Tag: Division I Proposal

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY EXPERTS WEIGH IN ON US & CDN SMALL BIZ RESTRUCTURING

Introduction

Small and medium-sized businesses play a vital role in all worldwide economies. Bankruptcy experts in the USA identified problems. The Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection process for these companies was not working. It is pricey, usually ineffective and impractical. So, many businesses in the USA in need of restructuring could not have access to the US insolvency system.

On July 23, 2019, the US Congress passed the Small Business Reorganization Act (SBRA). On August 1, 2019, the Senate passed the Bill. On August 23, 2019, President Donald Trump signed it to enact it.

The purpose of the SBRA is to make business bankruptcy protection much less troublesome for small and medium-size ventures. The result is Chapter 11, subchapter V of the US Bankruptcy Code (Titled: Small Business Debtor Reorganization). The aim is to make it more affordable and will serve to save otherwise viable owner-managed businesses.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to discuss the new US legislation. I will also comment on an approach for the Canadian insolvency system. Can we streamline restructuring under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) for small business?

Changes made by the SBRA

A small company is defined in the SBRA as a person or company whose non-contingent debts (leaving out financial obligations to affiliates or people not dealing at arms’-length) are $2,725,625 or less and which chooses to be dealt with under the SBRA. The Act includes a new subchapter V to Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. The purpose of this new approach is to make it simpler and more economical for small companies to efficiently restructure.

The main thrust of the Act is:

  1. A creditor cannot lodge a Chapter 11 restructuring plan that it is prepared to support. Just the business can. The company’s plan must be filed within 90 days of the day it filed its bankruptcy protection application, other than in specific conditions.
  2. A trustee comparable to those selected in a personal restructuring (Chapter 13) situations will be selected to manage each case.
  3. A creditors committee will not be developed.
  4. The Chapter 11 plan can change the legal rights of a lender registered against an individual’s primary home if the mortgage/funding secured by the home was used in the person’s business and was not financing used to purchase the property.
  5. The Court can approve a small business’ restructuring plan without the approval of any class of creditors. The Court must be satisfied that the restructuring plan treats all creditors fairly and does not prejudice any creditor class.
  6. To be fair and equitable, the restructuring plan must offer that all earnings received throughout the term of the restructuring plan will available to fund the restructuring for a duration of 3 to 5 years.

So the onus is on the creditors to carefully review all cases filed under the SBRA. Creditors will need to retain bankruptcy experts to advise them. Their role will be to make certain that Courts appropriately examine restructuring cases for fairness and that they treat all creditors equitably. This will be especially true for those that do not have the support of the creditors.

It will be very interesting to see if this new legislation accomplishes its goal of making it simpler and less costly for small businesses to restructure and continue.

The Canadian business restructuring landscape

There are two federal statutes that legislate business restructuring in Canada. They are the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA) and the Part III Division I of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA).

To qualify for restructuring under the CCAA, the insolvent corporation must owe at least $5 million. The CCAA is only for insolvent companies or income trusts to restructure. It is not for:

  • proprietors or partnerships
  • banks
  • telegraph companies (do people still send telegrams?)
  • insurance companies
  • companies to which the Trust and Loan Companies Act applies

Proceedings under the CCAA are a very heavily Court-driven process.

Restructurings under the Part III Division I proposal provisions of the BIA are available to both companies, proprietors and partnerships. It is also available to people who owe $250,000 or more, not including any mortgages or loans secured by the person’s principal residence.

For people who owe less than $250,000, a more streamlined restructuring process is available under Part III Division II of the BIA. These are called consumer proposals.

Restructuring under the proposal provisions of the BIA is not a heavily Court-driven process like the CCAA. Under consumer proposals, if all goes smoothly there is never a Court application.

So we have a simpler and streamlined version for people who have a smaller debt level but are still in need of restructuring their financial affairs. The same is also true for people with fewer or no assets that need to start over through the bankruptcy process. However, there is no equivalent streamlined version in Canada for small to medium-size businesses.

Could such a streamlined business restructuring model be developed? Not only do I think it could be, as one of the bankruptcy experts in Canada holding the designation of licensed insolvency trustee, I think it must be.

The statute for a streamlined Canadian business restructuring model

The CCAA is designed for large corporations. As I already stated, it is a heavily Court-driven process. Therefore, I think this eliminates the CCAA from developing a more streamlined version. It is not the case that it could not be done. It is just that a new section designed for simpler and more cost-effective CCAA proceedings goes somewhat against the purpose of the CCAA.

Therefore, I propose that CCAA legislation should remain available only to larger companies. Especially because the BIA, another federal statute, already includes restructuring provisions. It already has a streamlined version for bankruptcy and restructuring to avoid bankruptcy. So, why not a streamlined business restructuring section?

What would BIA streamlined business restructuring look like?

You might ask, why is this even necessary? Many small and medium-sized businesses are family-owned. There are even very large family-owned businesses. The Financial Post reports that “Family businesses own a bigger chunk of Canada’s economy than you think — way bigger”. They report it is a significant business sector contributing 35 percent of Canada’s real gross domestic product.

So with such an important business sector, it would make sense to allow those businesses on the smaller scale to qualify to have a simpler and more cost-effective way to restructure when they hit a financial bump in the road. If the viable parts of the business can be saved, it will continue to employ people, allow families to have a good quality of life and contribute to Canada’s GDP. It does not make sense to essentially kill off these smaller businesses because the cost of the restructuring will use up all the resources necessary to run the business.

I am not talking about family-owned businesses Bombardier Inc. and Loblaw Cos. Ltd. Rather, I am talking about the majority of Canadian entrepreneurial companies in the mid to small size range.

So here is what I propose for a streamlined restructuring process for small and medium-sized businesses. I will call it a new Part III Division III of the BIA. I will call it the General Scheme for Small Business Proposals (SBP) section of the BIA.

Size matters

The new SBP should be available to corporations, proprietorships and partnerships that are set up to conduct business. Their total debt should not be more than $1.5 million. There is nothing scientific about this number.

Statistics Canada could do an analysis as to the average debt load of Canadian businesses and an appropriate debt level could be picked based on it. For purposes of this Brandon’s Blog, I will use the $1.5 million amount.

I would not exclude loans from affiliates or people not dealing at arms’-length such as in the US legislation. In Canada, it is normal for the first funding of a company to come from the owners. Our chartered banks want to see a commitment from the owners before they will lend. Owners have sacrificed their own money to get the company off the ground. Just because that is how they had to finance the company, I would not preclude that debt from counting in the calculation.

