Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.

CREDIT CARD DEBT AFTER DEATH IN CANADA: WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 7, 2019

Introduction

The other day I received a phone call from a fellow wanting to know who is responsible for credit card debt after death in Canada. He was, unfortunately, suffering from a terminal illness and wanted to get his affairs in order. His wife will be both the Estate Trustee and beneficiary under his will.

This is not the first time I have received such inquiries. In dealing with the bankruptcy of deceased estates, this question, amongst others, is quite common. So, given the phone call, I thought it might make for an interesting blog to answer, what I have found to be, the most asked questions dealing with what happens to debt when you die Canada.

The 8 most asked questions

The 8 most asked questions I have found around credit card debt after death in Canada are:

Who is responsible for credit card debt after death?
Is my spouse responsible for my credit card debt in Canada?
If your parents die with debt who pays it in Canada?
Is an executor responsible for the debt in Canada?
Am I inheriting my parents’ debt in Canada?
Is there credit card debt forgiveness upon death?
What happens to debts after death with no assets in the estate?
Am I responsible for my spouse’s debt in Ontario?

Who is responsible for credit card debt after death?

The deceased’s estate is responsible for the credit card debt incurred by that person while they were alive. Therefore, any assets in the estate must first be used to pay off the person’s creditors, including tax amounts owing to Canada Revenue Agency. The creditors must be paid in full before any distribution is made to the beneficiaries.

If any person has co-signed the credit card agreement, or has guaranteed the debt or indemnified the credit card issuer for the debt incurred by the person on their credit card account while alive, then that person is liable if there are not sufficient, or any assets in the estate to pay off the credit card debt in full.

If any person holds a supplementary card on that person’s account, then under the credit card agreement, that person is normally held responsible by the credit card issuer for any unpaid debt on the account. That individual is also responsible to repay the bank card debt completely if the estate cannot pay the debt off in full.

Is my spouse responsible for my credit card debt in Canada?

Just like in the last situation, your spouse will be responsible if your spouse:

has guaranteed the debt;
indemnified the bank that issued the credit card; or
is a holder of a supplementary credit card on the same account.

If none of the above conditions are present, then your spouse cannot be held responsible for your debt.

If your parents die with debt who pays it in Canada?

Many times parents name all their children as Estate Trustee. They do so to make sure that the children know that their parents loved them. Hopefully, all the children are also beneficiaries too.

The fact that children are either an Estate Trustee, a beneficiary or both, does not make them liable for their parents’ debts upon their death.

There are however three situations where the children may be liable. They are:

Where there are assets in the estate, the children as Estate Trustees fail to pay all the debts prior to distributing funds to the beneficiaries.
One or more of the children have guaranteed or co-signed for a debt of one or both of the parents or has indemnified a creditor on behalf of one or both parents.
Is a supplementary cardholder on an account of one of the parents and at the date of death, there is an amount owing.

In any of the above cases, hopefully, there are sufficient assets available to pay off the debt(s) so that the individual child won’t be called upon to make good on the debt. In the case where there are no, or there are not enough assets AND one of the above situations exists, then the child will be called upon to pay off the debt.

Is an executor responsible for the debt in Canada?

If an Estate Trustee (previously in Ontario, this person was called the executor or executrix) disregards the financial obligations and disburses the money to the beneficiaries, then yes. The Estate Trustee will most likely be held directly responsible for those financial debts.

If the estate has no assets, or if what it had was insufficient to satisfy all debts, the Estate Trustee does not need to utilize his or her personal funds to satisfy the remaining debts. In this situation, there also will not be any distribution to the beneficiaries.

In the situation where there are some assets, but not enough to pay all liabilities of the deceased, the Estate Trustee would be well advised to seek the advice of both the lawyer and perhaps even a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy). The Estate Trustee should not be in the position after paying off testamentary costs and income tax obligations, to start choosing which debts will be paid and which will not be.

In the situation where the estate is insolvent, the Estate Trustee may be well advised to go to Court for an order allowing the deceased estate to be placed into bankruptcy. Then the funds that are remaining can be distributed in accordance with the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada).

By doing so, the Estate Trustee is not making any decisions about cherry-picking creditors who will get paid, while others won’t. This will protect the Estate Trustee from attack by any creditor who will not be paid or be paid in full.

Am I inheriting my parents’ debt in Canada?

You cannot inherit debt. As a beneficiary, if there are more debts than assets, you won’t receive an inheritance either. But, you can’t inherit debt. You can only be responsible if any of the conditions I explained above exist. The one exception is that if you are a blood relative, your parent owes money to Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and you received a transfer of their property while the debt to CRA was outstanding.

Is there credit card debt forgiveness upon death?

There is no automatic credit card debt forgiveness upon death. As I have discussed above, the person’s estate is responsible for paying off the credit card (and any other) debt. However, if there are no assets in the Estate, then the credit card issuer has no choice but to write off the debt if there is no other person to claim against. You will recall that I have previously discussed the situations where there may be a third party the credit card issuer can claim against.

One more possibility exists. If the bank that issued the credit card offered credit card balance insurance, and the person paid for it, then there will be an insurance policy that will pay off the debt. In that situation, the bank will get paid through the insurance policy. In this case, the credit card debt will neither be forgiven nor written off.

What happens to debts after death with no assets in the estate?

If there are no assets in the estate, then there are no funds to pay debts with. In this case, the Estate Trustee would notify all known creditors of the death of the person and that there are no assets. The creditors will have no choice but to write off the debts if there is no other person to claim against.

Am I responsible for my spouse’s debt in Ontario?

As I have discussed above, there is no automatic personal financial responsibility where one spouse is liable for the debts of the deceased spouse. However, if the remaining spouse has guaranteed, indemnified, co-signed or was otherwise jointly responsible for the same debts, then they will be. Specifically, with credit card debt, there is also the issue of being a supplementary cardholder on your spouse’s credit card account.

If none of those exceptions come into play, then one spouse is not responsible for the other spouse’s debt in Ontario.

Credit card debt after death in Canada summary

I hope you have found this credit card debt after death in Canada Brandon’s Blog informative. I am finding that I am getting involved more often in deceased estate matters. My involvement is in advising people who are the Estate Trustee of an insolvent estate. I also have acted as the licensed insolvency trustee of a bankrupt deceased estate.

That work has now naturally led to obtaining assignments where my skill set as a licensed insolvency trustee comes in handy in a deceased estate. Two examples are having acted as the Estate Asset Manager in selling off assets in an estate and as acting as an Estate Trustee where there is no bankruptcy involved.

Because of that work, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has opened up a new business division called Smith Estate Trustee Ontario. In that business, as Estate Trustee, we offer options for the complicated estate concerns. We end the discomfort and irritations the stakeholders are experiencing. We use the experience and integrity that we have built up over the years, with compassion, to help the parties navigate the messy estate issues. We strive for a win for all beneficiaries, adding value by reaching the settlements and distributions they were unable to accomplish by themselves.

We provide a full range of services to provide solutions for the complex Estate issues to end the pain and frustration the stakeholders are experiencing. We apply our expertise and creative thinking to take care of all details to end your pain and achieve the goals of the beneficiaries and other stakeholders. Contact Smith Estate Trustee Ontario today for your free consultation.

Tags am i responsible for my spouse's debt ontario, can you inherit your parents debt in canada, credit card, credit card debt, credit card debt after death in canada, estate trustee, if your parents die with debt who pays it canada, Ira Smith Trustee, is an executor responsible for debt in canada, is spouse responsible for credit card debt in canada, is there credit card debt forgiveness upon death, licensed insolvency trustee, trustee in bankruptcy, what happens to credit card debt when you die in canada, what happens to debts after death with no assets in the estate, who is responsible for credit card debt after death

Brandon Blog Post

HELP WITH DEBT: WILL THIS NEW METHOD ACTUALLY WORK?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 5, 2019

Help with debt

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this help with debt Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Help with debt introduction

Many people need help with debt; especially credit card debt. They are stuck lugging around this debt. They only make the minimum monthly payment while a high rate of interest cost continues to accumulate. The net result is they never really make a dent in paying down the balance owing.

Canadian household help with debt

In March 2019, Equifax Canada reported that Canadian consumer debt delinquent accounts are increasing. Equifax also reported that the average Canadian household consumer debt is an average of $23,000, not counting mortgages. Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz previously said that the typical Canadian owes about $1.70 for each dollar of income she or he earns each year, after taxes.

This, of course, is not a new story for Canadians. I have been writing about Canadians’ love affair with taking on more debt for several years now.

The Province of Quebec is trying to make a difference for help with debt

On November 15, 2017, Quebec’s Bill number 134, “An Act mainly to modernize rules relating to consumer credit and to regulate debt settlement service contracts, high-cost credit contracts and loyalty programs”, came into force. On August 1, 2019, certain aspects of this legislation, aimed at trying to curb credit card debt in Quebec, come into force.

Now in Quebec, brand-new charge card accounts opened up need the minimum monthly payment to be increased to 5% of the balance owing on those brand-new credit cards. For cards issued before August 1, 2019, cardholders will continue being required to pay a minimum of 2% of the outstanding balance. They have until 2025 to begin paying the new minimum of 5%. However, the minimum payment limit each month will be increased by half a percentage point annually after August 1, 2020, up until it gets to the five percent level.

