Tag: assignment in bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA PART OF BANKRUPTCIES LAWS IN ONTARIO?

Introduction

I prepared this vlog to explain the differences between a consumer proposal (CP), one of the bankruptcies laws in Ontario and bankruptcy. This discussion is based on the inquiries that we are asked often. Hopefully, this information will help you understand better specifically what a CP debt settlement strategy is and how it will certainly assist you to remove all your financial obligations. All this while AVOIDING personal bankruptcy.

Main benefits of a CP

Take into consideration several of the benefits of the CP vs. bankruptcy:

    • Unlike informal debt negotiation, the CP creates a forum where every one of your unsecured creditors must take part in for your debt restructuring.
    • You keep your property.
    • Legal actions against you on your property and debts, such as wage garnishments, cannot continue.
    • You do not require to file an assignment in bankruptcy

CP vs. bankruptcy

How do I recognize if I have a financial problem?

If you are having difficulty satisfying your debts or have actually quit paying them, you are probably insolvent. Another sign of insolvency is that if your assets if liquidated, will not bring in enough money to pay off your debts. When you are all stressed out over the money you owe, for sure you will know that you have financial problems.

How do I know if I qualify for either a CP or bankruptcy?

Any person that is insolvent and owes greater than $1,000 is qualified to file either a CP or an assignment in bankruptcy in Canada.

Will I have to give up my assets?

As soon as you file for bankruptcy you will certainly have to give up your non-exempt property to the Trustee. These possessions will be marketed and sold. The cash from the sale of your property will be used to pay for the cost of the bankruptcy administration. The balance will be dispersed among your creditors.

In CP, you will not be giving up your assets. You are making an offer to your creditors less than the total amount you owe. According to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA), your CP has to be a better result for your unsecured creditors than they would receive in your bankruptcy.

What occurs to my wages or salary?

Nothing. You receive it as normal.

In a CP that has been (deemed) accepted by your creditors and approved by the Court, you begin to make your payments. There are no other requirements for your income in CP.

In bankruptcy, nothing happens to your income either. However, in a bankruptcy, unlike a CP, your Trustee at the outset has to decide if you are required to make voluntary contributions to your bankruptcy case based off of your income. If so, this is called a surplus income requirement. Also, you will have to file monthly statements of income and expense with the Trustee. Your surplus income requirement can change, depending on if your income goes up or down. There is no such requirement in CP.

Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has frozen my bank account and has garnished my earnings. Exactly how can I deal with that?

As stated above, once you file a CP, there is a stay of proceedings. Upon receiving notice from the Trustee, CRA stops the garnishee process and lifts the freeze on your account(s). The same is true in bankruptcy.

Will I still owe money after I declare bankruptcy or file a CP?

Perhaps, because of neither a CP nor bankruptcy covers:

How much time will I be under the insolvency proceeding?

The duration of time in bankruptcy will depend on whether this is an initial or 2nd (or more) bankruptcy, whether you have to pay surplus income and if your discharge is opposed or not. Depending on your circumstances, it can be anywhere from 9 months to many years.

In a CP, you can take up to 60 months to pay the total amount you promised to pay. Payments in a CP are required monthly.

Will anyone find out that I have filed either a CP or for bankruptcy?

As soon as you file for bankruptcy or a CP, your Trustee must file a notification with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) to start either process. The OSB does run a public database showing the status of all files.

In either a CP or bankruptcy, your Trustee must send a notice to all of your creditors. So they will know.

In a CP or a shortened summary administration bankruptcy, the Trustee does not place a legal notice in the local newspaper advertising that you filed. In an ordinary administration bankruptcy, the Trustee must publish a notice.

Generally, it is only the OSB, your Trustee and your creditors who are aware of your filing.

Is my partner or spouse impacted by my CP or bankruptcy?

Your partner/spouse will not be impacted by your CP or bankruptcy unless he/she co-signed as a borrower or has guaranteed payment for any of your debts. If they have guaranteed some or all of your debts, then those specific creditors can ask your spouse for payment in full.

NOTE: There is a body of case-law to suggest that if your CP is fully performed, then there is no debt left for your guarantor to make good on. That type of discussion is too technical for this general blog. If you are in this situation, your spouse should get legal advice before agreeing to pay anything. No such argument could even be considered in a bankruptcy situation.

Just how will my CP or bankruptcy impact my existing divorce case?

In Canada, CP and bankruptcy filings do not conflict with the majority of the divorce procedures. In a bankruptcy, the Trustee will stand in the shoes of the bankrupt spouse. Ontario is an equalization Province; not a division of assets Province. If the bankrupt spouse is entitled to an equalization payment, that will come to the Trustee.

In a CP, the Trustee does not get involved at all in any way. The BIA does not interfere at all with non-financial divorce issues such as custody. It also does not have any effect on support or alimony.

Consumer Proposal Canada or bankruptcy: Conclusion

I hope this consumer proposal discussion about the differences between a Consumer Proposal Canada and bankruptcy has been helpful to you.

Do you have severe debt and don’t know where to begin to fix it? Are your debt issues causing you to lose sleep? Is too much debt triggering stress and anxiety, discomfort and pain? We know that discomfort better than anyone and we can get it out of your life.

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of experience helping people and companies seeking financial restructuring or a debt settlement strategy. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists recognized, accredited and supervised by the Federal government to give insolvency advice and remedies to assist you and to prevent bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can end the stress and anxiety financial problems create. With the special roadmap, we will develop with and special to you, we will promptly return you right into a healthy, balanced hassle-free life.

