Tag: Canada Revenue Agency

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

INCOME TAX DEBT RELIEF: DO YOU KNOW THE WAY TO INCOME TAX DEBT RELIEF?

income tax debt reliefIncome tax debt relief: Introduction

As 2018 draws to a close, I want to wish all of our readers a very happy, healthy and prosperous New Year. I hope that 2019 will be a great year for all of us. You have no doubt been bombarded so far with emails, articles, and programs on getting income tax debt relief for 2018 by making sure that you have taken advantage of all possible deductions before the year ends tonight. I thought I would take a slightly different approach to talk about another rich and famous person who is in hot water with the IRS.

Income tax debt relief: Even the rich and famous have income tax debt problems

We have previously written about rich and famous people who have debt problems and who have filed for bankruptcy. Their debt problems arose mainly out of irresponsible spending, financial mismanagement and income tax problems. These blogs were written to show you that it is not only ordinary people who run into trouble. People who many would think to have “all the money in the world” can also have financial problems. Financial mismanagement is not only an illness of the poor or middle class. It can strike anywhere or anyone.

Income tax debt relief: Some of our past rich and famous financial disaster blogs

Our previous financial mismanagement of the rich and famous includes:

FAMOUS CELEBRITY BANKRUPTCIES HAPPEN TOO

In this blog, I pointed out that many rich and famous people have gone bankrupt, including:

  • Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain)
  • Michael Jackson
  • Abraham Lincoln
  • Dorothy Hamill – Gold Medal Skater
  • Johnny Unitas – Football Hall of Fame
  • Milton Hershey – Founder Hershey’s
  • H.J. Heinz – Founder Heinz
  • Marvin Gaye
  • Mick Fleetwood – Fleetwood Mac
  • Walt Disney
  • Larry King
  • Burt Reynolds
  • PT Barnum
  • Tom Petty
  • David Cassidy
  • David Crosby
  • Ed McMahon
  • Henry Ford
  • M.C. Hammer
  • Toni Braxton
  • Natalie Cole
  • Robin Williams
  • 78% of former NFL players have gone bankrupt or are under financial stress because of joblessness or divorce within two years of retirement.
  • The National Endowment for Financial Education says that 70% of all people who suddenly receive large amounts of money will lose it within a few years.

FORMER PRO ATHLETES WHO ARE BROKE: EARN OVER $400 MILLION & GO BANKRUPT?

In this blog, I talked about former pro athletes who are broke. Former NBA star and broadcaster Charles Barkley estimates that 60% – 70% of professional athletes go broke for all or any of the following reasons:

  • Buying lavish gifts and giving money to family and friends
  • Unsupportable lifestyles
  • Mansions around the world
  • Yachts
  • Exotic cars
  • Bad business ventures
  • Bad money managers
  • Not understanding financial matters
  • Zero savings
  • No rainy day fund
  • No retirement plan

DEBT FORGIVENESS CRA: CANADA REVENUE AGENCY BEATS DONOVAN BAILEY

In this blog, I wrote about Canadian Olympian. Donovan Bailey and his income tax debt problems with Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). We also described his income tax debt relief settlement plan to cut his income tax debt.. It seems that Mr. Bailey was not able to outrun CRA. Therefore he needed a formal debt settlement plan.

DEBT SETTLEMENT VS CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA: ENGLISH REALITY TV STAR KATIE PRICE NEEDS

This blog was about UK celebrity Katie Price who had many financial problems. I spoke about her financial issues and her UK bankruptcy proceedings.

Income tax debt relief: Dionne Warwick

Grammy Award-winning vocalist Dionne Warwick has filed for bankruptcy because she was in need of income tax debt relief. The 72-year-old vocalist, well-known for hits such as “Do You Know the Way to San Jose” and “That’s What Friends Are For” submitted the bankruptcy documents in New Jersey, where she lives.

She listed assets of $25,500 and liabilities of greater than $10.7 million in her bankruptcy filing. Her largest debt is income tax debt of near $7 million owed in back tax obligations to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as well as greater than $3 million in tax obligations to the state of California. This includes interest and penalties.

She declared her present income as $20,950 a month, with monthly expenditures just $10 less than that. Dionne Warwick’s press agent, Kevin Sasaki, claimed that the vocalist’s personal bankruptcy was primarily the outcome of “irresponsible and gross financial mismanagement” in the late 1980s to the mid-1990s.

Income tax debt relief: Start 2019 off the right way

No one likes to pay taxes, but everyone hates having CRA tax debt problems. Do you require CRA debt forgiveness? If you’re considering bankruptcy because of income tax debt, or for any reason. We can show you bankruptcy alternatives to get CRA debt forgiveness. We can end your debt pain through a consumer proposal, debt consolidation, and credit counselling. Contact a professional that you can trust – Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.

The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience dealing with diverse issues and complex files, including negotiating with CRA. We deliver the highest quality of professional service. Don’t settle for less. Give us a call today and Starting Over, Starting Now you can overcome your financial difficulties.

Again I wish all of you a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY BLOG REVIEW: A LOOK AT MY TOP 2018 BANKRUPTCY BLOGS

Bankruptcy blog review: Introduction

I hope that you are all enjoying quality family time together over the holidays. As 2018 is nearly over, I thought that it would be interesting to do a bankruptcy blog review on my Brandon’s Blog. So here is a review of the 7 most viewed blogs over the past year.

Bankruptcy blog review: The 7 most viewed blogs in 2018

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT: COURT MAY NOT LISTEN TO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE

This blog was about a very interesting case decided in the Court of Appeal of British Columbia. The bankrupt’s creditors applied to have the transactions reviewed under section I00 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (“BIA”). One of the areas of contention was that the judge in the lower court found he could not rely on the bankruptcy trustee’s opinion of value in the circumstances.

MORTGAGE LENDING CRITERIA SELF EMPLOYED: BIGGEST MYTH MAY BE RIGHT

In this Brandon’s Blog, I wrote about mortgage lending criteria self-employed, I discussed a Court decision that shows when it comes to a self-employed person’s mortgage, if there is a deemed trust claim by Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), you cannot solely rely upon the registry system.


STALKING HORSE CREDIT BID: WE NEED COURT APPROVAL BEFORE STARTING A COURT SUPERVISED SALES PROCESS

This bankruptcy blog review post came from our corporate case files. I discussed the decision making process the Court goes through when being asked to approve a stalking horse sales process and the stalking horse credit bid being recommended by the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee).


CREDIT KARMA CANADA REVIEW: IS IT REALLY FREE AND LEGITIMATE?

Since 2007, Credit Karma USA has attempted to simplify credit and finance for more than 60 million Credit Karma members. They advertise very heavily on US television to attract new members. Becoming a member is free, and it allows any member to get access to their free credit score and credit report, with the option to update every single week. Credit Karma also provides financial education to put credit into context.

Credit Karma Canada arrived this past year from the United States. Its website is creditkarma.ca. The purpose of this blog was to describe what Credit Karma Canada is and to let you decide if it would be helpful or not for you or someone you know.


IS GOODWILL A NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION? ARE YOU SCARED BECAUSE YOUR COMPANY HAS TURNED INTO ONE?

 

The Goodwill Toronto bankruptcy confused and astonished many people. After all, how can Goodwill, a non-profit organization, go bankrupt? Isn’t the very nature of a non-profit or not-for-profit that it doesn’t have to make a profit? This Brandon’s Blog discussed the issues.


