Tag: trustee in bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY ACT CANADA: ARE YOU REALLY PREPARED FOR IT?

Introduction

No person wishes to go make a filing under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (Bankruptcy Act Canada), however occasionally it is inevitable. You might think that people who file are just those that are careless with their finances. However, with most of the people I see, it is usually an event outside of their control that pushes them over the edge.

In personal bankruptcy, things such as illness, divorce, job loss, unanticipated catastrophes, identity theft and fraud are many times the causes of insolvency. Of course, lack of proper budgeting, overspending and inappropriate uses of credit are also involved. In corporate insolvency, the #1 cause always seems to track back to management.

Insolvency filings happen every year. In 2018, a total amount of 128,846 insolvency filings were made with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). This is 2.4% more from 2017. Consumer insolvency filings increased 2.5% (125,266 filings), while company filings dropped 0.8% to 3,580.

At the very same time, people choosing to avoid bankruptcy by filing a proposal continued increasing in 2018, bringing this number to a brand-new level. Proposals represented 52.6% of consumer filings in 2017. In 2018, they expanded by 6.6% to 56% of all personal filings.

Are you considering a Bankruptcy Act Canada filing, or at least speaking to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) (Trustee)? In order to help you start your fact-finding, I want to tell you what will happen to your bank accounts, retirement accounts and your other important financial funds. Understanding what to anticipate can assist you to stay clear of some pricey blunders.

Bankruptcy or (consumer) proposal

Being insolvent is that you are not able to settle your financial debts. People with severe financial problems can make Bankruptcy Act Canada filing by filing either for bankruptcy, a consumer proposal or Division I proposal.

Proposals are official methods controlled by the Bankruptcy Act Canada for personal filings. Dealing with a Trustee you make a proposal to:

  • Pay your creditors a portion of what you owe them over a particular time period not going beyond 60 months
  • Extend the time you need to settle the debt
  • Or a mix of both

The Proposal is made via the Trustee, who uses the money in your proposal fund to pay the cost of administration and distribution to each of your creditors their pro-rata share. A consumer proposal needs to be finished within 5 years from the day of filing.

Proposal

People with severe financial problems can apply for bankruptcy. They can also try to avoid bankruptcy by using the Proposal provisions of the Bankruptcy Act Canada.

There are numerous advantages to avoiding bankruptcy. The main differences between proposals and bankruptcy are:

  • Unlike informal debt settlement, a Proposal produces a binding discussion forum where each of your unsecured creditors has to participate in for your debt restructuring.
  • You can keep your property, including your home, if you can afford to in your budget.
  • Lawsuits against you and enforcement proceedings, such as wage garnishments, cannot begin or continue.
  • In a successfully completed Proposal, you do not need to file for bankruptcy.

Keep in mind that financial institutions have “set-off” legal rights, implying that if you declare bankruptcy or file for bankruptcy when you’re behind in payments to them, they will take the funds in your accounts to try to cover all or some of what you owe them. This is notwithstanding that there is a stay of proceedings once a Bankruptcy Act Canada filing takes place and such an offset really should not take place.

So if you are thinking of filing either for bankruptcy or a proposal, I want you to be prepared for what might happen to your financial assets.

Your bank account

In a bankruptcy, the cash in your bank account is a property which must be paid over to the Trustee. Upon your filing, the Trustee will put all your banks on notice to provide the funds in any accounts maintained with them to the Trustee. As noted above, the bank may very well offset cash in your savings or chequing account against the money you may owe them, including credit card debt.

In a Proposal, you do not lose control of the money in your bank accounts. Rather, they are considered by the Trustee in formulating the type of Proposal you should offer your creditors. Remember, your Proposal must offer your creditors a better alternative than your bankruptcy would. However, even though there is a stay of proceedings invoked once you file your Proposal, it is not uncommon for a bank where you maintain an account and to whom you owe money, to take the money in your account and offset it against what you owe them.

So the moral of this story is that you are best to have bank accounts at financial institutions to whom you do not owe any money.

Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP), Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF) or Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (DPSP)

In a bankruptcy, your RRSP, RRIF or DPSP are excluded from seizure. However, the Trustee is entitled under the Bankruptcy Act Canada to receive the equivalent to any amounts contributed to these accounts in the 12 months preceding your filing date. In a Proposal, this 12-month amount must be included by the Trustee in the calculation of what amount your Proposal should offer your creditors.

Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security income (OAS)

Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is the only one permitted to garnish your CPP earnings if you have an unpaid personal income tax. By filing either for bankruptcy or a Proposal, the stay of proceedings will be invoked and CRA will have to stop the garnishment of your CPP and you will get the CPP payments you are qualified for.

However, the earnings obtained from CPP and OAS will certainly be taken into account by the Trustee in determining if you have any surplus income payment obligation in bankruptcy. In a Proposal, that amount also has to be considered in developing your Proposal.

Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA), Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) and other non-registered account investments

In a bankruptcy, just like any other non-exempt property, the amount held in your TFSA and any other non-registered investment account must be paid to the Trustee. In a Proposal, these amounts need to be taken into account in determining what type of Proposal to make. It may very well be that these accounts are collapsed in order to help fund a Proposal.

Similarly, RESPs are not excluded in personal bankruptcy. In a Proposal, the amount must be considered as an asset in calculating how much must be offered in your Proposal to stand a chance for success.

The reason that an RESP is not excluded from seizure in bankruptcy is relatively straightforward. Your child does not acquire ownership or other entitlement to the RESP funds as parents can take possession of the funds prior to the child becoming a post-secondary school student. For that reason, it is the parents who have ownership of the funds.

Consequently, the Trustee of an insolvent mother or father that has an RESP can collapse it. If the parent in bankruptcy wants the RESP to not collapse, adequate arrangements need to be made with the Trustee for the equal amount of funds in the RESP at the filing date be paid to the Trustee for the bankruptcy estate and the bankrupt’s creditors.

Annuity revenue in bankruptcy

Annuities are agreements where you pay a company (normally an insurance company) a specific amount, in order to get regular monthly payments for a specific period of time or for the remainder of your life.

