Tag: licensed insolvency trustee

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: SADLY IN E-COMMERCE TAXLAND

corporate bankruptcy in canadaCorporate bankruptcy in Canada: Introduction

A brand-new report from PwC Canada discloses that in 2018, Canadians anticipate spending an average of $1,563, up 6.7% over last year. Men are expected outspend women by almost $400. That got me to start thinking about what the most complex issue for corporate bankruptcy in Canada is when an online business fails?

The report finds that the majority of Canadians still prefer the in-store experience. Nearly two-thirds consider brick-and-mortar retail for their primary holiday season shopping. The rest is online shopping. Unsurprisingly, most millennials (51%) think of online purchasing first, which is in line with United States consumers overall (50%).

E-commerce, like any other industry, has its startups and more mature companies. There will be winners and losers. The fulfilment of online digital products is done online. The fulfilment of physical goods orders bought online more often than not will be done by a third party. That third party may not necessarily be fulfilling orders from Canada.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: The most complex issue for an e-commerce business, IMO

With that said, the retail vendor’s inventory, computer hardware and software value are relatively easy to determine. But to my way of thinking, the #1 issue for corporate online vendors, both solvent and viable or insolvent and not viable, is the area of sales tax.

In attempting to abide by tax laws for your e-business, you might find yourself falling down the rabbit-hole, going through the looking glass, and attending a Mad Tea-Party.

Sound judgment, logic, and fairness never did apply totally to the field of taxation, however, this is specifically true of e-commerce deals.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: Canada Customs Welcomes You to Canada!

Considering that I’m situated in Canada, let’s start here. To keep things simpler, but certainly not simple, I will review this issue strictly from a Federal tax collection perspective, i.e. Harmonized Sales Tax (HST).

Canada has what you may call a nationwide sales tax or a value included tax (VAT). This Goods and Services Tax (GST) of seven percent is applicable to lots of Canadian transactions.

Not just is it critical to identify whether a taxable sale was made in Canada or not, but also where in Canada. If it was made (or deemed to be made) in any of the HST provinces, a higher rate applies. This is due to the fact that those provinces have allowed Canada to gather their provincial sales taxes for them, as follows:

 

ProvinceHST % rate
New Brunswick15
Newfoundland and Labrador15
Nova Scotia15
Ontario13
Prince Edward Island15


Each province and territory has its own guidelines. Ontario charges 8 percent retail sales tax on numerous common internet deals whereas Alberta has no provincial sales tax.

Obviously, this is just scratching the surface. This entire blog by necessity is an oversimplification of an extremely complicated topic. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), I would certainly require the advice of a professional tax advisor to help me through e-commerce Taxland.

Since I am not a tax professional, you should also seek the advice of a tax professional. This is merely one bankruptcy trustee’s view of the issues in the insolvency of an e-commerce business.what does a court appointed receiver doCorporate bankruptcy in Canada: When Exports Aren’t Exports!

In Canada, exports are “zero-rated” sales for GST purposes. This means that when you ship a product to someone outside Canada, you don’t charge GST. Yet, you get to claim (or subtract from the GST collected by you) all the “input tax credits” (GST that you spent for business functions) to make that export.

However, if you export items aside from physical products, beware! There are lots of mistakes to look out for.

As one example, think about digitized products that you may offer from Canadian sites, such as e-books, downloadable software application, or subscriptions to a material. You would be considered to be selling “intangible personal property”. Unless your item is also thought about “copyright” (such as software or e-books that you produced or have gotten the rights for), you will need to charge GST. The reason, according to the Canada Revenue Agency, is that it could be utilized inside Canada, even if it isn’t.

Say you sold a subscription for accessing digitized content (from various sources) on your Canadian site to a client in the United States. Given that there are no restrictions regarding where the intangible personal property might be used, and the property is not considered copyright (nor the provision of a service), the American client goes through GST, even if he never comes to Canada.

Strangely, the same logic doesn’t apply when an American buys a routine book (or an automobile) which he could bring into Canada with him and utilize here. It holds true that it is much easier for Canada to assess such products at the border than in the online world. However, I have not heard of any cases of Americans being taxed on the cars and trucks or books they bring with them when they come to reside in Canada for a part of the year.

As a Canadian registrant, one way you might legally avoid this ridiculous March Hare is to clearly mention on your website and invoice that utilize of such intangible personal effects in Canada is restricted (or requires an extra charge and the payment of GST).

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: When imports Aren’t imports

Goods shipped to Canada are subject to GST on importation. Such tax is often assessed at the border. What if you are a Canadian registered for GST, selling to a Canadian customer but your provider is in a foreign country?

Pretend that your Canadian consumer has bought a book from you from your Canadian website. Your dropship supplier is located in the United States and is signed up for GST. You send your order to the American business, and they, in turn, ship the book for you (total with Customs Declaration and their GST Business Number).

Since they paid the GST, you wouldn’t think you would need to charge it again, would you? “Wrong!”, smiles the Cheshire cat. Since you are a registrant located in Canada, you need to charge and remit the GST. But you are entitled to input tax credits, aren’t you? In many cases, the answer is “No”.

It might be very tough for you to satisfy the documentary and other technical requirements. As an example, it is not uncommon for American providers to absolutely refuse to provide an invoice breaking down the GST or to enable you to be the importer of record. This complicates their life unnecessarily and they just don’t require the aggravation.

There are easing tax provisions covering drop shipping, sales agencies, and other situations. In most cases, sadly, the most practical option is to permit the tax to be paid twice.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: When you are subject to tax where you’re not subject to tax

It makes sense that countries impose a tax on sales and earnings made in their own jurisdiction. Does it make sense for Germany to tax sales made in the United States?

Starting July 1, 2003, the European Union actually did just that by enforcing an online sales tax.

This implies that if somebody from England buys an e-book from somebody in the United States, the American should submit this tax. Naturally, If the sale was to someone in Germany, the tax rate would be more complicated.

The reasoning behind this is as follows: Since countries can’t gather sales tax on internet deals at their borders, the only method they can collect it (other than a self-assessment system) is with an online sales tax. Even more, it is claimed that companies in the European Union suffer a significant competitive disadvantage due to the fact that they need to gather Value Added Tax but others don’t.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: But that isn’t all


So that is just a “scratching of the surface” description of the issue for Canadian companies selling online when it comes to HST. But if the company is insolvent, and will go into either receivership or bankruptcy, the story gets worse.

For every insolvent company in receivership, an HST liability is a trust claim against the assets of the company. So in a liquidation, the HST liability would have to be paid before a secured creditor, normally a chartered bank, recovers any money. What this means for the owner(s) who guaranteed the bank debt, is that they have additional exposure for any shortfall of the bank debt by the amount of the HST liability.

In a bankruptcy though, the HST liability is not a trust claim, but rather an unsecured claim. So, the good news is that it does not come ahead of the bank debt the owners have probably guaranteed payment for. However, the bad news is that the HST liability is always a Director liability. So in a bankruptcy, there are always insufficient funds to pay off the unsecured creditors 100%. So, the Directors of the bankrupt company will be on the hook for any unremitted HST.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company, either a traditional retailer, online retailer or both, experiencing financial difficulties? If yes, call the Ira Smith Team. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door.

