Categories
Brandon Blog Post

THE CANADIAN RECEIVERSHIP EASY BEGINNERS GUIDE

receivership

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you wish to listen to an audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click play on the podcast.

What is Receivership?

Last week I wrote an easy beginner’s guide on bankruptcy. This Brandon Blog is for anybody interested in finding out what type of insolvency process receivership is and how it differs from some other insolvency processes. I will explain the receivership process, provide an overview of what happens in a receivership, explaining what is sought to achieve, and the consequences of receivership.

Receiverships occur when a secured lender enforces its security to recover loans that have been defaulted on by a borrower. Secured creditors appoint an insolvency trustee to serve as receiver or receiver-manager depending on the terms of their security documents when the corporate debtor defaults.

Receivers and secured lenders can enter into a private contract appointing a receiver. Alternatively, the secured lender may seek an order from the court appointing a receiver. I’ll talk more about that shortly.

What Does Going into Receivership Mean?

If the corporate debtor defaults on a secured loan, the creditor may be entitled to appoint a receiver to collect their money. In Canada, “Section 244” notices are specific forms of notification that secured creditors must send to defaulting companies.

The notice specifies the assets covered by the security, the amount owed by the company in default, and that the secured creditor has the right to enforce the security after 10 days. The debtor company in default can consent to the appointment of the receiver before the expiration of the 10 day notice period.

A Section 244 notice is prescribed under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), and it is usually the last notice a creditor receives before the receiver takes possession of the debtor’s assets, properties, and undertakings.

Receivers then liquidate the assets of a business in order to pay secured creditors.

receivership

How Receivership Works

Parliament amended the BIA insolvency legislation in 1992 by enacting Part XI. BIA sections 243 through 252 to deal with secured creditors and receivers. Prior to that time, there was no federal statute insolvency legislation dealing with receivership matters. These provisions provide information about the court that hears bankruptcy and insolvency cases control over receivership matters that involve all or substantially all of the inventory, the accounts receivable, or the other property of a debtor. There are also restrictions imposed on the duties of secured creditors and receivers. It also stipulates that only a licensed insolvency trustee can act as a receiver. Part XI applies to both privately-appointed and court-appointed receivers.

These sections do not confer any powers available to a trustee of a bankrupt estate on secured creditors or receivers. Only those powers conferred upon the receiver in the appointment letter are granted to private receivers, and those are the powers specified in the security instrument. However, the receiver may also exercise certain statutory powers. If certain powers are required to administer the estate but are omitted under the security instrument, a receiver cannot act. Receivers are generally appointed by the secured creditor pursuant to security that at least states:

  • the collateral secured under the security; and
  • the receiver has the right to dispose of the collateral, including operating the insolvent debtor‘s business.

In a court-appointed receivership, the powers of the receiver come from the receivership appointment court order appointing the court-appointed receiver.

Receivership: Notice and Statement of the Receiver

From the 1992 amendments to the BIA, a receiver is required to provide notice to all known creditors of an insolvent debtor in receivership. Previously, creditors were not required to be notified.

When the receiver has become the receiver of an insolvent debtor‘s property, the receiver must provide notice of receivership as soon as reasonably possible but within 10 days of its appointment. Notice of the receivership must be sent to all creditors, the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy and the insolvent debtor.

If the debtor is also bankrupt, rather than sending the notice to all creditors, the receiver sends the notice to the bankruptcy trustee. Since the creditors are already represented in corporate bankruptcy by the Trustee, the bankruptcy process will deal with them.

A receivership notice states, among other things, that the receiver has been appointed, whether it is a private appointment or a court appointment, and what the receiver’s plan of action is. Additionally, it contains a list of all known creditors.

As part of the receivership process, the receiver must provide interim reports every six months as well as a final report when the receivership is concluded. A copy of the receiver’s final receipts and disbursements statement must also be included in the final notice.receivership

What’s The Difference Between a Court-Appointed Receiver and a Privately Appointed Receiver?

A court-appointed receiver vs. a privately appointed receiver is something people always want to know the answer to. I will explain the difference to you. It is pretty simple. Based on what I have already written, you have probably guessed it by now.

In a Court-appointed receivership, when the Court appoints a receiver, it does so through an Order on the application of the secured creditor. As between a secured creditor and a debtor, a privately appointed receiver is a receiver who is appointed by the secured creditor as provided in the Security Agreement. The Court-appointed receiver’s administration is supervised by the Court.

How is Receivership Different from Bankruptcy? Bankruptcy / receivership

Bankruptcy vs. receivership is also something people want to know. Many times, people confuse the two and use the terms receivership and bankruptcy, mistakenly, interchangeably. Often, receiverships and bankruptcy are confused, but the differences between the two are fairly straightforward. Whether it is a private appointment or a Court-appointed receivership, it is still different.

There are several main differences between bankruptcy and receivership. A receivership is a remedy available to secured creditors, as stated above. In order to enforce the secured creditor’s security rights against a defaulting debtor, a receiver is appointed.

