Tag: Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT DOES RECEIVERSHIP MEAN FOR 1 BETTER GUARANTOR BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

what does receivership mean

What does receivership mean: Receivership is for secured claims

What does receivership mean? A receivership is an enforcement proceeding that helps secured creditors recover secured debts on debtor defaults on loan payments from troubled companies. There are two types of receivers and receiverships: Privately-appointed receivers and court-appointed receivers.

As you can tell from the title of this Brandon Blog, I am not going to be writing about receiverships. You can take a look at my April 14, 2021, Brandon Blog titled “WHAT IS A RECEIVERSHIP? OUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO RECEIVERSHIP SOLUTIONS” to read all about what receiverships are.

What does receivership mean? It is a remedy for secured creditors.

I want to go through two more concepts quickly, and then I will get to what I really want to talk to you about today.

What does receivership mean: Bankruptcy vs. receivership

Despite the fact that receivership and bankruptcy sometimes get used interchangeably, they are not the same thing. A bankruptcy proceeding and a receivership proceeding are both legal actions conducted under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) and governed by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). According to the BIA, either a receiver or a bankruptcy trustee in Canada needs to be a licensed insolvency trustee, whose license is granted and whose actions are supervised by the federal government’s OSB.

Here is where the similarities end. In a receivership, a secured creditor would either hire a receiver privately or ask a court to place a company into receivership and appoint one to liquidate the collateral they have against the debtor. According to the Canadian bankruptcy process, either the person or company voluntary files for bankruptcy with a licensed insolvency practitioner, or one or more unsecured creditors apply to the Court for the appointment of an insolvency trustee to administer the bankruptcy Estate.

Licensed insolvency trustees are needed in both cases. The receivership procedure is a secured creditor’s remedy and bankruptcy is an unsecured creditor‘s remedy. To read up more on the bankruptcy process, look at my September 30, 2020, Brandon Blog “DECLARE BANKRUPTCY: A COMPLETE GUIDE ON WHAT IS IT LIKE TO DECLARE BANKRUPTCY“.

What does receivership mean? Not the same as bankruptcy.

what does receivership mean
what does receivership mean

Employee Rights in Bankruptcy Protection and Bankruptcy⁄Receivership

Bankruptcy protection can be gained to try to make a troubled company stable and then return the company to profitability by filing pursuant to either the BIA or the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), employees retain their right to unpaid wages, vacation pay, and severance or termination pay. There is no difference between filing and not filing. They are unsecured creditors of a troubled company, and the company directors are personally responsible for amounts owed to employees.

For the company in receivership or bankruptcy, the employees do have greater rights. The receiver of a company in receivership must register with Service Canada under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA) for the Wage Earner Protection Program. This program provides some compensation to eligible employees who are owed money by a bankrupt or receivership company.

To read more about WEPPA, take a look at my February 10, 2020 Brandon Blog, “SEVERANCE PAY ONTARIO & BANKRUPTCY-BARRYMORE FURNITURE UNPAID WORKERS ANGRY“.

So what does receivership mean to an employee with unpaid wages? It means they can claim a priority and get paid by Service Canada.

What does receivership mean: Receivership – a typical appointment

Now I will get to what this Brandon Blog is actually about. In Canada, it is the norm for secured creditors advancing loans secured against company assets, to also take a personal guarantee on the same debt from the principals of the company. In all entrepreneurial companies in Canada, that is at least the president running company affairs. If the lender-secured creditor suffers a shortfall from the liquidation of the company assets, the lender then looks to the guarantor(s) of the company debt to make good on the lender’s loss. Many times the company president/guarantor has no choice but to file consumer bankruptcy.

I was involved in a bankruptcy discharge hearing for one of our personal bankrupts in April 2021. He caused his company, being its sole Director, to file for bankruptcy with another Trustee. That same Trustee was also appointed as the company’s private receiver by the secured creditor. The company president provided the secured creditor with a personal guarantee.

Realizing that they would suffer a shortfall from the company situation, rather than suing on their personal guarantee, they approached us to consent to act as the Trustee in a Bankruptcy Application against the company president. We consented and the company president ultimately consented to a Bankruptcy Order being made to put him into bankruptcy with my Firm as the Trustee.

what does receivership mean
what does receivership mean

What does receivership mean: The bankruptcy of the guarantor

We administered the consumer bankruptcy. There were some assets to realize upon which we did. One realization required court approval as we were selling seat licenses and the right to purchase tickets for the Toronto Maple Leafs to a related party. The bankrupt person’s largest single consumer creditor was Canada Revenue Agency for unpaid income tax. The company in receivership was also a creditor as the president owed the company money. The secured creditor of the company was also an unsecured creditor of his in his personal bankruptcy for the personal guarantee on the shortfall.

The known creditors each filed their respective proof of claim in his bankruptcy, including the company by its privately-appointed receiver. We believed that the company by its receiver was a creditor for the amount of the shareholder loan owing to the company. The proof of claim they filed was for a much larger amount. As Trustee, we neither admitted nor disallowed any proofs of claim filed in this bankruptcy estate. The Trustee would have to take a cold hard look at the receiver’s proof of claim at some future date it is determined that a dividend will be paid to the creditors in this bankruptcy estate, which is highly unlikely.

What does receivership mean: The receiver opposes a bankruptcy discharge

Only one unsecured creditor opposed the bankrupt’s discharge. That was the receiver, or more correctly, the company in receivership by its privately-appointed receiver. The Trustee had not opposed. The lender, as an unsecured creditor, did not oppose either along with the other consumer creditors.

As I mentioned, in April 2021, the discharge hearing was held before the Master sitting as Registrar in Bankruptcy Court. The court raised a novel issue. Does the receiver have the standing to oppose the bankrupt’s discharge? The court allowed the hearing to be completed and allowed the parties to file further submissions, subsequent to the hearing, on this issue. Submissions were received from us, the
Trustee and from the Receiver in mid-May, 2021. The bankrupt took no position on the issue.

what does receivership mean
what does receivership mean

Does the Receiver have standing to oppose the bankrupt’s discharge?

Here is what I wrote to the court.

The security documents under which a privately-appointed receiver is appointed will determine if an unsecured amount owing by a bankrupt debtor is an asset secured by security held by a creditor over the assets of another party. If so, then the privately-appointed receiver has the right to file a proof of claim in the debtor’s bankruptcy as part of attempting to realize upon that asset forming part of the secured creditor’s collateral.

In doing so, the privately-appointed receiver is acting as Agent for the secured creditor. If the privately-appointed receiver files a proof of claim in the bankruptcy that is not disallowed by the licensed insolvency trustee administering the bankruptcy estate, then, in order to oppose the discharge of the bankrupt, the privately-appointed receiver must also be able to be the Agent for the debtor in receivership.

If the security under which the privately-appointed receiver is appointed allows for that receiver to operate the business of the debtor in receivership, then that receiver has the ability to be an Agent of the debtor in receivership and bring a claim in the name of that debtor.

In this matter, of the various pieces of security held by the secured creditor, only the General Security Agreement (the “GSA”), allows a receiver appointed in writing under it to operate the business of the debtor company. Under the GSA, the privately-appointed receiver has the ability to act as both Agent of the secured creditor and Agent of the company. The appointment letter appointing the receiver confirms that the appointment is under all security held, including the GSA.

Therefore, my opinion was that although we have concerns about the amount being claimed, the receiver has the ability to both file a proof of claim in this bankruptcy and oppose the discharge of the bankrupt as an Agent of the company. I believed it aided the administration of this bankruptcy to allow the receiver to oppose because it is able to draw the attention of the court to conduct of the bankrupt of which the court otherwise might not be aware of.

Finally, I advised the court that if there still was concern that it is formal defect or irregularity section 187(9) of the BIA, the court can determine that such formal defect or irregularity will not invalidate the opposition to the discharge of the bankrupt.

What the bankruptcy court decided

The court accepted our submission and agreed with it. The court continued to be skeptical of the amount of the company’s proof of claim filed by the receiver. The court noted that as Trustee, I reported that the bankrupt has fulfilled all statutory duties. Income and expense statements were provided and there was no surplus income payable.

On a general perusal of the Trustee’s s. 170 report, the Trustee does not report any significant misconduct or concerns but reserved its rights as to its position on the discharge pending the hearing and matters disclosed therein. In the court’s view, the Trustee’s non-opposition to discharge is a factor favouring the bankrupt’s discharge. After considering all facts, the court gave the bankrupt an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.

what does receivership mean
what does receivership mean

What does receivership mean summary

I hope that you found this what does receivership mean Brandon Blog helpful in describing the role of a privately appointed receiver especially in opposing the discharge of the bankrupt guarantor of the company’s secured debt. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt. You may not need to file for bankruptcy.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

what does receivership mean
what does receivership mean
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

REVERSE VESTING ORDER: 1 REMARKABLE CREATIVE WAY TO DO FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING

reverse vesting order

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click play on the podcast.

Vesting order and reverse vesting order

In a corporate insolvency case, a court may grant a vesting order, which authorizes the sale of a company’s assets to the buyer once the purchase price is paid. A vesting order vests ownership in the purchaser as a result of this court order. This is proof that the purchaser is entitled to transfer the assets into its name. No matter what insolvency process is used, this is the use of a vesting order.

In the past year or so, a new trend has emerged regarding the sale of the assets of insolvent companies as part of a restructuring under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). That new trend is the use of a reverse vesting order.

In this Brandon Blog, I explain what a reverse vesting order is and why I believe its use will be a significant feature of Canadian firm restructurings in 2021 and beyond.

Reverse vesting order – A powerful tool for maximizing recovery in complex insolvencies

A reverse vesting order can be very useful in complex insolvencies. A timely recovery can benefit creditors, and the process can maximize recoveries for all parties. Reverse vesting orders are a good solution for an insolvent debtor corporation when:

  • there are a large number of secured creditors, unsecured creditors and assets;
  • all of the assets do not have an immediate buyer;
  • the company is insolvent; and
  • the company must deal with unwanted assets and a group of creditors in a particular way.