Consumer advocates feel that other provinces will be viewing carefully what Quebec is doing. The Quebec government obviously believed that debt issues are an essential problem in Quebec that needed to be addressed.

**Will this help with debt work?**

Canadians have actually gone away from being a country of savers to a nation of borrowers. Therefore, if an unanticipated financial emergency hits, on average, Canadians do not have the resources to deal with it.

Many Canadians strung out on credit card debt need credit card debt help. A simple credit card debt calculator shows how problematic unpaid credit card debt is. Take a charge card with a balance owing of $1,000 with an annual 19.9% rate of interest and a two percent minimum monthly payment. It will take 26 years to pay off the balance. As well, it will cost $3,000 in interest. All this with an original balance of $1,000!

If the minimum monthly payment increases to 5%, that same credit card balance of $1,000 will take six years to pay off with $442 of interest. So you can see what the Province of Quebec is trying to achieve for its citizens.

The arithmetic of course works. However, the issue is not one of arithmetic. Better arithmetic won’t save Canadians who go into debt they cannot repay. If their budget does not allow them to pay more than a minimum of 2% each month, where will the extra money come from? Wage growth is stagnant and family expenses rise each year.

The Quebec government feels that having its people experience short-term pain for long-term gain will work.

As noble and well-intentioned this Quebec Bill 134 is, it does not appear that it has thought through what the real consequences will be. Will it help Quebeckers reduce their household debt faster? How will people who can only afford to pay a minimum monthly amount of 2% find the money to pay the higher amount. For Quebeckers in debt, it deserves asking if this sort of the change in policy will really help the people? Or, will it speed up the rate at which people in Quebec will have to make an insolvency filing, be it a consumer proposal or bankruptcy?

**Has Quebec tackled the real help with debt issue?**

High credit card debt is plainly a difficult situation for many. Time will tell exactly how effective a technique it is to raise the minimum monthly payment to 5% on a charge card will be. What Quebec is doing is a step in the right direction but it may not be one of the best high household debt solutions. But I am disappointed that it was not coupled with the requirement for better financial education and financial literacy.

In my opinion, it would have been much more impressive for Quebec to have at the same time developed simple online financial education tools for its citizens in trying to combat the problem of too much debt. What is really needed is to teach people that paying only the minimum monthly balance increases the cost of paying off the balance. Ideally, people need to adjust their household budget to be able to pay the full balance off every month.

Help with debt: Financial education was never on any curriculum

For many Canadians, proper money management and budgeting had not been a large subject in their house growing up. They get to college or university and they obtain that bank card. They just start spending and perhaps they also have student financial debt. They graduate and may or may not get a well-paying job to start off their new career. Then life takes place and living costs increase. Perhaps now a home with a home mortgage, children, automobile loan repayments and all other living costs take hold. Due to stagnant wage growth, or worse, corporate downsizing, there is not enough income in the family to keep up with all these debts. Now all you can do is make minimum payments.

To avoid this mess in the first place, people need to be taught basic budgeting skills. People need to understand that a household cannot spend more money than is earned, after income tax. This is the most basic concept for those in need of help with debt. The concept of having emergency savings funds is also necessary. People need to understand how fast credit card debt can grow and how hard it is to pay it off if the most you are able to pay is the minimum monthly payment.

Money management education and learning are so vital. People need to know that when they purchase things on a credit card, they do really need to have the money available to pay off that credit card at the end of the month. A credit card, unfortunately, is treated by many as an extra source of cash. In reality, it is a financial tool for convenience, but not an additional source of income.

Do you have too much debt?

Do you feel that you don’t have sufficient financial literacy? Do you believe that the lack of knowledge has led to you making financial mistakes? Have these mistakes caused you to now have too much debt? Is the pain and stress of too much debt now negatively affecting your health? Do you need help with debt?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies in need of financial restructuring and counselling. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide debt settlement and financial restructuring services.

We offer free consultation to help you solve your problems. We understand your pain that debt causes. We can also end it right away from your life. This will allow you to begin a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can begin helping you and get you back into a healthy, stress-free life.

Tags average Canadian household consumer debt, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy trustee, consumer debt, Consumer Proposal, credit card debt, credit card debt calculator, Debt, financial education, financial emergency, financial literacy, help with debt, household consumer debt, household debt, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, minimum monthly payment, stephen poloz

Brandon Blog Post

ANNUAL CREDIT REPORT CANADA REVIEW: A DEBACLE REQUIRES 1 IN 6 CANADIANS TO QUICKLY NEED IT

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 31, 2019

Annual credit report Canada: Introduction

On Monday, July 29, 2019, Capital One Financial Corp. (Capital One) reported a huge data breach. On the same day, Capital One announced that the FBI arrested a suspect, Paige A. Thompson. She is a Seattle software engineer. It is reported that the breach concerns 100 million individuals in the United States and approximately 6 million people in Canada touched in some capability by this violation. There are about 37 million people living in Canada. That is why I say that 1 in 6 Canadians will want an annual credit report Canada.

In Canada, Capital One issues and administers the Costco and Hudson’s Bay MasterCard. So, if you have one of those credit cards, then you have a high probability of having had your information hacked.

Annual credit report Canada: What Capital One said

Capital One claims there were no credit card account numbers or login details swiped. They also state that most of the Americans and Canadians impacted were from small companies that requested a bank card from 2005 through 2019. The jeopardized information consisted of information typical to such applications. Names, addresses, zip and postal codes, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth and annual income.

However, Capital One also admitted that for its US customers, 140,000 Social Security numbers for bank card clients and also 80,000 connected savings account numbers were also exposed. For Canadian customers, about 1 million social insurance numbers were obtained by the hacker.

Capital One’s press release has tried to downplay the data breach by saying how low the number of stolen data was. But that is still a great deal of stolen personal details for 106 million people in North America. I bet none of those people think that it was not a big deal!

Capital One said they are going to make free credit monitoring and identity protection available to everyone involved. I am sure that many attorneys will be asking a simple question: In the wake of the Equifax data breach, what did Capital One do to reinforce its cybersecurity? I am sure more will be reported on this over time.

Annual credit report Canada: What to do immediately if you might be affected

If you have ever applied for a Capital One card over that 14-year span, you could be affected. As I mentioned at the beginning, about 1 in 6 Canadians are at risk. No statements or other evidence has come out yet as to what Ms. Thompson did with the information, if anything if it was me, I would take certain steps to protect myself. Identity theft is what I would be most worried about.

The very first thing I would do is change my login credentials and password to my Capital One online account. Depending on what email address I use for that account, I would consider whether that email account was essential for me or could I use a new one. If essential, I would make sure that I had sufficient cybersecurity over the email account. In either case, I would make sure that I had proper security on any computer or device I might use to access my Capital One account.

In Canada, there are two credit reporting agencies or credit bureau Canada; Equifax Canada (Equifax) and TransUnion Canada (TransUnion). Unfortunately in Canada, unlike in the USA, you cannot put a freeze on your credit report. A freeze would require anyone wanting to access your credit files to first get your permission on a case by case basis.

However, in Canada, you can put a fraud alert on your credit report. I would contact both Equifax and TransUnion to see if they would let me put such an alert on my credit report. The alert would be that you believe you are a victim of the Capital One data breach in 2019. It is possible though that unless I could prove that a problem already existed, they may not let me. However, that would not stop me from trying.

I would also order my free annual credit report Canada to make sure that there are not any items showing up that you never applied for.

These are the three things that I would do immediately.

Annual credit report Canada: There are other things I would also do to protect myself

Next, I would watch my credit card statements very carefully when they arrive each month. I would look for any suspicious transactions and investigate them. If there were any, I would, of course, report them to the credit card issuer immediately. No doubt they would shut down my card and issue a new one to me.

If my information was sold or otherwise shared by the hacker, I would expect to receive phishing scam emails. I would be most vigilant not to succumb to any of them. I would mark them spam immediately, without clicking on any of the links.

I might also expect to receive scam phone calls to at least the phone number(s) I provided to Capital One. I would never share personal information over the telephone with someone calling me, even if it sounds legitimate. I would ask them for their company employee and contact details and then hang up. I would then do my own sleuthing to determine if that phone call was real or someone trying to pull a scam on me. You cannot rely on your caller id, since spoofing software exists to create a phony number resembling a legitimate company.

If you receive any calls from a credit card company or collection agency about an overdue account that you do not recognize, that to is a result of identity theft. Criminals take out credit cards and loans in the name of the person whose identity they stole. You don’t find out about it until the bank calls or writes you about your delinquent account.

Finally, both Equifax and TransUnion allow you to obtain an annual credit report Canada. I would not request both an Equifax Canada free credit report and a TransUnion Canada free credit report at the same time. Rather, I would first get, say, a TransUnion free credit report immediately and keep it as my baseline.

Then, 6 months later, I would request my Equifax free annual credit report Canada to compare. I would be looking for any credit inquiries from parties that I never made a credit application to or don’t currently have a credit line with. I would use this alternating procedure for a while to make sure nothing funny was going on in my credit files.