The Canadian business landscape is different from that in the USA. Our numbers are generally smaller. In order to exclude non-arms’-length debt, you would probably have to lower the debt threshold I have mentioned. So, let us keep that debt threshold for discussion purposes and include all debt; secured or unsecured, arms’-length or related parties and owners.

If a person is not conducting business in his or her name, then this new SBP would not be for them. They would fall under either Division I or Divison II restructuring proposals.

Administration of restructurings under the SBP

Currently, only a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (LIT) can administer restructuring proposals. Under Division I Proposals, the LIT is called the Proposal Trustee. Under consumer proposals, Division II personal restructurings, the LIT is called the Administrator.

So, for the new SBP, I will call the LIT the Small Business Administrator. It makes it obvious that it is the restructuring of a business qualifying under the new Division III. The use of the word “administrator” ties nicely into the word chosen already by Parliament for consumer proposals. So again, it makes it obvious that the LIT is administering a small business streamlined restructuring.

Since we are not talking about personal restructuring that falls under the consumer proposal provisions in this Brandon’s Blog, my suggestions for a streamlined business restructuring applies only to Part III Division I of the BIA Proposal restructurings to avoid bankruptcy.

Time to restructure

Under a Division I Proposal restructuring, the company or person can begin the restructuring process by filing either a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal (NOI) or the Proposal itself. Under either filing, the debtor then has 10 days to file its cash-flow statement reviewed and approved by both the company or person and the LIT. Under an NOI filing, the company or person then has an additional 20 days (30 days after the NOI filing date) to file a Proposal (unless the time is extended by Court Order).

Most times with small to medium-sized businesses, the debtor is not current in all of its filings with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). This includes payroll remittances, HST and perhaps even income tax returns. In any restructuring where CRA is a creditor, they need to have the most current information from the debtor’s business filings, to be able to know the full amount owing by the business. They will not be able to properly assess the Proposal until they know the proper amount owing to them.

Also in any Proposal restructuring, we want to have a provisional income tax return prepared by the external accountant for the business. The provisional return is to show if any further tax liability exists for the fiscal year up to and including the date of filing of the Proposal.

Books and records will first have to be brought up to date. Then the accountant will need time to prepare and file the income tax return. There is a reason for this. We want CRA to know if there is a further liability.

Although there is no statutory provision allowing for this, CRA so far on an administrative level will allow for a split tax year in a restructuring. The liability for the fiscal year up to and including the Proposal date will be included as a debt in the restructuring. This is to the company’s or person’s advantage in the business.

Once the Proposal is filed, the meeting of creditors has to take place within 21 days of the Proposal date. In my experience, there is never enough time for the business to do all the necessary filings for CRA that I just mentioned. So, CRA always requests an adjournment of the meeting until such time as all the filings are up to date.

So, in my proposed streamlined version, I would propose to extend the filing of a Proposal after the filing of an NOI from 30 days to 90 days, without the need for the expense of going to Court seeking an extension. This should give enough time for the business to get all of its filings up to date and hopefully avoid the need for an adjournment of the meeting of creditors.

Creditors

There really is nothing that needs to be changed on how creditors file their claims. The same is true for the rules of how the LIT must assess all claims. I do like the idea in the new Chapter 11 subchapter V. That is the ability to change the legal rights of a lender registered against an individual’s primary home if the mortgage/funding secured by the home was used in the person’s business and was not financing used to purchase the property.

In Canada, it is very rare, if not unheard of, for an entrepreneurial business to get a bank loan without the owner giving a personal guarantee. Many times the personal guarantee has to be backed by a hard asset, such as a pledge of the personal residence. If the secured debt can be restructured, shouldn’t the pledge agreement on a personal asset also be part of that restructuring?

So, I propose that in the new SBP, there should be the ability to change the legal rights of a lender registered against an individual’s primary home if the funds were used for the business or if the pledge was in support of a personal guarantee for funds borrowed by the business.

The types of changes to the security pledge will be unique to the individual restructuring. It has to make business sense and common sense. It is always up to the secured lender to vote against the plan if they don’t like it. In that case, the restructuring will fail. There will be great pressure on the business to bring forward the best possible restructuring plan and not go crazy on what changes the owner wants to make to the pledge of security.

Deemed acceptance and approval

Without going into all the rules, under the current consumer proposal legislation, there is the concept of deemed creditor approval and deemed Court approval. Unless creditors holding 25% in value of the proven claims request it, there is no need to hold a meeting of creditors. Creditors are asked to vote by way of voting letters when they file their proof of claim. If no obligation to call a meeting arises, then the consumer proposal is deemed accepted.

If a consumer proposal is either accepted or deemed accepted by the creditors, then there is probably never going to be a need for the LIT administrator to formally seek approval by the Court. The BIA reads that after the acceptance or deemed acceptance, the consumer proposal is deemed accepted by the Court unless the Official Receiver or “other interest party” requests it within 15 days after the date of (deemed) acceptance.

Currently, under a Division I Part III restructuring Proposal there are no deeming provisions for either creditor acceptance or Court approval. I would like to see in the new SBP section, that similar deeming provisions for both creditor acceptance and Court approval be implemented. This will save time and cost thereby being much more efficient.

No deemed bankruptcy

In a Division I Proposal, if the creditors do not accept the restructuring, or the Court does not approve it, then the debtor is automatically deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy. There is not a similar provision for consumer proposals.

If the creditors do not accept a consumer proposal, then it just dies then and there and the debtor goes back to their normal unprotected state.

My proposal for the new SBP is that if the creditors do not accept or the Court will not approve the restructuring plan, that does not produce a corporate or personal bankruptcy. Rather, the debtor just goes back to their normal unprotected insolvent state and they have to fend off their creditors as best as possible.

It may lead to bankruptcy, but that will not be automatic. In some corporate situations, the cost of a bankruptcy proceeding just does not make sense. This is especially true if a chartered bank has security over all of the assets and will be enforcing its security through a receivership.

Directors/Owners

Right now a corporate restructuring Proposal allows for Directors to be released from debts that arise prior to the date of filing the Proposal. The kinds of debts that a Director can be released from are those solely resulting from their role as a Director. In other words, generally statutory claims they would be legally liable for.

As I already mentioned, more often than not, the only way a small or medium-sized company can get a bank loan is if the entrepreneur personally guarantees the debt. There are times where a corporate restructuring can be done, but the secured debt arrangements will have to be amended. If the lender is not willing to amend the personal guarantee security arrangements in place, then, the corporate restructuring does not make sense.