If an annuity contract is properly set up with an insurance company, it will be exempt from seizure in bankruptcy. However, the income stream it produces will be considered by the Trustee in determining whether the bankrupt person has a surplus income obligation.

Your RRIF can also be considered as an annuity as it provides a legislated stream of payments. The RRIF is exempt from seizure in a bankruptcy, other than for any contributions in the 12 months immediately prior to filing. Like an annuity, the entitlement to payments will be considered by the Trustee in doing the surplus income calculation.

In a Proposal, you don’t give up ownership of an annuity contract or RRIF, but the income must be considered in preparing a suitable Proposal.

Bankruptcy Act Canada summary

Do you have financial problems? Do you not have enough money to pay your bills in full when due?

As a Trustee, we are the only professionals licensed, authorized and supervised by the federal government to offer insolvency advice and to implement solutions under the Bankruptcy Act Canada. A consumer proposal is a federal government licensed debt settlement plan to eliminate your debt. We will help you to select what is best for you to free you from your debt issues.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can eliminate the anxiousness, tension, discomfort and pain from your life that your cash problems have caused. With the unique roadmap, we develop just for you, we will promptly return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have generations and decades of experience helping people and companies looking for debt restructuring and a debt settlement plan to AVOID bankruptcy.

You can have a no-cost consultation so we can work with you to fix your money troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

bankruptcy act canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL CALCULATOR REVIEW FOR YOU

consumer proposal calculator

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this consumer proposal calculator Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on the podcast

Introduction

A consumer proposal calculator is important to figure out what sort of debt settlement plan should be offered to your creditors. But to have a truly successful one, you really need clear language. In Brandon’s Blog, I review a recent court case that explains why.

Shelly Gail Corriveau bankruptcy

I recently read the Reasons for Decision dated June 13, 2019 by Registrar in Bankruptcy L.A. Smart of Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta. This case is in the matter of the bankruptcy of Shelly Gail Corriveau. The case reference is Corriveau (Re), 2019 ABQB 438 (CanLII).

Ms. Corriveau filed an assignment in bankruptcy in April 2012. She had unsecured creditors of roughly $73,000. The reason for her insolvency was stated as offering monetary help to her child’s business. She was by all accounts a perfect example of an honest but unfortunate debtor. At the time of the bankruptcy, her only asset was her house.

In June 2012, Ms. Corriveau got a gift from her mom of $46,000. It featured instructions that $6,000 of those funds be utilized for children and certain other matters. She spent the $6,000 as instructed, with the balance of the $40,000 being paid to her licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) (the Trustee) for the benefit of her creditors.

The home was sold in October 2012. From the sale, she received her provincial exemption of $40,000 with the balance of $3,916.21 being paid to her bankruptcy estate.

Ms. Corriveau files a consumer proposal

On May 12, 2013, Ms. Corriveau advised her Trustee she had received an inheritance of $15,000 from her Mother’s estate. On May 26, 2013, Ms. Corriveau submitted a consumer proposal. The Trustee served as the Administrator of the consumer proposal.

The proposal in paragraph 4 states:

“4. That the following payments be made to [Name omitted to not embarrass the guilty] Trustee in Bankruptcy, the administrator of the consumer proposal, for the benefit of the unsecured creditors:

Proposal payments to total $10,000.00. The of (sic) funds will be provided to the Administrator as follows – $300.00 filing fee to be paid at time of filing and then a lump sum payment of $9,700.00 due 60 days after the proposal is court approved (all payments to be made within the 60 months proposal period)

The debtor reserves the right to accelerate payments should funds become available.

*** NOTE *** – There will be a significant dividend paid from the bankruptcy administration.”

In accordance with the requirements of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA), the consumer proposal Canada read that the payments must be completed within 60 months.

The Trustee recommended acceptance of the proposal. In his report to creditors he stated:

“This proposal will provide the debtor with relief and allow the debtor’s affairs to be restructured in an orderly fashion. It will allow the debtor to annul her bankruptcy and provide for a greater return to the creditors when compared to the bankruptcy option.”

The consumer proposal was deemed accepted by the creditors and approved by the Court. Ms. Corriveau made all the required payments and received her Certificate of Full Performance on August 2, 2013.

Have you “Noted” the problem yet?

Under the BIA, a bankrupt is allowed to lodge a proposal with the Trustee; either a consumer proposal or a Division I Proposal. In either format, it is a debt settlement plan that the bankrupt is proposing for acceptance by the debtor’s creditors. By definition, if the proposal is fully carried out, then the person or company’s bankruptcy is annulled.

When bankruptcy is annulled, it is declared to have had no legal existence. It is as if it never happened. The annulment of the bankruptcy takes place upon the approval or deemed approved by the court of the consumer proposal. There will never be a distribution to the creditors from the bankruptcy administration. The Trustee, in this case, did not issue any funds from the bankruptcy, yet.

So the Note that the Trustee added, “There will be a significant dividend paid from the bankruptcy administration.” is problematic. Actually, it is more than problematic. It is just plain wrong.

Now the Trustee wishes to complete the bankruptcy administration. The Trustee submits its Statement of Receipts and Disbursements as required to the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) for approval. This issue came before the Court because of the OSB’s unfavourable comment letter dated June 15, 2018.

The Court’s analysis

Section 66.4(2) of the BIA states:

“Where consumer debtor is bankrupt

(2) Where a consumer proposal is made by a consumer debtor who is a bankrupt,

(a) the consumer proposal must be approved by the inspectors, if any, before any further action is taken thereon;

(b) the consumer debtor must have obtained the assistance of a trustee who shall act as administrator of the proposal in the preparation and execution thereof;

(c) the time with respect to which the claims of creditors shall be determined is the time at which the consumer debtor became bankrupt; and

(d) the approval or deemed approval by the court of the consumer proposal operates to annul the bankruptcy and to revest in the consumer debtor, or in such other person as the court may approve, all the right, title and interest of the trustee in the property of the consumer debtor, unless the terms of the consumer proposal otherwise provide.”

