Tag: Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

BEYOND BANKRUPTCY SERVICES: OUR BEST PERSONAL INSOLVENCY FAQ 2 JUMPSTART YOUR FINANCIAL LIFE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 16, 2022

Bankruptcy services and FAQ information

Bankruptcy is a last resort for Canadian individuals, entrepreneurs and companies looking for a debt solution. However, bankruptcy services are just one of the available options we canvass with you to provide the opportunity to rebuild your financial affairs and your life.

I help people and senior company management understand bankruptcy and the other options available to rebuild their life. Frankly, bankruptcy is always the last option and hopefully in most cases, can be avoided.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I provide my best FAQ answers to common questions about personal bankruptcy services. The answers below will contain all the information you need to know. So here we go. In the future Brandon’s Blogs, I will talk about corporate bankruptcy services in addition to personal and corporate restructuring as alternatives to bankruptcy services.

Bankruptcy services: Who files for bankruptcy and why?

Many people who are considering looking into the need for the bankruptcy process may feel alone and lost. This is because they may not know anyone who has gone through the same thing, making them feel like they have no one to talk to about it. Bankruptcy can be very scary and intimidating, especially if you feel like you’re the only one experiencing financial difficulties.

Financial problems affect people from all walks of life and all income levels. It doesn’t discriminate, affecting married and single people alike, regardless of age. Seniors and those just starting out in life, consumers and companies are all susceptible to needing bankruptcy services.

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) keeps insolvency statistics. It used to be affiliated with a part of the federal government called Industry Canada. Now it is part of what is called Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. The OSB has not yet released the 2021 annual insolvency statistics. In 2020 99,244 insolvencies were filed in Canada. This was a 29.5% decrease in insolvencies filed with the OSB in 2020 compared to 2019. This is the largest annual decrease ever. The decrease can be largely attributed to the outbreak of COVID-19 and the various emergency response measures that followed.

The number of consumers filing for insolvency decreased from 137,178 to 96,458, while the number of businesses filing for insolvency decreased from 3,680 to 2,786. The proportion of proposals among consumer insolvency filings increased from 60.3% to 65.9%.

There are two things to remember from these statistics:

You are not alone. Many people face financial difficulties.
There are options available for avoiding bankruptcy services.
bankruptcy services

Bankruptcy services: Can bankruptcy clear debt in Canada?

Most outstanding debt owed to unsecured creditors is cleared not by a person filing for bankruptcy, but by that person receiving their absolute bankruptcy discharge.

Even after bankruptcy, some debts still need to be paid. This includes a student loan if it has been less than 7 years since you stopped being a student, alimony and child support, fines and penalties imposed by the court, and any debts due to fraud.

Also, any secured debts, such as a registered car loan or mortgage against real estate are not discharged by a bankruptcy – either personal bankruptcy or corporate bankruptcy.

What debts cannot be discharged through personal bankruptcy services in Canada?

See the section “Bankruptcy services: Can bankruptcy clear debt in Canada?” directly above.

Bankruptcy services: How much debt must you accumulate in order to file for bankruptcy in Canada?

The minimum amount of unsecured debt needed to file for bankruptcy in Canada is $1,000, as stipulated by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). In addition, the person, partnership or company must also be insolvent. Bankruptcy is a legal process. Insolvency is a bad financial situation.

Bankruptcy services: What debts are not erased in bankruptcy?

See the section “Bankruptcy services: Can bankruptcy clear debt in Canada?” directly above.

bankruptcy services

Bankruptcy services: What are the three types of bankruptcies?

There are several ways I could answer that question. For example, there are:

Personal bankruptcy is also sometimes referred to as consumer bankruptcy.
Small business bankruptcy. This would mainly be for a proprietorship or partnership.
Corporate bankruptcy – small or large companies.

Another way of answering the same question would be:

Voluntary bankruptcy – an assignment in bankruptcy being filed by the person or company.
Involuntary bankruptcy – a bankruptcy happening because one or more creditors issued a bankruptcy application resulting in a bankruptcy order.
Bankruptcy protection is not bankruptcy at all. It is a financial restructuring performed by a licensed insolvency trustee. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada maintains a searchable list of individuals licensed to act as a licensed insolvency trustee in Canada.

My final way of answering the same question is:

Consumer proposal – This is a financial restructuring under the BIA to avoid bankruptcy for a person who owes $250,000 or less not including any debts secured against the person’s principal residence.
Proposal – This is a financial restructuring under the BIA to avoid bankruptcy for a person who owes more than $250,000 (not including any debts secured against the person’s principal residence) or for a company with any amount of debt.
Financial restructuring under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act – This is what the media calls bankruptcy protection in order to restructure and avoid bankruptcy. To qualify to file under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act statute, the company must have a debt load of $5 million or more.

All of the above bankruptcy services can only be administered by a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee or trustee in bankruptcy), but they are not all bankruptcy.

I guess these are really 9 types!! It all depends on how you wish to look at it.

Bankruptcy services: What are the consequences for your assets when declaring bankruptcy?

A bankruptcy does not mean you have to give up all your assets. There are rules about bankruptcy exemptions in bankruptcy law. Also, every province/territory has laws that say what assets you can keep and how much equity you can have. These types of assets are called exempt assets. There are certain assets that you are allowed to keep that are not accessible to your creditors during a bankruptcy. These assets are exempt under federal law, provincial law or both.

In order to understand what exempt assets are in bankruptcy in Ontario, we must first look at the BIA. Section 67(1) of the BIA addresses the bankruptcy exemption issue specifically. It outlines what property of the bankrupt is available to creditors does and does not include.

Property that is not included is:

Property that is held in trust by the bankrupt for any third party.
Assets that are not subject to seizure under provincial law.
Payments to the bankrupt are made under a program that can be described as social assistance provided by the federal or provincial government.
Retirement Savings Plans – The bankrupt’s RRSP (other than for the total of payments made in the 12 months before bankruptcy) or RRIF cannot be touched even in bankruptcy.

As mentioned before, one type of asset that cannot be seized during bankruptcy is any property that is protected under provincial law. In Ontario, the amounts prescribed for exemptions are outlined in the Ontario Execution Act.

These exemptions include:

Household furnishings and household appliances – $14,180.
Tools and other personal property used to generate income:
Exemptions for farmers, being a debtor engaged exclusively in cultivating the soil or farming (and therefore it is that farmer’s principal source of primary income), $31,379 for livestock, fowl, bees, books, tools and implements, and other chattels ordinarily used by the debtor; $14,405 for any other case.
$7,117 for a motor vehicle.
$10, 783 for a principal residence.

Since these exemptions are provincial, you need to look at provincial/territorial laws for other jurisdictions in Canada.

bankruptcy services

Bankruptcy services: What are the implications of personal bankruptcy on retirement plans?

There are 4 main ways Canadians save to live comfortably in retirement. They are:

The principal residence.
RRSP..
Investments.
Private pension plan.

#1 – The principal residence and bankruptcy

For many Canadians, their house is the biggest investment they make and the majority of their savings are tied up in it. Owning a home makes people more confident about their financial future.

If the owner of a home becomes bankrupt, either through an assignment in bankruptcy or bankruptcy order, the debtor’s equity in the home is an asset for the licensed insolvency trustee to sell. The exception is if the home is fully encumbered so that there is only $10,783 or less of equity (in Ontario) in the home.

If the bankrupt is a joint owner, then the Trustee only has access to the bankrupt’s interest, which would be half the equity.

The loss of wealth from the sale of the house or the encumbrance of the house will make it take much longer to build back the equity by paying off the mortgage(s). In the case of joint ownership, the natural purchaser would be the non-bankrupt spouse or partner who owns the other half. The person would likely have to take on more debt to buy the equity from the Trustee.

The loss of wealth as a result of bankruptcy can mean having to work longer than originally planned. This is one way that bankruptcy can affect retirement.

#2 – Your RRSP and bankruptcy

It is the rare debtor that seeks an insolvency option and has a significant amount in their RRSP. This is notwithstanding that a creditor cannot seize your RRSP funds in Ontario.

If you think about it, if you have a 7-figure RRSP and a 6-figure total debt, then you are not insolvent. To be eligible to use the Canadian insolvency process, you must meet certain conditions, one of which is being insolvent.

The only amount of your RRSP that is affected by bankruptcy is any contributions made to the RRSP in the 12 months before the bankruptcy happened. That amount is subject to seizure by your Trustee. Rather than seizing that amount from your RRSP, the Trustee will require you to pay that amount to the Trustee for the benefit of your bankruptcy estate.

Not having a sizeable RRSP to start withdrawing at retirement obviously will affect your retirement plans.

#3 – Bankruptcy and investments

People who are able to save for retirement invest their money to make it grow in addition to an RRSP and principal residence. Investments such as stocks, bonds and mutual funds are very typical. There are two general ways these investments can be held: (i) investment in funds maintained by a life insurance company naming a designated beneficiary (either a spouse or blood relative); and (ii) investments held with your broker.

If you have investments through a contract of insurance and you name your spouse, child, parent, or grandchild as the beneficiary, then those investments are exempt from seizure in Ontario. If you file an assignment in bankruptcy will not have any effect on these investments, and you will be able to keep them. Therefore, this will not affect your retirement plans.

If your investments are through the brokerage arm of your bank, then your investments can be seized in Ontario. These investments will be lost in your bankruptcy and this will affect your retirement plans. If your spouse or partner purchases your interest in these investments from the Trustee, then whatever debt the purchaser had to take on to buy them may affect retirement plans.

#4 – Bankruptcy and a private pension plan

Not everyone in Canada has a private pension plan through their employer. Individuals who are self-employed certainly don’t have it. Having a private pension plan can relieve some of a person’s financial worries as they head toward retirement.

In Ontario, private pensions are protected from seizure and therefore not available for the Trustee. However, if you are already retired and are receiving the private pension income, that income is taken into account when calculating any surplus income payments you may have to make to your Trustee.

bankruptcy services

How bankruptcy services work in Ontario: What is the average length of time for a person to be discharged from bankruptcy in Canada?

To be discharged from bankruptcy in Canada can differ based on whether it is a first or second bankruptcy, and whether the bankrupt has any surplus income contributions to make. For a first-time bankrupt it can take 9 months (no surplus income) -21 months (with surplus income contributions). For a second time or more bankruptcy, it takes 24 months (no surplus income) to 36 months (surplus income).

Bankruptcy services: Surplus income

Surplus income is not an ideal term to describe the extra money an individual has. Many people would not feel they have surplus income, especially when they are dealing with debt. However, in the bankruptcy context, surplus income refers to a calculation that determines how much money a bankrupt individual must pay into their bankruptcy estate for the benefit of their creditors.

When you file an assignment in bankruptcy or have a bankruptcy order made against you in Canada, your monthly income is taken into consideration. To have what is supposed to be a practical standard of living during the bankruptcy period, the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada establishes a standard on an annual basis.

The earnings criteria are adjusted for inflation each year and based on information collected by Statistics Canada. Your licensed insolvency trustee decides how much you pay by making monthly payments into your bankruptcy estate each month based on these standards.

It is really the Canadian poverty line that is established by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada. Regardless of where you reside in Canada, there is no difference between an expensive city as well as a remote area. Just the most fundamental demands of individuals in addition to members of the family are considered.

Bankruptcy services: Debt problems got you down? Feeling overwhelmed?

I hope this Brandon’s Blog on personal bankruptcy services was helpful to you in understanding more about the personal bankruptcy system in Canada.

If you or your company has too heavy a debt load, we understand how you feel. You’re stressed out and anxious because you can’t fix your or your company’s financial situation on your own. But don’t worry. As a government-licensed insolvency professional firm, we can help you get your personal or corporate finances back on track.

If you’re struggling with money problems, call the Ira Smith Team today. We’ll work with you to develop a personalized plan to get you back on track and stress-free, all while avoiding the bankruptcy process if at all possible.

Call us today and get back on the path to a healthy stress-free life.

Brandon Blog Post

DECLARING BANKRUPTCY: REAL ESTATE COMPANY LOSES CHALLENGE ON CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY APPEAL

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 2, 2022

Declaring bankruptcy: Business insolvency

When the corporate finances are such that the business has an insufficient cash flow to cover its operating expenses and pay its debts when they come due, these financial difficulties create the financial condition of insolvency for the business. Another indicator of insolvency often exists at the same time: if you were to sell all of the company’s assets, you would not be able to raise enough money to pay off its outstanding debt.

