Tag: trustee in bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSTRUCTION LIEN ACT: CAN YOU TRUST AN INSOLVENCY PROCEEDING?

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and both Ira, as well as Brandon Smith, are right here for a telephone appointment, conference calls and also virtual meetings.

Stay healthy and safe everybody.

Introduction

Matters involving the Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30 ( formerly known as the Construction Lien Act) is very complex. In this Brandon’s Blog, I will use the term that laypeople are most familiar with, being the former name of the provincial legislation.

Construction law is a specialty unto itself. It gets even more complex when a company involved in construction enters insolvency proceedings. There is normally a conflict in these kinds of files between:

In this Brandon’s Blog, I describe a recent 5 member panel decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario who had to decide whether a trust created under section 9(1) of the provincial Construction Lien Act survives a sale by the Monitor in an insolvency proceeding under the federal Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

The case is Urbancorp Cumberland 2 GP Inc. (Re), 2020 ONCA 197 (Urbancorp). The matter was heard on October 3, 2019. The unanimous decision was recently released on March 11, 2020.

Some background matters

Before getting into the actual case, there are two background matters that I should first explain. When I thought of these concepts and then the decision this way, it made it easier for me to understand.

The first issue is the types of insolvency proceedings. There are essentially four types of insolvency proceedings. Some are not mutually exclusive. Each one of them can be used for the assets of the insolvent debtor to be sold. I break down the insolvency proceedings list in this way:

  1. Using the restructuring provisions of either the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or CCAA.
  2. A bankruptcy administration under the BIA.
  3. A secured creditor taking enforcement proceedings on the assets subject to its security through the security itself by privately appointing a Receiver or Receiver and Manager.
  4. A secured creditor making an application to the Court that it is just or convenient for the Court to appoint a Receiver to act on behalf of all creditors in stabilizing an insolvent debtor situation and to come back to Court with recommendations on how to proceed, including the sale of assets.

The second issue has to do with trust claims under the Construction Lien Act. There are several sections in the legislation dealing with trust claims. As I stated above, it is a very complex topic. So, I am going to only focus on the one that is the subject matter of this case. That is section 9(1) of the Act. That section deals with a trust claim against the vendor of the construction assets. It states:

“9 (1) Where the owner’s interest in a premises is sold by the owner, an amount equal to,

(a) the value of the consideration received by the owner as a result of the sale,

less,

(b) the reasonable expenses arising from the sale and the amount, if any, paid by the vendor to discharge any existing mortgage indebtedness on the premises,

constitutes a trust fund for the benefit of the contractor. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30, s. 9 (1); 2017, c. 24, s. 9, 70.

Obligations as trustee

(2) The former owner is the trustee of the trust created by subsection (1), and shall not appropriate or convert any part of the trust property to the former owner’s own use or to any use inconsistent with the trust until the contractor is paid all amounts owed to the contractor that relate to the improvement. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30, s. 9 (2).”

The distinction here that I want you to keep in mind is the words in the very first line “Where the owner’s interest in a premises is sold by the owner…”(emphasis added).

Now for the case.

The Urbancorp Construction Lien Act case

This case deals with Urbancorp and related companies that developed and was building a residential condominium project. Urbancorp was insolvent and filed first a Notice of Intention to Make A Proposal under the BIA. The proceedings were later converted by the Court into proceedings under the CCAA. The insolvency proceeding was in both cases under a Federal restructuring statue. The Court appointed a Monitor to oversee the insolvency administration. Through various Court applications and court orders, the Monitor was given the authority to market and sell the condominium assets. The Monitor did so.

Now the cash the Monitor received from the sale stood in place of the original condominium assets. Subcontractors brought an application before the lower Court claiming they had a valid trust claim under the Construction Lien Act. The lower court judge carefully reviewed the evidence and prior decided cases and came to the conclusion that the subcontractors did not have a valid trust claim against the assets. The subcontractors appealed the lower court’s decision.

In addition to appealing the lower court’s decision, they also raised with the Court of Appeal a constitutional question that comes up many times. The constitutional question is, does federal law always take priority, or trump (with a small “t”!!) provincial law. This is otherwise known as the concept of paramountcy. Stated slightly differently, the issue can be stated as does section 9 of the Construction Lien Act remain to have application after a bankruptcy or initial order under the CCAA? The Attorney General of Ontario also stepped in on that part of the case.

The Court of Appeal accepted this constitutional question to be decided so there were now two issues before the Court of Appeal; the issue of paramountcy and the trust claim issue.

The constitutional question

The Court of Appeal went through a very thoughtful and careful analysis. It confined the constitutional question to the facts of this case. The court concluded in this case:

  1. The trust created under section 9(1) of the Construction Lien Act is a valid trust under provincial law.
  2. The BIA excludes from property available to the creditors any property held in trust.
  3. Therefore, this provincial trust can be effective when there is an insolvency proceeding under the BIA.
  4. Similarly, with the CCAA legislation, it follows that a section 9(1) provincially created trust might be effective when the insolvency administration is subject to the CCAA.

Now for the actual appeal

The Appeal Court now turned to the lower court judge’s decision that a section 9(1) of the Construction Lien Act trust did not apply in this matter. The five-member panel again went through a careful analysis of the statute and the case law. They spent a lot of time reviewing an earlier Court of Appeal for Ontario decision which the lower court judge relied upon in his decision.

The Court of Appeal highlighted that in that decision the lower court relied upon, the owner, being the insolvent debtor, had no interest in the asset that the subcontractors were claiming a trust claim against. The reasons were:

  1. The asset was part of a package of assets sold.
  2. There was a secured creditor who had security over all of the assets of the developer.
  3. The proceeds less the expenses to produce the sale were less than what was owed to the secured creditor.
  4. The court allowed the cash from the sale to stand in place of the assets.

Using this framework, the Court of Appeal stated that a s.9( 1) trust only arises if the value of the consideration received by the owner from the sale of assets, which have actually been enhanced by the work or materials of the contractor, surpasses the amount of the mortgage debt. A trust will not occur if the value is zero, or if the mortgage debt is equal to or above any kind of sale proceeds.

Therefore, the decision that the lower court relied upon in disallowing the trust claim does not stand for the suggestion that control by a CCAA Monitor of a sales process, or the receipt by the Monitor of the proceeds of the sale by itself, avoids a s.9( 1) trust against the proceeds of the sale of the enhancement are shown to have a positive worth that surpasses the mortgage debt on the asset. That fact pattern was absent from the case relied upon.

The decision

Now, you remember at the beginning of this blog I went through the essentially four types of insolvency proceedings. The Court of Appeal also considered the various types. The court drew a distinction in them as it relates to section 9(1) of the Construction Lien Act. Also remember that from my quotation above of this section, it starts with “Where the owner’s interest in a premises is sold by the owner…”(emphasis added).

In a receivership or bankruptcy, the owner loses control of the assets. The vendor in a sale is either the receiver/receiver and manager or the trustee in bankruptcy, respectively. In those examples, it is not the owner selling its own assets. It is the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) selling its right, title and interest, if any, in the assets of the debtor. So the vendor is the licensed insolvency trustee in its specific capacity.

The Urbancorp matter started out as a restructuring under the Proposal provisions of the BIA and was then converted by the Court and continued under a different restructuring statute, the CCAA. In an insolvency administration under the restructuring provisions/statue, the owner does not lose control of its assets. True that the Monitor is given court authority to make decisions, market and then sell the assets. However, one of the cornerstones of the appointment of a Monitor is that the owner does not lose control of the assets and the Monitor does not become the owner of the assets.

Rather, the Monitor gets its powers from the court. The Monitor is actually selling the insolvent company’s assets as the company’s representative or agent. So even though it is the Monitor doing the selling, it is doing so on behalf of the owner. This is very different than a sale by a receiver/receiver and manager or trustee in bankruptcy.

In the Urbancorp situation, the value of the consideration received by the owner from the sale of assets, which have actually been enhanced by the work or materials of the contractor, surpasses the amount of the mortgage debt.

Highlighting these distinctions, the Court of Appeal for Ontario overturned the lower court decision and upheld the subcontractors’ trust claim. It substituted the lower court decision with an order that a s.9( 1) trust under the Construction Lien Act applies for the sum of $3,864,429 held in the accounts of the Monitor on account of the Urbancorp companies, for the benefit of the subcontractors, pro-rata in accordance with the amount owing to each of them.

Summary

I hope you found this case review helpful. It should be of particular interest to contractors, developers and builders in Ontario.

The Ira Smith Team family hopes that you and your family members are remaining secure, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person that has been affected either via misfortune or inconvenience.

We all must help each other to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Families are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when life can return to something near to typical and we can all be together once again.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. This is especially true these days.

If anyone needs our assistance, or you just need some answers for questions that are bothering you, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

Are you now worried just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. This pandemic situation has made everyone scared.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and both Ira, as well as Brandon Smith, are right here for a telephone appointment, conference calls and also virtual meetings.