You can have a no-cost appointment to assist you so we can fix your debt troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to make a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now.

consumer proposal bankruptcies laws in ontario

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TORONTO REAL ESTATE: REAL ESTATE NEWS ON BUYER’S REMORSE

assignment in bankruptcyToToronto real estate: Introduction

This Brandon’s Blog is about Toronto real estate and what happens when the purchaser experiences buyer’s remorse. “When the residential real estate market is a rising market, most people – perhaps with the exception of first-time buyers, are happy homeowners and investors. When the market turns and drops, it is not for the faint of heart.” This is how Justice M.L. Edwards begins his Reasons for Decision in Gamoff v. Hu, 2018 ONSC 2172 (CanLII).

The realities of this situation show how one family came to be involved in a bidding process. Determined to get their dream house, they exhausted their ability to fund the acquisition of that residence. We will describe this case which is similar to several people my Firm has helped overcome their financial problems after being found liable for similar amounts the defendants, in this case, were found responsible for.

Toronto real estate: The Toronto real estate market news facts

Douglas and Sheila Gamoff (the “Gamoffs” or the “plaintiffs”) were the owners of a residential property. The home was in Stouffville, Ontario (the “Home”), part of the GTA. The plaintiffs listed the Home for sale on the multiple listing service on March 29, 2017. Within a fairly short amount of time (March 29, 2017, to April 2, 2017), there were 18 offers.

The defendants, Yixing Hu and David Lea, saw the Home with their real estate agent on April 1, 2017. They state that they told their real estate agent that they had an interest in acquiring the Home. They also didn’t want to be involved in a bidding price battle.

The defendants originally submitted their written offer on April 1, 2017, with an offer of $2,050,000. On April 2, 2017, the defendants were told by their real estate agent that there were several deals for the residential property. Their realtor also told them that their offer of $2,050,000 was not accepted. In spite of having informed their real estate agent that they did not intend to end up being in a bidding war, they inevitably submitted a new offer for $2,250,000. The vendors accepted the revised offer.

The deal had no conditions. The agreement of purchase and sale read that the purchasers provided a deposit in the amount of $30,000 upon acceptance of the offer. It further read that a second down payment tranche of $90,000 would be made on April 6, 2017. The date for the second deposit payment was then amended to April 10, 2017. The closing day for the acquisition of the Home was August 30, 2017.

Toronto real estate: It did not take long for buyer’s remorse to arise

On the same day, the defendants called their real estate agent. They suggested to him that they thought that they had actually paid way too much for the Home. Their issue here was no doubt created by the fact that they had just found out that, a mix of their mortgage loan funding and the value of their house yet to be sold, would not be enough for them to get the essential funding to close on their purchase.

David Lea emailed his real estate agent stating to him that he and Ms. Hu had actually slipped up aiming to acquire the Home. Mr. Lea went on to say in this email that he is begging, please contact the vendor’s agent with a new firm offer.

As I previously stated, the agreement of purchase and sale did not have any conditions in it to allow them to end the agreement and get back their first tranche deposit. The agreement certainly was not conditional either on their obtaining satisfactory mortgage financing or the sale of their existing home. That is enough stress to cause anyone to panic which no doubt led to their buyer’s remorse.

Toronto real estate: The purchaser’s default

On April 10, 2017, the purchaser failed to pay the 2nd payment needed by the change to the agreement of purchase and sale. On the following day, the defendants visited the property. They informed the plaintiffs face to face that they did not actually have the funding needed to complete the purchase.

Toronto real estate: The vendors’ mitigation

The Gamoffs first consulted with their lawyer. Then on May 1, 2017, they listed the Home for sale again on the multiple listing service for $2,250,000. From May 1 to May 16, 2017, the plaintiffs got no offers on the Home.

The Gamoffs lowered the listing price of the Home to $1,998,000 on May 17, 2017. This was because of a recommendation from their real estate agent. In between May 17, 2017, and June 6, 2017, they obtained no deals on the Home.

On July 28, 2017, the Gamoffs, based on the further advice of their realtor, lowered the price of the Home again to $1,798,000.

In between June 6 and July 26, 2017, the Gamoffs got no offers on the Home. On July 31, 2017, they got an offer to purchase the Home for $1,700,000. After some back and forth, on August 9, 2017, the Gamoffs accepted a brand new agreement of purchase and sale. It was with an arm’s length buyer for $1,770,000. That deal closed on October 3, 2017.

Toronto real estate: The Court’s decision

The plaintiffs sought a summary judgment for the difference between the defendants’ offer of $2,250,000 and what the Home eventually sold for, $1,770,000. The defendants opposed this on several grounds, including, that there was an issue that required a full trial.

Based on the evidence, the judge disagreed. He awarded the plaintiffs the difference between the defendants’ offer of $2,250,000 and what the Home eventually sold for. The judge also awarded costs to the plaintiffs. The judgment was for $470,000 plus costs. Add that to the $30,000 down payment the defendants lost, this aborted deal cost them half a million bucks!

Toronto real estate: Our own case studies

My Firm has been involved in several matters helping people who have had judgments like the one described above made against them from failed real estate deals. We have been involved as a result of failed real estate deal judgments in:

  1. a bankruptcy caused by the plaintiffs (the vendors) who could not yet collect on their judgment filing a Bankruptcy Application with the Court and obtaining a Bankruptcy Order be made against the defendants;
  2. a consumer proposal for a defendant which was successfully completed;
  3. the successful proposal of the defendant who had a large amount awarded against him by the judgment; and
  4. an assignment in bankruptcy filed by the defendant who did not have the ability to attempt a proposal to get relief from the judgment against them.