So in my dream of the SBP, if a secured lender agrees to a restructuring of their debt, then the Director(s) who may be personally liable will now be responsible for the revised secured lending arrangement. This would also go hand in hand with my proposed change to the ability to change the legal rights of a lender registered against an individual’s primary home if the mortgage/funding secured by the home was used in the person’s business and was not financing used to purchase the property.

Bankruptcy experts summary

So there you have it. The US government saw fit to add to its Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection statute to allow smaller companies to restructure. My vision for a Canadian version is the SBP section to form a new Part I Division III for the BIA.

To summarize, the changes to allow for a more efficient and less costly way to restructure smaller businesses would include:

  1. The brand-new SBP will be offered to companies, proprietorships and partnerships that are established to run a business. It will be available to businesses with any kind of debt not greater than $1.5 million.
  2. A LIT who will be called a Small Business Administrator, will oversee and be responsible for the business restructuring.
  3. The time for the filing of a Proposal after the filing of an NOI will be extended from the current 30 days to 90 days. This will be without the need and cost of a Court application.
  4. There ought to be the capability to transform the rights of a lending institution who has taken an entrepreneur’s home as security for a business loan or personal guarantee of such financing and the funds were put into the business.
  5. Deeming provisions for both creditor acceptance and Court approval be implemented. It is already done in consumer proposals, so why not in streamlined business proposals? This will result in more efficient and less costly restructuring.
  6. If the creditors’ decline or the Court will not approve the restructuring, that will not generate a corporate or personal bankruptcy. Instead, the debtor simply returns to their vulnerable financially troubled state and they will need to deal with their creditors as best as possible. In some cases it may lead to either bankruptcy or just a closing down of the business. Where there is a secured creditor, it will lead to the enforcement of their security. Either way, it won’t be an automatic bankruptcy.
  7. A Director of a corporation can be released not only from statutory obligations arising from their office of Director. That person, or any other person, can have their guarantee of a debt to a lender be amended if the related business debt is amended in the restructuring.

There no doubt will be other areas that would need amending once all the relevant sections of the BIA were looked at. These are my ideas of the major amendments that could be made to the BIA, to allow for a more streamlined and cost-efficient restructuring for small and mid-sized businesses.

What about your business?

The financial restructuring process for either a large or small business is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex corporate restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur. You are worried because your company is facing significant financial challenges. Your business provides income not only for your family. Many other families rely on you and your company for their well-being.

The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your company’s problems; financial and emotional. The way we dealt with this problem and devised a corporate restructuring plan, we know that we can help you and your company too.

We know that companies facing financial problems need realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a company restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain it is facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

bankruptcy experts
bankruptcy experts
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY ACT CANADA: ARE YOU REALLY PREPARED FOR IT?

Introduction

No person wishes to go make a filing under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (Bankruptcy Act Canada), however occasionally it is inevitable. You might think that people who file are just those that are careless with their finances. However, with most of the people I see, it is usually an event outside of their control that pushes them over the edge.

In personal bankruptcy, things such as illness, divorce, job loss, unanticipated catastrophes, identity theft and fraud are many times the causes of insolvency. Of course, lack of proper budgeting, overspending and inappropriate uses of credit are also involved. In corporate insolvency, the #1 cause always seems to track back to management.

Insolvency filings happen every year. In 2018, a total amount of 128,846 insolvency filings were made with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). This is 2.4% more from 2017. Consumer insolvency filings increased 2.5% (125,266 filings), while company filings dropped 0.8% to 3,580.

At the very same time, people choosing to avoid bankruptcy by filing a proposal continued increasing in 2018, bringing this number to a brand-new level. Proposals represented 52.6% of consumer filings in 2017. In 2018, they expanded by 6.6% to 56% of all personal filings.

Are you considering a Bankruptcy Act Canada filing, or at least speaking to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) (Trustee)? In order to help you start your fact-finding, I want to tell you what will happen to your bank accounts, retirement accounts and your other important financial funds. Understanding what to anticipate can assist you to stay clear of some pricey blunders.

Bankruptcy or (consumer) proposal

Being insolvent is that you are not able to settle your financial debts. People with severe financial problems can make Bankruptcy Act Canada filing by filing either for bankruptcy, a consumer proposal or Division I proposal.

Proposals are official methods controlled by the Bankruptcy Act Canada for personal filings. Dealing with a Trustee you make a proposal to:

  • Pay your creditors a portion of what you owe them over a particular time period not going beyond 60 months
  • Extend the time you need to settle the debt
  • Or a mix of both

The Proposal is made via the Trustee, who uses the money in your proposal fund to pay the cost of administration and distribution to each of your creditors their pro-rata share. A consumer proposal needs to be finished within 5 years from the day of filing.

Proposal

People with severe financial problems can apply for bankruptcy. They can also try to avoid bankruptcy by using the Proposal provisions of the Bankruptcy Act Canada.

There are numerous advantages to avoiding bankruptcy. The main differences between proposals and bankruptcy are:

  • Unlike informal debt settlement, a Proposal produces a binding discussion forum where each of your unsecured creditors has to participate in for your debt restructuring.
  • You can keep your property, including your home, if you can afford to in your budget.
  • Lawsuits against you and enforcement proceedings, such as wage garnishments, cannot begin or continue.
  • In a successfully completed Proposal, you do not need to file for bankruptcy.

Keep in mind that financial institutions have “set-off” legal rights, implying that if you declare bankruptcy or file for bankruptcy when you’re behind in payments to them, they will take the funds in your accounts to try to cover all or some of what you owe them. This is notwithstanding that there is a stay of proceedings once a Bankruptcy Act Canada filing takes place and such an offset really should not take place.

So if you are thinking of filing either for bankruptcy or a proposal, I want you to be prepared for what might happen to your financial assets.

Your bank account

In a bankruptcy, the cash in your bank account is a property which must be paid over to the Trustee. Upon your filing, the Trustee will put all your banks on notice to provide the funds in any accounts maintained with them to the Trustee. As noted above, the bank may very well offset cash in your savings or chequing account against the money you may owe them, including credit card debt.

In a Proposal, you do not lose control of the money in your bank accounts. Rather, they are considered by the Trustee in formulating the type of Proposal you should offer your creditors. Remember, your Proposal must offer your creditors a better alternative than your bankruptcy would. However, even though there is a stay of proceedings invoked once you file your Proposal, it is not uncommon for a bank where you maintain an account and to whom you owe money, to take the money in your account and offset it against what you owe them.

So the moral of this story is that you are best to have bank accounts at financial institutions to whom you do not owe any money.

Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP), Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF) or Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (DPSP)

In a bankruptcy, your RRSP, RRIF or DPSP are excluded from seizure. However, the Trustee is entitled under the Bankruptcy Act Canada to receive the equivalent to any amounts contributed to these accounts in the 12 months preceding your filing date. In a Proposal, this 12-month amount must be included by the Trustee in the calculation of what amount your Proposal should offer your creditors.

Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security income (OAS)

Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is the only one permitted to garnish your CPP earnings if you have an unpaid personal income tax. By filing either for bankruptcy or a Proposal, the stay of proceedings will be invoked and CRA will have to stop the garnishment of your CPP and you will get the CPP payments you are qualified for.

However, the earnings obtained from CPP and OAS will certainly be taken into account by the Trustee in determining if you have any surplus income payment obligation in bankruptcy. In a Proposal, that amount also has to be considered in developing your Proposal.

Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA), Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) and other non-registered account investments

In a bankruptcy, just like any other non-exempt property, the amount held in your TFSA and any other non-registered investment account must be paid to the Trustee. In a Proposal, these amounts need to be taken into account in determining what type of Proposal to make. It may very well be that these accounts are collapsed in order to help fund a Proposal.

Similarly, RESPs are not excluded in personal bankruptcy. In a Proposal, the amount must be considered as an asset in calculating how much must be offered in your Proposal to stand a chance for success.

The reason that an RESP is not excluded from seizure in bankruptcy is relatively straightforward. Your child does not acquire ownership or other entitlement to the RESP funds as parents can take possession of the funds prior to the child becoming a post-secondary school student. For that reason, it is the parents who have ownership of the funds.

Consequently, the Trustee of an insolvent mother or father that has an RESP can collapse it. If the parent in bankruptcy wants the RESP to not collapse, adequate arrangements need to be made with the Trustee for the equal amount of funds in the RESP at the filing date be paid to the Trustee for the bankruptcy estate and the bankrupt’s creditors.

Annuity revenue in bankruptcy

Annuities are agreements where you pay a company (normally an insurance company) a specific amount, in order to get regular monthly payments for a specific period of time or for the remainder of your life.

If an annuity contract is properly set up with an insurance company, it will be exempt from seizure in bankruptcy. However, the income stream it produces will be considered by the Trustee in determining whether the bankrupt person has a surplus income obligation.

Your RRIF can also be considered as an annuity as it provides a legislated stream of payments. The RRIF is exempt from seizure in a bankruptcy, other than for any contributions in the 12 months immediately prior to filing. Like an annuity, the entitlement to payments will be considered by the Trustee in doing the surplus income calculation.

In a Proposal, you don’t give up ownership of an annuity contract or RRIF, but the income must be considered in preparing a suitable Proposal.

Bankruptcy Act Canada summary

Do you have financial problems? Do you not have enough money to pay your bills in full when due?

As a Trustee, we are the only professionals licensed, authorized and supervised by the federal government to offer insolvency advice and to implement solutions under the Bankruptcy Act Canada. A consumer proposal is a federal government licensed debt settlement plan to eliminate your debt. We will help you to select what is best for you to free you from your debt issues.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can eliminate the anxiousness, tension, discomfort and pain from your life that your cash problems have caused. With the unique roadmap, we develop just for you, we will promptly return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have generations and decades of experience helping people and companies looking for debt restructuring and a debt settlement plan to AVOID bankruptcy.

You can have a no-cost consultation so we can work with you to fix your money troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

bankruptcy act canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ONTARIO BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE: CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY LAW

320efcd005100f3ee3522fefba70f917 1

Ontario bankruptcy discharge certificate: Introduction

I have written before on the more practical aspects of Ontario bankruptcy discharge certificate issues and process within Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law. The most recent blogs are:

  1. BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE: THE TOP 8 THINGS THE BANKRUPTCY COURT WILL CONSIDER ON ANYONE’S BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE APPLICATION – September 13, 2017
  2. GAMBLING DEBT BANKRUPTCY: CAN GAMBLING DEBT BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY? – January 31, 2018

I recently reviewed the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Cole v. RBC Dominion Securities Inc., 2017 ONCA 1009. This case is very interesting as it highlights an issue that we often don’t talk enough about when advising a person on what they might expect at their hearing under Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law.

The facts

Henry Cole, age 52, had a Bankruptcy Order made against him in 2011 upon motion by Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”), after he misappropriated $5 million from clients while working as their investment advisor. While in bankruptcy, he had a net monthly income of $14,600, resulting in surplus monthly income of $12,500. He nevertheless failed to make any surplus income payments.

To understand what surplus income in a bankruptcy is, see my June 1, 2016 vlog titled WHY SURPLUS INCOME IS SO POPULAR UNTIL YOU ARE FORCED INTO BANKRUPTCY.

The Ontario Court of Appeal (“ONCA”) upheld the two lower Court decisions

As is the case in bankruptcy matters, Mr. Cole’s bankruptcy discharge hearing came before the Master in Bankruptcy Court who also sits as the registrar in bankruptcy. Mr. Cole appealed the Master’s decision (discussed below) unsuccessfully to a Judge of the Bankruptcy Court. The Judge dismissed Mr. Cole’s appeal, thereby upholding the Master’s decision. As indicated above, the ONCA agreed with the Judge (and the Master) in dismissing Mr. Cole’s appeal.

Now for the interesting stuff!

Now for the interesting stuff. The Master determined that there was enough evidence to show that Mr. Cole, as a bankrupt, committed various bankruptcy offenses. The Master determined facts for which discharge may be refused, suspended or granted conditionally, under Section 173(1) of the Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law called the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (“BIA”).

The Master determined that Mr. Cole had failed to provide information to enable the Licensed Insolvency Trustee to calculate surplus income. Mr. Cole also conceded to the following facts:

  1. his assets upon bankruptcy were not of a value equal to fifty cents on the dollar on the amount of his unsecured liabilities. Mr. Cole gave no evidence why he should not be held responsible;
  2. he failed to account satisfactorily for any loss of assets or for any deficiency of assets to meet his liabilities; and
  3. he brought on, or contributed to, his bankruptcy by rash and hazardous speculations, by unjustifiable extravagance in living, by gambling or by culpable neglect of his business affairs

With these findings, the Master, under Section 172(2) of the BIA, had to not grant an absolute discharge and to:

  1. refuse the discharge of a bankrupt;
  2. suspend the discharge for such period as the court thinks proper; or
  3. make the bankrupt, as a condition of his discharge, to do such acts, pay such moneys, consent to such judgments or comply with such other terms as the court may direct.

I must point out that the options available to the Master are not mutually exclusive. So, just like in Mr. Cole’s case, you could have the Court come up with a mixture of a suspension and a condition to pay moneys.