Stay healthy and safe everybody.construction lien act

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEES IN BANKRUPTCY TORONTO ONTARIO USUALLY FORBIDDEN TO DIG THIS

trustees in bankruptcy toronto ontario
trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario

Trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario introduction

On April 15, 2019, a group of companies operating as QuadrigaCX (Quadriga) became bankrupt. This followed their initial application under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) to get bankruptcy protection.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to describe the latest events in this ongoing saga. Especially something trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario usually don’t dig this.

What was Quadriga

Quadriga operated a crypto money exchange permitting customers to save, get, and offer various cryptocurrencies (including Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash Money, Bitcoin Cash SV, Litecoin and Ethereum) on the Quadriga platform.

The cryptocurrency industry is not regulated in Canada and there is no governing body giving oversight.

Canadian chartered banks generally do not supply financial services such as bank accounts to companies operating in the cryptocurrency sector. This held true at Quadriga who needed the solutions offered by Third-Party Payment Processors (TPPP) to provide Quadriga’s treasury functions.

TPPP’s utilize various banking facilities in many countries around the globe. It can be very difficult to trace the flow of funds. Especially if the TPPP purposely sets up an international flow of funds through various intermediaries. We found this when we administered the bankruptcy of Conquest Vacations Inc. (Conquest).

No Canadian or US TPPP would clear Conquest’s credit card transactions. So, Conquest entered into an arrangement with a UK TPPP who utilized, amongst other banks, a financial institution in Mauritius. Our ability to trace the flow of funds with a high level of accuracy was thwarted in that case.

Quadriga was started by Mr. Gerald Cotten. It is reported that he died at. the age of 30 from complications from Crohn’s disease. At the time of his reported death, he was travelling in India.

Apparently, Mr. Cotten was the only person who knew the passwords associated with all the wallet addresses holding cryptocurrency.

Various issues faced by Trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario

The Trustee was unable to find any documentation or other information regarding passwords. The Trustee also was unable to locate conventional books and records. The Trustee was not able to locate basic company records or accounting records.

There were also no records found documenting the location of Quadriga’s cryptocurrency and money reserves between third party settlement processors, savings account, wallet addresses and other third-party exchanges.

There also appeared to be no segregation of assets between funds of Quadriga and its customers. This would make it extremely difficult in any bankruptcy administration for trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario or anywhere else in Canada.

The Trustee found that a substantial volume of cryptocurrency from Quadriga’s platform was transferred to competitor exchanges, some of which were transferred into personal accounts controlled by Mr. Cotten.

Additionally, significant amounts of cryptocurrency were moved to wallet holders whose identification was impossible to identify.

trustees in bankruptcy Toronto ontario
trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario

Gerald Cotten enrichment found by Trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario

It turns out that the cryptocurrency of Quadriga’s customers was taken off the Quadriga system to other third party exchanges and traded on those exchanges.

In other situations, cryptocurrency and its resultant cash were utilized for a margin trading account established by Mr. Cotten. Trading losses sustained and also incremental fees charged by exchanges negatively affected Quadriga’s cryptocurrency books.

Mr. Cotten created particular accounts on the Quadriga system under pen names where it appears that make-believe cryptocurrency and cash funds were deposited and used to trade within the Quadriga platform.

This resulted in inflated revenue numbers and ultimately the withdrawal of customers’ cryptocurrency. Substantial funds were moved to Mr. Cotten directly and various other associated accounts. This resulted in a substantial amount of cash and cryptocurrency reserves that could not be located.

The Trustee’s examination revealed that Mr. Cotten occasionally moved substantial cryptocurrency as well as various other funds outside of Quadriga. In certain instances, these transfers were for considerable amounts of currency routed to Mr. Cotten directly. Funds were used to fund personal costs and also the purchase of various personal assets.

In various other cases, transfers were made straight to his wife, Jennnifer Robertson. Funds were also used to pay personal expenses and to purchase personal assets both in her name or the name of companies which she controlled.

The trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario settlement with Jennifer Robertson

Ms. Robertson has offered the Trustee a settlement offer that involves returning the majority of her possessions, the assets of Mr. Cotten’s Estate and also the assets of entities owned by Ms. Robertson or the Estate to the Trustee.

Negotiations have led to a settlement agreement acceptable to the Trustee. The Trustee was of the view that a negotiated settlement was more effective than ongoing litigation.

The settlement arrangements were substantial and conducted at arm’s length. The Trustee sought and obtained the agreement of the Inspectors in the Quadriga bankruptcy administration.

The settlement to transfer almost all of the assets owned by Ms. Robertson, the various companies and the Estate was also approved by the Court. So everything seems to be going smoothly, right?

Trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario usually don’t dig this!

Not quite. On Friday, December 13, 2019, the legal team representing individuals who were users of the platform in these bankruptcy proceedings and who have lost collectively millions of dollars, sent a letter.

The letter went to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police seeking an exhumation and also post-mortem autopsy be performed on the body. The reason is to confirm both its identity as well as the cause of death.

They say information revealed during the proceedings, even more, highlights the requirement for assurance around the concern of whether Mr. Cotten is in fact deceased.

I don’t know why these lawyers feel that proving Mr. Cotten is in fact dead is so important. Maybe they feel that anyone who would give up substantially all of her assets, the Estate’s assets and related companies’ assets, must have more money somewhere else hidden.

Maybe they think that Mr. Cotten faked his own death, has millions of dollars that still have not been found and the two will reunite once the heat is off. I don’t know why, but this certainly is an unusual turn of events in a bankruptcy administration.

It is certainly something that trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario or anywhere else in Canada don’t dig!

We will have to see how this saga unfolds and if there will be any more surprises.

Summary

I hope you found this Brandon’s Blog, Trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario usually don’t dig this interesting. Sometimes things are too far gone and more drastic and immediate triage action is required.

Do you have too much debt? Are you in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring.

However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt. You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.

It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing.

If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

trustees in bankruptcy Toronto ontario
trustees in bankruptcy Toronto Ontario
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADA DEBT HELP: ARE YOU MAKING THESE DEBT RELIEF MISTAKES?

Introduction

On Friday, November 22, 2019, Manulife Bank published its most recent Manulife Bank Canada debt help survey. Manulife Bank publishes its survey annually. The 2019 survey, compared to previous ones, shows that two in five Canadians have given up all hope of ever being debt-free.

In Brandon’s Blog, I review the main findings of the survey. The results show the debt relief mistakes being made. I will also discuss how you can get yourself out of debt so that you won’t be one of the 40% of Canadians that have given up all hope.

Manulife Bank Canadian customer debt relief reviews

The Manulife Bank Canada poll questioned 2,001 Canadians in all provinces between ages 20 and 69 with household revenue of more than $40,000. The survey was carried out on the internet by Ipsos between September 20 to September 26, 2019. National results were weighted by gender, age, area as well as education.

The 2019 survey results show:

  1. Two in 5 question will they ever be debt-free in their lifetime.
  2. Spending-to-income % is trending negatively in Canada.
  3. Ninety-four percent of Canadians say the ordinary home is in too much financial debt.
  4. The spending-to-income proportion is trending adversely as 45 percent record that their expenses are rising faster than their revenue.
  5. Sixty-seven percent of Canadians with too much debt presume everybody else does too.

“There is a financial wellness crisis, and it’s affecting Canadians of all demographics,” said Rick Lunny, President and CEO, Manulife Bank.

Canadians not really asking “How can I get out of debt in Canada?”

One of the saddest parts of the survey is what I did not read. Apparently, Canadians surveyed are not asking how they can get out of debt. Rather, they are just resigned to that being their normal reality.

The survey also shows differences by generation. Whether you are a Boomer, Generation X or Millennial makes a difference. This makes sense as the different generations are at different stages of life.

The generational differences are:

  1. Boomers – 38% of these survey participants say that their spending is greater than their income and 31% feel they will never be debt-free.
  2. Millennials – 46% of those surveyed say that their costs are greater than their earnings and 42% feel they don’t see themselves ever paying off debt.
  3. Generation X – 54% of these study participants state that their expenses are higher than their earnings and 49% feel they will certainly never ever get out of debt.

How can I get relief from debt?

So with these survey results as a backdrop, the question these Canadians need to ask is how to get debt relief. There are no free Canadian government grants to pay off debt. According to Manulife Bank Canada debt help is required by many Canadians.

People have to take matters into their own hands. It starts with a household budget. All members of the family have to be involved in preparing it and you need complete buy-in for it to be successful. The budgeting process begins with understanding what the family’s after-tax income is every month and what all of the household expenses are. Then, all the expenses have to be looked at critically to determine which are necessary and which represent “wants” not “needs”. You can also look at the income side and see if there are opportunities to also increase income.

