Tag: Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA)

A BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGED IS THE KEY TO HEARTWARMING DEBT ELIMINAT1ON

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 23, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would like to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

**Your Bankruptcy Discharged – But Wait**

Well, that took no time at all. Last week I told you about a bankruptcy discharge hearing I attended where the bankrupt person had his bankruptcy discharged by the Master in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice In Bankruptcy and Insolvency.

The Master’s decision was released on August 13, 2021. On August 20, 2021, we received the Notice of Motion of the opposing creditor appealing the Master’s decision to give this person his discharge from bankruptcy. That is their right.

In this Brandon Blog, I want to discuss the reasons for the opposition to the fact that this bankrupt had his bankruptcy discharged and my thoughts on one scenario of how this may play out. First, I just want to refresh your memory about the bankruptcy process and specifically how the discharge under bankruptcy law in Canada process works. Then I will get into this real-life story.

Bankruptcy is a roughly 9-month legal process to eliminate debt for the simplest of cases

Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) gives people the option of filing a debt management plan restructuring consumer proposal if they are unable to pay back all unsecured debt owing to their unsecured creditors. This option offers the consumer a way to maybe keep their home and car that is heavily financed, as long as they can maintain the payments to the secured creditors such as the financial institution who financed the purchase of the home by way of the mortgage, or the auto loan, and it makes sense in their budget.

A successful consumer proposal is also the way to avoid bankruptcy. Like bankruptcy, the process starts with a no-cost consultation for financial advice with a licensed insolvency trustee. A licensed trustee is the only party able to administer a consumer proposal in Canada (or a bankruptcy). The Trustee can help you lose your debt load.

A first-time bankrupt who fulfills all of their obligations, including attending 2 mandatory credit counselling sessions, is entitled to a discharge after 9 months from the date of bankruptcy.

A bankruptcy discharged: First and second bankruptcy (or more)

When an insolvent debtor files for bankruptcy for a second time, you cannot be discharged after a nine months bankruptcy period. When you don’t need to pay the Trustee any surplus income payments, a second bankruptcy lasts for a minimum of 24 months. A second-time bankruptcy filer with surplus income must make those payments for 36 months to qualify to get their bankruptcy discharged.

A third or subsequent bankruptcy follows the same timeline as a second bankruptcy. There is, however, a high probability that the Trustee or creditors will oppose the discharge. Where there is opposition, there must be a court bankruptcy discharge hearing and the court can impose any conditions it deems appropriate.

What does bankruptcy discharged mean in Canada?

It is a Canadian legal term used to describe the release of a consumer debtor or business proprietorship from their obligations, responsibilities, debts, and legal claims. “Bankruptcy” is a legal proceeding to protect the estate of a person or company. “Discharge” fulfills the requirement that a person is released from their obligations, responsibilities, debts, and legal claims through the bankruptcy process. There is no equivalent requirement for a company.

The insolvent debtor filing for bankruptcy merely invokes the legal protection to the person and puts a bankruptcy trustee in place to realize upon any available assets in the bankruptcy estate for the benefit of the creditors. Bankruptcy filings do not relieve the person of their debts. It is when the person is bankruptcy discharged, that they are released from their debts (other than for a select list of exceptions).

Bankruptcy discharged: Types of bankruptcy discharge

The licensed insolvency trustee can usually issue an automatic discharge when there is no trustee in bankruptcy opposition or creditor opposition to a bankrupt’s application for discharge, and the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties during bankruptcy.

In case of opposition or if the bankrupt meets one of the criteria that prevents automatic discharge (for example, the bankruptcy process finds the bankrupt to have a high tax debt situation), a discharge hearing in court is held, which is conducted by the Master of the Bankruptcy Court. There are four types of the bankruptcy discharge and a fifth outcome is also possible. Here they are:

Absolute discharge – An absolute discharge means that the bankrupt may obtain a discharge immediately. If the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties and there is no insolvency trustee or creditor opposition, this can be provided by the licensed insolvency trustee of the bankruptcy estate handling the bankruptcy administration;
Conditional discharge – can get discharged if certain conditions are met. Typically, to get bankruptcy discharged this way, conditions include payment to the licensed insolvency trustee;
Suspended – the bankruptcy discharge will be granted at a later date and may very well be combined with an absolute bankruptcy discharge or conditional bankruptcy discharge;
Refused– because the debtor has not made full disclosure or done other bankruptcy duties; or
“No order” – the insolvency trustee informs the court that the bankrupt has not fulfilled all of his or her obligations and has failed to respond to the Trustee’s demands for information despite the passing of time. The licensed insolvency trustee is at liberty to seek its discharge when the “no order” order is provided. When the bankrupt has actually complied with the court’s requirements, he or she may apply for a hearing for discharge. When the Trustee gets its discharge, the stay of proceedings preventing collection actions against the bankrupt disappears.

A bankruptcy discharged: The appeal just served upon us – a true story

To refresh your memory about the discharge hearing itself you can CLICK HERE. The appeal just served upon us seeks an Order setting aside the decision of the Master made on August 13, 2021. The grounds for the appeal can be described as throwing everything including the kitchen sink! The stated grounds are that the Learned Registrar erred:

by granting the bankrupt an absolute discharge from bankruptcy;
in holding that the Receiver’s interest in the discharge application is not firmly established and by not recognizing that should the Receiver be paid an amount in excess of the debt owed to the secured creditor, any surplus funds would be available for the other creditors of the
corporate bankruptcy estate;
in holding that the discharge hearing is not the proper forum in which to make determinations as to the propriety of the various transactions that the Receiver has raised;
in finding that the bankrupt has generally cooperated with me as his Trustee;
in declining to consider the bankrupt’s conduct in the corporate bankruptcy because that the trustee in the corporate bankruptcy had remedies available to it;
in finding that the failure of the company’s business was due to the loss of its 1 customer and pricing related to that arrangement;
in relying on her finding that the corporate trustee may be the only truly interested party on the discharge or would benefit most from the conditional order sought if the secured debt is otherwise repaid;
in exercising her discretion in finding that an order of discharge requiring payment of the significant amount proposed by the Receiver is not reasonable;
in finding that the bankrupt has no ability to pay and that his future prospects to pay are unknown;
in finding that an order for a conditional discharge of the magnitude sought would be tantamount to a refusal;
by omitting to consider relevant evidence or the absence thereof, in relying on irrelevant considerations, and/or giving improper weight to the evidence before the Court; and
anything else the lawyers may want to say.
bankruptcy discharged

Standard of review to getting a personal bankruptcy discharged

Such an appeal from a bankruptcy discharge hearing has a standard of review. According to BIA S. 192(1), the bankruptcy registrar can, among other things, grant orders of discharge. S. 192(4) of the BIA permits a party dissatisfied with a registrar’s order or decision to appeal it to a judge.

Registrars are exercising judicial discretion when granting discharges in bankruptcy cases. As long as the registrar acted reasonably, the judge should not set it aside or ignore it. Furthermore, if an appeal from a bankruptcy discharge order is based on alleged errors in factual findings, the court will not intervene if the findings of fact can be justified based on credible evidence. If the registrar has materially misinterpreted the law or made an error in respect of the facts underpinning his or her discretion, discretionary decisions can, of course, be overturned.

If the registrar decides that in order for the person to get their bankruptcy discharged, the court imposes conditions, those conditions must be realistic to allow the bankrupt to meet the requirements in a reasonable amount of time. If an amount ordered in order for the person to get their bankruptcy discharged is unrealistic and the discharge is conditional on making additional payments, the appellate court in such cases previously held that results in an error of law. The appellate judge can either substitute other conditions or refer the matter back to the registrar for reconsideration.

A bankruptcy discharged: What my gut is telling me

I normally am not in the prediction business. However, having been the insolvency trustee responsible for administering the consumer bankruptcy, having written the reports to the court on the bankrupt’s application for discharge, having attended the discharge hearing and having heard all the evidence, having read the Registrar’s decision and the Appeal documentation, I believe that the appeal should be dismissed.

You might recall that opposing the bankrupt getting bankruptcy discharged was the Receiver of the company previously operated by the bankrupt. As a result of complaints regarding the bankrupt and his family in relation to the company’s operations, the Receiver has filed lawsuits against several parties. The proceedings are still pending. According to previous court rulings, the court should not consider the issues raised in other proceedings when deciding whether to discharge the bankrupt. A discharge hearing is a summary proceeding. It is important to see how the debtor behaved during HIS bankruptcy.

As for the judge’s decision, only time will tell. I’ll keep you up to date as always.

Bankruptcy discharged summary

I hope that you found this bankruptcy discharged Brandon Blog helpful in telling this real-life story of an appeal to a person getting their bankruptcy discharged. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt. You may not need to file for bankruptcy.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Brandon Blog Post

TENANTS IN COMMON VS JOINT TENANCY IN ONTARIO: THE MODERN RULES OF A 1 CO-OWNER UNHAPPY BANKRUPTCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 4, 2021

tenants in common vs joint tenancy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Tenants in common vs joint tenancy in Ontario: Shared ownership of property

There are two different types of property joint ownership: tenants in common vs joint tenancy. Whether you’re married or not, you still face the same problems. Having a co-owned home raises the issue of how the title should be held; tenants in common vs joint tenancy. Both are equally good. The answer really depends on the relationship between the co-owners and their estate planning needs.