It is best used in a large-scale CCAA corporate restructuring but is not limited to that.

reverse vesting order

Reverse vesting order as a third restructuring tool

There have traditionally been two insolvency processes available to licensed insolvency trustees, insolvency lawyers, and company stakeholders. The two are (i) liquidating assets; and (ii) reorganizing companies. In general, assets are liquidated through either receivership or bankruptcy. Incorporated companies can restructure either under the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or, for larger and more complex restructurings, under the CCAA. It is obvious that assets must be sold in order to liquidate them.

Sometimes, as part of a corporate restructuring, there are redundant and unwanted assets that can be sold to raise cash. The question is, what if the real value, especially a going-concern value of a company in a commercial insolvency case is not in its tangible assets. Rather, its real value lies in:

  • the ability to operate in a specific industry and such licenses cannot be sold by their very nature and wording – think of the cannabis and nursing home industries as two examples;
  • tax losses and tax attributes that can be monetized if the licensed insolvency trustee is also able to take over the shares; or
  • being listed on the stock exchange and thus as a public company having a greater market value than a private corporation.

As a result, it is extremely difficult to realize any value from such assets.

What is the importance of the reverse vesting order? How a reverse vesting order works will tell you all you need to know about why it is important as a third restructuring tool. Under a reverse vesting order, a newly incorporated residual corporation is added as a party to the CCAA proceedings.

As part of the CCAA restructuring, the operating debtor company transfers undesirable assets and liabilities to the newly incorporated non-operating company. With its assets and liabilities selected by the purchaser, the debtor company holds only the desirable assets and liabilities, which means its common shares can be sold rather than the company’s assets. As a result, valuable permits, contracts, tax losses, and statutory authority are preserved, which can otherwise be lost in a disposition of assets.

Why is reverse vesting order important?

A reverse vesting order is an alternative to the traditional CCAA plans of arrangement, particularly for companies operating in highly regulated environments or when there is no value remaining after the realization of secured debt and the parties intend to continue the running of the debtor company.

A reverse vesting order is an alternative to the traditional CCAA plans of arrangement, particularly for companies operating in highly regulated environments or when there is no value remaining after the realization of secured debt and the parties plan to continue operating the debtor company.

By using a reverse vesting order, existing corporations, which have been streamlined to become solvent through an innovative solution, are transferred to new investors instead of desirable assets being sold through a court-approved sale. The debtor corporation that initially filed for bankruptcy protection under the CCAA can now be removed from the restructuring proceedings. There are certain unwanted assets and unwanted liabilities that are transferred to the newly incorporated residual corporation. There can then be asset sales allowing for some sort of distribution to creditors (either in a plan of arrangement or in bankruptcy) in order to allow some creditor recovery.

A reverse vesting order may prove to be the most efficient approach to facilitate a going concern operation transfer through restructuring proceedings, letting businesses emerge from CCAA proceedings quickly without having filed a plan of arrangement, while preserving key attributes of the corporate entity and its existing corporate structure.

Legal challenges to the use of reverse vesting orders have been unsuccessful. I would like to discuss the case of Nemaska Lithium Inc.reverse vesting order

Reverse vesting order issued by Québec Superior Court after first contested hearing

In December 2019, Nemaska Lithium Inc. and related companies (Nemaska Lithium or the Nemaska entities) commenced CCAA proceedings. A lithium mining project was developed in Quebec by them. A CCAA judge approved an uncontested sale or investment solicitation process (SISP) in January 2020 that led to the acceptance of a bid that was subject to the condition that a reverse vesting order is issued.

A proposed reverse vesting order provides that Nemaska entities will be acquired by the bidder free of the claims of the unsecured creditors, which will be transferred as part of a pre-closing reorganization to a newly incorporated non-operating company.

The reverse vesting order will allow the purchaser to continue to operate the Nemaska entities in a highly regulated environment by maintaining their existing permits, licences, authorizations, essential contracts, and fiscal attributes. In essence, it is a credit bid in which the shares of the Nemaska entities are acquired in exchange for the assumption of the secured debt.

A shareholder (who was also an alleged creditor) filed motions opposing the reverse vesting order issuance on multiple grounds, including:

  • a vesting order cannot be granted for anything other than a sale or disposition of assets through a vesting order for sales of assets;
  • the reverse vesting order is not permissible under the CCAA because it allows the Nemaska entities to exit CCAA protection outside of a plan of arrangement or plan of compromise;
  • this reverse vesting order contemplated a corporate reorganization that is not permitted by securities laws; and
  • in light of the proposed transaction, the directors and officers of Nemaska Lithium Inc. should not be released.

The Honourable Justice Gouin, J.S.C., reviewed and assessed:

  • the SISP process which led to the offer;
  • the lack of alternatives to the offer;
  • the potential harm to Nemaska Lithium‘s stakeholders, including its employees, creditors, suppliers, and the Cree community;
  • stopping the restructuring process to relaunch a SISP in the future following what was already a thorough examination of the market or, alternatively,
  • bankrupting the Nemaska entities.

In light of all these factors, the judge approved the reverse vesting order on October 15, 2020. Limiting the remedies available under the CCAA would unnecessarily hinder the development of innovative solutions for more complex commercial and social issues in Canadian insolvency matters.

The decision and formal recognition of reverse vesting order by the Court of Appeal

Leave to appeal the CCAA judge‘s decision was sought by the parties who objected to the reverse vesting order being made. The Appellate Court carefully considered the judge’s decision-making process and particularly that the Québec Superior Court judge relied extensively on the principles set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the matter of 9354-9186 Quebec inc. c. Callidus Capital Corp., namely the:

  • development of CCAA proceedings and the role of the CCAA supervising judge;
  • remedial objectives of Canadian insolvency laws to provide timely, efficient, and impartial resolution of a debtor’s insolvency, secure fair and equitable treatment of creditors’ claims against a debtor, protect the public interest, and balance the costs and benefits of restructuring or liquidating the debtor company’s assets;
  • CCAA‘s goal of preventing social and economic losses from liquidating insolvent companies by facilitating their reorganization and survival as a going concern; and
  • CCAA judge‘s broad discretion under s. 11 of the CCAA in an effort to advance the CCAA’s remedial objectives while taking into account three fundamental factors that the debtor company application must prove: (1) the requested order is appropriate in the circumstances, and (2) good faith on the part of the applicant, and (3) the applicant has been acting with due diligence.

It was determined by the Court of Appeal judge that the risk of potential harm to stakeholders outweighed any legal merits of any arguments raised by the opposing parties. Therefore, the Quebec Court of Appeal denied the leave to appeal the decision of the CCAA judge.

Canada’s Supreme Court has denied leave to appeal. Having now established reverse vesting as an option for CCAA restructurings, the law is now set in stone.

The Nemaska case is the first reverse vesting order transaction to withstand judicial scrutiny in Canada and reaffirms the flexibility of CCAA proceedings for distressed M&A transactions of distressed businesses.reverse vesting order

Reverse vesting order and distressed M&A opportunities

I hope that you found this reverse vesting order Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you or your company are in business distress, cash-starved and cannot repay debts. There are several insolvency processes available to a company or a person with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHERE IS LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY WITH ITS HELPFUL CONCLUSIVE COMPENSATION CLA1MS PROCESS?

where is laurentian university

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Where is Laurentian University in dealing with ‘An ugly stain for years to come’: Laurentian University students, staff reeling from cuts

As regular Brandon Blog readers know, I have been writing about the financial difficulties leading to the Laurentian University creditor protection filing under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) as major events unfolded. The filing for bankruptcy protection was to allow for ongoing operations to continue and to come up with a Plan of Arrangement to deal with creditor claims.

The end of this week was scheduled to be another milestone in the Laurentian CCAA insolvency process, but it appears that event won’t happen on time. The purpose of this Brandon Blog is to discuss where is Laurentian University at with its compensation claim process for current and terminated faculty and staff?

Laurentian University situation so dire, it couldn’t afford to pay staff

This post-secondary institution faced a cash crisis and many financial issues leading to having filed its application for creditor protection on February 1, 2021. So far, I have written on:

Where is Laurentian University with the Amended and Restated Claims Process Order?

I previously wrote about the Laurentian University Amended and Restated Claims Process Order (A&R Claims Process Order) when it was obtained from the Court on May 31, 2021.

Among other things, the A&R Claims Process Order developed a claims process to recognize, identify and deal with certain claims of creditors. The A&R Claims Process Order left out Compensation Claims to allow Laurentian, with the help of the Monitor and in discussions with the Laurentian University Faculty Association (LUFA) and also Laurentian University Staff Union (LUSU), to establish a process as well as a method for the identification of Compensation Claims.

Compensation Claims usually consist of the claims of current and previous employees, retirees, and also the labour unions relative to employment, benefits, pension, and/or labour contracts among the stakeholders and Laurentian University, and also claims of specific third parties relative to involvement of their employees in the retirement health benefit plan.

In their application to Court last May, Laurentian University told the Court that they would be back to have the Compensation Claims process approved no later than July 30, 2021.

where is laurentian university
where is laurentian university

Where is Laurentian University with its creditor protection compensation claims program now?

Laurentian told the Court that its Compensation Claims process will:

  • develop the key groups of claims to be covered in a Compensation Claims
    procedure;
  • determine what info and also how the information needed to calculate such
    claims can be assembled based upon the information in the hands of Laurentian and third-party service providers;
  • develop the Compensation Claims Methodology; and
  • think about alternate procedures for notice as well as claims handling.

