Tag: Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ONTARIO PENSION PLAN: DOUG FORD GUARANTEES ONTARIO PENSION PLAN RELIEF FOR ALGOMA STEELWORKERS

ontario pension plan

We are trying something new. At the bottom is an audiogram of this Ontario pension plan Brandon’s blog. If you would prefer to listen to it, and not read it, scroll down to the bottom and press on the play button. Let us know what you think by sending us a message in the Question box below.

Ontario pension plan: Algoma Steel

Ontario’s Premier Doug Ford is promising his help for Ontario steelworkers as well as their Ontario pension plan following the United States’ federal government’s 25 percent tariff on Canadian steel.

In news recently to Algoma Steel Inc. staff members in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., Ford claimed the provincial government would assist in passing revisions under the Ontario Pension Benefits Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.8, along with insurance coverage from the Pension Benefits Guarantee Fund, subject to particular conditions.

Premier Ford didn’t provide any additional information on what specifically the help might be. However, he stated that negotiations are happening and extra info about just how Ontario is sustaining Algoma will certainly be introduced as quickly as possible.

Ontario pension plan: United Steelworkers

At the same time, the United Steelworkers union is prompting the federal government to enact regulations that would safeguard pension plans as well as benefits in situations of company bankruptcy, reorganization or liquidation. Union participants will be meeting legislators to check regulations focused on changing the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA) and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA).

Ontario pension plan: Proposed federal legislation to date

We previously described the efforts of Scott Duvall, MP for Hamilton MountainA, , MP for Manicouagan and Senator Art Eggleton:

Ontario pension plan: Canadian Association of Retired Persons

The Canadian Association of Retired Persons (CARP) is calling out the federal government, claiming it’s unreasonable that Sears Canada could pay out millions of dollars in shareholder dividends, a large part of which went to the US. At the same time, the pension plans of Sears Holding Corp.’s American staff members will be safeguarded by the U.S.’s Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. while Canadian workers will certainly see benefits cuts.

“It’s time for the government to take decisive action to protect Canadian pensioners,” said Wanda Morris, chief advocacy and engagement officer at the CARP, in a press release.

Ontario pension plan: Private member’s Bill C-405

On October 17, 2018, Bill C-405 was presented by Conservative Erin O’Toole, MP for Durham. It is called “An Act to amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act”.

The proposal is to change the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 (R.S.C., 1985, c. 32 (2nd Supp.)), setting out what ought to take place if a business is under liquidation with the CCAA or Part III of the BIA.

His proposed changes lay out what should happen if a company is under liquidation through the CCAA or BIA. It proposes to allow, pending the permission of participants and beneficiaries, to transform the framework of the plan and/or move the pension’s assets to one more plans.

Granted this would probably be a necessary part of any global overhaul of pension plans. However, it is important to realize that it doesn’t do anything to safeguard the pensions or give the plan members and beneficiaries greater priority.

Ontario pension plan: Has a life event thrown you a curveball

Life has a way of throwing curve balls sometimes to good people. In the event of:

  • Illness;
  • addiction;
  • divorce;
  • family death; or
  • job loss

unbearable financial pressures can occur.

The Ira Smith Team has generations and decades of experience in dealing with people or their companies fighting the pain, stress and suffering that comes with financial problems and too much debt.

Our method for each person is to develop an outcome where Starting Over, Starting Now occurs. This begins the minute you come through our door. You’re just one call far from taking the essential actions to return to leading a healthy and balanced life, moving forward pain-free.

Call us today for your cost-free consultation.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CORPORATE BANKRUPTCIES CANADA: SENATOR EGGLETON PROPOSES NEW PENSION FUND CANADA LAW

corporate bankruptcies canada
corporate bankruptcies Canada

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: Introduction

The U.S. Steel Canada court-supervised restructuring and the court-supervised liquidation of Sears Canada have something in common. They both forced us to focus on the treatment of pensioners in corporate bankruptcies Canada under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) (or restructurings and liquidations under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA)).

We previously wrote about these pension fund Canada issues and the beginning of the focus in Ottawa for the need for new legislation. My previous blogs were:

  1. TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: NDP WANTS FEDERAL INSOLVENCY LAWS CHANGED SO THERE IS PENSION PLAN SECURITY WHEN FINANCIALLY TROUBLED BUSINESSES FAIL – September 27, 2017
  2. SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING – November 1, 2017
  3. SEARS CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN SHORTFALL: MP SCOTT DUVALL COMES THROUGH ON HIS PROMISE IN CANADIAN PARLIAMENT – November 8, 2017

Senator Art Eggleton, P.‍C., shortly before his retirement proposed BILL S-253, An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and other Acts and Regulations (pension plans).

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: Bill S-253

Bill S-253 passed First Reading on September 18, 2018, and Second Reading was moved on September 25, 2018. This Bill proposes to amend the BIA as well as the CCAA. It proposes to make certain that claims for unfunded obligations or solvency deficiencies of a pension are accorded priority. This is for both solvent companies and companies that would be rendered insolvent by certain payments to shareholders..

