As 2018 draws to a close, I want to wish all of our readers a very happy, healthy and prosperous New Year. I hope that 2019 will be a great year for all of us. You have no doubt been bombarded so far with emails, articles, and programs on getting income tax debt relief for 2018 by making sure that you have taken advantage of all possible deductions before the year ends tonight. I thought I would take a slightly different approach to talk about another rich and famous person who is in hot water with the IRS.
Income tax debt relief: Even the rich and famous have income tax debt problems
We have previously written about rich and famous people who have debt problems and who have filed for bankruptcy. Their debt problems arose mainly out of irresponsible spending, financial mismanagement and income tax problems. These blogs were written to show you that it is not only ordinary people who run into trouble. People who many would think to have “all the money in the world” can also have financial problems. Financial mismanagement is not only an illness of the poor or middle class. It can strike anywhere or anyone.
Income tax debt relief: Some of our past rich and famous financial disaster blogs
Our previous financial mismanagement of the rich and famous includes:
78% of former NFL players have gone bankrupt or are under financial stress because of joblessness or divorce within two years of retirement.
The National Endowment for Financial Education says that 70% of all people who suddenly receive large amounts of money will lose it within a few years.
In this blog, I talked about former pro athletes who are broke. Former NBA star and broadcaster Charles Barkley estimates that 60% – 70% of professional athletes go broke for all or any of the following reasons:
Buying lavish gifts and giving money to family and friends
In this blog, I wrote about Canadian Olympian. Donovan Bailey and his income tax debt problems with Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). We also described his income tax debt relief settlement plan to cut his income tax debt.. It seems that Mr. Bailey was not able to outrun CRA. Therefore he needed a formal debt settlement plan.
Grammy Award-winning vocalist Dionne Warwick has filed for bankruptcy because she was in need of income tax debt relief. The 72-year-old vocalist, well-known for hits such as “Do You Know the Way to San Jose” and “That’s What Friends Are For” submitted the bankruptcy documents in New Jersey, where she lives.
She listed assets of $25,500 and liabilities of greater than $10.7 million in her bankruptcy filing. Her largest debt is income tax debt of near $7 million owed in back tax obligations to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as well as greater than $3 million in tax obligations to the state of California. This includes interest and penalties.
She declared her present income as $20,950 a month, with monthly expenditures just $10 less than that. Dionne Warwick’s press agent, Kevin Sasaki, claimed that the vocalist’s personal bankruptcy was primarily the outcome of “irresponsible and gross financial mismanagement” in the late 1980s to the mid-1990s.
Income tax debt relief: Start 2019 off the right way
No one likes to pay taxes, but everyone hates having CRA tax debt problems. Do you require CRA debt forgiveness? If you’re considering bankruptcy because of income tax debt, or for any reason. We can show you bankruptcy alternatives to get CRA debt forgiveness. We can end your debt pain through a consumer proposal,debt consolidation, and credit counselling. Contact a professional that you can trust – Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience dealing with diverse issues and complex files, including negotiating with CRA. We deliver the highest quality of professional service. Don’t settle for less. Give us a call today and Starting Over, Starting Now you can overcome your financial difficulties.
Again I wish all of you a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year.
I hope that you are all enjoying quality family time together over the holidays. As 2018 is nearly over, I thought that it would be interesting to do a bankruptcy blog review on my Brandon’s Blog. So here is a review of the 7 most viewed blogs over the past year.
Bankruptcy blog review: The 7 most viewed blogs in 2018
This blog was about a very interesting case decided in the Court of Appeal of British Columbia. The bankrupt’s creditors applied to have the transactions reviewed under section I00 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (“BIA”). One of the areas of contention was that the judge in the lower court found he could not rely on the bankruptcy trustee’s opinion of value in the circumstances.
In this Brandon’s Blog, I wrote about mortgage lending criteria self-employed, I discussed a Court decision that shows when it comes to a self-employed person’s mortgage, if there is a deemed trust claim by Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), you cannot solely rely upon the registry system.
This bankruptcy blog review post came from our corporate case files. I discussed the decision making process the Court goes through when being asked to approve a stalking horse sales process and the stalking horse credit bid being recommended by the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee).
Since 2007, Credit Karma USA has attempted to simplify credit and finance for more than 60 million Credit Karma members. They advertise very heavily on US television to attract new members. Becoming a member is free, and it allows any member to get access to their free credit score and credit report, with the option to update every single week. Credit Karma also provides financial education to put credit into context.
Credit Karma Canada arrived this past year from the United States. Its website is creditkarma.ca. The purpose of this blog was to describe what Credit Karma Canada is and to let you decide if it would be helpful or not for you or someone you know.
The Goodwill Toronto bankruptcy confused and astonished many people. After all, how can Goodwill, a non-profit organization, go bankrupt? Isn’t the very nature of a non-profit or not-for-profit that it doesn’t have to make a profit? This Brandon’s Blog discussed the issues.
This Brandon’s Blog was a discussion about and a warning against being seduced by ads from companies for poor credit personal loans guaranteed approval. We pointed out the pitfalls of the products being offered. We also showed how people with poor credit can go about settling their debts and improving their credit score.
Bankruptcy blog review: Conclusion
These are my 7 top viewed Brandon’s Blogs in 2018. Four are about personal debt issues or personal bankruptcy blog items and three are about corporate insolvency issues. Three are about a review of a then-recent court case.
I hope that the year 2019 will be a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year for you and your families.
Have you taken on too much debt in 2018 or the years before? Is the pain and stress of too much debt now negatively affecting your health?
We offer a free consultation to help you solve your problems. We understand your pain that debt causes. We can also eliminate it right away from your life. This will allow you to begin a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can begin helping you and get you back into a healthy, stress-free life.
Full disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion on SMALL BUSINESS CANADA TAX issues. This blog must not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.
We are trying something new. At the bottom is an audiogram of this Brandon’s blog. If you would prefer to listen to it, and not read it, scroll down to the bottom and press on the play button. Let us know what you think by sending us a message in the Question box below.
