Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONDITIONAL DISCHARGE BANKRUPTCY COMPLETE GUIDE: IRA SMITH TRUSTEE TORONTO

As a Licensed Insolvency Trustee at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., I’ve guided many people through the bankruptcy process in the Greater Toronto Area. One of the most common questions I hear is: “What happens at my discharge hearing?” Recently, a significant Ontario court decision has shed new light on this crucial aspect of bankruptcy proceedings, particularly regarding conditional discharge orders.

This case is especially relevant when considering my recent blog posts. In my previous blog posts about the Toronto condo market and current issues in the Ontario mortgage default space, I’ve discussed how many people have found themselves in similar predicaments to the woman described in this recent decision.

Filing for bankruptcy may be a viable option for many people who are on the wrong end of a shortfall claim due to a failed real estate investment. Every person thinking about bankruptcy as a way to eliminate hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt must also consider the possibility that they may not get an absolute discharge from bankruptcy. This is what this case that I describe below highlights.

Today, I want to walk you through the detailed case of Re Xianglan Li, 2025 ONSC 5812. It illustrates what can happen when things go wrong in bankruptcy – and what you can learn from it to protect yourself.

Why Not All Discharges Are Absolute: Introducing Conditional Discharge

Before diving into the case details, let’s establish some fundamentals. When you file for bankruptcy in Canada under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada), the ultimate goal is to receive a discharge from bankruptcy – your legal release from most debts. However, not everyone receives an automatic discharge.

There are four types of discharge orders under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act:

  1. Absolute Discharge – You’re immediately released from your debts that can be discharged with no conditions
  2. Conditional Discharge – You must fulfill certain conditions (usually payment obligations) before being released from your debts
  3. Suspended Discharge – Your discharge is delayed for a specific period. A suspended discharge can be combined with conditions that also must be fulfilled, if appropriate. Otherwise, the person receives an absolute discharge after the suspension period expires.
  4. Refused Discharge – The court denies your discharge entirely (rare and only used in extreme cases)

A conditional discharge typically requires the bankrupt person to pay a certain amount of money to the trustee before being released from bankruptcy. This payment goes toward creditors’ claims and demonstrates a good-faith effort to repay at least some portion of the outstanding debts.

The Real Estate Speculation Case: A Cautionary Tale

The recent Ontario Superior Court decision in Re Xianglan Li provides valuable insights into how courts determine what kind of discharge order to grant, and whether it should be a conditional discharge, what conditions to impose, or should it be a different form of discharge.

The Background Story

Ms. Li’s bankruptcy story began with a failed real estate transaction in Richmond Hill, Ontario. In July 2017, she signed an Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) to buy a property for $1,435,607.67 – a significant investment by any measure, but not unusual for a home in the GTA. She paid deposits totalling $179,810.67, including upgrades.

Here’s where things get interesting: Ms. Li signed this agreement while her husband had just purchased another property four months earlier for $955,472.87. The new property she was planning to purchase cost approximately $480,000 more than the one her husband had just bought.

The real problem? The combined total of Ms. Li’s reported taxable income and that of her husband in 2017 was less than $20,000 – yet they were trying to purchase properties for a combined cost of over two million dollars. So either they had a lot of unreported income or they could never afford what they were trying to accomplish in real estate, or both.

When the closing date arrived in November 2018, Ms. Li couldn’t complete the purchase. The developer, Arista Homes, terminated the agreement, kept all deposits, and sued for damages totalling $281,421.39.

In April 2020, before a judgment was issued, Ms. Li filed for bankruptcy. It turns out that Arista was her only creditor in the bankruptcy. That is the Reader’s Digest version of a long, sordid tale.

Why This Matters for Toronto Area Residents

If you’ve been following real estate trends in the Greater Toronto Area, this story might sound familiar. It is a similar story to my prior blogs on the Toronto condo market and current issues in the Ontario mortgage default space.

The combination of rising interest rates, cooling real estate prices, and overextended purchasers has created a perfect storm. Many individuals who signed pre-construction purchase agreements during the hot market now cannot close on their properties.

A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge

What Happened at the Discharge Hearing Before the Registrar in Bankruptcy?

Ms. Li’s discharge hearing revealed several significant problems that led to a conditional discharge order rather than an absolute discharge.

Section 173(1) Facts: The Court’s Concerns

Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), Section 173(1) lists specific “facts” that, if proven, prevent the court from granting an absolute discharge. This section of Canada’s bankruptcy legislation lists facts for which discharge may be refused, suspended or granted conditionally. In Ms. Li’s case, the court found three such facts proven:

1. Section 173(1)(a) – Assets Not Equal to 50 Cents on the Dollar

This provision requires the bankrupt person to prove that their financial collapse arose from circumstances they cannot “justly be held responsible” for. Ms. Li couldn’t meet this burden.

The court found that Ms. Li had engaged in conduct similar to what the judge called “rash and hazardous speculation.” She had signed a $1.4 million purchase agreement without:

  • Consulting her husband
  • Considering how to finance the purchase
  • Having a reasonable income to support a mortgage qualification
  • Securing any form of financing commitment

As the court noted, she was “impulsive, naive and irresponsible in committing for a home purchase without any financial planning.”

2. Section 173(1)(e) – Rash and Hazardous Speculation

The court determined that Ms. Li’s conduct constituted “rash and hazardous speculation” under the BIA. The judge emphasized that this assessment must be made relative to the person’s financial circumstances.

For someone with Ms. Li’s paltry reported income to commit to purchasing a $1.4 million property was objectively rash and hazardous. Even if the real estate market had cooperated, there was no realistic path to securing mortgage financing with her income level.

3. Section 173(1)(o) – Failure to Perform Duties

Perhaps most damaging to Ms. Li’s case was the court’s finding that she failed to fulfill her duties as a bankrupt person. Under Section 158 of the BIA, bankrupts have various duties, including:

  • Deliver all books, records, and documents to the trustee
  • Make full disclosure of all property dispositions
  • Submit to examinations under oath
  • Aid the trustee to the utmost of their power

Ms. Li failed to complete the undertakings from her examination, leaving crucial questions unanswered about:

  • Bank account statements from relevant periods
  • Details of family loans and their sources
  • Contributions to previous mortgage payments
  • Disposition of proceeds from other property sales
  • Repaying a loan to a family in China

The court emphasized that bankrupts must “actively aid” the trustee, not “remain passive and hope that the financial storm would blow over.”