Medcap Real Estate Holdings Inc. (Medcap) is an Ontario corporation that owns certain commercial real estate. Medcap’s principal, through other companies which he owns or controls, operates various fitness facilities.

Several creditors made a bankruptcy application to the Court to wind up Medcap’s business through a corporate bankruptcy. In December 2021, the Judge released his decision to issue a bankruptcy order and place the company in the legal position of bankruptcy. Medcap appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I discuss the two ways there are for declaring bankruptcy and highlight the reasoning of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in dismissing this company’s appeal for its corporate bankruptcy.

Declaring bankruptcy: An overview of corporate bankruptcy

In Canada, a company is a separate legal entity from its shareholders or Directors and Officers. So a company can go into corporate bankruptcy, as opposed to a person entering personal bankruptcy, also known as consumer bankruptcy. There are two ways a company (or a person) can go bankrupt.

The first way is that a company (or person) files for bankruptcy by filing an assignment in bankruptcy with a licensed insolvency trustee. This is called a voluntary assignment into bankruptcy. The second way, which is what happened to Medcap, is that they are pushed into bankruptcy.

To push a limited company (person) into bankruptcy, one or more creditors, each owed at least $1,000, make a bankruptcy application to the court. The application will include a sworn affidavit from the people with knowledge of the situation providing evidence as to why the company (the person) is insolvent, what acts of bankruptcy the business (person) committed within 6 months preceding the date of the application and requesting that a bankruptcy order be made against the debtor.

Regardless of the types of bankruptcy proceedings that may be involved, these are the only two ways for companies with crippling debt to become bankrupt. It is either voluntary or an involuntary one.

declaring bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy: Types of Corporate Bankruptcy

A company that ends up declaring bankruptcy may be doing so for a variety of reasons, all of which relate to significant financial losses. In Canada, there are two primary types of bankruptcy filings under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

Once the company is insolvent and no longer viable, declaring bankruptcy in order to have liquidation of assets and end the business in that legal entity is the next step. In this situation, there may be certain business debts that are also a personal liability of the corporate Directors. Unremitted source deductions and HST and unpaid wages and vacation pay fall into this category.

Bankruptcy is a tricky topic. Many people tend to fear it, thinking of it as the end of the road. Given my description above of bankruptcy being for liquidating the company assets, that is understandable.

But what about the company that is insolvent but the business is very viable if the bad parts are cut out? In this kind of situation, filing under the BIA using the restructuring provisions of this federal statute, or for larger companies, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), is a legal way for the company to restructure its debts to get its finances back in order. In a successful restructuring, the good parts of the business are restructured and preserved, the company’s finances are right-sized and most if not all jobs are saved. This form of declaring bankruptcy is what is referred to in the media as bankruptcy protection.

So in Canada, declaring bankruptcy is one type, but declaring bankruptcy protection is also possible. That is why I suggest in Canada, there are 2 types of business-specific options in corporate bankruptcy filings.

Declaring bankruptcy: Does corporate bankruptcy affect personal assets?

The legal separation of personal and corporate assets is clear. However, a company declaring bankruptcy may have an impact on the personal assets of certain people. There are situations where personal assets may be at risk. If you are concerned about your personal assets, you should consult with a legal professional to assess your individual case.

Before making any business or investment decisions, is when you should get that professional advice. Once a corporate bankruptcy filing has been made, it will be too late to properly plan for that situation. Personal assets could be at risk if it is a bankruptcy liquidation and not a successful restructuring.

Examples of when personal assets may be at risk because of business bankruptcies include:

the entrepreneur who had to give a personal guarantee of certain corporate debt financial obligations to the company’s primary secured creditor lender and in a liquidation of the company’s assets, the lender suffers a shortfall;
there is not enough money left over from the liquidation after any trust claims and secured creditor claims to pay the outstanding wages and vacation pay so the Directors’ personal assets may be at risk;
the liquidation value of the assets is essentially zero so the Directors are called upon by Canada Revenue Agency to repay any unremitted employee source deductions or HST amounts;
in bankruptcy liquidation, there is generally nothing available to repay investors or shareholders so the money an individual investor or shareholder loses certainly affects their personal assets and personal property. The stock of companies that liquidated their assets after declaring bankruptcy is worthless; and
any creditors that are unincorporated, being either a proprietorship or partnership who lose some or all of the amounts owed to them as ordinary unsecured creditors clearly affect the personal assets of those business owners.

Declaring bankruptcy: The Medcap case

With this discussion of corporations declaring bankruptcy, there are some interesting points to be learned from the Medcap appeal case and the bankruptcy process. The application judge dismissed the bankruptcy applications of all but one of the applicants. He issued the bankruptcy order and appointed the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy or bankruptcy trustee) which began Medcap’s administration of bankruptcy.

The Medcap company appealed the bankruptcy order on only one ground; the judge who made the original order failed to exercise his discretion on whether or not to dismiss the application. Medcap did not appeal the application judge’s finding that the prerequisites to the making of a bankruptcy order – a debt owing to an applicant of at least $1,000 and the commission of an act of bankruptcy within six months of the commencement of the application – had been met!

The most interesting part of the Court of Appeal’s decision is the discussion of the two factors that a court could look at where a judge could exercise discretion to justify refusing an otherwise proven bankruptcy application.

declaring bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy: Appealing a bankruptcy order

As mentioned previously, Medcap did not contest the judge’s conclusion that the creditor whose bankruptcy application was allowed had met the requirements under s. 43(1) of the BIA. This is that Medcap owed them a debt exceeding $1,000 and that Medcap committed an act of bankruptcy within 6 months before the filing of that bankruptcy application.

The application judge found that Medcap had failed to pay that creditor’s debt, for which a judgment was issued, despite demands. This is defined as an act of bankruptcy in s. 42(1)(j) of the BIA. In its appeal, the Medcap company argued that, even though the debt and the act of bankruptcy were proven, the application judge made a mistake by not using his discretionary power under s. 43(7) of the BIA to dismiss the application.

Medcap made three arguments to support its appeal: (i) that the trial judge erred in finding that Medcap was unable to pay its debts; (ii) that he erred in finding that the application was brought for an improper motive; and (iii) that he erred in finding that the bankruptcy order would serve no purpose.

Let’s see what the Court of Appeal for Ontario said about this.

Declaring bankruptcy: Unable to pay its debts

This is the first of the three bankruptcy issues that the Court of Appeal looked at. Medcap argued that the application judge dismissed the applications of all applicants but one because there was potential that they were not creditors. Medcap also stated that the application judge had not taken into account that Medcap had reached a settlement with the one creditor whose application was allowed to be heard. Medcap submitted that the application judge erred in not taking this into account as there was no debt owing because of the settlement and the payment of that settlement.

The appellate court found that the lower court judge did not err in rejecting Medcap’s argument. An application for bankruptcy is not solely for the benefit of the applicant creditor, but for the rights of creditors, ALL creditors. Further, the arrangements between the applicant creditor and the debtor will not be able to justify the withdrawal or dismissal of a bankruptcy application, unless the court is satisfied that the debtor is solvent and that other creditors will not be prejudiced by the withdrawal or dismissal.

To be able to pay debts as set out in the BIA, the evidence must be provided for all debts owed, as well as the debtor’s ability to pay them. In other words, the debtor must prove that they are solvent. Medcap did not provide such evidence. Therefore this ground of appeal was dismissed.

Declaring bankruptcy: Bankruptcy application for improper motives

Medcap argued that in cases where a creditor has an ulterior motive for filing a bankruptcy application, this can be sufficient cause for dismissal of the application. The Court of Appeal said that the existence of a motive is a question of fact, and the application judge considered and rejected the suggestion that there was such a motive in this case.

The Court of Appeal found that the application judge was within his rights to reject the argument based on the record. Therefore, the Court of Appeal for Ontario found no justification to interfere and dismissed the appeal on that ground. declaring bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy: There is no purpose for this bankruptcy

Medcap argued that the application judge erred in failing to find that no purpose would be served by bankruptcy. He ought to have dismissed the application on the basis that there was nothing to be gained by making a bankruptcy order.

The Court of Appeal emphasized that safeguarding creditors is crucial to insolvency proceedings. A debtor who has (a) committed an act of bankruptcy by not paying debts when they come due, and (b) failed to provide evidence to the court demonstrating the ability to do so, carries the burden of proving that bankruptcy would be pointless. The judge was correct in finding that Medcap had not met that burden.

The three-panel judge went on to say that, in order to demonstrate that there is no purpose for the Medcap bankruptcy, they would need to show that a better result would be achieved for creditors if it were allowed time to restructure under the commercial proposal provisions of the BIA or the provisions of the CCAA.

Medcap did not argue that doing either would have the requisite creditor support but rather suggested that leaving it up to them would be best.

The three appellate court judges hearing this case unanimously rejected Medcap’s appeal, upholding the lower court’s ruling and allowing the bankruptcy process legal proceedings to continue. At this point, the licensed trustee named in the bankruptcy order begins administering the bankruptcy legal process.

Declaring bankruptcy: The final word

What fascinated me most about this case was the nerve of Medcap to argue that the application judge should have declined to make the bankruptcy order, regardless of all the evidence against it.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario soundly rejected the appeal of the bankruptcy order being issued after analyzing the bankruptcy application process in Canada. It concluded that only a real possibility of a successful restructuring under either the BIA or CCAA to avoid bankruptcy liquidation would be a reason to do so.

I hope this Brandon’s Blog on the Medcap case was helpful to you in understanding more about declaring bankruptcy, corporate bankruptcy and how the Ontario court would decide if it was appropriate to issue a bankruptcy order. Hopefully, you have also gained insight into how a corporate bankruptcy decision is made and how a successful corporate bankruptcy protection filing and restructuring can be beneficial.

We understand how you feel. You’re stressed out and anxious because you can’t fix your or your company’s financial situation on your own. But don’t worry. As a government-licensed insolvency professional firm, we can help you get your personal or corporate finances back on track.

Call us today and get back on the path to a healthy stress-free life.

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: THE UNDENIABLE BEST THING YOU NEED TO KNOW TO CASH YOUR INSOLVENT CUSTOMER’S CHEQUE SAFELY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 12, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Bankruptcy protection: What happens if a company gets into financial trouble?

A Canadian company seeking bankruptcy protection has two choices when it is financially troubled and wants to reorganize. By hiring insolvency legal counsel and a licensed insolvency trustee to get both insolvency and bankruptcy law advice and financial advice, they can protect themselves from their creditors, either by:

using the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) to file for bankruptcy protection; or
working with an insolvency trustee and filing a Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) you can obtain bankruptcy protection.

In order to reorganize in Canada, an insolvent company files for bankruptcy protection. If you are insolvent in Canada, then you must file for bankruptcy protection, which is equivalent to Chapter 11 in the United States. The process is called financial restructuring or financial reorganization. By doing this, the company will try to restructure while it continues to operate to come up with a restructuring plan that allows the company to survive while satisfying the needs of the creditors to some degree.a

This Brandon Blog discusses a recent court decision that demonstrates that there is a risk to creditors who receive payments from the insolvent company under bankruptcy protection for goods or services supplied if the restructuring fails.

What happens to the company that files for bankruptcy protection?

An organization that files for bankruptcy protection, or as it is sometimes called, creditor protection, differs from an organization that files for bankruptcy. A pure bankruptcy procedure consists of a liquidation. The company ceases to operate unless the Trustee sees value in continuing to operate the company for a limited period of time.

The trustee in bankruptcy takes possession of all assets that are either not subject to valid claims by secured creditors (typically financial institutions) or that belong to third parties (for example, equipment under lease or goods undergoing repair that are in the company’s possession). A licensed insolvency trustee then formulates a plan for selling the unencumbered assets of the company to maximize the proceeds. Afterwards, the Trustee distributes the funds in accordance with the BIA.

In the case of a company filing for bankruptcy protection, this is one of the alternatives to bankruptcy. The intention is to continue operating while it tries to restructure. Most of the time, this entails downsizing. A plan will be devised to repay some of the remaining debt in exchange for the creditors writing off the balance that is owed. With success, the company can retain employees and continue to operate. Creditors will be able to earn money by supplying the reorganized company in the future.

