Tag: Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act

STUDENT LOANS DEBT: WILL BANKRUPTCY ELIMINATE IT IF YOU ARE NOT THE STUDENT?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date April 25, 2016

An interesting American case about student loans debt

Student loans debt is nearly impossible to get rid of in bankruptcy. A case winding its way through the US court system has piqued our intellectual interest. A father, who is a discharged bankrupt, is taking the lender who HE borrowed funds from for his child’s education to Court. The lender is continuing to pursue collection efforts against the father on the basis that the provisions of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as amended, codified in Title 11 of the United States Code and commonly called the “Bankruptcy Code” (“Code”), does not release the father from what is in reality student loans debt. The father is taking the lender to Court for a ruling that by virtue of his discharge, he is released from that debt like all his other debts. It has raised the question whether the same student loans debt rules should apply in that case.

The Canadian perspective

We are not qualified to express any opinion on the US legal case before the US Court, but we are qualified to discuss the issue from the Canadian perspective. We started thinking whether this same situation could arise in Canada for student loans.

Last week we discussed student debt bankruptcy from the perspective of the student. Previously, we have written blogs and created a vlog about student loan debt, including:

So this week, we’re discussing student loan debt and bankruptcy from a very different and interesting angle. Could a Canadian lender take the position against a Canadian parent borrower who on the loan application described the purpose of the loans for the funding of his or her child’s Canadian post-secondary education, that the loans qualify as student loans under the applicable Canadian statutes, including, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). Stated otherwise, are such loans the same as student loans under Canadian law and can bankruptcy cut such loans if you’re not the student?

Are student loans necessary?

Many young Canadians need student loans to get a post-secondary education. To qualify as Canadian student loan debt, the loans must be issued under a specific Canadian student loan statute: the (i) Canada Student Loans Act; (ii) Canada Student Financial Assistance Act; (iii) Apprentice Loans Act; or (iv) any enactment of a province that provides for loans or guarantees of loans to students.

All students need financial help to be full-time university students. The only real places that such assistance can come from is either the parents, if they are willing and able to do so, student loans, or both. Many Canadian parents pay a hefty part of students’ tuition fees, even if it means sacrificing their financial stability, to help their children avoid a post-graduation life burdened by tens of thousands of dollars of student debt. Others may wish to, but they cannot afford to do so.

So are student loans and the resultant debt necessary? In most cases, yes.

Can a parent co-sign for or guarantee their child’s student loans?

The short answer is no. As I have already stated, to qualify as a student loan, the loan has to be made under the provisions of one of the Federal loan statutes mentioned above, or any such similar Provincial legislation. Nowhere in those student loans statutes is there a place for either a guarantor or cosigner. In fact, the Federal statutes all have similar language stating that upon the death of the borrower, the Federal government will repay the outstanding part of the loan. In addition to there not being any sections that allow for a guarantor or cosigner, the specific section dealing with the death of the borrower does not limit the government’s guarantee by using words like “….and if the lender is unable to collect in full from any guarantor or cosigner”. The reason is simple, student loans cannot be guaranteed or otherwise borrowed by anyone other than the student.

Will bankruptcy eliminate student loans debt?

Student loans are nearly impossible to get rid of in bankruptcy. Section 178(1) of the BIA states:

“(g) any debt or obligation in respect of a loan made under the Canada Student Loans Act, the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act or any enactment of a province that provides for loans or guarantees of loans to students where the date of bankruptcy of the bankrupt occurred:

(i) before the date on which the bankrupt ceased to be a full- or part-time student, as the case may be, under the applicable Act or enactment, or

(ii) within seven years after the date on which the bankrupt ceased to be a full- or part-time student;

(g.1) any debt or obligation in respect of a loan made under the Apprentice Loans Act where the date of bankruptcy of the bankrupt occurred

(i) before the date on which the bankrupt ceased, under that Act, to be an eligible apprentice within the meaning of that Act, or

(ii) within seven years after the date on which the bankrupt ceased to be an eligible apprentice;”

So if you’re a student, bankruptcy will only end student loans if you’ve ceased to be a full or part-time student for more than seven years and either declare personal bankruptcy or make a debt proposal to your creditors, most likely through a consumer proposal. The only other option is to attempt to seek from the Court relief because of undue hardship, but this is very difficult, if not impossible.

What is required to meet the burden of undue hardship?

If the Court is satisfied that you meet the two-pronged test, you’ll be discharged from your student loans obligations in bankruptcy only if the :

acted in good faith in connection with your obligation to repay your student loan debt; and (emphasis added)
have experienced, and will continue to experience, financial difficulty that will prevent you from repaying this debt

It’s then up to the bankruptcy court to decide whether they forgive your loans, either in full or in part. One of the difficulties in trying to prove undue hardship is that there is no clear definition for what makes up hardship; each bankruptcy court across Canada may use a slightly different interpretation. The only thing that’s clear is that you must prove that having to continue to pay the student loans after bankruptcy would be a financial hardship for you. If you try this route, the Court will look at ALL of your income and expenses.