Conclusion for annual credit report Canada

I hope you enjoyed this annual credit report Canada Brandon’s Blog. Are you the victim of identity theft? Has your stolen information been used to run up debts in your name? Are you on the verge of bankruptcy? Do not wait till it is far too late to understand how you can restructure your financial affairs and avoid bankruptcy. You do not need to be one more person or company declaring bankruptcy in Canada.

As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only specialists certified, accredited and overseen by the federal government to provide insolvency guidance and to apply remedies under the BIA. We will certainly help you to choose what is best for you to release you from your debt problems.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can get rid you for you the stress, anxiety, pain and discomfort that your money issues have created. With the distinct roadmap, we establish simply for you, we will without delay return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life, Starting Over Staring Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today.annual credit report canada

Tags annual credit report canada, bankruptcy trustee, capital one, capital one data breach, capital one data breach 2019, costco mastercard, credit bureau canada, credit report, credit reporting agencies, Equifax Canada, equifax canada free credit report, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, Paige, phishing, Thompson, transunion canada, transunion canada free credit report

Brandon Blog Post

CREDIT KARMA CA: CREDIT KARMA CANADA REVIEWS MILLENNIAL DEBT

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 29, 2019

If you would rather listen to an audio version of this Credit Karma ca Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down and click on the podcast

Introduction

A brand-new Credit Karma ca report on millennial debt is out. Credit Karma Canada reports that its US company has performed a research survey of 1,041 millennial customers in the United States. As far as I can tell, they did not do a similar Canadian survey. However, I highly doubt that a Canadian millennials debt study would produce results drastically different than this survey.

The results reveal that virtually fifty percent (48%) of millennials have spent money they really did not actually have by going into debt. Why? To keep up with their pals.

Unfortunately, this is a significant increase from the findings of the 2018 survey (up from 39% of participants evaluated in 2018).

The nature of the millennial debt

Whether it’s on food or beverages, concerts or tattoos, they discovered that more and more millennials are spending beyond their means as a result of increasing public opinions. Greater than 2 in 5 millennials (44%) from the study stated they’re terrified to miss out on unique or once in-.a-lifetime experiences. Over one-third (36%) don’t want to look like an outsider.

Despite the fact that according to Credit Karma ca, almost 1 in 2 millennials have actually experienced fear of missing out (FOMO) driven debt, they’re mostly being silent about it. Of the participants that have actually entered into debt just to keep up with their mates, 80% claimed they would certainly keep the fact that they have gone into debt quiet and not tell friends or family.

Why do they wish to keep it secret? The survey shows that their reasons are ones of regret, guilt and embarrassment. They do not feel good about the debt they have incurred.

In 2014 their survey showed that millennials were most likely to use the money they really did not have for unique experiences, such as events, nightlife or holidays with their buddies. The new survey also looked at what experiences and purchases were triggering millennials to acquire FOMO debt.

According to their study this year, the #1 point driving millennials to spend beyond your means is food ( 47%), and then clothing (41%). As well as there are some millennials that have entered into FOMO fueled debt on much bigger and long-term items. Cars and trucks (15%), tattoos (11%) and real estate (9%). So out of all the millennials that go into debt, only 9% of millennials go into debt in order to acquire an asset that will grow in value over time, millennial home ownership. Another way of looking at it, 91% of millennials go into debt either for an experience that once it is over, it is over or for a tattoo!

Regardless of the product or experience, social networks play a huge component in driving the millennials’ need to spend beyond their means. The survey results show that 2 in 5 participants (40%) claimed they spent money on something a minimum of one time per year simply to publish that fact on social media sites.

Why do millennials really feel forced to spend too much?

According to the survey, the main reasons that millennials really feel pressured to go into debt to keep up with their close friends are:

A concern of losing out on a unique or unbelievable experience 44%
Worry of not being included in future outings 41%
The concern of being treated like an outsider 36%
Worry of being evaluated 25%
Concern over losing close friends 24%

As you can see, 4 out of the top 5 responses has to do with what their friends may think. This makes sense. The majority of the things millennials go into debt for, such as vacations, concerts and restaurants, are things that you do with friends.

So what is the answer?

Obviously, no one can keep going into debt on an unlimited basis, especially when the reason is to keep up with others. I have some tips on how to deal with friends that either has more money than you or are willing to go deeper into debt than you. Or, at least are not concerned about their debt like you are.

Hang out together in ways that don’t force you to spend

Consider how you can invest in quality time but not your cash. Time spent with close friends and loved ones is an experience that can be valued over something that pushes you into debt. Those good times also last forever.

There is no need to be embarrassed about being not able to pay for an evening out or a costly getaway. As I pointed out previously, 80% of millennials that spend beyond their means hide it from others. However, by being straightforward with your buddies, you may be amazed to discover they really feel similar to you.

Speak to your pals concerning your worries and also do cost-free or much more modest cost things that let you hang out with each other.

Control your funds, do not allow it to control you

Eighty-one percent of participants stated they have a month-to-month budget that they attempt to stick to, which is wonderful. Nonetheless, the millenials that have such a plan seem to have a hard time keeping within it once they feel the peer pressure being applied.

If you’re amongst those that have a problem with budgeting, it can be handy to be a lot more conscious about the consequences of buying something. Take into consideration whether you can really afford it and if you didn’t buy it, will it really hurt your life. If not, then reevaluate, don’t buy it and build up some savings.

Another tip is to lock your debit and credit cards away and spend only cash. By using real cash and not plastic (or a debit card) you get a better sense of what you are spending on extras and how much you need to still have for essentials until the next paycheque. When cash is gone, it is gone. This behaviour will force you to think about how much money you need for essentials for the number of days until the next payday – which is a good thing.

Will this item or experience be important in 5 years?

In some cases, the answer is no, and sometimes it is yes. If the answer is yes, then slot it into your budget and see if you can afford it. Make sure your budget also has a line for savings. That way you will be building up a fund for investing. This fund can also be called upon in the event of a real emergency that could not have been planned for. Examples are increased health costs or reduced income through job loss.

It is essential to have an emergency fund that you can tap into in the event of a real crisis. It isn’t so bad to also have further savings and investments. It is never too early to start planning for retirement. If you wait until you are closer to retirement than the start of your career, you will never be able to catch up.

Conclusion

I hope you found the Credit Karma ca study as informative as I did. Of course, budgeting and debt issues are not limited to only millennials. Financial problems can affect anyone. Whenever I sit down with a person to talk about his or her insolvency, or with an owner of a company to discuss business financial problems, I make sure that we have an entire discussion. I not only talk to them about what process I recommend for their unique situation, but I also walk them through the entire process and what all the rights and responsibilities are.

Are you or your business experiencing money troubles? Are you on the verge of bankruptcy? Do not wait till it is far too late to understand how you can restructure your financial affairs and avoid bankruptcy. You do not need to be one more person or company declaring bankruptcy in Canada.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can get rid you of the stress, anxiety, pain and discomfort that your money issues have created. With the distinct roadmap, we establish simply for you, we will without delay return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life, Starting Over Staring Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today.

Tags Bankruptcy, budget, credit karma ca, credit karma canada review, Debt, fear of missing out, fomo, fomo debt, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, millennial home ownership, millennials debt, trustee in bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

DYING WITHOUT A WILL IN ONTARIO: DISTRIBUTION TO HEIRS NOT EASY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 24, 2019

Introduction

The official term for dying without a will in Ontario, or anywhere else, is that they have died intestate. The consequences of dying without a will in Ontario are significant. A recent Court decision about this famous Canadian’s Estate highlights the issue.

Toller James Montague Cranston, deceased

Toller Cranston was a popular Canadian figure skater and artist. He passed away on January 23, 2015, in Mexico where he lived for some

23 years. The departed passed away without leaving a will. His 3 siblings, Phillippa Baran, Goldie Cranston and Guy Cranston were proclaimed the sole heirs of the Estate by the Second Civil Court in San Miguel de Allende, Guanajuato, Mexico in August 2015.

Phillippa is the Estate Trustee. She was initially named “Executor” of the estate by the court in Mexico on September 2015. A Certificate of Appointment of Foreign Estate Trustee’s Nominee as Estate Trustee without a Will was issued by the Superior Court of Justice in Ottawa on December 8, 2016. This also includes a certificate of appointment of estate trustee without a will.

The assets of the Estate were located both in Canada and in Mexico. Upon his death, the Estate consisted of about 20,000 items of original art, bank accounts and other property. The initial worth of the Estate was around $6,258,520.

According to Phillippa, the unsold or unrealized property includes $429,958 in money and around $1,577,371 in the artwork. The deceased’s original artwork was placed on consignment at several art galleries for sale.

Siblings disagree on what to do with the remaining original artwork

At first, the siblings collaborated to carry out what needed to be done in the Estate. After Toller Cranston’s death, they took a trip to Mexico to deal with the Estate. Along with selling the real estate, a variety of paintings as well as other assets which were split between them.