The CCAA allows companies that owe at least $5 million to their creditors to file for bankruptcy protection. Either the business will be restructured and continue to exist on new financial terms or a wind-down will be supervised to pay back anyone owed money by selling assets. BIA restructuring provisions can be used by companies that owe less than $5 million.

In other words, a company that goes bankrupt will shut down. Those who file for bankruptcy protection want to keep operating. As disruptive as bankruptcy and restructuring are, they can be beneficial for businesses, individuals and the economy since they preserve value and prevent assets from being wasted.

As soon as the company enters bankruptcy protection (or bankruptcy), proceedings against it are stayed. As a result, all collection rights for creditors are suspended. A “time-out” gives the company a chance to restructure, or the Trustee can handle its duties in bankruptcy without interference from creditors. Additionally, it “freezes” all creditors at the time of the filing, so that one cannot gain an advantage over another.

bankruptcy protection

A record number of companies have sought creditor protection under COVID-19 and more are on the way?

The list of large Canadian companies with outstanding debts looking for bankruptcy protection from creditors got to a decade high in May and June 2020. Numerous financial commentators believed there would be a full-blown financial crisis and that a lot more would certainly file as a result of COVID-19 caused the economic downturn. Despite this, the number of corporate insolvency filings appears to have stabilized and also slowed down in 2021. One main reason is the number of government programs supporting Canadian business. In the same way as the virus itself, COVID-19 has actually taken a hefty financial toll on companies with pre-existing conditions.

Some familiar Canadian corporations in the list of companies that filed in that time due to their financial situation were:

Reitmans
Frank & Oak
Aldo
DavidsTea
Cirque Du Soleil
Mendocino
Bow River Energy
FlightHub
Christian charity, Gospel for Asia
Cequence Energy
Delphi Energy
Sail

Twenty-two major Canadian companies sought creditor protection in May and June 2020, almost four times the usual rate. The list obviously does not include major U.S. names such as Chesapeake Energy, J Crew, Neiman Marcus, Brooks Brothers, Pier 1 and Boy Scouts of America.

**The bankruptcy protection court case facts**

I want to tell you about Schendel Mechanical Contracting Ltd (Re), 2021 ABQB 893. On November 9, 2021, the Honourable Mr. Justice Douglas R. Mah released his decision.

Schendel Mechanical Contracting Ltd. (Schendel) was one of three associated companies that at one time collectively formed a major construction concern in Alberta under the Schendel name. As a result of financial difficulties, it was an insolvent entity and it filed a Notice of Intention to Make A Proposal under the BIA on March 22, 2019. Schendel continued operations as part of its restructuring effort. On various Schendel projects, Schendel bought HVAC equipment from the supplier between April 2018 and May 2019.

Ultimately, Schendel’s debt restructuring plan failed. Schendel was deemed to have filed for bankruptcy when it failed to implement a successful BIA Proposal restructuring. Schendel went bankrupt immediately. Its secured creditor applied to the Court for the appointment of a Receiver, which was granted.

As a result of reviewing the company’s books and records, the Receiver found and disputed the legality of a $40,000 payment from Schendel, an insolvent company, to one of its suppliers. According to the Applicant Receiver, the payment was prohibited for a number of reasons and the funds should be returned. The recipient supplier asserted that the payment was both innocent and validly received and that it was entitled to retain it.

In this case, a cheque dated July 8, 2019, to make the payment. Due to an unknown reason, the supplier did not negotiate the cheque until 11:48 AM on July 19, 2019. Schendel was also deemed to have filed for bankruptcy and the Court made the Receivership Appointment Order all on the same day, July 19, 2019. The Court had, however, no evidence regarding the exact moment the receivership and bankruptcy decision was made on that same day.

bankruptcy protection

**The bankruptcy protection case: The Receiver’s position**

It is noteworthy that the action to recover the $40,000 was brought by the Court-appointed Receiver and not the insolvency trustee of the bankruptcy estate. According to the Receiver, the funds should be returned on the following grounds:

the automatic stay under section 69(1) of the BIA was in effect at the time of filing and throughout the extension of the proposal period, so the supplier was without recourse against Schendel;
the Court-ordered stay contained in the Receivership Appointment Order of July 19, 2019, as well as the concurrent stay imposed by a deemed bankruptcy under the BIA, deprived the supplier of all collection remedies as of that date;
as an alternative, the payment may be prohibited under the Fraudulent Preferences Act; or
it may be in violation of the Statute of Elizabeth (see note below).

NOTE: The English Parliament passed this statute in 1571 with the purpose of prohibiting transfers that would defraud creditors or hinder their collection efforts. As a result of widespread fraudulent transactions designed to defraud creditors, the 13 Elizabeth Statute was passed. It is still in effect in Alberta today.

**The bankruptcy protection case: The supplier’s position**

The recipient supplier said that it received the payment both innocently and legally and that it is entitled to retain it. In addition, the recipient supplier said:

besides some routine questions about payment, the supplier had not engaged in any activity to try to collect the debt;
the relationship with Schendel was arm’s-length;
both of the last two extension orders for the NOI define a process by which Schendel may pay, and the Receiver has fallen short to prove that the procedure was not followed when it comes to the subject payment; and
for either the Fraudulent Preferences Act or the Statute of Elizabeth, the required intent cannot be shown.

Since the bankruptcy trustee was not involved in this case, nobody was claiming that the payment was a preference or transfer under value under the BIA.

bankruptcy protection

**The bankruptcy protection case: The Judge’s decision**

The Court was not presented with evidence on whether the $40,000 payment in question was approved within the proposal extension process or whether it was not approved. There was evidence to support Schendel’s compliance with approved procedures. In the post-NOI period, the supplier was found to have provided goods to various Schendel projects worth $34,476.75.

There was evidence that the payment was not just a payment on account of a pre-filing debt without further transactions post-filing. According to the Judge, the stay would not apply to indebtedness arising from goods or services supplied to Schendel after the filing of the NOI. This is because such indebtedness would not be a claim that could be a proven claim in the bankruptcy.

The Judge further stated that it is the Receiver’s responsibility to prove that the payment violated the stay. Schendel and the supplier did continue to do business together after the NOI was filed, according to the evidence. During the hearing, the Judge said that he should not simply assume facts in the Receiver’s favour. Additionally, the evidence indicated that some of the $40,000 payment was applied to the post-NOI supply of goods. A total of $34,476.75 worth of product was supplied to Schendel after the NOI was filed.

As a result, the Judge rejected all of the Receiver’s arguments and dismissed his Application in its entirety. Consequently, the supplier kept the $40,000.

Bankruptcy protection: How to cash your insolvent customer’s cheque safely

Companies filing for bankruptcy protection, whether under the CCAA or BIA, are reorganizing to stay in business. Businesses require purchasing goods and services and paying for them. It’s possible that some pre-filing debts will be paid after the filing date even though the debts are frozen from a collection perspective.

The stay does not necessarily prohibit every post-NOI payment by an insolvent company to a creditor. Such payments are valid when they are necessary to enable the company to move forward with restructuring. For example, a creditor may require payment of all or a portion of its pre-filing debt in order to supply post-filing.

Parties can agree to repay past debts in order to secure future supplies. First and foremost, the BIA process aims to encourage a debtor to reorganize as a going concern. Both creditors and debtors benefit from the debtor’s continued operation during this critical time. The BIA’s stay provisions and preference provisions give debtors breathing room to reorganize their finances. Setting up legitimate agreements with key suppliers is an integral part of that process.

In the end, it is critical to determine whether the payment of past indebtedness is a valid condition of post-NOI supply, which is required for restructuring to proceed. In that case, the post-filing payment of the pre-filing amount will be valid. If not, the insolvency trustee can recover it from the supplier.

Creditors seeking to recover pre-filing debts must make the payment as a condition of a post-filing supply arrangement. Additionally, because all of this is playing out in real-time in higher-risk settings, a supplier is free to amend the pricing post-filing. Similarly, if the supplier can secure it, there is no reason for them to not try to go from an unsecured creditor to a secured creditor on the post-filing supply by taking security or requesting a letter of credit. This would all be done out of an abundance of caution because as stated above, unpaid post-filing debts are not a claim provable in the company’s bankruptcy if the restructuring is unsuccessful.

bankruptcy protection

Bankruptcy protection summary

I hope you found this bankruptcy protection Brandon Blog post informative. Are you worried because you personally or as business owners are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? If it is too much debt for any reason, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Even though we are licensed insolvency trustees, we have found that not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Brandon Blog Post

PENSIONS IN BANKRUPTCY: FEDERAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY PROMISE MASSIVE CANADIAN WORKER PENSION PROTECT1ON

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date September 2, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Pension & Bankruptcy in Canada

Underfunding is a major concern for traditional, defined-benefit pension plans. In other words, do they have enough pension assets and therefore enough money to meet their projected future pension obligations? Inadequate actuarial assumptions, poor investment returns, and mismanagement can lead to pension plan underfunding. In the case of corporate insolvency of a large employer with a defined-benefit pension plan, this issue always arises. Underfunded pensions in bankruptcy wind up hurting retirees.

The Sears Canada court-supervised liquidation forced us to again focus on the treatment of pensioners in corporate bankruptcies under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or restructurings and liquidations under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). It was widely reported that representative for 17,000 Sears Canada retirees says insolvency laws are unjust when it comes to underfunded pensions.

PM Justin Trudeau is the only person who wants this election right now. Erin O’Toole, leader of the Conservative Party, promised to prioritize pensioners ahead of companies and creditors during bankruptcy and restructuring proceedings if he were elected.

This Brandon Blog discusses the issue of pensions in bankruptcy and how the Liberals had several opportunities to fix it but did not.

Pensions in bankruptcy: Pension and benefits issues in bankruptcy and restructuring

Pensioners suffer pension losses and ultimately pension income losses when a company is insolvent and its defined benefit pension fund plan is underfunded. In practice, the pensioners’ rights are weak and highly inadequate, especially when pension plans are underfunded. Although provincial and federal government pension legislation purports to offer some protection for amounts owing to an underfunded pension plan, insolvency legislation does not preserve that protection for the majority of those amounts. The insolvency protection of pensioners and pensions in bankruptcy is thus largely illusory.

Founder and Director of the National Centre for Business Law, Dr. Janis Sarra teaches law at Peter A. Allard School of Law. Canadian pensioners and employees, she believes, are among the worst protected pensions in bankruptcy and/or in insolvency among 60 countries.

In every Canadian province and territory, pensioners are protected by law in connection with pension deficits and pension payments. Specifically, every jurisdiction grants a deemed trust to protect employee pensions earned on employer assets owed to pension plans. The Pension Benefits Standards Act, which governs federally regulated pension plans, specifies the amounts that must be held separately from the employer’s funds, for example. Funds held in trust for active and retired pension plan members are not considered a part of the employer’s estate in liquidation or bankruptcy.

Under the Pension Benefits Act in Ontario, employers are required to hold all amounts owing to the pension plan in trust on behalf of their employees. According to the Supreme Court of Canada, the Ontario Pension Benefits Act creates a deemed trust over the entire wind-up deficit, subject only to the doctrine of paramountcy. Therefore, Ontario’s pension legislation expressly recognizes that the deemed trust is covered by all amounts of the employer owing to the pension plan.

The pension legislation in Quebec confers a deemed trust on special payments due in the year of insolvency. The special payments already due are deemed to be in trust, and the amount owing to the pension plan for unpaid special payments is deemed to be in trust based on Quebec’s pension law.

Due to other judicial decisions not giving effect to these deemed trusts in BIA and CCAA proceedings, the federal and provincial pension legislation has been hindered. In the meantime, to the extent that the BIA and CCAA protect pensions, the protection is negligible in practice. In Ontario (and every other province), provincial law protections are subject to the doctrine of paramountcy.

Paramountcy says that in the conflict between federal and provincial laws, federal law takes precedence. Both the BIA and CCAA are federal laws. The Supreme Court of Canada has held that provincial deemed trusts are not applicable to bankruptcy cases unless the BIA expressly permits them. There have even been successful attacks on federal pension law.

