Tag: Bankruptcy

INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY ACT: ANTI-DEPRIVATION RULE COMPLETELY VALID IN INSOLVENCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 12, 2020

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click on the podcast.

Insolvency and bankruptcy act introduction

On October 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) rendered its decision in Chandos Construction Ltd. v. Deloitte Restructuring Inc., 2020 SCC 25 (Chandos decision). This decision upheld the idea that the anti-deprivation rule is completely valid when it pertains to both personal and business insolvency and bankruptcy act cases.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I describe the Chandos case and what it stands for.

**The definition of the word deprive and the insolvency and bankruptcy act context**

The Merriam-Webster dictionary states the definition of the word deprive is:

1: to take something away from; and
: to withhold something from.

In the Chandos Construction Ltd. (Chandos) insolvency and bankruptcy act case, the SCC was asked to rule on contract clauses that if upheld, would deprive the bankruptcy estate and therefore the unsecured creditors of money that would otherwise be available. This deprivation of funds, which may make total sense as between contracting parties, is not enforceable in bankruptcy.

**The anti-deprivation rule in the Canadian insolvency and bankruptcy act matters**

Neither the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) nor the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) stops non-defaulting parties to a contract, from relying upon agreement provisions that create an inevitable result when a debtor declares bankruptcy. The common law becomes pertinent in these situations.

Canadian courts still refer to these anti-deprivation provisions as “ipso facto” provisions and also this idea as the fraud upon the bankruptcy law concept. In more current times, this has been described as the anti-deprivation rule.

The SCC has recognized the anti-deprivation rule since the 1890s. However, the contemporary application of this principle in Canadian law greatly originates from an Ontario court decision in 1995 – Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Bramalea Inc., 1995 CanLII 7262 (ON SC) (Bramalea decision).

This is a decision from the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division). Canadian courts have thought about and decided upon the anti-deprivation rule in many insolvency and bankruptcy act cases since then.

**The Bramalea case and its relevance of insolvency and bankruptcy act matters**

Luckily for me, Ira Smith was the receiver responsible for the file that involved the Bramalea decision. So, I have a bird’s-eye view of that case which started it all leading to the SCC Chandos decision.

In the Bramalea insolvency and bankruptcy act case, a group of companies, including Bramalea Inc. (Bramalea) was in a partnership agreement to develop and operate a shopping mall in Markham, Ontario called Shoppes on Steeles. In 1995, Bramalea was placed into receivership and bankruptcy. Bramalea’s partners included Sears Canada and a private real estate development company.

Amongst the different provisions of the partnership agreement was a specific provision in the contract which considers insolvency. It said that, in case of the insolvency of any of the partners, the non-insolvent partner(s) (given it does not waive the event of insolvency) can buy the interest of the financially troubled partner at the lesser of book value or fair market value.

The paradox of this case was that the large company partners at the time of the drafting of the partnership contract were concerned about what happens if the private property developer one day became insolvent? None of the partners ever believed that it would be that private company that would be the only one that was not insolvent. We all know what happened to Sears Canada!

The moving parties sought to exercise that right by serving a notification to buy the Bramalea passion at book value, approximated to be around $200,000. This was opposed by the receiver and also other stakeholders.

The receiver gave evidence that the fair market price surpassed book value by as much as $2 million to $3 million. The moving parties acknowledged that the fair market value of Bramalea’s stake in the partnership was more than book value. They did not agree with the receiver’s evidence regarding the amount of that difference. They additionally did not submit their own fair market valuation.

**The Bramalea insolvency and bankruptcy act decision**

Based on the evidence, the court took the view that the specific spread between book value and fair market value was not trivial. The court was satisfied that the distinction is greater than marginal, and enough to properly draw the interest of the receiver and the creditors.

The receiver’s position was that there is a higher principle in play and that the concern is not one of hindering the freedom of contract. Rather it was just one of whether or not that part of the partnership contract is void as being contrary to the public interest.

The receiver submitted that while the arrangement might quite possibly stand as between the contracting parties, it is void as against the receiver and also the bankruptcy trustee in the Bramalea insolvency and bankruptcy act proceedings.

The court agreed with the receiver’s position in this insolvency and bankruptcy act case. The court decided that it was clear from the provisions of the partnership agreement itself that the parties contemplated a transfer to one of the partners of the other partner’s partnership interest, only in case of insolvency, at a price less than what could be acquired for that interest on the open market.

The court specified that this stipulation made perfect sense, as between the contracting parties. It made total sense in regards to maintaining their partnership and their respective interests. Nevertheless, the court likewise specified that the clause cannot survive through the scrutiny of the “fraud on the bankruptcy law” principle.

The receiver ended up selling Bramalea’s partnership interest to the other partners for fair market value.

insolvency and bankruptcy act

**The Chandos Alberta court case and the anti-deprivation rule for insolvency and bankruptcy act matters**

Chandos was the general contractor for a condo project contracted with Capital Steel to give $1.3 million worth of steelwork. In the subcontract, Capital Steel agreed that if it became insolvent, Chandos was entitled to all costs arising from the suspension of the contract and it would forfeit 10% of the total subcontract price as an inconvenience fee. Capital Steel performed the majority of its commitments, nevertheless, it filed an assignment in bankruptcy before completing full performance.

As a result, Chandos was forced to finish the contract at an estimated expense of $22,800. Up until that point, Chandos owed Capital Steel $149,618 in outstanding invoices for the job it had performed.

Chandos relied upon the agreement and said that it was qualified to deduct its cost of finishing the job plus 10% of the total contract cost from the amount owing. Given the price of the subcontract, the 10% deduction eliminated Chandos’ balance owing plus an extra amount of $10,511. Chandos declared that gave them a provable claim in the Capital Steel insolvency and bankruptcy act case.

The Trustee’s application to the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench

On March 6, 2017, the Trustee applied to the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench seeking advice and directions on whether Chandos was entitled to rely on the provision in the contract or was it void pursuant to the anti-deprivation rule in common-law.

The chambers judge acknowledged that the common law anti-deprivation rule stops parties from contracting out of insolvency and bankruptcy act regulations. The judge stated that if that provision was a liquidating damages provision as opposed to a penalty, it would not violate the rule.

The chambers judge ruled that the condition was an authentic pre-estimate of costs, which imposed liquidated damages and not a penalty. He additionally held that the provision represented a bona fide commercial arrangement that did not have as its predominant objective the deprivation of Capital Steel’s property. Consequently, the chambers judge decided that Chandos can implement the clause against the Trustee.

**Trustee appeals the Chandos insolvency and bankruptcy act decision to the Court of Appeal for Alberta**

The Trustee appealed the Chandos decision to the Court of Appeal for Alberta. The appellate court reviewed the lower court decision in this insolvency and bankruptcy act case and decided that:

The chambers court properly determined the presence and application of the fraud on the bankruptcy law principle in Canada.
In describing the scope of the anti-deprivation rule, however, the chambers judge erred.
The lower court embraced the purpose-based technique set out by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
The appropriate technique is to check out the impact of the provision. Its purpose is a different analysis.
Chandos certainly had a genuine commercial interest it was looking to protect.
However, the clause conflicts with the BIA‘s scheme of distribution. The common law anti-deprivation rule revokes the clause and Chandos cannot count on it to defend its claim against the Trustee.

**Chandos appeals to the SCC in this insolvency and bankruptcy act anti-deprivation rule case**

One of the key goals of the insolvency and bankruptcy act law is to make certain there is a fair distribution among creditors. In order to fulfill the objective, the legislation restricts specific contractual stipulations that trigger when one of the parties goes into insolvency proceedings (ipso facto clauses).

As seen in the Bramalea situation, one of these limitations is the anti-deprivation rule. It holds that ipso facto conditions that rob the debtor’s creditors of assets they are qualified to receive in insolvency and bankruptcy act matters are void. This is likewise what the Court of Appeal for Alberta decided. Chandos appealed that decision to the SCC.

The Chandos appeal was heard on January 20, 2020. The SCC split decision was released on October 2, 2020. On the facts of Chandos, the SCC dismissed the Chandos appeal. The SCC refused to promote a contractual stipulation that the subcontractor Capital Steel waive 10 percent of the agreed price if Capital Steel became insolvent or bankrupt.

The SCC majority maintained that the test for application of the contractual provision is effects-based and not purpose-based. The SCC majority confirmed that the anti-deprivation rule stands under Canadian common law and it has not been eliminated in dismissing the appeal in this corporate insolvency and bankruptcy act case.

insolvency and bankruptcy act

Insolvency and bankruptcy act summary

I hope you have enjoyed this insolvency and bankruptcy act Brandon’s Blog. Hopefully, you have better insight now into the fact that a sick insolvent company’s business can be saved by doing a sale of its assets to a healthy organization.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags anti-deprivation rule, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy estate, bankruptcy trustee, bramalea, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Bramalea Inc., capital steel, chandos construction, Chandos Construction Ltd. v. Deloitte Restructuring Inc., fraud on the bankruptcy law, insolvency, insolvency and bankruptcy act, ipso-facto, ira smith team, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, receiver, trustee, unsecured creditors

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE CANADA: THE COMPLETE HAPPY STORY OF YOUR BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 5, 2020

If you would like to listen to the audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada introduction

What is a bankruptcy discharge? When a bankrupt is discharged from bankruptcy, he/she gets a bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada. The individual is launched from the legal responsibility to repay financial debts that existed on the day that the bankruptcy was filed. This is true other than for certain financial debts that are not discharged when the insolvent receives his/her discharge which I will go over listed below.

Usually, only personal bankrupts are discharged from bankruptcy. Companies that are bankrupt remain that way. The only method a company can exit from bankruptcy is if the claims of creditors are paid off with interest. This never occurs. If it could, the company would have submitted a restructuring strategy under either the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA).

Therefore, the balance of this Brandon’s blog will talk about an individual person who receives a bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada.

**Who can issue a bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada?**

Only a Canadian licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee) can carry out the bankruptcy administration and then provide the bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada. If neither the Trustee nor a creditor opposed the discharge and the Trustee issued the certificate, that means the bankrupt individual satisfied all of their obligations without the need for a court hearing.

If either the Trustee or a creditor opposes the discharge of the bankrupt individual, by issuing a notice of opposition to discharge, that indicates:

In the case of a Trustee opposition, that means the bankrupt did not fulfill all of their duties as an undischarged bankrupt when the time came for the Trustee to make that determination if the bankrupt is entitled to a discharge.
One or more creditors believe there is information that needs to be evaluated by the court to determine what kind of discharge from bankruptcy the person should get if any.

The court would then determine what type of bankruptcy discharge the bankrupt should receive:

absolute – entitled to an immediate discharge;
conditional – can obtain a discharge after fulfilling one or more conditions;
suspended – the bankrupt’s discharge will occur at a later date and is combined with either an absolute bankruptcy discharge or conditional bankruptcy discharge;
refused – the bankrupt’s discharge is such that the court refuses to hear the application; or
“no order” – the Trustee advises the court that notwithstanding the time period has elapsed, the bankrupt has not properly fulfilled all of his or her duties and the bankrupt has failed to respond to the Trustee’s requests. In this case, once the “no order” order is issued, the Trustee is at liberty to seek its discharge (more on this below).

Once the bankrupt person has fulfilled the conditions set by the court and/or the suspension period has ended, the Trustee can then issue the bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada: How long will I be bankrupt?