In each case, the only way that the defendants could get relief, voluntarily or involuntarily, was through an insolvency process. In the one case caused by the Bankruptcy Order, it was the plaintiff who took action. The plaintiff was able to get a payment for all the unsecured creditors. The insolvency process requires that the distribution is shared among all creditors. That result was better than the plaintiff not being able to collect on its judgment without the insolvency process.

In that specific case, it was a combination of the Trustee’s powers and the plaintiff’s judgment and specific knowledge, that joined to produce the recovery for all creditors. The Trustee’s powers were required to get enough leverage resulting in the recovery.

Toronto real estate: A tough lesson to learn


The effect of this Court’s decision will definitely have a significant result on the defendants. The judge said that he had every compassion for them.

With the adjustments in the realty market in the Greater Toronto Area, I have every reason to believe that there will be extra instances where buyers discover that they have not protected themselves and will not be able to complete their real estate transaction.

Buyers would certainly be well advised to think about making their deals to acquire real estate subject to satisfactory funding, as well as for the sale of their existing residence if they have one. The cost of entering a bidding war and getting the property unconditionally could turn out to be a very expensive one just like in this case.

Toronto real estate: What to do if you have too much debt

If you have too much debt because of a judgment against you, either because you have made the real estate in Toronto news from a failed real estate deal or for any other reason, there is no shame in looking for a professional to help you out of your financial jam. A licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) will look at your circumstances and assist you to get to the very best option for your issues. The Ira Smith Team will give you a free consultation.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is right here to help. We’re government supervised and adhere to a rigorous code of ethics. Our experienced team provides a high-quality service which will create a unique and an affordable solution made just for you. I feel your pain and know how to end it.

Don’t wait until we read about you in the real estate in Toronto news Canada. Call us today to end your stress and experience our pleasant, non-judgmental technique to solve your financial problems and get you back on the right track to stress-free living, Starting Over, Starting Now.toronto real estate

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FILING FOR BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: INTENSE MENTAL HEALTH & DISCHARGED BANKRUPTCY

anthony bourdain

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: Introduction

With filing for bankruptcy in Canada, if a person’s discharge is opposed, there must be a court hearing. At the hearing, the court will decide if the discharge will occur. Once the discharge is granted, the person will be relieved of his or her debts as of the day he or she filed for bankruptcy (with certain exceptions) and will be free to start rebuilding his or her credit rating and financial future.

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: Court of Appeal for Ontario decision

The purpose of my blog is to describe a March 2018 Court of Appeal for Ontario decision, Kuczera (Re), 2018 ONCA 322 (CanLII). This is an important decision in how mental health issues intersect with the bankruptcy discharge process.

Mr. Kuczera’s financial problems began with a costly and hotly contested divorce proceedings. With his debts mounting and the divorce proceedings continuing, Mr. Kuczera filed a consumer proposal. As a result of the ongoing family law battle, his mental health deteriorated and he became clinically depressed. He was no longer able to cope with life and was unable to work.

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: Defaulting on the consumer proposal

Up to this point, he was making the consumer proposal payments. His default in the consumer proposal caused it to be annulled. The consumer proposal was his attempt to get out of bankruptcy, as he first used filing for bankruptcy in Canada with an assignment in bankruptcy first. So, Mr. Kuczera now remained an undischarged bankrupt.

filing for bankruptcy in canada

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: The bankruptcy discharge hearing

Mr. Kuczera represented himself in Bankruptcy Court on his discharge hearing. He tried to show the Registrar in Bankruptcy that he tried his best to live up to all of his bankruptcy obligations to the licensed insolvency trustee, but due to his mental health issues, he could not. Unfortunately, his evidence was only a basic report from his psychiatrist.

The Registrar did not grant an absolute discharge. Rather, based on the evidence in front of her, she ordered that a discharge be granted only after payment of the outstanding balance under the consumer proposal, and one other minor condition. The Registrar went on to state that he was held responsible for his situation.

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: Appeal of the Registrar’s decision

Mr. Kuczera was able to hire a lawyer to appeal the Registrar’s decision to a Judge sitting in Bankruptcy Court. The Judge refused to consider fresh evidence in the form of more descriptive psychiatric reports supporting the summary findings presented at the original discharge hearing. The Judge dismissed Mr. Kuczera’s appeal.

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: Appeal of the Judge’s decision

He now had his lawyer appeal the Judge’s decision to the Court of Appeal for Ontario. The Court of Appeal disagreed with the approach of the appeal judge. The Court of Appeal could not understand why the appeal judge would not allow the more detailed reports from Mr. Kuczera’s treating psychiatrist. These new detailed reports were further to the summary report provided to the Registrar.

The Court of Appeal went on to say that neither the Registrar nor the appeal judge gave proper weight to the psychiatric evidence. It also went on to say that a discharge condition requiring Mr. Kuczera to pay the payments due under the consumer proposal would not be “difficult”, as described by the Registrar. Rather, the Court of Appeal said that it would be “crushing”.

filing for bankruptcy in canada

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: What the Court of Appeal found

So the Court of Appeal found that:

  • the appeal judge erred by not considering the fresh psychiatric report evidence;
  • The need for the bankrupt to pay the balance of the consumer proposal payments would be crushing; and
  • The fresh psychiatric evidence was compelling.

Given the length of time that Mr. Kuczera remained in bankruptcy, and considering the above factors, the three-judge panel in the Court of Appeal for Ontario unanimously agreed that Mr. Kuczera gets his absolute discharge from bankruptcy.

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: Mental health issues

Mental health issues are at the forefront of the news. Most recently, both Kate Spade and Anthony Bourdain committed suicide because of mental health issues. I believe that as society recognizes mental health issues as a legitimate illness or disability, you will see it influencing Bankruptcy Court decisions. That certainly was the case for Mr. Kuczera.

