Tag: LIT

4 PILLARS LAWSUIT GETS GIGANTIC APPROVAL TO PROCEED FROM COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 24, 2021

NOTE: On January 13, 2022, three settlement agreements were approved by the Honourable Justice Mayer of the British Columbia Supreme Court on January 29, 2021, and November 15, 2021. As a compromise of disputed claims, these settlements are not an admission or finding of liability by the settling Defendants. You can read all about the Settlement Administration Plan and how to file a claim by CLICKING HERE to read our latest 4 Pillars blog.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

**The 4 Pillars lawsuit class-action**

In my November 25, 2019, Brandon Blog titled “HOW DOES DEBT RELIEF WORK: APPARENTLY NOT GREAT 4 EVERYONE“ I wrote about the litigation involving 4 Pillars Debt and Credit Restructuring Company, 4 Pillars Consulting Group Inc. and other entities (4 Pillars or the 4 Pillars lawsuit), Pearce v 4 Pillars Consulting Group Inc., 2019 BCSC 1851.

Mr. Pearce is suing for damages for the fees billed by 4 Pillars to all persons that paid fees to it in British Columbia in connection with: (i) a consumer proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA); or (ii) an informal debt settlement negotiation proposal with the individual’s creditors, all after April 1, 2016.

Mr. Pearce claims that it is appropriate for the refunding fees paid, damages for alleged losses stemming from breaches of the provincial Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act (BPCPA) and BIA, and damages based upon the claim that the fees billed were unscrupulous under section 8 of the BPCPA.

In this Brandon Blog, I describe what the 4 Pillars lawsuit is all about and why the Court of Appeal for British Columbia has allowed it to proceed as a class action proceeding, dismissing the 4 Pillars objections.

4 Pillars lawsuit: What is a class action proceeding?

As part of that litigation, Mr. Pearce applied to the BC Court to have his litigation turned into a class action proceeding. The Court ruled that there were enough grounds for his legal action to move forward as a class-action claim. As can be expected, 4 Pillars objected to that motion. They also unsuccessfully argued that certain sections of the claim should be stricken.

4 Pillars appealed that decision to the Court of Appeal for British Columbia. On May 17, 2021, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia released its decision. In this Brandon Blog, I discuss the appeal, what the appeal court had to say and what it decided in the 4 Pillars lawsuit appeal.

Debtor Warning – Debt Consultants Sometimes Not What They Appear

**What 4 Pillars say their organization’s role is**

4 Pillars states that they are professionals who provide a variety of services specific to individuals in debt. They say they outline the choices readily available and also walk people through the procedure. They say that your financial debt settlement will likely be one of the following, which they will manage on your behalf:

informal debt settlement
consumer proposals
bankruptcy

They also say they will work with the person on their aftercare. They also say that their role ranges from providing individual debt settlements on behalf of debtors with collection agencies and their creditors to negotiating with Licensed Insolvency Trustees (individually a Trustee, Bankruptcy Trustee or LIT) on behalf of a debtor in determining the terms of a consumer proposal.

What the Court of Appeal for British Columbia says about the role of 4 Pillars

The Court of Appeal described them this way:

4 Pillars sell their debt restructuring services as debt advisors to individuals on the brink of insolvency who are seeking debt restructuring. They are unlicensed and charge fees above those professionals who are licensed and regulated.
Their debt consulting business is not licensed or registered, and they charge customers fees up‑front for services regardless of whether the appellants actually achieve any debt relief.
Their debt consulting services are:
- to meet and work with consumers who are struggling with debt;
- to help them draft a consumer proposal to present to a LIT:
- and to engage in back and forth discussions with the LIT in efforts to have the LIT agree to a consumer proposal that is favourable to the debtor.
All of these services are provided with the goal that the LIT will then present the consumer proposal to the debtor’s creditors.
4 Pillars may then provide input, on the debtor’s behalf, on any response or request from the creditors.

4 Pillars lawsuit: What do the 4 Pillars debt consultant’s services actually involve?

Just to remind you, this is what the lower BC Court and the Court of Appeal for British Columbia found the 4 Pillars services to be:

to meet and work with consumers who are struggling with debt;
to help them draft a consumer proposal to present to a LIT:
and to engage in back and forth discussions with the LIT in efforts to have the LIT agree to a consumer proposal that is favourable to the debtor.
Provide input, on the debtor’s behalf, on any response or request from the creditors.
They charge customers fees up‑front for services regardless of whether the appellants actually achieve any debt relief.
Charge fees above those professionals who are licensed and regulated.

This is very common amongst all the debt restructuring businesses. It is questionable what value they provide if any at all. Their business model preys on people’s fears of getting advice straight from Licensed Insolvency Trustees.

The services described above a LIT provides at no additional cost above and beyond what the government-approved tariff fee is. The reality is that you do not need the 4 Pillars Consulting Group Inc.

As a LIT, I provide financial advice regarding your unmanageable debt and if you are a candidate for informal debt settlement, I will tell you exactly what to do in our no-cost initial consultation. If you have too much personal debt and are not a candidate for an informal settlement, I have many times prepared consumer proposals that work. As part of that process, I also act as a licensed credit counsellor.

Is Debt Settlement Really Worth It?

Debt settlement is really worth it. Going to one of these unscrupulous debt settlement companies, instead of a licensed insolvency trustee for debt settlement is NOT.

If you’ve been struggling with debt, it’s time to consider debt settlement through a consumer proposal with the services of a LIT. It likely won’t sound appealing at first, and you may feel that you are taking a gamble, but the process of debt settlement can be incredibly beneficial to you. Keep in mind that even 4 Pillars introduce you to a LIT in order for you to relieve yourself of your debts, hopefully through a consumer proposal process.

A consumer proposal is the only government-approved debt relief program. A LIT can get you a true debt settlement, without having to pay extra unnecessary fees to any of the debt relief companies.

Now let’s see what the Court of Appeal for British Columbia had to say about this 4 Pillars Consulting debt restructuring services business’s appeal from the lower court decision.

Class action waiver not effective to resist class action certification

The Court of Appeal of British Columbia believes the class action waiver clause is unenforceable as being contrary to public policy. The class action waiver significantly interferes with the administration of justice. It would have the effect of precluding class action lawsuits.

It has the impact of precluding Mr. Pearce, and class participants, from having access to justice and to a dispute resolution procedure in accordance with the law for claims developing from the connection between these parties. Therefore, the class action certification was upheld.

Other grounds of appeal in the 4 Pillars lawsuit

Having reviewed the evidence filed in respect of 4 Pillars’ applications for summary dismissal and after considering their arguments, the lower court judge was not satisfied that Mr. Pearce’s arguments in the 4 Pillars lawsuit, that 4 Pillars was acting for, or representing, a debtor in arrangements or negotiations with their creditors is bound to fail.

The evidence suggested that 4 Pillars had a role in the negotiations between a debtor and their creditors regarding a consumer proposal – even if they were not directly engaged with creditors.

The lower court’s view was there is a genuine issue to be decided at trial on a full evidentiary record. Accordingly, the judge dismissed the 4 Pillars attempt to strike the portions of the pleadings in respect of the Plaintiffs’ claims under the BPCPA.

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia agreed that it will be necessary to have a trial to figure out if claims can occur from offences of the BIA. Therefore, 4 Pillars was likewise unsuccessful in getting this issue stricken from the 4 Pillars lawsuit.

Trouble ahead for 4 Pillars in Ontario and elsewhere because of the class action in British Columbia?

It will be very interesting to see how this class action 4 Pillars lawsuit winds its way through the BC court. Absent an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, it is now game on. Mr. Pearce and all members of the class have the green light to continue the litigation. If successful, it goes to the heart of the 4 Pillars business model. Every franchisee across Canada needs to worry.

I hope you found this 4 Pillars lawsuit Brandon Blog informative.

Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE: OUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO WHAT IS A LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 14, 2020

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

Licensed Insolvency Trustees, licensed by the Canadian Government

A bankruptcy trustee (now called a Licensed Insolvency Trustee) is a person or company licensed to administer receiverships, bankruptcies, and proposals in Canada. We are licensed by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB).

The role of the bankruptcy trustee is to help people and companies look at their financial situation and explore the various debt relief options. The Trustee can help with many possible debt solutions; much more than just filing bankruptcy. The Trustee looks at various ways the person or business can avoid bankruptcy first. Bankruptcy, which is the legal process for debtors to deal with their unsecured creditors, by discharging away their unsecured debt, including credit card debt and income tax debts, is the last resort.

In this Brandon’s blog, I provide my complete guide on how a bankruptcy trustee helps people and companies who are in a precarious financial situation because they have too much debt by providing insolvency services and helping people and companies through the Canadian insolvency process.

About Bankruptcy Trustees: what is a licensed insolvency trustee?

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) is federally certified by the OSB. A trustee in bankruptcy is the old name for a LIT. LITs are the only debt professionals who are federally regulated and supervised professional that offers recommendations and solutions to individuals and businesses with financial problems.

LITs help people make informed choices to manage their debt difficulties. A bankruptcy trustee is the only expert licensed to carry out government-regulated insolvency proceedings such as:

privately-appointed or court-appointed receiver or receiver and manager to administer receiverships Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada (BIA).
assisting people to restructure through consumer insolvency using a consumer proposal.
helping people who owe more than $250,000 (not including debts registered against their principal residence) and companies by making a proposal to creditors as alternatives to bankruptcy.
bankruptcy trustee/licensed insolvency trustee in a bankruptcy administration when a person or company is filing for bankruptcy.