Bankruptcy is a separate legal process. Trustees do not represent secured creditors in bankruptcy. Instead, they represent unsecured creditors. Corporate bankruptcy can occur simultaneously with a receivership of the same corporate debtor. The process of a corporate bankruptcy would be the subject of another Brandon Blog. To find other Brandon Blogs about corporate bankruptcy, use the search function at the top of this page.receivership

What’s the Difference Between Receivership and Liquidation?

By now you know what the definition of receivership is. So I won’t repeat it because I do not want to sound like a broken record (younger people may not catch that reference!)!

Liquidation is not governed by the federal BIA. Rather, it is done under the provincial Business Corporations Act or Wind-Up Act. A liquidation is for a solvent company where the shareholders, Officers and Directors decide to cease business operations by running off any existing contracts and selling off the assets. The cash obtained is then used first to pay off the creditors. Any funds leftover is then distributed to the shareholders.

Just like a receiver, a liquidator can be appointed either privately by resolution of the Directors or by Court order. Liquidation is not a receivership or bankruptcy.

Employee Rights in Bankruptcy Protection and Bankruptcy⁄Receivership

A device was created by the BIA for employees of a company that went bankrupt or into receivership. It does not apply to employees of a company trying to rightsize itself through reorganization; either a BIA Proposal or a Plan of Arrangement under the CCAA. The Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA) protects wages or benefits, including termination and severance pay, accumulated in the 6 months prior to a business going bankrupt or going into receivership.

The WEPPA ended up being enacted due to the federal government’s concern that when a company went bankrupt and employees were not paid their wages, there was rarely an opportunity for them to recoup any of their income. There are limits or caps on what employees can receive.

In the period in which amounts are past due to you, you will not qualify for WEPPA if:

  • you are a Director or Officer of the business;
  • or you have worked as a manager for the company
  • you are part of the management responsible for negotiating or refusing to pay amounts owed.

You may qualify if:

  • the previous employer has gone bankrupt or into receivership.
  • The firm owes you wages, salaries, vacation pay, or unreimbursed costs throughout the six months prior to the date of bankruptcy or receivership.

When an employer enters bankruptcy or receivership, the WEPPA provides funds to employees owed money. Those employees who qualify are paid as soon as possible. An employee’s qualifying earnings are equal to seven times their maximum regular insurance earnings under the Employment Insurance Act. According to Service Canada, the maximum amount of $56,300 a year is the limit for insurable earnings as of January 1, 2021. Thus, in 2021 the maximum amount a former employee can claim under WEPPA is $7,578.83.

Trustees and receivers are required to inform employees about the WEPPA program and provide information about amounts due. In the event of bankruptcy or receivership, trustees, as well as receivers, have 45 days to submit to Service Canada the Trustee Information Forms showing the amounts owed to each employee.

In other words, WEPPA‘s payment for former employees is something, but it may not be enough to fully compensate each. As a result of the amount paid by Service Canada, which administers the employment insurance system, $2,000 per employee is a super-priority against the company’s current assets. All remaining amounts paid to each employee, up to the maximum, are unsecured claims.receivership

Receivership summary

I hope you found this receivership Brandon Blog informative and that the differences between receivership, bankruptcy, restructuring and liquidation legal proceedings are now clearer. Because it all has to do with corporate insolvency, the provincial Bankruptcy Courts also deal with receivership matters to adjudicate under the applicable insolvency law.

With too high debt levels and not enough wealth, you are insolvent. You can choose from several insolvency processes to get the debt relief that you need and deserve. It may not be necessary for you to file for bankruptcy.

If you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help, and you assume bankruptcy is the only option, call me.

If you’re thinking about bankruptcy, you’re probably in a situation where you’re overwhelmed, frightened, and feel like you’re alone. That’s natural and it is not your fault.

It’s good that you’ve come to this site, where you’ll find answers to your questions, sort through your options, and discover that you can get help. You’re not alone, and the professionals at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. are committed to helping you find a debt solution that’s best for you.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

You are under a lot of pressure. Our team knows how you feel. You and your financial and emotional problems will be the focus of a new approach designed specifically for you. With our help, you will be able to blow away the dark cloud over your head. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

Because of this, we can develop a new method for paying down your debt that will be built specifically for you. It will be as unique as the economic problems and discomfort you are experiencing. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY: CERTAIN ACTIONS AGAINST TRUSTEE CAN BE UNLEASHED WITHOUT FIRST REQUIRING COURT PERMISSION

trustee in bankruptcy
trustee in bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

Trustee in Bankruptcy: No action against Trustees without leave of court

Canadian insolvency laws say that there cannot be any legal action against trustees in bankruptcy (now called a licensed insolvency trustee) without the prior leave of the court. The leave application, more often than not, would be brought before a Bankruptcy Judge. However, as you will see below, any Judge of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice could hear such an application involving a trustee in bankruptcy.