A bankruptcy filing by one of the co-owners complicates matters further. A recent bankruptcy case decision in Ontario where only one of the joint owners filed for bankruptcy, highlights the problem, especially for non-bankrupt co-owner. This Brandon Blog discusses the recent bankruptcy case and what it means for both the bankrupt co-owner and the non-bankrupt co-owner regardless of the ownership choices between tenants in common vs joint tenancy.

Home ownership in Ontario: tenants in common vs joint tenants as co-owners

The word “tenants” is normally thought of with property rental. But both joint tenancy and tenants in common reference to a type of shared property ownership. As tenants in common, the ownership rights and all areas of an entire property are owned equally by all members of the group.

When one of the joint tenants dies, the deceased owner‘s share of the property passes to the surviving owner without going through the probate process. With tenants in common, in the event of death, this is not the case.. For asset protection and estate planning purposes, many married couples who want to hold title to the real property in a co-ownership structure, do so as joint tenants to avoid the probate process. Each joint tenant owns a 50% share ownership stake in the property.

Tenants in common may freely decide what ownership percentage of the property each owns. Each tenant in common does not need to own an equal percentage of the property; unequal ownership is fine as long as all co-owners agree on the ownership arrangements of unequal shares. The tenants in common can also transfer their share of the property through a Will, a real estate transfer, or even an arm’s length sale. Tenants in common are well advised to have a signed co-ownership agreement that spells everything out.

This is the primary difference between tenants in common vs joint tenancy in Ontario for the joint ownership of real property.

Property ownership part 2: tenants in common vs joint tenants in Ontario and the bankruptcy of 1 co-owner

When a co-owner becomes bankrupt, what happens? The Brandon Blog faithful knows that I have previously explained that upon bankruptcy of a person, the non-exempt assets of the bankrupt should be vested in the licensed insolvency trustee, subject to secured creditors‘ rights. For real estate ownership, the answer does not change whether title is held in tenants in common vs joint tenancy.

There is an exemption in Ontario for equity in one’s home of not more than $10,783. It is not an exemption for the first $10K, but rather if the total equity is below that amount. Therefore, we can consider the equity in a bankrupt person’s ownership interest in their home to belong to the Trustee for all practical purposes.

If the bankrupt has a 50% ownership stake due to a joint tenancy agreement, then it is the bankrupt’s equity in half the home. If the bankrupt’s ownership stake is under a tenants in common co-ownership agreement, then it is the equity in only the bankrupt’s co-ownership share. In either scenario, the ownership interest of the non-bankrupt owners are not directly affected. However, the other co-owners’ are affected one way or the other by the bankruptcy of a co-owner. The legal case I am about to tell you about is no exception.

Land Owner Transparency Registry: A Public Database

Upon the person’s bankruptcy, the bankrupt must disclose all assets to the Trustee. With computerization and the internet, it is easy for a Trustee to determine if the bankrupt has an ownership interest in the real estate where they reside. This is whether or not the bankrupt has disclosed such ownership interest.

The decision of the Honourable Justice Pattillo of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Bankruptcy and Insolvency dated July 28, 2021, in Re Johansen Bankruptcy, 2021 ONSC 5241 (CanLII) highlights the issues in the bankruptcy of a co-owner of real estate. In December 2016, Mr. Johansen filed a voluntary bankruptcy assignment. In his sworn statement of affairs, he listed no realizable assets and liabilities of $73,968 (unsecured) and $14,950 (secured). No mention is made of any ownership in real estate.

The Trustee learned of the bankrupt’s interest in the home he lived in with his mother in March 2017. In the period from April 2017 to October 2020, the Trustee wrote to the bankrupt and Mrs. Johansen as well as spoke to the bankrupt several times about his interest in the home and why it hadn’t been disclosed. The bankrupt did not provide any information other than denying interest in the property, and his mother did not respond.

A FedEx courier envelope containing a one-page statutory declaration purportedly signed by Mrs. Johansen on October 18, 2018, arrived at the Trustee on October 16, 2020. Her declaration stated, in part, that putting the 20% in the bankrupt’s name was intended to provide her son with an interest in her Estate over and above any other entitlements under her Will. According to her, the 20% was a gift to be realized only after her death.

In the Trustee’s view, the bankrupt and his mother are playing games with each other. The Trustee applied to the court for a declaration that the bankrupt held a 20% interest in the home at the time of bankruptcy, and that he could partition and sell it. Despite the Trustee having a lawyer, the bankrupt represented himself. It would have been better if he had gotten legal advice and been represented in court.

Tenants In Common vs Joint Tenancy: Can your 90-year-old mother be thrown out of her house?

The Judge determined that the bankrupt owned a 20% interest in the property based on the legal title, and hence, that 20% interest vested in the Trustee pursuant to s. 71 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

Mrs. Johansen’s statutory declaration to the effect that the bankrupt did not own the real estate and that the 20% was a gift that only passes to him on her death was not accepted by the Judge. The declaration was signed some two years after the bankruptcy when the Trustee’s ownership interest was well known. Despite repeated requests from the Trustee for information, it was not produced for another two years. In addition to what was noted by the Judge, his main concern was the way she characterized the bankrupt’s interest, given the evidence concerning the property they owned before this home, which Mrs. Johansen failed to mention.

Mrs. Johansen and the former marriage of the bankrupt’s wife, as well as the bankrupt, were the three parties on title to the home they purchased on January 30, 2007. They obtained a mortgage from TD Bank on January 30, 2007, which was discharged on February 21, 2007. Due to a marital split, the bankrupt’s wife was removed from the legal title on October 17, 2008, leaving just his mother Mrs. Johansen and himself as parties on the legal title. The bankrupt admitted that his ex-wife was paid for her interest in that home. On June 28, 2012, the bankrupt and his mother sold that home for $567,000, and the same day purchased the current home for $450,000.

The home was purchased in 2012. The title documents recorded at the time, its ownership is divided between 20% owned by the bankrupt and 80% owned by Mrs. Johansen. Mrs. Johansen and the bankrupt both signed the Land Transfer Tax affidavit showing as between tenants in common vs joint tenancy they chose to own the home as tenants in common. There are no mortgages recorded on the title.

All title searches, including a current title search, did not reveal the nature of the interests of each of Mrs. Johansen, the bankrupt or his ex-wife held in that previous home. However, it did show that each of them had an interest in it. The Judge determined that when Mrs. Johansen and the bankrupt bought the current home, it is a reasonable conclusion that the bankrupt had a 20% ownership interest in it. It was not intended to only pass on Mrs. Johansen’s death.

Justice Pattillo did not accept the bankrupt’s evidence that he has no interest in the property and had no knowledge that he was one of the parties on title. Given the history and the fact that he signed the affidavit of Land Transfer Tax at the time of purchase, Justice Pattillo held that the bankrupt was aware he had an interest in the legal title in the property.

Justice Pattillo found that the Trustee had the standing to bring the application for partition or sale of the property since he is a person with an interest in it. The Judge noted that Mrs. Johansen is 90 years old and does not wish to sell her home. Based on the evidence, however, he did not consider that to be of sufficient hardship to warrant refusing the requested remedy.

Tenants in common vs joint tenancy: The bankruptcy of 1 co-owner will affect the others

The Judge stayed his order for three months. He encouraged the bankrupt and through him his mother to seek professional advice so that this issue can be resolved with the Trustee before the sale process begins. The order will take effect if a resolution is not reached within that timeframe.

Now that the prospect of the sale of the entire home, not just the bankrupt’s co-ownership interest, was a reality, the bankrupt and his mother needed professional guidance. Their professional advice would be that the Trustee is only entitled to 20% of the bankrupt’s equity interest. So, if the mother from her own funds, or by getting a mortgage, can come up with the value of the 20% interest and pay it to the Trustee, then the house will not get sold. She will have bought the bankrupt son’s 20% interest, and the Trustee will have all the money he is entitled to.

If one co-owner goes bankrupt, the other co-owners are affected as well. It is the Trustee’s responsibility to convert the bankrupt’s equity into cash. One or more of the remaining co-owners are the natural buyers of the bankrupt co-owner’s interest. Sometimes non-bankrupt co-owners must sell, as is the case for Johansen if the mother cannot purchase the son’s equity from the Trustee, but most often someone will purchase the Trustee’s equity to maintain the status quo.

Had the choice of ownership interest as between tenants in common vs joint tenancy, this would not have changed the outcome of this case.

A lawyer can help you understand tenants in common vs joint tenancy in Ontario

I hope that you found the tenants in common vs joint tenancy Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you or your company are in financial distress, cash-starved and cannot repay debts. There are several insolvency processes available to a company or a person with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

tenants in common vs joint tenancy

Brandon Blog Post

INSOLVENCY DEF: SHE HAS $100,000 IN DEBT AFTER A FAMILY EMERGENCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date June 16, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast

What is insolvency def?

The insolvency definition (insolvency def) is a state of financial distress in which a person or company is unable to pay its debts. The definition of insolvency can be displayed in an insolvent person or the insolvent debtor company which arises from:

poor cash management;
a reduction in cash inflow;
an increase in expenses;
inadequate accounting controls and reporting;
a lack of proper human resources management; or
all of the above.

The purpose of this insolvency def Brandon Blog is twofold. First I will give a simple primer on what insolvency def is. Next, I will explain how a person can analyze their situation to determine if an insolvency process is for them and if so, which one.