What the Master decided

The Master made several decisions. First, the Master dealt with the surplus income issue. The Master ordered Mr. Cole to pay $284,346 to the Trustee as surplus income, payable at a rate of $5,000 per month.

The Master also considered Mr. Cole’s criminal behaviour and that he had real income while not working any longer as an investment advisor. Given the amount of Mr. Cole’s liabilities, and for the integrity of the Canadian bankruptcy system, the Master ordered as further conditions that:

  1. Mr. Cole pay an extra $5,000 per month to the Trustee for a further six years for a total more payment of $360,000; and that
  2. his discharge from bankruptcy be suspended for two years.

The dismissed appeals

Mr. Cole argued before first the Judge, and then the ONCA, primarily that the Master’s treatment of surplus and other income was in error. He also argued that the Judge’s finding in dismissing his appeal was an error. The ONCA disagreed and dismissed his appeal.

ontario bankruptcy

So what is the lesson to be learned?

It is important for the Trustee, when sitting down with the person contemplating an insolvency proceeding, to understand all the facts. By properly understanding all the facts, we can provide proper professional advice and guidance.

Someone who had a facts situation like Mr. Cole, we would have strongly advised him or her to avoid bankruptcy and to contemplate performing a Division I Proposal to compromise his debts. The reasons we would have advised this are:

  1. the debtor has real income to successfully do a Proposal;
  2. Mr. Cole never would have qualified for an absolute discharge from bankruptcy given his facts situation and any discharge conditions would be onerous;
  3. avoiding the ongoing calculation of surplus income up to the time of his bankruptcy discharge hearing; and
  4. with the support of his major creditors, it is possible that the Proposal amount could have been somewhat less than $644,000 (subject to knowing the value of his assets at the date of bankruptcy).

he person needs our advice in plain English before making any decisions

We also would have advised the debtor the type of the rough ride they were in for if they chose to go ahead with the bankruptcy option. We would have explained in detail how we believed the Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law system would treat him, so at least there would be no surprises during the bankruptcy administration.

Many times people we speak with do not like to hear the truth, and begin “Trustee shopping” until they find a Trustee that does not tell them all the bad news up front. People like this believe that if they aren’t told it, it can’t happen. This is a mistake. We believe everyone deserves to know the truth about their situation, to help them make the best decision possible.

In Mr. Cole’s case, not only did he find out the hard truth from the Court, he then spent money on his lawyers appealing the Master’s and Judge’s decisions. That obviously was extra money spent with no benefit received.

FULL DISCLOSURE: Our firm has never met with Mr. Cole and was not considered to be his Trustee.

What to do if you have too much debt

Declaring personal bаnkruрtсу in Canada is a big deal. So is getting your Ontario bankruptcy discharge certificate. While it can be a way out for the honest but unfortunate debtor who is deep in debt and looking for a new start, there are rules, rеѕtrісtіоnѕ and fіnаnсіаl rаmіfісаtіоnѕ.

That is why the Ira Smith Team always looks first to see if one of the bankruptcy alternatives would be a better fit for you. The alternatives we look at with you include:

The Ira Smith Team has 50+ years of cumulative experience dealing with issues just like the ones that you’re facing. Give us a call today and let us give you back peace of mind Starting Over, Starting Now.

ISI 4
ontario bankruptcy discharge certificate
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

GAMBLING DEBT BANKRUPTCY: CAN GAMBLING DEBT BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY?

Gambling debt bankruptcy: Introduction

Since there are various provincial run casinos, horse racing and lotteries, we are often asked if you can have a gambling debt bankruptcy. More importantly, what clients really want to know is, can gambling debt be discharged in bankruptcy?

Gambling debt bankruptcy: What is gambling debt in bankruptcy?

We first must go back to basics. There are two types of gambling debts:

  1. Debts for loans taken out, either direct loans or through credit cards; and
  2. Loans directly from a casino with “markers”.

In the first case, the loans or credit card debts could be direct – using the cash advance to gamble with, or indirect – used to make purchases for the necessities of life because the person gambles away their employment or other income. The use of markers at a casino is obviously a direct gambling debt.

In the context of this discussion, it does not matter if the gambling debts are direct or indirect. As discussed in this blog, the gambling debts are legally enforceable. As such, gambling debts in bankruptcy (or a proposal) are claims provable under the BIA.

Gambling debt bankruptcy: Gambling debt and bankruptcy

You can declare bankruptcy on a gambling debt. So is it really as simple as declaring bankruptcy? The answer is no. There are various issues that you must first consider with the licensed insolvency trustee during your first free consultation. The major issues are:

  1. Your assets
  2. What is your annual income
  3. Have you ever been bankrupt before
  4. The nature and amount of your other debts because you lost cash in gambling
  5. Have you not been paying your taxes because of gambling losses and Canada Revenue Agency is also a major creditor
  6. Getting gambling addiction advice
  7. Getting a discharge from bankruptcy
  8. Is there another option available to you in order for you to avoid bankruptcy

Gambling debt bankruptcy: There are many issues in addition to just getting gambling addiction debt help

If you are insolvent and you choose the bankruptcy route, you will face the following issues:

  1. If you have non-exempt assets or equity in non-exempt assets, your interest in those assets will be taken over by your trustee. For example, your interest in the matrimonial home would come to the trustee and now your spouse, or other friend or relative, would have to purchase your interest back to the cash could go to your creditors. Go explain that to your spouse!
  2. Earning more than essentially a poverty line amount will cause you to have to pay surplus income to the trustee for the benefit of your creditors. If you are a first time bankrupt, with surplus income, you will have to pay the surplus income for 21 months. You can’t seek a discharge from bankruptcy until then.
  3. If you have been bankrupt before, the 21 months becomes 36 months.
  4. Once you show that your debts are due to gambling losses, you can expect your lenders and credit card companies to oppose your discharge from bankruptcy.

    gambling debt bankruptcy
    gambling debt bankruptcy

Gambling debt bankruptcy: Including your discharge from bankruptcy and your gambling addiction

  1. If you owe a large amount of unpaid income tax to Canada Revenue Agency, you can expect them to vigorously oppose your discharge from bankruptcy.
  2. Your trustee must oppose your discharge from bankruptcy when your bankruptcy is a result of gambling debt. The reason is under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3(“BIA”), there are various facts, if proven, it is impossible to get an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.
  3. Section 172 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3(“BIA”) allows the Court to make an order of discharge which is either absolute, conditional or suspended. Where a fact under s. 173 of the BIA is proven, an absolute discharge is precluded.
  4. Gambling which brings on or contributes to bankruptcy is a recognized s. 173 fact. (BIA, s. 173(e)). That is why your trustee would have to oppose your discharge from bankruptcy.
  5. In reaching any decision on your discharge, the Court and the trustee need to maintain the integrity of the Canadian insolvency system. You can assume that your discharge will at least be conditional upon you paying a certain sum of money to your trustee for the benefit of your creditors. A bankruptcy discharge suspension for a certain time after you fulfill the payment condition is also possible. If your behaviour was especially egregious, your discharge from bankruptcy may be outright refused.
  6. The bankruptcy discharge hearing is a full Court hearing. You will be well advised to retain experienced insolvency legal counsel to come with you to Court. This is an expense you may not even be able to afford.
  7. If you want to have a chance in obtaining a discharge from bankruptcy, you will also have to show that you are taking concrete steps to deal with your gambling addiction by getting gambling addiction advice. That will include proving in Court that you enrolled, attended and completed at least one recognized rehabilitation program for gambling addicts.