The Court may decide you are not trying hard enough, or, may look at things like your small car you use to get to work, which you purchased used (instead of taking public transit), your cell phone and your internet expenses, and decide that these are luxuries you do not need. If you are a smoker, the Court may very well decide that if you were not addicted to tobacco, you could start to repay some part of your student loans.

If you think my examples are picayune or silly, just look up the case of Fournier (Re), 2009 CanLII 31606 (ON SC).

Will bankruptcy eliminate student loan debt if you are not the student?

I don’t know what the eventual disposition of the US case which I mentioned at the beginning of this blog will be, but based on all the above, in my view in the Canadian context, a parent, relative or friend cannot guarantee, cosign or borrow for a loan that qualifies as a Canadian student loan. If you borrow to fund your child’s education, then you are borrowing under an ordinary commercial transaction and the applicable student loan sections of the BIA do not apply.

So if you have borrowed for this purpose, only the normal provisions of the BIA apply, and you will get a discharge from that and your other debts upon your discharge from bankruptcy. However, if you pledged any of your assets in support of such borrowings, such as your home, the lender does have the right to enforce its security against such assets if you cannot repay, whether you are bankrupt or not.

What should you do if you have too much debt?

If you’re drowning because of your finances, we know we can help you. Although many people believe that bankruptcy is the only way of out serious debt, that’s not always the case. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.can discuss other bankruptcy alternatives with you which include credit counselling, debt consolidation and consumer proposals.

If we get to see you early enough, at the first sign of trouble, you can use and carry out one of the bankruptcy alternatives, to free you from the burden of your financial challenges to go on to be a productive, contributing member of society and not be plagued by debt problems.

Bankruptcy law is very complicated and requires the expertise of a professional licensed insolvency trustee. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is here to help. With a cumulative 50+ years of experience dealing with diverse issues and complex files, we can get you back on your feet Starting Over, Starting Now. We can help. Call us today.

People consider us bankruptcy experts because we wrote the eBook which is sold on Amazon.ca, explaining the Canadian personal insolvency and bankruptcy system, specifically directed to the person stressed out with too much debt.

Brandon Blog Post

#VIDEO – SURPLUS INCOME LIMITS FOR 2015, 2016 & BEYOND: YOU WILL REALLY FEEL IT IN YOUR BANKRUPTCY #

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date April 13, 2016

Our inspiration for this vlog

This vlog was inspired by our new eBook: PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY CANADA – Not Because You Are A Dummy, Because You Need To Get Your Life Back On Track, which is sold on Amazon.com. The eBook explains the Canadian personal insolvency and bankruptcy system, specifically directed to the person stressed out with too much debt.

The most asked question is about surplus income limits

The question we are always asked is: What are the surplus income limits for 2015 and 2016 if I am in bankruptcy? I don’t have any cash left over from each paycheque, so, how can you say that I have surplus income?

What are the surplus income limits for 2015, 2016 and beyond?

Surplus income is the amount of a debtor’s total income that exceeds what is necessary to maintain a reasonable standard of living according to the standards set by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (remember, the actual standard is right at the poverty line so don’t get happy when you see words like “reasonable standard of living”). The bankrupt must make payments out of this surplus income to the Licensed Insolvency Trustee for distribution among the creditors.

It is part of the goals of the Canadian insolvency system that tries to balance the elimination of debt with the rights of creditors to be paid. The surplus income limits for 2015, 2016 and beyond, are set to allow Canadians to maintain what the Superintendent of Bankruptcy calls a reasonable standard of living during the bankruptcy process; the government has set thresholds or limits on net earnings (gross earnings after taxes and deductions) during the bankruptcy process. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy sets the threshold limits each year and these limits are indexed to inflation.

The threshold is set the same across Canada, regardless of what province or city you live in. So, someone living in the Greater Toronto Area, whose costs for shelter and probably transportation are higher than other parts of the country, will find that the threshold for them is essentially at the poverty line.

An example of how to apply the surplus income limits for 2015 and 2016

Here is an example of how the surplus income amount is calculated. Let’s assume we have a family of 4: a husband, wife and two young children in school. The husband earns (net of income tax) the annual amount of $46,000 and the wife earns (net of income tax) the annual amount of $18,000. To keep it simple, let’s assume that their monthly take-home pay can is their annual amount divided by 12 or a monthly income of $3,833.33 for the husband and $1,500 for the wife. Let’s assume that only the husband has to go bankrupt and not the wife.

The surplus income calculation for 2015 was:

(($3,833.33 + $1,500.00) – $3,831.00) X ($3,833.33/($3,833.33+$1,500)) = $539.90

This means the bankrupt husband will have to pay $539.90 to the Licensed Insolvency Trustee for a period of 21 months if he has never been bankrupt before, or for 36 months, if he has been bankrupt before, according to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada).