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: Debt after your bankruptcy discharge

After receiving your bankruptcy discharge, NOBODY can try to collect this debt again. Discharged debt cannot appear on your credit report as anything other than a zero balance. Sometimes collection agencies report a discharged debt to the credit bureaus, hoping you will pay off the debt and not correct the information with the credit bureaus. The debt will still incorrectly appear on your credit report.

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: Discharged debt and your credit report


When discharged debt re-appears on your credit reports, it affects your credit score and can result in higher interest rates or credit denials. Sometimes debt collectors buy discharged debt, knowing they can’t collect on it, but hoping you don’t know that.

These debt collectors may tell you that the discharge doesn’t apply to them because they are not the original creditor. Don’t be fooled. Creditors who attempt to collect a discharged debt are violating a court order. The court can stop them, and they may even have to pay damages.

Discharged debt should not show on your credit report except as a zero balance – Monitor your credit report and be proactive. A discharged debt is not valid and is not collectible.

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada: Do you have too much debt?

I hope that you have found this information helpful. Bankruptcy is the last thing we try to do for a person in financial difficulty. If caught early enough, we can get involved in a debt settlement restructuring program for you.

The Ira Smith Team knows that you are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. The stress placed upon you is enormous. We understand your pain points.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today. We know how to solve your financial challenges, remove your pain and put things back on a healthy path. Contact us today for your free consultation so that we can save your life, Starting Over Starting Now.filing for bankruptcy in canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADA BANKRUPTCIES: GRAPHIC & VID – CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY LAW

Canada bankruptcies: Introduction

The purpose of this infographic, video and blog is to give you Canada bankruptcies information. I want to explain how Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law works for companies and what the major steps corporate bankruptcy laws in Canada are. So watch the video below and feel free to read in more detail right below the video.

Canada bankruptcies: Video

 

Canada bankruptcies: The 10 standard steps in a voluntary corporate bankruptcy

The actions of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (Trustee) takes with respect to the assets and the claims of creditors in a corporate bankruptcy may differ from case to case. However, there are 10 standard steps the Trustee takes in each corporate bankruptcy file. These steps are to understand and deal with the nature of the assets and the creditor claims.

Here are the 10 steps I take as a standard process with each corporate bankruptcy.

Step 1 – Initial meeting with Trustee

I meet with the Directors of the company by providing a free consultation. In this meeting, I learn the causes of the company’s insolvency and the nature and extent of the assets and the claims of various creditors. This includes potential trust claimants and secured creditors.

After obtaining the information I need to provide advice specific to that company’s situation, I decide if the company is a candidate for a restructuring, either informally or in a bankruptcy protection mode. If possible, this is preferable, as it will save jobs and allow the company to continue in business. If not, I advise about corporate bankruptcy and what is involved.

Step 2 – Directors meeting

If bankruptcy is the answer, the Directors formally meet and pass a resolution stating that the company is insolvent and must file an assignment in bankruptcy. The resolution also indicates which Director is authorized to sign all documents and be the Designated Officer in the bankruptcy proceedings. The Designated Officer is the person that will attend the First Meeting of Creditors and answer questions about the causes of the company’s insolvency and bankruptcy and how the company conducted business.

Step 3 – Signing all documents

With the signed Directors’ resolution in hand, I prepare all necessary bankruptcy documents. I then meet with the Designated Officer to explain the documents and have them all signed by him or her.

Step 4 – Filing with Official Receiver

The Official Receiver is the local representative and part of the Federal Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. I electronically file the required documents and wait for the Official Receiver to issue the bankruptcy certificate. The company is not officially bankrupt until the day and time that the Official Receiver issues the bankruptcy certificate. Normally it gets issued on the same day or the next day. So, if the timing of the start of the bankruptcy is important, I need to take a time lag into consideration.

Step 5 – Bankruptcy certificate

The company is not officially bankrupt until the day and time that the Official Receiver issues the bankruptcy certificate. Normally the issuance is on the same day or the next day. So, if the timing of the start of the bankruptcy is important, I need to take a time lag into consideration.

Once the certificate is issued, my firm Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., is named as the Trustee. This appointment is valid until the First Meeting of Creditors. At the meeting, one of the things the creditors must vote on, is affirming the Trustee’s appointment.

Step 6 – Trustee takes possession

Now that I am the Trustee, I have a duty to take possession of the company’s books and records and the known assets. Taking possession of the assets is subject to the rights and wishes of any trust claimants or secured creditors.

Step 7 – Trustee notifies known creditors

Within 5 days of the date of bankruptcy, I must familiarize myself with the books and records as ot the names and addresses of the creditors. I must also in those same 5 days, set the time and place for the First Meeting of Creditors and mail out the notice to the creditors advising of the bankruptcy, the creditors meeting details and providing a proof of claim form. I must also arrange for a notice of the bankruptcy be placed in a local newspaper so that any unknown creditors are officially on notice.

Step 8 – Trustee safeguards assets

Again subject to the rights of any trust claimants or secured creditors, I must safeguard, insure and store the assets. I can begin formulating a plan for selling the assets if there is equity for the bankruptcy estate. However, I cannot sell any assets before the First Meeting of Creditors without a Court Order. At the creditors meeting is where I seek the approval of the creditors for the plan I have prepared to sell the assets. After obtaining that approval, sales can be completed by the Trustee.

Step 9 – Trustee prepares the report

I prepare my Trustee’s Report To The Creditors On Preliminary Administration. The report is handed out to the creditors present at the First Meeting of Creditors. It is also a public document, so any creditor who could not attend the meeting can receive a copy.