Consequently, Goldie and Guy Cranston came to be worried regarding Phillippa’s management of the Estate. They stated that Phillippa has actually mishandled the Estate and they are worried about how she will deal with the remaining Estate assets.

Especially bothering to Guy and Goldie Cranston is Phillippa’s views on dealing with the rest of the Estate. It is the artwork that is a significant emphasis on disagreement. These are among the main reasons Goldie and Guy are asking that an Estate Trustee During Litigation be assigned right now.

Goldie and Guy were particularly disturbed over the following:

Concerning the artwork in storage, they have repeatedly requested that they receive their share of the actual artwork. They don’t want or need it to be sold. Phillippa has ignored their requests.
There was evidence that the art gallery where a major amount of artwork was placed on consignment was having financial difficulties. The concern was that the gallery may not continue in business and the artwork could be lost.
The law firm acting for Philippa also acts for the art gallery in financial trouble.
Neither Guy nor Goldie requires the paintings to be sold. In fact, Guy owns an art gallery in Nova Scotia. They do not want to lose up to 50% of the value of the artwork they are entitled to because of art gallery commissions. Therefore, Phillippa’s insisting that the artwork must be sold is an unreasonable loss for them.
Toller Cranston’s legacy. They say that Phillippa’s actions related to marketing and licensing opportunities that the artwork could yield once the passing of accounts is concluded are unreasonable. She is more focused on that, without any consultation with the other heirs, than she is in administering the assets currently in the Estate.
They are surprised that the Estate Trustee has paid herself the amount of $528,228 from the Estate. They also have issues regarding the $315,774 spent by Phillippa in legal fees.

Guy and Goldie request the appointment of an Estate Trustee During Litigation

Goldie and Guy Cranston state that Phillippa ought to be replaced as Estate Trustee in order to avoid causing incurable damage to the heirs if the artwork is sold off in the current fashion. They propose that an Estate Trustee During Litigation should be designated to protect the assets of the Estate and to disperse the artwork in-kind amongst the heirs.

They nominated a specific lawyer as the Estate Trustee During Litigation. The Court found that his credentials are not a problem and that he is capable of acting in that capacity. Phillippa opposed this request.

The Court reviewed the relevant case law. The decision also states that Phillippa’s handling of the artwork in either marketing it over the arguments of the other heirs or in creating strategies when it comes to the future rights of the artwork without notifying or speaking with Goldie or Guy is unreasonable. The Court also found that it runs opposite to her

responsibilities as an Estate Trustee to act in the best interests of the heirs. The Court concluded that Phillippa remains in a conflict of interest.

The Court’s decision

The Court ordered that:

The lawyer is selected to act as the Court-appointed Estate Trustee During Litigation of the estate of Toller James Montague Cranston.
He is to act without posting an Administration Bond.
He will immediately file his written Consent with the Court and take immediate control of all properties of the Estate.
Phillippa will totally co-operate in the hand-over of the Estate property and documents
The Estate Trustee During Litigation is to examine and prepare for circulation a plan for the distribution of and liquidation of the remaining artwork.
To determine his plan, he must consult with all three heirs.

Conclusion – Dying without a will in Ontario

Dying without a will in Ontario is not helpful to anyone, especially your loved ones you wanted to have the benefit of your property when you die. There are many times where a neutral third party should be considered either to act as Estate Trustee or Estate Trustee Under Litigation. Consider these examples:

Moms and dads select all their kids to serve as Estate Trustee. Each child has a various degree of abilities, and some none, in what is called for to administer an Estate. Some children identify that either they do not have the necessary abilities or simply do not desire the obligation. Anxiousness, clashes and pain results.
Many affluent family members have disagreements over exactly how the family wealth should be handled. These fights can become very public and expensive when they resort to the courts.
A person passes away with assets yet no will. Many people think, deservedly or not, that they are entitled to the assets in the deceased’s estate.
You are a lawyer, estate planner or financial advisor. You hesitantly consented to be the Estate Trustee of the estate of the person that was the owner of your best corporate client. The person passes away and you find yourself in the middle of an illogical dispute of passion between the heirs. The problem is so extreme, it threatens your capability for maintaining the company as your client and therefore your future earnings.
As the Estate Trustee, you are not in conflict. Nonetheless, the time required to handle all the complicated estate problems is like a second full-time job. It is having a negative impact on your business as you cannot devote the necessary time to it. You have to get out, however, you do not have an option to replace yourself.
The heirs and the Estate are involved in significant expensive lawsuits. There is no end in sight. Nevertheless, there are live problems that require to be attended to in managing the Estate so that the assets are protected and do not dissipate. There is an instant need for an Estate Trustee Under Litigation.

These are all real-life examples. Nothing has been made up. This is why we started Smith Estate Trustee Ontario.

If you find yourself in the middle of an Estate problem, contact the Smith Estate Ontario Team. We will sit down with you and listen to the issues. We will provide you with a plan for moving forward and ending the pain, frustration and cost being caused by the Estate issues. There is no charge for this initial consultation.

Call the Smith Estate Trustee Ontario Team today. We will help you move forward. We do so with compassion, experience and impartiality. Call the Smith Estate Trustee Ontario Team now.

Tags certificate of appointment of estate trustee without a will, consequences of dying without a will in Ontario, court appointed estate trustee, dying without a will, dying without a will in ontario, estate trustee, estate trustee during litigation, estate trustee ontario, estate trustee without a will, intestate, smith estate trustee ontario, toller cranston

Brandon Blog Post

LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEES: CAN MY BASIC BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE BE REVERSED?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 22, 2019

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this licensed insolvency trustees Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Licensed insolvency trustees introduction

From time to time I am asked an interesting question about licensed insolvency trustees and the bankruptcy process. The question is, can a bankruptcy discharge be reversed? The simple answer is, yes.

Most people then wonder how this could be possible. In order to understand how we should have a discussion of the bankruptcy discharge process. The best way is through a recent Court case I recently read.

Licensed insolvency trustees: The discharge process

It is the discharge when the person’s debts are erased. The debts are not “discharged” until that time. In order to get a discharge, the bankrupt has to live up to all of his or her duties.

The duties of a bankrupt include:

make disclosure of and deliver possession of all his or her assets (other than for certain provincial exemptions) that is under his or her possession or control to the licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee) or to anyone the Trustee so directs;
in such scenarios as are defined by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, provide to the Trustee, for termination, all credit cards;
supply to the Trustee all documents or files relating to the property of the person who has filed for bankruptcy;
make full disclosure of all assets and liabilities to the Trustee by completing the sworn statement of affairs within 5 days of the date of bankruptcy;
assist the Trustee in making an inventory of all property; make full disclosure to the Trustee concerning all property sold or otherwise transferred within 1 year prior to the date of bankruptcy;
disclose any property sold or transferred at undervalue within 5 years prior to the date of filing;
attend the first meeting of creditors if held;
disclose current income and expense and continue monthly disclosure until discharged in order for the Trustee to calculate any surplus income requirement;
if there is surplus income, to make all such payments to the Trustee in full; and
to perform any other acts required by the Trustee or the Court, including, fulfilling any conditions of discharge issued by the Court.

Failure to perform any of the duties laid out in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA), will result in the Trustee, and perhaps one or more creditors, opposing the bankrupt’s discharge. When there is an opposition, the Trustee will schedule a Court hearing date.

At the Court hearing, the Court can issue an absolute order of discharge, provide a discharge but with conditions to be fulfilled or even suspend the bankrupt’s discharge. Sometimes, there may be both a condition and a suspension, depending on the circumstances. In rare and bad circumstances, the Court could even refuse to hear the bankrupt’s application for discharge. Licensed insolvency trustees are expected to assist the Court by making a recommendation. llicensed insolvency trustees

Mark Daniel MacFarlane bankruptcy

Section 180 (1) and (2) of the BIA states:

“Court may annul discharge

180 (1) Where a bankrupt after his discharge fails to perform the duties imposed on him by this Act, the court may, on the application, annul his discharge.

Annulment of discharge obtained by fraud

(2) Where it appears to the court that the discharge of a bankrupt was obtained by fraud, the court may, on the application, annul his discharge.”

On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia In Bankruptcy and Insolvency released its decision in the bankruptcy case of Mark Daniel MacFarlane (Citation: MacFarlane (Re), 2019 NSSC 201).

This case is not complex. However, it does clearly shows that the answer to the question, “can a bankruptcy discharge be reversed?” is clearly yes.

Mr. MacFarlane had a surplus income obligation to pay to the Trustee for the benefit of his creditors the amount of $3,823.05. At the time he was entitled to a discharge, he still owed the Trustee the amount of $2,879.05. In every personal bankruptcy, licensed insolvency trustees must do the surplus income calculation. If it turns out that the bankruptcy is required to contribute to his or her bankruptcy estate through surplus income payments, licensed insolvency trustees must report to the Court if the bankrupt made all the required payments.

The bankrupt also owned at the date of bankruptcy, an automobile that the Trustee estimated had a forced liquidation value of $17,500. The Trustee had disallowed the claim of a creditor claiming security over the vehicle. That creditor did not appeal the Trustee’s decision.