The surplus income calculation for 2016 is:

(($3,833.33 + $1,500.00) – $3,882.00) X ($3,833.33/($3,833.33+$1,500)) = $521.57

This means the bankrupt husband will have to pay $521.57 to the Licensed Insolvency Trustee for a period of 21 months if he has never been bankrupt before, or for 36 months, if he has been bankrupt before, according to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

You cannot deduct your normal monthly living expenses against the monthly income in order to calculate the surplus income limits for 2015 or any other year. However, if the bankrupt has any of the following types of expenses, they can be deducted from income in calculating the surplus income amount.

Child Support
Spousal Support
Child Care Expense
Expenses associated with medical condition
Court imposed fines or penalties that are in process of being paid
Expenses permitted by Income Tax Act that are a condition of employment
Any other debt where the stay of proceeding has been lifted

The surplus income limits for 2015 and 2016, or put another way, the amount the Superintendent of Bankruptcy believes a family, where there is one bankrupt person in a family of four, should have a take-home monthly income of $3,882 or annual family take home pay of $46,584, before the bankrupt person has to start contributing 50% of his or her income for the benefit of the bankrupt’s creditors. That is why we say the Federal government’s idea of a “reasonable standard of living” is really at the poverty line.

What to do if you have too much debt

If you’re in “survival mode” when it comes to your finances, we’ve got solutions for you. Although many people believe that bankruptcy is the only way out of serious debt, that’s not always the case. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can discuss other bankruptcy alternatives with you which include credit counselling, debt consolidation and consumer proposals.

If we get to see you early enough, at the first sign of trouble, you can utilize and implement one of the bankruptcy alternatives, to free you from the burden of your company’s financial challenges to go on to be a productive, profitable employer allowing management to focus on business growth and not be plagued by debt problems. Come in for a no obligation, no fee consultation and let us help you get back on track to living a debt free life Starting Over, Starting Now. Give us a call today.

Tags Bankruptcy, bankruptcy alternatives, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy process, BIA, Consumer Proposal, consumer proposals, eBook, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, starting over starting now, surplus income calculation for 2016, surplus income limits for 2015

Brandon Blog Post

BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL: REASONS WHY GOODWILL TORONTO IS NOT ALWAYS ENOUGH

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 10, 2016

The issue of a business restructuring proposal of Goodwill Toronto has recently been in the news. This video is an interview aired on TV Ontario, The Next Ontario show, with Dr. Sarah Kaplan, Professor of Strategic Management at Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto. The purpose of the interview is to obtain Dr. Kaplan’s views on the Goodwill Toronto closure of 16 Goodwill stores.

Toronto Goodwill thrift stores were operated, not unlike a Salvation Army thrift store, to raise funds to support the aims of the non-profit; in this case job skills and job creation for those who might otherwise be unemployable.

It takes money to restructure

We have all heard the expression “It takes money to make money”. I would like to make a slight twist on that expression by stating that it takes money to have a successful business restructuring proposal. Not only does the company and business have to be able to have sufficient cash flow in order to operate during the restructuring period, but there are also extraordinary one time expenditures related to the restructuring. Examples of such one time expenditures are reasonable one time exit fees to get out of uneconomical contracts, bonus payments to key personnel to ensure that they perform throughout the entire restructuring rather than resign for a new position elsewhere and professional fees.

Our Goodwill Toronto analysis

Our firm was consulted early in January to act as the licensed insolvency trustee in a business restructuring proposal of Goodwill Toronto. We spent half a day meeting with representatives of Goodwill Toronto in order to learn of their plight and to determine what sort of restructuring proposal might be possible.

In our meeting we learned that the main assets of Goodwill Toronto consisted of: (i) cash or liquid investments pledged to a Canadian chartered bank on account of business loans; (ii) accounts receivable with a certain percentage collectability; and (iii) inventory of items for sale, mainly used clothing, spread across 16 stores in leased locations.

We also learned that there were over 400 unionized employees, the majority of which had long term service with Goodwill Toronto. This is significant for three main reasons: (i) a viable restructuring proposal would be required to save the jobs of many, but probably not all of the employees; (ii) if the business restructuring proposal was unsuccessful, Goodwill Toronto would automatically be deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy (a deemed assignment); and (iii) in a bankruptcy, the employees would have a claim under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA).

It takes money to implement a successful business restructuring proposal

So, why is this significant? The reasons it is significant for a restructuring vs. bankruptcy are:

The secured portion of the employees’ WEPPA claim coming ahead of all creditors, including the chartered bank, totalled approximately $900,000.
Next in priority was the claim of the chartered bank.
There were no free assets after the above 2 claims that Goodwill Toronto could use to fund operations or the extraordinary expenses associated with a business restructuring proposal discussed above.

So as you can see, with no free cash flow, no excess realizable assets or a third party who could fund a business restructuring proposal (or in the worst case a bankruptcy proceeding), it would not be possible for a knowledgeable licensed insolvency trustee to agree to act as there was no source of funding available.

This is why the best of intentions and goodwill (toronto) is not always enough!

