Tag: real estate

RECEIVERSHIP IN CANADA: THE COMPLETE STORY OF WHOSE HAPPY RECEIVER IS IT ANYWAY?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 21, 2022

receivership in canada

Receivership in Canada: What does receivership mean?

I have just read a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commerical List dealing with an important aspect of receivership in Canada. The case is concerned with what happens when two equally applicable provincial laws appear to be working at cross purposes in the context of the receivership in Canada process.

I will explain the case and the process of company receivership in Canada. By understanding the process, the case will make more sense.

Secured lenders may enforce their security to recover loans from borrowers who have defaulted. This remedy available to secured creditors when a borrower, usually a company defaults, is known as receivership.

What does going into receivership in Canada mean?

A receivership is a legal process available to secured creditors, whereby a company’s affairs, business and property are entrusted to a receiver to manage and eventually sell the assets. Secured lenders may enforce their security to recover loans from borrowers who have defaulted. This remedy available to secured creditors is known as receivership.

If a business debtor does not make payments or otherwise defaults on a secured loan, the secured creditor would have the right to appoint a receiver to collect the money owed. Before appointing a receiver, a secured creditor must first issue a “Section 244” notice of intention to enforce security. This is a notification that secured creditors must send to defaulting debtors before appointing a receiver. Section 244 refers to that section number in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

The notice states that the security covers certain assets, that the company in default owes a specified amount to the secured creditor, and that the creditor may enforce the security after 10 days. The company in default may waive the notice period and consent to the appointment of the receiver.

Under the BIA, only a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) can be a receiver. No other party is licensed to administer a receivership in Canada.

receivership in canada

Receivership in Canada: What is the difference between a court-appointed receiver and a privately appointed receiver?

A privately-appointed receiver is a licensed trustee who is appointed by a contract between the insolvency trustee and the secured creditor. A private receiver is typically used when there is no dispute to ranking among secured creditors or various claims to ownership of the company’s assets. The powers of a receiver listed in the security document give the privately appointed receiver more limited powers than a court-appointed receiver gets under a court order.

A receiver is court-appointed when the secured creditor makes an application to the court for the appointment of a receiver with more expanded powers. Like a privately-appointed receiver, a court-appointed receiver takes control of a company’s property because of financial distress and when there is a dispute among secured creditors and others as to the ranking of secured claims and ownership of property.

Both kinds of receivers are tasked with protecting and preserving the value of the company or property and are certainly given broader powers by the court to do so.

How is receivership in Canada different from bankruptcy proceedings?

Many people mistakenly use the terms “receivership” and “bankruptcy” interchangeably. However, bankruptcy and receivership are two distinct legal proceedings with different implications.

Bankruptcy vs. receivership can be confusing, but once you understand the key differences between the two, it is fairly straightforward. Whether it is a private appointment or a court-appointed receiver, the differences between bankruptcy and receivership in Canada are the same.

A receivership is a legal remedy available to secured creditors to enforce their security rights against a defaulting debtor. A receiver is appointed to manage the debtor’s property and assets and sell them under a properly run and fair sales process.

The Canadian bankruptcy process is a distinct legal process. An insolvency trustee does not represent secured creditors in bankruptcy proceedings. Instead, under the bankruptcy regime, they represent the unsecured creditors of the bankrupt estate. A corporate debtor may be subject to both bankruptcy and receivership proceedings simultaneously.

One of the major differences has to do with the creditors. In a bankruptcy administration, the bankruptcy trustee must call a meeting of creditors. This is where the insolvency trustee provides its report on the affairs and conduct of the bankrupt debtor and unsecured creditors get to vote on any matters of importance. In receivership, there is no such requirement to hold a meeting of creditors.

receivership in canada

What are the key distinctions between receivership in Canada and liquidation?

So you know what receivership is by now. The federal BIA doesn’t govern liquidation, that’s done under the provincial Business Corporations Act or Wind-Up Act.

A liquidation is for a solvent company where the shareholders, Officers and directors decide to cease business operations. The company puts up its assets for sale and uses the proceeds to pay off its creditors with cash. Any funds left over are then distributed to the shareholders.

A liquidator can be appointed either privately by the company’s directors or by a court order. Liquidation is therefore different from both bankruptcy and receivership in Canada.

Can individuals be placed into receivership in Canada?

The answer is yes. When a secured creditor wishes to take enforcement action upon the security agreement they have against a debtor’s property, as indicated above, they have the remedy of receivership in Canada. This remedy allows them to collect as much of their secured debt as possible.

There are no restrictions as to who can go into receivership in Canada. One of our more famous (infamous?) receivership cases over the years has been the receivership of the assets, property and undertaking of Norma and Ronauld Walton.

receivership in canada

Receivership in Canada: Whose receiver is it anyway?

Now for the court case where two different provincial laws caused a fight amongst secured creditors over the appointment of a receiver. The case is Canadian Equipment Finance and Leasing Inc. v. The Hypoint Company Limited, 2618905 Ontario Limited, 2618909 Ontario Limited, Beverley Rockliffe and Chantal Bock, 2022 ONSC 6186. The two competing provincial statutes are the Mortgages Act and the Personal Property Security Act.

The business is conducted through two affiliated entities. One owns the property and the other operates the business. This is quite a typical arrangement.

One creditor funded the purchase of equipment and took PPSA security over it. Another creditor funded the acquisition of the real property and has a traditional mortgage security. The security agreements extend over different assets, and the outcome is usually uncomplicated.

However, when equipment that has been purchased is attached to real property, there is disagreement about whether and how it can be removed, and whether such removal will negatively affect the value of both the equipment and the real property. The question is now more complicated: which creditor’s rights should take priority over this matter?

Both the equipment lender and the mortgagee are seeking to enforce their security. The equipment lender has filed a motion with the court to appoint a receiver over both the operating company (Opco) that owns the pledged equipment and the holding company (Holdco) that owns the real estate. This would allow the receiver to manage and sell the assets of both companies in order to repay the outstanding debt.

In this case, Opco was a commercial marijuana operation that was unable to get off the ground due to its heavy debt load and startup problems.

Although the mortgagee began power of sale enforcement proceedings, they do not object to a receiver being appointed over the equipment only. The mortgagee wishes to continue its power of sale proceedings and opposes the receiver being appointed over the building. The mortgagee in possession is of the opinion that the equipment is attached to the building and cannot be removed.

The mortgagee concurred that the court has the power to assign a receiver over the property of both Opco and Holdco according to section 101 of the Ontario Courts of Justice Act. They stated that, if a receiver is appointed, the receiver needs to be a firm chosen by them.

Both the licensed insolvency trustee firm preferred by the mortgagee and the firm nominated by the equipment lender filed a consent to act with the court.

What are the conditions under which a receiver may be appointed?

The court looked at numerous factors in order to make a decision on whether or not to appoint a receiver, and if so, which one, including those that have historically in receivership in Canada cases been taken into account in such determinations:

Although it is not essential for a creditor to establish irreparable harm if a receiver is not appointed where the appointment is authorized by the security documentation, the court considered if no order is made, will irreparable harm be caused?
The size of the debtor company’s equity in the assets and the need for protection or safeguarding of assets during litigation are important factors to consider when assessing the risk to the security holder.
The kind of property it is.
The potential for the assets to be wasted or dissipated.
The need to safeguard the property until a legal ruling is made.
The parties’ respective balance of convenience needs to be considered when making the decision.
Pursuant to the loan documentation, the creditor has the right to an appointment.
Enforcing the security instrument when the security holder experiences or anticipates difficulties with the debtor.
The principle of appointing a receiver should be approached with caution.
The court will determine whether appointing a receiver is necessary to enable the receiver to carry out its duties efficiently.
The effect a receivership order will have on the parties.
The parties’ conduct.
How long a receivership may last.
The financial impact on the parties.
The likelihood of maximizing return to the parties is increased.
The goal of ensuring the smooth running of the receiver’s duties.

As everyone agreed that all assets of both Opco and Holdco should be sold to maximize recovery for all creditors, but cannot agree on the process by which that should be undertaken, resulting in the entire process being stalled, the judge was satisfied that it is just and convenient to appoint a receiver.

The court found that either proposed receiver was acceptable and decided that the receiver nominated by the mortgagee would be appointed by the court to administer all assets. The receiver would eventually come back to court with a sales plan to maximize the value of all the assets subject to the security of all stakeholders.

receivership in canada

How the entrepreneur can avoid receivership in Canada

As a business owner, the way to avoid the receivership process is long before financial difficulties ever become serious financial problems. Here are a few tips on how to do just that:

Keep a close eye on your finances. This means regularly reviewing your income and expenses, and making sure you have a good handle on your cash flow.
Stay current on your bills. This includes not only making timely payments but also staying on top of any changes in your billing terms or amounts.
Keep good records. This means having up-to-date financial statements and documentation for all of your income and expenses.
Make a plan. If you do find yourself in a financial bind, have a plan in place for how you’ll get out of it. This may include negotiating with creditors, seeking new financing, or making cuts to your expenses.
Seek professional help from a licensed insolvency trustee with commercial insolvency experience. If your business is viable and you seek help early enough, there may be many options. The most common ones are refinancing with or without financial restructuring. Reviewing your business allows us to make restructuring recommendations allowing your viable company to become healthy and profitable once again.

