I have written in several blogs before, a self-help remedy is always the best. First look at all your monthly income sources and all your expenses for a typical month. Create a budget showing what it all is so that you can figure out how much more you are spending each month than you earn. Now, look critically at all your behaviours during a typical month that leads to that spending. What can you cut out?

Also, look at your total monthly income. Do you have the time for and ability to either get a second part-time job or create a side hustle for yourself in order to earn more income? Based on all this reflection, what is the best budget you can come up with to try to spend no more than you earn, after-tax? This will let you see if you can work yourself out of your financial challenges by having excess money each month to pay off your debts or not.

If yes, terrific. Put your plan into play and pay down your debts. Curb your credit card spending so that you only charge what you can pay off by the due date. If not, then perhaps you need to visit a Trustee.

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Get a personalized debt free plan

When people talk about getting out of debt, it can sometimes be hard to know where to start. If you’re stressed about your financial situation, the last thing you want is to be confused by too many options and not know what to do. Thankfully, there’s a way to get a personalized debt-free plan that will help you figure out what to do and how to get out of debt. We can help you develop a debt relief plan that will put you on the path to a debt-free life.

If you have overdue consumer financial debts, you are receiving telephone calls from financial debt collectors. Although personal bankruptcy gives a fresh start for those that are drowning in debt, in my view, it is the last resort for those that have maxed out their credit cards. If you require an financial clean slate, a consumer proposal is an excellent way to relieve yourself of the stress and anxiety of too much debt. It is the only federal government-approved method for debt settlement.

In an initial no-cost consultation with a Trustee, all possible debt relief options will be discussed. At the end of the consultation, you will have a clear understanding of what personalized debt-free plan is best for you. Let us know dive deeper into how much does a consumer proposal cost.

How much does a consumer proposal cost: A negotiated debt settlement

You can easily look back on some of my earlier blogs to refresh yourself on all the details of what a consumer proposal is and how it works, including my Brandon Blog CONSUMER PROPOSAL FAQ: ANSWERS TO 10 TANTALIZING CONSUMER PROPOSAL QUESTIONS. To save you time, the important points to remember are that in the consumer proposal process:

You can settle your unsecured debts totalling a level of debt of $250,000 or less, not including any mortgages or lines of credit secured by way of a mortgage or other charge against your personal residence.
The settlement of debts will be at a total dollar settlement value much less than the total outstanding debt you owe.
The amount you will have to pay in a consumer proposal is based on what your creditors can expect from your bankruptcy. The bankruptcy statute in Canada states that your offer in the consumer proposal must be better than what your unsecured creditors would receive in your bankruptcy. Although there is no guarantee as to what the final amount will be, as a general rule of thumb, you can consider a consumer proposal totalling 25% of the total amount you owe as a good rule of thumb.
You can take a period of time up to 5 years to make monthly consumer proposal payments to the Trustee, who acts as the Administrator of your proposal, to pay the entire consumer proposal fund. The Trustee then makes the required creditor distributions to your unsecured creditors on a pro-rata basis.
A Trustee is the only debt professional in Canada who is licensed and supervised by the Canadian government, through the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada. A Trustee is the only professional that can offer consumer proposals services.
how much does a consumer proposal cost

The Cost of a Consumer Proposal in Ontario

In Canada, the term consumer proposal refers to a formal, legally binding arrangement between a debtor and creditors, involving a lump sum payment spread over equal monthly payments to the Trustee but taking no more than 60 months.

This money is then used by the Trustee to make the necessary creditor distributions in return for a consumer proposal discharge. The creditors agree to accept a portion of the outstanding debt in full settlement. A consumer proposal is a viable option for those who are having trouble paying their debts because they are disabled, unemployed, or have suffered a loss of income.

How much does a consumer proposal cost is on everyone’s mind when they contemplate filing one. When we think of cost, our minds first go to “how much will the licensed trustee charge me for all this?”. The reality is that the amount the insolvent debtor will have to pay to the Trustee who is called the Administrator in a consumer proposal to create the proposal fund is a direct result of what the unsecured creditors could expect to receive in the debtor’s bankruptcy filing. The statute says that the offer to the unsecured creditors has to be better than what they could expect to receive in the debtor’s bankruptcy.

Let’s look at a real example so I can better illustrate this. Assume we have an insolvent debtor who would be a first-time bankrupt. Assume that their personal situation in their filing for bankruptcy is as follows:

Surplus income payments of NIL.
Assets realization of $20,000 and non-exempt assets therefore not sold by the Trustee.
Total liabilities of $173,000.

So in this bankruptcy process, the total fund that would provide for the payments to creditors would be $20,000 in the bankruptcy. The fee and disbursements allowed for the Trustee in this bankruptcy example are governed by the bankruptcy statute. The fee is therefore called a tariff fee. For purposes of figuring out what kind of consumer proposal would be required, the tariff fee of the Trustee in this bankruptcy is irrelevant.

Assuming the person in this example did not commit any sort of bankruptcy offence, there is nothing more to discuss as to what each creditor could expect out of the bankruptcy. They would receive their pro-rata share of the distribution.

In order for a consumer proposal to be a better alternative for the unsecured creditors, I suggest that a consumer proposal filing offering a total payment of $25,000 payable in regular monthly payments over a maximum five-year period would be appropriate.

This is the cost of this consumer proposal in Ontario, $25,000. As this example shows, how much does a consumer proposal cost has zero relationship to what my Firm would earn as the Administrator.

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Consumer proposal costs in Ontario

As the Administrator of a consumer proposal, I am entitled to a tariff fee stipulated in the Rules to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). There are also some administrative expenses and taxes to be paid. What the tariff allows, to be paid from the consumer proposal fund, is as follows:

$750 payable on filing a copy of the consumer proposal with the Official Receiver;
$750 payable on the approval or deemed approval of the consumer proposal by the court;
20% of the money distributed to creditors under the consumer proposal, payable on the distribution of the money;
the costs of counselling at $85 per session, payable after each session, to a maximum of two sessions;
the fee payable to the official receiver in the amount of $100, payable at the time of filing a copy of the consumer proposal;
the fee payable to the registrar in the amount of $50, but only if you have to go to Court; and
all applicable taxes for GST/HST.

The final amount payable not listed above is the levy payable to the federal government calculated at 5% of any distribution made to the creditors. This payment to the government is what pays for the administration of the Canadian bankruptcy system.

So taking the above example of the $25,000 consumer proposal, the consumer proposal calculation assuming everything went smoothly and there was no need to go to Court would go as follows:

Category	$
Payment under proposal	25,000.00
Counselling fees (2 x $85) for Administrator	170.00
The fee paid to the Official Receiver	100.00
Administrator’s fees	1,500.00
HST on above fees ($2,250)	292.50
The amount available for distribution	22,937.50
Administrator fee of 20% of the money distributed to creditors	4,587.50
Applicable HST	596.37
5% Levy payable	887.68
Total amount to be distributed to the unsecured creditors	16,865.95

So in this example, out of the total consumer proposal fund of $25,000:

- The amount paid for the consumer proposal is $25,000.
- This represents 14.5% of the total liabilities.
- The Administrator earned fees (net of HST) totalling $6,257.50.
- The Administrator earned fees are paid for by the unsecured creditors as it is deducted from the amount they would otherwise receive.