Gambling debt bankruptcy: Going bankrupt doesn’t seem to be an easy fix

You are right about that. As if the above 11 issues weren’t enough, depending on your specific circumstances, there could be more. Therefore, I always recommend to debtors that if there is hope for the person to be able to successfully restructure through either a consumer proposal or Division I BIA Proposal, that must be seriously looked at and considered preferable to going bankrupt.

Gambling debt bankruptcy: What must you do if you have gambling debts and are considering personal bankruptcy?

Do you have unmanageable debts from gambling, other addictions or for any other reason? Be proactive; it’s time to rehabilitate yourself and deal with your debt while you still have alternatives.

The Ira Smith Team has years of experience assisting Canadians like you, getting you back on track to debt free living. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today so that we can help you regain control of your life and be stress-free, Starting Over, Starting Now.

gambling debt bankruptcy
gambling debt bankruptcy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY LAW: WHAT TO THINK ABOUT BANKRUPTCY

320efcd005100f3ee3522fefba70f917 4

Introduction

The holiday gift buying season is over. Next month the credit card bills will be arriving. Maybe you overspent on holiday gifts this year. Maybe you had too much debt to start with, and you know this new spending will put you over the top. Perhaps you already have questions about Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law.

Perhaps you spent wisely but modestly because you were acutely aware of your financial problems. Maybe you never were an uncontrollable spender. Perhaps a specific damaging event outside of your control caused you to wind up deep in the red. So far you have worked hard to overcome the financial challenges, but for the first time you are thinking that you should read up on Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law.

Either one unfortunate life issue or one foolish monetary choice is all it could take. Despite how you arrived, there is no simple escape, except perhaps winning the lottery or an unexpected inheritance.

Bankruptcy is one alternative

If you’ve fallen under just what seems like impossible financial debt and you have no chance to get out of it, bankruptcy is one alternative. It’s not constantly an excellent one– and never ever one to be taken gently.

Below is exactly what you should understand prior to making any kind of choices about filing personal bankruptcy.

Long-term results

Almost 63,372 people declared bankruptcy in 2016, an action that will certainly have an effect on them for a long time to come. They have certainly started learning about the Canada bankruptcy and insolvency law regime.

While declaring bankruptcy relieves debt pressures caused by decisions and/or issues of the past, it could adversely influence your future. The record of your filing for bankruptcy will certainly stay on your record for up to 10 years.

Numerous companies run a credit check on job applicants. The record of your bankruptcy will come up. Potential employers have either their own bias or unique interpretation about this. Perhaps the job you are applying for requires you to be bonded. Faced with many qualified applicants, a potential employer may very well choose the person who does not have a bankruptcy on their record. As I have previously written, it can likewise have an influence on insurance coverage costs.

The Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law system is designed to financially rehabilitate the honest but unfortunate debtor. As a licensed insolvency trustee, I certainly believe in our system. However, it is also my role to point out to anyone considering personal bankruptcy, there are many issues to consider before taking this choice.

Evaluating your alternatives

For some people bankruptcy many not be the only option. Just how do you recognize its the right one for you? What are the options under Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law?

Prior to making any type of choice about filing for bankruptcy, you should first contact a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT) in your area for a free consultation. The LIT will review with you your current financial situation and ask you various questions. The purpose is for the LIT to gain an understanding of your current financial position and how you got there. Based on this information, the LIT will be able to give you a preliminary opinion about what your realistic options are.

In general, the options available to someone experiencing difficulty in paying their debts on time include: (i) credit counselling; (ii) debt consolidation; (iii) (consumer) proposal; and (iv) personal bankruptcy.

3bestaward
canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law

The proposal option used for half of all personal insolvency filings in 2016

I am using brackets around the word “consumer” when talking about the proposal option. A consumer proposal is available to anyone who owes the amount of $250,000 or less, not including the amount you owe on loans registered against your home. If you owe more than this $250,000 threshold, a proposal may still be the most viable option for you. That proposal process just falls under a different section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). It is not called a consumer proposal, but rather a Division I proposal. The BIA governs Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law.

As I mentioned above, in 2016, 63,372 Canadians filed personal bankruptcy. However the total number of people who filed an insolvency proceeding in 2016 in Canada was 126,843. So what did the other 63,471 people do? They filed a proposal. So roughly half of the people who filed an insolvency proceeding in Canada in 2016 to solve their debt problems, were able to avoid bankruptcy.

In 2016, 63,471 individuals filed a (consumer) proposal. This bankruptcy alternative is an organized settlement of your financial debts for an amount less than the total you owe. You can take up to 60 months of regular monthly payments to complete your (consumer) proposal.

The proposal provisions of Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law allow those people “in the red” to keep their assets they can afford to continue paying for, including their home. At the same time, they made a monthly payment to the LIT to be distributed to their creditors for their past debts that they could not afford to repay.

Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law: Beginning the insolvency filing process

If you believe that bankruptcy may be for you, your first action is to speak with a LIT. Remember, you are not only looking to them for solutions. The LIT is not only interviewing you. You are also interviewing the LIT to decide if this is someone you feel you can work with.

If you don’t feel comfortable after speaking to that first LIT, there is nothing wrong with you getting a second opinion from a different LIT. Not only is that not anything wrong with that, I urge it. You are going to be working with your LIT for quite some time. Make sure that you believe it will be a comfortable relationship for you.

The bottom line is if you got in over your head with money, you do have alternatives. Get an expert viewpoint on just what your options might be under Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law. If you can’t make your monthly payments, you need professional help; and you need it now. Contact a professional Toronto bankruptcy trustee.