As licensed insolvency trustees, we’re here to help: How do I become an insolvency trustee?

A person who wishes to acquire an individual licence may complete and file an application with the OSB. The following are required for the issuance of a personal licence under the BIA:

successfully passed the following, which is administered by the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP):
the Canadian Insolvency and Restructuring Professional (CIRP) Qualification Program (CQP) unless otherwise exempted;
the CIRP National Insolvency Exam; and
the insolvency counselling course;
paid the required fee;
the applicant shall be solvent;
the applicant must be of good character and reputation; and
passed the oral board of examination run by the OSB.

You need to pass the educational program run by CAIRP. In order to register, you need to be sponsored by a bankruptcy trustee. That LIT will most certainly be your employer. When you pass the final CQP exam, you are awarded the CIRP designation and then able to apply to sit before the OSB’s oral board of examiners.

bankruptcy trustee

***Trustees in Bankruptcy near you: How to find a bankruptcy trustee* in Canada**

If you are looking for a trustee in bankruptcy near you, there are three good ways to find one.

The best way to find a bankruptcy trustee is a referral from friends or family members. Although they themselves may have never filed for bankruptcy, perhaps they know someone who did. Or, maybe they know a lawyer they trust who can provide them with a name or two that could be passed on to you. A personal reference is the best way to go.

The second way is through the OSB. They maintain a searchable database of all LITs in Canada. You can look for a bankruptcy trustee located near you. The directory includes the office locations of all LITs. You can browse either by name, city or province.

The third way is to look for bankruptcy information online. Type into your favourite search engine a phrase like “ bankruptcy trustee”, “bankruptcy trustee near me”, bankruptcy trustee Vaughan ” or “ trustee in bankruptcy Toronto ” and start searching websites. Then call the one whose website seems to speak to you. You can make an appointment for a no-cost consultation to get all your questions answered. You may even want to try two or three so that you can compare approaches. Then you can select the bankruptcy trustee that you feel you could work best with.

The fee of a bankruptcy trustee in a summary administration bankruptcy – The Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act

A personal bankruptcy administration is called a “summary” bankruptcy administration when the realizable assets are estimated at $15,000 or less. This kind of filing for bankruptcy is many times referred to as “no assets, no income”.

Rule 128 of the BIA General Rules dictates the fee and disbursements of a bankruptcy trustee in a summary administration personal bankruptcy. The fee is fixed and is called a tariff. It is calculated as follows:

“128 (1) The fees of the trustee for services performed in a summary administration are calculated on the total receipts remaining after deducting necessary disbursements relating directly to the realization of the property of the bankrupt, and the payments to secured creditors, according to the following percentages:

(a) 100 percent on the first $975 or less of receipts;

(b) 35 percent on the portion of the receipts exceeding $975 but not exceeding $2,000; and (c) 50 percent on the portion of the receipts exceeding $2,000.

(2) A trustee in a summary administration may claim, in addition to the amount set out in subsection (1), (a) the costs of counselling referred to in subsection 131(2);

(b) the fee for filing an assignment referred to in paragraph 132(a);

(d) the amount of applicable federal and provincial taxes for goods and services; and (e) a lump sum of $100 in respect of administrative disbursements.” If there are no assets or surplus income that will provide cash in the bankruptcy administration, then the debtor, in order to retain the services of the bankruptcy trustee, needs someone to either guarantee the fee and disbursements or post a cash retainer with the LIT in order to file for bankruptcy.

The fees of the bankruptcy trustee in an ordinary bankruptcy

A bankruptcy is called an “ordinary” bankruptcy when the realizable assets are estimated at $15,000 or greater in personal bankruptcy. Every corporate bankruptcy is an ordinary administration.

In an ordinary administration, the trustee is entitled to the remuneration voted by the inspectors in the bankruptcy case. The inspectors are representatives of the creditors who were voted in at the First Meeting of Creditors. The fee must also be approved by the court.

The fee will be affected by the complexity of the bankruptcy case, how much work the LIT had to do to preserve and sell the assets and did the LIT obtain verifiable results that can be described as extraordinary. The time spent and the hourly rates of the bankruptcy trustee staff involved are the basis for calculating the fee in an ordinary administration.

The disbursements incurred are to be added to the fee and must also be taxed. If the bankruptcy trustee is unsure at the outset if there will be any realizable assets, the LIT will ask a third party to provide either a guarantee or cash retainer.

bankruptcy trustee

The consumer proposal fee for a bankruptcy trustee acting as administrator of a consumer proposal – The Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act

Rule 129 sets out how to calculate the tariff fee in a consumer proposal. As I stated above, one of the roles a bankruptcy trustee is licensed for is to act as the administrator of a consumer proposal This rule states:

“129 (1) For the purposes of paragraph 66.12(6)(b) of the Act, the fees and expenses of the administrator of a consumer proposal that must be provided for in a consumer proposal are as follows:

(a) $750, payable on filing a copy of the consumer proposal with the official receiver;

(b) $750, payable on the approval or deemed approval of the consumer proposal by the court;

(c) 20 percent of the moneys distributed to creditors under the consumer proposal, payable on the distribution of the moneys;

(d) the costs of counselling referred to in subsection 131(1);

(e) the fee for filing a consumer proposal referred to in paragraph 132(c);

(f) the fee payable to the registrar under paragraph 3(b) of Part II of the schedule; and (g) the amount of applicable federal and provincial taxes for goods and services.

Our regular readers of Brandon’s Blog will recall that in previous blogs that I wrote, I described what the BIA minimum requirements are for calculating how much a debtor should offer its creditors as a proposal fund in a consumer proposal. That calculation has nothing to do with what fee the licensed trustee acting as the administrator may be entitled to.

That is why any debtor thinking about filing a consumer proposal in order to avoid bankruptcy need not be concerned with how much they have to pay as a fee. The calculation as to what a reasonable proposal fund will be has zero relation to what the administrator’s fee will be. In this way, the fee of the bankruptcy trustee acting as administrator is no-cost!

The fee of the bankruptcy trustee for the administration of a Division I proposal

Readers of the Brandon Blog will remember that a consumer proposal is available for any individual who has $250,000 of debt or less, not including any debts secured against their personal residence. A Part III Divison I of the BIA proposal is available to all companies and to any person whose debts are too large to do a consumer proposal. Both are alternatives to bankruptcy Under either administration, a proposal is a debt relief plan sanctioned by the BIA. It is the only debt settlement plan authorized by the Government of Canada. Above I described how the fee and disbursements of a bankruptcy trustee in an ordinary bankruptcy administration must be approved by the inspectors and the court.

The same is true for the fee of the bankruptcy trustee acting as the licensed trustee in a Divison I proposal. The calculation of the fee will be very similar to an ordinary bankruptcy administration also. The only difference will be as required by the difference between a proposal and bankruptcy.

A proposal is a great alternative to bankruptcy.

Only a bankruptcy trustee can act as a receiver

Section 243(4) of the BIA states that only a bankruptcy trustee can be appointed as a receiver. It does not matter whether the receiver will be privately or court-appointed. The calculation of the receiver’s fee is based on the hours worked and the hourly rate charged by the respected staff working on the file.

In a private appointment, the fee must be approved by the appointing secured creditor. In a court appointment, the fee must be approved by the court.

bankruptcy trustee

Bankruptcy trustee summary

I hope you have enjoyed this bankruptcy trustee Brandon’s Blog. Hopefully, you have better insight now into the many roles played by a LIT. As part of any bankruptcy or proposal administration, there are two mandatory credit counselling sessions also. So, the LIT also acts as a credit counsellor.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing.

If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), bankruptcy trustee, bankruptcy trustee near me, bankruptcy trustee toronto, Consumer Proposal, Division I Part III proposal, how do i become an insolvency trustee, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, LIT, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, ordinary administration, ordinary bankruptcy, OSB, receiver, receivership, Summary Administration, what is a licensed insolvency trustee

Brandon Blog Post

THE EASIEST WAY TO ACTUALLY LIKE WHAT IS A DIVISION i PROPOSAL ONTARIO

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 28, 2019

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this what is a division i proposal Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast

Introduction

Over recent times, I have been receiving increased inquiries as to what is a division i proposal. The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to explain what it is. No person or company actually likes to enter a restructuring process to avoid bankruptcy, so hopefully, this discussion will be helpful to those that really need it to appreciate why if necessary, it is actually easy to like it; especially a successful one!

What is a division i proposal?

Division I is one of the two divisions of Part III of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3). Division I is a restructuring provision. It is available to people who owe more than $250,000 and companies with any level of debt, in need of financial restructuring.

At the beginning of any consultation with an insolvent person or for an insolvent company, is to determine if a successful restructuring can be accomplished. If not, the only other realistic alternative is bankruptcy. A successful restructuring of a person will allow that person to keep the assets they wish to keep and can afford to hold onto.

A company that successfully restructures will continue to provide employment. The jobs that will be preserved are not only those of the company that restructures. Its continuing to do business with suppliers who continue to do business with the restructured company will also avoid layoffs or terminations of their own staff. The reason for this is that their own volumes will not decrease, or decrease as much as if its customers went bankrupt and could no longer buy from them.

How do I start a restructuring plan for a person?

The first thing the insolvent person or company needs to do is hire a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT) (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy). The reason why is because a LIT is the only one in Canada authorized to administer a restructuring proposal.

