Categories
Brandon Blog Post

COMPANY IS BANKRUPT: A COMPLETE GUIDE TO BANKRUPTCY SALES FOR BUYERS

An Introduction to Company Is Bankrupt Asset Sales

On May 13 of this year, I published Brandon’s Blog titled: NAVIGATING THE STALKING HORSE OFFER LEGAL MAZE: THE TOOL SHED BREWING BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION EXPERIENCE. This week I am expanding on that specific Brandon’s Blog to comment on bankruptcy asset sales in general.

For anyone interested in strategic acquisitions and investment opportunities, exploring bankruptcy sales can offer a unique avenue to acquire assets at distressed pricing. In this Brandon’s Blog, I delve into the intricacies of bankruptcy sales, particularly focusing on buying assets when a company is bankrupt in Ontario, to provide you with a comprehensive understanding of the process and considerations involved.

Types of Bankruptcy

Let’s embark on this journey together to unlock the potential of acquiring assets through bankruptcy sales. When I use the term “bankruptcy sale”, I mean all the various types of bankruptcy or insolvency processes. It could be in the context of a sale of assets by a court-appointed receiver or even the company that has filed for restructuring under bankruptcy protection and is looking to sell assets out of the ordinary course of business.

For this Brandon’s Blog, you can consider it to mean any court-supervised insolvency process, be it out of a sale of assets when the company is bankrupt or in receivership under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). The issues are the same be it a bankruptcy or receivership.

When delving into the realm of bankruptcy sales, one encounters a landscape that offers both challenges and opportunities. The allure of acquiring distressed assets at potentially discounted prices is undeniable. Picture this: a sales process setting where bidders, including yourself, have the chance to engage in a fair competition, armed with the ability to conduct due diligence and submit bids for coveted assets. Such is the essence of a bankruptcy sale.

A bankruptcy sale isn’t just a run-of-the-mill transaction; it is a meticulously structured process governed by legal frameworks and case law. The principles applied from the leading case law act as a guiding light, laying down the procedures for sales that occur outside the typical course of business. It sets the stage for a structured process where the highest or best bid, subject to stakeholder approval, court approval, or both, emerges victorious.

The pivotal role of court approval in sale transactions cannot be overstated. It serves as the ultimate checkpoint, ensuring that the sale is conducted by the law and safeguarding the interests of all parties involved. Court approval is not merely a stamp of approval. The Court will only add its layer of legitimacy and finality to the transaction after it is satisfied that all legal standards have been met, assuring buyers of the validity of their acquisitions and unsuccessful buyers that the process was fair and transparent.

In the realm of bankruptcy sales, one must navigate the terrain with caution. While the prospect of purchasing assets free and clear of all creditor claims and liens is enticing, there are caveats to consider. Assets are typically sold in an “as-is, where-is” condition, with limited assurances from the licensed insolvency trustee who is the seller. The pace of proceedings is expedited, leaving little room for post-closing recourse or exhaustive due diligence.

Balancing these nuances is crucial for bidders eyeing strategic acquisitions in the bankruptcy sales arena. It requires a blend of foresight, adaptability, and a keen understanding of the intricacies of the process. Join me as we unravel the layers of bankruptcy sales and explore the dynamic landscape governing these kinds of transactions in Canada.

Gavel resting on bankruptcy sales documents in a courtroom.
company is bankrupt

Benefits and Downsides of Court-Supervised Sales When a Company is Bankrupt

As someone deeply involved in the field, I often find myself exploring the nuances of court-supervised sales, delving into their advantages and potential pitfalls. Let’s take a closer look at the intricacies of this unique opportunity.

Advantages of Purchasing Assets through Court-Supervised Sales

When I consider the benefits of acquiring assets from court-supervised insolvency process sales, one key advantage stands out – the opportunity to acquire assets at potentially distressed pricing. This presents a unique chance to make strategic acquisitions at potentially lower costs, providing a competitive edge in the market.

Moreover, the level playing field offered by court-supervised sales allows bidders to engage in fair competition, conduct thorough due diligence albeit in an environment where as much information as you would like may not be available, and submit bids directly to the licensed insolvency trustee. The ability to purchase assets free and clear of the company’s financial obligations and the secured debts and unsecured debts, with the transaction receiving court approval, provides a sense of finality and security that is highly valuable in such transactions.

Limitations and Challenges in Court-Supervised Sales

However, in the realm of Court-supervised sales, you need to be acutely aware of the limitations that come with this process. Assets in bankruptcy sales are always sold “as-is, where-is,” with such limited representations and warranties from the licensed insolvency trustee seller, there are essentially none. This, coupled with the fact that the licensed insolvency trustee was not the operator of the business utilizing those assets where the company was bankrupt. This makes due diligence both critical and yet challenging. The expedited timeline and lack of post-closing recourse further adds complexity to the transaction.

Additionally, since the company is bankrupt the buyer needs to bid without the safety net of due diligence and financing contingencies, which can be a daunting prospect. Balancing these limitations against the potential benefits requires a keen eye for detail and a strategic mindset.

Balancing Pros and Cons for Strategic Bidders

For strategic bidders, finding the equilibrium between the pros and cons of court-supervised sales is crucial. Evaluating the cost-benefit ratio, understanding the bidding process, and complying with the court-approved terms and conditions of sale are all essential steps in the process.

Navigating this complex landscape requires a strategic approach. By weighing these factors thoughtfully, the buyer must aim to make informed decisions that lead to successful and accretive acquisitions through the court-supervised sales process.

Company is Bankrupt: Tactical Considerations for Potential Bidders

If you are someone considering participating in a bankruptcy sale, understand the unique opportunity it presents to potentially acquire assets at favourable pricing. This process allows you to compete on a level playing field with other bidders, conducting due diligence and submitting bids directly to the licensed insolvency trustee.

One significant advantage of a bankruptcy sale is the ability to purchase assets free and clear of all creditor claims and liens, as finalized through court approval. The money you pay as the winning bidder stands in place of the assets. However, there are essential aspects to consider before diving into this opportunity.

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Participating in the Sale Process: Before getting involved, you need to evaluate the cost versus benefit of participating in the sale process. Understanding the potential risks and rewards is crucial for making informed decisions.

Key Elements of the Bidding Procedures: To make a successful bid, you must ensure that it meets all the necessary criteria and complies with the bidding procedures governing the bankruptcy sale. This requires attention to detail and a clear understanding of the requirements.

Strategies for Successful Participation in Bankruptcy Sales: To navigate the bankruptcy sale process effectively, you need to develop strategies that can help you stand out among other bidders. This involves setting clear goals, assessing the competition, and being prepared to act decisively.

By considering these tactical aspects carefully, you can position yourself for a successful experience in a bankruptcy sale. It’s about weighing the pros and cons, understanding the process, and strategizing effectively to make the most out of this unique opportunity.

Gavel resting on bankruptcy sales documents in a courtroom.
company is bankrupt

Company is Bankrupt: What the Court Requires

Being involved as a bidder in bankruptcy sales can be both exciting and daunting, laden with unique challenges and opportunities. Let’s delve into the intricacies of what the Court requires for the legal process to approve a particular sales process and sale of assets when the company is bankrupt or in receivership.

The Soundair principles

The Soundair principles are a collection of lawful standards developed by the Court of Appeal for Ontario in 1991 in the case of Royal Bank of Canada v. Soundair Corp., 1991 CanLII 2727 (ON CA). These principles are followed by all Canadian courts.

The Soundair principles are aimed at creating fairness and transparency in the sale of assets throughout bankruptcy or receivership cases. Thirty-one years later, it is still the leading case in Canadian insolvency asset sales rules and regulations. These concepts guide courts in evaluating whether the sale procedure carried out by a receiver (or a trustee in bankruptcy) has been fair and suitable.

Here are the Soundair principles in detail:

Diligent Efforts to Secure the Best Price: The receiver/trustee is obliged to exert sensible efforts to secure the highest possible price for the assets for the general benefit of creditors. This entails thoroughly advertising the assets for sale, soliciting competing bids, and ensuring that prospective purchasers are provided with sufficient information to submit proper offers to purchase. The goal is to get the highest sales price possible under the circumstances, to maximize the return for the benefit of creditors.

Fairness and Integrity in the Sale Process: It is essential to give all interested parties an equivalent opportunity to join the sales process and to avoid any potential purchaser from obtaining an unreasonable edge. Transparency and impartiality are vital, and conflicts of interest cannot be tolerated.

All Stakeholders’ Interests: The receiver/trustee must look out for the interests of all parties, secured creditors and unsecured creditors, shareholders, and any other appropriate stakeholders. It is very important for the licensed insolvency trustee to avoid preference for any party and to strive for a fair equilibrium of the interests among everybody affected because the company is bankrupt.

Input from significant creditors: This is a crucial consideration for the licensed insolvency trustee. While the trustee retains the ultimate decision-making authority, it is essential to carefully weigh and consider the recommendations and preferences of major creditors. Given that these creditors will bear financial implications based on the sale outcomes, their input carries substantial significance in the decision-making process.

Application of the Soundair principles

In practice, when a sale of assets is held because the company is bankrupt or in receivership, there are two stages of court review. First, the licensed insolvency trustee needs to get approval for the actual sales process itself. Then, the Court will review the process as implemented by the licensed insolvency trustee.

The Court’s reviews are to ensure conformity with these Soundair principles. This is the case if this is not a sale at arm’s length purchaser. The court will take into consideration the following elements:

Marketing Efforts: How the assets were advertised and marketed, including the period and reach of the advertising and marketing initiatives.

Number and Quality of Offers: The variety of offers obtained and whether they reflect reasonable market price. To assist the Court in determining the reasonableness of the offers received, the Trustee must provide evidence to the Court. An independent appraisal of the assets and other market data is the normal kind of evidence usedwhat a fair valuation of the assets is.

Transparency: Whether the sale process was conducted fairly and transparently, with appropriate details provided to all possible purchasers.

Stakeholder Consultation: Whether the licensed insolvency trustee has spoken with and taken into consideration the views of significant creditors and other stakeholders.

Authorization of Sale: Whether the proposed sale is supported by the significant creditors or as a minimum, is not being opposed.

The Soundair principles assist when a company is bankrupt or in receivership, in guaranteeing that the sale of assets in an insolvency context is carried out in a fashion that maximizes value, keeps fairness, and appreciates the interests of all the major stakeholders. By adhering to these concepts, the court aims to supply confidence in the integrity and fairness of the process and protect the rights of all stakeholders.

Gavel resting on bankruptcy sales documents in a courtroom.
company is bankrupt

Company is Bankrupt: Navigating Contracts and Leases

When it comes to Court-approved sales in bankruptcy proceedings, sometimes some contractual commitments or leases are in place. Even though the company is bankrupt or in receivership, a purchaser of the assets may need some or all of those contracts or leases to make the purchasing of those assets make sense. Expressed another way, having the assets may not be enough.

Having the rights and responsibilities that come with those contracts and leases may be required. Navigating contracts and leases is a crucial aspect that requires careful consideration and strategic decision-making. Let’s delve into some key points related to this intricate process.

Options Regarding Contracts and Leases

There are 2 primary options regarding contractual commitments and leases: rejection or assignment and assumption. Each option comes with its own set of implications and considerations that need to be weighed meticulously. Making the right choice can significantly impact the outcome of the sale process and the overall success of the bankruptcy proceedings.

Practical Challenges Regarding Contracts and Leases

There are some practical challenges regarding contracts and leases as follows:

Rejection: If there are contracts or leases that a purchaser does not require, this is the simplest. The purchaser will not purchase the licensed insolvency trustee’s right, title and interest, if any, in those obligations. By not purchasing those rights, the purchaser will simply not deal with them. The licensed insolvency trustee, acting as the receiver or bankruptcy trustee, will either ignore them or will formally reject them. Any rejection or repudiation will occur as part of the sales process.

Any claims by the party that contracted with the debtor company will be an unsecured claim caught in the court-supervised insolvency process as against the company and therefore, as against the pool of money obtained through the sales process. The Court will ultimately approve the distribution of funds by the Trustee, so the lessor/contracting party will be out of the money if the secured creditors suffer a shortfall.

Assumption and Assignment: One major challenge is determining whether contracts and leases can be assigned to the purchaser. In many cases, contracts contain anti-assignment clauses that prohibit transfer without consent from the other party.

Termination Rights: Contracts and leases might have termination clauses that can be triggered by the insolvency or the sale itself, complicating the continuity of these agreements.

Negotiating Consents: Obtaining necessary consents from counterparties to contracts and leases can be time-consuming and uncertain. Counterparties may demand changes to terms or additional payments as a condition for their consent. These negotiations normally are in addition to the process of purchasing the assets and do not involve the licensed insolvency trustee administering the sales process because the company is bankrupt or in receivership.

Legal Challenges: Even if a Trustee can theoretically assign a contract or lease, the counterparties might contest this in court, leading to potential delays and additional legal costs.

Successfully navigating contracts and leases in Canadian insolvency court-supervised sales requires a comprehensive understanding of the legal framework, meticulous attention to detail, and strategic decision-making. By carefully evaluating the options available, addressing challenges proactively, and adhering to legal requirements, potential purchasers can enhance the efficiency and efficacy of the sale process, ultimately maximizing the value of assets and securing a successful outcome in the proceedings.

Company is Bankrupt: Considerations for Governmental Approvals and Regulatory Reviews

Certain industries are regulated under provincial or federal government licenses or approvals. Purchasing the assets when a company is bankrupt or receivership is not enough to operate the business itself. The business operations require government approval. It is of paramount importance to navigate governmental approvals and regulatory reviews. These considerations are not mere formalities but critical steps that can significantly impact the success of the sale process.

Importance of Regulatory Approvals in Bankruptcy Sales: In the realm of bankruptcy sales, regulatory approvals play a pivotal role in ensuring that the transaction complies with all necessary laws and regulations. These approvals act as safeguards to protect the public. A prudent purchaser will make such regulatory approvals a buyer’s condition to purchase the assets.

Sometimes, such as my receivership file I referenced in my stalking horse Brandon’s Blog, we purposely made it a condition that the buyer is solely responsible for obtaining the necessary regulatory approval and not obtaining it is not a reason the purchaser can rely upon to not complete the transaction. The reason we did this is because we did not want the sale of assets to be conditional on obtaining regulatory approval. In such a circumstance, the purchaser must understand this and have a high expectation that they will be approved.

Transition Services Agreements for Regulated Industries: Operating in regulated industries adds another layer of complexity to bankruptcy sales. A sophisticated purchaser will recognize that they may need a transition services agreement as a crucial mechanism to facilitate the seamless transfer of assets while adhering to industry-specific regulations and requirements. These agreements outline the terms under which services will be provided post-sale, ensuring continuity and compliance.