Receivership in Canada summary & speak with a licensed insolvency trustee

I hope you enjoyed this receivership in Canada Brandon’s Blog.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are now worried about its economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags assets for sale, assets subject, bankrupt estate, bankruptcy and receivership, bankruptcy proceedings, bankruptcy process, bankruptcy regime, bankruptcy trustee, Bankruptcy vs. receivership, business operations, business owners, Canadian bankruptcy, commercial insolvency experience, company defaults, company in default, company receivership, court appointed receiver, creditors in bankruptcy, debtor company, differences between bankruptcy, financial difficulties, insolvency trustee, insolvent companies, legal proceedings, legal process, licensed trustee, meeting of creditors, notice of intention, outstanding debt, private appointments, private receiver, real estate, receivership in Canada, receivership proceedings, receivership process, sales process, secured creditors, secured debt, secured lender, security agreement, security instrument, security rights, solvent company, Trustee and Receiver, trustee in bankruptcy, unsecured creditors

Brandon Blog Post

LEGAL PROCEEDING JUDGMENT LIEN: 2 KINDS OF JUDGMENT LIENS WITH HUGELY DIFFERENT RESULTS IN BANKRUPTCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 9, 2022

Legal proceeding: What are some things I can do if someone owes me money and refuses to pay?

In Canada, there are several options in what you can do when someone owes you money and you do not hold any security against any of their property. First, a person or company should obviously make one or more demands on the party that owes them the money before starting any legal proceeding.

If that proves to be unsuccessful, your next steps will probably be governed by how that creditor reacted to your demand. Did they just ignore you or did they put up either a false or somewhat valid dispute to your claim?

One possible next step is that you can retain a lawyer to make a demand to collect the money owed. If those initial efforts to collect payment prove unsuccessful, your lawyer can begin a legal proceeding against the person or company you believe owes you the money. If your legal action is successful in proving your case in court, you will receive a judgment against the party. One option is you can then take this judgment to a debt collector to try to collect on it.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I first explore several issues surrounding being a judgment debtor, having a judgment debt to collect and what happens if the judgment creditor files for bankruptcy? As the title of this Brandon’s Blog suggests, there are 2 kinds of judgment liens and in bankruptcy, the results are very different.

So I first look at what it means to get a judgment and what happens to a judgment creditor and the judgment debt if the debtor files for bankruptcy. To do this, I look at a recent decision from the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta which looks at the 2 kinds of judgments in detail.

Legal proceeding: Retrieving payment from a debtor

If you are having financial difficulties collecting a debt from another person or company, you may need legal assistance. If the other person (or their lawyer) refuses to pay, then you can take a legal proceeding to collect the money you are owed.

If you are owed money by someone, your lawyer will want as much information as possible before starting any legal action. The first step is to collect as many details and supporting documents as you can about the debt. Make sure you have a comprehensive overview of the debt, including the amount owed, the name of the debtor, and any relevant deadlines or timelines.

Next, collect the name, address, and phone number of the individual or company who owes the debt – the debtor. Finally, make sure that your proposed legal proceeding is going to be handled for the person or company who is actually owed the debt – the creditor. You need to be precise in who the legal proceeding is against and who it is for.

Finally, make sure that your proposed legal proceeding is going to be handled for the person or company who is actually owed the debt – the debtor. You need to be precise in who the legal proceeding is against and who it is for.

Your lawyer will take the first step of issuing a demand letter to the debtor who owes you money. The letter will most likely threaten that your lawyer will begin a legal proceeding by filing a lawsuit on your behalf if the debt is unpaid after a specific number of days or weeks. If you win, you now have the amount owing as a proven judgment debt.

Legal proceeding: In Ontario, after how long does debt become uncollectible?

The law in Ontario prevents anyone from beginning a legal proceeding against you for debts that you owe that are over 2 years old. This law is called the Limitations Act, and it applies to any debts that you owe, even if the creditor stops trying to collect the debt.

The Ontario Limitations Act establishes a maximum timeframe within which court proceedings relating to a “claim” may be initiated. In general, someone has 2 years from the time they either knew or ought to have known, that they had suffered a loss or damages as a result of an action or omission on your part.

In general, debt is uncollectible and you cannot be sued on it after 2 years have passed from the time the debt went into default resulting in the party’s claim against you. This result has even been extended to Canadian insolvency proceedings where a creditor files a proof of claim. If there is no judgment, and the claim is over 2 years old, that debt may very well be statute-barred in Ontario and the licensed insolvency trustee would have to disallow that claim.

Legal proceeding: Collecting money that is owed to you after winning a court case in Ontario

A judgment is the result of a successful legal proceeding against one or more parties in order to prove the existence of a debt. Getting a judgment made by a provincial court is just the first step. Now the money must be collected. A judgment claim can then be registered against a debtor’s personal property or real property to become a judgment lien. A successful plaintiff in their legal proceeding, now a judgment creditor, would do this to secure payment of the debt. A lien is a method of ensuring payment of money owed by registering against a debtor’s property as security.

The lien arising from a legal proceeding judgment can be properly registered to attach as a security interest in either personal property or real property. Examples against personal property would be:

to garnishee wages;
obtaining funds from a bank account or non-exempt investments; or
amounts to be paid in the future, such as the accounts receivable of a business from various customers.

When it comes to real property, if the judgment debtor is a property owner, a registered judgment lien attaches to the real estate just like a mortgage if properly registered to secure amounts payable.

In Ontario, if you wanted to register a judgment lien against a judgment debtor’s personal property, you would do so under the Ontario Personal Property Security Registration System.

Legal proceeding: What could happen if you were to lose a lawsuit and be unable to pay?

What are the judgement proof laws in Ontario?

Being judgment proof means that creditors cannot take your assets if you cannot pay what you owe. The first way this could be is because the only assets you have are the type that is exempt from seizure under provincial law. The Ontario Execution Act stipulates which assets are exempt from seizure.

The second way you may be judgment proof is that your non-exempt assets are fully encumbered by secured loans, such as mortgages and lines of credit, and that there is no value in your property for anyone else, including the judgment debtor. So if you’re judgement proof, your assets are safe from seizure.

If you’re judgment-proof in Ontario, then you don’t have to worry about having your assets seized. However, you will have to learn to live without a bank account, as cash in the bank is not an exempt asset. You also need to be the type of person who doesn’t worry.

You can’t be the type of person who worries about unsatisfied judgments against them or their credit rating taking a hit because of that. You have to plan never to own any non-exempt property in your name because that can be seized.

The non-judgment proof debtor can take action as soon as judgment is given

What if the judgment debtor is not judgment proof but the judgment renders them insolvent? In that case, the assets owned by the judgment debtor are insufficient to pay off the judgment and all of the other debts of the judgment debtor in full. Therefore that judgment debtor may very well need to look at an insolvency proceeding to deal with their debts. Depending on their debt load, they may have to consider either a consumer proposal or a full restructuring proposal or even bankruptcy. Each of these insolvency proceedings is conducted under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

This is the introduction to the court decision I will now discuss from MNP Ltd v Canada Revenue Agency, 2022 ABQB 320.

Legal proceeding: What does it mean to have a judgement against you in Canada when you file for bankruptcy?

At the beginning of Brandon’s Blog, I said that there are two types of judgment liens with very different outcomes in bankruptcy. The Alberta court decision released on May 3, 2020, supports this view. The Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice M. J. Lema are quite clear and well-reasoned.

The issue that the court had to decide on was “What does a writ of enforcement’s “binding interest”, acquired on registration against a debtor’s land, mean after the debtor’s bankruptcy?”. The fact that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) are respondents, hopefully, gives you a clue as to the 2 kinds of registered judgment liens against a judgment debtor.

The licensed insolvency trustee argued that the pre-bankruptcy priority arising from that interest continues after bankruptcy, that the Trustee acquires that priority position on the debtor’s bankruptcy, and that, on behalf of registered writ-holders (and, in fact, all unsecured creditors). The Trustee further argued that it can assert the binding interest and resulting priority position against a down-title secured creditor (here, CRA) and a secured-against-personal-property-only secured creditor (here, RBC).

Unfortunately, the Trustee’s position as Trustee in the bankruptcy of the judgment debtor was incorrect, according to the Honourable Mr. Justice M.J. Lema. From here on, I will refer to the judgment debtor as the bankrupt.

The key facts are that, before bankruptcy, various registered judgment liens/writs of enforcement were done against various of the bankrupt’s lands. Those writs included writs in favour of the CRA for unpaid taxes and associated amounts. The CRA writs were registered after most or all of the other writs.

The bankrupt was also indebted to the RBC, which held a general security agreement giving it a security interest in all of the debtor’s present and after-acquired personal property. After bankruptcy, via both foreclosures and trustee-initiated sales, various proceeds were harvested from the debtor’s lands.