The earlier you contact us, the more options we will have to implement. Whether it is a corporate restructuring or personal debt settlement through a consumer proposal, the goal is to avoid bankruptcy. However, if bankruptcy turns out to be the best option, we can assist there too.

You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, ending the pain and stress you are feeling forever. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for your free consultation.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE: CRITICAL ILLNESS INSURANCE IN A BANKRUPTCY

Canadian bankruptcy discharge: Introduction

Many times during the administration of a Canadian bankruptcy, the licensed insolvency Trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (Trustee) comes across a novel issue. The decision of A.R. Robertson, a Registrar in Bankruptcy in Calgary, Alberta in the bankruptcy discharge application of Shirley Rose Cooke has such an issue within it.

The case is Cooke (Re), 2018 ABQB 628 (CanLII). The issue that came before the Court was, what happens to a critical illness benefit payment for the undischarged bankrupt? Does it go to the Trustee or is the undischarged bankrupt debtor able to keep it? This topic should be of interest to accountants, lawyers, insurance agents and financial planners, in addition to Trustees.

Canadian bankruptcy discharge: The issue

Registrar Robertson described this case as an “interesting application” for bankruptcy discharge. The matter was heard on July 9, 2018. Ms. Cooke is 62 years old. She filed for bankruptcy on April 12, 2016. The issue to be decided is whether a critical illness benefit payment she obtained in the amount of $25,000, forms part of her assets which fall to the Trustee. The Trustee’s position was that it is an asset of the bankruptcy Estate and Ms. Cooke’s creditors are entitled to it.

Canadian bankruptcy discharge: The facts

In March 2016, Ms. Cooke was diagnosed with breast cancer. She went through surgery and had radiation treatments until July 2016. Prior to her medical diagnosis, she worked full time as a healthcare worker. She stopped working in March 2016 as a result of her diagnosis and need to undergo surgery and radiation. She returned to part-time work at her former employer, in about August 2016.


Her evidence was that at the time that she left her full-time work, her employer informed her she had the critical illness benefit policy and that she should apply under it. Apparently, she was unaware of this policy as being part of her benefits package. She applied for the benefit payment.

When she made her assignment in bankruptcy, she did not divulge the critical illness benefit application to the Trustee. She advised the Court that she did not have any type of certainty that she would receive the benefit. Eventually, she did, in January 2017. When she did, she advised her Trustee.

Canadian bankruptcy discharge: The Trustee’s position


The Trustee took the view that the critical illness benefit payment was a component of the insolvent person’s income under s. 67 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA). S. 67 of the BIA deals with property of the bankrupt, while s. 68 of the BIA deals with surplus income. However, s. 67 of the BIA does cover certain exclusions of types of payments a bankrupt may receive. The kinds of payments carved out are normally government type payments that have an overarching social aim, such as GST/HST tax credit payments.

It was very clear from the evidence that had she known she was going to get a $25,000 insurance payment from the insurance company, she would likely not have entered bankruptcy. Had she divulged the benefit application to the Trustee, the Trustee may very well have recommended she not go bankrupt.

The Trustee desires that Ms. Cooke pay the amount of $20,000 as a condition of her discharge. The Trustee states that in dealing with this critical illness benefit issue, including research, its fee now approximates that amount. I find it interesting that the Trustee is requesting the majority of her critical illness benefit payment as a discharge condition.

If the Trustee truly believes that the benefit payment should be considered as income under s. 67 of the BIA, then the correct treatment would be for the Trustee to redo its surplus income calculation under s. 68 of the BIA for Ms. Cooke. Then see what her surplus income obligation would be. If the Trustee is really trying to say the benefit payment is an asset that should come to the Trustee, then they should be asking for the entire $25,000. From my reading of the Registrar’s decision, it appears that the Trustee did neither but merely is asking for an amount to cover its costs!

Canadian bankruptcy discharge: The Registrar’s analysis


The Registrar indicated that in order to determine what is the appropriate condition if anything, he would have to assess the fees charged by the Trustee. If the Registrar really meant that he would have to tax the Trustee’s fee and costs, that makes sense. Otherwise, I am not sure what the connection is between the Trustee’s fee and costs, and whether a conditional discharge should be granted.

Ms. Cooke’s legal counsel referred to the Registrar the facts under s.173 of the BIA that could lead to an absolute discharge from bankruptcy not being granted. Her legal counsel indicated that none of the factors that would allow for a conditional, suspended or refused discharge apply in this matter.

The Registrar encouraged both parties to provide him with whatever additional information or authorities they thought appropriate by Tuesday, August 7, 2018.

The Trustee provided the Court with additional material. One such item was a copy of a letter sent by the Trustee to Ms. Cooke advising that, in the Trustee’s view, the critical illness benefit is a survivor benefit and not a wage or wage substitute. So much for it being part of surplus income!

The Registrar correctly pointed out that none of the exemptions in s. 67 of the BIA mention a critical illness benefit payment. The Registrar could also not find a precedent exactly on point.


The closest cases the Registrar could find were those of when the undischarged bankrupt suffered an injury in a motor vehicle accident and had a claim for pain and suffering. In that case, the action is personal to the injured person, and therefore that claim does not fall under the definition of property of the bankrupt available to the Trustee.

The Registrar stated that he sees no sensible distinction why a tort-based damages insurance claim for pain and suffering would be dealt with in a different way than a contract-based insurance policy for the pain and suffering Ms. Cooke had from her illness.

Accordingly, the Registrar decided that the critical illness benefit payment did not create a component of property designated to the Trustee. He also stated that Ms. Cooke did not have to pay any amount, to the Trustee. The Registrar went on to say that the Trustee should have brought on an application to have this matter determined much earlier in the bankruptcy proceedings so that the Trustee would not have incurred as many costs as it had.

The Registrar directed that:

  1. Although the Registrar did not explicitly state it in his judgment, the implication certainly is that Ms. Cooke received an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.
  2. Moreover, the Trustee should bring on the application for the Trustee’s discharge.
  3. Similarly, the Trustee should keep the Registrar’s comments as to the Trustee should have brought on a motion on the critical illness benefit issue earlier when submitting its dockets to have its fee and costs taxed by the Court.

Canadian bankruptcy discharge: Do you have too much debt?

I hope that none of us ever suffer from such a critical illness. However, it is good that Ms. Cooke had that insurance coverage. Do you have too much debt, or debt that you can’t repay because life got in your way? Illness and job loss are two prime factors in reducing someone’s income and increasing their expenses. It could force people to have to live off of credit cards until there is no credit room left, and no ability to ever repay the debt.

If you have too much debt, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have years of experience in helping those people and companies where life got in the way. Perhaps you need a debt settlement plan. Alternatively, if bankruptcy is the only real answer, we can help ease the stress and pain of bankruptcy for you.

Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life. Call us today for your free consultation.canadian bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FORM 31 PROOF OF CLAIM: HOW TO PROPERLY COMPLETE THE PROOF OF CLAIM

Form 31 proof of claim: Introduction

In last week’s vlog, I reviewed why it is important to complete a form 31 proof of claim truthfully, and the penalties for filing a false claim. For both personal and corporate insolvency files, creditors call asking how to complete the document. I discuss in this vlog why it needs to be completed properly. I also provide a link in this blog that you can click on to see how to properly complete the form step by step.