Section 215 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) protects the Canadian bankruptcy laws for all officials in the bankruptcy process, including the bankruptcy trustee:

“215 Except by leave of the court, no action lies against the Superintendent, an official receiver, an interim receiver or a trustee with respect to any report made under, or any action taken pursuant to, this Act.”

In my January 9, 2019, Brandon Blog, PRIVACY BREACH LAWSUIT AGAINST LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE FAILS, I described one attempt that failed to obtain leave of the court to begin litigation against a trustee in bankruptcy.

Our bankruptcy and insolvency courts believe that the test to determine whether a court should use its discretion to give leave for litigation to be commenced against either a trustee in bankruptcy or a court-appointed receiver was not a tough test. The protection is only to ensure that the receiver or trustee in bankruptcy is protected against senseless or burdensome actions that have no basis.

In this Brandon Blog, I describe a recent Ontario court decision that further clarifies a basis for when the court will exercise its discretion and allow litigation against a licensed trustee in bankruptcy. As the Motions Judge used the old terminology, I will stick with it in this blog.

Action against the trustee in bankruptcy background

The Motion Judge‘s Endorsement was released on May 31, 2021. The Endorsement was from a motion by the plaintiff for a determination as to whether or not leave of the court under S.215 of the BIA was required. The plaintiff’s position was that it was not, but if it was, such leave should be granted. The defendant trustee in bankruptcy’s position was that leave was required and should not be granted.

The plaintiff, Mr. Flight, ended up filing bankruptcy proceedings 4 times over a 13 year period of time! He filed the same type of bankruptcy over and over again! He claims his financial situation is the fault of the defendant trustee in bankruptcy. He used the same trustee in bankruptcy for all of his bankruptcies! It is not clear in this motion how the trustee is responsible for his having to file personal bankruptcy all those times.

Mr. Flight brings on litigation against the trustee in bankruptcy claiming negligence, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and conversion. The complainant claims the accused failed to identify and take suitable action relating to a fraud perpetrated by the bookkeeper for Mr. Flight’s sole proprietorship business.

The plaintiff’s amended claim seeks a declaration the defendant engaged in misfeasance, negligence, fraud and breach of fiduciary duty in his personal capacity, and that the defendant was unjustly enriched.

trustee in bankruptcy
trustee in bankruptcy

The plaintiff’s claim against the trustee in bankruptcy

The main subject matter of the claim alleges the bookkeeper’s theft caused the plaintiff’s repeated bankruptcies and that the defendant trustee in bankruptcy ought to have detected this fraud in the administration of the four bankruptcies.

The plaintiff maintains that the trustee in bankruptcy then failed to take any meaningful action to address the alleged fraud and its impact on the fourth bankruptcy after its discovery. In particular, the plaintiff claims the trustee failed to diligently commence an action against the former bookkeeper, failed to investigate the fraud, failed to adjust the plaintiff’s surplus income, failed to recommend debt relief options or financial options, and certainly no other possible insolvency process such as a consumer proposal alternative to bankruptcy and failed to have the plaintiff promptly discharged from his fourth bankruptcy.

The defendant’s alleged “grand failure to act” caused Mr. Flight damages of $10 million from loss of business, loss of profit, loss of income and pain and suffering.

The court’s analysis

As I mentioned above, the threshold issue under Canadian insolvency legislation is whether the plaintiff required leave to commence this action. If it is determined that leave is required, the analysis then moves to whether the claim meets the test for leave.

The Motion Judge stated that there is authority to support the plaintiff’s position that the insolvency laws state that leave is not required where the trustee in bankruptcy is being sued in its personal capacity.

More particularly, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the leave provision under the BIA is not to be interpreted as though it applied to any action arising out of the administration of the estate. That is not the way section 215 is worded. To allege that the trustee in bankruptcy made an act of omission is a claim that is not concerning a report made under or any action taken according to the BIA.

trustee in bankruptcy
trustee in bankruptcy

Trustee in bankruptcy: The court’s decision

The plaintiff alleges causes of action against the trustee in bankruptcy in his personal capacity in their amended statement of claim and affidavit materials for negligence, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and conversion starting with the confidential consultation and with each bankruptcy assignment. The Motion Judge concluded that the plaintiff does not require leave under s. 215 of the BIA to commence this action. Based on this conclusion, the Motion Judge did not need to consider anything further.

You will observe as I previously stated, none of the court’s evaluation had anything to do with whether the claims had a possibility of success in its litigation legal process. The Motion Judge, who was not a Bankruptcy Judge but rather a Motion Judge felt the accusations were such that they were not purposeless or burdensome actions that have no basis.

As the main action will now proceed, I will follow the case to find out the exact details and the various bankruptcy claims that Mr. Flight is making regarding the conduct of trustees involved. As the case is reported, I will report to you.