Navigating Foreign Purchasers and Regulatory Requirements: Dealing with foreign purchasers introduces a host of additional challenges, particularly in terms of regulatory compliance. Understanding and adhering to the specific requirements imposed by different jurisdictions is vital to the sale’s success. Navigating these regulatory landscapes demands meticulous attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of international laws. As the licensed insolvency trustee seller, it would be my preference to not sell to a foreign purchaser and have the sale hung up for a lengthy time pending the outcome of the regulator’s review of the suitability of the foreign purchaser.

Being mindful of these aspects is not just a matter of legal obligation but a strategic imperative. Failing to secure necessary approvals or overlooking regulatory nuances can derail the entire sale process, leading to potential legal repercussions and financial setbacks.

As someone immersed in the complex world of bankruptcy sales, I recognize the delicate balancing act required to maneuver through governmental approvals and regulatory reviews successfully. A purchaser needs to be informed, proactive, and meticulous in its approach, aiming to navigate these intricate processes with precision and expertise. If I must recommend a foreign purchaser in the sale of assets used in a regulated industry, I must have confidence in the purchaser’s ability to navigate the governmental approval process.

Gavel resting on bankruptcy sales documents in a courtroom.
company is bankrupt

Company is Bankrupt: Addressing Liabilities Affecting Bankruptcy Sales

It’s important to recognize the significance of addressing potential liabilities throughout the process. One key aspect that stands out is the need for thorough identification and mitigation of these liabilities, ensuring a smooth and successful acquisition. As stated above, most liabilities of the company are caught in the bankruptcy estate or receivership process.

The sales of assets vests them out of the company to the purchaser and the money obtained from the sale stands in its place. The licensed insolvency trustee must then make its recommendation to the Court for the distribution of the money as the priorities require.

However, sometimes some liabilities may on a practical level make it difficult to use the assets as an operating business, without addressing certain liabilities. Here are some essential talking points to consider:

Identification and Mitigation of Potential Liabilities: Before diving headfirst into a bankruptcy sale, it’s crucial to conduct a comprehensive review of potential liabilities associated with the assets up for acquisition. Identifying any existing or potential risks early on allows for strategic planning to mitigate these liabilities effectively.

Thorough Due Diligence and Legal Counsel Consultation: Engaging in thorough due diligence, possibly with the support of legal counsel, can provide valuable insights into the liabilities that may not be immediately apparent. Legal experts can offer guidance on navigating complex legal frameworks and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.

Understanding Exceptions to ‘Free and Clear’ Asset Sales: While the concept of purchasing assets ‘free and clear’ in a bankruptcy sale may seem straightforward, it’s essential to be aware of exceptions that could impact the transaction. Certain liabilities, such as environmental issues, may not be absolved despite the ‘free and clear’ nature of the sale. Also, the business may be reliant on one or two essential suppliers and without their cooperation, it will be impossible to operate a business utilizing those assets.

The concerns and interests of such creditors who cannot be replaced going forward in the business operations and their respective unsecured creditors’ claims must be addressed before completing the purchase of the assets.

By paying close attention to these critical aspects, potential buyers can approach bankruptcy sales with a well-rounded strategy, safeguarding their interests and minimizing potential risks. Collaborating with legal experts and conducting in-depth due diligence are pillars of success in navigating the complexities of bankruptcy sales.

Company is Bankrupt: The Insolvency Process and Sale Order Approval

When diving into the world of bankruptcy sales, there is a mix of thrill and caution that comes with the territory. It’s a realm where opportunities to acquire assets at distressed pricing collide with the need for strategic decision-making and quick actions. You see, a bankruptcy sale isn’t your run-of-the-mill transaction – it’s a structured process overseen by the Bankruptcy Court, designed to ensure fairness and transparency for all parties involved.

As I take you through the stages where the company is bankrupt, the bankruptcy process, the role of the Bankruptcy Court in sale order approval, and the key milestones in bankruptcy asset sales, you’ll start to see the intricate dance that occurs in the world of distressed asset acquisitions.

Stages of the Bankruptcy Process

Filing for Bankruptcy: It all begins with the company filing for bankruptcy (or being placed into a court-supervised receivership) overseen by the Bankruptcy Court.

Approval for the Sales Process Including the Bidding Procedures: Once the company is bankrupt or in a court-supervised receivership, the licensed insolvency trustee will seek approval for the sales process including the bidding procedures from the court, setting the stage for the asset sale process.

Marketing Assets: With the court’s approval, the licensed insolvency trustee starts marketing the assets to potential buyers, generating interest and gathering bids for the distressed assets.

Receiving Bids: Prospective buyers submit their bids, each vying for the opportunity to acquire the assets through the bankruptcy sale process.

Application to Court: The licensed insolvency trustee administering the bankruptcy or receivership process, will make its application to the Court, filing its evidence, which includes a Report to the Court explaining how the Court-approved sales process was conducted, the results of the process and the bids received, showing how the Soundair principles were adhered to and recommending a specific offer to be approved,.

Finalizing Sale with Court Approval: The sale approval order, once issued by the Bankruptcy Court, finalizes the transaction, paving the way for the transfer of assets to the successful bidder.

Each stage in the insolvency process plays a crucial role in the successful sale of distressed assets, ensuring that the interests of all stakeholders are protected and that the process remains transparent and fair.

Role of Court Resulting in the Sale Approval Order

The Court acts as the guardian of the bankruptcy or receivership process, overseeing the sale approval order and ensuring that all legal requirements and considerations are met. Its role is pivotal in maintaining the integrity of the asset sale process, providing a level playing field for prospective buyers and all stakeholders.

When a sale order is presented to the Court for approval, the court scrutinizes the terms of the transaction, ensuring that it aligns with the laws and the best interests of the parties involved. By granting the sale approval order, the court adds a layer of legitimacy and finality to the asset sale, safeguarding the rights of the buyer and seller.

Key Milestones and Deadlines in Bankruptcy Asset Sales

Deadlines are a crucial aspect of any bankruptcy or receivership asset sale, dictating the pace and efficiency of the process. Key milestones and deadlines serve as guideposts throughout the sale process, ensuring that each step is taken within the specified timeframe to maintain the momentum and integrity of the transaction.

From the initial filing for bankruptcy or receivership to the finalization of the sale order, adhering to these milestones and deadlines is essential for a smooth and successful asset sale. These markers not only provide clarity and structure to the process but also instill confidence in all parties involved, signalling a well-managed and efficient transaction.

Company is Bankrupt Conclusion: Key Takeaways for Successful Asset Acquisitions

As we wrap up our discussion on successful asset acquisitions in bankruptcy sales, let’s reflect on the pivotal points that can guide us toward making informed and strategic decisions in this unique process:

  1. Firstly, navigating bankruptcy proceeding sales requires a nuanced understanding of the key considerations that come into play. Assets are sold “as-is, where-is,” with limited warranties and protections for buyers. This necessitates a careful evaluation of the risks and rewards before participating.
  2. Secondly, being well-informed is crucial when participating. The competitive nature of these sales demands swift decision-making and strategic bidding strategies. Having a clear grasp of the process and a thorough assessment of the assets can give bidders a competitive edge.
  3. Lastly, the guiding principles for acquiring distressed assets successfully revolve around finding the balance between opportunity and risk. Whether you are a strategic investor or a financial bidder, understanding the intricacies of bankruptcy sales and aligning your acquisition strategy with your overall goals is key to driving value from these transactions.

I hope you have enjoyed this company is bankrupt Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

Gavel resting on bankruptcy sales documents in a courtroom.
company is bankrupt
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA BUT CANNOT SPEAK BASIC ENGLISH?

What happens when you file for bankruptcy? Introduction

Canada has two official languages: English and French. Canada’s cultural diversity means that our citizens speak a wide range of languages as their native tongue. In Ontario, the majority of the people’s mother tongue is English. That is the language throughout this Brandon’s Blog site, however, if French is your native tongue, you can conveniently substitute the two languages wherever I speak of English, one for the other.

What happens when you file for bankruptcy in Canada when English or French isn’t your native language? In this Brandon’s Blog site, I will certainly discover the unique obstacles faced by non-English speakers in this process and also overview you on exactly how to get rid of language barriers, access necessary sources, as well as seek emotional support throughout this hard time.

Declaring bankruptcy is already a tough as well as stressful trip, and it becomes a lot more intimidating for people that do not speak English. Navigating the Canadian insolvency system needs a comprehensive understanding of the process and paperwork, all as explained by the licensed insolvency trustee, making language effectiveness paramount. Unfortunately, the lack of English can prevent those people from completely understanding their situation.

This Brandon’s Blog about what happens when you file for bankruptcy but cannot speak English reviews a BC court case as well as the resulting policy statement from the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy on this exact subject.

What happens when you file for bankruptcy? Importance of understanding the bankruptcy process in Canada

Trying to understand the Canadian insolvency regime and what happens when you file for bankruptcy is difficult for every layman and particularly for people facing language obstacles due to their limited English. Navigating the ins and outs of insolvency can prove to be an overwhelming job, and language obstacles can worsen the difficulties. Nevertheless, equipped with a thorough understanding of the process, those that talk languages other than English or French can properly tackle their financial dilemma, access necessary resources, and discover the essential emotional support.

What happens when you file for bankruptcy? Declaring bankruptcy is a legal process that grants individuals and even enterprises a fresh start when they can no longer fulfill their financial obligations. In Canada, the insolvency procedure is overseen by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). This intricate course of action entails various stages and specific regulations for addressing a multitude of concerns. Grasping the ins and outs of the insolvency process is vital for any individual or business seeking to restructure or entirely absolve their debt because they cannot afford to make the debt payments they are obligated to make.

The journey through insolvency can be overwhelming, particularly for an individual who lacks proficiency in English, but there’s no need for it to be so. Armed with the right information and supported emotionally and linguistically, both individuals and companies can make well-informed decisions about their financial future.

what happens when you file for bankruptcy
what happens when you file for bankruptcy

What happens when you file for bankruptcy? Requirements and eligibility criteria for filing for bankruptcy in Canada

To launch an insolvency filing in Canada, it is necessary to satisfy certain requirements. It is critical to have a comprehensive understanding of these criteria, no matter your mother tongue.

Eligibility for a declaration under the BIA needs the person or company to be insolvent. The BIA uses three main criteria to identify the insolvency condition of a specific person or business:

  1. Does the person or company owe $1,000 or more?
  2. Are they incapable to satisfy their liabilities as they end up being due?
  3. If they were to sell off all their assets, would the cash not be able to fully pay off their liabilities?

If you are able to answer “yes” to the very first inquiry as well as “yes” to either or both of the 2nd and 3rd questions, you or your company meet the standards for insolvency under the BIA and are eligible to proceed with an insolvency declaration.

Language barriers can complicate this procedure, making it important to overcome them in order to access the Canadian insolvency system. Utilizing an interpreter is an effective strategy for resolving the language obstacle and efficiently accessing the Canadian insolvency system. By fixing the linguistic divide, individuals are able to completely be involved with the system, make informed choices, and obtain the necessary assistance throughout the insolvency process.

What happens when you file for bankruptcy? Language barriers and their implications

Challenges faced by individuals who cannot speak basic English

When people who are not skilled in English seek help from Canada’s insolvency system legal process, they come across a wide range of challenges, especially when involving their creditors and the licensed insolvency trustee. Language barriers can greatly impede their ability to properly describe their financial difficulties, understand what happens when they file for bankruptcy, understand the insolvency process, and properly complete the needed documents. This interaction space can trigger misconceptions, delays, and also legal issues that are beyond their control. As we look into the conversation below, it comes to be evident that getting expert support, such as working with interpreters or translators, is crucial for non-English speakers to assist in reliable communication throughout the insolvency process.

Types of insolvency process people and companies can access

In the consumer market, the available insolvency processes are:

  1. Consumer proposal to restructure debts and avoid bankruptcy.
  2. Division I proposal to restructure debts and avoid bankruptcy.
  3. Bankruptcy – summary administration or ordinary administration.

For the corporate market, the insolvency processes under the BIA are:

  1. Division I proposal to restructure debts and avoid bankruptcy.
  2. Receivership.
  3. Bankruptcy – ordinary administration.

If you use the search function in the top right corner of this Brandon’s Blog and type in any of the above terminologies, you will find previous Brandon’s Blogs covering all these insolvency topics.

As you will see from the discussion of the court decision and the OSB’s position paper, the licensed insolvency trustee is responsible for hiring a qualified interpreter for a person who cannot speak English in specific situations. The cost of the interpreter in a Division I proposal, receivership or ordinary bankruptcy is not an issue as the cost is an allowable expense. Where the issue comes into play to pay for the cost of interpreter services is in both a summary administration bankruptcy or a consumer proposal.

what happens when you file for bankruptcy
what happens when you file for bankruptcy

What happens when you file for bankruptcy? Access to language support services

The OSB, in response to the British Columbia Supreme Court’s ruling in Ali (Re) 2022 BCSC 169, has lately revealed its position paper that emphasizes the critical value of diversity and also language inclusivity in our society. This document presents comprehensive guidelines for interpreter services, aiming to level the playing field and make sure equal accessibility to these important services, all the while adhering to the BIA and relevant case law.

This July 24, 2023 position paper explores the pivotal functions taken on by Licensed Insolvency Trustees in working with interpreter solutions for debtors during OSB examinations or meetings of creditors. Additionally, it clarifies the step-by-step process whereby Trustees can look for repayment of interpreter expenses from the estate. By promoting practical and also fair access to interpreter services, we can foster an all-encompassing and also inclusive culture that celebrates as well as appreciates the uniqueness of every individual’s voice.

The OSB maintains that if a debtor is unable to communicate fluently in the official language used during an OSB examination or the meeting of creditors, the Trustee must engage the services of an approved interpreter. The OSB’s position paper states that the Trustee has the responsibility of arranging and paying for the services of the interpreter.

As stated above, this really is a non-issue in every insolvency administration other than for a summary administration consumer bankruptcy or a consumer proposal. This is where the Ali (Re) case comes in.

What happens when you file for bankruptcy? The Ali (Re) case

This case before a judge in the BC Supreme Court was a result of an appeal from a decision of a Registrar sitting in bankruptcy court. The issue is who is responsible for paying the cost of an interpreter in a summary administration bankruptcy estate. In a summary administration bankruptcy, the Trustee’s fee is calculated by a government-set tariff and the Trustee’s disbursements, as part of the tariff, are fixed as an allowance of $100. As an aside, in a consumer proposal, the Trustee’s fee is a tariff calculation also and other than for the filing fee and court fee, there is no allowance for disbursements.