For a 1st time bankrupt person, many will certainly qualify for an automatic discharge after 9 months.

If you have been bankrupt before a second bankruptcy discharge will not be able to get a discharge in 9 months. Your bankruptcy will be prolonged. A 2nd bankruptcy lasts for a minimum of 24 months. If you have surplus income, a second-time bankrupt will not have the ability to get a bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada for 36 months.

For a 3rd time bankrupt, the timeline is the same as the 2nd time bankrupt. Nonetheless, it is more probable that there will be resistance to that bankrupt’s discharge by the Trustee or one or more creditors. The court can prolong the time in whichever means it believes is most suitable.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada: Who tells my creditors that I am discharged from bankruptcy

The Trustee will notify the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) that the individual has been released from bankruptcy. The Trustee advises the OSB by filing a copy of the bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada. The Trustee advised the creditors that the insolvent is qualified to a discharge unless an opposition is filed in the bankruptcy notification sent out to all creditors.

The Canadian credit bureaus, Equifax Canada and TransUnion Canada are notified because they pay the OSB to get Canadian bankruptcy information. The credit bureaus then update all credit files with the corresponding bankruptcy info, including discharges.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada: What debts are not forgiven and will survive my bankruptcy?

What debts cannot be discharged? A bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada provides the discharge of all unsecured debts, except for:

matrimonial or children support payments;
fines or penalties mandated by the court;
claims arising from fraud or fraudulent breach of trust;
student loan debt if less than 7 years have actually passed since the bankrupt stopped being a part-time or full-time student.

These kinds of debts survive bankruptcy and are not released. The person will need to continue paying those financial obligations according to their terms. All other debts are discharged and do not have to be paid.

Also, any debts that are properly secured by one of your assets, such as a house mortgage or car financing, are not released as a result of your bankruptcy or your bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada: What if my creditors still contact me and try to get me to pay them?

If the creditors are consistently calling you and demanding settlement, supply them with a duplicate of your bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada. If the creditor states they were not aware of your bankruptcy, also offer them a duplicate of your sworn statement of affairs revealing them listed as a creditor.

If they are listed, then the Trustee sent them a notice of bankruptcy including a form 31 proof of claim to complete and return to the Trustee.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada: What does trustee discharge mean?

After the Trustee has fully completed the administration of the bankruptcy estate, the Trustee is entitled to its discharge. The Trustee must prove to the OSB that it has completed the administration. This includes providing the OSB with a copy of the Final Statement of Receipts and Disbursements to get the Superintendent’s comment letter.

Then the Trustee must provide the final statement, the comment letter, and other documents to the court to prove that the administration is complete, get the final statement approved, and taxed. When that happens, the court issues the Trustee’s discharge order. The Trustee then files that order with the OSB and closes its file.

It is possible for the Trustee to receive its discharge while the bankrupt remains undischarged. This happens either when the result of the bankrupt’s discharge hearing results in a “no order” (see definition above) or sufficient time has elapsed showing the bankrupt is not going to fulfill the conditions to get a discharge. In this case, the Trustee is at liberty to get its discharge.

Once the Trustee gets its discharge, an undischarged bankrupt loses the protection of the automatic stay of proceedings that were invoked upon the bankruptcy occurring. Once this protection is lost, the creditors are at liberty to once again pursue the bankrupt person for collection on the debts owing.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada: what if I fail to include one of my creditors in my bankruptcy?

If I failed to remember to include one of my creditors in my bankruptcy do I need to pay them? If your Trustee hasn’t been discharged yet, simply tell the creditor to call your Trustee to participate in your bankruptcy.

If your Trustee has actually been discharged then the creditor is qualified to be paid the same returns (% of the debt) your other creditors obtained from your bankruptcy. You will need to pay this amount.

If you intentionally omitted the lender from your bankruptcy (the obligation is on the lender to verify this) after that the lender can ask the court to enable their financial obligation to survive, and if successful, you will need to pay the full amount.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada: What are the benefits of keeping my bankruptcy discharge papers?

As reviewed above, after you have actually successfully finished every one of your bankruptcy responsibilities and any kind of conditions of discharge, you will receive your discharge from bankruptcy. When you get your bankruptcy discharge your Trustee will give you a bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada.

That paper is proof that you have actually formally been launched from your financial debts that were included in your bankruptcy. As already stated, particular financial obligations can’t be discharged in bankruptcy. Also, any type of debts that you sustain after the day of your bankruptcy are your responsibility as well as are not eliminated by your bankruptcy discharge.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada: How long does my credit score take to recover from bankruptcy?

Your bankruptcy will stay on your credit report for 6 years from the date your bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada is issued. If you have actually been bankrupt more than once, then it might be reported for approximately 14 years from the date of your discharge.

Having actually removed your financial obligation problems by getting your bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada, most individuals see they now have the ability to construct a more powerful financial future. Unless you urgently need to purchase a house for the very first time or buy an auto, you need not also bother with getting approved credit to take on debt right away. Many find they have the ability to live without credit considering that they have a more powerful cash flow than prior to bankruptcy. They are now able to start saving.

While you remain in bankruptcy, you are learning to live your life without credit. You are living essentially on a cash basis. You are not spending more than you make. Your Trustee is advising you to do so on an after-tax basis so that you will not have a nasty surprise when tax time comes.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada: 2 simple steps to improve your credit score after your discharge from bankruptcy

This remains for the first 2 or three years after you have actually completed the bankruptcy process. Throughout this time access to credit will be restricted.

We encourage all our bankrupts, once discharged, to immediately start rebuilding their credit. You can slowly start rebuilding your credit through 2 simple steps:

Apply for a secured credit card. This kind of credit card works on the basis that you deposit money against the card with the secured credit card issuer. You then use the credit card like any other. If you pay it off each month, this gets reported to the credit bureaus. This proper use of this credit helps to improve your credit score. If you do not pay the card off when due, the issuer takes the money from your deposit to pay it off.
Take out a small RRSP or TFSA loan. The funds are deposited into your RRSP or TFSA. Make monthly payments against the loan so that the principal and interest are all fully repaid within 1 year. Start small. The important thing is that you do what your cash flow allows. The fact that you are current on your loan is reported monthly to the credit bureaus. This helps to improve your credit score.

Keep in mind that if you do not stay current in paying off your secured credit card balance or your loan, this will further hurt your credit score. The idea is that you have saved this money each month so that you are able to make the monthly payment.

Bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada summary

To declare personal bankruptcy is a major life event. However, it is a necessary thing to rid yourself of crippling debt. Most people who declare bankruptcy have been faced with a major life event. The main examples are illness, pay cuts, job loss, or divorce. It is not your fault. I hope this bankruptcy discharge certificate Canada Brandon’s Blog has given you helpful information.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.
It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

We know that people facing financial problems need realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.
Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags Bankruptcy, bankruptcy and insolvency act canada, bankruptcy discharge, bankruptcy discharge certificate, bankruptcy discharge certificate canada, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, discharged from bankruptcy, form 31 proof of claim, how long does my credit score take to recover from bankruptcy, licensed insolvency trustee, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, OSB, trustee, undischarged bankrupt, what debts cannot be discharged, what if I forgot to include one of my creditors in my bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

DECLARE BANKRUPTCY: A COMPLETE GUIDE ON WHAT IS IT LIKE TO DECLARE BANKRUPTCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date September 30, 2020

What is it like to declare bankruptcy?

What is it like to declare bankruptcy? It is a scary life event, but filing bankruptcy is not as bad or terrifying as the majority of people think. Actually, you have already been through the worst of it before you declare bankruptcy.

If it’s the right option for you, it will get rid of the tension, stress, and anxiety from your life that you have been lugging with you for a very long time. It does not require that much of your time. You will usually have 3 to 4 visits with the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (Trustee). If all works out, you will never ever see the inside of the bankruptcy court and all your debt will be removed.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to describe what it is like to declare bankruptcy and what the bankruptcy process is all about.

When to declare bankruptcy

Bankruptcy law exists to help people who have handled an unmanageable amount of debt. Most of the time, it is a result of unforeseen expenses or other unexpected life events that are no fault of the person. Two main examples of such life events are job loss and illness.

Before deciding to declare bankruptcy, make sure to explore all your alternatives, and weigh the benefits and negative aspects of each reasonable option. Part of the no-cost examination we give everyone is doing precisely that; going through the alternatives, taking into consideration the pluses and minuses of each, and making our ideal professional recommendation to every person’s unique scenario.

If you determine that bankruptcy is your only viable alternative as lots of other Canadians do each year remember that the blot on your credit score will not be forever. By using credit properly in the future and paying your debts on time, you can begin to reconstruct your credit rating and put bankruptcy behind you.

To declare bankruptcy, either a bankruptcy restructuring or bankruptcy liquidation likewise assists companies that have unrestrained debt levels. We also offer solutions to companies and businesses searching for debt settlement help.

declare bankruptcy

**What are the consequences for a person to declare bankruptcy?**

Everyone assumes that if you declare bankruptcy, it takes a massive emotional toll on you. Our experience in working with people we help is the exact opposite. Their financial debts, the fear of not having the ability to pay it off along with the anxiety of the unknown is what is devastating to everyone.

Once people declare bankruptcy, they tell us that the automatic stay of proceedings and the involvement of the Trustee stopping creditors’ collection calls are great benefits. Individuals that file for bankruptcy have already looked over the cliff and feared the worst. When they figure out that their worst worries never happen, and they currently have peace and quiet from collection phone calls, they feel like a weight has been taken off of them. As we tell people, your creditors will certainly now bother the Trustee, not you!

Your bankruptcy is a matter of public record. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) maintains a public database. The Trustee alerts your creditors, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) as well as the OSB of your filing. People can look up any name they wish for $8 per search. Although it is public, very few people spend money to browse the OSB database. It is mainly for Equifax and TransUnion to place on your credit history report. It is also for the federal government to keep data concerning people and companies that declare bankruptcy in Canada. There are no billboards or flashing neon lights with your name on it for all the world to see.

The most effective repercussion when you declare bankruptcy is that you have the chance to release either all or most of your financial debts and start life once again hassle-free.

**How do I declare bankruptcy?**

Anybody who is insolvent and owes more than $1,000 qualifies for personal bankruptcy or also known as a consumer bankruptcy filing in Canada. If you are having a problem meeting your financial responsibilities or have actually stopped satisfying them, you remain in financial trouble.

The primary step is to get in touch with a federally licensed Trustee asap to discuss your options. The Trustee will certainly initially collect info from you regarding your assets, liabilities, your household income, and expenses. This allows the Trustee to get a very good understanding of your one-of-a-kind situation.

You and the Trustee will then review your choices. Bankruptcy is just one of the feasible range of options. There are numerous bankruptcy alternatives which include, however, are not restricted to, debt consolidation and consumer proposals.

The Trustee will use the information you gave to prepare the bankruptcy forms. When you declare bankruptcy, of the various bankruptcy files the Trustee prepares, you are signing, and the Trustee is filing what is called an assignment in bankruptcy.

**What should I do before I declare bankruptcy?**

Many people think there are several things they should do before they declare bankruptcy. Common questions include:

Should I transfer my interest in the matrimonial home to my spouse?
When should I transfer the cash in my bank account to my spouse’s bank account?
Should I stop working or not look for work so that I will not have to make any surplus income payments?

