Tag: licensed trustee

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

UNLOCKING REAL ESTATE IN RECEIVERSHIP: TOP CHALLENGES & PROVEN SOLUTIONS

in receivership

Overview of In Receivership

I have just read a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dealing with an important aspect of real estate in receivership in Canada. The case is about when the Debtor/real estate owner does not believe that the court-appointed receiver has made proper decisions about the listing of the property for sale and the sale of a commercial property in receivership.

It also deals with the role of receivers and how they interact with the debtor, secured lenders and unsecured creditors.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I first provide some background of being in receivership in Canada. Then I discuss and highlight the issues found in the case of Rathcliffe Properties Inc. v. 2184698 Ontario Inc., 2024 ONSC 5077 (CanLII).

Legal Basis for In Receivership

A receivership is a legal process available to secured creditors, whereby a company’s affairs, business and property are entrusted to a receiver to manage and eventually sell the assets. Secured lenders may enforce their security to recover loans when the borrower defaults in its payment obligations relating to the secured debt. This remedy available to secured creditors is known as receivership, while the debtor is said to be “in receivership“.

If a business debtor does not make payments or otherwise defaults on a secured loan, the secured creditor would have the right to appoint a receiver to collect the money owed. Before appointing a receiver, a secured creditor must first issue a “Section 244” notice of intention to enforce security. This is a notification that secured creditors must send to defaulting debtors before appointing a receiver. Section 244 refers to that section number in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

The notice states that the security covers certain assets, that the company in default owes a specified amount to the secured creditor, and that the creditor may enforce the security after 10 days. The company in default may waive the notice period and consent to the appointment of the receiver.

Under the BIA, only a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) can be a receiver. No other party is licensed to administer the receivership process in Canada.in receivership

Types of Receivers In Receiverships

There are two types of receivers in receivership in Canada: (i) privately-appointed receivers; and (ii) Court-appointed receivers.

Privately-Appointed Receivers

A privately-appointed receiver is a licensed trustee who is appointed by a contract between the insolvency trustee and the secured creditor. A private receiver is typically used when there is no dispute to ranking among secured creditors or various claims to ownership of the company’s assets. The powers of a receiver listed in the security document give the privately appointed receiver more limited powers than a court-appointed receiver gets under a court order.

Court-Appointed Receivers

A receiver is court-appointed when the secured creditor makes an application to the court for the appointment of a receiver with more expanded powers. Like a privately-appointed receiver, a court-appointed receiver takes control of a company’s property because of financial distress and when there is a dispute among secured creditors and others regarding the ranking of secured claims and ownership of property.

Both kinds of receivers are tasked with protecting and preserving the value of the company or property and are certainly given broader powers by the court.

Duties and Responsibilities of a Receiver In Receivership

A Receiver is a licensed insolvency trustee appointed to manage and control the assets, property, or business of another person or entity, typically in a situation where the person or entity cannot manage their affairs due to financial difficulties, bankruptcy, or other reasons. In receivership in Ontario, a Receiver can be appointed either privately or through a court order.

Private Appointment

When a Receiver is appointed privately, it is typically done so through a contractual agreement between the Receiver and the secured creditor requiring the Receiver’s services. The Receiver’s duties and responsibilities may include:

  1. Managing and controlling the assets, property, or business of the person or entity.
  2. Collecting and managing debts, accounts receivable, and other financial obligations.
  3. Paying bills, expenses, and other financial obligations.
  4. Managing and overseeing the day-to-day operations of the business or property.
  5. Identifying and realizing assets to convert them into cash.
  6. Negotiating with creditors, suppliers, and other stakeholders to resolve disputes and improve the financial situation.
  7. Preparing and submitting financial reports and statements to the appointing creditor and other stakeholders.
  8. Providing advice and guidance primarily to the appointing creditor.

A privately appointed receiver needs to consult with and get approval from the appointing creditor for its proposed actions and activities. In a private appointment, the Receiver’s duty of care is mainly to the appointing creditor.

Court-Appointment

When in receivership a Receiver is appointed through a court order, many of the court-appointed receiver’s duties are the same as for a privately-appointed Receiver. The main differences though are that in receivership supervised by the Court, the court-appointed receiver:

  1. Owes a duty of care to all parties.
  2. Must obtain the approval of the Court for its actions and activities.in receivership

Stakeholder Considerations in Receivership

Stakeholder considerations in receivership leads us perfectly into discussing the case of Rathcliffe Properties Inc. v. 2184698 Ontario Inc., 2024 ONSC 5077 (CanLII).

This case was heard in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice involving a court-appointed receiver appointed to sell real property. The Debtor (2184698 Ontario Inc.) challenged the Receiver’s real estate receivership process, alleging that it was not conducted in a commercially reasonable manner and was biased towards the lender (Rathcliffe Properties Inc.).

The Debtor’s Argument

The Debtor, being the property owner, claimed the Receiver breached its duty under s. 247 of the BIA to act in good faith and in a “commercially reasonable manner.” They alleged the Receiver set a low listing price for the real property ($4,500,000) potentially based on “liquidation basis” appraisals rather than “fair market value.” They also argued that the court-appointed receiver showed favouritism by consulting only the Lender about the realtor and listing price, denying the Debtor crucial information.

Finally, they argued that the Receiver withheld crucial information by not sharing its appraisals with the Debtor.

Receiver and Lender’s argument

They argued:

  • The Receiver acted properly by basing the listing price for the property in question on professional advice and independent appraisals.
  • Choosing not to share appraisals to avoid giving the Debtor an unfair advantage in the sale was proper.
  • Consulting the Lender due to their expertise and potential buyer network, while the Debtor lacked relevant information and consistently overestimated the property’s value, was also appropriate.

The Court’s Findings

The Court found it more efficient to address the substance of the motion, providing clarity and avoiding further delays. The Court dismissed the Debtor’s claims of a breach of the BIA, stating:

  • The Receiver was not obligated to share appraisals.
  • The listing price, based on professional advice from professinoals working in this kind of real estate market, did not breach the court-appointed receiver’s duties or the BIA.
  • Consulting the Lender was justifiable, aiming for the best interests of all stakeholders.
  • The Court considered the motion premature, stating concerns about the sale process can be raised at the Sale Motion, where a complete evidentiary record would be available.

Since the Court found no evidence of a breach of the BIA and dismissed the Debtor’s motion in this real estate receivership, the Court ordered the Debtor to pay costs to both the Receiver and the Lender. The Court also lifted an interim injunction the Debtor obtained stopping the Receiver from continuing the sales process.

Clashing Interests in Receivership: Lender vs. Stakeholders

The receiver’s duty to act in the best interests of all stakeholders can clash with the specific needs of the lender because the lender prioritizes recovering the debt owed to them, even if it means selling the property for a lower price. Conversely, the receiver must consider the interests of all stakeholders, including the debtor, and aim for the highest possible sale price, even if it takes longer.

Here’s how this tension plays out in this case:

  • The Lender’s Interest: The lender (Rathcliffe Properties Ltd.) wants to recover the $2.9 million loan it provided to the debtor (2184698 Ontario Inc.) as quickly as possible. They likely see the receivership and subsequent sale of the property as the most expedient way to recoup their investment.
  • The Receiver’s Dilemma: The court-appointed receiver has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of all stakeholders, not just the lender. This means they must strive to obtain the highest possible price for the property, under the circumstances, even if it delays the Lender’s recovery.
  • Conflicting Approaches: The debtor argued that the receiver’s listing price of $4,500,000 was too low and favoured a quick sale to satisfy the Lender’s debt. However, the court found no evidence of this, highlighting that the Receiver based the listing price on professional advice and appraisals. The court emphasized that the market ultimately determines the property’s value, not just the initial listing price.

This case demonstrates the inherent tension in receivership scenarios. While the Lender’s primary concern is recovering their debt, the receiver must balance this against the interests of all stakeholders, including maximizing the sale price for the benefit of all parties involved.

Key Takeaways From This In Receivership Case

This situation highlights the conflicting priorities often found in receivership proceedings. On one hand, financial institutions lenders are focused on getting back their money, while on the other, the Receiver has to consider the needs of all stakeholders involved, aiming to achieve the highest possible sale price to benefit everyone.

In Receivership: Conclusion

We experience these same issues whenever we act as a real estate receiver. We rely on real estate experts both for appraisals and for the receiver sale of real estate. We must rely on real estate professionals in order to show that we properly handled our duties as a real estate receiver.

I hope you enjoyed this real estate receiver in receivership Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring due to distressed real estate or other reasons? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.in receivership

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

THE BANK RUPTCY RECOVERY PLAN: A COMPREHENSIVE ROADMAP TO FINANCIAL STABILITY

bank ruptcy canada
bank ruptcy

Bank ruptcy: Introduction

I know it looks weird, but I have noticed through our software that people wanting to find out more about the Canadian bankruptcy process are searching for the two-syllable phrase “bank ruptcy“. I started to investigate this phenomenon. It turns out that individuals may often search for the term “bankruptcy” by entering “bank ruptcy” due to a phenomenon known as “typo-based search behaviour.” This behaviour occurs when users inadvertently type a word incorrectly while still approaching the correct spelling closely enough that their search engine or browser can suggest the accurate term.

In this instance, individuals may intend to find information about “bankruptcy” but mistakenly type “bank ruptcy.” The search engine or browser, recognizing the intent, may then offer “bankruptcy” as a suggested correction, which users can select to access the desired information.

Moreover, some users may be utilizing mobile devices or keyboards with non-standard layouts, which can contribute to typographical errors or misspellings. In such instances, search engines or browsers often retain the capability to discern the user’s intent behind the query and provide relevant search results.

It is also important to acknowledge that search engines, such as Google, are designed to improve user experience by interpreting and correcting common typing errors, thereby facilitating more effective information retrieval without necessarily teaching the person the correct spelling.

Bank ruptcy: What is Bankruptcy and Where Did the Word Originate?

The term “bankruptcy” has its origins in ancient civilizations, notably in Greece and Rome, where debtors had avenues for seeking relief from their creditors through various forms of debt forgiveness or restructuring. However, the modern legal framework and procedures associated with bankruptcy are a more recent development, emerging in Europe during the 16th century.

The word bank ruptcy is likely derived from the Italian two-word phrase “banca rupta,” which translates to “broken bench” or “broken table.” In this context, “banca” refers to a “bench” or “table,” while “rupta” means “broken.” This term was historically employed in medieval Italy to describe a merchant or trader who was unable to meet their financial obligations. Business was conducted at the benches or tables of the various merchants. Consequently, their “bench” or “table,” representing their business, was broken and rendered inoperative if they ran out of money.

In the 14th century, the Old French term “banqueroute” evolved from the phrase “banquer ost,” which followed the Italian meaning and further contributed to the development of the modern word and concept of bankruptcy as we understand it today.

The term evolved to include the concept of a legal process by which a person or business could be declared insolvent and their assets liquidated to pay off creditors. Being insolvent is the financial condition that can lead to the legal bankruptcy process to allow the honest but unfortunate debtor to have financial recovery.

bank ruptcy canada
bank ruptcy

Bank ruptcy: Are you ready to take control of your financial life and gain peace of mind?

Are you facing overwhelming debt and experiencing persistent financial stress and uncertainty? Do you aspire to liberate yourself from the burdens of debt and emerge more resilient and financially savvy? If so, you are not alone.

Millions of individuals worldwide are navigating similar challenges, and it is common to feel isolated in your struggle with debt issues. However, there is a solution. By identifying the underlying causes of debt and formulating a tailored recovery plan, you can take significant steps toward financial stability.

If you are prepared to regain control of your finances, overcome debt, and lay the groundwork for a more secure future, you have come to the right place. Let us embark on this journey to financial freedom from debt together.

Bank ruptcy: Reasons for Filing for Bankruptcy

Common financial difficulties

Consumers

Many Canadians who are considering a consumer proposal or personal bank ruptcy filing face similar financial challenges, including:

  1. High-interest debt.
  2. Job loss or reduced income.
  3. Unexpected expenses.
  4. Divorce or separation.
  5. High credit card debt.
  6. Student loan debt.
  7. Mortgage debt.
  8. Tax debt.
  9. Overextension of credit.
  10. Lack of budgeting and financial planning.
  11. Financial stress and anxiety.

It’s essential for individuals experiencing financial difficulties to seek professional help, such as credit counselling or speaking to a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), to address their debt and develop a plan for financial recovery.

Businesses

Common financial difficulties Canadian businesses who need to file either a financial restructuring proposal or bank ruptcy often exhibit common danger signals such as:

  1. Cash flow problems.
  2. High debt levels.
  3. Declining sales or revenue.
  4. Increased competition.
  5. Regulatory changes.
  6. Supply chain disruptions.
  7. Economic downturns.
  8. Over-expansion.
  9. Poor financial planning.
  10. High operating costs.
  11. Lack of diversification.
  12. Insufficient working capital.
  13. Seasonal fluctuations.
  14. Lack of access to capital.
  15. Poor management decisions.
  16. Industry-specific challenges.
  17. Cybersecurity breaches.
  18. Environmental liabilities.
  19. Lack of succession planning.

If a business faces financial struggles, it’s important to, it’s important to consult a licensed insolvency trustee. They can advise on turnaround strategies and help create a recovery plan to tackle these challenges effectively.