In its motion record dated July 23, 2021, Laurentian has advised the Court that although it is working diligently with the Monitor, LUFA and LUSA, Laurentian will not be able to serve materials explaining its Compensation Claims process in time to seek Court approval no later than July 30. So, Laurentian is asking for an extension from July 30 to August 20, 2021. In the motion record, it is not stated exactly where is Laurentian University in this process. Laurentian has advised that its lawyers have booked time with the Court to hear the motion on August 17, 2021, at 9:30 AM.

UPDATE: On July 28, 2021, the Court approved amending paragraph 46 of the Claims Process Order to extend the date that Laurentian University must bring a motion to the Court to seek approval of: (a) the Compensation Claims Methodology, and (b) the process for notification of Employees and claims process, from “no later than July 30, 2021” to “no later than August 20, 2021”.

Where is Laurentian University? Ask current President Dr. Robert Haché

In support of this motion for an extension of time, the motion material includes the affidavit of Dr. Robert Haché, University President and Vice-Chancellor of Laurentian University of Sudbury, sworn on July 23 (the Haché Affidavit).

The Haché Affidavit really doesn’t say much and unfortunately, it does not say exactly where is Laurentian University in the finalization of the Compensation Claims process. It summarizes the background about the bilingual university financial troubles as to how this post-secondary education institution got to where it is today in the Laurentian CCAA insolvency process and advises the Court that:

  • Laurentian and the Monitor have been working diligently on settling the Compensation Claims Methodology, nonetheless, as a result of a variety of competing and urgent demands put on the University’s limited resources, (which presumably includes the demands of day to day operations) development has actually been slower than expected.
  • Although the information-gathering phase took longer than anticipated, drafts of the Compensation Claims Methodology have been prepared and also shown to LUFA and LUSU.
  • Regardless of best efforts, Laurentian was not able to finalize the Compensation Claims process in order to have everything in time for the Compensation Claims Methodology to be provided for Court authorization by July 30, 2021, based on the A&R Claims Process Order.
  • Therefore, the University looks for a short extension to that date. This requires a change to paragraph 46 of the A&R Claims Process Order to prolong the day whereby Laurentian can bring a motion to the Court to seek the authorization for the Compensation Claims Methodology to no later than August 20, 2021.

The Haché Affidavit is light on details as to what the issues getting in the way are, what has been agreed to so far and where is Laurentian University in all this? Close or still far off? It provides no real useful information to determine where is Laurentian University on this issue. My review of documents that were made public sheds no more light than what I am telling you in this Brandon Blog. They are obviously hoping that this request will not meet with any opposition so that it will allow for a positive impact on the financial restructuring.

So, unfortunately, there is no real insight into what is holding up the Compensation Claims process for claims of current and former faculty and staff, including severance payments, which certainly will be in the millions of dollars.

I doubt that anyone will wish to try to upset the restructuring over this issue. As of the time of writing this Brandon Blog, there is not a current Monitor’s Report in support of this motion yet made public.

Where is Laurentian University in all of this? I suspect that Laurentian will receive the extension it is requesting.

where is laurentian university
where is laurentian university

Where is Laurentian University summary

I hope that you found this where is Laurentian University Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

where is laurentian university
where is laurentian university
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY LAWYER IN TORONTO VS. BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE IN TORONTO: WE EXPLORE AND EXPLAIN COMPLETELY THE DIFFERENCES FOR YOU

bankruptcy lawyer in toronto
bankruptcy lawyer in toronto

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

Bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto introduction

Canada is recognized for its cultural diversity, but it can be a battle to locate trustworthy information on the nation’s laws. Bankruptcy is a difficult topic to learn about; both learning the technical side and dealing with the emotional one.

If you or your company are thinking about bankruptcy, you might think you need a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto. However, you do not necessarily require one. A licensed insolvency trustee in Toronto (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee in Toronto) can help you pick the perfect insolvency process for you and make certain that you survive it as best as possible.

In this Brandon Blog, I discuss the roles of a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto and a licensed insolvency trustee. Sometimes they can overlap and many times they do not. We will take a detailed look at a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto vs a licensed insolvency trustee. We will discuss the differences between the two and exactly how they can each help you.

Bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto – Do you need one to file personal bankruptcy?

Whether it is personal bankruptcy proceedings, or one of the formal alternatives to bankruptcy such as a consumer proposal or a Division I Proposal that are being contemplated, a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere is not involved in the actual bankruptcy filing. or the Canada – restructuring & insolvency filing. That is what trustees in bankruptcy do.

When a person or company is contemplating an insolvency process, they can get a no-cost consultation with any one of the bankruptcy trustees they choose to meet with. During the consultation, information is gathered by the Trustee, analyzed and possible solutions are discussed.

Trustees must always be careful to not tread into areas that could possibly give them a conflict in providing their financial services. People wanting advice on asset transfers, asset protection, or preferring one or more creditors over others are areas that Trustees should not wade into.

In situations like that, I always advise potential bankruptcy clients that as there is no privilege in our discussions and we should not talk about those things so that I will not be conflicted. Rather, the person should get advice from a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere where the discussions and the legal advice are protected by solicitor-client privilege.

bankruptcy lawyer in toronto
bankruptcy lawyer in toronto

Do You Need a personal bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto to get your bankruptcy discharge?

As I have written before in several Brandon Blogs, there are 6 possible outcomes in a bankrupt’s application for discharge. This depends on whether the discharge is being opposed by either the Trustee and/or one or more creditors. The possible bankruptcy discharge outcomes are:

  • Automatic – This discharge is absolute and is given by the Trustee at the earliest possible time the bankrupt person is entitled to a discharge. It means that the bankruptcy has performed all of his or her duties, has fully cooperated with the Trustee and nobody has opposed the discharge.
  • Absolute – An absolute discharge is obtained when the Trustee issues the automatic discharge. it is also possible to obtain an absolute discharge when a creditor opposes the bankrupt’s discharge, the matter goes to court for a hearing, but the court does not believe the evidence presented by the opposing creditor is persuasive and the court orders an absolute discharge.
  • Conditional – In this type of discharge, there was opposition to the bankruptcy receiving an absolute discharge. The court considered the evidence and concluded that the bankrupt must fulfill one or more conditions before being entitled to a discharge from bankruptcy. More often than not, a conditional discharge includes a certain amount of money the bankrupt must pay to the Trustee for the general benefit of the creditors.
  • Suspended – A suspended discharge is given when there is opposition to the bankrupt’s discharge and the matter goes to court for a discharge hearing. Based on the evidence, the court believes that the bankrupt, either before or during the bankruptcy estate file administration, has conducted himself or herself in such a way that although a discharge will be given, it should be delayed. The suspension acts to delay the discharge and can be combined with conditions.
  • Refused – The bankrupt’s discharge is opposed probably by at least the Trustee and probably one or more creditors. There is sufficient evidence before the court that the bankrupt has not lived up to his or her duties and has probably failed to fully cooperate and provide full disclosure to the Trustee. The court, based on the evidence, refuses to consider the bankrupt’s application for discharge until such time as the bankrupt performs all duties and discloses all information.
  • No order – This is not an actual discharge type, but can be the outcome of a discharge hearing. The court can issue a “no order” instead of a refusal. The facts are probably similar to when the court can issue a refusal. However, in a “no order” situation, the bankrupt remains in bankruptcy but the Trustee is then free to pursue its discharge. Once the Trustee gets its discharge, the bankrupt lose the protection offered by the stay of proceedings. Creditors are then free to pursue all of their rights and remedies against the bankrupt in the enforcement of their trying to collect their respective debts.

When the time comes for the bankrupt to get his or her discharge from bankruptcy, if the Trustee or a creditor opposes, the bankrupt would be well advised to consult with a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere. The Trustee cannot give an automatic discharge and the matter is going to court for a trial. The bankrupt should get the benefit of legal advice and probably will need to retain the lawyer to provide legal services in representing the bankrupt in court. That is not the job of the Trustee.

Corporate Bankruptcy in Canada – Corporate bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Canada – Do you need one to file corporate bankruptcy?

As I will explain, every Canadian corporate insolvency file requires probably several, not just one bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere. Insolvency law is complex and lawyers will help all the parties involved.

The current economic climate in Canada is going to be challenging for Canadian businesses and I expect there will be many financial difficulties. Government COVID-19 support programs are scheduled to end soon. Companies have been tapped out while shut down just trying to stay alive with little or no revenue being earned. Companies will need cash now that it is time to start everything up again. No doubt there will be business casualties.

However, not all businesses are created equal. Some will be able to restructure, some will file for bankruptcy and others will merely shut their doors and fade away.

Among the keystones of a restructuring proceeding under either the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act or the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act is the debt workout. The restructuring is designed to maintain the debtor’s business and negotiate a financial debt repayment strategy with its creditors. The aim is to save jobs, allow the company to continue while avoiding bankruptcy liquidation.

Key components of a debt workout normally include debtor-in-possession lending (DIP lending) while the company is reorganizing, new capital for the company coming out of its restructuring and getting unsecured creditors, and possibly secured creditors, to agree to accept less than they are owed. In the very large corporate restructuring files, there are normally lending syndicates due to large and complex lending arrangements. They too will need lawyers to help them with the insolvency law.

If a restructuring proceeding is not possible or does not succeed, then either the company’s secured creditor will begin receivership enforcement proceedings or the company will file an assignment in bankruptcy or a creditor will launch a bankruptcy application to put the company into bankruptcy.

In every corporate insolvency file, legal services are required by all the stakeholders. Canadian counsel plays an important part in providing advice. In the larger files, a large team of lawyers will be needed for both the company and its main creditors. The Board of Directors will need their own independent legal team. The bankruptcy trustee in Toronto will also need a dedicated team of lawyers to help navigate through the formal restructuring in court or help in a court-appointed receivership, private receivership or bankruptcy.