So, equity in the vehicle was available. In such cases, licensed insolvency trustees must obtain that value. For some reason that the Trustee could not fully explain, he agreed to sell the vehicle to Mr. MacFarlane for $15,702.50 plus HST. The Trustee did not sell it for all cash, but rather, entered into a conditional sale agreement with the bankrupt. In other words, the Trustee gave him financing.

Mr. MacFarlane paid made various payments totalling $7,040.00, both before and after his discharge, leaving a balance of $8,662.50.

Mark Daniel MacFarlane discharge

Although now stated explicitly in the Court decision, it appears that when it came time for Mr. MacFarlane’s application for discharge, the Trustee opposed it. On June 1, 2018, the Trustee applied for his discharge.

For some unexplained reason, the Trustee decided to not collect the balance of the surplus income requirement. The Trustee asked the Court for his outright discharge. The Court gave Mr. MacFarlane his absolute discharge.

So now the bankrupt is discharged, but he still owed the outstanding money for the vehicle that was sold to him by the Trustee under a conditional sale agreement. Rather than paying off the amount owing, Mr. MacFarlane sold the vehicle out of province and pocketed the cash. llicensed insolvency trustees

Licensed insolvency trustees can apply to Court to have a discharge reversed

So now the Trustee makes an application to Court to have Mr. MacFarlane’s discharge reversed. Officially, it is called having the discharge annulled. An annulment makes it as if the discharge never happened. So, if the Trustee is successful, Mr. MacFarlane will be back in bankruptcy. The Trustee also asked that the Court order the payment of the balance of what is owing on the vehicle, for a suspension of the discharge and an amount for costs and disbursements. Mr. MacFarlane represented himself in Court.

The Court was not overly impressed with either Mr. MacFarlane or the Trustee. The Court felt that not did he fail to carry out his responsibilities under the BIA, he actually acted in such a way to deny himself the advantage of any type of latitude the Court might have given him relative to those obligations.

The Court went on to say that his responsibilities under the BIA are not pointers or activities to be carried out when convenient or if life does not get in the way. It was obviously not his place to choose what he would and would not do. Concerning the automobile, it was not his to just sell it, pocket the cash, and tell the Trustee (and by extension his creditors) to go take a hike.

The Court was not too happy with the Trustee

The Court was at a loss to some of the Trustee’s behaviour also. There was no explanation given as to why the Trustee merely gave up on collecting all of the surplus income requirement. Likewise, there was no explanation why the Trustee would have given the bankrupt a discount off of the liquidation value of the vehicle. Such a look is not good for licensed insolvency trustees.

Quite rightly, the Court pointed out that in such situation, licensed insolvency trustees, and specifically this Trustee, should not have recommended to the Court that Mr. MacFarlane receive an absolute order of discharge. Rather, the Trustee should have insisted on a conditional order of discharge. The conditions would have been that the bankrupt pay off both the surplus income balance and the amount owing on the vehicle before being entitled to an absolute order of discharge. llicensed insolvency trustees

The Court’s decision

The Court ordered that:

Mr. MacFarlane’s discharge from bankruptcy be annulled, so now he is once again an undischarged bankrupt.
He must pay the Trustee the $8,662.50 owing on the vehicle.
The Trustee will collect $500 for disbursements in tracing what happened to the vehicle from Mr. MacFarlane also.
There will not be an automatic discharge once he pays the $9,162.50 to the Trustee. Rather, the bankrupt will have to apply to the Court for his discharge and there will be another discharge hearing.
Since the Court was not asked to revisit the balance owing on surplus income, the Court didn’t review that again.
The request of the Trustee for $5,000 as a censure of the bankrupt’s behaviour was denied. The Court said that this situation was caused in part by the Trustee allowing the surplus income requirement to be waived and agreeing to an absolute discharge.

Although not part of the Order, the Court strongly stated that any costs in the additional work done by the Trustee now, and the disposition of the amount to be received once finally paid, will be reviewed by the Court.

The Court emphatically intimated that since the Trustee’s actions were in part to blame for this situation, the Court was going to make sure that part of the $9,162.50 will go to the creditors when the Trustee comes back to Court to have its accounts taxed.

Licensed insolvency trustees conclusion

So there you have it on licensed insolvency trustees. Can a bankruptcy discharge be reversed or revoked? As we see in this case if the discharge was improperly obtained because the bankrupt did not fulfill all of his or her duties, YES. Similarly, if it can be shown that a discharge was obtained through fraud or fraudulent conduct, the discharge can be annulled in that case also.

Whenever I sit down with a person to talk about his or her insolvency, or with an owner of a company to discuss business financial problems, I make sure that we have an entire discussion. I not only talk to them about what process I recommend for their unique situation, but I also walk them through the entire process and what all the rights and responsibilities are. For personal insolvency, this includes the discharge process.

As licensed insolvency trustees, we are the only specialists certified, accredited and overseen by the federal government to provide insolvency guidance and to apply remedies under the BIA. We will certainly help you to choose what is best for you to release you from your debt problems.

Tags absolute discharge, annul, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy discharge, bankruptcy process, BIA, conditional discharge, court, date of bankruptcy, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, licensed insolvency trustees, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, surplus income, suspended discharge, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

PROBATE IN ONTARIO – SMITH ESTATE TRUSTEE ONTARIO BEGINS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 17, 2019

Introduction

I have written several blogs on the topic of when someone dies and their estate is insolvent. One of our most popular blogs is WHAT HAPPENS TO DEBT WHEN YOU DIE CANADA: ARE YOU FREE OF DEBT? I have also written on estate matters including probate in Ontario. Not from an insolvent estate perspective, but as to why a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) has the skill set to be an estate trustee.

Historically, estate trustees have been a trust company, a lawyer or family of the deceased, such as children. Based on our work with insolvent deceased estates, we have learned all about the emotions and even pain that family and business ties can cause and place parties in conflict.

So, I am pleased to announce that today we have opened up a new business division, Smith Trustee Estate Ontario. You can click on the button above or below to take you to our website. Have a look and let us know what you think.

Why use a licensed insolvency trustee as an estate trustee?

We have the skillset to perform the duties of an estate trustee. We also understand the role and responsibilities that the statutes demand, such as the:

Estate trustee problems we can help solve

In Ontario, an estate trustee is the only person with the lawful authority to look after an estate. Probate in Ontario is a process to ask the court to:

give a person the authority to work as the estate trustee of an estate; or
verify the authority of a person named as the estate trustee in the deceased’s will.

Sometimes an objective and experienced party have to be assigned to function as the independent estate trustee. Take into consideration the possible circumstances:

Moms and Dads select all their kids to work together as an estate trustee. Each child has various degree of abilities, and some may have no desire, to do is called for to carry out the estate trustee duties. Stress and anxiety, clashes and pain results without any end in sight.
Lots of well-off family members have disagreements over just how the family’s assets need to be invested. Rich family members aren’t beyond turning family squabbles into public fights in the courts. Often the circumstance simply calls out for a caring, skilled and neutral party to become the Officer of the Court to aid everybody gets to a good and fair outcome. This also will ideally decrease or prevent the demand for costly lawsuits.
Somebody passes away with assets however no will. Many people think they are entitled to all or part of the deceased’s estate. Somebody without a financial interest yet with the abilities and experience is required to intervene to work things out in a reasonable and objective and cost-effective method.
You are the lawyer or financial advisor to a great client. You have hesitantly consented to be the estate trustee of the estate of the person that is the driving force behind one of your best corporate clients. The person passes away and you find that you are now in the middle of an illogical dispute amongst the beneficiaries that is driven not by business sense but by passion and hate. The dispute is so serious, it endangers your capability to maintain the corporate client and the prospective future earnings to your business that this client can generate.
As the lawyer or financial advisor to a person, acting as the estate trustee is not a problem. Nevertheless, the time required to take care of all the intricate estate problems may be that it takes you far from the remainder of your professional practice. You believe that you really cannot afford to do so. You want to relinquish the estate trustee duty, however, you don’t have a reasonable alternative to make sure that the estate can be effectively carried out.
The person names as the Estate Trustee has a real conflict and must be replaced. Again, a skilled party who has no financial interest in the outcome and is easily recognized as an expert by the Court is required, and fast!
There is a crucial demand for an Estate Trustee Under Litigation. Our experience in working as an Officer of the Court has actually resulted in our being identified for acting in a proficient and neutral way. We comprehend exactly how to navigate the different regulations and Court procedures associated with being an estate trustee. The Court acknowledges our capabilities and approves our qualifications without question.

The fact of the matter is with many problems such as these, the estate is most likely to be involved in significant expensive lawsuits. It will certainly not finish anytime quickly. Nevertheless, in the meanwhile, there are actual time problems that require to be attended to in managing the estate assets so they do not dissipate or otherwise are at risk.

Probate in Ontario – Why work with us?

Our mix of empathy, experience and impartiality provides us with a distinct viewpoint and the capability to appropriately administer the estate, minimize problems and accomplish outcomes for all stakeholders in an economical way.