Impact of debt on individuals and businesses

Debt can significantly influence both individuals and businesses in various ways. For individuals, the burden of overwhelming debts may result in considerable financial stress, which can manifest as anxiety and, in severe cases, depression. When debt becomes unmanageable, it can hinder one’s ability to meet daily expenses, potentially leading to missed monthly payments, impaired credit scores, and a pervasive sense of despair.

Additionally, consumer debts can restrict an individual’s financial flexibility, making it challenging to make substantial purchases, assume new financial responsibilities, or pursue long-term financial aspirations. Moreover, the strain of financial difficulties can impact personal relationships, as stress related to finances often leads to conflicts and tension among family and friends.

Similarly, for businesses, the implications of debt issues can be equally challenging. Elevated outstanding debt levels can create cash flow issues, complicating a company’s ability to fulfill its financial commitments, including employee salaries, supplier payments, and tax obligations.

Furthermore, substantial debt can curtail a business’s capacity to invest in new opportunities, foster innovation, or expand operations, ultimately hindering growth and sustainability. Understanding debt’s effects is crucial for individuals and businesses to navigate financial challenges effectively and maintain long-term stability.

Bank ruptcy: The Bankruptcy Process in Canada

Obtaining a Free Debt Assessment

If you’re having difficulty keeping up with your debt payments and feeling stressed about your financial situation, you might want to seek help from a licensed insolvency trustee. These professionals are qualified to guide you through the often complicated process of managing debt. One of the key services they provide is a free debt assessment.

This assessment involves a thorough look at your finances, including your income, expenses, assets, and debts. The trustee will work with you to pinpoint the main issues contributing to your debt and help create a personalized plan to get you back on your feet.

The best part is that a free debt assessment from a licensed insolvency trustee is completely free, with no obligation to proceed with any debt relief options. This means that you can get a clear understanding of your financial situation and explore your options without incurring any costs or risks.

During the assessment, the trustee will also be able to advise you on the best course of action to take, whether that’s a debt consolidation loan, a debt management plan, or even bank ruptcy. By taking advantage of a free debt assessment from a licensed insolvency trustee, you can gain the clarity and confidence you need to take control of your finances and start building a brighter financial future.

Necessary Forms to Declare Bankruptcy

The bankruptcy procedure in Canada is a complex and intimidating process, but it’s essential to understand the necessary forms and procedures to navigate it successfully. In Canada, the necessary bankruptcy paperwork is to declare bank ruptcy is prepared by a licensed insolvency trustee, who will guide you through the process and ensure that all required documents are completed accurately and on time.

More than that, the insolvency trustee must be able to explain your options to you and help you feel comfortable that the option you choose, is the best one for your circumstances. The information that the insolvency trustee uses to prepare the forms comes from the initial intake form the licensed trustee provides to you. From that form, the Trustee can then prepare the required documents.

The main documents required to file either a consumer proposal or for bank ruptcy are:

  1. Either the consumer proposal or the assignment in bankruptcy.
  2. The statement of affairs outlines the assets and liabilities of the debtor and includes other important information for both unsecured creditors and the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada to consider.
  3. The debtor’s statement of monthly income and expenses.
  4. The notice to the debtor outlining their responsibilities in the insolvency process chosen, be it a consumer proposal or bankruptcy.

Your licensed insolvency trustee will provide you with these forms and guide you through the process of completing them accurately and submitting them to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada. By completing these forms and following the necessary procedures, you can ensure that your bankruptcy is processed efficiently and effectively and that you can start rebuilding your financial future.

Role of Licensed Insolvency Trustees

Licensed Insolvency Trustees are essential participants in the Canadian debt relief landscape. These professionals possess specialized expertise in the field of insolvency, and their work is regulated by the Canadian government, which oversees the entire insolvency process and bankruptcy laws in the country. As the only individuals authorized by the federal government, insolvency trustees play a critical role in assisting both individuals and businesses as they navigate the often complex procedures associated with debt relief, including bankruptcy, consumer proposals, and financial restructuring.

Insolvency trustees serve as neutral third parties, allowing them to offer objective advice and support to those experiencing financial challenges. They collaborate closely with creditors to negotiate settlements and develop payment plans, and they can facilitate debt restructuring efforts that lead to a more sustainable financial future.

Engaging the services of a licensed insolvency trustee can provide individuals and businesses with valuable reassurance, as they can trust in the expertise and guidance of these qualified professionals during their journey toward financial recovery.

bank ruptcy canada
bank ruptcy

Advantages of Filing for Bank ruptcy in Canada

Filing for a consumer proposal, corporate restructuring or bank ruptcy for individuals or corporate bankruptcy in Canada can provide several advantages, including:

  1. Debt Relief: It provides a fresh start by discharging most of your debts, allowing you to start over financially.
  2. Protection from Creditors: An insolvency process provides automatic protection from creditors, which means they cannot pursue you for payment or take legal action against you.
  3. Stop Wage Garnishments: A consumer proposal or bankruptcy can stop wage garnishments, which is a legal process when judgment creditors take a portion of your paycheque to pay off debts.
  4. Stop Collection Calls and legal proceedings: Upon filing, you can stop collection calls and letters from creditors by referring them to your insolvency trustee. This gives you peace of mind and reduces stress.
  5. Impact on Credit Score: It is true that an insolvency process initially worsens a person’s credit score. However, it allows you to use certain techniques that we teach you to rebuild credit and over time improve your credit rating.
  6. Protection of Assets: A consumer proposal can protect all of your assets. Bankruptcy protects your exempt property. In many cases, it stops your home or car from being seized by creditors.
  7. Simplified Financial Life: The insolvency process simplifies your financial life by eliminating debt and providing a clear plan for moving forward.
  8. Professional Guidance: Insolvency trustees provide guidance and support throughout the process.
  9. Discharge of Debts: Over time, the insolvency process allows you to discharge most debts, including credit card debt, loans, and other unsecured debts.
  10. Fresh Start Perspective: Bankruptcy, a consumer proposal and financial restructuring all provide a fresh start, allowing you to start over and make a new beginning.
  11. Reduced Stress: A successful insolvency process reduces stress and anxiety caused by debt, allowing you to focus on rebuilding your life.
  12. Protection from Tax Debt: It protects you from tax debt which can be a significant burden for many individuals.

It’s important to note that bankruptcy is a serious legal process and should only be considered as a last resort. There are various debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy for you to consider before resorting to bankruptcy. It’s essential to consult with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee to determine which of the many options is best for your specific situation.

Bank ruptcy: Resources for Bank ruptcy Information

There are several resources available for bankruptcy information in Canada, including:

  1. Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada: The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada is the federal agency responsible for overseeing the bankruptcy and insolvency system in Canada. Their website provides information on bankruptcy, consumer proposals, and other debt-relief options.
  2. Licensed insolvency trustees: They and their websites can They and their websites can provide guidance and advice on bankruptcy and other debt-relief options.
  3. Credit Counselling Services: Legitimate non-profit c services, such as the Credit Counselling Society, provide free or low-cost advice and guidance on managing debt and avoiding bankruptcy. Financial institutions: Many banks and credit unions provide resources and information about bankruptcy and debt relief options.
  4. Government Websites: The Government of Canada’s website provides information on bankruptcy, including a guide to bankruptcy and a list of licensed insolvency trustees.

    bank ruptcy canada
    bank ruptcy

Bank ruptcy Conclusion: Moving Forward After Bank ruptcy

Here is what I tell everyone about moving forward after bank ruptcy to have a successful and stress-free life:

  1. Take responsibility: Acknowledge that you made mistakes and take responsibility for your financial decisions. This will help you to learn from your mistakes and positively move forward.
  2. Continue budgeting: Part of the personal insolvency process involves financial counselling and proper budgeting. A budget shows you what you earn each month and therefore how much you have, after tax, to spend. Allocating your earnings over your essential needs first and sticking to that plan will keep you out of debt trouble in the future.
  3. Establish an emergency fund: It is important to try to save part of your monthly income to create an emergency fund that can pay for unforeseen expenses. This will help you reduce the need for debt when unexpected financial demands arise.
  4. Focus on rebuilding credit: Rebuilding credit takes time, but it’s essential to start building a positive credit history. Make on-time payments, keep credit utilization low, and monitor your credit report regularly.
  5. Support: Finally, It’s important to reach out for support from friends, family, or even a financial advisor. Having a solid support system can keep you motivated and focused on your goals.

I hope you enjoyed this bank ruptcy Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bank ruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

bank ruptcy canada
bank ruptcy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ESSENTIAL DUTIES OF BANKRUPTS AND TRUSTEES IN LIQUIDATING ASSETS: THE ULTIMATE COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE

liquidating assets

Liquidating Assets: Introduction

Today I am writing about an exciting recent court decision from the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta released on July 23, 2024. This case is an appeal to the Court decided by The Honourable Justice Douglas R. Mah from the decision of the Registrar in Bankruptcy in the bankruptcy discharge hearing of Dr. Omar Ahmad Nsair. The case citation is Nsair (Re), 2024 ABKB 450.

Regular readers of my Brandon’s Blog will recall that last week I wrote about the bankruptcy discharge hearing of Ontario’s self-proclaimed Crypto King in LESSONS FROM THE AIDEN PLETERSKI BANKRUPTCY: OUR COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE ON A “CRYPTO KING” BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE.

That blog dealt with Aiden Pleterski’s failed application for discharge from bankruptcy. One of the various reasons his discharge application failed was, amongst other things, his total lack of cooperation with their licensed insolvency trustee for the identification and liquidation of his non-exempt assets.

Dr. Omar Ahmad Nsair’s case answers the following question: How much assistance does the bankrupt need to give the licensed insolvency trustee? Dr. Nsair filed a voluntary assignment in bankruptcy. His case underscores the challenges of balancing statutory duties with practical limitations in asset realization, offering valuable insights into the intricacies of bankruptcy proceedings.

First I will provide an overview of the role and responsibilities of a receiver or bankruptcy trustee in liquidating assets. Then I will delve into the details of Dr. Nsair’s personal bankruptcy, where a compelling narrative unfolds, shedding light on the complexities of asset realization and statutory duties in the face of economic uncertainties. Join me on this legal journey as we dissect the nuances of bankruptcy proceedings and the implications for all parties involved.

Liquidating Assets: The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada

Overview of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Relating To Liquidating Assets

The Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) is a federal statute that plays a crucial role in liquidating assets in both receivership and bankruptcy scenarios. Here are some key aspects of the BIA’s importance in this context:

  1. Priorities: The BIA sets out the order of priority for the distribution of assets in receivership or bankruptcy. This ensures that certain creditors, such as secured creditors, are paid first, followed by unsecured creditors.
  2. Stay of Proceedings: The BIA provides for a stay of proceedings, which prevents creditors from taking legal action against the debtor or its assets during the receivership or bankruptcy process. This stay allows for a more orderly way of liquidating assets.
  3. Powers of the Receiver or Trustee: The BIA grants the receiver or trustee extensive powers to manage and liquidate the insolvent debtor’s assets. This includes the power to sell assets, collect debts, and manage the debtor’s business.
  4. Asset Protection: The BIA provides for the protection of certain assets, such as exempt property, which are not available to creditors. This ensures that debtors have some protection for essential assets, such as their primary residence.
  5. Notice and Disclosure: The BIA requires the receiver or trustee to provide notice to creditors and other interested parties of the liquidation process. This ensures that all parties are aware of the process and have an opportunity to participate.
  6. Liquidating Assets Process: The BIA sets out the procedures for liquidating assets, including the requirement for a public auction or sale of assets. This ensures that assets are sold fairly and transparently.
  7. Distribution of Proceeds: The BIA sets out the rules for distributing the proceeds of liquidating assets, including the priority of payments to creditors. This ensures that creditors are paid in the correct order.
  8. Avoidance Powers: The BIA grants the licensed insolvency trustee acting as receiver or bankruptcy trustee avoidance powers, which allow them to recover assets that were transferred or sold by the insolvent debtor for less than their fair value. This ensures that creditors receive a fair return on their investment.
  9. Reporting Requirements: The BIA requires the receiver or trustee to provide regular reports to the court and creditors, which ensures transparency and accountability in liquidating assets.
  10. Court Supervision: The BIA provides for court supervision of the liquidation process, which ensures that the receiver or trustee is following the law and that the process is fair and orderly.

In summary, the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act plays a critical role in liquidating assets in both receivership and bankruptcy scenarios by providing a framework for the process, protecting creditors’ interests, and ensuring transparency and accountability.

Purpose of liquidating assets in bankruptcy

The primary purpose of liquidating assets in bankruptcy is to:

  1. Distribute the proceeds to creditors: The goal is to collect as much money as possible from the sale of assets and distribute it among creditors, including secured and unsecured creditors, under the priority of claims.
  2. Pay off debts: Liquidating assets helps to pay off the debts of the bankrupt individual or business, allowing them to discharge their obligations and start fresh.
  3. Provide a fresh start: By liquidating assets and paying off debts, the bankrupt individual or business can obtain a fresh start, free from the burden of debt and the stigma of bankruptcy.
  4. Prevent asset stripping: Liquidating assets helps to prevent asset stripping, where creditors or other parties attempt to remove or sell assets for personal gain, leaving the bankrupt individual or business with little or no assets.
  5. Ensure Equity: Liquidating assets guarantees that all creditors receive fair and equitable treatment, as the proceeds are allocated following the established priority of claims.
  6. Provide a mechanism for debt forgiveness: In some cases, liquidating assets can provide a mechanism for debt forgiveness, where debts are written off or reduced due to the lack of assets or the inability to recover them.
  7. Facilitate business restructuring: In the case of a business bankruptcy, liquidating assets can facilitate restructuring and reorganization, allowing the business to continue operating and creating jobs.
  8. Protect the public interest: Liquidating assets helps to protect the public interest by ensuring that the assets of the bankrupt individual or business are not used to perpetuate fraud or other illegal activities.
  9. Provide a mechanism for asset recovery: Liquidating assets provides a mechanism for asset recovery, where assets that were transferred or hidden by the bankrupt individual or business can be recovered and distributed among creditors.
  10. Ensure compliance with bankruptcy laws: Liquidating assets ensures compliance with bankruptcy laws and regulations, which helps to maintain public confidence in the bankruptcy system.