There is a similar provision for Division I Proposals.

The Court looked at the:

  • Statute
  • wording of the consumer proposal
  • Trustee’s report to the creditors on the consumer proposal; and the
  • Trustee’s actions in administering the proposal.

The Court had to decide if the Note was a term of the proposal or not. The Registrar took all factors into consideration, including that the Trustee issued to Ms. Corriveau the certificate evidencing full completion of the proposal upon her payment of $10,000.

The Registrar decided that the Note was an unfortunate error and that the only intention was for the creditors to share in the distribution from the consumer proposal with a gross value of $10,000.

Now for the treatment of the funds collected by the Trustee under the bankruptcy that is now annulled. The Registrar further concluded that consumer proposals that purport to also include a distribution from the funds held in the bankruptcy administration, must include clear and precise language in the proposal. The Registrar said that the Trustee failed to do so.

Therefore, the Registrar concluded that subject to any entitlement to fees by the Trustee from the bankruptcy administration, the funds held in the annulled bankruptcy are Ms. Corriveau’s property and should be returned to her. Costs of the application will be dealt with at the taxation of the Trustee’s account. The Trustee was directed to arrange a suitable date for that taxation to proceed before that Registrar.

Consumer proposal calculator summary

A proposal must offer the creditors a better result than what they would get in a person or company’s bankruptcy. So although a consumer proposal calculator is important, I think clear language is more important.

Are you in financial distress? Do you not have sufficient funds to pay your commitments as they come due?

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can remove the anxiety, stress, pain and discomfort from your life that your money troubles have created. With the distinctive roadmap, we establish simply for you, we will quickly return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

As a Trustee, we are the only experts recognized, licensed and supervised by the federal government to give insolvency recommendations and to carry out insolvency procedures. A consumer proposal is a federal government authorized debt negotiation strategy to do that. We will assist you to choose what is best for you to rid yourself of your debt problems.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have years as well as generations of experience helping people and companies searching for debt restructuring, a debt negotiation strategy, or a consumer proposal Ontario to AVOID bankruptcy. You can have a no-cost evaluation so we can aid you to repair your financial problems. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will let you return to a brand-new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SUCCESSION LAW REFORM ACT OPPORTUNITIES FROM A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE

succession law reform act

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Succession Law Reform Act Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Succession Law Reform Act: Introduction

I wish to focus on the last provincial statute that is also important for the administration of a deceased estate; the Succession Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.26.

This is my last blog in this collection to show how it would certainly be proper to appoint a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or bankruptcy trustee) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) as the estate trustee (formerly called an executor or executrix) of a solvent deceased estate.

As always, given that we are not lawyers, and I am not offering in this or any of the other Brandon’s Blogs in this series, suggestions on wills or estate issues. For that, you have to consult your lawyer.

My estate trustee blogs

In my blog TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS, I discussed some crucial issues when it entails a deceased estate and why a LIT would certainly be exceptionally knowledgable and qualified to serve as an estate trustee.

In the blog, TRUSTEE OF PARENTS ESTATE: DO I REALLY HAVE TO?, I discussed why many times moms and dads attempt doing the correct thing by selecting their youngsters as estate trustees and the several times it simply ends up all wrong.

In ESTATES ACT ONTARIO: TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE REVEALS HIDDEN SECRET, I describe how the needs and stipulations of the Estates Act are already very familiar to a bankruptcy trustee. As a matter of fact, a lot of the tasks called for by the Estates Act are currently carried out in the insolvency context by a LIT.

My blog ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES ACT CANADA: EASY FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE TO DO, I clarified why a LIT is an appropriate specialist to lead the management of Estates Act Canada.

In the blog TRUSTEE ACT ONTARIO BY A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE, I describe the duties of a trustee under the Trustee Act Ontario and how a bankruptcy trustee is experienced to carry out those duties.

In this blog, I will explain why a bankruptcy trustee would be extremely comfortable working with this provincial legislation.

Things an estate trustee must be aware of

The Act has 79 sections and regulations. Sections 1 through 43 inclusive, set the ground rules for establishing wills and their validity.

The Act figures out how your estate and assets will be allocated to family members based on based upon guidance and a collection of policies.

This statute is different from the other ones I reviewed affecting acting as an estate trustee in a deceased estate. The Act is really just a set of guiding rules.

Intestacy and the entitlement of spouse and the preferential share

Section 44 of the Act deals with a person who has a spouse and no living children who die intestate. This section says that his or her spouse is entitled to all the property.

Section 45(1) of this Act deals with the situations where a person dies intestate and has both a spouse and living children. It says that where the value of the deceased’s property is not more than the preferential share, which is a defined term, then the spouse is entitled to all the property.

Preferential share is set by Ontario Regulation 54/95. It says that for the purpose of section 45 of the Act, the preferential share is $200,000.

Section 45(2) of the Act deals with the person who dies intestate, has a spouse and living children, and whose property is worth more than the preferential share. This section says that the spouse is absolutely entitled to the preferential share or the amount of $200,000. Presumably, the spouse and children then have to either agree or litigate about who is entitled to how much of the value above $200,000.

Just to add another wrinkle, Section 45(3) deals with the situation where the deceased dies with a will dealing with some property but intestate to the balance of the property and is survived by both a spouse and children. This section states that the spouse is always entitled to the preferential share out of the property not governed by a will. If the spouse is entitled to property under a will having a value of more than the preferential share ($200,000), then there is no need to be concerned with the workings of the preferential share.

Residue: spouse and children

Section 46(1) of this provincial statute says that where a person dies intestate and has a spouse and one living child, the spouse is entitled to one-half of the residue of the property AFTER payment of the preferential share.

Section 46(2) states that if the intestate dead person has a spouse and more than one child, the spouse is entitled to one-third of the residue. Again, this is after payment of the preferential share. Section 46(3) deals with the situation of any children predeceasing the parent who died intestate. This section says that for the purposes of calculating the spouse’s share, assume the deceased child(ren) is alive.