Conditional Discharge: The Doctrine of Avoiding Judgment Through Bankruptcy

One particularly important principle emerged from this case: courts don’t look favourably on people who use bankruptcy primarily to avoid paying a judgment claim.

The Supreme Court of Canada established in Kozack v. Richter, 1973 CanLII 166 (SCC), that when someone files for bankruptcy mainly to escape a judgment arising from their wrongful conduct, courts should impose meaningful payment conditions if the person can pay.

In Ms. Li’s situation, even though Arista hadn’t obtained a formal judgment before she filed for bankruptcy, it was clear that the lawsuit was the primary reason for her assignment into bankruptcy. The court considered this factor heavily in determining the appropriate conditions.

A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge

The Final Conditional Discharge Order: How the Court Decided

After reviewing all the evidence in this case, Associate Justice Ilchenko ordered a conditional discharge requiring Ms. Li to pay 10% of the proven claim, being $28,142.14, within 24 months.

This amounted to roughly 10 cents on the dollar of the total claim of $281,421.39. While this was significantly less than the 20-30% sought by Arista, it was also much more than the $5,000 recommended by the trustee.

The court balanced several competing considerations:

Factors Supporting a Lower Amount:

  • Ms. Li had already paid $179,810 in deposits that Arista kept
  • She earned a modest income as a bus driver ($64,974 in 2024)
  • She had some chronic medical conditions
  • She had tried to extend the closing date and complete the purchase

Factors Supporting a Higher Amount:

  • The proven Section 173((1) facts show poor judgment
  • The need to maintain the integrity of the bankruptcy system
  • Her failure to cooperate fully with the trustee
  • The public interest in commercial morality
  • Her age (51) and continued earning capacity

Conditional Discharge: Key Lessons for Anyone Considering Bankruptcy

This case offers several crucial lessons for anyone in the Greater Toronto Area or elsewhere in Ontario dealing with overwhelming debt:

1. Be Realistic About Real Estate Commitments

If you’re considering purchasing property – especially pre-construction condos or high-value homes – ensure you have:

  • Verified mortgage pre-approval from a qualified lender
  • Realistic assessment of your income and expenses
  • Contingency plans if market conditions change
  • Professional advice from mortgage brokers and real estate lawyers

Don’t rely on optimistic assumptions about future property value increases or income growth.

2. Cooperate Fully With Your Trustee

If you do file for bankruptcy, complete cooperation with your Licensed Insolvency Trustee is essential. This means:

  • Providing all requested documents promptly and completely
  • Answering all questions truthfully and thoroughly
  • Attending all required meetings and examinations
  • Disclosing all assets, income sources, and property dispositions
  • Responding to undertakings and follow-up requests
  • Attending the two mandatory bankruptcy and credit counselling sessions with the Licensed Insolvency Trustee under the Insolvency Counselling Program established by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada

Failure to cooperate can transform what might have been an absolute discharge into a conditional discharge – or even a refused discharge.

3. Understand Your Duties as a Bankrupt

The BIA imposes significant duties on anyone who files for bankruptcy. You’re not just passively waiting for discharge – you have active obligations to:

  • Aid the trustee in realizing your assets
  • Submit to examinations under oath
  • File all required tax returns
  • Report material changes in your financial situation
  • Attend financial counselling sessions

These aren’t optional suggestions – they’re legal requirements that the court takes very seriously.

4. Consider Consumer Proposals as an Alternative

Many people in situations similar to Ms. Li’s might be better served by filing a consumer proposal rather than bankruptcy. A consumer proposal allows you to:

  • Negotiate a settlement with creditors for less than 100% of your debts
  • Keep control of your assets
  • Avoid some of the restrictions that apply to bankrupts
  • Make predictable monthly payments over up to five years

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we often find that consumer proposals, or for those with debts greater than $250,000, not including any mortgages or lines of credit secured against your personal residence, a Division I Proposal under the BIA, provide better outcomes for clients, particularly those arising from failed real estate transactions.

5. Document Everything

If you’re involved in property transactions that later fail, maintain meticulous records of:

  • All agreements and amendments
  • Payment receipts and bank statements
  • Communications with developers or sellers
  • Financial advice you received
  • The efforts you made to complete transactions

This documentation becomes crucial if you later need to demonstrate that your financial difficulties arose from circumstances beyond your control.

A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge

The Current Real Estate Reality in the GTA

As I discussed in my blog about mortgage default, we’re seeing increasing numbers of people facing similar challenges to Ms. Li’s situation.

The combination of:

  • Higher interest rates
  • Stricter mortgage qualification rules
  • Declining property values
  • Economic uncertainty
  • Job market volatility

…has created a situation where many pre-construction purchasers simply cannot close on their agreements.

If you signed a pre-construction purchase agreement during the hot market of 2020-2022, you may now be facing:

  • Inability to qualify for necessary mortgage financing
  • Property values below your purchase price
  • Difficulty selling your current home to fund the new purchase
  • Developer demands for additional deposits or price increases

These situations require professional guidance from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee who understands both insolvency law and real estate market realities.

Life After Conditional Discharge: Rebuilding Your Financial Future

If you receive a conditional discharge in bankruptcy, here’s what you need to know:

You Remain Bankrupt Until Conditions Are Met

A conditional discharge doesn’t release you from bankruptcy immediately. You remain an undischarged bankrupt with all associated restrictions and obligations until you fulfill the court-ordered conditions.

This means:

  • You cannot obtain credit over $1,000 without disclosing your bankruptcy
  • You cannot act as a director of a corporation
  • You may face professional restrictions depending on your occupation
  • You must continue reporting income and expenses to your trustee

Payment Terms Are Usually Flexible

Courts typically give reasonable time periods to fulfill payment conditions – often 12 to 24 months. Section 172(3) of the BIA does allow for modifying a conditional discharge order.