FILING FOR BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: MENTAL HEALTH & DISCHARGED BANKRUPTCY

 

This bankruptcy blogspot dealt with filing for bankruptcy in Canada and the bankruptcy discharge process when mental health issues are involved.


POOR CREDIT PERSONAL LOANS GUARANTEED APPROVAL CANADA: REDUCE AND DON’T INCREASE DEBT TO IMPROVE YOUR CREDIT SCORE

 

This Brandon’s Blog was a discussion about and a warning against being seduced by ads from companies for poor credit personal loans guaranteed approval. We pointed out the pitfalls of the products being offered. We also showed how people with poor credit can go about settling their debts and improving their credit score.

 

Bankruptcy blog review: Conclusion

 

These are my 7 top viewed Brandon’s Blogs in 2018. Four are about personal debt issues or personal bankruptcy blog items and three are about corporate insolvency issues. Three are about a review of a then-recent court case.

I hope that the year 2019 will be a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year for you and your families.

Have you taken on too much debt in 2018 or the years before? Is the pain and stress of too much debt now negatively affecting your health?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies in need of financial restructuring and counselling. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide debt settlement and financial restructuring services.

We offer a free consultation to help you solve your problems. We understand your pain that debt causes. We can also eliminate it right away from your life. This will allow you to begin a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can begin helping you and get you back into a healthy, stress-free life.bankruptcy blog review

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA PART OF BANKRUPTCIES LAWS IN ONTARIO?

Introduction

I prepared this vlog to explain the differences between a consumer proposal (CP), one of the bankruptcies laws in Ontario and bankruptcy. This discussion is based on the inquiries that we are asked often. Hopefully, this information will help you understand better specifically what a CP debt settlement strategy is and how it will certainly assist you to remove all your financial obligations. All this while AVOIDING personal bankruptcy.

Main benefits of a CP

Take into consideration several of the benefits of the CP vs. bankruptcy:

    • Unlike informal debt negotiation, the CP creates a forum where every one of your unsecured creditors must take part in for your debt restructuring.
    • You keep your property.
    • Legal actions against you on your property and debts, such as wage garnishments, cannot continue.
    • You do not require to file an assignment in bankruptcy

CP vs. bankruptcy

How do I recognize if I have a financial problem?

If you are having difficulty satisfying your debts or have actually quit paying them, you are probably insolvent. Another sign of insolvency is that if your assets if liquidated, will not bring in enough money to pay off your debts. When you are all stressed out over the money you owe, for sure you will know that you have financial problems.

How do I know if I qualify for either a CP or bankruptcy?

Any person that is insolvent and owes greater than $1,000 is qualified to file either a CP or an assignment in bankruptcy in Canada.

Will I have to give up my assets?

As soon as you file for bankruptcy you will certainly have to give up your non-exempt property to the Trustee. These possessions will be marketed and sold. The cash from the sale of your property will be used to pay for the cost of the bankruptcy administration. The balance will be dispersed among your creditors.

In CP, you will not be giving up your assets. You are making an offer to your creditors less than the total amount you owe. According to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA), your CP has to be a better result for your unsecured creditors than they would receive in your bankruptcy.

What occurs to my wages or salary?

Nothing. You receive it as normal.

In a CP that has been (deemed) accepted by your creditors and approved by the Court, you begin to make your payments. There are no other requirements for your income in CP.

In bankruptcy, nothing happens to your income either. However, in a bankruptcy, unlike a CP, your Trustee at the outset has to decide if you are required to make voluntary contributions to your bankruptcy case based off of your income. If so, this is called a surplus income requirement. Also, you will have to file monthly statements of income and expense with the Trustee. Your surplus income requirement can change, depending on if your income goes up or down. There is no such requirement in CP.

Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has frozen my bank account and has garnished my earnings. Exactly how can I deal with that?

As stated above, once you file a CP, there is a stay of proceedings. Upon receiving notice from the Trustee, CRA stops the garnishee process and lifts the freeze on your account(s). The same is true in bankruptcy.

Will I still owe money after I declare bankruptcy or file a CP?

Perhaps, because of neither a CP nor bankruptcy covers:

How much time will I be under the insolvency proceeding?

The duration of time in bankruptcy will depend on whether this is an initial or 2nd (or more) bankruptcy, whether you have to pay surplus income and if your discharge is opposed or not. Depending on your circumstances, it can be anywhere from 9 months to many years.

In a CP, you can take up to 60 months to pay the total amount you promised to pay. Payments in a CP are required monthly.

Will anyone find out that I have filed either a CP or for bankruptcy?

As soon as you file for bankruptcy or a CP, your Trustee must file a notification with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) to start either process. The OSB does run a public database showing the status of all files.

In either a CP or bankruptcy, your Trustee must send a notice to all of your creditors. So they will know.

In a CP or a shortened summary administration bankruptcy, the Trustee does not place a legal notice in the local newspaper advertising that you filed. In an ordinary administration bankruptcy, the Trustee must publish a notice.

Generally, it is only the OSB, your Trustee and your creditors who are aware of your filing.

Is my partner or spouse impacted by my CP or bankruptcy?

Your partner/spouse will not be impacted by your CP or bankruptcy unless he/she co-signed as a borrower or has guaranteed payment for any of your debts. If they have guaranteed some or all of your debts, then those specific creditors can ask your spouse for payment in full.

NOTE: There is a body of case-law to suggest that if your CP is fully performed, then there is no debt left for your guarantor to make good on. That type of discussion is too technical for this general blog. If you are in this situation, your spouse should get legal advice before agreeing to pay anything. No such argument could even be considered in a bankruptcy situation.

Just how will my CP or bankruptcy impact my existing divorce case?

In Canada, CP and bankruptcy filings do not conflict with the majority of the divorce procedures. In a bankruptcy, the Trustee will stand in the shoes of the bankrupt spouse. Ontario is an equalization Province; not a division of assets Province. If the bankrupt spouse is entitled to an equalization payment, that will come to the Trustee.

In a CP, the Trustee does not get involved at all in any way. The BIA does not interfere at all with non-financial divorce issues such as custody. It also does not have any effect on support or alimony.

Consumer Proposal Canada or bankruptcy: Conclusion

I hope this consumer proposal discussion about the differences between a Consumer Proposal Canada and bankruptcy has been helpful to you.

Do you have severe debt and don’t know where to begin to fix it? Are your debt issues causing you to lose sleep? Is too much debt triggering stress and anxiety, discomfort and pain? We know that discomfort better than anyone and we can get it out of your life.

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of experience helping people and companies seeking financial restructuring or a debt settlement strategy. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists recognized, accredited and supervised by the Federal government to give insolvency advice and remedies to assist you and to prevent bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can end the stress and anxiety financial problems create. With the special roadmap, we will develop with and special to you, we will promptly return you right into a healthy, balanced hassle-free life.

You can have a no-cost appointment to assist you so we can fix your debt troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to make a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now.

consumer proposal bankruptcies laws in ontario

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CANADA: ENHANCING RETIREMENT SECURITY IN CANADIAN INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY

,employee benefits canada

If you prefer, you can listen to the employee benefits Canada podcast.  Please scroll down to the bottom of the page for the audio.

Employee benefits Canada:  Introduction

The Federal government supports the proposition that Canadians are entitled to a risk-free, safe, secure and sensible retired life.  Corporate financial troubles have increased problems about the safety of pension plan, wage and benefit payments for employees and senior citizens.   Employee benefits Canada is now being looked at by the Federal government.