Distribution of kin

Section 47 of the Succession Law Reform Act deals with how property should be distributed when a person dies intestate. The general principle starts with the property being divided between the spouse and living children as described above. The balance of the section deals with the treatment of grandchildren, parents, siblings and nephews and nieces when a person dies intestate.

This section ultimately says that if there are no kin, then the intestate property becomes the property of the Crown under the Escheats Act, 2015.

Succession Law Reform Act: Designation of beneficiaries of interest in funds or plans, survivorship and support of dependants

The balance of the Act deals with specific rules about:

  • the designation in plans or funds of specific beneficiaries;
  • how to deal with the death of two or more persons at the same time who either hold property together or may be entitled to all or some of the other’s property; and
  • support of dependants.

Summary

I really hope that this collection of blogs show to you just how the various provincial statutes describing the obligations of a trustee or estate trustee tracks actually near to exactly how a LIT executes in either a Court-appointed receivership or bankruptcy mandate.

If you have any type of concerns about a deceased estate and the requirements for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, call the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

If you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE IN TORONTO: BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE EXPLAINS POVERTY LINE

angus reid

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: Introduction

As a bankruptcy trustee in Toronto (now called a licensed insolvency trustee), I took great interest in reading a recent poverty line Canada study. A new research project whose results were announced in July 2018, studied poverty in Canada. It finds higher than 25% of respondents feel they have stress over financial matters. Not just a part-time stress; it is a full time feeling. Instead of just analyzing income levels, the survey considers the daily realities of making ends meet and how that can take a toll on people.

Many are unable to spend on simple things like going to the movie theatre, but also on more serious needs, like warm clothes for winter time and dental care. Some are late paying bills or cannot pay them at all and many say they can’t afford better quality food at the grocery store.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: People are struggling

Researchers also found of the people who struggle most, 20% make well above what’s considered low income. However, the study finds that doesn’t always go far particularly in major urban cities. You can be making what many would consider middle-class earnings and still feel stressed. The survey showed many feel on the edge with their ability to have a life with some level of comfort or relaxation.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: 4 major groups

This ARI research identified four groups:

  1. the struggling (16%);
  2. on the edge (11%);
  3. recently comfortable (36%); and
  4. always comfortable (37%).

As expected from these labels, the struggling is dealing with economic difficulties that are adversely influencing their lifestyle. Those on the edge are a stone’s throw behind them.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: The study’s other main findings

The study’s other main findings are:

  • nearly a third (31%) really feel extremely worried about money regularly– either usually or constantly;
  • about half (52%) think hardship has actually been rising;
  • almost ten percent (9%) feel that financial hardship has been decreasing;
  • thirty percent (30%) are downhearted concerning their individual finances over the near future;
  • more think their youngsters’ finances will be worse (43%) compared to those who think their children will be financially better (32%);
  • all 4 state financial anxiety exists, yet there is more for both lower groups; and
  • the anxiety felt by the always comfortable group is a fret about future troubles as opposed to their present life.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: Canada Without Poverty

Canada Without Poverty charitable organization states that roughly 5 million Canadians, or 1 in 7, live in poverty. However, the ARI study shows that the participants in the study estimate that about one third live in poverty. As you can see, their views were shaped by their own feelings of money anxiety.

Bankruptcy trustee in Toronto: Are you are “on the edge”?

Do you feel you are in the “on the edge” or the “recently comfortable” groups? Are you always feeling financially stressed? Are you worried that you may not be able to absorb an unexpected expense of $1,000 or more? If so, why not get a free financial checkup?

Seek professional help immediately. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a full-service practice serving people just like you and companies throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) who need a plan for Starting Over, Starting Now.

We know your pain and the stress you feel because of your finances. Our Firm has helped many others restructure their debt and return to a financially healthy life. Give us a call today. We can give you peace of mind and set you on a path to debt free living. We are a bankruptcy trustee in Toronto.

(43.807606, -79.534091)bankruptcy trustee in toronto

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TORONTO REAL ESTATE: REAL ESTATE NEWS ON BUYER’S REMORSE

assignment in bankruptcyToToronto real estate: Introduction

This Brandon’s Blog is about Toronto real estate and what happens when the purchaser experiences buyer’s remorse. “When the residential real estate market is a rising market, most people – perhaps with the exception of first-time buyers, are happy homeowners and investors. When the market turns and drops, it is not for the faint of heart.” This is how Justice M.L. Edwards begins his Reasons for Decision in Gamoff v. Hu, 2018 ONSC 2172 (CanLII).

The realities of this situation show how one family came to be involved in a bidding process. Determined to get their dream house, they exhausted their ability to fund the acquisition of that residence. We will describe this case which is similar to several people my Firm has helped overcome their financial problems after being found liable for similar amounts the defendants, in this case, were found responsible for.

Toronto real estate: The Toronto real estate market news facts

Douglas and Sheila Gamoff (the “Gamoffs” or the “plaintiffs”) were the owners of a residential property. The home was in Stouffville, Ontario (the “Home”), part of the GTA. The plaintiffs listed the Home for sale on the multiple listing service on March 29, 2017. Within a fairly short amount of time (March 29, 2017, to April 2, 2017), there were 18 offers.

The defendants, Yixing Hu and David Lea, saw the Home with their real estate agent on April 1, 2017. They state that they told their real estate agent that they had an interest in acquiring the Home. They also didn’t want to be involved in a bidding price battle.

The defendants originally submitted their written offer on April 1, 2017, with an offer of $2,050,000. On April 2, 2017, the defendants were told by their real estate agent that there were several deals for the residential property. Their realtor also told them that their offer of $2,050,000 was not accepted. In spite of having informed their real estate agent that they did not intend to end up being in a bidding war, they inevitably submitted a new offer for $2,250,000. The vendors accepted the revised offer.

The deal had no conditions. The agreement of purchase and sale read that the purchasers provided a deposit in the amount of $30,000 upon acceptance of the offer. It further read that a second down payment tranche of $90,000 would be made on April 6, 2017. The date for the second deposit payment was then amended to April 10, 2017. The closing day for the acquisition of the Home was August 30, 2017.