In accordance with existing regulations, the secured creditors may receive funds that would otherwise go to employees’ pension plans. Therefore, there really isn’t much protection for pensions in bankruptcy.

Pensions in bankruptcy: PM Justin Trudeau had his chance to fix this problem

Erin O’Toole doesn’t seem to be bringing up a new subject. The Liberal federal government had at least three chances to fix this pension issue for Canadian workers whose employers become financially troubled and have to liquidate or file for bankruptcy. A brief look at the recent history follows.

Let’s look at some history of attempts to protect pensions in bankruptcy. The Canadian Association for Retired Persons, a nationwide not-for-profit group, lobbied politicians on Parliament Hill about legislation changes. According to Wanda Morris, vice-president of CARP, the unfunded pension liability should be given priority so that it is handled first.

There is no priority for retirees when it comes to dividing up assets in bankruptcy, and Morris wants to protect underfunded defined benefit pensions when the company goes through restructuring or bankruptcy.

CARP estimates that roughly 1.3 million Canadians, aside from the retired Sears employees, may be at risk due to defined benefit pension plans. The closure of Sears Canada stores made the plight of retirees a top priority for CARP.

Marilène Gill, Bloc Québécois MP, introduced a member’s BILL C-372, on Oct. 17, 2017. It was intended to change the BIA and the CCAA. The change seeks to correct the injustice faced by retired workers whose pension and insurance policy benefits are not secured when their company declares bankruptcy or undergoes restructuring. As a result of Sears Canada closing locations, the changes were related to the employees’ and retirees’ treatment.

On October 17, 2017, Bill C-372 passed First Reading. The House rarely passes private member’s bills like this one. The Liberal Party did not support taking it further and allowed it to die.

Hamilton Mountain NDP MP Scott Duvall asked for leave to introduce Bill C-384 in the House of Commons on November 6, 2017. He proposed amending Canada’s insolvency laws so that companies must bring any pension fund to 100% before paying any other secured creditors. Additionally, it requires companies to pay termination or severance pay owing before paying secured creditors. Similarly, this bill passed first reading and then died.

Lastly, Senator Art Eggleton, P.C., proposed BILL S-253 shortly before his retirement to amend the insolvency legislation in Canada. After First Reading passed on September 18, 2018, Second Reading followed on September 25. By introducing this bill, the BIA and CCAA would be amended. The plan proposed to give priority to claims for unfunded obligations or solvency deficiencies of pensions. This is applicable to both solvent companies as well as companies that might become insolvent if certain shareholder payments were made.

The proposed legislation would also amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act as well as the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations in order to enable the Superintendent of Financial Institutions to identify when a pension plan’s funding is impaired and to recommend to the employer the necessary steps to fix it. It is not surprising that the Liberal federal government did not carry forward this bill.

Pensions in bankruptcy: Erin O’Toole vows to force bankrupt firms to pay pensions over executive bonuses

The Hon. Erin O’Toole announced on August 24, 2021, that if he wins the election he plans to protect workers’ pensions. In bankruptcy and restructuring proceedings, he pledges to give priority to pensioners over the corporations and most other creditors.

According to him, as part of Canada’s Recovery Plan, a Conservative government will change the law to ensure that workers come first in cases of bankruptcy and reorganization.

The Conservative Party of Canada will also improve pension security by:

Preventing executives from receiving bonuses during a time of restructuring unless the pension plan is fully funded.
Unlike in the past, underfunded pension plans will no longer be forced to convert to annuities, a practice that involves financial assets being disposed of and replaced with an insurance contract to reduce risks, as well as offer pensioners, fixed payments. The practice of companies failing during a recession when markets are depressed usually locks in losses and means workers receive less money.
By mandating that companies report the funding status of their pension plans to their employees, they can provide their employees with greater transparency.

No further details were given. At least the Conservative Party is focused on this issue of when an employer is insolvent and there are pensions in bankruptcy.

Pensions in bankruptcy: Summary

We will have to wait to see the results of this election to know if anything might change when it comes to pensions in bankruptcy of the employer.

I hope that you found this pensions in bankruptcy Brandon Blog informative. An unexpected situation, such as your employer having financial trouble and entering liquidation or bankruptcy proceedings, by their very nature, are not pleasant and could have the effect of making your debt load now impossible to service. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt. You may not need to file for bankruptcy.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

pensions in bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

WHAT DOES RECEIVERSHIP MEAN FOR 1 BETTER GUARANTOR BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 18, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

what does receivership mean

What does receivership mean: Receivership is for secured claims

What does receivership mean? A receivership is an enforcement proceeding that helps secured creditors recover secured debts on debtor defaults on loan payments from troubled companies. There are two types of receivers and receiverships: Privately-appointed receivers and court-appointed receivers.

As you can tell from the title of this Brandon Blog, I am not going to be writing about receiverships. You can take a look at my April 14, 2021, Brandon Blog titled “WHAT IS A RECEIVERSHIP? OUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO RECEIVERSHIP SOLUTIONS” to read all about what receiverships are.

What does receivership mean? It is a remedy for secured creditors.

I want to go through two more concepts quickly, and then I will get to what I really want to talk to you about today.

What does receivership mean: Bankruptcy vs. receivership

Despite the fact that receivership and bankruptcy sometimes get used interchangeably, they are not the same thing. A bankruptcy proceeding and a receivership proceeding are both legal actions conducted under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) and governed by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). According to the BIA, either a receiver or a bankruptcy trustee in Canada needs to be a licensed insolvency trustee, whose license is granted and whose actions are supervised by the federal government’s OSB.

Here is where the similarities end. In a receivership, a secured creditor would either hire a receiver privately or ask a court to place a company into receivership and appoint one to liquidate the collateral they have against the debtor. According to the Canadian bankruptcy process, either the person or company voluntary files for bankruptcy with a licensed insolvency practitioner, or one or more unsecured creditors apply to the Court for the appointment of an insolvency trustee to administer the bankruptcy Estate.

Licensed insolvency trustees are needed in both cases. The receivership procedure is a secured creditor’s remedy and bankruptcy is an unsecured creditor‘s remedy. To read up more on the bankruptcy process, look at my September 30, 2020, Brandon Blog “DECLARE BANKRUPTCY: A COMPLETE GUIDE ON WHAT IS IT LIKE TO DECLARE BANKRUPTCY“.

What does receivership mean? Not the same as bankruptcy.

Employee Rights in Bankruptcy Protection and Bankruptcy⁄Receivership

Bankruptcy protection can be gained to try to make a troubled company stable and then return the company to profitability by filing pursuant to either the BIA or the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), employees retain their right to unpaid wages, vacation pay, and severance or termination pay. There is no difference between filing and not filing. They are unsecured creditors of a troubled company, and the company directors are personally responsible for amounts owed to employees.

For the company in receivership or bankruptcy, the employees do have greater rights. The receiver of a company in receivership must register with Service Canada under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA) for the Wage Earner Protection Program. This program provides some compensation to eligible employees who are owed money by a bankrupt or receivership company.

To read more about WEPPA, take a look at my February 10, 2020 Brandon Blog, “SEVERANCE PAY ONTARIO & BANKRUPTCY-BARRYMORE FURNITURE UNPAID WORKERS ANGRY“.

So what does receivership mean to an employee with unpaid wages? It means they can claim a priority and get paid by Service Canada.

***What does receivership mean: Receivership – a typical appointment***

Now I will get to what this Brandon Blog is actually about. In Canada, it is the norm for secured creditors advancing loans secured against company assets, to also take a personal guarantee on the same debt from the principals of the company. In all entrepreneurial companies in Canada, that is at least the president running company affairs. If the lender-secured creditor suffers a shortfall from the liquidation of the company assets, the lender then looks to the guarantor(s) of the company debt to make good on the lender’s loss. Many times the company president/guarantor has no choice but to file consumer bankruptcy.

I was involved in a bankruptcy discharge hearing for one of our personal bankrupts in April 2021. He caused his company, being its sole Director, to file for bankruptcy with another Trustee. That same Trustee was also appointed as the company’s private receiver by the secured creditor. The company president provided the secured creditor with a personal guarantee.

Realizing that they would suffer a shortfall from the company situation, rather than suing on their personal guarantee, they approached us to consent to act as the Trustee in a Bankruptcy Application against the company president. We consented and the company president ultimately consented to a Bankruptcy Order being made to put him into bankruptcy with my Firm as the Trustee.

What does receivership mean: The bankruptcy of the guarantor

We administered the consumer bankruptcy. There were some assets to realize upon which we did. One realization required court approval as we were selling seat licenses and the right to purchase tickets for the Toronto Maple Leafs to a related party. The bankrupt person’s largest single consumer creditor was Canada Revenue Agency for unpaid income tax. The company in receivership was also a creditor as the president owed the company money. The secured creditor of the company was also an unsecured creditor of his in his personal bankruptcy for the personal guarantee on the shortfall.

The known creditors each filed their respective proof of claim in his bankruptcy, including the company by its privately-appointed receiver. We believed that the company by its receiver was a creditor for the amount of the shareholder loan owing to the company. The proof of claim they filed was for a much larger amount. As Trustee, we neither admitted nor disallowed any proofs of claim filed in this bankruptcy estate. The Trustee would have to take a cold hard look at the receiver’s proof of claim at some future date it is determined that a dividend will be paid to the creditors in this bankruptcy estate, which is highly unlikely.

What does receivership mean: The receiver opposes a bankruptcy discharge

Only one unsecured creditor opposed the bankrupt’s discharge. That was the receiver, or more correctly, the company in receivership by its privately-appointed receiver. The Trustee had not opposed. The lender, as an unsecured creditor, did not oppose either along with the other consumer creditors.

As I mentioned, in April 2021, the discharge hearing was held before the Master sitting as Registrar in Bankruptcy Court. The court raised a novel issue. Does the receiver have the standing to oppose the bankrupt’s discharge? The court allowed the hearing to be completed and allowed the parties to file further submissions, subsequent to the hearing, on this issue. Submissions were received from us, the
Trustee and from the Receiver in mid-May, 2021. The bankrupt took no position on the issue.

Does the Receiver have standing to oppose the bankrupt’s discharge?

Here is what I wrote to the court.

The security documents under which a privately-appointed receiver is appointed will determine if an unsecured amount owing by a bankrupt debtor is an asset secured by security held by a creditor over the assets of another party. If so, then the privately-appointed receiver has the right to file a proof of claim in the debtor’s bankruptcy as part of attempting to realize upon that asset forming part of the secured creditor’s collateral.

In doing so, the privately-appointed receiver is acting as Agent for the secured creditor. If the privately-appointed receiver files a proof of claim in the bankruptcy that is not disallowed by the licensed insolvency trustee administering the bankruptcy estate, then, in order to oppose the discharge of the bankrupt, the privately-appointed receiver must also be able to be the Agent for the debtor in receivership.

If the security under which the privately-appointed receiver is appointed allows for that receiver to operate the business of the debtor in receivership, then that receiver has the ability to be an Agent of the debtor in receivership and bring a claim in the name of that debtor.

In this matter, of the various pieces of security held by the secured creditor, only the General Security Agreement (the “GSA”), allows a receiver appointed in writing under it to operate the business of the debtor company. Under the GSA, the privately-appointed receiver has the ability to act as both Agent of the secured creditor and Agent of the company. The appointment letter appointing the receiver confirms that the appointment is under all security held, including the GSA.

Therefore, my opinion was that although we have concerns about the amount being claimed, the receiver has the ability to both file a proof of claim in this bankruptcy and oppose the discharge of the bankrupt as an Agent of the company. I believed it aided the administration of this bankruptcy to allow the receiver to oppose because it is able to draw the attention of the court to conduct of the bankrupt of which the court otherwise might not be aware of.

Finally, I advised the court that if there still was concern that it is formal defect or irregularity section 187(9) of the BIA, the court can determine that such formal defect or irregularity will not invalidate the opposition to the discharge of the bankrupt.

What the bankruptcy court decided

The court accepted our submission and agreed with it. The court continued to be skeptical of the amount of the company’s proof of claim filed by the receiver. The court noted that as Trustee, I reported that the bankrupt has fulfilled all statutory duties. Income and expense statements were provided and there was no surplus income payable.