The reference to “form 31” is merely the number of the form given to the form 31 proof of claim form under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (“BIA”).

What is the form 31 proof of claim form?

Completing and returning form 31 is the second phase in the bankruptcy process. They are included with the notice of bankruptcy documents mailed out by the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) (the “Trustee”) to formally notify the creditors of the bankruptcy.

When properly completed and filed by each creditor, they are what a Trustee uses to compare the debt as listed on the debtor’s bankruptcy sworn Statement of Affairs. The amount claimed by a creditor is normally different than the amount of the debt listed on the bankruptcy schedules. The reason for this is normally because the creditor’s records are accurate to the penny, while the bankrupt’s records are usually not up to date.

The process is the same whether you are filing a secured claim, an ordinary unsecured claim or a priority claim, which is also unsecured, under s.138 of the BIA. What is important is that you need to have a provable claim.

If the Trustee determines that you have either an unliquidated claim or a contingent claim, there will be additional steps you will need to take for the Trustee to be able to ascribe a value and for you to have a properly proved claim.

Form 31 proof of claim: Form 31

In every:

the Trustee will supply to all creditors form 31 document. If the debtor who intends to restructure first files a Notice of Intention To Make a Proposal, a claim form is not sent out at that stage. It will be sent with the actual restructuring proposal and other related documents.

The same document contains both where you can make your claim as well as complete the proxy form, if applicable. Creditors may experience difficulty completing the document. So, the Trustee provides instructions on how to complete the claim form and proxy. That is also why I have provided a step-by-step instruction sheet from the link below so you can follow exactly how to complete the form.

form 31 proof of claim
form 31 proof of claim

Form 31 proof of claim: Acceptability of proof of claim

It is important to properly complete the document. It must be completed fully and properly. The claim must include all necessary details called for under the BIA. Below is a link to an example on how to properly complete the form 31 proof of claim. A Trustee is required to review all proofs of claim received.

The purpose of this is to know what claims are acceptable to be admitted for voting at the First Meeting of Creditors. Also, all proofs received either before or after the creditors’ meeting must also be reviewed carefully to make sure that they are acceptable if there is a dividend to be paid on the claims in the insolvency proceeding.

The Chair of the creditors meeting has the power to admit or disallow claims for the purpose of voting at the meeting. The Trustee has the same power for the proofs of claim for dividend purposes. Most times the Trustee will also be the Chair at the meeting of creditors.

It is incumbent on the Trustee to communicate with creditors whose claims the Trustee believes to be deficient. The purpose is to obtain additional information to make a final determination. The Trustee has to decide whether to admit or disallow a specific claim.

As you can see, completing the document properly is essential.

Does a creditor have to file a claim?

Nobody will force a creditor to file a claim in a bankruptcy estate. A creditor’s claim becomes valid when the creditor files it and the Trustee accepts it. . When a creditor files a claim against a bankruptcy estate, the creditor is making a claim that the Trustee should record and count their claim so that the creditor will be entitled to receive their pro-rata share of any dividend payments that may be made.

The Trustee will issue the maximum payment each creditor is entitled to when the bankruptcy estate is liquidated. When a creditor files a claim, the creditor also becomes an interested party in the bankruptcy case. An interested party is a person who has a vested interest in the bankruptcy case. If the claim is filed before the First Meeting of Creditors in bankruptcy, then the creditor has the right to participate in and vote at the meeting.

Form 31 proof of claim: My example

CLICK HERE TO SEE AND DOWNLOAD PROPERLY COMPLETED

FORM 31 PROOF OF CLAIM

form 31 proof of claim
form 31 proof of claim

Can I file a proof of claim after the deadline?

There are really only two important deadlines when it comes to filing a claim. The first is before the First Meeting of Creditors. As mentioned above, if you wish to participate in that meeting, then you need to have filed a properly completed valid claim before the start of the meeting. However, if you don’t file it by then, although you won’t be able to vote at the meeting, you have not lost out on anything else.

Once all the realization of assets of the bankrupt has been completed, being both the current assets, fixed assets, and possibly even intangible assets, if the Trustee has sufficient funds to issue a dividend payment, then the Trustee has to review all the claims filed. The Trustee also has to compare the claims register containing all of the creditor claims filed against the names and amounts listed in the bankrupt’s sworn Statement of Affairs.

If any creditors have not yet filed, and there will be a payment made to the unsecured creditors, the Trustee has to send a specific notice pursuant to the requirements of the BIA to each such creditor. The notice in writing says that a dividend will be paid, and if you don’t file your claim by a specific date, then you will be barred from receiving any payment.

How do I object to a form 31 proof of claim?

First, you have to be a creditor with a proven claim accepted by the Trustee. The BIA states that any creditor can inspect the claims filed. So if you have personal knowledge that a party listed on the sworn Statement of Affairs is really not a creditor, then you would be assisting the Trustee by reviewing the claims filed and pointing out any claims you believe are invalid, and why. However, it is very unusual for a creditor to take the time to do so.

The next opportunity and really the only time it matters, for a creditor to object to a claim filed by a creditor is if a dividend distribution is going to be made and the Trustee sends out the Final Dividend Sheet. If you think there are errors, then you can object to the approval of the Trustee’s Final Statement of Receipts and Disbursements and the Dividend Sheet.

Reasons that you may feel one or more claims are incorrect could be:

  • You do not believe that someone that has filed as a secured creditor can provide adequate proof of security with their claim.
  • You feel that the compromise of claims being proposed is improper.
  • There may be details of payments received by a creditor are missing and therefore their claim is overvalued.
  • The priority of claims listed is improper.
  • The priority of payment as listed in the Trustee’s Final Statement is incorrect.
  • Some of the more complicated claims, such as the claim of lessor, a claim by wage earner, claim by farmer or another claim for employees have been incorrectly calculated by the Trustee.

If you have any concern that there is an error with the amounts being claimed, or if you believe that there are circumstances where one or more claims are not valid, you should immediately communicate this to the Trustee.

Keep in mind that once the Trustee issues the Final Statement with Dividend Sheet and has the intention of making a payment to all creditors with valid claims, you have to file your own objection within 30 days of the date on which the notice was issued.

Form 31 proof of claim: Do you need help?

Do you or your company have too much debt? Is a financial restructuring or debt settlement plan necessary but you just don’t know where to start? If so, then you need the help of a professional trustee.

The Ira Smith Team has years of experience of helping individuals and companies successfully complete their restructuring proposal debt settlement plans. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our door.

form 31 proof of claim
form 31 proof of claim

You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, recover your money and move on to the next investment opportunity. Call us today for your free consultation.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE IN TORONTO: BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE EXPLAINS POVERTY LINE

angus reid

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: Introduction

As a bankruptcy trustee in Toronto (now called a licensed insolvency trustee), I took great interest in reading a recent poverty line Canada study. A new research project whose results were announced in July 2018, studied poverty in Canada. It finds higher than 25% of respondents feel they have stress over financial matters. Not just a part-time stress; it is a full time feeling. Instead of just analyzing income levels, the survey considers the daily realities of making ends meet and how that can take a toll on people.