The Sarah Kaplan interview

Professor Kaplan raises many good points in this interview, including:

We should first think about what the whole business model of the goodwill is.
The goods that they get to sell are aimed at just generating revenues that allow them to perform their actual services like job.
It may be that the retail environment is tougher in some ways if we think about the alternative for people who buy things at goodwill would be to go to discount stores or dollar stores.
As the market is becoming more and more competitive we could imagine that people would not need to shop at Goodwill if they can get a t-shirt for $5 at WalMart.
Goodwill’s in other areas though are doing fine so we may need to look a little bit more deeply into the problem.
The entire board resigned so there could be some other management issues that led to Goodwill Toronto to be running a deficit.
You have to be well managed and being a social enterprise is not an excuse to not be well managed; you need the same skills capabilities and maybe even more skills and more capabilities than in the for-profit world.
The fact that they’ve taken this extraordinary really drastic measure leads me to believe that the difficult retail environment is not the whole story and therefore not the whole story for other social enterprises.

NOTE: After writing this blog, Goodwill Toronto filed an assignment in bankruptcy.

Is your company in need of a business restructuring proposal?

If your company is trapped with too much debt, you need a professional trustee to help you manage debt and create a viable business restructuring proposal (either under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act or the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act – BIA or CCAA) before it reaches a critical stage where bankruptcy is your only option. We have been able to help many companies carry out a successful business restructuring proposal. Successful completion of such a program, will free you from the burden of your company’s financial challenges to go on to be a productive, profitable employer allowing management to focus on business growth and not be plagued by debt problems.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today in order to look at the bankruptcy alternative of a business restructuring proposal. We can help and Starting Over, Starting Now you can be restored to financial health.

Brandon Blog Post

407ETR BANKRUPTCY DEBT CHECKLIST: YOU NEED IT NOW!

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 25, 2015

To access the 407ETR bankruptcy debt checklist, simply click on the picture either at the top or bottom of this blog. It will take you to our secure website for access.

407ETR Bankruptcy Debt: How did the Checklist come about?

407ETR bankruptcy debt was the topic of last week’s blog 407ETR DEBT SETTLEMENT: OUR NEWEST GUILT FREE WAY TO DO IT, we reported on the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) decision in 407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy), 2015 SCC 52 (CanLII) (the Moore Decision).

To summarize that decision, the SCC dismissed the 407ETR’s appeal because the discharge provisions of the BIA override the plate denial provisions of the Highway 407 Act.

We also reported that the effect of the SCC’s decision is that:

Pre-bankruptcy amounts owed to 407ETR are deemed to be provable claims under the BIA and can no longer be collected through plate denial under the Highway 407 Act following a customer’s discharge from bankruptcy
Where a person has been discharged from bankruptcy and has pre-bankruptcy amounts in plate denial, which are provable claims under the BIA, 407ETR will credit these amounts (plus interest and fees incurred on those amounts) on the person’s 407ETR bill, upon receipt of a Notice of Bankruptcy, and an Order of Discharge or a Certificate of Discharge.

In both cases, once the amount owing is credited, then the person is free to obtain plate renewal from the Province.

But the Court won’t tell me how to get my plate after getting rid of my 407ETR bankruptcy debt!

That is all well and good, but the SCC did not and would not tell the “man on the street” how to go about having the combination of the 407ETR and the Province of Ontario reflect all this and issue a new vehicle plate registered in the name of the discharged bankrupt. So we did!

Where do I get these tools?

We prepared a checklist so that discharged bankrupts and their advisors will have a roadmap as to what needs to be done and what tools are required in order for 407ETR and the Province to have the proper information in order to amend their records and allow for the vehicle plate registration.

To access the 407ETR bankruptcy debt checklist, simply click on the picture either at the top or bottom of this blog. It will take you to our secure website for access.

Do you have too much 407 debt and other debts?

Instead of going deeper into debt seek the help from a professional trustee, even if you’re not considering bankruptcy at this stage. A trustee in bankruptcy will evaluate your situation and help you to arrive at the best possible solution for your problems, whether that solution is a bankruptcy alternative like credit counselling, debt consolidation or a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. With immediate action and the right plan the Ira Smith Team can solve your financial problems Starting Over, Starting Now. We’re just a phone call away.

Brandon Blog Post

407 ETR DEBT SETTLEMENT: OUR NEWEST GUILT FREE WAY TO DO IT

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 19, 2015

407 ETR debt settlement

This 407 ETR debt settlement blog was reviewed earlier this week by Mr. Brian Empey, Partner, Goodmans LLP. We wish to express our thanks to Mr. Empey who made a valuable suggestion which we incorporated.

We have updated this blog for 2018 where 407 ETR has implemented some changes. Check out our blog 407 ETR RATES: THE ONLY 407 ETR RATES DEBT SETTLEMENT PLAN GUARANTEED TO ACTUALLY WORK for the update.

In January 2014 in our blog titled 407ETR FAIRNESS-ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL ENSURES FRESH START we described to you the decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in 407 ETR Concession Company Limited v. Superintendent of Bankruptcy (In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Matthew David Moore) (the Moore Decision).