If you face genuine hardship preventing payment, you can apply to the court to vary the terms. However, you must demonstrate that you’ve made reasonable efforts and that circumstances beyond your control prevent compliance. Also, you cannot even apply for such relief until at least 1 year after the date the conditional discharge order was made.

Your Credit Report Is Affected

A conditional discharge appears on your credit report differently from an absolute discharge. The bankruptcy notation expiry time period cannot even begin until you satisfy the conditions and receive your discharge certificate.

This can affect:

  • Your ability to obtain credit
  • Employment opportunities in the financial sector
  • Professional licensing in certain fields
  • Your credit score and borrowing costs

You Can Rebuild Afterward

Once you fulfill the conditions and receive your discharge, you can begin rebuilding your financial life. While the bankruptcy remains on your credit report for six to seven years from discharge, many people successfully rebuild credit within two to three years through:

  • Secured credit cards
  • Small installment loans
  • Consistent bill payment history
  • Steady employment and income
  • Financial counselling and budgeting

    A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
    conditional discharge

When to Seek Professional Help

If you’re facing financial difficulties related to real estate commitments or mounting debts for any other reason, and are considering a potential bankruptcy, don’t wait until the situation becomes critical.

Warning Signs You Need Help Now

Contact a Licensed Insolvency Trustee immediately if you’re experiencing:

  1. Inability to make mortgage or rent payments
  2. Collection calls from creditors or legal proceedings
  3. Using credit cards or loans to pay basic living expenses
  4. Considering withdrawing RRSP funds to pay debts
  5. Losing sleep or experiencing stress-related health problems due to debt
  6. Contemplating a consumer proposal or bankruptcy

What We Can Do for You

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we provide comprehensive debt relief services for individuals and businesses throughout the Greater Toronto Area, including:

  • Free Initial Consultations – We’ll review your complete financial situation and explain all available options
  • Consumer Proposals – We’ll negotiate with creditors to reduce your debt and create affordable payment plans
  • Personal Bankruptcy Filings – We’ll guide you through the entire bankruptcy process professionally and compassionately
  • Credit Counselling – We’ll help you understand what went wrong and develop strategies to avoid future problems
  • Business Restructuring – For entrepreneurs, we offer financial restructuring through commercial proposal services to save your business and the jobs you create

Our team understands the unique challenges facing Greater Toronto Area residents dealing with high housing costs, challenging economic conditions, and complex debt situations.

The Importance of Choosing the Right Trustee

Choosing an experienced, knowledgeable Licensed Insolvency Trustee matters so much. The relationship between the trustee’s recommendations and the court’s final order can significantly impact your outcome.

When selecting a trustee, look for:

  • Experience with similar cases – Has the trustee handled situations like yours?
  • Clear communication – Do they explain complex legal concepts in understandable terms?
  • Comprehensive service – Do they offer alternatives to bankruptcy like consumer proposals?
  • Local knowledge – Do they understand the specific challenges in your community?
  • Professional reputation – What do other clients and legal professionals say about them, such as in Google reviews
A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge

Moving Forward, Your Next Steps

If you’re dealing with overwhelming debt, potential mortgage default, or considering bankruptcy, here’s what to do next:

Step 1: Gather Your Financial Information

Collect documentation, including:

  • Recent pay stubs and tax returns
  • List of all debts with balances and payment terms
  • Monthly expense breakdown
  • Asset list with current values
  • Mortgage statements and property tax bills
  • Any legal documents, like demand letters or court papers
  • All of this information can be captured by completing our Debt Relief Worksheet

Step 2: Schedule a Free Consultation

Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We offer both video and in-person meetings. We’ll review your situation and explain your options clearly, including:

  • Whether bankruptcy is necessary or if alternatives exist
  • What type of discharge might you expect
  • How to avoid a conditional discharge if possible
  • Timeline and costs for each option
  • Impact on your family, employment, and future

Step 3: Make an Informed Decision

After understanding all options, you can make the choice that’s right for your situation. We’ll never pressure you – our role is to provide expert advice and support whatever decision you make.

Step 4: Take Action

Once you’ve decided on a path forward, we’ll handle all the legal requirements, court filings, and creditor communications. You’ll have experienced professionals managing every aspect of your case.

Conditional Discharge Conclusion: Learning from Others’ Experiences and Embracing the Path to a Bright Financial Future

The case of Ms. Li’s conditional discharge offers important lessons for anyone struggling with debt in the Greater Toronto Area. While her situation involved failed real estate transactions, the principles apply broadly:

  • Be realistic about your financial capacity before making major commitments
  • Cooperate fully with professionals trying to help you
  • Understand your legal duties and responsibilities
  • Seek expert advice early, before problems become crises
  • Choose experienced professionals to guide you through difficult processes

A conditional discharge isn’t the end of the world – it’s a manageable step toward financial recovery. However, the best approach is avoiding situations that might lead to bankruptcy in the first place, or choosing alternatives like consumer proposals when appropriate.

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we’ve helped many individuals and families in the Greater Toronto Area successfully navigate financial difficulties and emerge with a fresh start. Whether you’re facing mortgage default, overwhelming consumer debts, failed business ventures, or other financial challenges, we’re here to help. You can also visit our Google Business Profile to learn more about our services and read client testimonials.

Don’t let financial stress control your life. Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for a free, confidential consultation. Call us at (647) 799-3312 to discuss your options with an experienced Licensed Insolvency Trustee who truly cares about your future, Starting Over Starting Now.

Remember: seeking help isn’t a sign of failure – it’s a smart step toward financial recovery and peace of mind. Let us help you find the right path forward.

The information provided in this blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., and any contributors do not assume any liability for any loss or damage.


Brandon Smith is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and Senior Vice-President at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., serving individuals and businesses throughout the Greater Toronto Area. With years of experience in insolvency cases, including financial restructuring, Brandon helps clients navigate complex financial challenges and find sustainable solutions, Starting Over Starting Now.