I will use a real-life example that appeared earlier this week in the Toronto Star.

Factors contributing to insolvency

The above reasons can lead to different types of insolvency. The insolvency def can be looked at in a few different ways when considering factors and symptoms.

Balance Sheet insolvency def –

Balance sheet insolvency is when a person or company does not have enough assets, if fully collected or liquidated to pay off all of their debts.

Cash flow insolvency def –

Cash-flow insolvency is when an individual or company has enough assets, if fully collected or liquidated, to pay what is owed. Nevertheless, they do not have enough cash to pay their creditors in full.

What is the difference between technical insolvency and actual insolvency def?

While insolvency def in the technical sense is a basic synonym for balance sheet insolvency, cash-flow insolvency is not the same as insolvency under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

What Is an insolvent person according to the BIA?

“Insolvent person” according to the BIA insolvency def is a person or company that is not bankrupt and is resident, carries on business or has property in Canada, whose liabilities to creditors provable as claims under the BIA amount to $1,000 or more and which for any reason they are not able to pay those obligations as they typically come to be due.

Further, if the insolvent person or the insolvent company liquidated all of their assets, there would still not be enough money to pay off all of the amounts owing to creditors; both secured creditors and unsecured creditors.

What does the insolvent def mean financially?

Now that I have given you the textbook insolvency def, let us look at a real-life example. Every Monday in the Toronto Star there is a column called Millenial Money. This past Monday, Evelyn Kwong wrote about a 34-year-old named Chele. Chele earns $45,000 per year gross.

As I understand it, she borrowed $100,000 to pay for medical expenses back home in the Philippines for a family member. Also, her ex-husband racked up an amount of debt that she is also responsible for. It is unclear from the article if the two sets of debt obligations total $100,000 or something greater.

They presented Chele’s situation to a financial expert to give advice. After looking at Chele’s debt situation, he advised that she speak with a licensed insolvency trustee to determine if a consumer proposal or a bankruptcy proceeding would be best to alleviate Chele of her outstanding debts.

What If I Am Insolvent?

What is Chele’s situation? First, let us look at her monthly statement of income and expenses:

Monthly take-home pay	$2,200
Recurring monthly expenses:
Rent	700
Transportation	810
Food	250
Sports and hobbies	50
Cell and internet	100
Personal	300
Monthly total expenses	$2,210

So Chele is able to essentially balance her cash-flow budget. Her take-home pay is presumably after income tax and other deductions. We can assume that she either receives a small refund on her tax return or at least does not owe any income tax.

As she rents, she does not own a home. Her transportation costs are for her car which is financed. Let us assume that the equity she has in her car fits into her provincial exemption so that a licensed insolvency trustee would have no interest in her car.

So Chele has no assets other than her car and she owes at least $100,000. Now we can look at the consumer proposal as an alternative to bankruptcy vs her doing an assignment in bankruptcy filing.

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy proceeding

As I have written before, a consumer proposal is an insolvency process under the BIA for any person who owes $250,000 or less, not including any debts secured by their personal residence. It is a debt settlement arrangement to pay your unsecured creditors less than the total you owe in order to relieve yourself of all of your debt obligations.

A person can take up to 5 years to make the regular monthly payments to the licensed insolvency trustee acting as the Administrator in the consumer proposal. The insolvency trustee then distributes the total amount agreed to by the creditors and paid by the insolvent debtor as a dividend distribution. Once the insolvent debtor fully completes the consumer proposal, they are relieved of all of their unsecured debt balances (other than a few minor exceptions laid out in the BIA).

Canadian bankruptcy law says that any offer to the creditors in a consumer proposal has to be a better alternative for the creditors than they would get from the person’s bankruptcy estate. So first we need to calculate what the creditors could expect from Chele’s bankruptcy.

Chele has no assets available to her creditors. Her equity in her only asset, her car, is protected by her personal exemption for a vehicle in Ontario. There are no other known assets. All bankruptcy trustees are required to perform a surplus income calculation. In Chele’s case, she earns $2,200 per month net of tax, and she is allowed to earn as a single person in 2021 $2,400 per month before she is subject to any surplus income. So she also does not need to contribute any surplus income.

Assuming Chele has never been bankrupt before if she performs all of her duties in bankruptcy, she is entitled to a discharge from bankruptcy 9 months after the date of bankruptcy, unless a creditor opposes it. All she will be required to pay is the fee to the licensed insolvency trustee to administer her bankruptcy.

In a consumer proposal, in this case, she could offer anything because that would meet the requirement of being a better alternative than her bankruptcy. However, creditors generally expect to receive no less than 20% to 25% on their outstanding debt. So if Chele owes $100,000, at the midpoint of 22.5%, she would have to offer to pay her creditors $22,500 payable in monthly payments over no more than 5 years or 60 months. That works out to a monthly payment of $375. Chele does not have room in her budget right now to afford that monthly payment.

So in her case, unless she can figure out how to reduce her spending so that she can afford a monthly payment for the next 60 months, my advice to her would be to choose the bankruptcy option and file an assignment in bankruptcy. If all goes well, she can start to rebuild her life, free from all her unsecured debt, in 9 months’ time.

Insolvency def summary

I hope that you found this insolvency def Brandon Blog interesting. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE: OUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO WHAT IS A LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 14, 2020

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

Licensed Insolvency Trustees, licensed by the Canadian Government

A bankruptcy trustee (now called a Licensed Insolvency Trustee) is a person or company licensed to administer receiverships, bankruptcies, and proposals in Canada. We are licensed by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB).

The role of the bankruptcy trustee is to help people and companies look at their financial situation and explore the various debt relief options. The Trustee can help with many possible debt solutions; much more than just filing bankruptcy. The Trustee looks at various ways the person or business can avoid bankruptcy first. Bankruptcy, which is the legal process for debtors to deal with their unsecured creditors, by discharging away their unsecured debt, including credit card debt and income tax debts, is the last resort.

In this Brandon’s blog, I provide my complete guide on how a bankruptcy trustee helps people and companies who are in a precarious financial situation because they have too much debt by providing insolvency services and helping people and companies through the Canadian insolvency process.

About Bankruptcy Trustees: what is a licensed insolvency trustee?

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) is federally certified by the OSB. A trustee in bankruptcy is the old name for a LIT. LITs are the only debt professionals who are federally regulated and supervised professional that offers recommendations and solutions to individuals and businesses with financial problems.

LITs help people make informed choices to manage their debt difficulties. A bankruptcy trustee is the only expert licensed to carry out government-regulated insolvency proceedings such as:

privately-appointed or court-appointed receiver or receiver and manager to administer receiverships Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada (BIA).
assisting people to restructure through consumer insolvency using a consumer proposal.
helping people who owe more than $250,000 (not including debts registered against their principal residence) and companies by making a proposal to creditors as alternatives to bankruptcy.
bankruptcy trustee/licensed insolvency trustee in a bankruptcy administration when a person or company is filing for bankruptcy.

As licensed insolvency trustees, we’re here to help: How do I become an insolvency trustee?

A person who wishes to acquire an individual licence may complete and file an application with the OSB. The following are required for the issuance of a personal licence under the BIA:

successfully passed the following, which is administered by the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP):
the Canadian Insolvency and Restructuring Professional (CIRP) Qualification Program (CQP) unless otherwise exempted;
the CIRP National Insolvency Exam; and
the insolvency counselling course;
paid the required fee;
the applicant shall be solvent;
the applicant must be of good character and reputation; and
passed the oral board of examination run by the OSB.

You need to pass the educational program run by CAIRP. In order to register, you need to be sponsored by a bankruptcy trustee. That LIT will most certainly be your employer. When you pass the final CQP exam, you are awarded the CIRP designation and then able to apply to sit before the OSB’s oral board of examiners.

bankruptcy trustee

***Trustees in Bankruptcy near you: How to find a bankruptcy trustee* in Canada**

If you are looking for a trustee in bankruptcy near you, there are three good ways to find one.

The best way to find a bankruptcy trustee is a referral from friends or family members. Although they themselves may have never filed for bankruptcy, perhaps they know someone who did. Or, maybe they know a lawyer they trust who can provide them with a name or two that could be passed on to you. A personal reference is the best way to go.

The second way is through the OSB. They maintain a searchable database of all LITs in Canada. You can look for a bankruptcy trustee located near you. The directory includes the office locations of all LITs. You can browse either by name, city or province.

The third way is to look for bankruptcy information online. Type into your favourite search engine a phrase like “ bankruptcy trustee”, “bankruptcy trustee near me”, bankruptcy trustee Vaughan ” or “ trustee in bankruptcy Toronto ” and start searching websites. Then call the one whose website seems to speak to you. You can make an appointment for a no-cost consultation to get all your questions answered. You may even want to try two or three so that you can compare approaches. Then you can select the bankruptcy trustee that you feel you could work best with.

The fee of a bankruptcy trustee in a summary administration bankruptcy – The Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act

A personal bankruptcy administration is called a “summary” bankruptcy administration when the realizable assets are estimated at $15,000 or less. This kind of filing for bankruptcy is many times referred to as “no assets, no income”.