Small business Canada tax: Introduction
In December 2017, our Federal Minister of Finance, Bill Morneau, disclosed some new policies he and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were thinking about. The changes Finance Minister Morneau was touting, were for toughening up the small business Canada tax scheme. It would have affected entrepreneur’s businesses, their taxes, and their households.
The main aspect of small business Canada tax that our federal government wanted to attack was the age-old concept of family business income splitting. Its more modern name that you would have seen a lot in the press is called income sprinkling. The federal government was trying to advance the theory that small business owners whose family members were shareholders in the business, but not necessarily working in the business, were somehow cheating on their taxes.
Small business Canada tax: The Federal Government’s discussion points
The discussion focussed mainly on professionals, such as doctors, lawyers, and accountants who had a professional corporation. The government was trying to advance the argument how unfair it was for a professional earning say $250,000 annually, to “sprinkle” some of the income among family members older than 18 as compared to a salaried employee earning the same total amount in salary. I find it interesting that they used a quarter of a million dollars annually as an example, and not a lesser number. Do you think that was picked on purpose to subtly portray all family business owners as being fat cats?
The government’s position was that income that might have been paid to only the manager of the business, could be redirected to other family members by way of dividends. If those family members were in a lower-income tax bracket, then they would pay less tax. The government felt that was unfair.
Small business Canada tax: How income splitting or income sprinkling works
First, in order for this to work for a professional, the laws of the Province you live in has to allow you to have household members that aren’t professionals be shareholders of your professional firm. Second, if your spouse has a high taxable income already, then you will not profit by including him or her as an owner of the business. Lastly, you must decide if you’re going to add your children more than 18 years of age, as shareholders. Assuming you’ve marked off all those issues, it can make a difference to your family’s overall income tax bill to add your partner and/or your grown-up kids as shareholders of your business. By doing this, you can choose to distribute dividends from the business and take advantage of their lower-income tax bracket. Paying your partner or kids a salary is not as effective as making them shareholders of the firm and paying dividends. If you pay a salary, it needs to be a sensible one, for work that you can actually prove to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). In other words, you cannot simply pay your partner $100,000 for doing bookkeeping for the firm. CRA will certainly allow an affordable wage for that function, but it would have to be justified by comparison to the marketplace for such services. The advantage of paying dividends to family members is that you do not need to prove it. The other benefit of paying dividends is that your firm recovers some of the business tax you’ve paid on dividends made by the firm’s financial investment portfolio. Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand (RDTOH) is the issue. Our firm does not do tax work. This is a complex topic, I will leave it up to you to research how RDTOH works.
Small business Canada tax: Tax changes effective January 1, 2018
Beginning January 1, 2018, the government changed the rules specifically to target professionals who have incorporated (specifically, doctors, lawyers, and accountants). Professionals who are gaining from reduced tax rates on what would have otherwise been fully taxed earnings at the highest marginal personal income tax rates, if not for their company. The government is saying that these incorporate professionals aren’t adding their fair share to Canadian society by their decision to have a professional corporation. For that reason, they should not gain from the tax advantages of doing so.
So what are the changes? The Tax on Split Income (TOSI) rules has been amended to cover grown-up shareholders of private firms. Previously, TOSI rules only applied to minor children. The issue now becomes: If you’re a private company owner and pay dividends to adult family member shareholders, when can you do so without invoking the new regulations? Essentially, you need to be able to show much involvement in business. Small business Canada tax: Clear bright line
The Federal government is putting what they’re calling a “clear bright-line”’ to exclude some relatives from the TOSI rules. The general TOSI exclusions are:
The company owner’s spouse, providing they more than 65 years old.
Children over 18 years old who have made a real labour contribution to the business. CRA is gauging this as an average of 20 hours a week during the year. Alternatively, there is also a test throughout any of the 5 earlier years.
The government has taken direct aim at professional corporations though. These exclusions do not apply where 90% + of the income of the corporation comes from the provision of services. Income from ownership of related businesses that earn income from the provision of services is also included in the calculation.
Inserting a trust into the ownership equation may get around this “excluded shares” provision. You need the advice of your income tax advisor to decide if it would be beneficial to you.
Small business Canada tax: Ottawa punishing small business Canada
When the federal government presented new tax rules, local business claimed they were being unjustly targeted by “punishing” measures. According to Small Business Association Canada, up to fifty percent of the country’s entrepreneurs state they’re feeling negative results.
The federal government also added changes to the passive income rules for private corporations. In the February 2018 Federal Budget, the Liberals added a grind-down mechanism for the small business tax deduction through which every dollar of investment income over $50,000 cuts profits eligible for the small business tax deduction by $5.
This has been especially challenging for organizations that use passive earnings to help in special capital funding. For example, paying for building and construction equipment or to acquire real estate used by the business.
Small business Canada tax: The greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over
For small businesses, the greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over. Private corporations who use responsible budgeting techniques and save up their profits and invest them to earn income, to be prepared for a rainy day, are being attacked. They may be saving to smooth out cash flow problems, or they might have a big upcoming purchase. Now they are being attacked through the income tax system for earning investment income in excess of $50K annually. It is clear that CRA will be looking closely at professional corporations’ income tax returns. I would not be surprised to see more CRA audits performed. The Federal government is looking to extract more income tax revenue from private corporations.
The rules are increasingly complex. Entrepreneurs will be spending more time dealing with more punitive income tax rules and income tax audits. All of this is designed by Ottawa for private corporations to pay more income tax. It ignores the investments small business makes. Creating jobs and making capital investments allows small business to contribute in many ways to the Canadian economy. This is aside from paying income tax.
Small business Canada tax: Does your company have too much debt?
Is your company under attack because of tax obligations or for other reasons. Is your company in need of restructuring to get debt relief?
The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience people and companies in financial trouble. If your company is in need of a corporate restructuring proposal debt settlement plan, we have the experience to end your stress and pain and return you and your company to a healthy productive pain-free condition.
Our approach for each case is to develop a solution where Starting Over, Starting Now happens. This starts the moment you meet with us. You’re simply one call away from taking the necessary actions to return to leading a healthy and well-balanced problem-free life. Call us today for your free appointment.