Overall, the purpose of liquidating assets in bankruptcy is to achieve a fair and orderly distribution of assets among creditors, while providing a fresh start for the bankrupt individual or business.liquidating assets

Liquidating Assets: Role of a Trustee in Liquidation

Duties and Responsibilities of a Trustee

As a licensed insolvency trustee, my duties and responsibilities include:

  1. To act as a fiduciary: The licensed trustee must act in the best interests of the bankrupt individual or business, and not in their interests.
  2. To take possession of assets: The trustee must take possession of the assets of the bankrupt individual or business, including real estate, inventory, equipment, and other assets.
  3. To inventory and value assets: The trustee must conduct an inventory of the assets and determine their value.
  4. To determine the priority of claims: The trustee must determine the priority of claims against the assets, including secured and unsecured creditors.
  5. To sell or dispose of assets: The trustee must sell or dispose of assets in a fair and orderly manner, often through public auction or private sale.
  6. To distribute proceeds: The trustee must distribute the proceeds from the sale of assets among creditors, following the priority of claims.
  7. To manage the liquidation process: The trustee must manage the liquidation process, including hiring professionals, such as appraisers and auctioneers, and negotiating with creditors.
  8. Regular reporting: The licensed trustee is required to furnish regular reports and updates to the court, creditors, and other stakeholders regarding the progress of the liquidation process.
  9. To ensure compliance with laws and regulations: The trustee must ensure compliance with bankruptcy laws and regulations, as well as any applicable provincial or territorial laws.
  10. To represent the bankrupt: The trustee represents the bankrupt individual or business when liquidating assets, including negotiating with creditors and making decisions about the sale of assets. The Trustee must do so as a prudent person, but at the same time, is representing and looking out for the rights of the unsecured creditors.
  11. To provide a fresh start: The trustee’s role is to help the bankrupt individual or business obtain a fresh start, by liquidating assets and distributing the proceeds fairly and equitably among creditors.
  12. To maintain confidentiality: The trustee must maintain confidentiality regarding the affairs of the bankrupt individual or business.
  13. To act impartially: The licensed trustee must act impartially and without bias in the process of liquidating assets.
  14. To provide a fair and orderly liquidation: The trustee must provide a fair and orderly process when liquidating assets, taking into account the interests of all stakeholders.
  15. To ensure transparency: The trustee must ensure transparency in the liquidation process, providing regular updates and reports to stakeholders.

These duties and responsibilities are outlined in the BIA and the Bankruptcy Rules and are subject to the supervision of the court.

Trustee’s role in asset valuation and sale

The LIT plays a crucial role in the valuation and sale of assets in receivership or bankruptcy. Here are some key responsibilities:

  1. Asset Identification: The licensed trustee is responsible for identifying all assets of the bankrupt or receiver, including real estate, inventory, equipment, vehicles, and other tangible and intangible assets.
  2. Asset Valuation: The LIT must determine the fair market value of each asset, which may involve hiring appraisers, conducting auctions, or negotiating sales with potential buyers. The goal is to ensure that the assets are valued accurately and fairly.
  3. Asset Classification: The licensed trustee must categorize assets into different classes, such as:
    • Preserved assets: Those that are essential to the business or have significant value and should be preserved for the benefit of creditors.
    • Realizable assets: Those that can be sold or liquidated to generate cash for creditors.
    • Non-realizable assets: Those that have little or no value and may be abandoned or written off.
  5. Asset Sale and Liquidation of assets: The Trustee is tasked with the responsibility of conducting asset sales for liquidating assets in a timely and efficient manner, to maximize returns for creditors. This process may include:
    • Auctions: The LIT may conduct public or private auctions to sell assets to the highest bidder.
    • Negotiated sales: The LIT may negotiate sales with potential buyers, taking into account the asset’s value, market conditions, and the needs of creditors.
    • Private sales: The LIT may sell assets privately, often to a specific buyer or group of buyers.
  7. Asset Disposition: The LIT must ensure that assets are disposed of under the BIA and for large debtor companies, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), as well as any applicable provincial or territorial laws.
  8. Reporting and Disclosure: The LIT must provide regular reports to the court, creditors, and other stakeholders on the valuation, sale, and disposition of assets, as well as any issues or challenges that arise during the process.
  9. Compliance with Court Orders: The LIT must comply with any court orders or directions regarding the valuation and sale of assets, including any restrictions or limitations imposed by the court.

Throughout the process, the licensed trusteeNsair’s must maintain transparency, accountability, and fairness, ensuring that the valuation and sale of assets are conducted in a manner that is in the best interests of all stakeholders, including creditors, the bankrupt or receiver, and other parties involved.

Now that we have gone over the basics of the liquidation of assets in a receivership or bankruptcy context, it is time to focus on the specifics of Dr. Nsair’s personal bankruptcy case.

Significance of ATB Financial as a Major Secured Creditor Turned Unsecured Creditor

ATB Financial’s role as a major creditor in Dr. Nsair’s bankruptcy proceedings cannot be understated. With substantial sums at stake and implications for the overall outcome of the proceedings, the actions and decisions of ATB Financial carry significant weight in determining the resolution of the case.

In reading the Judge’s Decision, it is obvious that ATB was fuming at their loss and that the Registrar decided that Dr. Nsair fully cooperated with the Trustee and deserved an absolute discharge. It is ATB Financial that appealed the Registrar’s ruling.

Liquidating Assets: Key Details and Contention Points

The valuation disagreements surrounding these condominium units added a layer of complexity to the situation, with various parties presenting differing estimates of their worth. Marketability challenges further compounded the issue, as the aftermath of the 2020 Beirut explosion cast a shadow of uncertainty over the realizable value of these properties.

Exploring the stalemate in asset realization, it became evident that the conflicting perspectives on the condos’ marketability hindered progress in the bankruptcy process. Despite efforts to assess their sale feasibility, the uncertainty surrounding their actual value created a deadlock, impeding any meaningful progress toward creditor benefit.

As a result, the Trustee decided that it could not take the risk of attempting to sell the condominium units. The Trustee wrote to all the creditors advising them of the situation and that it was not going to take any action concerning the condominium assets. The Trustee further advised the creditors that if they wished to, they could seek the Court’s permission under section 38(1) of the BIA to take on the action of selling the condos in their name. No creditors, including ATB Financial, moved on this option.liquidating assets

Liquidating Assets: Introduction to Dr. Nsair’s Bankruptcy Case

As I delve into the intricate details of Dr. Nsair’s bankruptcy case, it’s essential to provide a comprehensive overview of the background and the key players involved. The case of Dr. Nsair, a dentist facing challenging financial circumstances, unfolds with significant legal implications and complexities.

Dr. Nsair’s bankruptcy situation is a focal point of this case, highlighting the struggles and obligations under the BIA of an insolvent person. The involvement of ATB Financial as a major secured creditor suffering a shortfall, adds a layer of significance to the proceedings. Approximately $1.9 million was still owed after a receivership related to dental clinics operated by Dr. Nsair and his brother. Dr. Nsair’s financial difficulties continued as he guaranteed the ATB Financial debt.

However, the argument that ATB Financial put forward for their opposition to Dr. Nsair’s bankruptcy discharge leading to the appeal of the Registrar’s ruling was they felt the bankrupt did not cooperate with the Trustee enough. ATB Financial could not articulate what else the bankrupt should have done. Just that he should have done not only more, but more than what the Trustee or ATB Financial had done.

The result of all this would be that if Dr. Nsair’s discharge from bankruptcy was upheld, then the Trustee would finish the file and obtain its discharge. The BIA states that if there is unrealized property when the Trustee gets its discharge, then subject to any further directive from the Court, the unrealized property goes back to the discharged bankrupt. That got ATB Financial’s juices flowing!

Liquidating Assets: The Registrar’s Decision and Legal Interpretations

Upon assessing Dr. Nsair’s obligations and actions in the context of his bankruptcy case, it became evident that he faced many challenges. From the looming shadow of ATB Financial, a significant now unsecured creditor seeking approximately $1.9 million, to the uncertainties surrounding the commercial condominium units in Beirut, Lebanon, owned by Dr. Nsair, the stakes were undeniably high.

The Court of King’s Bench of Alberta, in its scrutiny of Dr. Nsair’s case, highlighted the delicate balance between statutory duties and the financial condition of the parties involved. It underscored the need for a nuanced approach that considers the economic uncertainties and practical limitations inherent in such proceedings.

Section 158(k) of the BIA reads as follows:

(k) aid to the utmost of his power in the realization of his property and the distribution of the proceeds among his creditors;

Despite the challenges faced by the Trustee and creditors, the Registrar’s decision shed light on the complexities of the situation. By delving into the legal interpretations surrounding section 158(k) of the BIA and Dr. Nsair’s obligations, the decision provided clarity on the expectations placed on individuals in bankruptcy scenarios. It emphasized the importance of aligning actions with the objectives of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act while acknowledging the constraints faced by all parties.

Through this lens, the Registrar’s decision not only addressed the immediate concerns raised by ATB Financial but also set a precedent for future cases involving asset realization and creditors’ benefits. It highlighted the need for a pragmatic approach that considers the practicalities of the situation while upholding the principles of fairness and justice.liquidating assets

Liquidating Assets: Court Ruling and Implications

One of the pivotal aspects under scrutiny was Dr. Nsair’s obligation, as outlined in section 158(k) of the BIA, to facilitate the realization of his assets for the benefit of creditors. The focal point emerged around three commercial condominium units in Beirut, Lebanon, owned by Dr. Nsair. These properties, impacted by the 2020 Beirut explosion, sparked valuation disputes, with estimates varying widely. Dr. Nsair declared the asset on his sworn Statement of Affairs and provided the Trustee with complete information about them and their legal status.

The Registrar’s ruling centred on interpreting section 158(k) and assessing Dr. Nsair’s compliance with aiding in asset realization. While ATB Financial advocated for stringent measures due to perceived inaction on Dr. Nsair’s part, they could not state what else Dr. Nsair should have done. The Registrar’s decision favoured a nuanced approach. It emphasized the practical limitations and reasonable expectations aligned with the BIA’s objectives, highlighting the complexities of balancing statutory duties with economic uncertainties.

Ultimately, the Court upheld the Registrar’s decision, emphasizing that Dr. Nsair did not breach section 158(k) by refraining from actions beyond his or the Trustee’s capacity. The directive the Court can give when the Trustee seeks its discharge, if any before condos were to revert to Dr. Nsair underscores the importance of a fair evaluation of asset realization potential for the benefit of creditors.

This case underscores the intricate dynamics of bankruptcy proceedings, showcasing the delicate balance between legal obligations, practical constraints, and economic realities. It serves as a testament to the challenges inherent in navigating asset realization in bankruptcy cases, emphasizing the need for a judicious approach that considers all stakeholders’ interests.

Liquidating Assets: Lessons Learned

As I reflect on the intricate details of the bankruptcy legal process, one key aspect that stands out is the delicate balance between statutory duties and practical limitations. The case of Dr. Nsair’s bankruptcy journey shed light on the complexities involved in asset realization and the legal interpretations surrounding it.

Throughout Dr. Nsair’s legal battle, it became evident that navigating the intricacies of the BIA requires a deep understanding of one’s statutory duties while also acknowledging the practical constraints that may hinder swift resolutions. The case exemplified the challenges faced by individuals like Dr. Nsair in fulfilling their obligations to aid in asset realization for creditors’ benefits.

One of the key takeaways from Dr. Nsair’s legal ordeal is the importance of maintaining a clear line of communication and collaboration between all parties involved, including creditors, trustees, and the Court. By aligning expectations and working towards a common goal, the process of asset realization can be streamlined, ensuring a fair and equitable outcome for all stakeholders.

Liquidating Assets: FAQ

  1. What is the role of a receiver in a receivership case?

A receiver is appointed either privately or by the court to take possession of and liquidate the assets under receivership to satisfy the obligations owed to secured creditors.

  1. How does financial restructuring differ from bankruptcy in Canada?

Financial restructuring involves negotiating more sustainable debt terms with creditors and taking steps towards financial sustainability under court supervision, to preserve the business as a going concern. Bankruptcy, on the other hand, involves liquidating assets of the insolvent business and distributing the proceeds to unsecured creditors.

  1. What are the key functions of insolvency laws like the BIA in Canada?

Insolvency laws like the BIA provide frameworks and processes to help minimize the impact of business insolvency on stakeholders, make the best of a bad situation, and ensure that assets of failed businesses are returned to the economy for productive purposes.