Professional and impartial Officer of the Court

Acting as estate trustee
Obtain probate in Ontario
Asset management
Investigation and valuation
Monetization of assets
Trust accounting
Beneficiary reporting and distribution

Estate Trustee Under Litigation

Professional and impartial Officer of the Court
Asset investigation, valuation and safeguarding
Trust accounting
Reporting to the Court and all stakeholders

Conflict resolution

Protecting assets
Experienced as Officer of the Court if estate trustee has conflict – perceived or real
Minimize costs
Stakeholder strategies

Insolvency

Planning and strategy to safeguard assets
Restructuring and Turnaround
Acting as Trustee of an insolvent estate

Get our free full-scale analysis of your issues and our recommended options to solve your problems allowing you to move forward confidently. Check out our website by clicking on the button below. All our details are there.

Tags beneficiaries, beneficiary, estate trustee, estates act, estates administration act, financial advisor, insolvent estate, Ira Smith Trustee, lawyer, licensed insolvency trustee, probate, probate in ontario, smith estate trustee ontario, succession law reform act, trust accounting, trustee act, trustee in bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

FILING BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: RETAILER BANKRUPTCIES AND CO-TENANCY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 15, 2019

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this filing bankruptcy in Canada Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Introduction

I read one article and one legal case over this past weekend that gave me the idea for this Brandon’s Blog about filing bankruptcy in Canada. The article was about the large US jewelry and accessories retailer Charming Charlie’s filing Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the second time in just over a year. In its 2018 filing, the retailer shed almost half of its 400 stores in a restructuring. Unfortunately, that was not good enough to save them. They have now filed again and announced they are closing their remaining stores.

The case I read is Old Navy (Canada) Inc. v. The Eglinton Town Centre Inc., 2019 ONSC 3740 (CanLII). This decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice was released on June 21, 2019. This case involves a retail tenant’s right to put into play rights it has as a result of a co-tenancy requirement under its commercial lease.

What Is Co-Tenancy Provision?

Simply put, a co-tenancy clause in retail lease agreements permits retail tenants to reduce their lease payments if key renters or a specific variety of lessees leave the retail premises. The idea being that certain tenants are major draws to a shopping centre and produce traffic for themselves and the other tenants. Those types of tenants are called anchor tenants.

A retail tenant agrees with the landlord to specific lease terms, especially the amount of rent to be paid. The commercial tenant agrees to those terms expecting a certain level of traffic in the mall or shopping centre. If anchor tenants leave, a co-tenancy provision allows a tenant to decide if it wishes to remain or not. If it decides to stay, then the lower amount of rent to be paid when a co-tenancy provision comes into play is meant to compensate the tenant for the lower traffic volume.

The Players

Old Navy is a famous retailer of clothes. It runs stores throughout Canada, the United States, and worldwide. Old Navy is a subsidiary of Gap Inc. (GAP), which is headquartered in San Francisco, California. Old Navy’s operations and stores are owned and operated by GAP.

GAP is the biggest specialty retailer in the USA. It has roughly 3,700 locations globally, consisting of 240 shops in malls and strip/power centres throughout Canada. GAP also owns the Banana Republic brand. Of the three, Banana Republic is taken to be on the top end of the GAP household of brand names, while Old Navy is the reduced level, affordable or budget brand name.

The landlord, The Eglinton Town Centre Inc., is owned and run by Lebovic Enterprises, a major Canadian property developer with its head office in Toronto, Ontario. Among others, it owns and runs the “Power Centre”, situated at Eglinton Opportunity East (the Centre).

The Old Navy Canada Lease

The Old Navy Canada lease, of course, had many terms in it. It included a co-tenancy provision. The clause named the key retailers (Key Shops) and their square footage. The Key Shops are the following retailers with the flooring area indicated:

Key Shops	Square footage
Cineplex	68,000 sf
Roots	6,545 sf
Globo Shoes	12,084 sf
Danier Leather	6,548 sf

Although the co-tenancy clause had various alternative remedies in it, all of them are not essential for you to know for the purpose of this Brandon’s Blog.

It is important for us to know that the co-tenancy section consisted of three main parts: (i) the number of Key Shops; (ii) a gross leasable area test; and (iii) a requirement for the landlord to advise the tenant in writing when a co-tenancy failure has actually happened.

Simply put, if the co-tenancy provision kicked in Old Navy Canada had the option to either:

Shut down its store and leave on proper notice to the landlord; or
Remain and pay a lesser “Alternate Rent” for the period that the co-tenancy issue remained unresolved.

The Danier Leather bankruptcy

Danier Leather (Danier) was a prominent Canadian seller of leather clothing and related leather items. The landlord entered into a lease with Danier for a preliminary 10-year term from June 10, 1999, to June 9, 2009. Danier’s lease was renewed in 2009 and Danier continued to be a renter of the Centre up until 2016. Danier’s premises of 6,548 square feet of space was out of a total of 285,425.37 square feet of gross leasable area in the Centre. Danier’s retail outlet represented just 2.3% of the gross leasable area.

Danier was a public company. Its shares were traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Nonetheless, public filings showed that Danier had been battling financial issues since 2014. Decreased earnings and yearly losses were unfortunately now its norm.

The negative operating results were thought to have been attributable to a change in the preferences of the buying public. There was a sentiment among some people to stop wearing leather items and apparel. On February 4, 2016, Danier submitted a Notice of Intention to File a Proposal (NOI) under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C., 1985 c. B-3.

Certainly, Danier’s insolvency was major news in the retail market. It was publicly reported in the nationwide media. At the time of the NOI filing, Danier operated 84 stores throughout Canada. Every one of the shops was leased. Ultimately, nonetheless, Danier determined not to submit a proposal and instead made an assignment in bankruptcy. A receiver was also appointed over Danier to liquidate the shops. Danier continued running until July 2016.

Definitely, every one of the occupants at the Centre, including the local staff of the Old Navy shop, would have recognized that Danier was conducting a going out of business inventory sale. It was unclear if anyone from Old Navy Canada told this to its senior management at the GAP.

Throughout the duration of the closing of the Danier outlet, the various other retailers at the Centre were growing. The Centre’s construction had long been completed and was well over 90% rented at the time of Danier’s insolvency. Cineplex was drawing audiences daily. The remaining stores in the portion of the Centre in which the Old Navy shop was located, across the parking area from the Danier outlet, were all operating. There was no proof they were not operating well and profitably.

The Dispute

The landlord believed that the closure of Danier had no material impact whatsoever on traffic at the Centre or on Old Navy’s sales. Given its interpretation of the co-tenancy requirements, the landlord ruled out that a co-tenancy failing had actually occurred. Therefore it did not provide any notice to the Old Navy care of GAP.

By September 15, 2016, GAP asserted they had ultimately found out about Danier’s filing bankruptcy in Canada. Thus, Old Navy issued a Notice of Co-Tenancy Failure to the Landlord and took the view that:

Danier’s bankruptcy constituted a “co-tenancy failure” under the lease;
that the landlord had breached the lease by not advising Old Navy of Danier’s bankruptcy; and
that Old Navy was, as a result, exercising its “right” under the lease to pay the lesser rent to the landlord, retroactive to May 1, 2016.

The landlord argued that the Centre was in co-tenancy failure as a result of the closure of Danier and stated that if the current lease was not paid, the landlord would declare Old Navy Canada to be in default under the terms of the lease.

Various communications took place between lawyers for the landlord and Old Navy Canada. The landlord also kept them up to date on discussions it was having with various potential retailers that would be interested in either the Danier space or larger premises. One such retailer was a global party supply store chain. Another, that ultimately entered into a lease and began operating in the Centre, was a retailer of pets and pet products.

Old Navy Canada, through its parent the GAP, took the position that only a retailer of upscale clothing like Danier was, would be a suitable replacement. It also stated that it had a corporate policy not to be located in shopping centres that had a pet retailer as a tenant.

It turns out that assertion was untrue. The landlord produced evidence that there is a power centre in the west end of Toronto where the opposite is true. That centre was the Stock Yards Village, where the anchor was Target Canada until it failed several years ago. There is an Old Navy store operating in that shopping centre along with a PetSmart retail outlet. This contradicted Old Navy Canada’s and the GAP’s position on suitable co-tenants.

The landlord and Old Navy Canada continued to agree to disagree. Old Navy Canada continued to pay the normal rent but under protest. Ultimately, Old Navy Canada launched the litigation against the landlord looking for reimbursement of rent that it asserts to have actually overpaid to the Landlord.

The Court’s decision

The Court went through a complex analysis of legal precedents that are beyond the scope of this Brandon’s Blog. After careful consideration of the lease, the issues involved and precedent case law, the Judge decided:

Old Navy’s interpretation of the provisions of the lease for the co-tenancy requirements is rejected.
He accepted the landlord’s interpretation of the relevant terms as being the most objective.
GAP/Old Navy’s evidence which was speculative.
It was not sensible for GAP/Old Navy to anticipate to be able to occupy the facilities for the rest of its lease term without paying proper rent, merely because of a technical issue that had no noticeable effect on its operations.
The landlord acted throughout in a commercially reasonable way.