The LIT will discuss with the insolvent person about the nature of his or her assets and liabilities. Which assets are financed and which are owned free and clear. There will also be a frank analysis and discussion of the person’s income and expenses. The reason for this is to do preliminary credit counselling to help the person recognize how their historical household budget (whether they actually knew it or not) needs to change. Is there room in a new solvent budget to pay for an expensive asset, or does it need to be replaced by a less expensive one? A leased or financed auto is a prime example.

I want to make that determination upfront because a financed asset given up before the debt is fully repaid will create an acceleration of the full amount of that liability claim. I will want to make sure that it is done the right way, so the new accelerated liability will be caught as a debt being compromised, not a post-filing debt not caught in the financial restructuring.

Once the issues have been identified and the realistic options identified, I will then want to work with the person to put together a realistic post-filing cash flow budget. There are three main reasons for this, being:

I want to make sure that there is a budget that shows the person’s monthly expenses will be no more than, and hopefully less than, their monthly after-tax income.
We must be sure that the monthly cash flow shows the person can afford the monthly payments to the LIT required to have a successful restructuring.
One step needed to have a successful restructuring is to have such a monthly cash flow budget signed off by both the insolvent person and the LIT showing the person can survive through and afford a successful restructuring. Any creditor can request to see a copy of that signed off cash flow budget.

How do I start a corporate restructuring plan for a company?

The initial step in any corporate restructuring is for the board of directors to recognize and also resolve that the company is insolvent, that it needs to reorganize under this part of the BIA and to approve the hiring of a LIT.

I described the consultation process I first go through with a person to determine if they can successfully complete a restructuring proposal and then to start developing it. Similarly, I go through a consultation process with the senior management of the company.

I first want to determine if we have the basic requirement for a successful corporate restructuring. That basic requirement is, the company’s business, or one or more portions of the business, must be viable, notwithstanding that it is insolvent. There must be a true demand for the business and that it will be able to operate successfully once its financial position is right-sized. It may be the whole business, or it may be the case that we need to use the restructuring process to cut away the dead business units, in order to allow the viable one to survive and ultimately flourish.

By its nature, corporate restructuring is more complex than a personal one. There are many more moving parts to a company. However, the basic analysis is similar. What are the assets and liabilities of the company? Which business units are capable of being operated profitably? Which assets that are financed are essential to the future of the restructured company. Which are redundant and must be jettisoned. How will all the answers to these questions affect the company’s labour force? How many jobs will be lost and how many will be saved?

Ultimately, all these answers must be compiled into a cash flow statement. We must know does the company have sufficient financing or funds available to it so that it can properly operate during the restructuring process. There is no point in starting a restructuring if the company cannot survive the restructuring period. What will the company’s post-restructuring cash flow look like? We want to know that answer also to make sure that there is a real business that can operate profitably after coming out of the restructuring process. Just like in a personal financial restructuring, the company and the LIT must sign off on a realistic cash flow budget to show that the company can operate and survive the restructuring process.

What if the person or company needs immediate protection but is not ready to file the real proposal yet?

Just like in a bankruptcy, the filing of a Proposal brings in an immediate stay of proceedings. What this means is that no creditor can either begin or continue any action against the person or company for the enforcement or collection of a debt. Sometimes the insolvent debtor is under attack from a creditor.

Examples of proceedings against a person or company need protection from are numerous. The more standard ones are:

They need to defend a lawsuit but can’t afford the cost and therefore a default judgment is about to be issued.
Attendance is required at a judgment debtor examination to disclose the nature and whereabouts of their assets.
The Sheriff may be seizing an asset that if successful, it will stop the person or company from conducting business.

The BIA provides a way for an insolvent debtor under such an attack to invoke a stay of proceedings before they are ready to file their formal restructuring plan. That option is to first file what is called a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal (NOI). This is a BIA filing that serves as a notification to the creditors that the debtor will certainly be making a restructuring proposal but it needs to have the stay of proceedings start right now.

How the concept of NOI evolved is very interesting. Before the 1992 amendments to the BIA, there was no such thing as an NOI. However, people and companies needed to invoke an immediate stay of proceedings, but the BIA did not contain such provisions. So, what was done, is that the LIT would prepare what was called a holding proposal. All the proposal said was that I promise to file a real restructuring proposal as soon as possible. That holding proposal was then filed which brought on a stay of proceedings.

Paperwork and procedures

The LIT needs to be satisfied that: (i) all the relevant details have been gotten; (ii) the person or company has a likelihood of a successful proposal restructuring; as well as (iii) the person’s or company’s cash flow is enough that it can pay its ongoing post-filing debts through the restructuring process.

The LIT then assists the insolvent debtor in completing the necessary paperwork. The LIT also prepares its own report. The LIT then does a mailing to all known creditors to advise them of the filing of the Proposal, a means by which they can file their claim with the LIT and a description of what the process is and what it all means. The documents are:

the Proposal
a statement of the person’s or company’s assets and liabilities
a listing of creditors
the form 31 proof of claim
the voting letter
LIT’s report on the insolvent debtor, the Proposal and the LIT’s recommendation for voting in favour of (or against) acceptance of the Proposal

The meeting of creditors is then held to allow the creditors to vote on the Proposal. If the Proposal is accepted by the required majority of the creditors, then the LIT applies to Court for approval of the Proposal. Once approved by the Court, it forms a contract between the debtor and the creditors is formed. The person or company then needs to perform the promises it made in the Proposal to its creditors. This, of course, includes paying the necessary funding to the LIT for distribution to the creditors.

Executing on the Proposal promise

The Proposal of a person will require that insolvent debtor to make monthly payments to the LIT. The payments are made out of the person’s monthly cash flow, as indicated in its budget. The person can take up to 60 months to fulfill the promise of payments to the LIT for distribution to the creditors.

A company carries out its Proposal as it continues its operations. It hopefully succeeds in operating profitably. The firm would be conserving a particular amount of its earnings in money and paying to the LIT what is needed under the company’s restructuring strategy to create the Proposal fund it promised. The LIT after that makes the distribution to the creditors called for in the restructuring plan. When all the payments have actually been made, the company has effectively reorganized and continues its business having successfully completed its restructuring.

What happens if a Proposal is unsuccessful?

This is a very simple question to answer. What is a division i proposal if not successful? It is called bankruptcy. If a restructuring plan does not get either acceptance by the necessary majority of creditors or approval by the Court, then the person or company is automatically bankrupt. If the person or company fails to make all the payments called for, that also creates an unsuccessful restructuring. In any of those cases, It is as if the insolvent debtor filed an assignment in bankruptcy.

In that case, the LIT administering the restructuring program becomes the LIT administering a bankruptcy.

What is a division 1 consumer proposal?

I have been asked this question several times. Firstly, there is no such thing as a division 1 consumer proposal, but there is such a thing as a consumer proposal. A consumer proposal is found in Part III Division II of the BIA. So, it is called either a division 2 proposal or a consumer proposal.

Is consumer proposal worth it?

Before being able to decide if a consumer proposal is worth it, we need to understand what a consumer proposal is. The same way I described what is a division i proposal, I need to describe a consumer proposal. The consumer proposal process is a streamlined version of the personal division i proposal already described. It is only for people and not companies. Further, the person cannot owe more than $250,000, not including any loans registered against the person’s home, such as a mortgage or home equity line of credit.

I have written many times about different issues concerning consumer proposals. Rather than repeating it in Brandon’s Blog, I recommend you read my earlier blogs on the consumer proposal topic. Some of the blogs I have written for ease of reference are:

Summary

I hope that I have adequately answered the question of what is a division i proposal and how you can like it. The honest answer is that no one really does. However, if it is necessary for you or your company’s survival, it becomes very easy to like it.

Do you or your company have way too much debt? Before you reach the phase where you can’t stay afloat and where financial restructuring is no longer a viable alternative, contact the Ira Smith Team.

We know full well the discomfort and tension excessive debt can create. We can help you to eliminate that pain and address your financial issues supplying timely, realistic and easy to implement action steps in finding the optimal strategy created just for you.

Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today. Make a free appointment to visit with one of the Ira Smith Team for a totally free, no-obligation assessment. You can be on your path to a carefree life Starting Over, Starting Now. Give us a call today so that we can help you return to an anxiety-free and pain-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEE ACT ONTARIO BY A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 20, 2019

Trustee Act Ontario: Introduction

I want to highlight a provincial statute that is also important for the administration of a deceased estate; the Trustee Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.23 (Trustee Act Ontario). This blog continues my blog series to show how it would be proper to appoint a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or bankruptcy trustee) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) as the estate trustee (formerly called an executor or executrix) of a solvent deceased estate.

As always, since we are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

My prior estate blogs

In my blog TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS, I looked at some essential matters when it involves a deceased estate and why a LIT would be extremely knowledgable and competent to act as an estate trustee of a deceased estate with those basic requirements.

In the blog, TRUSTEE OF PARENTS ESTATE: DO I REALLY HAVE TO?, I explained why many times parents try doing the proper thing by appointing their children as estate trustees and how many times it just turns out all wrong.

In ESTATES ACT ONTARIO: TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE REVEALS HIDDEN SECRET, I describe how the requirements and provisions of the Estates Act are already very familiar to a bankruptcy trustee. In fact, most of the duties required by the Estates Act are already performed in the insolvency context by a LIT.

My blog ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES ACT CANADA: EASY FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE TO DO, I explained why a LIT is a right professional to lead the administration of Estates Act Canada.

In this and my next blog, I will focus on two more Ontario statutes that impact the administration of a deceased estate by an estate trustee. The three statutes are:

As you have by now correctly guessed, in this blog, I will show how a bankruptcy trustee would be very familiar with the workings of this provincial legislation.