Therefore, how much does a consumer proposal cost the insolvent debtor? The cost to the debtor for the Administrator’s services is FREE!
how much does a consumer proposal cost

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Get a personalized debt free plan today

I hope you enjoyed this how much does a consumer proposal cost Brandon Blog post. Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

how much does a consumer proposal cost

Tags bankruptcy statute, Consumer Proposal, consumer proposal filing, consumer proposal payments, crushing debt, debt professional, debt relief options, debt settlement, Get a personalized debt free plan, getting rid of debt, how much does a consumer proposal cost, licensed insolvency trustee, monthly income, negotiated debt settlement, only pay a trustee for consumer proposal services, personal bankruptcy, settlement of debts, the cost of a consumer proposal in ontario, trustee in bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

HOW TO BEAT 407 PLATE DENIAL RULES EACH AND EVERY MONTH FOREVER

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date March 10, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

how to beat 407 plate denial

How to beat 407 plate denial: What happens if you don’t pay 407?

Last week I received an inquiry from a woman who owes 407 ETR some $25,000. She wanted to know how to beat 407 plate denial. Being a licensed insolvency trustee and having written on the topic before, I thought it was already well known that there is only one real sure-fire way to beat them from denying your plate sticker when you show up to pay your renewal plate fee. So I am writing this Brandon Blog as a refresher since it is still a question people ask.

If you’re not paying your 407 tolls, chances are you’re going to get a letter in the mail asking you to pay up. You’ve probably also heard that the 407 is a hotbed for toll dodgers, but how many of them actually get found out?

According to figures from the 407 ETR, the company’s collection agencies and police forces find that only about 2% of toll dodgers pay up voluntarily. However, 407 ETR has the ultimate collection weapon; Ontario can enforce plate denials against those who have an outstanding 407 toll bill. People are always interested in how to beat 407 plate denial.

How do I fight my 407 payment?

You really cannot fight with 407 on your payment. The tolls are calculated based on your usage of the toll road. They know where you entered and exited the highway. They also have a picture of your vehicle and plate. So, unless you can prove that the amount you were billed is false charges, you cannot fight it. You may be able to negotiate, sort of, but you can’t fight it.

Can you negotiate 407 bill?

The 407 bill is one of the most intimidating bills that people receive in Ontario. It is called the 407 bill because it is associated with the 407 highway and that’s also where the tolls are collected. The 407 bill is the toll amount that you need to pay based on your trip. If you drive on the 407, you will have to pay the 407 bill.

The 407 bill is issued by 407 ETR, a company that operates the 407 highway. If you have received a 407 bill, you should pay it right away. If you do not pay it, you will receive a collection notice from the company.

407 ETR offers an Exceptional Hardship plan to aid consumers that have accumulated substantial tolls and who would suffer “exceptional hardship” with the denial of their licence plate. The plan permits a consumer to pay the amount owing over an agreed time period, rather than all at once.

Approval is at the sole discernment of 407 ETR. Their decision is final and there is no avenue for appeal. As you can see, it isn’t much of a negotiation.

As you will see below, the only way to successfully negotiate the 407 bill is with the assistance of a licensed insolvency trustee.

How to beat 407 plate denial: Does 407 affect credit?

It’s common knowledge that unpaid traffic tickets can result in fines and penalties galore, but did you know unpaid 407 ETR tolls can also result in toll fines and penalties? And, like unpaid traffic tickets, they can also affect your credit score and therefore your credit rating. When you do not pay your bills on time, they will eventually send the unpaid bills to a collection agency. Once in the hands of the collection agency, it gets reported to the credit bureaus. That reporting negatively affects your credit score.

How to beat 407 plate denial: Can 407 ETR garnish wages?

If 407 ETR sued people in court and obtained a judgement, then yes they could garnish wages. But they don’t sue. Rather, they rely upon their powers of license plate suspension to block those seeking license plate renewal.

It is stopping anyone from being able to how to beat 407 plate denial that is the real collection tool. That is the reason why 407 ETR had to amend their procedures because of a Supreme Court of Canada decision.

If you can’t pay the 407 toll charges, only a licensed insolvency trustee can show you how to beat 407 plate denial

Denying license plates were found by the court to be a collection tool. In Canada, there is only one professional who can stymie the 407 collection tool. So if you can’t fight 407 bills and you really can’t negotiate with them, then how to beat 407 plate denial seems to be a long shot, no? That is where the Supreme Court of Canada in the “Moore Decision” comes into play.

Our firm, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., has assisted individuals in negotiating their 407 bills. A debtor who becomes our client is very easy to work with since they do not deny that they have debt and they know that they must pay. Our firm takes the 407 on. We start communicating with them by listing 407 ETR as a creditor in your bankruptcy or consumer proposal.

How to beat 407 plate denial: Highway Toll Arrears and the “Moore Decision”

In my blog titled 407ETR FAIRNESS-ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL ENSURES FRESH START I described to you the decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in 407 ETR Concession Company Limited v. Superintendent of Bankruptcy (In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Matthew David Moore) (the Moore Decision).

The highway’s owners appealed that decision to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC). On Friday, November 13, 2015, the SCC released 3 decisions all dealing with the very same fundamental problem: does the federal government’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) take paramountcy over provincial laws professing to handle the concerns of debt and bankruptcy in Canada. The SCC answer was a resounding YES!

What did the SCC decide about the provincial law about 407 debt settlement?

The SCC dismissed the appeal of the 407. The SCC considered whether the plate denial stipulations of the Highway 407 Act conflicted with the discharge provisions of the BIA. 407’s position was that provincial regulation about plate denial needs to apply after a person’s discharge from bankruptcy. The Attorneys General for several provinces, including Ontario, advanced arguments on behalf of the right of the province to enforce all laws for vehicle licensing.

The SCC’s decision supported the Moore Decision which found that the discharge section of the BIA bypasses and overrides the plate rejection arrangements of the Highway 407 Act.

What is the effect of a bankruptcy or consumer proposal on ETR debt settlement?

The effect of the SCC’s decision is that pre-bankruptcy amounts owed to the ETR are provable claims under the BIA and the plate rejection scheme under the Highway 407 Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 28 can no longer be used to collect pre-filing amounts. Therefore, 407 etr financial debt settlement is possible.

Upon the filing of bankruptcy or consumer proposal, in which 407 ETR is provided for in the sworn Statement of Affairs as a creditor, 407 ETR will remove from plate rejection any amount still owing from the period before your Assignment in Bankruptcy, or filing of consumer proposal (that includes interest and any other type of charges incurred on those amounts). The Ministry of Transportation will be told to amend its records to show this change.

You will be removed from plate denial if:

you have not incurred any type of brand-new financial obligation with 407 ETR for which you might remain barred from how to beat 407 plate denial since the filing of your bankruptcy or consumer proposal; and
you have no debts with the Ministry of Transportation (e.g. parking tickets) causing plate denial.

In both instances, once the balance owing is adjusted from your account, then, the individual is allowed to get plate renewal from the Province.