Many are unable to spend on simple things like going to the movie theatre, but also on more serious needs, like warm clothes for winter time and dental care. Some are late paying bills or cannot pay them at all and many say they can’t afford better quality food at the grocery store.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: People are struggling

Researchers also found of the people who struggle most, 20% make well above what’s considered low income. However, the study finds that doesn’t always go far particularly in major urban cities. You can be making what many would consider middle-class earnings and still feel stressed. The survey showed many feel on the edge with their ability to have a life with some level of comfort or relaxation.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: 4 major groups

This ARI research identified four groups:

  1. the struggling (16%);
  2. on the edge (11%);
  3. recently comfortable (36%); and
  4. always comfortable (37%).

As expected from these labels, the struggling is dealing with economic difficulties that are adversely influencing their lifestyle. Those on the edge are a stone’s throw behind them.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: The study’s other main findings

The study’s other main findings are:

  • nearly a third (31%) really feel extremely worried about money regularly– either usually or constantly;
  • about half (52%) think hardship has actually been rising;
  • almost ten percent (9%) feel that financial hardship has been decreasing;
  • thirty percent (30%) are downhearted concerning their individual finances over the near future;
  • more think their youngsters’ finances will be worse (43%) compared to those who think their children will be financially better (32%);
  • all 4 state financial anxiety exists, yet there is more for both lower groups; and
  • the anxiety felt by the always comfortable group is a fret about future troubles as opposed to their present life.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: Canada Without Poverty

Canada Without Poverty charitable organization states that roughly 5 million Canadians, or 1 in 7, live in poverty. However, the ARI study shows that the participants in the study estimate that about one third live in poverty. As you can see, their views were shaped by their own feelings of money anxiety.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: Are you are “on the edge”?

Do you feel you are in the “on the edge” or the “recently comfortable” groups? Are you always feeling financially stressed? Are you worried that you may not be able to absorb an unexpected expense of $1,000 or more? If so, why not get a free financial checkup?

Seek professional help immediately. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a full-service practice serving people just like you and companies throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) who need a plan for Starting Over, Starting Now.

We know your pain and the stress you feel because of your finances. Our Firm has helped many others restructure their debt and return to a financially healthy life. Give us a call today. We can give you peace of mind and set you on a path to debt free living. We are a bankruptcy trustee in Toronto.

(43.807606, -79.534091)bankruptcy trustee in toronto

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL OR BANKRUPTCY: LIST OF MY CREDITORS FOR CONSUMER PROPOSAL

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: Introduction

We always perform an initial free consultation with people thinking about filing either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. People ask me, what if I can’t create a list of all my creditors?

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: A refresher

If you are a regular reader of my Brandon’s Blog, then you know the difference between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy. For those of you who need a brief refresher, both the consumer proposal and bankruptcy are different processes under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). To file either one, the person must be insolvent. That means that they cannot meet their liabilities as they become due and if they liquidated all their assets, it would not produce enough cash to pay of all the debts.

Consumer proposal – This is a restructuring process to avoid bankruptcy for any person who owes $250,000 or less, not including any mortgage or line of credit debts secured by a mortgage registered against their home. The purpose of a consumer proposal is to AVOID bankruptcy.

Division I proposal – This is a restructuring process for people who owe too much money to fit under the consumer proposal rules. A company can also reorganize under this section of the BIA.

Bankruptcy – If a person cannot successfully carry out a restructuring proposal but requires relief from their crushing debts, then they would file for bankruptcy. In this process, subject to certain provincial exemptions, you would hand over your assets to the licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee). The Trustee would then sell the assets for cash, call for your creditors to file a proof of claim with the Trustee and then distribute the money according to the rules of the BIA.

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: A common question

Regardless of whether the person is thinking about a consumer proposal, Division I proposal or bankruptcy, a common question is: (i) what if I don’t know who all my creditors are; or (ii) what if I leave off some creditors from my sworn statement of affairs; or (iii) do I have to list all of my creditors?

Some of our clients come to us, tell us that they don’t even know who their creditors are. Sometimes it’s been such a long time that they don’t even receive the bills or notices anymore and their memories aren’t good enough. So here is an easy hack so that you can put together a list of most, if not all, of your creditors.

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: The easy hack

We will add CRA to your statement of affairs. If you don’t know how much you owe them, we will put them in showing either “$1” or “Unknown” as a placeholder

Every person must file an income tax return. Most people know whether they are current or not in their tax filings. So Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) should always be listed.

CRA cannot file an accurate proof of claim if you have not been current in your income tax filings. So we tell everyone to file all outstanding tax returns and provide us with a copy before filing either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy.

Pull your credit report

You may obtain your credit report from either Equifax or TransUnion. Your credit report will list all those who you owe money to and who wanted to update their files with your new credit score. We will add those creditors to your statement of affairs also.

Check your mail and save the bills

No doubt your creditors will keep mailing your statements. Even if all it says is balance forward unpaid, or is from a collection agency or lawyer, it will list their address, their name and the amount they say you owe. We will put that information on your statement of affairs.

Your lawyer can easily do an execution search. This search will show who holds a judgement against you and some basic details. We will add those details to your statement of affairs.

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: The test is due diligence, not perfection

The test is, did you use your best efforts to identify all of your creditors on your sworn statement of affairs. It is very rare that any of our clients know exactly how much they owe. It is normal for the amounts according to the sworn statement of affairs to be different from the proofs of claim filed. That is OK.

Sophisticated large creditors pay the Superintendent of Bankruptcy to get a download of insolvency filings on a regular basis. They match the names of those who have filed against their client database. If a client shows up that they did not have listed as having filed, they contact the Trustee. Once they contact us, we send them a creditor’s package. They will then be able to further check their records and if owed money, can file a proof of claim.

We had a client who said they mistakenly left off a few creditors in their proposal filing. Those creditors found out. All those creditors had judgements against the person who filed the restructuring proposal. These creditors were very mad at being left off the list, although they did not suffer any damages.

It made it much tougher for the person and us to get a deal struck with all the creditors. At the end of the day, a deal was struck and the person is currently performing and is currently making their payments under the restructuring proposal. The anger of these creditors rubbed off on creditors who would have otherwise been happy with a lesser proposal. So in the end, leaving these creditors off the initial sworn statement of affairs just cost them more money!

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: Corporate filings

In terms of a corporation filing either a restructuring proposal or bankruptcy, we normally don’t incur the same issues. A company will have an accounting department and/or an accounting system. They will be able to produce a list of creditors. The amounts shown may not be current, but the list of names and addresses will be reasonably accurate.

However, the easy hack I described above also works for a company.

Consumer proposal or bankruptcy: More free stuff

I hope that you have found my free easy hack useful to answer the question of how to create a list of all my creditors. You can use it if you wish to do proper budgeting, which everyone should do. You don’t have to wait until you are insolvent!! With proper budgeting, you can avoid insolvency and therefore bankruptcy.

If you have too much debt and need someone to talk to about consumer proposal vs bankruptcy, call the Ira Smith Team. We will listen to your issues and provide you with our thoughts and recommendations for free. That’s right; a free initial consultation. So why not? All you have to lose is your stress. We will advise you whether or not we think you are a candidate for either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. If we feel you can solve your financial problems without an insolvency process, we will tell you straight.