In this summary administration consumer bankruptcy estate, the Registrar determined that the Trustee was not responsible for paying for the cost of the service of an interpreter for an examination of the bankrupt as required by the OSB The Registrar, however, did not specify whether the bankrupt or the OSB was required to pay this expense.

In this case, The bankrupt is originally from Lebanon and her first language is Arabic. She came to Canada as a refugee in 2000. She is functional in English but did not feel comfortable with technical or business English, so she requested an interpreter. The Trustee found several individuals who spoke Arabic and were willing to translate for the bankrupt during the examination. However, they were not certified interpreters. The OSB insisted that at its examination, only certified interpreters were acceptable. The cost of retaining a certified interpreter for this duration ranges from $190 to $305.

The Trustee applied to the court to determine who is the responsible party for paying for a certified interpreter. The Registrar concluded that the Trustee was not responsible for the cost of the interpreter, as the Trustee had fulfilled their duty of arranging for the services of an OSB-approved translator. However, the issue of expense responsibility remained unresolved. As a result, both the Trustee and the OSB appealed the Registrar’s decision to a judge in the BC Supreme Court.

The OSB wants the Registrar’s order set aside. It seeks declarations that the Trustee is required to pay the cost of an approved interpreter and will be compensated out of the general remuneration from the bankrupt’s estate provided by the tariff.

The Trustee submits that the Registrar erred in failing to find that the government levy it receives pursuant to s. 147 of the BIA whenever a Trustee distributes funds and was set up to pay for the cost of the government administering the Canadian bankruptcy system is to be used to pay for the expense of having a certified interpreter attend the bankrupt’s examination by the OSB.

Our national association, the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP), sought and obtained intervenor status. CAIRP’s position was that the Trustee of the bankruptcy estate usually paid the cost, with correspondingly lower distribution to creditors. It recognizes that, on rare occasions, the Trustee will have to pay this expense where an estate has no assets. However, it submits that a general “trustee pays” rule skews incentives and access to the bankruptcy system by vulnerable groups.

The judge reviewed the BIA legislation and available case law and determined that the Registrar’s order should be set aside. The judge further ruled that the Trustee is entitled to the expenses it incurs, from the bankrupt’s estate, for the services of an interpreter for an examination requested by and to be conducted by the OSB.

what happens when you file for bankruptcy
what happens when you file for bankruptcy

What happens when you file for bankruptcy? The OSB position

Abiding by the court’s decision, the OSB now recognizes that the cost of interpreter services used for an examination conducted by the OSB or for a meeting of creditors is a reimbursable expense in a summary administration consumer bankruptcy (or in a consumer proposal). However, rather than just saying that the OSB will now approve it in those circumstances, it forces Trustees to go for taxation just like in ordinary administrations. In an ordinary administration, the Trustee is entitled to recover its time and disbursements in going for taxation or as the court may otherwise determine.

I can only imagine that if a Trustee goes for taxation in a summary administration or consumer proposal because of interpreter services costs, the OSB very well may take the position that the fee and disbursements of the Trustee in going for taxation are non-recoverable. What leads me to that conclusion is that in the position paper, the OSB states that the Trustee may just decide to:

“Consider the expenses incurred for the services of an interpreter as encompassed under their fees chargeable under section 128 of the Rules, not claim to recover the specific expenses, send their final statement of receipts and disbursements, and proceed to deemed taxation and discharge under sections 62 and 65 of the Rules.”

In other words, what happens when you file for bankruptcy and require an interpreter for those special situations, don’t bother trying to claim the cost of the interpreter, file your summary administration final statement of receipts and disbursements without including that cost, and you won’t have to get your fee and disbursements taxed as it will be in accordance with the tariff. If the Trustee decides to go for taxation to claim the interpreter cost, and perhaps the cost of going for taxation, then it is open for the OSB to issue a negative comment letter and oppose the taxation in court.

What happens when you file for bankruptcy? Conclusion

What happens when you file for bankruptcy is a challenge for all debtors, particularly for those who do not speak English or French. Language barriers can complicate the already difficult financial situation faced by non-English speakers.

However, it is crucial to recognize that language should not hinder individuals from seeking help and relief. Various resources are available to assist non-English speakers in navigating the bankruptcy process and overcoming language barriers. As seen from the above case and the OSB position paper, the Trustee must engage an approved interpreter for all OSB examinations or for a meeting of creditors.

I hope you enjoyed this what happens when you file for bankruptcy Brandon’s Blog. Problems with making ends meet are a growing concern in Canada, affecting individuals of all ages and income levels.

Creating a solid financial plan can be the key to unlocking a brighter and more prosperous future. By taking control of your finances, you can prioritize your expenses, set clear financial goals, and build a strong foundation for your dreams to come true. With the right mindset and approach, financial planning can empower you to regain control, eliminate this issue as a source of stress in your life and find peace of mind.

Individuals must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own and it does not mean that you are a bad person. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

what happens when you file for bankruptcy
what happens when you file for bankruptcy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DISCHARGE FROM BANKRUPTCY CANADA: OUR DETAILED STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE

What are the implications of discharge from bankruptcy Canada?

If you are experiencing financial troubles and can’t pay your debts, you can file for bankruptcy in Canada. This legal process lets you off the hook for your debts and start fresh. Once you’re discharged from bankruptcy, you’re no longer responsible for those debts (other than for a few exceptions noted below). Filing for bankruptcy is stressful. We understand how difficult and stressful the bankruptcy process can be, so we hope that this will be a helpful resource for you.

Once the Trustee has completed their duties under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) with respect to the administration of your property and the bankruptcy estate, the next step in the bankruptcy process is they must apply for a discharge. This will occur after the Trustee has applied for your discharge from bankruptcy Canada, even if you did not get an absolute discharge.

This Brandon’s Blog is for people who have made a bankruptcy filing but have not yet been discharged. If your Licensed Insolvency Trustee has been discharged or is otherwise unable to help you with a second discharge application, this blog will provide you with the information you need to get through the process on your own.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: What are the implications if you are not discharged from bankruptcy?

If your previous application for discharge was unsuccessful, you remain an undischarged bankrupt and your Trustee is not obliged to make another application on your behalf. However, you should check with your Trustee first as they may or may not be prepared to do so.

We often receive calls from individuals who claim that their Trustee has been discharged, but they have not been. They express confusion as to why their Licensed Insolvency Trustee will not make an application for their discharge from bankruptcy. A quick search reveals that in these cases, the individual received a conditional discharge, but has not yet fulfilled all of their conditions to get a bankruptcy discharge. That is why their conditional discharge has not yet been converted into an absolute discharge.

If you filed an assignment in bankruptcy and are still an undischarged bankrupt, you may be able to apply for discharge from bankruptcy. An insolvency Trustee only needs to make one application on your behalf. Once the Trustee obtains their discharge, they do not need to make your application for discharge on your behalf again.

The Licensed Trustee cannot be discharged until all bankruptcy administration requirements have been met, including making the first discharge application on behalf of the bankrupt person.

discharge from bankruptcy canada
discharge from bankruptcy canada

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: How do you obtain a bankruptcy discharge in Canada?

Automatic discharge from bankruptcy is typically granted unless there are exceptional circumstances. If there is opposition to the automatic discharge, the discharge application must be brought before the court for a hearing.

If you did not complete all of your bankruptcy duties as the bankrupt person, such as providing income and expense statements, attending required financial counselling sessions, and/or paying surplus income, your Trustee had reasons to oppose your automatic discharge and scheduled a hearing with the court.

The Report of Trustee on Bankrupt’s Application for Discharge sets out the reasons for the insolvency Trustee’s opposition to a bankrupt’s application for discharge. This document is on file with the court.

If a bankrupt does not receive a discharge at the time of the court application, it is usually because they have not yet done what is required. The associate justice/registrar who heard the application at court may have therefore adjourned the application (i.e. stated it was to be heard at a later date, which may or may not have been set).

The court may have adjourned your discharge application or imposed conditions that must be met before you are entitled to a discharge. The disposition sheet from the hearing will state what the court decided in this regard.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: What are the steps to clear my bankruptcy?

It’s not unusual for people who didn’t do what they were supposed to at first to try and get back on track and do what’s required to get their discharge. You must comply with your duties during bankruptcy to the best of your ability and be prepared to explain to the court any deficiency in doing so.

For example, to get your discharge, you must be able to provide details and evidence of your income and expenses during bankruptcy. You probably recall that you were required to provide the Trustee with your monthly income and expense reports. If you’re unable to provide the court with those details, the court may want to review your income tax returns for that period. If you want the court to rescind or vary the conditions imposed, you must show that you complied with the conditions to the best of your ability.

There are many examples of trying your best to meet the conditions but maybe not perfectly. If the court orders you to pay a certain sum of money to the Trustee by a certain date, you can make the court-ordered additional payment but not by the specified date. If you were required to make surplus income monthly payments but didn’t make them all, that’s one reason there were conditions attached to your discharge. You can apply to the court to change the date and get your discharge.

Another one is that you didn’t finish all your required credit counselling sessions. You could finish them and then provide proof of completion to the court.

discharge from bankruptcy canada
discharge from bankruptcy canada

Completing your own application for discharge from bankruptcy Canada

Making your own application to be discharged from bankruptcy can be a bit daunting, but don’t worry—just follow a few simple steps and you’ll be all set. Here are some tips to help you get your application ready and submitted without the help of a bankruptcy trustee or a bankruptcy lawyer.

To begin, you’ll want to locate your bankruptcy file at the court office. Once you have your file, be sure to look through it thoroughly to find:

  • your bankruptcy court file number;
  • the Report of Trustee on the Bankrupt’s Application for Discharge under section 170 of the BIA;
  • any order issued by the bankruptcy court at the original discharge hearing; and
  • the court’s disposition sheet from any previous discharge hearing identifies what the court previously ordered or decided.

You will need copies of these documents. You can ask the court office to make copies for you. They will charge you a fee for photocopying. You should check the Report of the Trustee, the court’s disposition sheet, and any court order to see what you failed to do and what conditions the court has imposed. Also, it is not a bad idea to find out who attended your last application for discharge.

You should check the Report of the Trustee, the court’s disposition sheet, and any court order(s) in the file to see what you didn’t do and what conditions (if any) the court has imposed. Lastly, you need to schedule a date for your discharge hearing with the bankruptcy court.

You will be required to prepare the following documents and file them with the court:

  • a notice of hearing for a bankrupt person’s application for discharge;
  • your affidavit explaining why you believe you are entitled to the discharge order sought;
  • an affidavit of service; and
  • a draft of the order sought.

The Associate Justice/Registrar in Bankruptcy hearing your application for discharge may make any order he or she sees fit. If the order you are seeking is made, he or she may accept and sign it in court on the day you appear, which may save you a period of time later on.

Requisition – Notice of hearing for bankrupt’s discharge from bankruptcy Canada hearing for discharge

The first step in obtaining a discharge in bankruptcy is to file a Notice of Hearing for Bankrupt’s Application for Discharge with the court. That document would have first been filed by the Trustee when the Application for discharge is first scheduled. If you have a copy of it, it will be a good precedent for you to follow.

A requisition must be filed again by you in order to have the matter brought back before the court.

discharge from bankruptcy canada
discharge from bankruptcy canada

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada:The Affidavit

An affidavit is a formal, written statement that provides key information in your legal case. Any evidence you want the court to consider in your application must be submitted in an affidavit. Your affidavit should describe the events leading up to your bankruptcy, and your current financial situation.

You must swear or affirm your affidavit before a notary public or commissioner of oaths. Make sure that your affidavit only includes evidence that is relevant to your application for discharge.

The court is familiar with a standard form of affidavit for discharge applications. You should familiarize yourself with that normal format. You should also include:

  • additional information about why you did not seek a bankruptcy discharge earlier;
  • is this a 1st-time bankruptcy, 2nd-time bankruptcy or more;
  • why you have not been able to comply with the bankrupt’s duties or the requirements of an earlier court order; and
  • state the reasons you are wanting to be discharged now.

You will need to attach any relevant documents to your affidavit in support of your application, including a statement of your current income, expenses, assets, liabilities and any previous bankruptcy information.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada:Affidavit of Service

To serve documents, you must provide a written copy to the party to be served. You need to obtain a signature or other confirmation, such as an email, to confirm that the document was properly served. You will need to serve the filed Requisition and all filed Affidavits and documents on:

These parties may attend your hearing and make submissions.

In order to provide proper service within the required time period before your discharge hearing, you must familiarize yourself with the rules. You must also provide proof of service at the hearing, especially if no one else attends. This proof of service can be the signature of everyone served to show the date they were served.

An Affidavit of Service can also be filed with the court. This Affidavit of Service is separate from the Affidavit filed with the court regarding your reasons for entitlement to anabsolute bankruptcy discharge certificate.

discharge from bankruptcy canada
discharge from bankruptcy canada

At the discharge from bankruptcy Canada hearing

When you appear in court for your discharge hearing, you will be able to present your case to either an Associate Justice or Registrar in Bankruptcy. If your application is being opposed, the creditors opposing your discharge need to file a notice of opposition. In this case, the hearing will be in front of a bankruptcy Judge. This is the normal process followed:

  1. You explain why you believe you are entitled to the order you are seeking, for example, an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.
  2. Anyone opposing your application explains his or her position.
  3. The Judge or Registrar may ask questions relating to the affidavits and documents you have filed and make suggestions or give directions.

When presenting your position at the hearing, remember to:

  1. Clearly state what order you are seeking from the Registrar in Bankruptcy or Judge.
  2. Outline the facts supporting your application in a concise manner.
  3. Explain the law on the subject and how it applies to the facts of your case.

Your conduct before and during bankruptcy will be taken into consideration when making a decision on your application for discharge. The Trustee’s report will provide information on your conduct before and during bankruptcy, which will be taken into account. if you did not attend the required financial counselling
sessions, did not file required statements of income and expense, and/or did not make the required surplus income payments to the Trustee for the benefit of your creditors.

The court will consider the relevant factors and make the appropriate order, or it may adjourn the hearing for further information or conditions to be met. Some of the types of orders the court may make are:

  • An order of discharge that is absolute and therefore you are immediately discharged from bankruptcy.
  • A conditional discharge may be granted. Examples of conditions are:
    • if the debtor pays any unpaid surplus income,
    • the debtor pays the outstanding balance for any asset that was agreed to be paid for; or
    • if the debtor pays a sum of money to the Trustee toward their debt obligations, as decided by the court.
  • A discharge that has been suspended.
  • The court may refuse to issue a discharge order if it is not satisfied that you have made full and adequate disclosure, or if there are issues with your conduct.