The most recent case that has brought these issues to the forefront has been the Sears Canada liquidation.  Federal politicians have sponsored several private member’s bills which have now caught the serious attention of our Federal government.    Two such Bills were brought forward by Hamilton Mountain NDP MP Scott Duvall and Senator Art Eggleton.  The Federal government wants to make employee benefits Canada news.

Employee benefits Canada: My previous blogs

I have written on the issue in several blogs:

  1. TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: NDP WANTS FEDERAL INSOLVENCY LAWS CHANGED SO THERE IS PENSION PLAN SECURITY WHEN FINANCIALLY TROUBLED BUSINESSES FAIL – September 27, 2017
  2. SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS – October 18, 2017
  3. SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING – November 1, 2017
  4. SEARS CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN SHORTFALL: MP SCOTT DUVALL COMES THROUGH ON HIS PROMISE IN CANADIAN PARLIAMENT – November 8, 2017
  5. CORPORATE BANKRUPTCIES CANADA: SENATOR EGGLETON PROPOSES NEW PENSION FUND CANADA LAW – October 22, 2018

Arising out of certain policy statements in the Fall 2018 Budget, the Federal government is looking for responses from pensioners, employees, firms, professionals and various other stakeholders to take a macro, evidence-based strategy to try to provide better-retired life protection for all Canadians.

Employee benefits Canada: Canada’s retirement income system

Canada’s retirement income system (RIS) is currently based upon 3 columns:

  1. Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) give a fundamental degree of retired life earnings.Canada Pension (CPP) gives standard a certain wage substitute for employees, funded by payments from employees, companies and the self-employed.
  2. Employer-based pension – Defined Benefit (DB) and Defined Contribution (DC)).
  3. Income tax-assisted personal saving vehicles, such as Registered Retired Savings Plan (RRSP) and Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSA).

Employee benefits Canada:  Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law

In 2008-2009, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA) was changed.  Under the BIA, in a receivership or bankruptcy, arrears of wages was given a super-priority.  Approximately $2,000 per staff member must be paid before secured creditors. Any unfunded normal employer pension plan contributions (as distinct from any unfunded pension liability determined by an actuarial evaluation) also have a super-priority in either a bankruptcy or receivership.  

As far as a corporate restructuring proposal under the BIA, the amendment also states that the Court cannot approve any Proposal that does not provide for the same treatment.  The CCAA was similarly modified to be consistent with corporate restructuring under the BIA.

Employee benefits Canada: Corporate governance

The Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) supplies the fundamental business administration structure for Federally incorporated companies.  Although good corporate governance is important for all business stakeholders, it must be followed and implemented to be of any use.

As I indicated above, the Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall has caused the Federal government to now look at a variety of options to try to better protect employees and retirees for both pensions and benefits.

Employee benefits Canada:  The Feds are looking for stakeholder comments

The Federal government wants to listen to the thoughts of stakeholders on what further actions that might be embraced to boost retired life safety for workers and senior citizens impacted by company bankruptcy.  Specifically, the Federal government wants stakeholder response on increased security for workers’ claims in insolvencies, including changing the BIA and CCAA to make sure that there is a super-priority to pay unfunded pension plan contributions and benefits claims ahead of the claims of secured creditors.

Many options are being considered that the Federal government wants stakeholder comments on by the end of this year.

Employee benefits Canada:  Pension options being looked at

Possible pension options being considered are:

  • Solvency reserves: A solvency reserve is an account the employer could contribute to so that pension deficits can be eliminated.   I doubt this would work. If the company could afford to pay into a solvency reserve, they could also afford to just pay off the pension payment deficit.
  • Pension plan financing relief: The Minister of Finance has the authority to offer companies with pension plan financing relief to assist in the long-term survival of the company pension. The Minister’s authority could be boosted to assist companies with a pension plan deficit experiencing financial problems.  This type of help, being a moratorium on pension payments, could come with specific conditions. Such special conditions could include a moratorium on the payment of dividends, share redemptions and senior executive bonuses.
  • Self-managed accounts: Upon the bankruptcy of the company, the DB plan ends.  In that case, the only option is to transfer each former employees’ respective entitlement to purchase an annuity.  So, the expected benefit will never materialize because of the underfunding. Federal pension legislation (and provincial legislation to follow) could provide extra options.  It could allow rolling over of each entitlement into a self-managed plan such as an RRSP.  This way there is an opportunity to recoup some of the lost benefits over time.

Employee benefits Canada:  Corporate governance options being looked at

  • Limitations on the company: Dividends, share redemptions and senior management bonuses could be restricted under the CBCA in situations where a company is in arrears of pension contributions.  Once the arrears are caught up, then such special payments could continue. As federally incorporated companies are the minority of all companies in Canada. The Provinces would also have to invoke similar legislation.  An annual filing mechanism, perhaps through the Canada Revenue Agency, would also have to be established so that companies could be monitored.

Employee benefits Canada:  Bankruptcy and insolvency options being looked at

  • Increased “look-back” time: The BIA permits a court to reverse dividends paid or share redemptions made by an insolvent company within one year preceding the date of bankruptcy. The BIA and CCAA additionally allow a court to invalidate reviewable transaction (transfers at undervalue) by the Debtor as much as 5 years prior to the insolvency. In order to further connect corporate behaviour with employee interests, the “look-back” period in the BIA and the CCAA can be amended to include the unwinding of executive benefits, dividend payments and share redemptions at a time when there were also unfunded pension liabilities. The legislation could be amended to state that the recovered funds must go to paying down the pension payment arrears.  I would also go one step further to make the amount approved by the Directors of the corporation to be paid out while there were pension plan contribution arrears a personal liability of such Directors.
  • Improved openness in CCAA rules: In CCAA, the borrower business negotiates with its creditors on a debt settlement plan.  The process is conducted under court supervision.  The legislation could be amended so that when there is an underfunded pension plan, it would be mandatory to have legal representation for the employees who are participants in such pension plan.  This could be accomplished by amending the CCAA legislation to need that upon the motion to get the Initial Order the administrator of the pension plan must be an initial stakeholder that is consulted and served with the Initial Order motion material.  The plan administrator has the statutory right to retain legal counsel and be represented at all Court hearings.

Employee benefits Canada:  The solutions are varied and complex

As you can see, the range of possible solutions are varied and complex.  However, one thing is for sure though. The Federal government has now awoken to the issue of shareholders being enriched off of the backs of the workers.  The Sears Canada CCAA liquidation has brought the issue to the forefront. It will be very interesting to see how the Federal government proceeds in 2019.

Employee benefits Canada:  Is your company bogged down by too much debt?

Is your company under fire as a result of too much debt, including pension plan contribution arrears? Is your business looking for reorganizing to get debt alleviation?

The Ira Smith Team has years as well as generations of experience helping people and companies in financial difficulty. If your company needs a corporate restructuring debt negotiation strategy, we have the experience.  We will end your stress, anxiety and discomfort.   Whether it is a BIA or CCAA debt restructuring, we can help you.  We will return you and your company to a healthy, balanced and efficient pain-free life.

Our method for every case is to establish a remedy where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This begins the minute you consult with us and walk through our front door. You’re merely one telephone call away.  Therefore, with our help, you will take the required steps to go back to leading a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

Call us today for your free first consultation.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SMALL BUSINESS CANADA TAX: LIBERALS UNFAIRLY TARGET SMALL BUSINESS TAXES IN CANADA RULES

small business canada taxFull disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion on SMALL BUSINESS CANADA TAX issues. This blog must not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.