This proposed legislation likewise would change the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 as well as the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985 to equip the Superintendent of Financial Institutions to identify that the financing of a pension is impaired and to recommend procedures to be taken by the employer in regard of the financing of such plan.1

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: Is Bill S-253 new?

Yes and no. In our earlier blogs, I told you about the proposals by Bloc Québécois MP Marilène Gill’s Bill, C-372 and Hamilton Mountain NDP MP Scott Duvall rose in the House of Commons for leave to introduce Bill C-384. The amendments proposed to the BIA and CCAA in those proposed Bills, to create a priority for unfunded obligations or solvency deficiencies, are pretty well the same as in Senator Eggleton’s Bill S-253.

However, Senator Eggleton’s Bill goes further. It requires a company to report to the Superintendent of Financial Institutions:

“…of any proposed or actual decision of the employer, transaction or event, including the repurchase of shares of the employer or the payment of dividends to shareholders of the employer…”

that would cause a solvency deficiency and/or render the company insolvent.

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: So what now for Bill S-253?

To become legislation, a Bill needs to initially be presented in either the Senate or the House of Commons. It needs to after that go through numerous phases in each House: 1st, 2nd and 3rd reading. After that, it has to obtain Royal Assent. No doubt there will be a lot of debating and tinkering with this Bill. It will be interesting to see if this Bill makes it all the way through, or dies before becoming legislation.

However, the picture is clear. The result of the Sears Canada dividend payments and asset liquidation is clear. Shareholders received dividends and pensioners will have to take a deep cut in their pensions. This has caught the attention of the legislators in Ottawa. It will be interesting to see if the political will is there for pensioners to be protected in Canadian insolvency cases.

Corporate bankruptcies Canada: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company experiencing financial difficulties? If yes, call the Ira Smith Team. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door.

The earlier you contact us, the more options we will have to implement. Whether it is a corporate restructuring or personal debt settlement through a consumer proposal, the goal is to avoid bankruptcy. However, if bankruptcy turns out to be the best option, we can assist there too.

You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, ending the pain and stress you are feeling forever. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for your free consultation.ira smith trustee

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

330 UNIVERSITY AVENUE: CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY COURT TORONTO SECRETS EXPOSED FROM THE CANADA LIFE BUILDING

330 university avenue

330 University Avenue: Introduction

On the west side of University Avenue and immediately north of Queen Street, lies 330 University Avenue, in Toronto’s core. This University Ave. building is known as the Canada Life Building. Work on the building began in 1929 for the brand-new head office of the Canada Life Assurance Company and it opened up in 1931. It was the 4th structure to act as the head office of Canada Life. Most noteworthy is that this company was Canada’s earliest, as well as the biggest insurance provider.

330 University Avenue: Brief building history

The development of this fifteen-floor Beaux Arts structure was by Sproatt & Rolph. It stands at 285 feet (87 m), 321 feet (97.8 m) including its famous weather beacon. This building was the very first of scheduled buildings along University Avenue, however, the Great Depression stopped those plans. When it finished, it was among the highest structures in Toronto. It stays one of the biggest office complexes in Toronto with windows that tenants can open. In 1997, Toronto City Council designated the building a heritage property.

330 University Avenue: The most noticeable part of the building

The weather beacon was added in 1951. Its colour codes sum up the weather report at a look. Environment Canada out of Toronto Pearson International Airport revises the weather details 4 times each day.

The top light indicates:
Consistent green = clear
Stable red = overcast
Blinking red = rainfall
Blinking = snow

The white lights along the tower show:

Lights rising = warmer
Lights running down = colder
Solid = consistent temperature level/ No adjustment

During the day, the weather tower shows the weather for that day. The evening signals show the weather for the next day.

330 University Avenue: 330 university avenue 8th floor

But enough of the history lesson. Maybe you didn’t come to this vlog to learn about the building’s history; I will now change the focus. On the 8th floor are the courtrooms. These Courts are presided over by Judges of the Superior Court of Justice Toronto Region. All corporate insolvency matters, certainly not just corporate bankruptcy matters, are part of what is known as the Commercial List.

Personal bankruptcy in Toronto Ontario is normally first heard in a different Court up the street at 393 University Avenue before a Registrar in Bankruptcy. The Registrar is a Master of the Court hearing bankruptcy matters. Most importantly, a Commerical List Judge in 330 University Avenue, Toronto Ontario M5G 1R8 must hear any appeal of a Registrar’s decision. This is for the reason that is what the rules state.

330 University Avenue: The corporate insolvency matters overview

The Court at 330 University deals mainly with corporate insolvency matters. Examples are:

  1. Corporate receivership – appointment of a receiver, motions by the receiver or a stakeholder requesting approval for specific relief, approval motions for sale of assets or fee and costs of the receivership administration, and above all, the receiver’s discharge application.
  2. Corporate restructuring – all motions for bankruptcy protection and restructuring of a company under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), motions by the Court-appointed monitor or a stakeholder requesting approvals, approval motions for the Restructuring Plan of Arrangement including voting rights of all stakeholders, approval of the implementation of the Plan of Arrangement, approval of the fee and costs of the CCAA administration, monitor’s discharge application.
  3. Personal and Corporate bankruptcy matters – as indicated above, these would mostly be either an appeal from Registrar in Bankruptcy’s decision or an opposed matter that the Registrar was not allowed to hear under the bankruptcy rules.