Rule 128 of the BIA General Rules dictates the fee and disbursements of a bankruptcy trustee in a summary administration personal bankruptcy. The fee is fixed and is called a tariff. It is calculated as follows:

“128 (1) The fees of the trustee for services performed in a summary administration are calculated on the total receipts remaining after deducting necessary disbursements relating directly to the realization of the property of the bankrupt, and the payments to secured creditors, according to the following percentages:

(a) 100 percent on the first $975 or less of receipts;

(b) 35 percent on the portion of the receipts exceeding $975 but not exceeding $2,000; and (c) 50 percent on the portion of the receipts exceeding $2,000.

(2) A trustee in a summary administration may claim, in addition to the amount set out in subsection (1), (a) the costs of counselling referred to in subsection 131(2);

(b) the fee for filing an assignment referred to in paragraph 132(a);

(d) the amount of applicable federal and provincial taxes for goods and services; and (e) a lump sum of $100 in respect of administrative disbursements.” If there are no assets or surplus income that will provide cash in the bankruptcy administration, then the debtor, in order to retain the services of the bankruptcy trustee, needs someone to either guarantee the fee and disbursements or post a cash retainer with the LIT in order to file for bankruptcy.

The fees of the bankruptcy trustee in an ordinary bankruptcy

A bankruptcy is called an “ordinary” bankruptcy when the realizable assets are estimated at $15,000 or greater in personal bankruptcy. Every corporate bankruptcy is an ordinary administration.

In an ordinary administration, the trustee is entitled to the remuneration voted by the inspectors in the bankruptcy case. The inspectors are representatives of the creditors who were voted in at the First Meeting of Creditors. The fee must also be approved by the court.

The fee will be affected by the complexity of the bankruptcy case, how much work the LIT had to do to preserve and sell the assets and did the LIT obtain verifiable results that can be described as extraordinary. The time spent and the hourly rates of the bankruptcy trustee staff involved are the basis for calculating the fee in an ordinary administration.

The disbursements incurred are to be added to the fee and must also be taxed. If the bankruptcy trustee is unsure at the outset if there will be any realizable assets, the LIT will ask a third party to provide either a guarantee or cash retainer.

bankruptcy trustee

The consumer proposal fee for a bankruptcy trustee acting as administrator of a consumer proposal – The Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act

Rule 129 sets out how to calculate the tariff fee in a consumer proposal. As I stated above, one of the roles a bankruptcy trustee is licensed for is to act as the administrator of a consumer proposal This rule states:

“129 (1) For the purposes of paragraph 66.12(6)(b) of the Act, the fees and expenses of the administrator of a consumer proposal that must be provided for in a consumer proposal are as follows:

(a) $750, payable on filing a copy of the consumer proposal with the official receiver;

(b) $750, payable on the approval or deemed approval of the consumer proposal by the court;

(c) 20 percent of the moneys distributed to creditors under the consumer proposal, payable on the distribution of the moneys;

(d) the costs of counselling referred to in subsection 131(1);

(e) the fee for filing a consumer proposal referred to in paragraph 132(c);

(f) the fee payable to the registrar under paragraph 3(b) of Part II of the schedule; and (g) the amount of applicable federal and provincial taxes for goods and services.

Our regular readers of Brandon’s Blog will recall that in previous blogs that I wrote, I described what the BIA minimum requirements are for calculating how much a debtor should offer its creditors as a proposal fund in a consumer proposal. That calculation has nothing to do with what fee the licensed trustee acting as the administrator may be entitled to.

That is why any debtor thinking about filing a consumer proposal in order to avoid bankruptcy need not be concerned with how much they have to pay as a fee. The calculation as to what a reasonable proposal fund will be has zero relation to what the administrator’s fee will be. In this way, the fee of the bankruptcy trustee acting as administrator is no-cost!

The fee of the bankruptcy trustee for the administration of a Division I proposal

Readers of the Brandon Blog will remember that a consumer proposal is available for any individual who has $250,000 of debt or less, not including any debts secured against their personal residence. A Part III Divison I of the BIA proposal is available to all companies and to any person whose debts are too large to do a consumer proposal. Both are alternatives to bankruptcy Under either administration, a proposal is a debt relief plan sanctioned by the BIA. It is the only debt settlement plan authorized by the Government of Canada. Above I described how the fee and disbursements of a bankruptcy trustee in an ordinary bankruptcy administration must be approved by the inspectors and the court.

The same is true for the fee of the bankruptcy trustee acting as the licensed trustee in a Divison I proposal. The calculation of the fee will be very similar to an ordinary bankruptcy administration also. The only difference will be as required by the difference between a proposal and bankruptcy.

A proposal is a great alternative to bankruptcy.

Only a bankruptcy trustee can act as a receiver

Section 243(4) of the BIA states that only a bankruptcy trustee can be appointed as a receiver. It does not matter whether the receiver will be privately or court-appointed. The calculation of the receiver’s fee is based on the hours worked and the hourly rate charged by the respected staff working on the file.

In a private appointment, the fee must be approved by the appointing secured creditor. In a court appointment, the fee must be approved by the court.

bankruptcy trustee

Bankruptcy trustee summary

I hope you have enjoyed this bankruptcy trustee Brandon’s Blog. Hopefully, you have better insight now into the many roles played by a LIT. As part of any bankruptcy or proposal administration, there are two mandatory credit counselling sessions also. So, the LIT also acts as a credit counsellor.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing.

If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), bankruptcy trustee, bankruptcy trustee near me, bankruptcy trustee toronto, Consumer Proposal, Division I Part III proposal, how do i become an insolvency trustee, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, LIT, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, ordinary administration, ordinary bankruptcy, OSB, receiver, receivership, Summary Administration, what is a licensed insolvency trustee

Brandon Blog Post

ESTATES ACT ONTARIO: TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE REVEALS HIDDEN SECRET

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 13, 2019

Estates Act Ontario: Introduction

I am continuing my series of blogs to show how it would be very natural to appoint a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or bankruptcy trustee) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) as the estate trustee (formerly called an executor or executrix) of a solvent deceased estate under the Estates Act Ontario. In this blog, I am going to focus on that piece of provincial legislation that guides the activities of an estate trustee.

In my blog TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS, I set the stage by going over some basics when it comes to a deceased estate and why a LIT would be very comfortable with those basic requirements for an administration of a deceased estate. In the blog, TRUSTEE OF PARENTS ESTATE: DO I REALLY HAVE TO?, I described why in some cases parents trying to do the right thing by making all their children an estate trustee could turn out very wrong.

In this and the next two blogs, I want to focus on the three main Ontario statutes that govern the conduct, duties and responsibilities of an estate trustee of a deceased estate. The three statutes that I will talk about are:

As you have probably guessed by now, in this blog, I will show how a bankruptcy trustee would be very familiar with the workings of the Estates Act.

Since we are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

Provisions a LIT is familiar with

Jurisdiction

Section 5 of the Estates Act Ontario states that letters of administration shall not be granted to a person not residing in Ontario. Similarly, a bankruptcy trustee must be licensed by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy in each province the LIT wishes to practice in.

Posting of security

Section 14(2) of the Estates Act Ontario requires that the administrator appointed to administer a deceased estate may be required to post security as the court might require.

Section 5(3)(c) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) states that the Superintendent of Bankruptcy can:

“…require the deposit of one or more continuing guaranty bonds or continuing suretyships as security for the due accounting of all property received by trustees and for the due and faithful performance by them of their duties in the administration of estates to which they are appointed, in any amount that the Superintendent may determine…”

The posting of security is another common area that a LIT understands well.

Court can appoint

Section 29 of the Estates Act Ontario deals with the appointment of an estate trustee. This section gives the Ontario Superior Court of Justice the authority to appoint an estate trustee where:

a person dies intestate;
the estate trustee named in the will refuses to prove the will;
where the named estate trustee(s) ask another person be appointed to administer the deceased’s estate; or
where there are special circumstances.

Section 243(1) of the BIA gives the Court the power to appoint a receiver. So, assessing the appropriateness of acting as a Court officer and providing consent to do so is something a LIT is quite familiar with.

Accounts to be rendered

Section 39 of the Estates Act Ontario requires the estate trustee to “…render a just and full account…” of the estate trustee’s activities. The LIT is fully familiar with this process. In both a Court-appointed receivership and a bankruptcy administration, the LIT must submit full and detailed accounts showing its activities, fees and disbursements for approval by the Court. This approval process is called taxation. This is another common area between the duties of an estate trustee administering a solvent deceased’s estate and the duties of a LIT.

Admitting and disallowing claims

Sections 44 and 45 of the Estates Act Ontario deals with the rules to be followed in contesting claims made against the deceased’s estate. The LIT is very familiar with this process. Section 135 of the BIA deals with the admission and disallowance of proofs of claim and proofs of security.

The LIT is a perfect party to be able to decipher claims made against a deceased’s estate and follow the provincial statute in the allowance and disallowance of claims.

Disputes as to ownership

Section 46 of the Estates Act Ontario describes the process for handling the claim by any third party to ownership of personal property in the estate not exceeding $800 in value. There are steps in the BIA that a LIT must follow when faced with claims of ownership of property by a third party in the possession of the bankrupt. So resolving such disputes is very familiar to the LIT.

Summary

I hope that in this blog I have successfully made the case that the provisions of the Estates Act Ontario outlining the responsibilities of an estate trustee tracks very closely what a LIT does in either a Court-appointed receivership or bankruptcy administration.