We are trying something new. At the bottom is an audiogram of this Brandon’s blog. If you would prefer to listen to it, and not read it, scroll down to the bottom and press on the play button. Let us know what you think by sending us a message in the Question box below.

Small business Canada tax: Introduction

In December 2017, our Federal Minister of Finance, Bill Morneau, disclosed some new policies he and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were thinking about. The changes Finance Minister Morneau was touting, were for toughening up the small business Canada tax scheme. It would have affected entrepreneur’s businesses, their taxes, and their households.

The main aspect of small business Canada tax that our federal government wanted to attack was the age-old concept of family business income splitting. Its more modern name that you would have seen a lot in the press is called income sprinkling. The federal government was trying to advance the theory that small business owners whose family members were shareholders in the business, but not necessarily working in the business, were somehow cheating on their taxes.

Small business Canada tax: The Federal Government’s discussion points

The discussion focussed mainly on professionals, such as doctors, lawyers, and accountants who had a professional corporation. The government was trying to advance the argument how unfair it was for a professional earning say $250,000 annually, to “sprinkle” some of the income among family members older than 18 as compared to a salaried employee earning the same total amount in salary. I find it interesting that they used a quarter of a million dollars annually as an example, and not a lesser number. Do you think that was picked on purpose to subtly portray all family business owners as being fat cats?

The government’s position was that income that might have been paid to only the manager of the business, could be redirected to other family members by way of dividends. If those family members were in a lower-income tax bracket, then they would pay less tax. The government felt that was unfair.

Small business Canada tax: How income splitting or income sprinkling works

First, in order for this to work for a professional, the laws of the Province you live in has to allow you to have household members that aren’t professionals be shareholders of your professional firm. Second, if your spouse has a high taxable income already, then you will not profit by including him or her as an owner of the business. Lastly, you must decide if you’re going to add your children more than 18 years of age, as shareholders.

Assuming you’ve marked off all those issues, it can make a difference to your family’s overall income tax bill to add your partner and/or your grown-up kids as shareholders of your business. By doing this, you can choose to distribute dividends from the business and take advantage of their lower-income tax bracket.

Paying your partner or kids a salary is not as effective as making them shareholders of the firm and paying dividends. If you pay a salary, it needs to be a sensible one, for work that you can actually prove to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). In other words, you cannot simply pay your partner $100,000 for doing bookkeeping for the firm. CRA will certainly allow an affordable wage for that function, but it would have to be justified by comparison to the marketplace for such services.

The advantage of paying dividends to family members is that you do not need to prove it. The other benefit of paying dividends is that your firm recovers some of the business tax you’ve paid on dividends made by the firm’s financial investment portfolio. Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand (RDTOH) is the issue. Our firm does not do tax work. This is a complex topic, I will leave it up to you to research how RDTOH works.

Small business Canada tax: Tax changes effective January 1, 2018

Beginning January 1, 2018, the government changed the rules specifically to target professionals who have incorporated (specifically, doctors, lawyers, and accountants). Professionals who are gaining from reduced tax rates on what would have otherwise been fully taxed earnings at the highest marginal personal income tax rates, if not for their company.

The government is saying that these incorporate professionals aren’t adding their fair share to Canadian society by their decision to have a professional corporation. For that reason, they should not gain from the tax advantages of doing so.

So what are the changes? The Tax on Split Income (TOSI) rules has been amended to cover grown-up shareholders of private firms. Previously, TOSI rules only applied to minor children. The issue now becomes: If you’re a private company owner and pay dividends to adult family member shareholders, when can you do so without invoking the new regulations? Essentially, you need to be able to show much involvement in business.

Small business Canada tax: Clear bright line

The Federal government is putting what they’re calling a “clear bright-line”’ to exclude some relatives from the TOSI rules. The general TOSI exclusions are:

  1. The company owner’s spouse, providing they more than 65 years old.
  2. Children over 18 years old who have made a real labour contribution to the business. CRA is gauging this as an average of 20 hours a week during the year. Alternatively, there is also a test throughout any of the 5 earlier years.

The government has taken direct aim at professional corporations though. These exclusions do not apply where 90% + of the income of the corporation comes from the provision of services. Income from ownership of related businesses that earn income from the provision of services is also included in the calculation.

Inserting a trust into the ownership equation may get around this “excluded shares” provision. You need the advice of your income tax advisor to decide if it would be beneficial to you.

Small business Canada tax: Ottawa punishing small business Canada

When the federal government presented new tax rules, local business claimed they were being unjustly targeted by “punishing” measures. According to Small Business Association Canada, up to fifty percent of the country’s entrepreneurs state they’re feeling negative results.

The federal government also added changes to the passive income rules for private corporations. In the February 2018 Federal Budget, the Liberals added a grind-down mechanism for the small business tax deduction through which every dollar of investment income over $50,000 cuts profits eligible for the small business tax deduction by $5.

This has been especially challenging for organizations that use passive earnings to help in special capital funding. For example, paying for building and construction equipment or to acquire real estate used by the business.ira smith trustee

Small business Canada tax: The greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) has asked the Provinces not to follow the Federal Liberals but to support small business.

For small businesses, the greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over. Private corporations who use responsible budgeting techniques and save up their profits and invest them to earn income, to be prepared for a rainy day, are being attacked. They may be saving to smooth out cash flow problems, or they might have a big upcoming purchase. Now they are being attacked through the income tax system for earning investment income in excess of $50K annually. It is clear that CRA will be looking closely at professional corporations’ income tax returns. I would not be surprised to see more CRA audits performed. The Federal government is looking to extract more income tax revenue from private corporations.

The rules are increasingly complex. Entrepreneurs will be spending more time dealing with more punitive income tax rules and income tax audits. All of this is designed by Ottawa for private corporations to pay more income tax. It ignores the investments small business makes. Creating jobs and making capital investments allows small business to contribute in many ways to the Canadian economy. This is aside from paying income tax.

Small business Canada tax: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company under attack because of tax obligations or for other reasons. Is your company in need of restructuring to get debt relief?

The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience people and companies in financial trouble. If your company is in need of a corporate restructuring proposal debt settlement plan, we have the experience to end your stress and pain and return you and your company to a healthy productive pain-free condition.

Our approach for each case is to develop a solution where Starting Over, Starting Now happens. This starts the moment you meet with us. You’re simply one call away from taking the necessary actions to return to leading a healthy and well-balanced problem-free life. Call us today for your free appointment.

Full disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion. This blog should not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADA BANKING INFO COLLECTION: YOUR EXPECTATIONS VS REALITY ACCORDING TO JUSTIN TRUDEAU

Canada banking info collection: Introduction

On October 29, 2018, the Hon. Candice Bergen (Portage– Lisgar, CPC), stood in Parliament during Question Period. She talked to troubling reports this previous weekend that Statistics Canada was taking part in Canada banking info collection without the consent of the people whose info was being asked for.

Statistics Canada notified financial institutions, charge card businesses as well as credit reporting companies that it anticipates them to turn over individual financial information of a minimum of half a million Canadians without their consent or authorization. Financial institutions will not be able to tell their customers about the government demand for their financial transactions.