Summary

What this case shows is that the bankruptcy of a retailer may very well invoke co-tenancy rights. However, it is not the bankruptcy that is the determining factor. Rather, it is the terms of the co-tenancy clause and its formulas contained in the clause that we have to look to. As seen in this example, the breach was not just because one of the Key Shops no longer operated. The terms of the Old Navy Canada Lease also forced a gross leasable area calculation to be performed. If the gross leasable area test was not met, then there was no breach.

Is your company experiencing financial problems? Are you on the brink of insolvency just like Danier was? Don’t wait until it is too late to properly restructure your company’s financial affairs. You don’t have to be another one filing bankruptcy in Canada.

As a Trustee, we are the only professionals licensed, authorized and supervised by the federal government to offer insolvency advice and to implement solutions under the Bankruptcy Act Canada. We will help you to select what is best for you to free you from your debt issues.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can eliminate the anxiousness, tension, discomfort and pain from your life that your cash problems have caused. With the unique roadmap, we develop just for you, we will promptly return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

Tags anchor tenant, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, chapter 11, charming charlie's, co-tenancy provision, danier leather, filing bankruptcy in canada, insolvency, insolvent, Ira Smith Trustee, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, retail, Target Canada, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY ACT CANADA: ARE YOU REALLY PREPARED FOR IT?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 10, 2019

Introduction

No person wishes to go make a filing under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (Bankruptcy Act Canada), however occasionally it is inevitable. You might think that people who file are just those that are careless with their finances. However, with most of the people I see, it is usually an event outside of their control that pushes them over the edge.

In personal bankruptcy, things such as illness, divorce, job loss, unanticipated catastrophes, identity theft and fraud are many times the causes of insolvency. Of course, lack of proper budgeting, overspending and inappropriate uses of credit are also involved. In corporate insolvency, the #1 cause always seems to track back to management.

Insolvency filings happen every year. In 2018, a total amount of 128,846 insolvency filings were made with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). This is 2.4% more from 2017. Consumer insolvency filings increased 2.5% (125,266 filings), while company filings dropped 0.8% to 3,580.

At the very same time, people choosing to avoid bankruptcy by filing a proposal continued increasing in 2018, bringing this number to a brand-new level. Proposals represented 52.6% of consumer filings in 2017. In 2018, they expanded by 6.6% to 56% of all personal filings.

Are you considering a Bankruptcy Act Canada filing, or at least speaking to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) (Trustee)? In order to help you start your fact-finding, I want to tell you what will happen to your bank accounts, retirement accounts and your other important financial funds. Understanding what to anticipate can assist you to stay clear of some pricey blunders.

Bankruptcy or (consumer) proposal

Being insolvent is that you are not able to settle your financial debts. People with severe financial problems can make Bankruptcy Act Canada filing by filing either for bankruptcy, a consumer proposal or Division I proposal.

Proposals are official methods controlled by the Bankruptcy Act Canada for personal filings. Dealing with a Trustee you make a proposal to:

Pay your creditors a portion of what you owe them over a particular time period not going beyond 60 months
Extend the time you need to settle the debt
Or a mix of both

The Proposal is made via the Trustee, who uses the money in your proposal fund to pay the cost of administration and distribution to each of your creditors their pro-rata share. A consumer proposal needs to be finished within 5 years from the day of filing.

Proposal

People with severe financial problems can apply for bankruptcy. They can also try to avoid bankruptcy by using the Proposal provisions of the Bankruptcy Act Canada.

There are numerous advantages to avoiding bankruptcy. The main differences between proposals and bankruptcy are:

Unlike informal debt settlement, a Proposal produces a binding discussion forum where each of your unsecured creditors has to participate in for your debt restructuring.
You can keep your property, including your home, if you can afford to in your budget.
Lawsuits against you and enforcement proceedings, such as wage garnishments, cannot begin or continue.
In a successfully completed Proposal, you do not need to file for bankruptcy.

Keep in mind that financial institutions have “set-off” legal rights, implying that if you declare bankruptcy or file for bankruptcy when you’re behind in payments to them, they will take the funds in your accounts to try to cover all or some of what you owe them. This is notwithstanding that there is a stay of proceedings once a Bankruptcy Act Canada filing takes place and such an offset really should not take place.

So if you are thinking of filing either for bankruptcy or a proposal, I want you to be prepared for what might happen to your financial assets.

Your bank account

In a bankruptcy, the cash in your bank account is a property which must be paid over to the Trustee. Upon your filing, the Trustee will put all your banks on notice to provide the funds in any accounts maintained with them to the Trustee. As noted above, the bank may very well offset cash in your savings or chequing account against the money you may owe them, including credit card debt.

In a Proposal, you do not lose control of the money in your bank accounts. Rather, they are considered by the Trustee in formulating the type of Proposal you should offer your creditors. Remember, your Proposal must offer your creditors a better alternative than your bankruptcy would. However, even though there is a stay of proceedings invoked once you file your Proposal, it is not uncommon for a bank where you maintain an account and to whom you owe money, to take the money in your account and offset it against what you owe them.

So the moral of this story is that you are best to have bank accounts at financial institutions to whom you do not owe any money.

In a bankruptcy, your RRSP, RRIF or DPSP are excluded from seizure. However, the Trustee is entitled under the Bankruptcy Act Canada to receive the equivalent to any amounts contributed to these accounts in the 12 months preceding your filing date. In a Proposal, this 12-month amount must be included by the Trustee in the calculation of what amount your Proposal should offer your creditors.

Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security income (OAS)

Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is the only one permitted to garnish your CPP earnings if you have an unpaid personal income tax. By filing either for bankruptcy or a Proposal, the stay of proceedings will be invoked and CRA will have to stop the garnishment of your CPP and you will get the CPP payments you are qualified for.

However, the earnings obtained from CPP and OAS will certainly be taken into account by the Trustee in determining if you have any surplus income payment obligation in bankruptcy. In a Proposal, that amount also has to be considered in developing your Proposal.

Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA), Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) and other non-registered account investments

In a bankruptcy, just like any other non-exempt property, the amount held in your TFSA and any other non-registered investment account must be paid to the Trustee. In a Proposal, these amounts need to be taken into account in determining what type of Proposal to make. It may very well be that these accounts are collapsed in order to help fund a Proposal.

Similarly, RESPs are not excluded in personal bankruptcy. In a Proposal, the amount must be considered as an asset in calculating how much must be offered in your Proposal to stand a chance for success.

The reason that an RESP is not excluded from seizure in bankruptcy is relatively straightforward. Your child does not acquire ownership or other entitlement to the RESP funds as parents can take possession of the funds prior to the child becoming a post-secondary school student. For that reason, it is the parents who have ownership of the funds.

Consequently, the Trustee of an insolvent mother or father that has an RESP can collapse it. If the parent in bankruptcy wants the RESP to not collapse, adequate arrangements need to be made with the Trustee for the equal amount of funds in the RESP at the filing date be paid to the Trustee for the bankruptcy estate and the bankrupt’s creditors.

Annuity revenue in bankruptcy

Annuities are agreements where you pay a company (normally an insurance company) a specific amount, in order to get regular monthly payments for a specific period of time or for the remainder of your life.

If an annuity contract is properly set up with an insurance company, it will be exempt from seizure in bankruptcy. However, the income stream it produces will be considered by the Trustee in determining whether the bankrupt person has a surplus income obligation.

Your RRIF can also be considered as an annuity as it provides a legislated stream of payments. The RRIF is exempt from seizure in a bankruptcy, other than for any contributions in the 12 months immediately prior to filing. Like an annuity, the entitlement to payments will be considered by the Trustee in doing the surplus income calculation.

In a Proposal, you don’t give up ownership of an annuity contract or RRIF, but the income must be considered in preparing a suitable Proposal.

Bankruptcy Act Canada summary

Do you have financial problems? Do you not have enough money to pay your bills in full when due?

As a Trustee, we are the only professionals licensed, authorized and supervised by the federal government to offer insolvency advice and to implement solutions under the Bankruptcy Act Canada. A consumer proposal is a federal government licensed debt settlement plan to eliminate your debt. We will help you to select what is best for you to free you from your debt issues.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have generations and decades of experience helping people and companies looking for debt restructuring and a debt settlement plan to AVOID bankruptcy.

You can have a no-cost consultation so we can work with you to fix your money troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

Tags avoid bankruptcy, avoiding bankruptcy, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy act canada, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, Consumer Proposal, Debt, debt settlement, Division I Proposal, informal debt settlement, insolvent, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, personal bankruptcy, proposal, stay of proceedings, trustee in bankruptcy, wage garnishment

Brandon Blog Post

THE BUSINESS OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY ACT SYSTEM PREVAILS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 8, 2019

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this insolvency and bankruptcy act Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Introduction

The administration of the Canadian insolvency and bankruptcy system and the enforcement of the insolvency and bankruptcy act is delegated to the Office of The Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). The Governor in Council appoints the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (Superintendent) “…to hold office during good behaviour for a term of not more than five years…”. The current Superintendent is Elisabeth Lang.

The OSB is a self-funding federal government agency. It must fund itself from the insolvency process and system in Canada. It earns its revenue mainly from:

The fees charged for the licensing of individual and corporate licensed insolvency trustees (formerly called trustees in bankruptcy) (Trustee).
Filing fees for the registration of all insolvency files in Canada.
The levy is payable out of dividends paid to creditors by a Trustee to help defray the Superintendent’s expenses of supervising the Canadian insolvency system. The levy is mandated by section 147 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c B-3 (BIA).