Legal proceeding: #1 – How a CRA judgment lien becomes their competitive advantage in bankruptcy

How does CRA get a judgment against a tax debtor? CRA can take its assessment of the taxpayer to Federal Court without notice to the taxpayer or anyone else. Before this happens, CRA has already sent the taxpayer the notice of assessment and if it was not appealed, tried to collect the money. If the taxpayer fails to pay, then CRA’s lawyer through the Department of Justice can go to Federal Court to get the judgment. The judgment that CRA obtains is called a “memorial”.

Read together, s. 223 of the Income Tax Act (ITA) and s. 87 of the BIA clearly provide that:

if the Crown registers a memorial against a property in the land titles office
under ss. 223(5) and (6), it is an ordinary judgment creditor by statute; however,
subsection 223(11.1) deems the memorial to be a secured claim in bankruptcy, provided that the requirements of s. 87(1) are met.

There is no ambiguity.

The Trustee acknowledged that, on bankruptcy and per the combined effect of ss. 223(11.1) of the ITA and ss. 86 and 87 BIA, CRA is deemed to be a secured creditor in the bankruptcy. However, the Trustee argued that CRA’s secured position is subordinate to any writs that were registered before the memorial was registered. The court shot down that argument so there is no need to go through the Trustee’s rationale for making it.

By virtue of the ITA, CRA not only has a secured claim but gets to leapfrog everyone else – for sure judgment lien creditors but also prior registered secured creditors registered in the land titles office against the bankrupt property owner. This assumes that the registration is done in the proper land titles office.

The CRA memorial registered against any parcels of land is the first kind of judgment lien. As you can see, Parliament intended that CRA gets a priority secured position ahead of everyone else upon the bankruptcy of the taxpayer landowner. Ahead of not just anyone with a judgment or construction lien, but also any prior registered secured creditors, normally mortgagees.

This takes care of the 1st type of a registered judgment lien in bankruptcy. CRA’s judgment lien moves into a #1 deemed secured lien position if the judgment debtor goes bankrupt.

Legal proceeding: #2 – What happens if a judgement lien is not paid and the judgment debtor goes bankrupt

The court’s analysis proves that the 2nd type of judgment lien, being that of an ordinary judgment creditor does not retain any special status. The judgment creditor is an unsecured creditor and the fact that they registered a judgment lien before the judgment debtor filed for bankruptcy means nothing.

The possibility of a judgment lien-enforcement sale of land or building by the judgment creditor in question or other judgment creditors is effectively eliminated once the debtor is bankrupt. The same is true for a sale of land or building or other disposition of the debtor’s assets by the debtor him-, her-, or itself, regardless of the purchase price. The Trustee is installed to realize the debtor’s non-exempt assets and make sure the creditors are paid, in priority according to the provisions of the BIA.

What is the significance of a judgment lien’s binding interest after the debtor becomes bankrupt? The answer is none.

If there is no bankruptcy, a judgment lien’s binding interest has been interpreted to mean that it:

anchors the judgment creditor’s right to seek a sale of the property;
protects that creditor’s position against sales or other dispositions (e.g. mortgaging or charging) of the property by the judgment debtor; and
provides that the creditor will get actual notice and can share in the proceeds of any legal disposition of the property, such as a writ-based sale by another enforcement creditor, a foreclosure, or a sale by the owner.

A registered judgment lien holder’s binding interest does not make it a “secured creditor” under the BIA. This means that the holder’s interest is not equal to or equivalent to a mortgage or other security against the property for a debt that is due or accruing due. So with the bankruptcy of the judgment debtor, all registered judgment lienholders are merely ordinary unsecured creditors. They have no special rights and can only expect to receive a distribution from the bankruptcy estate once any deemed trust, secured and preferred claims are paid in full, subject to the levy of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy.

The Trustee tried to argue that the judgment creditors who registered against the real properties of the bankrupt company somehow retained their priority position against each other based on their respective dates of registration. The court decided that this could never be the case. Rather, the BIA prescribes how their ordinary unsecured claims are treated.

The Honourable Mr. Justice M.J. Lema confirmed in his decision that this 2nd kind of judgment lien has no priority of any kind once the judgment debtor is bankrupt. Whether the bankrupt is a man, woman or corporation, the answer is still the same.

Legal proceeding: After judgement and bankruptcy

The judgment debtor’s bankruptcy changed the priorities landscape. The binding interests stemming from judgment lien registration against one or more parcels of land were undercut. Judgment lien creditors other than CRA were relegated to waiting and watching the Trustee gather and sell the assets, regardless of what period of time it takes.

Under that scheme, secured creditors are given priority over unsecured creditors, regardless of their position before bankruptcy. In this case, both CRA (via its deemed security interest against real property) and RBC (via its GSA against personal property) are secured creditors. According to the BIA, they must be paid in full before the unsecured creditors (both preferred and ordinary) are entitled to receive any money.

I hope this Brandon’s Blog on a successful legal proceeding leading to a judgment was helpful to you in understanding more about the 2 kinds of judgments and how they are treated very differently in bankruptcy. It does not matter if it is a personal bankruptcy or corporate bankruptcy.

If you or your company has too much debt, we understand how you feel. You’re stressed out and anxious because you can’t fix your or your company’s financial situation on your own. But don’t worry. As a government-licensed insolvency professional firm, we can help you get your personal or corporate finances back on track.

If you’re struggling with money problems, call the Ira Smith Team today. We’ll work with you to develop a personalized plan to get you back on track and stress-free, all while avoiding the bankruptcy process if at all possible.

Call us today and get back on the path to a healthy stress-free life.

Tags Bankruptcy, deemed secured creditor, judgment, judgment creditor, judgment debt, judgment debtor, judgment lien, land titles office, legal action, legal proceeding, MNP Ltd v Canada Revenue Agency, personal property, personal property security registration, purchase price, real estate, real property, registered judgment, secured creditors, unsecured creditors

Brandon Blog Post

THE RISING COST OF LIVING IN TORONTO AND ELSEWHERE: WILL YOU BE PUSHED INTO HUGE DEBT?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 21, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere: Canada’s rising annual inflation rate is a cost-of-living crisis

Two articles about living costs for Canadians were published this week. According to a recent Angus Reid poll, many Canadians’ quality of life is further diminishing as more debt is accumulated and the pandemic continues. Then Statistics Canada announced that the annual inflation rate reached its highest level since February 2003 in September.

When you hear the term “cost of living“, it’s often accompanied by the phrase “rise” or “have risen”. Recent data shows that Canada as a whole has experienced an increase in the cost of living. In this Brandon Blog, I describe how the rising cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere has the potential to create more debt and therefore more stress on Canadians.

cost of living in toronto

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere: What is the Consumer Price Index?

Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a national measure of prices based on living costs across major cities in Canada. As the most quoted measure of living costs today, the CPI shows how costs have changed from year to year and illustrate that not everything is as cheap as it once was.

It is inflation that tells the whole story. A rising cost of goods and services reduces the purchasing power of the dollar. Cost increases are measured by this indicator. A CPI calculation represents the average cost of an accepted basket of the standard of living items, such as:

food prices;
cost of housing;
transportation costs; and
medical costs

How does inflation affect our daily lives? Inflation increases food, gasoline, and utility costs, reducing savings and discretionary spending. Price increases create economic inequity. They are tough on the middle class, and even harder on the lower class.

What is behind the rise in prices? The federal government, via Statistics Canada, reports that the consumer price index in September was up 4.4 percent compared to last year. In August, the reading grew by 4.1% year-over-year. Last month, consumers paid 32.8 percent more for gasoline than in September 2020. This increase in gas prices is what drove most of the increase.

cost of living in toronto

***Cost of living in Toronto* and elsewhere: The negative side of the *cost of living increases***

As the cost of living and the inflation rate rises, Canadians are often caught short by unexpected financial burdens that can quickly devour their earnings. At the same time, the cost of day-to-day living, like food and housing, is increasing, which makes it hard for Canadians to save money for the future. Research shows that for low-income families, housing, food, transit and child-care costs generally are all increasing at a faster rate than incomes. This can easily push poorer households below the poverty line.

All of us have heard about the cost of living increases, and so far it has been a controversial topic. We haven’t reached a consensus regarding this issue. Some say we shouldn’t worry about it, while others say we need to act.

The surge in inflation highlighted the failure of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s economic policies, said Erin O’Toole during the recent federal election. How did PM Trudeau respond? In his view, monetary policy is not one of the top priorities for his government after the election. He continued:

“When I think about the biggest, most important economic policy this government if re-elected, would move forward, you’ll forgive me if I don’t think about monetary policy. You’ll understand that I think about families.”

Canadians were encouraged by Erin O’Toole to vote out the government. Well, that did not happen!

cost of living in toronto

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere: How the rising Consumer Price Index affects you

Researchers at Angus Reid Group conducted an online poll of 2,015 Canadians in September to determine the affordability of living in Canada. The survey found 26% of respondents had incurred at least one new debt, with 72% reporting that this debt has negatively affected their lives. The most common type of new debt was credit card debt.

In a previous Brandon Blog, I reported that many households were able to pay off higher-rate credit card debt during the lockdown while receiving payments from federal government COVID-19 pandemic support programs. After a return to normal, however, that will look, those same households run the risk of increasing their credit card balances again. The reality is that most people used their credit cards as a supplement to their income to pay for living expenses and/or lifestyles due to insufficient income.