The Ira Smith Team understands the stress you are under and the pain it is causing you and your loved ones. We can eliminate your pain. I guarantee that you will start feeling better right away after our free initial consultation. Taking action after that will put you on the right path, Starting Over Starting Now.

consumer proposal or bankruptcy

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT CANADA: BANKRUPTCY LAW FAQ

Introduction

I am often asked general questions about the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada. Sometimes it is about the application of a certain section or topic. Other times, it is a simple question such as where can I find a copy that I can look at?

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to list the most often asked questions. Not all of them may be of interest to you. However, for those that have questions about the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, hopefully at least one of these questions (and the answer) will be of interest to you.

So here we go.

Is there a book that explains the various topics and sections of the Act?

Yes, there is. The book is an annotated version of the statute. It has the complete Act and its rules and regulations. In addition, the annotations provide explanations on the application of each section as well as a listing of decided cases to support the explanations.

Can I look up the Act and decided cases somewhere online for free?

Yes. The Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII) operates a website. It has the legislation online calling it the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada CanLII. CanLII can also be used to search bankruptcy legal decisions in both English and French.

Where can I find a listing of the many forms that a licensed insolvency trustee uses?

The best place to find all the mandated forms is on the website operated by the Government of Canada, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. It lists all the forms. They are also downloadable as pdf forms.

People ask me if they can perform a Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada search. What they really mean is can they perform a search to find out if a specific person or company did a personal or corporate filing under the Canadian bankruptcy system. The answer to this question is yes.

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy operates a database for people to search the bankruptcy and insolvency records in Canada. The database can be accessed for free by a licensed insolvency trustee. Any member of the public can do the same search for the cost of $8 per search. Eventually, the Government of Canada is going to move to a free system, but it is not in place yet.

What are the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada regulations?

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada regulations, otherwise known as the bankruptcy rules, form part of the Act itself. The pure legislation contained in the various sections of the Act is just that; the legislation. However, there are practical considerations which also need clarification. Such clarification is found in the Rules contained in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). For example, the rules describe steps to abide by a specific section of the Act, or who is responsible for establishing Court fees.

Is their equal treatment for all unsecured creditors?

This is always an interesting question. The answer is also confusing to many lay people. The answer is both no and yes. I will explain. There are two types of unsecured creditors; preferred unsecured and ordinary unsecured. Many people forget this.

All ordinary unsecured creditors ARE treated equally. Their claims rank equally. The licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called bankruptcy trustee) paying a dividend to the ordinary unsecured creditors, they will all receive theirs in proportion share. The calculation is based on their respective ordinary unsecured claims.

The preferred unsecured creditors ARE NOT treated equally. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada section 136 sets out the scheme of distribution for the rank of the claims. Payment to preferred creditors ALWAYS happens BEFORE payment to ORDINARY creditors.

The preferred creditors

However, preferred unsecured creditors are not equal. The Act states that there is a ranking of claims within the preferred group. The list and order of priority of the major types of preferred creditors are as follows:

  • for a deceased bankrupt, the reasonable funeral and testamentary expenses incurred;
  • the costs of the bankruptcy administration:
  • the levy payable by the licensed insolvency trustee under section 147 of the Act;
  • any wages, salaries, commissions, compensation or disbursements owing to employees for the six month period prior to the bankruptcy;
  • municipal taxes assessed or levied against the bankrupt, within the two years before the bankruptcy, that is not secured against the real property;
  • the commercial landlord for arrears of rent for three months immediately before the bankruptcy and accelerated rent for not more than three months following the bankruptcy (if entitled to accelerated rent under the lease);
  • one bill of costs of a lawyer for the creditor who first attached by way of garnishment or filed with the Sheriff an attachment, execution or another process against the property of the bankrupt;
  • indebtedness of the bankrupt under any Act about workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance or under any provision of the Income Tax Act creating an obligation to pay to Her Majesty amounts that have been deducted or withheld;
  • claims resulting from injuries to employees of the bankrupt for which there will be a receipt of money from persons guaranteeing the bankrupt against damages resulting from those injuries; and
  • any other claims of the Crown

The Trustee must pay the claims of the preferred creditors in full, less the statutory levy mentioned above. If there are insufficient funds to pay some or all the preferred creditors, then their claims become ordinary unsecured claims.

In personal bankruptcy, are there any claims not discharged upon the person receiving their absolute discharge from bankruptcy?

Yes. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada section 178 lists the claims not discharged in a person’s bankruptcy. Such debts are:

  • a fine, penalty, restitution order or other order similar in nature imposed by a court in respect of an offence, or any debt arising out of a recognizance or bail;
  • any award of damages by a court in civil proceedings in respect of bodily harm intentionally inflicted, sexual assault, or wrongful death as a result of such an act;
  • a debt or liability for alimony or support under a court order or valid written agreement;
  • the debt or liability arising out of fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity;
  • debts or liabilities resulting from obtaining property or services by false pretenses or fraudulent misrepresentation;
  • the entitlement to a dividend a creditor would have received on any provable claim not disclosed to the trustee unless the creditor had notice or knowledge of the bankruptcy and failed to take reasonable action to prove a claim;
  • any debt or obligation of a loan made under the Canada Student Loans Act, the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act or any enactment of a province that provides for loans or guarantees of loans to students where the date the person ceased being a full or part-time student was within seven years before the date of bankruptcy;

All claims against a bankrupt person are discharged when the person obtains their absolute bankruptcy discharge except those indicated above.

Student loans

There is an additional provision in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada student loans section. It states that any time after 5 years after the bankrupt person has ceased to be a full or part-time student, they can apply to the Court for relief. The Court can cut the student loan debt if proved that the bankrupt person:

  • has acted in good faith in trying to repay the student loan debt, and
  • the bankrupt person has and will continue to experience financial difficulty and will be unable to pay the debt

What is the history of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act in Canada?

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act in Canada has a very interesting history. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada has its origins in the Bankruptcy Act of 1919. The Act changed in 1949. In terms of the history of our country, this means the Act is a relatively young piece of legislation. The reason for the enactment is that every modern society has to realize that some of its citizens and businesses will run into financial trouble. A modern and efficient economy has to have the means to help those people and businesses out of their trouble. Everyone deserves a fresh start. To redeploy a company’s assets there must be a formal system to allow this to happen.

The Act changed again in 1992, 1997 as well as 2008-2009. The 1992 reforms concentrated on maximizing value for creditors with reorganization and rehabilitation, boosting the fair distribution to employees and providers of goods and services to the bankrupt company.

The 1997 reforms urged consumer debtor responsibility and boosted the reorganization stipulations as well as the administration of the Act. It introduced new sections dealing with the insolvency of securities firms and dealing with global insolvencies.

The 2009 reforms, had 4 primary aims:

  • to urge the restructuring of viable, but financially hampered companies;
  • to better secure workers’ insurance claims for wages and holiday pay;
  • making the bankruptcy system fairer and lower abuse; and
  • to improve the administration of the Canadian bankruptcy system.

Is the Act federal or provincial legislation?

Federal legislation. The name of the Act gives the answer. Its name is the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada. Although there are laws in each Province that will come into play during the administration of a bankruptcy or reorganization, the Act is Federal.