On a general perusal of the Trustee’s s. 170 report, the Trustee does not report any significant misconduct or concerns but reserved its rights as to its position on the discharge pending the hearing and matters disclosed therein. In the court’s view, the Trustee’s non-opposition to discharge is a factor favouring the bankrupt’s discharge. After considering all facts, the court gave the bankrupt an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.

What does receivership mean summary

I hope that you found this what does receivership mean Brandon Blog helpful in describing the role of a privately appointed receiver especially in opposing the discharge of the bankrupt guarantor of the company’s secured debt. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt. You may not need to file for bankruptcy.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags Bankruptcy, bankruptcy and insolvency act canada, bankruptcy proceeding, bankruptcy protection, Bankruptcy vs. receivership, BIA, Canada Revenue Agency, Canadian bankruptcy process, CCAA, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, company directors, company into receivership, company voluntary files for bankruptcy, Court-appointed receivership, debtor, defaults on loan payments, Employee Rights in Bankruptcy Protection and Bankruptcy⁄Receivership, licensed insovency trustee, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, OSB, personal guarantee, Privately-appointed receivers, receivership, Receivership - a typical appointment, Receivership is for secured claims, receivership proceeding, secured creditor, secured debts, troubled company, troubled company stable, trustee, unpaid income tax, unsecured creditors, Wage Earner Protection Program, Wage Earner Protection Program Act, WEPPA, What does receivership mean

Brandon Blog Post

REVERSE VESTING ORDER: 1 REMARKABLE CREATIVE WAY TO DO FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 2, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click play on the podcast.

Vesting order and reverse vesting order

In a corporate insolvency case, a court may grant a vesting order, which authorizes the sale of a company’s assets to the buyer once the purchase price is paid. A vesting order vests ownership in the purchaser as a result of this court order. This is proof that the purchaser is entitled to transfer the assets into its name. No matter what insolvency process is used, this is the use of a vesting order.

In the past year or so, a new trend has emerged regarding the sale of the assets of insolvent companies as part of a restructuring under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). That new trend is the use of a reverse vesting order.

In this Brandon Blog, I explain what a reverse vesting order is and why I believe its use will be a significant feature of Canadian firm restructurings in 2021 and beyond.

Reverse vesting order – A powerful tool for maximizing recovery in complex insolvencies

A reverse vesting order can be very useful in complex insolvencies. A timely recovery can benefit creditors, and the process can maximize recoveries for all parties. Reverse vesting orders are a good solution for an insolvent debtor corporation when:

there are a large number of secured creditors, unsecured creditors and assets;
all of the assets do not have an immediate buyer;
the company is insolvent; and
the company must deal with unwanted assets and a group of creditors in a particular way.

It is best used in a large-scale CCAA corporate restructuring but is not limited to that.

reverse vesting order

Reverse vesting order as a third restructuring tool

There have traditionally been two insolvency processes available to licensed insolvency trustees, insolvency lawyers, and company stakeholders. The two are (i) liquidating assets; and (ii) reorganizing companies. In general, assets are liquidated through either receivership or bankruptcy. Incorporated companies can restructure either under the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or, for larger and more complex restructurings, under the CCAA. It is obvious that assets must be sold in order to liquidate them.

Sometimes, as part of a corporate restructuring, there are redundant and unwanted assets that can be sold to raise cash. The question is, what if the real value, especially a going-concern value of a company in a commercial insolvency case is not in its tangible assets. Rather, its real value lies in:

the ability to operate in a specific industry and such licenses cannot be sold by their very nature and wording – think of the cannabis and nursing home industries as two examples;
tax losses and tax attributes that can be monetized if the licensed insolvency trustee is also able to take over the shares; or
being listed on the stock exchange and thus as a public company having a greater market value than a private corporation.

As a result, it is extremely difficult to realize any value from such assets.

What is the importance of the reverse vesting order? How a reverse vesting order works will tell you all you need to know about why it is important as a third restructuring tool. Under a reverse vesting order, a newly incorporated residual corporation is added as a party to the CCAA proceedings.

As part of the CCAA restructuring, the operating debtor company transfers undesirable assets and liabilities to the newly incorporated non-operating company. With its assets and liabilities selected by the purchaser, the debtor company holds only the desirable assets and liabilities, which means its common shares can be sold rather than the company’s assets. As a result, valuable permits, contracts, tax losses, and statutory authority are preserved, which can otherwise be lost in a disposition of assets.

Why is reverse vesting order important?

A reverse vesting order is an alternative to the traditional CCAA plans of arrangement, particularly for companies operating in highly regulated environments or when there is no value remaining after the realization of secured debt and the parties intend to continue the running of the debtor company.

A reverse vesting order is an alternative to the traditional CCAA plans of arrangement, particularly for companies operating in highly regulated environments or when there is no value remaining after the realization of secured debt and the parties plan to continue operating the debtor company.

By using a reverse vesting order, existing corporations, which have been streamlined to become solvent through an innovative solution, are transferred to new investors instead of desirable assets being sold through a court-approved sale. The debtor corporation that initially filed for bankruptcy protection under the CCAA can now be removed from the restructuring proceedings. There are certain unwanted assets and unwanted liabilities that are transferred to the newly incorporated residual corporation. There can then be asset sales allowing for some sort of distribution to creditors (either in a plan of arrangement or in bankruptcy) in order to allow some creditor recovery.

A reverse vesting order may prove to be the most efficient approach to facilitate a going concern operation transfer through restructuring proceedings, letting businesses emerge from CCAA proceedings quickly without having filed a plan of arrangement, while preserving key attributes of the corporate entity and its existing corporate structure.

Legal challenges to the use of reverse vesting orders have been unsuccessful. I would like to discuss the case of Nemaska Lithium Inc.

Reverse vesting order issued by Québec Superior Court after first contested hearing

In December 2019, Nemaska Lithium Inc. and related companies (Nemaska Lithium or the Nemaska entities) commenced CCAA proceedings. A lithium mining project was developed in Quebec by them. A CCAA judge approved an uncontested sale or investment solicitation process (SISP) in January 2020 that led to the acceptance of a bid that was subject to the condition that a reverse vesting order is issued.

A proposed reverse vesting order provides that Nemaska entities will be acquired by the bidder free of the claims of the unsecured creditors, which will be transferred as part of a pre-closing reorganization to a newly incorporated non-operating company.

The reverse vesting order will allow the purchaser to continue to operate the Nemaska entities in a highly regulated environment by maintaining their existing permits, licences, authorizations, essential contracts, and fiscal attributes. In essence, it is a credit bid in which the shares of the Nemaska entities are acquired in exchange for the assumption of the secured debt.

A shareholder (who was also an alleged creditor) filed motions opposing the reverse vesting order issuance on multiple grounds, including:

a vesting order cannot be granted for anything other than a sale or disposition of assets through a vesting order for sales of assets;
the reverse vesting order is not permissible under the CCAA because it allows the Nemaska entities to exit CCAA protection outside of a plan of arrangement or plan of compromise;
this reverse vesting order contemplated a corporate reorganization that is not permitted by securities laws; and
in light of the proposed transaction, the directors and officers of Nemaska Lithium Inc. should not be released.

The Honourable Justice Gouin, J.S.C., reviewed and assessed:

the SISP process which led to the offer;
the lack of alternatives to the offer;
the potential harm to Nemaska Lithium‘s stakeholders, including its employees, creditors, suppliers, and the Cree community;
stopping the restructuring process to relaunch a SISP in the future following what was already a thorough examination of the market or, alternatively,
bankrupting the Nemaska entities.

In light of all these factors, the judge approved the reverse vesting order on October 15, 2020. Limiting the remedies available under the CCAA would unnecessarily hinder the development of innovative solutions for more complex commercial and social issues in Canadian insolvency matters.

The decision and formal recognition of reverse vesting order by the Court of Appeal

Leave to appeal the CCAA judge‘s decision was sought by the parties who objected to the reverse vesting order being made. The Appellate Court carefully considered the judge’s decision-making process and particularly that the Québec Superior Court judge relied extensively on the principles set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the matter of 9354-9186 Quebec inc. c. Callidus Capital Corp., namely the:

development of CCAA proceedings and the role of the CCAA supervising judge;
remedial objectives of Canadian insolvency laws to provide timely, efficient, and impartial resolution of a debtor’s insolvency, secure fair and equitable treatment of creditors’ claims against a debtor, protect the public interest, and balance the costs and benefits of restructuring or liquidating the debtor company’s assets;
CCAA‘s goal of preventing social and economic losses from liquidating insolvent companies by facilitating their reorganization and survival as a going concern; and
CCAA judge‘s broad discretion under s. 11 of the CCAA in an effort to advance the CCAA’s remedial objectives while taking into account three fundamental factors that the debtor company application must prove: (1) the requested order is appropriate in the circumstances, and (2) good faith on the part of the applicant, and (3) the applicant has been acting with due diligence.

It was determined by the Court of Appeal judge that the risk of potential harm to stakeholders outweighed any legal merits of any arguments raised by the opposing parties. Therefore, the Quebec Court of Appeal denied the leave to appeal the decision of the CCAA judge.

Canada’s Supreme Court has denied leave to appeal. Having now established reverse vesting as an option for CCAA restructurings, the law is now set in stone.

The Nemaska case is the first reverse vesting order transaction to withstand judicial scrutiny in Canada and reaffirms the flexibility of CCAA proceedings for distressed M&A transactions of distressed businesses.

Reverse vesting order and distressed M&A opportunities

I hope that you found this reverse vesting order Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you or your company are in business distress, cash-starved and cannot repay debts. There are several insolvency processes available to a company or a person with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags 9354-9186 Quebec inc. c. Callidus Capital Corp., Appellate Court, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, Canadian insolvency, CCAA, CCAA judge, CCAA proceedings for distressed M&A transactions, CCAA supervising judge, commercial insolvency, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, corporate insolvency, corporate reorganization, corporate restructuring, court-approved sale, covid-19 pandemic, debtor company, debtor corporation, distressed businesses, going-concern value, insolvency processes, insolvent, insolvent companies, Ira Smith Trustee, leave to appeal, Nemaska entities, Nemaska Lithium Inc., newly incorporated non-operating company, newly incorporated residual corporation, plan of arrangement, plan of compromise, plans of arrangement, receivership, remedial objectives, restructuring tool, reverse vesting order, Reverse vesting order as a third restructuring tool, Reverse vesting order issued by Québec Superior Court after first contested hearing, Reverse vesting order – A powerful tool for maximizing recovery in complex insolvencies, sale or investment solicitation process, secured creditors, SISP, Supreme Court of Canada, The decision and formal recognition of reverse vesting order, undesirable assets, unsecured creditors, unwanted assets, vesting order, vesting orders, Why is reverse vesting order important

Brandon Blog Post

WHERE IS LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY WITH ITS HELPFUL CONCLUSIVE COMPENSATION CLA1MS PROCESS?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 28, 2021

where is laurentian university

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Where is Laurentian University in dealing with ‘An ugly stain for years to come’: Laurentian University students, staff reeling from cuts

As regular Brandon Blog readers know, I have been writing about the financial difficulties leading to the Laurentian University creditor protection filing under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) as major events unfolded. The filing for bankruptcy protection was to allow for ongoing operations to continue and to come up with a Plan of Arrangement to deal with creditor claims.

The end of this week was scheduled to be another milestone in the Laurentian CCAA insolvency process, but it appears that event won’t happen on time. The purpose of this Brandon Blog is to discuss where is Laurentian University at with its compensation claim process for current and terminated faculty and staff?