According to the new survey, Canadians have now started taking on new credit card debt. As a result, their quality of life is further diminished as more debt accumulates and the pandemic continues. Canadians’ savings have also been impacted by increased spending on essentials, job loss and lower-income, according to the survey.

High real estate prices are forcing many Canadians to delay home ownership, according to the survey. Meanwhile, we have seen that the one thing the pandemic couldn’t stop was the booming real estate market in large Canadian cities. Even areas not typically associated with significant price increases are showing growth in real estate prices now that more big city dwellers are opting for a more flexible lifestyle by working remotely. Based on these results, it is clear that there is a larger gap between those who can afford to buy a home and those who cannot.

60 percent of Canadians said they would prioritize saving for an emergency fund or nest egg. In other words, Canadians’ priorities have shifted in 2022, with most thinking about saving for emergencies, retirement, and a major purchase like a house, car, or cottage.

cost of living in toronto

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere: Tips to combat the financial hit of rising living costs

If we spend $10 at a coffee shop every day, what should we do differently ahead of time so that we’re not tempted to spend that $10? All of these things become habits, and habits are hard to break.

Regular readers know that in prior blogs about household debt and spending, I have stressed the importance of household budgets. Every source of family income and every expense must be considered. You need to look critically at all family expenses and separate the wants from the needs. Attempt to cut every expense you have (yes, every single one!) with the aim of saving 10% – 50% right now. Also, consider creatively if you can earn extra income in any other way.

There is no doubt that rising inflation, ongoing economic challenges worldwide, and the risk of interest rates going up are causing many Canadians to feel stressed and stretched to the limit. But it is still possible to spend less and build savings, even as your living costs rise.

As you do so, here are a few tips to help you stay on top of your finances and avoid debt in spite of rising costs:

Even though restaurants reopen, that doesn’t mean you have to buy most of your meals there. You can buy food at grocery stores instead.
Take advantage of what’s on sale or can be purchased at a discount when planning your meals.
If you can, buy bigger packages when they’re on sale for a lower price than smaller packages.
Analyze all your household and utility bills to find savings.
Savings are possible in many areas, including the bank account, cell phone, and internet plans.
Those $10 a day you spend at coffee shops add up to $170 a month if you do it 4 days a week.

When you’re looking forward to preserving your overall well-being through a sound money management plan, it’s easy to remember why you’re making frugal choices.

cost of living in toronto

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere summary

I hope you found this cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere Brandon Blog post informative. Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Brandon Blog Post

IS MORTGAGE DEBT NOW THE OBSESSION FOR MANY CANADIANS?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date June 9, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Is mortgage debt surge responsible for pushing Canadian consumer debt levels higher?

For many people in Canada, a house is the centre of the family’s financial world. As a result, if the family’s financial situation changes, the house, and the mortgage that goes with it, become the focus of the family.

Is mortgage debt pressing consumer financial debt higher in Canada?

Equifax Canada recently reported that it is. One effect of the pandemic is that Canadian credit card usage and debt are dropping, as families borrow more cash right for their homes while spending less on everything else.

In this Brandon Blog, I offer some thoughts on why is mortgage debt rising, pushing total Canadian consumer debt above pre-pandemic levels, while credit card debts are falling during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Is mortgage debt surge pushing Canada consumer debt to $2.1 trillion?

Those in the real estate sector in Canada will certainly agree that the housing market is one of the greatest financial factors that influence the success of the Canadian economy. These days, the sector is exceptionally competitive which has a great influence on the housing market.

Competition among residential real estate buyers is fierce in many markets throughout the nation, especially British Columbia and Ontario. The pandemic has actually stimulated a record boom in Canada’s housing market. Low rates of interest, as well as brand-new demand for a larger home, have actually sustained bidding battles for houses.

What’s behind the record-breaking growth in the hot housing market in Canada? Is mortgage debt behind the increase in mortgage debt? Yes, according to Statistics Canada. It stated last Friday that Canadian families incurred a new high level of mortgage debt in the 2nd quarter in a row. Canadian households added record mortgage debt amid low interest, high prices.

Driving hot markets in many regions aided move real estate prices and the average sale price higher, pushing the need for home loans to $34.9 billion in the 4th quarter of 2020. This need beat the previous high of $28.7 billion in the 3rd quarter, Statistics Canada reported.

Is mortgage debt growth making Canada’s economy vulnerable? The central bank says yes

What is the Bank of Canada‘s worries? The Bank of Canada said that growing mortgage debt makes Canada’s economy vulnerable.

High household debt, as well as inequalities in the real estate market, have escalated in the past 12 months, leaving the economy more prone to economic shocks. The central bank said that although consumer debt had actually dropped in early 2020, a boost in housing debt has more than balanced out that decrease, with total household debt climbing sharply since mid-2020.

That is one reason why, effective June 1, 2021, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI, Canada’s leading financial regulatory authority, elevated the home mortgage stress test level for mortgage applications through banks, insurance companies and credit unions. It does not yet apply to private mortgages.

The stress test was raised so that borrowers must now be able to meet the financial test to carry a mortgage at an annual interest rate of either 5.25 percent or 2 points over the actual mortgage market rate they can get, whichever is greater. This will certainly make it harder for some to get approved for a home mortgage. The government hopes this will lead to reducing the pool of accepted borrowers as well as eventually, lowering residence rates.

The June 1 adjustment implies potential mortgagors will certainly need to prove that their finances can stand paying at that greater interest rate, no matter what rate a lender is willing to lend at. OSFI hopes that this adjustment will reduce either the number of buyers or the amount a purchaser can afford to pay given the mortgage financing available to them. The hope is that it will stem the higher pressure on house prices in the country.

Is mortgage debt the only reason Canadian household debt is so high?

As you can see from the above, mortgage debt is up but credit card debt is down. in fact, it is at a 6 year low. So is mortgage debt the only reason total household debt is up? When I speak of mortgage debt, I am talking about conventional mortgage debt. The answer is no.

Equifax Canada also reports that other big-ticket credit products like credit lines have likewise represented a general increase in Canadian financial debt. She said there was a 60 percent rise in house equity credit lines! Like mortgage debt, this is a secured debt registered against the borrower’s home.

People are borrowing these additional home equity lines of credit. The worry is if rates of interest rise, individuals may not be able to pay the debt servicing costs and the debt payments for that financial obligation. Those kinds of loans are usually at a variable interest rate.

**My take on why is mortgage debt and other household debt driving in these directions?**

It wasn’t an interest rate boost that forced Canadians to get consumer spending in check – it took a pandemic for many of us to transform our spending practices. Stay-at-home orders, lockdowns, nowhere to go and fewer places to spend our money have all contributed to what we are now seeing. Couple that with many Canadians being able to work from home and Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan.

Consumer spending shifted away from credit card spending. My personal view is that people’s spending patterns shifted away from consumer goods that normally would be charged to credit cards. Perhaps some of the increase in home equity lines of credit was to consolidate debt by borrowing against their homes to pay down high rate credit card debt.

Also, people were hunkered down working, going to school and generally living 24/7 in their homes. We all got to see the points we love about our home and perhaps noticed for the first time, or at least were bothered for the first time, with little imperfections in our homes. That could lead to increased borrowing in order to do additions or renovations.

It also could lead to selling the existing home and buying a different one and moving. Maybe that drove more demand than there was supply, which caused home prices to continue rising. Increased pricing required increased mortgage application numbers, mortgage borrowing, the individual size of mortgages to increase and drove total mortgage growth. Perhaps FOMO also contributed to the increased demand.

This is merely conjecture on my part, but one thing is for sure. The pandemic could not stop house prices from rising, mortgage debt from increasing and credit card debt from reducing. Overall, household debt increased. The worry now is if interest rates rise, it will take a larger proportion of household income to meet debt servicing requirements. Hopefully, everyone’s household budget will be able to handle it.

Is mortgage debt now the focus for many Canadians?

Apparently so. I hope that you found this Is mortgage debt now the obsession for many Canadians Brandon Blog interesting. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

is mortgage debt

Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEE OF PARENTS ESTATE: DO I REALLY HAVE TO?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 11, 2019

If If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Trustee of parents estate

Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom for the podcast.

Trustee of parents estate: Introduction

I want to talk about an issue which is all too common. I am also going to give you two real-life examples. The issue is that of children being named as the estate trustee of parents estate.

I caution that I and my firm are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

Why the children?

Many times in drafting a will, parents want their children to know that the parents trust and love them. So, they not only have their children as beneficiaries of their estate, they also make them the estate trustees (formerly known as executor or executrix). This is natural, but may not be the best choice.

The reason I say this is because the role of the estate trustee is a demanding one that requires a specific skill set. Children don’t always have the necessary skills. What if one or more of the children have great financial skills and have sound judgment, but others don’t. This can lead to differences of opinion and major arguments. In the most extreme case, it can lead to costly and lengthy litigation to dissipate estate assets. Executors must act in the best interests of all beneficiaries. If personal agendas get in the way, then everyone’s best interests can’t be met.

Adult children are probably married. Now you have daughters-in-law and sons-in-law involved in the background. This can lead to a whole host of issues that has nothing to do with the efficient administration of the parents’ estate and being even-handed with all beneficiaries.