Toronto real estate: It did not take long for buyer’s remorse to arise

On the same day, the defendants called their real estate agent. They suggested to him that they thought that they had actually paid way too much for the Home. Their issue here was no doubt created by the fact that they had just found out that, a mix of their mortgage loan funding and the value of their house yet to be sold, would not be enough for them to get the essential funding to close on their purchase.

David Lea emailed his real estate agent stating to him that he and Ms. Hu had actually slipped up aiming to acquire the Home. Mr. Lea went on to say in this email that he is begging, please contact the vendor’s agent with a new firm offer.

As I previously stated, the agreement of purchase and sale did not have any conditions in it to allow them to end the agreement and get back their first tranche deposit. The agreement certainly was not conditional either on their obtaining satisfactory mortgage financing or the sale of their existing home. That is enough stress to cause anyone to panic which no doubt led to their buyer’s remorse.

Toronto real estate: The purchaser’s default

On April 10, 2017, the purchaser failed to pay the 2nd payment needed by the change to the agreement of purchase and sale. On the following day, the defendants visited the property. They informed the plaintiffs face to face that they did not actually have the funding needed to complete the purchase.

Toronto real estate: The vendors’ mitigation

The Gamoffs first consulted with their lawyer. Then on May 1, 2017, they listed the Home for sale again on the multiple listing service for $2,250,000. From May 1 to May 16, 2017, the plaintiffs got no offers on the Home.

The Gamoffs lowered the listing price of the Home to $1,998,000 on May 17, 2017. This was because of a recommendation from their real estate agent. In between May 17, 2017, and June 6, 2017, they obtained no deals on the Home.

On July 28, 2017, the Gamoffs, based on the further advice of their realtor, lowered the price of the Home again to $1,798,000.

In between June 6 and July 26, 2017, the Gamoffs got no offers on the Home. On July 31, 2017, they got an offer to purchase the Home for $1,700,000. After some back and forth, on August 9, 2017, the Gamoffs accepted a brand new agreement of purchase and sale. It was with an arm’s length buyer for $1,770,000. That deal closed on October 3, 2017.

Toronto real estate: The Court’s decision

The plaintiffs sought a summary judgment for the difference between the defendants’ offer of $2,250,000 and what the Home eventually sold for, $1,770,000. The defendants opposed this on several grounds, including, that there was an issue that required a full trial.

Based on the evidence, the judge disagreed. He awarded the plaintiffs the difference between the defendants’ offer of $2,250,000 and what the Home eventually sold for. The judge also awarded costs to the plaintiffs. The judgment was for $470,000 plus costs. Add that to the $30,000 down payment the defendants lost, this aborted deal cost them half a million bucks!

Toronto real estate: Our own case studies

My Firm has been involved in several matters helping people who have had judgments like the one described above made against them from failed real estate deals. We have been involved as a result of failed real estate deal judgments in:

  1. a bankruptcy caused by the plaintiffs (the vendors) who could not yet collect on their judgment filing a Bankruptcy Application with the Court and obtaining a Bankruptcy Order be made against the defendants;
  2. a consumer proposal for a defendant which was successfully completed;
  3. the successful proposal of the defendant who had a large amount awarded against him by the judgment; and
  4. an assignment in bankruptcy filed by the defendant who did not have the ability to attempt a proposal to get relief from the judgment against them.

In each case, the only way that the defendants could get relief, voluntarily or involuntarily, was through an insolvency process. In the one case caused by the Bankruptcy Order, it was the plaintiff who took action. The plaintiff was able to get a payment for all the unsecured creditors. The insolvency process requires that the distribution is shared among all creditors. That result was better than the plaintiff not being able to collect on its judgment without the insolvency process.

In that specific case, it was a combination of the Trustee’s powers and the plaintiff’s judgment and specific knowledge, that joined to produce the recovery for all creditors. The Trustee’s powers were required to get enough leverage resulting in the recovery.

Toronto real estate: A tough lesson to learn


The effect of this Court’s decision will definitely have a significant result on the defendants. The judge said that he had every compassion for them.

With the adjustments in the realty market in the Greater Toronto Area, I have every reason to believe that there will be extra instances where buyers discover that they have not protected themselves and will not be able to complete their real estate transaction.

Buyers would certainly be well advised to think about making their deals to acquire real estate subject to satisfactory funding, as well as for the sale of their existing residence if they have one. The cost of entering a bidding war and getting the property unconditionally could turn out to be a very expensive one just like in this case.

Toronto real estate: What to do if you have too much debt

If you have too much debt because of a judgment against you, either because you have made the real estate in Toronto news from a failed real estate deal or for any other reason, there is no shame in looking for a professional to help you out of your financial jam. A licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) will look at your circumstances and assist you to get to the very best option for your issues. The Ira Smith Team will give you a free consultation.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is right here to help. We’re government supervised and adhere to a rigorous code of ethics. Our experienced team provides a high-quality service which will create a unique and an affordable solution made just for you. I feel your pain and know how to end it.

Don’t wait until we read about you in the real estate in Toronto news Canada. Call us today to end your stress and experience our pleasant, non-judgmental technique to solve your financial problems and get you back on the right track to stress-free living, Starting Over, Starting Now.toronto real estate

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

PAYDAY LOANS AROUND ME: DO PAYDAY LOANS CAUSE A BANKRUPTCY?

payday loans

Introduction

We’ve been sounding the alarm bells about payday loans long and loud, but it seems that many Canadians are still unaware of their dangers. According to the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC), many loan users are unaware of the high costs of these loans compared to their alternatives. This includes all such loans around me and you. This just goes to confirm what we already knew – there’s a great need to continue to raise consumer awareness about the costs of, and alternatives to, payday loans.