Things an estate trustee must be aware of

There are various sections of the Trustee Act Ontario that affects the duties and responsibilities of an estate trustee in administering a deceased estate. All the concepts are very familiar to a LIT.

Power of court to appoint new trustees

Section 5(1) of this statute gives the Ontario Superior Court of Justice the authority to make an Order for the appointment of a new trustee. This is the same Court that we attend for Court-appointed receivership and bankruptcy matters. So, a LIT is very familiar with the workings and requirements of this Court.

Who may apply for the appointment of a new trustee, or vesting order

Section 16(1) of this provincial statute says that anyone who has a beneficial interest in the property of the trust can apply for the appointment of a new trustee. This is very similar to how a Court-appointed Receiver is appointed. Although it is normally a secured creditor who makes the application, in theory, it could be any party that has an interest. Section 101(1) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43 states that a receivership Order may be made “…where it seems to a judge of the court to be just or convenient to do so.”. It is the “just and convenient” clause that was relied upon by the judge when we were appointed Receiver and Manager of the assets, properties and undertakings of The Suites at 1 King West condo strata hotel back in August 2007.

For this reason, as a LIT, we are very familiar with this aspect of appointing a trustee.

Power and discretion of trustee for sale

In my blog ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES ACT CANADA: EASY FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE TO DO, I referred to sections 16 and 17 of the Estates Administration Act. Section 17 in particular, provides the estate trustee with the power to pay off the debts of the deceased. It also allows a trustee to distribute or divide the estate among the beneficiaries.

Section 17 of the provincial Act provides the trustee with the authority to sell, but subject to the requirements of the Estates Administration Act.

A LIT, either in receivership or bankruptcy, is extremely acquainted and experienced in the sale of real and personal property. The LIT likewise makes certain that the creditors are paid in the correct order of priority.

Sales by trustees not impeachable on certain grounds

Section 18(1) deals with a certain aspect of the sale of the property. It states that unless it is proven that there was an inadequate sales price, a sale properly made cannot be impeached by any beneficiary. Any beneficiary wanting to try to impeach a sale must prove that the process used resulted in a sales price at less than fair market value.

Similarly, in a Court-appointed receivership or bankruptcy, the LIT must be able to prove that both the conditions of the sales process and the sales price achieved, was right for the types of assets in the circumstances.

The leading case is the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Soundair Corp., 1991 CanLII 2727 (ON CA). The process a LIT must follow is known as the “Soundair principles”. This is the test used when deciding whether a receiver or trustee applying for Court approval of a sales process and the authority to sell assets has acted properly. The Court must decide whether the receiver or trustee has:

made a sufficient effort to get the best price and has not acted improvidently;
considered the interests of all parties;
Devised a fair process that has integrity by which offers were obtained; and
Introduced any element of unfairness in the working out of the process.

Therefore, I submit, that a LIT is very experienced in devising a sales process and selling assets in a way that is fair to all stakeholders or beneficiaries to attempt to maximize sales proceeds.

Trust funds and investing

Section 26 of the Act deals with the area of the requirement for a trustee to maintain trust accounts and to invest trust property in a way that will maximize the return while not putting the capital at risk to swings in investment pricing, inflation or income tax.

The LIT is very familiar and experienced in trust accounts and the investing of trust funds. Section 25 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) deals with the requirement of a trustee to establish trust accounts. Also, the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Directive no. 5R5 deals with Estate funds and banking. The Superintendent also monitors the banking of trust funds by all LITs across Canada.

Therefore a LIT is very knowledgeable and experienced in the banking, investing and protection of trust funds.

Security by the person appointed

If letters of administration were granted under the Estates Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, section 37(2) of the provincial legislation requires every trustee to post security.

I discussed in my blog ESTATES ACT ONTARIO: TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE REVEALS HIDDEN SECRET, the experience of a LIT in the posting of security by way of an insurance company bond.

Actions for torts

Section 38(1) of the provincial statute gives authority to an estate trustee of a deceased person to maintain an action for all torts and injuries to the deceased person or his or her property, except in cases of libel and slander. Any recovery forms part of the deceased’s personal estate. Section 38(3) provides for a limitation on such actions. The action cannot be brought after the expiration of two years from the date of death.

As a LIT, this is a familiar concept to us. When a person or company is insolvent and has a chose in action against one or more parties, such action can be started or continued by a receiver or bankruptcy trustee. In fact, in a bankruptcy, the action actually vests in the trustee.

The receiver or trustee has to make sure that they have a legal opinion on the likelihood of success. The receiver or trustee also has to make sure that they can afford to fund the litigation. The litigation cost cannot reduce the value of the assets under administration. This includes the issue of costs if the action proves unsuccessful.

Distribution of assets under trust deeds for benefit of creditors, or of the assets of the intestate

Section 53(1) of the Act lays out the requirements of a trustee to make a distribution for the general benefit of creditors. As I have described in previous blogs, Section 135 of the BIA deals with the admission and disallowance of proofs of claim and proofs of security.

A LIT is an expert at sorting out creditor claims and could certainly do so under the Trustee Act also.

Trustee Act Ontario: Summary

I hope that this blog reveals to you how the provisions of this provincial statute, detailing the duties of a trustee or estate trustee tracks really close to how a LIT performs in either a Court-appointed receivership or bankruptcy administration.

Therefore, the LIT is used to acting as a Court officer and could very easily perform the requirements and duties of a trustee as described in this provincial legislation.

If you have any questions about a deceased estate and the need for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

In my next blog, I am going to write a similar comparison. It will be about the requirements outlined in the Succession Law Reform Act and how a LIT is most familiar with it also.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

trustee act ontario

Tags Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, court appointed receiver, estate administration act ontario, estate trustee, estate trustee ontario, estates act ontario, executor, Ira Smith, licensed insolvency trustee, LIT, Ontario Court of Appeal, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, section 38 trustee act ontario, Soundair Corp., Toronto bankruptcy trustee, trustee, trustee act ontario

Brandon Blog Post

ESTATES ACT ONTARIO: TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE REVEALS HIDDEN SECRET

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 13, 2019

Estates Act Ontario: Introduction

I am continuing my series of blogs to show how it would be very natural to appoint a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or bankruptcy trustee) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) as the estate trustee (formerly called an executor or executrix) of a solvent deceased estate under the Estates Act Ontario. In this blog, I am going to focus on that piece of provincial legislation that guides the activities of an estate trustee.

In my blog TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS, I set the stage by going over some basics when it comes to a deceased estate and why a LIT would be very comfortable with those basic requirements for an administration of a deceased estate. In the blog, TRUSTEE OF PARENTS ESTATE: DO I REALLY HAVE TO?, I described why in some cases parents trying to do the right thing by making all their children an estate trustee could turn out very wrong.

In this and the next two blogs, I want to focus on the three main Ontario statutes that govern the conduct, duties and responsibilities of an estate trustee of a deceased estate. The three statutes that I will talk about are:

As you have probably guessed by now, in this blog, I will show how a bankruptcy trustee would be very familiar with the workings of the Estates Act.

Since we are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

Provisions a LIT is familiar with

Jurisdiction

Section 5 of the Estates Act Ontario states that letters of administration shall not be granted to a person not residing in Ontario. Similarly, a bankruptcy trustee must be licensed by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy in each province the LIT wishes to practice in.

Posting of security

Section 14(2) of the Estates Act Ontario requires that the administrator appointed to administer a deceased estate may be required to post security as the court might require.

Section 5(3)(c) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) states that the Superintendent of Bankruptcy can:

“…require the deposit of one or more continuing guaranty bonds or continuing suretyships as security for the due accounting of all property received by trustees and for the due and faithful performance by them of their duties in the administration of estates to which they are appointed, in any amount that the Superintendent may determine…”

The posting of security is another common area that a LIT understands well.

Court can appoint

Section 29 of the Estates Act Ontario deals with the appointment of an estate trustee. This section gives the Ontario Superior Court of Justice the authority to appoint an estate trustee where:

a person dies intestate;
the estate trustee named in the will refuses to prove the will;
where the named estate trustee(s) ask another person be appointed to administer the deceased’s estate; or
where there are special circumstances.

Section 243(1) of the BIA gives the Court the power to appoint a receiver. So, assessing the appropriateness of acting as a Court officer and providing consent to do so is something a LIT is quite familiar with.

Accounts to be rendered

Section 39 of the Estates Act Ontario requires the estate trustee to “…render a just and full account…” of the estate trustee’s activities. The LIT is fully familiar with this process. In both a Court-appointed receivership and a bankruptcy administration, the LIT must submit full and detailed accounts showing its activities, fees and disbursements for approval by the Court. This approval process is called taxation. This is another common area between the duties of an estate trustee administering a solvent deceased’s estate and the duties of a LIT.

Admitting and disallowing claims

Sections 44 and 45 of the Estates Act Ontario deals with the rules to be followed in contesting claims made against the deceased’s estate. The LIT is very familiar with this process. Section 135 of the BIA deals with the admission and disallowance of proofs of claim and proofs of security.

The LIT is a perfect party to be able to decipher claims made against a deceased’s estate and follow the provincial statute in the allowance and disallowance of claims.

Disputes as to ownership

Section 46 of the Estates Act Ontario describes the process for handling the claim by any third party to ownership of personal property in the estate not exceeding $800 in value. There are steps in the BIA that a LIT must follow when faced with claims of ownership of property by a third party in the possession of the bankrupt. So resolving such disputes is very familiar to the LIT.