Full disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion. This blog should not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.
On October 29, 2018, the Hon. Candice Bergen (Portage– Lisgar, CPC), stood in Parliament during Question Period. She talked to troubling reports this previous weekend that Statistics Canada was taking part in Canada banking info collection without the consent of the people whose info was being asked for.
Statistics Canada notified financial institutions, charge card businesses as well as credit reporting companies that it anticipates them to turn over individual financial information of a minimum of half a million Canadians without their consent or authorization. Financial institutions will not be able to tell their customers about the government demand for their financial transactions.
The noticeable issue is, that with the lengthy history of federal government personal privacy violations, Canadians are appropriately stressed over both the collection as well as the security of their individual economic deals. Ms. Bergen needed to know why the Liberals are accumulating the individual information of Canada without telling them.
Canada banking info collection: PM Justin Trudeau reacts
Our PM reacted by stating that the federal government is ensuring that the individual information of Canadians is secured. Stats Canada will certainly make use of the anonymized information for analytical functions only. No details will be revealed.
He stated that he understands (which is a way of repeating rumours or hearsay, or worse, that he truly does not understand whatsoever) that Statistics Canada is proactively involved with the Privacy Commissioner’s office, to make sure Canadians’ financial details stays safeguarded and private. High-grade and prompt information is important to guaranteeing that federal government programs stay pertinent as well as efficient for Canadians.
Canada banking info collection: Ms. Bergen had not been pleased, and neither ought to we
Ms. Bergen responded that the Liberal federal government strategies to get access to the individual details of Canadians without their knowing about it or permission. This consists of details like payments, internet purchases, charge card purchases, cash withdrawals and e-transfers between members of a family.
She wants to know if the Prime Minister will do the right thing. Will he guarantee Canadians that this invasion into their lives will be stopped?
Canada banking info collection: PM Justin Trudeau reacts by attempting to fault the Conservatives
Our PM reacted by stating that Canadians appropriately expect that federal government agencies like Statistics Canada will collaborate with the Privacy Commissioner. He said that Stats Canada will make certain that Canadians’ exclusive lives are shielded. Good words up until we hear that CRA obtained accessibility to the info, or even worse, cyberpunks!
Then for the good part. PM Trudeau said to the House of Commons and all Canadians that it was the Conservative federal government that selected to end the long-form census as a method of protecting an individuals’ exclusive info. So our PM is saying that in some way our private financial transactions is a straight substitute for basic analytical demographics? I don’t think so.
PM Justin Trudeau after that doubled down by stating that the Conservatives’ assaults on information and privacy continue.
Canada banking info collection: Mr. Alain Rayes (Richmond– Arthabaska, CPC)
Mr. Alain Rayes also participated. He repeated that Canadians expect the federal government to secure their private details, yet the Liberals wish to gain access to private information on 500,000 Canadians without their approval. They intend to consider loan repayments, ATM withdrawals, credit card transactions, financial institution money transfers and social insurance numbers.
Exactly how can the Prime Minister warrant these activities, which are plainly an offence of Canadians’ personal privacy?
Canada banking info collection: Blah, blah, blah.
Prime Minister Trudeau responded with more of the same. He said again the government will constantly make sure (a warranty?) that the individual information of Canadians is safeguarded. He said that Stats Canada will make use of the anonymized information only for analytical goals. No details will be revealed (does analytical purposes only include analysis by Canada Revenue Agency?).
He repeated that Statistics Canada is proactively involved with the Privacy Commissioner’s workplace on this task and is dealing with it to make certain Canadians’ info continues to be secured and private.
My personal view is that the primary federal government program that would certainly most take advantage of understanding my private financial information is the income tax collection system in Canada!
“4.3 Principle 3 – Consent The knowledge and consent of the individual are required for the collection, use, or disclosure of personal information, except where inappropriate.” (emphasis added).
What is one of the exceptions?
4.3 Principle 3 – Consent “Note: In certain circumstances personal information can be collected, used, or disclosed without the knowledge and consent of the individual. For example, legal, medical, or security reasons may make it impossible or impractical to seek consent. When information is being collected for the detection and prevention of fraud or for law enforcement, seeking the consent of the individual might defeat the purpose of collecting the information.”
So, looking at the exceptions, this only bolsters my hunch. I am convinced this is not only to evaluate the viability and effectiveness of existing social programs. Rather, it will be used to evaluate and amend the effectiveness of tax investigation programs. This will provide direct new information to the Canada Revenue Agency to bolster current and start new investigations. That is why the information is being collected without Canadians’ consent to invade their privacy.
Canada banking info collection: May I have this dance?
Justin Trudeau just kept dancing and blaming Conservatives. This new invasion of privacy really doesn’t have anything to do directly with insolvency. However, if I am correct in my guess, and the information is going to be used by CRA, then it may well.
People may very well have engaged in tax evasion. I, of course, do not condone it. Criminal charges aside, Canadians who evade taxes and get caught will now have a huge income tax bill to pay. Many won’t be able to.
There will be many high tax debtors who will not be able to afford a voluntary payment with CRA. Such a voluntary payment plan will need you to pay your original income tax debt. You will not get any reduction in all penalties and interest. So you will be paying in full to Her Majesty. For those who will not be able to afford such a voluntary payment plan, bankruptcy is definitely not your first option. You would have to look at a debt settlement restructuring proposal as a first choice. Bankruptcy should be your last option.
Canada banking info collection: What about you?
If you have received legal advice that you don’t really have a case, or you can’t afford to fight it out in Court or pay the income tax debt that renders you insolvent, then you need the help of a professional trustee.
The Ira Smith Team has years of experience of negotiating with CRA on behalf of tax debtors. If you are an individual person and owe CRA and your other creditors, other than for any loans secured by your home, less than $250,000, you can enter into a consumer proposaldebt settlement plan. If you owe more or are a corporation, we can still negotiate with CRA and restructure you with a restructuring proposal debt settlement plan.
Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, recover your money and move on to the next investment opportunity.
In conclusion, call us today for your free consultation.
Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: Introduction
Last August, Rudy Giuliani said, “truth isn’t truth”. Today I want to explore an important issue we come across many times when dealing with income taxdebt driven insolvency files. That is the transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act(Canada). The decision of The Honourable Justice David E. Graham of the Federal Tax Court of Canada released July 6, 2018, gives rise to a variation of Rudy Giuliani’s comment to say – property isn’t property.
Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: The participants
APC is a law firm operating under the name Aitchison Law Office. The creation of APC happened in December 2003 by 3 people: James Aitchison (“James”) and his two daughters, Kelly Aitchison (“Kelly) and Laurie Aitchison (“Laurie”). All three are Ontario lawyers. In 2012, the Minister of National Revenue assessed APC for nearly $2.1 million pursuant to s. 160 of the Income Tax Act. The assessment stated that James had actually moved property worth even more than $3 million to APC for little or no value. There was no disagreement that, at the time of the claimed transfers, James owed practically $2.1 million to the CRA. James had not paid any income tax since 1992. His tax obligation, along with interest and penalty, remains outstanding. The main concern, in this case, was whether James moved property to APC. If he did, it would have to be valued. CRA claimed the property James transferred to APC is his right to invoice for legal services.
Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: Invoicing for legal services
As indicated above, CRA’s position was that the right to invoice for legal services was the property transferred. It is interesting to note that they did not claim that either the work-in-process, the accounts receivable, or both, derived from James’ work, was the property transferred. In my view, this was a fatal error in their case. The Court considered subsection 248( 1) of the Income Tax Act and in particular, His Honour considered the definition of the word property under the Income Tax Act is “a right of any kind whatever”. In his decision, His Honour stated the distinction that “property” has a wide meaning, but not every little thing of value is property.
Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: The Judge’s words
The Judge found that:
CRA had problems verbalizing specifically how James’ “right to invoice for legal services” is property.
He thought CRA was attempting to fit a square peg into a round hole.
CRA was attempting to take something that is clearly a service and trying to make it fit into the definition of property.
CRA’s position is faulty. They argued that James carried out work for APC neither as an independent contractor nor as an employee. CRA did not provide any evidence as to what they believed the actual arrangement was.
Notwithstanding it is prudent for a company to have an employment agreement with all of its employees, none of James, Kelly or Laurie had an employment agreement with APC. However, CRA accepts that Kelly and Laurie are employees of APC but do not recognize James the same way.
James was either an employee of APC with no salary or, an unpaid volunteer. The Judge held that it was not necessary for him to determine which one it was.
It is an employee’s right to be paid. If the evidence was that James was entitled to a salary but he waived it, then he would have found that the waived salary was property transferred to APC. However, this was not the case.
CRA, to their peril, did not argue that James was a sole practitioner, transferring his work-in-process and/or accounts receivable to APC.
Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: Saulnier v. Royal Bank of Canada
The intersection of insolvency and the issue of a transfer of property under s. 160 of the Income Tax Act is an important one. Although it did not help them, CRA referred to the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Saulnier v. Royal Bank of Canada, [2008] 3 SCR 166, 2008 SCC 58 (CanLII). That decision was in a bankruptcy case, dealing with the transfer of fishing licenses.
In that case, the Receiver and Trustee applied to the Court for the authorization to sell its interest in the fishing licenses. Due to an opposition, the Trustee went to Court seeking approval of the sale. The trial judge decided that the fishing licenses was a property that could be sold. The Court of Appeal agreed with the trial judge.
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal of the Court of Appeal’s decision, upholding the trial judge’s finding, that the fishing licenses was property under s. 160 of the Income Tax Act. The interesting thing about that case is that the fishing licenses were considered as property mainly because of the wide sweeping definition of property contained in another federal statute, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (“BIA”).
In the APC case, the Judge did not find the Saulnier case persuasive. The reason was the matter before him did not involve the BIA. In this case, it was only the Income Tax Act. Rather, the Judge relied upon a different case decided in the Federal Court of Appeal, Manrell v. Canada, [2003] 3 FC 727, 2003 FCA 128 (CanLII).
As explained by the Federal Court of Appeal in Manrell: “[25] It is implicit in this notion of “property” that “property” must have or entail some exclusive right to make a claim against someone else. A general right to do something that anyone can do, or a right that belongs to everyone, is not the “property” of anyone . . . . . . [50] The phrase . . . “a right of any kind whatever”, like the word “property”, has a very broad meaning. But it is not a word of infinite meaning. It cannot include every conceivable right. It cannot be given a meaning that would extend the reach of the Income Tax Act beyond what Parliament has conceived”.
Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: The verdict and the Judge’s conflict
Based on the evidence, His Honour found that James didn’t transfer property to APC by working for APC for free. The Judge also awarded costs to APC.
However, the Judge gave his personal view of his decision in the judgment. He felt that this was a horrible outcome. Furthermore, he commented that James had not paid a cent of income tax since being discharged from his bankruptcy in 1992. The Honourable Justice David E. Graham did not feel this was a just result, based on his interpretation of the law.
So that is why I paraphrase Rudy Giuliani to say – property isn’t property!
Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: Is CRA pursuing you?
Is CRA pursuing you because of transferred property to you? If so, you need an income tax lawyer. However, if you have received legal advice that you don’t really have a case, or you can’t afford to fight it out in Court and the debt renders you insolvent, then you need the help of a professional trustee.
The Ira Smith Team has years of experience of negotiating with CRA on behalf of tax debtors. If you are an individual person and owe CRA and your other creditors, other than for any loans secured by your home, less than $250,000, you can enter into a consumer proposal debt settlement plan. If you owe more or are a corporation, we can still negotiate with CRA and restructure you with a restructuring proposal debt settlement plan.
Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, recover your money and move on to the next investment opportunity.
In conclusion, call us today for your free consultation.
Special thanks to Ian MacInnis of Fogler Rubinoff for bringing this decision to my attention and inspiring me to write this blog.
Mortgagees rely upon the provincial land registry system to decide what obligations are secured against real property and in what order of priority. When it comes to mortgage lending criteria self employed, a recent Court decision has proven that when it comes to a self employed person’s mortgage, if there is a deemed trust claim by Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), you cannot solely rely upon the registry system.