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: Order for discharge

The Judge or Registrar in Bankruptcy will grant a discharge order at the end of the hearing. The type of discharge will be one of the kinds indicated above. If you prepared a draft order and the Registrar in Bankruptcy or Judge finds it acceptable, they will sign it and you can then have it filed with the court. However, if your application was opposed, keep in mind that one of the opposing parties may choose to appeal the discharge order.

If you have not prepared your order before the hearing, you should do so after the hearing and submit the order in duplicate to the court. The court office will then send the order to the Registrar in Bankruptcy or Judge who heard your application for signing. Once you receive your copy of the signed order, your discharge will be official.

When you receive a copy of the signed order, you must provide a copy to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. They will in turn notify the credit bureaus and Canada Revenue Agency of your discharge.

When you have received your absolute discharge, you are no longer legally responsible for repaying debts that you incurred before your assignment in bankruptcy. You will get rid of debt with some exceptions set out in Section 178 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. They are:

  • payment of child support or alimony;
  • student loans, if you have not been a full-time or part-time student for less than 7 years;
  • a fine or penalty imposed by the court; or
  • debt resulting from fraud.

    discharge from bankruptcy canada
    discharge from bankruptcy canada

Discharge from bankruptcy Canada: Are you tired of being in debt?

Bankruptcy law and the bankruptcy process can be complex, so it may be worth retaining a bankruptcy lawyer to help you apply for your discharge. Ultimately, it is up to you, but hopefully, this guide to discharge from bankruptcy Canada will lay out the steps you need to take if you wish to apply for a discharge yourself.

I hope that you found this discharge from bankruptcy Canada Brandon’s Blog informative. If you’re sick and tired of carrying the burden of debt and ready to live a much better life, we can assist. We know exactly how it really feels to be in debt as well as feel like you’re never going to get ahead. We have actually helped lots of people and businesses that were in your position reach financial stability, so we understand it’s feasible for you to prosper in your objective of ending up being debt-free. Nevertheless, it will certainly require some work on your part. We’ll be right here to assist you with every action necessary.

The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too many personal unsecured debts, Credit card debt, income tax debt liability, unsecured loans or personal obligations from the running of your company or from being a business owner. These are all types of debt we can help you eliminate. We are aware of your financial difficulties and understand your concerns. Filing bankruptcy is the last option we explore only after we have exhausted all other options to avoid bankruptcy, such as financial restructuring through a debt repayment plan.

It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to give you the best management advice to get you out of your outstanding debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We are sympathetic to the financial difficulties you are experiencing and would like to help alleviate your concerns. We want to lighten your load by coming up with a debt settlement plan crafted just for you.

We realize that people and businesses in financial difficulty need practical advice and a workable solution in an easy-to-understand financial plan. The Ira Smith Team knows that not everyone has to file for bankruptcy in Canada. Most of our clients never do, as we are familiar with alternatives to bankruptcy. We assist many people in finding the relief they need.

Call or email us. We would be happy to give you a no-cost initial consultation. We can find you the perfect solution to tailor a new debt restructuring procedure specifically for you, based on your unique economic situation and needs. We provide a full range of services to people and companies. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you’re serious about finding a solution, let us know. We will get you back to living a happy life, whether or not there is an economic recession in Canada.

Call us now for a no-cost initial consultation. We are licensed professionals.

discharge from bankruptcy canada
discharge from bankruptcy canada
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SUSPENSION OF DISCHARGE FROM BANKRUPTCY: OUR COMPLETE GUIDE ON BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGES

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: Bankruptcy discharge and what it means for the bankrupt

The implications of an absolute bankruptcy discharge on the debtor are significant. Once an absolute discharge is granted, the debtor is no longer liable for any unsecured debts that existed at the date of bankruptcy. The debtor is released from having to repay any debts that they incurred before filing for bankruptcy.

This means that the debtor no longer has to worry about repaying those debts and can move on with their life. This provides a fresh start for the debtor and helps them get back on their feet.

There are different types of bankruptcy discharges. The one every bankrupt person wants is an absolute discharge. However, sometimes there is a reason for either a creditor, the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) (Trustee), or both, to oppose a bankrupt person’s discharge. When this happens, there must be a court hearing to determine what form of discharge the bankrupt is entitled to.

The purpose of the discharge hearing is for the court to view the evidence put forward by those opposing an absolute discharge, the bankrupt who believes they are entitled to one and to review the Trustee’s report and gain further information about the conduct of the bankrupt person, both before and during bankruptcy, and to hear about the administration of the bankruptcy.

At the discharge hearing, the court is attempting to balance the right of a bankrupt person to receive a discharge and the rights of the creditors to be paid. The court will also be concerned that the administration of the bankruptcy is not only fair to all parties but is also seen to be fair. I recently came across a decision of the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta which exemplifies this finding of balance.

In this Brandon’s Blog post, I’m discussing what it means when a bankrupt person is discharged, as well as the process and different types of discharges. One type of discharge that a bankrupt person can be given is a suspension of discharge from bankruptcy taking place. I’m also highlighting this recent court decision that demonstrates the balance and fairness that the courts strive for.

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: When can a bankrupt person be discharged?

If you have filed for bankruptcy for the first time, you may qualify for an automatic discharge after a 9 month bankruptcy period. To qualify for this automatic discharge, you must have:

  • attended the two mandatory financial counselling sessions with the Trustee;
  • no requirement to pay surplus income, being a portion of their income is paid to the bankruptcy estate according to guidelines set by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB or Official Receiver); and
  • no opposition to his or her discharge.

The only party that can authorize an automatic discharge in bankruptcy is the Trustee.

If you have made an assignment in bankruptcy before and so this subsequent bankruptcy is your 2nd bankruptcy, you will need to wait at least 24 months before you can receive a discharge. If you have a surplus income payment requirement, your bankruptcy will be prolonged to 36 months.

If you have filed for bankruptcy twice before, you can expect the timeline for a third bankruptcy to be the same as your 2nd. However, the Trustee or creditors may be more resistant to your discharge this time. The court may extend the timeline if it deems necessary.

suspension of discharge from bankruptcy
suspension of discharge from bankruptcy

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: When is a discharge challenged?

The Trustee may oppose a bankrupt’s discharge by issuing a notice of opposition. This means that the bankrupt did not fulfill all of their duties when the time came for the Trustee to make a determination if the bankrupt is entitled to a discharge.

If one or more creditors oppose the debtor’s bankruptcy discharge, they may believe that additional information is needed to be evaluated by the court in order to determine what kind of discharge, if any, the debtor should receive.

The court will then decide what kind of bankruptcy discharge the bankrupt should receive.

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: What are the different types of discharge that can be granted in bankruptcy proceedings?

There are different kinds of discharge from bankruptcy process. They are:

  • Absolute discharge: you are entitled to an immediate discharge;
  • Conditional discharge: you can obtain a discharge after fulfilling one or more conditions;
  • Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy – a suspended discharge from bankruptcy means that the discharge will occur at a later date set by the court, and will be combined with either an absolute bankruptcy discharge or conditional bankruptcy discharge;
  • Refused discharge – the court can refuse the bankrupt’s discharge due to unsatisfactory fulfillment of duties and lack of response to the Trustee’s inquiries; or
  • “no order” – the Trustee has advised the court that, despite the passage of time, the bankrupt has not fulfilled all of his or her duties, has failed to respond to the Trustee’s requests, and the Trustee wishes to seek its discharge.

The bankrupt’s discharge in bankruptcy occurs when the bankrupt person has fulfilled the conditions set by the court and/or the suspension of discharge from bankruptcy period has ended.

The duration of bankruptcy depends on all of the above factors.

suspension of discharge from bankruptcy
suspension of discharge from bankruptcy

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: There are five types of debt that are not dischargeable in bankruptcy

What debts cannot be discharged through bankruptcy? There are 5 types of debts that cannot be discharged. They are:

  1. alimony or child support payments;
  2. penalties or fines set by the court;
  3. claims from fraud or fraudulent breach of trust;
  4. student loan debt if it is less than 7 years since you stopped being a full-time or part-time student; and
  5. Any debts that are properly secured by an asset are not released as a result of a bankruptcy discharge.

There are five types of debt that are not discharged in bankruptcy. The debtor will need to continue paying these financial obligations according to their terms. For all other unsecured debts, the discharge from bankruptcy will discharge all those debts.

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: The opposed bankruptcy discharge process case

The decision was released on September 29, 2022, in Wasylynuk (Re), 2022 ABKB 650 (CanLII), For me, this Court of King’s Bench of Alberta (it is still going to take me time to get used to the switch from “Queen” to “King”!) by the Registrar in Bankruptcy, epitomizes the balance the court strives to find in bankruptcy discharge situations.

This is an application for a bankrupt’s discharge which is opposed. The bankrupt, Ms. Wasylynuk, has completed all required duties. She is a first-time bankrupt with a surplus income requirement. The bankruptcy was driven by litigation costs when Ms. Wasylynuk unsuccessfully sued her surviving brothers and sisters for a share of her father’s estate.

The bankrupt filed a challenge to her father’s will and the disposition of his property in 2008. This led to 10 years of litigation for a share of the estate. All of the estate had been given to one of her brothers, who was tasked with caring for the father and, after his passing, dividing it as he saw fit. Ms. Wasylynuk rejected her brother’s offer of a share, wanting more.

Prior to her bankruptcy, Ms. Wasylynuk brought an application, presumably based on legal advice she received, to set aside her father’s will and an inter vivos gift made by her father that gave everything to one of her siblings. The will and the gift were both drawn up by lawyers with doctors’ certificates of competence and capacity. The will and the gift were upheld by the lower court. The lower court’s ruling was upheld on appeal. The Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear the case.

suspension of discharge from bankruptcy
suspension of discharge from bankruptcy

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: The opposition to bankruptcy discharge and the evidence

The bankrupt’s siblings are the opposing creditors. The opposing creditors dispute Ms. Wasylynuk’s characterization as an honest but unfortunate debtor. Their grounds for opposition are:

  • The value of the bankrupt’s assets does not equal fifty cents on the dollar of the bankrupt’s unsecured liabilities, and the bankrupt is responsible for the circumstances that caused this.
  • Ms. Wasylynuk has not been able to provide an explanation for the disappearance of assets, or for why there are not enough assets to cover debts.
  • She was eligible to make a proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) rather than bringing on this bankruptcy process but did not.

The evidence included the fact that, during the litigation, the bankrupt employed several different law firms and did not pay most of the legal fees she incurred. At the time of her bankruptcy, she owed in excess of $200,000 for unpaid legal fees. In her bankruptcy filing, she claimed $5,500 in assets, consisting of a motor vehicle, furniture, and personal effects, all of which were exempt.

Another bit of evidence was that Ms. Wasylynuk had likewise allowed a charge to be registered against the home in favour of her spouse to support his alleged loans to her of $277,000.00. Mr. Wasylynuk additionally declared an unsecured amount of $152,365.00 for loans to her. There were no documents to validate the amount. The Registrar noted that he was skeptical of these alleged loans as most of the bankrupt’s legal fees were unpaid.

On top of this, 13 months prior to her making her bankruptcy assignment, she transferred her half share of the matrimonial home to her husband. The bankruptcy Trustee did not have the funds to attack the transfer in the current bankruptcy administration.

Ms. Wasylynuk’s siblings’ litigation costs totalled approximately $750,000.00. The costs awarded from the first instance through the appeal will cover less than a third of those costs.

The Registrar calculated that, under Alberta law, the bankrupt’s non-exempt equity in the matrimonial home at the time of transfer to the spouse was approximately $118,000.00.

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: The balancing act of the Registrar’s decision

The Registrar took note of the above and made several findings. First was that Ms. Wasylynuk, 59, is a specialized nurse in a teaching position. She makes nearly $60 per hour. She continues to live in her fully encumbered matrimonial home with her husband, which is now out of reach of her creditors.

The Trustee explained that a proposal was ruled out because the litigation between Ms. Wasylynuk and her siblings that led to this bankruptcy was highly acrimonious. The Registrar found that it is unclear whether a proposal would have been doomed to failure because of ill will between the siblings, particularly since a proposal would have resulted in a better result for the creditors than her bankruptcy.

Ms. Wasylynuk has paid $51,000 into the estate over her 21-month bankruptcy. Her monthly surplus is $2,000. At that surplus rate, a 60-month proposal would have achieved $120,000 for her creditors or about the value of her non-exempt portion of the matrimonial home.

So to balance the scales, the Registrar gave Ms. Wasylynuk a conditional discharge. Ms. Wasylynuk’s discharge is conditioned upon her paying an additional $60,000.00 into the bankruptcy estate at the rate of a monthly payment of $2,000.00. By ordering these additional payments, once they are all made, the amount paid into the bankruptcy estate will be roughly equal to the minimum amount she would have paid if she chose to make a proposal over bankruptcy.

suspension of discharge from bankruptcy
suspension of discharge from bankruptcy

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: Ready to be debt-free?

I hope that you found this suspension of discharge from bankruptcy Brandon’s Blog informative. If you’re sick and tired of being in debt and ready to live a much better life, we can assist. We know exactly how it really feels to be in debt as well as feel like you’re never going to get ahead. We have actually helped lots of people and businesses that were in your position reach financial stability, so we understand it’s feasible for you to prosper in your objective of ending up being debt-free. Nevertheless, it will certainly require some work on your part. We’ll be right here to assist you with every action necessary.

The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too many personal unsecured debts, Credit card debt, income tax debt liability, unsecured loans or personal obligations from the running of your company or from being a business owner. These are all types of debt we can help you eliminate. We know that you are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. Filing bankruptcy is the last option we explore only after we have exhausted all other options to avoid bankruptcy, such as financial restructuring through a debt repayment plan.

It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to give you the best management advice to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We know that we can help you the way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan.

We realize that people and businesses in financial difficulty need practical advice and a workable solution in an easy-to-understand financial plan. The Ira Smith Team knows that not everyone has to file for bankruptcy in Canada. Most of our clients never do, as we are familiar with alternatives to bankruptcy. We assist many people in finding the relief they need.

Call or email us. We would be happy to give you a no-cost initial consultation. We can find you the perfect solution to tailor a new debt restructuring procedure specifically for you, based on your unique economic situation and needs. We provide a full range of services to people and companies. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you’re serious about finding a solution, let us know. We will get you back to living a happy life, whether or not there is an economic recession in Canada.