Therefore, the LIT is used to acting as a Court officer and could very easily perform the requirements and duties of an estate trustee as described in the Estates Act Ontario.

If you have any questions about a deceased estate and the need for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

In my next blog, I am going to write a similar comparison. It will be about the requirements outlined in the Estates Administration Act and how a LIT is most familiar with them also.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

Tags Administrator, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), bankruptcy trustee, Canada, court appointed receiver, Debt, estate trustee, estates act ontario, estates administration act, Ira Smith, LIT, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Superintendent of Bankruptcy, Toronto bankruptcy trustee, Trust law, trustee, trustee act

Brandon Blog Post

WEPPA CALCULATION CANADA: EMPLOYEES’ WEPP MONEY INCREASES ON EMPLOYER BANKRUPTCY OR RECEIVERSHIP

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date December 24, 2018

weppa calculation canada

WEPPA calculation: Introduction

As part of the Federal Budget 2018, the Wage Earner Protection Program Act calculation (WEPPA calculation) has increased the maximum payout. We have written before about the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA). However, to understand the recent change, it would make sense for me to check again what the WEPPA is.

How did it arise?

A change to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) developed a device for employees of an employer that entered either bankruptcy or receivership to be paid for wages or benefit claims owed, built up in the 6 months before the company became bankrupt or was put into receivership.

The WEPPA became legislation because of the federal government’s previous worry that when you experienced “my firm owes me money and declared bankruptcy” there was seldom a possibility for workers to get any of the salaries owed.

WEPPA calculation: Who can’t file?

.Nevertheless, you are normally not qualified if, throughout the duration for which qualified earnings are overdue, you:

were a director or officer of the company;
had a management position in the company; or
were management whose duties consisted of making financial decisions and/or making binding choices on the settlement or non-payment of amounts owing.

WEPPA calculation Canada: Who is qualified for the WEPP?

You might be if:

your previous company has actually entered bankruptcy or receivership; and
you have unpaid wages, salaries, vacation pay or reimburse expenses from the company during the 6 months prior to the date of bankruptcy or receivership.

WEPPA calculation: Budget 2018 maximum payout increase

The WEPPA gives financial backing to Canadian employees, owed money when their company goes into either bankruptcy or receivership. The WEPPA offers a prompt settlement of qualified earnings. The amount of qualified earnings is an amount equal to 4 weeks maximum insurable earnings under the Employment Insurance Act ($3,977 for 2018).

The Federal government in its Budget 2018 stated that the maximum payout would be increased by raising the maximum settlement from 4 weeks to 7 weeks of insurable revenues, which will amount to $6,960 in 2018. This is a boost of nearly $3,000 for each former employee. The rise to the maximum payout received Royal Assent on December 13, 2018. This increased calculation is retroactive for bankruptcies or receiverships that happened on or after February 27, 2018, the day Budget 2018 was tabled.

Receivers and licensed insolvency trustees (LIT) (formerly called bankruptcy trustees) are obliged to tell employees of the Wage Earner Protection (WEPP) program and give employees details about amounts owing to them. From the day of bankruptcy or receivership, trustees and receivers have 45 days to send Trustee Information Forms showing the amounts owing to employees. Employees have 56 days to send their Service Canada WEPP application to the WEPP. The present handling time for a WEPP settlement is within 35 days of receipt of a finished WEPP Canada application and Trustee Information Form.

WEPPA calculation: Do you have way too much debt?

Have you lost your job because your employer went into bankruptcy or receivership? Is the pain and stress of too much debt now negatively affecting your health?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies in need of financial restructuring and counselling. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only professionals licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide debt settlement and financial restructuring services.

We offer a free consultation to help you solve your problems. We understand your pain that debt causes. We can also end it right away from your life. This will allow you to begin a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can begin helping you and get you back into a healthy, stress-free life.

To all my readers, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays.

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), bankruptcy or receivership, bankruptcy trustee, budget 2018, employment insurance act, financial restructuring services, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, receivership, Service Canada, service canada wepp application, Trustee Information Form, Wage Earner Protection Program Act, WEPP, weppa calculation

Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA PART OF BANKRUPTCIES LAWS IN ONTARIO?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date December 12, 2018

Introduction

I prepared this vlog to explain the differences between a consumer proposal (CP), one of the bankruptcies laws in Ontario and bankruptcy. This discussion is based on the inquiries that we are asked often. Hopefully, this information will help you understand better specifically what a CP debt settlement strategy is and how it will certainly assist you to remove all your financial obligations. All this while AVOIDING personal bankruptcy.

Main benefits of a CP

Take into consideration several of the benefits of the CP vs. bankruptcy:

- Unlike informal debt negotiation, the CP creates a forum where every one of your unsecured creditors must take part in for your debt restructuring.
- You keep your property.
- Legal actions against you on your property and debts, such as wage garnishments, cannot continue.
- You do not require to file an assignment in bankruptcy

CP vs. bankruptcy

How do I recognize if I have a financial problem?

If you are having difficulty satisfying your debts or have actually quit paying them, you are probably insolvent. Another sign of insolvency is that if your assets if liquidated, will not bring in enough money to pay off your debts. When you are all stressed out over the money you owe, for sure you will know that you have financial problems.

How do I know if I qualify for either a CP or bankruptcy?

Any person that is insolvent and owes greater than $1,000 is qualified to file either a CP or an assignment in bankruptcy in Canada.

Will I have to give up my assets?

As soon as you file for bankruptcy you will certainly have to give up your non-exempt property to the Trustee. These possessions will be marketed and sold. The cash from the sale of your property will be used to pay for the cost of the bankruptcy administration. The balance will be dispersed among your creditors.

In CP, you will not be giving up your assets. You are making an offer to your creditors less than the total amount you owe. According to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA), your CP has to be a better result for your unsecured creditors than they would receive in your bankruptcy.

What occurs to my wages or salary?

Nothing. You receive it as normal.

In a CP that has been (deemed) accepted by your creditors and approved by the Court, you begin to make your payments. There are no other requirements for your income in CP.

In bankruptcy, nothing happens to your income either. However, in a bankruptcy, unlike a CP, your Trustee at the outset has to decide if you are required to make voluntary contributions to your bankruptcy case based off of your income. If so, this is called a surplus income requirement. Also, you will have to file monthly statements of income and expense with the Trustee. Your surplus income requirement can change, depending on if your income goes up or down. There is no such requirement in CP.

Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has frozen my bank account and has garnished my earnings. Exactly how can I deal with that?

As stated above, once you file a CP, there is a stay of proceedings. Upon receiving notice from the Trustee, CRA stops the garnishee process and lifts the freeze on your account(s). The same is true in bankruptcy.

Will I still owe money after I declare bankruptcy or file a CP?

Perhaps, because of neither a CP nor bankruptcy covers:

secured creditors – mortgages, car loans;
student loans (if it is less than seven years since you ceased to be a full or part-time student)
alimony and support payments you must make in your divorce proceedings; and
debts arising from fraud.fines or penalties imposed by the court;

How much time will I be under the insolvency proceeding?

The duration of time in bankruptcy will depend on whether this is an initial or 2nd (or more) bankruptcy, whether you have to pay surplus income and if your discharge is opposed or not. Depending on your circumstances, it can be anywhere from 9 months to many years.

In a CP, you can take up to 60 months to pay the total amount you promised to pay. Payments in a CP are required monthly.

Will anyone find out that I have filed either a CP or for bankruptcy?

As soon as you file for bankruptcy or a CP, your Trustee must file a notification with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) to start either process. The OSB does run a public database showing the status of all files.

In either a CP or bankruptcy, your Trustee must send a notice to all of your creditors. So they will know.

In a CP or a shortened summary administration bankruptcy, the Trustee does not place a legal notice in the local newspaper advertising that you filed. In an ordinary administration bankruptcy, the Trustee must publish a notice.

Generally, it is only the OSB, your Trustee and your creditors who are aware of your filing.

Is my partner or spouse impacted by my CP or bankruptcy?

Your partner/spouse will not be impacted by your CP or bankruptcy unless he/she co-signed as a borrower or has guaranteed payment for any of your debts. If they have guaranteed some or all of your debts, then those specific creditors can ask your spouse for payment in full.

NOTE: There is a body of case-law to suggest that if your CP is fully performed, then there is no debt left for your guarantor to make good on. That type of discussion is too technical for this general blog. If you are in this situation, your spouse should get legal advice before agreeing to pay anything. No such argument could even be considered in a bankruptcy situation.

Just how will my CP or bankruptcy impact my existing divorce case?

In Canada, CP and bankruptcy filings do not conflict with the majority of the divorce procedures. In a bankruptcy, the Trustee will stand in the shoes of the bankrupt spouse. Ontario is an equalization Province; not a division of assets Province. If the bankrupt spouse is entitled to an equalization payment, that will come to the Trustee.

In a CP, the Trustee does not get involved at all in any way. The BIA does not interfere at all with non-financial divorce issues such as custody. It also does not have any effect on support or alimony.

Consumer Proposal Canada or bankruptcy: Conclusion

I hope this consumer proposal discussion about the differences between a Consumer Proposal Canada and bankruptcy has been helpful to you.

Do you have severe debt and don’t know where to begin to fix it? Are your debt issues causing you to lose sleep? Is too much debt triggering stress and anxiety, discomfort and pain? We know that discomfort better than anyone and we can get it out of your life.