The report covers the following areas:

  • Background information
  • Causes of financial difficulty
  • Description and estimated value of the company’s assets
  • Any trust, secured or property claims against the assets
  • What conservatory and protective measures to safeguard the assets the Trustee has taken to date
  • Books and records of the company
  • What the Trustee’s review to date of the books and records has determined, if anything
  • Did the Trustee retain legal counsel yet and if so, for what reason? If there is a trust, secured or property claims that the Trustee knows about, it would be normal for the Trustee to get a legal opinion on the validity and extent of such claims prior to the creditors meeting. The Trustee would advise the creditors of what the legal opinion says and how it will affect the sale of assets, or if there is even anything for the Trustee to sell.
  • The claims of the creditors identified to date.
  • What the anticipated realization and distribution to the unsecured creditors may be
  • The Trustee’s fee
  • Any other matters

Step 10 – The First Meeting of Creditors

Within 21 days of the date of bankruptcy, I hold the creditors meeting. My report described above is distributed. The Trustee, the Designated Officer and possibly the lawyer hired by the Trustee, attend the creditors meeting. Also attending are any creditors who wish to take part.

The creditors meeting is the place where the creditors can ask questions and find out information about the causes of bankruptcy and the Trustee’s estimate of what the unsecured creditors may receive by way of a distribution.

As mentioned above, the creditors also must approve the actions and activities of the Trustee to date, and approve any steps the Trustee wishes to take in realizing upon assets and dealing with creditors’ claims. The creditors also appoint up to 5 Inspectors. The Inspectors are representatives of the creditors who supervise and assist the Trustee and ultimately must approve the Trustee’s actions.

canada bankruptcies
canada bankruptcies

 

These are the 10 standard steps I take in every voluntary corporate bankruptcy. The exact things I must do to realize upon the assets and deal with the claims of creditors will depend on the assets and claims themselves. When the bankruptcy administration is complete, including any distributions made, the Trustee then obtains a discharge.

Is your company experiencing financial difficulty?

I hope that you have found this information helpful. Bankruptcy is the last thing we try to do for a company in financial difficulty. If caught early enough, we can get involved in a turnaround situation for your company to keep jobs and value.

The Ira Smith Team knows that you are worried because your company is facing significant financial challenges. Your business provides income not only for your family. Many other families rely on you and your company for their well-being. The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today. We know how to solve your company’s financial challenges, remove your pain and put things back on a healthy path. Contact us today for your free consultation so that we can save your company, Starting Over Starting Now.

canada bankruptcies
canada bankruptcies

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RECEIVERSHIP BANKRUPTCY DIFFERENCE CANADA: WHAT A TRUSTEE SAYS ABOUT IT

Introduction

The purpose of this blog is to discuss the corporate receivership bankruptcy difference Canada. Every general security agreement defines exactly how the secured lender will certainly deal with obtaining his/her cash when it comes to default. One means to do this is by selecting a receiver.

A receiver or receiver/manager is an individual/company licensed by the Federal Government to act as a licensed insolvency trustee. The receiver can be appointed either by an instrument in writing or by a court order. A receivership administration falls under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), where the receiver takes possession and control over the assets to of the insolvent business.

The receiver or receiver/manager will certainly seize the properties covered under the lender’s security or covered by the court order. The receiver will also develop a plan to market the assets for sale. After paying any type of priority claims as well as the receivership administration costs, the net funds are paid to the first secured creditor.

receivership bankruptcy difference canada

Can you have both at the very same time?

Sometimes there is both a bankruptcy plus a receivership. Receivership is a treatment for secured creditors, such as financial institutions. Bankruptcy is a treatment for unsecured creditors.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: Bankruptcy

A business could be placed right into bankruptcy by any one of the following methods:

  1. a creditor could apply for a bankruptcy order putting the business right into bankruptcy through the courts;
  2. the directors could assign the corporation right into bankruptcy;
  3. a restructuring proposal could be voted down at the meeting of creditors; or
  4. a restructuring proposal could be annulled by the trustee or creditor for non-compliance.

There are many reasons that a corporation could go into bankruptcy. These consist of the following:

  1. The firm has defaulted under its premises lease, the landlord distrains against the firm’s possessions. A bankruptcy or a notice to make a proposal filed before the property owner finishes the sale of assets defeats the lease distraint.
  2. The firm has unsecured assets (i.e., possessions without a lender’s security registered against it) that are available to be realized upon. Also, the firm cannot carry on business any longer.
  3. If a restructuring proposal is submitted, but the company could not get adequate funding to continue its business and complete the proposal.
  4. To reorganize the statutory priorities.
  5. To officially bring the business to an end as well as give a complete report to the creditors so they will not believe the principals engaged in any kind of misbehaviour.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: Corporate Bankruptcy

In a company bankruptcy, the licensed insolvency trustee seizes all the business’s properties plus deals with all the creditors. The directors and management of the company accept the authority of the trustee; if requested by the trustee, they can as well as aid the trustee in his/her tasks. This eliminates them from all the stress of dealing with the creditors as well as running the cash-starved business.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: Making the Application to Put a Debtor Into Bankruptcy

If a creditor is incapable of recovering the amount owed to it with any one of the readily available techniques which can be done, they may look to a bankruptcy application. This is especially so having actually acquired a judgment for the quantum owing which has not been satisfied. The BIA allows for the licensed insolvency trustee, once appointed, to take possession in an organized way, the assets of an insolvent debtor, to realize upon those assets and to then distribute the funds according to the scheme of priority in the BIA.

The BIA allows for the benefit of both bankrupts and their creditors. While the Act is not planned for usage as a device for the collection of private financial obligations, this may be the case in specific situations.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: When is a Creditor Allowed making a Bankruptcy Application?