The goal of the budgeting process is to end up with a household budget that is realistic, will be tracked and all family members will be accountable for. Monthly expenses cannot be greater than the monthly net after-tax income. The budget must also have room for making regular monthly payments to pay down debt, including credit card debt. The budget must also include regular monthly savings, in order to build up an emergency fund. The emergency fund is essential to meet unexpected expenses or income loss.

The 6 main benefits of a household budget

The 6 main benefits of a household budget are:

  1. A budget offers you the ability to have control over your cash: A budget plan is a list of all revenues and costs. It permits you to plan exactly how you intend to spend your money. Rather than money just flying out of your pocketbook, you make deliberate choices on where you desire your cash to go. You’ll never need to wonder each month where your money went.
  2. A budget keeps you concentrated on your economic goals: Budgeting will enable you to meet your money objectives – paying down debt, putting money away in a retirement savings plan, getting a home – as long as you follow it consistently. With a budget, you’ll know exactly what you can afford and you can separate your money appropriately. E.g. If your instant goal is to save for the deposit of a house, then you might need to pass up that holiday you wanted to take. Your spending plan will inform you specifically what you can or can’t manage.
  3. A budget plan will ensure that you do not spend what you do not have: Charge cards are a great convenience yet they also make it really easy to spend due to the fact that there is no cash exchanged in the transaction. Many Canadians rack up major credit card spending and land up deep in debt before they recognize what’s occurred. When you use and stay with your spending plan you need to record every little thing you spend, even if it’s a bank card purchase. You will not wake up deep in debt, ask yourself how you arrived there.
  4. A spending plan will prepare you for the unanticipated: Every budget plan must have a rainy day fund for those unanticipated costs. It’s recommended that you should budget for three months worth of costs for when there may be an unanticipated layoff or various other unplanned for a significant expense. Don’t be distressed; you do not need to save all the cash at once. Build your fund up slowly.
  5. A budget decreases tension: Lots of Canadians panic every month about where the money will come from to pay their bills. A budget will offer you satisfaction. It reveals to you just how much you earn and what your expenses are. If need be you can reduce unneeded expenditures or take on an extra gig to live within a well-balanced budget. No more panicking at the end of the month.
  6. A budget plan can assist you to pay for the retirement you’ve been desiring: Saving for your retirement is really essential and your spending plan can help you save for your future. Reserve part of your income every month for retirement savings. Beginning early as well as consistently stick to it. The money you conserve now will determine the type of retirement you can anticipate.

Is there a government debt relief program?

There is a government-approved debt relief program. It is governed under the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). There are 3 personal debt government approved debt relief programs. The only person authorized to administer any of these debt settlement programs is a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy).

I have written about them before, but I will summarize here what they are:

  1. Consumer proposal: A consumer proposal is a streamlined process. This process enables insolvent people to make a formal deal with their creditors. This federal government authorized financial debt settlement program allows you to repay only a portion of what you owe to eliminate all of your debts. You can take as long as 5 years of routine month-to-month payments to do so. To qualify, you have to be insolvent and owe $250,000 or less to all creditors, apart from for any kind of financial obligations secured by way of registration against your house. A successful consumer proposal allows you to keep your assets that you can afford to keep. It also allows you to avoid bankruptcy.
  2. Division I proposal: A Division I proposal offers the same protections as a consumer proposal. If successfully completed, it provides the same benefits as the consumer proposal, including avoiding bankruptcy. This kind of proposal is not as streamlined as a consumer proposal and is for people who owe more than $250,000, not including any mortgage or other loan registration against your home. The other major difference is that an unsuccessful Division I Proposal results in an automatic bankruptcy. A consumer proposal does not have this same automatic provision.
  3. Bankruptcy: Bankruptcy is a process whereby in exchange for giving up your assets to the Trustee (with certain provincial exemptions), the honest but unfortunate debtor will be able to discharge all of their debts (with certain exceptions). When I meet with insolvent people for their no-cost consultation to explore their options, I always try to find the option that allows them to avoid bankruptcy as long as it is feasible and realistic.

Canada debt help summary

I hope you enjoyed this Brandon’s Blog on Canada debt help. Are you in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt. You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.

It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.canada debt help

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

THE EASIEST WAY TO ACTUALLY LIKE WHAT IS A DIVISION i PROPOSAL ONTARIO

what is a division i proposal

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this what is a division i proposal Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast

Introduction

Over recent times, I have been receiving increased inquiries as to what is a division i proposal. The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to explain what it is. No person or company actually likes to enter a restructuring process to avoid bankruptcy, so hopefully, this discussion will be helpful to those that really need it to appreciate why if necessary, it is actually easy to like it; especially a successful one!

What is a division i proposal?

Division I is one of the two divisions of Part III of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3). Division I is a restructuring provision. It is available to people who owe more than $250,000 and companies with any level of debt, in need of financial restructuring.

At the beginning of any consultation with an insolvent person or for an insolvent company, is to determine if a successful restructuring can be accomplished. If not, the only other realistic alternative is bankruptcy. A successful restructuring of a person will allow that person to keep the assets they wish to keep and can afford to hold onto.

A company that successfully restructures will continue to provide employment. The jobs that will be preserved are not only those of the company that restructures. Its continuing to do business with suppliers who continue to do business with the restructured company will also avoid layoffs or terminations of their own staff. The reason for this is that their own volumes will not decrease, or decrease as much as if its customers went bankrupt and could no longer buy from them.

How do I start a restructuring plan for a person?

The first thing the insolvent person or company needs to do is hire a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT) (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy). The reason why is because a LIT is the only one in Canada authorized to administer a restructuring proposal.

The LIT will discuss with the insolvent person about the nature of his or her assets and liabilities. Which assets are financed and which are owned free and clear. There will also be a frank analysis and discussion of the person’s income and expenses. The reason for this is to do preliminary credit counselling to help the person recognize how their historical household budget (whether they actually knew it or not) needs to change. Is there room in a new solvent budget to pay for an expensive asset, or does it need to be replaced by a less expensive one? A leased or financed auto is a prime example.

I want to make that determination upfront because a financed asset given up before the debt is fully repaid will create an acceleration of the full amount of that liability claim. I will want to make sure that it is done the right way, so the new accelerated liability will be caught as a debt being compromised, not a post-filing debt not caught in the financial restructuring.

Once the issues have been identified and the realistic options identified, I will then want to work with the person to put together a realistic post-filing cash flow budget. There are three main reasons for this, being:

  1. I want to make sure that there is a budget that shows the person’s monthly expenses will be no more than, and hopefully less than, their monthly after-tax income.
  2. We must be sure that the monthly cash flow shows the person can afford the monthly payments to the LIT required to have a successful restructuring.
  3. One step needed to have a successful restructuring is to have such a monthly cash flow budget signed off by both the insolvent person and the LIT showing the person can survive through and afford a successful restructuring. Any creditor can request to see a copy of that signed off cash flow budget.

How do I start a corporate restructuring plan for a company?

The initial step in any corporate restructuring is for the board of directors to recognize and also resolve that the company is insolvent, that it needs to reorganize under this part of the BIA and to approve the hiring of a LIT.

I described the consultation process I first go through with a person to determine if they can successfully complete a restructuring proposal and then to start developing it. Similarly, I go through a consultation process with the senior management of the company.

I first want to determine if we have the basic requirement for a successful corporate restructuring. That basic requirement is, the company’s business, or one or more portions of the business, must be viable, notwithstanding that it is insolvent. There must be a true demand for the business and that it will be able to operate successfully once its financial position is right-sized. It may be the whole business, or it may be the case that we need to use the restructuring process to cut away the dead business units, in order to allow the viable one to survive and ultimately flourish.

By its nature, corporate restructuring is more complex than a personal one. There are many more moving parts to a company. However, the basic analysis is similar. What are the assets and liabilities of the company? Which business units are capable of being operated profitably? Which assets that are financed are essential to the future of the restructured company. Which are redundant and must be jettisoned. How will all the answers to these questions affect the company’s labour force? How many jobs will be lost and how many will be saved?

Ultimately, all these answers must be compiled into a cash flow statement. We must know does the company have sufficient financing or funds available to it so that it can properly operate during the restructuring process. There is no point in starting a restructuring if the company cannot survive the restructuring period. What will the company’s post-restructuring cash flow look like? We want to know that answer also to make sure that there is a real business that can operate profitably after coming out of the restructuring process. Just like in a personal financial restructuring, the company and the LIT must sign off on a realistic cash flow budget to show that the company can operate and survive the restructuring process.

What if the person or company needs immediate protection but is not ready to file the real proposal yet?

Just like in a bankruptcy, the filing of a Proposal brings in an immediate stay of proceedings. What this means is that no creditor can either begin or continue any action against the person or company for the enforcement or collection of a debt. Sometimes the insolvent debtor is under attack from a creditor.