Laurentian University situation so dire, it couldn’t afford to pay staff

This post-secondary institution faced a cash crisis and many financial issues leading to having filed its application for creditor protection on February 1, 2021. So far, I have written on:

LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY FACING INSOLVENCY MAKES STARTLING CCAA NEWS FILING FOR CREDITOR PROTECTION. I wrote about what creditor protection in the Canadian context is for companies under financial strain and why Laurentian University did so.
LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY INSOLVENCY RESTRUCTURING – OUR UPDATED GUIDE ON ITS MASSIVE CUTS TO GAIN FINANCIAL HEALTH. I discussed what went wrong in this Northern Ontario Sudbury-based university leading to the Laurentian University insolvency restructuring.
LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY IN SUDBURY: THE LAURENTIAN FEDERATED UNIVERSITIES SUFFERED A CRUSHING DEFEAT. I explained the court rulings in favour of Laurentian University in Sudbury in its effort to terminate all of its federated agreements with the independent universities: the University of Sudbury, Thorneloe University and Huntington University.
COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT: CREDITORS ARE NOW ABLE TO MAKE BOLD CLAIMS AGAINST LAURENTIAN. I wrote about the CCAA Claims Process having begun, other than for compensation claims of current and terminated faculty and staff. I described the rules for creditors to file their claims.
LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY OF SUDBURY: LAURENTIAN SCORES HUGE WIN OVER THORNELOE UNIVERSITY. I discussed the Laurentian University of Sudbury decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario concerning the request of one of the independent universities, Thorneloe University.
CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD TORONTO: COURT READILY APPOINTS FIRM TO REVIEW LAURENTIAN’S MASSIVE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS. I discussed the Cushman Wakefield Toronto appointment as the Sudbury school plans a real estate review in Phase 2 of its court-guided restructuring process. The purpose of the independent third-party review is to see what Laurentian University might sell to get out of its financial hole and get it back onto a proper financial footing.

Where is Laurentian University with the Amended and Restated Claims Process Order?

I previously wrote about the Laurentian University Amended and Restated Claims Process Order (A&R Claims Process Order) when it was obtained from the Court on May 31, 2021.

Among other things, the A&R Claims Process Order developed a claims process to recognize, identify and deal with certain claims of creditors. The A&R Claims Process Order left out Compensation Claims to allow Laurentian, with the help of the Monitor and in discussions with the Laurentian University Faculty Association (LUFA) and also Laurentian University Staff Union (LUSU), to establish a process as well as a method for the identification of Compensation Claims.

Compensation Claims usually consist of the claims of current and previous employees, retirees, and also the labour unions relative to employment, benefits, pension, and/or labour contracts among the stakeholders and Laurentian University, and also claims of specific third parties relative to involvement of their employees in the retirement health benefit plan.

In their application to Court last May, Laurentian University told the Court that they would be back to have the Compensation Claims process approved no later than July 30, 2021.

Where is Laurentian University with its creditor protection compensation claims program now?

Laurentian told the Court that its Compensation Claims process will:

develop the key groups of claims to be covered in a Compensation Claims
procedure;
determine what info and also how the information needed to calculate such
claims can be assembled based upon the information in the hands of Laurentian and third-party service providers;
develop the Compensation Claims Methodology; and
think about alternate procedures for notice as well as claims handling.

In its motion record dated July 23, 2021, Laurentian has advised the Court that although it is working diligently with the Monitor, LUFA and LUSA, Laurentian will not be able to serve materials explaining its Compensation Claims process in time to seek Court approval no later than July 30. So, Laurentian is asking for an extension from July 30 to August 20, 2021. In the motion record, it is not stated exactly where is Laurentian University in this process. Laurentian has advised that its lawyers have booked time with the Court to hear the motion on August 17, 2021, at 9:30 AM.

UPDATE: On July 28, 2021, the Court approved amending paragraph 46 of the Claims Process Order to extend the date that Laurentian University must bring a motion to the Court to seek approval of: (a) the Compensation Claims Methodology, and (b) the process for notification of Employees and claims process, from “no later than July 30, 2021” to “no later than August 20, 2021”.

***Where is Laurentian University? Ask current President* *Dr. Robert Haché***

In support of this motion for an extension of time, the motion material includes the affidavit of Dr. Robert Haché, University President and Vice-Chancellor of Laurentian University of Sudbury, sworn on July 23 (the Haché Affidavit).

The Haché Affidavit really doesn’t say much and unfortunately, it does not say exactly where is Laurentian University in the finalization of the Compensation Claims process. It summarizes the background about the bilingual university financial troubles as to how this post-secondary education institution got to where it is today in the Laurentian CCAA insolvency process and advises the Court that:

Laurentian and the Monitor have been working diligently on settling the Compensation Claims Methodology, nonetheless, as a result of a variety of competing and urgent demands put on the University’s limited resources, (which presumably includes the demands of day to day operations) development has actually been slower than expected.
Although the information-gathering phase took longer than anticipated, drafts of the Compensation Claims Methodology have been prepared and also shown to LUFA and LUSU.
Regardless of best efforts, Laurentian was not able to finalize the Compensation Claims process in order to have everything in time for the Compensation Claims Methodology to be provided for Court authorization by July 30, 2021, based on the A&R Claims Process Order.
Therefore, the University looks for a short extension to that date. This requires a change to paragraph 46 of the A&R Claims Process Order to prolong the day whereby Laurentian can bring a motion to the Court to seek the authorization for the Compensation Claims Methodology to no later than August 20, 2021.

The Haché Affidavit is light on details as to what the issues getting in the way are, what has been agreed to so far and where is Laurentian University in all this? Close or still far off? It provides no real useful information to determine where is Laurentian University on this issue. My review of documents that were made public sheds no more light than what I am telling you in this Brandon Blog. They are obviously hoping that this request will not meet with any opposition so that it will allow for a positive impact on the financial restructuring.

So, unfortunately, there is no real insight into what is holding up the Compensation Claims process for claims of current and former faculty and staff, including severance payments, which certainly will be in the millions of dollars.

I doubt that anyone will wish to try to upset the restructuring over this issue. As of the time of writing this Brandon Blog, there is not a current Monitor’s Report in support of this motion yet made public.

Where is Laurentian University in all of this? I suspect that Laurentian will receive the extension it is requesting.

Where is Laurentian University summary

I hope that you found this where is Laurentian University Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags 'An ugly stain for years to come': Laurentian University students, A&R Claims Process Order, application for creditor protection, CCAA, CCAA Claims Process, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, compensation claims, Compensation Claims Methodology, Court of Appeal for Ontario, creditor protection, Cushman Wakefield Toronto, Dr. Robert Haché, financial difficulties, financial issues, financial strain, Huntington University, independent third-party review, independent universities, insolvency, it couldn't afford to pay staff, Laurentian, Laurentian CCAA insolvency, Laurentian University, Laurentian University creditor protection, Laurentian University Faculty Association, laurentian university of sudbury, Laurentian University situation so dire, Laurentian University Staff Union, LUFA, LUSA, post-secondary institution, staff reeling from cuts, Sudbury school plans a real estate review in Phase 2 of its court-guided restructuring process, Thorneloe University, University of Sudbury, University President, where is Laurentian University

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY LAWYER IN TORONTO VS. BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE IN TORONTO: WE EXPLORE AND EXPLAIN COMPLETELY THE DIFFERENCES FOR YOU

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 19, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

Bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto introduction

Canada is recognized for its cultural diversity, but it can be a battle to locate trustworthy information on the nation’s laws. Bankruptcy is a difficult topic to learn about; both learning the technical side and dealing with the emotional one.

If you or your company are thinking about bankruptcy, you might think you need a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto. However, you do not necessarily require one. A licensed insolvency trustee in Toronto (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee in Toronto) can help you pick the perfect insolvency process for you and make certain that you survive it as best as possible.

In this Brandon Blog, I discuss the roles of a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto and a licensed insolvency trustee. Sometimes they can overlap and many times they do not. We will take a detailed look at a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto vs a licensed insolvency trustee. We will discuss the differences between the two and exactly how they can each help you.

Bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto – Do you need one to file personal bankruptcy?

Whether it is personal bankruptcy proceedings, or one of the formal alternatives to bankruptcy such as a consumer proposal or a Division I Proposal that are being contemplated, a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere is not involved in the actual bankruptcy filing. or the Canada – restructuring & insolvency filing. That is what trustees in bankruptcy do.

When a person or company is contemplating an insolvency process, they can get a no-cost consultation with any one of the bankruptcy trustees they choose to meet with. During the consultation, information is gathered by the Trustee, analyzed and possible solutions are discussed.

Trustees must always be careful to not tread into areas that could possibly give them a conflict in providing their financial services. People wanting advice on asset transfers, asset protection, or preferring one or more creditors over others are areas that Trustees should not wade into.

In situations like that, I always advise potential bankruptcy clients that as there is no privilege in our discussions and we should not talk about those things so that I will not be conflicted. Rather, the person should get advice from a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere where the discussions and the legal advice are protected by solicitor-client privilege.

Do You Need a personal bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto to get your bankruptcy discharge?

As I have written before in several Brandon Blogs, there are 6 possible outcomes in a bankrupt’s application for discharge. This depends on whether the discharge is being opposed by either the Trustee and/or one or more creditors. The possible bankruptcy discharge outcomes are:

Automatic – This discharge is absolute and is given by the Trustee at the earliest possible time the bankrupt person is entitled to a discharge. It means that the bankruptcy has performed all of his or her duties, has fully cooperated with the Trustee and nobody has opposed the discharge.
Absolute – An absolute discharge is obtained when the Trustee issues the automatic discharge. it is also possible to obtain an absolute discharge when a creditor opposes the bankrupt’s discharge, the matter goes to court for a hearing, but the court does not believe the evidence presented by the opposing creditor is persuasive and the court orders an absolute discharge.
Conditional – In this type of discharge, there was opposition to the bankruptcy receiving an absolute discharge. The court considered the evidence and concluded that the bankrupt must fulfill one or more conditions before being entitled to a discharge from bankruptcy. More often than not, a conditional discharge includes a certain amount of money the bankrupt must pay to the Trustee for the general benefit of the creditors.
Suspended – A suspended discharge is given when there is opposition to the bankrupt’s discharge and the matter goes to court for a discharge hearing. Based on the evidence, the court believes that the bankrupt, either before or during the bankruptcy estate file administration, has conducted himself or herself in such a way that although a discharge will be given, it should be delayed. The suspension acts to delay the discharge and can be combined with conditions.
Refused – The bankrupt’s discharge is opposed probably by at least the Trustee and probably one or more creditors. There is sufficient evidence before the court that the bankrupt has not lived up to his or her duties and has probably failed to fully cooperate and provide full disclosure to the Trustee. The court, based on the evidence, refuses to consider the bankrupt’s application for discharge until such time as the bankrupt performs all duties and discloses all information.
No order – This is not an actual discharge type, but can be the outcome of a discharge hearing. The court can issue a “no order” instead of a refusal. The facts are probably similar to when the court can issue a refusal. However, in a “no order” situation, the bankrupt remains in bankruptcy but the Trustee is then free to pursue its discharge. Once the Trustee gets its discharge, the bankrupt lose the protection offered by the stay of proceedings. Creditors are then free to pursue all of their rights and remedies against the bankrupt in the enforcement of their trying to collect their respective debts.

When the time comes for the bankrupt to get his or her discharge from bankruptcy, if the Trustee or a creditor opposes, the bankrupt would be well advised to consult with a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere. The Trustee cannot give an automatic discharge and the matter is going to court for a trial. The bankrupt should get the benefit of legal advice and probably will need to retain the lawyer to provide legal services in representing the bankrupt in court. That is not the job of the Trustee.

Corporate Bankruptcy in Canada – Corporate bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Canada – Do you need one to file corporate bankruptcy?

As I will explain, every Canadian corporate insolvency file requires probably several, not just one bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere. Insolvency law is complex and lawyers will help all the parties involved.

The current economic climate in Canada is going to be challenging for Canadian businesses and I expect there will be many financial difficulties. Government COVID-19 support programs are scheduled to end soon. Companies have been tapped out while shut down just trying to stay alive with little or no revenue being earned. Companies will need cash now that it is time to start everything up again. No doubt there will be business casualties.

However, not all businesses are created equal. Some will be able to restructure, some will file for bankruptcy and others will merely shut their doors and fade away.

Among the keystones of a restructuring proceeding under either the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act or the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act is the debt workout. The restructuring is designed to maintain the debtor’s business and negotiate a financial debt repayment strategy with its creditors. The aim is to save jobs, allow the company to continue while avoiding bankruptcy liquidation.

Key components of a debt workout normally include debtor-in-possession lending (DIP lending) while the company is reorganizing, new capital for the company coming out of its restructuring and getting unsecured creditors, and possibly secured creditors, to agree to accept less than they are owed. In the very large corporate restructuring files, there are normally lending syndicates due to large and complex lending arrangements. They too will need lawyers to help them with the insolvency law.