What if some of the children have personal financial issues. There will be a temptation for self-dealing or self-enrichment. Again this can lead to major problems.

What if you have an even number of children? Two or four estate trustees can lead to many problems. With two, the estate trustees will always be deadlocked if they don’t see eye to eye. With four, not only can you have a deadlock, but too many cooks may spoil the broth!

Splitting the tasks

Sometimes parents split the tasks. One child will be the estate trustee because she has great financial acumen. The other child will be made responsible for health and living decisions if the parents first become incapacitated. Sounds great in theory. However, the way the health decider child wishes the parents to live may be at odds with the financial person seeing the estate shrinking away. Or, the health decider may make decisions for the parents to live in a way that does not shrink away from the estate, but is demeaning to the parents and does not give them a good quality of life in their final days.

So, as you can see, what started out as the parents wanting to “do right” by their children, can lead to many problems.

What an estate trustee should not do

In my last blog, TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS, I spoke about some basic elements of the role of an estate trustee. I described the process of becoming an estate trustee, and what the responsibilities are.

Now, I want to touch on some practical matters of what an estate trustee should not do.

The first is communicating with some beneficiaries and not others. As I have previously described, one of the roles and responsibilities of an estate trustee is to deal with all beneficiaries even-handedly. The estate trustee cannot tell certain details to some beneficiaries, and not others. So, all communications should be with all beneficiaries at the same time; either in writing or orally. Everyone should get the same information at the same time. The estate trustee does not wish to be accused of favouring some beneficiaries over others.

The second thing not to do is to rush to distribute smaller personal possessions of the deceased. The estate trustee may be pressured by family members to distribute certain items quickly. Possibly because the family member is the proper beneficiary of those small items and wants them as quickly as possible. Alternatively, perhaps they are not the rightful beneficiary of all the items they are claiming. However, they want to get their hands on certain items to stop other family members from getting them. Or perhaps there is a home involved that must be sold, so family members will pressure the estate trustee to clean out the home immediately so that the home can be put up for sale as soon as possible.

As tempting and easy as it might be, the estate trustee must first take steps to:

get a copy of the will and the deceased’s financial records
take possession and control of all assets
ensure that a proper inventory is made and that appraisals are obtained where necessary
make sure that all required insurance and bonding is in place

There is another reason. An estate trustee will be putting more pressure on themselves than they should bY making piecemeal distributions. Regardless of value, making a quick distribution to one of the beneficiaries will only give rise to all the other beneficiaries clamouring for their entitlements. The estate trustee may not be in a position for some time to be able to make a proper distribution to all other beneficiaries. This will only lead to headaches for the estate trustee.

Why some children may not want to be an estate trustee

There can be danger in being an estate trustee. In my last blog, I highlighted specific expertise and knowledge that an estate trustee must have. I also discussed how a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) also possesses the same skill set required of an estate trustee.

A trustee, including an estate trustee, acts in a fiduciary capacity. The estate trustee is fully accountable for all decisions made and steps were taken with respect to the assets. Not only is it important to have the necessary financial skills, but an estate trustee also has to be aware of the myriad of income tax issues. Final income tax returns must be filed. The estate trustee has a duty to ensure that all income tax legislation requirements are met, including the obtaining of clearance certificates. Any loss to the estate as a result of things an estate trustee either did or did not do, the estate trustee will be personally liable for.

The steps required in formulating an appropriate sales process for the different asset types not being directly distributed to beneficiaries is not totally scientific. There is some art to it as well. Making wrong decisions can expose the estate to loss of value, which will blow back right onto the estate trustee.

For these reasons, children may not wish to take on responsibility. The smart ones will understand that they do not have the required skill set. In other cases, the children may see the real possibility of creating family strife if they were to take on the role of an estate trustee. So what if children are named in the will as the estate trustees, but they don’t wish to take on the role. Must they anyway?

Renunciation of estate trustee Ontario

If you have not yet applied for probate or have otherwise not started to administer the estate, you do not have to be an estate trustee. There is a specific form to complete in order to renunciate your position as an estate trustee. Again, it must be done before you take any action as the estate trustee. If you have already applied for probate, or have started administering the estate and now find that you are in over your head, you cannot renunciate your position. You must make application to Court for an Order removing you as the estate trustee. I would suggest that if you are the sole estate trustee, you should have someone else lined up to succeed you. Otherwise, the Court may not allow you to be removed.

Two real-life examples

Example 1

In my blog, COURT APPOINTED ESTATE TRUSTEE CASE STUDY: IF IT WAS EASY YOU WOULDN’T NEED US, I described one of our case studies where we were appointed estate trustee to sell real estate. In that case, neither of the beneficiaries were capable of agreeing on anything. They were also incapable of carrying out the role of taking possession and control of the real property, Insuring it and selling it. Legal counsel for one of the beneficiaries made an application to Court seeking an Order appointing Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as an estate trustee.

The Court made the Order. With the approval of the Court, we listed the property for sale, obtained approval to our actions and activities, including a sale of the property. We then proposed a distribution of funds which also was approved by the Court. We made the distribution and obtained our discharge. This is a perfect example of how our skill set as a licensed insolvency trustee was recognized by the Court and allowed us to carry out the mandate in an efficient way.

Example 2

Recently, one of Ira Smith’s cousins needed to update her will and name an estate trustee. This cousin has three children. None of the children believed that they had the necessary skills and knowledge to be an estate trustee. They also agreed that it was not a good idea for any of them to take on that role.

However, there was one thing that the mother and her three children could all agree on. That was that Ira had the necessary skills to be the estate trustee. They unanimously agreed that it would be a good idea for Ira to take on that role. Ira’s cousin asked him if he would. He told his cousin that he was honoured that they all thought so highly of him. He agreed to be named in her will as the estate trustee.

The children were smart. They knew what they didn’t know. They all agreed on the estate trustee being proposed. A huge weight was taken off of the mother’s shoulders.

Trustee of parents estate: Why not appoint a Toronto bankruptcy trustee?

I hope that you can see that the knowledge, experience, and expertise of a licensed insolvency trustee would stand him or her in good stead to act as executor, executrix or estate trustee of a deceased estate. Many times, it may be a smart move to allow an independent neutral third party act as the estate trustee. Especially one like a licensed insolvency trustee who is used to acting as the independent Court officer.

If you have any questions about a deceased estate and the need for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

Tags bankruptcy trustee, Court for an Order, daughters-in-law, estate trustee, estate trustee ontario, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., Law, legal counsel, licensed insolvency trustee, Ontario, real estate, renunciation of estate trustee Ontario, sons-in-law, toronto, Toronto bankruptcy trustee, trustee, trustee of parents estate

Brandon Blog Post

CANADIAN INSOLVENCY LAWS: ALIENATION OF ASSETS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 17, 2018

Canadian insolvency laws: Introduction

In today’s commercial world, our economy focuses on and requires Canadian insolvency laws. Insolvency is the financial condition where you cannot pay your debts as they come due and if you liquidated all of your assets, there would not be enough cash to pay off all of your debts.

Insolvency laws are required in a mature economy. It reassures investors that there is a way to “recycle” assets. Asset recycling makes them once again valuable and revenue producing, should insolvency set in on a person or company.

Canadian insolvency laws: My goal with this blog

An insolvency process is used as a means of liquidating one’s whole legacy (i.e. the totality of one’s assets) in order to attempt to please all of the creditors that have grown way beyond the ability of the person or company to repay. Emotions always run high in insolvency procedures. We are dealing with the lives of real people that may be losing their jobs, income, homes and other assets.

The purpose of this vlog is not to teach you about insolvency laws. I want to caution anyone considering going into business how important it is to structure things properly. Your aim is to make sure that you are protecting yourself, your business and your family. If your business falters and becomes insolvent you will be glad that you did.

Canadian insolvency laws: Believe it or not, it may be good for you to meet a licensed insolvency trustee

So naturally, as a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) the first focus is on restructuring. Sometimes bad things happen to good people and companies. Bad judgement, bad luck and bad management all contribute to personal and corporate insolvency. Our primary focus is to use various ways to help people and companies recover from insolvency.

The potential ramifications of insolvency procedures can be minimized. A person can no longer afford to keep their assets. A company has too many problems to continue its business. However, those same assets can be used very successfully in a new business or by someone else. So insolvency laws and procedures help to avoid a total loss of asset values.

In many of our cases, this can involve particular minor legal procedures which could eventually conserve a fortune. For financial institutions, this can be especially good news.

Canadian insolvency laws: Why you need to “alienate” your assets

If you are running a company, or are likely to do so in your career, you must minimize your exposure by safeguarding your assets. By doing so, you are protecting yourself and your family for the future, especially if something in business goes wrong. The time to protect yourself is when you are starting out and there are no problems. If you do so when the problems have already arisen, it is too late. Any asset protection steps you take knowing yourself to be insolvent, will not stand up to attack.

By running a company, you will probably become a Director. If your business needs to borrow money from the Bank to operate, you will probably be required to guarantee the bank debt. So, if you anticipate yourself collecting considerable unsecured financial obligations in the coming years, you need to act. Starting out properly protecting yourself, allows you to either avoid or successfully defend, any challenges on the sequestration of your assets.