A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

A BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGED IS THE KEY TO HEARTWARMING DEBT ELIMINAT1ON

bankruptcy discharged
bankruptcy discharged

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would like to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

Your Bankruptcy Discharged – But Wait

Well, that took no time at all. Last week I told you about a bankruptcy discharge hearing I attended where the bankrupt person had his bankruptcy discharged by the Master in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice In Bankruptcy and Insolvency.

The Master’s decision was released on August 13, 2021. On August 20, 2021, we received the Notice of Motion of the opposing creditor appealing the Master’s decision to give this person his discharge from bankruptcy. That is their right.

In this Brandon Blog, I want to discuss the reasons for the opposition to the fact that this bankrupt had his bankruptcy discharged and my thoughts on one scenario of how this may play out. First, I just want to refresh your memory about the bankruptcy process and specifically how the discharge under bankruptcy law in Canada process works. Then I will get into this real-life story.

Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) gives people the option of filing a debt management plan restructuring consumer proposal if they are unable to pay back all unsecured debt owing to their unsecured creditors. This option offers the consumer a way to maybe keep their home and car that is heavily financed, as long as they can maintain the payments to the secured creditors such as the financial institution who financed the purchase of the home by way of the mortgage, or the auto loan, and it makes sense in their budget.

A successful consumer proposal is also the way to avoid bankruptcy. Like bankruptcy, the process starts with a no-cost consultation for financial advice with a licensed insolvency trustee. A licensed trustee is the only party able to administer a consumer proposal in Canada (or a bankruptcy). The Trustee can help you lose your debt load.

A first-time bankrupt who fulfills all of their obligations, including attending 2 mandatory credit counselling sessions, is entitled to a discharge after 9 months from the date of bankruptcy.

bankruptcy discharged
bankruptcy discharged

A bankruptcy discharged: First and second bankruptcy (or more)

When an insolvent debtor files for bankruptcy for a second time, you cannot be discharged after a nine months bankruptcy period. When you don’t need to pay the Trustee any surplus income payments, a second bankruptcy lasts for a minimum of 24 months. A second-time bankruptcy filer with surplus income must make those payments for 36 months to qualify to get their bankruptcy discharged.

A third or subsequent bankruptcy follows the same timeline as a second bankruptcy. There is, however, a high probability that the Trustee or creditors will oppose the discharge. Where there is opposition, there must be a court bankruptcy discharge hearing and the court can impose any conditions it deems appropriate.

What does bankruptcy discharged mean in Canada?

It is a Canadian legal term used to describe the release of a consumer debtor or business proprietorship from their obligations, responsibilities, debts, and legal claims. “Bankruptcy” is a legal proceeding to protect the estate of a person or company. “Discharge” fulfills the requirement that a person is released from their obligations, responsibilities, debts, and legal claims through the bankruptcy process. There is no equivalent requirement for a company.

The insolvent debtor filing for bankruptcy merely invokes the legal protection to the person and puts a bankruptcy trustee in place to realize upon any available assets in the bankruptcy estate for the benefit of the creditors. Bankruptcy filings do not relieve the person of their debts. It is when the person is bankruptcy discharged, that they are released from their debts (other than for a select list of exceptions).

bankruptcy discharged
bankruptcy discharged

Bankruptcy discharged: Types of bankruptcy discharge

The licensed insolvency trustee can usually issue an automatic discharge when there is no trustee in bankruptcy opposition or creditor opposition to a bankrupt’s application for discharge, and the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties during bankruptcy.

In case of opposition or if the bankrupt meets one of the criteria that prevents automatic discharge (for example, the bankruptcy process finds the bankrupt to have a high tax debt situation), a discharge hearing in court is held, which is conducted by the Master of the Bankruptcy Court. There are four types of the bankruptcy discharge and a fifth outcome is also possible. Here they are:

  1. Absolute discharge – An absolute discharge means that the bankrupt may obtain a discharge immediately. If the bankrupt has fulfilled all of their duties and there is no insolvency trustee or creditor opposition, this can be provided by the licensed insolvency trustee of the bankruptcy estate handling the bankruptcy administration;
  2. Conditional discharge – can get discharged if certain conditions are met. Typically, to get bankruptcy discharged this way, conditions include payment to the licensed insolvency trustee;
  3. Suspended – the bankruptcy discharge will be granted at a later date and may very well be combined with an absolute bankruptcy discharge or conditional bankruptcy discharge;
  4. Refused– because the debtor has not made full disclosure or done other bankruptcy duties; or
  5. “No order” – the insolvency trustee informs the court that the bankrupt has not fulfilled all of his or her obligations and has failed to respond to the Trustee’s demands for information despite the passing of time. The licensed insolvency trustee is at liberty to seek its discharge when the “no order” order is provided. When the bankrupt has actually complied with the court’s requirements, he or she may apply for a hearing for discharge. When the Trustee gets its discharge, the stay of proceedings preventing collection actions against the bankrupt disappears.

A bankruptcy discharged: The appeal just served upon us – a true story

To refresh your memory about the discharge hearing itself you can CLICK HERE. The appeal just served upon us seeks an Order setting aside the decision of the Master made on August 13, 2021. The grounds for the appeal can be described as throwing everything including the kitchen sink! The stated grounds are that the Learned Registrar erred:

  • by granting the bankrupt an absolute discharge from bankruptcy;
  • in holding that the Receiver’s interest in the discharge application is not firmly established and by not recognizing that should the Receiver be paid an amount in excess of the debt owed to the secured creditor, any surplus funds would be available for the other creditors of the
    corporate bankruptcy estate;
  • in holding that the discharge hearing is not the proper forum in which to make determinations as to the propriety of the various transactions that the Receiver has raised;
  • in finding that the bankrupt has generally cooperated with me as his Trustee;
  • in declining to consider the bankrupt’s conduct in the corporate bankruptcy because that the trustee in the corporate bankruptcy had remedies available to it;
  • in finding that the failure of the company’s business was due to the loss of its 1 customer and pricing related to that arrangement;
  • in relying on her finding that the corporate trustee may be the only truly interested party on the discharge or would benefit most from the conditional order sought if the secured debt is otherwise repaid;
  • in exercising her discretion in finding that an order of discharge requiring payment of the significant amount proposed by the Receiver is not reasonable;
  • in finding that the bankrupt has no ability to pay and that his future prospects to pay are unknown;
  • in finding that an order for a conditional discharge of the magnitude sought would be tantamount to a refusal;
  • by omitting to consider relevant evidence or the absence thereof, in relying on irrelevant considerations, and/or giving improper weight to the evidence before the Court; and
  • anything else the lawyers may want to say.