***How to beat 407 plate denial*: This seems to be the end of the discriminatory plate denial**

407 ETR must and is following the SCC decision. They have set up the procedure for those who have been rejected from plate renewal and who have filed either for bankruptcy or a consumer proposal. The 407 ETR debt, including penalty and interest, is reversed and plate revival issued.

Remarkably enough, there was no evidence whatsoever in any one of the Court hearings, including this one heard by the SCC, as to the 407 ETR’s right to reject anyone from providing credit to them. When you get your transponder, the 407 ETR is actually extending credit to you, in the form of using the toll highway with the promise to pay when your bill arrives. It is no different than you making purchases on your credit card and your bank expects you to pay them when it shows up on your bill.

How to beat 407 plate denial summary

I hope that you found this how to beat 407 plate denial Brandon Blog interesting. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags 407 etr, 407 ETR bill, 407 ETR Concession Company Limited v. Superintendent of Bankruptcy, 407 tolls, Bankruptcy, Can 407 ETR garnish wages, Can you negotiate 407 bill, Does 407 affect credit, Highway 407 Act, How do I fight my 407 payment, how to beat 407 plate denial, Ira Smith Trustee, license plate renewal, license plate suspension, licensed insolvency trustee, Matthew David Moore, proposal, What happens if you don't pay 407

Brandon Blog Post

SMALL BUSINESSES IN CANADA ACCUMULATE MASSIVE DEBT DUE TO COVID-19

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date March 1, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this small businesses in Canada Brandon Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast.

Small businesses in Canada introduction

Did you know that since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak 1 year ago that small businesses in Canada racked up $135 billion worth of debt to stay afloat? Seven in 10 small businesses in Canada have actually borrowed money because of COVID-19. The average is almost $170,000 per business, according to a new survey released by the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB). In total, small businesses in Canada currently owe a cumulative $135 billion.

Out of these businesses that have increased their debt, 76% say it will take them over a year to pay it off. Eleven percent of respondents worry that they might not have the ability to repay their COVID-19 associated financial obligations ever! As far as returning to normal profitability (before the additional COVID-19 debt repayment), 40% are hoping to see it in 1 year’s time, but they really worry that it will take longer.

The purpose of this small businesses in Canada Brandon Blog is to discuss how important small business really is to the Canadian economy and what options exist for businesses and companies facing insurmountable debt challenges. Sometimes I will refer to small businesses in Canada as SMEs.

Contribution of SMEs to Canadian business

The best way to describe the contribution of SMEs to the Canadian economy is by looking at the most recent facts about small businesses in Canada reported by Statistics Canada.

How many businesses in Canada are small businesses?

The widely held definition of a small business corporation is a company that employs no more than 500 people and that has a total asset value of less than $15 million. Most of us have heard that a “small business” is one that employs fewer than 50 people — and that a “big business” has more than 500 employees. But what about businesses that fall in the middle? They are not quite small, but they’re not quite big either; they all fall into the category of SMEs.

In Canada, 91 percent of businesses fall into this in-between category, and there are roughly 3.5 million businesses in total. That’s a lot of businesses to keep up with.

What is the contribution of SMEs to exports in Canada?

Small businesses in Canada are not just small versions of large companies. They are different beasts altogether, and their individual contributions to the Canadian economy are just as important as those of their larger counterparts. In fact, SMEs contribute almost 50% of the country’s exports, and if they were taken out of the picture, exports would fall by almost 40%.

In 2018, exports of items were valued at $522.8 billion, of which 41.1 percent was attributable to SMEs. More than 50,000 Canadian companies exported goods, the huge majority of which were SMEs (97.4 percent).

How many people were employed in Canada in 2019?

In 2019, roughly 16.1 million people were employed in Canada. Private sector businesses employed 76.2% of the total number. The public sector employed the balance of 23.8%.

The definition of small businesses in Canada ranked by firm size using the number of employees are:

Small companies (1 – 99 workers)
Medium-sized businesses (100 − 499 workers)
SMEs (1 − 499 employees)
Large companies (500+ workers).

What is the distribution of employment across the private sector?

The variety of people employed defined by the business size of the employer varies significantly between the private and public sectors. In 2019, 88.5% of employed individuals in the economic sector worked for small businesses in Canada, compared with 76.2 percent of those used by public companies of the same dimension.

For the five-year period 2014-2019, Canadian employment ranks had a net gain of 1,076,100. Just over 70% of this increase is attributed to the private sector employment and less than 30% to the public sector.

How many businesses appear and disappear each year?

From these statistics, we see that the contribution of SMEs to economic growth is huge. These small and medium-sized businesses make up the majority of businesses in Canada. These key small business statistics show just how important these Canadian businesses are to the survival of the Canadian economy.

An increase or decrease in the number of businesses is the net result of the appearance or disappearance of businesses over a given period. This is often referred to as “creative destruction.” Between 2001 and 2016, the business birth rate was greater than those that died, except for two: in 2013 and in 2016, when more businesses disappeared (97,151 and 95,889) than were created (95,326 and 95,176),

There are more business births each year than those that disappear, other than for 2 years; 2013 and 2016. According to a Business Development Canada report from the Business Development Bank of Canada, there are more than a quarter of a million businesses in the country at any one time each year. More than 40,000 disappear.

The report was based on data from Statistics Canada’s Business Demography Statistics, which tracks businesses based on the number of active and inactive corporations, and Entrepreneurship in Canada, which tracks self-employed and “indeterminate” businesses. The Statistics Canada information is that business formation is on the rise, and the rate of business deaths has decreased.

This variation between the average birth rate for these two sectors can be explained by the entry cost and different levels of competition. If this is, indeed, the case, higher birth rates would be observed in sectors with a lower entry cost or with a higher level of competition than other sectors.

So more small businesses in Canada appear than disappear every year according to these findings. These statistics of course were from time periods all before the coronavirus pandemic.

What proportion of new businesses survive the first 15 years?

Every year, an average of 128,000 new businesses are started in Canada. According to the CFIB, about 10% of these new businesses close their doors within the first year. By year 10, that number has risen to 25%. Those are pretty alarming statistics, no matter how you look at them.

What this means is that most new businesses are doomed to fail in their first year, and many of the rest will only survive a few years beyond that. Here are some more alarming statistics on the percent of SMEs enterprise survival rate:

there is a 45.8% chance that a business will survive for one year;
a 32.3% chance that it will survive for two years;
an 18.3% chance that it will survive for three years; and
a 9.5% chance that it will survive for five years.

How many small businesses in Canada could close permanently amid a pandemic

The number of small businesses in Canada that survive for ten years (and beyond) is quite low, so it is important to recognize those that are able to make it. So two essential business owner characteristics have to be eternal optimism and being a solid business planner when starting a new business because of the high failure rate.

Now take those long odds for a business survival rate and layer a global pandemic on top of that. The COVID-19 pandemic is nerve-wracking enough to the general public, but for many small business owners, it is downright terrifying. According to the CFIB, close to half of the country’s small businesses could close permanently. The CFIB‘s findings were based on responses from 1,800 small business owners. The CFIB called for the government to provide small business owners with the tools they need to protect themselves and keep their businesses afloat.