Call us now for a no-cost initial consultation. We are licensed professionals.

suspension of discharge from bankruptcy
suspension of discharge from bankruptcy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

INHERITANCE DURING BANKRUPTCY: OUR BEST ANSWER TO HOW IS AN INHERITANCE TREATED IN A BANKRUPTCY?

Inheritance during bankruptcy: Family situations

Your assets are considered yours in Canada. In other words, if during your bankruptcy you inherit money from a family member, the property belongs to the bankruptcy estate. Your property, including cash, will be distributed by your licensed insolvency trustee (“Trustee”) to your unsecured creditors.

Whenever an insolvent person comes to us for a free consultation, we always inquire whether or not the insolvent person is in line to inherit anything in the near future. Our recommendations will depend on the answer.

Many Canadians wonder whether the bankruptcy process will affect their inheritance. The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently reviewed a bankruptcy judge’s decision that bankruptcy would impact an estate in Richards (Re), 2022 ONCA 216 (CanLII).

This Brandon’s Blog examines this Court of Appeal decision about inheritance during bankruptcy. The case looks at would you lose your inheritance if you filed for bankruptcy, or can you use family situations to protect it from your creditors and eventually be able to get it back?

Inheritance during bankruptcy: Bankruptcy, winnings, gifts, inheritance property and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act

Section 67 (1)(c) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (“BIA” ) sets out the bankruptcy law and the bankruptcy procedure regarding the property of the bankrupt as:

“all property wherever situated of the bankrupt at the date of the bankruptcy or that may be acquired by or devolve on the bankrupt before their discharge, including any refund owing to the bankrupt under the Income Tax Act in respect of the calendar year — or the fiscal year of the bankrupt if it is different from the calendar year — in which the bankrupt became a bankrupt…”

This includes any assets that you own as of the date you filed for bankruptcy, as well as any assets that you have acquired after filing for bankruptcy and before you get your bankruptcy discharge. Additionally, it includes assets that you were entitled to but hid or contracted out of.

There are two parts to that sentence that are simple, but the second part is more complicated. Gifts, lottery winnings, inheritance during bankruptcy, and any other unexpected financial gain are included in this category.

inheritance during bankruptcy
Inheritance during bankruptcy

Inheritance during bankruptcy: What happens if I receive property, assets or an inheritance while I am bankrupt?

Receiving an inheritance or gift of a property while in bankruptcy can be a mixed blessing. A gift or inheritance can relieve financial stress by allowing you to pay off debts that would otherwise require you to file for bankruptcy. Receiving assets, property, or inheritances during bankruptcy will be for the benefit of creditors and will also affect how your bankruptcy file is handled including your discharge, as well as whether you were really qualified for bankruptcy at all. Of course, timing is everything.

The reason is the section of the BIA I quoted above. Your windfall could have paid off all your creditors without making an assignment in bankruptcy if it was large enough. In the event that it happens during your period of bankruptcy and before you apply for discharge, but the windfall is not large enough to pay off all your debts, it will affect the type of discharge from bankruptcy you may be able to get, whether it is an automatic discharge or a conditional discharge.

If it occurs after you have made your bankruptcy filing and is large enough to pay off all your debts, then perhaps you can apply to annul the bankruptcy. So all of these factors have to be taken into consideration when you experience an inheritance during bankruptcy or if you otherwise have a windfall.

Inheritance during bankruptcy: Will I lose my Inheritance in a bankruptcy?

By now, you should know that you will lose whatever part of your inheritance during bankruptcy. It will be whatever portion is required to pay off your creditors in full (plus interest). But what happens to an inheritance during bankruptcy if you try to contract out of receiving your inheritance if you are an undischarged bankrupt? Can the Will or trust set up that provides you with the inheritance be used to stop you from losing it during your bankruptcy?

That is what the Court of Appeal for Ontario decision in Richards (Re), 2022 ONCA 216 (CanLII) is all about which I will now describe.

Michael Richards filed an appeal with the Court of Appeal for Ontario on March 11, 2022, challenging the bankruptcy judge’s order from June 3, 2021. The issue at stake concerned the interpretation of a trust of which Mr. Richards was a beneficiary (the “Trust”).

A judgment against him was owed to The Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) for $987,613 plus costs and interest. Mr. Richards was struggling financially. RBC filed a Bankruptcy Application against him on September 16, 2019. The Bankruptcy Order was issued the same day.

A trust set up by his father in 2001 gives Mr. Richards the right to either the property at 61 St. Clair Avenue West or the proceeds of its sale (the “Property”). His parents were able to live in the house during their lives, with a life interest in the Property. In 2010, his father died. His mother remained in the Property and she died in July 2020. The date of death of the second parent is called the “Time of Division” in the Trust.

Before his mother died, the trustees of the Trust sold the property with the net proceeds from the sale, totalling $1,172,120.90, held in trust. Trust funds had to be distributed to Mr. Richards if he was alive at the time of division. Obviously, he was.

inheritance during bankruptcy
Inheritance during bankruptcy

Inheritance during bankruptcy: RBC and section 38 of the BIA

In October 2020, RBC obtained an order under s. 38 of the BIA (the “s. 38 order”). Section 38 allows one or more creditors to take an assignment of a claim or action that the Trustee may have if the Trustee is unable or unwilling to enforce that claim or action.

The s. 38 order gave RBC (in this case alone) an assignment of rights of the Trustee of the bankrupt estate to make a claim against the sale proceeds of the Property. The Trustee had not wanted to pursue the claim due to a lack of funding. RBC now stood in the shoes of the Trustee with respect to the sale proceeds of the Property.

RBC filed a motion to recoup the sale proceeds up to the amount owed to them (including the costs of the s. 38 action). They sought a declaration that Mr. Richards was the beneficiary of the Trust and had an interest in the Property under the terms of the Trust. RBC argued that the sale proceeds should go towards satisfying their outstanding debt because it was the property of the bankrupt.

Inheritance during bankruptcy: The undischarged bankrupt’s position

Mr. Richards responded that his interest in the Property was suspended while he is bankrupt, under the provisions of a different section of the document establishing the Trust. That very unusual provision reads as follows:

“Any right of a Beneficiary to receive any income or capital of the Trust Fund…. shall be enforceable only until such Beneficiary shall become bankrupt … whereupon… the Beneficiary’s Interest shall cease until the cause of the Beneficiary’s Interest becoming vested in or belonging to or being payable to a person other than such Beneficiary shall have ceased to exist … and then the Beneficiary’s Interest shall again be allocated to such Beneficiary as aforesaid unless and until a like or similar event shall happen whereupon the Beneficiary’s Interest of such Beneficiary shall again cease and so on from time to time.”

Mr. Richards submitted that his interest in the Property could not vest in his Trustee as he had no rights to the Property until such time as he was discharged from bankruptcy. He contended that, during his bankruptcy, any rights he had were suspended. It is only on his discharge from bankruptcy that the Property will vest in him and only then will he own it outright.

inheritance during bankruptcy
Inheritance during bankruptcy

Inheritance during bankruptcy: The trial judge’s decision

The bankruptcy judge overseeing the bankruptcy case trial held that the Property vested in Mr. Richards at the Time of Division. This meant that the Property was his and vested in his Trustee upon becoming bankrupt. Since the Trustee had transferred its rights in the action against the Property to RBC, the bank was legally entitled to receive the proceeds of sale up to the amount owed.

Inheritance during bankruptcy: The Court of Appeal for Ontario decision

The Court of Appeal for Ontario made a very clear and concise decision. It said that Mr. Richards had not shown any mistakes in the bankruptcy judge’s decision. The appellate court ruled that her interpretation of the Trust document was entitled to deference on review, stating that it agreed with her interpretation. The court found that her interpretation was consistent with the plain wording of the relevant section and also consistent with the stated purpose of the Trust.

This case demonstrates that actions that violate the public policy underpinning the BIA by individuals trying to shield their assets from creditors are not tolerated.

inheritance during bankruptcy
Inheritance during bankruptcy

Inheritance during bankruptcy: Could the inheritance have been shielded from the creditors?

In the beginning, I want to make it clear that I am not a lawyer and I do not give advice to insolvent people on how to protect their assets from their secured creditors, preferred creditors or unsecured ordinary creditors. Instead, given these specific facts, can I think of a way the Trust could have been structured differently?

When the Trust was prepared, obviously his parents were concerned about their son’s financial situation and legal proceedings against him. Rather than having the Property transferred to him at the Time of Division, the Trust should have kept the cash from the sale of the real property invested and paid Mr. Richards a monthly allowance for life.

That monthly allowance could not have been treated directly as his property. Rather, it would be considered part of his income, subject to the surplus income rule. Mr. Richards may have very well may have had to make surplus income payments to his Trustee as part of getting his bankruptcy discharge, but the bulk of the inheritance could have been shielded from his creditors.

Inheritance during bankruptcy: With the right Trust personal bankruptcies can be avoided

If the Trust was worded as I suggest, only providing Mr. Richards with a lifetime allowance but never able to have the asset itself transferred to his ownership, Mr. Richards could have avoided bankruptcy altogether. He could have filed a Proposal.

If his financial situation was such that he owed $250,000 or less, he could have filed a consumer proposal. If he owed more than $250,000, it would be a Division I BIA restructuring proposal. Either way, he would have avoided filing for bankruptcy or having a Bankruptcy Order made against him.

Although the RBC judgement against him was an ordinary unsecured claim, without their vote in favour of his proposal, it could not have succeeded. However, with the differing approach for the Trust that I suggested, it would not give RBC access to the entire amount of cash. They would have been facing the reality that they would not have been able to collect in full on their judgement for a very long time. There wouldn’t be a pot of money to attack.

This is how Mr. Richards’s parents could have made sure that the inheritance was protected for him and shielded from his creditors.

inheritance during bankruptcy
Inheritance during bankruptcy

Inheritance during bankruptcy: Summary

In conclusion, the BIA allows a bankrupt’s assets to distribute property to creditors based on a “just and equitable” standard.

I hope you found this inheritance during bankruptcy Brandon’s Blog. Are you on the edge of insolvency? Are bill collectors hounding you? Are you ducking all your phone calls to the point where your voicemail box is always full?

If so, you need to call me today. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) we are the only professionals licensed, recognized as well as supervised by the federal government to give insolvency assistance. We are also the only authorized party in Canada to apply remedies under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). I can definitely help you to choose what is best for you to free you from your financial debt issues.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can get free you from the stress, anxiety, and discomfort that your cash issues have created. With the distinct roadmap, we establish simply for you, we will without delay return you right to a healthy and balanced problem-free life, Starting Over Starting Now.

Inheritance during bankruptcy
Inheritance during bankruptcy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

THE CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT EASY BEGINNER’S GUIDE

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

What is in the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act?

Canada’s bankruptcy and insolvency laws are governed by two major pieces of federal legislation: the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. Additionally, provincial legislation intersects with the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. During bankruptcy, a debtor can keep certain types of property based on provincial legislation. Details may differ amongst each Canadian province. Provincial governments and territories have their own laws regarding property exemptions, court orders, and debt collection.

The Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (often referred to as the “BIA” or the “Bankruptcy Act“) is a federal government statute that sets out the rules and procedures governing insolvency proceedings in Canada. These rules and procedures will apply to all corporations, individuals and partnerships that are parties to an insolvency filing. The whole point of bankruptcy legislation is to allow the honest but unfortunate debtor to shed themselves of their debts and to allow for the sale of assets or reorganization and refinancing of insolvent persons so that there is also fairness for the different claims of creditors.

Under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), financially troubled corporations are given the opportunity to restructure their affairs in order to avoid bankruptcy. A corporation must have debts of at least $5 million to qualify for the CCAA.

The Canadian insolvency landscape is a complex one, with many different insolvency proceedings being used to deal with many different types of debtors. In this Brandon Blog, I provide an easy beginner’s guide of the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, as a primer into Canadian insolvency legislation and the administration of estates.

This Brandon Blog is not about the nuts and bolts of filing for bankruptcy. Other blogs I have written cover that topic and more. You can use the search function above to search for those Brandon Blog topics.

What is the purpose of the Canadian Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act?

Everyone knows you should do your best to stay out of too much debt, but for many people, it’s an impossible feat. When you’re over your head in debt, you’re having to keep up just to pay the interest on your debt. When you are spending more than you are making, you can’t pay your bills on time, or your assets when liquidated are worth less than your total liabilities, you are insolvent. Insolvency is the main test to see if you, or insolvent companies, qualify to start a bankruptcy process or a formal restructuring process, either under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act or the CCAA.

The Bankruptcy Act was designed to help Canadians who find themselves in financial difficulty. It is the main piece of Canadian insolvency legislation that governs bankruptcy proceedings, receivership and personal and corporate restructuring proceedings through consumer proposals and commercial proposals. Commercial proposals are also available for those people with consumer debt levels greater than the amount allowed to qualify for a consumer proposal. All Canadian bankruptcies, proposals and receiverships are governed by the Act. It contains bankruptcy laws, rules and guidelines for all stakeholders: the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (which is part of Industry Canada) the Licensed Insolvency Trustee, the debtor, and the creditors.

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act

What options are available under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act?

The Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act provides a number of ways to deal with a financially troubled company or person. Most involve a court-supervised process. The options for a person or business in financial trouble and not able to right themself or itself are:

  • Consumer proposal

It is an offer to your creditors to repay a portion of your unsecured debt obligations in exchange for their elimination (with certain limited exceptions as laid out in the Bankruptcy Act). You can qualify if you owe $250,000 or less, excluding any debts registered against your home, such as mortgage debt or secured home equity line of credit debt.

A person proposes a plan to make monthly payments to the Licensed Trustee acting as the consumer proposal Administrator. The total amount offered to your unsecured creditors must be agreed upon by them. Within 60 months, you must pay off the entire amount accepted. Creditors typically accept a total payment of 25% or less of your total unsecured debt. Individual situations vary, however.

A successfully completed consumer proposal allows the insolvent person to eliminate their debts and avoid an assignment into bankruptcy.

  • Commercial proposal

Commercial proposals are also known as Division I proposals. The reason for this is because it is provided under Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, Part III, Division 1 (consumer proposals are found under Part III Division II). An insolvent corporation or person can use it for restructuring proceedings. When a consumer’s debt exceeds the limits of a consumer proposal, a “commercial proposal” would be filed. If a definitive commercial proposal cannot be immediately prepared but the debtor needs to file in order to invoke the stay of proceedings (discussed in the next section), they can get the immediate protection they need by first filing a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal.