The highway’s owners appealed that decision to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC). On Friday, November 13, 2015, the SCC released three decisions all dealing with the same basic issue: does the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) take paramountcy over provincial laws purporting to deal with the issue of debt and bankruptcy in Canada. The SCC answer was a resounding YES!

What did the SCC decide about the provincial law about 407 debt settlement?

The SCC dismissed the appeal of the ETR. The SCC considered whether the plate denial provisions of the Highway 407 Act conflicted with the discharge provisions of the BIA. ETR’s position was that provincial law about plate denial should apply following a person’s discharge from bankruptcy. The Attorneys General for several provinces, including the Province of Ontario, advanced positions in support of the provinces’ jurisdiction to legislate in vehicle licensing.

The SCC’s decision upheld the Moore Decision which found that the discharge provisions of the BIA override the plate denial provisions of the Highway 407 Act.

What is the effect on ETR debt settlement?

The effect of the SCC’s decision is that pre-bankruptcy amounts owed to the ETR are deemed to be provable claims under the BIA and can no longer be collected through plate denial under the Highway 407 Act following a customer’s discharge from bankruptcy. Therefore, 407 etr debt settlement is possible.

Where a person has been discharged from bankruptcy and has pre-bankruptcy amounts in plate denial, which are provable claims under the BIA, 407 ETR will credit these amounts (plus interest and fees incurred on those amounts) on the person’s 407 ETR bill, upon receipt of a Notice of Bankruptcy, and an Order of Discharge or a Certificate of Discharge.

In both cases, once the amount owing is credited, then the person is free to get plate renewal from the Province.

What will 407 ETR do next?

407 ETR must and is abiding by the SCC decision. They will set up a protocol whereby those who have already been discharged from bankruptcy and have been denied a plate renewal will be able to prove they have been discharged, get the 407 ETR debt, including penalty and interest, reversed, and get a plate renewal.

Those who are still in the middle of their bankruptcy proceedings and not yet discharged will be able to apply to have a plate renewal, once they are discharged from bankruptcy and prove it to 407 ETR.

Interestingly enough, there was no evidence whatsoever in any of the Court cases, including this one before the SCC, as to the 407 ETR’s right to deny anyone credit. When you get your transponder, the 407 ETR is actually extending credit to you, in the form of use of the toll highway in return for the toll charges they expect you to pay. It is no different from the bank loaning you money, and expecting you to repay it in full, with interest.

Will 407 ETR deny extending credit to discharged bankrupts? Will they only issue a new transponder to discharged bankrupts who give them a large cash deposit so that use of the 407 ETR will only be on a “cash and carry” basis? We don’t know, they have so far been silent on the issue, but it is still early in the game.

Do you need 407 etr debt settlement and a plan for your other debts too?

Instead of going deeper into debt seek help from a professional trustee, even if you’re not considering bankruptcy at this stage. A trustee in bankruptcy will evaluate your situation and help you to arrive at the best possible solution for your problems, whether that solution is a bankruptcy alternative like credit counselling, debt consolidation or a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. With immediate action and the right plan, the Ira Smith Team can solve your financial problems Starting Over, Starting Now. We’re just a phone call away.

Brandon Blog Post

ADVANTAGES OF CONSUMER PROPOSALS VIDEO FOR YOU

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 21, 2015

Introduction

We have written many blogs on the advantages of consumer proposals, including:

HOW ADVANTAGES OF CONSUMER PROPOSALS SAVES YOU FROM DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES

CONSUMER PROPOSAL; THE GREAT ALTERNATIVE TO BANKRUPTCY

CONSUMER PROPOSAL ONTARIO: AVOID BANKRUPTCY

CONSUMER PROPOSALS: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

We thought it would be good to now put together a short video on the topic.

The best alternative to personal bankruptcy in Canada

Of the various alternatives to bankruptcy, this government approved debt settlement plan is the one option with the most predictable and certain results for the insolvent person in dealing with their debt. You may have heard a proposal being called other names such as consumer credit proposal, debt proposal or debt settlement.

The main difference is that the only formal legal mechanism to be able to stop your creditors from continuing to harass and sue you is with a formal consumer proposal through a licensed trustee in bankruptcy. Unlike the other options, the consumer proposal is codified in the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act which provides the trustee with certain weapons that can be used for your protection.

That is why we say that of all the bankruptcy alternatives, the consumer proposal is the best one. There are many bankruptcy options, but the consumer proposal also allows you to rebuild your credit thereby increasing your credit score.

Keep away from bankruptcy with the advantages of consumer proposals

If you are insolvent and are considering bankruptcy, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. We offer sound advice, will check all of your bankruptcy options with you and then with you, formulate a solid plan for Starting Over, Starting Now so that you’ll be well on your way to a debt-free life in no time.