Summary

So I hope you have a better understanding of the most asked questions about the Government of Canada Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. The Act deals with bankruptcy insolvency issues for both bankruptcy law personal and corporate.

If you have any questions about how the Canadian bankruptcy system works or feel that someone you know could benefit from a free first consultation with a professional licensed insolvency trustee, feel free to contact me.

The Ira Smith Team have decades of experience in both personal and corporate insolvency matters. We can handle complex corporate and other business financial restructurings as well as personal financial problems. In both corporate and personal insolvency matters, we first look at how we can reorganize and restructure the person or business to do a rescue.

bankruptcy and insolvency act canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TORONTO REAL ESTATE: REAL ESTATE NEWS ON BUYER’S REMORSE

assignment in bankruptcyToToronto real estate: Introduction

This Brandon’s Blog is about Toronto real estate and what happens when the purchaser experiences buyer’s remorse. “When the residential real estate market is a rising market, most people – perhaps with the exception of first-time buyers, are happy homeowners and investors. When the market turns and drops, it is not for the faint of heart.” This is how Justice M.L. Edwards begins his Reasons for Decision in Gamoff v. Hu, 2018 ONSC 2172 (CanLII).

The realities of this situation show how one family came to be involved in a bidding process. Determined to get their dream house, they exhausted their ability to fund the acquisition of that residence. We will describe this case which is similar to several people my Firm has helped overcome their financial problems after being found liable for similar amounts the defendants, in this case, were found responsible for.

Toronto real estate: The Toronto real estate market news facts

Douglas and Sheila Gamoff (the “Gamoffs” or the “plaintiffs”) were the owners of a residential property. The home was in Stouffville, Ontario (the “Home”), part of the GTA. The plaintiffs listed the Home for sale on the multiple listing service on March 29, 2017. Within a fairly short amount of time (March 29, 2017, to April 2, 2017), there were 18 offers.

The defendants, Yixing Hu and David Lea, saw the Home with their real estate agent on April 1, 2017. They state that they told their real estate agent that they had an interest in acquiring the Home. They also didn’t want to be involved in a bidding price battle.

The defendants originally submitted their written offer on April 1, 2017, with an offer of $2,050,000. On April 2, 2017, the defendants were told by their real estate agent that there were several deals for the residential property. Their realtor also told them that their offer of $2,050,000 was not accepted. In spite of having informed their real estate agent that they did not intend to end up being in a bidding war, they inevitably submitted a new offer for $2,250,000. The vendors accepted the revised offer.

The deal had no conditions. The agreement of purchase and sale read that the purchasers provided a deposit in the amount of $30,000 upon acceptance of the offer. It further read that a second down payment tranche of $90,000 would be made on April 6, 2017. The date for the second deposit payment was then amended to April 10, 2017. The closing day for the acquisition of the Home was August 30, 2017.

Toronto real estate: It did not take long for buyer’s remorse to arise

On the same day, the defendants called their real estate agent. They suggested to him that they thought that they had actually paid way too much for the Home. Their issue here was no doubt created by the fact that they had just found out that, a mix of their mortgage loan funding and the value of their house yet to be sold, would not be enough for them to get the essential funding to close on their purchase.

David Lea emailed his real estate agent stating to him that he and Ms. Hu had actually slipped up aiming to acquire the Home. Mr. Lea went on to say in this email that he is begging, please contact the vendor’s agent with a new firm offer.

As I previously stated, the agreement of purchase and sale did not have any conditions in it to allow them to end the agreement and get back their first tranche deposit. The agreement certainly was not conditional either on their obtaining satisfactory mortgage financing or the sale of their existing home. That is enough stress to cause anyone to panic which no doubt led to their buyer’s remorse.

Toronto real estate: The purchaser’s default

On April 10, 2017, the purchaser failed to pay the 2nd payment needed by the change to the agreement of purchase and sale. On the following day, the defendants visited the property. They informed the plaintiffs face to face that they did not actually have the funding needed to complete the purchase.

Toronto real estate: The vendors’ mitigation

The Gamoffs first consulted with their lawyer. Then on May 1, 2017, they listed the Home for sale again on the multiple listing service for $2,250,000. From May 1 to May 16, 2017, the plaintiffs got no offers on the Home.

The Gamoffs lowered the listing price of the Home to $1,998,000 on May 17, 2017. This was because of a recommendation from their real estate agent. In between May 17, 2017, and June 6, 2017, they obtained no deals on the Home.

On July 28, 2017, the Gamoffs, based on the further advice of their realtor, lowered the price of the Home again to $1,798,000.

In between June 6 and July 26, 2017, the Gamoffs got no offers on the Home. On July 31, 2017, they got an offer to purchase the Home for $1,700,000. After some back and forth, on August 9, 2017, the Gamoffs accepted a brand new agreement of purchase and sale. It was with an arm’s length buyer for $1,770,000. That deal closed on October 3, 2017.

Toronto real estate: The Court’s decision

The plaintiffs sought a summary judgment for the difference between the defendants’ offer of $2,250,000 and what the Home eventually sold for, $1,770,000. The defendants opposed this on several grounds, including, that there was an issue that required a full trial.

Based on the evidence, the judge disagreed. He awarded the plaintiffs the difference between the defendants’ offer of $2,250,000 and what the Home eventually sold for. The judge also awarded costs to the plaintiffs. The judgment was for $470,000 plus costs. Add that to the $30,000 down payment the defendants lost, this aborted deal cost them half a million bucks!

Toronto real estate: Our own case studies

My Firm has been involved in several matters helping people who have had judgments like the one described above made against them from failed real estate deals. We have been involved as a result of failed real estate deal judgments in:

  1. a bankruptcy caused by the plaintiffs (the vendors) who could not yet collect on their judgment filing a Bankruptcy Application with the Court and obtaining a Bankruptcy Order be made against the defendants;
  2. a consumer proposal for a defendant which was successfully completed;
  3. the successful proposal of the defendant who had a large amount awarded against him by the judgment; and
  4. an assignment in bankruptcy filed by the defendant who did not have the ability to attempt a proposal to get relief from the judgment against them.

In each case, the only way that the defendants could get relief, voluntarily or involuntarily, was through an insolvency process. In the one case caused by the Bankruptcy Order, it was the plaintiff who took action. The plaintiff was able to get a payment for all the unsecured creditors. The insolvency process requires that the distribution is shared among all creditors. That result was better than the plaintiff not being able to collect on its judgment without the insolvency process.

In that specific case, it was a combination of the Trustee’s powers and the plaintiff’s judgment and specific knowledge, that joined to produce the recovery for all creditors. The Trustee’s powers were required to get enough leverage resulting in the recovery.

Toronto real estate: A tough lesson to learn


The effect of this Court’s decision will definitely have a significant result on the defendants. The judge said that he had every compassion for them.

With the adjustments in the realty market in the Greater Toronto Area, I have every reason to believe that there will be extra instances where buyers discover that they have not protected themselves and will not be able to complete their real estate transaction.

Buyers would certainly be well advised to think about making their deals to acquire real estate subject to satisfactory funding, as well as for the sale of their existing residence if they have one. The cost of entering a bidding war and getting the property unconditionally could turn out to be a very expensive one just like in this case.