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of experience helping people and companies seeking financial restructuring or a debt settlement strategy. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists recognized, accredited and supervised by the Federal government to give insolvency advice and remedies to assist you and to prevent bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can end the stress and anxiety financial problems create. With the special roadmap, we will develop with and special to you, we will promptly return you right into a healthy, balanced hassle-free life.

You can have a no-cost appointment to assist you so we can fix your debt troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to make a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now.

consumer proposal bankruptcies laws in ontario

Tags assignment in bankruptcy, bankruptcies laws in ontario, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), Canada Revenue Agency, consumer bankruptcy in Canada, Consumer Proposal, consumer proposal canada, consumer proposal vs bankruptcy, difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy, insolvency, Ira Smith Trustee, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, personal bankruptcy, Should I Use Bankruptcy or a Consumer Proposal, surplus income

Brandon Blog Post

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CANADA: ENHANCING RETIREMENT SECURITY IN CANADIAN INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date December 10, 2018

,

If you prefer, you can listen to the employee benefits Canada podcast. Please scroll down to the bottom of the page for the audio.

Employee benefits Canada: Introduction

The Federal government supports the proposition that Canadians are entitled to a risk-free, safe, secure and sensible retired life. Corporate financial troubles have increased problems about the safety of pension plan, wage and benefit payments for employees and senior citizens. Employee benefits Canada is now being looked at by the Federal government.

The most recent case that has brought these issues to the forefront has been the Sears Canada liquidation. Federal politicians have sponsored several private member’s bills which have now caught the serious attention of our Federal government. Two such Bills were brought forward by Hamilton Mountain NDP MP Scott Duvall and Senator Art Eggleton. The Federal government wants to make employee benefits Canada news.

Employee benefits Canada: My previous blogs

I have written on the issue in several blogs:

TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: NDP WANTS FEDERAL INSOLVENCY LAWS CHANGED SO THERE IS PENSION PLAN SECURITY WHEN FINANCIALLY TROUBLED BUSINESSES FAIL – September 27, 2017
SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS – October 18, 2017
SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING – November 1, 2017
SEARS CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN SHORTFALL: MP SCOTT DUVALL COMES THROUGH ON HIS PROMISE IN CANADIAN PARLIAMENT – November 8, 2017
CORPORATE BANKRUPTCIES CANADA: SENATOR EGGLETON PROPOSES NEW PENSION FUND CANADA LAW – October 22, 2018

Arising out of certain policy statements in the Fall 2018 Budget, the Federal government is looking for responses from pensioners, employees, firms, professionals and various other stakeholders to take a macro, evidence-based strategy to try to provide better-retired life protection for all Canadians.

Employee benefits Canada: Canada’s retirement income system

Canada’s retirement income system (RIS) is currently based upon 3 columns:

Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) give a fundamental degree of retired life earnings.Canada Pension (CPP) gives standard a certain wage substitute for employees, funded by payments from employees, companies and the self-employed.
Employer-based pension – Defined Benefit (DB) and Defined Contribution (DC)).
Income tax-assisted personal saving vehicles, such as Registered Retired Savings Plan (RRSP) and Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSA).

Employee benefits Canada: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law

In 2008-2009, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA) was changed. Under the BIA, in a receivership or bankruptcy, arrears of wages was given a super-priority. Approximately $2,000 per staff member must be paid before secured creditors. Any unfunded normal employer pension plan contributions (as distinct from any unfunded pension liability determined by an actuarial evaluation) also have a super-priority in either a bankruptcy or receivership.

As far as a corporate restructuring proposal under the BIA, the amendment also states that the Court cannot approve any Proposal that does not provide for the same treatment. The CCAA was similarly modified to be consistent with corporate restructuring under the BIA.

Employee benefits Canada: Corporate governance

The Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) supplies the fundamental business administration structure for Federally incorporated companies. Although good corporate governance is important for all business stakeholders, it must be followed and implemented to be of any use.

As I indicated above, the Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall has caused the Federal government to now look at a variety of options to try to better protect employees and retirees for both pensions and benefits.

Employee benefits Canada: The Feds are looking for stakeholder comments

The Federal government wants to listen to the thoughts of stakeholders on what further actions that might be embraced to boost retired life safety for workers and senior citizens impacted by company bankruptcy. Specifically, the Federal government wants stakeholder response on increased security for workers’ claims in insolvencies, including changing the BIA and CCAA to make sure that there is a super-priority to pay unfunded pension plan contributions and benefits claims ahead of the claims of secured creditors.

Many options are being considered that the Federal government wants stakeholder comments on by the end of this year.

Employee benefits Canada: Pension options being looked at

Possible pension options being considered are:

Solvency reserves: A solvency reserve is an account the employer could contribute to so that pension deficits can be eliminated. I doubt this would work. If the company could afford to pay into a solvency reserve, they could also afford to just pay off the pension payment deficit.
Pension plan financing relief: The Minister of Finance has the authority to offer companies with pension plan financing relief to assist in the long-term survival of the company pension. The Minister’s authority could be boosted to assist companies with a pension plan deficit experiencing financial problems. This type of help, being a moratorium on pension payments, could come with specific conditions. Such special conditions could include a moratorium on the payment of dividends, share redemptions and senior executive bonuses.
Self-managed accounts: Upon the bankruptcy of the company, the DB plan ends. In that case, the only option is to transfer each former employees’ respective entitlement to purchase an annuity. So, the expected benefit will never materialize because of the underfunding. Federal pension legislation (and provincial legislation to follow) could provide extra options. It could allow rolling over of each entitlement into a self-managed plan such as an RRSP. This way there is an opportunity to recoup some of the lost benefits over time.

Employee benefits Canada: Corporate governance options being looked at

Limitations on the company: Dividends, share redemptions and senior management bonuses could be restricted under the CBCA in situations where a company is in arrears of pension contributions. Once the arrears are caught up, then such special payments could continue. As federally incorporated companies are the minority of all companies in Canada. The Provinces would also have to invoke similar legislation. An annual filing mechanism, perhaps through the Canada Revenue Agency, would also have to be established so that companies could be monitored.

Employee benefits Canada: Bankruptcy and insolvency options being looked at

Increased “look-back” time: The BIA permits a court to reverse dividends paid or share redemptions made by an insolvent company within one year preceding the date of bankruptcy. The BIA and CCAA additionally allow a court to invalidate reviewable transaction (transfers at undervalue) by the Debtor as much as 5 years prior to the insolvency. In order to further connect corporate behaviour with employee interests, the “look-back” period in the BIA and the CCAA can be amended to include the unwinding of executive benefits, dividend payments and share redemptions at a time when there were also unfunded pension liabilities. The legislation could be amended to state that the recovered funds must go to paying down the pension payment arrears. I would also go one step further to make the amount approved by the Directors of the corporation to be paid out while there were pension plan contribution arrears a personal liability of such Directors.
Improved openness in CCAA rules: In CCAA, the borrower business negotiates with its creditors on a debt settlement plan. The process is conducted under court supervision. The legislation could be amended so that when there is an underfunded pension plan, it would be mandatory to have legal representation for the employees who are participants in such pension plan. This could be accomplished by amending the CCAA legislation to need that upon the motion to get the Initial Order the administrator of the pension plan must be an initial stakeholder that is consulted and served with the Initial Order motion material. The plan administrator has the statutory right to retain legal counsel and be represented at all Court hearings.

Employee benefits Canada: The solutions are varied and complex

As you can see, the range of possible solutions are varied and complex. However, one thing is for sure though. The Federal government has now awoken to the issue of shareholders being enriched off of the backs of the workers. The Sears Canada CCAA liquidation has brought the issue to the forefront. It will be very interesting to see how the Federal government proceeds in 2019.

Employee benefits Canada: Is your company bogged down by too much debt?

Is your company under fire as a result of too much debt, including pension plan contribution arrears? Is your business looking for reorganizing to get debt alleviation?

The Ira Smith Team has years as well as generations of experience helping people and companies in financial difficulty. If your company needs a corporate restructuring debt negotiation strategy, we have the experience. We will end your stress, anxiety and discomfort. Whether it is a BIA or CCAA debt restructuring, we can help you. We will return you and your company to a healthy, balanced and efficient pain-free life.

Our method for every case is to establish a remedy where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This begins the minute you consult with us and walk through our front door. You’re merely one telephone call away. Therefore, with our help, you will take the required steps to go back to leading a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

Call us today for your free first consultation.

Tags bankruptcy and insolvency, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), Canada Pension Plan (CPP), Canada Revenue Agency, CCAA, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, defined benefit, employee benefits canada, employee benefits canada news, enhancing retirement security, Federal government, insolvency and bankruptcy, pension plan, pension plan shortfall, sears canada, sears canada ccaa, sears canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall

Brandon Blog Post

INSOLVENT DEFINITION: A NEW FOCUS FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 28, 2018

JUNE 17, 2019 UPDATE: The Court of Appeal for Ontario reversed this lower court decision. You can read all about it in our blog update – INSOLVENT DEFINITION RESTORED IN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Insolvent definition: Introduction

The basis of the Canadian insolvency system is to assist the honest but unfortunate person or company shed their debt (with certain limitations) and start over fresh. There are many terms defined in the Canadian insolvency legislation. The most basic one is the insolvent definition.