  1. What options does an insolvent firm have under the BIA in Canada?

An insolvent firm in Canada can opt for bankruptcy to liquidate its assets and distribute proceeds to creditors, or work with creditors to restructure their debt and continue as a going concern through commercial proposal proceedings. If the firm requires an immediate stay of proceedings, it can first file a Notice of Intention To Make a Proposal. The firm may also require interim financing otherwise called DIP financing to work through the proposal process.

  1. How does bankruptcy liquidation contribute to marketplace dynamics in Canada?

Bankruptcy liquidation helps ensure that assets of failed businesses are returned to the economy for productive purposes, contributing to marketplace dynamics and minimizing the impact of business insolvency on stakeholders.liquidating assets

Liquidating Assets: Conclusion

Dr. Nsair’s bankruptcy case underscores the challenges of balancing statutory duties with practical limitations in asset realization, offering valuable insights into the intricacies of bankruptcy proceedings.

I hope you enjoyed this liquidating assets Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.liquidating assets

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY LAWYER: IS ONE ESSENTIAL TO FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY IN ONTARIO?

bankruptcy lawyer
bankruptcy lawyer

Bankruptcy lawyer: Introduction

Step right into this week’s edition of Brandon’s Blog, where we’re embarking on a profound exploration. Our focus today delves into a crucial theme that carries substantial weight within the psyche of a myriad of Canadian consumers grappling with financial adversity, as well as Canadian business owners navigating their enterprises with too many business debts through fiscal quandaries. The question at the forefront: do the circumstances warrant enlisting the expertise of a bankruptcy lawyer when contemplations of insolvency filings in Canada take center stage?

Venturing through the intricate landscape of insolvency and the realms of personal or corporate bankruptcy has the potential to stir feelings of frustration and helplessness. This sentiment amplifies mainly when the trajectory of your personal or corporate fiscal destiny hangs in a precarious balance, swaying like a delicate pendulum. The gravity of making prudent choices during this trying juncture cannot be overstated. At its core, lies the quintessential need to not only identify the right course but also to discern the adept professional from whose wellspring of wisdom guidance should be sought.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I will outline the scenarios in which consulting with a bankruptcy lawyer is highly advised, but as you will see, it is not essential in every circumstance. Whether you are taking into consideration submitting a restructuring proposal or seeking bankruptcy protection, recognizing who to turn to for specialist assistance for legal and financial advice can substantially affect the result of your financial journey.

I will discuss the intricate details surrounding insolvency as well as bankruptcy law in Canada. By diving into the significance of professional assistance and support, I intend to equip you with the understanding needed to make enlightened decisions during this difficult phase. Join me as we decipher the secrets of insolvency and bankruptcy and empower ourselves to safeguard a better financial future.

Bankruptcy lawyer: Overview of the insolvency and bankruptcy process in Canada

The bankruptcy procedure in Canada is governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). It is a legal statute developed to supply relief to people and companies that are unable to pay their financial obligations. The process always includes the services of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee that is responsible for administering the insolvency process.

The Licensed Insolvency Trustee is first required to assess the debtor’s entire financial situation, including the causes of the insolvency, the current financial position and the nature of the assets and liabilities of the debtor. The Licensed Insolvency Trustee then needs to make recommendations to the debtor to solve their current financial crisis. Once agreed on, what insolvency or bankruptcy process will be implemented, the BIA and the restructuring consumer proposal, Division I proposal or the bankruptcy, is put into operation to offer a fresh start for the debtor while making certain there is fair treatment for the creditors.

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee is the only professional licensed in Canada by the federal government to administer the Canadian insolvency process chosen. In many cases, the process can be carried out without the advice of a bankruptcy lawyer.

bankruptcy lawyer
bankruptcy lawyer

Bankruptcy lawyer: Formal insolvency options in Canada

Navigating the intricate labyrinth of bankruptcy within Canada unfurls as a legal undertaking of profound significance, extending its benevolent embrace to both individuals and enterprises ensnared within the inescapable clutches of their fiscal commitments. This orchestrated progression finds its regulatory compass in the venerable BIA, its vigilant guardianship entrusted to a duly licensed sentinel of fiscal adversity, recognized as a Trustee.

Commencing this odyssey, the debtor sets forth to formally lodge their supplication for bankruptcy, an entreaty promptly received by the Licensed Insolvency Trustee, who, in turn, undertakes the judicious scrutiny of the debtor’s economic constellations. From this intricate appraisal blooms a stratagem, a masterwork designed to navigate the undulating terrain of debt repayment, fostering equilibrium amid the ranks of creditors.

Through the procession of this intricate ballet, the debtor finds sanctuary from the clamorous onslaught of creditor collections, an ephemeral respite nestled within the folds of the overarching process. This respite, however, is not a sojourn of idle reprieve; it entails the debtor’s obligatory participation in the convocations of credit counsel, a didactic interlude intended to illuminate the labyrinthine corridors of fiscal wisdom.

Once the intricacies of this design garner the seal of approval, the gears of asset liquidation are set into motion, unfurling a cascade of transactions wherein the debtor’s holdings metamorphose into liquid currency, a tribute disseminated among the consortium of creditors who await their apportioned spoils.

The culmination of this voyage heralds the debtor’s liberation from the shackles of residual indebtedness, a phoenix rising from the embers of fiscal duress, reborn into a realm unburdened by the obligations that once ensnared them.

The formal insolvency options in Canada are described below.

Insolvency and debt relief solutions for individuals –

  • Restructuring by making monthly payments under a consumer proposal for those who owe $250,000 or less (not including any debts secured by and registered against a person’s residence).
  • Financial restructuring under a Division I proposal, for those who owe more than $250,000.
  • Personal bankruptcy.

Insolvency and debt relief options for companies –

  • Financial restructuring under a Division I proposal as an alternative to bankruptcy.
  • Sale of assets through a receivership enforcement process initiated by a secured creditor.
  • Restructuring for companies that owe $5 million or more under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).
  • corporate/business bankruptcies..

In certain situations, looking for the advice of a Canadian bankruptcy lawyer is of utmost significance. An insolvency or bankruptcy filing is an intricate legal process that needs careful consideration of an individual’s financial scenario. A bankruptcy legal representative can assist with whether corporate or personal bankruptcy, as the case may be, is the best option, the kinds of insolvency processes readily available, and the connected lawful obligations and effects.

Furthermore, individuals can seek assistance from a bankruptcy lawyer to guide them through the legal procedures. It is highly recommended that consumer debtors seek advice from both a licensed insolvency trustee and a bankruptcy lawyer in certain circumstances. Some typical scenarios that warrant additional counsel from a bankruptcy lawyer well-versed in insolvency law include:

  1. They are involved in complex family law proceedings.
  2. There are one or more legal actions against you that allege unlawful behaviour, such as fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation or the conversion of someone else’s property, such as funds held in trust.
  3. The bankrupt’s application for discharge from bankruptcy is being opposed and therefore there will be a court hearing.
  4. Their financial situation is intertwined with other issues where confidential consultation with legal advice is required and that advice must be protected by solicitor-client privilege.
  5. There are special asset considerations where a privileged discussion with a bankruptcy lawyer is essential before seeking advice and assistance from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee.

In corporate insolvency situations, we always recommend that the Directors obtain legal advice from a bankruptcy lawyer in addition to the corporation obtaining legal assistance.

A bankruptcy lawyer can provide customized guidance in such touchy situations as well as representation to guarantee the most effective feasible outcome for their clients.

bankruptcy lawyer
bankruptcy lawyer

Can I file for bankruptcy without a bankruptcy lawyer in Canada?

While it is possible to declare bankruptcy without a bankruptcy lawyer in Canada, it is recommended to seek legal counsel for complex corporate and personal filings. Hiring a bankruptcy attorney supplies several advantages, including knowledge of insolvency legislation, assistance in more complex proceedings and guidance on unusual issues, specific unique creditor issues or claims and personal liability under any personal guarantees.

In addition, a bankruptcy lawyer can represent you in court proceedings such as with litigants who have obtained approval of the court to continue litigation against the debtor and on a personal bankruptcy discharge hearing. This will guarantee that your legal rights are safeguarded throughout the process. Therefore, in these kinds of consumer and corporate insolvency matters, it is smart to talk to a qualified bankruptcy lawyer to ensure a smoother and much more successful bankruptcy process in Canada.

Determining the necessity of enlisting the services of both a bankruptcy lawyer and a Licensed Insolvency Trustee: Is a bankruptcy lawyer required to initiate bankruptcy proceedings in Canada?

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada can be a complex as well as stressful process, however, as defined above, it is feasible to do it without the help of a bankruptcy lawyer. A bankruptcy lawyer cannot launch the bankruptcy process in Canada. In Canada, bankruptcy, as well as any other insolvency process, is launched and administered by Licensed Insolvency Trustees that are qualified and also supervised by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). So when someone files for bankruptcy, it is done with a trustee in bankruptcy (this is the old name for a Licensed Insolvency Trustee).

Trustees are accountable for overseeing and handling the Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency procedures, including the liquidation of assets and the distribution of proceeds to creditors for unsecured debts. They additionally offer debtors financial counselling, therapy and support on how to handle their financial resources in the future. To end up being a Trustee, people need to satisfy particular educational and professional requirements, consisting of completing specialized training, courses and examinations. Thus, Canadians can trust that their insolvency, as well as personal bankruptcy procedures, are being managed by qualified and also experienced professionals.

Regardless of the guidance and aid regarding your financial affairs from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee before and also after the initiation of a financial restructuring or personal bankruptcy process, a Licensed Insolvency Trustee practically acts on behalf of the unsecured creditors. So, for circumstances like those described above, if any debtor has an extra complicated scenario, is associated with sticky scenarios or is concerned about the director or personal responsibility as a result of a business restructuring or bankruptcy, then the recommendations of a bankruptcy lawyer should be acquired before entering into any insolvency procedure.

bankruptcy lawyer
bankruptcy lawyer

Bankruptcy lawyer and a Licensed Insolvency Trustee: Determining the necessity of enlisting the services of both a bankruptcy lawyer and a Licensed Insolvency Trustee

There arise certain junctures where the imperative of engaging a proficient bankruptcy lawyer to adroitly navigate the intricate labyrinth of the Canadian bankruptcy process becomes unequivocal. As expounded upon earlier, should your fiscal panorama manifest intricacies reminiscent of a Byzantine tapestry, replete with an entanglement of debts and creditors, the tutelage and expertise proffered by a bankruptcy lawyer morph into an invaluable compass.

The determination of the exigency to enlist the services not only of a bankruptcy lawyer but also of a bankruptcy trustee constitutes a pivotal crossroads for both individuals and enterprises ensnared in the throes of financial quandaries. While a bankruptcy lawyer adroitly dispenses legal counsel and advocates in the corridors of justice, a bankruptcy trustee’s role expands to encompass the labyrinthine realm of debt reorganization, proposal filings, and the art of debt alchemy. Their convergence encapsulates a holistic stratagem in the pursuit of resolving the monetary labyrinth.

Grasping the complexity inherent in bankruptcy law is tantamount, and a seasoned bankruptcy lawyer deftly steers through the legal firmament, charting a course that aligns with the best nexus of legal tenets. Conversely, a Licensed Insolvency Trustee proffers a detached analysis of the financial constellation, endowing clients with an array of options extending beyond the binary realm of bankruptcy and answering any questions about bankruptcy you may have.

At its essence, the verdict to summon forth both the prowess of a bankruptcy lawyer and the sagacity of a Trustee should hinge upon the unique tapestry woven by individual circumstances and the crystalline aspirations of the client. Ultimately, it comes down to the complexity and sensitivity of the person’s or company’s overall situation.

How to find a qualified bankruptcy lawyer or Licensed Insolvency Trustee in Ontario

When confronted with financial troubles in Canada, it’s important to make informed choices. If you’re thinking about bankruptcy, it’s smart to seek guidance from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. These professionals can assist you through the intricate procedure and also give important understanding.

For those with especially complicated financial circumstances, or who is a corporate director of an insolvency company, it might be essential to employ the help of a seasoned bankruptcy lawyer.

Starting your search for trustworthy professionals can be frustrating. Nonetheless, a calculated strategy can aid. Begin by discovering the Law Society of Ontario’s website, where you’ll discover a comprehensive list of competent legal experts that concentrate on bankruptcy and insolvency.

To locate a bankruptcy trustee near you, explore the computerized database of the OSB. This will certainly give a list of bankruptcy trustees in your locale to seek insight, advice and assistance. For both a bankruptcy lawyer as well as a Trustee, it is essential to engage in a comprehensive conversation with any prospective advisor, delving into their specialist background, navigational technique, and cost structure.

Efficiency is not the only aspect to think about; reliability and also the personal vibe you get from that person to see if you make a connection are likewise essential elements that need to inform your decision. By locating an ally who can give adept support throughout this challenging period, you can navigate this hard juncture with greater ease as well as confidence.

Finally, check out Google and other online reviews. There is nothing better than reviews from people who were in your shoes before and sought assistance from a Licensed Trustee, bankruptcy lawyer or both. Their experience and insight into specific professionals will help you immensely. Things to look for include:

  1. What service did they perform for the person?
  2. Does the reviewer live in your general area?
  3. Did the professional do a good job?
  4. What were some of the reviewer’s favourite things in working with that professional?
  5. Did they work with any specific people in the firm that they highly recommend?
  6. How did the Licensed Insolvency Trustee or bankruptcy lawyer they chose to compare to others they may have consulted with?
  7. Are there any tips the reviewer offers to others?