An unsecured creditor could apply for a bankruptcy order where:

  1. the lender is owed $1,000 or even more on an unsecured basis, and
  2. there has actually been an act of bankruptcy by the borrower within the 6 months that come before the filing of the application. Keep in mind that a secured lender can value its security at less than the overall amount owing to develop a partly unsecured debt.

The BIA states that acts of bankruptcy consist of the following:

  1. if in Canada or elsewhere he makes an assignment of his property to a trustee for the benefit of his creditors generally, whether it is an assignment authorized by this Act or not;
  2. if in Canada or elsewhere the debtor makes a fraudulent gift, delivery or transfer of the debtor’s property or of any part of it;
  3. if in Canada or elsewhere the debtor makes any transfer of the debtor’s property or any part of it, or creates any charge on it, that would under this Act be void or, in the Province of Quebec, null as a fraudulent preference;
  4. if, with intent to defeat or delay his creditors, he departs out of Canada, or, being out of Canada, remains out of Canada, or departs from his dwelling house or otherwise absents himself;
  5. if the debtor permits any execution or other process issued against the debtor under which any of the debtor’s property is seized, levied on or taken in execution to remain unsatisfied until within five days after the time fixed by the executing officer for the sale of the property or for fifteen days after the seizure, levy or taking in execution, or if any of the debtor’s property has been sold by the executing officer, or if the execution or other process has been held by the executing officer for a period of fifteen days after written demand for payment without seizure, levy or taking in execution or satisfaction by payment, or if it is returned endorsed to the effect that the executing officer can find no property on which to levy or to seize or take, but if interpleader or opposition proceedings have been instituted with respect to the property seized, the time elapsing between the date at which the proceedings were instituted and the date at which the proceedings are finally disposed of, settled or abandoned shall not be taken into account in calculating the period of fifteen days;
  6. if he exhibits to any meeting of his creditors any statement of his assets and liabilities that shows that he is insolvent, or presents or causes to be presented to any such meeting a written admission of his inability to pay his debts;
  7. if he assigns, removes, secretes or disposes of or attempts or is about to assign, remove, secrete or dispose of any of his property with the intent to defraud, defeat or delay his creditors or any of them;
  8. if he gives notice to any of his creditors that he has suspended or that he is about to suspend the payment of his debts;
  9. if he defaults in any proposal made under this Act; and if he ceases to meet his liabilities generally as they become due.
  10. if he ceases to meet his liabilities generally as they become due.

Keep in mind that in most of the situations above, the creditor does not need to show that the borrower cannot pay various other creditors. In the last situation, the creditor should show that more than just its own debt is not being paid. Unique situations would differentiate matters though.

Unique scenarios can consist of allegations of fraud, near-fraud or those other transactions which fall under the types that would seem to be attackable by a trustee. At least on a prima facie basis.

It should, nonetheless, be remembered that stringent evidence of both your unsecured debt and an act of bankruptcy is required to have an individual or business judged bankrupt.

 

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: Under What Circumstances Should a Creditor Make An Application For A Bankruptcy Order?

Making an application for a bankruptcy order to put a debtor into bankruptcy is no little job. Prior to choosing this option, consider the following:

  1. the presence and amounts of claims that could take priority over your unsecured creditor status;
  2. the dollar measure of unsecured debt ranking on the same level with your financial debt (i.e., each unsecured creditor is paid according to the calculated share based on the measure of his/her debt);
  3. the existence of questionable transactions or transfers undervalue within the three-month to five-year evaluation period before the declaration of bankruptcy;
  4. your very own history of repayments from the debtor/borrower in addition to the normal payment patterns in the 3 months before the date of bankruptcy; as well as
  5. the legitimacy of any kind of security you might hold.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: The Bankruptcy Application Can Be Very Useful

Think about:

  1. has the debtor actually moved the residential property to a related party for inadequate or no consideration;
  2. where the debtor does not want to lose a specific part of its property (e.g. a private yacht, unique cars and truck or shares in a firm) or does not want its transactions and events to be inspected by a trustee and/or creditors;
  3. the debtor (being an individual) expects an inheritance;
  4. where the debtor (being an individual) needs to be an officer, director and/or shareholder of several businesses;
  5. the debtor (being an individual) might have his/her expert certification or licence from which he/she derives income compromised or lost as an outcome of being ruled a bankrupt;
  6. when the bankruptcy of the debtor would cause him/her to lose the ability to generally conduct business, such as required to use a trust account or employment requires the need to be bonded; or
  7. being a bankrupt would cause the company or individual to lose the advantage of a specific useful agreement, lease, or company.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: How Does a Creditor Make The Application For A Bankruptcy Order?

The creditor desiring to file the application will certainly need a lawyer to prepare the needed documents to make the bankruptcy application. The lawyer will serve the motion material and attend for the bankruptcy order. For an uncontested motion, the lawyer appears before the Bankruptcy Registrar who is a Master of the Court. If opposed, the matter can only be heard by a Judge.

The creditor has to additionally make arrangements with a licensed insolvency trustee to act will need to guarantee the trustee’s fee and costs incurred by the trustee where there are not enough proceeds from the sale of assets. A lot of times it is likewise needed to give the trustee a cash retainer.

When the Bankruptcy Order is made, the licensed insolvency trustee starts the bankruptcy administration. All actions against the insolvent are stayed.

Receivership bankruptcy difference Canada: What If You’re Company Has Too Much Debt?

Is your company insolvent? Are you looking for solutions? The Ira Smith Team is here to offer alternatives to restructuring and turnaround services however, if required, we also act as a licensed insolvency trustee in bankruptcy matters. We offer help in Vaughan as well as throughout the GTA.