Tags advantages of consumer proposals, alternative to bankruptcy, alternatives to bankruptcy, avoid bankruptcy, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy alternative, bankruptcy alternatives, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy options, consumer credit proposal, Consumer Proposal, Debt, debt proposal, debt settlement, increase your credit score, insolvency, personal bankruptcy, rebuild your credit

Brandon Blog Post

# VIDEO: THE HISTORY OF CONSUMER PROPOSAL DEFINITION #

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 7, 2015

Consumer Proposal definition

It is important to know what the consumer proposal definition is. A consumer proposal is a relatively new addition to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), even though it has been around for 23 years. Although the origins of the current BIA can be traced back to the original 1869 An Act respecting Insolvency, the consumer proposal section was enacted with the 1992 amendments to the BIA.

According to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, the consumer proposal definition is:

“A consumer proposal is a formal, legally binding process that is administered by a bankruptcy trustee. In this process, the trustee will work with you to develop a “proposal”—an offer to pay creditors a percentage of what is owed to them, or extend the time you have to pay off the debts, or both. The term of a consumer proposal cannot exceed five years.

Payments are made through the trustee, and the trustee uses that money to pay each of your creditors.”

My consumer proposal definition

My consumer proposal definition is THE GREAT alternative to bankruptcy. It’s available only to people, whose total debts do not exceed $250,000, not including debts secured by their principal residence. Working with a trustee in bankruptcy you make a consumer proposal to:

Pay your creditors a percentage of what you owe them over a specific time
Extend the time you have to pay off the debt
Or a combination of both

Watch this short video

I hope that you enjoy the video. Most people facing financial challenges, or insurmountable debt that they can never repay, cannot focus on the consumer proposal definition. We understand that what you need is an experienced trustee to recommend you solutions tailored specifically to your situation. Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. for sound, professional advice and a solid financial plan for Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, BIA, Consumer Proposal, consumer proposal definition, Debt, debts, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, starting over starting now, trustee, trustee in bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY AND DIVORCE: NOT ALL REASONS TO GO BANKRUPT ARE GOOD

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date September 15, 2015

Bankruptcy and divorce

Whenever we speak to groups about bankruptcy and divorce, and especially to grey divorce support groups, the same questions always arise regarding the interplay between the Federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and the Ontario family law provisions. I thought it would be best to address one such interesting issue in this week’s blog.

You may hate your soon-to-be ex, but the courts won’t allow you to use bankruptcy as a weapon against that spouse. Bankruptcy is legal proceeding involving an insolvent person or business that is unable to repay outstanding debts. It is not a way to avoid paying alimony or child support. There was a recent case that clearly demonstrates the court’s view on this very issue.

Blatherwick v Blatherwick

The case is Blatherwick v Blatherwick, 2015 ONSC 2606 (CanLII). The parties separated after 39 years of marriage. The wife was seeking spousal support and equalization, among other things. The husband disputed the amounts that the wife was seeking. The wife obtained a Mareva injunction which is a court order preventing a defendant from transferring assets until the outcome of the associated law suit is decided. However, the husband breached the Mareva injunction by declaring bankruptcy. And, to make matters worse he made false representations in bankruptcy, including the valuation of corporate assets and reporting of income. The husband thought that if he declared bankruptcy he would be putting his assets beyond the reach of his wife’s claim for equalization. (In a bona fide bankruptcy, it is true that an equalization claim is not a claim provable in the bankruptcy, unlike a claim for alimony and child support which cannot be extinguished as a result of a bankruptcy).

Unfortunately for Mr. Blatherwick, the intersection of bankruptcy and divorce does not work that way!

The Judge’s view on Mr. Blatherwick’s bankruptcy

The Judge stated:

“303 I find as a fact that Mr. Blatherwick made false statements which were significant in his Statement of Affairs.

304 I find as a fact that he made the assignment into bankruptcy to avoid making an equalization payment to Mrs. Blatherwick and to avoid his financial obligations arising from his voluntary disclosure to Revenue Canada.

305 I find as a fact that the purpose of Mr. Blatherwick going bankrupt was to obtain a collateral benefit in the matrimonial proceedings.

306 I conclude there was no bona fide financial reason for making a voluntary assignment into bankruptcy.”

Accordingly, the court annulled the bankruptcy. In the truest sense, it was as if the bankruptcy never happened at all. In this case, bankruptcy and divorce did could not be combined.

Summary

Trying to cheat the system by making false statements on your sworn statement of affairs to make yourself appear insolvent is never a good idea and can even lead to criminal charges. The bankruptcy can, as demonstrated in this case, be annulled.

If you are insolvent and are considering bankruptcy, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. We offer sound advice and a solid plan for Starting Over, Starting Now so that you’ll be well on your way to a debt free life in no time.

Tags 2015 ONSC 2606 (CanLII), Bankruptcy, bankruptcy alternaties, bankruptcy and divorce, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, Blatherwick, Blatherwick v Blatherwick, Debt, divorce, equalization payment, grey divorce support groups, how to file bankruptcy in canada, information on bankruptcy, insolvent, Mareva injunction, Revenue Canada, starting over starting now, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

ECONOMIC DOWNTURN CAUSES MORE PEOPLE TO CONSIDER BANKRUPTCY OR PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY ALTERNATIVES

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 11, 2015

When do people generally want information about personal bankruptcy alternatives?