The reality is that by the time you are contemplating bankruptcy, it is too late. The time to do your valid creditor proofing is not when you are insolvent, but when you are solvent! When you are not experiencing any financial problems.

Transferring assets most likely will be successfully attacked by the Trustee. That means that the Trustee will go after the person you have transferred assets to for no or little value. You will not only have protected assets, but you will also have caused your loved one to incur legal costs and have to cough up the assets.

Declaring bankruptcy is an emotional as well as a scary thing. There is only one thing you should do before you declare bankruptcy. You must meet with a Trustee for a no-cost initial consultation and be honest with them. Make full disclosure so that the Trustee can provide you with your realistic options. The Trustee will also fully explain to you what the process will look like and what might happen to you if you declare bankruptcy.

When is bankruptcy a good idea? The answer depends on your situation

Bankruptcy is not naturally negative or excellent, but it is vital for the honest but unfortunate debtor who finds themselves in big trouble with financial debt. Bankruptcy is actually for honest people that have come upon tough times. They need to look to bankruptcy due to the fact that they can’t see a way out. Even the Bible calls for debt mercy at the end of every 7 years (Deuteronomy 15:1).

If you find yourself in a hard financial situation and cannot see a way out, meet with a Trustee. Do not let fears or stereotypes stand in the way of getting the relief and your household need. To declare bankruptcy must be considered as taking a positive step in helping you and your family begin again on the right track.

declare bankruptcy

**Is filing bankruptcy bad? Can it be good?**

You’ll listen to a great many people effectively say: “bankruptcy is bad”. Yet why? Why is the general consensus that filing for bankruptcy is a negative thing? While it is true that when you declare bankruptcy or a consumer proposal it is evidence of difficulty with your finances, that’s not the whole story.

A large part of the reason that people state bankruptcy is bad is that they do not understand the procedure. No two bankruptcy instances are alike. People are forced into bankruptcy for a whole host of different factors, most of which are outside their control and for that reason, not their fault.

What Happens to a company when it goes to declare bankruptcy?

The BIA regulates exactly how companies can liquidate or restructure and recover from crippling debt. An insolvent company may make use of Part III Division I of the BIA to reorganize its business and try to end up being profitable again. Management remains in place to run the daily activities of the company. Any significant change in the business organization should need to be approved by the Trustee, the bankruptcy court, or both.

Under a pure liquidation bankruptcy filing, the company stops operations and goes completely dark. The Trustee is assigned to sell the firm’s possessions and the money is used to pay for the bankruptcy administration and to make a distribution to creditors. The priority of payouts is governed by the BIA.

Trust claimants and secured creditors are paid first. For instance, secured creditors take less risk due to the fact that the money that they lend is backed by the firm’s assets. If the lender is concerned that the assets may not at any time be enough to fully cover the loan, it will also require additional backup by way of the personal guarantee of the entrepreneur. That personal guarantee can be either an unsecured promise or additional collateral by the entrepreneur pledging personal assets. They do this to limit their risk of loss if the company declares bankruptcy.

Bondholders have a better potential for recovery than shareholders because bonds are a financial debt of the business. The company promises to pay interest on the money it takes in through the sale of bonds. The company also promises to repay the principal according to the terms of the bond issuance.

Shareholders own the company and also take a higher risk. They might make more if the company does well, yet they could lose money if the company is not successful. The shareholders are last in line to be repaid if the company stops working. Bankruptcy laws establish the order of payment.

**If I declare bankruptcy, what happens with the CRA garnishee?**

If you declare bankruptcy or file a consumer proposal, personal income tax debt is one type of debt in the category of ordinary unsecured debts. When you’ve filed for bankruptcy or a consumer proposal, CRA can’t take any kind of further collection activity against you. This includes wage garnishment or freezing your bank account. Your Trustee will certainly alert CRA once you declare bankruptcy. The Trustee will also advise CRA to quit any type of collection activity against you.

**What is it like to declare bankruptcy summary?**

To declare personal bankruptcy is a major life event. However, it is a necessary thing to rid yourself of crippling debt. Most people who declare bankruptcy have been faced with a major life event. The main examples are illness, pay cuts, job loss, or divorce. It is not your fault. I hope this Brandon’s Blog has given you helpful information.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.
It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom from one of the alternatives to bankruptcy.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags assignment in bankruptcy, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy and insolvency act canada, bankruptcy liquidation, bankruptcy restructuring, Canada Revenue Agency, Consumer Proposal, debt settlement, declare bankruptcy, declaring bankruptcy, filing for bankruptcy, how do i declare bankruptcy, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, personal bankruptcy, trustee, what is it like to declare bankruptcy, when is bankruptcy a good idea, when to declare bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

DEFAULTING ON A MORTGAGE: THE BEST COURT-APPROVED WAY TO DEBT FREEDOM IN 2020 & BEYOND

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date September 23, 2020

Defaulting on a mortgage introduction

I just finished reading a defaulting on a mortgage decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released on September 15, 2020. It had to do with a person who had filed a proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). The court case is about the debtor who could not afford to pay all the mortgages on her home. The home was sold on a conditional basis, and a dispute occurred between two potential purchasers. I describe below how the court dealt with the dispute.

That case highlighted for me three things:

what we advise everyone who comes to us for a no-cost initial consultation who cannot afford to keep paying a loan registered against an asset, normally a vehicle or house;
how sometimes a strategic default on a mortgage or vehicle loan can help someone in dealing with all of their debts when they are about to file either a proposal or for bankruptcy; and
the appropriate manner (in my view) the court decided to resolve the dispute between the two potential purchasers.

Defaulting on a mortgage: What we advise debtors

Whenever someone comes to us for a no-cost consultation, we first get financial information from them. We want to understand the nature of their assets and liabilities and their household income and expenses. Through our analysis and discussion, we determine if the person can afford to keep paying that loan or mortgage. We also ask them, if appropriate, are they happy with the asset if it seems that they are paying too much based on the level of secured debt and the market value of the asset.

If the person says they would love to get rid of the asset, that they have no or little equity in, then we look at the impact of using defaulting on a mortgage as a strategic default so that any shortfall experienced by the lender will be an ordinary unsecured debt which can be discharged through either a proposal or bankruptcy.

Obviously, the person has to have a realistic option to replace that asset or have an alternate plan:

Can they lease a different vehicle at a lesser cost before filing which they can afford and therefore will not default on?
Is public transit a realistic option as opposed to having their own vehicle for the time being?
Is there a relative who will co-sign for them so that they can lease or buy a more reasonable cost vehicle?
Can they rent somewhere that they can afford for much less than what they have been paying on their home and then look at buying something after they are through their debt restructuring when they are back on their feet?

As I said, we do this all the time when working with people to look at all of their options for financial restructuring. We especially look at in the case of a home, does defaulting on a mortgage make financial sense?

Defaulting on a mortgage: What is a strategic default?

When the market value of your home is less than the amount owed on the mortgage, that mortgage debt is underwater. To put it simply, an underwater home mortgage loan has a higher remaining principal balance than the value of the house.

Homeowners with little or negative home equity can find themselves in this situation when housing prices fall, even if they are current on all their payments. It’s also described as being “upside-down” or having “negative equity” in the residence.

When it doesn’t make sense to keep using your cash to stay current on that underwater mortgage, rather than using that money for other necessary expenses, defaulting on a mortgage as a strategic default may be your only option. After establishing that you can’t see your property rising in value in a reasonable period to restore some of your equity, you may plan to just stop making mortgage repayments. You’ll default and eventually, the lender will enforce on its mortgage, take over the property and sell it.

Even if you have equity in the home, but you can no longer afford to keep up the payments, you may find that putting your home up for sale is your best option. Again, you need to have a realistic plan in place on where you will live once your home sells. Depending on the situation, you might decide to also create a strategic default by defaulting on a mortgage at the same time you list your home for sale. Once sold, the net proceeds of the sale, representing the equity in the home, can be used to help fund the proposal.

During the financial crisis in the United States, a strategic default on underwater homes by defaulting on a mortgage became progressively typical. Such home loans came to a head at 26 percent of all mortgaged homes in 2009. Many house owners did the math and made the agonizing however rational decision to leave the home and let the lender deal with the property and its underwater mortgage.

As I explain in the next section, in most cases, you can just walk away from such a loan in the United States. Unfortunately, it is not so easy for Canadians to walk away from their homes and defaulting on a mortgage. But there is one way to do it in Ontario.

Defaulting on a mortgage: Walking away from a mortgage in Canada is not simple

In the United States, it is normal for a mortgage to be “non-recourse“. What this means is that the lender can only look to the value of the property it has mortgage security against to repay the mortgage loan. If the lender suffers a shortfall, unless there is a separate guarantee given, the lender cannot sue the mortgagor, the borrower, for any shortfall. So if you have negative equity, defaulting on a mortgage may be the right decision for such a US resident.

In Canada, it is normal for a mortgage to be “full recourse“. This means that if the lender suffers a shortfall on the mortgage debt, the terms of the mortgage loan automatically allows the mortgagee, the lender, to go to court and get a judgment against the borrower for the amount of the shortfall. So defaulting on a mortgage needs to be done in conjunction with a plan to deal with the shortfall debt.

For this reason, walking away from a mortgage in Canada is not simple. However, there is one way to do it. Once the shortfall is known and, either before or right after the lender gets a judgment, the debtor can file a proposal under the BIA to restructure all their unsecured debt. If that is not practical, then bankruptcy is the other option.

Now the shortfall is caught in the insolvency proceeding. The filing invokes an automatic stay of proceedings so that the lender cannot take action to try to execute against any of the assets or income of the debtor who has filed. The debt is caught in the insolvency proceeding and will be dealt with in that forum.

Defaulting on a mortgage: The first sale

The court case deals with a woman in Ontario who had begun a proposal process under the BIA. The debtor owned (at least) two residential properties. The property in question had 4 mortgages registered against it. The other property had multiple mortgages against it, including a mortgage as additional security for the 4th mortgage loan against the property in question. To make matters worse, there was also a lien registered against the same residential property in favour of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) in the amount of $308,258.

The 4th mortgage was totally underwater. The debtor entered into an agreement of purchase and sale. The sale of the home would result in a shortfall of over $700,000. It would not provide any funds for the 4th mortgage. It would only partially repay the 3rd mortgage. So, one of the conditions of sale was that the vendor would either get a discharge of all of the mortgages or a court order vesting title in the home to the purchaser clear of all mortgages and other registrations against the title. The 4th mortgagee’s charge against the other home, which was also in 4th position, was also totally underwater.

As part of the proposal proceedings, the debtor brought a motion to the court to approve the sale (supported by appraisals) and get the vesting order to vest title clear of all registrations against the title. The debtor was not only going to be defaulting on a mortgage but on at least 2 of them!

Defaulting on a mortgage: The 4th mortgagee opposes the sale approval motion

The 4^th mortgagee appeared at the motion with her lawyer to get an adjournment in order to oppose the authorization and vesting order and enable her to acquire the home on the same terms but also for even more money. This would enable the 4^th mortgagee to possibly recover something on her outstanding mortgage loan at a later date.

The purchaser or the purchaser’s lawyer was not told in advance that there was going to be an opposition to the application. Therefore, the purchaser’s lawyer did not attend the hearing.