    bankruptcy discharged
    bankruptcy discharged

Standard of review to getting a personal bankruptcy discharged

Such an appeal from a bankruptcy discharge hearing has a standard of review. According to BIA S. 192(1), the bankruptcy registrar can, among other things, grant orders of discharge. S. 192(4) of the BIA permits a party dissatisfied with a registrar’s order or decision to appeal it to a judge.

Registrars are exercising judicial discretion when granting discharges in bankruptcy cases. As long as the registrar acted reasonably, the judge should not set it aside or ignore it. Furthermore, if an appeal from a bankruptcy discharge order is based on alleged errors in factual findings, the court will not intervene if the findings of fact can be justified based on credible evidence. If the registrar has materially misinterpreted the law or made an error in respect of the facts underpinning his or her discretion, discretionary decisions can, of course, be overturned.

If the registrar decides that in order for the person to get their bankruptcy discharged, the court imposes conditions, those conditions must be realistic to allow the bankrupt to meet the requirements in a reasonable amount of time. If an amount ordered in order for the person to get their bankruptcy discharged is unrealistic and the discharge is conditional on making additional payments, the appellate court in such cases previously held that results in an error of law. The appellate judge can either substitute other conditions or refer the matter back to the registrar for reconsideration.

A bankruptcy discharged: What my gut is telling me

I normally am not in the prediction business. However, having been the insolvency trustee responsible for administering the consumer bankruptcy, having written the reports to the court on the bankrupt’s application for discharge, having attended the discharge hearing and having heard all the evidence, having read the Registrar’s decision and the Appeal documentation, I believe that the appeal should be dismissed.

You might recall that opposing the bankrupt getting bankruptcy discharged was the Receiver of the company previously operated by the bankrupt. As a result of complaints regarding the bankrupt and his family in relation to the company’s operations, the Receiver has filed lawsuits against several parties. The proceedings are still pending. According to previous court rulings, the court should not consider the issues raised in other proceedings when deciding whether to discharge the bankrupt. A discharge hearing is a summary proceeding. It is important to see how the debtor behaved during HIS bankruptcy.

As for the judge’s decision, only time will tell. I’ll keep you up to date as always.

bankruptcy discharged
bankruptcy discharged

Bankruptcy discharged summary

I hope that you found this bankruptcy discharged Brandon Blog helpful in telling this real-life story of an appeal to a person getting their bankruptcy discharged. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt. You may not need to file for bankruptcy.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEES: CAN MY BASIC BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE BE REVERSED?

licensed insolvency trusteesIf you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this licensed insolvency trustees Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Licensed insolvency trustees introduction

From time to time I am asked an interesting question about licensed insolvency trustees and the bankruptcy process. The question is, can a bankruptcy discharge be reversed? The simple answer is, yes.

Most people then wonder how this could be possible. In order to understand how we should have a discussion of the bankruptcy discharge process. The best way is through a recent Court case I recently read.

Licensed insolvency trustees: The discharge process

It is the discharge when the person’s debts are erased. The debts are not “discharged” until that time. In order to get a discharge, the bankrupt has to live up to all of his or her duties.

The duties of a bankrupt include:

  • make disclosure of and deliver possession of all his or her assets (other than for certain provincial exemptions) that is under his or her possession or control to the licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee) or to anyone the Trustee so directs;
  • in such scenarios as are defined by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, provide to the Trustee, for termination, all credit cards;
  • supply to the Trustee all documents or files relating to the property of the person who has filed for bankruptcy;
  • make full disclosure of all assets and liabilities to the Trustee by completing the sworn statement of affairs within 5 days of the date of bankruptcy;
  • assist the Trustee in making an inventory of all property; make full disclosure to the Trustee concerning all property sold or otherwise transferred within 1 year prior to the date of bankruptcy;
  • disclose any property sold or transferred at undervalue within 5 years prior to the date of filing;
  • attend the first meeting of creditors if held;
  • disclose current income and expense and continue monthly disclosure until discharged in order for the Trustee to calculate any surplus income requirement;
  • if there is surplus income, to make all such payments to the Trustee in full; and
  • to perform any other acts required by the Trustee or the Court, including, fulfilling any conditions of discharge issued by the Court.

Failure to perform any of the duties laid out in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA), will result in the Trustee, and perhaps one or more creditors, opposing the bankrupt’s discharge. When there is an opposition, the Trustee will schedule a Court hearing date.

At the Court hearing, the Court can issue an absolute order of discharge, provide a discharge but with conditions to be fulfilled or even suspend the bankrupt’s discharge. Sometimes, there may be both a condition and a suspension, depending on the circumstances. In rare and bad circumstances, the Court could even refuse to hear the bankrupt’s application for discharge. Licensed insolvency trustees are expected to assist the Court by making a recommendation.llicensed insolvency trustees

Mark Daniel MacFarlane bankruptcy

Section 180 (1) and (2) of the BIA states:

“Court may annul discharge

180 (1) Where a bankrupt after his discharge fails to perform the duties imposed on him by this Act, the court may, on the application, annul his discharge.

Annulment of discharge obtained by fraud

(2) Where it appears to the court that the discharge of a bankrupt was obtained by fraud, the court may, on the application, annul his discharge.”

On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia In Bankruptcy and Insolvency released its decision in the bankruptcy case of Mark Daniel MacFarlane (Citation: MacFarlane (Re), 2019 NSSC 201).

This case is not complex. However, it does clearly shows that the answer to the question, “can a bankruptcy discharge be reversed?” is clearly yes.