The noticeable issue is, that with the lengthy history of federal government personal privacy violations, Canadians are appropriately stressed over both the collection as well as the security of their individual economic deals. Ms. Bergen needed to know why the Liberals are accumulating the individual information of Canada without telling them.

Canada banking info collection: PM Justin Trudeau reacts

Our PM reacted by stating that the federal government is ensuring that the individual information of Canadians is secured. Stats Canada will certainly make use of the anonymized information for analytical functions only. No details will be revealed.

He stated that he understands (which is a way of repeating rumours or hearsay, or worse, that he truly does not understand whatsoever) that Statistics Canada is proactively involved with the Privacy Commissioner’s office, to make sure Canadians’ financial details stays safeguarded and private. High-grade and prompt information is important to guaranteeing that federal government programs stay pertinent as well as efficient for Canadians.

Canada banking info collection: Ms. Bergen had not been pleased, and neither ought to we

Ms. Bergen responded that the Liberal federal government strategies to get access to the individual details of Canadians without their knowing about it or permission. This consists of details like payments, internet purchases, charge card purchases, cash withdrawals and e-transfers between members of a family.

She wants to know if the Prime Minister will do the right thing. Will he guarantee Canadians that this invasion into their lives will be stopped?

Canada banking info collection: PM Justin Trudeau reacts by attempting to fault the Conservatives

Our PM reacted by stating that Canadians appropriately expect that federal government agencies like Statistics Canada will collaborate with the Privacy Commissioner. He said that Stats Canada will make certain that Canadians’ exclusive lives are shielded. Good words up until we hear that CRA obtained accessibility to the info, or even worse, cyberpunks!

Then for the good part. PM Trudeau said to the House of Commons and all Canadians that it was the Conservative federal government that selected to end the long-form census as a method of protecting an individuals’ exclusive info. So our PM is saying that in some way our private financial transactions is a straight substitute for basic analytical demographics? I don’t think so.

PM Justin Trudeau after that doubled down by stating that the Conservatives’ assaults on information and privacy continue.

Canada banking info collection: Mr. Alain Rayes (Richmond– Arthabaska, CPC)

Mr. Alain Rayes also participated. He repeated that Canadians expect the federal government to secure their private details, yet the Liberals wish to gain access to private information on 500,000 Canadians without their approval. They intend to consider loan repayments, ATM withdrawals, credit card transactions, financial institution money transfers and social insurance numbers.

Exactly how can the Prime Minister warrant these activities, which are plainly an offence of Canadians’ personal privacy?

Canada banking info collection: Blah, blah, blah.

Prime Minister Trudeau responded with more of the same. He said again the government will constantly make sure (a warranty?) that the individual information of Canadians is safeguarded. He said that Stats Canada will make use of the anonymized information only for analytical goals. No details will be revealed (does analytical purposes only include analysis by Canada Revenue Agency?).

He repeated that Statistics Canada is proactively involved with the Privacy Commissioner’s workplace on this task and is dealing with it to make certain Canadians’ info continues to be secured and private.

My personal view is that the primary federal government program that would certainly most take advantage of understanding my private financial information is the income tax collection system in Canada!

Canada banking info collection: The law

The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (S.C. 2000, c. 5) (PIPEDA), Canada’s federal private sector privacy legislation, was specifically amended on the issue of privacy. Schedule I of Section 5 of PIPEDA states that:

“4.3 Principle 3 – Consent
The knowledge and consent of the individual are required for the collection, use, or disclosure of personal information, except where inappropriate.” (emphasis added).

What is one of the exceptions?

4.3 Principle 3 – Consent
“Note: In certain circumstances personal information can be collected, used, or disclosed without the knowledge and consent of the individual. For example, legal, medical, or security reasons may make it impossible or impractical to seek consent. When information is being collected for the detection and prevention of fraud or for law enforcement, seeking the consent of the individual might defeat the purpose of collecting the information.”

So, looking at the exceptions, this only bolsters my hunch. I am convinced this is not only to evaluate the viability and effectiveness of existing social programs. Rather, it will be used to evaluate and amend the effectiveness of tax investigation programs. This will provide direct new information to the Canada Revenue Agency to bolster current and start new investigations. That is why the information is being collected without Canadians’ consent to invade their privacy.

Canada banking info collection: May I have this dance?

Justin Trudeau just kept dancing and blaming Conservatives. This new invasion of privacy really doesn’t have anything to do directly with insolvency. However, if I am correct in my guess, and the information is going to be used by CRA, then it may well.

People may very well have engaged in tax evasion. I, of course, do not condone it. Criminal charges aside, Canadians who evade taxes and get caught will now have a huge income tax bill to pay. Many won’t be able to.

There will be many high tax debtors who will not be able to afford a voluntary payment with CRA. Such a voluntary payment plan will need you to pay your original income tax debt. You will not get any reduction in all penalties and interest. So you will be paying in full to Her Majesty. For those who will not be able to afford such a voluntary payment plan, bankruptcy is definitely not your first option. You would have to look at a debt settlement restructuring proposal as a first choice. Bankruptcy should be your last option.

Canada banking info collection: What about you?

If you have received legal advice that you don’t really have a case, or you can’t afford to fight it out in Court or pay the income tax debt that renders you insolvent, then you need the help of a professional trustee.

The Ira Smith Team has years of experience of negotiating with CRA on behalf of tax debtors. If you are an individual person and owe CRA and your other creditors, other than for any loans secured by your home, less than $250,000, you can enter into a consumer proposal debt settlement plan. If you owe more or are a corporation, we can still negotiate with CRA and restructure you with a restructuring proposal debt settlement plan.

Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, recover your money and move on to the next investment opportunity.

In conclusion, call us today for your free consultation.canada banking info collection ira smith trustee

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: SADLY IN E-COMMERCE TAXLAND

corporate bankruptcy in canadaCorporate bankruptcy in Canada: Introduction

A brand-new report from PwC Canada discloses that in 2018, Canadians anticipate spending an average of $1,563, up 6.7% over last year. Men are expected outspend women by almost $400. That got me to start thinking about what the most complex issue for corporate bankruptcy in Canada is when an online business fails?

The report finds that the majority of Canadians still prefer the in-store experience. Nearly two-thirds consider brick-and-mortar retail for their primary holiday season shopping. The rest is online shopping. Unsurprisingly, most millennials (51%) think of online purchasing first, which is in line with United States consumers overall (50%).

E-commerce, like any other industry, has its startups and more mature companies. There will be winners and losers. The fulfilment of online digital products is done online. The fulfilment of physical goods orders bought online more often than not will be done by a third party. That third party may not necessarily be fulfilling orders from Canada.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: The most complex issue for an e-commerce business, IMO

With that said, the retail vendor’s inventory, computer hardware and software value are relatively easy to determine. But to my way of thinking, the #1 issue for corporate online vendors, both solvent and viable or insolvent and not viable, is the area of sales tax.

In attempting to abide by tax laws for your e-business, you might find yourself falling down the rabbit-hole, going through the looking glass, and attending a Mad Tea-Party.

Sound judgment, logic, and fairness never did apply totally to the field of taxation, however, this is specifically true of e-commerce deals.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: Canada Customs Welcomes You to Canada!

Considering that I’m situated in Canada, let’s start here. To keep things simpler, but certainly not simple, I will review this issue strictly from a Federal tax collection perspective, i.e. Harmonized Sales Tax (HST).

Canada has what you may call a nationwide sales tax or a value included tax (VAT). This Goods and Services Tax (GST) of seven percent is applicable to lots of Canadian transactions.