At the hearing, the court authorized the sale and vesting order yet suspended its issuance for 9 days to allow the 4^th mortgagee the chance to make an offer. She did, on the very same terms yet $5,000 greater than the approved offer. She also had the deposit funds put into her lawyer’s trust account. She then made a motion for the approval of her offer and vesting order. Not surprisingly, and as to be expected, the first purchaser objected to her motion.

Defaulting on a mortgage: What the court decided

The 4^th mortgagee’s lawyer argued that the first purchaser’s agreement of purchase and sale is nullified since there was neither discharges provided nor a binding court order vesting title free and clear from all mortgages and the CRA registration by the closing date. Therefore, it cannot now come to court and try to extend the closing of a deal that is already dead.

Legal counsel for the first purchaser argued that if the court approves the 4^th mortgagee as the buyer, the sales procedure will be unfair. The first purchaser was not notified that there would be any type of objection to its motion for the approval and vesting order of its deal. Although the first purchaser can be criticized for not keeping up with what was happening both before and on the date of its court motion, it is still a good-faith buyer who took part in a fair sales process. The 4^th mortgagee had every right to bid on the subject property when it was initially listed and did not do so.

The court decided that ultimately, this situation boils down to the process being fair and seen as being fair. So given all of this, the court decided:

All previous agreements of purchase and sale for the subject property are terminated.
A new sales process will be carried out where any of the interested parties, being the first purchaser and the 4^th mortgagee, can send their best offers to the Trustee, on a confidential basis.
The offers are to be submitted and evaluated by the Trustee by September 18, 2020, with the closing of September 25, 2020.
In the event, the winning bid is not able to close on September 25, 2020, the other party may purchase the property.
If court approval of the successful offer and a vesting order is needed, a draft order may be provided to the court.
The proceeds of the sale, presumably net of the realtor commission, the vendor’s real estate legal fees, and any HST that may be applicable on the sale, are to be paid into court in order to figure out the proper amount and priority of the charges against the property.

As neither side was totally successful, the court did not award costs to any party. This seems to be the fairest outcome to all concerned.

Defaulting on a mortgage: A proposal is your best option

So as you can see, it is possible to use the proposal process under the BIA either to sell a home you can no longer afford to keep which has equity. The net sales proceeds can be used to partially fund the proposal. A proposal under the BIA is the only government-approved debt settlement plan.

Alternatively, you can use the proposal process to sell the home where you are defaulting on a mortgage where there are one or more mortgages underwater. The proposal process will compromise the resulting ordinary unsecured debt arising from the shortfall claim of underwater mortgage lenders. An application can be made to the court for an order approving the sales process, the sale, and obtaining a vesting order to complete the sale.

We have helped many people and companies do exactly that when defaulting on a mortgage.

Defaulting on a mortgage summary

I hope you have enjoyed this defaulting on a mortgage Brandon’s Blog. Hopefully, you have better insight now into the fact that there is a way to get out of a secured loan, especially a mortgage. It will require an insolvency proceeding to settle all your debts, including any shortfall on the sale of the secured asset.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.
It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, BIA, court, court order, defaulting on a mortgage, financial information, full recourse mortgage, Ira Smith Trustee, market value, negative equity, non recourse, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, proposal, sale approval, sales process approval', strategic default, underwater mortgage, vesting order

Brandon Blog Post

STALKING HORSE INSOLVENCY PROCESS: OUR BEST GUIDE TO GET YOUR M&A DEAL DONE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date September 21, 2020

If you would like to listen to an audio version of this stalking horse insolvency process Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Stalking horse introduction

I have written before about a stalking horse in the insolvency context. Two things recently happened that suggested that I should write about it again, from a slightly different perspective. The first thing was that Ira Smith recently did a Zoom webinar presentation for the M&A Club Canada. The topic they wanted the webinar on and the title of the webinar was “Insolvency restructuring to get your M&A deal done”. Second, I see that there has been an increase in online searches for that term.

So, the purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to describe what a stalking horse is and provide you with some insight as to how an insolvency process can be used to get an M&A deal done.

**What is a stalking horse in the insolvency and M&A world?**

In the distressed M&A context, a stalking horse refers to a possible buyer participating in a stalking horse auction to purchase the assets of an insolvent debtor as a going concern. In a stalking horse public auction of a financially troubled business, an initial bid by the stalking horse bidder is divulged to the marketplace and becomes the minimum quote, or floor cost, that potential purchasers can then outbid.

It was first extensively utilized in the USA and currently is a routine part of the Canadian insolvency landscape. The stalking horse process is different than the sealed tender sale approach that is traditional in Canada. The stalking horse sales process has been used in Canada many times. The case study that Ira presented in his webinar and gone over below, was one that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice approved.

The stalking horse participates in the process understanding that it might be outbid. Accordingly, it negotiates a break fee to cover its costs. This includes its due diligence costs to put together the first offer. Typically, for a competing bid to knock out the stalking horse offer, it will certainly have to be more than the stalking horse bid plus the Break Fee (described below). The competing offer will certainly likewise need to be on the exact same terms as the stalking horse bid, and cannot include any kind of burdensome conditions.

**Why would anyone want to become a stalking horse?**

So, why would someone want to be a stalking horse? Initially, as a stalking horse, you will certainly have the most effective opportunity of discussing the terms of a purchase that are customized to satisfy your specific issues. Also, as the first prospective buyer, you will have even more time to evaluate and comprehend the insolvent debtor’s company. You will also have a chance to develop connections with management, vendors, and key stakeholders in the sales process. This gives the stalking horse bidder a leg up.

Their expenses of participating in the sales procedure are covered by the break fee that you will negotiate. That break fee is generally secured by a unique court-ordered charge against the assets of the insolvent debtor. However, you will need to consider the ranking of this charge against other charges that may have been already granted by the court.

**How a stalking horse bid works**

The stalking horse method permits a distressed company to prevent receiving reduced proposals as it sells its assets. When the stalking horse prospective buyer has made its deal, the court has accepted that quote and all other conditions of the court-supervised sale, other prospective purchasers may send contending bids for the company’s assets.

By setting the low end of the bidding process, the insolvent firm wishes to realize a greater price, yet understands it cannot obtain a lower one. Insolvencies are public. The general public nature allows for the disclosure of even more information about the opportunity and the company than what would certainly be available in a private deal. Because of this, in this case study, I explain below, I can mention some names.

Stalking horse prospective buyers can typically bargain which specific assets it wishes to obtain. It likewise does not have to acquire any of the insolvent business’s liabilities. It may however choose for business reasons to take some on voluntarily. Examples would be amounts owing to critical suppliers or employment-related liabilities for employees of the insolvent company they may wish to retain.

**MPH Graphics stalking horse bid process case study**

MPH Graphics inc. (MPH) was an insolvent company. They had a potential purchaser who was willing to stand as a stalking horse bidder. We ran a successful stalking horse process in this case. This case happened quite a few years ago, but, since then, we have used the identical technique in other cases. When a similar kind of case comes up in the future, we would use the same process. So, although the case is older, the steps taken are still well suited today.

MPH was a company that provided printing design and finishing for Canadian and US customers. MPH printed a variety of products such as business cards, direct mail pieces, annual reports, and marketing materials and primarily serviced government agencies, not for profit organizations, and unions.

MPH grew by acquisitions and required additional capital equipment financed by debt. The business also had to change because the industry was changing from traditional printing presses to digital. That changeover required further capital investment.

MPH was insolvent

MPH’s line of business primarily serviced government agencies, not for profit organizations, and unions. Absorbing the acquisitions produced inefficiencies and redundancies. It also needed to move to larger premises which meant moving costs and higher ongoing rent costs were being incurred.

At the same time, the industry was extremely pricing competitive. Gross margins were squeezed. Overhead costs, especially sales salaries and entertainment expenses increased. There was now a history of losses. The technical staff was very experienced. To get the union business, MPH’s technical side had to be a union shop. MPH had a blue-chip client list, which is what was really of interest to the stalking horse bidder.

Receivable collections were slowing down and the bookkeeper had to put payable cheques that were printed every month in a drawer. The cheques could not be released because there was not enough money to pay their liabilities as they become due.

stalking horse

**The stalking horse bidder came knocking**

The bidder was an industry consolidator. They came knocking to try to buy the MPH assets. The consolidator did its due diligence and issued a non-binding letter of interest. After further discussions, that interest turned into a binding agreement to purchase the assets. One of the terms of the deal was that the stalking horse bidder required court approval of the purchase and a vesting order from the court to vest the assets out of MPH into the acquiring corporation.

Notwithstanding there were tax losses, the purchaser did not want to purchase shares and have to deal with all the creditor issues. The company could not on its own give the purchaser the certainty it wanted by way of a vesting order. So an insolvency process was required.

**What kind of stalking horse insolvency process?**

There are generally three insolvency options. Some are not necessarily mutually exclusive. They are:

receivership;
bankruptcy; and
restructuring.

Receivership is a remedy for secured creditors. In a receivership, the company loses control of the sales process. Bankruptcy is a remedy for unsecured creditors. In bankruptcy, likewise, the company loses control. It needed a process where the company stays in control.

The insolvent company’s requirements were:

stay in control of the process;
do that specific transaction or a better one; and
get court protection for both the sales process and the sale.

So neither receivership nor bankruptcy would work. So what would allow the company to meet its requirements and run a stalking horse bid process?

**A stalking horse process works best in an insolvency restructuring process**

What is needed is a debtor in possession option. In the United States, it is called a Chapter 11 proceeding. In Canada, there are two federal statutes that apply and can accommodate the needed process:

Liquidating Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).
Liquidating Plan of Arrangement under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA).

The benefits of this approach are:

The company stays in control of the process.
It allows for the stalking horse transaction or a better one to be completed.
Allows the insolvent company to get protection from its creditors through the automatic stay of proceedings. This gives it the time to run the stalking horse process, go back to court for approval, and to complete a transaction.

**Liquidating proposal under the BIA to run the stalking horse process**

We chose the strategy of a proposal filing under the BIA. The main reason was that the CCAA is for companies that owe $5 million or more. MPH owed under that threshold, so only the BIA process was available. The strategy would have been the same, even if MPH qualified for a CCAA process and we decided to go under that statute.

As time was of the essence, we MPH first filed a Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal (NOI). This quickly got them the stay of proceedings they needed and access to the court, before needing to draft the definitive proposal document.

The company filed the NOI to implement a sale of its assets, properties, and undertaking, in order to attempt to preserve as much value as possible for the Company’s stakeholders, while preserving as many jobs as possible. As Trustee, we then wrote a report to the court in support of the company’s motion to get the purchaser’s agreement of purchase and sale to be approved as a stalking horse bid and for approval of a sales process, we would run.

As Trustee, we worked with MPH, the purchaser, and their respective legal counsel, to draft the sales process and the terms and conditions of sale. These would be the rules that would allow for the marketplace to become aware of the opportunity to purchase all or substantially all of the assets, properties, and undertaking of MPH.

**Key elements of the stalking horse sales process**

The key elements of the stalking horse sales process were:

The break fee payable to the stalking horse bidder if they turned out to not be the successful purchaser was set at the amount of $100,000.
The Overbid Amount (as described in the Stalking Horse Agreement of Purchase and Sale) was reduced to the amount of $100,000.
If an auction was to be held between parties that all qualified as successful bidders, each bid had to be at least $5,000 higher than the last one.