Examples of proceedings against a person or company need protection from are numerous. The more standard ones are:

  • They need to defend a lawsuit but can’t afford the cost and therefore a default judgment is about to be issued.
  • Attendance is required at a judgment debtor examination to disclose the nature and whereabouts of their assets.
  • The Sheriff may be seizing an asset that if successful, it will stop the person or company from conducting business.

The BIA provides a way for an insolvent debtor under such an attack to invoke a stay of proceedings before they are ready to file their formal restructuring plan. That option is to first file what is called a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal (NOI). This is a BIA filing that serves as a notification to the creditors that the debtor will certainly be making a restructuring proposal but it needs to have the stay of proceedings start right now.

How the concept of NOI evolved is very interesting. Before the 1992 amendments to the BIA, there was no such thing as an NOI. However, people and companies needed to invoke an immediate stay of proceedings, but the BIA did not contain such provisions. So, what was done, is that the LIT would prepare what was called a holding proposal. All the proposal said was that I promise to file a real restructuring proposal as soon as possible. That holding proposal was then filed which brought on a stay of proceedings.

Paperwork and procedures

The LIT needs to be satisfied that: (i) all the relevant details have been gotten; (ii) the person or company has a likelihood of a successful proposal restructuring; as well as (iii) the person’s or company’s cash flow is enough that it can pay its ongoing post-filing debts through the restructuring process.

The LIT then assists the insolvent debtor in completing the necessary paperwork. The LIT also prepares its own report. The LIT then does a mailing to all known creditors to advise them of the filing of the Proposal, a means by which they can file their claim with the LIT and a description of what the process is and what it all means. The documents are:

  • the Proposal
  • a statement of the person’s or company’s assets and liabilities
  • a listing of creditors
  • the form 31 proof of claim
  • the voting letter
  • LIT’s report on the insolvent debtor, the Proposal and the LIT’s recommendation for voting in favour of (or against) acceptance of the Proposal

The meeting of creditors is then held to allow the creditors to vote on the Proposal. If the Proposal is accepted by the required majority of the creditors, then the LIT applies to Court for approval of the Proposal. Once approved by the Court, it forms a contract between the debtor and the creditors is formed. The person or company then needs to perform the promises it made in the Proposal to its creditors. This, of course, includes paying the necessary funding to the LIT for distribution to the creditors.

Executing on the Proposal promise

The Proposal of a person will require that insolvent debtor to make monthly payments to the LIT. The payments are made out of the person’s monthly cash flow, as indicated in its budget. The person can take up to 60 months to fulfill the promise of payments to the LIT for distribution to the creditors.

A company carries out its Proposal as it continues its operations. It hopefully succeeds in operating profitably. The firm would be conserving a particular amount of its earnings in money and paying to the LIT what is needed under the company’s restructuring strategy to create the Proposal fund it promised. The LIT after that makes the distribution to the creditors called for in the restructuring plan. When all the payments have actually been made, the company has effectively reorganized and continues its business having successfully completed its restructuring.

What happens if a Proposal is unsuccessful?

This is a very simple question to answer. What is a division i proposal if not successful? It is called bankruptcy. If a restructuring plan does not get either acceptance by the necessary majority of creditors or approval by the Court, then the person or company is automatically bankrupt. If the person or company fails to make all the payments called for, that also creates an unsuccessful restructuring. In any of those cases, It is as if the insolvent debtor filed an assignment in bankruptcy.

In that case, the LIT administering the restructuring program becomes the LIT administering a bankruptcy.

What is a division 1 consumer proposal?

I have been asked this question several times. Firstly, there is no such thing as a division 1 consumer proposal, but there is such a thing as a consumer proposal. A consumer proposal is found in Part III Division II of the BIA. So, it is called either a division 2 proposal or a consumer proposal.

Is consumer proposal worth it?

Before being able to decide if a consumer proposal is worth it, we need to understand what a consumer proposal is. The same way I described what is a division i proposal, I need to describe a consumer proposal. The consumer proposal process is a streamlined version of the personal division i proposal already described. It is only for people and not companies. Further, the person cannot owe more than $250,000, not including any loans registered against the person’s home, such as a mortgage or home equity line of credit.

I have written many times about different issues concerning consumer proposals. Rather than repeating it in Brandon’s Blog, I recommend you read my earlier blogs on the consumer proposal topic. Some of the blogs I have written for ease of reference are:

Summary

I hope that I have adequately answered the question of what is a division i proposal and how you can like it. The honest answer is that no one really does. However, if it is necessary for you or your company’s survival, it becomes very easy to like it.

Do you or your company have way too much debt? Before you reach the phase where you can’t stay afloat and where financial restructuring is no longer a viable alternative, contact the Ira Smith Team.

We know full well the discomfort and tension excessive debt can create. We can help you to eliminate that pain and address your financial issues supplying timely, realistic and easy to implement action steps in finding the optimal strategy created just for you.

Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today. Make a free appointment to visit with one of the Ira Smith Team for a totally free, no-obligation assessment. You can be on your path to a carefree life Starting Over, Starting Now. Give us a call today so that we can help you return to an anxiety-free and pain-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SINGLE SPOUSE BANKRUPTCY ON-DEMAND: LEGAL EFFECTS WHEN ONLY 1 SPOUSE FILES FOR BANKRUPTCY

Single Spouse Bankruptcy: Does Declaring Bankruptcy Affect Your Spouse?

You are in either a common-law relationship or are married. You are thinking about filing bankruptcy alone as a single spouse bankruptcy without your partner filing. You have actually possibly questioned just how will your bankruptcy affect your spouse. The bright side is that in the vast bulk of situations, your bankruptcy will have no influence on your spouse. In most cases, there will be no legal effects when only one spouse files for bankruptcy.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to discuss the financial and legal implications of a single spouse bankruptcy. No doubt the stress and strain of one spouse’s debt load will place a strain on the household and the partner. Providing marriage advice is not my specialty, but insolvency is.

How Will My Bankruptcy Filing Impact My Spouse’s Credit and a Non-Filing Spouse’s Income In Bankruptcy?

Each individual has a separate credit rating and a unique credit report. When married, people’s credit scores and credit reports are not blended. When both spouses are working, their respective employers do not blend or pool their combined monthly incomes.

There is no credit record or wage or salary aggregators that combine credit reports or incomes of married or common-law partners. That merely does not exist. So when people wed, their credit ratings are not combined or averaged in any way. They stay separate.

For example, if you open up a credit card in your own name and do not include your partner as a supplementary cardholder, the credit history and debt for that credit card will never appear on your partner’s credit history record. If you make your payments on that separate credit card and they’re on time, or even continually late, it does not aid or harm your partner’s credit rating. Different financial obligations are never ever reported on anybody else’s credit report and do not impact their credit score.

Marriage or a common-law relationship, does not alter the fact that credit scores and reports are not combined in any way. For that same reason if you file an assignment in bankruptcy on the separate debt it is also not recorded on your partner’s credit report and will certainly not influence their credit score.

Joint debt is where both you and your partner are responsible for that debt. If just one partner files for bankruptcy there is no impact on the non-filing partner’s credit rating. However, the non-bankrupt spouse remains responsible to pay that debt. If the non-filing spouse does not do so, then it will affect that spouse’s credit rating and score.

Not because their spouse filed an assignment in bankruptcy, but because they are fully responsible for a joint debt. That’s the trick. So in a single spouse bankruptcy, initially the filing for bankruptcy by one spouse does not impact the non-bankrupt spouse credit rating, it can affect their financial situation and possibly their credit rating if there are joint debts that go unpaid.

single spouse bankruptcy
single spouse bankruptcy

Single spouse bankruptcy: How Will Filing Bankruptcy Affect My Spouse’s Property Or Income?

The second reason why one spouse’s assignment in bankruptcy will generally not impact a non-bankrupt spouse is that spouses are allowed to own separate property in their separate names. Added to this, the vast majority of unsecured debts such as credit cards, or secured debts like car loans mortgages are created by contract.

This means that only the person who agreed to be liable for the debt can be affected by it. Except in rare instances, one spouse is not required to pay the debts that are solely those of when the other spouse files bankruptcy either through their wages or their assets.

If you have joint property, bankruptcy law does not allow your non-bankrupt spouse’s portion of that property cannot be taken to pay your debts. Your licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) (Trustee) only holds the bankrupt person’s interest in the property.

While joint property can sometimes be sold, the non-filing spouse’s portion of that property must be returned to the non-filing spouse. It is never used to pay the debts of the filing spouse. The non-bankrupt spouse would, of course, be the natural purchaser of the bankrupt spouse’s interest in such joint property.

If you are filing in Canadian bankruptcy proceedings and wonder how the bankruptcy process will affect your spouse’s income, you are most likely confused about how bankruptcy can affect your spouse’s income. Your spouse does not need to be a part of a bankruptcy. It is a common misconception that bankruptcy affects your spouse’s monthly income.