What the FCAC survey shows

The FCAC recently conducted a survey on payday loans and the results were quite insightful and at times quite surprising:

  • They are an expensive way for consumers to borrow money. The annual percentage rate (APR) is typically 546%.
  • Fewer than 43% of respondents understood that this kind of loan is more expensive than available alternatives. This suggests that many do not have enough knowledge to consistently make the borrowing decisions that best serve their financial well-being.
  • The use of these loans has more than doubled in Canada recently to 4% of Canadian households.
  • 45% of respondents reported typically using such loans for unexpected, necessary expenses.
  • 41% used them for expected, necessary expenses.
  • Users are primarily those with low-to-moderate incomes (more than half lived in households with annual incomes under $55,000).
  • 20% of respondents who used this kind of loans reported household incomes exceeding $80,000.
  • 7% of respondents who used them reported household incomes over $120,000.
  • Many of the users surveyed indicated that they rarely sought financial advice even when they felt it was necessary.

Why not go to a bank or credit union?

Why didn’t respondents access credit from a bank or credit union?

  • 90% said payday lending was the fastest or most convenient option.
  • 74% said payday lending was the best option available to them.
  • 55% said payday lending offered the best customer service.
  • 27% said a bank or credit union would not lend them money.
  • 15% said they did not have time to get a loan from a bank or credit union.
  • 13% said they did not want to get money from a bank or credit union.

Can payday loans lead to bankruptcy?

Payday loans are a huge problem. In fact, the Canadian Payday Loan Association reports that nearly 2 million Canadians use payday loans each year. And many borrowers often find it very difficult to repay the full loan amount with the interest and fees. Now they’re trapped. They take out another payday loan to pay off the first payday loan and then take out another and another. It’s not difficult to imagine payday loans causing bankruptcy.

Are you caught in a payday loan trap?

If you’re caught in the payday loan trap, borrowing more money is not the answer – professional help is. Seek the advice of a professional trustee. Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today. You need answers, options and realistic plan for recovery and you need help now.

We’ll evaluate your situation and help you to arrive at the best possible solution for your problems, whether that solution is a bankruptcy alternative like credit counselling, debt consolidation or a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. Starting Over, Starting Now we can help you become debt-free.

payday loans

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TOYS R US BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION IN CANADA: COURT AGREES WITH TOYS R US BANKRUPTCY COUNSEL NEGATIVE = POSITIVE

2 1920x1080 1

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Introduction

I want to tell you about a recent Ontario Court decision about the claims process approved in the Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd. and Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltee (Toys R Us) bankruptcy protection proceedings. The Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada began with the Court making the Initial Order on September 19, 2017. This Initial Order was made under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, as amended (CCAA).

On January 25, 2018, the Toys R Us bankruptcy lawyers attended in Court. There was a motion before the Court to extend the time that Toys “R” Us remains under bankruptcy protection to try to restructure. The motion was also for the Court to approve a draft claims process to quantify the outstanding creditor claims.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: The normal claims process

It is the claims procedure which while not novel, is also not regularly seen. That is what I want to talk about.

In a bankruptcy regulated by the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c.B-3 (BIA), creditors are required to prove their claims independently. They do so by providing to the trustee in bankruptcy sworn proof of claim forms that are accompanied by supporting invoices and other pertinent documents. The detailed treatment for creditor claims to be proven and counted is not set out in the CCAA like it is in the BIA.

The Court routinely grants claims procedure orders under the Court’s general powers under ss. 11 and 12 of the CCAA. Claims process orders generally involve developing a technique to interact with all the creditors. This is so they can file their claims. It normally creates a process to communicate to (potential) creditors. It tells them that there is a process they must follow to prove their claims by a specific date.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Why do we even need a claims process?

The claims process includes an opportunity for the company under restructuring proceedings, or its representative, to check all claims. The Monitor, or its representative, can disallow creditors’ claims, either in whole or in part. The claims procedure establishes an adjudication mechanism. If claims are not agreed upon and cannot be settled by negotiation, then the adjudication process begins. This could be either in court or first by arbitration. Decisions on the claims of creditors are then subject to an appeal to the Court.

Claims procedure orders will usually also set a claims bar date. Claims will not be accepted after this date. it is necessary to have a cut off to give the right numbers for voting and distribution purposes. Late claims won’t be allowed. In this way the Monitor achieves finality.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Who has the most up to date books and records?

Most large businesses, including Toys R Us, have readily ascertainable payables outstanding. Sophisticated electronic systems carefully track these amounts, supervised and reviewed by the company’s senior financial staff. The electronic systems not only track purchases and payments, but also the many vendor allowances which are offsets to the accounts payable.

Such offsets include:

  • guaranteed sale provisions, which means if the product does not sell within a specific period, Toys R Us can either return the unsold items to the vendor, or take massive discounts against amounts owing for such products;
  • early payment discounts, promotional allowances, warranty fees, co-op/marketing fees and defect fees; and
  • shipping and warehousing fees

So for large companies like Toys R Us, the vendor will most likely be reconciling their books to what the company shows on its books net of the various offsets.

The recommendation to the Court was for a different type of claims process. As indicated above, the process required by the BIA is a positive one. It requires each creditor to prove the state of its outstanding claims by submitting a sworn proof of claim backed up by invoices.

The draft form of claims process submitted to the Court in the Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada proceedings was a different one. It proposed to list creditor claims from the company’s books and records and to provide each known creditor with a simple claim statement. The statement would set out the amount of the respective creditor’s claim recognized by the company. If a creditor agrees with the amount that the company says it owes, the creditor need do nothing and the listed claim will become the final proven claim at the claims bar date. I call this a negative claims process.

Creditors who disagree with the amounts set out in their claims statement can file a dispute notice with the Monitor by the claims bar date to begin a review process.

ISI 4
toys r us bankruptcy protection in canada

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Advantages of the negative option

This negative option has certain advantages in companies such as Toys R Us. These advantages include:

  • eliminating the need for filing proofs of claim and supporting evidence in the majority of cases;
  • guarantees that known claims won’t lose out if a certain percentage of creditors to fail to file their claims on a timely basis; and
  • making the claims process streamlined; and
  • making the process easier for recognizing and counting all known creditor claims

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: The negative option approved by the Court

The proposed claims process met the needs of the Court to ensure that any claims procedure is both fair and reasonable. The negative option claims process proposed in the Toys R Us case met the needs of the Court. The Court approved the negative claims process in the Order dated January 25, 2018.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Does your company require restructuring?