As you can see, in pretty well every corporate file, a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere is pretty well a must-have requirement. Lawyers will be able to help the company, its Board of Directors, its creditors and the insolvency professional create effective solutions. The best ones will also make sure that they are also practical solutions.

bankruptcy lawyer in toronto
bankruptcy lawyer in toronto

Other situations where you could need a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Barrie, GTA, or elsewhere

When looking for a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Barrie, GTA and elsewhere, you want to find one that has substantial experience. Depending on the situation you or your company are involved in, the experience could be in one or more of:

  • financial reorganizations;
  • debt reorganizations and debt restructurings;
  • debtor legal rights and creditor rights;
  • security enforcement;
  • forbearance/standstill arrangements;
  • lender liability suits;
  • receivership and related matters for banks or other secured lenders, court and privately appointed receivers;
  • insolvency and bankruptcy litigation or other complex matters; and
  • acting for receivers and Trustees, debtors, secured creditors, unsecured creditors or any other stakeholder in an insolvency process.

Take Your First Step Towards A Debt Free Life

I hope that you found this bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto Brandon Blog interesting and that you now have a better appreciation for when getting bankruptcy legal advice is necessary. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline and practical financial advice. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

bankruptcy lawyer in toronto
bankruptcy lawyer in toronto

Call us now for a no-cost bankruptcy consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE ORDER: OBSESSED CREDITOR LOSES APPEAL OF THE DISCHARGE ORDER

bankruptcy dischargeWe hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

What does bankruptcy discharge mean in Canada?

A bankruptcy filing is a form of insolvency process under Canadian bankruptcy law available to individuals and businesses. Bankruptcy deals with a person’s or company’s debt load and assets. After performing a detailed initial assessment, the licensed insolvency trustee will be in a position to advise the debtor if they will be better serviced through a restructuring process as an alternative to bankruptcy (consumer proposal or Division I Proposal for individuals, Division I Proposal or Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act bankruptcy protection for companies) with creditors, or whether the debtor will be better served filing for bankruptcy.

The final piece of any bankruptcy process for an individual is the bankruptcy discharge. Individuals who go bankrupt are entitled to a discharge from bankruptcy. Companies are only entitled to one if every bankruptcy claim filed is paid in full, with interest. Because this never happens, companies do not receive a bankruptcy discharge. It is not impossible, but for this reason, it really does not happen.

If you are thinking about filing an assignment in bankruptcy, then you may be wondering about the bankruptcy discharge process and how it will affect you. Many people think their debts are eliminated at the moment of their bankruptcy filing.

This is incorrect. It is the bankruptcy discharge that will remove all (with certain limited exceptions) of your unsecured debts from your life and will result in letting you move forward with a clean slate. In this Brandon Blog, I discuss the bankruptcy discharge process and a recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia hearing an appeal to the decision of the Master sitting as bankruptcy registrar on a bankrupt’s application for discharge.bankruptcy discharge

Bankruptcy discharge and its consequences for the bankrupt

When you are granted a bankruptcy discharge, this means that those debts caught by your bankruptcy are no longer your responsibility. This means that every action from creditors or the collection agencies they have retained stops trying to collect the debt obligations.

As I previously mentioned, most almost all debts are wiped off your slate when you receive your discharge from bankruptcy. The kinds of debts that remain even after a bankruptcy discharge are:

  • spousal or child support payments;
  • fines or penalties mandated by the court;
  • claims arising from fraud or fraudulent breach of trust;
  • student loan debt if less than 7 years have passed since the bankrupt stopped being a part-time or full-time student.
  • any kind of financial debts that are secured against your assets, such as a home mortgage or automobile financing, are not discharged as a result of your bankruptcy discharge.

These sorts of financial debts endure after bankruptcy as they are not released. The individual will be required to continue paying those financial obligations according to their terms. All various other financial obligations are discharged and do not have to be paid.

What are the types of bankruptcy discharge?

If there is no Trustee opposition or creditor opposition to a bankrupt’s application for discharge, and the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties of a bankrupt, in most situations, the licensed insolvency trustee can issue an automatic discharge which provides the bankrupt with an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.

If there is an opposition or the bankrupt meets one of the criteria that does not allow for an automatic discharge (such as the bankruptcy process finding the bankrupt a high income tax debt situation), there must be a discharge hearing in court which is heard by a Master of the court sitting as the registrar in bankruptcy. There are 4 types of bankruptcy discharge and a 5th bankruptcy outcome is also possible. They are:

  1. absolute – an absolute discharge means the bankrupt is entitled to an immediate discharge. This can be given by the licensed insolvency trustee in the bankruptcy estate handling the bankruptcy administration if the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties and there is no trustee or creditor opposition;
  2. conditional discharge – can get a discharge after meeting one or more conditions. The most common type of condition of discharge involves paying a sum of money to the licensed insolvency trustee;
  3. suspended – the bankrupt’s discharge will take place at a later date and may very well be combined with either an absolute bankruptcy discharge or conditional bankruptcy discharge;
  4. refused– the court refused to grant a bankruptcy discharge probably because the bankrupt has failed to provide full disclosure or perform other bankruptcy duties; or
  5. “no order”– the Trustee advises the court that regardless of the time period that has passed, the bankrupt has actually not satisfied every one of his or her obligations and the bankrupt has actually failed to reply to the Trustee’s demands for information. In this situation, when the “no order” order is provided, the licensed insolvency trustee is at liberty to seek its discharge. Once the bankrupt person has actually fulfilled the requirements set by the court, the bankrupt can re-apply for a discharge hearing by the court.bankruptcy discharge

For a first-time bankrupt with no surplus income who fulfills of their duties, including attending the 2 mandatory credit counselling sessions, they are entitled to their bankruptcy discharge after a bankruptcy period of 9 months from the date of bankruptcy.

If this is your second bankruptcy a discharge will not be available after 9 months. A 2nd bankruptcy lasts for a minimum of 24 months if you do not have any surplus income payments to make to the Trustee. If you have surplus income, a second-time bankrupt must make those monthly payments for 36 months before they are entitled to a bankruptcy discharge.

For a 3rd or subsequent bankruptcy, the timeline is the same as the 2nd time bankrupt. However, it is much more possible that there will certainly be resistance to the discharge by the Trustee or the creditors. The court can also impose whatever conditions it sees fit.

Creditor objects to the decision of the Master on bankrupt’s application for discharge

On July 9, 2021, the decision in Hanlon (Re), 2021 BCSC 1348 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia was released. This was an appeal from an order by the bankruptcy registrar of the Supreme Court of British Columbia dated April 28, 2021 in Hanlon (Re), 2021 BCSC 800, VA B190492. This is an appeal under s. 192(4) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (BIA), from an order of a master of that Court, sitting as a registrar in bankruptcy, granting the bankrupt, Mr. Hanlon, a bankruptcy discharge that was made conditional on his paying $7,500 to the Trustee.

The appellant, Ms. Johnson, is one of Mr. Hanlon’s creditors. She states that the registrar erred in approving the discharge on those terms. If the appeal is allowed, she looks for an order refusing Mr. Hanlon’s application for a discharge, with leave to apply again in two years, or alternatively, giving a discharge conditional on his paying $50,000. The appeal is opposed by both Mr. Hanlon the bankrupt, and the Trustee. The appeal was heard by Judge Milman, Canada’s bankruptcy legislation, the BIA states that a person dissatisfied with an order or decision of a registrar can appeal that decision to a judge of that court who in that capacity is sitting as a bankruptcy judge.

The alleged errors made by the registrar in the making of the order of conditional discharge

Ms. Johnson argued that the registrar made certain errors in granting the conditional bankruptcy discharge order. Ms. Johnson says that in granting the bankruptcy discharge on those terms, the registrar erred as follows:

  • in concluding that Mr. Hanlon had complied with the injunction resulting from Ms. Johnson’s original successful litigation against Mr. Hanlon when he had not;
  • in falling short to take into account Mr. Hanlon’s refusal to agree with the accuracy of the trial judge; and
  • in failing to consider Mr. Hanlon’s real income earning potential.bankruptcy discharge

The standard of review on such an appeal

There is a standard of review on such an appeal from an order of a bankruptcy discharge hearing. S. 192(1) of the BIA gives the bankruptcy registrar the authority to, amongst other things, grant orders of discharge. S. 192(4) of the BIA allows a party dissatisfied with an order or decision of a
registrar may appeal it to a judge.

In granting an order of discharge in the bankruptcy process, the registrar is exercising judicial discretion. If the registrar has acted reasonably, the judge should not set it aside or ignore it. Further, if an appeal from a bankruptcy discharge order is based on alleged errors in findings of fact, the court will not interfere if there is no overriding error in the findings of fact and there is evidence from which the findings of fact could be made. Discretionary decisions may, naturally, be overturned if the registrar has materially misinterpreted the law or made an error in respect of the facts underlying the use of that discretion.

When a registrar’s decision in a bankruptcy discharge hearing imposes conditions, those conditions must be realistic for the bankrupt to perform in a reasonable period of time. Where the amount ordered was unrealistic and the bankrupt’s discharge is conditional on making additional payments, the appeal court did hold that results in an error of law and the appellate judge can either substitute the conditions or refer the matter back to the registrar for reconsideration.

The judge’s decision on the appeal from the registrar’s bankruptcy discharge order

The judge dismissed the appeal finding there were no overriding errors made by the registrar. With respect to the amount of $7,500 ordered as a condition of discharge from bankruptcy, the judge found as follows:

Ms. Johnson says that the registrar did not consider Mr. Hanlon’s untapped earning capacity and instead concentrated practically completely on her arguments of his potential inheritance. She suggests that Mr. Hanlon could be earning more than he is. In her opinion, he could earn more to enable him to make a settlement of $50,000 rather than the $7,500 that was ordered.