Last week I reviewed a decision of the Ontario bankruptcy Court that really did give me a new focus. It doesn’t change the bottom line of the advice I would give an insolvent debtor, but it did change my focus. That is one of the things I love about being a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee). I never stop learning.

Insolvent definition: Two examples

The Oxford dictionary definition is:

“insolvent

ADJECTIVE

Unable to pay debts owed.

‘the company became insolvent’”

Section 2 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) defines an insolvent person as:

“insolvent person means a person who is not bankrupt and who resides, carries on business or has property in Canada, whose liabilities to creditors provable as claims under this Act amount to one thousand dollars, and

(a) who is for any reason unable to meet his obligations as they generally become due,

(b) who has ceased paying his current obligations in the ordinary course of business as they generally become due, or

(c) the aggregate of whose property is not, at a fair valuation, sufficient, or, if disposed of at a fairly conducted sale under legal process, would not be sufficient to enable payment of all his obligations, due and accruing due;”

Insolvent definition: The concept of net worth

Insolvent person refers to both people and companies. The BIA definition incorporates the common English definition. The BIA definition also incorporates the accounting concept of net worth. Net worth = Assets – Liabilities. If the difference is positive, you have a positive net worth. If the difference is negative, you have negative or no net worth.

For those that want to read more about the concept of net worth, look at the Addendum I wrote which is at the bottom of this blog. Since many of you already have an advanced understanding of net, I don’t want to insert it in here.

When giving our free first consultation, my advice to anyone with lots of debt but positive net worth is that in bankruptcy, they will lose their non-exempt assets. If the major asset providing the positive net worth value is their home, I advise the person that they will lose their equity in their home which is not a good outcome. So, my first advice is always to see if the person can either refinance the home or sell it. Then they can use the funds to pay off their debts. In a sale, any balance can be used as a down payment on a smaller home or can set them up nicely to rent.

I normally don’t think of part (c) of the BIA insolvent definition as being mutually exclusive. However, after reading the Court decision and looking again at the BIA definition, I am reminded that it really is. Let me describe the Court’s decision to explain.

Insolvent definition: Kormos v. Fast, 2018 ONSC 6044 (CanLII)

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos got a judgment against their neighbours, Mr. and Mrs. Fast. The Small Claims Court at St. Catherines issued the judgment for $25,565.64. This judgment comes about from problems arising from flooding in their home which was triggered by the Fasts.

After the judgment was given, the Fasts were contacted by Mr. Kormos’ licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee). The Trustee advised that Mr. Fast had submitted a consumer proposal under the BIA many months previously, on August 24, 2016. Mr. Fast did not previously mention anything about his consumer proposal or his later filing of an assignment in bankruptcy.

Fifteen days after the Kormos plaintiffs started enforcement of the judgment by serving a notice of examination on Mrs. Fast, she made an assignment in bankruptcy under the BIA on April 25, 2017.

In their different bankruptcy filings, each of the Fasts attested in their respective sworn Statement of Affairs, that their home in Queenston, Ontario (Home) was worth $630,000.

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos provided evidence by way of an expert witness appraisal who also testified in Court, showing that the Home was considerably underestimated in the BIA filings by Mr. Fast on August 24, 2016, and Mrs. Fast on April 25, 2017, when she made an assignment in bankruptcy.

The Kormos’ lawyer stated that when a reasonable value is designated to the Home, neither Mr. Fast nor Mrs. Fast was insolvent when their corresponding filings were made under the BIA. They were obviously relying on the fact that each of Mr. and Mrs. Fast really had a positive net worth.

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos were looking for an Order under the BIA (i) annulling Mr. Fast’s consumer proposal as well as, if required, his 2014 bankruptcy; as well as (ii) annulling Mrs. Fast’s bankruptcy.

Insolvent definition: The Court’s analysis

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos wanted:

An Order according to s. 66.3(1) of the BIA annulling the consumer proposal submitted by Mr. Fast.
Since an outcome of such an annulment would be that Mr. Fast is considered to make an assignment in bankruptcy under s. 66.3(5) of the BIA, they also were looking for an annulment of his bankruptcy on the ground that Mr. Fast is not presently insolvent.
An order according to ss. 181(1) as well as 187(5) of the BIA annulling the bankruptcy of Mrs. Fast.
An Order according to Rule 60.07 of the Rules of Civil Procedure issuing a writ of seizure and sale of the Home.

The Fasts did not challenge the expert appraisal opinion. The Court accepted the expert’s appraisal as being the value of the Home on the relevant dates of Mr. and Mrs. Fast’s respective filings under the BIA.

The Court looked at the insolvent definition in the BIA, which again is:

(a) who is for any reason unable to meet his obligations as they generally become due,

(b) who has ceased paying his current obligations in the ordinary course of business as they generally become due, or

In her bankruptcy filing, Mrs. Fast filed her statement of monthly income and expenses. According to the statement, her monthly expenses exceed her monthly income by $2,010. When looking at the definition of an insolvent, the Court concluded that Mrs. Fast was unable to meet her obligations and had stopped paying her current obligations. Notwithstanding that the Court found that Mrs. Fast probably understated the value of her interest in the Home, the Court was not persuaded to annul her bankruptcy as she met the definition of an insolvent person.

As for Mr. Fast, the Court decided it would not annul his consumer proposal. The Judge went on to say that even if he was persuaded to do so, Mr. Fast was still a bankrupt and the Judge had no evidence for the proposition that his bankruptcy should also be annulled.

So, the Judge did not grant the application, the Fasts are under their respective BIA proceedings and Mr. and Mrs. Kormos can file their claim with the Fasts’ Trustee.

Insolvent definition: The Trustee

Now the Trustee has an interesting situation. The Trustee is now aware of the expert valuation of the Home. The Trustee will have to use that information to decide if the Fasts have equity in their home. If yes, then as far as Mrs. Fast, her equity will have to be realized upon because she is bankrupt. Her equity in the Home devolves to the Trustee as an asset (if it is more than the minuscule provincial exemption).

Is Mr. Fast’s consumer proposal has already been (deemed) accepted by the creditors and (deemed) approved by the Court. If yes, then he will just have to keep making the agreed payments to fully complete his consumer proposal and get out of bankruptcy. If not, the Trustee will now have to take his real equity in the Home into account. The Trustee will have to decide if the consumer proposal can still be recommended to the creditors, or if it must be improved because of the increased total asset value.

Insolvent definition: Are you insolvent?

Are you unable to pay your debts as they come due? Are your bills past due and you don’t know how you are going to pay them? If so, then you are insolvent, and we can help end your pain.

Licensed Insolvency Trustees (formerly called bankruptcy trustees) are the only experts accredited, licensed and supervised by the federal government to handle debt restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee, our personalized strategy will assist you to know all your alternatives. The alternative you choose based on our recommendations will take away the stress and pain you are feeling because of your debt problems.

The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience people and companies in financial trouble. Whether it is a consumer proposal debt settlement plan, a larger personal or corporate restructuring proposal debt settlement plan, or as a last resort, bankruptcy, we have the experience.

Our approach for each file is to create a result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life. Call us today for your free consultation.

Insolvent definition: NET WORTH ADDENDUM

Regularly monitoring your finances reveals invaluable lessons. A most important aspect of building wealth is to find it. People that constantly increase their net worth track it to direct it. So, the starting point is understanding what the net worth definition for a person is.

Seeing the measurable results of your spending and investing decisions is the first step to take control of them. Contrarily, people in the worst monetary shape have no concept where their money is spent and are too afraid to know what their net worth might be since it will not be pretty.

Which extreme more closely matches your mindset? You can’t handle what you don’t measure. Consider it: if you were seriously rich, you’d invest a long time weekly handling some element of your finances.

A beginner variation of a financial tracking approach is needed to begin improving your financial condition.. In addition, the more money you build up, the more financial assets and liabilities to keep an eye on. I ‘d wager that you won’t own them for long if you don’t have your financial tracking system set up before you acquire them. If you don’t see and feel the gains and losses of your monetary choices–you are playing the complex money-game of life without any scorecard.

This is how so many people with good income still find their way into financial trouble. You need to have navigation reference points to know if you are going toward developing wealth or ruining wealth. It is by monitoring your net worth that you’ll begin to discover the monetary impact and effects of your decisions.

The beginning point for financial measuring is a simple statement of net worth (or balance sheet). It is a list of the current market price of whatever you own and what you owe to others. Your net worth is the difference between these 2 numbers. This is the number that you want to measure and increase every month. As with a business, as soon as you start determining the monetary repercussions of your habits you can begin making your own individual financial guidance. Basic insights and rules like these will help increase your net worth. This will lead to bigger insights and develop into bigger gains.

If you find that you have a lot of debt that is reducing your net worth, or possibly a negative net worth, then what guidance about debt are you going to develop for yourself? Think about including a guideline to read a new personal finance book each year. Your money rules and net worth statements can be as advanced or as basic as you wish to make them.

When you have computed your calculation of net worth, you begin having the ability to plan for purchases and payments. As an easy example, if your auto insurance coverage costs get paid annually, you can calculate just how much cash that you must to set aside monthly to easily pay it when the bill arrives. Or if you are getting a new car, you’ll be a lot better prepared for the first costs before you get squeezed at the end of the month and wind up paying a couple of bills late.