Not just is it critical to identify whether a taxable sale was made in Canada or not, but also where in Canada. If it was made (or deemed to be made) in any of the HST provinces, a higher rate applies. This is due to the fact that those provinces have allowed Canada to gather their provincial sales taxes for them, as follows:

 

ProvinceHST % rate
New Brunswick15
Newfoundland and Labrador15
Nova Scotia15
Ontario13
Prince Edward Island15


Each province and territory has its own guidelines. Ontario charges 8 percent retail sales tax on numerous common internet deals whereas Alberta has no provincial sales tax.

Obviously, this is just scratching the surface. This entire blog by necessity is an oversimplification of an extremely complicated topic. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), I would certainly require the advice of a professional tax advisor to help me through e-commerce Taxland.

Since I am not a tax professional, you should also seek the advice of a tax professional. This is merely one bankruptcy trustee’s view of the issues in the insolvency of an e-commerce business.what does a court appointed receiver doCorporate bankruptcy in Canada: When Exports Aren’t Exports!

In Canada, exports are “zero-rated” sales for GST purposes. This means that when you ship a product to someone outside Canada, you don’t charge GST. Yet, you get to claim (or subtract from the GST collected by you) all the “input tax credits” (GST that you spent for business functions) to make that export.

However, if you export items aside from physical products, beware! There are lots of mistakes to look out for.

As one example, think about digitized products that you may offer from Canadian sites, such as e-books, downloadable software application, or subscriptions to a material. You would be considered to be selling “intangible personal property”. Unless your item is also thought about “copyright” (such as software or e-books that you produced or have gotten the rights for), you will need to charge GST. The reason, according to the Canada Revenue Agency, is that it could be utilized inside Canada, even if it isn’t.

Say you sold a subscription for accessing digitized content (from various sources) on your Canadian site to a client in the United States. Given that there are no restrictions regarding where the intangible personal property might be used, and the property is not considered copyright (nor the provision of a service), the American client goes through GST, even if he never comes to Canada.

Strangely, the same logic doesn’t apply when an American buys a routine book (or an automobile) which he could bring into Canada with him and utilize here. It holds true that it is much easier for Canada to assess such products at the border than in the online world. However, I have not heard of any cases of Americans being taxed on the cars and trucks or books they bring with them when they come to reside in Canada for a part of the year.

As a Canadian registrant, one way you might legally avoid this ridiculous March Hare is to clearly mention on your website and invoice that utilize of such intangible personal effects in Canada is restricted (or requires an extra charge and the payment of GST).

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: When imports Aren’t imports

Goods shipped to Canada are subject to GST on importation. Such tax is often assessed at the border. What if you are a Canadian registered for GST, selling to a Canadian customer but your provider is in a foreign country?

Pretend that your Canadian consumer has bought a book from you from your Canadian website. Your dropship supplier is located in the United States and is signed up for GST. You send your order to the American business, and they, in turn, ship the book for you (total with Customs Declaration and their GST Business Number).

Since they paid the GST, you wouldn’t think you would need to charge it again, would you? “Wrong!”, smiles the Cheshire cat. Since you are a registrant located in Canada, you need to charge and remit the GST. But you are entitled to input tax credits, aren’t you? In many cases, the answer is “No”.

It might be very tough for you to satisfy the documentary and other technical requirements. As an example, it is not uncommon for American providers to absolutely refuse to provide an invoice breaking down the GST or to enable you to be the importer of record. This complicates their life unnecessarily and they just don’t require the aggravation.

There are easing tax provisions covering drop shipping, sales agencies, and other situations. In most cases, sadly, the most practical option is to permit the tax to be paid twice.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: When you are subject to tax where you’re not subject to tax

It makes sense that countries impose a tax on sales and earnings made in their own jurisdiction. Does it make sense for Germany to tax sales made in the United States?

Starting July 1, 2003, the European Union actually did just that by enforcing an online sales tax.

This implies that if somebody from England buys an e-book from somebody in the United States, the American should submit this tax. Naturally, If the sale was to someone in Germany, the tax rate would be more complicated.

The reasoning behind this is as follows: Since countries can’t gather sales tax on internet deals at their borders, the only method they can collect it (other than a self-assessment system) is with an online sales tax. Even more, it is claimed that companies in the European Union suffer a significant competitive disadvantage due to the fact that they need to gather Value Added Tax but others don’t.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: But that isn’t all


So that is just a “scratching of the surface” description of the issue for Canadian companies selling online when it comes to HST. But if the company is insolvent, and will go into either receivership or bankruptcy, the story gets worse.

For every insolvent company in receivership, an HST liability is a trust claim against the assets of the company. So in a liquidation, the HST liability would have to be paid before a secured creditor, normally a chartered bank, recovers any money. What this means for the owner(s) who guaranteed the bank debt, is that they have additional exposure for any shortfall of the bank debt by the amount of the HST liability.

In a bankruptcy though, the HST liability is not a trust claim, but rather an unsecured claim. So, the good news is that it does not come ahead of the bank debt the owners have probably guaranteed payment for. However, the bad news is that the HST liability is always a Director liability. So in a bankruptcy, there are always insufficient funds to pay off the unsecured creditors 100%. So, the Directors of the bankrupt company will be on the hook for any unremitted HST.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company, either a traditional retailer, online retailer or both, experiencing financial difficulties? If yes, call the Ira Smith Team. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door.

The earlier you contact us, the more options we will have to implement. Whether it is a corporate restructuring or personal debt settlement through a consumer proposal, the goal is to avoid bankruptcy. However, if bankruptcy turns out to be the best option, we can assist there too.

You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, ending the pain and stress you are feeling forever. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for your free consultation.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TRANSFER OF PROPERTY UNDER S.160 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT: PROPERTY ISN’T PROPERTY

transfer of property under s.160 of the income tax actTransfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: Introduction

Last August, Rudy Giuliani said, “truth isn’t truth”. Today I want to explore an important issue we come across many times when dealing with income tax debt driven insolvency files. That is the transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act (Canada). The decision of The Honourable Justice David E. Graham of the Federal Tax Court of Canada released July 6, 2018, gives rise to a variation of Rudy Giuliani’s comment to say – property isn’t property.

The case was an appeal by Aitchison Professional Corporation (“APC”) of an income tax assessment issued by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”). The case is Aitchison Professional Corporation v. The Queen, 2018 DTC 1101 (Tax Court of Canada).

Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: The participants

APC is a law firm operating under the name Aitchison Law Office. The creation of APC happened in December 2003 by 3 people: James Aitchison (“James”) and his two daughters, Kelly Aitchison (“Kelly) and Laurie Aitchison (“Laurie”). All three are Ontario lawyers.

In 2012, the Minister of National Revenue assessed APC for nearly $2.1 million pursuant to s. 160 of the Income Tax Act. The assessment stated that James had actually moved property worth even more than $3 million to APC for little or no value.

There was no disagreement that, at the time of the claimed transfers, James owed practically $2.1 million to the CRA. James had not paid any income tax since 1992. His tax obligation, along with interest and penalty, remains outstanding.

The main concern, in this case, was whether James moved property to APC. If he did, it would have to be valued. CRA claimed the property James transferred to APC is his right to invoice for legal services.

As indicated above, CRA’s position was that the right to invoice for legal services was the property transferred. It is interesting to note that they did not claim that either the work-in-process, the accounts receivable, or both, derived from James’ work, was the property transferred. In my view, this was a fatal error in their case.