Your company may not be as large as Toys R US, but it is the most important one to you. Your company may be facing financial challenges, and you have tried everything you can think of to solve the problems. But the red ink still flows. Many families rely on you and your company to continue for their survival. You have invested your money, your blood, sweat and tears in your company, and want to do everything possible to save it.

If you find your company in this situation, then you need the help of a professional trustee immediately. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. If we consult with you early, we could develop a restructuring and turnaround strategy. By doing this your business will once again thrive. It may not be as complex as the Toys R Us bankruptcy protection process in Canada, but it is the most significant one for you.

Our approach for every person and company is to develop an outcome where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. You’re just one telephone call away from taking the important actions to return to leading a healthy, balanced, and stress free life.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today.

TOYS R US BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA 0
toys r us bankruptcy protection in canada
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DEBT RELIEF PROGRAM VS BANKRUPTCY: ARE DEBT RELIEF COMPANIES SCARY?

debt relief program

Debt Relief Program vs Bankruptcy: Introduction

We keep hearing commercials about debt relief and their scare tactics of portraying the safety of a debt relief program vs bankruptcy. But, what is debt relief? And can some of these so-called debt relief companies actually put you deeper into debt?

Debt Relief Program vs Bankruptcy: Are They Legit?

As consumer debt continues to soar many Canadians are easy marks for unscrupulous companies who make false claims which are quite frankly just scams. The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC) is warning Canadians to be very cautious about companies that claim they can negotiate a deal to cut the amount of debt you must repay to your creditors. This process is often called “debt reduction,” “debt settlement,” “debt relief” or “debt negotiation.” The truth is that there is no easy way out of debt. And, if you need help dealing with debt problems, run away from these companies and work only with a licensed insolvency trustee (the new name for a trustee in bankruptcy).

Heed the warning of FCAC Commissioner Ursula Menke. “Unfortunately, people do not always see the benefits that debt reduction companies lead them to expect—and some people wind up even deeper in debt than they were before,” says FCAC Commissioner Ursula Menke. “If an offer to reduce your debts seems too good to be true, it probably is.”

Debt Relief Program vs Bankruptcy: Debt relief tactics to beware of:

  1. Government approved: Companies will try to win your confidence by stating that they are government approved. Not true. A company’s business license or registration doesn’t mean that the government has approved or endorsed them.
  2. We can reduce your debt by 60% or more: Not true. Your creditors are under no obligation to reduce your debts.
  3. High pressure sales tactics: Don’t ever be victimized by high pressure sales tactics. Always take your time. Do your due diligence. Check out the company thoroughly. Check with the government office that handles consumer affairs in your province or territory, as well as the Better Business Bureau.
  4. Upfront fees: These companies usually charge you hefty upfront fees and then don’t reduce your debt. Good luck getting a refund.

Debt Relief Program vs Bankruptcy: How Can You Get Debt Relief Safely And Reliably?

Contact a licensed insolvency trustee. We’re federally regulated, our fees are federally regulated, we’re subject to a strict code of ethics and we complete ongoing mandatory professional development each year.

A licensed insolvency trustee MUST first discuss all of your options with you in order for you to avoid bankruptcy, and attempt to find the best bankruptcy alternative solution for you. Many times the trustee can successfully carry out a debt restructuring proposal for you as an alternative to bankruptcy.

Don’t take chances with your financial future. Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. We’ll evaluate your situation and help you to arrive at the best possible solution for your problems. Let us help restore you to financial health and give you back peace of mind Starting Over, Starting Now. Give us a call today. You’ll be happy you did.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

#VIDEO: AVERAGE STUDENT LOAN DEBT: REASONS WHY WE PITY YOU#

The rise of average student loan debt

Average student loan debt is getting out of control. Post-secondary education is effectively a need for today’s labour market. According to the Canadian Federation of Students in its paper titled: “The Impact of Student Debt”, unfortunately, since the demand for education has inflated, public funding did not keep up. Public funding shortfalls have resulted in the increased cost of post-secondary education being borne by students.

The growth in average tuition fees

From 1990 to 2014, the national average tuition fees have seen an inflation adjusted increase of over one hundred and fifty per cent (150%). In Ontario, tuition fees have grown over one hundred and eighty percent (180%). For most students—often having spent very little time active within the workforce, other than for part-time work—funding their education has become more and more troublesome.

Students now taking on higher levels of average student loan debt

Many students are now taking on increased levels of debt for their education. Students requiring a Canada Student Loan currently graduate with an average student loan debt of over $28,000. Keep in mind that this is an average, with the costs of graduate education resulting in higher debt levels. Relying on debt to finance education suggests that there is a delay in the full impact of high tuition fees till after graduation—when interest begins to be charged.

Societal issues caused by rising average student loan debt statistics

This impact is now exacerbated by the effects of the most recent recession and the rising trend of precarious, and even unpaid, employment. The broader effects of high levels of student debt on both the person and the general economy are now resulting in various issues:

  • Young Canadians (15-24) accounted for over half of job losses over the last 5 years;
  • Un and under-employment can cost the Canadian economy over $22 billion by 2031;
  • In 2014, youth un and under-employment was twenty-seven per cent (27%);
  • Thirty per cent (30%) of medical students expect to graduate with over $100,000 in student debt;
  • Under-employment and work outside one’s field of study results in talent degradation, falling behind in ability, and lost networking opportunities;
  • Canada has seen a fifteen per cent (15%) growth in Canadians under the age of 30 who still live in their parent’s home since 1981;
  • Those with student debt have a fewer assets, savings or investments compared to debt-free peers.