Summary

I hope that in this blog I have successfully made the case that the provisions of the Estates Act Ontario outlining the responsibilities of an estate trustee tracks very closely what a LIT does in either a Court-appointed receivership or bankruptcy administration.

Therefore, the LIT is used to acting as a Court officer and could very easily perform the requirements and duties of an estate trustee as described in the Estates Act Ontario.

In my next blog, I am going to write a similar comparison. It will be about the requirements outlined in the Estates Administration Act and how a LIT is most familiar with them also.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

Tags Administrator, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), bankruptcy trustee, Canada, court appointed receiver, Debt, estate trustee, estates act ontario, estates administration act, Ira Smith, LIT, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Superintendent of Bankruptcy, Toronto bankruptcy trustee, Trust law, trustee, trustee act

Brandon Blog Post

PRIVACY BREACH LAWSUIT AGAINST LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE FAILS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 9, 2019

Privacy breach lawsuit: Introduction

A licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) and a Court appointed Receiver are both officers of the Court. As such, they have a duty of care to all stakeholders and parties. A decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia released in late 2018 deals with an application to begin a class action privacy breach lawsuit against a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or Trustee).

The case I am referring to is Netlink Computer System Inc. (re),2018 BCSC2309. Netlink Computer System Inc. (Netlink) was a British Columbia-based business that marketed computers and associated software solutions. In late 2017, Netlink went bankrupt.

Privacy breach lawsuit: The request to go ahead

As is required under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), any party wishing to initiate litigation against a bankruptcy trustee must first get the permission of the Court to do so.

In the Netlink case, a former Netlink customer wanted to start a class action lawsuit against the Trustee. The customer claimed that the Trustee breached the personal privacy of Netlink’s customers by permitting their personal details to be revealed. The unproven claim was that the Trustee sold to or, otherwise, allowed 3rd parties to get personal information of the Netlink customers.

This particular customer wished to start an action versus the Trustee for breach of privacy. If leave is approved, this customer would then seek certification of his case as a class action lawsuit.

Privacy breach lawsuit: The issue in requesting the leave of the Court

The Court’s task was to figure out whether to exercise its discretion to allow the claim to go ahead. The Court had to look at the nature and scope of the proposed claim taking into account the evidence. Leave is rarely given. If leave was granted in this case, it would be the first time in Canada a bankruptcy Trustee has been taken legal action against in a potential class action proceeding.

The BIA does not give any type of specific advice about the elements the Court ought to take into consideration in thinking about an application for leave to start an action against a LIT. These have just been developed through case-law analyzing and using s. 215 of the BIA.

For almost 150 years, Courts and legal scholars have been of the view that the bar for approving the commencement of litigation I versus a Court-appointed receiver or Trustee is not a high one. It is designed to protect the receiver or LIT against only frivolous or vexatious actions which have no basis.

The leading cases on the issue of leave to go ahead with litigation against either a Court-appointed receiver or LIT can be summarized as follows;

Leave to take such legal action should not be given if the action is frivolous or vexatious. Manifestly unmeritorious claims need to not be allowed to continue
Actions need to not be allowed to continue if the evidence submitted on behalf of the action, does not show a cause of action against the Trustee.
The court is not required to make a final evaluation of the benefits of the claim prior to granting leave.

This threshold tries to strike the ideal balance between the security of bankruptcy trustees and Court appointed receivers from the interruption of an insolvency administration from unimportant or simply tactical suits and preserving to the maximum degree possible the legal rights of creditors and other stakeholders.

Privacy breach lawsuit: This Netlink application

In this privacy breach lawsuit case, the claimant states that his affidavit evidence provides proof reveals a real case against the Trustee. The Trustee says that the proposed claim and the evidence on its behalf does not satisfy the relatively reduced threshold called for to prove leave.

The claimant described in his materials, his potential claim. . He also discloses that he has already begun a claim against the auction company who sold the bankruptcy company’s assets, Netlink and Netlink’s landlord. (The action versus Netlink has remained stayed due to the fact that Netlink is in bankruptcy). The proposed claim against the LIT is exactly the same and consists of practically the same phrasing as the action already started. There is no separate accusation that the Trustee did anything different from the auctioneer, Netlink, or the landlord.

The proposed claimant’s main points were:

He purchased a product from Netlink and provided personal information, including, his name, address and credit card details.
The Trustee contracted with the auctioneer to sell the assets.
During that process, the Trustee allowed customers’ private information, including addresses, credit card numbers, and various other sensitive information (the “Private Information”) to be exposed and offered to or otherwise acquired by 3rd parties, including criminals.
The Trustee provided the auctioneer computers and Netlink servers and other records containing the Private Information.
Criminals that obtained the Netlink servers offered the information to other criminals, consisting of cybercriminals and identity thieves.
The trustee knew that customer details are often included in the property of such bankrupt’s estates and it took no steps to safeguard the information when taking guardianship of Netflix’s property.
The Trustee’s choice to offer the Private Information, or at a minimum, the Netlink servers including the Private Information, was intended and deliberate and was made knowing that Netlink customers had not consented to their details being shared.
Customers have suffered damages.

Privacy breach lawsuit: This evidence

The Court examined the claims and the evidence. Unfortunately, the claimant did not have first-hand knowledge of what the Trustee did or did not do. Rather, the claimant submitted two sworn affidavits of what he believed took place. The information contained in the two affidavits was derived mainly from blog posts and YouTube videos that the claimant believed to be true.

The Trustee submitted 2 sworn affidavits of the LIT responsible for the Netlink file. The Trustee’s evidence was mainly why the relatively low threshold for allowing a claim against a Trustee or Court appointed receiver were not met. It did not provide much information about what the Trustee actually did (or did not do).

The Court had no choice but to rule that the claimant’s evidence was mainly hearsay and not admissible. With no real evidence before the Court to support the accusations, the Court dismissed the application and leave to begin the action against the Trustee was denied.

Privacy breach lawsuit: My take

Based on my reading of this case, I believe the Trustee was very lucky that there was no real evidence against it. There is no information indicating what steps the Trustee took to make sure that all Private Information was protected prior to the assets being sold. It is imperative that privacy breaches do not take place. Once a Trustee or Court appointed receiver to take possession of assets that may contain private or sensitive information, steps must be taken to ensure that the information does not fall into the hands of 3rd parties who have no right to that information. It does not matter whether the information is stored on computer hard drives, in the cloud, or physically in books or on paper.

The claimant still has its action against the auctioneer and the landlord. My understanding is that the landlord is involved because once the auction sale was completed and the auctioneer left the premises, there were still books, records and papers that contained some or all the Private Information. The landlord disposed of such papers in a way that did not protect the Private Information.

My Firm’s standard practice is to remove hard drives that contain Private Information so that computers would be sold minus a hard drive. With respect to physical records, any documents not required that would contain Private Information, we have shredded. We do not just throw it into a dumpster intact for someone to find. These are minimum steps required to protect Private Information.

Unfortunately, in the Netlink case, the Court’s Reasons for Decision does not include any information indicating the Trustee took such steps.

Privacy breach lawsuit: What does it all mean?

What it all means is that in any insolvency assignment, the LIT needs to know what it is he or she has taken possession and control of. Decisions must be made that protect the interests of all stakeholders, as best possible. There are always competing interests. The LIT must balance them all carefully when making decisions.

Do you have too much debt because you are a victim of identity theft? Does your company have too much debt and is in danger of shutting down? Is the pain and stress of too much debt now negatively affecting your health?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies in need of financial restructuring and counselling. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide debt settlement and financial restructuring services.

We offer a free consultation to help you solve your problems. We understand your pain that debt causes. We can also end it right away from your life. This will allow you to begin a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can begin helping you and get you back into a healthy, stress-free life. privacy breach lawsuit

Tags Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, Canada, court appointed receiver, cyber criminal, Debt, identity theft, Ira Smith Trustee, Lawsuit, leave, licensed insolvency trustee, LIT, Netlink Computer System Inc., privacy breach lawsuit, receiver, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL ONTARIO: AMAZING GOVERNMENT PLAN TO REDUCE CONSUMER DEBT

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 7, 2018

Consumer proposal Ontario: Introduction

I am finding that more people are calling me to ask about a consumer proposal Ontario. This is a Canadian federal government authorized program for people to lower their consumer debt.

What is triggering the boost in these queries?

Consumer proposal Ontario: New Ipsos Canadian consumer debt survey

A brand-new study by Ipsos might assist. It paints an unpleasant scene of just how much debt some Canadians are holding on to. Of those asked 31% claim they do not make an adequate amount to pay their costs monthly. More state they are having a hard time to merely to survive. Ontario residents in this predicament are candidates for consumer proposal Ontario.

The study discovers many people are sorry for the sort of spending they’ve done to find themselves with such debt. Peoples’ incomes aren’t maintaining pace with the increase in their costs. I am not just talking about extras; I am also talking about the basics of life such as food and shelter.

Consumer proposal Ontario: Bank of Canada benchmark interest rate hike

At the very same time, on October 24, 2018, Stephen Poloz, the Governor of the Bank of Canada (BOC) announced the Bank of Canada interest rate hike by a quarter-point to 1.75%. This increases the cost of borrowing for Canadians. This is the 5th bump since the summertime of 2017.

The Bank of Canada states that the Canadian economic situation remains running near capacity and is reasonably broad-based. The rising cost of living is close to target so what stands apart is that the current rate at 1.75% is still negative in actual terms adjusting for inflation.