**The outcome of the stalking horse sales process**

The process we recommended to the court was a 5-week process. The court approved our recommendations and ran the sales process. The process included:

Advertising the opportunity in a national newspaper.
Preparing and distributing a “teaser” non-confidential information circular to distribute to anyone who requested it along with the terms and conditions of sale.
Preparation and distribution of a confidentiality agreement to those who wished more detailed financial information.
Receipt of signed confidentiality agreements and distribution of the confidential information memorandum we prepared.
Receiving non-binding letters of intent from potential purchasers and deciding which ones we chose to provide access to our electronic data room.
Potential purchasers performed due diligence and submitted their final binding offers with deposit funds.

We then reviewed all offers received, to make sure that they met the terms and conditions of sale. We did receive a better offer, but that purchaser’s offer was conditional on them obtaining financing. They could not waive the condition, so the stalking horse bidder’s agreement of purchase and sale turned out to be the winning bid.

**Court approval of the stalking horse bid**

As Trustee, we then prepared our report to court to provide all the information as to the steps we took and the results of the process. We obviously recommended that the company be allowed to complete the stalking horse agreement. The court agreed and issued the vesting order.

There were enough funds to pay out the government trust claim and all the secured creditors in full. There was also enough cash left over to pay for all the costs of the process. Unfortunately, there was not enough money to do any sort of proposal. So the company filed an assignment in bankruptcy and we became the trustee in bankruptcy.

Moving from our role as proposal trustee to the bankruptcy trustee, we informed all the creditors the details of the sale and the outcome. The business and many jobs were saved as a result.

Stalking horse summary

I hope you have enjoyed this stalking horse Brandon’s Blog. Hopefully, you have better insight now into the fact that a sick insolvent company’s business can be saved by doing a sale of its assets to a healthy organization.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.
It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, CCAA, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, court approval, insolvent, Ira Smith Trustee, mph graphics, proposal, stalking horse, stalking horse bid, stalking horse bid process, stalking horse bidder, stalking horse offer, stalking horse sales process, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL VS BANKRUPTCY ONTARIO: THE BEST INFO YOU REALLY NEED

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date September 16, 2020

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario introduction

What is the difference between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario is a question people calling me up these days are asking. No doubt the looming end of the various COVID-19 government support programs is now sparking this interest. People and businesses were given a reprieve with Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan and the courts being closed. Now fear is creeping back into everyone’s minds about their debts that essentially were put on hold for the last 6 months.

So, since people are asking me the question, I want to answer the consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario question in this Brandon’s Blog.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: Who qualifies for and what is a consumer proposal?

A consumer proposal is different from bankruptcy. Consumer proposals are available to individuals only whose overall financial obligations do not exceed $250,000, not including debts secured by their principal residence.

Division 1 proposals are offered to both companies with any debt level and people whose debts go beyond $250,000 (omitting the mortgage or any other debts secured by their primary residence).

Consumer proposals are official methods regulated by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) readily available to individuals. Collaborating with a licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee) serving as the consumer proposal administrator, you make a proposal to:

Pay your creditors a percentage of what you owe them over a certain period not exceeding 60 months.
Expand the time you need to settle those debts.
Or a mix of both.

Payments are made via the Trustee, and the Trustee utilizes that cash to pay each of your creditors their pro-rata share. The consumer proposal must be completed within 5 years from the day of filing.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: Who qualifies for bankruptcy?

You can declare bankruptcy if you:

Live in Canada.
Continue business or have assets in Canada.
Have financial debts totalling a minimum of $1,000.
Are insolvent.

There are different tests for insolvency laid out in the BIA. They are:

for any reason, you are unable to pay your financial debts as they generally come to be due;
you have ceased paying present debts in the regular course as they usually are due; or
the complete worth of your property is not, at a reasonable valuation, enough, or, if sold at a sale under legal process, would not be sufficient to make it possible for repayment of all your financial obligations.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What is bankruptcy?

A consumer proposal is an excellent option for you if you can afford to make payments towards your financial debts monthly. If you are entirely unable to make enough payments for a consumer proposal, then bankruptcy is probably your only other alternative.

By statute, the offer you make your creditors via a consumer proposal must be a much better option than what your creditors would certainly get in your bankruptcy. I help people make that analysis during our initial no-cost consultation prior to them selecting the ideal insolvency process for them. We discover the choices readily available, including a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario. Bankruptcy is an alternative when you cannot afford to fund a consumer proposal to your creditors.

If bankruptcy is the selected alternative, you work with me, as the Trustee, to complete the needed documents. I then submit them with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB). When the OSB issues its Certificate, after that you are formally bankrupt.

From that point on, the Trustee will deal directly with your creditors in your place. As soon as you are bankrupt:

you will stop making payments to your unsecured creditors;
any type of garnishments against your wages or bank account will stop; and
any lawsuits for money against you from your creditors will also be stopped.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What are the advantages of a consumer proposal?

The benefits of a consumer proposal vs. bankruptcy Ontario are:

You maintain all of your assets.
Actions against you by creditors, such as wage garnishments will quit.
Unlike informal financial debt settlement, the consumer proposal is a legal forum where every one of your creditors has to deal with your restructuring.
You do not have to think any more about the “B” word.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What are the differences in credit score?

The person that files for bankruptcy will absolutely get an R9 rating. This is the lowest credit rating possible. It will continue to be on their record for at least 7 years. An individual that submits a consumer proposal will have an R7 credit score which is less extreme. It will certainly remain to be on their record for around 8 years overall, from the moment of filing.

You will absolutely pay less than the total you owe with a consumer proposal. Commonly as much as 70% less. All your unsecured financial obligations will be combined right into a simple regular month-to-month payment. This number will be based upon what you can afford.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What are the costs and fees of a consumer proposal versus filing for bankruptcy?

When doing a consumer proposal, the Trustee’s charges are paid for out of the repayment you bargain with your creditors. For example, if your consumer proposal has you paying a total amount of $20,000 over 5 years, the Trustee’s fee and disbursements are drawn from those funds. The cost of the consumer proposal is likewise regulated by the BIA. The expense does not go up or down based upon the amount you are required to pay in your consumer proposal.

However, if you were to file for bankruptcy, the cost is once again controlled by the BIA. The Trustee is paid out of the funds available in your bankruptcy. Examples of sources of funds in personal bankruptcy are any surplus income you might need to pay as well as any assets that are available to the Trustee to sell.

If there are not expected to be any type of funds in your bankruptcy, the regulated cost to be funded either by the debtor or a third party guarantor will be around $2,000. This is one more difference between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: Are assets treated differently between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy?

If you do a consumer proposal, you can keep your assets whereas in bankruptcy your assets in most cases are affected. This includes the equity in your home if greater than $10,000, an auto or other vehicle worth greater than $6,600 (without liens against it), investments, tax refunds, as well as any RRSP contributions made in the 12 months immediately before filing for bankruptcy.

This distinction between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario is huge.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What if I default on my consumer proposal vs bankruptcy payments?

If you do not keep up your payments on a consumer proposal, and drop 3 months behind, you have defaulted and the consumer proposal is void. You additionally are unable to submit a brand-new consumer proposal. Collection activity by your creditors will begin again.

In bankruptcy, if you do not complete all your obligations, you will not have the ability to get your discharge from bankruptcy. As soon as the Trustee gets its discharge, your creditors will certainly return to collection activities too.

This is one more consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario difference.

consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: When is a meeting of creditors held in a consumer proposal?

A meeting of creditors in a consumer proposal is held if one is requested by creditors that are owed at least one-quarter of the total amount of proven claims filed.

An ask for a meeting needs to be made by the creditors within 45 days of the declaring of the consumer proposal. The OSB can additionally ask for the Trustee to call a meeting any time within that same duration.

The meeting of creditors must be held within 21 days after being called. At the meeting of creditors, they vote to either accept or reject the proposal.

If no meeting of creditors is requested within 45 days of the declaring of the proposal, the proposal will be considered to have been approved by the creditors no matter any kind of objections made later.

**How long does it take to complete a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario?**

A consumer proposal is ended when the individual has made the call for payments over the amount of time stated in the proposal itself. In a bankruptcy, the discharge relies on a selection of different aspects, including whether it was the very first time the debtor filed for bankruptcy and if they need to make surplus income payments.

If the borrower has never proclaimed bankruptcy and they do not need to make surplus income payments, then they are entitled to be discharged 9 months. However, if the bankrupt has surplus income, then a first-time bankrupt will need to pay for 21 months before when they can be discharged

If this is not the person’s first bankruptcy, and they do not have surplus income, they cannot get a discharge before the expiry of 24 months. If that person has a surplus income requirement, then they must pay for 36 months before being able to be discharged.

This is another distinction between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: What do consumer proposals and bankruptcy have in common?

Both a consumer proposal and bankruptcy are lawfully binding treatments that are administered by a Trustee. If you are thinking of a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario, it is vital that you consult with a Trustee to ensure that you completely understand what’s involved, and the costs. You can talk with friends or family that might have applied for one or the other before. It is also important that you get referrals from professionals you trust.

Declaring bankruptcy or doing a consumer proposal are both issues of public record. That means there will be a permanent public record concerning your insolvency that can be accessed by anyone. If your debts are joint or co-signed or guaranteed by someone else, the other person is liable for the debt. That is the case even if you file for either a consumer proposal or personal bankruptcy.

Even these similarities still point out differences between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario.

How do I choose between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario?

As you can see, when you consider a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario, there are most definitely differences between the two. But they are both formal insolvency processes to eliminate your debt. What’s essential, though, is that you discover the best method to get yourself back on the right track in such a way that will assist you to achieve your long-term goals.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: How to file for bankruptcy?

In order to take advantage of either a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario, you must involve a Trustee. This is a person or company licensed by the OSB to provide the insolvency process. The 10 actions listed below are a guide to the bankruptcy procedure.

Call a qualified Trustee and go to a meeting with him or her to talk about your personal circumstance and your alternatives including if it is possible for you to prevent bankruptcy.
Deal with the Trustee to complete the needed forms. The Trustee will after that submit the bankruptcy with the OSB.
The Trustee notifies your creditors of the bankruptcy.
You participate in a meeting of creditors if one is called.
You participate in 2 counselling sessions.
Based on your personal exemptions, the Trustee markets your available assets; you may additionally need to make surplus income payments to the Trustee.
In certain circumstances, you might need to participate in an examination held by an OSB representative.
The Trustee prepares a report describing your actions throughout the bankruptcy.
You go to the discharge hearing if needed.
You obtain your discharge from your bankruptcy.

Afterward, the Trustee completes the administration, including paying a dividend to your creditors, if offered.

Consumer proposals and bankruptcy Ontario aren’t the only ways of obtaining debt relief and consolidating debt

There are additionally other ways of fixing debt problems that do not include a formal process or paying a fee. If you honestly wish to thoroughly and objectively take a look at all your options, contact a Trustee, and meet with him or her. They’ll pay attention to your scenario and concerns and advise you on what will work best for you even if you do not need to file for either a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario. Their assistance is normally cost-free and non-judgmental.