The Court considered subsection 248( 1) of the Income Tax Act and in particular, His Honour considered the definition of the word property under the Income Tax Act is “a right of any kind whatever”. In his decision, His Honour stated the distinction that “property” has a wide meaning, but not every little thing of value is property.

Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: The Judge’s words


The Judge found that:

  1. CRA had problems verbalizing specifically how James’ “right to invoice for legal services” is property.
  2. He thought CRA was attempting to fit a square peg into a round hole.
  3. CRA was attempting to take something that is clearly a service and trying to make it fit into the definition of property.
  4. CRA’s position is faulty. They argued that James carried out work for APC neither as an independent contractor nor as an employee. CRA did not provide any evidence as to what they believed the actual arrangement was.
  5. Notwithstanding it is prudent for a company to have an employment agreement with all of its employees, none of James, Kelly or Laurie had an employment agreement with APC. However, CRA accepts that Kelly and Laurie are employees of APC but do not recognize James the same way.
  6. James was either an employee of APC with no salary or, an unpaid volunteer. The Judge held that it was not necessary for him to determine which one it was.
  7. It is an employee’s right to be paid. If the evidence was that James was entitled to a salary but he waived it, then he would have found that the waived salary was property transferred to APC. However, this was not the case.
  8. CRA, to their peril, did not argue that James was a sole practitioner, transferring his work-in-process and/or accounts receivable to APC.

Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: Saulnier v. Royal Bank of Canada

The intersection of insolvency and the issue of a transfer of property under s. 160 of the Income Tax Act is an important one. Although it did not help them, CRA referred to the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Saulnier v. Royal Bank of Canada, [2008] 3 SCR 166, 2008 SCC 58 (CanLII). That decision was in a bankruptcy case, dealing with the transfer of fishing licenses.

In that case, the Receiver and Trustee applied to the Court for the authorization to sell its interest in the fishing licenses. Due to an opposition, the Trustee went to Court seeking approval of the sale. The trial judge decided that the fishing licenses was a property that could be sold. The Court of Appeal agreed with the trial judge.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal of the Court of Appeal’s decision, upholding the trial judge’s finding, that the fishing licenses was property under s. 160 of the Income Tax Act. The interesting thing about that case is that the fishing licenses were considered as property mainly because of the wide sweeping definition of property contained in another federal statute, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (“BIA”).

In the APC case, the Judge did not find the Saulnier case persuasive. The reason was the matter before him did not involve the BIA. In this case, it was only the Income Tax Act. Rather, the Judge relied upon a different case decided in the Federal Court of Appeal, Manrell v. Canada, [2003] 3 FC 727, 2003 FCA 128 (CanLII).

As explained by the Federal Court of Appeal in Manrell:

“[25] It is implicit in this notion of “property” that “property” must have or entail some exclusive right to make a claim against someone else. A general right to do something that anyone can do, or a right that belongs to everyone, is not the “property” of anyone . . . . . .

[50] The phrase . . . “a right of any kind whatever”, like the word “property”, has a very broad meaning. But it is not a word of infinite meaning. It cannot include every conceivable right. It cannot be given a meaning that would extend the reach of the Income Tax Act beyond what Parliament has conceived”.

Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: The verdict and the Judge’s conflict

Based on the evidence, His Honour found that James didn’t transfer property to APC by working for APC for free. The Judge also awarded costs to APC.

However, the Judge gave his personal view of his decision in the judgment. He felt that this was a horrible outcome. Furthermore, he commented that James had not paid a cent of income tax since being discharged from his bankruptcy in 1992. The Honourable Justice David E. Graham did not feel this was a just result, based on his interpretation of the law.

So that is why I paraphrase Rudy Giuliani to say – property isn’t property!

Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: Is CRA pursuing you?

Is CRA pursuing you because of transferred property to you? If so, you need an income tax lawyer. However, if you have received legal advice that you don’t really have a case, or you can’t afford to fight it out in Court and the debt renders you insolvent, then you need the help of a professional trustee.

The Ira Smith Team has years of experience of negotiating with CRA on behalf of tax debtors. If you are an individual person and owe CRA and your other creditors, other than for any loans secured by your home, less than $250,000, you can enter into a consumer proposal debt settlement plan. If you owe more or are a corporation, we can still negotiate with CRA and restructure you with a restructuring proposal debt settlement plan.

Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, recover your money and move on to the next investment opportunity.

In conclusion, call us today for your free consultation.

Special thanks to Ian MacInnis of Fogler Rubinoff for bringing this decision to my attention and inspiring me to write this blog.

what does a court appointed receiver do

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL OR BANKRUPTCY: LIST OF MY CREDITORS FOR CONSUMER PROPOSAL

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: Introduction

We always perform an initial free consultation with people thinking about filing either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. People ask me, what if I can’t create a list of all my creditors?

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: A refresher

If you are a regular reader of my Brandon’s Blog, then you know the difference between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy. For those of you who need a brief refresher, both the consumer proposal and bankruptcy are different processes under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). To file either one, the person must be insolvent. That means that they cannot meet their liabilities as they become due and if they liquidated all their assets, it would not produce enough cash to pay of all the debts.

Consumer proposal – This is a restructuring process to avoid bankruptcy for any person who owes $250,000 or less, not including any mortgage or line of credit debts secured by a mortgage registered against their home. The purpose of a consumer proposal is to AVOID bankruptcy.

Division I proposal – This is a restructuring process for people who owe too much money to fit under the consumer proposal rules. A company can also reorganize under this section of the BIA.

Bankruptcy – If a person cannot successfully carry out a restructuring proposal but requires relief from their crushing debts, then they would file for bankruptcy. In this process, subject to certain provincial exemptions, you would hand over your assets to the licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee). The Trustee would then sell the assets for cash, call for your creditors to file a proof of claim with the Trustee and then distribute the money according to the rules of the BIA.

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: A common question

Regardless of whether the person is thinking about a consumer proposal, Division I proposal or bankruptcy, a common question is: (i) what if I don’t know who all my creditors are; or (ii) what if I leave off some creditors from my sworn statement of affairs; or (iii) do I have to list all of my creditors?

Some of our clients come to us, tell us that they don’t even know who their creditors are. Sometimes it’s been such a long time that they don’t even receive the bills or notices anymore and their memories aren’t good enough. So here is an easy hack so that you can put together a list of most, if not all, of your creditors.

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: The easy hack

We will add CRA to your statement of affairs. If you don’t know how much you owe them, we will put them in showing either “$1” or “Unknown” as a placeholder

Every person must file an income tax return. Most people know whether they are current or not in their tax filings. So Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) should always be listed.

CRA cannot file an accurate proof of claim if you have not been current in your income tax filings. So we tell everyone to file all outstanding tax returns and provide us with a copy before filing either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy.

Pull your credit report

You may obtain your credit report from either Equifax or TransUnion. Your credit report will list all those who you owe money to and who wanted to update their files with your new credit score. We will add those creditors to your statement of affairs also.

Check your mail and save the bills

No doubt your creditors will keep mailing your statements. Even if all it says is balance forward unpaid, or is from a collection agency or lawyer, it will list their address, their name and the amount they say you owe. We will put that information on your statement of affairs.

Your lawyer can easily do an execution search. This search will show who holds a judgement against you and some basic details. We will add those details to your statement of affairs.