Mr. Hanlon’s real historic earnings offered adequate assistance for the registrar’s verdict that he was incapable of paying any more than the $7,500 that she ordered for him, did not have the financial prospects himself to do so and without getting personal loans from family members to help him with that. That was properly decided by the registrar based on the evidence before her.

The judge found that there is no merit in this or any other of the grounds of appeal. He found no error in the registrar’s decision, and having found the discharge condition that she imposed to have been reasonable in the circumstances, he dismissed the appeal.

Bankruptcy discharge summary

I hope that you found this bankruptcy discharge Brandon Blog interesting and that you now have a good appreciation for the process at the end of the administration for a person who files for bankruptcy and the considerations of the court if someone appeals a bankruptcy discharge order. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost bankruptcy consultation.bankruptcy discharge

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD TORONTO: COURT READILY APPOINTS FIRM TO REVIEW LAURENTIAN’S MASSIVE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Sudbury, Ont., school looks for court approval to move on to Phase 2 of restructuring plan

 

On June 29, 2021, the Laurentian University CCAA Court-appointed Monitor issued its Fifth Report to Court in the Laurentian University insolvency restructuring under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA). On July 5, 2021, it filed its Supplementary Fifth Report with the Ontario Court.

The report was issued in support of Laurentian’s application to the court for approval to retain a Toronto office of Cushman & Wakefield (Cushman Wakefield Toronto) as Real Estate Advisor to Laurentian. The Supplementary Fifth Report was filed at the direction of the Ontario Court (further described below).

I have previously written about Laurentian University’s court-supervised restructuring in 5 previous Brandon Blogs:

The first phase of the Laurentian insolvency process had many parts to it. First was to declare its poor financial situation and file for bankruptcy protection under the CCAA and perform a review of its various contracts, leases, supplier arrangements, the federated university model, its academic offerings and its faculty and non-teaching staffing. As part of this first phase, Laurentian also needed to determine where cuts needed to be made.

Laurentian then implemented the reductions for cost savings including reaching new arrangements with the unions representing its employees to set out the terms of new collective bargaining agreements and to disclaim various agreements, including the federated university agreement with Huntington University, Thorneloe University and the University of Sudbury.

My February 8 and May 5 Brandon Blogs describe these steps in detail.

Next in this phase 1 was getting approval from the Ontario Court to retain a consultant to, amongst other things, perform a governance review and for the Monitor to get approval for the claims process the Monitor approves of. At this stage of the process, Laurentian pulled together a list of creditors; secured creditors and unsecured creditors.

This was all described in my June 14 Brandon Blog, including the changes to the claims process resulting from the hearing in the Ontario Court. The Monitor advised the court that the Monitor approves of the amendment and therefore the amended claims process received court approval.

In this Brandon Blog, I describe the second phase of this insolvency process and the Laurentian restructuring plan now being undertaken. It is the real estate review.

cushman wakefield toronto
cushman wakefield toronto

Cushman Wakefield Toronto: Laurentian University plans real estate review to see what could help pay off debt

On July 5, 2021, the Court listened to Laurentian University’s application for an order approving Laurentian to retain Cushman Wakefield Toronto as a realty advisor to do an evaluation of Laurentian’s real estate portfolio, and also its request for a sealing order with respect to the monetary details of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto retainer.

The Monitor advised the court that a significant amount of Laurentian University’s assets is represented by its real estate holdings. This includes the land and buildings on which the primary campus rests in addition to off-campus realty. The Monitor also advised that Laurentian has noted that with the academic and labour force changes lately executed within the CCAA proceedings, there may be opportunities to customize its use of space within different structures. This leads to possibilities to monetize specific real estate assets. Therefore, Laurentian determined, that it was appropriate to involve a real estate consultant to take on a study of its real estate portfolio in order to advise Laurentian on the best way to monetize its available real estate.

The Monitor described its RFP process that had a deadline of May 28 for the submission of proposals from qualified real estate professionals. After the Monitor, Laurentian and its respective legal counsel received certain requests for additional time in order to submit a proposal, the Monitor extended the deadline for submissions to June 1, 2021. The Monitor advised the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List that it received 6 proposals and held meetings with 4 of the parties who submitted a proposal in order to interview each of them.

The Monitor recommended to the court that the proposed contract between Laurentian and Cushman Wakefield Toronto (including the third parties Cushman Wakefiled Toronto advised would be part of its team) be approved. The Monitor also advised the Court that Laurentian would be seeking a sealing order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commerical List concerning the financial terms of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto retainer. Accordingly, a copy of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto proposal excluding any financial terms.

What the court said about the Sudbury school plans a real estate review in Phase 2 of its court-guided restructuring process

Chief Justice Morawetz took issue with the part of the motion that requested the financial terms of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto proposal to continue to be confidential under a sealing order. He directed that the total amount of the retainer be disclosed. Proprietary information such as how Cushman Wakefield Toronto calculated its total fee could remain private.

After evaluating the Confidential Appendix, Chief Justice Morawetz shared his view that specific aspects of the appendix did not contain commercially sensitive or proprietary details. Upon obtaining further instructions, Laurentian legal counsel advised the court that certain portions of the appendix could develop part of the general public record. Therefore the information covered by the sealing order was tightened up.

The sole purpose of the Monitor’s Supplementary 5th Report to Court dated July 5, 2021, was to abide by the Court’s decision that a redacted copy of the financial terms of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto retainer must be filed with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List so that it will become a public document.

cushman wakefield toronto
cushman wakefield toronto

Laurentian University owns some of the last undeveloped waterfront on Sudbury’s Lake Nepahwin

So phase 2 of the Laurentian University creditor protection CCAA process is now underway. Laurentian has real estate both on and off-campus that will be reviewed for monetization by Cushman Wakefield Toronto. The monetization will provide the necessary funds to offer to both secured creditors and unsecured creditors in the ultimate financial restructuring plan called a Plan of Arrangement.

Laurentian has some of the last undeveloped waterfront on Lake Nepahwin. Much of that land is bushland, including some prime beachfront property on Lake Nepahwin, where the university has its own beach.

Here is a fun fact about some Laurentian real estate. In recent years, the only public discussion concerning Laurentian’s lands has actually centred on a couple who purchased a residence in the area, just to find out half their backyard, including their septic tank, was encroaching on university property!

The Sudbury couple stated they made offers to Laurentian to purchase the land from them. The latest offer was for them to pay Laurentian $70,000 plus give the university a bigger land parcel in return for the Laurentian land to eliminate the encroachment. Laurentian refused and started a lawsuit against them.

Perhaps as part of the overall financial restructuring, Laurentian can see fit not to continue this war against the Sudbury couple and accept their offer. You would think the Board of Governors has much bigger issues to be concerned about, such as the entire CCAA restructuring including the monetization of the real estate portfolio.

Cushman Wakefield Toronto summary

I hope that you found this Cushman Wakefield Toronto Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. You may have assets that you can monetize to rectify your financial situation. Many do not though.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, whether you need gambling debt help or just plain old debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost bankruptcy consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

cushman wakefield toronto
cushman wakefield toronto
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY OF SUDBURY: LAURENTIAN SCORES HUGE WIN OVER THORNELOE UNIVERSITY

laurentian university of sudbury
laurentian university of sudbury

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

Laurentian University of Sudbury: This will forever be a stain on Laurentian University

The Laurentian University of Sudbury is a public-funded, northern Ontario multilingual and tricultural independent university, serving both Canadian and global students for both undergraduate programs & graduate programs.

However, Laurentian University of Sudbury has its financial problems. It was in need of a restructuring plan. On February 1, 2021, it applied to the Court and obtained protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 (” CCAA”), to permit it to restructure, financially as well as operationally, in order to emerge as a sustainable university for the advantage of all stakeholders.

When it sought CCAA protection, Laurentian University of Sudbury, with the assistance of the Monitor, identified a number of issues in which an economic restructuring was required. These consisted of a downsizing of the variety of programs being taught, as well as new, sustainable collective bargaining agreements with the labour unions representing Laurentian professors and other staff.

To date I have written 4 blogs on the Laurentian University of Sudbury CCAA proceedings:

In this Brandon Blog, I discuss the recent decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario released on June 23, 2021, concerning the request of Thorneloe University to appeal a decision of the CCAA judge.

laurentian university of sudbury
laurentian university of sudbury

Laurentian University of Sudbury and the Federated Universities

The Laurentian University of Sudbury additionally recognized, at the beginning of its CCAA proceeding, that it would be essential in dealing with its financial insolvency, to have a fundamental readjustment or realignment of its setups with the 3 Federated Schools: Thorneloe University (sometimes referred to as “Thorneloe“), Huntington University (“Huntington”) and also University of Sudbury (“USudbury”) (collectively referred to as the “Laurentian Federation”).

A court-ordered mediation facilitated the Laurentian University of Sudbury reaching agreements with the unions on the collective bargaining agreements. Nevertheless, the Laurentian University of Sudbury was not successful in reaching what is considered to be the needed readjustments with the Federated Universities on the 60-year-old federation agreement.

On April 1, 2021, Laurentian sent out notices of disclaimer to the Federated Universities. The Monitor concurred with the notifications under the CCAA insolvency process. Thorneloe University College brought an action opposing Laurentian University’s disclaimer notification. (USudbury brought a comparable motion, which was heard by a different judge). Huntington University did not bring such action as they reached an accommodation with the Laurentian University of Sudbury.

The CCAA judge dismissed Thorneloe’s action. Thorneloe University College sought leave of the Court of Appeal for Ontario to appeal the Judge’s decision. At the heart of its opposition is its opinion that permitting the disclaimer will certainly result in Thorneloe’s insolvency and also yet supply only de minimis monetary benefit to Laurentian. Thorneloe further submitted that the real intention for the disclaimer is the elimination of competitors, which is inconsistent with the responsibility to act in good faith.