Mortgage lending criteria self employed: The Court case
The Court case I am referring to is Canada v. Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2018 FC 538 (CanLII) which was heard in Federal Court. In this matter, the Crown on behalf of Her Majesty looked to recover funds Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) obtained from one of its clients who repaid a loan secured by a home mortgage upon the sale of his house. The client was a self employed person.
The Crown claimed that there was an outstanding deemed trust claim for collected but unremitted GST. The Crown further claimed that the proceeds from the sale of the home collected by TD was subject to the CRA deemed trust claim, was property of Her Majesty and that TD had to pay it over. TD did not take the position that it had a registered first charge and can keep the funds. It argued that as a “bona fide purchaser for value” it is not subject to the deemed trust claim and does not have to pay over the money.
Mortgage lending criteria self employed: The undisputed facts
The borrower carried on a landscaping business as a sole proprietor. In 2007 and 2008, he collected and did not remit GST totaling $67,854. TD held both a registered mortgage and a home equity line of credit (HELOC) against the borrower’s home. The home was sold in 2011. The borrower repaid the mortgage and HELOC in full from the sale of the home.
Almost two years later in April 2013, CRA made demand on TD for repayment of $97,327, revised in 2015 by amended demand for $67,854. TD refused to pay.
Mortgage lending criteria self employed: What the Court said
The Federal Court reviewed the legislation. The Court decided that the funds paid to TD were proceeds of sale of his property. Therefore, it is covered by the deemed trust CRA claim. So the Court found that the requirements of Section 222 of the Excise Tax Act were met.
The Court agreed with the Crown’s position that the deemed trust Canada claim covered the debtor’s house. This is in spite of there was no registration on title and that the Bank had proper valid registrations. The Court further agreed that according to Section 222(3) of the Income Tax Act, the Bank has an obligation to pay over the proceeds it received which were impressed with the deemed trust.
The Judge disagreed with TD’s position. TD stated that the payment of proceeds only applied if a secured creditor enforces its security. This was not the case in this situation. The Court further disagreed with TD’s position that it was a bona fide purchaser for value. The Court agreed that money could be considered property available in such a defence. However, it stated that a secured creditor facing a deemed trust claim could not use that defence. TD also offered certain public policy issues in its defence, but the Court was not swayed.
TD is liable to pay over the amount of $67,854, interest and costs.
Mortgage lending criteria self employed: So what is the biggest myth?
The biggest myth is as follows. To find out what claims against the real property, you only have to perform a title search.
This is an important decision for mortgage lending criteria self employed people. Now TD is in the position of having to make demand on and possibly sue in 2018 its borrower who ostensibly repaid the loan in full in 2011! It would be suing as an unsecured creditor.
What this means for mortgagees is that they can no longer just accept funds from a self employed person who wishes to pay off a loan, be it a mortgage or other type of loan, from the sale of property. It also cannot merely accept funds to pay off a loan from a self employed individual’s business bank account.
Mortgage lending criteria self employed: So what is the fix?
Rather, the lender also must now get a true copy of a statement from CRA showing that there are no amounts owing by the self employed person on account of either HST or source deductions as the employer of others.
Lenders would also be well advised to add language to their loan term sheet, loan documents and any other documents issued when a loan is repaid. The new language would be an attestation by the self employed borrower that there are no amounts owing to any government authority that would be considered or deemed to be a trust claim.
Further, the language would have to make it clear that in the event there were any such amounts owing, even if the loan was fully repaid, the lender had the right to demand and sue the borrower for any amounts proven to be a deemed trust claim that the lender was required to pay over to the government at some later date.
Mortgage lending criteria self employed: Does your business need HST and source deductions you collected to stay afloat?
Does your business need HST and source deductions you collected to stay afloat? Can your business not afford to pay over to the government deemed trust claim amounts collected? If so, then your business is in trouble and requires restructuring immediately. You need the advice of a professional trustee now!
The Ira Smith Team have decades of experience in complex corporate and other business financial restructurings. We first look at how we can reorganize and restructure your business to rescue it. You are worried because your business is facing significant financial challenges. The stress placed upon you because of your business’s financial challenges are enormous. We understand your pain points, and we know how to relieve them for you.
If you or your company cannot survive without a restructuring, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. NOW for a free consultation. You are just one phone call away from getting back on the road to financial health and reducing your stress levels, Starting Over, Starting Now.
Last week we told you about professional athletes who earned enormous fortunes and blew it all on lavish, unsupportable lifestyles. The end result was bankruptcy. There is another group of professional athletes who also earned millions and ended up using a bankruptcy alternative to avoid bankruptcy, but not because they blew it all. They were trying to shield their money from taxes through complex offshore tax structures. However, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) reassessed them and now they had a huge tax bill and needed debt forgiveness CRA.
This is certainly not a new phenomenon. The newspapers and tabloids often feature stories about famous people who the tax department reassesses for using complex tax structures designed by agents, managers, accountants, and lawyers. In this case, our very own Olympian, Donovan Bailey, had to file a proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada), as a result of an offshore tax scheme to try to beat the CRA. And, sadly, he’s not the only one.
Debt forgiveness CRA: Her Majesty outruns the offshore tax scheme
The offshore tax scheme that nearly bankrupted Donovan Bailey was designed to lessen the amount of income tax to be paid. Donovan Bailey made a “charitable donation”. It went through a complicated series of transactions. The money made its way back to Mr. Bailey, through an offshore account. It was supposed to come back in tax-free.
The problem was that the tax authority reassessed Donovan Bailey. They said the charitable donation was no more than a sham to avoid paying taxes. Instead of tax-free money Donovan Bailey found himself in debt to the CRA to the tune of $2.3 million in unpaid taxes and ended up in bankruptcy court.
Debt forgiveness CRA: CRA gets tough
The CRA has vowed to get tough on tax evaders and the tax professionals who help them. CRA threatens with increased fines and jail sentences. They have a strategy to root out high-risk wealthy Canadians and corporations that stash cash in offshore accounts to avoid taxes. And, they’re spending $444 million on these measures, and expect to recoup $2.6 billion in added revenue over five years.