Finding a good, Licensed Insolvency Trustee (Trustee In Bankruptcy) Near You

I hope that you found this trustee in bankruptcy Brandon Blog interesting. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost bankruptcy consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY BLOG 2019: OUR MOST FAVOURITE INSOLVENCY TOPICS

bankruptcy blogIntroduction

I first want to wish all of you and your families a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year. As 2019 draws to a close, I thought it would be interesting to do some research in my 2019 Brandon’s bankruptcy blog to see which ones were the most top 10 popular this year.

So, in order counting down from number 10 to number 1, here are my top 10 bankruptcy blog counts for 2019.

#10 – 407 ETR DEBT SETTLEMENT: OUR NEWEST GUILT FREE WAY TO DO IT

This was a blog I wrote in 2015 as a follow up from one in 2014. It was updated for a 2018 Court decision.

In January 2014 in our blog titled 407ETR FAIRNESS-ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL ENSURES FRESH START I described to you the decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in 407 ETR Concession Company Limited v. Superintendent of Bankruptcy (In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Matthew David Moore) (the Moore Decision).

The highway’s owners appealed that decision to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC). On Friday, November 13, 2015, the SCC released three decisions all dealing with the same basic issue: does the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) take paramountcy over provincial laws purporting to deal with the issue of debt and bankruptcy in Canada. The SCC answer was a resounding YES!

This blog talks about how 407etr deals with the debt owing by an insolvent person filing either a consumer proposal or for bankruptcy.

#9 – SOMETIMES EVEN A SHARK NEEDS BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY HELP

Not every innovation that is seen on The Shark Tank is bound to be one of the very best. Among the winners, one just entered into bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings. In this blog, I described one such company that got a deal on Shark Tank, but ultimately, went into bankruptcy.

Fizzics is a machine that makes use of sound waves that improves the taste and quality of a beer. Not even a Shark can stop its company from being driven to Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. This proves that often an ingenious and fantastic invention being marketed with the assistance of a Shark might not truly interest people.

#8 – COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT: COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CREATES NEW RULE?

This was a June 2019 blog about a then-recent decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario that raises certain issues for a Receiver appointed under the Ontario Courts of Justice Act. The question answered in this blog which I focussed on was does the appeal period in the BIA or the Courts of Justice Act, regulates the appeal period from the order of the motion judge in this situation?

#7 – GAMBLING DEBT BANKRUPTCY: CAN GAMBLING DEBT BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY?

I am often asked if you can have a gambling debt bankruptcy; can gambling debts be discharged in bankruptcy? In that January 2018 blog, I discussed the issues and provided my views on how best to get a discharge from not only gambling debts but debts related to any addiction.

#6 – CANADIAN REVERSE MORTGAGE: SENIORS MOVING FORWARD WITH INCREASED DEBT

In this August 2019 blog, I discussed the issue of how seniors are flocking to the Canadian reverse mortgage product in record numbers. I described what seniors must know to avoid reverse mortgage problems.

#5 – PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS MAKE FAMILIES STRONGER: THEY AREN’T JUST FOR THE RICH & FAMOUS – PRENUPS IN ONTARIO ARE FOR YOU TOO

In this July 2017 blog, I wrote about how prenuptial agreements make families stronger and why anyone can benefit from prenups in Ontario.

#4 – FORM 31 PROOF OF CLAIM: HOW TO COMPLETE THE PROOF OF CLAIM

This blog is from October 2018. I discussed how a form 31 proof of claim form should be completed and discussed why it is important for it, and the related proxy, to be completed properly.

#3 – 40 PARK LANE CIRCLE, 44 PARK LANE CIRCLE TORONTO FOR SALE: ARE FINANCIAL PROBLEMS CONTAGIOUS?

This March 2015 blog asked somewhat tongue in cheek if financial problems could be a result of where you lived. I reviewed some high profile insolvency cases by residents of 40 Park Lane Circle and 44 Park Lane Circle in the toney Bridle Path area of Toronto. I also provided some solutions people could use to solve their own debt issues.

#2 – WHAT HAPPENS TO DEBT WHEN YOU DIE CANADA: ARE YOU FREE OF DEBT

This was a June 2018 blog. In it, I explored what happens to debt when you die in Canada. Does debt survive death or not?

#1 – AVERAGE CANADIAN NET WORTH 2018: MIDLIFE WEALTH SHOCK MAY LEAD TO DEATH

This September 2018 blog looked at household debt at an all-time high, making the average Canadian net worth 2018 is a hot topic. My blog explored a then-recent study showing what could happen if we experience wealth shock.

Bankruptcy blog conclusion

You may have already noticed over the last 10 days or so I have slowed down a bit in the writing of my Brandon’s bankruptcy Blog. The holiday period will do that to me! I will continue in January at a slower pace of blog posting. Come February, I will pick up the pace again.