Are you an individual or company who feels your situation is hopeless? Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can prepare and put in place the plan MADE JUST FOR YOU. The plan will free you from the burden of your financial challenges. With our help, you will go on to live a productive, stress-free, financially sound life.

Our motto is Starting Over, Starting Now! Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can help you overcome your financial difficulties. Contact us today.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

#VIDEO – BANKRUPTCY INFORMATION ONLINE: WHAT EVERY CANADIAN OUGHT TO KNOW#

Is there bankruptcy information online?

There is a large amount of bankruptcy information online. Just go to the website of any Licensed Insolvency Trustee or bankruptcy lawyer. There is information about:

  • Canadian bankruptcy
  • the Canadian Bankruptcy Act (BIA)
  • general insolvency information

The Ira Smith Trustee website

On our website, you will find bankruptcy information online such as:

The other source for information online

You can also find relevant bankruptcy information online at the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada website.

To take action you have to take it offline

Once you have gotten the online information, to take action, you need to take it offline. It is not possible in Canada to file online yourself.

To file either a consumer proposal to make debt settlement or bankruptcy, you need to select a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. A Licensed Insolvency Trustee administers the insolvency process in Canada.

The 10 Step Program of the Canadian Insolvency System

  1. Meet with a trustee to talk about your personal situation and your options.
  2. Work with the trustee to complete the required forms.
  3. The trustee filing your consumer proposal or bankruptcy and notifying your creditors.
  4. You attend a meeting of creditors if required.
  5. You attend two counselling sessions.
  6. Subject to your provincial exemptions, the trustee sells your assets; you may also have to make surplus income payments to the trustee.
  7. In certain circumstances, you may have to attend an examination by an officer at the OSB.
  8. The trustee prepares a report to the OSB describing your actions during the bankruptcy.
  9. You attend the discharge hearing if required.
  10. Your discharge and then the trustee completes the administration.

This is why to take action in the Canadian insolvency system you have to take it offline

How To Take Action To Achieve Debt Settlement

If you’re in deep financial difficulties and are looking for a way out, there is help for you. You need help from experts in debt – professional trustees.

We are:

  1. regulated by the Canadian government, as are our fees;
  2. licensed and have undergone a background check by the RCMP;
  3. subject to a stringent code of ethics; and
  4. required to maintain our competence by completing ongoing mandatory professional development each year.

Are you an individual or company who feels your situation is hopeless? Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can prepare and put in place the plan MADE JUST FOR YOU. The plan will free you from the burden of your financial challenges. With our help, you will go on to live a productive, stress-free, financially sound life.

Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today. Starting Over, Starting Now you can free yourself from debt.

THIS VLOG WAS INSPIRED IN PART BY OUR eBOOK – PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY CANADA: Not because you are a dummy, because you need to get your life back on track

bankruptcy information online

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL: REASONS WHY GOODWILL TORONTO IS NOT ALWAYS ENOUGH

The issue of a business restructuring proposal of Goodwill Toronto has recently been in the news. This video is an interview aired on TV Ontario, The Next Ontario show, with Dr. Sarah Kaplan, Professor of Strategic Management at Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto. The purpose of the interview is to obtain Dr. Kaplan’s views on the Goodwill Toronto closure of 16 Goodwill stores.

Toronto Goodwill thrift stores were operated, not unlike a Salvation Army thrift store, to raise funds to support the aims of the non-profit; in this case job skills and job creation for those who might otherwise be unemployable.

It takes money to restructure

We have all heard the expression “It takes money to make money”. I would like to make a slight twist on that expression by stating that it takes money to have a successful business restructuring proposal. Not only does the company and business have to be able to have sufficient cash flow in order to operate during the restructuring period, but there are also extraordinary one time expenditures related to the restructuring. Examples of such one time expenditures are reasonable one time exit fees to get out of uneconomical contracts, bonus payments to key personnel to ensure that they perform throughout the entire restructuring rather than resign for a new position elsewhere and professional fees.

Our Goodwill Toronto analysis

Our firm was consulted early in January to act as the licensed insolvency trustee in a business restructuring proposal of Goodwill Toronto. We spent half a day meeting with representatives of Goodwill Toronto in order to learn of their plight and to determine what sort of restructuring proposal might be possible.

In our meeting we learned that the main assets of Goodwill Toronto consisted of: (i) cash or liquid investments pledged to a Canadian chartered bank on account of business loans; (ii) accounts receivable with a certain percentage collectability; and (iii) inventory of items for sale, mainly used clothing, spread across 16 stores in leased locations.

We also learned that there were over 400 unionized employees, the majority of which had long term service with Goodwill Toronto. This is significant for three main reasons: (i) a viable restructuring proposal would be required to save the jobs of many, but probably not all of the employees; (ii) if the business restructuring proposal was unsuccessful, Goodwill Toronto would automatically be deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy (a deemed assignment); and (iii) in a bankruptcy, the employees would have a claim under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA).

It takes money to implement a successful business restructuring proposal

So, why is this significant? The reasons it is significant for a restructuring vs. bankruptcy are:

  1. The secured portion of the employees’ WEPPA claim coming ahead of all creditors, including the chartered bank, totalled approximately $900,000.
  2. Next in priority was the claim of the chartered bank.
  3. There were no free assets after the above 2 claims that Goodwill Toronto could use to fund operations or the extraordinary expenses associated with a business restructuring proposal discussed above.

So as you can see, with no free cash flow, no excess realizable assets or a third party who could fund a business restructuring proposal (or in the worst case a bankruptcy proceeding), it would not be possible for a knowledgeable licensed insolvency trustee to agree to act as there was no source of funding available.