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: The test is due diligence, not perfection

The test is, did you use your best efforts to identify all of your creditors on your sworn statement of affairs. It is very rare that any of our clients know exactly how much they owe. It is normal for the amounts according to the sworn statement of affairs to be different from the proofs of claim filed. That is OK.

Sophisticated large creditors pay the Superintendent of Bankruptcy to get a download of insolvency filings on a regular basis. They match the names of those who have filed against their client database. If a client shows up that they did not have listed as having filed, they contact the Trustee. Once they contact us, we send them a creditor’s package. They will then be able to further check their records and if owed money, can file a proof of claim.

We had a client who said they mistakenly left off a few creditors in their proposal filing. Those creditors found out. All those creditors had judgements against the person who filed the restructuring proposal. These creditors were very mad at being left off the list, although they did not suffer any damages.

It made it much tougher for the person and us to get a deal struck with all the creditors. At the end of the day, a deal was struck and the person is currently performing and is currently making their payments under the restructuring proposal. The anger of these creditors rubbed off on creditors who would have otherwise been happy with a lesser proposal. So in the end, leaving these creditors off the initial sworn statement of affairs just cost them more money!

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: Corporate filings

In terms of a corporation filing either a restructuring proposal or bankruptcy, we normally don’t incur the same issues. A company will have an accounting department and/or an accounting system. They will be able to produce a list of creditors. The amounts shown may not be current, but the list of names and addresses will be reasonably accurate.

However, the easy hack I described above also works for a company.

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: More free stuff

I hope that you have found my free easy hack useful to answer the question of how to create a list of all my creditors. You can use it if you wish to do proper budgeting, which everyone should do. You don’t have to wait until you are insolvent!! With proper budgeting, you can avoid insolvency and therefore bankruptcy.

If you have too much debt and need someone to talk to about consumer proposal vs bankruptcy, call the Ira Smith Team. We will listen to your issues and provide you with our thoughts and recommendations for free. That’s right; a free initial consultation. So why not? All you have to lose is your stress. We will advise you whether or not we think you are a candidate for either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. If we feel you can solve your financial problems without an insolvency process, we will tell you straight.

The Ira Smith Team understands the stress you are under and the pain it is causing you and your loved ones. We can eliminate your pain. I guarantee that you will start feeling better right away after our free initial consultation. Taking action after that will put you on the right path, Starting Over Starting Now.

consumer proposal or bankruptcy

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

MORTGAGE LENDING CRITERIA SELF EMPLOYED: BIGGEST MYTH MAY BE RIGHT

320efcd005100f3ee3522fefba70f917

Mortgage lending criteria self employed: Introduction

Mortgagees rely upon the provincial land registry system to decide what obligations are secured against real property and in what order of priority. When it comes to mortgage lending criteria self employed, a recent Court decision has proven that when it comes to a self employed person’s mortgage, if there is a deemed trust claim by Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), you cannot solely rely upon the registry system.

Mortgage lending criteria self employed: The Court case

The Court case I am referring to is Canada v. Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2018 FC 538 (CanLII) which was heard in Federal Court. In this matter, the Crown on behalf of Her Majesty looked to recover funds Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) obtained from one of its clients who repaid a loan secured by a home mortgage upon the sale of his house. The client was a self employed person.

The Crown claimed that there was an outstanding deemed trust claim for collected but unremitted GST. The Crown further claimed that the proceeds from the sale of the home collected by TD was subject to the CRA deemed trust claim, was property of Her Majesty and that TD had to pay it over. TD did not take the position that it had a registered first charge and can keep the funds. It argued that as a “bona fide purchaser for value” it is not subject to the deemed trust claim and does not have to pay over the money.

Mortgage lending criteria self employed: The undisputed facts

The borrower carried on a landscaping business as a sole proprietor. In 2007 and 2008, he collected and did not remit GST totaling $67,854. TD held both a registered mortgage and a home equity line of credit (HELOC) against the borrower’s home. The home was sold in 2011. The borrower repaid the mortgage and HELOC in full from the sale of the home.

Almost two years later in April 2013, CRA made demand on TD for repayment of $97,327, revised in 2015 by amended demand for $67,854. TD refused to pay.

Mortgage lending criteria self employed: What the Court said

The Federal Court reviewed the legislation. The Court decided that the funds paid to TD were proceeds of sale of his property. Therefore, it is covered by the deemed trust CRA claim. So the Court found that the requirements of Section 222 of the Excise Tax Act were met.

The Court agreed with the Crown’s position that the deemed trust Canada claim covered the debtor’s house. This is in spite of there was no registration on title and that the Bank had proper valid registrations. The Court further agreed that according to Section 222(3) of the Income Tax Act, the Bank has an obligation to pay over the proceeds it received which were impressed with the deemed trust.

The Judge disagreed with TD’s position. TD stated that the payment of proceeds only applied if a secured creditor enforces its security. This was not the case in this situation. The Court further disagreed with TD’s position that it was a bona fide purchaser for value. The Court agreed that money could be considered property available in such a defence. However, it stated that a secured creditor facing a deemed trust claim could not use that defence. TD also offered certain public policy issues in its defence, but the Court was not swayed.

TD is liable to pay over the amount of $67,854, interest and costs.

Mortgage lending criteria self employed: So what is the biggest myth?

The biggest myth is as follows. To find out what claims against the real property, you only have to perform a title search.

This is an important decision for mortgage lending criteria self employed people. Now TD is in the position of having to make demand on and possibly sue in 2018 its borrower who ostensibly repaid the loan in full in 2011! It would be suing as an unsecured creditor.

What this means for mortgagees is that they can no longer just accept funds from a self employed person who wishes to pay off a loan, be it a mortgage or other type of loan, from the sale of property. It also cannot merely accept funds to pay off a loan from a self employed individual’s business bank account.

Mortgage lending criteria self employed: So what is the fix?

Rather, the lender also must now get a true copy of a statement from CRA showing that there are no amounts owing by the self employed person on account of either HST or source deductions as the employer of others.

Lenders would also be well advised to add language to their loan term sheet, loan documents and any other documents issued when a loan is repaid. The new language would be an attestation by the self employed borrower that there are no amounts owing to any government authority that would be considered or deemed to be a trust claim.

Further, the language would have to make it clear that in the event there were any such amounts owing, even if the loan was fully repaid, the lender had the right to demand and sue the borrower for any amounts proven to be a deemed trust claim that the lender was required to pay over to the government at some later date.

No doubt this case will be relied upon by Her Majesty when the Callidus Capital Corporation v. Her Majesty the Queen case is heard by the Supreme Court of Canada in November 2018

Mortgage lending criteria self employed: Does your business need HST and source deductions you collected to stay afloat?

Does your business need HST and source deductions you collected to stay afloat? Can your business not afford to pay over to the government deemed trust claim amounts collected? If so, then your business is in trouble and requires restructuring immediately. You need the advice of a professional trustee now!

The Ira Smith Team have decades of experience in complex corporate and other business financial restructurings. We first look at how we can reorganize and restructure your business to rescue it. You are worried because your business is facing significant financial challenges. The stress placed upon you because of your business’s financial challenges are enormous. We understand your pain points, and we know how to relieve them for you.

If you or your company cannot survive without a restructuring, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. NOW for a free consultation. You are just one phone call away from getting back on the road to financial health and reducing your stress levels, Starting Over, Starting Now.mortgage lending criteria self employed

 

Call a Trustee Now!