Bankruptcy lawyer: Conclusion

Looking for legal advice when considering bankruptcy is not needed in every scenario. However, it is necessary when it concerns complicated plans. Hiring a qualified bankruptcy lawyer can provide countless benefits. They have the proficiency as well as knowledge to advise you before embarking on a bankruptcy process and afterwards to assist you with the whole procedure.

When considering filing an assignment in bankruptcy in Canada, it is crucial to comprehend the complexities of the process and also the potential effects. While it may be possible to navigate through it without an insolvency lawyer, talking to one will supply the specialist expertise necessary to guarantee a smooth and efficient process when you have complex or unique issues in your situation.

From evaluating your financial situation to exploring alternatives such as a restructuring proposal, a bankruptcy lawyer can direct you through the legal puzzle and also suggest the most ideal strategy. When it concerns matters as substantial as bankruptcy, seeking expert help is a sensible choice to secure your best interests and also secure a fresh financial start.

I hope you enjoyed this bankruptcy lawyer Brandon’s Blog. Problems with making ends meet are a growing concern in Canada, affecting individuals of all ages and income levels.

Creating a solid financial plan can be the key to unlocking a brighter and more prosperous future. By taking control of your finances, you can prioritize your expenses, set clear financial goals, and build a strong foundation for your dreams to come true. With the right mindset and approach, financial planning can empower you to regain control, eliminate this issue as a source of stress in your life and find peace of mind.

Individuals must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses with debt problems that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these financial health concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own and it does not mean that you are a bad person. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

bankruptcy lawyer
bankruptcy lawyer

 

 

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BIA: 2 PEOPLE’S CHALLENGE SUING A CANADIAN LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE

bia

<h2>

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA): Introduction

On April 13, 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) dismissed the application by the legal counsel of a former bankrupt and his wife for leave to appeal the costs awarded against them in a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. As is the usual case, the SCC did not give any reasons for the dismissal. The Court of Appeal for Ontario’s decision dealt with what is required under section 215 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) to sue a licensed insolvency trustee.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I provide a comprehensive guide to the Court of Appeal for Ontario decision and everything you need to know about section 215 of the BIA. Using this real court decision as an example, we’ll explore the ins and outs of Section 215 of the BIA to give you a clear understanding of its purpose, how it applies, and the potential consequences of non-compliance.

Overview of BIA Section 215

Section 215 of the BIA requires that permission of the court be obtained to bring an action against the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada, an official receiver, an interim receiver or a licensed insolvency trustee with respect to any report made under, or any action taken, under the BIA.

The purpose of this section is to ensure that the court must first decide if a proposed action has on its surface a legitimate purpose relating to the administration of insolvency matters in Canada and to avoid frivolous actions that have no chance of success.

Regular readers of Brandon’s Blog know that I have been following and writing about the case of the former bankrupt, Mr. Wayne Flight and his wife, Amber Nicole Flight. In my November 2021 blog titled: TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY: CERTAIN ACTIONS AGAINST TRUSTEE CAN BE UNLEASHED WITHOUT FIRST REQUIRING COURT PERMISSION, I detailed a decision of the Ontario court where the motion judge decided that notwithstanding section 215 of the BIA, the Flights did not need to first obtain authorization from the Court in order to initiate their legal proceeding.

Then in July 2022, I wrote that the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) had appealed this lower court decision and gave an overview of the appeal and other related issues in my blog titled: INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE: TURNS OUT CERTAIN ACTIONS AGAINST THE TRUSTEE CANNOT BE UNLEASHED WITHOUT COURT PERMISSION.

As stated above, this Brandon’s Blog will provide a comprehensive guide to the Court of Appeal for Ontario decision and everything you need to know about section 215 of the BIA.bia

BIA: The Motion Judge’s Decision

The motion judge decided that the Flights did not require the permission of the court, under s. 215 of the BIA, to bring an action against the Trustee, relating to the administration of four bankruptcies of Brian Wayne Flight! The same corporate trustee was the Trustee in each of his bankruptcy proceedings. The lower court judge rendered a decision that negates the applicability of the clause in dispute, deeming the action to be levied against the individual Trustee in a personal capacity, and further alleging omissions as a mitigating factor. She did not assess whether section 215 of the BIA did apply and if it did, should permission to proceed with the action be granted.

Upon due consideration of the arguments presented, the Court of Appeal for Ontario has granted the Trustee in Bankruptcy leave to appeal and has subsequently set aside the order of the motion judge. In rendering its decision, the appellate court has determined that pursuant to section 215 of the BIA, permission to bring the civil action must be obtained and has thus directed the matter back to the bankruptcy court to assess whether such permission should be granted.

It is noteworthy that, despite the Flights’ appeal of this ruling to the SCC, said appeal has been dismissed. Consequently, the matter will now be remanded to the bankruptcy court for further deliberations.

The BIA case background

Mr. Flight filed for bankruptcy on four separate occasions – specifically in the years 2004, 2006, 2011, and 2016. The same corporate trustee was the Trustee in respect of each of these bankruptcies. The same individual licensed insolvency trustee was the individual at the corporate trustee with carriage of Mr. Flight’s bankruptcies.

The total of the proven claims in the first three bankruptcies was $324,800. The total amount distributed to creditors of those bankruptcies was about $3,200. Proven claims in the fourth bankruptcy were $127,870.

In the year 2018, amidst his fourth bankruptcy, Mr. Flight uncovered the fact that substantial amounts had been unlawfully appropriated from his business operations between 2003 and 2018. The perpetrator of this offence was none other than Julie LeBlanc, his former spouse, his bookkeeper, and authorized agent. Ultimately, Mr. Flight determined that the amount of the misappropriations was approximately $206,000.

Mr. Flight successfully retrieved a sum of approximately $30,300 from Ms. LeBlanc, however, it was not submitted to the Trustee. Subsequently, in April 2018, Mr. Flight lodged a complaint with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy regarding the Trustee’s inability to identify Ms. LeBlanc’s actions. Following the formal complaint, the Trustee was made aware of Ms. LeBlanc’s illicit activities and the funds secured by Mr. Flight.

Disputes then arose between the Trustee and Mr.Flight concerning whether and on what terms he would be discharged from bankruptcy and how the payments from Ms. LeBlanc should be treated. In August 2019, Mr. Flight was granted a conditional discharge on terms that, if complied with, allowed him to receive an absolute discharge after twelve months. The Trustee and Mr. Flight did not agree as to whether those conditions were met.

In September 2019, Mr. Flight and his current spouse, Amber Nicole Flight, commenced an action against the individual licensed trustee, seeking relief (the “Action”). The Action does not name, or refer to, the corporate trustee, but it treats the individual trustee as though he were the Trustee. The central allegation in the Action is that the individual trustee, as the“Licensed Insolvency Trustee” for each of the bankruptcies, ought to have detected Ms. LeBlanc’s misappropriations and, once told about them, ought to have taken steps including suing Ms. LeBlanc.

As Mr. Flight states in his affidavit:

“At the heart of this action is the Trustee’s failure to detect, prevent, and once he became aware of it, to litigate, the theft and fraud committed by my former Accountant, Bookkeeper, and Power of Attorney, JulieLeBlanc”.bia

Did the undischarged bankrupt have the right to launch the Action under the BIA?

Both the individual trustee and the corporate trustee objected to the Action on the basis that at the time of its commencement, (i) Mr. Flight was an undischarged bankrupt person, and (ii) no permission was obtained under s. 215 of the BIA to bring the Action.

Mr. Flight brought a motion, in his bankruptcy proceeding, seeking directions with respect to whether he had the right to commence the Action as an undischarged bankrupt and, if required, seeking leave to do so under section 215 of the BIA.

In September 2020, and before the motion for directions was heard, Mr. Flight launched but did not proceed with, a motion for an absolute discharge. In October 2020, working with a different insolvency professional, he filed a consumer proposal under the BIA. It was accepted by Mr. Flight’s sole significant creditor in February 2021. The acceptance of the consumer proposal resulted in his bankruptcy being deemed annulled.

Following acceptance of the consumer proposal the motion judge heard the motion for directions with respect to the Action.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario’s analysis

The motion judge, sitting in the bankruptcy court, determined that permission was not required under section 215 of the BIA to commence the Action. She expressly did not determine whether, if permission were required, should it be granted. She did not address whether Mr. Flight’s status as an undischarged bankrupt at the time the Action was started prevented him from bringing it.

The motion judge described the Action as one seeking “a declaration that the defendant engaged in misfeasance, negligence, fraud and breach of fiduciary duty in his personal capacity and that the defendant was unjustly enriched.” She described the claims in the Action as alleging a theft (by Ms. LeBlanc) that caused Mr. Flight’s repeated bankruptcies, and as alleging that the individual trustee was liable since the“defendant trustee ought to have detected this fraud in the administration of the four bankruptcies”.

The motion judge described the Action as claiming damages flowing from the individual trustee’s alleged failure to: “take any meaningful action to address the alleged fraud and its impact on the fourth bankruptcy after its discovery”; “diligently commence an action against the former bookkeeper”; “investigate the fraud”; “adjust the plaintiff’s surplus income”; “recommend a consumer proposal in alternative to bankruptcy”; and “have the plaintiff promptly discharged from his fourth bankruptcy”.

The motion judge gave two reasons for finding that the Action did not require permission under section 215 of the BIA. According to her perspective, seeking recourse against trustees in their individual capacity does not necessitate prior authorization. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the pursuit of legal recourse pertaining to omissions does not necessitate getting prior authorization.bia

The Court of Appeal for Ontario’s decision

The Court of Appeal for Ontario found that the motion judge erred in concluding that the capacity in which the Trustee was sued made section 215 of the BIA inapplicable. An action does not fall outside of section 215 of the BIA because it names an individual rather than the corporate trustee as the defendant, where the action alleges that the individual owed the duties of a Trustee and is liable as if he were the Trustee. Nor does an action fall outside of section 215 of the BIA because the claim asserts that it is brought against the Trustee in a personal capacity, where the gist of the claim is wrongdoing in the performance of the Trustee’s role.

The appellate court stated that the motion judge also erred in holding that an action that makes any allegation of an omission falls outside of section 215 of the BIA. Although section 215 does not apply to an action premised on the failure of a Trustee to do an act specifically and expressly mandated by the BIA, that is not the core allegation in the Flight’s claim. Section 215 applies to the Action, which alleges common law wrongdoing in the performance of the Trustee’s role, even if an aspect of that wrongdoing is described as an omission to act.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario granted the Trustee’s leave to appeal, allowed the appeal, and returned the matter to the bankruptcy court to determine whether the Flights should be granted permission to sue the individual trustee. The individual and corporate trustees were entitled to the costs of the appeal, fixed in the amount of $13,000, inclusive of disbursements and applicable taxes. Now that the SCC appeal is dismissed, the lower court will have to decide the real issues as determined by the Court of Appeal for Ontario

BIA: Conclusion

I hope you enjoyed this section 215 BIA Brandon’s Blog.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are also now worried about the economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy proceedings. We can get you debt relief now.

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.bia

 

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RECEIVERSHIP IN CANADA: THE COMPLETE STORY OF WHOSE HAPPY RECEIVER IS IT ANYWAY?

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

Receivership in Canada: What does receivership mean?

I have just read a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commerical List dealing with an important aspect of receivership in Canada. The case is concerned with what happens when two equally applicable provincial laws appear to be working at cross purposes in the context of the receivership in Canada process.

I will explain the case and the process of company receivership in Canada. By understanding the process, the case will make more sense.

Secured lenders may enforce their security to recover loans from borrowers who have defaulted. This remedy available to secured creditors when a borrower, usually a company defaults, is known as receivership.

What does going into receivership in Canada mean?

A receivership is a legal process available to secured creditors, whereby a company’s affairs, business and property are entrusted to a receiver to manage and eventually sell the assets. Secured lenders may enforce their security to recover loans from borrowers who have defaulted. This remedy available to secured creditors is known as receivership.

If a business debtor does not make payments or otherwise defaults on a secured loan, the secured creditor would have the right to appoint a receiver to collect the money owed. Before appointing a receiver, a secured creditor must first issue a “Section 244” notice of intention to enforce security. This is a notification that secured creditors must send to defaulting debtors before appointing a receiver. Section 244 refers to that section number in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

The notice states that the security covers certain assets, that the company in default owes a specified amount to the secured creditor, and that the creditor may enforce the security after 10 days. The company in default may waive the notice period and consent to the appointment of the receiver.

Under the BIA, only a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) can be a receiver. No other party is licensed to administer a receivership in Canada.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

Receivership in Canada: What is the difference between a court-appointed receiver and a privately appointed receiver?

A privately-appointed receiver is a licensed trustee who is appointed by a contract between the insolvency trustee and the secured creditor. A private receiver is typically used when there is no dispute to ranking among secured creditors or various claims to ownership of the company’s assets. The powers of a receiver listed in the security document give the privately appointed receiver more limited powers than a court-appointed receiver gets under a court order.

A receiver is court-appointed when the secured creditor makes an application to the court for the appointment of a receiver with more expanded powers. Like a privately-appointed receiver, a court-appointed receiver takes control of a company’s property because of financial distress and when there is a dispute among secured creditors and others as to the ranking of secured claims and ownership of property.