Debt forgiveness CRA: What to do if you have too much debt
The Ira Smith Team has a cumulative 50+ years of experience dealing with diverse issues and complex files. We deliver the highest quality of professional service. Don’t settle for less. Give us a call today and Starting Over, Starting Now you can overcome your financial difficulties.
Last week I provided you with my infographic, video and blog to give you information on the Canadian corporate bankruptcy Canada process. I focussed on how an incorporated business files for a voluntary bankruptcy in Canada. This week, I want to describe how an individual files for voluntary bankruptcy. I also want to answer what I have found to be the personal bankruptcy Canada faq. So look at the infographic and watch the video below. Feel free to read in more detail below the video.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq: Personal bankruptcy process in Canada
One of the most asked questions is “What is the bankruptcy process in Canada?”. Last week our infographic and video described the corporate bankruptcy process in Canada. This week’s video describes the personal bankruptcy process in Canada.
VIDEO – Personal bankruptcy Canada faq
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 1 – How do I recognize if I am in financial trouble?
If you are having difficulty paying your debts or have actually quit paying them altogether then you are in financial difficulty. Call an expert, a government qualified trustee to check your choices for reducing your debt and eliminating your stress and pain.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 2 – Is bankruptcy my only alternative to get relief from debt?
The short answer is no; there are other options. You should always start first with a free consultation with a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or Trustee). A LIT is a private party licensed by Industry Canada to carry out the restructuring and liquidation rules under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). The LIT will discuss options with you to first avoid bankruptcy. These options include:
Bankruptcy does not deal with debts such as home mortgages, vehicle loan, spousal support or child support. Debt settlement firms try to bargain with your lenders to lower the amount owing. They also prepare a payment plan for you to settle the debt; they do not “erase your debt”.
The Canadian government is in the process of implementing new rules to curb the activities of some debt settlement companies. Some of them charge you for reviews that a licensed insolvency trustee performs for free. They also sell you products you don’t need, under the guise of helping you improve your credit score.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 3 – I have actually seen advertisements from Debt Settlement firms stating they could erase my debt without making use of a Trustee in bankruptcy. Just how does that work?
They don’t and their ads are misleading. If you first have a free consultation with a LIT, you will learn that a number of choices available to you that include yet are not restricted to debt reduction including a consumer proposal.
Understand that these debt settlement firms are not licensed trustees. Eventually, they stop charging you for things a LIT would do for free. Then they ultimately hand you over to a LIT for either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. You could have just gone to see a professionally licensed Trustee to start with!
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 4 – Do I get approved for bankruptcy?
You qualify for individual bankruptcy in Canada if you are financially troubled, insolvent and owe greater than $1,000.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 5 – Should I file bankruptcy?
Without the detailed information of your unique circumstance, that decision cannot be made. Get In touch With Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. for a complimentary no commitment session so you will understand your options for ending your debt pains, Starting Over, Starting Now.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 6 – If I declare bankruptcy, will I lose my house and car?
There are certain claims that are not released by your discharge from bankruptcy. Examples are home mortgages and car loans, if you choose to keep them. It comes down to what is your equity in those assets. The answer to that question and your ability to cash-flow those debts will be the determining factor. There is a list of items that are exempt from seizure. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. to find out more.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 7 – Once I file bankruptcy, exactly what occurs to the money I owe?
Once you declare bankruptcy you will be required to surrender certain non-exempt assets to the Trustee. These assets will then be sold and the money earned from the sale of the assets distributed among your creditors.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 8 – Even though I have not located work in my field, I still owe on my student loans. Will my bankruptcy get rid of that debt?
Is your date of bankruptcy within 7 years of when you discontinued to be a full or part-time student? If so, your student loan debt will not be released by your discharge from bankruptcy. In particular instances, you could be able to apply to the court for a discharge of your student debt obligations under the “hardship provision”.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 9 – What takes place to my salary or wages throughout a bankruptcy?
Salaries and wages are not influenced by bankruptcy. However you will need to complete an Income and Expense Form noting your household earnings as well as costs. This becomes part of your budgeting procedure. If your earnings goes beyond specific requirements developed by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) (“surplus income”), you will be required to pay part of the surplus income into the bankruptcy estate through the trustee.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 10 – Canada Revenue Agency has actually frozen my bank accounts and has a garnishee with my employer on my earnings. Just how can I stop all that?
If you have filed personal bankruptcy, personal income tax debt is an unsecured debt. As soon as you’ve declared bankruptcy or made a consumer proposal, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) cannot start or continue taking any kind of enforcement activity versus you, consisting of wage garnishment or freezing your assets. Your Trustee will alert CRA once you file. The LIT will also advise both CRA and your bank and employer that any enforcement activity against you for your debt cannot continue.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 11 – Will I still owe loan after I state bankruptcy?
Maybe, due to the fact that bankruptcy does not cover secured lenders – home mortgages, auto loan, student loans (if it is less than 7 years given that you discontinued to be a full or part-time student). It also does not cover certain other debts:
penalties or fines enforced by the court;
spousal support;
child support; or
debts arising from fraud.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 12 – How long will I be bankrupt?
The time you spend in bankruptcy will depend on whether this is a first or 2nd bankruptcy and if you have surplus income. Get In touch with Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. to find out more.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 13 – Who will know that I have declared bankruptcy?
As soon as you declare bankruptcy your Trustee will tell your creditors, CRA, and the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. The two Canadian credit bureaus, Equifax and TransUnion, obtain filing records from the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, so it will be on your credit report.
Bankruptcy filings are a public document. On top of that particular personal bankruptcies, those with non-exempt assets estimated to realize more than $15,000, need an ad in the “legal” section of a local newspaper.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 14 – How will bankruptcy influence my creditscore ranking?
An individual that files bankruptcy gets the lowest credit score ranking. Details of your bankruptcy that influences your credit report is inevitably eliminated many years after your discharge from bankruptcy.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 15 – What does a LIT/Trustee do?