In the meantime, again, I wish all of my loyal readers and their families a healthy, happy and prosperous 2020.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SOMETIMES EVEN A BONA FIDE SHARK NEEDS BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY HELP

bankruptcy and insolvency
bankruptcy and insolvency

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this bankruptcy and insolvency Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Bankruptcy and insolvency: Introduction

Not every innovation that is seen on The Shark Tank is bound to be one of the very best. Among the winners, Fizzics is a machine that makes use of sound waves that improve the taste and quality of a beer. Not even a Shark can stop its company from being driven to bankruptcy and insolvency Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. This proves that often an ingenious and fantastic invention being marketed with the assistance of a Shark might not truly interest people.

bankruptcy and insolvency
bankruptcy and insolvency

Fizzics was seen on the season 8 première of The Shark Tank. The judges, in spite of the early skepticism, accepted this pitch. It currently seems to be backfiring in a huge way. The idea of making a bottle of beer taste better, just like a draft beer from the tap, isn’t a silly way to invest your time. But a better tasting beer is a big luxury. Many people may check out is the brand-new shiny plaything on the block. It is something wacky and cute but not completely effective or needed.

What is difference between bankruptcy and insolvency in Canada?

What is insolvency? – Individuals are considered to be insolvent when they are not able to pay the financial debts they owe their creditors on their respective due dates. If you become insolvent, you might choose to declare bankruptcy, or you could handle your financial debts with other options such as a consolidation loan or a debt settlement consumer proposal.

Insolvency and bankruptcy are 2 terms that are often very closely associated when discussing debt. However, they have very different meanings. Insolvency describes an economic state. It is when you cannot afford to pay your debts when due. If you liquidated all of your assets, there would not be enough money to pay off all your debts in full.

What is bankruptcy? – Bankruptcy is a legal process. It means that a creditor has gone to court and obtained a Bankruptcy Order to place a person or company into the legal status of bankruptcy. Or, the person or company has filed an Assignment in Bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) is the Canadian bankruptcy law legislation regulating all administrations of the BIA in Canada.

The various kinds of insolvency proceedings under the BIA are:

Canadian BIA insolvency proceedings and bankruptcy proceedings can only be administered by licensed insolvency trustees (formerly called trustees in bankruptcy). The short form for a trustee in bankruptcy is now LIT, licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee). Trustees are licensed and supervised by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (Canada) (OSB) which is part of Industry Canada. The OSB is responsible for the administration of bankruptcies in Canada.

Bankruptcy and Insolvency: Does the consumer really need it?

Eventually, these types of ideas are those that often tend to seem like the most effective thing since sliced bread. Their shiny brand-new finish tends to subside promptly given the expense of creating them. Even tougher, is finding a large enough market of people who truly intend to quit the dependable and old ways to carry out something. The uniqueness will swiftly wear away. The equipment will then come to be a chunk of scrap that is most likely to rest on the counter and seldom gets used. That might seem unkind, however, usefulness and need to at some point seem to divide the wheat (or barley) from the chaff!

So Fizzics, for all that it is able to do, turned out to be not the sort of device that has the ability to make a great deal of sense in a business setting. It is just for home-usage. In a bar, people go to consume alcohol and socialize. They are not there to wait on a number of sound waves to make their drink preference taste and look better. If they want a draft beer, they will order from the tap. If they want a bottled beer, that is what they will order.

For home usage, it is an excellent novelty. Everyone has their favourite beer. People anticipate it to taste the way they know it too – straight out of the bottle or can.

The Fizzics Business: The Sharks bit and invested money

Philip Petracca and his partner, David McDonald, made it to ABC’s “Shark Tank” in 2016, offering beer to a hesitant panel. They eventually turned most of the judges into followers. Lori Greiner and fellow Shark Mark Cuban agreed to spend $2 million into Fizzics for a consolidated 16.67 percent equity. Fizzics attained its objective of expanding its selling networks.

With the help of the Sharks, Fizzics entered Target, Best Buy, Brookstone, on Amazon, and several other areas– including Bed, Bath & Beyond. They have been reviewed in many renowned publications, and on several websites such as Yahoo! Tech as well as CNet. The Fizzics beer-making device was called absolutely nothing short of a wonder.

bankruptcy and insolvency
bankruptcy and insolvency

They increased their patented modern technology and generated a much more portable item called the Fizzics Waytap. Beer fanatics were still going crazy about the original dispenser in magazines.

On March 12, 2019, Fizzics Group, Inc. applied for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware under the United States insolvency and bankruptcy code. It reported assets of between $100,000 as well as $500,000 and debts of between $1 million and $10 million (based on contingencies and disputed claims). Time will tell if the business can be reorganized and saved, or if the remaining product inventory will end up in the clearance area!

Bankruptcy and insolvency: Do you need help?

I hope you enjoyed this Fizzics Shark Tank bankruptcy and insolvency blog. Do you or your business have excessive debt? Are you having an issue making your month-to-month expenses? Is your company handling its financial obstacles something you simply can’t figure the way out of? Are you looking for a business restructuring plan or an individual debt negotiation plan?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of experience helping people and companies seeking financial restructuring or a debt settlement strategy. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists recognized, accredited and supervised by the Federal government to give insolvency advice and remedies to assist you and to prevent bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can end the stress and anxiety financial problems create. With the special roadmap, we will develop with and special to you, we will promptly return you right into a healthy, balanced hassle-free life.