Canadian insolvency laws: Why you want to be an “alien”

You will make sure that the properties you have “alienated” no longer form part of your estate. The alienation ensures that the possessions from which you will still benefit cannot be gotten by your financial institutions if the business is unsuccessful and they are looking for any assets you may have to honour the financial obligations you accumulate. what does a court appointed receiver do

Canadian insolvency laws: Use your lawyer

When setting up a company, you need a lawyer. Make sure that you choose a lawyer that can also counsel you on how to protect your assets in the event your business venture fails. We are not lawyers, and the general advice I am going to give you is not meant to replace the advice of a lawyer.

Canadian insolvency laws: You may need more than one company to conduct your business

The first thing to think about is incorporating a limited liability company. Depending on the type of business, you may need to incorporate several, within which to house your operations, the leased or owned premises you operate out of and your shareholdings. Conducting your business through a company will require more documentation and therefore cost.

However, it is well worth it. It removes and protects you personally to the greatest extent possible from personal liability. The goal is to minimize or eliminate the destruction of you and your family. If you choose not to go through a corporate body, for whatever reason, protecting your personal assets becomes even more important. There will not be one or more corporate entities to serve as the first line of protection.

Canadian insolvency laws: Examples of multiple corporations in running a business

Examples of how multiple corporations will better insulate you and your business assets are:

Operating company. Your operating company is the one you conduct business through. It is the vehicle which will attract the most liability. There is always a risk in running any business. However, there is no law that requires you to hold all your business assets in your operating company.

Single purpose corporation. You may want to incorporate a second single purpose company to hold valuable assets used to conduct the business of your operating company. Tangible assets such as machinery and equipment are obvious. You are operating out of premises; either leased or owned.

You may wish to have a corporation that holds the tangible assets. Another company that is simply the real estate company. If you also have valuable intangible assets such as copyrights, licenses, trademarks, you may wish a separate company to hold all of the intangible assets.

These single-purpose corporations will then lease the assets to your operating company to conduct its business. Your operating company will pay rental charges, lease payments and licensing fees to the respective sole purpose companies. You need your lawyer to carefully document in writing everything. By now you can probably see the value in separating out the various important and valuable assets from your normal business operations.

Canadian insolvency laws: Alienating your most valuable asset

The most significant and most important property most of us will own is our house. The time to transfer your ownership interest to your partner ideally is before the first day of your going into business. Waiting until there are business problems and you are insolvent, any transfer will be successfully attacked. Obviously, you have to believe that you and your partner have a solid loving relationship before making the transfer as you will no longer have your ownership interest in the house.

Canadian insolvency laws: Does your company have too much debt?

To set up your company and structure your affairs properly, we urge you to use the best lawyer for your needs. This blog cannot replace the advice of your lawyer. However, if your company is experiencing financial difficulties, you need a professional trustee. If yes, call the Ira Smith Team. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door.

The earlier you contact us, the more options we will have to implement. Whether it is a corporate restructuring or personal debt settlement through a consumer proposal, the goal is to avoid bankruptcy. However, if bankruptcy turns out to be the best option, we can assist there too.

You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, ending the pain and stress you are feeling forever. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for your free consultation. canadian insolvency laws 1

Tags Bankruptcy, bankruptcy trustee, Business Finance, canadian insolvency laws, Debt, economy, Finance, insolvency, Ira Smith Trustee, Law, lawyer, lawyer for your needs, licensed insolvency trustee, machinery, professional trustee, real estate, receivership, Sole trader insolvency

Brandon Blog Post

WHAT DOES A COURT APPOINTED RECEIVER DO: REQUIRED CONDITIONS FOR RECEIVERSHIP REAL ESTATE SALE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date September 19, 2018

What does a court appointed receiver do: Introduction

Earlier this week I wrote my blog COURT APPOINTED RECEIVER REAL ESTATE: ALL PURCHASE TERMS AREN’T EQUAL. In that blog, I described 5 common conditions that a buyer wants in a real estate agreement of purchase and sale. I also showed why a court appointed receiver cannot agree to those requested conditions. The purpose of today’s Brandon’s Blog is to answer the question what does a court appointed receiver do in setting the vendor’s conditions in a real estate sale.

What does a court appointed receiver do: The 5 most common vendor terms

In the earlier blog this week, I listed the 5 most common seller terms that the court appointed receiver cannot agree to. Here are the five most common terms that the court appointed receiver as seller requires.

Capacity – The court appointed receiver requires the buyer to acknowledge that the vendor is selling solely in its court-appointed role.
Title – Buyer agrees to accept title to the property as will be conveyed by the Court order conveying title which is called a Vesting Order. Also, the buyer must acknowledge that it is accepting title subject to any site plan agreements, restrictions, easements for the supply of utilities, services or otherwise. Also, the buyer will accept title subject to any rights of way, encroachments on or by the subject property onto adjoining properties, leases or licences. This is why it is important for the buyer’s lawyer to do a careful search of title and explain any and all issues to the buyer before the purchaser agrees to accept title.
Inspections – A buyer from a court appointed receiver must be very careful in doing its due diligence. The court appointed receiver will allow for reasonable inspections. The buyer must acknowledge that he/she/it relies entirely upon its own inspection and investigation with respect to quantity, quality and value of the property. The buyer must also agree that it is purchasing and accepts the property on an “as is” basis, as of the date of acceptance and as of the closing date.
Fixtures and chattels – Every buyer obviously wants to get the most possible out of the real estate purchase. It is normal for all buyers to want to confirm that they are receiving good title to all chattels and fixtures. The buyer is also looking for a warranty that they will all be in good working order on the date of closing. This is not possible in a court appointed receiver real estate sale. Rather, in a Court-appointed receivership, the receiver will insist on the condition that notwithstanding anything contained to the contrary in the agreement of purchase and sale, the Buyer acknowledges that the seller does not have title to the chattels or fixtures presently located on or used in connection with the property. The buyer and seller can agree that the chattels and fixtures set out in the schedule to the agreement remain at the property. However the buyer must also agree to take it on an “as is” basis. There is no warranty or representation and the seller won’t provide a bill of sale on closing for any chattels or fixtures. The court appointed receiver probably cannot verify that ownership of the fixtures and chattels are the property of the owner of the real estate. The receiver won’t rely on what is affixed to the premises to to prove or infer title.
Court approval – A court appointed receiver must obtain court approval to the method of offering the property for sale (obtained before the sales process begins) and certainly for a specific sale. The court appointed receiver must seek that approval in order to have the sales process and sale sanctioned. The Court will issue an Approval and Vesting Order. This is the Court order allowing the transfer of title to the buyer. A court appointed receiver will put together its motion material and attend in Court for such approvals once it knows that it has a firm deal, all buyer conditions have been waived and the necessary deposit funds have been received. A Court will not approve a transaction that isn’t firm. The Court will question why the court appointed receiver is wasting resources in making the approval request at that time.

What does a court appointed receiver do: Is your mortgagor in trouble?

I hope this information will help you understand better the most common terms and conditions a court appointed receiver selling real estate requires. A court appointed receiver does this in setting the vendor’s conditions in a real estate sale.

Are you a mortgagor over industrial or commercial realty where the debtor remains in default? There may be reasons that you have to take into consideration for putting in a court appointed receiver.

If yes, call the Ira Smith Team. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are in the door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, recover your money and move on to the next investment opportunity.

Tags Bankruptcy, careful search, court appointed receiver, court-appointed receiver real estate sale, Court-appointed receivership, insolvency, Ira Smith Trustee, real estate, real estate agreement, real estate purchase, real estate sale, receiver real estate sale, receivership, vesting order, what does a court appointed receiver do, What Is A Court Appointed Receiver Real Estate

Brandon Blog Post

TORONTO REAL ESTATE: REAL ESTATE NEWS ON BUYER’S REMORSE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 25, 2018

ToToronto real estate: Introduction

This Brandon’s Blog is about Toronto real estate and what happens when the purchaser experiences buyer’s remorse. “When the residential real estate market is a rising market, most people – perhaps with the exception of first-time buyers, are happy homeowners and investors. When the market turns and drops, it is not for the faint of heart.” This is how Justice M.L. Edwards begins his Reasons for Decision in Gamoff v. Hu, 2018 ONSC 2172 (CanLII).

The realities of this situation show how one family came to be involved in a bidding process. Determined to get their dream house, they exhausted their ability to fund the acquisition of that residence. We will describe this case which is similar to several people my Firm has helped overcome their financial problems after being found liable for similar amounts the defendants, in this case, were found responsible for.

Toronto real estate: The Toronto real estate market news facts

Douglas and Sheila Gamoff (the “Gamoffs” or the “plaintiffs”) were the owners of a residential property. The home was in Stouffville, Ontario (the “Home”), part of the GTA. The plaintiffs listed the Home for sale on the multiple listing service on March 29, 2017. Within a fairly short amount of time (March 29, 2017, to April 2, 2017), there were 18 offers.

The defendants, Yixing Hu and David Lea, saw the Home with their real estate agent on April 1, 2017. They state that they told their real estate agent that they had an interest in acquiring the Home. They also didn’t want to be involved in a bidding price battle.