At my Firm, declaring bankruptcy is only encouraged until all other potential solutions have investigated. A consumer proposal is the only government-approved financial debt settlement strategy and is always the far better bankruptcy alternative.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario: Move on with your life

I hope you have enjoyed this consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario Brandon’s Blog. Both a successfully completed consumer proposal or obtaining your discharge from bankruptcy lets you get back on the road to financial health, relieve the stress you face, and bring you:

Freedom from lawsuits and garnishments;
The ability to live better than just hanging on one payday to the next;
Improved credit scores; and
Better health and well-being.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.
It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.
Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

consumer proposal vs bankruptcy ontario — consumer proposal vs bankruptcy Ontario

Tags alternatives to bankruptcy, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy alternative, bankruptcy and insolvency act canada, BIA, Consumer Proposal, consumer proposal vs bankruptcy, consumer proposal vs bankruptcy ontario, consumer proposals, Division I Proposal, insolvent, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada, OSB, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

WHAT IS A LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE? READ OUR BEST AND COMPLETE 12 STEP CHECKLIST

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date September 14, 2020

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this what is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click on the podcast.

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee introduction

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee is a question I see asked regularly. Is it the same as a bankruptcy trustee? The answer is yes. A bankruptcy trustee is an old name. Licensed Insolvency Trustee is the new name. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) changed the name in 2015. The change came about partly because of submissions made by the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP).

The change came about since the new name more precisely explains the breadth of solutions they offer to consumers and businesses. The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to describe for the stressed-out person who is facing financial challenges, or the entrepreneur whose business is in financial trouble, what is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee all about and give a 12 point checklist to help you find the best one for you.

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee?

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee is a financial and debt specialist licensed and supervised by the OSB. The OSB released a directive calling for trustees to utilize the classification of Licensed Insolvency Trustee to more precisely show the solutions they offer.

**What is the difference between a Licensed Insolvency Trustee, a credit counsellor, and a debt settlement business?**

Licensed Insolvency Trustees, credit counsellors, and financial debt settlement companies, all provide financial guidance. However, they are extremely different.

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee is the only person who can file a bankruptcy or consumer proposal for you. A trustee can also offer you financial advice and help you plan on how to repay your debt. Credit counsellors and debt settlement businesses can give you financial advice and information. They can help you make a budget and make plans to repay your debt. But they can’t file a bankruptcy or consumer proposal for you.

Unlike the others, a Licensed Insolvency Trustee is an Officer of the Court, and as such, is the only financial debt relief professional in Canada legally allowed to administer insolvency proceedings under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and what can they do for me?

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee will first gather info to comprehend the individual’s or business’s entire circumstance, examine the effects of different choices, discuss them with you and also suggest the one he or she really feels is ideal for you. When filing a restructuring debt settlement proposal or for bankruptcy, Licensed Insolvency Trustees will direct the debtor through the whole procedure, will certainly prepare and submit the needed paperwork, and be the one to deal directly with all of your creditors.

So what is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee? It is the only expert that can offer you a complimentary consultation and advice as well as recommendations. After that, she or he will either direct you what to do if you do not need an insolvency process to repair your financial concerns or administer the insolvency procedure if one is required.

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and what sets them apart?

By now you should realize that a Licensed Insolvency Trustee is licensed and supervised by the OSB. No other professional dealing with consumer or business debt issues is. Licensed Insolvency Trustees also have to go through a rigorous course of study and examinations in order to obtain that license.

So what is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee? It is someone who:

successfully complete the Chartered Insolvency and Restructuring Professional (CIRP) Qualification Program (CQP), the CIRP National Insolvency Exam and the Insolvency Counsellor’s Qualification Course;
passed an Oral Board of Examination;
has been found to be a person of good character and reputation; and
has been cleared through an RCMP investigation.

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and how are their fees calculated?

There are set calculations and rules that all Licensed Insolvency Trustees must strictly follow when administering a bankruptcy or proposal. Trustee fees are calculated and drawn from the funds that have been paid into each individual proceeding. Licensed Insolvency Trustees are not allowed to simply set their own fees and rates.

In most bankruptcies and proposals, the Licensed Insolvency Trustee’s fees are based on a tariff set by the BIA. Unlike other professionals, working with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee is not a “fee for service” – this means that a phone call to discuss any questions you have or get ongoing support throughout the process won’t result in an invoice.

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and how do I find one?

The best way to find one is through a referral from someone that you trust. This could be your lawyer, accountant, a relative or a close friend. Someone you trust, who refers you to someone they trust, is always the best. I take pride that my Firm has many times helped relatives of lawyers and accountants who we work with. If they are willing to refer a family member to us, that is the highest compliment anyone can pay to me as a professional.

You can also contact a local non-profit credit counselling service. There are two benefits to doing this. A local non-profit credit counselling organization is probably one of the most objective places to find out about all your debt relief options. They’re not trying to sell you anything, and they’re not paid on commission. So they can actually help you look at all your options and see if insolvency (a consumer proposal or bankruptcy) is your best option or if there is something else that might make sense.

The OSB maintains a searchable database of all Licensed Insolvency Trustees in Canada. You can search for a trustee located near you. Finding a trustee near you may be convenient, but, it will not give you a sense of whether you feel you can work with that professional.

You can also search for “licensed insolvency trustee” or “bankruptcy trustee” in your favourite search engine. Just be mindful that the companies who appear at the top of your search results with the word “Ad” next to their name have paid for that listing. It has nothing to do with their expertise or rating.

Looking at the online reviews given by people who have worked with them is a great way to start to get a feel for each professional. If they write blogs or have videos posted online, that will also help to get a feel for the personality of the Licensed Insolvency Trustee.

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and have they been recognized by any rating agencies?

I am pleased to report that, for the 5th year in a row, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has been voted as one of the Top 3 Licensed Insolvency Trustees in Vaughan, ON. (Yes, there are more than 3!). It is gratifying to get recognition fo the professional services we provide and our commitment to full service and support for our clients.

So what is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and how should I go about choosing one? There are many factors that you must consider. Below is our 12 step checklist to make the best choice for you.

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee? Our 12 step checklist to help you find the best one for your situation

Do they have the necessary qualifications?
How many cases like yours have they done before?
Do they go to Court also or do you have to hire a lawyer to do so?
Is bankruptcy right for you and is it your only option?
How much will it cost you?
Will you be dealing with the actual licensee ultimately responsible to the OSB for your file?
Will you only be seeing one of many clerks once you enter the insolvency process?
How did you feel after meeting the people at their office after your initial consultation?
Do they practice exclusively in the bankruptcy/insolvency area?
Do they have experience in only personal insolvency matters, only corporate insolvency matters, or both?
Do they have enough experience and the time to handle your matter?
Will they communicate in a timely manner with you throughout?

As you can see, when trying to answer what is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and who is the right one for me question, there are many things to consider.

What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee summary

I hope you found this what is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee Brandon’s Blog about helpful. Sometimes things are too far gone and more drastic and immediate triage action is required.

Do you have too much debt? Are you in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt. You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges.
It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags Bankruptcy, bankruptcy and insolvency act canada, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, Consumer Proposal, credit counsellor, debt restructuring, debt restructuring proposal, debt settlement, debt settlement company, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, licensed insolvency trustees, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, OSB, what is a licensed insolvency trustee

Brandon Blog Post

MORTGAGE DEFERRAL CANADA IS ENDING: 3 KILLER WAYS TO DEAL WITH COVID-19 RELATED MONEY PROBLEMS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date September 2, 2020

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

Mortgage deferral Canada introduction

The bulk of the home mortgage deferral Canada that banks have given to Canadians was approved in March and April. This was the time when the COVID-19 pandemic began taking a financial toll on the country with non-essential businesses shuttered and millions unemployed or seeing their earnings take a deep cut.

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) proposed actions planned to support federally regulated lenders to make sure that they would not experience problems due to the mortgage deferrals provided to help Canadians. The OSFI mortgage deferral help it provided to the lending institutions enhanced the security of the Canadian economic situation and monetary system when faced with obstacles postured by the coronavirus.

The mortgage deferrals are slowly coming to an end. This Brandon’s Blog discusses what you can do if you fear what your personal fallout will be when the mortgage deferrals end.

**How did mortgage deferral Canada work for the borrower?**

As of July 30, there were approximately $170 billion in mortgage deferments for the biggest 6 banks. The majority were established to unwind by September 30. Mortgage deferral Canada arrangements between Canadians and their financial institutions were truly an individual conversation. The federal government provided a wide overview, yet the specific arrangements between each borrower and lender were established individually as each case required. The significant style was that if a customer was struggling with financial difficulty because of the COVID-19 lockdown, mortgage payments would be deferred for an agreed-on, short-term amount of time.

Currently, these mortgage deferral Canada setups are slowly ending. The chartered banks are reporting that currently, for those whose deferments have ended, 80% to 90% are current in their payments. That means 10% to 20% of people who had a mortgage deferral Canada deal currently cannot maintain their mortgage payments.

**How did mortgage deferral Canada work for the lenders?**

OSFI told the federally regulated lending institutions and mortgage insurers they can deal with home mortgage financings for which a payment deferment is approved as being current. Payment deferments of as much as 6 months approved prior to August 31 and repayment deferments of up to 3 months approved after August 30 and on or before September 30 that it need not categorize such mortgages as impaired or revamped.

In April OSFI advised lenders that in circumstances where banks provide home mortgage repayment deferrals, those mortgages can continue to be dealt with as performing loans under the . Consequently, OSFI told the banks they did not need to increase their capital resource requirements based upon the home mortgage deferral Canada arrangements they provided. OSFI additionally told the loan providers that it would not assess such mortgage portfolios as having a larger credit risk.

For all federally regulated banks, OSFI specified that it is prepared to use flexibility for any that might need additional time to satisfy upcoming due dates for filing regulatory returns, on a case-by-case basis.

Where mortgages need to be insured due to being high ratio, there are insurance coverage costs that the lending institutions need to make to the insurer each month. OSFI likewise aided the banks and insurers, such as CMHC, by stating that it will not place the lenders or insurers offside when the monthly insurance premiums were not being paid as a result of the mortgage deferral Canada arrangements. OSFI also stated that deferments will not boost capital charges on unpaid premiums. OSFI told insurance providers that they can deal with a mortgage for which a deferment is granted as performing.

So with these OSFI initiatives, lenders can make mortgage deferral Canada happen and both lenders and mortgage insurance providers can treat the mortgages under these deferred home mortgage settlements and mortgage insurance payments, as not being in default.

Mortgage deferral Canada is ending – what can you do if you believe it will cause financial problems for you

OSFI has just stated that any type of mortgage deferral Canada plans past September 30, 2020, will now be subject to OSFI’s typical policies. People who need to start making their mortgage payments once again, but whose economic situation has not improved since the pandemic hit, are scared. I have read some “what to do” articles if you think you will have trouble making your normal mortgage payments. In my view, several have actually missed the mark. Some I have checked out start explaining how a consumer proposal or bankruptcy can help you.

Just so you know, a consumer proposal or bankruptcy cannot help you with the end of your mortgage deferral Canada. The reason it cannot help you is that your mortgage is a secured debt. Your mortgagee is a secured creditor, assuming its mortgage security is valid. A consumer proposal or bankruptcy is a method of dealing with your unsecured creditors. The mortgagee has rights if you default on your mortgage whether or not you are involved in a formal insolvency process. If you have too much debt and too little income to service all that debt, you may very well need to consider an insolvency filing. But it is not a direct answer to your mortgage deferral Canada ending.

mortgage deferral canada

So in order, here are my 3 top recommendations of what you could do when your mortgage deferral Canada deal with your lender ends and you believe you will be in financial trouble.