Mr. MacFarlane had a surplus income obligation to pay to the Trustee for the benefit of his creditors the amount of $3,823.05. At the time he was entitled to a discharge, he still owed the Trustee the amount of $2,879.05. In every personal bankruptcy, licensed insolvency trustees must do the surplus income calculation. If it turns out that the bankruptcy is required to contribute to his or her bankruptcy estate through surplus income payments, licensed insolvency trustees must report to the Court if the bankrupt made all the required payments.

The bankrupt also owned at the date of bankruptcy, an automobile that the Trustee estimated had a forced liquidation value of $17,500. The Trustee had disallowed the claim of a creditor claiming security over the vehicle. That creditor did not appeal the Trustee’s decision.

So, equity in the vehicle was available. In such cases, licensed insolvency trustees must obtain that value. For some reason that the Trustee could not fully explain, he agreed to sell the vehicle to Mr. MacFarlane for $15,702.50 plus HST. The Trustee did not sell it for all cash, but rather, entered into a conditional sale agreement with the bankrupt. In other words, the Trustee gave him financing.

Mr. MacFarlane paid made various payments totalling $7,040.00, both before and after his discharge, leaving a balance of $8,662.50.

Mark Daniel MacFarlane discharge

Although now stated explicitly in the Court decision, it appears that when it came time for Mr. MacFarlane’s application for discharge, the Trustee opposed it. On June 1, 2018, the Trustee applied for his discharge.

For some unexplained reason, the Trustee decided to not collect the balance of the surplus income requirement. The Trustee asked the Court for his outright discharge. The Court gave Mr. MacFarlane his absolute discharge.

So now the bankrupt is discharged, but he still owed the outstanding money for the vehicle that was sold to him by the Trustee under a conditional sale agreement. Rather than paying off the amount owing, Mr. MacFarlane sold the vehicle out of province and pocketed the cash.llicensed insolvency trustees

Licensed insolvency trustees can apply to Court to have a discharge reversed

So now the Trustee makes an application to Court to have Mr. MacFarlane’s discharge reversed. Officially, it is called having the discharge annulled. An annulment makes it as if the discharge never happened. So, if the Trustee is successful, Mr. MacFarlane will be back in bankruptcy. The Trustee also asked that the Court order the payment of the balance of what is owing on the vehicle, for a suspension of the discharge and an amount for costs and disbursements. Mr. MacFarlane represented himself in Court.

The Court was not overly impressed with either Mr. MacFarlane or the Trustee. The Court felt that not did he fail to carry out his responsibilities under the BIA, he actually acted in such a way to deny himself the advantage of any type of latitude the Court might have given him relative to those obligations.

The Court went on to say that his responsibilities under the BIA are not pointers or activities to be carried out when convenient or if life does not get in the way. It was obviously not his place to choose what he would and would not do. Concerning the automobile, it was not his to just sell it, pocket the cash, and tell the Trustee (and by extension his creditors) to go take a hike.

The Court was not too happy with the Trustee

The Court was at a loss to some of the Trustee’s behaviour also. There was no explanation given as to why the Trustee merely gave up on collecting all of the surplus income requirement. Likewise, there was no explanation why the Trustee would have given the bankrupt a discount off of the liquidation value of the vehicle. Such a look is not good for licensed insolvency trustees.

Quite rightly, the Court pointed out that in such situation, licensed insolvency trustees, and specifically this Trustee, should not have recommended to the Court that Mr. MacFarlane receive an absolute order of discharge. Rather, the Trustee should have insisted on a conditional order of discharge. The conditions would have been that the bankrupt pay off both the surplus income balance and the amount owing on the vehicle before being entitled to an absolute order of discharge.llicensed insolvency trustees

The Court’s decision

The Court ordered that:

  1. Mr. MacFarlane’s discharge from bankruptcy be annulled, so now he is once again an undischarged bankrupt.
  2. He must pay the Trustee the $8,662.50 owing on the vehicle.
  3. The Trustee will collect $500 for disbursements in tracing what happened to the vehicle from Mr. MacFarlane also.
  4. There will not be an automatic discharge once he pays the $9,162.50 to the Trustee. Rather, the bankrupt will have to apply to the Court for his discharge and there will be another discharge hearing.
  5. Since the Court was not asked to revisit the balance owing on surplus income, the Court didn’t review that again.
  6. The request of the Trustee for $5,000 as a censure of the bankrupt’s behaviour was denied. The Court said that this situation was caused in part by the Trustee allowing the surplus income requirement to be waived and agreeing to an absolute discharge.

Although not part of the Order, the Court strongly stated that any costs in the additional work done by the Trustee now, and the disposition of the amount to be received once finally paid, will be reviewed by the Court.

The Court emphatically intimated that since the Trustee’s actions were in part to blame for this situation, the Court was going to make sure that part of the $9,162.50 will go to the creditors when the Trustee comes back to Court to have its accounts taxed.

Licensed insolvency trustees conclusion

So there you have it on licensed insolvency trustees. Can a bankruptcy discharge be reversed or revoked? As we see in this case if the discharge was improperly obtained because the bankrupt did not fulfill all of his or her duties, YES. Similarly, if it can be shown that a discharge was obtained through fraud or fraudulent conduct, the discharge can be annulled in that case also.

Whenever I sit down with a person to talk about his or her insolvency, or with an owner of a company to discuss business financial problems, I make sure that we have an entire discussion. I not only talk to them about what process I recommend for their unique situation, but I also walk them through the entire process and what all the rights and responsibilities are. For personal insolvency, this includes the discharge process.

Are you or your business experiencing money troubles? Are you on the verge of bankruptcy? Do not wait till it is far too late to understand how you can restructure your financial affairs and avoid bankruptcy. You do not need to be one more person or company declaring bankruptcy in Canada.

As licensed insolvency trustees, we are the only specialists certified, accredited and overseen by the federal government to provide insolvency guidance and to apply remedies under the BIA. We will certainly help you to choose what is best for you to release you from your debt problems.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so we can get rid you of the stress, anxiety, pain and discomfort that your money issues have created. With the distinct roadmap, we establish simply for you, we will without delay return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life, Starting Over Staring Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DEBT RELIEF IN CANADA: BANKRUPTCY COURT SALUTES CANADIAN MILITARY VETERAN

automatic discharge

Debt relief in Canada: Introduction

I recently read a decision of the Bankruptcy Registrar of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Bankruptcy and Insolvency that really inspired me. It got me thinking about the sacrifices our men and women in the military make for all Canadians. This particular Court decision, also made me think of sometimes they need our help for debt relief in Canada.

Debt relief in Canada: The case

The case I refer to is Durdle (re), 2018 NSSC 206, released August 31, 2018. The first two paragraphs of the Registrar’s decision, I found especially poignant:

[1] This Court routinely considers situations in which the Bankrupt is indebted to the people of Canada, through tax or other liabilities to the State. As a matter of general policy, these obligations have a higher moral and sometimes legal priority than to private creditors as they are borne by all of us, as citizens and fellows of Society; and because the public generally must bear the share not paid by someone else. The collective public is an involuntary creditor in the result.

[2] What, then, is the situation when that is reversed – when it is the people of Canada who are indebted to the individual? Should compensation paid out as a consequence be considered divisible among creditors in an insolvency?

Debt relief in Canada: The facts

Master Corporal Durdle was a career soldier. He spent 24 years in the military, retiring at the age of 45 years old. Master Corporal is now 49 years old and suffers from military service induced post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). He remains under professional care. He is in need of debt relief.

On November 13, 2013, Master Corporal Durdle filed an assignment in bankruptcy. This was his second bankruptcy and therefore, he was not entitled to an automatic discharge from bankruptcy. The purpose of the Court hearing was for the Court to consider what form of bankruptcy discharge he should be entitled to. In this second bankruptcy, there were minimal non-exempt assets and unsecured creditors totaling $73,476.76.

In 2014 while an undischarged bankrupt, Master Corporal Durdle received taxable income, including:

  1. $16,778 from a wage loss replacement plan;
  2. A rehiring allowance of $28,107.04, including $19,675 in severance pay;
  3. Pension income of $23,594.10;
  4. Disability income of $49,289; and
  5. $3,624 in employment income.

The decision the Court had to make was, as the guidelines existed in 2014, how much if any of this 2014 taxable income should be considered “surplus income”?ira smith bankruptcy trustee vaughan

Debt relief in Canada: The Court’s thinking

The Registrar made a point of saying:

…I wish to be clear that nothing should be taken as putting military debtors on a different footing than a civilian. The rule of law, including that of civil contract, is one of the core values we hold as Canadians, and which is protected by our men and women in uniform. What is, however, on a different footing is the debt we owe those men And women when they are injured or ill in the discharge of those Duties.”

Debt relief in Canada: The Registrar’s analysis

The Registrar went through a very thoughtful analysis of the law. He considered it in connection with the various types of 2014 taxable income:

  1. Wage loss replacement plan – Wrongful termination awards would normally be included in total income, as would pay in lieu of notice. The Registrar, however, went on to comment that in this case, the wage loss replacement plan was not termination pay or pay in lieu of notice but rather, pay because Master Corporal Durdle’s PTSD prevented him to continue serving. The Registrar concluded that this amount should not be considered as income in accordance with Section 68 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). Therefore, the Registrar also concluded that this amount should not be included in the calculation of surplus income.
  1. Rehiring allowance – The Registrar applied the same logic for this payment. He decided that it should not be included in the calculation of surplus income. He decided that this payment was a result of Master Corporal Durdle’s PTSD preventing him from continuing to serve in the military.
  1. Pension income – The Registrar could not determine whether this income was solely a benefit due to Master Corporal Durdle’s PTSD or not. However, it did factor into the Registrar’s ruling.
  1. Disability income – The Registrar considered this income in light of previous Court decisions involving lump sum awards. This included under a Workers’ Compensation Plan. The Registrar went on to review the actual Federal statute under which the payment was made to him, the Veterans Well-being Act (S.C. 2005, c. 21). The Registrar concluded that this amount would not be included in the calculation of surplus income.
  1. Employment income – The Registrar concluded that this amount is included in the surplus income calculation.

Debt relief in Canada: The Court’s decision

The Registrar concluded that if he includes the pension income ($23,594.10) and of course the employment income ($3,624) (less statutory deductions), Accordingly, Master Corporal Durdle’s income falls under the Superintendent of Bankruptcy threshold for 2014. Accordingly, Master Corporal Durdle had no surplus income to pay when considering Section 68 of the BIA.

Since this was Master Corporal Durdle’s second bankruptcy, he was not entitled to an absolute discharge. Therefore, the Registrar did not impose any conditions on his discharge, but rather, suspended his discharge for one day.

Debt relief in Canada: Sometimes understanding and kindness is required

The Registrar was obviously moved by Master Corporal Durdle’s service to Canada. He also considered his current plight brought on by service-related PTSD. The Registrar followed the law and also showed his understanding and kindness of this sad situation.

If you have financial difficulties, whether brought on by a medical cause or for any other reason, you need to seek professional advice from a Firm that will show you the understanding and kindness you deserve. The Ira Smith Trustee Team has seen many cases of personal and corporate financial distress. We understand your pain and we know how to alleviate it; with understanding and kindness.

Our strategy for every single business and person is to develop a result where Starting Over, Starting Now comes true, starting the minute you walk through our door. You’re just one call away from taking the necessary actions to get your debt settlement and back on the road to leading a healthy and stress-free life. Contact the Ira Smith Team today.debt relief in canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ONTARIO BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE: CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY LAW

320efcd005100f3ee3522fefba70f917 1

Ontario bankruptcy discharge certificate: Introduction

I have written before on the more practical aspects of Ontario bankruptcy discharge certificate issues and process within Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law. The most recent blogs are:

  1. BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE: THE TOP 8 THINGS THE BANKRUPTCY COURT WILL CONSIDER ON ANYONE’S BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE APPLICATION – September 13, 2017
  2. GAMBLING DEBT BANKRUPTCY: CAN GAMBLING DEBT BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY? – January 31, 2018

I recently reviewed the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Cole v. RBC Dominion Securities Inc., 2017 ONCA 1009. This case is very interesting as it highlights an issue that we often don’t talk enough about when advising a person on what they might expect at their hearing under Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law.

The facts

Henry Cole, age 52, had a Bankruptcy Order made against him in 2011 upon motion by Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”), after he misappropriated $5 million from clients while working as their investment advisor. While in bankruptcy, he had a net monthly income of $14,600, resulting in surplus monthly income of $12,500. He nevertheless failed to make any surplus income payments.

To understand what surplus income in a bankruptcy is, see my June 1, 2016 vlog titled WHY SURPLUS INCOME IS SO POPULAR UNTIL YOU ARE FORCED INTO BANKRUPTCY.

The Ontario Court of Appeal (“ONCA”) upheld the two lower Court decisions

As is the case in bankruptcy matters, Mr. Cole’s bankruptcy discharge hearing came before the Master in Bankruptcy Court who also sits as the registrar in bankruptcy. Mr. Cole appealed the Master’s decision (discussed below) unsuccessfully to a Judge of the Bankruptcy Court. The Judge dismissed Mr. Cole’s appeal, thereby upholding the Master’s decision. As indicated above, the ONCA agreed with the Judge (and the Master) in dismissing Mr. Cole’s appeal.

Now for the interesting stuff!

Now for the interesting stuff. The Master determined that there was enough evidence to show that Mr. Cole, as a bankrupt, committed various bankruptcy offenses. The Master determined facts for which discharge may be refused, suspended or granted conditionally, under Section 173(1) of the Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law called the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (“BIA”).

The Master determined that Mr. Cole had failed to provide information to enable the Licensed Insolvency Trustee to calculate surplus income. Mr. Cole also conceded to the following facts:

  1. his assets upon bankruptcy were not of a value equal to fifty cents on the dollar on the amount of his unsecured liabilities. Mr. Cole gave no evidence why he should not be held responsible;
  2. he failed to account satisfactorily for any loss of assets or for any deficiency of assets to meet his liabilities; and
  3. he brought on, or contributed to, his bankruptcy by rash and hazardous speculations, by unjustifiable extravagance in living, by gambling or by culpable neglect of his business affairs

With these findings, the Master, under Section 172(2) of the BIA, had to not grant an absolute discharge and to:

  1. refuse the discharge of a bankrupt;
  2. suspend the discharge for such period as the court thinks proper; or
  3. make the bankrupt, as a condition of his discharge, to do such acts, pay such moneys, consent to such judgments or comply with such other terms as the court may direct.

I must point out that the options available to the Master are not mutually exclusive. So, just like in Mr. Cole’s case, you could have the Court come up with a mixture of a suspension and a condition to pay moneys.

What the Master decided

The Master made several decisions. First, the Master dealt with the surplus income issue. The Master ordered Mr. Cole to pay $284,346 to the Trustee as surplus income, payable at a rate of $5,000 per month.

The Master also considered Mr. Cole’s criminal behaviour and that he had real income while not working any longer as an investment advisor. Given the amount of Mr. Cole’s liabilities, and for the integrity of the Canadian bankruptcy system, the Master ordered as further conditions that:

  1. Mr. Cole pay an extra $5,000 per month to the Trustee for a further six years for a total more payment of $360,000; and that
  2. his discharge from bankruptcy be suspended for two years.

The dismissed appeals

Mr. Cole argued before first the Judge, and then the ONCA, primarily that the Master’s treatment of surplus and other income was in error. He also argued that the Judge’s finding in dismissing his appeal was an error. The ONCA disagreed and dismissed his appeal.

ontario bankruptcy

So what is the lesson to be learned?

It is important for the Trustee, when sitting down with the person contemplating an insolvency proceeding, to understand all the facts. By properly understanding all the facts, we can provide proper professional advice and guidance.

Someone who had a facts situation like Mr. Cole, we would have strongly advised him or her to avoid bankruptcy and to contemplate performing a Division I Proposal to compromise his debts. The reasons we would have advised this are:

  1. the debtor has real income to successfully do a Proposal;
  2. Mr. Cole never would have qualified for an absolute discharge from bankruptcy given his facts situation and any discharge conditions would be onerous;
  3. avoiding the ongoing calculation of surplus income up to the time of his bankruptcy discharge hearing; and
  4. with the support of his major creditors, it is possible that the Proposal amount could have been somewhat less than $644,000 (subject to knowing the value of his assets at the date of bankruptcy).

he person needs our advice in plain English before making any decisions

We also would have advised the debtor the type of the rough ride they were in for if they chose to go ahead with the bankruptcy option. We would have explained in detail how we believed the Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency law system would treat him, so at least there would be no surprises during the bankruptcy administration.

Many times people we speak with do not like to hear the truth, and begin “Trustee shopping” until they find a Trustee that does not tell them all the bad news up front. People like this believe that if they aren’t told it, it can’t happen. This is a mistake. We believe everyone deserves to know the truth about their situation, to help them make the best decision possible.

In Mr. Cole’s case, not only did he find out the hard truth from the Court, he then spent money on his lawyers appealing the Master’s and Judge’s decisions. That obviously was extra money spent with no benefit received.

FULL DISCLOSURE: Our firm has never met with Mr. Cole and was not considered to be his Trustee.

What to do if you have too much debt

Declaring personal bаnkruрtсу in Canada is a big deal. So is getting your Ontario bankruptcy discharge certificate. While it can be a way out for the honest but unfortunate debtor who is deep in debt and looking for a new start, there are rules, rеѕtrісtіоnѕ and fіnаnсіаl rаmіfісаtіоnѕ.

That is why the Ira Smith Team always looks first to see if one of the bankruptcy alternatives would be a better fit for you. The alternatives we look at with you include:

The Ira Smith Team has 50+ years of cumulative experience dealing with issues just like the ones that you’re facing. Give us a call today and let us give you back peace of mind Starting Over, Starting Now.

ISI 4
ontario bankruptcy discharge certificate
Call a Trustee Now!