You can have a no-cost appointment to assist you so we can fix your debt troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to make a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now.

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CANADA: ENHANCING RETIREMENT SECURITY IN CANADIAN INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY

,employee benefits canada

If you prefer, you can listen to the employee benefits Canada podcast.  Please scroll down to the bottom of the page for the audio.

Employee benefits Canada:  Introduction

The Federal government supports the proposition that Canadians are entitled to a risk-free, safe, secure and sensible retired life.  Corporate financial troubles have increased problems about the safety of pension plan, wage and benefit payments for employees and senior citizens.   Employee benefits Canada is now being looked at by the Federal government.

The most recent case that has brought these issues to the forefront has been the Sears Canada liquidation.  Federal politicians have sponsored several private member’s bills which have now caught the serious attention of our Federal government.    Two such Bills were brought forward by Hamilton Mountain NDP MP Scott Duvall and Senator Art Eggleton.  The Federal government wants to make employee benefits Canada news.

Employee benefits Canada: My previous blogs

I have written on the issue in several blogs:

  1. TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: NDP WANTS FEDERAL INSOLVENCY LAWS CHANGED SO THERE IS PENSION PLAN SECURITY WHEN FINANCIALLY TROUBLED BUSINESSES FAIL – September 27, 2017
  2. SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS – October 18, 2017
  3. SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING – November 1, 2017
  4. SEARS CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN SHORTFALL: MP SCOTT DUVALL COMES THROUGH ON HIS PROMISE IN CANADIAN PARLIAMENT – November 8, 2017
  5. CORPORATE BANKRUPTCIES CANADA: SENATOR EGGLETON PROPOSES NEW PENSION FUND CANADA LAW – October 22, 2018

Arising out of certain policy statements in the Fall 2018 Budget, the Federal government is looking for responses from pensioners, employees, firms, professionals and various other stakeholders to take a macro, evidence-based strategy to try to provide better-retired life protection for all Canadians.

Employee benefits Canada: Canada’s retirement income system

Canada’s retirement income system (RIS) is currently based upon 3 columns:

  1. Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) give a fundamental degree of retired life earnings.Canada Pension (CPP) gives standard a certain wage substitute for employees, funded by payments from employees, companies and the self-employed.
  2. Employer-based pension – Defined Benefit (DB) and Defined Contribution (DC)).
  3. Income tax-assisted personal saving vehicles, such as Registered Retired Savings Plan (RRSP) and Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSA).

Employee benefits Canada:  Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law

In 2008-2009, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA) was changed.  Under the BIA, in a receivership or bankruptcy, arrears of wages was given a super-priority.  Approximately $2,000 per staff member must be paid before secured creditors. Any unfunded normal employer pension plan contributions (as distinct from any unfunded pension liability determined by an actuarial evaluation) also have a super-priority in either a bankruptcy or receivership.  

As far as a corporate restructuring proposal under the BIA, the amendment also states that the Court cannot approve any Proposal that does not provide for the same treatment.  The CCAA was similarly modified to be consistent with corporate restructuring under the BIA.

Employee benefits Canada: Corporate governance

The Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) supplies the fundamental business administration structure for Federally incorporated companies.  Although good corporate governance is important for all business stakeholders, it must be followed and implemented to be of any use.

As I indicated above, the Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall has caused the Federal government to now look at a variety of options to try to better protect employees and retirees for both pensions and benefits.

Employee benefits Canada:  The Feds are looking for stakeholder comments

The Federal government wants to listen to the thoughts of stakeholders on what further actions that might be embraced to boost retired life safety for workers and senior citizens impacted by company bankruptcy.  Specifically, the Federal government wants stakeholder response on increased security for workers’ claims in insolvencies, including changing the BIA and CCAA to make sure that there is a super-priority to pay unfunded pension plan contributions and benefits claims ahead of the claims of secured creditors.

Many options are being considered that the Federal government wants stakeholder comments on by the end of this year.

Employee benefits Canada:  Pension options being looked at

Possible pension options being considered are:

  • Solvency reserves: A solvency reserve is an account the employer could contribute to so that pension deficits can be eliminated.   I doubt this would work. If the company could afford to pay into a solvency reserve, they could also afford to just pay off the pension payment deficit.
  • Pension plan financing relief: The Minister of Finance has the authority to offer companies with pension plan financing relief to assist in the long-term survival of the company pension. The Minister’s authority could be boosted to assist companies with a pension plan deficit experiencing financial problems.  This type of help, being a moratorium on pension payments, could come with specific conditions. Such special conditions could include a moratorium on the payment of dividends, share redemptions and senior executive bonuses.
  • Self-managed accounts: Upon the bankruptcy of the company, the DB plan ends.  In that case, the only option is to transfer each former employees’ respective entitlement to purchase an annuity.  So, the expected benefit will never materialize because of the underfunding. Federal pension legislation (and provincial legislation to follow) could provide extra options.  It could allow rolling over of each entitlement into a self-managed plan such as an RRSP.  This way there is an opportunity to recoup some of the lost benefits over time.