Personal bankruptcy alternatives are always sought after an economic downturn. The economic downturn is causing more people to rely on credit to supplement their income and/or their lifestyle. This mountain of debt will ultimately result in bankruptcy or hopefully, an alternative to bankruptcy.

What Bank of Montreal and Statistics Canada say about Canadian household debt

In BMO’s Annual Debt Report, the average household debt of those surveyed is $92,699, more than $4,000 higher than the four-year average dating back to 2012. And servicing that debt, which includes mortgages, lines of credit and credit card debt, is costing $1,165 a month.

According to Statistics Canada:

The debt-to-income ratio of Canadian households is 163.3% which means for every dollar Canadians earn, they owe $1.63 in debt
Canadian households now owe $1.841 trillion in various forms of debt
More than $1.1 trillion is from mortgages
$519 billion is consumer debt, like credit cards

Debt + More Debt = a Solution?

Adding debt to more debt is not a solution to the problem; it compounds the problem. If you are using credit cards to supplement your income or your lifestyle, you have a serious problem that needs professional help. Don’t wait until bankruptcy is your only option. You should be learning about personal bankruptcy alternatives before it is too late.

Is there such a thing as bankruptcy solutions?

We are asked this question all the time. Before even considering bankruptcy, I always want to discuss 3 formal alternatives to personal bankruptcy:

Credit Counselling
Credit counselling is in reality debt counselling. Professionals provide assistance with a host of issues related to debt including budgeting, finding debt solutions, working with your creditors and rebuilding credit.
Debt Consolidation
Debt consolidation is a single loan that allows you to repay your debts to several or all of your creditors at once, leaving you with only one outstanding loan.
Consumer Proposals
Consumer proposals are formal offers made to your creditors under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) to modify your payments. e.g. paying a lesser amount each month for a longer period of time and paying a total lesser amount than you owe, all on an interest-free basis!

In addition there are informal personal bankruptcy alternatives including budget review, contacting your creditors (including your mortgage lender), selling an asset and contacting the Federal Government’s Repayment Assistance Plan (if you’re having difficulty repaying your student loan debt).

Just ask your Toronto bankruptcy trustee

A professional trustee can open up a world of possibilities for you. Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. for help with your financial problems. With just one phone call you can be well on your way to a debt free life Starting Over, Starting Now.

Brandon Blog Post

STALKING HORSE BID: DO YOU REALLY WANT 2 STALK YOUR ADORABLE HORSE?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 21, 2015

stalking horse bid

This blog was originally published on July 21, 2015. It was updated on March 22, 2021.

Bankruptcy Sales: What Is a Stalking-Horse Bid?

A stalking horse bid, in the Canadian insolvency context, is an attempt by a company (and/or its Monitor, Receiver or Trustee ) in a Court supervised insolvency proceeding, to set what will be the baseline that must be met and beaten by any other bids for the assets. The intent is to maximize the value of its assets as part of a Court supervised sales process and to discourage any bid below a certain value.

A stalking horse is a process that allows a potential buyer (the stalking horse bidder) to make a public bid for a company’s assets in order to set a floor price for the amount of money to be received by the company’s creditors in a (bankruptcy) sale. The stalking horse bidder will get to purchase the company’s assets if no other bidder comes forward. The stalking horse provision allows for the bidding process terms and conditions to be set in a court-supervised sale.

In this Brandon Blog, I describe the stalking horse bid process and how it works

What’s a stalking horse bid? Example of a stalking horse bid

According to Wikipedia:

“The term stalking horse originally derived from the practice of hunting, particularly of wildfowl. Hunters noticed that many birds would flee immediately on the approach of humans, but would tolerate the close presence of animals such as horses and cattle. Hunters would therefore slowly approach their quarry by walking alongside their horses, keeping their upper bodies out of sight until the flock was within firing range. Animals trained for this purpose were called stalking horses.”

In an insolvency context, a stalking horse bid stands to test the market to see how the market values the assets for sale. If the market values the assets less than the amount of the stalking horse bid, then no one will bid higher and the party who made the stalking horse bid will be successful in acquiring the assets.

If the market values the assets more than the amount of the stalking horse bid, the higher offers will be made for the assets and for the Court to consider for approval. Presumably, a higher offer will be approved, the purchaser will purchase the assets and the stalking horse bid will not prevail.

How a Stalking-Horse Bid Works

The stalking-horse bid method allows a distressed company to avoid receiving low ball bids as its assets are being sold. Once the stalking-horse bidder has made its offer and it has been negotiated and court-approved, other potential buyers may submit competing bids for the company’s assets.

By setting the low end of the bidding range, the insolvent company hopes to realize a higher price on its assets. Insolvency proceedings are public. The public nature allows for the disclosure of more information about the deal and the buyer than what would be available in a private deal.