Take a critical look at your family household budget

I cannot emphasize enough just how essential the household budget is to your financial security. A spending plan is a listing of all income and your families’ costs. Do it on a monthly basis. It enables you to prepare how you need to spend your money and if there is anything left over each month for savings for an emergency fund or for investment. Rather than cash just flying out of your pocketbook, you make intentional choices on where you want your cash to go. You’ll never need to doubt at the end of the month where your money went or search for a hole in your wallet.

Numerous Canadians panic every month regarding where the cash will come from to pay their bills. A household budget will give you the direction you need. That direction should give you comfort. It reveals to you just how much you make and also what your costs are. If need be you can decrease unneeded costs or possibly tackle extra work to live within a well-balanced budget plan. No extra panicking at the end of the month.

So if you have a household budget that you follow, look at it carefully. If you don’t’ have one, prepare it immediately. Look at the last 6 months and see what your average monthly income has been and what your average monthly expenses were. List them all out line by line for both income and expenses. Then adjust any line that you believe will change in the coming months. Adding your normal monthly mortgage payment is one of those things that will need to be added.

Then take a look at it and see if you are spending less or more than you earn. If you are spending more, then you need to cut back on certain expenses, increase your income, or a combination of both. Take a critical look and slash any expenses that you can. Then see what that looks like.

If you feel that making your normal monthly mortgage payment will not be a problem, then terrific. Just follow your family budget and each month compare your actual to budget. Make any adjustments you need to along the way. However, keep spending less than you earn.

If your budget shows that you are going to have trouble making your normal monthly mortgage payment, then go on to my next step 2.

Speak to your banker

Get ahead of it. Contact your lender. Let them know that you have a current family budget and it shows that you may need added help when your mortgage deferral Canada deal ends. Your banker will be impressed that you:

have a current budget that you are tracking; and
you are being proactive and not causing the banker to chase you because you came up on the computer screen as a delinquent mortgagor.

That already makes you the most liked person in the 10% to 20% of people who are experiencing problems paying their mortgage. Hopefully, your lender can work something out for you that will help you.

Call me

If your budget shows that you do not have enough family income to pay all the families’ debts on a monthly basis and your lender cannot do anything to help you, then call me. I will take a critical look at your family budget and get more personal financial details from you. After reviewing all of it, I will give you my best recommendations to meet your unique financial challenges. Keep in mind that this is not your fault. The COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting shutdown of the Canadian economy continues to cause problems for the majority of Canadians.

Mention this blog, and I will not charge you a penny for this help. I truly want you to succeed.

Mortgage deferral Canada summary

I hope you have found this mortgage deferral Canada Brandon’s Blog interesting and helpful. The Ira Smith Team family hopes that you and your family members are remaining secure, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person that has been affected either via misfortune or inconvenience.

We all must help each other to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Families are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when life can return to something near to typical and we can all be together once again.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Income, revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs, their companies and individual Canadians. This is especially true these days.

If anyone needs our assistance for debt relief Canada COVID-19, or you just need some answers for questions that are bothering you, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

Tags Bankruptcy, budget, Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline, cmhc, Consumer Proposal, coronavirus, coronavirus pandemic, covid-19, covid-19 pandemic, family budget, household budget, Ira Smith Trustee, monthly budget, mortgage, mortgage deferral, mortgage deferral canada, mortgage payment, mortgage payments, OSFI

Brandon Blog Post

WHEN ARE 2019 TAXES DUE CANADA: 4 AMAZING WAYS TO CRA PERSONAL DEBT RELIEF

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 26, 2020

The Ira Smith Trustee Team Is Absolutely Operational And Ira, In Addition To Brandon Smith, Is Readily Available For A Telephone Consultation Or Video Meeting.

When are 2019 taxes due Canada introduction

I have noticed recently that Canadians are searching online the question “when are 2019 taxes due Canada“. That leads me to believe that many people are unclear about the changes this year. Some people are searching because they don’t want to miss the payment deadline. Others may be searching because they want to know when the deadline is that they are going to miss because of the COVID-19 pandemic has hit them right in the wallet or purse.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to go over for individuals:

the important tax filing and payment dates for 2019 taxes;
what needs to happen on those dates and what if you can’t make it on time; and
ways you can deal with Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to eliminate your tax debt

I remind you that I and my Firm are not personal or corporate tax advisors. We are licensed insolvency trustees. This Brandon’s Blog is not meant to be income tax advice or to replace professional income tax advice. To learn when are 2019 taxes due Canada for your personal situation, contact your own professional income tax advisor.

Is the Tax Deadline Delayed for 2019 Tax Returns?

You may have wondered how COVID-19 influences the filing of your 2019 tax return, repayment of any income tax owing and your tax obligations generally in terms of deadlines, or payments or refunds and tax credits. Apart from those that are self-employed, the income tax return filing date is usually April 30 of every year.

Identifying the turmoil brought on by COVID-19, the CRA provided most Canadians extra time to submit a 2019 tax return. CRA provided us till June 1, 2020, aside from self-employed people operating as a proprietorship or partnership. For those self-employed people, the filing day remained June 15, 2020, for a 2019 tax return.

So since that due date has passed, nevertheless, this year there might be a technicality as I describe below. The government wants every cent they are owed and they want it in a good time. Thus, there are fines for filing a late income tax return if you have an unpaid tax amount. If you are entitled to a refund or your tax balance is nil, there will be no charges for sending in your return after the deadline date.

Charges for filing your income tax return late when you owe the CRA are levied. The CRA will charge you a late-filing penalty if you file your 2019 income tax return after September 30, 2020 (notwithstanding the actual filing date was June 1), and you owe tax obligation that continues to be unpaid. The fine is 5% of your 2019 tax owing, plus 1% of your income tax owing for each complete month your return was filed after September 30, 2020, to a maximum of twelve months.

So without making you any guarantees, there is a real possibility that if you missed out on the June 1 due date, if you submit and pay on or prior to September 30, 2020, and you do not have any kind of prior years’ late-filing penalty, one may not be levied for 2019.

If the CRA charged a late-filing penalty on your return for 2016, 2017, or 2018 your late-filing fine for 2019 may be 10% of your 2019 balance owing, plus 2% of your 2019 balance owing for each and every complete month your return was submitted after September 30, 2020, to a maximum of 20 months.

So it seems the CRA will forgo arrears interest on 2019 tax obligations related to the specific income tax returns from April 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. This procedure for your 2019 tax obligation does not terminate penalties and interest on a taxpayer’s account prior to April 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. It does make it less complicated on a taxpayer’s 2019 tax debt that it will certainly not rise via interest charges throughout this challenging coronavirus pandemic time.

Why file by the June 1 deadline if no payment is due until September 30?

Filing your income tax return on time lessen any negative results on your tax credits and benefits payments. If your 2019 return has actually not been assessed by the CRA, details from your 2018 return will be used to compute benefits as well as credits payments up until September 2020. That will guarantee you continue to obtain vital payments. Nevertheless, without filing your 2019 tax return, you may not be getting exactly the correct amounts you are entitled to.

I doubt you desire any kind of disturbance to benefit payments you get for government programs such as the Canada Child Benefit (CCB) and GST/HST tax credits, as well as amounts from provincial programs that are carried out by the CRA.

By filing a return by the due date, you will lessen this impact. Also, if you are owed a refund, the earlier you file, the earlier it will show up in your pocket. By registering for direct payment, you’ll get your refund quicker.

If you are expecting a tax refund for sure you would certainly want to submit on time. CRA may not chase you for it if you don’t owe them for 2019. Submitting your tax return is the only way to get that refund. Remember, a refund means that you gave too much of your money to CRA during the year. For sure you want it back!

However, registering for a direct deposit could lead to other problems. For more information on that, read my Brandon’s Blog CANADA REVENUE AGENCY LOGIN: MASSIVE CREDENTIAL STUFFING CAUSES MANY PROBLEMS.

When are 2019 taxes due Canada: Are there new deadlines for GST/HST returns and payments as well?

Excellent information for the self-employed as well as entrepreneur small-business owners: while the CRA is not changing the filing target dates for GST/HST returns, it is forgoing late filing charges for returns submitted by the end of June. As for payments, any type of GST/HST installments that are due March 27 through June 2020 can be deferred up until June 30, interest-free.

When are 2019 taxes due Canada: What is the payment date?

The target date to pay amounts owed was initially extended to September 1, 2020. On July 27, the CRA revealed that the payment deadline for a person’s 2019 income tax obligation was additionally extended to September 30, 2020.

There are a few other concerns surrounding the declaring of your 2019 income tax return and the payment of any balance owing that you must understand:

Some taxpayers may have received a Notification of Assessment that says the date for settlement is April 30, 2020, or September 1, 2020. If you did get such a notice giving those dates for when are 2019 taxes due Canada, it is now incorrect.
On May 15, it was revealed that qualified Canadians who are currently obtaining the GST/HST credit and/or CCB payments will continue to get them up until the end of September 2020. Benefits starting in July 2020 and those arranged for August and September won’t be disrupted.
If CRA is unable to evaluate your 2019 return by early September 2020, your estimated benefits and/or credits will certainly stop in October 2020 and you’ll have to repay the approximated amounts that were released to you starting in July 2020.
By prolonging the due dates for federal returns and instalments, the CRA is additionally expanding the due dates for provincial/territorial individual returns and instalments. Note that the CRA does not administer the tax system for the province of Quebec.

When are 2019 taxes due Canada: What if I owe CRA and cannot pay it?

If you find yourself to be in a financially challenging situation then you need to take proactive activity. The COVID-19 pandemic has hit Canadians hard. I envision there will be many individuals that do not have the needed cash to pay their 2019 income tax debt by September 30. It is necessary to be proactive and positive since the CRA has special powers.

The CRA does have the capacity to take collection procedures without having to go via the court system. The federal government can garnishee your wages or salary, get the money you have on deposit at a bank as well as freeze your bank accounts. They can also make demand on anyone they think owes you money.

There are 4 ways to CRA personal debt relief:

If you are able to, borrow the money you owe and pay it to CRA on or before September 30. I don’t think this option needs any further explanation.
Contact a CRA collection officer and make a payment arrangement repayment plan. A payment arrangement is an agreement you make with the CRA. This allows you to agree on a monthly amount to pay that you can afford and then provide CRA with a series of post-dated cheques.
Consider filing a consumer proposal to consolidate your income tax and other debts so you can make one manageable monthly payment. Through a consumer proposal, you will pay much less than the total of all your debts.
If you cannot see your way to being able to do any of the three options listed above, the final one is to use personal bankruptcy to eliminate your income tax and other debts.

If you are able to make a settlement arrangement you have to maintain the payment plan by making certain your regular monthly post-dated cheques clear the financial institution every single time. Also, ensure that all your returns are filed promptly. If you fail to do any of these things, they can terminate the payment arrangement and begin collection action to recoup the tax debt.

September 30, the date when are 2019 taxes due Canada is coming up fast. If you know that you will not be able to pay that liability, don’t fret and don’t waste time. Give us a call. We will help you put together the best strategy that meets your overall needs.

When are 2019 taxes due Canada: A consumer proposal

A consumer proposal is a government-regulated debt negotiation program submitted with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (Trustee). The purpose of submitting one is to eliminate problem financial debts to make sure that you can start the process of resuming life debt-free.

It can just be filed with a Trustee. When you sign your papers, they are filed with the federal government. It is a legal process under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency (Canada) (BIA).