That is how the government business side of the Canadian insolvency and bankruptcy act system works. The rate of levy is a sliding scale according to Rule 123 of the BIA as follows:

Full administration bankruptcy

Five percent, if the amount of payments is $1,000,000 or less.
5% of the first $1,000,000, plus one and one-quarter per cent of the amount in excess of $1,000,000, if the amount of payments exceeds $1,000,000 but is not more than $2,000,000.
Five percent of the first $1,000,000, one and one-quarter percent of the second $1,000,000, plus one-quarter of one percent of the amount in excess of $2,000,000, if the amount of payments exceeds $2,000,000.

In a proposal, the levy is the same as above, except for distributions over $2 million, there is no further levy collected on the excess.

The rate of levy payable for a streamlined personal bankruptcy, called a summary administration, is:

100 percent, if the amount of payments is $200 or less; or
100 percent of the first $200 plus zero percent of the amount in excess of $200, if the amount of payments exceeds $200.

The challenge to the levy

I want to describe to you the case of Superintendent of Bankruptcy v Business Development Bank of Canada, 2019 MBCA 72 (CanLII). This is an appeal to the Court of Appeal of Manitoba from the ruling of the lower court.

Topsyn Flexible Packaging Ltd. (the insolvent) is a bankrupt company. The Trustee made a payment from the sale of assets to the secured creditor, Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) on account of its secured debt. The lower court judge on hearing the evidence ruled that the levy was not payable to the Superintendent by the Trustee for the payment made to BDC. The Superintendent appealed that decision.

The Superintendent’s position was that the lower court erred in deciding that the Trustee was not required to hold back the levy payable to the Superintendent from the funds paid to BDC.

History

The insolvent first filed a Notice of Intention To Make a Proposal. During those proceedings, the Court issued various vesting orders approving the insolvent selling its assets. The cash received from the sales was paid over to the Trustee as mandated by the Court Orders. The cash stood in place of the assets and the Trustee held the cash pending the determination as to who was entitled to the money and in what priority.

Ultimately the insolvent could not make a viable Proposal and was deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy.

After falling into bankruptcy, the Trustee paid over the net proceeds from the deals to BDC (as well as Royal Bank of Canada, another secured creditor) (RBC). The Trustee also kept back the levy that should be paid.

The BDC motion

Ultimately, BDC filed motion materials on its application to the Court that the levy in favour of the Superintendent is not payable relative to funds paid to BDC as well as RBC as secured creditors of the insolvent.

The approval and vesting orders likewise ordered the insolvent to pay over the net sale proceeds to the Trustee, to be held pending a decision regarding priority.

The lower court made the following findings in deciding that the levy was not payable:

When it made the repayments to BDC and RBC, the Trustee was acting neither as a representative for BDC or RBC nor as trustee in bankruptcy of the insolvent.
The secured creditors and the Trustee believed that the funds held from the sale of assets from the approval and vesting orders were being kept in escrow for the secured creditors, subject only to determine who had priority for payment as between BDC and RBC.

The appeal court analysis

This lower court decision is just plain wrong. From my perspective, the issue was decided many years ago. The OSB’s position through its Directive No. 10, which has been updated over the years, is quite clear. The OSB directive on this point is its Directive No. 10R.

Although directives are not law, they do outline the OSB’s interpretation and position on BIA issues. This directive states that the levy is payable on all distributions made, with only two exceptions. The exemptions are:

When the Trustee has actually functioned as the agent pr receiver in a separate but related engagement for a secured creditor in selling the assets.
When the Trustee actually redeems, or buys out the security, within the definition of section 128(3) of the BIA.

Neither of those exceptions took place in this case.

The appellate court looked at section 147 of the BIA and Directive No. 10R. The appellate court said that Parliament’s objective is for all secured creditors that get payments from an insolvency proceeding under the BIA pays the levy. The appeallate court said that had Parliament planned that such payments to secured creditors were to be excluded from the application of s. 147, such a provision would have been included in the statute. No such exception exists in the BIA.

The appeal court also went through a very thorough analysis or previous case law. That level of detail is beyond the scope of my Brandon’s Blog. You can read the appeal court decision by clicking here if you like.

The appeal court decision

The appeal court said that the lower court judge made 2 mistakes which led him to discover that the levy is not payable in this situation.

The first mistake was in finding that the net sale proceeds were being held by the Trustee in escrow as opposed to in its role as trustee in bankruptcy.
The second mistake is highlighted by the fact that he made no findings concerning the existence of an escrow contract, its terms, the nature of the relationship produced by it, or exactly how that arrangement might bypass the requirements for the Trustee to deduct the levy and remit it to the OSB.

The appeal court, therefore, allowed the OSB’s appeal and the Trustee will have to remit the levy to the OSB on payments made to BDC and RBC.

There was always a simple fix

The simple fix is really easy. A bankruptcy trustee needs to obtain an independent legal opinion on the validity and enforceability of the security held by creditors claiming to be secured. The Trustee should get that opinion as early on in the bankruptcy administration as possible.

Once the Trustee has the opinion that the security is good, the Trustee can then approach the secured creditor(s) to see if they wish to retain that firm to act on the secured creditor’s behalf either as its agent or as a receiver. That is a separate appointment under the insolvency and bankruptcy act system.

Once appointed separately by the secured creditor, the payment made to the secured creditor by its agent or receiver, does not attract the levy. The secured creditor did not rely on the bankruptcy process to produce the payment to it, so no levy is payable. This has been our standard well-established way of dealing with such a situation forever.

Summary for insolvency and bankruptcy act

Are you in financial distress? Do you not have sufficient funds to pay your commitments as they come due?

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can remove the anxiety, stress, pain and discomfort from your life that your money troubles have created. With the distinctive roadmap, we establish simply for you, we will quickly return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

As a Trustee, we are the only experts recognized, licensed and supervised by the federal government to give insolvency recommendations and to carry out insolvency procedures. A consumer proposal is a federal government authorized debt negotiation strategy to do that. We will assist you to choose what is best for you to rid yourself of your debt problems.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have years as well as generations of experience helping people and companies searching for debt restructuring, a debt negotiation strategy, or a consumer proposal Ontario to AVOID bankruptcy. You can have a no-cost evaluation so we can aid you to repair your financial problems. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will let you return to a brand-new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

Tags insolvency and bankruptcy act

Introduction

The 8 most asked questions

Who is responsible for credit card debt after death?

Is my spouse responsible for my credit card debt in Canada?

If your parents die with debt who pays it in Canada?

Is an executor responsible for the debt in Canada?

Am I inheriting my parents’ debt in Canada?

Is there credit card debt forgiveness upon death?

What happens to debts after death with no assets in the estate?

Am I responsible for my spouse’s debt in Ontario?

Credit card debt after death in Canada summary

Help with debt introduction

Canadian household help with debt

The Province of Quebec is trying to make a difference for help with debt

Will this help with debt work?

Has Quebec tackled the real help with debt issue?

Help with debt: Financial education was never on any curriculum

Do you have too much debt?

Annual credit report Canada: Introduction

Annual credit report Canada: What Capital One said

Annual credit report Canada: What to do immediately if you might be affected

Annual credit report Canada: There are other things I would also do to protect myself

Conclusion for annual credit report Canada

If you would rather listen to an audio version of this Credit Karma ca Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down and click on the podcast

Introduction

The nature of the millennial debt

Why do millennials really feel forced to spend too much?

So what is the answer?

Conclusion

Introduction

Toller James Montague Cranston, deceased

Siblings disagree on what to do with the remaining original artwork

Guy and Goldie request the appointment of an Estate Trustee During Litigation

The Court’s decision

Conclusion – Dying without a will in Ontario

Licensed insolvency trustees introduction

Licensed insolvency trustees: The discharge process

Mark Daniel MacFarlane bankruptcy

Mark Daniel MacFarlane discharge

Licensed insolvency trustees can apply to Court to have a discharge reversed

The Court was not too happy with the Trustee

The Court’s decision

Licensed insolvency trustees conclusion

Introduction

Why use a licensed insolvency trustee as an estate trustee?

Estate trustee problems we can help solve

Probate in Ontario – Why work with us?

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this filing bankruptcy in Canada Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Introduction

What Is Co-Tenancy Provision?

The Players

The Old Navy Canada Lease

The Danier Leather bankruptcy

The Dispute

The Court’s decision

Summary

Introduction

Bankruptcy or (consumer) proposal

Proposal

Your bank account

Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP), Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF) or Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (DPSP)

Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security income (OAS)

Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA), Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) and other non-registered account investments

Annuity revenue in bankruptcy

Bankruptcy Act Canada summary

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this insolvency and bankruptcy act Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Introduction

The challenge to the levy

History

The BDC motion

The appeal court analysis

The appeal court decision

There was always a simple fix

Summary for insolvency and bankruptcy act

**Will this help with debt work?**

**Has Quebec tackled the real help with debt issue?**