Average student loan debt causes affect the Canadian economy

Starting out with huge debt and facing a weak labour market, this prevents graduates to fully take part within the Canadian economy. Student debt impacts career selections, even among professional school graduates in medicine and law. An estimate of unpaid internships is in the range of 300,000 graduates working with no pay.

Do you have too much debt? Then contact us now

If you are an individual or company who needs to free themselves from the stress and strain of too much debt, and especially if you have been told your situation is hopeless, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can prepare and carry out the plan made just for you, to free you from the burden of your financial challenges to go on to live a productive, stress-free, financially sound life.

Student loan debt has its own set of unique rules and complexities within the Canadian insolvency scheme. If you’re experiencing serious debt issues, contact a professional trustee for a free, no obligation consultation. The Ira Smith Team does not try to write new insolvency law or tax law. Rather, we will evaluate your situation within the existing statutes, and help you to arrive at the best possible solution for your problems, whether that solution is a bankruptcy alternative like credit counselling, debt consolidation or a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. Starting Over, Starting Now you can be debt free with the help of a professional, licensed trustee in bankruptcy. Contact us today.

student loans,student loan debt,student loans explained,student loan debt crisis,student loan crisis,Student Loan (Litera...,Bankruptcy,Student Loan,Debt,Loan,average student loan debt,ontario student loans login,student loan debt statistics,student loan debt canada,manage student loan,ira smith trustee,consumer proposal,canadian student loan forgiveness,average student loans debt,Student Debt,Trustee (Job Title),Credit, average student loan debt, Canadian Federation of Students, the impact of student debt, student debt, debt, loan debt, student loan debt, tuition fees, inflation, Ontario, economy, Canadian economy, internships, trustee, bankruptcy, bankruptcy alternative, credit counselling, debt consolidation, consumer proposal, trustee in bankruptcy, student loan debt statistics

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DioGUARDI TAX LAW: BELIEVING THEIR INTENSE MYTHS KEEPS YOU FROM SOLVING YOUR DEBT PROBLEMS

DioGuardi tax amnesty, dioguardi tax law, dioguardi tax lawyers, tax lawyer, Philippe DioGuardi, Canada Revenue Agency, CRA, Law Society Tribunal, professional trustee, bankruptcy alternative, credit counselling, debt consolidation, consumer proposal, bankruptcy, trustee in bankruptcy, starting over starting now

DioGuardi Tax Law – The Introduction

Several months ago we first introduced you to Philippe DioGuardi, a Canadian tax lawyer – The Tax Lawyer; Even a High Profile Tax Fighting Tax Lawyer Has to Pay His Income Tax. He’s the high-profile tax lawyer of DioGuardi tax lawyers who portrays himself as a one-man bulldog lawyer crusader against the unfair tactics of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). Ironically, at that time, a Toronto Star investigation revealed that Philippe DioGuardi had his own tax problems with the CRA and he paid up; the DioGuardi tax law couldn’t create the DioGuardi tax amnesty magic or “change the game”, to quote his own radio ads.

dioguardi tax law

DioGuardi Tax Law – The Change

Recently I noticed that Philippe DioGuardi, a prominently featured DioGuardi tax lawyer, was no longer featured in the radio ads. Instead, they are being voiced by his father Paul DioGuardi. The ads are now very low-key, with none of the old bluster and bravado. And, I wondered why DioGuardi tax law no longer featured Philippe DioGuardi, the tax lawyer in Toronto.

That is until I read the latest Toronto Star article about him stating, “Self-styled tax fighter Philippe DioGuardi has been given a six-week suspension, a $5,000 fine and an order to pay $75,000 in legal costs after being found guilty of professional misconduct by the Law Society of Upper Canada” (LSUC). So LSUC found law society misconduct charges were proven and assessed a tribunal penalty and didn’t buy into the DioGuardi tax law concept of income tax law, as written by Philippe, and so he has a brief rest from the practice of law – a twist on DioGuardi tax amnesty!

dioguardi tax law

DioGuardi Tax Law Professional Misconduct

The law society lawyer was successful in proving, according to the Order Summary of the Law Society Tribunal Philippe Joseph Mario DioGuardi (1990), of the City of Mississauga was found to have engaged in professional misconduct for:

  • failing to act with integrity by having eight clients execute a Retainer Agreement which contains terms that benefit DTL to the potential detriment of the tax debtors clients;
  • between April 2007 and October 2012, failing to deposit client money retainer funds received from six clients into a trust account or transferred the client retainer money from the trust to general within a few days of receipt of the funds prior to the performance of any or very little legal services for which he was retained;
  • transferring the retainer client funds paid by a client into DTL’s general account within a few days of receipt of the funds prior to the performance of any legal services for which he was retained;
  • immediately transferring the retainer funds paid by a client into a third party trust account for the benefit of DTL alone rather than for the client’s benefit and the client no longer had ownership of the monies;
  • failing to perform legal services to the standard of a competent lawyer in respect to six tax troubles matters.

DioGuardi tax law, as written by Philippe, is an interesting experiment. It may not be right, but it has certainly garnered a lot of attention.

dioguardi tax law

If you have too much debt, contact us

Do you or your company have unpayable tax debts? Are you looking for unpayable tax debt solutions? If you are an individual or company who needs to free themselves from the stress and strain of too much debt, and especially if you have been told your situation is hopeless, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can prepare and implement the plan made just for you, to free you from the burden of your financial challenges to go on to live a productive, stress-free, financially sound life. This plan includes resolving unpayable tax debt solutions. We have vast experience in helping people and companies with a variety of financial challenges.

If you’re experiencing serious debt issues with the CRA, or for any reason, contact a professional trustee for a free, no-obligation consultation. The Ira Smith Team does not try to write new insolvency law or tax law. Rather, we will evaluate your situation within the existing statutes, and help you to arrive at the best possible solution for your problems, whether that solution is a bankruptcy alternative like credit counselling, debt consolidation or a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. Starting Over, Starting Now you can be debt-free with the help of a professional, licensed trustee in bankruptcy.

Contact us today.

dioguardi tax law

Call a Trustee Now!