The Public Health Agency of Canada reported an even scarier estimate. It felt that up to 70% of small businesses in Canada could close permanently amid a pandemic. The reason? Employees and customers won’t show up. The industry sectors that will be affected the most are the ones whose employees and customers are the most mobile and those whose employees have to work in crowds, like cabs, the hospitality industry, food and beverage, and theatres.

From what we have seen so far, they are correct.

The need for government assistance for Canadian business

Given this result, the Canadian federal government is investing heavily in maintaining and creating jobs to help the struggling Canadian economy. One of its investment vehicles is Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan which I have previously written about. This program is aimed at supporting business sectors that create jobs here.

This financial help program is designed to assist businesses that are having difficulties because of the pandemic-caused state of the economy. It is intended to support businesses that create jobs. Although many of the support programs have now ended, the Economic Response Plan still has the following programs:

Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS); and the
Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA) interest-free loan
small businesses in canada

Saving small businesses in Canada

So before COVID-19 arrived here, the odds were always against Canadian start-up businesses having a healthy long-term survival rate. With the pandemic, credible Canadian organizations estimate that we could lose 50% (CFIB) to 70% (Public Health Agency of Canada) of small businesses in Canada.

The life support program federal and provincial governments have instituted help. Multiple lockdowns obviously do not. What is really needed is some sort of return to normal operations so that business revenue can return. Then hopefully over time, profitability will follow. But that is really outside of all of our control.

However, as a licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee), there are things we are currently doing for businesses that cannot see any short-term prospects for being able to overcome their debt problems on their own. The kinds of businesses that we are seeing fall into two categories; viable and non-viable.

The first thing I do as a Trustee is to get a good understanding from the business owner as to the history of the business and the reasons why the business owner believes the company has gotten itself into financial trouble. I also want to get a snapshot of what the assets and liabilities of the business are and I try to form an assessment as to whether the business is viable or not. Even if viable, does the entrepreneur have the energy, mindset and desire to manage a business turnaround. Finally, I need to understand the cash flow requirements of the business and is there a source of funding.

I then analyze all this information and form an opinion as to what the realistic options are for the company and its business. Depending on each situation, the range of options are:

The business operations and debt levels are such that they are not serious enough and the company, over time, should be able to work itself out of a short-term cash crunch through some imaginative management of the company. Perhaps even an informal restructuring of sorts.
The business is viable but needs to do a formal restructuring in order to keep the good parts of the business so that it can become profitable again and continue to provide jobs to Canadians. The process would be either a Division I Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or a Plan of Arrangement under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA).
If a formal restructuring is not possible, perhaps a sale of the business assets is required and the buyer will operate the assets as an operating business. In this case, a secured creditor will enforce its security in a receivership, through either a private appointment or a court appointment.
Finally, maybe corporate bankruptcy is required either in concert with the secured creditor enforcement or by itself if there are no secured creditors. This would allow for the necessary protection to give the time to liquidate the assets, either as a going concern sale or a pure liquidation. The funds obtained from the sale would then be paid to the creditors, in priority of their claims.

Entrepreneurs are obviously scared of any formal insolvency proceeding

The idea of a formal insolvency proceeding makes an entrepreneur feel like a failure. I know they can feel discouraged, but the business isn’t in trouble because senior management did something wrong. You didn’t fail. Business conditions changed. Especially under today’s pandemic circumstances.

Now you’re ready to move forward with your business, but you need some help. That’s what the BIA and CCAA are designed to do; to help your business make a new start. Insolvency proceedings are there to provide a safety net for people and companies. It’s a tool that responsible people use to save a good business after a setback.

Don’t worry what your customers might think about you if your business goes through a formal insolvency proceeding. You won’t be the first and you won’t be the last.

Small businesses in Canada summary

I hope that you found the question posed in this small businesses in Canada Brandon Blog. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with theIra Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags Business Development Canada, canada emergency business account (ceba), canada emergency wage subsidy cews, Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan, Canadian Federation of Independent Business, cfib, How many businesses appear and disappear each year?, How many businesses in Canada are small businesses?, How many people were employed in Canada in 2019?, How many small businesses in Canada could close permanently amid a pandemic, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, small businesses in canada, small businesses in Canada racked up $135 billion worth of debt, Statistics Canada, Statistics Canada's Business Demography Statistics, What is the contribution of SMEs to exports in Canada?, What is the distribution of employment across the private sector?, What proportion of new businesses survive the first 15 years?

Brandon Blog Post

FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY: CAN YOU FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY CANADA FROM THE LUXURIOUS CARIBBEAN?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 22, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast.

File for bankruptcy introduction

You have all probably read about or heard about the Ontario judge who presided over Toronto-area court cases from the Caribbean. With today’s technology, it is electronically possible to attend Zoom court from anywhere in the world. That got me thinking. Can a Canadian file for bankruptcy from the Caribbean or anywhere else in the world?

So I did the research. In my opinion, using what is right now permissible technology, I think it is possible for a licensed insolvency trustee to either accept a Canadian filing bankruptcy or make it happen from the luxurious Caribbean or anywhere else outside of Canada. In this Brandon Blog, I will explain the bankruptcy process and why I think a person or company can file for bankruptcy from outside Canada.

You owe money: Considering bankruptcy?

To file for bankruptcy is a difficult decision to make, especially considering the financial and personal consequences it has on you and your family. But sometimes, there is no other option. If you find yourself unable to pay your debts, filing for bankruptcy may be your best bet for a fresh financial start. But before you decide to file for bankruptcy, you must assess your situation and understand the consequences.

It’s easy to be overwhelmed when you’re facing the prospect of filing for bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is a complicated legal proceeding, and the law has established procedures that must be followed in a specific order. If you’re considering bankruptcy, it’s important that you understand how the process works and the critical role a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called either a trustee in bankruptcy or a bankruptcy trustee (Trustee) plays in that process.

As a Trustee, I can tell you that bankruptcy is a serious undertaking. It can have a big impact on you financially and emotionally, and there are many important decisions you must make before, during, and after the process. The decisions you make now will have a big impact on your future. As a Trustee, I always first try to help people and companies look at the alternatives to bankruptcy in order to avoid bankruptcy, rather than file for bankruptcy. Personal bankruptcy or business bankruptcies are truly a last resort when there is no other choice.

How to file for bankruptcy Canada: Let the licensed insolvency trustee no-cost consultation happen first

You may be considering filing for bankruptcy in Canada because you have debts that you can no longer pay. If you are drowning in debt, you might feel like there is no way out. But bankruptcy isn’t the end of the world. In fact, it can help many people get a fresh start by eliminating debts they can no longer pay. But as I always say, an individual or company may not need to file for bankruptcy. You have to consider all of your options. But in this section, we will focus on the bankruptcy filing process.

It all starts with you going to see a Trustee for a free, no-obligation initial consultation. The Trustee will listen to the facts you describe and ask you some questions to gain a better and deeper understanding of your specific situation. The Trustee will then tell you about the various debt relief options he or she believes are available to you. The Trustee will then provide you with his or her recommendation as to what is best for your situation and why.