The Ira Smith Team has a cumulative 50+ years of experience helping people who are facing a financial crisis and we deliver the highest quality of professional service. Make an appointment for a free, no obligation appointment today and Starting Over, Starting Now you’ll take your first steps towards financial freedom.

We wish all of our readers and subscribers a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year 2018.

canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ONLINE BANKRUPTCY SEARCH: THIS CANADIAN INSOLVENCY RECORDS SEARCH RENEWAL (IRS) WON’T CHASE YOU FOR MONEY!

2

Online bankruptcy search: Introduction

This blog is about the Canadian government’s plan to update its online bankruptcy search function. It is an update to our November 15, 2017 Brandon’s Blog titled: “BANKRUPTCY FILINGS FREE PUBLIC RECORDS: WILL FREE SEARCHES TURN YOU INTO A PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY RECORDS SLEUTH FOR THE TRUTH”.

As you can imagine, I have a schedule for creating Brandon’s Blog. I created the above-mentioned blog and related video on the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) insolvency records search renewal (IRS) program and posted it for publishing on November 15. After doing so, the OSB published an update on its IRS program. The purpose of this blog is to give you the updated information.

The OSB November 2017 update offers more information about the IRS post it published in August 2017.

Online bankruptcy search: Updating the technology

The OSB has stated that its updated IRS system will consist of modern-day safeguards. The new IRS will secure the private information of people or companies who have either filed or become bankrupt or who have filed a consumer proposal or Division I proposal.

Online bankruptcy search: The legislative need

Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), the Superintendent of Bankruptcy is required to keep and make available a public document of all personal and corporate bankruptcies and proposals. The public document, includes the names of the insolvent debtors given statutory stay of proceedings from the commitment to pay their financial debts.

This record consists of vital information needed to administer the bankruptcy system. It is also important for the running of an efficient and well-functioning Canadian marketplace.

Online bankruptcy search: The purpose of the current system

The current Bankruptcy and Insolvency Records Search data source offers Canadians with access to search the public database for specific people or companies that have submitted a (consumer) proposal or bankruptcy, as the case may be. It is also for creditors to see if any party applying for credit are in an insolvency proceeding.

Online bankruptcy search: Uses of the current system

The OSB’s database allows for searches for:

  • creditors to take necessary activity with respect to specific insolvency filings;
  • insolvent debtors, either an individual or Directors of a company, to acquire information about their bankruptcy or proposal;
  • Licensed Insolvency Trustees (LIT) to properly administer insolvency estates;
  • people and companies making informed credit choices on people or organizations applying for loans or trade credit.

Online bankruptcy search: How many times a year is the current system searched?

Each year the current database, (which has a cost of $8 each search for public users), is searched about 800,000 times by individual Canadians, including LITs (for whom there is no charge). Any member of the public who pays the charge could browse the government insolvency records. The present system does not limit access in any other way.

Online bankruptcy search: The proposed new IRS

The OSB will be changing the current system. It is outdated by today’s privacy standards. The OSB will create a new IRS. While still attending to the legislative needs to give access to a public document of bankruptcies, it will substantially make individual information of debtors more secure.

As compared to the old system, the IRS will consist of many steps developed to particularly restrict the disclosure and use of the individual’s details of the debtors who file for an insolvency proceeding.

3bestaward
online bankruptcy search

Online bankruptcy search: New IRS protections

Examples of the brand-new protections which are not available in the current system, to shield disclosure of individual information, are:

  • Individual information entered will just be confirmed, not offered in a search result.
  • Searchers will need to recognize the first, last name, as well as date of birth of a debtor. This is required to get verification of an individual in bankruptcy or who has filed a (consumer) proposal.
  • The new system will no longer supply access to bankrupts’ documents that do not match the search requirements. The new IRS will be search specific, and not providing a complete list of names matching search criteria.
  • For every right search, a decreased measure of individual information will certainly be returned in the public search results page. Home addresses and complete postal codes will no longer be included in search results.
  • The public document search retention will be lower. The duration for the storage of details will be 10 years post-discharge.
  • The new system will consist of innovations designed to decrease the possibility for unexpected uses of the information. For example, machine-based searches.

Online bankruptcy search: Meeting the needs of LITs

The OSB has talked to the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP) as part of developing the IRS. The OSB has dealt with comments received thus far. The IRS layout will certainly make best use of technology to protect personal information. The new system will fulfill the specific needs of LITs, in meeting their insolvency estate management and legal requirements.

It must be kept in mind that the OSB has no plan to remove the $8 charge from the current system before its being retired. The first introduction of the fee was designed exclusively to sustain the OSB’s operating expenses in developing and keeping the existing system.

The new IRS will consist of many measures to appropriately reduce disclosure and increase the defense of personal information of debtors. The OSB says that it has no proof that a service charge with the brand-new IRS would better safeguard debtor information against improper use.

Online bankruptcy search: This IRS won’t chase you for money!

As a result, the OSB says it will look at and suggest getting rid of the historic governing arrangement which permitted the charging of a cost to get access to the public record. The OSB states that this will align with Treasury Board Policy. That is why this IRS, is not planning to ever chase you for money!

Online bankruptcy search: What to do if you think you might need an insolvency process

Are you or your company insolvent and in need of restructuring? Are you scared to become another entry in an online bankruptcy search? If so, the worst thing you can do is procrastinate and not take positive steps to remedy your situation. Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Team. If we meet with you early on, we can create a restructuring and turnaround strategy designed specifically for you.

online bankruptcy search 1
online bankruptcy search
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY BLOG – TRUSTEE EXPLAINS BANKRUPTCY OPTIONS

Introduction

Our Brandon’s Blog certainly is a personal bankruptcy blog, but it is more than that. Brandon writes on various finance and insolvency-related topics including corporate restructuring, corporate bankruptcy, alternatives to bankruptcy, credit counselling, restructuring through a consumer proposal or a Division I Proposal or the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

Every Monday and Wednesday night Brandon posts to Brandon’s Blog. Monday night is a blog and Wednesday night is a vlog. Just to remind you what this means, here are dictionary definitions:

blog Pronunciation: /blɒɡ/noun

A regularly updated website or web page, typically one run by a person or small group, written in an informal or conversational style: you can add personal bankruptcy blog to the growing list of insolvency-related material popping up on the Web

vlog Pronunciation: /vlɒɡ/ noun

A blog in which the postings are primarily in video form: you can add personal bankruptcy vlog to the growing list of insolvency-related material popping up on the Web

Differences between US and Canadian insolvency statutes

In the United States, people filing for bankruptcy have many “chapters” from which to choose. Similarly, Canada has one chief insolvency law, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, or BIA, and several supporting pieces of legislation. In perusing a personal bankruptcy blog, the potential filer can find the information he or she seeks.