Employee benefits Canada:  Corporate governance options being looked at

  • Limitations on the company: Dividends, share redemptions and senior management bonuses could be restricted under the CBCA in situations where a company is in arrears of pension contributions.  Once the arrears are caught up, then such special payments could continue. As federally incorporated companies are the minority of all companies in Canada. The Provinces would also have to invoke similar legislation.  An annual filing mechanism, perhaps through the Canada Revenue Agency, would also have to be established so that companies could be monitored.

Employee benefits Canada:  Bankruptcy and insolvency options being looked at

  • Increased “look-back” time: The BIA permits a court to reverse dividends paid or share redemptions made by an insolvent company within one year preceding the date of bankruptcy. The BIA and CCAA additionally allow a court to invalidate reviewable transaction (transfers at undervalue) by the Debtor as much as 5 years prior to the insolvency. In order to further connect corporate behaviour with employee interests, the “look-back” period in the BIA and the CCAA can be amended to include the unwinding of executive benefits, dividend payments and share redemptions at a time when there were also unfunded pension liabilities. The legislation could be amended to state that the recovered funds must go to paying down the pension payment arrears.  I would also go one step further to make the amount approved by the Directors of the corporation to be paid out while there were pension plan contribution arrears a personal liability of such Directors.
  • Improved openness in CCAA rules: In CCAA, the borrower business negotiates with its creditors on a debt settlement plan.  The process is conducted under court supervision.  The legislation could be amended so that when there is an underfunded pension plan, it would be mandatory to have legal representation for the employees who are participants in such pension plan.  This could be accomplished by amending the CCAA legislation to need that upon the motion to get the Initial Order the administrator of the pension plan must be an initial stakeholder that is consulted and served with the Initial Order motion material.  The plan administrator has the statutory right to retain legal counsel and be represented at all Court hearings.

Employee benefits Canada:  The solutions are varied and complex

As you can see, the range of possible solutions are varied and complex.  However, one thing is for sure though. The Federal government has now awoken to the issue of shareholders being enriched off of the backs of the workers.  The Sears Canada CCAA liquidation has brought the issue to the forefront. It will be very interesting to see how the Federal government proceeds in 2019.

Employee benefits Canada:  Is your company bogged down by too much debt?

Is your company under fire as a result of too much debt, including pension plan contribution arrears? Is your business looking for reorganizing to get debt alleviation?

The Ira Smith Team has years as well as generations of experience helping people and companies in financial difficulty. If your company needs a corporate restructuring debt negotiation strategy, we have the experience.  We will end your stress, anxiety and discomfort.   Whether it is a BIA or CCAA debt restructuring, we can help you.  We will return you and your company to a healthy, balanced and efficient pain-free life.

Our method for every case is to establish a remedy where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This begins the minute you consult with us and walk through our front door. You’re merely one telephone call away.  Therefore, with our help, you will take the required steps to go back to leading a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

Call us today for your free first consultation.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADA BANKRUPTCIES: GRAPHIC & VID – CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY LAW

Canada bankruptcies: Introduction

The purpose of this infographic, video and blog is to give you Canada bankruptcies information. I want to explain how Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law works for companies and what the major steps corporate bankruptcy laws in Canada are. So watch the video below and feel free to read in more detail right below the video.

Canada bankruptcies: Video

 

Canada bankruptcies: The 10 standard steps in a voluntary corporate bankruptcy

The actions of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (Trustee) takes with respect to the assets and the claims of creditors in a corporate bankruptcy may differ from case to case. However, there are 10 standard steps the Trustee takes in each corporate bankruptcy file. These steps are to understand and deal with the nature of the assets and the creditor claims.

Here are the 10 steps I take as a standard process with each corporate bankruptcy.

Step 1 – Initial meeting with Trustee

I meet with the Directors of the company by providing a free consultation. In this meeting, I learn the causes of the company’s insolvency and the nature and extent of the assets and the claims of various creditors. This includes potential trust claimants and secured creditors.

After obtaining the information I need to provide advice specific to that company’s situation, I decide if the company is a candidate for a restructuring, either informally or in a bankruptcy protection mode. If possible, this is preferable, as it will save jobs and allow the company to continue in business. If not, I advise about corporate bankruptcy and what is involved.

Step 2 – Directors meeting

If bankruptcy is the answer, the Directors formally meet and pass a resolution stating that the company is insolvent and must file an assignment in bankruptcy. The resolution also indicates which Director is authorized to sign all documents and be the Designated Officer in the bankruptcy proceedings. The Designated Officer is the person that will attend the First Meeting of Creditors and answer questions about the causes of the company’s insolvency and bankruptcy and how the company conducted business.