The truth is, the courts do not look into your spouse’s income at all in a single spouse bankruptcy. However, your spouse’s income may be included in the calculation of family income and household expenses to calculate if the bankrupt spouse has any obligation to make surplus income payments from the household monthly income to contribute to his or her bankruptcy estate.

The individual contributions to household income also affect the surplus income calculation. Most of the monthly living expenses have an effect on the surplus income calculation.

Does Single Spouse Bankruptcy Change the Nature of Joint or Co-Signed Debts?

So you open a new account with one of the credit card companies in your name and do not get a supplementary card for your spouse. In that situation, your partner does not get a card for your account. Therefore, your partner also did not consent to be collectively responsible with you on that credit card. If you fail to make a payment on that bank card, they cannot sue your spouse.

If they can’t sue your partner, they cannot get a judgment against him or her. If they can’t get a judgment, then they cannot garnish your partner’s wages. They can not take your partner’s different bank account or different assets. They can try to collect the credit card debt from the individual that consented to be liable for it. This does not change because of a marital or common-law relationship. Therefore, if you file a personal assignment in bankruptcy, your non-filing spouse’s separate property and income cannot be taken by either the Court or your Trustee.

If unsecured creditors report a joint debt in the single spouse bankruptcy estate on that person’s credit record, that does not influence the non-filing partner’s credit history. However, for any joint debt, or a debt of the filing spouse that is guaranteed by the non-filing spouse, that is a different story. The non-filing spouse must live up to his or her obligations, which includes the responsibility for that joint or guaranteed debt after the partner files for bankruptcy.

If not, then the unsecured creditor definitely has remedies against the non-filing spouse. Not because they are the non-filing spouse, but because they are equally liable for the unsecured debt. However, if a creditor incorrectly reports the joint debt as being included in personal bankruptcy on the non-filing partner’s credit report, I do suggest that the non-filing spouse writes to the credit reporting agencies to get it corrected. The reason for this is because the non-filing spouse is not involved in bankruptcy.

single spouse bankruptcy
single spouse bankruptcy

A Non-Filing Spouse’s Joint Debt: Can my spouse and I file for joint bankruptcy?

Section 155 (f) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) states:

“in such circumstances as are specified in directives of the Superintendent, the estates of individuals who, because of their relationship, could reasonably be dealt with as one estate may be dealt with as one estate”.

Section 66.12(1.1) of the BIA states:

“Two or more consumer proposals may, in such circumstances as are specified in directives of the Superintendent, be dealt with as one consumer proposal where they could reasonably be dealt with together because of the financial relationship of the consumer debtors involved.”

So, it is possible for the individual debtors who are spouses to file a joint consumer proposal to avoid personal bankruptcies or if it is really the only solution, a joint assignment in bankruptcy. What is necessary is that there should be is that the majority of their debts are joint, even though they are individual debtors.

Each situation will be different. Many times I have advised couples that they should file jointly and not do a single spouse bankruptcy. This is most useful where if only one spouse files either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy, the other spouse will not be able on their own to pay the joint debts. A joint bankruptcy filing will be more streamlined and less costly than if each spouse filed separately.

When considering a joint filing vs. single filing, follow the financial advice the Trustee provides. I once had a situation where the husband came to see me. He needed to file, but so did his wife. The reason was because of the predominance of joint debts. I advised that it would be best for the husband and wife to come to see me together so that I could explain the benefits of a joint consumer proposal filing to both of them.

The husband, thinking that he was protecting his wife, was adamant that only he would file in a single spouse bankruptcy process. Against my recommendation, he insisted on filing alone. We filed his debt management plan consumer proposal. As expected, the creditors where the debts were joint, starting making demands on the wife. She was unable to pay up, so, she too had to file a consumer proposal with me.

The unfortunate part was that the sum of the amounts that needed to be paid for a successful consumer proposal was greater than if they had filed jointly. So, as a family household, it cost them more than it would have if they filed jointly.

Both the husband and wife each made all the payments required under their respective accepted consumer proposals. It is just too bad that the total paid was more than if they had filed jointly. As always, I gave my best recommendations upfront. Unfortunately, the advice was not followed.

Single spouse bankruptcy: Bankruptcy and the non-filing spouse – Say goodbye to debt stress

Now what we have discussed are simply generalities in a single spouse bankruptcy. There are situations that do not fit neatly within these rules but that’s why you need an experienced Trustee to help review your situation and provide you with information on legal effects when only one spouse files for bankruptcy.

Do you have way too much debt? Prior to you getting to the phase where you can’t make ends meet and your credit report looks awful, reach out to a licensed insolvency trustee (previously called a bankruptcy trustee). In fact, if you understand that you can’t pay your separate debts, contact us.

We understand the pain and stress excessive financial debt can trigger. We can aid you to get rid of that discomfort as well as address your financial affairs and problems by offering prompt action and the ideal plan. We will be able to advise you on the legal effects when only one spouse files for bankruptcy or a consumer proposal.

Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today.

Make an appointment with one of the Ira Smith Team for a free, no-obligation consultation and you can be on your way to enjoying a carefree life Starting Over, Starting Now.

Give us a call today so that we can help you get back to a stress and pain-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

legal effects when single spouse bankruptcy
single spouse bankruptcy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEE COMPANY RESPONSIBILITY IN REVIEWING BANKRUPTCY PROOF OF CLAIM

Introduction

I recently read a case from the Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba. The decision deals with the responsibility of a trustee company in reviewing and disallowing bankruptcy proofs of claim.

The case

The case citation is Re 5274398 Manitoba Ltd. o/a Cross Country Manufacturing (Bankrupt) 2019 MBQB 89. This is an appeal of Bellhop Express Corp. (“Bellhop”) from the Notification of Disallowance of Claim by the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) (Trustee). 5274398 Manitoba Ltd. operating as Cross Nation Production (the Company) filed a Proposal under Division I Part III of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA).

On February 6, 2018, a creditors meeting was held in Winnipeg at which time the creditors of the Company, existing in person or by proxy, elected to approve the proposal. On February 5, 2018, the day prior to the meeting, Bellhop sent its Proof of Claim and also registered its ballot voting down the Proposal.

The Trustee disallowed the Bellhop Proof of Claim for voting. The Trustee also did not count Bellhop’s vote against in the calculation in whether the Proposal received the required majority of creditors.

The Court approved the Proposal. After Court approval, the Trustee again reviewed Bellhop’s Proof of Claim. On September 10, 2018, the Trustee sent a formal Form 77—Notice of Disallowance of Claim, Right to Priority or Security or Notice of Valuation of Claim to Bellman.

Bellhop appealed the Trustee’s decision to the Court. Their right to do so is found in Section 135 of the BIA.

The appeal

In the Canadian bankruptcy system, the obligation to prove a claim is that of the creditor. When a creditor files a Proof of Claim, the Trustee has the duty of examining it in order to identify whether the claim stands. If the Trustee is not pleased with the Proof of Claim, he or she might look for additional details from the creditor. The goal of the Trustee is to figure out whether the claim of the creditor is a claim provable under the BIA.

Once the Trustee has made its determination, the claim is either admitted or disallowed. If disallowed, in whole or in part, the Trustee must issue its disallowance using Form 77—Notice of Disallowance of Claim, Right to Priority or Security or Notice of Valuation of Claim. The creditor receiving such a Notice of Disallowance can appeal the Trustee’s decision to the Court.

In this case, before getting to the merits of the appeal, the Court had to decide if the creditor was allowed to present new evidence in support of its claim not previously provided to the Trustee. In this case, the Court decided that it would be appropriate for this new evidence to be presented.

The Trustee did not handle its investigation properly

The Court was prepared to approve additional Bellhop evidence. The Court said that the Trustee company got Bellhop’s Proof of Claim and made inquiries through the Company regarding it. It obtained specific information and made use of some or all of it. The Trustee then developed its Notice of Disallowance.

The Court was critical of the Trustee’s analysis of the Proof of Claim. The Court stated that the Trustee should have shared with Bellhop the information it obtained from the Company and the Company’s legal counsel which it relied upon to develop the Notice of Disallowance. The Trustee could have also shared a draft of its Notice of Disallowance to see if Bellhop had any other documents or information to refute the Trustee’s analysis. Unfortunately, no such transmittal of details was provided by the Trustee to Bellhop before the issuance of the Notice of Disallowance.

The Court went on to say that it was this failure to share such details, it denied Bellhop of the chance to comment on it. It also, therefore, created this situation where Bellhop had to seek leave of the Court for the chance to submit extra details.

The Court’s view was that a Trustee could prevent this situation by having telegraphed its decision to the plaintiff before the official Notice of Disallowance was issued. The Trustee should have asked for the Bellhop’s remarks of any type of, prior to providing its Notice. If the plaintiff failed to react, or react properly, after that it will certainly have a harder job in obtaining approval to provide more proof of its claim.