If a restructuring proceeding is not possible or does not succeed, then either the company’s secured creditor will begin receivership enforcement proceedings or the company will file an assignment in bankruptcy or a creditor will launch a bankruptcy application to put the company into bankruptcy.

In every corporate insolvency file, legal services are required by all the stakeholders. Canadian counsel plays an important part in providing advice. In the larger files, a large team of lawyers will be needed for both the company and its main creditors. The Board of Directors will need their own independent legal team. The bankruptcy trustee in Toronto will also need a dedicated team of lawyers to help navigate through the formal restructuring in court or help in a court-appointed receivership, private receivership or bankruptcy.

As you can see, in pretty well every corporate file, a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto or elsewhere is pretty well a must-have requirement. Lawyers will be able to help the company, its Board of Directors, its creditors and the insolvency professional create effective solutions. The best ones will also make sure that they are also practical solutions.

**Other situations where you could need a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Barrie, GTA, or elsewhere**

When looking for a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Barrie, GTA and elsewhere, you want to find one that has substantial experience. Depending on the situation you or your company are involved in, the experience could be in one or more of:

financial reorganizations;
debt reorganizations and debt restructurings;
debtor legal rights and creditor rights;
security enforcement;
forbearance/standstill arrangements;
lender liability suits;
receivership and related matters for banks or other secured lenders, court and privately appointed receivers;
insolvency and bankruptcy litigation or other complex matters; and
acting for receivers and Trustees, debtors, secured creditors, unsecured creditors or any other stakeholder in an insolvency process.

Take Your First Step Towards A Debt Free Life

I hope that you found this bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto Brandon Blog interesting and that you now have a better appreciation for when getting bankruptcy legal advice is necessary. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline and practical financial advice. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost bankruptcy consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags alternatives to bankruptcy, bankrupt's application for discharge, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy discharge, bankruptcy filing, bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto - Do you need one to file personal bankruptcy?, bankruptcy litigation, bankruptcy trustee in toronto, bankruptcy trustees, barrie, Board of Directors, Canada, Canada - restructuring & insolvency, Canadian counsel, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, company into bankruptcy, complex matters, Consumer Proposal, Corporate Bankruptcy in Canada - Corporate bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, corporate insolvency, creditor rights, debt restructurings, dedicated team, Division I Proposal, Do You Need a personal bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto to get your bankruptcy discharge?, effective solutions, financial difficulties, GTA, insolvency law, legal advice, legal services, legal team, lender liability suits, lending syndicates, licensed insolvency trustee, licensed insolvency trustee in toronto, practical solutions, restructuring proceeding, team of lawyers, trustees in bankruptcy, unsecured creditors

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE ORDER: OBSESSED CREDITOR LOSES APPEAL OF THE DISCHARGE ORDER

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 12, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

What does bankruptcy discharge mean in Canada?

A bankruptcy filing is a form of insolvency process under Canadian bankruptcy law available to individuals and businesses. Bankruptcy deals with a person’s or company’s debt load and assets. After performing a detailed initial assessment, the licensed insolvency trustee will be in a position to advise the debtor if they will be better serviced through a restructuring process as an alternative to bankruptcy (consumer proposal or Division I Proposal for individuals, Division I Proposal or Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act bankruptcy protection for companies) with creditors, or whether the debtor will be better served filing for bankruptcy.

The final piece of any bankruptcy process for an individual is the bankruptcy discharge. Individuals who go bankrupt are entitled to a discharge from bankruptcy. Companies are only entitled to one if every bankruptcy claim filed is paid in full, with interest. Because this never happens, companies do not receive a bankruptcy discharge. It is not impossible, but for this reason, it really does not happen.

If you are thinking about filing an assignment in bankruptcy, then you may be wondering about the bankruptcy discharge process and how it will affect you. Many people think their debts are eliminated at the moment of their bankruptcy filing.

This is incorrect. It is the bankruptcy discharge that will remove all (with certain limited exceptions) of your unsecured debts from your life and will result in letting you move forward with a clean slate. In this Brandon Blog, I discuss the bankruptcy discharge process and a recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia hearing an appeal to the decision of the Master sitting as bankruptcy registrar on a bankrupt’s application for discharge.

Bankruptcy discharge and its consequences for the bankrupt

When you are granted a bankruptcy discharge, this means that those debts caught by your bankruptcy are no longer your responsibility. This means that every action from creditors or the collection agencies they have retained stops trying to collect the debt obligations.

As I previously mentioned, most almost all debts are wiped off your slate when you receive your discharge from bankruptcy. The kinds of debts that remain even after a bankruptcy discharge are:

spousal or child support payments;
fines or penalties mandated by the court;
claims arising from fraud or fraudulent breach of trust;
student loan debt if less than 7 years have passed since the bankrupt stopped being a part-time or full-time student.
any kind of financial debts that are secured against your assets, such as a home mortgage or automobile financing, are not discharged as a result of your bankruptcy discharge.

These sorts of financial debts endure after bankruptcy as they are not released. The individual will be required to continue paying those financial obligations according to their terms. All various other financial obligations are discharged and do not have to be paid.

What are the types of bankruptcy discharge?

If there is no Trustee opposition or creditor opposition to a bankrupt’s application for discharge, and the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties of a bankrupt, in most situations, the licensed insolvency trustee can issue an automatic discharge which provides the bankrupt with an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.

If there is an opposition or the bankrupt meets one of the criteria that does not allow for an automatic discharge (such as the bankruptcy process finding the bankrupt a high income tax debt situation), there must be a discharge hearing in court which is heard by a Master of the court sitting as the registrar in bankruptcy. There are 4 types of bankruptcy discharge and a 5th bankruptcy outcome is also possible. They are:

absolute – an absolute discharge means the bankrupt is entitled to an immediate discharge. This can be given by the licensed insolvency trustee in the bankruptcy estate handling the bankruptcy administration if the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties and there is no trustee or creditor opposition;
conditional discharge – can get a discharge after meeting one or more conditions. The most common type of condition of discharge involves paying a sum of money to the licensed insolvency trustee;
suspended – the bankrupt’s discharge will take place at a later date and may very well be combined with either an absolute bankruptcy discharge or conditional bankruptcy discharge;
refused– the court refused to grant a bankruptcy discharge probably because the bankrupt has failed to provide full disclosure or perform other bankruptcy duties; or
“no order”– the Trustee advises the court that regardless of the time period that has passed, the bankrupt has actually not satisfied every one of his or her obligations and the bankrupt has actually failed to reply to the Trustee’s demands for information. In this situation, when the “no order” order is provided, the licensed insolvency trustee is at liberty to seek its discharge. Once the bankrupt person has actually fulfilled the requirements set by the court, the bankrupt can re-apply for a discharge hearing by the court.

Bankruptcy is a roughly 9-month legal process to eliminate debt

For a first-time bankrupt with no surplus income who fulfills of their duties, including attending the 2 mandatory credit counselling sessions, they are entitled to their bankruptcy discharge after a bankruptcy period of 9 months from the date of bankruptcy.

If this is your second bankruptcy a discharge will not be available after 9 months. A 2nd bankruptcy lasts for a minimum of 24 months if you do not have any surplus income payments to make to the Trustee. If you have surplus income, a second-time bankrupt must make those monthly payments for 36 months before they are entitled to a bankruptcy discharge.

For a 3rd or subsequent bankruptcy, the timeline is the same as the 2nd time bankrupt. However, it is much more possible that there will certainly be resistance to the discharge by the Trustee or the creditors. The court can also impose whatever conditions it sees fit.

Creditor objects to the decision of the Master on bankrupt’s application for discharge

On July 9, 2021, the decision in Hanlon (Re), 2021 BCSC 1348 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia was released. This was an appeal from an order by the bankruptcy registrar of the Supreme Court of British Columbia dated April 28, 2021 in Hanlon (Re), 2021 BCSC 800, VA B190492. This is an appeal under s. 192(4) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (BIA), from an order of a master of that Court, sitting as a registrar in bankruptcy, granting the bankrupt, Mr. Hanlon, a bankruptcy discharge that was made conditional on his paying $7,500 to the Trustee.

The appellant, Ms. Johnson, is one of Mr. Hanlon’s creditors. She states that the registrar erred in approving the discharge on those terms. If the appeal is allowed, she looks for an order refusing Mr. Hanlon’s application for a discharge, with leave to apply again in two years, or alternatively, giving a discharge conditional on his paying $50,000. The appeal is opposed by both Mr. Hanlon the bankrupt, and the Trustee. The appeal was heard by Judge Milman, Canada’s bankruptcy legislation, the BIA states that a person dissatisfied with an order or decision of a registrar can appeal that decision to a judge of that court who in that capacity is sitting as a bankruptcy judge.

The alleged errors made by the registrar in the making of the order of conditional discharge

Ms. Johnson argued that the registrar made certain errors in granting the conditional bankruptcy discharge order. Ms. Johnson says that in granting the bankruptcy discharge on those terms, the registrar erred as follows:

in concluding that Mr. Hanlon had complied with the injunction resulting from Ms. Johnson’s original successful litigation against Mr. Hanlon when he had not;
in falling short to take into account Mr. Hanlon’s refusal to agree with the accuracy of the trial judge; and
in failing to consider Mr. Hanlon’s real income earning potential.

The standard of review on such an appeal

There is a standard of review on such an appeal from an order of a bankruptcy discharge hearing. S. 192(1) of the BIA gives the bankruptcy registrar the authority to, amongst other things, grant orders of discharge. S. 192(4) of the BIA allows a party dissatisfied with an order or decision of a
registrar may appeal it to a judge.

In granting an order of discharge in the bankruptcy process, the registrar is exercising judicial discretion. If the registrar has acted reasonably, the judge should not set it aside or ignore it. Further, if an appeal from a bankruptcy discharge order is based on alleged errors in findings of fact, the court will not interfere if there is no overriding error in the findings of fact and there is evidence from which the findings of fact could be made. Discretionary decisions may, naturally, be overturned if the registrar has materially misinterpreted the law or made an error in respect of the facts underlying the use of that discretion.

When a registrar’s decision in a bankruptcy discharge hearing imposes conditions, those conditions must be realistic for the bankrupt to perform in a reasonable period of time. Where the amount ordered was unrealistic and the bankrupt’s discharge is conditional on making additional payments, the appeal court did hold that results in an error of law and the appellate judge can either substitute the conditions or refer the matter back to the registrar for reconsideration.

**The judge’s decision on the appeal from the registrar’s bankruptcy discharge order**

The judge dismissed the appeal finding there were no overriding errors made by the registrar. With respect to the amount of $7,500 ordered as a condition of discharge from bankruptcy, the judge found as follows:

Ms. Johnson says that the registrar did not consider Mr. Hanlon’s untapped earning capacity and instead concentrated practically completely on her arguments of his potential inheritance. She suggests that Mr. Hanlon could be earning more than he is. In her opinion, he could earn more to enable him to make a settlement of $50,000 rather than the $7,500 that was ordered.

Mr. Hanlon’s real historic earnings offered adequate assistance for the registrar’s verdict that he was incapable of paying any more than the $7,500 that she ordered for him, did not have the financial prospects himself to do so and without getting personal loans from family members to help him with that. That was properly decided by the registrar based on the evidence before her.

The judge found that there is no merit in this or any other of the grounds of appeal. He found no error in the registrar’s decision, and having found the discharge condition that she imposed to have been reasonable in the circumstances, he dismissed the appeal.

Bankruptcy discharge summary

I hope that you found this bankruptcy discharge Brandon Blog interesting and that you now have a good appreciation for the process at the end of the administration for a person who files for bankruptcy and the considerations of the court if someone appeals a bankruptcy discharge order. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost bankruptcy consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags action from creditors, alternative to bankruptcy, application for discharge, assignment in bankruptcy, automatic discharge, bankruptcy deals, bankruptcy discharge, bankruptcy duties, bankruptcy estate, bankruptcy filing, Bankruptcy Judge, bankruptcy law, bankruptcy legislation, bankruptcy outcome, bankruptcy period, bankruptcy process, bankruptcy protection, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, condition of discharge, condition of discharge from bankruptcy, conditional discharge, Consumer Proposal, creditor opposition, date of bankruptcy, debt load, debt obligations, discharge hearing, Division I Proposal, duties of a bankrupt, files for bankruptcy, filing for bankruptcy, income tax debt, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, mandatory credit counselling sessions, surplus income, Trustee opposition, unsecured debts

Brandon Blog Post

CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD TORONTO: COURT READILY APPOINTS FIRM TO REVIEW LAURENTIAN’S MASSIVE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 7, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Sudbury, Ont., school looks for court approval to move on to Phase 2 of restructuring plan

On June 29, 2021, the Laurentian University CCAA Court-appointed Monitor issued its Fifth Report to Court in the Laurentian University insolvency restructuring under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA). On July 5, 2021, it filed its Supplementary Fifth Report with the Ontario Court.