Step 3 – Signing all documents

With the signed Directors’ resolution in hand, I prepare all necessary bankruptcy documents. I then meet with the Designated Officer to explain the documents and have them all signed by him or her.

Step 4 – Filing with Official Receiver

The Official Receiver is the local representative and part of the Federal Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. I electronically file the required documents and wait for the Official Receiver to issue the bankruptcy certificate. The company is not officially bankrupt until the day and time that the Official Receiver issues the bankruptcy certificate. Normally it gets issued on the same day or the next day. So, if the timing of the start of the bankruptcy is important, I need to take a time lag into consideration.

Step 5 – Bankruptcy certificate

The company is not officially bankrupt until the day and time that the Official Receiver issues the bankruptcy certificate. Normally the issuance is on the same day or the next day. So, if the timing of the start of the bankruptcy is important, I need to take a time lag into consideration.

Once the certificate is issued, my firm Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., is named as the Trustee. This appointment is valid until the First Meeting of Creditors. At the meeting, one of the things the creditors must vote on, is affirming the Trustee’s appointment.

Step 6 – Trustee takes possession

Now that I am the Trustee, I have a duty to take possession of the company’s books and records and the known assets. Taking possession of the assets is subject to the rights and wishes of any trust claimants or secured creditors.

Step 7 – Trustee notifies known creditors

Within 5 days of the date of bankruptcy, I must familiarize myself with the books and records as ot the names and addresses of the creditors. I must also in those same 5 days, set the time and place for the First Meeting of Creditors and mail out the notice to the creditors advising of the bankruptcy, the creditors meeting details and providing a proof of claim form. I must also arrange for a notice of the bankruptcy be placed in a local newspaper so that any unknown creditors are officially on notice.

Step 8 – Trustee safeguards assets

Again subject to the rights of any trust claimants or secured creditors, I must safeguard, insure and store the assets. I can begin formulating a plan for selling the assets if there is equity for the bankruptcy estate. However, I cannot sell any assets before the First Meeting of Creditors without a Court Order. At the creditors meeting is where I seek the approval of the creditors for the plan I have prepared to sell the assets. After obtaining that approval, sales can be completed by the Trustee.

Step 9 – Trustee prepares the report

I prepare my Trustee’s Report To The Creditors On Preliminary Administration. The report is handed out to the creditors present at the First Meeting of Creditors. It is also a public document, so any creditor who could not attend the meeting can receive a copy.

The report covers the following areas:

  • Background information
  • Causes of financial difficulty
  • Description and estimated value of the company’s assets
  • Any trust, secured or property claims against the assets
  • What conservatory and protective measures to safeguard the assets the Trustee has taken to date
  • Books and records of the company
  • What the Trustee’s review to date of the books and records has determined, if anything
  • Did the Trustee retain legal counsel yet and if so, for what reason? If there is a trust, secured or property claims that the Trustee knows about, it would be normal for the Trustee to get a legal opinion on the validity and extent of such claims prior to the creditors meeting. The Trustee would advise the creditors of what the legal opinion says and how it will affect the sale of assets, or if there is even anything for the Trustee to sell.
  • The claims of the creditors identified to date.
  • What the anticipated realization and distribution to the unsecured creditors may be
  • The Trustee’s fee
  • Any other matters

Step 10 – The First Meeting of Creditors

Within 21 days of the date of bankruptcy, I hold the creditors meeting. My report described above is distributed. The Trustee, the Designated Officer and possibly the lawyer hired by the Trustee, attend the creditors meeting. Also attending are any creditors who wish to take part.

The creditors meeting is the place where the creditors can ask questions and find out information about the causes of bankruptcy and the Trustee’s estimate of what the unsecured creditors may receive by way of a distribution.

As mentioned above, the creditors also must approve the actions and activities of the Trustee to date, and approve any steps the Trustee wishes to take in realizing upon assets and dealing with creditors’ claims. The creditors also appoint up to 5 Inspectors. The Inspectors are representatives of the creditors who supervise and assist the Trustee and ultimately must approve the Trustee’s actions.

canada bankruptcies
canada bankruptcies

 

These are the 10 standard steps I take in every voluntary corporate bankruptcy. The exact things I must do to realize upon the assets and deal with the claims of creditors will depend on the assets and claims themselves. When the bankruptcy administration is complete, including any distributions made, the Trustee then obtains a discharge.

Is your company experiencing financial difficulty?

I hope that you have found this information helpful. Bankruptcy is the last thing we try to do for a company in financial difficulty. If caught early enough, we can get involved in a turnaround situation for your company to keep jobs and value.

The Ira Smith Team knows that you are worried because your company is facing significant financial challenges. Your business provides income not only for your family. Many other families rely on you and your company for their well-being. The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today. We know how to solve your company’s financial challenges, remove your pain and put things back on a healthy path. Contact us today for your free consultation so that we can save your company, Starting Over Starting Now.

canada bankruptcies
canada bankruptcies

 

Call a Trustee Now!