So under these circumstances, the Court allowed Bellhop to submit more evidence.

The review of the claim and the Trustee’s disallowance

It is a shame that the Trustee seemed to stop short of a fullsome review of all potential information before reaching its decision to disallow the Bellhop Proof of Claim. The reason being is that the Court spent a great deal of time having to determine the issue of presenting additional evidence. The Court was quite critical of the Trustee in its handling of the adjudication of the claim requiring the motion for leave to present more evidence.

In the end, the Court agreed with the Trustee’s decision to disallow the Bellhop claim. The Court held that the proof sent to the Trustee did not warrant a claim of $3,270,684, or anything near that. To reach a decision to allow the claim, part of which was for the loss of income, the Trustee would have to decide on an arbitrary basis. The role of the Trustee is to be neutral and rely upon evidence; not act arbitrarily.

The Court went on to say that there is a responsibility upon creditors in a BIA proceeding to equip a Trustee with sufficient proof that sustains the claim they are making. That did not happen in this case. The Court went on to say that additionally, there is no responsibility on a Trustee to sustain the cost of a substantial examination of a claim which on its face seems blatantly overvalued. Were that the situation, creditors would certainly be urged to submit extremely pumped up claims.

The far better strategy is to urge a circumstance where creditors file sensible claims with sufficient proof to sustain them. That way creditors ensure that the time, initiative, and expense of a Trustee to examine, analyze and value the claim is reasonable.

So in the end, the Court sided with the Trustee’s decision but admonished the Trustee for essentially wasting the Court’s time.

Trustee company summary

Do you or your business have creditors claiming against you? Are you in financial distress? Do you not have sufficient funds to pay your expenses as they come due?

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can get rid of the tension, anxiousness, pain and discomfort from your life that your money issues have generated. With the unique roadmap, we establish simply for you, we will promptly return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

We have years as well as generations of experience helping people and businesses trying to find debt restructuring to avoid bankruptcy. You can have a no-cost evaluation so we can assist you to repair your financial difficulties.

As a Trustee company, we are the only experts recognized, approved and audited by the federal government to offer insolvency guidance and solutions. A proposal is a federal government accredited debt settlement strategy to remove your debt and let you avoid bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will definitely enable you to return to a brand-new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

trustee company

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FINANCIAL LITERACY: FINANCIAL LITERACY FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN ONTARIO

financial literacyIf you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this financial literacy Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast

Introduction

When I was in high school, I was very fortunate. I thankfully took two accounting courses, in addition to the normal reading, writing and arithmetic. It was in accounting, that I received some financial literacy education. Anyone who did not take accounting did not get any exposure to basic financial education.

When Ontario grade 10 students go back to school next week, their course curriculum is now amended so that a financial literacy course is mandatory. The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to discuss why financial literacy is important and what the new course will offer these students.

What is financial literacy and why is it important?

Financial literacy is the education, learning and understanding of different financial subjects related to handling personal money, budgeting and investing. This topic focuses on the capability to manage individual finance matters in a reliable way.

With such education, people gain an understanding of making suitable decisions about their personal money. Without a basic financial understanding, how can people develop their financial skills? Where will you learn about things such as investing, insurance, budgeting, saving, retired life and income tax concepts?

Why is financial literacy important for students?

The typical high school curriculum of education and learning is extremely important. People generally do not get specialist education until they are in a career program. To become a medical professional, an auto mechanic or a web developer requires specialist education for career success. The one area of education that is generally missing to equip our youth to be able to make smart economic decisions in their lives is proper financial education.

Our society values money and entrepreneurship, yet for some reason, our institutions appear to assume you will somehow just know or pick up the proper financial skills to succeed. Perhaps if there was a mandatory financial education system in place we would see the gap between the rich and poor lessen. Teaching basic financial concepts and skills can go a long way to make sure that people can learn good financial habits and keep their heads above water.

How do you get financial literacy?

The Ontario curriculum for Grade 10 career studies for the first time this school year will include a section on financial literacy. The provincial government believes that it is important for students to understand budgeting and financial management. I applaud this effort.

The education system’s overall expectation is that students will get an understanding of responsible monitoring of financial resources and of services readily available to support their financial proficiency as they prepare for post-secondary life. This is an excellent thing.

I remember my first day at university. Day one all the banks have tables to entice students to sign up for a new credit card. Young adults who have student loans and have never been exposed to financial management courses will now have the ability to take on more debt. Not a good thing.

The specific expectations are that students will:

  • Learn the principles of financial responsibility
  • Evaluate the advantages of a variety of financial savings options
  • Explore financial planning tools available with banks and other sources

What are the three main components of financial literacy?

The three main components that the new financial literacy piece to career studies program will cover are:

  • Financial responsibility
    • setup and follow a budget
    • sensibly handling bill payments and using credit wisely understanding the difference between
    • knowing the difference between a bank and a credit union
    • managing their very own bank accounts
    • defending themselves against monetary scams and fraud
  • Financial savings choices
    • types of interest-bearing accounts and their associated rate of interest
    • tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs)
    • registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs)
  • Different kinds of borrowing and their advantages and disadvantages
    • federal government student loans
    • provincial government student financings, such as those available with the Ontario Student Assistance Program (OSAP)
    • loans or bursaries from their local cities and towns
    • personal (unsecured) loans from a financial institution, be it a chartered bank or a credit union
    • lines of credit, credit card and overdraft products
    • recognizing the benefits and disadvantages of the numerous kinds of credit products
    • how the responsible use of a credit card can boost an individual’s credit score ranking
    • how improper use of the same credit card can hamper a person’s credit score ranking
    • that the proper use of bank loans can allow a person to pay for a costly item, such as a car or home
    • how the improper use of loans and excessive debt can lead to a poor credit rating, money troubles and even insolvency and bankruptcy
    • How borrowing from family or close friends can be advantageous, but how defaulting on repayment can negatively impact personal relationships

The teacher’s role

The teacher’s role will be to provide illustrations to drive home these points. In the context of spending and personal finance, the students will learn the difference between “needs” and “wants”. Teachers will ask the students to reflect on exactly how a person’s values will influence their wants or the ways in which they satisfy their needs. Students will learn what “living within your means” really means.

The teacher will lead a discussion on exactly how a person can do this successfully. Students will consider what the impact on a person will be from not paying expenses promptly and from using numerous credit cards.

Students will learn the benefits of beginning to save at a young age. They will be exposed to the advantages of then having a formal financial savings plan. All this will naturally lead to a realization that budgeting for both short-term objectives, such as purchasing clothes, differs from budgeting for long-term goals, such as buying and maintaining a car. Students will also learn about the different types of savings vehicles as well as debt products. They will also learn the proper use of debt.

In my view, the students will learn about the three most important parts of any financial literacy program: 1. proper budgeting techniques; 2. the importance of saving from an early age and the various savings vehicles available; and 3. debt and how to use it properly.

Summary

Hopefully, by exposing grade 10 students to these concepts, they will be motivated to keep learning and using proper financial management techniques. My hope is that more students will come out of high school and begin their post-secondary career, whatever that may be, by having better financial management skills and therefore fewer people will be able to stay clear of insolvency.

Prior to the new mandatory curriculum, the first exposure many people had to financial literacy education was as part of insolvency counselling, which means they already made mistakes before having a chance to learn the basics.

Are you on the edge of insolvency? Are bill collectors hounding you? Are you ducking all your phone calls to the point where your voicemail box is always full?

If so, you need to call me today. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) we are the only professionals licensed, recognized as well as supervised by the federal government to give insolvency assistance. We are also the only authorized party in Canada to apply remedies under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). I can definitely help you to choose what is best for you to free you from your financial debt issues.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can get free you from the stress, anxiety, and discomfort that your cash issues have created. With the distinct roadmap, we establish simply for you, we will without delay return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life, Starting Over Starting Now.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CREDIT CARD DEBT AFTER DEATH IN CANADA: WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?

Introduction

The other day I received a phone call from a fellow wanting to know who is responsible for credit card debt after death in Canada. He was, unfortunately, suffering from a terminal illness and wanted to get his affairs in order. His wife will be both the Estate Trustee and beneficiary under his will.

This is not the first time I have received such inquiries. In dealing with the bankruptcy of deceased estates, this question, amongst others, is quite common. So, given the phone call, I thought it might make for an interesting blog to answer, what I have found to be, the most asked questions dealing with what happens to debt when you die Canada.

The 8 most asked questions

The 8 most asked questions I have found around credit card debt after death in Canada are:

  1. Who is responsible for credit card debt after death?
  2. Is my spouse responsible for my credit card debt in Canada?
  3. If your parents die with debt who pays it in Canada?
  4. Is an executor responsible for the debt in Canada?
  5. Am I inheriting my parents’ debt in Canada?
  6. Is there credit card debt forgiveness upon death?
  7. What happens to debts after death with no assets in the estate?
  8. Am I responsible for my spouse’s debt in Ontario?