Stalking-horse bidders can generally negotiate which particular assets and liabilities it hopes to acquire. After the stalking horse bid is negotiated resulting in an asset purchase agreement, it will be necessary for the company, Receiver or Trustee to obtain Court approval of not only the stalking horse bid but also for the entire sales process to be implemented.

If the company is attempting to restructure and requires “bankruptcy protection”, then those corporate proceedings would be either under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) or the Proposal provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (the “BIA”). In that situation, it is the company making an application to the Court with the support and assistance of the monitor or proposal trustee.

If it is a corporate receivership or bankruptcy proceeding, then it is either the receiver or bankruptcy trustee making the application. In the case of bankrupt corporations, then it is the bankruptcy court that needs to approve the stalking horse bid, the entire sales process and approve the sale.

What does it take to get bankruptcy court approval?

When applying to the Court, approval for an entire sales process is being sought, a component of which is the stalking horse agreement. The Court has various considerations in determining if a stalking horse sale process should be approved. They are:

Is a sale transaction warranted at this time?
Will the sale benefit the whole “economic community”?
Do any of the debtors’ creditors have a bona fide reason to object to a sale process of the business?
Is there a better viable alternative?”

In the event the stalking horse bid is not the successful winner because of the other potential bidders at least one made a better offer, it is normal for the stalking horse purchaser to receive some form of compensation. The compensation is for the time, cost and resources invested to perform its due diligence, to make its offer which was found to be reasonable in the circumstances and to expose that offer to the marketplace to stand as a stalking horse bid, and for that bidder to not end up as the successful purchaser.

Our Firm has been involved in situations where the stalking horse bid has been both the successful bid unsuccessful bid. If the compensation, commonly known as break-up fees, is fair and reasonable, it will not dissuade other purchasers from coming forward in the sales process, and it will also be fair to the stalking horse bidder if they are unsuccessful. It is fair to the stalking horse bidder to have these bid protections incorporated into their offer.

The Court in considering the approval of a stalking horse bid also considers if the breakup fee, and the entire stalking horse bid, has been negotiated between arms’-length parties and has the support of the stakeholders involved in the insolvency proceeding.

The Pros and Cons of Being A Stalking Horse Bidder for Assets In Bankruptcy

There are various pros and cons to being a stalking horse bidder and making the stalking horse bid. First the advantages:

First to tie up the company’s management, perform due diligence thereby dealing exclusively with the company for the proposed purchase of its assets.
Gaining the advantage of time and access to the company’s financial information.
Having the time to be able to understand the company’s problems and challenges.
Getting under contract for the assets the purchaser wants to acquire.

The cons of making the stalking horse bid are:

Making sure that you set the break fee high enough to fully compensate the stalking horse bidder.
Not having too long a time period between approval of the stalking horse bid and the time when other bids must be submitted to avoid the assets or the company’s operations worsening through the process.
Would it have been better not to have been the stalking horse bidder and see how the company and its assets fare before having to submit a bid?
If the stalking horse bidder is not a secured lender, is there a likelihood the secured lenders will bid their security which will outbid yours?
If there is more than one acceptable bid, then an auction process is required to determine the successful bidder. The stalking horse bidder may not wish to participate in such an auction and will end up losing out.

Can a secured creditor credit bid? Cirque du Soleil agrees to ‘stalking horse’ takeover bid from lenders worth $375M

One of the most recent high-profile successful stalking horse bids was the Cirque du Soleil insolvency proceeding under the CCAA. In that case, a takeover proposal from the Cirque du Soleil’s secured creditors has been approved as the benchmark bid for a court-supervised auction of the insolvent entertainment company.

That is called a credit bid. When the secured creditor bids all or a portion of its outstanding loan. This will be done in situations where the secured creditor believes that the value of the assets to be sold is less than the amount owed, yet the company’s assets can be used to run a viable business. In that situation, the secured creditor would rather bid its security with the company debt to take over the assets.

By making a credit bid, the secured creditor potential purchaser does not need to come up with cash for the purchase price. However, cash will be required to make certain payments to parties the company business cannot operate without and to have working capital going forward.

If they bid the full amount of their loan and get outbid in other purchase agreements, it means they get fully paid out. Otherwise, they get the assets to run the company, bring it back to financial good health and profitability. Eventually, then they will sell the healthy company to recoup their money plus make a profit.

Stalking horse bid summary

If your company is experiencing financial difficulties, don’t waste your time stalking horses or any other animal. Seek the advice of your professional advisers. The earlier you seek financial help the more options will be open to you. Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today. We’ll review your corporate issues and come up with a sound plan so that Starting Over, Starting Now you can enjoy financial peace of mind.

stalking horse bid

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, BIA, CCAA, Cirque du Soleil, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, corporate insolvency, court, insolvency, monitor, Park Lane Circle, proposal, receiver, restructuring, stalking horse, stalking horse bid, stalking horse bidder, starting over starting now, trustee