The report was issued in support of Laurentian’s application to the court for approval to retain a Toronto office of Cushman & Wakefield (Cushman Wakefield Toronto) as Real Estate Advisor to Laurentian. The Supplementary Fifth Report was filed at the direction of the Ontario Court (further described below).

I have previously written about Laurentian University’s court-supervised restructuring in 5 previous Brandon Blogs:

LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY FACING INSOLVENCY MAKES STARTLING CCAA NEWS FILING FOR CREDITOR PROTECTION – February 8, 2021
LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY INSOLVENCY RESTRUCTURING – OUR UPDATED GUIDE ON ITS MASSIVE CUTS TO GAIN FINANCIAL HEALTH – May 5, 2021
LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY IN SUDBURY: THE LAURENTIAN FEDERATED UNIVERSITIES SUFFERED A CRUSHING DEFEAT – May 17, 2021
COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT: CREDITORS ARE NOW ABLE TO MAKE BOLD CLAIMS AGAINST LAURENTIAN – June 14, 2021
LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY OF SUDBURY: LAURENTIAN SCORES HUGE WIN OVER THORNELOE UNIVERSITY – June 28, 2021

The first phase of the Laurentian insolvency process had many parts to it. First was to declare its poor financial situation and file for bankruptcy protection under the CCAA and perform a review of its various contracts, leases, supplier arrangements, the federated university model, its academic offerings and its faculty and non-teaching staffing. As part of this first phase, Laurentian also needed to determine where cuts needed to be made.

Laurentian then implemented the reductions for cost savings including reaching new arrangements with the unions representing its employees to set out the terms of new collective bargaining agreements and to disclaim various agreements, including the federated university agreement with Huntington University, Thorneloe University and the University of Sudbury.

My February 8 and May 5 Brandon Blogs describe these steps in detail.

Next in this phase 1 was getting approval from the Ontario Court to retain a consultant to, amongst other things, perform a governance review and for the Monitor to get approval for the claims process the Monitor approves of. At this stage of the process, Laurentian pulled together a list of creditors; secured creditors and unsecured creditors.

This was all described in my June 14 Brandon Blog, including the changes to the claims process resulting from the hearing in the Ontario Court. The Monitor advised the court that the Monitor approves of the amendment and therefore the amended claims process received court approval.

In this Brandon Blog, I describe the second phase of this insolvency process and the Laurentian restructuring plan now being undertaken. It is the real estate review.

Cushman Wakefield Toronto: Laurentian University plans real estate review to see what could help pay off debt

On July 5, 2021, the Court listened to Laurentian University’s application for an order approving Laurentian to retain Cushman Wakefield Toronto as a realty advisor to do an evaluation of Laurentian’s real estate portfolio, and also its request for a sealing order with respect to the monetary details of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto retainer.

The Monitor advised the court that a significant amount of Laurentian University’s assets is represented by its real estate holdings. This includes the land and buildings on which the primary campus rests in addition to off-campus realty. The Monitor also advised that Laurentian has noted that with the academic and labour force changes lately executed within the CCAA proceedings, there may be opportunities to customize its use of space within different structures. This leads to possibilities to monetize specific real estate assets. Therefore, Laurentian determined, that it was appropriate to involve a real estate consultant to take on a study of its real estate portfolio in order to advise Laurentian on the best way to monetize its available real estate.

The Monitor described its RFP process that had a deadline of May 28 for the submission of proposals from qualified real estate professionals. After the Monitor, Laurentian and its respective legal counsel received certain requests for additional time in order to submit a proposal, the Monitor extended the deadline for submissions to June 1, 2021. The Monitor advised the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List that it received 6 proposals and held meetings with 4 of the parties who submitted a proposal in order to interview each of them.

The Monitor recommended to the court that the proposed contract between Laurentian and Cushman Wakefield Toronto (including the third parties Cushman Wakefiled Toronto advised would be part of its team) be approved. The Monitor also advised the Court that Laurentian would be seeking a sealing order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commerical List concerning the financial terms of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto retainer. Accordingly, a copy of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto proposal excluding any financial terms.

What the court said about the Sudbury school plans a real estate review in Phase 2 of its court-guided restructuring process

Chief Justice Morawetz took issue with the part of the motion that requested the financial terms of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto proposal to continue to be confidential under a sealing order. He directed that the total amount of the retainer be disclosed. Proprietary information such as how Cushman Wakefield Toronto calculated its total fee could remain private.

After evaluating the Confidential Appendix, Chief Justice Morawetz shared his view that specific aspects of the appendix did not contain commercially sensitive or proprietary details. Upon obtaining further instructions, Laurentian legal counsel advised the court that certain portions of the appendix could develop part of the general public record. Therefore the information covered by the sealing order was tightened up.

The sole purpose of the Monitor’s Supplementary 5th Report to Court dated July 5, 2021, was to abide by the Court’s decision that a redacted copy of the financial terms of the Cushman Wakefield Toronto retainer must be filed with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List so that it will become a public document.

Laurentian University owns some of the last undeveloped waterfront on Sudbury’s Lake Nepahwin

So phase 2 of the Laurentian University creditor protection CCAA process is now underway. Laurentian has real estate both on and off-campus that will be reviewed for monetization by Cushman Wakefield Toronto. The monetization will provide the necessary funds to offer to both secured creditors and unsecured creditors in the ultimate financial restructuring plan called a Plan of Arrangement.

Laurentian has some of the last undeveloped waterfront on Lake Nepahwin. Much of that land is bushland, including some prime beachfront property on Lake Nepahwin, where the university has its own beach.

Here is a fun fact about some Laurentian real estate. In recent years, the only public discussion concerning Laurentian’s lands has actually centred on a couple who purchased a residence in the area, just to find out half their backyard, including their septic tank, was encroaching on university property!

The Sudbury couple stated they made offers to Laurentian to purchase the land from them. The latest offer was for them to pay Laurentian $70,000 plus give the university a bigger land parcel in return for the Laurentian land to eliminate the encroachment. Laurentian refused and started a lawsuit against them.

Perhaps as part of the overall financial restructuring, Laurentian can see fit not to continue this war against the Sudbury couple and accept their offer. You would think the Board of Governors has much bigger issues to be concerned about, such as the entire CCAA restructuring including the monetization of the real estate portfolio.

Cushman Wakefield Toronto summary

I hope that you found this Cushman Wakefield Toronto Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. You may have assets that you can monetize to rectify your financial situation. Many do not though.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, whether you need gambling debt help or just plain old debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost bankruptcy consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Bankruptcy services and FAQ information

Bankruptcy services: Who files for bankruptcy and why?

Bankruptcy services: Can bankruptcy clear debt in Canada?

What debts cannot be discharged through personal bankruptcy services in Canada?

Bankruptcy services: How much debt must you accumulate in order to file for bankruptcy in Canada?

Bankruptcy services: What debts are not erased in bankruptcy?

Bankruptcy services: What are the three types of bankruptcies?

Bankruptcy services: What are the consequences for your assets when declaring bankruptcy?

Bankruptcy services: What are the implications of personal bankruptcy on retirement plans?

#1 – The principal residence and bankruptcy

#2 – Your RRSP and bankruptcy

#3 – Bankruptcy and investments

#4 – Bankruptcy and a private pension plan

How bankruptcy services work in Ontario: What is the average length of time for a person to be discharged from bankruptcy in Canada?

Bankruptcy services: Surplus income

Bankruptcy services: Debt problems got you down? Feeling overwhelmed?

Declaring bankruptcy: Business insolvency

Declaring bankruptcy: An overview of corporate bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy: Types of Corporate Bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy: Does corporate bankruptcy affect personal assets?

Declaring bankruptcy: The Medcap case

Declaring bankruptcy: Appealing a bankruptcy order

Declaring bankruptcy: Unable to pay its debts

Declaring bankruptcy: Bankruptcy application for improper motives

Declaring bankruptcy: There is no purpose for this bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy: The final word

Bankruptcy protection: What happens if a company gets into financial trouble?

What happens to the company that files for bankruptcy protection?

A record number of companies have sought creditor protection under COVID-19 and more are on the way?

The bankruptcy protection court case facts

The bankruptcy protection case: The Receiver’s position

The bankruptcy protection case: The supplier’s position

The bankruptcy protection case: The Judge’s decision

Bankruptcy protection: How to cash your insolvent customer’s cheque safely

Bankruptcy protection summary

Pension & Bankruptcy in Canada

Pensions in bankruptcy: Pension and benefits issues in bankruptcy and restructuring

Pensions in bankruptcy: PM Justin Trudeau had his chance to fix this problem

Pensions in bankruptcy: Erin O’Toole vows to force bankrupt firms to pay pensions over executive bonuses

Pensions in bankruptcy: Summary

What does receivership mean: Receivership is for secured claims

What does receivership mean: Bankruptcy vs. receivership

Employee Rights in Bankruptcy Protection and Bankruptcy⁄Receivership

What does receivership mean: Receivership – a typical appointment

What does receivership mean: The bankruptcy of the guarantor

What does receivership mean: The receiver opposes a bankruptcy discharge

Does the Receiver have standing to oppose the bankrupt’s discharge?

What the bankruptcy court decided

What does receivership mean summary

Vesting order and reverse vesting order

Reverse vesting order – A powerful tool for maximizing recovery in complex insolvencies

Reverse vesting order as a third restructuring tool

Why is reverse vesting order important?

Reverse vesting order issued by Québec Superior Court after first contested hearing

The decision and formal recognition of reverse vesting order by the Court of Appeal

Reverse vesting order and distressed M&A opportunities

Where is Laurentian University in dealing with ‘An ugly stain for years to come’: Laurentian University students, staff reeling from cuts

Laurentian University situation so dire, it couldn’t afford to pay staff

Where is Laurentian University with the Amended and Restated Claims Process Order?

Where is Laurentian University with its creditor protection compensation claims program now?

Where is Laurentian University? Ask current President Dr. Robert Haché

Where is Laurentian University summary

Bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto introduction

Bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto – Do you need one to file personal bankruptcy?

Do You Need a personal bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto to get your bankruptcy discharge?

Corporate Bankruptcy in Canada – Corporate bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Canada – Do you need one to file corporate bankruptcy?

Other situations where you could need a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Barrie, GTA, or elsewhere

Take Your First Step Towards A Debt Free Life

What does bankruptcy discharge mean in Canada?

Bankruptcy discharge and its consequences for the bankrupt

What are the types of bankruptcy discharge?

Bankruptcy is a roughly 9-month legal process to eliminate debt

Creditor objects to the decision of the Master on bankrupt’s application for discharge

The alleged errors made by the registrar in the making of the order of conditional discharge

The standard of review on such an appeal

The judge’s decision on the appeal from the registrar’s bankruptcy discharge order

Bankruptcy discharge summary

Sudbury, Ont., school looks for court approval to move on to Phase 2 of restructuring plan

Cushman Wakefield Toronto: Laurentian University plans real estate review to see what could help pay off debt

What the court said about the Sudbury school plans a real estate review in Phase 2 of its court-guided restructuring process

**The bankruptcy protection court case facts**

**The bankruptcy protection case: The Receiver’s position**

**The bankruptcy protection case: The supplier’s position**

**The bankruptcy protection case: The Judge’s decision**

***What does receivership mean: Receivership – a typical appointment***

***Where is Laurentian University? Ask current President* *Dr. Robert Haché***

**Other situations where you could need a bankruptcy lawyer in Toronto, Barrie, GTA, or elsewhere**

**The judge’s decision on the appeal from the registrar’s bankruptcy discharge order**