Thorneloe likewise looked to present new evidence in connection with the Laurentian Federation, consisting of testimony from Thorneloe’s President. There was no resistance from the parties to the introduction of new evidence. The Court of Appeal for Ontario allowed the new evidence.

The Thorneloe appeal

Thorneloe applied for an order that the Laurentian Federation Arrangement, and also the Financial Distribution Notice between Laurentian and Thorneloe, not be disclaimed. The Court of Appeal noted that the CCAA judge noted that the provision of the CCAA under which the Laurentian University of Sudbury issued its disclaimer notices calls for a harmonizing of interests.

The CCAA judge said there are competing interests that must be balanced in determining if the disclaimers should be allowed. After taking part in that analysis, he concluded that the much better choice, or, to say it another way, the least unfavourable selection, was to uphold the notices of disclaimer.

In addressing whether leave should be provided, the Court of Appeal for Ontario will think about 4 aspects, specifically whether:

  • the requested appeal is prima facie meritorious or not;
  • the factors on the suggested appeal are of significance to the insolvency community;
  • the factors on the proposed appeal are important to the action, being the CCAA restructuring; and also
  • whether the appeal will unduly impede the progression of the restructuring.

    laurentian university of sudbury
    laurentian university of sudbury

Laurentian University of Sudbury: The prima facie test

Thorneloe puts five questions to the court for answers in their submission that leave ought to be given:

  • Can the CCAA, a law whose objective is to stop bankruptcies, be made use of by a debtor to remove competitors as well as create the bankruptcy of a currently solvent entity (in this case, one more university)?
  • Must s.32 of the CCAA be interpreted so generally that it enables the disclaimer of an arrangement that will certainly lead to the bankruptcy of the counter-party, for removing competition, and where the potential financial gain to the debtor is both unsure and also of no consequence?
  • What inferences need to be made by the CCAA Court where a DIP loan lender demands the disclaimer of a contract that will certainly cause the bankruptcy of the counter-party or else it will refuse to advance further funds, yet the DIP lending institution refuses to explain why it demands the disclaimer?
  • What is the duty of the CCAA Court when faced with a requirement for the disclaimer of a contract which the debtor admits is motivated to eliminate competitors, and after that threatens that if the CCAA Court does not support the disclaimer, the debtor may not be able to restructure?
  • What are the aspects appropriate for persons to act in good faith under s.18.6 of the CCAA, and also specifically where the Laurentian University of Sudbury and/or the DIP lender looks to close down Thorneloe for the confessed objective of eliminating Thorneloe as a competitor?

The Court of Appeal for Ontario was not satisfied that the suggested appeal, challenging the CCAA judge’s discretionary decision to accept the disclaimer and to decline to erase the related term in the DIP Amendment Agreement, is prima facie meritorious. Within that verdict, the appellate court was cognizant that valid findings of fact are owed considerable deference as are discretionary decisions, as long as there is not an extricable error in interpreting the law. So the Court of Appeal of Ontario stated that Thorneloe did not meet the leave test.

Laurentian University of Sudbury: Significance to the practice

In a very tersely worded statement, the Court of Appeal for Ontario said that they do not feel that the proposed appeal is significant to the insolvency community as the concerns raised turn on the application of the legislation to this particular case only.

Laurentian University of Sudbury: Significance to the action

The Court of Appeal for Ontario stated the suggested appeal does have significance. However, the court said that the significance still does not justify leave be provided.

Laurentian University of Sudbury: Appeal would hinder progress of the action

The appeal court said there is a danger that an appeal would be a distraction from the
real-time restructuring initiatives and also would unduly hinder the progress of the CCAA case.

So the Court of Appeal for Ontario has decided that Thorneloe should not be given the right to appeal the notice of disclaimer as decided by the CCAA judge. This seems to end this part of the CCAA restructuring. If Thorneloe’s submissions to the courts about its own solvency are correct, we should soon see the bankruptcy of Thorneloe University.

laurentian university of sudbury
laurentian university of sudbury

Laurentian University of Sudbury summary

I hope that you found this Laurentian University of Sudbury Brandon Blog interesting. Among the countless problems that can arise when a significant customer stops doing business with you, your business cash flow takes a massive hit.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, whether you need gambling debt help or just plain old debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost bankruptcy consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT: CREDITORS ARE NOW ABLE TO MAKE BOLD CLAIMS AGAINST LAURENTIAN

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

companies' creditors arrangement act
Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

If you would like to listen to an audio version of this Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act: Facing insolvency, Laurentian University files for creditor protection

Laurentian University’s filing under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act has been reported in the media and I have written about it in previous Brandon Blogs. On February 1, 2021, Laurentian University filed for what the media calls the “bankruptcy protection process” under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. It is really a creditor protection process for a financial restructuring. A large amount of work and involving tough choices will definitely be required for Laurentian to emerge from this as a financially and operationally sound university.

This restructuring will call for difficult negotiations with its lenders, suppliers, faculty and labour unions. Laurentian will have to overhaul its academic programs and look for brand-new revenue generation opportunities to survive. As well it will require a re-evaluation of its federated colleges’ design (Laurentian is just one of 4 universities that make the Laurentian Federation; the others who are all part of the Laurentian Federation Agreement are: the University of Sudbury, the University of Thorneloe, and Huntington University).

The stay of proceedings provided by the Court gives Laurentian protection from creditors and prevents them from taking steps against Laurentian, without the prior leave of the Court. The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act filing means that Laurentian has concluded that it cannot fulfill its financial commitments as they end up being due and uses the protection supplied by this restructuring law to reduce its overall debt load without having to pay its debts in full.

FOR A FULL DESCRIPTION OF WHAT THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT IS AND HOW IT WORKS, SEE OUR BLOG:

CCAA CANADA: OUR EXTRAORDINARY GUIDE TO 2020 TROUBLED CANADIAN COMPANIES SEEKING BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION

FAQ on the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Insolvency Proceedings of Laurentian University

As I mentioned, I previously wrote three blogs so far on the Laurentian University Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act insolvency process:

Every time there has been a major event in this court-supervised restructuring, I have written about it. So far the topics I have covered are:

  • The filing under the Companie’s Creditors Arrangement Act.
  • What creditor protection is under the “Bankruptcy Protection Legislation“.
  • What a stay period and a stay of proceedings are.
  • What does CCAA mean?
  • The Laurentian President affidavit upon filing and what it said about the university finances.
  • What Laurentian has said about its day-to-day operations, the Federated University model and the need to get out of that agreement and general oversight of university affairs.
  • The shock and the effect on Northern Ontario’s community over Laurentian’s filing.
  • The potential effect on current students, both undergraduate and graduate students and the overall student experience.
  • The initial list of creditors, both secured and unsecured creditors, in this restructuring process filing.
  • The unions have lost the fight to unseal documents relating to Laurentian communications with the provincial government.
  • Faculty and other staff terminations.
  • The union represents faculty members on a new collective agreement reached by Laurentian Union Faculty Association or LUFA.
  • Adjustments to the benefit pension plan and health benefit plan.
  • The failure of the non-Laurentian parties to the Federated University agreement in appealing Laurentian’s disclaimer of the Federated University model agreement.
  • The status of the interim financing DIP loan in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act administration.
companies' creditors arrangement act
Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

So as you can see, all the topics that I have covered in these 3 previous Brandon Blogs really are answers to a legal FAQ regarding Laurentian University’s CCAA filing.

Decisions about Laurentian University being made by creditors, insolvency specialists and the Ontario Court but not public

The National Union of Public and General Employees have stated that in a free and democratic society, choices regarding publicly financed institutions are expected to be made by elected officials or people who are responsible to them. That makes sure that when choices are made the demands of our communities who are funding these institutions through our tax dollars and donations are considered.

But when such organizations, like Laurentian University, are permitted to use a bankruptcy protection statute like the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, that responsibility is lost. All that matters is what the creditors either desire or are willing to accept. They want the federal government to change bankruptcy protection legislation so that this cannot happen again.

Liberal MP Paul Lefebvre introduced a bill in Parliament that aims to keep Laurentian University’s turmoil from happening at other schools. He and the Union believe that public institutions shouldn’t be allowed to use bankruptcy protection to force through cuts. I don’t believe that at this time, the bill has any traction to change bankruptcy legislation.

4 inspectors will be chosen to work with court monitor in the claims process

This now brings us current to the last attendance in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List where Laurentian and its court monitor brought forward a claims process to be approved by the court in this Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act process.

The lawyer for TD Bank advised the Court that TD supports the making of a Claims Process Order however feels that, in the circumstances, the procedure ought to contemplate that the Monitor will disclose its analysis of the claims filed with the Pre-filing Lenders. The Bank said that Laurentian and the Monitor have acknowledged that there may very well be material claims filed, some of which will be unliquidated and/or contingent. Some may be subject to a bona fide conflict – both relative to liability as well as quantum.

The Bank proposed a modification to the Monitor’s Claims Process where material cases should be discussed with the Pre-filing Lender group so that there could be a consensual resolution of such claims. The Bank said that it is reasonable as well as proper in this case to produce a reasonable and transparent process that enhances the goals of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

Based upon information available to TD Bank at the time its factum was issued, the overall quantum of claims is unidentified, yet can sensibly be expected to include substantial claims representing: (a) the claims of the Pre-filing Lenders; (b) claims of current and also previous employees; (c) those of the federated colleges occurring from the termination and disclaimer of their contracts with Laurentian; (d) potential claims developing from the pension-related issues; as well as (e) claims of various other creditors with prefiling and also restructuring claims.

The Judge specified that he bore in mind the TD Bank submissions that it is extremely vital to move quickly, however not to rush. The Claims Process needs to be reasonable to all. He acknowledged that the Pre-filing Lenders should have some involvement in the Claims procedure. So the Judge borrowed from the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), as there were no specific rules for this in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. He ruled that there will be a bespoke process.