Who is responsible for credit card debt after death?

The deceased’s estate is responsible for the credit card debt incurred by that person while they were alive. Therefore, any assets in the estate must first be used to pay off the person’s creditors, including tax amounts owing to Canada Revenue Agency. The creditors must be paid in full before any distribution is made to the beneficiaries.

If any person has co-signed the credit card agreement, or has guaranteed the debt or indemnified the credit card issuer for the debt incurred by the person on their credit card account while alive, then that person is liable if there are not sufficient, or any assets in the estate to pay off the credit card debt in full.

If any person holds a supplementary card on that person’s account, then under the credit card agreement, that person is normally held responsible by the credit card issuer for any unpaid debt on the account. That individual is also responsible to repay the bank card debt completely if the estate cannot pay the debt off in full.

Is my spouse responsible for my credit card debt in Canada?

Just like in the last situation, your spouse will be responsible if your spouse:

  1. has guaranteed the debt;
  2. indemnified the bank that issued the credit card; or
  3. is a holder of a supplementary credit card on the same account.

If none of the above conditions are present, then your spouse cannot be held responsible for your debt.

If your parents die with debt who pays it in Canada?

Many times parents name all their children as Estate Trustee. They do so to make sure that the children know that their parents loved them. Hopefully, all the children are also beneficiaries too.

The fact that children are either an Estate Trustee, a beneficiary or both, does not make them liable for their parents’ debts upon their death.

There are however three situations where the children may be liable. They are:

  1. Where there are assets in the estate, the children as Estate Trustees fail to pay all the debts prior to distributing funds to the beneficiaries.
  2. One or more of the children have guaranteed or co-signed for a debt of one or both of the parents or has indemnified a creditor on behalf of one or both parents.
  3. Is a supplementary cardholder on an account of one of the parents and at the date of death, there is an amount owing.

In any of the above cases, hopefully, there are sufficient assets available to pay off the debt(s) so that the individual child won’t be called upon to make good on the debt. In the case where there are no, or there are not enough assets AND one of the above situations exists, then the child will be called upon to pay off the debt.

Is an executor responsible for the debt in Canada?

If an Estate Trustee (previously in Ontario, this person was called the executor or executrix) disregards the financial obligations and disburses the money to the beneficiaries, then yes. The Estate Trustee will most likely be held directly responsible for those financial debts.

If the estate has no assets, or if what it had was insufficient to satisfy all debts, the Estate Trustee does not need to utilize his or her personal funds to satisfy the remaining debts. In this situation, there also will not be any distribution to the beneficiaries.

In the situation where there are some assets, but not enough to pay all liabilities of the deceased, the Estate Trustee would be well advised to seek the advice of both the lawyer and perhaps even a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy). The Estate Trustee should not be in the position after paying off testamentary costs and income tax obligations, to start choosing which debts will be paid and which will not be.

In the situation where the estate is insolvent, the Estate Trustee may be well advised to go to Court for an order allowing the deceased estate to be placed into bankruptcy. Then the funds that are remaining can be distributed in accordance with the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada).

By doing so, the Estate Trustee is not making any decisions about cherry-picking creditors who will get paid, while others won’t. This will protect the Estate Trustee from attack by any creditor who will not be paid or be paid in full.

Am I inheriting my parents’ debt in Canada?

You cannot inherit debt. As a beneficiary, if there are more debts than assets, you won’t receive an inheritance either. But, you can’t inherit debt. You can only be responsible if any of the conditions I explained above exist. The one exception is that if you are a blood relative, your parent owes money to Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and you received a transfer of their property while the debt to CRA was outstanding.

Is there credit card debt forgiveness upon death?

There is no automatic credit card debt forgiveness upon death. As I have discussed above, the person’s estate is responsible for paying off the credit card (and any other) debt. However, if there are no assets in the Estate, then the credit card issuer has no choice but to write off the debt if there is no other person to claim against. You will recall that I have previously discussed the situations where there may be a third party the credit card issuer can claim against.

One more possibility exists. If the bank that issued the credit card offered credit card balance insurance, and the person paid for it, then there will be an insurance policy that will pay off the debt. In that situation, the bank will get paid through the insurance policy. In this case, the credit card debt will neither be forgiven nor written off.

What happens to debts after death with no assets in the estate?

If there are no assets in the estate, then there are no funds to pay debts with. In this case, the Estate Trustee would notify all known creditors of the death of the person and that there are no assets. The creditors will have no choice but to write off the debts if there is no other person to claim against.

Am I responsible for my spouse’s debt in Ontario?

As I have discussed above, there is no automatic personal financial responsibility where one spouse is liable for the debts of the deceased spouse. However, if the remaining spouse has guaranteed, indemnified, co-signed or was otherwise jointly responsible for the same debts, then they will be. Specifically, with credit card debt, there is also the issue of being a supplementary cardholder on your spouse’s credit card account.

If none of those exceptions come into play, then one spouse is not responsible for the other spouse’s debt in Ontario.

Credit card debt after death in Canada summary

I hope you have found this credit card debt after death in Canada Brandon’s Blog informative. I am finding that I am getting involved more often in deceased estate matters. My involvement is in advising people who are the Estate Trustee of an insolvent estate. I also have acted as the licensed insolvency trustee of a bankrupt deceased estate.

That work has now naturally led to obtaining assignments where my skill set as a licensed insolvency trustee comes in handy in a deceased estate. Two examples are having acted as the Estate Asset Manager in selling off assets in an estate and as acting as an Estate Trustee where there is no bankruptcy involved.

Because of that work, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has opened up a new business division called Smith Estate Trustee Ontario. In that business, as Estate Trustee, we offer options for the complicated estate concerns. We end the discomfort and irritations the stakeholders are experiencing. We use the experience and integrity that we have built up over the years, with compassion, to help the parties navigate the messy estate issues. We strive for a win for all beneficiaries, adding value by reaching the settlements and distributions they were unable to accomplish by themselves.

We provide a full range of services to provide solutions for the complex Estate issues to end the pain and frustration the stakeholders are experiencing. We apply our expertise and creative thinking to take care of all details to end your pain and achieve the goals of the beneficiaries and other stakeholders. Contact Smith Estate Trustee Ontario today for your free consultation.

credit card debt after death in canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CREDIT KARMA CA: CREDIT KARMA CANADA REVIEWS MILLENNIAL DEBT

credit karma ca

If you would rather listen to an audio version of this Credit Karma ca Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down and click on the podcast

Introduction

A brand-new Credit Karma ca report on millennial debt is out. Credit Karma Canada reports that its US company has performed a research survey of 1,041 millennial customers in the United States. As far as I can tell, they did not do a similar Canadian survey. However, I highly doubt that a Canadian millennials debt study would produce results drastically different than this survey.

The results reveal that virtually fifty percent (48%) of millennials have spent money they really did not actually have by going into debt. Why? To keep up with their pals.

Unfortunately, this is a significant increase from the findings of the 2018 survey (up from 39% of participants evaluated in 2018).

The nature of the millennial debt

Whether it’s on food or beverages, concerts or tattoos, they discovered that more and more millennials are spending beyond their means as a result of increasing public opinions. Greater than 2 in 5 millennials (44%) from the study stated they’re terrified to miss out on unique or once in-.a-lifetime experiences. Over one-third (36%) don’t want to look like an outsider.

Despite the fact that according to Credit Karma ca, almost 1 in 2 millennials have actually experienced fear of missing out (FOMO) driven debt, they’re mostly being silent about it. Of the participants that have actually entered into debt just to keep up with their mates, 80% claimed they would certainly keep the fact that they have gone into debt quiet and not tell friends or family.

Why do they wish to keep it secret? The survey shows that their reasons are ones of regret, guilt and embarrassment. They do not feel good about the debt they have incurred.

In 2014 their survey showed that millennials were most likely to use the money they really did not have for unique experiences, such as events, nightlife or holidays with their buddies. The new survey also looked at what experiences and purchases were triggering millennials to acquire FOMO debt.

According to their study this year, the #1 point driving millennials to spend beyond your means is food ( 47%), and then clothing (41%). As well as there are some millennials that have entered into FOMO fueled debt on much bigger and long-term items. Cars and trucks (15%), tattoos (11%) and real estate (9%). So out of all the millennials that go into debt, only 9% of millennials go into debt in order to acquire an asset that will grow in value over time, millennial home ownership. Another way of looking at it, 91% of millennials go into debt either for an experience that once it is over, it is over or for a tattoo!

Regardless of the product or experience, social networks play a huge component in driving the millennials’ need to spend beyond their means. The survey results show that 2 in 5 participants (40%) claimed they spent money on something a minimum of one time per year simply to publish that fact on social media sites.

Why do millennials really feel forced to spend too much?