Since the old Free Trade Agreement, the new USMCA appears to be resolved, several think with this 800-pound gorilla out of the room, it’s most likely to unlock the Bank of Canada’s ability to continue with rate hikes.

Consumer proposal Ontario: How will higher interest rates affect you?

If you stay in a variable price home mortgage or credit line, your rate of interest has risen. What that indicates for your capital is that your month-to-month repayment has actually risen. If your home mortgage is half a million bucks, your month-to-month repayment has actually increased by sixty-five dollars.

It does not feel like a great deal. Nevertheless, if your loan(s) rate of interest rises during the rest of the year and right into 2019, that will certainly maintain raising your repayments.

It isn’t simply your variable price home mortgage. Canadians additionally lug debt with credit lines, automobile financings as well as bank cards. Each rate of interest rise will certainly increase the price of borrowing on those variable price financings.

The raised repayments will certainly maintain consumption in your capital. So for those battling to make ends meet, rates of interest boosts will just make life harder. A consumer proposal Ontario won’t help with secured debt, but it will help eliminate unsecured debt

Consumer proposal Ontario: Higher interest costs lead to belt-tightening

To regulate debt, Canadians need to be aggressive with their budgeting. Individuals need to take ways to boost their monetary scenario, such as:

surrendering the little things that you appreciate setting you back cash
decreasing variable expenditures
releasing an evening at the cinema or that day-to-day coffee you always buy
upgrading and adhering to a well-balanced spending plan
lowering fixed costs such as rent, home loan repayments or vehicle lease/financing costs
raising revenue by taking on side jobs
joining the sharing economy
talking to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (previously referred to as a bankruptcy trustee) (LIT or Trustee)

When talking to a LIT, ask about how a consumer proposal Ontario can help you.

Consumer proposal Ontario: Nonetheless, many Canadians are still seeking help

Many Canadians continue to be haunted by debt. They experience remorse towards their existing and future debt scenario. Fifty percent are not certain that they will not have any kind of debt in retired life, while 44% are not certain they will have the ability to cover all living expenditures in the next year, without taking on additional debt.

Some Canadians are thinking about bankruptcy. Their first step must be to go to a Trustee. A Trustee is an expert that is certified by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB). The OSB is the government organization that controls the insolvency system in Canada.

Consumer proposal Ontario: A government-approved strategy to end consumer debt

To most of our potential clients’ shock, I have told many that bankruptcy might not be essential for them. Sometimes I suggest that it is possible to remove their debt via a government-approved strategy to decrease consumer debt called a consumer proposal Ontario.

Your government authorized debt settlement program is an offer made to your creditors. The offer is to repay only a percentage of what you owe, over a duration of no more than 5 years. ira smith trustee

Consumer proposal Ontario: The benefits to you

There are benefits for you to file such a debt settlement plan. First, you keep your assets. Next off, an approved proposal binds all creditors to the arrangement.

We begin with having the individual complete the standard intake form that we call, the Debt Relief Worksheet. When totally filled in, it gives us a listing of the individual’s assets as well as what they owe. It additionally aids them to budget their income and expenses. Utilizing that info, I am able to formulate a proposal based on your capacity to pay.

The proposal is submitted to the OSB. Once submitted, you can quit paying your unsecured creditors. If creditors are garnishing your income or suing you, those activities are stopped. As soon as the proper documents are submitted with the OSB, I then send out the proposal to every one of your creditors.

The creditors then have 45 days to approve or decline the deal. If creditors are unhappy with the proposal, as the Trustee I can work out changes such as greater payments. However, it all is based on what you can still manage to safely pay.

I tell people that if the proposal is turned down, the individual will certainly need to consider various other alternatives to resolve their monetary troubles. This might include bankruptcy.

Once we get approval, you are then in charge of making routine payments to the LIT as the proposal administrator. The LIT will certainly use that cash to pay your creditors.

As part of the consumer proposal process, you will need to go to 2 counseling sessions in the LIT’s office. This will aid you to get back on your feet monetarily. If you fully complete your plan, you will certainly be legitimately released from your unsecured financial obligations.

Consumer proposal Ontario: There are 2 consumer proposal FAQs everybody asks me

What this affect my credit score?

Yes, it will certainly be influenced, I tell every person. Once the regards to the proposal are fulfilled, people can begin reconstructing their credit history and their economic future.

Just how much does it cost?

The cost is established by the Federal government. How much an individual pays in for an effective consumer proposal is totally unrelated to the allowable government authorized to charge. The Trustee earns the fee from the amount you pay into your debt settlement restructuring plan. So, that means, the cost is FREE!

Consumer proposal Ontario: That freedom feeling

Our clients who complete their consumer proposal are so pleased to get that letter from us enclosing their Certificate of Full Performance. That is the document that confirms they have become debt-free.

The Ira Smith Team has years of experience of negotiating with creditors for debtors. If you owe less than $250,000, other than for any mortgages against your home, you can enter into a consumer proposal debt settlement plan. If you owe more or are a corporation, we can still negotiate with your creditors and restructure you with a restructuring proposal debt settlement plan.

Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, recover your money and move on to the next investment opportunity.

Call us today for your free consultation.

Tags bank cards, bank of canada, bank of canada interest rate hike, bankruptcy alternatives, bankruptcy canada, bankruptcy trustee, Consumer Proposal, consumer proposal ontario, Debt, debt settlement, debt settlement program, higher interest rates, Ipsos, Ira Smith Trustee, LIT, proposal administrator, stephen poloz, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

CANADIAN DEBT SOLUTIONS: AVOIDING THE BANKRUPTCY PROCESS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 24, 2018

Canadian debt solutions: Introduction

This blog discusses a very interesting recent decision in the British Columbia bankruptcy case of Hervias (Re), 2018 BCSC 1579 (CanLII). A licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or Trustee) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) is trained to develop Canadian debt solutions. Sometimes the best debt solution does not involve a formal insolvency process; either a consumer proposal or personal bankruptcy. The purpose of this blog is to describe the case of Mr. Hervias and why sometimes the best advice is that you don’t need to go bankrupt. This is a story of Canadian debt help – the good, bad & ugly.

Canadian debt solutions: The position of the stakeholders

Mr. Hervias made a Court application to annul his bankruptcy. He says that the bankruptcy assignment ought not to have been submitted because his only creditor of any significance was the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The evidence showed that CRA would have accepted a voluntary proposal to settle his tax liability in regular monthly payments affordable to him. He claims that the Trustee never asked such questions of CRA prior to recommending that he file for bankruptcy.

CRA does not challenge an annulment. It is encouraging his proposal to repay the debt. They likewise intend to file a memorial on the title to his home in which he has equity higher than the debt owed to CRA!

The Trustee is the only party to oppose the annulment application. The LIT insists that when Mr. Hervias sought his help, Mr. Hervias was insolvent because CRA was garnishing his pension and had frozen his bank account. Mr. Hervias had a previous bankruptcy and a couple of other minor creditors. Mr. Hervias had significant equity in buildings he owned with his son and his wife.

Canadian debt solutions: How could this even happen?

Mr. Hervias owed CRA, his major creditor, unpaid income tax of $23,820.50, including penalty and interest. In April 2017, CRA froze his only bank account. He sought help from a debt consultant, Canada Debt Helpline. He required CRA debt forgiveness. On the second meeting with an agent of Canada Debt Helpline, they introduced him to a LIT.

The Trustee met Mr. Hervias at the offices of Canada Debt Helpline. The LIT argues that Mr. Hervias sought bankruptcy guidance when he initially met with him. The Court determined that Mr. Hervias was presented to the Trustee by the debt counselor. The evidence showed that Mr. Hervias looked for the help of a debt consultant; not for a bankruptcy trustee!

The Court found that at the date of bankruptcy, Mr. Hervias had net equity in real estate of $95,000 – far more than the total of his debts! I question whether Mr. Hervias was even insolvent at the date of bankruptcy.

His bankruptcy happened because a debt consultant, who had a cozy relationship with a LIT, recommended a bankruptcy trustee with whom no doubt a financial relationship existed.

Canadian debt solutions: Debt consultants cause harm

I have written before on the evils of the debt consulting/debt settlement industry:

DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES FINALLY TAKEN TO TASK IN ONTARIO – December 17, 2013
HOW ADVANTAGES OF CONSUMER PROPOSALS SAVES YOU FROM DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES – June 30, 2015
CONSUMER PROPOSAL VS DEBT SETTLEMENT – October 1, 2015
DEBT SETTLEMENT OR CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA: NEW CANADIAN GOVERNMENT REPORT EXPOSES DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES HARMING CONSUMERS – May 3, 2017
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DEBT SETTLEMENT AND CONSUMER PROPOSAL: DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES ARE PROS WHEN IT COMES TO CONS ON INSOLVENT CONSUMERS – May 10, 2017

Canadian debt solutions: Technically or temporarily insolvent?

At the time of the bankruptcy, Mr. Hervias declared some other little financial obligations including:

a possible debt of roughly $900 to a Recreational Vehicle park chain;
$213 owed to Telus Mobility from an old phone agreement; and
a $186 debt to Best Buy for a laptop computer that he had not repaid in full.

Mr. Hervias had assets that well surpassed his obligations. Notwithstanding, he met the technical interpretation of a bankrupt person under s. 2 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA). Since the CRA had frozen his only bank account, he had no access to his income to fulfill his commitments as they came to be due.