Laurentian and the Monitor should modify their proposed Claims Process by assigning 4 Inspectors; 2 of which will be representatives of the Pre-filing Lender group. The remaining 2 will be drawn from the creditors from those with a claim over $5 million.

The Inspectors will:

  • Be selected by the Monitor who will devise an appointment process.
  • Act in the interests of all creditors.
  • Stand in a fiduciary capacity on behalf of all creditors.
  • Need to accomplish their duties on an impartial basis.
  • Are entitled to payment by following the payment structure for Inspectors set out in the BIA.
  • Help the Monitor in evaluating and admitting material claims.

    companies' creditors arrangement act
    Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

Laurentian expecting about 15 claims of more than $5M from creditors, court documents show

Laurentian reported that upon filing under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, it estimated its liabilities at $322 million. The categories of creditor groups are properly summarized by legal counsel for TD Bank recently in Court, indicated above.

The “bespoke” Claims Process approved by the Court is now underway. It is for all claims against Laurentian, but not including any form of compensation claim by any current or former employee. That type of claim has been defined by Laurentian and its Monitor as “Compensation Claims“. The Monitor advised the Court that it would soon come back to Court to get approval for a special process to establish the Compensation Claims.

The current Claims Process, not including any Compensation Claims, works like this:

  • Any creditor who has not received a Claims Package and who believes that he or
    she has a Claim against Laurentian, under the Claims Process Order must contact the Monitor
    in order to obtain a Proof of Claim form or visit the Monitor’s website.
  • Employees (and Former Employees) will not be receiving a Claims Package and do not need to complete a Proof of Claim at this time. Compensation Claims of Employees and Former Employees will be determined by a Court Approved Compensation Claims Methodology at a later date.
  • Three types of Claims qualify for this Claims Process: (i) Claims for amounts owing as at the date of Laurentian filing under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Pre-filing Claims), February 1, 2021; (ii) Claims which arose as a result of the restructuring itself (Restructuring Claims); and (iii) Claims against senior management, Directors and Officers, the Board (D&O Claims).
  • In order to for Claims to be considered in the Claims Process, the fully completed Proof of Claim must be received by the Monitor no later than:
    • For Pre-filing Claims, 5:00 PM Toronto time on July 30, 2021 (Pre-Filing Claims Bar Date).
    • For Restructuring Claims, 5:00 p.m. (Toronto Time) on, whichever is later: (i) July 30, 2021, or (ii) the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Monitor sends a Proof of Claim Document Package to the Creditor with respect to such Restructuring Claim (Restructuring Claims Bar Date).
    • For D&O Claims, 5:00 PM Toronto time on July 30, 2021 (D&O Claims Bar Date).

No doubt the Monitor, the Inspector Group and Laurentian will be very busy sorting out all the Claims.

Public institutions shouldn’t be allowed to use bankruptcy protection to force through cuts

There has been an outcry from the public service community that public institutions should not be allowed to make use of Canadian insolvency laws like any other person or company that qualifies. I doubt that movement will get much traction.

I hope that you found this Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Brandon Blog interesting. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

companies' creditors arrangement act
Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY IN SUDBURY: THE LAURENTIAN FEDERATED UNIVERSITIES SUFFERED A CRUSHING DEFEAT

laurentian university in sudburylaurentian university in sudbury

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast

Laurentian University in Sudbury introduction

As widely reported, Laurentian University in Sudbury had federation agreements with the University of Sudbury, Thorneloe University and Huntington University (also known as the Federated Schools or federated universities). These three northern Ontario institutions are each an independent university offering university credits through certain courses that Laurentian University students took.

The reason for the federation agreements, which also had a companion Grant Distribution and Services agreement, is because these three colleges did not have full provincial status to register students, handle the admission to programs, confer degrees or receive provincial funding. Everyone benefitted from the arrangement.

The colleges were able to offer courses (in addition to a few specific courses unique to each respective college) and Laurentian, in turn, shared $7.7 million in funding. Canada Laurentian University made the calculation that it may not need all of the courses they administer on behalf of the 3 colleges. Rather, they can gain a full $7.7 million in funding, rather than just their administrative charge for doing the processing of the academic courses and degrees.

As readers of Brandon Blog know, I have been following the northern Ontario Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario financial difficulty insolvency restructuring saga. To date I have written 2 blogs on it:

In my 2 previous Brandon Blogs, I told you about Laurentian University’s academic program cuts comprising 38 English-language undergraduate and 27 French-language undergraduate program closures, in addition to 11 graduate program cuts (4 in French; 7 in English). These undergraduate program and graduate program cuts, dozens of program cuts, have caused job losses amongst the 116 full-time professors and 1 counsellor placement ending up being redundant. It has also obviously affected both undergraduate students and graduate students alike.

In this Brandon Blog, I talk about the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruling in favour of Laurentian University in Sudbury in its effort to terminate all of its federated agreements.

laurentian university in sudbury
laurentian university in sudbury

Laurentian University in Sudbury: Losing academic programs will ‘hurt,’ prof says

The Laurentian University in Sudbury Board of Governors approved the issuance of issued Notices of Disclaimer of Laurentian University in Sudbury to terminate the university’s current agreement with the other Laurentian affiliates, Huntington University and Thorneloe University College, as well as the University of Sudbury (the Federated Universities). The decision was made amidst growing concern from students at all three universities. The Notices of Disclaimer were issued on April 1, 2021 (no joke!).

This news made waves in the Canadian higher education community. Laurentian University in Sudbury decided to terminate its agreement with the Federated Universities effective at the expiry of the notices. Laurentian University cited, in a press release, “concerns relating to low retention and graduation rates.” One grad student described it as “An ugly stain for years to come“.

Huntington University ended up settling with Laurentian University. Perhaps capitulating is a better word. On the other hand, Thorneloe University and the University of Sudbury each brought a motion before the court under section 32(2) of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) for an order that their Federated Universities agreements not be terminated. They did so within the 15 day period they had to oppose the Disclaimers under the CCAA. Their motions were heard on the last two days of April. These motions were heard separately by two different Judges.

laurentian university in sudbury
laurentian university in sudbury

Sudbury’s Laurentian, Huntington universities reach a separation agreement, but Thorneloe and the University of Sudbury fought on

The Thorneloe University College and the University of Sudbury did not want to just capitulate. Huntington reached an agreement with Laurentian University regarding just how to terminate its collaboration. Both Thornloe and the University of Sudbury proceeded with their motions to set aside the Disclaimers. Thornloe’s motion was heard on April 29, 2021, by Chief Justice Morawetz.

Justice Gilmore listened to the University of Sudbury‘s motion on April 30, 2021. The Laurentian University stay of proceedings was expanded briefly up until May 2, 2021. On that date, the Justices released short endorsements dismissing both motions and the CCAA proceedings were extended until August 31, 2021. On May 7, both Justices released their detailed reasons.

The factors that the court needed to consider were:

In choosing whether to make the order opposing the Disclaimers, the court needs to consider whether the:

  • monitor approved the proposed Disclaimers;
  • Disclaimers would boost the prospects of a viable Plan of Arrangement being made for Laurentian; and also
  • Disclaimers would likely cause considerable financial difficulty to a party to the agreement.

The arguments against the Disclaimers in each of the northern Ontario Thorneloe and the University of Sudbury motions were essentially the same. They were:

  • Thorneloe and Huntington did not create Laurentian’s economic problems.
  • The Disclaimer will result in a significant financial challenge for Thorneloe and as a result, Thorneloe will need to make an insolvency filing either under the CCAA or the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada).
  • Thorneloe and Huntington are immaterial to Laurentian’s financial scenario. Therefore the Disclaimer would not cause a material improvement for the chances of a successful Plan of Arrangement and a restructuring of Laurentian’s finances.
  • The partnership between Laurentian and the two northern Ontario colleges is not a business relationship to which the provisions of the CCAA were meant to apply.
  • Laurentian is acting in bad faith against the provisions of s. 18.6 of the CCAA.
  • The debtor-in-possession lender (DIP lender) has no reason to make it a condition of increased financing that the Federation Agreements must be terminated.

    laurentian university in sudbury
    laurentian university in sudbury

The court decision about the Laurentian University in Sudbury Disclaimers for Thorneloe University and University of Sudbury

In both cases, everyone had their legal counsel and Thorneloe retained a financial advisor also. Thorneloe‘s financial advisor prepared a report for the court to attempt to counter the submissions of both Laurentian University and the CCAA Monitor.

The Judges each weighed all the evidence very carefully and both concluded that the:

  • Monitor authorized the Disclaimer Notices.
  • Disclaimers will improve the prospects of a successful Plan of Arrangement for Laurentian.
  • Notices of Disclaimer will have negative economic consequences to Thorneloe and the University of Sudbury, yet this is not enough of a factor to prohibit the Notices of Disclaimer.
    University of Sudbury and Thorneloe was provided a choice, similar to Huntington, which was not accepted.
  • Court has a choice to make and neither choice is a good one. It is required to consider
    the more comprehensive implication of refusing the Notices of Disclaimer which would result in the demise of Laurentian.

The choice is if the motions succeed so the Disclaimers are not effective, it might cause an unravelling of Laurentian’s restructuring strategy and also the collapse of Laurentian. This in turn would certainly have a substantial impact on all professors, students and parts of the northern Ontario region and the entire Sudbury community. It would likewise create financial harm to Thorneloe and the University of Sudbury. Certainly, this is not a desirable outcome.

If the Notices of Disclaimer are supported, the court acknowledged that this very well may threaten the survival of the colleges. The court was sympathetic to this but stated that the impact on the colleges will be considerably less than if Laurentian and the colleges both stop operating. Given these two undesirable choices, the much better choice or the least unwanted selection is to support the Notices of Disclaimer.