A commercial proposal works in a very similar way to a consumer proposal, except for some differences as follows:

    • A commercial proposal may have various classes of creditors. A consumer proposal normally does not.
    • Unlike for a person, there is no streamlined reorganization process for companies. Therefore, even if its debt is $250,000 or less, a company cannot file a consumer proposal.
    • A meeting of creditors must be held as part of a commercial proposal. If the Official Receiver (being a representative of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy), doesn’t wish to chair the meeting, it can be delegated to the Trustee. A creditor who has filed a valid proof of claim has voting rights. They have the right to vote ahead of the creditors’ meeting by using a voting letter or in person. An official meeting of creditors is only held in a consumer proposal if 25% of the proven creditors’ claims request one.
    • In a consumer proposal, if a meeting is not requested, the consumer proposal is deemed approved and there are no voting rights to be concerned about. If a meeting is requested, then the creditors who attend the meeting can vote by ordinary resolution for the acceptance of the consumer proposal. In a commercial proposal, it is a two-pronged test: 3/4 of the $ value voting AND a majority in the number of those voting.
    • If the commercial proposal is voted down, the person or company is immediately deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy. There is no such automatic bankruptcy if a consumer proposal is not accepted.

As soon as the commercial proposal is accepted by the creditors and approved by the court, the debtor starts making the payments promised in the proposal to the Insolvency Trustee. Once full payment has been made, the trustee in bankruptcy will issue to the person or company their Certificate of Full Performance. At this point, all provable claims, regardless of whether they filed a proof of claim or not.

As part of a successful restructuring process, the Trustee will run a claims process, vet every proof of claim to ensure that they are valid and that only an allowable claim is considered for distribution purposes. The Trustee will then comprise a scheme of distribution in order to distribute the funds promised to the creditors in the commercial proposal.

Restructuring under either the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act or CCAA becomes possible for companies with debts greater than $5 million.

  • Receivers and Secured Creditors

Receiverships are remedies for lenders who have loaned money out and taken security over the debtor’s assets. It is most common in Canada for financial institutions to be lenders to Canadian businesses. As long as their loan documents, including the security agreement, allow for it in writing, a secured creditor may appoint a receiver when a debtor defaults on secured debt. Secured creditors and receivers are subject to certain requirements under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

Receivership relies both on provincial laws and federal legislation. The Bankruptcy Act specifies several main requirements for receivership, including:

    • It is not permissible to enforce a security interest on the business assets of an insolvent person unless the secured creditor has given 10 days prior notice in the prescribed form and manner.
    • Only a Licensed Insolvency Trustees (formerly called Trustees in Bankruptcy) can act as a receiver.

The secured creditor can appoint the receiver privately or with court approval.

A private receiver’s primary responsibility is to the secured creditor who appointed it. A court-appointed receiver is an officer of the court who protects the interests of all creditors of the debtor company.

Private receivers usually have from the security documents the power to run the debtor’s business and sell the debtor’s assets through auctions, tenders or private sales.

A court appointment is also preferred over a private appointment when there are significant claims against the debtor or its property as well as litigation or a threat of litigation. It is according to the provincial rules of court and s. 243 of the BIA (National Receiver) that a court may appoint a receiver.

The receivership order normally stays proceedings (discussed below in the next section) against the receiver, the debtor, and its property. In terms of its purpose, it gives the receiver authority to manage the assets of the debtor, to borrow money against the assets to repay a loan, to sell the assets of the debtor with the approval of the court, and to commence and defend litigation on behalf of the debtor. A privately-appointed receiver does not enjoy a stay of proceedings.

  • Bankruptcy

If a personal or commercial restructuring is not possible, then the insolvent person or company has no choice but to file for bankruptcy. The first step in dealing with insolvency is to consult an insolvency trustee. You can learn about the bankruptcy administration process and your legal rights from Trustees in Bankruptcy so you can make an informed decision. A candid discussion about how much you earn, what assets you own, and what types of debts you have can help you decide if bankruptcy is the best choice for you.

Here is what the Canadian bankruptcy procedure is all about. After the bankruptcy assignment has been completed, the Trustee submits it to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada. All legal obligations will be handled by the Trustee once the assignment has been filed. Your credit­ors will no longer receive payments directly from you.

The Trustee administers your bankruptcy. No more lawsuits or wage garnishments for you. Depending on your province’s law, some of your assets will certainly be exempt. The bankruptcy vests your non-exempt assets in the Trustee. The Trustee will sell them. According to the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the proceeds will be for the benefit of the bankrupt estate and there could be a scheme of distribution among your preferred creditors and ordinary unsecured creditors.

In the administration of bankruptcy, the Trustee will send your creditors a notice of bankruptcy. You must attend a creditors’ meeting if one is called. Additionally, you will need to attend two counselling sessions. Canadian insolvency legislation in Canada includes rehabilitation programs to help individuals regain financial stability.

Finally, you may need to make payments toward your debt. “Surplus income payments” ensure that people who declare bankruptcy and have sufficient income contribute to paying back a portion of their debt. Your debts will eventually be discharged, relieving you from the obligation of repaying most of the debt you had on the day you filed for bankruptcy.

Despite the fact that most debts can be discharged, some cannot, namely:

  • alimony and child support;
  • court fines and penalties;
  • debts related to fraud; and some
  • student loans.

You will suffer credit damage for several years after filing for bankruptcy. After your debt is discharged, you can start rebuilding your credit. Although it’s not ideal, it will lift the burden from your shoulders and solve the debt problems you couldn’t resolve on your own.

Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act: Can bankruptcy protect you from creditors?

In addition to bankruptcy, any filing listed above under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act will protect you from creditors. In fairness to all stakeholders, the filing calls for a “time out” after which no claims for money, lawsuits, or collection efforts are permitted. In legal jargon, we call this a stay of proceedings.

By virtue of the individual’s bankruptcy or insolvency, you may not terminate, amend, or accelerated pay, or claim the term of any agreement. When an insolvent person files a notice of intention or a proposal, a similar provision is made.

Just like in bankruptcy, if you file a notice of intention or a Division I proposal or Division II proposal, all proceedings automatically stay and no creditor is entitled to take any action against the debtor or to pursue any execution or other proceeding for the recovery of a claim provable.

Commercial proposals are normally worded so that Directors of insolvent companies who have filed notices of intention or proposals enjoy similar protection.

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act

A word on cross-border insolvencies

Many of the large CCAA reorganization filings in recent times have been cross-border insolvencies. Canadian courts prefer that cross-border insolvencies proceed as a single process with one jurisdiction acting as the primary entity. The Canadian court examines whether the Canadian case should be considered the main proceeding in order to determine whether it is significant and connected to Canada.

The other jurisdiction (most often the U.S.) usually recognizes the Canadian court’s authority when the court believes the insolvency action should be handled, for the most part, in Canada. Likewise, the opposite is also true.

Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act: Personal bankruptcy

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act

Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act summary

I hope you found this Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Brandon Blog informative. With too high household debt levels and not enough wealth, you are insolvent. You can choose from several insolvency processes to get the debt relief that you need and deserve. It may not be necessary for you to file for bankruptcy.

If you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help, and you assume bankruptcy is the only option, call me.

If you’re thinking about bankruptcy, you’re probably in a situation where you’re overwhelmed, frightened, and feel like you’re alone. That’s natural and it is not your fault.

It’s good that you’ve come to this site, where you’ll find answers to your questions, sort through your options, and discover that you can get help. You’re not alone, and the professionals at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. are committed to helping you find a debt solution that’s best for you.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

You are under a lot of pressure. Our team knows how you feel. You and your financial and emotional problems will be the focus of a new approach designed specifically for you. With our help, you will be able to blow away the dark cloud over your head. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

Because of this, we can develop a new method for paying down your debt that will be built specifically for you. It will be as unique as the economic problems and discomfort you are experiencing. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency act

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

A BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGED IS THE KEY TO HEARTWARMING DEBT ELIMINAT1ON

bankruptcy discharged
bankruptcy discharged

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would like to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

Your Bankruptcy Discharged – But Wait

Well, that took no time at all. Last week I told you about a bankruptcy discharge hearing I attended where the bankrupt person had his bankruptcy discharged by the Master in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice In Bankruptcy and Insolvency.

The Master’s decision was released on August 13, 2021. On August 20, 2021, we received the Notice of Motion of the opposing creditor appealing the Master’s decision to give this person his discharge from bankruptcy. That is their right.

In this Brandon Blog, I want to discuss the reasons for the opposition to the fact that this bankrupt had his bankruptcy discharged and my thoughts on one scenario of how this may play out. First, I just want to refresh your memory about the bankruptcy process and specifically how the discharge under bankruptcy law in Canada process works. Then I will get into this real-life story.

Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) gives people the option of filing a debt management plan restructuring consumer proposal if they are unable to pay back all unsecured debt owing to their unsecured creditors. This option offers the consumer a way to maybe keep their home and car that is heavily financed, as long as they can maintain the payments to the secured creditors such as the financial institution who financed the purchase of the home by way of the mortgage, or the auto loan, and it makes sense in their budget.

A successful consumer proposal is also the way to avoid bankruptcy. Like bankruptcy, the process starts with a no-cost consultation for financial advice with a licensed insolvency trustee. A licensed trustee is the only party able to administer a consumer proposal in Canada (or a bankruptcy). The Trustee can help you lose your debt load.

A first-time bankrupt who fulfills all of their obligations, including attending 2 mandatory credit counselling sessions, is entitled to a discharge after 9 months from the date of bankruptcy.

bankruptcy discharged
bankruptcy discharged

A bankruptcy discharged: First and second bankruptcy (or more)

When an insolvent debtor files for bankruptcy for a second time, you cannot be discharged after a nine months bankruptcy period. When you don’t need to pay the Trustee any surplus income payments, a second bankruptcy lasts for a minimum of 24 months. A second-time bankruptcy filer with surplus income must make those payments for 36 months to qualify to get their bankruptcy discharged.

A third or subsequent bankruptcy follows the same timeline as a second bankruptcy. There is, however, a high probability that the Trustee or creditors will oppose the discharge. Where there is opposition, there must be a court bankruptcy discharge hearing and the court can impose any conditions it deems appropriate.

What does bankruptcy discharged mean in Canada?

It is a Canadian legal term used to describe the release of a consumer debtor or business proprietorship from their obligations, responsibilities, debts, and legal claims. “Bankruptcy” is a legal proceeding to protect the estate of a person or company. “Discharge” fulfills the requirement that a person is released from their obligations, responsibilities, debts, and legal claims through the bankruptcy process. There is no equivalent requirement for a company.

The insolvent debtor filing for bankruptcy merely invokes the legal protection to the person and puts a bankruptcy trustee in place to realize upon any available assets in the bankruptcy estate for the benefit of the creditors. Bankruptcy filings do not relieve the person of their debts. It is when the person is bankruptcy discharged, that they are released from their debts (other than for a select list of exceptions).

bankruptcy discharged
bankruptcy discharged

Bankruptcy discharged: Types of bankruptcy discharge

The licensed insolvency trustee can usually issue an automatic discharge when there is no trustee in bankruptcy opposition or creditor opposition to a bankrupt’s application for discharge, and the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties during bankruptcy.

In case of opposition or if the bankrupt meets one of the criteria that prevents automatic discharge (for example, the bankruptcy process finds the bankrupt to have a high tax debt situation), a discharge hearing in court is held, which is conducted by the Master of the Bankruptcy Court. There are four types of the bankruptcy discharge and a fifth outcome is also possible. Here they are:

  1. Absolute discharge – An absolute discharge means that the bankrupt may obtain a discharge immediately. If the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties and there is no insolvency trustee or creditor opposition, this can be provided by the licensed insolvency trustee of the bankruptcy estate handling the bankruptcy administration;
  2. Conditional discharge – can get discharged if certain conditions are met. Typically, to get bankruptcy discharged this way, conditions include payment to the licensed insolvency trustee;
  3. Suspended – the bankruptcy discharge will be granted at a later date and may very well be combined with an absolute bankruptcy discharge or conditional bankruptcy discharge;
  4. Refused– because the debtor has not made full disclosure or done other bankruptcy duties; or
  5. “No order” – the insolvency trustee informs the court that the bankrupt has not fulfilled all of his or her obligations and has failed to respond to the Trustee’s demands for information despite the passing of time. The licensed insolvency trustee is at liberty to seek its discharge when the “no order” order is provided. When the bankrupt has actually complied with the court’s requirements, he or she may apply for a hearing for discharge. When the Trustee gets its discharge, the stay of proceedings preventing collection actions against the bankrupt disappears.

A bankruptcy discharged: The appeal just served upon us – a true story

To refresh your memory about the discharge hearing itself you can CLICK HERE. The appeal just served upon us seeks an Order setting aside the decision of the Master made on August 13, 2021. The grounds for the appeal can be described as throwing everything including the kitchen sink! The stated grounds are that the Learned Registrar erred:

  • by granting the bankrupt an absolute discharge from bankruptcy;
  • in holding that the Receiver’s interest in the discharge application is not firmly established and by not recognizing that should the Receiver be paid an amount in excess of the debt owed to the secured creditor, any surplus funds would be available for the other creditors of the
    corporate bankruptcy estate;
  • in holding that the discharge hearing is not the proper forum in which to make determinations as to the propriety of the various transactions that the Receiver has raised;
  • in finding that the bankrupt has generally cooperated with me as his Trustee;
  • in declining to consider the bankrupt’s conduct in the corporate bankruptcy because that the trustee in the corporate bankruptcy had remedies available to it;
  • in finding that the failure of the company’s business was due to the loss of its 1 customer and pricing related to that arrangement;
  • in relying on her finding that the corporate trustee may be the only truly interested party on the discharge or would benefit most from the conditional order sought if the secured debt is otherwise repaid;
  • in exercising her discretion in finding that an order of discharge requiring payment of the significant amount proposed by the Receiver is not reasonable;
  • in finding that the bankrupt has no ability to pay and that his future prospects to pay are unknown;
  • in finding that an order for a conditional discharge of the magnitude sought would be tantamount to a refusal;
  • by omitting to consider relevant evidence or the absence thereof, in relying on irrelevant considerations, and/or giving improper weight to the evidence before the Court; and
  • anything else the lawyers may want to say.

    bankruptcy discharged
    bankruptcy discharged

Standard of review to getting a personal bankruptcy discharged

Such an appeal from a bankruptcy discharge hearing has a standard of review. According to BIA S. 192(1), the bankruptcy registrar can, among other things, grant orders of discharge. S. 192(4) of the BIA permits a party dissatisfied with a registrar’s order or decision to appeal it to a judge.