Because he had a poor credit score, he was not able to arrange to finance on the real property he owned jointly. His wife was also not ready to consent to the financing because she was back in her homeland of the Philippines looking after her elderly mother. She asked her husband to wait until she returned to Canada.

Canadian debt solutions: Was there a realistic option for an insolvency process?

Definitely. The evidence showed that CRA would have agreed to an informal proposal, allowing Mr. Hervias time to repay his debt to CRA. As stated above, his other debts were minor. His bankruptcy was unnecessary.

This is a prime example of the dangers of debt consultants and the Trustees who are in bed with them. For the record, my Firm does not have a relationship with any debt consulting or debt settlement firm.

Canadian debt solutions: The Court’s concerns

The main concerns for the Court were:

did the Court have jurisdiction to annul a bankruptcy in circumstances where the bankrupt was insolvent when the bankruptcy occurred and there is no finding that the bankrupt abused the Court’s process or committed fraud on his creditors in filing an assignment in bankruptcy;
if the court has jurisdiction, whether it should exercise its discretion to annul the bankruptcy in this case; and
in granting the application to annul, whether it should be subject to payment of the trustee’s fees.

The Court determined that it was absurd that someone with considerable assets which created income would assign himself into bankruptcy. This is especially so when the main creditor is prepared to accept payment over a longer time span in amounts that the debtor can afford. The Court concluded that these circumstances were both special as well as uncommon.

Canadian debt solutions: The Court’s decision

However, just because bankruptcy ought not to have taken place, an annulment does not instantly follow. The law is clear that the bankrupt must additionally satisfy the Court that in all the conditions of the case, thinking about all the different stakeholder interests, the discretion needs to be worked out in favour of annulment. Furthermore, the jurisprudence guides the Court to think about the legal rights of the insolvent, the creditors and the public policy issues.

The Court was critical of the LIT. The Court found that prior to the assignment in bankruptcy, the Trustee should have consulted with CRA. Certainly, had he done so, he would have found out that an informal proposal was possible and there would have been no need for any insolvency process, especially a bankruptcy.

In the Court’s view, Mr. Hervias and his creditors are not harmed by an annulment, while the public interest in the integrity of the bankruptcy process is not undermined by annulling this bankruptcy under these unique conditions. Mr. Hervias’ bankruptcy was annulled according to s. 181 of the BIA. Mr. Hervias was ordered to pay the Trustee’s fee and disbursements immediately, subject to taxation.

Canadian debt solutions: Our approach

If you or your company are experiencing financial difficulties, you need a professional trustee. If yes, call the Ira Smith Team. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door.

First of all, we always offer a free consultation. We listen to your issues and offer you a full range of realistic options to help you get out of debt. There have been many times where thinking about all the solutions available, we have advised debtors that they do not need an insolvency process. Rather, maybe they can avoid it by implementing an informal process. As a result, we do not earn any fees from such advice; it is just the right thing to advise and do in those circumstances to help you make total debt freedom.

The earlier you contact us, the more options we will have to carry out. Whether it is a corporate restructuring or personal debt settlement through a consumer proposal, the goal is to avoid bankruptcy. However, if bankruptcy turns out to be the best option, we can assist there too.

You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, ending the pain and stress you are feeling forever. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for your free consultation.

canadian debt solutions

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), BIA, canada debt helpline, canadian debt help - the good, canadian debt solutions, Consumer Proposal, cra debt forgiveness, Debt, debt consultant, debt settlement, debt settlement companies, debt solutions, get out of debt, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., licensed insolvency trustee, LIT, total debt freedom, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL IN CANADA: CONSUMER PROPOSAL TORONTO ONTARIO REVIEW

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date June 13, 2018

Consumer proposal in Canada: Introduction

In this vlog, I try to provide answers to the most asked questions about a consumer proposal in Canada (the Proposal, the Plan or CP). A Proposal is an official method controlled by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) readily available to people.

Consumer proposal in Canada: Collaborating with the trustee

Collaborating with a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT) serving as administrator of your Plan you make an offer to:

pay your creditors part of the total you owe them over a specific duration;
expand the length of time you need to repay that part of your financial debts; and
stay clear of bankruptcy

Consumer proposal in Canada: The consumer proposal payments

Payments are made with the LIT. The LIT uses that cash to pay each of your creditors their in a proportionate share based on the proven claims filed by them with the LIT. The financial obligations need to be repaid through the CP within 5 years.

Consumer proposal in Canada: Who qualifies?

You need to be a person and not a corporation. Your overall financial debts need to not surpass $250,000. This limit doesn’t include debts from a home loan, mortgage or credit line supported by your primary house.

You need to likewise satisfy the insolvency requirements. This implies that:

your financial debts value is above the value of your possessions;
if you sold off your assets you wouldn’t adequate funds to repay your financial obligations completely;
you are having difficulty making a complete settlement on every one of your financial obligations monthly

Making just the minimal month-to-month payments as disclosed on your credit card or loan statements do not count as repaying your financial debts.

Consumer proposal in Canada: What is the price of a consumer proposal?

Your Plan payments also cover the fee for the Proposal. There are no different costs either for:

submitting a Plan; or
charges paid to the LIT to administer your CP

Consumer proposal in Canada: How long will my consumer proposal take?

A Plan could last for no more than 5 years. You could reduce the term either by boosting the amount of your month-to-month repayment or by providing a round figure repayment all at once. The one-time repayment makes sense if you can get an adequate loan from either a financial institution or family member.

Consumer proposal in Canada: What are the steps of a consumer proposal?

A CP permits you to pay all or part of your unsecured debt in regular monthly amounts over time. The maximum length of time is 5 years.

In drafting your Plan, the LIT must make sure that your consumer proposal provides a better result for your creditors than in your bankruptcy.

The normal steps are:

A LIT will consult with you and develop a Plan that you both think will work for both you as well as serve the needs of your financial institutions and others you owe money to
The LIT administering your CP will send the Proposal to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy
The LIT will mail out the CP to your creditors who then have 45 days to approve or deny it
The creditors can approve or deny your Plan at a meeting of creditors.

Typically, in a CP in Canada, there is no need to hold a meeting.

Consumer proposal in Canada: Can a consumer proposal eliminate debt collectors and avoid my income from being seized?

Yes, as soon as the filing of a Plan happens, all creditor seizure activities stop. However, it does not stop family law payments under a proper settlement agreement or court order.

Consumer proposal in Canada: In a consumer proposal will I hand over my home and my auto?

KEEP IN MIND: If you were to surrender your secured properties after declaring your Proposal, you will not be relieved from any type of financial debt shortfall since it happened after the declaring of your consumer proposal.

Make certain that if you are offering up secured assets, wait until they have started their enforcement and are claiming any shortfall against you BEFORE you give your CP.

Normally lenders who register a mortgage or other security for a loan are outside the Plan process. It is the equity you have in your residence or car that must be considered when you and the LIT first sit down to work out a budget. This will affect the type of offer you are going to make.

If you have enough income to keep paying the mortgage against your home and/or your auto loan and you wish to keep the assets, you can do so. Again, your equity must be considered in the offer you make to your creditors. Your income and expenses must be reviewed to make sure you can afford all these expenses plus the monthly payment under your Proposal.

Consumer proposal in Canada: Will I need to surrender my charge cards?

Generally, you should be ready to offer every one of your charge cards to the LIT and you will not be able to ask for a brand-new charge card until after your Plan is finished. You nevertheless can make use of a guaranteed/secured credit card throughout this CP process.

Consumer proposal in Canada: If I miss out on repayment will I automatically become bankrupt?

We highly recommend you to make your repayments consistently and on time. If you drop 3 behind, your consumer proposal will certainly finish. If that were to happen, you will no longer have protection from your creditors and their collection efforts. However, you will not automatically become bankrupt if you default on your Proposal.

Consumer proposal in Canada: What should I do if I have excessive financial debt?

If you’re thinking about a debt settlement program or are looking for ways to end your financial debt call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. We understand the stress and pain your financial problems are causing you. We feel your pain and we can end it for you.

Our strategy for every single person is to develop a result where Starting Over, Starting Now comes true, starting the minute you walk through our door. You’re just one call away from taking the necessary actions to get back on the road to leading a healthy and stress-free life.

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, BIA, can a consumer proposal eliminate debt collectors and avoid my income from being seized, Consumer Proposal, consumer proposal in canada, consumer proposal payments, consumer proposal repayment, consumer proposal toronto ontario review, how long will my consumer proposal take, in a consumer proposal will I hand over my home and my auto, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, LIT, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, trustee, what are the steps of a consumer proposal, what is the price of a consumer proposal, will I need to surrender my charge cards

Brandon Blog Post

BUSINESS DEBT ADVICE CANADA: TROUBLE SHOOTING DEBT STRAPPED COMPANIES

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 30, 2018

Business debt advice Canada: Introduction

When it involves money, timing is everything. Your business is getting closer to the top of its banking line and your banker is asking for more information than usual. This is where your heart starts pounding faster and your stress level increases. This is the moment you can seize to right size your business or else it very well may fail. The purpose of my blog is to give you business debt advice Canada.

Business debt advice Canada: Relationships can become strained

Relationships can become strained with your lender and suppliers when business debts are mounting and your company is facing a cash crisis. However, there are actions a borrower can take to prevent calamity. Reassuringly, most of the time, lenders would rather support you if you have a viable business plan to correct the situation going forward, and not putting you out of business.

I hope the suggestions below shows you that you should look at this as an opportunity to fix your business. I have found that in trying times when a company has mounting debts and insufficient cash, there is no replacement for good management.