Both kinds of receivers are tasked with protecting and preserving the value of the company or property and are certainly given broader powers by the court to do so.

How is receivership in Canada different from bankruptcy proceedings?

Many people mistakenly use the terms “receivership” and “bankruptcy” interchangeably. However, bankruptcy and receivership are two distinct legal proceedings with different implications.

Bankruptcy vs. receivership can be confusing, but once you understand the key differences between the two, it is fairly straightforward. Whether it is a private appointment or a court-appointed receiver, the differences between bankruptcy and receivership in Canada are the same.

A receivership is a legal remedy available to secured creditors to enforce their security rights against a defaulting debtor. A receiver is appointed to manage the debtor’s property and assets and sell them under a properly run and fair sales process.

The Canadian bankruptcy process is a distinct legal process. An insolvency trustee does not represent secured creditors in bankruptcy proceedings. Instead, under the bankruptcy regime, they represent the unsecured creditors of the bankrupt estate. A corporate debtor may be subject to both bankruptcy and receivership proceedings simultaneously.

One of the major differences has to do with the creditors. In a bankruptcy administration, the bankruptcy trustee must call a meeting of creditors. This is where the insolvency trustee provides its report on the affairs and conduct of the bankrupt debtor and unsecured creditors get to vote on any matters of importance. In receivership, there is no such requirement to hold a meeting of creditors.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

What are the key distinctions between receivership in Canada and liquidation?

So you know what receivership is by now. The federal BIA doesn’t govern liquidation, that’s done under the provincial Business Corporations Act or Wind-Up Act.

A liquidation is for a solvent company where the shareholders, Officers and directors decide to cease business operations. The company puts up its assets for sale and uses the proceeds to pay off its creditors with cash. Any funds left over are then distributed to the shareholders.

A liquidator can be appointed either privately by the company’s directors or by a court order. Liquidation is therefore different from both bankruptcy and receivership in Canada.

Can individuals be placed into receivership in Canada?

The answer is yes. When a secured creditor wishes to take enforcement action upon the security agreement they have against a debtor’s property, as indicated above, they have the remedy of receivership in Canada. This remedy allows them to collect as much of their secured debt as possible.

There are no restrictions as to who can go into receivership in Canada. One of our more famous (infamous?) receivership cases over the years has been the receivership of the assets, property and undertaking of Norma and Ronauld Walton.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

Receivership in Canada: Whose receiver is it anyway?

Now for the court case where two different provincial laws caused a fight amongst secured creditors over the appointment of a receiver. The case is Canadian Equipment Finance and Leasing Inc. v. The Hypoint Company Limited, 2618905 Ontario Limited, 2618909 Ontario Limited, Beverley Rockliffe and Chantal Bock, 2022 ONSC 6186. The two competing provincial statutes are the Mortgages Act and the Personal Property Security Act.

The business is conducted through two affiliated entities. One owns the property and the other operates the business. This is quite a typical arrangement.

One creditor funded the purchase of equipment and took PPSA security over it. Another creditor funded the acquisition of the real property and has a traditional mortgage security. The security agreements extend over different assets, and the outcome is usually uncomplicated.

However, when equipment that has been purchased is attached to real property, there is disagreement about whether and how it can be removed, and whether such removal will negatively affect the value of both the equipment and the real property. The question is now more complicated: which creditor’s rights should take priority over this matter?

Both the equipment lender and the mortgagee are seeking to enforce their security. The equipment lender has filed a motion with the court to appoint a receiver over both the operating company (Opco) that owns the pledged equipment and the holding company (Holdco) that owns the real estate. This would allow the receiver to manage and sell the assets of both companies in order to repay the outstanding debt.

In this case, Opco was a commercial marijuana operation that was unable to get off the ground due to its heavy debt load and startup problems.

Although the mortgagee began power of sale enforcement proceedings, they do not object to a receiver being appointed over the equipment only. The mortgagee wishes to continue its power of sale proceedings and opposes the receiver being appointed over the building. The mortgagee in possession is of the opinion that the equipment is attached to the building and cannot be removed.

The mortgagee concurred that the court has the power to assign a receiver over the property of both Opco and Holdco according to section 101 of the Ontario Courts of Justice Act. They stated that, if a receiver is appointed, the receiver needs to be a firm chosen by them.

Both the licensed insolvency trustee firm preferred by the mortgagee and the firm nominated by the equipment lender filed a consent to act with the court.

What are the conditions under which a receiver may be appointed?

The court looked at numerous factors in order to make a decision on whether or not to appoint a receiver, and if so, which one, including those that have historically in receivership in Canada cases been taken into account in such determinations:

  1. Although it is not essential for a creditor to establish irreparable harm if a receiver is not appointed where the appointment is authorized by the security documentation, the court considered if no order is made, will irreparable harm be caused?
  2. The size of the debtor company’s equity in the assets and the need for protection or safeguarding of assets during litigation are important factors to consider when assessing the risk to the security holder.
  3. The kind of property it is.
  4. The potential for the assets to be wasted or dissipated.
  5. The need to safeguard the property until a legal ruling is made.
  6. The parties’ respective balance of convenience needs to be considered when making the decision.
  7. Pursuant to the loan documentation, the creditor has the right to an appointment.
  8. Enforcing the security instrument when the security holder experiences or anticipates difficulties with the debtor.
  9. The principle of appointing a receiver should be approached with caution.
  10. The court will determine whether appointing a receiver is necessary to enable the receiver to carry out its duties efficiently.
  11. The effect a receivership order will have on the parties.
  12. The parties’ conduct.
  13. How long a receivership may last.
  14. The financial impact on the parties.
  15. The likelihood of maximizing return to the parties is increased.
  16. The goal of ensuring the smooth running of the receiver’s duties.

As everyone agreed that all assets of both Opco and Holdco should be sold to maximize recovery for all creditors, but cannot agree on the process by which that should be undertaken, resulting in the entire process being stalled, the judge was satisfied that it is just and convenient to appoint a receiver.

The court found that either proposed receiver was acceptable and decided that the receiver nominated by the mortgagee would be appointed by the court to administer all assets. The receiver would eventually come back to court with a sales plan to maximize the value of all the assets subject to the security of all stakeholders.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

How the entrepreneur can avoid receivership in Canada

As a business owner, the way to avoid the receivership process is long before financial difficulties ever become serious financial problems. Here are a few tips on how to do just that:

  • Keep a close eye on your finances. This means regularly reviewing your income and expenses, and making sure you have a good handle on your cash flow.
  • Stay current on your bills. This includes not only making timely payments but also staying on top of any changes in your billing terms or amounts.
  • Keep good records. This means having up-to-date financial statements and documentation for all of your income and expenses.
  • Make a plan. If you do find yourself in a financial bind, have a plan in place for how you’ll get out of it. This may include negotiating with creditors, seeking new financing, or making cuts to your expenses.
  • Seek professional help from a licensed insolvency trustee with commercial insolvency experience. If your business is viable and you seek help early enough, there may be many options. The most common ones are refinancing with or without financial restructuring. Reviewing your business allows us to make restructuring recommendations allowing your viable company to become healthy and profitable once again.

Receivership in Canada summary & speak with a licensed insolvency trustee

I hope you enjoyed this receivership in Canada Brandon’s Blog.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are now worried about its economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

 

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE FEES: WHAT UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE IS NEEDED FOR COURT APPROVAL OF INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE FEES?

Licensed insolvency trustee fees: How is a licensed insolvency trustee paid?

Are your debts or your company’s debts and financial situation causing you so much stress that you are considering speaking to a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee or trustees in bankruptcy), but you are worried about the licensed insolvency trustee fees? Are you concerned about the professional fees to be paid because you think that businesses with debt problems already cannot afford to hire professionals? Your concerns are valid and relevant but you should not let that stop you from your initial inquiry. An insolvency trustee will always provide you with a no-cost initial consultation, discuss realistic options and explain the cost of each option to you.

Licensed insolvency trustee fees are set by bankruptcy laws and rules contained in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). They are reviewed by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy and must be approved by the bankruptcy court. Fees are either drawn from the funds accumulated in the insolvency file from the sale of assets in the receivership or bankruptcy administration or the monthly payment funding of the restructuring proposal. If there are insufficient assets in the insolvency file, then the insolvency trustee gets its fee from a third-party retainer.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I describe how licensed insolvency trustee fees are calculated. Then, I review a recent Ontario court decision to show what kind of evidence the Trustee needs to provide the court in order for its fees to be approved.

Licensed insolvency trustee fees: Disbursements included in a streamlined personal insolvency process

Licensed insolvency trustees offer a range of services for both individuals and businesses. For individuals, there are two streamlined insolvency processes:

  • summary administration personal bankruptcy; and
  • consumer proposals.

    licensed insolvency trustee fees
    licensed insolvency trustee fees

Licensed insolvency trustee fees in a summary administration personal bankruptcy

The summary administration personal bankruptcy process applies when the assets of the bankrupt person to be sold are expected to sell for $15,000 or less. Licensed insolvency trustee fees for a summary administration personal bankruptcy are set by a formula called a tariff.

In a summary administration bankruptcy, the fees that insolvency trustees are entitled to are calculated as follows:

  • 100 percent on the first $975 or less of receipts;
  • 35 percent on the portion of the receipts exceeding $975 but not exceeding $2,000;
  • 50% of receipts exceeding $2,000;
  • for counselling fees of $75 per session, totalling $150; and
  • an allowance for administrative disbursements of $100.

The reason the formula refers to receipts (of cash) rather than net proceeds from asset sales is that, in any personal bankruptcy, there are two types of cash receipts: 1. from the sale of assets; and 2. surplus income payments made by the bankrupt person, if any.

Licensed insolvency trustee fees: How much will it cost me to file a consumer proposal?

The calculation of the amount you need to offer your creditors in your consumer proposal has no relation to what the licensed insolvency trustee fees will be. Licensed insolvency trustee fees for a licensed trustee acting as the Administrator in the consumer proposal process is also governed by a tariff. It is calculated as follows:

  • $750 on the filing of the proposal with the official receiver;
  • $750 on the approval or deemed approval by the court;
  • 20% of moneys distributed payable on distribution; and
  • counselling fee of $75 for each counselling session for a total of $150.

In a consumer proposal, administrative disbursements are paid out of the above fee calculation.

In both summary administrations and consumer proposals where the licensed insolvency trustee fees are only the tariff, there is no need for court approval.

licensed insolvency trustee fees
licensed insolvency trustee fees

What factors influence licensed insolvency trustee fees in other administrations?

There are no streamlined provisions for any corporate insolvency administration. In addition to administering summary administration bankruptcies and consumer proposals, licensed insolvency trustees also can provide the following services:

  • business review of a company to identify its solvency and future prospects so that financial advice can be given
  • ordinary administration personal bankruptcy
  • commercial bankruptcy
  • personal Division I restructuring proposal to creditors (for consumers who cannot qualify for a consumer proposal)
  • corporate Division I restructuring proposal
  • private corporate receivership
  • court-appointed corporate receivership
  • winding-up corporate liquidation, either voluntary or court-supervised
  • corporate restructuring under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

In all of the above government-regulated insolvency proceedings/insolvency procedures, there are only two factors that influence the licensed insolvency trustee fees. They are:

  1. Hours spent by the level of staff working.
  2. The professional hourly rate of the staff.

Licensed insolvency trustee fees: How does an insolvency practitioner receive compensation?

In all of the non-streamlined insolvency processes, I just described, how the licensed trustee gets the fees it is charging requires approval. In private appointments, the licensed trustee needs the approval of the client. In a court appointment or administration for bankruptcy services or any other mandate under the BIA, the licensed trustee needs court approval.

What evidence do licensed insolvency trustees need to provide to prove the time that was spent doing the work? The documentation expected of a licensed trustee is the same that is expected from an insolvency lawyer or any other kind of lawyer. What is expected are detailed time dockets, so that everyone can see who spent what time, on what day on what activity.

But what if proper dockets are not kept? Well, that is exactly what the court case I want to describe to you is all about.

licensed insolvency trustee fees
licensed insolvency trustee fees

Licensed insolvency trustee fees: How do practitioners of insolvency get compensated – it takes a Final Statement of Receipts and Disbursements

I am writing this Brandon’s Blog to be informative, not to embarrass anyone. So I will not be providing the case reference of the case I am now going to describe. This is actually the second such case in Ontario that I am aware of in the last 12 months.

The case deals with a bankruptcy trustee who submitted its final statement of receipts and disbursements (SRD) to the court for approval. Contained in this final statement is amongst other things, the line item for the fee and disbursements the Trustee is seeking court approval for. The court expects to see a sworn affidavit from someone on the insolvency trustee’s staff who has knowledge of the time spent and the fee charged outlining what was done and why it was necessary. The court also expects to see detailed time dockets.

In this case, and the very similar one that came before it, the insolvency trustee’s material did not include detailed time dockets. Both Trustees applied for taxation of their SRD in an individual debtor’s Division I Proposal. In both cases, the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy issued clean letters of comment. The primary issue raised on this taxation is whether the insolvency trustee’s fees are to be approved. In the ordinary course, the debtor and the creditors have not been given notice of the taxation but it would appear that there is unlikely to be any objection.