Registrars are exercising judicial discretion when granting discharges in bankruptcy cases. As long as the registrar acted reasonably, the judge should not set it aside or ignore it. Furthermore, if an appeal from a bankruptcy discharge order is based on alleged errors in factual findings, the court will not intervene if the findings of fact can be justified based on credible evidence. If the registrar has materially misinterpreted the law or made an error in respect of the facts underpinning his or her discretion, discretionary decisions can, of course, be overturned.

If the registrar decides that in order for the person to get their bankruptcy discharged, the court imposes conditions, those conditions must be realistic to allow the bankrupt to meet the requirements in a reasonable amount of time. If an amount ordered in order for the person to get their bankruptcy discharged is unrealistic and the discharge is conditional on making additional payments, the appellate court in such cases previously held that results in an error of law. The appellate judge can either substitute other conditions or refer the matter back to the registrar for reconsideration.

A bankruptcy discharged: What my gut is telling me

I normally am not in the prediction business. However, having been the insolvency trustee responsible for administering the consumer bankruptcy, having written the reports to the court on the bankrupt’s application for discharge, having attended the discharge hearing and having heard all the evidence, having read the Registrar’s decision and the Appeal documentation, I believe that the appeal should be dismissed.

You might recall that opposing the bankrupt getting bankruptcy discharged was the Receiver of the company previously operated by the bankrupt. As a result of complaints regarding the bankrupt and his family in relation to the company’s operations, the Receiver has filed lawsuits against several parties. The proceedings are still pending. According to previous court rulings, the court should not consider the issues raised in other proceedings when deciding whether to discharge the bankrupt. A discharge hearing is a summary proceeding. It is important to see how the debtor behaved during HIS bankruptcy.

As for the judge’s decision, only time will tell. I’ll keep you up to date as always.

bankruptcy discharged
bankruptcy discharged

Bankruptcy discharged summary

I hope that you found this bankruptcy discharged Brandon Blog helpful in telling this real-life story of an appeal to a person getting their bankruptcy discharged. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt. You may not need to file for bankruptcy.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT ARE EXEMPT ASSETS IN BANKRUPTCY?: ARE THEY REV1EWED UPON THE SAD DEATH OF THE BANKRUPT?

what are exempt assets in bankruptcy
what are exempt assets in bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would like to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

What are exempt assets in bankruptcy?: Bankruptcy exemptions – how what assets you can keep are determined

An assignment in bankruptcy does not require you to give up all of your assets. In bankruptcy law, there are rules for bankruptcy exemptions. Furthermore, every province/territory has regulations that mandate what assets can be kept and how much equity can be retained. Assets of this type are called exempt assets.

Assets that you are allowed to keep that are not accessible to your creditors are exempt assets in a bankruptcy. There are some that fall under federal law and some that fall under provincial law.

So what are exempt assets in bankruptcy in Ontario? To answer the question, we need to look at two statutes: one federal and one provincial. For federal, we look at the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). Section 67(1) of the BIA deals specifically with the bankruptcy exemption issue. It states what property of the bankrupt available to creditors does and does not comprise. Property that is not included is:

  • Property held in trust by the bankrupt for any third party.
  • Under provincial law, the property cannot be seized.
  • Payments to the bankrupt are paid under a program that I will describe as social assistance provided by the federal or provincial government.
  • Retirement Savings Plans – The bankrupt’s RRSP or RRIF, except for contributions made in the 12 months before the bankruptcy.

When we discuss the property of a bankrupt, we are referring to the bankrupt’s equity in those assets.

Ontario bankruptcy exemptions: Assets you can keep

As indicated above, one of the asset exemptions in bankruptcy is any property that cannot be seized under provincial law. So what are exempt assets in bankruptcy in Ontario that cannot be seized? For that, we need to go to the Ontario Execution Act. In Ontario, the prescribed amounts for exemptions are:

  • Household furnishings and household appliances – $14,180.
  • Tools and other personal property used to generate income:
    • Exemptions for farmers, being a debtor engaged exclusively in cultivating the soil or farming (and therefore it is that farmer’s principal source of primary income), $31,379 for livestock, fowl, bees, books, tools and implements, and other chattels ordinarily used by the debtor;
    • $14,405 for any other case.
  • $7,117 for a motor vehicle.
  • $10, 783 for a principal residence.

As I have written before, there is an exemption in Ontario for equity in one’s home of not more than $10,783. It is not an exemption for the first $10K, but rather if the total equity is below that amount. Therefore, we can consider the equity in a bankrupt person’s ownership interest in their home to belong to the bankruptcy trustee for all practical purposes.

So this seems pretty straightforward. But what if the bankrupt person dies before the end of the bankruptcy proceedings and the bankruptcy estate administration? A recent decision from the Alberta bankruptcy court, which for reasons I will explain I believe would be instructive for Ontario, answers that question.

what are exempt assets in bankruptcy
what are exempt assets in bankruptcy

What are exempt assets in bankruptcy even in death?

In addition to the above statutory exemptions, since we are always dealing with the bankrupt’s equity in assets, there is another class of assets that form exempt property in a bankruptcy. If any of the bankrupt’s assets are pledged as security to the point where the amount owing to the secured creditor on the secured debt is the same or more than the value of the asset, then a bankruptcy trustee will not attempt to seize it.

So what may have started out as non-exempt property can become property that will not be seized. Two obvious examples are one of the motor vehicles owned by a person worth more than $7,117 that is heavily financed or a principal residence that has mortgages against it that essentially soaks up all the value.

Another type of asset that may be exempt is life insurance policies. If the beneficiary under the policy listed is the spouse, child, parent or grandparent of the deceased, then the funds flow directly to the beneficiary and avoid probate. The bankruptcy of the deceased does not change that.

Although not an asset per se, and only available while the person is living, are wages salary from employment. A bankrupt person is allowed to keep all of their income. However, all Trustees are required to perform an evaluation to see if the bankrupt must contribute by making surplus income payments. The concept of bankruptcy surplus income has been the subject of certain of my prior Brandon Blogs.

Now, what are exempt assets in bankruptcy if the bankrupt person dies before receiving a bankruptcy discharge? On August 3, 2021, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Registrar in Bankruptcy L.R. Birkett released Reasons for Decision in Perry (Re), 2021 ABQB 609 (CanLII). In this case, the Trustee sought advice and directions with respect to whether the principal residence exemption continues or is no longer available on the death of the bankrupt. Keep in mind that the principal residence exemption is much different in Alberta than in Ontario. In Alberta, under the Civil Enforcement Act, an Albertan can claim a principal residence exemption up to $40,000.

However, the fact that the issue was over equity in a principal residence is somewhat irrelevant. The real issue is exempt assets in general. So I would frame it as whether any asset exemption continues or is no longer available upon the death of the bankrupt.

Mr. and Mrs. Perry each filed an assignment in bankruptcy on December 19, 2012 (date of bankruptcy) and both remain undischarged bankrupts. At the date of bankruptcy, the bankrupt husband was the only registered owner of the couple’s principal residence. The bankrupt husband died on January 28, 2018.

He did not have any dependents at the time of his death. The bankrupt wife is the only beneficiary under his Will. The widowed bankrupt wife moved from the home and the Trustee sold it.

As a first observation, this is a perfect example of why a bankrupt should not allow the bankruptcy proceedings to drag on. Future events are impossible to predict. Winning a lottery or acquiring an inheritance are the two best reasons to avoid letting the bankruptcy process linger for a very long time. If such a windfall occurs, the bankruptcy trustee administering the bankruptcy estate can claim it.

Types of assets commonly exempt from bankruptcy across Canada: The Registrar’s analysis

The question is does the personal exemption of an undischarged bankrupt remain after his death? In Alberta, the applicable laws under which property is exempt from execution or seizure are set out in the Civil Enforcement Act (CEA) and the Civil Enforcement Regulation(CER). The combined effect of s.88(g) CEA and s 37(1)(e) CER allows an enforcement debtor to claim up to $40,000 of the equity in the debtor’s principal residence as being exempt from execution or seizure. The Registrar noted that the personal exemption is personal to the individual, in this case, the deceased bankrupt husband.

Section 92(1) of the CEA specifically provides that where the enforcement debtor is deceased, the property of the debtor that would be exempt if the debtor were alive remains exempt from writ proceedings against the debtor’s estate for the period of time that the property is required for the maintenance and support of the deceased debtor’s dependents. This allows the dependents of a deceased enforcement debtor the opportunity to access up to $40,000 of exempt equity in the debtor’s principal residence for their needs.

In this case, the widowed bankrupt wife moved out of the house and the Trustee sold it. The exempt equity was no longer necessary for her needs. Therefore the Registrar decided that the deceased bankrupt husband’s exemption was lost on his death. Since the exempt equity was not required to support the bankrupt wife’s needs, the Trustee of the dead bankrupt husband can keep the $40,000 amount as property not covered by the provincial exemption and it is available for the benefit of creditors through the bankruptcy debtor‘s unsecured creditors.

There is a strong argument that if the personal exemption resulted in the bankrupt wife being entitled to her deceased husband’s exemption amount, it would not have been paid to her anyway. Rather, it would have been property available to her Trustee for her unsecured creditors and possibly even a dividend to creditors!

what are exempt assets in bankruptcy
what are exempt assets in bankruptcy

What are exempt assets in bankruptcy and what would happen in Ontario?

What would happen in Ontario with exempt assets (up to their prescribed maximum exempt amount)? Under s.5(1) of the Execution Act, if an execution debtor dies before the seizure and sale of his or her personal property, then whatever personal property the deceased already elected for exemption before death remains valid after death and may not be changed by an executor, administrator or heir of the debtor. s.5(2) of the Execution Act says that If no such election was made prior to death, then, in this order, a surviving spouse, a dependent or a family member has the right to make such an election.

S.5(3) of the Execution Act states:

“(3) The total quantity and total value of personal property of an execution debtor that may be claimed as exempt by a person mentioned in subsection (2) and by the execution debtor before death must not exceed the quantity and value of property that would have been exempt property to just the execution debtor. 2010, c. 16, Sched. 2, s. 3 (9).”

The wording of sections 5(1) and (2) of the Execution Act is very different from that of the relevant Alberta legislation referenced above. So, in my view, it appears that the personal exemption in Ontario would survive and not constitute property available for the Trustee to realize upon, but this is only up to the exemption limit of each class of exempt asset.

However, under a bankruptcy process, along with the bankruptcy protection from unsecured creditors, the bankrupt actually hands over all property to the Trustee. The Trustee either overtly or it is implied, hands back to the bankruptcy debtor any property that is exempt from seizure, either from a provincial statute or because it is a fully encumbered asset because of it being pledged for a secured loan and there is no equity.

In Ontario, since the Execution Act allows for selecting exempt assets after death for the benefit of the deceased Estate, it does not appear to me that bankruptcy would change things for the reasons I have stated. The provincial exemptions, up to their maximum limits, would continue to protect certain property from seizure in bankruptcy.

What are exempt assets in bankruptcy summary

I hope that you found this what are exempt assets in bankruptcy Brandon Blog helpful in describing the personal exemptions in Ontario and whether bankruptcy and death can change that. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt. You may not need to file for bankruptcy.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

what are exempt assets in bankruptcy
what are exempt assets in bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

what are exempt assets in bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE ORDER: OBSESSED CREDITOR LOSES APPEAL OF THE DISCHARGE ORDER

bankruptcy dischargeWe hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

What does bankruptcy discharge mean in Canada?

A bankruptcy filing is a form of insolvency process under Canadian bankruptcy law available to individuals and businesses. Bankruptcy deals with a person’s or company’s debt load and assets. After performing a detailed initial assessment, the licensed insolvency trustee will be in a position to advise the debtor if they will be better serviced through a restructuring process as an alternative to bankruptcy (consumer proposal or Division I Proposal for individuals, Division I Proposal or Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act bankruptcy protection for companies) with creditors, or whether the debtor will be better served filing for bankruptcy.

The final piece of any bankruptcy process for an individual is the bankruptcy discharge. Individuals who go bankrupt are entitled to a discharge from bankruptcy. Companies are only entitled to one if every bankruptcy claim filed is paid in full, with interest. Because this never happens, companies do not receive a bankruptcy discharge. It is not impossible, but for this reason, it really does not happen.

If you are thinking about filing an assignment in bankruptcy, then you may be wondering about the bankruptcy discharge process and how it will affect you. Many people think their debts are eliminated at the moment of their bankruptcy filing.

This is incorrect. It is the bankruptcy discharge that will remove all (with certain limited exceptions) of your unsecured debts from your life and will result in letting you move forward with a clean slate. In this Brandon Blog, I discuss the bankruptcy discharge process and a recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia hearing an appeal to the decision of the Master sitting as bankruptcy registrar on a bankrupt’s application for discharge.bankruptcy discharge

Bankruptcy discharge and its consequences for the bankrupt

When you are granted a bankruptcy discharge, this means that those debts caught by your bankruptcy are no longer your responsibility. This means that every action from creditors or the collection agencies they have retained stops trying to collect the debt obligations.

As I previously mentioned, most almost all debts are wiped off your slate when you receive your discharge from bankruptcy. The kinds of debts that remain even after a bankruptcy discharge are:

  • spousal or child support payments;
  • fines or penalties mandated by the court;
  • claims arising from fraud or fraudulent breach of trust;
  • student loan debt if less than 7 years have passed since the bankrupt stopped being a part-time or full-time student.
  • any kind of financial debts that are secured against your assets, such as a home mortgage or automobile financing, are not discharged as a result of your bankruptcy discharge.

These sorts of financial debts endure after bankruptcy as they are not released. The individual will be required to continue paying those financial obligations according to their terms. All various other financial obligations are discharged and do not have to be paid.

What are the types of bankruptcy discharge?

If there is no Trustee opposition or creditor opposition to a bankrupt’s application for discharge, and the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties of a bankrupt, in most situations, the licensed insolvency trustee can issue an automatic discharge which provides the bankrupt with an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.