After you get comfortable with a net worth statement, you can move on to an income & expense sheet. How much net worth will you need by when? The answer is based upon the financial routines, tools and education you will establish. However, it can all start with your very first net worth statement.

JUNE 17, 2019 UPDATE: The Court of Appeal for Ontario reversed this lower court decision. You can read all about it in our blog update – INSOLVENT DEFINITION RESTORED IN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Tags Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), bankruptcy court, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, Consumer Proposal, Debt, debts, insolvent, insolvent definition, Ira Smith Trustee, lawyer, licensed insolvency trustee, Net worth, personal finance book, Small Claims Court, toronto, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

ONTARIO PENSION PLAN: DOUG FORD GUARANTEES ONTARIO PENSION PLAN RELIEF FOR ALGOMA STEELWORKERS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 5, 2018

We are trying something new. At the bottom is an audiogram of this Ontario pension plan Brandon’s blog. If you would prefer to listen to it, and not read it, scroll down to the bottom and press on the play button. Let us know what you think by sending us a message in the Question box below.

Ontario pension plan: Algoma Steel

Ontario’s Premier Doug Ford is promising his help for Ontario steelworkers as well as their Ontario pension plan following the United States’ federal government’s 25 percent tariff on Canadian steel.

In news recently to Algoma Steel Inc. staff members in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., Ford claimed the provincial government would assist in passing revisions under the Ontario Pension Benefits Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.8, along with insurance coverage from the Pension Benefits Guarantee Fund, subject to particular conditions.

Premier Ford didn’t provide any additional information on what specifically the help might be. However, he stated that negotiations are happening and extra info about just how Ontario is sustaining Algoma will certainly be introduced as quickly as possible.

Ontario pension plan: United Steelworkers

At the same time, the United Steelworkers union is prompting the federal government to enact regulations that would safeguard pension plans as well as benefits in situations of company bankruptcy, reorganization or liquidation. Union participants will be meeting legislators to check regulations focused on changing the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA) and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA).

Ontario pension plan: Proposed federal legislation to date

We previously described the efforts of Scott Duvall, MP for Hamilton MountainA, , MP for Manicouagan and Senator Art Eggleton:

TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: NDP WANTS FEDERAL INSOLVENCY LAWS CHANGED SO THERE IS PENSION PLAN SECURITY WHEN FINANCIALLY TROUBLED BUSINESSES FAIL
Posted on September 27, 2017
SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS
Posted on October 18, 2017
SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING
Posted on November 1, 2017
SEARS CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN SHORTFALL: MP SCOTT DUVALL COMES THROUGH ON HIS PROMISE IN CANADIAN PARLIAMENT
Posted on November 8, 2017
CORPORATE BANKRUPTCIES CANADA: SENATOR EGGLETON PROPOSES NEW PENSION FUND CANADA LAW
Posted on October 22, 2018

Ontario pension plan: Canadian Association of Retired Persons

The Canadian Association of Retired Persons (CARP) is calling out the federal government, claiming it’s unreasonable that Sears Canada could pay out millions of dollars in shareholder dividends, a large part of which went to the US. At the same time, the pension plans of Sears Holding Corp.’s American staff members will be safeguarded by the U.S.’s Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. while Canadian workers will certainly see benefits cuts.

“It’s time for the government to take decisive action to protect Canadian pensioners,” said Wanda Morris, chief advocacy and engagement officer at the CARP, in a press release.

Ontario pension plan: Private member’s Bill C-405

On October 17, 2018, Bill C-405 was presented by Conservative Erin O’Toole, MP for Durham. It is called “An Act to amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act”.

The proposal is to change the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 (R.S.C., 1985, c. 32 (2nd Supp.)), setting out what ought to take place if a business is under liquidation with the CCAA or Part III of the BIA.

His proposed changes lay out what should happen if a company is under liquidation through the CCAA or BIA. It proposes to allow, pending the permission of participants and beneficiaries, to transform the framework of the plan and/or move the pension’s assets to one more plans.

Granted this would probably be a necessary part of any global overhaul of pension plans. However, it is important to realize that it doesn’t do anything to safeguard the pensions or give the plan members and beneficiaries greater priority.

Ontario pension plan: Has a life event thrown you a curveball

Life has a way of throwing curve balls sometimes to good people. In the event of:

Illness;
addiction;
divorce;
family death; or
job loss

unbearable financial pressures can occur.

The Ira Smith Team has generations and decades of experience in dealing with people or their companies fighting the pain, stress and suffering that comes with financial problems and too much debt.

Our method for each person is to develop an outcome where Starting Over, Starting Now occurs. This begins the minute you come through our door. You’re just one call far from taking the essential actions to return to leading a healthy and balanced life, moving forward pain-free.

Call us today for your cost-free consultation.

Tags advocacy and engagement officer, Art Eggleton, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), BIA, Canada, Canadian Association of Retired Persons, CARP, CCAA, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, Federal government, Hamilton Mountain NDP MP Scott Duvall, Ira Smith Trustee, Marilène Gill, Ontario, ontario pension plan, Pension fund, sears canada, Wanda Morris

Your Bankruptcy Discharged – But Wait

Bankruptcy is a roughly 9-month legal process to eliminate debt for the simplest of cases

A bankruptcy discharged: First and second bankruptcy (or more)

What does bankruptcy discharged mean in Canada?

Bankruptcy discharged: Types of bankruptcy discharge

A bankruptcy discharged: The appeal just served upon us – a true story

Standard of review to getting a personal bankruptcy discharged

A bankruptcy discharged: What my gut is telling me

Bankruptcy discharged summary

Tenants in common vs joint tenancy in Ontario: Shared ownership of property

Home ownership in Ontario: tenants in common vs joint tenants as co-owners

Property ownership part 2: tenants in common vs joint tenants in Ontario and the bankruptcy of 1 co-owner

Land Owner Transparency Registry: A Public Database

Tenants In Common vs Joint Tenancy: Can your 90-year-old mother be thrown out of her house?

Tenants in common vs joint tenancy: The bankruptcy of 1 co-owner will affect the others

A lawyer can help you understand tenants in common vs joint tenancy in Ontario

What is insolvency def?

Factors contributing to insolvency

Balance Sheet insolvency def –

Cash flow insolvency def –

What is the difference between technical insolvency and actual insolvency def?

What Is an insolvent person according to the BIA?

What does the insolvent def mean financially?

What If I Am Insolvent?

Consumer proposal vs bankruptcy proceeding

Insolvency def summary

Licensed Insolvency Trustees, licensed by the Canadian Government

About Bankruptcy Trustees: what is a licensed insolvency trustee?

As licensed insolvency trustees, we’re here to help: How do I become an insolvency trustee?

Trustees in Bankruptcy near you: How to find a bankruptcy trustee in Canada

The fee of a bankruptcy trustee in a summary administration bankruptcy – The Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act

The fees of the bankruptcy trustee in an ordinary bankruptcy

The consumer proposal fee for a bankruptcy trustee acting as administrator of a consumer proposal – The Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act

The fee of the bankruptcy trustee for the administration of a Division I proposal

Only a bankruptcy trustee can act as a receiver

Bankruptcy trustee summary

Estates Act Ontario: Introduction

Provisions a LIT is familiar with

Summary

WEPPA calculation: Introduction

How did it arise?

WEPPA calculation Canada: Who is qualified for the WEPP?

WEPPA calculation: Budget 2018 maximum payout increase

CP vs. bankruptcy

Consumer Proposal Canada or bankruptcy: Conclusion

,

If you prefer, you can listen to the employee benefits Canada podcast. Please scroll down to the bottom of the page for the audio.

Employee benefits Canada: Introduction

Employee benefits Canada: My previous blogs

Employee benefits Canada: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law

Employee benefits Canada: Corporate governance

Employee benefits Canada: The Feds are looking for stakeholder comments

Employee benefits Canada: Pension options being looked at

Employee benefits Canada: Corporate governance options being looked at

Employee benefits Canada: Bankruptcy and insolvency options being looked at

Employee benefits Canada: The solutions are varied and complex

Employee benefits Canada: Is your company bogged down by too much debt?

JUNE 17, 2019 UPDATE: The Court of Appeal for Ontario reversed this lower court decision. You can read all about it in our blog update – INSOLVENT DEFINITION RESTORED IN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Insolvent definition: Introduction

Insolvent definition: Two examples

Insolvent definition: The concept of net worth

Insolvent definition: Kormos v. Fast, 2018 ONSC 6044 (CanLII)

Insolvent definition: The Court’s analysis

Insolvent definition: The Trustee

Insolvent definition: Are you insolvent?

Insolvent definition: NET WORTH ADDENDUM

We are trying something new. At the bottom is an audiogram of this Ontario pension plan Brandon’s blog. If you would prefer to listen to it, and not read it, scroll down to the bottom and press on the play button. Let us know what you think by sending us a message in the Question box below.

Ontario pension plan: Algoma Steel

Ontario pension plan: United Steelworkers

Ontario pension plan: Proposed federal legislation to date

Ontario pension plan: Canadian Association of Retired Persons

Ontario pension plan: Private member’s Bill C-405

Ontario pension plan: Has a life event thrown you a curveball

**Your Bankruptcy Discharged – But Wait**

***Trustees in Bankruptcy near you: How to find a bankruptcy trustee* in Canada**