This procedure is a lawful arrangement between you and you’re unsecured creditors to eliminate all of your debt by repaying only a part of the debt that you owe. If a simple majority by dollar amount accept the terms you have offered, then your consumer proposal is binding on all your unsecured creditors.

This court-sanctioned procedure enables you to bargain negotiation with your creditors. When you are carrying out your consumer proposal by making your required payments, you must also file your income tax returns as normal. CRA manages your refunds in the normal course. If you owe tax for any time period after the filing date of your consumer proposal, you additionally pay that amount as regular.

In a consumer proposal, you maintain your assets and as long as you make all the required payments you promised to make, nobody can garnishee your salary or earnings. If you have filed a consumer proposal, personal income tax obligations arising before your filing is an unsecured debt. When you have filed CRA can’t take any type of additional action against you, like wage garnishment, or freezing your bank accounts. As the Trustee, we alert CRA once you file as well as advise it to stop any additional action against you.

For further information on how a consumer proposal could work for you, please get in touch with me. If you know that when are 2019 taxes due Canada you will not be able to pay them, give us a shout so we can help put together a plan of attack for you.

***When are 2019 taxes due Canada: Personal bankruptcy in Canada***

If none of the above ways can work for you, then you will have to consider personal bankruptcy in Canada. Personal bankruptcy should be considered by anyone who:

is insolvent;
has seen a Trustee who has assessed you and determined that you will not be able to complete a consumer proposal; and
owes more than $1,000.

As soon as you become bankrupt you will be required to surrender most assets to the Trustee, other than those that are exempt under provincial law or are fully encumbered. These assets will then be sold and the money gained from the sale of the properties will be dispersed according to the BIA. You may additionally have to pay a part of your earnings to the Trustee for the benefit of your creditors.

Personal tax obligations can be discharged when you receive your discharge from personal bankruptcy. Many various other financial debts will also be released. If you have liability to CRA from being a director of a company, those financial obligations can also be discharged.

If you have actually declared personal bankruptcy, personal income tax debt is an ordinary unsecured financial debt. As soon as you’ve applied for bankruptcy CRA can’t take any kind of additional action versus you, consisting of a wage garnishment or freezing your accounts. We will inform CRA when you file as well as instruct it to quit any additional activity against you to try to collect their debt.

Your spouse will not be affected by your bankruptcy unless your spouse:

co-signed a debt;
owns assets with you jointly; or
has received a transfer of property from you at a time when you owed CRA money.

A creditor can go after your spouse for payment in these circumstances and also he/she will be called to account and pay.

You may also wish to check out our Top 20 personal bankruptcy FAQs. So if you know now that when are 2019 taxes due Canada you will not be able to pay it, consider giving us a call and we can run through your various options and tailor a plan to fit your unique circumstances.

***When are 2019 taxes due Canada: Summary***

I hope you found this is Canada when are 2019 taxes due Canada Brandon’s Blog informative. The Ira Smith Team family hopes that you and your family members are remaining secure, healthy, and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person that has been affected either via misfortune or inconvenience.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Income, revenue, and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs, their companies, and individual Canadians. This is especially true these days.

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tags 2019 tax return, Are there new deadlines for GST/HST returns and payments as well, Bankruptcy, Canada Child Benefit (CCB), Canada Revenue Agency, Consumer Proposal, coronavirus, covid-19, CRA, GST/HST tax credits, Ira Smith Trustee, is the tax deadline delayed for 2019 income tax returns, licensed insolvency trustee, pandemic, Revenue Canada, self employed, tax filing, when are 2019 taxes due canada, Why file by the June 1 deadline if no payment is due until September 30

Brandon Blog Post

CCAA CANADA: OUR EXTRAORDINARY GUIDE TO 2020 TROUBLED CANADIAN COMPANIES SEEKING BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 10, 2020

The Ira Smith Team is totally operational and both Ira and Brandon Smith are here for a telephone consultation, conference calls and virtual meetings.

Keep healthy and safe everybody.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast.

CCAA Canada introduction

We are now about 5 months into this COVID-19 pandemic since the state of emergency was announced in Canada. There has also been a lot of media coverage of the many negative effects it has had on Canadians and the Canadian economy. I thought it might be interesting at this point to do some review on CCAA Canada. Now I am not talking about the Canadian Collegiate Athletic Association. Rather, I am going to look at the companies that have so far filed for creditor protection under one of Canada’s insolvency statutes. The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

When a company tries to reorganize under CCAA Canada – What does CCAA mean?

When Canadian companies who owe more than $5 million experience financial problems, they might go to court to seek creditor protection, filing under the CCAA Canada. That’s federal legislation that primarily offers a company time to try to work out its financial troubles with those to which it owes money.

As I have written before in various Brandon’s Blogs, if the company owes less than $5 million it can file under the Part III Division I reorganization section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). Although it is the other Canadian federal insolvency statute and some procedures are more streamlined and handled slightly differently, the net effect is the same as the matters I explain below about the CCAA Canada.

What does CCAA Canada protection mean? CCAA vs Chapter 11

“Bankruptcy protection” is a term closely associated with a US company filing under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. That term has been adopted into the Canadian insolvency dialogue. In Canada, it most likely means that the Canadian company has applied to a Canadian court to look for protection from their creditors by filing under CCAA Canada.

A firm files under CCAA Canada for consent to come up with a restructuring plan strategy that would certainly provide it time to rearrange its financial affairs to make sure that it can keep operating.

As long as a CCAA order continues to be in place, creditors are not allowed to start or continue any kind of action to recover money owed to them. They can’t try to confiscate the firm’s property or try to petition it into bankruptcy, without the prior approval of the court. This is called the CCAA stay of proceedings.

Considering that a CCAA Canada filing is made because a business is deeply in the red, the initial order of business is to strike some kind of satisfactory arrangement with its creditors. That includes secured creditors, unsecured creditors and shareholders.

Can CCAA Canada protection be extended?

Yes, under CCAA Canada, court-ordered protection can be extended. After Algoma Steel filed under CCAA Canada in April 2001, the firm had gotten eight extensions prior to emerging with a new ownership framework.

Who gets priority under a CCAA Canada filing?

Not all creditors are treated equally. There is a priority generally established for the ranking of creditors and the order in which they might be paid by a debtor.

First in a CCAA Canada restructuring, will be any government claims that rank as a priority deemed trust claim. Next will be any new charges ordered by the court as part of the restructuring. Examples of such court-ordered security charges are Key Employee Retention Plans, financing the company needs in order to survive during the restructuring period and the costs of the professionals involved in the restructuring for the company.

Secured creditors, including lenders and bondholders, usually head the list next when it concerns getting back their money. Secured creditors might hold security such as a general security agreement and/or a mortgage as security for their debt held.

Unsecured creditors follow next on the list of creditors. Unsecured creditors have supplied goods or services on credit to the company without being given any security. In the many retailer filings that have been in the news recently, even customers who have paid deposits for items not yet picked up or who have gift cards are also unsecured creditors. Last on the list are the shareholders.

What happens if the court doesn’t approve a CCAA Canada application or the sides can’t agree on how to restructure debt?

If a restructuring effort is not successful, or if the court does not approve it, a company can be placed right into receivership or bankruptcy. The main difference between a CCAA Canada filing and the options of receivership or bankruptcy, suggests that the company can no longer be a going concern and will be liquidated.

The choice between receivership or bankruptcy depends on the nature and extent of the creditors. If there is a major secured creditor who is owed more than the assets are worth, on a failed restructuring, the court will allow that secured creditor to appoint a receiver (or the court will appoint the receiver). The receiver will then liquidate the company’s assets and repay the secured creditor as much as possible. If there are no secured creditors (which is highly unusual), or there will be money left over from the liquidation after full repayment of the secured creditors, then there will be bankruptcy. The licensed insolvency trustee acting as the bankruptcy trustee will make a distribution to the unsecured creditors.

Sometimes the type of company or industry will require both receivership and bankruptcy. Retail liquidations are a good example. The reasons are outside the main topic of discussion for this CCAA Canada Brandon’s Blog, but, one day, I will do one on that topic.

What happens to shareholders in a CCAA Canada restructuring?

Holders of common stock generally come last. On a regular basis in a CCAA Canada restructuring, they tend to get wiped out. Their old shares come to be worthless. Usually, brand-new shares are issued in the restructured company.

Holders of preferred shares rank ahead of common shareholders (for this reason the title “preferred”) yet more often than not do not get back the full value of their shares.

Public company shares in a company if it enters CCAA Canada protection and all trading is halted

When a public company announces that it has filed under CCAA Canada, a trading halt is applied. The listing exchange notifies the marketplace that trading is not taking place. While the stop is in effect, brokers are forbidden from publishing quotations or signs of interest in trading. The listing exchange will end the trading stop by taking the actions called for by its rules. Generally, the marketplace is alerted that a trading halt is about to end either at the same time the halt finishes or a few minutes before.

When a company gets on the edge of bankruptcy, its stock value mirrors the danger of a CCAA Canada administration becoming liquidation. Purely as an example, a business that used to trade at $50 might trade at $2 per share as a result of the bankruptcy environment. After entering into a CCAA Canada filing, the company’s stock price might be up to $2.10. This value is composed of the potential amount that shareholders might get after liquidation and also the possibility that the firm might restructure and run effectively in the future. Investors can buy and sell these $2.10 shares in the market. The actual value does not reach zero unless the likelihood of restructuring is so low that liquidation becomes a certainty.

While the company is in a CCAA Canada restructuring, its stock will certainly still have some value, though it will likely plummet. The regulatory authorities will watch it very closely and shut down trading if any anomalies are encountered where investors could get hurt. This was recently seen in the United States in the Hertz Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection administration.

Nonetheless, if the business restructures and emerges from CCAA Canada reorganization as a solvent going-concern, its share price might start to rise again. How much will depend on the unique restructuring issues. If a business rises from its restructuring stronger than ever, investors can take advantage of the turnaround, as old stock may get cancelled during the insolvency process, and new shares issued.

List of CCAA filings under CCAA Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic so far?

There have been many media reports about companies filing under CCAA Canada during this coronavirus pandemic. I thought it would be useful to look at which companies have filed and what industries seem to be most affected between the calling for the state of emergency and the last date for which these statistics have been published, July 31, 2020. All of this information comes from statistics published by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada.

The number of companies and the industries that these companies engage in is allocated as follows:

Cannabis	6
Charity	1
Construction	4
Energy	4
Entertainment	1
Hospitality	1
Manufacturing	1
Media	1
Mining	2
Pulp and Paper	1
Real Estate	2
Retail	8
Technology	1
Travel	1

	34

The following chart shows the filings by the province in this same time frame:

ccaa canada graph

CCAA Canada summary

I hope you enjoyed this CCAA Canada Brandon’s Blog. The Ira Smith Team family hopes you and your family are staying safe, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person who has been affected either through inconvenience or personal family tragedy.

We are all citizens of Canada and we have to coordinate our efforts to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Family members are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when things can return to something close to normal and we can all be together again physically.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has always employed clean and safe habits in our professional practice and continues to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Should you take advantage of the CEBA? I say a resounding YES!. I just wanted to highlight all of the issues that you should consider.

If anyone needs our assistance, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

Are you now worried just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. This pandemic situation has made everyone scared.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Team is totally operational and both Ira and Brandon Smith are here for a telephone consultation, conference calls and virtual meetings.

Keep healthy and safe everybody.