A Trustee is an individual or company licensed by the OSB to carry out mandates under the BIA such as bankruptcy, proposal, consumer proposal, summary administration bankruptcy and business reorganizations. A LIT is an officer of the Court. The Trustee has a duty of care for the rights of both the debtor and the creditors.
The LIT also makes certain that the legal rights of the insolvent/bankrupt are not abused.
Here is a listing of standard steps taken by a Trustee:
Reviews and counsels debtors on available alternatives
Prepares official documentation that is both filed with the OSB and used to tell creditors
Ensures the validity of creditors’ claims
Ensures that debtors are provided with mandatory counselling and access to mediation services if there is a dispute about any income they are required to contribute
Sells the debtor’s assets, except those exempt from seizure by provincial and federal laws, and hold the proceeds in trust for distribution to creditors
Administers the bankrupt estate from beginning to end
Assesses the debtor’s conduct both before and during a bankruptcy, as well as the cause(s) of the bankruptcy; and
Arranges for (and if necessary reports all the above to the Court) for the bankrupt’s application for a discharge (in the case of personal debtors)
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 16 – How do I pick the ideal Trustee?
Make an appointment for your free consultation. Meet with the Trustee and ask any questions you might have about alternatives to bankruptcy, consumer proposal, debt settlement/restructuring, bankruptcy and/or the bankruptcy procedure. Get a feel for not only the answers you receive, but how interested does the Trustee seem in you as a person. Can you see yourself relating well to that person. Does the Trustee make you feel comfortable and the type of person you want to work with.
If not, consult with a different Trustee firm and repeat the procedure until you find a Trustee that you really feel comfy working with.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 17 – Is my spouse/partner impacted by my bankruptcy?
Your partner/spouse will not be financially affected by your bankruptcy unless they have co-signed a debt or own assets jointly with you. A creditor could pursue your spouse/partner for any debt that they have co-signed for. This includes a mortgage on your jointly owned home.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 18 – How will my bankruptcy impact my present divorce case?
In Canada, the bankruptcy process does not interfere with the majority of the divorce proceeding. The Trustee will stand in the shoes of the bankrupt spouse when it comes to the rights for either the equalization payment or the division of property. All issues about spouse and child support and child custody issues carry on as if there was no bankruptcy at all.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 19 – What is Chapter 7?
Chapter 7 is not applicable in Canada. It is the liquidation section of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the federal law governing bankruptcy in America.
Personal bankruptcy Canada faq # 20 – What is Chapter 11?
I hope that you have found this information helpful. Bankruptcy is the last thing we try to do for a person in financial difficulty. If caught early enough, we can get involved in a debt settlement restructuring program for you.
The Ira Smith Team knows that you are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. The stress placed upon you is enormous. We understand your pain points.
Contact the Ira Smith Team today. We know how to solve your financial challenges, remove your pain and put things back on a healthy path. Contact us today for your free consultation so that we can save your life, Starting Over Starting Now.
Hannah Bell beats PEI NDP leader was certainly a great headline. However, the one we want to focus on is “Hannah Bell Beats Her Debt Problems”. The purpose of this Brandon’s blog is to tell the story of the financial woes of Hannah Bell. She is a Prince Edward Island woman who recently won a by-election in Prince Edward Island. Hannah Bell, PEI Charlottetown-Parkdale, is the 2nd Green Party MLA sworn into the legislature. Ms. Bell is a very accomplished woman. Here is a link to the Hannah Bell PEI bio.
Hannah Bell beats PEI NDP Leader: Hannah’s story is like so many others
Hannah’s story is like so many others who have filed for either bankruptcy or a consumer proposal, the best bankruptcy alternative. It is also like many who have consulted and filed with our firm; life got in the way. The only difference is that none of our clients hold public office like Hannah Bell PEI green party member Charlottetown-Parkdale.
Hannah Bell beats PEI NDP Leader: Hannah’s tax problem
A Federal memorial submitted versus her, the Green Party candidate that won the District 11 Charlottetown-Parkdale by-election in a surprise victory over the Liberals and Progressive Conservatives. The judgment, submitted in September 2016, reveals she owes $26,252 to the federal government in tax obligations.
She was reassessed a $26,000 tax obligation after the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) carried out a review of her tax returns going back many years. She states she had gotten some bad tax recommendations when relocating her government pension plan into a private plan after leaving a federal government position. The outcome was this costly tax obligation.
Be proactive and proud like Hannah Bell
She says she is not embarrassed by this tale of her financial woes. She states that she has worked very hard through some difficult times to provide for herself and her child as a single mother. Her debt was such when– after a previous costly custody fight and living life as a single mom– that she determined the most effective means to manage this issue was to file a consumer proposal through a Licensed Insolvency Trustee.
Ms. Bell states it’s unfortunate her economic problems had to come to light as part of the other candidates’ political agenda. “Most of us don’t have emergency funds that go into the tens of thousands of dollars,” Bell said.
Ms. Bell is somewhat philosophical about her journey:
“It puts me a bit closer to everybody’s regular story, which is – I can tell you what it feels like to run out of money and wonder what you’re going to do and that you have to make really good decisions. So for that, there is no shame in this.”
She is not alone
Ms. Bell is by far not alone. In previous blogs, we have shown that even the rich and famous have run into financial problems and declared bankruptcy.
Family and Human Services Minister Tina Mundy’s individual economic debts ended up being front-page fodder in 2015. Premier Wade MacLauchlan had actually picked her for cabinet then, and one day after being sworn in, approved her resignation after it concerned him that Ms. Mundy had submitted a consumer proposal.
The financial woes of Hannah Bell could happen to anyone. From our experience, we agree with Ms. Bell’s assessment that her journey puts her a bit closer to many people’s regular story.
What to do if you have too much debt
This story shows that anything is possible. Against all odds, Hannah Bell won the election and her debt problems. With our help, you can beat your debt problems too.
Have you been reassessed by CRA and don’t have the money to pay them in a reasonable period? Do you have unmanageable debts from any other reason? Be proactive, just like Hannah Bell and Tina Mundy. It’s time to repair the cycle of debt while you still have alternatives.