Therefore, the motions brought by Thorneloe and the University of Sudbury to revoke the Notices of Disclaimer were dismissed. The Judges reject appeals from federated universities. Thorneloe stated it would appeal the decision of the court. As previously stated, Huntington has already struck a brand-new plan with Laurentian. The University of Sudbury is considering what it ought to do next.

laurentian university in sudbury
laurentian university in sudbury

Laurentian University in Sudbury summary

I hope you enjoyed the Laurentian University in Sudbury Brandon Blog post. According to the Monitor’s reporting to the court, on April 30, 2021, Laurentian owes millions of dollars; $321.8 million to be precise.

Are you worried because you just lost your job through no fault of your own? Is your business dealing with substantial debt challenges and financial problems due to your largest customer failing to perform and pay your company? Do you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

laurentian university in sudbury

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE FOR BANKRUPTCY SIMPLE STEPS ON HOW TO AVOID BANKRUPTCY AND SAVE YOUR BUSINESS

licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy on why businesses go bankrupt

In my last Brandon Blog, Business Bankruptcy In Canada: Discover The Causes Of Business Insolvency And Bankruptcy, I described the causes of business insolvency, the types of business entities normally found in Canada and tips on how to pull your business around back from insolvency.

Numerous businesses are battling to survive today, not to mention stay lucrative. They are scaling down or just closing their doors. They are accessing the available government support money for a business. Most entrepreneurs hesitate to seek the advice of a licensed insolvency trustee due to the fact that they are afraid all the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee or a trustee in bankruptcy) wants to do is be a trustee for bankruptcy.

In this Brandon blog post, I want to continue from the suggestions from my last blog, to show you exactly how that the last point I push for is to be a trustee for bankruptcy. I first look to reorganize your business. If your business or company remains in danger because of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, it will certainly be advantageous for you and also your organization to do so.

I will also show how sometimes, a trustee for bankruptcy or receivership, can actually help save parts of your business. The only other alternative could be to let all the business parts fail, which is the worst possible outcome.

The role of a debtor in bankruptcy or insolvency

Remember, I previously defined insolvency as a financial condition, where bankruptcy is a legal condition and a legal process. You will also recall that in my last Brandon Blog, I described the three common types of business structures in Canada; proprietorship, partnership and corporation. Just as these three business structures are different in form, they are also treated differently in insolvency vs bankruptcy. Here is how I differentiate the role of each debtor.

Proprietorship – Sole proprietorships are a type of business structure in which one individual is the sole owner of the business, which gives that person control over everything related to the business. This includes the business’ name, structure, accounting, legal obligations and tax responsibilities.

As I described last week, in Canada, the person, the sole proprietor, is carrying on business in their personal name, operating as the business name. You can register a sole proprietorship with the provincial government by completing an application form.

A sole proprietorship is the simplest kind of business structure. It permits an individual to sell goods or run a service with complete control of it on their own. Nonetheless, a sole proprietorship is not considered a separate legal entity from the owner. This means that any liabilities incurred by the business are also personal financial obligations of the owner.

So in an insolvency situation, all of the sole proprietor’s assets come into play as do all of his or her debts. It is not just the business assets and business liabilities. It is everything. This is the worst-case scenario for an entrepreneur.

So if the business is viable, and the personal assets and liabilities lead to the sole proprietor being in the situation where they can do a debt settlement plan, they can choose one of two options to restructure their entire personal financial situation. This assumes they cannot resolve their financial issues informally to bring their financial situation back to being solvent.

Partnership – A terrific way to begin a new business is teaming up with one or more people. All of you should enhance the group’s abilities as well as energy. Nonetheless, you also wish to be with people that are trustworthy, industrious and have a certain expertise that will help the business grow. Just like the way a proprietorship is one person, a partnership is made up of two or more people.

A partnership agreement is crucial. This is an agreement between the partners, describing the rights as well as obligations of each partner in the business. The same way a sole proprietor is personally responsible for the debts of the business and is putting all of their personal and business assets at risk, the same is true for partners in a business partnership. The partners are each liable for 100% of the business debts in case of insolvency. The partners cannot limit their liability to only their partnership share of the business.

Corporation – When you incorporate a business, it is a corporation. The company is a different legal entity from its owner shareholders. Shareholders are not responsible for the unpaid debts owed to financial institutions (normally a secured creditor), suppliers to the firm (normally an unsecured creditor) or the government. There are only two exceptions: (i) certain government liabilities that are a personal liability of a Director; and (ii) if the entrepreneur directly guarantees a financial debt of the company, such as a company loan, then that individual will have a liability with respect to such debt.

If the company’s financial future becomes bleak because it is insolvent, there are options. In my last blog, I talked about self-help remedies senior management of a company whose business is viable can try to informally bring the company back to a healthy financial state. You can re-read that blog to see the options available. If the self-help remedies do not work yet then we must look at more formal proceedings.

trustee for bankruptcy
licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy

Licensed InsolvencyTrustee for bankruptcy: Settle with creditors and debt collectors without bankruptcy

In a proprietorship or partnership, if the underlying business is viable, then there are a variety of options to try to turn the business around yourself. You would use the self-help methods I described in my last blog. If the self-help options do not work, there are debt settlement options available to the individual(s) under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). They would be the only government-sanctioned debt settlement plan available in Canada. Either a consumer proposal or a Division I Proposal. You can read about how each one works by clicking on the following links:

In a successfully completed debt settlement program, the bankruptcy trustee would not be a trustee for bankruptcy. Rather, the trustee in bankruptcy would be an Administrator under a consumer proposal or a Proposal Trustee in the Division I Proposal.

If the business is not viable or the circumstances are such that a debt settlement plan is not feasible, then personal bankruptcy would be the only other option. You can read about how personal bankruptcy works by looking at our top 20 bankruptcy FAQs section. Upon the bankruptcy of the person, the sole proprietorship is automatically terminated.

Since a partnership is a way of carrying on business personally, then the same insolvency options available to the partners to the business debtor are also available. A restructuring is always preferred over a bankruptcy when the partnership is in financial difficulty.

For a debt settlement insolvency filing, the licensed trustee is not a trustee for bankruptcy. That is the case only if there is an actual bankruptcy assignment. Under provincial law, if a partner goes bankrupt, the partnership is automatically dissolved.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: Ask creditors to help you avoid bankruptcy of the corporation

Without wanting to sound like a broken record, you can review my prior blog to go over the self-help remedies for turning a business around, even if it is a corporation. A self-help remedy is always a great alternative to bankruptcy. If that isn’t appropriate, or just plain does not work, then you must get in touch with an insolvency trustee.

Again, if the company’s business is viable, then there are financial restructuring alternatives. these alternatives will be within a government-regulated insolvency proceeding. There are two formal restructuring statutes in Canada:

In both cases, a company should retain the services of both a licensed trustee for bankrutpcy and a bankruptcy lawyer. The lawyer acts as legal counsel to the company. The licensed trustee will be both a financial advisor and steer the company through the restructuring process. The CCAA option is for companies with $5 million or more of debt. A BIA Proposal is for a company with any amount of debt. The main difference between the two processes are:

  • In a failed BIA Proposal, the debtor is immediately deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy. This is not the case in a failed CCAA Plan of Arrangement.
  • A CCAA proceeding is more costly as there are many more court appearances in that forum than in a BIA restructuring.

Using one of these two statutes to gain what is called in the media “bankruptcy protection” in order to work out a successful restructuring with your unsecured creditors is always preferable. The company will pay less than it owes while keeping its viable but insolvent business alive. Don’t underestimate the power of preserving jobs in the eyes of a court. A bankruptcy trustee can be very helpful in obtaining great results.

trustee for bankruptcy
licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: When to consider an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors

If the business is not viable and is insolvent, then the only thing left to consider is an assignment in bankruptcy filing. It is definitely a last resort if everything I have already spoken about in this Brandon Blog just won’t work and you have run out of options. Trustees in bankruptcy always consider the alternatives to bankruptcy, but sometimes filing bankruptcy is the only option available.

In the case of a proprietorship or partnership, it is the individual sole proprietor and one or more of the partners who will be meeting with a trustee in bankruptcy and filing for a personal type of bankruptcy. the personal bankruptcy trustee will administer the personal bankruptcy estate. Again, you can read up on personal bankruptcy by looking at our top 20 personal bankruptcy FAQs section.

In personal bankruptcies, it will be either a streamlined system called a Summary Administration and if not, it is then an ordinary administration bankruptcy. Unlike a company, a person is ultimately entitled to a bankruptcy discharge.

When it comes to the administration of bankruptcy for a corporation, it is always an ordinary administration bankruptcy. The purpose of this Brandon Blog is not to run through all the steps in a personal or corporate bankruptcy process. Above I have provided some links to read up on debt settlement restructuring and personal bankruptcy. For corporate bankruptcy, I recommend that you read our corporate website page on corporate bankruptcy.

Alternatively, you can also read my previous Brandon Blog Bankrupting a Limited Company: Canadian Corporate Bankruptcy Process.

A trustee for bankruptcy administers the bankruptcy process for the benefit of unsecured creditors. Sometimes, it is a secured creditor who needs to enforce their security. They do not necessarily need the company to meet with a trustee for bankruptcy. Rather, the secured creditor needs the appointment of trustee to act not in a bankruptcy administration, but rather, to act as a receiver or receiver-manager to enforce the secured creditor’s position by taking control of the assets subject to the security and ultimately selling them. To read the receivership process, you can read the receivership section of our corporate website.

You can also read my Brandon Blog titled What Is A Receivership? Our Complete Guide To Receivership Solutions.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: How to avoid bankruptcy and save your business from closing

I hope you enjoyed the licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy Brandon Blog post. Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. As you can see from this blog, we are not just a trustee for bankruptcy. We believe every person and business should first explore debt settlement to avoid bankruptcy.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

trustee for bankruptcy
licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy
Call a Trustee Now!