Many factors will play into the Trustee’s recommendations, especially around your debt issues, including:

The types of debts.
Your unsecured debt vs. secured debts.
Do you have any student debt and if so, when did you graduate from the program that you acquired the student loan debt for?
The total amount of your Canadian debts and any foreign debt you may have.
Is Canada Revenue Agency hounding you for tax debt?
How appropriate are all the various debt options for your situation?
What percentage of debts are related to your assets that you cannot afford to lose.
What is the nature and extent of all of your assets?
Which assets are exempt from seizure and which are non-exempt?
Do you have any joint (co-signed) debt and how will your insolvency filing affect the other person?
Is the pressure from debt you are feeling right now require an immediate filing or could you wait a bit to see how some things play out over the short-term future?
Do you need immediate protection from debt and the related creditors or debt collectors taking collection actions right now such as trying to enforce against your assets, sue you or garnish your wages under a judgement?
How is your burden of debt currently affecting you and your family?
Comparing your current debt situation pre-filing to what your debt after filing and after your discharge will look like under each of the available alternatives.
How does the Trustee’s debt assessment factor into the realistic alternatives available to you to avoid bankruptcy?
Does your debt level at this stage that of overwhelming debts or are you right now only feeling mild indigestion? Perhaps you could work out of your debt problems on your own with just one or two strategies the Trustee will share with you at the no-cost consultation stage.

The Trustee considers all of this to see if you have an unmanageable debt to determine the best options available to you, including having you file for bankruptcy. You don’t want to do a consumer bankruptcy filing for yourself or have your company filing bankruptcy if it is not necessary to fix the debt problems.

How to file for bankruptcy – How the bankruptcy process starts

Alright, now for getting to answering the question I posed in the title and at the beginning of this Brandon Blog. Can a Canadian file for bankruptcy from the luxurious Caribbean? Can Canadian bankruptcy filings start from outside of Canada? To answer this question, we must look at what are the requirements of both the debtor, be it a person or company, and the Trustee, for a bankruptcy file to begin? All of my comments below, with appropriate amendments for context, will apply to:

an individual filing a debt settlement consumer proposal;
a person filing for personal bankruptcy;
either a person or a company filing a debt settlement financial restructuring proposal under Part III Division I of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA); or
a company filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the debtor and Trustee met in-person at the Trustee’s office in order for the Trustee to assess the debtor’s financial situation. If an insolvency process was required to help fix the debtor’s financial problems, then there was also an in-person meeting at the Trustee’s office to sign up the filing documents. Since the pandemic began, the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) Messages to LITs concerning COVID-19 gave Trustees the authority to hold meetings by video conference. This is how the whole world has been operating for almost 1 year now. So this is how the insolvency process begins.

In addition to the initial consultation and signup. other meetings are also held via video meetings. Examples are a Meeting of Creditors and the two credit counselling sessions. Although the OSB’s guidance does say that Trustees can use methods other than in-person…..” for those areas where they have an approved resident or non-resident office…” keep in mind that a Trustee is licensed to act within an entire province! I won’t get into the semantics of the apparent conflict between the OSB’s guidance and its licensing approval process in this Brandon Blog.

Who can file for bankruptcy?

Any insolvent person can file for bankruptcy. Section 2 of the BIA defines an insolvent person as:

“insolvent person means a person who is not bankrupt and who resides, carries on business or has property in Canada, whose liabilities to creditors provable as claims under this Act amount to one thousand dollars, and

(a) who is for any reason unable to meet his obligations as they generally become due,
(b) who has ceased paying his current obligations in the ordinary course of business as they generally become due, or
(c) the aggregate of whose property is not, at a fair valuation, sufficient, or, if disposed of at a fairly conducted sale under legal process, would not be sufficient to enable payment of all his obligations, due and accruing due;”
So to file for bankruptcy, amongst other requirements, the person or company must reside, carry on business or have property in Canada.

The locality of the debtor

Once all the documents are signed up to file for bankruptcy, the Trustee has to file them with the OSB in the “locality of the debtor“. Section 2 of the BIA defines “locality of the debtor” as:

“locality of a debtor means the principal place

(a) where the debtor has carried on business during the year immediately preceding the date of the initial bankruptcy event,

(b) where the debtor has resided during the year immediately preceding the date of the initial bankruptcy event, or

(c) in cases not coming within paragraph (a) or (b), where the greater portion of the property of the debtor is situated;”

If the debtor has been living in the Caribbean for 4 months immediately preceding the date of the filing of the assignment in bankruptcy, do they qualify? The answer is yes. Court decisions have determined that the word “during” means “at some time” during the year preceding the date of bankruptcy. It does not mean continuously. So during these pandemic days where we meet with everyone online, it is possible for the Canadian person to be in the Caribbean, meet with the Trustee for the initial consultation, decide on an insolvency process, in this case, bankruptcy and then initiate the bankruptcy proceedings, all from the luxury of a Caribbean vacation spot.

Let’s not delve into how a debtor who needs to file for bankruptcy can afford to live in the Caribbean or whose villa it is. That is beyond the scope of this Brandon Blog.

What about the Trustee?

The same way the debtor, or a judge, can transact business by video meeting from outside Canada, the same is true for the Trustee. As long as the Trustee can access all his or her office documents and systems online from outside of the office, there is no reason why the Trustee could not operate from the Caribbean as well to handle the person or company that wants to file for bankruptcy.

I am not advocating for this position, especially when you consider both the danger of and the appropriateness of travelling during these times of hardship and sacrifice. But since the question was “Can a Canadian file for bankruptcy from the Caribbean or anywhere else in the world?”, the answer is YES.

So whether you are a judge in the Ontario court, an insolvent debtor or a Trustee, I do not see any legal reason why someone could not file for bankruptcy from the Caribbean or anywhere else in the world.

File for bankruptcy summary

I hope you enjoyed the file for bankruptcy Brandon Blog post. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags avoid bankruptcy, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, Consumer Proposal, debt assessment, debt collectors, debts, file for bankruptcy, filing bankruptcy, insolvency, insolvent person, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, locality of the debtor, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada, student debt, Toronto-area court cases, unsecured debt

Brandon Blog Post

RACHEL UCHITEL: Her Astonishing Story on Seduction, Addiction, Celebrity Rehab & Bankruptcy

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 15, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

The Rachel Uchitel story

Rachel Uchitel was an American night club manager. She gained popularity for her involvement in the Tiger Woods sex scandal. Currently, she is making news for a different reason – bankruptcy. Her father died when she was only 15 years old. She lost her fiance in the 9/11 tragedy.

She has been quoted as saying that her dad’s fatality had a big impact on her life. Maybe that can describe her as “looking for love in all the wrong places“. But a lot more on that particular later.

In reading about her background, you could reach the conclusion that she was just a pillow-lipped party girl. It may feel like she has actually committed her adult life to arrive on the social scene and in show business. Nonetheless, she does have a college degree in communications. In 2002, Rachel Uchitel was a Bloomberg television producer. But it is clear that she turned away from Bloomberg news to seek her fame and fortune as a star celebrity.

I think you will find this Brandon Blog is very different from most of the others. I tell a bit of the Rachel Uchitel story. I tell her story not to be salacious, but to highlight how real addictions can lead to a person’s downfall. Even a famous celebrity type and how their troubles can lead to bankruptcy.