In the United States, Chapter 11 bankruptcy is the most complex because it applies to large businesses and usually involves gigantic sums of money. In Canada, the equivalent is the Division I proposal. In such a proposal, the debtor’s business can keep assets necessary for its role so that it can generate streams of income from other places to repay its debts. Management also stays in control of the company and business operations.

What are the Choices in Canada?

The BIA sets out the ground rules, and several smaller pieces of legislation fill in the details. Although we Canadians don’t call them various chapters, our legislation is like that of the U.S. Here are the options for filing bankruptcy in Canada:

Personal bankruptcy in Canada is most similar to Chapter 7 in the U.S. By filing bankruptcy, the debtor seeks to deal with his or her entire debt load at once. The debtor does not believe that he or she has the means to attempt a restructuring. There are certain assets that are exempt for any one of a number of reasons, so anyone filing bankruptcy should consult a Trustee to find out more.

If a debtor decides to file a consumer proposal (because his or her debt load is $250,000 or less, not including any mortgages against the principal residence) or a Division I Proposal (for unsecured debts $250,000 or greater) instead, he or she is seeking a restructuring of debt so for repayment over a five years or less. Many times, debtors can negotiate with their creditors for part of the amount owed and work out deals on monthly payments, rates of interest, and other such considerations. A proposal is most similar to Chapter 13 in the U.S. and used by people who wish to AVOID bankruptcy.

Basically, the business operates as usual while making an offer to its creditors of payments over time, totalling an amount greater than the creditors would receive if everything was sold off in liquidation in bankruptcy. The largest businesses might even have several layers of debt that would need restructuring as part of a Division I proposal, and each layer might have different guidelines and restrictions based on the proposal.

For companies with greater than $5 million in debt, they could also make use of a different Federal restructuring statute called the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). Both the Proposal under the BIA and restructuring under the CCAA are for large complex corporate reorganizations.

Is a Lawyer Required?

Unlike citizens of the United States, Canadians don’t need a lawyer to file for bankruptcy. A Licensed Insolvency Trustee acts as the “referee” between debtor and creditors. In this way, people file and handle bankruptcy proceedings on their own in Canada. If the debtor has various complex issues or is a defendant in litigation where the plaintiff wishes to continue the litigation perhaps to attempt to prove that their claim is one not released by the person’s discharge from bankruptcy, then they may very well need a lawyer for those issues.

What to do if you have too much debt and want to read a personal bankruptcy blog?

To find out more, check out our Brandon’s Blog entries for the topic of personal bankruptcy blog. If you’re dealing with serious financial issues, contact a trustee, who is the Canadian bankruptcy expert. For the reasons already given, you should do this whether or not you’re contemplating bankruptcy. The reason is very simple: the licensed insolvency trustee will assess your situation, offer you all of your available options and will do this for you for free! You can’t find a better deal anywhere.

We’re not only bankruptcy experts; we’re experts in dealing with debt. Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for a free consultation and you will be well on your way to regaining your former quality of life Starting Over, Starting Now.

THIS VLOG WAS INSPIRED IN PART BY OUR eBOOK – PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY CANADA: Not because you are a dummy, because you need to get your life back on track

personal bankruptcy blog

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

OWED WAGES BY EMPLOYER? FIND OUT IF YOU QUALIFY TO GET PAID

accrued vacation pay wage earner protection program, owed wages by employer, starting over starting now, avoid bankruptcy, licensed trustee, trustee, Service Canada, receivership, bankruptcy, notice of intention to make a proposal, Division I Proposal, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, WEPPA, bankrupt, wages, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, BIADo you believe you wages are owing to by your employer? People ask us what if my employer owes me money & goes into either receivership or bankruptcy.

We answer if wages are owed by your employer and the company is either in receivership or is bankrupt don’t despair; there is hope for you to recuperate monies owed to you. The Wage Earner Protection Program (“WEPP”) Act – WEPPA – in conjunction with an amendment to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) – BIA – created a mechanism for employees to be compensated for claims of unpaid wages, commissions and vacation pay accrued in the six months preceding the employer files for bankruptcy or being placed in receivership and wages are owed to you along with claims for unpaid termination and/or severance pay.

Are there any exceptions to this? What are the rules?

There are a few exceptions. You are generally not eligible if, during the period for which you wages are owed to you by your employer, you:

  • were an officer or a director of your former employer
  • had a controlling interest in the business of your former employer
  • were a manager whose responsibilities included making binding financial decisions impacting the business of your former employer, and/or making binding decisions on the payment or non-payment of wages by your former employer

Who is eligible for the WEPP? You may apply if wages are owed to you by your employer and:

  • your former employer has filed for bankruptcy or is subject to a receivership
  • wages are owed to you by your employer, vacation pay, termination or severance pay from your former employer
  • amounts earned during the eligibility period or, in the case of termination or severance pay, your employment was terminated during the eligibility period ending on the date of bankruptcy or receivership

One more very important exception – it only applies if wages are owed to you by your employer and your employer is in either receivership or bankruptcy and owes you wages. If your employer is attempting a corporate restructuring under a Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal, a Division I Proposal or the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, then WEPPA and its provisions do not come into play.

Claim limits

Regardless of the total amount owing to you, the maximum any employee can receive under WEPPA is the greater of $3,200 or four times the maximum weekly insurable earnings under the Employment Insurance Act (which is now greater than $3,200). Once employees file claims with both the Trustee and Service Canada, Service Canada pays their claims for owed wages by employer and Service Canada becomes the creditor. The amendment to the BIA has recognized WEPPA and created a priority charge that supersedes all secured charges except CRA’s deemed trust claim (and the reclaiming rights of farmers and suppliers) to a max of $2,000 per employee, secured against current assets.

Documentation

While no one wants – or expects – to be part of a receivership or bankruptcy, you should always keep detailed records of hours worked for any pay period. On any occasion when you discover there will be no paycheque, record the loss that you will suffer, such as not being able to pay bills or buy groceries. Ask for a formal explanation from your employer and keep detailed notes on your efforts. It’s important to prove that when owed wages by employer; you still expect to be paid, even if it’s late.

If your employer is in receivership or bankruptcy proceedings, and you believe you have a claim for owed wages by employer, find the trustee and get in touch with Service Canada. Have your records ready and make sure you get your Proof of Claim.

If you are experiencing financial problems, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. We are a licensed trustee and will listen to your issues and offer compassionate, professional assistance to aid you to avoid bankruptcy, so that you can regain control of your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Call a Trustee Now!