If there is an opposition or the bankrupt meets one of the criteria that does not allow for an automatic discharge (such as the bankruptcy process finding the bankrupt a high income tax debt situation), there must be a discharge hearing in court which is heard by a Master of the court sitting as the registrar in bankruptcy. There are 4 types of bankruptcy discharge and a 5th bankruptcy outcome is also possible. They are:

  1. absolute – an absolute discharge means the bankrupt is entitled to an immediate discharge. This can be given by the licensed insolvency trustee in the bankruptcy estate handling the bankruptcy administration if the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties and there is no trustee or creditor opposition;
  2. conditional discharge – can get a discharge after meeting one or more conditions. The most common type of condition of discharge involves paying a sum of money to the licensed insolvency trustee;
  3. suspended – the bankrupt’s discharge will take place at a later date and may very well be combined with either an absolute bankruptcy discharge or conditional bankruptcy discharge;
  4. refused– the court refused to grant a bankruptcy discharge probably because the bankrupt has failed to provide full disclosure or perform other bankruptcy duties; or
  5. “no order”– the Trustee advises the court that regardless of the time period that has passed, the bankrupt has actually not satisfied every one of his or her obligations and the bankrupt has actually failed to reply to the Trustee’s demands for information. In this situation, when the “no order” order is provided, the licensed insolvency trustee is at liberty to seek its discharge. Once the bankrupt person has actually fulfilled the requirements set by the court, the bankrupt can re-apply for a discharge hearing by the court.bankruptcy discharge

For a first-time bankrupt with no surplus income who fulfills of their duties, including attending the 2 mandatory credit counselling sessions, they are entitled to their bankruptcy discharge after a bankruptcy period of 9 months from the date of bankruptcy.

If this is your second bankruptcy a discharge will not be available after 9 months. A 2nd bankruptcy lasts for a minimum of 24 months if you do not have any surplus income payments to make to the Trustee. If you have surplus income, a second-time bankrupt must make those monthly payments for 36 months before they are entitled to a bankruptcy discharge.

For a 3rd or subsequent bankruptcy, the timeline is the same as the 2nd time bankrupt. However, it is much more possible that there will certainly be resistance to the discharge by the Trustee or the creditors. The court can also impose whatever conditions it sees fit.

Creditor objects to the decision of the Master on bankrupt’s application for discharge

On July 9, 2021, the decision in Hanlon (Re), 2021 BCSC 1348 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia was released. This was an appeal from an order by the bankruptcy registrar of the Supreme Court of British Columbia dated April 28, 2021 in Hanlon (Re), 2021 BCSC 800, VA B190492. This is an appeal under s. 192(4) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (BIA), from an order of a master of that Court, sitting as a registrar in bankruptcy, granting the bankrupt, Mr. Hanlon, a bankruptcy discharge that was made conditional on his paying $7,500 to the Trustee.

The appellant, Ms. Johnson, is one of Mr. Hanlon’s creditors. She states that the registrar erred in approving the discharge on those terms. If the appeal is allowed, she looks for an order refusing Mr. Hanlon’s application for a discharge, with leave to apply again in two years, or alternatively, giving a discharge conditional on his paying $50,000. The appeal is opposed by both Mr. Hanlon the bankrupt, and the Trustee. The appeal was heard by Judge Milman, Canada’s bankruptcy legislation, the BIA states that a person dissatisfied with an order or decision of a registrar can appeal that decision to a judge of that court who in that capacity is sitting as a bankruptcy judge.

The alleged errors made by the registrar in the making of the order of conditional discharge

Ms. Johnson argued that the registrar made certain errors in granting the conditional bankruptcy discharge order. Ms. Johnson says that in granting the bankruptcy discharge on those terms, the registrar erred as follows:

  • in concluding that Mr. Hanlon had complied with the injunction resulting from Ms. Johnson’s original successful litigation against Mr. Hanlon when he had not;
  • in falling short to take into account Mr. Hanlon’s refusal to agree with the accuracy of the trial judge; and
  • in failing to consider Mr. Hanlon’s real income earning potential.bankruptcy discharge

The standard of review on such an appeal

There is a standard of review on such an appeal from an order of a bankruptcy discharge hearing. S. 192(1) of the BIA gives the bankruptcy registrar the authority to, amongst other things, grant orders of discharge. S. 192(4) of the BIA allows a party dissatisfied with an order or decision of a
registrar may appeal it to a judge.

In granting an order of discharge in the bankruptcy process, the registrar is exercising judicial discretion. If the registrar has acted reasonably, the judge should not set it aside or ignore it. Further, if an appeal from a bankruptcy discharge order is based on alleged errors in findings of fact, the court will not interfere if there is no overriding error in the findings of fact and there is evidence from which the findings of fact could be made. Discretionary decisions may, naturally, be overturned if the registrar has materially misinterpreted the law or made an error in respect of the facts underlying the use of that discretion.

When a registrar’s decision in a bankruptcy discharge hearing imposes conditions, those conditions must be realistic for the bankrupt to perform in a reasonable period of time. Where the amount ordered was unrealistic and the bankrupt’s discharge is conditional on making additional payments, the appeal court did hold that results in an error of law and the appellate judge can either substitute the conditions or refer the matter back to the registrar for reconsideration.

The judge’s decision on the appeal from the registrar’s bankruptcy discharge order

The judge dismissed the appeal finding there were no overriding errors made by the registrar. With respect to the amount of $7,500 ordered as a condition of discharge from bankruptcy, the judge found as follows:

Ms. Johnson says that the registrar did not consider Mr. Hanlon’s untapped earning capacity and instead concentrated practically completely on her arguments of his potential inheritance. She suggests that Mr. Hanlon could be earning more than he is. In her opinion, he could earn more to enable him to make a settlement of $50,000 rather than the $7,500 that was ordered.

Mr. Hanlon’s real historic earnings offered adequate assistance for the registrar’s verdict that he was incapable of paying any more than the $7,500 that she ordered for him, did not have the financial prospects himself to do so and without getting personal loans from family members to help him with that. That was properly decided by the registrar based on the evidence before her.

The judge found that there is no merit in this or any other of the grounds of appeal. He found no error in the registrar’s decision, and having found the discharge condition that she imposed to have been reasonable in the circumstances, he dismissed the appeal.

Bankruptcy discharge summary

I hope that you found this bankruptcy discharge Brandon Blog interesting and that you now have a good appreciation for the process at the end of the administration for a person who files for bankruptcy and the considerations of the court if someone appeals a bankruptcy discharge order. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost bankruptcy consultation.bankruptcy discharge

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY ACT: ANTI-DEPRIVATION RULE COMPLETELY VALID IN INSOLVENCY

insolvency and bankruptcy act
insolvency and bankruptcy act

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click on the podcast.

Insolvency and bankruptcy act introduction

On October 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) rendered its decision in Chandos Construction Ltd. v. Deloitte Restructuring Inc., 2020 SCC 25 (Chandos decision). This decision upheld the idea that the anti-deprivation rule is completely valid when it pertains to both personal and business insolvency and bankruptcy act cases.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I describe the Chandos case and what it stands for.

The definition of the word deprive and the insolvency and bankruptcy act context

The Merriam-Webster dictionary states the definition of the word deprive is:

  • 1: to take something away from; and
  • : to withhold something from.

In the Chandos Construction Ltd. (Chandos) insolvency and bankruptcy act case, the SCC was asked to rule on contract clauses that if upheld, would deprive the bankruptcy estate and therefore the unsecured creditors of money that would otherwise be available. This deprivation of funds, which may make total sense as between contracting parties, is not enforceable in bankruptcy.

The anti-deprivation rule in the Canadian insolvency and bankruptcy act matters

Neither the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) nor the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) stops non-defaulting parties to a contract, from relying upon agreement provisions that create an inevitable result when a debtor declares bankruptcy. The common law becomes pertinent in these situations.

Canadian courts still refer to these anti-deprivation provisions as “ipso facto” provisions and also this idea as the fraud upon the bankruptcy law concept. In more current times, this has been described as the anti-deprivation rule.

The SCC has recognized the anti-deprivation rule since the 1890s. However, the contemporary application of this principle in Canadian law greatly originates from an Ontario court decision in 1995 – Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Bramalea Inc., 1995 CanLII 7262 (ON SC) (Bramalea decision).

This is a decision from the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division). Canadian courts have thought about and decided upon the anti-deprivation rule in many insolvency and bankruptcy act cases since then.

The Bramalea case and its relevance of insolvency and bankruptcy act matters

Luckily for me, Ira Smith was the receiver responsible for the file that involved the Bramalea decision. So, I have a bird’s-eye view of that case which started it all leading to the SCC Chandos decision.

In the Bramalea insolvency and bankruptcy act case, a group of companies, including Bramalea Inc. (Bramalea) was in a partnership agreement to develop and operate a shopping mall in Markham, Ontario called Shoppes on Steeles. In 1995, Bramalea was placed into receivership and bankruptcy. Bramalea’s partners included Sears Canada and a private real estate development company.

Amongst the different provisions of the partnership agreement was a specific provision in the contract which considers insolvency. It said that, in case of the insolvency of any of the partners, the non-insolvent partner(s) (given it does not waive the event of insolvency) can buy the interest of the financially troubled partner at the lesser of book value or fair market value.

The paradox of this case was that the large company partners at the time of the drafting of the partnership contract were concerned about what happens if the private property developer one day became insolvent? None of the partners ever believed that it would be that private company that would be the only one that was not insolvent. We all know what happened to Sears Canada!

The moving parties sought to exercise that right by serving a notification to buy the Bramalea passion at book value, approximated to be around $200,000. This was opposed by the receiver and also other stakeholders.

The receiver gave evidence that the fair market price surpassed book value by as much as $2 million to $3 million. The moving parties acknowledged that the fair market value of Bramalea’s stake in the partnership was more than book value. They did not agree with the receiver’s evidence regarding the amount of that difference. They additionally did not submit their own fair market valuation.

The Bramalea insolvency and bankruptcy act decision

Based on the evidence, the court took the view that the specific spread between book value and fair market value was not trivial. The court was satisfied that the distinction is greater than marginal, and enough to properly draw the interest of the receiver and the creditors.

The receiver’s position was that there is a higher principle in play and that the concern is not one of hindering the freedom of contract. Rather it was just one of whether or not that part of the partnership contract is void as being contrary to the public interest.

The receiver submitted that while the arrangement might quite possibly stand as between the contracting parties, it is void as against the receiver and also the bankruptcy trustee in the Bramalea insolvency and bankruptcy act proceedings.

The court agreed with the receiver’s position in this insolvency and bankruptcy act case. The court decided that it was clear from the provisions of the partnership agreement itself that the parties contemplated a transfer to one of the partners of the other partner’s partnership interest, only in case of insolvency, at a price less than what could be acquired for that interest on the open market.

The court specified that this stipulation made perfect sense, as between the contracting parties. It made total sense in regards to maintaining their partnership and their respective interests. Nevertheless, the court likewise specified that the clause cannot survive through the scrutiny of the “fraud on the bankruptcy law” principle.

The receiver ended up selling Bramalea’s partnership interest to the other partners for fair market value.

insolvency and bankruptcy act
insolvency and bankruptcy act

The Chandos Alberta court case and the anti-deprivation rule for insolvency and bankruptcy act matters

Chandos was the general contractor for a condo project contracted with Capital Steel to give $1.3 million worth of steelwork. In the subcontract, Capital Steel agreed that if it became insolvent, Chandos was entitled to all costs arising from the suspension of the contract and it would forfeit 10% of the total subcontract price as an inconvenience fee. Capital Steel performed the majority of its commitments, nevertheless, it filed an assignment in bankruptcy before completing full performance.

As a result, Chandos was forced to finish the contract at an estimated expense of $22,800. Up until that point, Chandos owed Capital Steel $149,618 in outstanding invoices for the job it had performed.

Chandos relied upon the agreement and said that it was qualified to deduct its cost of finishing the job plus 10% of the total contract cost from the amount owing. Given the price of the subcontract, the 10% deduction eliminated Chandos’ balance owing plus an extra amount of $10,511. Chandos declared that gave them a provable claim in the Capital Steel insolvency and bankruptcy act case.

The Trustee’s application to the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench

On March 6, 2017, the Trustee applied to the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench seeking advice and directions on whether Chandos was entitled to rely on the provision in the contract or was it void pursuant to the anti-deprivation rule in common-law.

The chambers judge acknowledged that the common law anti-deprivation rule stops parties from contracting out of insolvency and bankruptcy act regulations. The judge stated that if that provision was a liquidating damages provision as opposed to a penalty, it would not violate the rule.

The chambers judge ruled that the condition was an authentic pre-estimate of costs, which imposed liquidated damages and not a penalty. He additionally held that the provision represented a bona fide commercial arrangement that did not have as its predominant objective the deprivation of Capital Steel’s property. Consequently, the chambers judge decided that Chandos can implement the clause against the Trustee.

Trustee appeals the Chandos insolvency and bankruptcy act decision to the Court of Appeal for Alberta

The Trustee appealed the Chandos decision to the Court of Appeal for Alberta. The appellate court reviewed the lower court decision in this insolvency and bankruptcy act case and decided that:

  • The chambers court properly determined the presence and application of the fraud on the bankruptcy law principle in Canada.
  • In describing the scope of the anti-deprivation rule, however, the chambers judge erred.
  • The lower court embraced the purpose-based technique set out by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
  • The appropriate technique is to check out the impact of the provision. Its purpose is a different analysis.
  • Chandos certainly had a genuine commercial interest it was looking to protect.
  • However, the clause conflicts with the BIA‘s scheme of distribution. The common law anti-deprivation rule revokes the clause and Chandos cannot count on it to defend its claim against the Trustee.

Chandos appeals to the SCC in this insolvency and bankruptcy act anti-deprivation rule case

One of the key goals of the insolvency and bankruptcy act law is to make certain there is a fair distribution among creditors. In order to fulfill the objective, the legislation restricts specific contractual stipulations that trigger when one of the parties goes into insolvency proceedings (ipso facto clauses).

As seen in the Bramalea situation, one of these limitations is the anti-deprivation rule. It holds that ipso facto conditions that rob the debtor’s creditors of assets they are qualified to receive in insolvency and bankruptcy act matters are void. This is likewise what the Court of Appeal for Alberta decided. Chandos appealed that decision to the SCC.

The Chandos appeal was heard on January 20, 2020. The SCC split decision was released on October 2, 2020. On the facts of Chandos, the SCC dismissed the Chandos appeal. The SCC refused to promote a contractual stipulation that the subcontractor Capital Steel waive 10 percent of the agreed price if Capital Steel became insolvent or bankrupt.

The SCC majority maintained that the test for application of the contractual provision is effects-based and not purpose-based. The SCC majority confirmed that the anti-deprivation rule stands under Canadian common law and it has not been eliminated in dismissing the appeal in this corporate insolvency and bankruptcy act case.

insolvency and bankruptcy act
insolvency and bankruptcy act

Insolvency and bankruptcy act summary

I hope you have enjoyed this insolvency and bankruptcy act Brandon’s Blog. Hopefully, you have better insight now into the fact that a sick insolvent company’s business can be saved by doing a sale of its assets to a healthy organization.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

 

Call a Trustee Now!