Rachel Uchitel and the Bottle Girls

Starting in 2008 in Las Vegas, a team of young women called the “Bottle Girls” began to appear on the scene. It wasn’t long before these ladies were creating a great deal of enthusiasm from the public as well as the financial investment community. Before the coronavirus pandemic, Bottle Girls were a typical sight at some of the most preferred clubs and bars in Las Vegas. They are young, gorgeous women that stand outside of the bar or casino and try to people to go into the establishment to partake in all that it has to offer.

While they may be scantily clad to stand out, they are the friendly girl next door type. Rachel Uchitel was a bottle girl.

Nightclub hostess and NHL Rangers good luck charm

Rachel Uchitel was one of the most famous people hosting in New York, and her links with nightclub managers had been invaluable to the New York Rangers. Soon after she started dating then-Ranger Sean Avery, the team started winning. So it’s reasonable that the Ranger players and then-coach Tom Renney held her in high regard.

Her grandparents owned the Manhattan El Morocco supper club in the 1960s. Famous people like President John F. Kennedy and Cary Grant frequented the place on a regular basis. She held on to her family’s memorabilia, and her dream has always been to one day re-create a contemporary version to be a nightclub owner.

What Rachel Uchitel is most famous for

As the story has it, Rachel Uchitel and Tiger Woods first met at the Griffin, a former club in New York’s Meatpacking District. The American nightclub manager was the director of VIP services. In interviews, she would often stress that it was her duty to greet important patrons such as Tiger and also ensure that they were having fun. After that, she met Tiger a number of times more before they hooked up with each other.

When the news came out concerning Tiger’s extramarital relations, Rachel Uchitel was caught up in the media storm and the face of one of the greatest celebrity cheating scandals. She was called an “alleged mistress” and dealt with public scrutiny over this.

When Tiger Woods drove his vehicle into a fire hydrant in November 2009, the headlines weren’t regarding the accident itself. They were about Rachel Uchitel, the American model and one of the most notorious women connected to the pro golfer. She came to be the face of his affairs regardless of dozens of allegations from women of sexual affairs with Tiger that appeared shortly thereafter.

As you may remember, the fling notoriously finished when Woods’ angered his better half Elin Nordegren who chased him from their Florida home brandishing a golf club after discovering saucy messages from Rachel Uchitel on his phone. Horrified Woods then banged up his car backing up into a fire hydrant and his neighbour’s tree. Nordegren later got an estimated $100 million in their divorce. It was not a pretty picture.

Rachel Uchitel was paid $10 million in 2010 after signing a non-disclosure contract meant to acquire her silence over the affair. Yet a year later, she was forced to hand most of the money back by her then-lawyer Gloria Allred after discussing her fling with Tiger when she appeared on Celebrity Rehab.

The Rachel Uchitel Addiction

Nowadays, it feels like lots of people are addicted to something. The one-way ticket to dependency seems to be love. The love of money, love of sex, love of liquor, even the love of food. Addiction has actually brought about a lot of issues in our society. The concern is, what’s the dividing line between addiction and a healthy and balanced relationship?

Rachel Uchitel says she had a love addiction. Looking back on her affair with Tiger Woods, she says that she didn’t think she was a love addict. Rather, she said the affair with such a famous person wanting to have sex with her was her way of validating her own self-worth. She did not lump herself in with drug and alcohol addicts. Yet her striving to prove her own self-worth was through a love addiction.

She may not be alone. According to an American survey, one in 10 Americans claims to be head over heels in love with someone who does not love them back. This is a statistic that appears to support the claim that love dependency is an actual, diagnosable condition. The study, conducted by the American Psychiatric Association, also discovered that 7% of Americans made love with a person they understood had not been helpful for them, just because they felt they could not quit the relationship.

Rachel Uchitel really did not include herself in with drug addicts, alcoholics and those with gambling issues. However ultimately, she did come to the realization that she did need to go to rehab. She got assistance to understand and overcome her sex addiction.

Rachel Uchitel is now bankrupt

Rachel Uchitel has recently been making more headlines not in a good way. The 45-year-old-woman at the time filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection last July. She has since turned 46. She listed her main creditors like American Express and Deutsche Bank, both of whom are owed more than $595,000.

She additionally owed more than $10,000 in an unsettled lease on her Manhattan home and racked up a bill of $164,770 on a 2nd Manhattan residence. Rachel Uchitel says she has not worked since her children’s clothing shop closed in 2019.

She described herself as jobless in her Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. She is likewise on the hook for another $17,339 in tax debt in addition to $23,694 due to a New York law firm. rachel uchitel

Rachel Uchitel on the HBO documentary talks about Tiger, boyfriends and marriage

Rachel Uchitel is currently showing up in the HBO documentary Tiger, where she discusses her affair with him in detail for the very first time. It is unknown whether she was paid to be on the program.

Ms. Uchitel asserts that the huge majority of her financial obligations to be discharged were directly related to her kids’ clothes shop business which proved to be not financially viable. She stated she had directly guaranteed debts of the business, leaving her no choice but to go into bankruptcy.

When asked if her connection with Woods was to blame for her financial troubles, Rachel Uchitel reacted saying, “No, I don’t think so. There’s no correlation between golf and bankruptcy.“

Is Chapter 7 one of the types of bankruptcies in Canada?

No. Chapter 7 bankruptcy is one of the bankruptcy Chapters under the US Bankruptcy Code. It is the most common type of bankruptcy in the United States. This chapter of the Bankruptcy Code is for the liquidation of the debtor’s non-exempt property and then distributing the funds realized to the creditors in priority. It is not meant as a restructuring tool or to implement a debt settlement plan.

In Canada, there is no such thing as Chapter 7. Here in Canada, it is just called either personal bankruptcy or consumer bankruptcy. As in the US, this is not one of the types of bankruptcies in Canada that would be used to do a restructuring to implement a debt settlement plan. Rather, personal bankruptcy in Canada is also for the liquidation of the debtor’s non-exempt property so that funds can be distributed to the creditors. In Canada, the bankruptcy system is operated under the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

Bankruptcy and addictions

The Canadian insolvency process is geared to deal with debts resulting from any kind of addiction. It does not only deal with the debts caused by borrowing money to feed an addiction. The insolvency process is uniquely positioned to deal with the person’s total rehabilitation. When the person hits rock bottom with debts they cannot repay and no more credit to keep borrowing to feed the addiction, a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) is positioned to help not only with the debt issues but also the rehabilitation issues.

My firm has been involved in helping many people out of their debt problems arising from addiction issues. The most common are gambling, alcohol and drug addictions. But a love addiction can be just as troublesome. Professionals have referred their family members suffering because of an addiction to me.

In my January 31, 2018 blog, GAMBLING DEBT BANKRUPTCY: CAN GAMBLING DEBT BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY?, I discussed from a procedural view the issue of gambling debts and bankruptcy. In my January 30, 2019 GAMBLING DEBTS HELP blog, I focussed on how the insolvency process, especially bankruptcy, can deal with overall rehabilitation.

The addict is not an awful person but they do have an awful problem. They need the support of their family, family friends and medical professionals. If addiction has led to unmanageable debt, that is where a licensed insolvency trustee fits in to be part of the team helping the honest but unfortunate person. If Rachel Uchitel was living in Canada, a proceeding under the BIA would help her get rid of her debts.