Toronto real estate: What to do if you have too much debt

If you have too much debt because of a judgment against you, either because you have made the real estate in Toronto news from a failed real estate deal or for any other reason, there is no shame in looking for a professional to help you out of your financial jam. A licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) will look at your circumstances and assist you to get to the very best option for your issues. The Ira Smith Team will give you a free consultation.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is right here to help. We’re government supervised and adhere to a rigorous code of ethics. Our experienced team provides a high-quality service which will create a unique and an affordable solution made just for you. I feel your pain and know how to end it.

Don’t wait until we read about you in the real estate in Toronto news Canada. Call us today to end your stress and experience our pleasant, non-judgmental technique to solve your financial problems and get you back on the right track to stress-free living, Starting Over, Starting Now.toronto real estate

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

330 UNIVERSITY AVENUE: CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY COURT TORONTO SECRETS EXPOSED FROM THE CANADA LIFE BUILDING

330 university avenue

330 University Avenue: Introduction

On the west side of University Avenue and immediately north of Queen Street, lies 330 University Avenue, in Toronto’s core. This University Ave. building is known as the Canada Life Building. Work on the building began in 1929 for the brand-new head office of the Canada Life Assurance Company and it opened up in 1931. It was the 4th structure to act as the head office of Canada Life. Most noteworthy is that this company was Canada’s earliest, as well as the biggest insurance provider.

330 University Avenue: Brief building history

The development of this fifteen-floor Beaux Arts structure was by Sproatt & Rolph. It stands at 285 feet (87 m), 321 feet (97.8 m) including its famous weather beacon. This building was the very first of scheduled buildings along University Avenue, however, the Great Depression stopped those plans. When it finished, it was among the highest structures in Toronto. It stays one of the biggest office complexes in Toronto with windows that tenants can open. In 1997, Toronto City Council designated the building a heritage property.

330 University Avenue: The most noticeable part of the building

The weather beacon was added in 1951. Its colour codes sum up the weather report at a look. Environment Canada out of Toronto Pearson International Airport revises the weather details 4 times each day.

The top light indicates:
Consistent green = clear
Stable red = overcast
Blinking red = rainfall
Blinking = snow

The white lights along the tower show:

Lights rising = warmer
Lights running down = colder
Solid = consistent temperature level/ No adjustment

During the day, the weather tower shows the weather for that day. The evening signals show the weather for the next day.

330 University Avenue: 330 university avenue 8th floor

But enough of the history lesson. Maybe you didn’t come to this vlog to learn about the building’s history; I will now change the focus. On the 8th floor are the courtrooms. These Courts are presided over by Judges of the Superior Court of Justice Toronto Region. All corporate insolvency matters, certainly not just corporate bankruptcy matters, are part of what is known as the Commercial List.

Personal bankruptcy in Toronto Ontario is normally first heard in a different Court up the street at 393 University Avenue before a Registrar in Bankruptcy. The Registrar is a Master of the Court hearing bankruptcy matters. Most importantly, a Commerical List Judge in 330 University Avenue, Toronto Ontario M5G 1R8 must hear any appeal of a Registrar’s decision. This is for the reason that is what the rules state.

330 University Avenue: The corporate insolvency matters overview

The Court at 330 University deals mainly with corporate insolvency matters. Examples are:

  1. Corporate receivership – appointment of a receiver, motions by the receiver or a stakeholder requesting approval for specific relief, approval motions for sale of assets or fee and costs of the receivership administration, and above all, the receiver’s discharge application.
  2. Corporate restructuring – all motions for bankruptcy protection and restructuring of a company under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), motions by the Court-appointed monitor or a stakeholder requesting approvals, approval motions for the Restructuring Plan of Arrangement including voting rights of all stakeholders, approval of the implementation of the Plan of Arrangement, approval of the fee and costs of the CCAA administration, monitor’s discharge application.
  3. Personal and Corporate bankruptcy matters – as indicated above, these would mostly be either an appeal from Registrar in Bankruptcy’s decision or an opposed matter that the Registrar was not allowed to hear under the bankruptcy rules.

330 University Avenue: Do I need a lawyer to appear at 330 University Avenue?

Corporations are not a human being, so they cannot show up in Court and speak. Therefore, a company requires a person to act on its behalf. Although a shareholder or officer and director authorized to speak on behalf of the company can represent the company in Court, it is not advisable.

I say this because the legal matters heard are most complex. As a result, an experienced insolvency lawyer is necessary to properly represent the position of either the company or a stakeholder.

The licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as trustee in bankruptcy) who is acting as the receiver, monitor or trustee, similarly will have a competent insolvency or bankruptcy lawyer acting on its behalf. Motion filings always include very detailed reports.

Complex text, financial calculations and detailed exhibits will form part of the filed material. Most laypeople would need both an independent licensed insolvency trustee as a financial advisor, as well as an experienced corporate insolvency lawyer on their team. Therefore, the costs can mount quickly.

330 University Avenue: Is your company going to be in Court either for a restructuring or as a stakeholder?

Is your company dealing with severe economic problems and you aren’t sure what to do? There’s no embarrassment in looking for specialist, financial advice. As a licensed insolvency trustee, the Ira Smith Team can check your company’s circumstances and assist you to get to the most effective solution to solve your company’s financial issues. Several of our successful case studies can be found on our website.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is here to assist. The government licenses and supervises us. Hence, to keep our license in good standing, we must adhere to a stringent code of ethics. We are well-known to the Judges at 330 University Avenue and all the Toronto insolvency lawyers.

I know the pain and discomfort you are in because of your corporate financial problems. You will certainly discover that we use a pleasant, non-judgmental technique in understanding you, your goals and in restructuring your company.

Give me a phone call today and allow me to address your economic issues Starting Over, Starting Now.330 university avenue

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY IN ONTARIO CANADA & CONSUMER PROPOSAL ONTARIO

Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Introduction

Bankruptcy is sometimes necessary for the financially troubled individual or company. In Canada in 2017, there were 125,807 insolvency filings; 60,669 bankruptcies and 65,138 proposals. Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada accounted for 15,968 of the 2017 filings. The majority of these across Canada filings were people, not companies.

Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Not entirely unexpected

This is an expected statistic once you understand the purpose of the Canadian insolvency system to get rid of financial obligations. It is also for the financial rehabilitation of people and companies and if possible, allow them to do so while retaining their assets.

In a down economic climate, even more, debtors use bankruptcy to protect their wide range of interests. Although on a per capita basis Canadians are savers, more recently, especially related to real estate, we are a country of borrowers. A lot of people are overloaded with debt, including credit card debt.

Bankruptcy in Ontario Canada: Bankruptcy is not always right

Any debtor with severe monetary troubles must think about bankruptcy. Bankruptcy isn’t always the right response though. In my practice, we first run through the various options available to avoid bankruptcy.

It is proper only when you have too many financial obligations that you cannot realistically repay, in whole or in part, from your future earnings or from selling your assets. This is the meaning of the financial state of insolvency.

If you make $100,000 a year and your financial obligations are only $20,000 (assuming you have no assets), why go bankrupt? Temporary financial sacrifice on your part could pay off your debts in full. This is definitely more suitable for bankruptcy.

What about a proposal?

Although each case is unique, generally speaking, if your unsecured financial debts are less than 60 percent of your net yearly pay, stay clear of bankruptcy. You could use a self-help remedy to pay off your debts in full. Alternatively, you could look to the proposal or consumer proposal mechanisms under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada).

Under the proposal provisions of the BIA, a person or company could take up to 5 years to pay off part of the debt. A successful proposal forgives the balance of your debt (subject to certain ones indicated below). Many creditors will wait if you show good faith and make organized repayments that provide your creditors with a better result.

A filing may protect some assets

A bankruptcy or proposal filing may also be necessary to secure your assets; this is especially true for companies looking to restructure. In a BIA filing, all civil actions against you instantly stop— whether they are legal actions, CRA garnishments or secured creditor seizure and enforcement (the last under specific conditions). Every creditor must obey the automatic stay of proceedings imposed by the BIA. A proposal filing gives you the possibility to solve your economic issues with lenders who would certainly otherwise seize and sell your assets.

Timing is everything

I advise every person and company in need of restructuring that timing is crucial. It is human nature for debtors to regularly wait far too long. By waiting too long, they shed possible advantages from an earlier restructuring filing. The longer a person or company waits, the fewer options they have. Also, if you wait too long, the less creative I can be to protect your assets.

5 general tips

  1. Collect your tax refunds prior to your filing. When you file for bankruptcy, any tax refund owing to you prior to the date of bankruptcy belong to your bankruptcy estate. Your licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee) collects the payments.
  2. The insolvency process is meant to treat all creditors fairly and all ordinary unsecured creditors equally. Seek the advice of a Trustee prior to making payments to specific unsecured creditors prior to filing. Your good intentions may prove to have created transactions that the Trustee can attack. The Trustee will then seek recovery from those parties.
  3. Consider how the causes of your insolvency will look to your creditors. Uncontrolled lifestyle spending looks a lot different from ongoing costs due to a mental or physical illness or an addiction. The causes of your insolvency sometimes dictate whether a proposal or bankruptcy filing is preferable.
  4. Have you contributed to an RRSP in the 12 months before filing for bankruptcy? That amount will have to be paid over to your Trustee under bankruptcy or accounted for in what type of proposal can be successful.
  5. If you have student loans, was the last time you were either a full or part-time student more than 7 years prior to your filing? If no, you won’t be able to end the student loan debt. However, it may be enough to relieve yourself of your other unsecured debts to have enough funds every month to start repaying the student loans.

Some debts can’t be discharged

Bankruptcy will not end every debt. There are certain debts that cannot be discharged through bankruptcy. Examples are:

  • student loans as described above
  • child support and alimony under either a court order or written separation agreement
  • fines or restitution ordered by a Court
  • debts arising out of fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation while acting in a fiduciary capacity
  • amounts owing to secured creditors registered against your assets, such as a mortgage or car loan. Any amount still owing after the asset is sold, if any, is an unsecured claim which is discharged in a bankruptcy

Bankruptcy must be your last option

Bankruptcy could be your ideal choice if the amount of your debt and the amount you can realistically repay will not settle it. If you have few possessions to lose in bankruptcy, then a bankruptcy filing may be your best choice. By meeting with a Trustee early to discuss your options, you will get a good understanding of what may be possible.

I always advise every person or company never file for bankruptcy without first striving to solve a case without bankruptcy. Bankruptcy must be your last option, not your very first – avoid bankruptcy if you can.

Think about all readily available options prior to determining that bankruptcy is genuinely the best decision for you and your situation. If you find you are in too deep and can’t dig out fast enough, then you do need professional help.

Seek the advice of a professional trustee

Many people and companies facing serious financial issues don’t know where to go for professional help or are too embarrassed. There’s no shame in seeking professional, financial help. Licensed insolvency trustees evaluate your situation and help you to arrive at the best possible solution for your problems.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is here to help. We’re federally regulated and subject to a strict code of ethics. We offer a depth of expertise and provide a high quality and cost-effective service. I understand your pain and we can end it. You will find that we use a friendly, non-judgmental method.

Give us a call today and let us help you solve your financial problems Starting Over, Starting Now.bankruptcy in ontario canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DEBT SOLUTIONS: ARE YOU IN FINANCIAL PROBLEMS DUE TO YOUR SPENDING?

debt solutionsDebt solutions: Introduction

Many Canadians are in a hole financially because of their spending habits and don’t realize it. When it hits them in the face, they need the best debt solutions. Many people can’t even afford to seek the help they need. But there is good news. The best fixes are the ones you can do yourself. The purpose of my blog is to describe to you steps you can take by yourself to solve your financial problems, as long as you catch it early enough. My blog will also help you turn any wasteful spending habits into wise spending habits.

Debt solutions: Disposable income

There’s a tendency to look at income as disposable – what we earn, we spend. If that’s your attitude, then you already have the shovel in your hands and you’ve started digging. Before you get in so deep that you can’t get out of the hole, let’s look at what you’re doing wrong and what you can do to get back on track financially.

Debt solutions: My 5 step self-help free plan

  1. Stop spending everything you earn. Living paycheque to paycheque is no way to live. Your income should cover all of your expenses, fund an emergency account and allow you to save for retirement. Look at your budget and see what expenses you can end or reduce. Don’t have a budget?
  2. Make a budget and stick to it. Do you know where your money’s going? Or do you think you have a hole in your wallet? A budget is the most effective money management tool. List all the things that you spend money on each month; and that includes designer coffees. In order to pay down debt and/or save money you’ll have to do some penny-pinching. Eliminate wasteful spending. Spend mindfully instead. Think twice before making a purchase you don’t really need. Make sure you’re getting the best prices on your cellphone plan, car insurance, house insurance, cable and internet. Use coupons at the grocery store. Make a budget and stick to it to meet your financial goals.
  3. Get rid of credit card debt as quickly as possible. High interest debt is the worst kind of debt. Pay off your credit card balances as quickly as possible. Use cash instead. Plastic is too easy.
  4. Check your credit score annually. Do you know what your credit score is? You should. Your credit score will decide whether you can buy a house, buy/lease a car and it can even affect your ability to get a job. Check it annually and go over it thoroughly. It may contain errors that can adversely affect your ability to borrow money.
  5. Save for retirement. Retirement will come quicker than you think. Have you started saving? Government sponsored pension plans will not keep you in the lifestyle you imagined for your retirement. It’s never too early or too late to start saving for retirement.

Debt solutions: The most serious financial problems need professional help

If you try my free 5 step debt solutions plan but find you are in too deep and can’t dig out fast enough, then you do need professional help. Many people facing serious financial issues don’t know where to go for professional help or are too embarrassed. There’s no shame in seeking professional, financial help. A trustee in bankruptcy (now called a licensed insolvency trustee) will evaluate your situation and help you to arrive at the best possible solution for your problems.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is here to help. We’re federally regulated and subject to a strict code of ethics. We offer a depth of expertise and provide a high quality and cost-effective service. I understand your pain and we can end it. You will find that we use a friendly, non-judgmental method.

Give us a call today and let us help you solve your financial problems Starting Over, Starting Now.

Call a Trustee Now!