The defendants originally submitted their written offer on April 1, 2017, with an offer of $2,050,000. On April 2, 2017, the defendants were told by their real estate agent that there were several deals for the residential property. Their realtor also told them that their offer of $2,050,000 was not accepted. In spite of having informed their real estate agent that they did not intend to end up being in a bidding war, they inevitably submitted a new offer for $2,250,000. The vendors accepted the revised offer.

The deal had no conditions. The agreement of purchase and sale read that the purchasers provided a deposit in the amount of $30,000 upon acceptance of the offer. It further read that a second down payment tranche of $90,000 would be made on April 6, 2017. The date for the second deposit payment was then amended to April 10, 2017. The closing day for the acquisition of the Home was August 30, 2017.

Toronto real estate: It did not take long for buyer’s remorse to arise

On the same day, the defendants called their real estate agent. They suggested to him that they thought that they had actually paid way too much for the Home. Their issue here was no doubt created by the fact that they had just found out that, a mix of their mortgage loan funding and the value of their house yet to be sold, would not be enough for them to get the essential funding to close on their purchase.

David Lea emailed his real estate agent stating to him that he and Ms. Hu had actually slipped up aiming to acquire the Home. Mr. Lea went on to say in this email that he is begging, please contact the vendor’s agent with a new firm offer.

As I previously stated, the agreement of purchase and sale did not have any conditions in it to allow them to end the agreement and get back their first tranche deposit. The agreement certainly was not conditional either on their obtaining satisfactory mortgage financing or the sale of their existing home. That is enough stress to cause anyone to panic which no doubt led to their buyer’s remorse.

Toronto real estate: The purchaser’s default

On April 10, 2017, the purchaser failed to pay the 2nd payment needed by the change to the agreement of purchase and sale. On the following day, the defendants visited the property. They informed the plaintiffs face to face that they did not actually have the funding needed to complete the purchase.

Toronto real estate: The vendors’ mitigation

The Gamoffs first consulted with their lawyer. Then on May 1, 2017, they listed the Home for sale again on the multiple listing service for $2,250,000. From May 1 to May 16, 2017, the plaintiffs got no offers on the Home.

The Gamoffs lowered the listing price of the Home to $1,998,000 on May 17, 2017. This was because of a recommendation from their real estate agent. In between May 17, 2017, and June 6, 2017, they obtained no deals on the Home.

On July 28, 2017, the Gamoffs, based on the further advice of their realtor, lowered the price of the Home again to $1,798,000.

In between June 6 and July 26, 2017, the Gamoffs got no offers on the Home. On July 31, 2017, they got an offer to purchase the Home for $1,700,000. After some back and forth, on August 9, 2017, the Gamoffs accepted a brand new agreement of purchase and sale. It was with an arm’s length buyer for $1,770,000. That deal closed on October 3, 2017.

Toronto real estate: The Court’s decision

The plaintiffs sought a summary judgment for the difference between the defendants’ offer of $2,250,000 and what the Home eventually sold for, $1,770,000. The defendants opposed this on several grounds, including, that there was an issue that required a full trial.

Based on the evidence, the judge disagreed. He awarded the plaintiffs the difference between the defendants’ offer of $2,250,000 and what the Home eventually sold for. The judge also awarded costs to the plaintiffs. The judgment was for $470,000 plus costs. Add that to the $30,000 down payment the defendants lost, this aborted deal cost them half a million bucks!

Toronto real estate: Our own case studies

My Firm has been involved in several matters helping people who have had judgments like the one described above made against them from failed real estate deals. We have been involved as a result of failed real estate deal judgments in:

a bankruptcy caused by the plaintiffs (the vendors) who could not yet collect on their judgment filing a Bankruptcy Application with the Court and obtaining a Bankruptcy Order be made against the defendants;
a consumer proposal for a defendant which was successfully completed;
the successful proposal of the defendant who had a large amount awarded against him by the judgment; and
an assignment in bankruptcy filed by the defendant who did not have the ability to attempt a proposal to get relief from the judgment against them.

In each case, the only way that the defendants could get relief, voluntarily or involuntarily, was through an insolvency process. In the one case caused by the Bankruptcy Order, it was the plaintiff who took action. The plaintiff was able to get a payment for all the unsecured creditors. The insolvency process requires that the distribution is shared among all creditors. That result was better than the plaintiff not being able to collect on its judgment without the insolvency process.

In that specific case, it was a combination of the Trustee’s powers and the plaintiff’s judgment and specific knowledge, that joined to produce the recovery for all creditors. The Trustee’s powers were required to get enough leverage resulting in the recovery.

Toronto real estate: A tough lesson to learn

The effect of this Court’s decision will definitely have a significant result on the defendants. The judge said that he had every compassion for them.

With the adjustments in the realty market in the Greater Toronto Area, I have every reason to believe that there will be extra instances where buyers discover that they have not protected themselves and will not be able to complete their real estate transaction.

Buyers would certainly be well advised to think about making their deals to acquire real estate subject to satisfactory funding, as well as for the sale of their existing residence if they have one. The cost of entering a bidding war and getting the property unconditionally could turn out to be a very expensive one just like in this case.

Toronto real estate: What to do if you have too much debt

If you have too much debt because of a judgment against you, either because you have made the real estate in Toronto news from a failed real estate deal or for any other reason, there is no shame in looking for a professional to help you out of your financial jam. A licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) will look at your circumstances and assist you to get to the very best option for your issues. The Ira Smith Team will give you a free consultation.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is right here to help. We’re government supervised and adhere to a rigorous code of ethics. Our experienced team provides a high-quality service which will create a unique and an affordable solution made just for you. I feel your pain and know how to end it.

Don’t wait until we read about you in the real estate in Toronto news Canada. Call us today to end your stress and experience our pleasant, non-judgmental technique to solve your financial problems and get you back on the right track to stress-free living, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY IN ONTARIO CANADA & CONSUMER PROPOSAL ONTARIO

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 11, 2018

Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Introduction

Bankruptcy is sometimes necessary for the financially troubled individual or company. In Canada in 2017, there were 125,807 insolvency filings; 60,669 bankruptcies and 65,138 proposals. Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada accounted for 15,968 of the 2017 filings. The majority of these across Canada filings were people, not companies.

Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Not entirely unexpected

This is an expected statistic once you understand the purpose of the Canadian insolvency system to get rid of financial obligations. It is also for the financial rehabilitation of people and companies and if possible, allow them to do so while retaining their assets.

In a down economic climate, even more, debtors use bankruptcy to protect their wide range of interests. Although on a per capita basis Canadians are savers, more recently, especially related to real estate, we are a country of borrowers. A lot of people are overloaded with debt, including credit card debt.

Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Bankruptcy is not always right

Any debtor with severe monetary troubles must think about bankruptcy. Bankruptcy isn’t always the right response though. In my practice, we first run through the various options available to avoid bankruptcy.

It is proper only when you have too many financial obligations that you cannot realistically repay, in whole or in part, from your future earnings or from selling your assets. This is the meaning of the financial state of insolvency.

If you make $100,000 a year and your financial obligations are only $20,000 (assuming you have no assets), why go bankrupt? Temporary financial sacrifice on your part could pay off your debts in full. This is definitely more suitable for bankruptcy.

What about a proposal?

Although each case is unique, generally speaking, if your unsecured financial debts are less than 60 percent of your net yearly pay, stay clear of bankruptcy. You could use a self-help remedy to pay off your debts in full. Alternatively, you could look to the proposal or consumer proposal mechanisms under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada).

Under the proposal provisions of the BIA, a person or company could take up to 5 years to pay off part of the debt. A successful proposal forgives the balance of your debt (subject to certain ones indicated below). Many creditors will wait if you show good faith and make organized repayments that provide your creditors with a better result.

A filing may protect some assets

A bankruptcy or proposal filing may also be necessary to secure your assets; this is especially true for companies looking to restructure. In a BIA filing, all civil actions against you instantly stop— whether they are legal actions, CRA garnishments or secured creditor seizure and enforcement (the last under specific conditions). Every creditor must obey the automatic stay of proceedings imposed by the BIA. A proposal filing gives you the possibility to solve your economic issues with lenders who would certainly otherwise seize and sell your assets.

Timing is everything

I advise every person and company in need of restructuring that timing is crucial. It is human nature for debtors to regularly wait far too long. By waiting too long, they shed possible advantages from an earlier restructuring filing. The longer a person or company waits, the fewer options they have. Also, if you wait too long, the less creative I can be to protect your assets.

5 general tips

Collect your tax refunds prior to your filing. When you file for bankruptcy, any tax refund owing to you prior to the date of bankruptcy belong to your bankruptcy estate. Your licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee) collects the payments.
The insolvency process is meant to treat all creditors fairly and all ordinary unsecured creditors equally. Seek the advice of a Trustee prior to making payments to specific unsecured creditors prior to filing. Your good intentions may prove to have created transactions that the Trustee can attack. The Trustee will then seek recovery from those parties.
Consider how the causes of your insolvency will look to your creditors. Uncontrolled lifestyle spending looks a lot different from ongoing costs due to a mental or physical illness or an addiction. The causes of your insolvency sometimes dictate whether a proposal or bankruptcy filing is preferable.
Have you contributed to an RRSP in the 12 months before filing for bankruptcy? That amount will have to be paid over to your Trustee under bankruptcy or accounted for in what type of proposal can be successful.
If you have student loans, was the last time you were either a full or part-time student more than 7 years prior to your filing? If no, you won’t be able to end the student loan debt. However, it may be enough to relieve yourself of your other unsecured debts to have enough funds every month to start repaying the student loans.