The Rachel Uchitel story summary

I hope you enjoyed the Rachel Uchitel Brandon Blog post. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags addiction, American night club manager, bankruptcy trustee, Bottle Girls, celebrity cheating scandals, Celebrity Rehab, Chapter 7, Chapter 7 bankruptcy, consumer bankruptcy, El Morocco, Elin Nordegren, HBO documentary Tiger, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, personal bankruptcy, pillow-lipped party girl, rachel uchitel, Tiger Woods, Tiger Woods sex scandal

Brandon Blog Post

LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY FACING INSOLVENCY MAKES STARTLING CCAA NEWS FILING FOR CREDITOR PROTECTION

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 8, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy, and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast.

UPDATE MAY 5, 2021: SEE OUR UPDATED BLOG PUBLISHED TODAY ON THE LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY INSOLVENCY CREDITOR PROTECTION PROCEEDINGS STATUS – CLICK HERE FOR THE UPDATE

Laurentian University introduction

Laurentian University is facing a cash crisis and has filed for creditor protection. The Ontario university states that the application under the federal Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) is intended to permit the university to continue running day-to-day operations during restructuring.

The Sudbury, Ontario school is not shutting down and will continue to provide services for students. It states it will keep normal operations and keep classes running. In this Brandon Blog, I talk about what creditor protection in the Canadian context is and why Laurentian University did so.

***Laurentian University: What is creditor protection***?

In its simplest terms, creditor protection is the protection you get when you start a proceeding with a filing under either the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or the CCAA. Under the BIA, an individual or company gets that protection in either a consumer or corporate bankruptcy. This safeguard is also obtained by filing under the restructuring proposal provisions of the BIA. A company safeguards itself when it files for restructuring under the CCAA.

Once a filing is done, without getting special permission from the court, none of your creditors can start or continue legal action against the person or the company for the repayment of a debt or for any enforcement action against its assets.

Laurentian University, therefore, received its sheltering once it made its filing under the CCAA. When using this statute, it can also be called CCAA protection.

Below is the section titled “How the Laurentian University restructuring story begins”. I discuss its particular issues leading up to the need to file.

Laurentian University: What is a stay period?

The “time out” that a person or business gets from its creditors is called a stay period (Stay of Proceedings). Upon the agreement of the court to the initial filing, the result is that the court will issue an Order giving the company an initial 30 days of protection from creditors to allow for the preparation of the restructuring proposal called a Plan of Arrangement.

This initial stay can be extended by the court, as long as the judge is convinced that the company is acting in good faith and working expeditiously in sorting through the myriad of issues stopping it from putting together its Plan of Arrangement.

Laurentian University: What does CCAA mean

The CCAA is a Canadian federal law that helps companies in financial difficulties emerge from its difficulties. The company begins its reorganization proceeding with its application to the court and files for creditor protection to avail itself of the process for a company and its creditors to come to an agreement on how to reorganize the company’s debt, while the company continues to operate normally and pay amongst other things, wages to its employees.

One of the biggest advantages of the CCAA is that it allows a business to “hold the fort” while the creditors and the company work out an agreement that will hopefully get the company back on its feet. While operating in this fashion, company management remains in control of running the business. The company does not hand over its assets to a licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee). Rather, the Trustee is appointed by the court to act as Monitor.

As the title sounds, the role of the Monitor is that of the neutral court officer working with the company. The duties of the Monitor include:

overseeing and providing supervision of the company’s affairs;
assisting in the negotiations with creditors;
helping with the drafting of the Plan of Arrangement for describing what the restructuring process will be;
report regularly to the court on the progress and details of the restructuring administration, and ultimately,
conducting the meetings of the various classes of creditors where voting on the Plan of Arrangement takes place.

Although the CCAA is unique to the country of Canada, other countries have similar restructuring legislation. The most famous is probably Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. This is when you normally hear the term “bankruptcy protection“.

Laurentian University files to reorganize university finances

Last Fall, Laurentian University recognized it was in financial trouble. On October 1, 2020, it issued a press release advising that it has financial challenges brought on by the global COVID-19 pandemic and its pre-existing structural deficit. It also announced at that time that it hired Ernst & Young as financial advisors to assist in a further review of its detailed financial results, budgets, and our various initiatives to help identify and analyze any additional opportunities for cost savings or improvement.

On February 1, 2021, facing insolvency, Laurentian University took the step to begin its insolvency proceeding under the CCAA in order to come up with a formal restructuring plan. Since it is in the early stages of the insolvency administration, the actual plan has not yet been developed as Laurentian University needs time to come up with the proper plan. It will be one of many future events I will keep my eye on for you.

From my review of the filing documents, I can tell you what the story is so far.

How the Laurentian University restructuring story begins

“We are working with all stakeholders to ensure a smooth process for students,” said Peter Baxter, the university’s provost and vice-president, academic.”

Who would’ve thought that universities, which are supposed to be institutions of higher learning, would actually run into financial problems and put their stakeholders at risk? But that’s exactly what happened and is the current situation with the Laurentian University insolvency in Sudbury, Ontario. I guess the place was not run by any of the finance profs! It is obviously a stressful time for all students, staff, faculty, and creditors.

Dr. Robert Haché, the President and Vice-Chancellor of the Laurentian University of Sudbury, swore the necessary affidavit on January 30, 2021, in support of Laurentian’s court application for an Initial Order to commence CCAA proceedings. In his affidavit, Dr. Haché stated:

Laurentian’s financial issues were first determined as early as 2008-09 when a prior administration gave a budget to the Board that would not be balanced for the 2008-2009 academic year and showed little to no improvement for the future financial prospects of the university absent any revised processes. The budget was approved, but the Board expected the financial situation to be fixed as a top priority item.
A Plan for Regaining Sustainability at Laurentian was presented to the school’s Board on December 18, 2008, and again on February 20, 2009. The Board approved the implementation of the plan, expecting to regain financial health over a three-year period.
Starting in 2014, Laurentian undertook a $64 million Campus Modernization Project for the construction of approximately 250,000 sq. ft. of classrooms, research, study as well as a public area.
The Campus Modernization Project involved Laurentian incurring a substantial amount of long-term debt (approximately $40 million) to pay for the construction of buildings and facilities to modernize the campus in order to accommodate its historical growth and fuel the projected enrolment growth. The university elected to defer repayment of the principal amounts borrowed until after construction was completed, leading to the accrual of further interest.
When the Board approved the 2016-17 operating budget, LU forecasted operational deficits continuing through 2021-22 leading to an accumulated operational deficit of greater than $43 million.
With the exception of the modest growth experienced in 2020, enrolment has declined each year from 2015 to 2018 and tuition fees remain low, while labour and debt servicing costs have grown substantially.
The 10% tuition reduction and tuition freeze ordered by the Province of Ontario beginning in 2019.
Laurentian’s academic costs are generally higher as a percentage of total costs than other Ontario universities.
Not re-evaluating over the last decade its programs to make sure it is focusing on those the marketplace of students deem relevant and required.
The COVID-19 pandemic has made all these issues worse.