This is why the best of intentions and goodwill (toronto) is not always enough!

The Sarah Kaplan interview

Professor Kaplan raises many good points in this interview, including:

  1. We should first think about what the whole business model of the goodwill is.
  2. The goods that they get to sell are aimed at just generating revenues that allow them to perform their actual services like job.
  3. It may be that the retail environment is tougher in some ways if we think about the alternative for people who buy things at goodwill would be to go to discount stores or dollar stores.
  4. As the market is becoming more and more competitive we could imagine that people would not need to shop at Goodwill if they can get a t-shirt for $5 at WalMart.
  5. Goodwill’s in other areas though are doing fine so we may need to look a little bit more deeply into the problem.
  6. The entire board resigned so there could be some other management issues that led to Goodwill Toronto to be running a deficit.
  7. You have to be well managed and being a social enterprise is not an excuse to not be well managed; you need the same skills capabilities and maybe even more skills and more capabilities than in the for-profit world.
  8. The fact that they’ve taken this extraordinary really drastic measure leads me to believe that the difficult retail environment is not the whole story and therefore not the whole story for other social enterprises.

NOTE: After writing this blog, Goodwill Toronto filed an assignment in bankruptcy.

Is your company in need of a business restructuring proposal?

If your company is trapped with too much debt, you need a professional trustee to help you manage debt and create a viable business restructuring proposal (either under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act or the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act – BIA or CCAA) before it reaches a critical stage where bankruptcy is your only option. We have been able to help many companies carry out a successful business restructuring proposal. Successful completion of such a program, will free you from the burden of your company’s financial challenges to go on to be a productive, profitable employer allowing management to focus on business growth and not be plagued by debt problems.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today in order to look at the bankruptcy alternative of a business restructuring proposal. We can help and Starting Over, Starting Now you can be restored to financial health.

keiko nakamura goodwill.org, business restructuring proposal, Goodwill Toronto, toronto goodwill thrift store, goodwill thrift stores toronto, salvation army thrift store, toronto thrifting, good will hunting, mathematics, matt damon, the next ontario, business, retail, social enterprises, goodwill toronto, ira smith trustee, hoyes, spergel, david sklar, farber, deemed assignment, assignment in bankruptcy, restructuring vs. bankruptcy, sarah kaplan, rotman school of management, licensed insolvency trustee, bankruptcy and insolvency act, bia, companies creditors arrangement act, ccaa, closure of 16 Goodwill stores

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RESTRUCTURING AND TURNAROUND IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE! HERE’S WHY

restructuring and turnaround, assignment in bankruptcy, bankruptcy, bankruptcies, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, BIA, Companies Creditors Arrangement Act, CCAA, Casimir Capital Ltd., deemed assignment in bankruptcy, trustee, proposal, starting over starting nowA restructuring and turnaround process that does not garner the support of the creditors can lead to bankruptcy. Bankruptcy ends up being a result of an attempt to save the business that has gone awry.

There are two statutes which set out the law of bankruptcy and insolvency law in Canada, including the Canadian regimes for a corporate restructuring and turnaround:

  • Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”): Contains 275 sections and is intended to be a complete code for bankruptcies. The law dealing with bankruptcies is within the BIA itself
  • Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”): Deals with corporate restructuring and turnaround (as does the BIA) and contains 22 sections. Most of the law dealing with the CCAA has developed from Court decisions as the statute is very thin!

Once in motion it’s extremely difficult to set aside an assignment into bankruptcy. That is why the interests of all stakeholders must be carefully considered and addressed in order for a restructuring and turnaround plan to be successful. Take for example the motion which was recently brought before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (In Bankruptcy and Insolvency) by Casimir Capital Ltd., an intermediary or broker of various underwritings and placements. Up until January 31, 2014 when it resigned, it was a member and registered as a securities dealer with the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (“IIROC”).

Casimir Capital Ltd. brought a motion seeking to set aside its deemed assignment into bankruptcy, and a review of a decision of a trustee to allow certain creditors to vote against a proposal put forth by the firm to settle its debts. At that meeting, 93.7% of the creditors voted against the proposal. However, in the motion, Casimir argued that some of the creditors should not have been allowed to vote as it disputes the validity of their claims.

The decision: In Re Casimir Capital, 2015 ONSC 2819 (CanLII), Casimir’s motion was dismissed. In his ruling The Honourable Mr. Justice Pattillo stated that the trustee “…was correct in allowing the Disputed Creditors to vote.” and “…the steps taken by the Proposal Trustee in reviewing and validating the proofs of claims filed, including the Disputed Creditors, for the purpose of voting at the first meeting were more than sufficient.”

The court noted that even if the votes of the disputed creditors were disallowed, 69.4% of the other creditors, whose claims are not disputed, voted against the proposal. The Court also agreed with the trustee that the debtor’s motion to have its deemed assignment in bankruptcy set aside fails in any event because even if the disputed creditors votes are set aside, the votes of the remaining creditors still defeat the proposal. As you can see, this restructuring and turnaround attempt was doomed for failure, as essentially none of the needs of the stakeholders were successfully addressed. Therefore in this case, a deemed assignment in bankruptcy was the end result. I am sure the professionals involved did the best they could with what they had to work with, but it obviously was not enough.

Unfortunately many companies and individuals find themselves in financial difficulties and surviving these financial difficulties can be a daunting task. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has helped many companies to not only survive, but prosper. Our corporate restructuring and turnaround strategies not only deal with short term crisis management but the long term viability of corporations. Contact us today so that Starting Over, Starting Now once again your company can a financially viable entity.

Call a Trustee Now!