Some debts can’t be discharged

Bankruptcy will not end every debt. There are certain debts that cannot be discharged through bankruptcy. Examples are:

student loans as described above
child support and alimony under either a court order or written separation agreement
fines or restitution ordered by a Court
debts arising out of fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation while acting in a fiduciary capacity
amounts owing to secured creditors registered against your assets, such as a mortgage or car loan. Any amount still owing after the asset is sold, if any, is an unsecured claim which is discharged in a bankruptcy

Bankruptcy must be your last option

Bankruptcy could be your ideal choice if the amount of your debt and the amount you can realistically repay will not settle it. If you have few possessions to lose in bankruptcy, then a bankruptcy filing may be your best choice. By meeting with a Trustee early to discuss your options, you will get a good understanding of what may be possible.

I always advise every person or company never file for bankruptcy without first striving to solve a case without bankruptcy. Bankruptcy must be your last option, not your very first – avoid bankruptcy if you can.

Think about all readily available options prior to determining that bankruptcy is genuinely the best decision for you and your situation. If you find you are in too deep and can’t dig out fast enough, then you do need professional help.

Seek the advice of a professional trustee

Many people and companies facing serious financial issues don’t know where to go for professional help or are too embarrassed. There’s no shame in seeking professional, financial help. Licensed insolvency trustees evaluate your situation and help you to arrive at the best possible solution for your problems.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is here to help. We’re federally regulated and subject to a strict code of ethics. We offer a depth of expertise and provide a high quality and cost-effective service. I understand your pain and we can end it. You will find that we use a friendly, non-judgmental method.

Give us a call today and let us help you solve your financial problems Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy in ontario, bankruptcy in ontario canada, BIA, Canada, car loan, consumer proposal ontario, Debt, insolvency, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, licensed insolvency trustees, Ontario, possible solution, professional trustee, proposal, real estate, Trustee & Receiver Inc.

Brandon Blog Post

MOODY’S DOWNGRADES CANADIAN BANKS: IS NO FRIEND TO THE CANADIAN ECONOMY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 17, 2017

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: Introduction

Sales of brand-new cars and trucks in Canada struck an all-time high earlier this year. It’s been a constant wonderful market in the car business since interest rates have remained so low. With so many people buying new vehicles financed by debt, that is what has led to Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks.

Exactly what’s great for Canada’s auto dealerships isn’t so excellent for Canada’s most significant financial institutions. Fears stay and are growing about the overheated Canadian real estate market.

3bestaward

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: Moody`s concerned over Canadian consumer debt

Credit monitoring company Moody’s fears Canadians have as well too much automobile and credit card debt and home mortgage and home equity loans. Moody’s states those variables have the financial institutions prone to losses.

As you include more consumer debt in the Canadian economy, it ends up being riskier. Moody`s fears that the Canadian banks will be less able to soak up any more shocks to the economy. Simply put, there’s a high danger of funding defaults that would harm the Canadian financial institutions. That’s why the reduction in the debt ranking.

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: Don`t worry, they are still extremely highly ranked

The financial institutions affected are all the large ones: Toronto-Dominion, Bank of Montreal, Bank of Nova Scotia, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Royal Bank as well as the National Bank of Canada. Every one of those huge 6 had their standard credit score ranking devalued by one notch. Still excellent, yet lower to where they’ve been.

The large 6 financial institutions in Canada are still extremely highly ranked establishments. On an international basis, they would certainly stay in the leading 10 percent. This is not a dangerous situation yet; it is a warning for one sector of Canada’s population.

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: The Canadian government can`t do anything more

Moody`s states the federal government has done exactly what they could to cool the hot real estate markets. To reduced credit danger further there are only just 2 points that would help: (i) a more powerful Canadian economic climate; or (ii) much less loaning and borrowing.

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: What to do if you have too much debt

Packing up on too much financial debt is never ever a great suggestion. Are you bewildered by financial debt? Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today so we can give you a clear road map on how you can navigate through your financial debt. Our licensed professionals will help you reduce your debt and allow you to reduce stress and regain control and peace of mind. Starting Over, Starting Now you could be on your way to debt free living.

moody’s downgrades canadian banks 0

Tags banks, Canada, Canadian, canadian banks, canadian banks downgraded, credit card debt, Debt, home loan debt, home mortgage debt, Ira Smith Trustee, money, moody's, moody's downgrades Canadian banks, real estate, six big canadian banks downgraded, starting over starting now

Receivership in Canada: What does receivership mean?

What does going into receivership in Canada mean?

Receivership in Canada: What is the difference between a court-appointed receiver and a privately appointed receiver?

How is receivership in Canada different from bankruptcy proceedings?

What are the key distinctions between receivership in Canada and liquidation?

Can individuals be placed into receivership in Canada?

Receivership in Canada: Whose receiver is it anyway?

What are the conditions under which a receiver may be appointed?

How the entrepreneur can avoid receivership in Canada

Receivership in Canada summary & speak with a licensed insolvency trustee

Legal proceeding: What are some things I can do if someone owes me money and refuses to pay?

Legal proceeding: Retrieving payment from a debtor

Legal proceeding: In Ontario, after how long does debt become uncollectible?

Legal proceeding: Collecting money that is owed to you after winning a court case in Ontario

Legal proceeding: What could happen if you were to lose a lawsuit and be unable to pay?

What are the judgement proof laws in Ontario?

The non-judgment proof debtor can take action as soon as judgment is given

Legal proceeding: What does it mean to have a judgement against you in Canada when you file for bankruptcy?

Legal proceeding: #1 – How a CRA judgment lien becomes their competitive advantage in bankruptcy

Legal proceeding: #2 – What happens if a judgement lien is not paid and the judgment debtor goes bankrupt

Legal proceeding: After judgement and bankruptcy

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere: Canada’s rising annual inflation rate is a cost-of-living crisis

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere: What is the Consumer Price Index?

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere: The negative side of the cost of living increases

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere: How the rising Consumer Price Index affects you

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere: Tips to combat the financial hit of rising living costs

Cost of living in Toronto and elsewhere summary

Is mortgage debt surge responsible for pushing Canadian consumer debt levels higher?

Is mortgage debt surge pushing Canada consumer debt to $2.1 trillion?

Is mortgage debt growth making Canada’s economy vulnerable? The central bank says yes

Is mortgage debt the only reason Canadian household debt is so high?

My take on why is mortgage debt and other household debt driving in these directions?

Is mortgage debt now the focus for many Canadians?

If If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Trustee of parents estate

Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom for the podcast.

Trustee of parents estate: Introduction

Why the children?

Splitting the tasks

What an estate trustee should not do

Why some children may not want to be an estate trustee

Renunciation of estate trustee Ontario

Two real-life examples

Trustee of parents estate: Why not appoint a Toronto bankruptcy trustee?

Canadian insolvency laws: Introduction

Canadian insolvency laws: My goal with this blog

Canadian insolvency laws: Believe it or not, it may be good for you to meet a licensed insolvency trustee

Canadian insolvency laws: Why you need to “alienate” your assets

Canadian insolvency laws: Why you want to be an “alien”

Canadian insolvency laws: Use your lawyer

Canadian insolvency laws: You may need more than one company to conduct your business

Canadian insolvency laws: Examples of multiple corporations in running a business

Canadian insolvency laws: Does your company have too much debt?

What does a court appointed receiver do: Introduction

What does a court appointed receiver do: The 5 most common vendor terms

Toronto real estate: The Toronto real estate market news facts

Toronto real estate: It did not take long for buyer’s remorse to arise

Toronto real estate: The purchaser’s default

Toronto real estate: The vendors’ mitigation

Toronto real estate: The Court’s decision

Toronto real estate: A tough lesson to learn

Toronto real estate: What to do if you have too much debt

Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Introduction

Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Not entirely unexpected

If you make $100,000 a year and your financial obligations are only $20,000 (assuming you have no assets), why go bankrupt? Temporary financial sacrifice on your part could pay off your debts in full. This is definitely more suitable for bankruptcy. What about a proposal?

5 general tips

Some debts can’t be discharged

Bankruptcy must be your last option

Seek the advice of a professional trustee

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: Introduction

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: Moody`s concerned over Canadian consumer debt

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: Don`t worry, they are still extremely highly ranked

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: The Canadian government can`t do anything more

Moody’s downgrades Canadian banks: What to do if you have too much debt

***Cost of living in Toronto* and elsewhere: The negative side of the *cost of living increases***

**My take on why is mortgage debt and other household debt driving in these directions?**

If you make $100,000 a year and your financial obligations are only $20,000 (assuming you have no assets), why go bankrupt? Temporary financial sacrifice on your part could pay off your debts in full. This is definitely more suitable for bankruptcy.

What about a proposal?