From reading his sworn affidavit, I would use one simple word to describe what has led to the Laurentian University insolvency – MISMANAGEMENT! Dr. Haché joined Laurentian University in July 2019. So he has only been involved in this mess for the last 19 months.

What Laurentian University reports its immediate plans are by making this CCAA filing

Laurentian University reported that as at April 30, 2020, it had $358.5 million in assets based on generally accepted accounting principles. Of that total, only $33.2 million is either liquid or near-liquid. As at the same date, its liabilities are:

Line of credit $14.4 million
Short-term loan $1.4 million
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $22.4 million
Accrued vacation pay $1.8 million
Deferred revenue $1.0 million
Current portion of long-term debt $2.7 million
Long-term debt $89 million
Employee future benefits liabilities $20.8 million
Deferred contributions $38.6 million
Deferred capital contributions $129.9 million

This adds up to $322 million. The balance sheet balances because the remainder represents either restricted capital or special purpose endowments.

Laurentian University advised the court that it intends to come back requesting an Amended and Restated Initial Order. Right now, Laurentian has the benefit of the Stay of Proceedings and will not be making any payments on any outstanding amounts owing as of February 1, 2021.

Among other things, the motion in respect of the Amended and Restated Initial Order will seek the following additional relief:

extending the Stay of Proceedings to April 30, 2021;
suspending Laurentian’s requirement to make certain special payments in respect of its defined benefit pension plan, pending further Order of the Court;
suspending Laurentian’s need to reply to requests for information received under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (Ontario) during the Stay of Proceedings, nunc pro tunc to February 1, 2021;
the appointment of a mediator, as an officer of the Court and a neutral third party to undertake a mediation of various issues under the supervision of this Court, on an urgent basis;
approving Laurentian’s request for a debtor-in-possession credit facility (the “DIP Facility”) borrowing authority up to the principal amount of $25 million to finance its working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes, post-filing expenses and costs during the Stay of Proceedings.

The court has now declared that Laurentian University is insolvent. I will be following this CCAA administration and will write more blogs on material points of special interest as this restructuring winds its way through the court.

Laurentian University summary

I hope you enjoyed the Laurentian University Brandon Blog post. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you in such a time of uncertainty is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy, and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags bankruptcy and insolvency act canada, bankruptcy protection, CCAA, classes of creditors, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, covid-19 pandemic, Dr. Robert Haché, Ernst & Young, initial order, Laurentian University, licensed insolvency trustee, plan of arrangement, protection from creditors, restructuring proposal, stay of proceedings, what does ccaa mean, what is a stay period, what is creditor protection

The 4 Pillars lawsuit class-action

4 Pillars lawsuit: What is a class action proceeding?

Debtor Warning – Debt Consultants Sometimes Not What They Appear

What 4 Pillars say their organization’s role is

What the Court of Appeal for British Columbia says about the role of 4 Pillars

4 Pillars lawsuit: What do the 4 Pillars debt consultant’s services actually involve?

Is Debt Settlement Really Worth It?

Class action waiver not effective to resist class action certification

Other grounds of appeal in the 4 Pillars lawsuit

Trouble ahead for 4 Pillars in Ontario and elsewhere because of the class action in British Columbia?

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy on why businesses go bankrupt

The role of a debtor in bankruptcy or insolvency

Licensed InsolvencyTrustee for bankruptcy: Settle with creditors and debt collectors without bankruptcy

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: Ask creditors to help you avoid bankruptcy of the corporation

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: When to consider an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: How to avoid bankruptcy and save your business from closing

Bankruptcy and divorce: Equalization payment introduction

Bankruptcy and property: Insolvency 101 on what happens to property in a personal bankruptcy

What are equalization payments in divorce?

Rusinek & Associates v. Arachchilage & Baliah, 2020 ONSC 1090 (CanLII)

Bankruptcy and equalization payments: Court of Appeal for Ontario says the timing of the bankruptcy matters

How does an unpaid equalization payment intersect with bankruptcy?

What happens to joint debt if you file for bankruptcy?

Equalization payment and Ontario divorce and bankruptcy summary

False pretences and bankruptcy introduction

What is a false pretence?

Crimes of Dishonesty: What is the criminal offence of false pretences?

Debt arising from false pretences not released by the bankrupt’s discharge

The most recent false pretences released decision in Ontario – Bank of Montreal v. Mathivannan, 2021 ONSC 2538

The court’s decision regarding the false statements in the credit application document

The court should not issue hypothetical decisions even with deceitful conduct

False pretences: A new creditor blueprint is needed

False pretences summary

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Only pay a Trustee for consumer proposal services

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Getting rid of debt

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Get a personalized debt free plan

How much does a consumer proposal cost: A negotiated debt settlement

The Cost of a Consumer Proposal in Ontario

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Consumer proposal costs in Ontario

How much does a consumer proposal cost: Get a personalized debt free plan today

How to beat 407 plate denial: What happens if you don’t pay 407?

How do I fight my 407 payment?

Can you negotiate 407 bill?

How to beat 407 plate denial: Does 407 affect credit?

How to beat 407 plate denial: Can 407 ETR garnish wages?

If you can’t pay the 407 toll charges, only a licensed insolvency trustee can show you how to beat 407 plate denial

How to beat 407 plate denial: Highway Toll Arrears and the “Moore Decision”

What did the SCC decide about the provincial law about 407 debt settlement?

What is the effect of a bankruptcy or consumer proposal on ETR debt settlement?

How to beat 407 plate denial: This seems to be the end of the discriminatory plate denial

How to beat 407 plate denial summary

Small businesses in Canada introduction

Contribution of SMEs to Canadian business

How many businesses in Canada are small businesses?

What is the contribution of SMEs to exports in Canada?

How many people were employed in Canada in 2019?

What is the distribution of employment across the private sector?

How many businesses appear and disappear each year?

What proportion of new businesses survive the first 15 years?

How many small businesses in Canada could close permanently amid a pandemic

The need for government assistance for Canadian business

Saving small businesses in Canada

Entrepreneurs are obviously scared of any formal insolvency proceeding

Small businesses in Canada summary

File for bankruptcy introduction

You owe money: Considering bankruptcy?

How to file for bankruptcy Canada: Let the licensed insolvency trustee no-cost consultation happen first

How to file for bankruptcy – How the bankruptcy process starts

Who can file for bankruptcy?

The locality of the debtor

What about the Trustee?

File for bankruptcy summary

The Rachel Uchitel story

Rachel Uchitel and the Bottle Girls

Nightclub hostess and NHL Rangers good luck charm

What Rachel Uchitel is most famous for

The Rachel Uchitel Addiction

Rachel Uchitel is now bankrupt

Rachel Uchitel on the HBO documentary talks about Tiger, boyfriends and marriage

Is Chapter 7 one of the types of bankruptcies in Canada?

**The 4 Pillars lawsuit class-action**

**What 4 Pillars say their organization’s role is**

The most recent false pretences released decision in Ontario – *Bank of Montreal v. Mathivannan, 2021 ONSC 2538***

***False pretences*: A new creditor blueprint is needed**

***How to beat 407 plate denial*: This seems to be the end of the discriminatory plate denial**

***Laurentian University: What is creditor protection***?