According to the survey, the main reasons that millennials really feel pressured to go into debt to keep up with their close friends are:

  1. A concern of losing out on a unique or unbelievable experience 44%
  2. Worry of not being included in future outings 41%
  3. The concern of being treated like an outsider 36%
  4. Worry of being evaluated 25%
  5. Concern over losing close friends 24%

As you can see, 4 out of the top 5 responses has to do with what their friends may think. This makes sense. The majority of the things millennials go into debt for, such as vacations, concerts and restaurants, are things that you do with friends.

So what is the answer?

Obviously, no one can keep going into debt on an unlimited basis, especially when the reason is to keep up with others. I have some tips on how to deal with friends that either has more money than you or are willing to go deeper into debt than you. Or, at least are not concerned about their debt like you are.

Hang out together in ways that don’t force you to spend

Consider how you can invest in quality time but not your cash. Time spent with close friends and loved ones is an experience that can be valued over something that pushes you into debt. Those good times also last forever.

There is no need to be embarrassed about being not able to pay for an evening out or a costly getaway. As I pointed out previously, 80% of millennials that spend beyond their means hide it from others. However, by being straightforward with your buddies, you may be amazed to discover they really feel similar to you.

Speak to your pals concerning your worries and also do cost-free or much more modest cost things that let you hang out with each other.

Control your funds, do not allow it to control you

Eighty-one percent of participants stated they have a month-to-month budget that they attempt to stick to, which is wonderful. Nonetheless, the millenials that have such a plan seem to have a hard time keeping within it once they feel the peer pressure being applied.

If you’re amongst those that have a problem with budgeting, it can be handy to be a lot more conscious about the consequences of buying something. Take into consideration whether you can really afford it and if you didn’t buy it, will it really hurt your life. If not, then reevaluate, don’t buy it and build up some savings.

Another tip is to lock your debit and credit cards away and spend only cash. By using real cash and not plastic (or a debit card) you get a better sense of what you are spending on extras and how much you need to still have for essentials until the next paycheque. When cash is gone, it is gone. This behaviour will force you to think about how much money you need for essentials for the number of days until the next payday – which is a good thing.

Will this item or experience be important in 5 years?

In some cases, the answer is no, and sometimes it is yes. If the answer is yes, then slot it into your budget and see if you can afford it. Make sure your budget also has a line for savings. That way you will be building up a fund for investing. This fund can also be called upon in the event of a real emergency that could not have been planned for. Examples are increased health costs or reduced income through job loss.

It is essential to have an emergency fund that you can tap into in the event of a real crisis. It isn’t so bad to also have further savings and investments. It is never too early to start planning for retirement. If you wait until you are closer to retirement than the start of your career, you will never be able to catch up.

Conclusion

I hope you found the Credit Karma ca study as informative as I did. Of course, budgeting and debt issues are not limited to only millennials. Financial problems can affect anyone. Whenever I sit down with a person to talk about his or her insolvency, or with an owner of a company to discuss business financial problems, I make sure that we have an entire discussion. I not only talk to them about what process I recommend for their unique situation, but I also walk them through the entire process and what all the rights and responsibilities are.

Are you or your business experiencing money troubles? Are you on the verge of bankruptcy? Do not wait till it is far too late to understand how you can restructure your financial affairs and avoid bankruptcy. You do not need to be one more person or company declaring bankruptcy in Canada.

As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only specialists certified, accredited and overseen by the federal government to provide insolvency guidance and to apply remedies under the BIA. We will certainly help you to choose what is best for you to release you from your debt problems.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can get rid you of the stress, anxiety, pain and discomfort that your money issues have created. With the distinct roadmap, we establish simply for you, we will without delay return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life, Starting Over Staring Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today.

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

PROBATE IN ONTARIO – SMITH ESTATE TRUSTEE ONTARIO BEGINS

probate in ontario

Introduction

I have written several blogs on the topic of when someone dies and their estate is insolvent. One of our most popular blogs is WHAT HAPPENS TO DEBT WHEN YOU DIE CANADA: ARE YOU FREE OF DEBT? I have also written on estate matters including probate in Ontario. Not from an insolvent estate perspective, but as to why a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) has the skill set to be an estate trustee.

Historically, estate trustees have been a trust company, a lawyer or family of the deceased, such as children. Based on our work with insolvent deceased estates, we have learned all about the emotions and even pain that family and business ties can cause and place parties in conflict.

So, I am pleased to announce that today we have opened up a new business division, Smith Trustee Estate Ontario. You can click on the button above or below to take you to our website. Have a look and let us know what you think.

Why use a licensed insolvency trustee as an estate trustee?

We have the skillset to perform the duties of an estate trustee. We also understand the role and responsibilities that the statutes demand, such as the:

Estate trustee problems we can help solve

In Ontario, an estate trustee is the only person with the lawful authority to look after an estate. Probate in Ontario is a process to ask the court to:

  • give a person the authority to work as the estate trustee of an estate; or
  • verify the authority of a person named as the estate trustee in the deceased’s will.

Sometimes an objective and experienced party have to be assigned to function as the independent estate trustee. Take into consideration the possible circumstances:

  1. Moms and Dads select all their kids to work together as an estate trustee. Each child has various degree of abilities, and some may have no desire, to do is called for to carry out the estate trustee duties. Stress and anxiety, clashes and pain results without any end in sight.
  2. Lots of well-off family members have disagreements over just how the family’s assets need to be invested. Rich family members aren’t beyond turning family squabbles into public fights in the courts. Often the circumstance simply calls out for a caring, skilled and neutral party to become the Officer of the Court to aid everybody gets to a good and fair outcome. This also will ideally decrease or prevent the demand for costly lawsuits.
  3. Somebody passes away with assets however no will. Many people think they are entitled to all or part of the deceased’s estate. Somebody without a financial interest yet with the abilities and experience is required to intervene to work things out in a reasonable and objective and cost-effective method.
  4. You are the lawyer or financial advisor to a great client. You have hesitantly consented to be the estate trustee of the estate of the person that is the driving force behind one of your best corporate clients. The person passes away and you find that you are now in the middle of an illogical dispute amongst the beneficiaries that is driven not by business sense but by passion and hate. The dispute is so serious, it endangers your capability to maintain the corporate client and the prospective future earnings to your business that this client can generate.
  5. As the lawyer or financial advisor to a person, acting as the estate trustee is not a problem. Nevertheless, the time required to take care of all the intricate estate problems may be that it takes you far from the remainder of your professional practice. You believe that you really cannot afford to do so. You want to relinquish the estate trustee duty, however, you don’t have a reasonable alternative to make sure that the estate can be effectively carried out.
  6. The person names as the Estate Trustee has a real conflict and must be replaced. Again, a skilled party who has no financial interest in the outcome and is easily recognized as an expert by the Court is required, and fast!
  7. There is a crucial demand for an Estate Trustee Under Litigation. Our experience in working as an Officer of the Court has actually resulted in our being identified for acting in a proficient and neutral way. We comprehend exactly how to navigate the different regulations and Court procedures associated with being an estate trustee. The Court acknowledges our capabilities and approves our qualifications without question.

The fact of the matter is with many problems such as these, the estate is most likely to be involved in significant expensive lawsuits. It will certainly not finish anytime quickly. Nevertheless, in the meanwhile, there are actual time problems that require to be attended to in managing the estate assets so they do not dissipate or otherwise are at risk.

Probate in Ontario – Why work with us?

Our mix of empathy, experience and impartiality provides us with a distinct viewpoint and the capability to appropriately administer the estate, minimize problems and accomplish outcomes for all stakeholders in an economical way.

Professional and impartial Officer of the Court

  • Acting as estate trustee
  • Obtain probate in Ontario
  • Asset management
  • Investigation and valuation
  • Monetization of assets
  • Trust accounting
  • Beneficiary reporting and distribution

Estate Trustee Under Litigation

  • Professional and impartial Officer of the Court
  • Asset investigation, valuation and safeguarding
  • Trust accounting
  • Reporting to the Court and all stakeholders

Conflict resolution

  • Protecting assets
  • Experienced as Officer of the Court if estate trustee has conflict – perceived or real
  • Minimize costs
  • Stakeholder strategies

Insolvency

  • Planning and strategy to safeguard assets
  • Restructuring and Turnaround
  • Acting as Trustee of an insolvent estate

We provide a full range of services to provide solutions for the complex Estate issues to end the pain and frustration the stakeholders are experiencing. We apply our expertise and creative thinking to take care of all details to end your pain and achieve the goals of the beneficiaries and other stakeholders. Contact Smith Estate Trustee Ontario today for your free consultation.

Get our free full-scale analysis of your issues and our recommended options to solve your problems allowing you to move forward confidently. Check out our website by clicking on the button below. All our details are there.

probate in ontario

 

probate in ontario

 

 

 

 

 

Call a Trustee Now!