The taxation raises the question of how the Trustee is supposed to establish its entitlement to fees when there is no time dockets kept or otherwise available to support the trustee’s claim. In this case (and the one before it), the Trustee is relying solely on the terms of the proposal. The proposal contains the methodology for calculating the fees to be taken by the Trustee in administering the proposal. The Trustee is relying on the fact that a Proposal is a contract between the debtor and its creditors, the court has already approved the Proposal and the Proposal includes the Trustee’s remuneration.

Licensed insolvency trustee fees: Bankruptcy trustees – why not keep accurate time records?

The Trustee requested fees (plus HST) based on the formula set out in the debtor’s proposal. While the Trustee provided an affidavit in support of its taxation, the Trustee did not provide any evidence of actual time spent at each staff level. The taxation came before the Associate Justice on September 1, 2021. She adjourned the taxation and requested time dockets.

The Trustee filed a report in response to the September 1, 2021 endorsement and request for time dockets, supporting the taxation and approval of the fees claimed, but no time dockets were included. In its report, the Trustee noted that it did not keep formal, detailed time records, as the terms of the Trustee’s fees and expenses are set forth in the Proposal as a “fixed fee” formula. This fee formula was accepted by creditors and approved by the Court. Therefore, the Trustee is relying upon that in not keeping time dockets.

The Trustee advised that its rationale for the development of a fixed fee formula to be charged by the Trustee, and for its decision to eliminate time docketing in such Division I proposals containing a formula for fixing a fee, were as follows:

  1. The fixed fee formula was designed by the Trustee to provide more certainty about the costs of administration for the Division I proposal. This formula also takes into account contingencies such as the time needed to negotiate the terms of the proposal and to verify the debtor’s financial information.
  2. The fixed fee formula was designed to make billing and accounting more efficient by eliminating the need to track chargeable time.
  3. The fixed fee formula was based on the consumer proposal tariff, to a certain extent.
  4. The fixed fee formula’s structure helped the Trustee keep initial costs low, so creditors could start getting dividends from the debtor’s monthly payments sooner.
  5. The fixed fee formula was designed to minimize unexpected increases in costs of administration and a resulting decrease in dividends.
  6. Not once has a creditor balked at the Trustee’s fixed fee.
  7. The court approved the proposal with the fixed fee formula, so the Trustee did not keep time dockets.
  8. There are many proposals whose administration is underway or completed that the Trustee has relied upon the fixed fee formula, and therefore has not maintained time dockets.
  9. The trustee’s fees, as claimed under the fixed fee formula, have not been objected to by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada.

    licensed insolvency trustee fees
    licensed insolvency trustee fees

Licensed insolvency trustee fees: The court’s analysis and decision

The BIA provides for the determination of a Trustee’s remuneration in section 39. The Associate Justice said that s. 39(5) of the BIA provides the jurisdiction to increase or reduce the remuneration claimed by a Trustee. Further, the court was not a “rubber stamp” obliged to approve the fees claimed by the Trustee merely because they were in the Proposal. The court noted that it is common for Trustees to request remuneration based on the time spent and hourly rates charged. The burden is on the Trustee to convince the court that the amount claimed for remuneration is warranted.

The Associate Justice listed the following principles that must be considered when it comes to taxation:

  • Trustees should be given proper compensation for their services.
  • Prevent unjustifiable payments for Trustee fees that harm the insolvent estate and its unsecured creditors.
  • The efficient and conscientious administration of an estate for the benefit of creditors and, to the extent that the public is concerned, in the interests of the proper carrying-out of the objectives of the BIA, should be encouraged.

This Associate Justice also dealt with the previous case I mentioned above, which involved the taxation of a statement of receipts and disbursements in a Division I proposal where no time dockets were kept. In that case, she held that the lack of time dockets was not fatal to the approval of fees. She said the court is in a difficult position when there is no corroborative evidence as to the time and effort spent in the administration of the proposal.

So due to the lack of evidence justifying the time spent by the various staff members of the Trustee firm at their normal hourly rates, the Associate Justice was forced to look at the entirety of the Trustee’s administration. She found issues with it and therefore concluded that the Trustee was not entitled to the full fee being requested, based on the formula contained in the Division I Proposal. The Associate Justice determined, with the benefit of hindsight as to how the Division I Proposal turned out, that the debtor could have filed a consumer proposal and the creditors would have then been better off with a higher dividend distribution.

The Associate Justice ruled that, in this case, fees and disbursements will be set on a consumer proposal tariff basis. The proposal fund totalled $31,500. Using the formula for a consumer proposal, the Trustee was therefore entitled to fee and disbursements of $7,620 (plus HST) and not the $9,973.46 fee and $14,252.01 of disbursements (plus HST) formula amount.

The Associate Justice was also very critical of the Trustee’s administration and she had strong words overall for Trustees coming to court without proper evidence of the time spent when requesting approval for fees and disbursements at taxation. Her warning was that she did not accept the Trustee’s submissions that:

  • The court’s jurisdiction over approving the SRD and the fees to be claimed by the Trustee is replaced by the approval of the creditors and the OSB. Creditor and OSB approval are not determinative when it comes to taxation, but their approval is still relevant.
  • The appropriateness of the Trustee’s fees is not considered in an application for court approval of a Division I proposal. The court is not prevented from taxing the Trustee’s fee and disbursements upon the taxation of the SRD.
  • Any benefits to having a set fee remove the court’s jurisdiction to approve the Trustee’s fees. If the Trustee decides to save time by not documenting their hours worked, they do so at their own risk. The responsibility is always on the Trustee to justify their fees.
  • Creditors who want to know how much the Trustee’s fee will be cannot override the Trustee’s responsibility to explain to the court why the fee is fair and reasonable.

The court directed the Trustee to redo its SRD on the basis decided by the court, resubmit it to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy for its comment letter and then resubmit the entire package to the court for the taxation order.

A tough day in court to be sure.

Licensed insolvency trustee fees: Call us for debt-free solutions

I hope you found this licensed insolvency trustee fees Brandon’s Blog interesting. Among the many problems that can arise from having too much debt, you may also find yourself in a situation where bankruptcy seems like a realistic option.

If you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and are concerned that bankruptcy may be your only option, call me. I can provide you with debt relief advice in setting up one of various possible debt management plans using debt relief options for you or your company.

You are not to blame for your current situation. You have only been taught the old ways of dealing with financial issues, which are no longer effective. We are debt professionals who know how to use the new innovative tools to solving debt problems while avoiding a bankruptcy filing.

We’re passionate about permanently solving your financial problems with you and getting you or your company out of debt. We offer innovative services and alternatives, and we’ll work with you to develop a personalized preparation for becoming debt-free which does not include bankruptcy. We are committed to helping everyone obtain the relief they need and are worthy of.

You are under a lot of pressure. We understand how uncomfortable you are. We will assess your entire situation and develop a new, custom approach that is tailored to you and your specific financial and emotional problems. We will take the burden off of your shoulders and clear away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We realize that people and businesses in financial difficulty need a workable solution. The Ira Smith Team knows that not everyone has to file for bankruptcy in Canada. Most of our clients never do, as we are familiar with alternatives to bankruptcy. We assist many people in finding the relief they need.

Call or email us. We can tailor a new debt restructuring procedure specifically for you, based on your unique economic situation and needs. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you’re serious about finding a solution and improving your financial future, let us know. Starting Over, Starting Now.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation to find out what your debt relief options are.

licensed insolvency trustee fees
licensed insolvency trustee fees
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RECEIVER APPOINTED BY COURT: 16 KEY INGREDIENTS TO ENSURE COURT APPROVAL OF A RECEIVER

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

A receiver appointed by court: What is a receiver in Canada?

In the event that a company has financial difficulties, a Receiver may be appointed to take over its assets and manage them until its assets can be sold. The receivers are third parties appointed to supervise the liquidation process and remit the proceeds in accordance with legal priorities. A judge appoints a court-appointed receiver, and a secured creditor appoints a privately appointed receiver under a simple appointment letter. In Canada, for a court-appointed receivership, a receiver appointed by court must be a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee).

In this Brandon Blog, I focus on the factors to be considered by the Court when determining an application for a receiver appointed by court.

receiver appointed by court
receiver appointed by court

The receiver appointed by court: What happens when a receiver is appointed?

The licensed trustee acting as receiver’s first duty is to take possession and control of the assets covered by the secured creditor’s security, or of all the assets identified in the court order in a court appointment. The receiver can decide if it can sell the assets for a higher price if it operates the business.

Senior management and the Board of Directors lose most of their decision-making authority when the company goes into receivership. Their advice and assistance are only needed if requested by the receiver.

The source of authority for the receiver appointed by court is appointed in Ontario under two statutes:

  • Section 101 of the provincial Ontario Courts of Justice Act; and
  • Section 243(1) of the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada).

The receiver appointed privately has a duty of care to only the appointing secured creditor. Court-appointed receivers are responsible to all creditors.

receiver appointed by court
receiver appointed by court

Receiver appointed by court: When can a court appoint a receiver?

Under Section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act (Ontario), the court considers whether the appointment “is just or convenient” under the circumstances. When deciding the origin of authority on whether or not to appoint a receiver as the court-appointed officer, the court must consider a variety of factors. Among them leading to the authority for decision making when there is an application for authorization for the appointment of a receiver are:

  1. in spite of not having to prove it, will there be irreparable harm if the court does not appoint a receiver?;
  2. the risk to a secured creditor and the equity the company owns in the assets, while litigation continues;
  3. types of assets that would be subject to possession with respect to the receiver’ acts in its appointment;
  4. it is necessary to balance the interests of the parties and to consider their rights;the preservation and protection of the property through the receivership proceeding pending judicial determination;
  5. under its security, the creditor has the right to appoint a receiver;
  6. when a creditor expects that the debtor will resist the enforcement of its security agreement;
  7. it is an extreme measure which should be authorized sparingly, but less so if the applicant is a secured creditor who has that right under its security document;
  8. in order to allow the receiver to perform its duties more effectively, a court appointment is necessary;
  9. effects of the receivership order on the various parties;
  10. actions taken by the parties and the litigation against properties;
  11. duration of the Court-Approved receivership;
  12. the costs incurred by each party;
  13. it is likely that the receiver appointed by the court will maximize the return to the parties when the assets are sold under a receivership asset purchase agreement with the purchaser of assets;
  14. facilitating the receiver’s duties and activities for its asset plan by a court order; and
  15. a secured creditor’s good faith, the commercial reasonableness of the proposed Court-Appointed receivership and any equity questions.

A decision will usually turn on whether it is necessary to incur the expense and formalities of naming the third party to exercise neutral, transparent, and accountable stewardship of the debtor’s assets, while interested parties argue about the merits of the dispute and the receiver, attempts to maximize the recovery under an asset purchase agreement.

The court will usually intervene if the parties’ dispute puts the business assets at risk or where realizing the debtor’s assets or indemnifying a private receiver could impair the secured creditor’s recovery options. Often, simple default on the secured debt will be sufficient to attract a receivership where the risk to the business is implicit in the nature of the business or the dispute between the creditor(s) and the debtor(s). However, as with all equitable remedies, context is everything and each case turns on its own facts.

receiver appointed by court
receiver appointed by court

A receiver appointed by court summary

I hope you found this receiver appointed by court Brandon Blog informative. Although nothing is guaranteed, managing your debt in a way that will allow you or your company in a way to be able to afford it, will lead to your financial success. It will also give you the best shot at having a financially stress-free life.

Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation or a crushing debt load and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you? Do you need to search out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a Government of Canada-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

receiver appointed by court
receiver appointed by court

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE FOR BANKRUPTCY SIMPLE STEPS ON HOW TO AVOID BANKRUPTCY AND SAVE YOUR BUSINESS

licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy on why businesses go bankrupt

In my last Brandon Blog, Business Bankruptcy In Canada: Discover The Causes Of Business Insolvency And Bankruptcy, I described the causes of business insolvency, the types of business entities normally found in Canada and tips on how to pull your business around back from insolvency.

Numerous businesses are battling to survive today, not to mention stay lucrative. They are scaling down or just closing their doors. They are accessing the available government support money for a business. Most entrepreneurs hesitate to seek the advice of a licensed insolvency trustee due to the fact that they are afraid all the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee or a trustee in bankruptcy) wants to do is be a trustee for bankruptcy.

In this Brandon blog post, I want to continue from the suggestions from my last blog, to show you exactly how that the last point I push for is to be a trustee for bankruptcy. I first look to reorganize your business. If your business or company remains in danger because of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, it will certainly be advantageous for you and also your organization to do so.

I will also show how sometimes, a trustee for bankruptcy or receivership, can actually help save parts of your business. The only other alternative could be to let all the business parts fail, which is the worst possible outcome.

The role of a debtor in bankruptcy or insolvency

Remember, I previously defined insolvency as a financial condition, where bankruptcy is a legal condition and a legal process. You will also recall that in my last Brandon Blog, I described the three common types of business structures in Canada; proprietorship, partnership and corporation. Just as these three business structures are different in form, they are also treated differently in insolvency vs bankruptcy. Here is how I differentiate the role of each debtor.

Proprietorship – Sole proprietorships are a type of business structure in which one individual is the sole owner of the business, which gives that person control over everything related to the business. This includes the business’ name, structure, accounting, legal obligations and tax responsibilities.

As I described last week, in Canada, the person, the sole proprietor, is carrying on business in their personal name, operating as the business name. You can register a sole proprietorship with the provincial government by completing an application form.