A solid business plan showing how the company will turn itself around is what your lender wants to see. Communication with your lender and your suppliers is key. Do not hide from the problem. Face it head on. If your business plan shows you can turn things around, you will feel like you are dealing from a sound platform and not just running scared.

Business debt advice Canada: Take emotion out of the equation

These situations generally become more tense before they become better. You, your lender and your unpaid suppliers all want the same thing. You all want the company to be successful and profitable, and to be able to pay all of its bills in full when due. Your lender and suppliers are not out to get you. However, if they do not: (i) know that you have solid business turnaround plan; and (ii) receive ongoing information to show what steps you are taking to fix the problems, they will have no choice but to turn off the tap.

I have unfortunately seen too many companies fail in their business restructuring efforts due to lack of communication. The turnaround plan may have been sound, but nobody knew. This only creates ill will among the stakeholders and a result that nobody wants.

Business debt advice Canada: Informal and formal turnaround options

I must preface this section by saying do not be afraid to consult with a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT) for business debt advisory services. Trustees’ training makes them expert in assessing troubled business situations and implementing turnaround steps. A LIT does a lot more than just bankruptcy.

You will find it helpful to have a professional trustee assist you in developing your turnaround business plan, implementing it and keeping management focussed and accountable. You will also find it very helpful to have a LIT go with you for meetings with your banker; there will be many of those!

Business debt advice Canada: Troubleshooting

Fully understanding the full current status of the company showing signs of financial trouble is key. Things that I focus on early on when looking at troubled companies are:

What are all the different assets of the company and where are they located?
Are all the assets properly insured?
What is the going-concern value and the estimated liquidation value of the assets?
What is the full extent of all liabilities and business debt levels? This includes amounts owing to the government for:

- unremitted source deductions
- outstanding HST
- amounts owing to lender(s) and other secured creditors
- amounts owing to employees; and
- amounts owing to unsecured trade suppliers
What is the status of premises lease(s) for both remaining term and cost?
Is the cost of the leased premises above or below current market value?
Has anyone personally guaranteed bank debt, the landlord or any other creditor that would affect turnaround decisions to be taken?
Has a current crisis cash-flow statement and turnaround business plan been developed and tested for reasonableness?
What are the causes of the company’s current financial problems and how likely are those causes to recur?

This list is not meant to be exhaustive. No doubt other questions will arise as answers are found for these first questions. However, this is the information I first want to get before embarking on developing a restructuring plan.

Business debt advice Canada: Informal restructuring and turnaround

If the business problems have been identified early and have not been allowed to fester, then an informal restructuring may very well work. Perhaps all that will be needed is some accommodation from the lender both in time and money. Banks are quite willing to enter into a forbearance agreement with their corporate client allowing the time (and sometimes more money) to see if the turnaround plan will work.

The bank would rather have a successful turnaround than shut you down. The bank needs to know that management has the bench strength to pull off the restructuring. If not, they will expect you to have a lawyer experienced in turnarounds and a LIT active on your team.

Companies that have relatively few trade suppliers may also be able to work out a restructuring of their unsecured debt. The fewer people you have to talk to and get onside, the higher the likelihood of success. Of course, the trust developed from earlier dealings is very important. If there is no trust, or if there are just too many suppliers, an informal restructuring will not work with them.

Business debt advice Canada: Formal restructuring

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA) are the two primary Federal statutes that govern corporate restructuring in Canada. The requirements of each statute and the exact processes themselves are weighty enough to deserve their own blog. However, the takeaways from this blog on formal restructuring are:

In a formal restructuring, I still go through the checklist I have identified above of issues to look into.
Under the BIA, the restructuring section is Part I Division III of the BIA
If a restructuring under the BIA does not receive the necessary creditor AND court approval, the company will automatically be bankrupt
In a formal restructuring, the company stays in control of its assets and business operations
A formal restructuring invokes a stay of proceedings so no party can begin or continue litigation or enforcement action against the company
A company needs to have at least $5 million in debt to restructure under the CCAA
A BIA restructuring will be less costly than a CCAA restructuring because the company does not have to go to Court for approval every time it wishes to do something
The term “bankruptcy protection” in Canada, refers to a formal restructuring under either the BIA or CCAA.

Business debt advice Canada: What to do if your company has too much debt

Is your business facing financial problems? Perhaps your company is in need of a restructuring. The Ira Smith Team can develop a restructuring plan which may or may not include the need to file for bankruptcy protection.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. Team understands the pain you are going through trying to keep your company alive while trying to negotiate with potential purchasers. We understand that you are playing beat the clock, and the pain and stress you are feeling thinking that you may just run out of time. The bankruptcy protection process can ease this stress and provide a level playing field so that no potential purchaser takes advantage of you.

The Ira Smith Team has a great deal of experience in running a stalking horse stalking horse asset purchase agreement. The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points. Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation. We can end your pain and put your company back on a healthy profitable path, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The 4 Pillars lawsuit class-action

4 Pillars lawsuit: What is a class action proceeding?

Debtor Warning – Debt Consultants Sometimes Not What They Appear

What 4 Pillars say their organization’s role is

What the Court of Appeal for British Columbia says about the role of 4 Pillars

4 Pillars lawsuit: What do the 4 Pillars debt consultant’s services actually involve?

Is Debt Settlement Really Worth It?

Class action waiver not effective to resist class action certification

Other grounds of appeal in the 4 Pillars lawsuit

Trouble ahead for 4 Pillars in Ontario and elsewhere because of the class action in British Columbia?

Licensed Insolvency Trustees, licensed by the Canadian Government

About Bankruptcy Trustees: what is a licensed insolvency trustee?

As licensed insolvency trustees, we’re here to help: How do I become an insolvency trustee?

Trustees in Bankruptcy near you: How to find a bankruptcy trustee in Canada

The fee of a bankruptcy trustee in a summary administration bankruptcy – The Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act

The fees of the bankruptcy trustee in an ordinary bankruptcy

The consumer proposal fee for a bankruptcy trustee acting as administrator of a consumer proposal – The Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act

The fee of the bankruptcy trustee for the administration of a Division I proposal

Only a bankruptcy trustee can act as a receiver

Bankruptcy trustee summary

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this what is a division i proposal Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast

Introduction

What is a division i proposal?

How do I start a restructuring plan for a person?

How do I start a corporate restructuring plan for a company?

What if the person or company needs immediate protection but is not ready to file the real proposal yet?

Paperwork and procedures

Executing on the Proposal promise

What happens if a Proposal is unsuccessful?

What is a division 1 consumer proposal?

Is consumer proposal worth it?

Summary

Trustee Act Ontario: Introduction

My prior estate blogs

Things an estate trustee must be aware of

Trustee Act Ontario: Summary

Estates Act Ontario: Introduction

Provisions a LIT is familiar with

Summary

Privacy breach lawsuit: The request to go ahead

Privacy breach lawsuit: The issue in requesting the leave of the Court

Privacy breach lawsuit: This Netlink application

Privacy breach lawsuit: This evidence

Privacy breach lawsuit: My take

Privacy breach lawsuit: What does it all mean?

Consumer proposal Ontario: Introduction

Consumer proposal Ontario: New Ipsos Canadian consumer debt survey

Consumer proposal Ontario: Bank of Canada benchmark interest rate hike

Consumer proposal Ontario: How will higher interest rates affect you?

Consumer proposal Ontario: Nonetheless, many Canadians are still seeking help

Consumer proposal Ontario: The benefits to you

Consumer proposal Ontario: There are 2 consumer proposal FAQs everybody asks me

Consumer proposal Ontario: That freedom feeling

Canadian debt solutions: Introduction

Canadian debt solutions: The position of the stakeholders

Canadian debt solutions: How could this even happen?

Canadian debt solutions: Debt consultants cause harm

Canadian debt solutions: Technically or temporarily insolvent?

Canadian debt solutions: Was there a realistic option for an insolvency process?

Canadian debt solutions: The Court’s concerns

Canadian debt solutions: The Court’s decision

Canadian debt solutions: Our approach

Consumer proposal in Canada: Introduction

Consumer proposal in Canada: Collaborating with the trustee

Consumer proposal in Canada: Who qualifies?

Consumer proposal in Canada: What is the price of a consumer proposal? Your Plan payments also cover the fee for the Proposal. There are no different costs either for:

Consumer proposal in Canada: How long will my consumer proposal take?

Consumer proposal in Canada: What are the steps of a consumer proposal?

Consumer proposal in Canada: Can a consumer proposal eliminate debt collectors and avoid my income from being seized?

Consumer proposal in Canada: In a consumer proposal will I hand over my home and my auto?

Consumer proposal in Canada: Will I need to surrender my charge cards?

Consumer proposal in Canada: If I miss out on repayment will I automatically become bankrupt?

Consumer proposal in Canada: What should I do if I have excessive financial debt?

Business debt advice Canada: Introduction

Business debt advice Canada: Relationships can become strained

Business debt advice Canada: Take emotion out of the equation

Business debt advice Canada: Informal and formal turnaround options

Business debt advice Canada: Troubleshooting

Business debt advice Canada: Informal restructuring and turnaround

Business debt advice Canada: Formal restructuring

**The 4 Pillars lawsuit class-action**

**What 4 Pillars say their organization’s role is**

***Trustees in Bankruptcy near you: How to find a bankruptcy trustee* in Canada**

Consumer proposal in Canada: What is the price of a consumer proposal?

Your Plan payments also cover the fee for the Proposal. There are no different costs either for: