Tag: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RECEIVERS AND RECEIVERSHIPS: CAN A FINANCIALLY TROUBLED CANADIAN LAW FIRM BE PLACED IN AN EMBARRASSING RECEIVERSHIP?

an image of a financiallt\y troubled company that is havnig to go into either receivership or bankruptcy
receivers and receiverships

Receivers and receiverships: Introduction

Imagine a prestigious Canadian law firm, typically the epitome of stability and justice, suddenly hit by a financial storm. The once robust balance sheets now shake, and partners are left to navigate a legal and financial labyrinth they never expected. This Brandon’s Blog takes you on a journey through the intersection of law and finance, revealing the truth behind what happens when even the legal giants fall on hard times.

Financial turbulence is a universal challenge affecting any business, including law firms. In the context of Canadian law firms, the concept of receivers and receiverships is unique, and the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta grappled with this issue in a recent case. Join us as we explore the legal strategies, regulations, and complexities of a financially challenged Canadian law firm placed in receivership.

Definition of receivers and receiverships

What Is Receivership?

Receivers and receiverships are a legal process that includes the retention of a 3rd party, referred to as a receiver, to take control of a company’s assets, finances and operations in an effort to resolve the underlying economic problems. Receivership is a lawful remedy used when a company, sole proprietorship, partnership or person, even including a law office, encounters impossible monetary issues. Receivers and receiverships can be used either to restructure a business by separating the good assets from the horrific financial problems or for a straight liquidation.

Receivership is a legal system where a secured creditor either independently designates or petitions the court to appoint a 3rd party, described as a receiver, to manage the properties and affairs of a business or person. Receivers and receiverships become a multifaceted process imbued with complexity. This option regularly serves as an avenue for the reconfiguration of a faltering business or the resolution of financial disagreements among diverse parties.

Navigating receivership involves a formidable blend of legal acumen and also the capability to make wise financial judgments. It is incumbent upon companies and people alike to realize the far-reaching ramifications of receivers and receiverships as well as the prospective scenarios that might ensue from its invocation. Among these considerations lies the essential issue of its repercussions on stakeholders, including employees, unsecured creditors, as well as lenders.

Within Canadian territory, the mantle of a receiver can solely be born by an appropriately qualified licensed insolvency trustee to manage this intricate legal process.

When Is Receivership Considered?

Receivership ends up being a factor to consider when a business experiences severe financial distress, such as mounting financial debts, operational inadequacies, or the inability to satisfy financial commitments. It works as a last resource to salvage what continues to be of the firm’s assets.

an image of a financiallt\y troubled company that is havnig to go into either receivership or bankruptcy
receivers and receiverships

Canada’s legal landscape is complicated, with federal and provincial laws and guidelines controlling the process of receivership. Let us explore this further.

Federal Laws

In Canada, the procedure of receivership is regulated mostly by federal government regulation, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. The receiver must act lawfully. In a court appointment, the receiver must act in the very best interests of all parties involved. In this type of appointment, receivers as well as receiverships go through oversight by the court. The procedure of receivership can be complicated as well as calls for well-informed legal and financial recommendations to guarantee an effective outcome.

Provincial Regulations

Provinces in Canada also have their own laws which intersect with receivers and receiverships. Examples of provincial regulations that could affect receivers and receiverships are:

  • the actual statute under which a court supervises receivers and receiverships;
  • food and beverage service;
  • landlord and tenant.issues;
  • real property laws;
  • employment laws; and
  • environmental regulations.

Receivers and receiverships: Signs of financial troubles in Canadian law firms

Early signs of law firm financial distress may manifest discreetly initially; however, they possess the potential to swiftly burgeon into more significant predicaments if they remain unaddressed. These initial cues often comprise a diminution in earnings or profits, the gradual accumulation of aged or unrecoverable accounts receivable, protracted deferrals in settling obligations with suppliers, elevated turnover ratios among the workforce, and a conspicuous dearth of financial commitment to technological advancements or educational initiatives.

Furthermore, additional red flags might encompass extravagant expenditures on non-essential items, an absence of transparency in financial disclosures, and an excessive reliance upon a select few pivotal clientele for the lion’s share of the generated income. It is of paramount importance for legal practitioners to diligently oversee their fiscal well-being and to adopt assertive measures for rectification as soon as such issues come to the fore. These remedial actions may encompass the implementation of cost-saving measures, the pursuit of novel revenue streams, and judicious investments in pivotal facets of their enterprise to maintain a competitive edge within the industry.

an image of a financiallt\y troubled company that is havnig to go into either receivership or bankruptcy
receivers and receiverships

Receivers and receiverships: Initiating receivership proceedings

Secured creditors and their loans

In the intricate tapestry of the Canadian receivership process, secured creditors assume a pivotal role, being the foremost lenders vested with a security interest in the debtor company assets. This security interest, the secured loan being a legal tether of paramount significance, empowers them to wield their influence with precision, invoking either the private appointment of a receiver or the judicial machinery to issue an order for a court-appointed receiver.

In the realm of receivers and receiverships, this designated receiver takes upon themselves the onerous task of seizing the reins and stewarding the debtor company’s possessions.

Empowered by their position, secured creditors hold sway over the inception of the receivership process, their voices resonating in the selection of the receiver, a decision of paramount consequence. This influence is not merely titular; it is wielded to safeguard their interests and optimize the potential for recovery.

There are two types of receivers and receiverships:

Privately-appointed receiver

In privately appointed receiverships, the receiver bears the weighty mantle of responsibility, owing a fiduciary duty to the secured lender, a commitment to act in their utmost interest. Secured creditors, in turn, possess the authority to interpose their veto, casting judgment upon select decisions proposed by the receiver.

Court-appointed receiverships

However, when the path leads to court-appointed receivership, a different dynamic emerges, for here, the receiver is an independent arbiter, an officer of the court, rendering decisions with impartiality. No doubt secured creditors will attempt to wield their influence, but the court-appointed receiver must be seen to be even-handed.

In the grand scheme of the Canadian receivership process, secured creditors emerge as the linchpin upon which rests the beginning of efficient oversight and resolution of a debtor’s financial quagmire.

an image of a financiallt\y troubled company that is havnig to go into either receivership or bankruptcy
receivers and receiverships

Receivers and receiverships case study: A recent instance of a Canadian law firm receivership process

The recent decision of the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta is in the case of Law Society of Alberta v Higgerty, 2023 ABKB 499. This case involves an application to put a law firm into receivership. Notwithstanding that it is not one of the larger firms, it is, in my view, having been involved in both the receiverships and bankruptcies of law firms, a complete analysis of all the important considerations that insolvency practitioners and non-insolvency lawyers must be aware of in either advising or dealing with an insolvent law firm.

Law firm receivers and receiverships: Background

The Law Society of Alberta (“LSA”) and Mr. Richard E. Harrison are the applicants on this matter (collectively, the “Applicants”). The Applicants seek an order appointing a receiver or a receiver and manager over certain undertakings, personal property, real property and assets of the law practices of Patrick B. Higgerty and Patrick B. Higgerty Professional Corporation (collectively, “Higgerty Law”).

The receivership order sought by the Applicants is unique because of the circumstances underlying this application (the “Application”). The tension in this Application concerns: (i) the desire of a secured lender to enforce its rights and entitlements under the security it holds over the assets held by Higgerty Law; and (ii) the desire of the LSA to ensure the parties are acting in the public interest and to protect solicitor-client privilege that is a component of the files of Higgerty Law.

Easy Legal Finance Inc (“ELFCo”) is a secured lender to Higgerty Law. It seeks the right to enforce its security which is part of the loan agreement. It proposes a process that it alleges will ensure confidentiality and solicitor-client privilege are maintained for stakeholders, and not strip ELFCo of substantially all of its contractual, legal and beneficial rights.

Law firm receivers and receiverships: Facts

During its years of operation, Higgerty Law focused on personal injury law and class action litigation. Compensation for those files was often based on contingency fee agreements, payable when the matter concluded. On March 10, 2023, Higgerty Law was placed under custodianship pursuant to an Order of this Court (the “Custodianship Order”). Mr. Harrison was named the custodian (the “Custodian”).

On the date the Custodianship Order was issued, Higgerty Law had a substantial number of creditors. ELFCo asserted it held security over all present and after-acquired personal property of Higgerty Law. ELFCo claims that its security gives it priority over the proceeds of the class action lawsuits.

Higgerty Law has a debt of around $1.4 million to ELFCo. The interest rate charged on the ELFCo Loan is a whopping 18% per year! Last April, ELFCo served a demand for payment and a notice to enforce security under section 244(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (“BIA”).

The President of ELFCo swore in an affidavit that he believed there was no reasonable prospect of Higgerty Law repaying the ELFCo Loan.

Law firm receivers and receiverships: What the Court needed to address

Initially, several issues were to be addressed in the Application, including: (i) whether a receiver and manager should be appointed; (ii) whether the interest payable on the ELFCo Loan should be stayed; and (iii) the scope of the ELFCo Loan security. The parties agreed to restrict the hearing to the issue of whether a receiver and manager should be appointed. The other issues were deferred to a subsequent hearing.

ELFCo challenges the proposal to appoint a receiver and manager. It asserts there is no business of Higgerty Law to manage and no material estate to administer. ELFCo also asserted that a receiver and manager in these circumstances would be limited to the negotiation of the transfer of a limited number of legal files to new lawyers. It submits that this is not an appropriate mandate for a receiver and manager and that it would not be commercially reasonable in view of the needless cost and redundancy a receivership would create.

As an alternative, ELFCo made an application for approval of a basic process to enforce its security. It asserts that this alternative process would ensure that confidentiality and solicitor-client privilege are maintained for stakeholders. Further, ELFCo asserted that this alternative process would not strip it of substantially all its rights and entitlements under its security, which would occur under the Custodian’s proposal. The one thing that the ELFCo proposal failed to recognize is that under section 244(4) of the BIA, only a licensed insolvency trustee can act as a receiver.

The unique circumstances of this case presented a challenge for the Court because there are various stakeholders with different rights that must be balanced, including:

  • the rights of the Higgerty Law clients to have their solicitor-client privileged communications protected;
  • the entitlement of a secured creditor to enforce its legal and beneficial rights;
  • the rights of Higgerty Law clients whose funds appear to have been misappropriated;
  • the rights of Higgerty Law clients to access their file material; and
  • the rights of unsecured creditors, including clients of Higgerty Law.

A wide array of factors should be taken into consideration when considering receivers and receiverships

The Court considered a list of important factors in considering a receivership appointment:

  1. whether irreparable harm might be caused if no order were made, although it is not essential for a creditor to establish irreparable harm if a receiver is not appointed, particularly where the appointment of a receiver is authorized by the security documentation;
  2. the risk to the security holder, taking into consideration the size of the debtor’s equity in the assets and the need for protection or safeguarding of the assets while litigation takes place;
  3. the nature of the property;
  4. the apprehended or actual waste of the debtor’s assets;
  5. the preservation and protection of the property pending judicial resolution;
  6. the balance of convenience to the parties;
  7. the fact that the creditor has the right to appoint a receiver under the documentation provided for the loan;
  8. the enforcement of rights under a security instrument where the security-holder encounters or expects to encounter difficulty with the debtor and others;
  9. the principle that the appointment of a receiver is extraordinary relief, which should be granted cautiously and sparingly;
  10. the consideration of whether a court appointment is necessary to enable the receiver to carry out its duties more efficiently;
  11. the effect of the order upon the parties;
  12. the conduct of the parties;
  13. the length of time that a receiver may be in place;
  14. the cost to the parties;
  15. the likelihood of maximizing return to the parties;
  16. the goal of facilitating the duties of the receiver.

Ultimately, the Court has to decide if, under provincial law, on the balance of the evidence, is it just and convenient to appoint a receiver.

Receivers and receiverships: The evidence and the Court’s analysis

The evidence, in this case, is that:

  • there are trust account improprieties in the range of $419,000; and
  • there is no reasonable prospect of the Applicants or Higgerty Law repaying the ELFCo Loan or continuing to make loan payments.

By virtue of being members of the LSA, custodians can maintain solicitor-client privilege over files and information within their custody. Both the LSA and the Custodian are stakeholders in ensuring the maintenance of solicitor-client privileged information.

There is an important distinction between secured creditors, who are interested in protecting themselves and usually do so through a receiver that they appoint, and a custodian who is typically interested in protecting the clients of the financially troubled law firm and their respective rights and entitlements, including their respective rights to solicitor-client privilege.

From the perspective of the secured creditors, the results which flow from the appointment of a custodian are no happier. A custodian is obliged by the to protect the interests of clients of the firm, including confidentiality, and is consequently unable to collect accounts receivable either efficiently or economically. The task of the custodian is significantly dissimilar from that of the receiver in that the primary objective of the custodian is the protection of clients’ interests. Receivers, by contrast, act in accordance with the interests of creditors. Any benefit enjoyed by creditors which results from the appointment of the custodian is merely incidental to the primary function of the custodian, which is the protection of the clients.

Solicitor-client privilege is a fundamental underpinning of the legal profession in Canada. It is near absolute and merits protection.

Solicitor-client privilege cannot be breached by the interests and entitlement of a secured creditor. Any risks in that regard must be carefully considered. To illustrate this point, the Supreme Court of Canada has held that Anton Piller orders must ensure the protection of the solicitor-client communications of the party being searched. There is no right to disclosure of such communications in discovery because they are protected by privilege.

The Judge determined that the higher duty in the circumstances of this case is to protect the public interest, which includes the protection of privilege associated with the files of Higgerty Law. Given the inherent concerns associated with the issues touching on the “Property” as that term is defined in the Draft Receiver Order, it is inevitable that matters concerning the solicitor-client privilege over the Higgerty Law files will be engaged. As a regulator, the LSA has an obligation to ensure the parties are acting in the public interest and to protect privilege over the Higgerty Law files.

The Judge’s view was that protecting solicitor-client privilege is an essential element of this custodianship. The unique circumstances of this case presented a challenge for the Court because there are various stakeholders with different rights that must be balanced, including:

  1. the rights of the Higgerty Law clients to have their solicitor-client privileged communications protected;
  2. the entitlement of a secured creditor to enforce its legal and beneficial rights;
  3. the rights of Higgerty Law clients whose funds appear to have been misappropriated;
  4. the rights of Higgerty Law clients to access their file material; and
  5. the rights of unsecured creditors, including clients of Higgerty Law.

Receivers and receiverships: The Court’s decision

Based on the Judge’s review of the evidence and analysis of the law, the Judge found that it was just or convenient to appoint a receiver and manager of Higgerty Law. The unique circumstance, in this case, calls for a receiver and manager to be appointed in order to best ensure the protection of the solicitor-client privilege associated with the files of Higgerty Law.

The Judge also directed that the Draft Receiver Order obligate the receiver and manager to come back to the Court for an order whenever a Higgerty Law file is proposed to be transferred to a third party. The Draft Receiver Order must stipulate the notice that is to be given to the stakeholders whenever there is a proposed file transfer.

an image of a financiallt\y troubled company that is havnig to go into either receivership or bankruptcy
receivers and receiverships

Receivers and receiverships: Impact of receivership on law firm clients

Client confidences

Maintaining client confidence is a paramount concern during receivership. The receiver must uphold ethical standards and protect sensitive information.

Receivership does not absolve a law firm from its ongoing legal obligations, including representing existing clients and fulfilling contractual commitments.

Advantages

Receivership can offer advantages such as a structured approach to resolving financial issues and protecting creditor interests.

Disadvantages

However, it also comes with disadvantages, including the potential loss of control for the firm’s owners and uncertainty for employees.

an image of a financiallt\y troubled company that is havnig to go into either receivership or bankruptcy
receivers and receiverships

Alternatives to receivership for law firms: Restructuring options available to a law firm

Restructuring

When confronted with financial difficulties, a Canadian law practice has a range of alternatives to think about prior to being put in receivership. Bankruptcy, restructuring either by merging with another firm or financial help in the form of additional partner capital contributions could be potential options that must be explored. Restructuring permits firms to rearrange their operations and debt structure to bring back financial security.

Bankruptcy

Receivership or bankruptcy, on the other hand, ought to be taken into consideration when the company’s financial situation is irreparable. It is necessary for an insolvent law practice to carefully evaluate and take into consideration these choices in order to determine the very best strategy to resolve their financial difficulties.

Receivers and receiverships: Frequently asked questions

1. What triggers the need for receivership in a law firm?

Receivership may be triggered in a law firm when the organization is no longer able to meet its financial obligations. This can be due to several factors, including a significant decrease in client demand, mismanagement of funds, or overwhelming debt. The need for receivership can also arise from legal action, such as a lawsuit against the firm.

When the organization is unable to pay its debts, receivership becomes necessary to protect the interests of clients, creditors and stakeholders. In such cases, a court-appointed receiver takes control of the firm’s assets and operations to manage the liquidation process and ensure the equitable distribution of funds from the sale of assets.

2. Can a law firm continue to operate during receivership?

Being in receivership can be a roller coaster ride for a law practice! The future of the firm lies in the hands of the receiver and their assessment of the scenario. If the receiver believes that the law office has the prospective to create revenue by continuing business operations, then the firm might be allowed to continue operating in some fashion in continuing legal services and moving the clients’ legal proceedings forward, while a realization strategy is being developed. But, if the receiver thinks that the firm cannot operate profitably and therefore it’s better for the firm’s assets should be sold, the receiver will seek court approval for that strategy.

3. How does receivership impact the firm’s clients?

The influence of receivership on a law firm’s clients can be significant. Clients may experience hold-ups in obtaining legal services, provided the sanctity of solicitor-client privilege. Furthermore, clients may be worried about the stability and dependability of the firm during the receivership process, which can impact their self-confidence in the firm’s capability to continue to supply essential legal solutions. It is important for both the receiver as well as the law firm in receivership to interact transparently with the clients during the receivership to maintain their confidence as well as minimize the impact of the process.

4. What alternatives exist to receivership for struggling law firms?

When confronted with financial difficulties, a Canadian law practice has a range of alternatives to think about prior to being put in receivership. Bankruptcy, restructuring either by merging with another firm or financial help in the form of additional partner capital contributions could be potential options that must be explored. Restructuring permits firms to rearrange their operations and debt structure to bring back financial security.

5. Are there differences in receivership laws across Canadian provinces?

As indicated above, receivership is governed first by the BIA, a federal statute. Although there may be differences in provincial law in the areas described above that have an effect on receivership proceedings, the base laws governing receivers and receiverships are the same across all provinces.

Receivers and Receiverships: Conclusion

In conclusion, receivers and receiverships are a complex but vital legal process that can be initiated when a Canadian law firm faces insurmountable financial challenges. It involves the appointment of a receiver to manage the firm’s assets and affairs, with the ultimate goal of protecting stakeholder interests. While receivership is a significant step, it is essential to understand its pros and cons and explore alternative solutions before proceeding.

Individuals and business owners must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses with debt problems that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these financial health concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual who has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own and it does not mean that you are a bad person. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

an image of a financiallt\y troubled company that is havnig to go into either receivership or bankruptcy
receivers and receiverships

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FROM GRIPPING TAKEOVER TO DISCHARGE: HOW LONG DO RECEIVERSHIPS LAST?

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada? Introduction

In my September 2021 Brandon’s Blog, THE CANADIAN RECEIVERSHIP EASY BEGINNERS GUIDE, I provided an easy-to-understand guide to understand the receivership process. To summarize, I described that in Canada, a receivership is a legal remedy available to secured creditors to recover outstanding amounts under a secured loan if a company defaults on its loan payments. It may also be used in shareholder disputes to complete a project, liquidate assets, or sell a business.

A court may appoint a receiver to take possession of assets, oversee liquidation proceedings, and distribute the proceeds according to the applicable legal priorities as outlined in Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). Or, a secured creditor may issue a letter of appointment to the same effect.

It is essential to recognize that receivership and bankruptcy are distinct legal proceedings. Bankruptcy is a formal proceeding, regulated by the BIA, to provide debtors with debt relief when they are financially incapable of paying their unsecured creditors. Conversely, a receivership is a process available to secured creditors to recuperate outstanding debt arising from a secured loan or to address shareholder disputes.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to answer the question I am often asked: “how long do receiverships last in Canada?”.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada? Understanding what receivership is

There are two types of receiverships in Canada: court-appointed receiverships and private receiverships. Court-appointed receivers are appointed by a court to oversee the management and disposition of a debtor’s assets. Private receivers are appointed by secured creditors as part of a loan agreement and the security agreement between the debtor company and the creditor.to manage and sell a business debtor’s assets outside of the court system.

The receiver, regardless if it is a court-appointed receiver or privately appointed receiver, takes control of a company’s assets and business operations to repay outstanding debts to creditors. The receiver’s primary duty is to maximize the value of the assets and distribute the proceeds to the creditors according to their priority ranking. The receiver has the power to sell, manage, or liquidate the assets and may also negotiate with creditors to restructure the company’s debt.

Some key players in a receivership process are:

  • Borrower: The owner of the property who defaults on their loan obligations or faces financial distress.
  • Lender: The secured lender, normally a financial institution, who initiates the receivership action to protect their interest in the property and recover their debt.
  • Receiver: The neutral third party who is a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called bankruptcy trustees) and is appointed either privately or by the court to take charge of the property and manage it toward a sale or resolution.
  • Court: The judicial authority that grants or denies the receivership request, sets the terms and conditions for the receiver’s appointment and oversees the receivership process.
  • Law firm: The lawyers who are acting for the lender, the borrower and the court-appointed receiver.

The powers and duties of a receiver can vary depending on the nature of the assets or the court order appointing them. Generally, it includes taking control of the assets, managing them in a financially responsible manner, and reporting to the court and parties involved in the dispute.

The duration of receiverships in Canada can vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case, but it typically lasts for a few months to over a year.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada?

Several factors will affect the duration of receivership in Canada, including:

  • the complexity of the case;
  • the number and nature of the assets involved;
  • the cooperation of the parties involved; and
  • the efficiency of the court system.

Other factors may include the availability of qualified professionals to manage and sell the assets, the level of creditor involvement and negotiation, and the overall economic and market conditions at the time. Ultimately, the length of receivership will depend on the specific circumstances of each case.

Court supervision is the oversight provided by a court in a court-appointed receivership. The purpose of court supervision is to appoint the receiver, to allow for the receiver to obtain the approval of the court to decisions and actions the court-appointed receiver wishes to take, to ensure that the receiver acts in the best interest of all parties involved and follows the court’s orders and to allow a forum for any aggrieved party to bring their dispute to the court for adjudication.

Termination of a receivership occurs when the court is satisfied that the receiver has fulfilled their duties and objectives or when the receiver’s appointment is no longer necessary. The court terminates a receivership by court order after approving the receiver’s final report and accounts.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada? Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Navigating receiverships can be a tricky and complex situation. Asking questions like “how long do receiverships last in Canada?” is essential to any company dealing with financial hardship. Here I will cover some of the common FAQs associated with receiverships in Canada, and provide an in-depth look at the timeline of these proceedings. It is essential to have a thorough comprehension of receiverships to successfully manage this situation.

What are the differences between bankruptcy vs. receivership?

Receivership is a process to secure the rights of secured creditors, allowing for the control and eventual sale of the assets of a distressed company. Bankruptcy, on the other hand, is a legal process which allows a company in financial difficulty to reorganize its affairs or liquidate its assets under the guidance of an insolvency trustee – providing a safety net to unsecured creditors.

What happens during a receivership process in Canada?

As part of the receivership process in Canada, a receiver is appointed to handle a company’s assets and activities, facilitating the sale of these to settle the company’s debt to creditors.

How does a receiver sell a business or assets?

To sell a business or assets, a receiver has many options available. A receiver can:

  • advertise the assets for sale by running a tender bid sales process;
  • a tender bid sales process could be stand-alone or could be combined with a stalking horse sales process;
  • the assets could be liquidated through a public auction using the services of an auctioneer;
  • the receiver could hand all the assets over to a liquidator in order to sell the assets in an online auction;
  • in certain circumstances, the receiver may wish to hire a professional business broker experienced in that particular industry or assets the receiver took possession of; or
  • for retail store assets, the receiver may sell the entire package of assets and will then run a retail sale to the public.

Regardless of the process chosen, the receiver’s aim is to market and sell the assets or business and obtain the best price for the assets or business under the circumstances.

How does a creditor apply for receivership in Canada?

Secured lenders can apply for receivership in Canada by filing an application to the court under a federal or provincial statute or enforcing their security rights by appointing a receiver privately through a security instrument by way of an appointment letter. A receivership is a remedy that allows a secured creditor to take control of and sell the debtor’s property and assets to collect their secured debt through a private or court appointment process.

Can a receivership be stopped or avoided?

Receivership can sometimes be stopped or avoided through negotiation with the secured creditor(s), restructuring or refinancing of debts, or by finding alternative sources of funding. However, whether or not it can be stopped or avoided depends on the specific circumstances of each case. The cessation of receivership will not be easy unless the secured creditor is being paid out.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How does a creditor enforce a secured loan in Canada?

In Canada, a creditor can enforce a secured loan by appointing a receiver under a private contract or through the court process. Upon appointment, the receiver will seize and sell the secured assets or the assets set out in the court order to recover the amount owed.

However, before being able to appoint the Receiver, there have to be one or more events of default as described in the loan agreement. Then, the lender must be reasonable in allowing the company borrower to cure the default. If the company in default does not remedy the default(s) and the lender has lost confidence, the lender can then make a written demand on the company to repay the entire loan, plus interest and costs and also serve the necessary statutory form on the defaulting borrower.

The lender must give the borrower a reasonable period of time to repay the secured lender’s debt. Reasonable time will vary depending on the unique circumstances of the situation. In Canada, the minimum amount of time that has to be given is 10 days, unless the borrower acknowledges in writing that they can never repay the debt and is waiving the notice period.

Legal options available to recover outstanding loan payments may include sending demand letters, filing a lawsuit, obtaining a judgment and using collection methods such as wage garnishment or asset seizure.

How long does the bankruptcy process take in Canada?

The timeline of a corporate bankruptcy process depends on the uniqueness and complexity of each individual situation. There is no typical timeline, but, it could be a year or more from the start of the bankruptcy until the licensed insolvency trustee is discharged.

How do I liquidate assets in Canada?

When seeking to divest yourself of some assets you have a plethora of choices – in the case of an asset like real estate, you can list it on the public market. Alternatively, you can try to find the right buyer on your own. Or, if you’d like some professional assistance, enlist the help of a savvy broker or financial adviser.

What are the consequences of not paying off secured loans in Canada?

In Canada, if you don’t pay back a secured loan, the lender may reclaim the collateral you put up, personal property like a car or real property such as a house. Don’t let your possessions be taken away! Be sure to make all loan payments in a timely manner.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada? Conclusion

So I hope that you now have a good appreciation for receiverships in Canada including the answer to the question “how long do receiverships last in Canada?”. If your company or business is under financial pressure and your secured creditor is about to demand full repayment of all loans, you need immediate professional advice.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are also now worried about the economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE VAUGHAN: THE COMPLETE GUIDE FOR YOUR HAPPY DEBT FREE L1FE

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. Through the use of video meetings, we can help you even if you do not live close to our office in the Jane Street Hwy. 7 area. It is just like we are coming to you!

The bankruptcy trustee in Vaughan: We transformed into a licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan

The bankruptcy trustee in Vaughan went through a metamorphosis similar to a caterpillar becoming a butterfly. The term “bankruptcy trustee” turned into a “licensed insolvency trustee“. The licensed insolvency trustee designation was mandated to all licensed trustees by the Industry Canada Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). The OSB licenses and supervises the activities of all licensed insolvency trustees across Canada. This includes us as a licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan, Ontario.

The purpose of this Brandon blog is to offer an overview of our role in the Greater Toronto Area with our licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan insolvency trustee firm head office.

The purpose of this Brandon blog is to offer an overview of our role in the Greater Toronto Area with our licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan insolvency trustee firm head office.

Role of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee Vaughan (formerly called Trustee in Bankruptcy Vaughan)

A licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan can fulfill various roles. It all starts with providing a no-cost consultation for a person or company that finds themselves in a troubling financial situation that worries them about their prospects for a bright financial future.

Due to the various roles, a licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan can play, we are also known as “receivers”, “trustee in bankruptcy” or “financial restructuring professionals”. We are appointed when a company or person is financially distressed and either has no other options to get out of financial difficulty and is unable to pay its bills. A licensed insolvency trustee is the only party licensed by the Government of Canada to perform a federal government-approved debt settlement plan, being a consumer proposal consolidation.

As a licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan firm, there are different roles we can play.

licensed insolvency trustee vaughan
licensed insolvency trustee vaughan

Find the right option with the help of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee Vaughan

Personal situation insolvency

For individuals who are insolvent, we can provide and act in the following:

  • A no-cost initial consultation to provide advice about debt relief.
  • Credit counselling. to help with your household budget and determine if you really need one of the available debt relief options.
  • Consumer Proposal – Toronto and GTA – Act as Consumer Proposal Administrator to conduct a Consumer Proposal Process for people who owe $250,000 or less in unsecured debts (not including any debts registered against their home) who wish to eliminate their debt and wish an alternative to bankruptcy so that they can avoid filing bankruptcy. This is a government-approved interest-free debt settlement plan that can be paid over as much as five years.
  • Division I Proposal – Toronto and GTA – This process is not quite as streamlined as a consumer proposal, but it is for people who wish to eliminate their debt while avoiding personal bankruptcy.
  • These 2 proposal remedies are the only accredited government debt relief programs in Canada.
  • Personal bankruptcy – Toronto and GTA – As a licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan, we can of course assist anyone who wishes filing for bankruptcy. In your no-cost consultation with us, we first get to know you and your financial situation in order to determine if you qualify for one of the bankruptcy alternatives. If not, we will discuss the entire bankruptcy process with you, including the cost of bankruptcy. If you wish to proceed, we will accept your assignment in bankruptcy.

All collection activities against you cease when you make an assignment in bankruptcy, or file a debt settlement restructuring proposal. Legal action against you may include wage garnishment, collection calls, or a legal action against you. You get legal protection as a result of the stay of proceedings afforded by an insolvency filing.

The two most common types of debt we encounter in our personal insolvency practice are credit card debt and income tax debt. We have successfully handled for clients serious negotiations with Canada Revenue Agency in order to achieve debt settlement for people with a financial history of income tax debt.

Corporate insolvency

For companies, and especially entrepreneurial family businesses that are insolvent, we can provide and act in the following:

  • A no-cost initial consultation to provide advice about debt restructuring options.
  • Restructuring & Turnarounds.
  • Business analysis, business review and monitoring.
  • Receivership – Toronto and GTA – Only a licensed insolvency trustee can act as a receiver on behalf of a secured creditor. As a licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan, we act as a privately-appointed receiver on behalf of a secured creditor. We also act as a court-appointed receiver upon the application to a court by a secured creditor or other stakeholders.
  • Winding-Up and Liquidator – Toronto and GTA – For solvent companies that wish to wind up operations through a legal process, we act as either privately appointed or court-appointed Liquidator.

    licensed insolvency trustee vaughan
    licensed insolvency trustee vaughan

Selecting The Right Licensed Insolvency Trustee in Vaughan

Experience and professionalism

You might not find the expertise to solve your financial difficulties with someone just around the corner. You can start your search for the right Trustee by visiting the website of the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals. Both Ira Smith and Brandon Smith are members of the Canadian Insolvency and Restructuring Professional Association. It shows an individual’s commitment to staying up to date with all the latest industry advancements by belonging to this organization. Check the website of the OSB to ensure that the Trustees you are considering are not suspended or under file management by the regulator.

Interacting with them on many levels is essential

As a beginning, they must be able to quickly understand your needs and desires, as well as provide you with a realistic plan that can be followed. If you have issues or concerns, they also need to be available to you. Look for their interest in you. How enthusiastic are they about their industry? Do you really feel their compassion for you? Do you feel you are going to get along on an inter-personal basis with this person?

That’s exactly how you measure enthusiasm. The most effective solutions and suggestions will be offered by a knowledgeable insolvency trustee. You may not find this type of person within walking distance of your home or workplace.

licensed insolvency trustee vaughan
licensed insolvency trustee vaughan

Licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan: Are you able to agree on the same concepts?

It is not a totally free service to engage a professional trustee. The complexity of your situation could affect the bankruptcy cost. Your trust in a bankruptcy trustee is diminished if you feel they view you as just another dollar sign. Look for those who seem to have similar values to you. It may not be the closest to your home to find such a licensed insolvency trustee.

Websites for licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan

Searching for “bankruptcy trustee near me” or “licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan” on a search engine today will bring up various websites to visit. How does the website make you feel? What bankruptcy FAQs do they provide? Can you see pictures of the people you would deal with? From their blog, do they demonstrate that they have a deep knowledge base?

licensed insolvency trustee vaughan
licensed insolvency trustee vaughan

You can meet with more than one Trustee

Unless you sit across the table from him or her, you won’t know which one is the right fit for you. Comparing two bankruptcy trustees is a good idea. You want to be able to compare two or more for your own validation purposes. The one you feel best about is the one to go with. Trust your gut!

3 Best Licensed Insolvency Trustees in Vaughan, ON

Throughout the years my firm has been inspected for 50 points, including reviews, ratings, reputation, history, complaints, satisfaction, trust, cost, and general excellence. The results have allowed us to rank consistently among the top 3 Best Licensed Insolvency Trustees in Vaughan, ON.

Licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan summary

I hope that you found this licensed insolvency trustee Vaughan Brandon Blog helpful in describing our role as debt professionals and my thoughts on how to go about choosing the one you think is the best fit for anyone in a financial crisis. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

licensed insolvency trustee vaughan
licensed insolvency trustee vaughan

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

HOW TO LOSE MONEY WITH WINNING LOTTERY NUMBERS

winning lottery numbersIntroduction

It is true that winning a lotto game can transform lives. Most people hope for winning lottery numbers. They hope for a lotto win to bring life-altering money. They hope their winning ticket will let them quickly repay a home mortgage or get a new home, purchase a brand-new vehicle, bring on early retirement and also limitless travelling.

That dream result is not always the case. I really hope a money windfall will bring excellent luck and fortune to you. However, this Brandon’s Blog is about how betting on winning lottery numbers to erase your debt or repair all your troubles, might not always hold true.

The probability of having the winning lottery numbers

Winning lotto is an unbelievable experience. The possibility of winning a lotto game are controlled by the law of probabilities. You do not need to have a Ph.D. in mathematics to recognize that winning a lottery game is a once-in-many-lifetimes chance. The likelihood of winning a lottery game is truly a conditional probability.

Your chances of winning are conditional on the number of tickets you have purchased. The selling of individual tickets and the selection of the winning lottery numbers are independent events. After that, the probability of winning a lottery is the combined event wherein your ticket matches the numbers selected.

There are just two ways of raising your possibilities to win a lottery game:

  1. Purchase extra tickets.
  2. You and your associate engage in fraudulent behaviour by having inside details on which numbers your pal can manipulate the bouncing spheres to get you the win!

Religious people say that everything they obtain is a true blessing. So, I assume winning a lottery falls into that same category. So, rather than thinking about their probabilities of winning, they buy lotto tickets and put their faith a higher power. Some people claim that the opportunity of winning a lottery game is so low, it is almost like throwing your cash away. The opposite side of the coin is that people who talk about the small probability of winning the lotto are met with the argument: But what if I’m the one?

Winning a lottery is not a debt elimination plan

For sure winning a lotto will put a smile on your face. Winning a lotto may be among the best experiences in someone’s life. Winning a lottery has constantly been the only opportunity for the typical individual with financial debts to get their financial freedom. Surveys show that virtually half of Canadians are counting on either receiving an inheritance or winning a lotto game for their retirement, with similar numbers showing up in various other developed nations.

Some people incorrectly think winning a lotto will fix all their troubles. If you see that your desire for winning a lotto has developed into troubles in any other facets of your life, understand that you are a lottery addict. The addiction is fuelled because the possibility of winning the lotto is so little and there are none of the regular small gains which persuade the habitual casino player to take their winnings and leave the table a winner that day. Chasing after the desire of winning the lottery keeps many people always coming back for more because their requirement to win has actually not been satisfied.

Winning a lotto game can have both adverse as well as positive influences in your life. Winning a lotto can totally transform you. A few years ago I wrote two blogs on how winning a lottery can ruin a person’s life as opposed to saving it. Those people actually lost money with winning lottery numbers.

Worse problems from winning a lottery

Most provincial lotteries have similar rules. One common rule is the need for transparency by publishing the name and other details about the winner. This can lead to worse problems than the ones I have already mentioned. Consider this coming from the United States.

One fortunate lottery winner from New Jersey might have the ability to relish all the cash from the next state lottery in secret– many thanks to a brand-new regulation that went into effect just last month. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy signed a law in January that enables winners to stay confidential.

Previous Governor Chris Christie vetoed the regulation saying that it would certainly threaten the openness that provides taxpayers confidence in the honesty of the lottery game. But advocates of the regulation, which was passed unanimously this year, claimed lottery winners must be able to make their own choice on whether they want the publicity or not.

New Jersey joined a handful of various other states consisting of Arizona, Delaware, Georgia as well as Kansas that permit lotto game champions to conceal their identifications if their winnings exceed a particular amount.

The legislation excuses names and addresses from the state’s public records, but state departments are still able to share the information internally to collect child assistance or other state social assistance overpayments.

Winning the lottery can lead to great pleasures like high-end cars, holidays and homes. However, it can also attract a lot of unwanted attention. All sorts of scammers come out of the woodwork to try to get the lotto winners to separate from their money. It can also lead to unwanted attention, harassment and even physical violence.

In 2016, a 20-year-old male that had won an almost half-million-dollar lottery game prize was killed during a home invasion robbery in Georgia. In 2010, a man that won $31 million, was found buried under concrete. His good friend was found guilty of his murder.

So from these examples, it is possible to lose money and more, with winning lottery numbers.

Summary

You can’t rely on winning lottery numbers to solve your financial problems. In fact, always buying lottery tickets might lead some people to have bigger problems. Do you have too much debt? Are you banking on some outside event that you have no control over, like an inheritance or gambling winnings to save you or your company?

If yes, then you need immediate help. The Ira Smith Team comprehends just how to do a debt restructuring. Much more notably, we know the demands of the business owner or the person who has too much debt. Due to the fact that you are managing these stressful financial problems, you are anxious.

It is not your fault you cannot fix this issue on your own. You have just been shown the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we take a look at your whole condition and layout a strategy that is as unique as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as a part of the debt negotiation approach we will create just for you.

We understand that individuals facing financial troubles require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you as well as end the pain you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will certainly get you or your business back on the road to a well balanced and healthy life and end the pain factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEE OF PARENTS ESTATE: DO I REALLY HAVE TO?

If trustee of parents estateIf you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Trustee of parents estate

Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom for the podcast.

Trustee of parents estate: Introduction

I want to talk about an issue which is all too common. I am also going to give you two real-life examples. The issue is that of children being named as the estate trustee of parents estate.

I caution that I and my firm are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

Why the children?

Many times in drafting a will, parents want their children to know that the parents trust and love them. So, they not only have their children as beneficiaries of their estate, they also make them the estate trustees (formerly known as executor or executrix). This is natural, but may not be the best choice.

The reason I say this is because the role of the estate trustee is a demanding one that requires a specific skill set. Children don’t always have the necessary skills. What if one or more of the children have great financial skills and have sound judgment, but others don’t. This can lead to differences of opinion and major arguments. In the most extreme case, it can lead to costly and lengthy litigation to dissipate estate assets. Executors must act in the best interests of all beneficiaries. If personal agendas get in the way, then everyone’s best interests can’t be met.

Adult children are probably married. Now you have daughters-in-law and sons-in-law involved in the background. This can lead to a whole host of issues that has nothing to do with the efficient administration of the parents’ estate and being even-handed with all beneficiaries.

What if some of the children have personal financial issues. There will be a temptation for self-dealing or self-enrichment. Again this can lead to major problems.

What if you have an even number of children? Two or four estate trustees can lead to many problems. With two, the estate trustees will always be deadlocked if they don’t see eye to eye. With four, not only can you have a deadlock, but too many cooks may spoil the broth!

Splitting the tasks

Sometimes parents split the tasks. One child will be the estate trustee because she has great financial acumen. The other child will be made responsible for health and living decisions if the parents first become incapacitated. Sounds great in theory. However, the way the health decider child wishes the parents to live may be at odds with the financial person seeing the estate shrinking away. Or, the health decider may make decisions for the parents to live in a way that does not shrink away from the estate, but is demeaning to the parents and does not give them a good quality of life in their final days.

So, as you can see, what started out as the parents wanting to “do right” by their children, can lead to many problems.

What an estate trustee should not do

In my last blog, TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS, I spoke about some basic elements of the role of an estate trustee. I described the process of becoming an estate trustee, and what the responsibilities are.

Now, I want to touch on some practical matters of what an estate trustee should not do.

The first is communicating with some beneficiaries and not others. As I have previously described, one of the roles and responsibilities of an estate trustee is to deal with all beneficiaries even-handedly. The estate trustee cannot tell certain details to some beneficiaries, and not others. So, all communications should be with all beneficiaries at the same time; either in writing or orally. Everyone should get the same information at the same time. The estate trustee does not wish to be accused of favouring some beneficiaries over others.

The second thing not to do is to rush to distribute smaller personal possessions of the deceased. The estate trustee may be pressured by family members to distribute certain items quickly. Possibly because the family member is the proper beneficiary of those small items and wants them as quickly as possible. Alternatively, perhaps they are not the rightful beneficiary of all the items they are claiming. However, they want to get their hands on certain items to stop other family members from getting them. Or perhaps there is a home involved that must be sold, so family members will pressure the estate trustee to clean out the home immediately so that the home can be put up for sale as soon as possible.

As tempting and easy as it might be, the estate trustee must first take steps to:

  • get a copy of the will and the deceased’s financial records
  • take possession and control of all assets
  • ensure that a proper inventory is made and that appraisals are obtained where necessary
  • make sure that all required insurance and bonding is in place

There is another reason. An estate trustee will be putting more pressure on themselves than they should bY making piecemeal distributions. Regardless of value, making a quick distribution to one of the beneficiaries will only give rise to all the other beneficiaries clamouring for their entitlements. The estate trustee may not be in a position for some time to be able to make a proper distribution to all other beneficiaries. This will only lead to headaches for the estate trustee.

Why some children may not want to be an estate trustee

There can be danger in being an estate trustee. In my last blog, I highlighted specific expertise and knowledge that an estate trustee must have. I also discussed how a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) also possesses the same skill set required of an estate trustee.

A trustee, including an estate trustee, acts in a fiduciary capacity. The estate trustee is fully accountable for all decisions made and steps were taken with respect to the assets. Not only is it important to have the necessary financial skills, but an estate trustee also has to be aware of the myriad of income tax issues. Final income tax returns must be filed. The estate trustee has a duty to ensure that all income tax legislation requirements are met, including the obtaining of clearance certificates. Any loss to the estate as a result of things an estate trustee either did or did not do, the estate trustee will be personally liable for.

The steps required in formulating an appropriate sales process for the different asset types not being directly distributed to beneficiaries is not totally scientific. There is some art to it as well. Making wrong decisions can expose the estate to loss of value, which will blow back right onto the estate trustee.

For these reasons, children may not wish to take on responsibility. The smart ones will understand that they do not have the required skill set. In other cases, the children may see the real possibility of creating family strife if they were to take on the role of an estate trustee. So what if children are named in the will as the estate trustees, but they don’t wish to take on the role. Must they anyway?

Renunciation of estate trustee Ontario

If you have not yet applied for probate or have otherwise not started to administer the estate, you do not have to be an estate trustee. There is a specific form to complete in order to renunciate your position as an estate trustee. Again, it must be done before you take any action as the estate trustee. If you have already applied for probate, or have started administering the estate and now find that you are in over your head, you cannot renunciate your position. You must make application to Court for an Order removing you as the estate trustee. I would suggest that if you are the sole estate trustee, you should have someone else lined up to succeed you. Otherwise, the Court may not allow you to be removed.

Two real-life examples

Example 1

In my blog, COURT APPOINTED ESTATE TRUSTEE CASE STUDY: IF IT WAS EASY YOU WOULDN’T NEED US, I described one of our case studies where we were appointed estate trustee to sell real estate. In that case, neither of the beneficiaries were capable of agreeing on anything. They were also incapable of carrying out the role of taking possession and control of the real property, Insuring it and selling it. Legal counsel for one of the beneficiaries made an application to Court seeking an Order appointing Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as an estate trustee.

The Court made the Order. With the approval of the Court, we listed the property for sale, obtained approval to our actions and activities, including a sale of the property. We then proposed a distribution of funds which also was approved by the Court. We made the distribution and obtained our discharge. This is a perfect example of how our skill set as a licensed insolvency trustee was recognized by the Court and allowed us to carry out the mandate in an efficient way.

Example 2

Recently, one of Ira Smith’s cousins needed to update her will and name an estate trustee. This cousin has three children. None of the children believed that they had the necessary skills and knowledge to be an estate trustee. They also agreed that it was not a good idea for any of them to take on that role.

However, there was one thing that the mother and her three children could all agree on. That was that Ira had the necessary skills to be the estate trustee. They unanimously agreed that it would be a good idea for Ira to take on that role. Ira’s cousin asked him if he would. He told his cousin that he was honoured that they all thought so highly of him. He agreed to be named in her will as the estate trustee.

The children were smart. They knew what they didn’t know. They all agreed on the estate trustee being proposed. A huge weight was taken off of the mother’s shoulders.

Trustee of parents estate: Why not appoint a Toronto bankruptcy trustee?

I hope that you can see that the knowledge, experience, and expertise of a licensed insolvency trustee would stand him or her in good stead to act as executor, executrix or estate trustee of a deceased estate. Many times, it may be a smart move to allow an independent neutral third party act as the estate trustee. Especially one like a licensed insolvency trustee who is used to acting as the independent Court officer.

If you have any questions about a deceased estate and the need for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

INCOME TAX DEBT RELIEF: DO YOU KNOW THE WAY TO INCOME TAX DEBT RELIEF?

income tax debt reliefIncome tax debt relief: Introduction

As 2018 draws to a close, I want to wish all of our readers a very happy, healthy and prosperous New Year. I hope that 2019 will be a great year for all of us. You have no doubt been bombarded so far with emails, articles, and programs on getting income tax debt relief for 2018 by making sure that you have taken advantage of all possible deductions before the year ends tonight. I thought I would take a slightly different approach to talk about another rich and famous person who is in hot water with the IRS.

Income tax debt relief: Even the rich and famous have income tax debt problems

We have previously written about rich and famous people who have debt problems and who have filed for bankruptcy. Their debt problems arose mainly out of irresponsible spending, financial mismanagement and income tax problems. These blogs were written to show you that it is not only ordinary people who run into trouble. People who many would think to have “all the money in the world” can also have financial problems. Financial mismanagement is not only an illness of the poor or middle class. It can strike anywhere or anyone.

Income tax debt relief: Some of our past rich and famous financial disaster blogs

Our previous financial mismanagement of the rich and famous includes:

FAMOUS CELEBRITY BANKRUPTCIES HAPPEN TOO

In this blog, I pointed out that many rich and famous people have gone bankrupt, including:

  • Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain)
  • Michael Jackson
  • Abraham Lincoln
  • Dorothy Hamill – Gold Medal Skater
  • Johnny Unitas – Football Hall of Fame
  • Milton Hershey – Founder Hershey’s
  • H.J. Heinz – Founder Heinz
  • Marvin Gaye
  • Mick Fleetwood – Fleetwood Mac
  • Walt Disney
  • Larry King
  • Burt Reynolds
  • PT Barnum
  • Tom Petty
  • David Cassidy
  • David Crosby
  • Ed McMahon
  • Henry Ford
  • M.C. Hammer
  • Toni Braxton
  • Natalie Cole
  • Robin Williams
  • 78% of former NFL players have gone bankrupt or are under financial stress because of joblessness or divorce within two years of retirement.
  • The National Endowment for Financial Education says that 70% of all people who suddenly receive large amounts of money will lose it within a few years.

FORMER PRO ATHLETES WHO ARE BROKE: EARN OVER $400 MILLION & GO BANKRUPT?

In this blog, I talked about former pro athletes who are broke. Former NBA star and broadcaster Charles Barkley estimates that 60% – 70% of professional athletes go broke for all or any of the following reasons:

  • Buying lavish gifts and giving money to family and friends
  • Unsupportable lifestyles
  • Mansions around the world
  • Yachts
  • Exotic cars
  • Bad business ventures
  • Bad money managers
  • Not understanding financial matters
  • Zero savings
  • No rainy day fund
  • No retirement plan

DEBT FORGIVENESS CRA: CANADA REVENUE AGENCY BEATS DONOVAN BAILEY

In this blog, I wrote about Canadian Olympian. Donovan Bailey and his income tax debt problems with Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). We also described his income tax debt relief settlement plan to cut his income tax debt.. It seems that Mr. Bailey was not able to outrun CRA. Therefore he needed a formal debt settlement plan.

DEBT SETTLEMENT VS CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA: ENGLISH REALITY TV STAR KATIE PRICE NEEDS

This blog was about UK celebrity Katie Price who had many financial problems. I spoke about her financial issues and her UK bankruptcy proceedings.

Income tax debt relief: Dionne Warwick

Grammy Award-winning vocalist Dionne Warwick has filed for bankruptcy because she was in need of income tax debt relief. The 72-year-old vocalist, well-known for hits such as “Do You Know the Way to San Jose” and “That’s What Friends Are For” submitted the bankruptcy documents in New Jersey, where she lives.

She listed assets of $25,500 and liabilities of greater than $10.7 million in her bankruptcy filing. Her largest debt is income tax debt of near $7 million owed in back tax obligations to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as well as greater than $3 million in tax obligations to the state of California. This includes interest and penalties.

She declared her present income as $20,950 a month, with monthly expenditures just $10 less than that. Dionne Warwick’s press agent, Kevin Sasaki, claimed that the vocalist’s personal bankruptcy was primarily the outcome of “irresponsible and gross financial mismanagement” in the late 1980s to the mid-1990s.

Income tax debt relief: Start 2019 off the right way

No one likes to pay taxes, but everyone hates having CRA tax debt problems. Do you require CRA debt forgiveness? If you’re considering bankruptcy because of income tax debt, or for any reason. We can show you bankruptcy alternatives to get CRA debt forgiveness. We can end your debt pain through a consumer proposal, debt consolidation, and credit counselling. Contact a professional that you can trust – Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.

The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience dealing with diverse issues and complex files, including negotiating with CRA. We deliver the highest quality of professional service. Don’t settle for less. Give us a call today and Starting Over, Starting Now you can overcome your financial difficulties.

Again I wish all of you a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY CANADA

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: Introduction

Encountering major money troubles is life-shattering, especially if you automatically think that bankruptcy is your only alternative. As a matter of fact, lots of people erroneously think that serious financial difficulties immediately suggest the only answer is bankruptcy. The most common question I am asked is, “what is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada”.

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: Insolvency

If you are having problems meeting your financial obligations or have stopped meeting those financial obligations as they come due you are insolvent, not bankrupt. Insolvent is a cash flow problem; bankruptcy is a legal state. You can read a detailed discussion on the definition of being insolvent in my last week’s vlog INSOLVENT DEFINITION: A NEW FOCUS FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE.

Bаnkruрtсу is a legal рrосеѕѕ under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) that helps you to resolve уоur debts if they have become unmanageable. If you have relatively few assets and low іnсоmе and dесіdе to file for bаnkruрtсу, you will probably fіlе under the streamlined Summary Administration part of the BIA.

If you have realizable assets that will produce a value greater than $10,000, then your bankruptcy would be administered under the general administrative provisions. Don’t worry about these distinctions right now. For now, just know that the summary administration rules are shortened, and the cost of the bankruptcy administration is fixed by a tariff set by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy.

In either case, you will turn over to your Licensed Insolvency Trustee (“LIT”) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) all уоur рrореrtу that is not exempt (protected) by law. The LIT will sell your property and the proceeds will be used to рау for the bankruptcy administration and then make a distribution to уоur сrеdіtоrѕ.

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: Assets exempt in a bankruptcy in Ontario

In Ontario, where my practice is, the following assets are exempt from seizure in a personal bankruptcy:

  1. Your necessary clothing without any dollar restriction.
  2. Family furnishings and appliances up to a value of $13,150.
  3. Your tools and other personal property used to earn income from your occupation up to a value of $11,300.
  4. One vehicle with equity of no more than $6,600.
  5. Registered Retirement Savings Plan and Registered Retirement Income Fund savings, other than payments made within the 12 months immediately before the bankruptcy filing.
  6. The equity in your house if up to the amount of $10,000. Note that the current thinking is that if your equity is more than $10,000, then your exemption is zero.

If you have very little property, all of it may be рrоtесtеd so that you will not lose it.

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: Surplus income

How much уоur сrеdіtоrѕ will get in this process dереndѕ on how much уоur unрrоtесtеd property can be ѕоld fоr and whether you will be required to pay “surplus income” to your LIT. For a detailed discussion on surplus income, read my May 28, 2013 blog CAN YOU REALLY HAVE SURPLUS INCOME IF YOU’RE BANKRUPT?

Among all the things that seem to perplex many people when it involves the bankruptcy procedure is surplus income. It’s tough to get your head around the concept of surplus income when you are heading towards bankruptcy. Can that really be true if you are insolvent?

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: What is surplus income

Surplus income in a bankruptcy describes the amount the bankrupt must pay to the Trustee monthly. The Canadian bankruptcy system attempts to balance your right to end your debt and start over with the rights of creditors to be paid.

To permit Canadians to keep a sensible right to make a living throughout the bankruptcy administration, the federal government has established limits or standards on revenue a person can keep (after tax obligations and certain limited deductions) throughout their bankruptcy. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy establishes the limit restriction every year tied into the cost of living.

How do you figure surplus income?

The Federal Government establishes the formula used to calculate surplus income payments. The same formula is used for all of Canada.

The limits for surplus income are based off across the country “poverty line”. Surplus income has absolutely nothing to do with what you have left over monthly. It is a federal government formula that considers your revenue, specific non-discretionary costs as well as your household size.

The calculation is to find if you will need to contribute from your earnings monthly to your Trustee, for the benefit of your creditors.

Bankruptcy discharge

The final step of your bankruptcy process will be to get your discharge. Your discharge from bankruptcy acts as the trigger to discharge you from all of your debts. This means that you will not have to рау them (with possibly certain exceptions depending on your circumstances).

Whether you get an absolute discharge from your bankruptcy will depend essentially on your conduct. Before your bankruptcy, did you treat all your creditors the same? Does anyone feel aggrieved by your actions? That will decide if any of your creditors will oppose your discharge.

For an in-depth discussion of the personal bankruptcy discharge process, check out our vlog BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE: THE TOP 8 THINGS THE BANKRUPTCY COURT WILL CONSIDER ON ANYONE’S BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE APPLICATION.

Is your debt keeping you up at night?

Do you have extreme debt and have no concept of how to handle it? Are your debt woes keeping you up at night and causing you stress, pain and maybe even depression? We understand that pain and can cut it from your life.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has helped many companies and people throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) juggling too much debt in their lives that requires a blueprint for Starting Over, Starting Now. Do not delay. Help is 1 phone call away. You can fix your financial troubles while avoiding bankruptcy as long as you take swift action. Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation.what is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SMALL BUSINESS CANADA TAX: LIBERALS UNFAIRLY TARGET SMALL BUSINESS TAXES IN CANADA RULES

small business canada taxFull disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion on SMALL BUSINESS CANADA TAX issues. This blog must not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.

We are trying something new. At the bottom is an audiogram of this Brandon’s blog. If you would prefer to listen to it, and not read it, scroll down to the bottom and press on the play button. Let us know what you think by sending us a message in the Question box below.

Small business Canada tax: Introduction

In December 2017, our Federal Minister of Finance, Bill Morneau, disclosed some new policies he and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were thinking about. The changes Finance Minister Morneau was touting, were for toughening up the small business Canada tax scheme. It would have affected entrepreneur’s businesses, their taxes, and their households.

The main aspect of small business Canada tax that our federal government wanted to attack was the age-old concept of family business income splitting. Its more modern name that you would have seen a lot in the press is called income sprinkling. The federal government was trying to advance the theory that small business owners whose family members were shareholders in the business, but not necessarily working in the business, were somehow cheating on their taxes.

Small business Canada tax: The Federal Government’s discussion points

The discussion focussed mainly on professionals, such as doctors, lawyers, and accountants who had a professional corporation. The government was trying to advance the argument how unfair it was for a professional earning say $250,000 annually, to “sprinkle” some of the income among family members older than 18 as compared to a salaried employee earning the same total amount in salary. I find it interesting that they used a quarter of a million dollars annually as an example, and not a lesser number. Do you think that was picked on purpose to subtly portray all family business owners as being fat cats?

The government’s position was that income that might have been paid to only the manager of the business, could be redirected to other family members by way of dividends. If those family members were in a lower-income tax bracket, then they would pay less tax. The government felt that was unfair.

Small business Canada tax: How income splitting or income sprinkling works

First, in order for this to work for a professional, the laws of the Province you live in has to allow you to have household members that aren’t professionals be shareholders of your professional firm. Second, if your spouse has a high taxable income already, then you will not profit by including him or her as an owner of the business. Lastly, you must decide if you’re going to add your children more than 18 years of age, as shareholders.

Assuming you’ve marked off all those issues, it can make a difference to your family’s overall income tax bill to add your partner and/or your grown-up kids as shareholders of your business. By doing this, you can choose to distribute dividends from the business and take advantage of their lower-income tax bracket.

Paying your partner or kids a salary is not as effective as making them shareholders of the firm and paying dividends. If you pay a salary, it needs to be a sensible one, for work that you can actually prove to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). In other words, you cannot simply pay your partner $100,000 for doing bookkeeping for the firm. CRA will certainly allow an affordable wage for that function, but it would have to be justified by comparison to the marketplace for such services.

The advantage of paying dividends to family members is that you do not need to prove it. The other benefit of paying dividends is that your firm recovers some of the business tax you’ve paid on dividends made by the firm’s financial investment portfolio. Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand (RDTOH) is the issue. Our firm does not do tax work. This is a complex topic, I will leave it up to you to research how RDTOH works.

Small business Canada tax: Tax changes effective January 1, 2018

Beginning January 1, 2018, the government changed the rules specifically to target professionals who have incorporated (specifically, doctors, lawyers, and accountants). Professionals who are gaining from reduced tax rates on what would have otherwise been fully taxed earnings at the highest marginal personal income tax rates, if not for their company.

The government is saying that these incorporate professionals aren’t adding their fair share to Canadian society by their decision to have a professional corporation. For that reason, they should not gain from the tax advantages of doing so.

So what are the changes? The Tax on Split Income (TOSI) rules has been amended to cover grown-up shareholders of private firms. Previously, TOSI rules only applied to minor children. The issue now becomes: If you’re a private company owner and pay dividends to adult family member shareholders, when can you do so without invoking the new regulations? Essentially, you need to be able to show much involvement in business.

Small business Canada tax: Clear bright line

The Federal government is putting what they’re calling a “clear bright-line”’ to exclude some relatives from the TOSI rules. The general TOSI exclusions are:

  1. The company owner’s spouse, providing they more than 65 years old.
  2. Children over 18 years old who have made a real labour contribution to the business. CRA is gauging this as an average of 20 hours a week during the year. Alternatively, there is also a test throughout any of the 5 earlier years.

The government has taken direct aim at professional corporations though. These exclusions do not apply where 90% + of the income of the corporation comes from the provision of services. Income from ownership of related businesses that earn income from the provision of services is also included in the calculation.

Inserting a trust into the ownership equation may get around this “excluded shares” provision. You need the advice of your income tax advisor to decide if it would be beneficial to you.

Small business Canada tax: Ottawa punishing small business Canada

When the federal government presented new tax rules, local business claimed they were being unjustly targeted by “punishing” measures. According to Small Business Association Canada, up to fifty percent of the country’s entrepreneurs state they’re feeling negative results.

The federal government also added changes to the passive income rules for private corporations. In the February 2018 Federal Budget, the Liberals added a grind-down mechanism for the small business tax deduction through which every dollar of investment income over $50,000 cuts profits eligible for the small business tax deduction by $5.

This has been especially challenging for organizations that use passive earnings to help in special capital funding. For example, paying for building and construction equipment or to acquire real estate used by the business.ira smith trustee

Small business Canada tax: The greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) has asked the Provinces not to follow the Federal Liberals but to support small business.

For small businesses, the greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over. Private corporations who use responsible budgeting techniques and save up their profits and invest them to earn income, to be prepared for a rainy day, are being attacked. They may be saving to smooth out cash flow problems, or they might have a big upcoming purchase. Now they are being attacked through the income tax system for earning investment income in excess of $50K annually. It is clear that CRA will be looking closely at professional corporations’ income tax returns. I would not be surprised to see more CRA audits performed. The Federal government is looking to extract more income tax revenue from private corporations.

The rules are increasingly complex. Entrepreneurs will be spending more time dealing with more punitive income tax rules and income tax audits. All of this is designed by Ottawa for private corporations to pay more income tax. It ignores the investments small business makes. Creating jobs and making capital investments allows small business to contribute in many ways to the Canadian economy. This is aside from paying income tax.

Small business Canada tax: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company under attack because of tax obligations or for other reasons. Is your company in need of restructuring to get debt relief?

The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience people and companies in financial trouble. If your company is in need of a corporate restructuring proposal debt settlement plan, we have the experience to end your stress and pain and return you and your company to a healthy productive pain-free condition.

Our approach for each case is to develop a solution where Starting Over, Starting Now happens. This starts the moment you meet with us. You’re simply one call away from taking the necessary actions to return to leading a healthy and well-balanced problem-free life. Call us today for your free appointment.

Full disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion. This blog should not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADIAN DEBT SOLUTIONS: AVOIDING THE BANKRUPTCY PROCESS

Canadian debt solutions: Introduction

This blog discusses a very interesting recent decision in the British Columbia bankruptcy case of Hervias (Re), 2018 BCSC 1579 (CanLII). A licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or Trustee) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) is trained to develop Canadian debt solutions. Sometimes the best debt solution does not involve a formal insolvency process; either a consumer proposal or personal bankruptcy. The purpose of this blog is to describe the case of Mr. Hervias and why sometimes the best advice is that you don’t need to go bankrupt. This is a story of Canadian debt help – the good, bad & ugly.

Canadian debt solutions: The position of the stakeholders

Mr. Hervias made a Court application to annul his bankruptcy. He says that the bankruptcy assignment ought not to have been submitted because his only creditor of any significance was the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The evidence showed that CRA would have accepted a voluntary proposal to settle his tax liability in regular monthly payments affordable to him. He claims that the Trustee never asked such questions of CRA prior to recommending that he file for bankruptcy.

CRA does not challenge an annulment. It is encouraging his proposal to repay the debt. They likewise intend to file a memorial on the title to his home in which he has equity higher than the debt owed to CRA!

The Trustee is the only party to oppose the annulment application. The LIT insists that when Mr. Hervias sought his help, Mr. Hervias was insolvent because CRA was garnishing his pension and had frozen his bank account. Mr. Hervias had a previous bankruptcy and a couple of other minor creditors. Mr. Hervias had significant equity in buildings he owned with his son and his wife.

Canadian debt solutions: How could this even happen?

Mr. Hervias owed CRA, his major creditor, unpaid income tax of $23,820.50, including penalty and interest. In April 2017, CRA froze his only bank account. He sought help from a debt consultant, Canada Debt Helpline. He required CRA debt forgiveness. On the second meeting with an agent of Canada Debt Helpline, they introduced him to a LIT.

The Trustee met Mr. Hervias at the offices of Canada Debt Helpline. The LIT argues that Mr. Hervias sought bankruptcy guidance when he initially met with him. The Court determined that Mr. Hervias was presented to the Trustee by the debt counselor. The evidence showed that Mr. Hervias looked for the help of a debt consultant; not for a bankruptcy trustee!

The Court found that at the date of bankruptcy, Mr. Hervias had net equity in real estate of $95,000 – far more than the total of his debts! I question whether Mr. Hervias was even insolvent at the date of bankruptcy.

His bankruptcy happened because a debt consultant, who had a cozy relationship with a LIT, recommended a bankruptcy trustee with whom no doubt a financial relationship existed.

Canadian debt solutions: Debt consultants cause harm

I have written before on the evils of the debt consulting/debt settlement industry:

  1. DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES FINALLY TAKEN TO TASK IN ONTARIO – December 17, 2013
  2. HOW ADVANTAGES OF CONSUMER PROPOSALS SAVES YOU FROM DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES – June 30, 2015
  3. CONSUMER PROPOSAL VS DEBT SETTLEMENT – October 1, 2015
  4. DEBT SETTLEMENT OR CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA: NEW CANADIAN GOVERNMENT REPORT EXPOSES DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES HARMING CONSUMERS – May 3, 2017
  5. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DEBT SETTLEMENT AND CONSUMER PROPOSAL: DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES ARE PROS WHEN IT COMES TO CONS ON INSOLVENT CONSUMERS – May 10, 2017

Canadian debt solutions: Technically or temporarily insolvent?

At the time of the bankruptcy, Mr. Hervias declared some other little financial obligations including:

  • a possible debt of roughly $900 to a Recreational Vehicle park chain;
  • $213 owed to Telus Mobility from an old phone agreement; and
  • a $186 debt to Best Buy for a laptop computer that he had not repaid in full.

Mr. Hervias had assets that well surpassed his obligations. Notwithstanding, he met the technical interpretation of a bankrupt person under s. 2 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA). Since the CRA had frozen his only bank account, he had no access to his income to fulfill his commitments as they came to be due.

Because he had a poor credit score, he was not able to arrange to finance on the real property he owned jointly. His wife was also not ready to consent to the financing because she was back in her homeland of the Philippines looking after her elderly mother. She asked her husband to wait until she returned to Canada.

Canadian debt solutions: Was there a realistic option for an insolvency process?

Definitely. The evidence showed that CRA would have agreed to an informal proposal, allowing Mr. Hervias time to repay his debt to CRA. As stated above, his other debts were minor. His bankruptcy was unnecessary.

This is a prime example of the dangers of debt consultants and the Trustees who are in bed with them. For the record, my Firm does not have a relationship with any debt consulting or debt settlement firm.

Canadian debt solutions: The Court’s concerns

The main concerns for the Court were:

  • did the Court have jurisdiction to annul a bankruptcy in circumstances where the bankrupt was insolvent when the bankruptcy occurred and there is no finding that the bankrupt abused the Court’s process or committed fraud on his creditors in filing an assignment in bankruptcy;
  • if the court has jurisdiction, whether it should exercise its discretion to annul the bankruptcy in this case; and
  • in granting the application to annul, whether it should be subject to payment of the trustee’s fees.

The Court determined that it was absurd that someone with considerable assets which created income would assign himself into bankruptcy. This is especially so when the main creditor is prepared to accept payment over a longer time span in amounts that the debtor can afford. The Court concluded that these circumstances were both special as well as uncommon.

Canadian debt solutions: The Court’s decision

However, just because bankruptcy ought not to have taken place, an annulment does not instantly follow. The law is clear that the bankrupt must additionally satisfy the Court that in all the conditions of the case, thinking about all the different stakeholder interests, the discretion needs to be worked out in favour of annulment. Furthermore, the jurisprudence guides the Court to think about the legal rights of the insolvent, the creditors and the public policy issues.

The Court was critical of the LIT. The Court found that prior to the assignment in bankruptcy, the Trustee should have consulted with CRA. Certainly, had he done so, he would have found out that an informal proposal was possible and there would have been no need for any insolvency process, especially a bankruptcy.

In the Court’s view, Mr. Hervias and his creditors are not harmed by an annulment, while the public interest in the integrity of the bankruptcy process is not undermined by annulling this bankruptcy under these unique conditions. Mr. Hervias’ bankruptcy was annulled according to s. 181 of the BIA. Mr. Hervias was ordered to pay the Trustee’s fee and disbursements immediately, subject to taxation.

Canadian debt solutions: Our approach

If you or your company are experiencing financial difficulties, you need a professional trustee. If yes, call the Ira Smith Team. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door.

First of all, we always offer a free consultation. We listen to your issues and offer you a full range of realistic options to help you get out of debt. There have been many times where thinking about all the solutions available, we have advised debtors that they do not need an insolvency process. Rather, maybe they can avoid it by implementing an informal process. As a result, we do not earn any fees from such advice; it is just the right thing to advise and do in those circumstances to help you make total debt freedom.

The earlier you contact us, the more options we will have to carry out. Whether it is a corporate restructuring or personal debt settlement through a consumer proposal, the goal is to avoid bankruptcy. However, if bankruptcy turns out to be the best option, we can assist there too.

You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, ending the pain and stress you are feeling forever. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for your free consultation.

canadian debt solutions

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CORPORATE BANKRUPTCIES CANADA: SENATOR EGGLETON PROPOSES NEW PENSION FUND CANADA LAW

corporate bankruptcies canada
corporate bankruptcies Canada

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: Introduction

The U.S. Steel Canada court-supervised restructuring and the court-supervised liquidation of Sears Canada have something in common. They both forced us to focus on the treatment of pensioners in corporate bankruptcies Canada under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) (or restructurings and liquidations under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA)).

We previously wrote about these pension fund Canada issues and the beginning of the focus in Ottawa for the need for new legislation. My previous blogs were:

  1. TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: NDP WANTS FEDERAL INSOLVENCY LAWS CHANGED SO THERE IS PENSION PLAN SECURITY WHEN FINANCIALLY TROUBLED BUSINESSES FAIL – September 27, 2017
  2. SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING – November 1, 2017
  3. SEARS CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN SHORTFALL: MP SCOTT DUVALL COMES THROUGH ON HIS PROMISE IN CANADIAN PARLIAMENT – November 8, 2017

Senator Art Eggleton, P.‍C., shortly before his retirement proposed BILL S-253, An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and other Acts and Regulations (pension plans).

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: Bill S-253

Bill S-253 passed First Reading on September 18, 2018, and Second Reading was moved on September 25, 2018. This Bill proposes to amend the BIA as well as the CCAA. It proposes to make certain that claims for unfunded obligations or solvency deficiencies of a pension are accorded priority. This is for both solvent companies and companies that would be rendered insolvent by certain payments to shareholders..

This proposed legislation likewise would change the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 as well as the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985 to equip the Superintendent of Financial Institutions to identify that the financing of a pension is impaired and to recommend procedures to be taken by the employer in regard of the financing of such plan.1

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: Is Bill S-253 new?

Yes and no. In our earlier blogs, I told you about the proposals by Bloc Québécois MP Marilène Gill’s Bill, C-372 and Hamilton Mountain NDP MP Scott Duvall rose in the House of Commons for leave to introduce Bill C-384. The amendments proposed to the BIA and CCAA in those proposed Bills, to create a priority for unfunded obligations or solvency deficiencies, are pretty well the same as in Senator Eggleton’s Bill S-253.

However, Senator Eggleton’s Bill goes further. It requires a company to report to the Superintendent of Financial Institutions:

“…of any proposed or actual decision of the employer, transaction or event, including the repurchase of shares of the employer or the payment of dividends to shareholders of the employer…”

that would cause a solvency deficiency and/or render the company insolvent.

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: So what now for Bill S-253?

To become legislation, a Bill needs to initially be presented in either the Senate or the House of Commons. It needs to after that go through numerous phases in each House: 1st, 2nd and 3rd reading. After that, it has to obtain Royal Assent. No doubt there will be a lot of debating and tinkering with this Bill. It will be interesting to see if this Bill makes it all the way through, or dies before becoming legislation.

However, the picture is clear. The result of the Sears Canada dividend payments and asset liquidation is clear. Shareholders received dividends and pensioners will have to take a deep cut in their pensions. This has caught the attention of the legislators in Ottawa. It will be interesting to see if the political will is there for pensioners to be protected in Canadian insolvency cases.

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company experiencing financial difficulties? If yes, call the Ira Smith Team. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door.

The earlier you contact us, the more options we will have to implement. Whether it is a corporate restructuring or personal debt settlement through a consumer proposal, the goal is to avoid bankruptcy. However, if bankruptcy turns out to be the best option, we can assist there too.

You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, ending the pain and stress you are feeling forever. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for your free consultation.ira smith trustee

Call a Trustee Now!