A sole proprietorship is the simplest kind of business structure. It permits an individual to sell goods or run a service with complete control of it on their own. Nonetheless, a sole proprietorship is not considered a separate legal entity from the owner. This means that any liabilities incurred by the business are also personal financial obligations of the owner.

So in an insolvency situation, all of the sole proprietor’s assets come into play as do all of his or her debts. It is not just the business assets and business liabilities. It is everything. This is the worst-case scenario for an entrepreneur.

So if the business is viable, and the personal assets and liabilities lead to the sole proprietor being in the situation where they can do a debt settlement plan, they can choose one of two options to restructure their entire personal financial situation. This assumes they cannot resolve their financial issues informally to bring their financial situation back to being solvent.

Partnership – A terrific way to begin a new business is teaming up with one or more people. All of you should enhance the group’s abilities as well as energy. Nonetheless, you also wish to be with people that are trustworthy, industrious and have a certain expertise that will help the business grow. Just like the way a proprietorship is one person, a partnership is made up of two or more people.

A partnership agreement is crucial. This is an agreement between the partners, describing the rights as well as obligations of each partner in the business. The same way a sole proprietor is personally responsible for the debts of the business and is putting all of their personal and business assets at risk, the same is true for partners in a business partnership. The partners are each liable for 100% of the business debts in case of insolvency. The partners cannot limit their liability to only their partnership share of the business.

Corporation – When you incorporate a business, it is a corporation. The company is a different legal entity from its owner shareholders. Shareholders are not responsible for the unpaid debts owed to financial institutions (normally a secured creditor), suppliers to the firm (normally an unsecured creditor) or the government. There are only two exceptions: (i) certain government liabilities that are a personal liability of a Director; and (ii) if the entrepreneur directly guarantees a financial debt of the company, such as a company loan, then that individual will have a liability with respect to such debt.

If the company’s financial future becomes bleak because it is insolvent, there are options. In my last blog, I talked about self-help remedies senior management of a company whose business is viable can try to informally bring the company back to a healthy financial state. You can re-read that blog to see the options available. If the self-help remedies do not work yet then we must look at more formal proceedings.

trustee for bankruptcy
licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy

Licensed InsolvencyTrustee for bankruptcy: Settle with creditors and debt collectors without bankruptcy

In a proprietorship or partnership, if the underlying business is viable, then there are a variety of options to try to turn the business around yourself. You would use the self-help methods I described in my last blog. If the self-help options do not work, there are debt settlement options available to the individual(s) under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). They would be the only government-sanctioned debt settlement plan available in Canada. Either a consumer proposal or a Division I Proposal. You can read about how each one works by clicking on the following links:

In a successfully completed debt settlement program, the bankruptcy trustee would not be a trustee for bankruptcy. Rather, the trustee in bankruptcy would be an Administrator under a consumer proposal or a Proposal Trustee in the Division I Proposal.

If the business is not viable or the circumstances are such that a debt settlement plan is not feasible, then personal bankruptcy would be the only other option. You can read about how personal bankruptcy works by looking at our top 20 bankruptcy FAQs section. Upon the bankruptcy of the person, the sole proprietorship is automatically terminated.

Since a partnership is a way of carrying on business personally, then the same insolvency options available to the partners to the business debtor are also available. A restructuring is always preferred over a bankruptcy when the partnership is in financial difficulty.

For a debt settlement insolvency filing, the licensed trustee is not a trustee for bankruptcy. That is the case only if there is an actual bankruptcy assignment. Under provincial law, if a partner goes bankrupt, the partnership is automatically dissolved.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: Ask creditors to help you avoid bankruptcy of the corporation

Without wanting to sound like a broken record, you can review my prior blog to go over the self-help remedies for turning a business around, even if it is a corporation. A self-help remedy is always a great alternative to bankruptcy. If that isn’t appropriate, or just plain does not work, then you must get in touch with an insolvency trustee.

Again, if the company’s business is viable, then there are financial restructuring alternatives. these alternatives will be within a government-regulated insolvency proceeding. There are two formal restructuring statutes in Canada:

In both cases, a company should retain the services of both a licensed trustee for bankrutpcy and a bankruptcy lawyer. The lawyer acts as legal counsel to the company. The licensed trustee will be both a financial advisor and steer the company through the restructuring process. The CCAA option is for companies with $5 million or more of debt. A BIA Proposal is for a company with any amount of debt. The main difference between the two processes are:

  • In a failed BIA Proposal, the debtor is immediately deemed to have filed an assignment in bankruptcy. This is not the case in a failed CCAA Plan of Arrangement.
  • A CCAA proceeding is more costly as there are many more court appearances in that forum than in a BIA restructuring.

Using one of these two statutes to gain what is called in the media “bankruptcy protection” in order to work out a successful restructuring with your unsecured creditors is always preferable. The company will pay less than it owes while keeping its viable but insolvent business alive. Don’t underestimate the power of preserving jobs in the eyes of a court. A bankruptcy trustee can be very helpful in obtaining great results.

trustee for bankruptcy
licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: When to consider an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors

If the business is not viable and is insolvent, then the only thing left to consider is an assignment in bankruptcy filing. It is definitely a last resort if everything I have already spoken about in this Brandon Blog just won’t work and you have run out of options. Trustees in bankruptcy always consider the alternatives to bankruptcy, but sometimes filing bankruptcy is the only option available.

In the case of a proprietorship or partnership, it is the individual sole proprietor and one or more of the partners who will be meeting with a trustee in bankruptcy and filing for a personal type of bankruptcy. the personal bankruptcy trustee will administer the personal bankruptcy estate. Again, you can read up on personal bankruptcy by looking at our top 20 personal bankruptcy FAQs section.

In personal bankruptcies, it will be either a streamlined system called a Summary Administration and if not, it is then an ordinary administration bankruptcy. Unlike a company, a person is ultimately entitled to a bankruptcy discharge.

When it comes to the administration of bankruptcy for a corporation, it is always an ordinary administration bankruptcy. The purpose of this Brandon Blog is not to run through all the steps in a personal or corporate bankruptcy process. Above I have provided some links to read up on debt settlement restructuring and personal bankruptcy. For corporate bankruptcy, I recommend that you read our corporate website page on corporate bankruptcy.

Alternatively, you can also read my previous Brandon Blog Bankrupting a Limited Company: Canadian Corporate Bankruptcy Process.

A trustee for bankruptcy administers the bankruptcy process for the benefit of unsecured creditors. Sometimes, it is a secured creditor who needs to enforce their security. They do not necessarily need the company to meet with a trustee for bankruptcy. Rather, the secured creditor needs the appointment of trustee to act not in a bankruptcy administration, but rather, to act as a receiver or receiver-manager to enforce the secured creditor’s position by taking control of the assets subject to the security and ultimately selling them. To read the receivership process, you can read the receivership section of our corporate website.

You can also read my Brandon Blog titled What Is A Receivership? Our Complete Guide To Receivership Solutions.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee for bankruptcy: How to avoid bankruptcy and save your business from closing

I hope you enjoyed the licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy Brandon Blog post. Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. As you can see from this blog, we are not just a trustee for bankruptcy. We believe every person and business should first explore debt settlement to avoid bankruptcy.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

trustee for bankruptcy
licensed insolvency trustee for bankruptcy
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT: COURT MAY NOT LISTEN TO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE

2

Bankruptcy and insolvency act: Introduction

I want to describe to you a very interesting case that was recently decided in the Court of Appeal of British Columbia, Randen v. HPCB-Online Ltd., 2018 BCCA 123 (CanLII). The bankrupt’s creditors applied to have the transactions reviewed under section I00 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (“BIA”). One of the areas of contention was that the judge in the lower court found he could not rely on the bankruptcy trustee’s opinion of value in the circumstances.

The applicants, Shawn and Edvige Cody, were the principals of the bankrupt, Half Price Computer Books Ltd. (“Half Price”) and the applicant HPCB-Online Ltd. (“Online”). About ten days before Half Price was assigned into bankruptcy, Online bought roughly 10% of the book inventory of Half Price.

The application under s.100 was originally made by the bankruptcy trustee, and later transferred to creditors David Randen, The Innovative Alliance Inc., J.R. Trading Co. Inc. and Fairmount Books Inc. under section 38 of the BIA. The lower court judge found Online acquired property from Half Price at much less than reasonable market value. The lower court judge ordered Online and the Codys to pay back the difference which he established to be $287,000.

Bankruptcy and insolvency act: Section 100

Section 100 of the BIA. The section was repealed in 2009, but applies on transactions before then. The main purpose of that section was for reversing the effects of non-arm’s length transactions that reduced value from the estate of a bankrupt person or company.

Until 2009, s. 100 of the BIA provided:

“100 (1) Where a bankrupt sold, purchased, leased, hired, supplied or received property or services in a reviewable transaction within the period beginning on the day that is one year before the date of the bankruptcy event and ending on the date of the bankruptcy, both dates included, the court may, on the application of the trustee, inquire into whether the bankrupt gave or received, as the case may be, fair market value in consideration for the property or services concerned in the transaction.

(2) Where the court in proceedings under this section finds that the consideration given or received by the bankrupt in the reviewable transaction was conspicuously greater or less than the fair market value of the property or services concerned in the transaction, the court may give judgment to the trustee against the other party to the transaction, against any other person being privy to the transaction with the bankrupt or against all those persons for the difference between the actual consideration given or received by the bankrupt and the fair market value, as determined by the court, of the property or services concerned in the transaction.”

Bankruptcy and insolvency act: The questionable transaction

The brand-new company Online bought roughly 10% of Half Price’s stock, or 44,000 books. These books were clearly selected by Mr. Cody as the best-selling. Online paid $21,964.50 for these books, about $0.50 CDN for each publication. The books and records of Half Price, including an e-commerce website which Half Price created at its expense and was the property of Half Price, were copied and used by Online to aid in the sale of these publications at the instructions of Mr. Cody.

The Half Price sorting software and mailing software program that was later used to retail these books by Online, which software was the property of Half Price, was duplicated and taken or transferred to Online. Additionally, there was a claim that the goodwill of Half Price was made use by Online. There was no evidence that Online paid anything for the use of the software and goodwill.bankruptcy and insolvency act 1

Bankruptcy and insolvency act: The lower court’s first problem

The lower court found that Online paid conspicuously much less compared to fair market value. It must pay to the bankruptcy Estate for the benefit of the creditors which he determined to be $287,000. The lower court judge noted that this was not a case in which the trustee was driving the application. The trustee assigned the action to specific creditors.

Normally, the bankruptcy trustee would have to submit evidence to the court in a section 100 application as to the value of the property in question. Since the trustee had assigned its interest to specific creditors, there was no report from the trustee. The creditors said the value of the joint assets is close to $1.07 million. The lower court had to look at the trustee’s actions in determining what the trustee must have thought the value was.

The lower court acknowledged the need in s. 100 to accept the trustee’s viewpoint about the value, unless other values are confirmed. The court however discovered it could not depend on that viewpoint in this case. The first problem was that they were standing in the place of the trustee. The trustee had determined that the software and other assets was of no value. In addition, the trustee did not figure out that there was any kind of goodwill value to this.

Bankruptcy and insolvency act: The lower court’s second problem

The second problem was that Half Price could have moved the best publications to Online at the direction of the Codys. The remaining books, being 90% of the book inventory, sold for around the same value as the 10% of publications. Though this is not entirely determinative of worth, it shows that the inventory, software and goodwill was not as valuable as these creditors represented to the lower court..

The BIA required the lower court judge to accept the trustee‘s viewpoint as to the value, or in this situation the point of view of those creditors, unless other values can be confirmed. The lower court considered the trustee’s activity when the bankruptcy first happened, that those assets had no value. The lower court found that it could not rely on any trustee viewpoint on worth.

Bankruptcy and insolvency act: The Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal confirmed that a trustee in bankruptcy is an officer of the court and has an obligation to offer all relevant facts to the court in a dispassionate, non-adversarial fashion. It went on to say that the creditors do not have the same responsibilities. They got the right to pursue the proceedings in their very own passionate way. The Court of Appeal went on to say that it was open to the court to decline the trustee’s opinion on the evaluation of a fair market price.

The Court of Appeal finally concluded that although the Court did not have to accept the trustee’s opinion of value, there was insufficient evidence for the lower court judge to place a value. So the Court of Appeal ordered a new trial in the lower court. Now both the creditors, and certainly the trustee, will have to submit evidence about what the fair market value was, in their respective opinion. That way, the lower court will be able to rely on experts, an officer of the court and real evidence.

Bankruptcy and insolvency act: The licensed insolvency trustee

Licensed insolvency trustee is the relatively new name for a bankruptcy trustee. Is your company experiencing financial problems? Are you, or somebody you care about, experiencing personal financial problems?

Bankruptcy is the last thing we try to do for a company or person in financial difficulty. If caught early enough, we can get involved in a turnaround situation for your company to keep jobs and value. We also carry out debt settlement plans for people.

If you’ve personally fallen victim to money mistakes and are in pain and stressed out, it’s time for professional help now too.

The Ira Smith Team knows that you are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. Your business provides income not only for your family. Many other families rely on you and your company for their well-being. The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today. We know how to solve both corporate and personal financial challenges, remove your pain and put things back on a healthy path. Contact us today for your free consultation so that we can save your company, Starting Over Starting Now.

bankruptcy and insolvency act

 

Call a Trustee Now!