The Ira Smith Team has years of experience assisting Canadians like you, getting you back on track to debt free living. CallIra Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today so that we can help you regain control of your life and be stress-free, Starting Over, Starting Now.
Can you file personal and corporate bankruptcy: Introduction
Can you file personal and corporatebankruptcy is a question all small business owners ask us when they come to our office for a free consultation. We discuss local business bankruptcy with entrepreneurs in our office. Their personal and business lives are intertwined. There’s very little distinction between the individual their small business.
This is especially true if their business in unincorporated and is being operated as a proprietorship. Our role is to first understand them as a person and as a business separately. This way we can give the best possible advice. If the business is a proprietorship, then we are only talking personal bankruptcy, or alternatives to avoid bankruptcy, such as a consumer proposal or restructuring proposal.
Can you file personal and corporate bankruptcy: Better to be separate legal entities
If their business legal form is that of a corporation, then we look at both the corporate and personal issues separately. The reason for this is because in the eyes of the law, the corporation and the individual are separate people. Many times it is not necessary for both the corporation and the individual to each file an insolvency process. Maybe only one has to.
Separating your business and personal assets and liabilities is a great reason for incorporating your business. When discussing bankrupting an incorporated company, we also need to consider if there are any Director liabilities. We must also consider the owner’s personal situation. This is so we can make sure they do not do themselves more personal harm than good. We also first look to see if there is a way to restructure and save the corporation.
Can you file personal and corporate bankruptcy: What is bankruptcy
Bankruptcy is a lawful method for the honest but unfortunate company or person to get a remedy from the burden of the financial debts that cannot be repaid. When an assignment in bankruptcy is submitted a “stay of proceedings” is invoked.
What the stay of proceedings means
The stay of proceedings results in stopping creditors from beginning or continuing with litigation against the company or person. The stay of proceedings also stops an unsecured creditor who has obtained a judgement. It stops them from garnishing funds from a bank account or part of the person’s wages. For unsecured creditors, the stay of proceedings also calls a timeout to make sure that one unsecured creditor does not get a benefit over others in regards to the settlement of financial obligations. Keep in mind that the bankruptcy process could also be started by one or more unsecured creditors. They must be owed at least $1,000 in total.
Can creditors push you into bankruptcy?
The unsecured creditor(s) could file a motion with the Court requesting that a Bankruptcy Order be issued against the company or person. The method of bankrupting a corporation in Canada is the same as that of a person. In addition to being able to prove that the company or person owes this unsecured creditor or group at least $1,000, they also need to prove that at least one act of bankruptcy has been committed in the 6 months prior to the filing of the motion.
Secured creditors are generally not impacted by bankruptcy. They can realize upon the assets of the company or person covered by the security. In return for the original loan, the lender required that the borrower put up the security as a condition of the loan. The reason for this was so that if insolvency happens, the lender could sell the assets to try to repay the loan, interest and costs.
The secured creditor only really takes part in the bankruptcy process if after they have sold all the assets covered by their security, they are still owed money. The balance they are still owed is an unsecured debt.
Personal bankruptcy
If an individual’s business is a single proprietorship or a partnership, but not a corporation, legally, the person or people are also the business. So when they deal with the possibility of bankruptcy, all their assets are included, subject to provincial exemptions. Simply put, the assets of the business are not held different from their individual assets, so a small business bankruptcy of this kind is personal bankruptcy. Where does Canada Revenue Agency fit in?
There are generally 3 types of claims that Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has against a business. It does not matter if the business is incorporated or is a sole proprietorship.
Both the HST liability and income tax, in a bankruptcy, is an unsecured claim. However, the HST liability is also a personal claim against the Director(s) of a corporation. Unremitted source deductions are both a deemed trust claim against the bankrupt’s assets and in the case of a corporation, a personal claim against the Director(s) of the company.
When we do our first consultation with a business owner, when the business is run in a corporation, whenever unremitted source deductions or HST is involved, this always leads to a talk about the person’s situation in the event CRA would make a claim against the Director. Some bankruptcy statistics
According to the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada, for the 12 months ending September 30, 2017, there were 125,912 insolvencies in Canada. This is a decrease of 3% over the same time period a year earlier. Consumer insolvency filings were 122,296 or 97.1% of total filings. The consumer filings were split into 59,192 bankruptcies and 63,104 consumer proposals – roughly half and half.
Business insolvency filings for the same time period in all of Canada totalled 3,616, a decrease of 8.1% from the 12 month period one year earlier. Business insolvency filings were split into 2,719 bankruptcies and 897 proposals. These statistics do not include filings by very large corporations under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36).
As you can see, for a country the size of Canada, there were not a lot of business insolvencies during the first 9 months of 2017. The consumer filings were split roughly even between bankruptcy and a consumer proposal, the best consumer bankruptcy alternative.
Alternatives to Declaring Bankruptcy
A consumer proposal entails paying back a part of your financial debts in return for your unsecured creditors forgiving the remaining balance owing. A consumer proposal provides a significant benefit for a proprietor or partner in an unincorporated business. Unlike in a bankruptcy, your assets are not available for seizure by the licensed insolvency trustee (LIT).
You can take up to 60 months to pay off your consumer proposal. How much you will have to offer your creditors depends on what the unsecured creditors could expect in your bankruptcy. Working with a LIT, you work out that amount through discussion and analysis. A LIT can explain the entire process to you. From a financial viewpoint, a consumer proposal is better than your bankruptcy because it permits the unsecured creditors to recoup a larger part of the debt than they would receive in your bankruptcy.
What is best for you and your business?
If you find you or your business is in a financial danger zone, contactIra Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. We’re full-service insolvency and financial restructuring practice serving companies and people throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) facing financial crisis or bankruptcy that need a plan for Starting Over, Starting Now.
Your financial problems can be solved with immediate action and the right plan. Give us a call today.
Income tax debt relief: Introduction
Full disclosure: 
Transfer of property under s.160 of the Income Tax Act: Introduction
: Introduction