330 University Avenue: Do I need a lawyer to appear at 330 University Avenue?

Corporations are not a human being, so they cannot show up in Court and speak. Therefore, a company requires a person to act on its behalf. Although a shareholder or officer and director authorized to speak on behalf of the company can represent the company in Court, it is not advisable.

I say this because the legal matters heard are most complex. As a result, an experienced insolvency lawyer is necessary to properly represent the position of either the company or a stakeholder.

The licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as trustee in bankruptcy) who is acting as the receiver, monitor or trustee, similarly will have a competent insolvency or bankruptcy lawyer acting on its behalf. Motion filings always include very detailed reports.

Complex text, financial calculations and detailed exhibits will form part of the filed material. Most laypeople would need both an independent licensed insolvency trustee as a financial advisor, as well as an experienced corporate insolvency lawyer on their team. Therefore, the costs can mount quickly.

330 University Avenue: Is your company going to be in Court either for a restructuring or as a stakeholder?

Is your company dealing with severe economic problems and you aren’t sure what to do? There’s no embarrassment in looking for specialist, financial advice. As a licensed insolvency trustee, the Ira Smith Team can check your company’s circumstances and assist you to get to the most effective solution to solve your company’s financial issues. Several of our successful case studies can be found on our website.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is here to assist. The government licenses and supervises us. Hence, to keep our license in good standing, we must adhere to a stringent code of ethics. We are well-known to the Judges at 330 University Avenue and all the Toronto insolvency lawyers.

I know the pain and discomfort you are in because of your corporate financial problems. You will certainly discover that we use a pleasant, non-judgmental technique in understanding you, your goals and in restructuring your company.

Give me a phone call today and allow me to address your economic issues Starting Over, Starting Now.330 university avenue

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BUSINESS DEBT ADVICE CANADA: TROUBLE SHOOTING DEBT STRAPPED COMPANIES

business debt advice canada

2

 

Business debt advice Canada: Introduction

When it involves money, timing is everything. Your business is getting closer to the top of its banking line and your banker is asking for more information than usual. This is where your heart starts pounding faster and your stress level increases. This is the moment you can seize to right size your business or else it very well may fail. The purpose of my blog is to give you business debt advice Canada.

Business debt advice Canada: Relationships can become strained

Relationships can become strained with your lender and suppliers when business debts are mounting and your company is facing a cash crisis. However, there are actions a borrower can take to prevent calamity. Reassuringly, most of the time, lenders would rather support you if you have a viable business plan to correct the situation going forward, and not putting you out of business.

I hope the suggestions below shows you that you should look at this as an opportunity to fix your business. I have found that in trying times when a company has mounting debts and insufficient cash, there is no replacement for good management.

A solid business plan showing how the company will turn itself around is what your lender wants to see. Communication with your lender and your suppliers is key. Do not hide from the problem. Face it head on. If your business plan shows you can turn things around, you will feel like you are dealing from a sound platform and not just running scared.

Business debt advice Canada: Take emotion out of the equation

These situations generally become more tense before they become better. You, your lender and your unpaid suppliers all want the same thing. You all want the company to be successful and profitable, and to be able to pay all of its bills in full when due. Your lender and suppliers are not out to get you. However, if they do not: (i) know that you have solid business turnaround plan; and (ii) receive ongoing information to show what steps you are taking to fix the problems, they will have no choice but to turn off the tap.

I have unfortunately seen too many companies fail in their business restructuring efforts due to lack of communication. The turnaround plan may have been sound, but nobody knew. This only creates ill will among the stakeholders and a result that nobody wants.

Business debt advice Canada: Informal and formal turnaround options

I must preface this section by saying do not be afraid to consult with a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT) for business debt advisory services. Trustees’ training makes them expert in assessing troubled business situations and implementing turnaround steps. A LIT does a lot more than just bankruptcy.

You will find it helpful to have a professional trustee assist you in developing your turnaround business plan, implementing it and keeping management focussed and accountable. You will also find it very helpful to have a LIT go with you for meetings with your banker; there will be many of those!

Business debt advice Canada: Troubleshooting

Fully understanding the full current status of the company showing signs of financial trouble is key. Things that I focus on early on when looking at troubled companies are:

  • What are all the different assets of the company and where are they located?
  • Are all the assets properly insured?
  • What is the going-concern value and the estimated liquidation value of the assets?
  • What is the full extent of all liabilities and business debt levels? This includes amounts owing to the government for:
  • What is the status of premises lease(s) for both remaining term and cost?
  • Is the cost of the leased premises above or below current market value?
  • Has anyone personally guaranteed bank debt, the landlord or any other creditor that would affect turnaround decisions to be taken?
  • Has a current crisis cash-flow statement and turnaround business plan been developed and tested for reasonableness?
  • What are the causes of the company’s current financial problems and how likely are those causes to recur?

This list is not meant to be exhaustive. No doubt other questions will arise as answers are found for these first questions. However, this is the information I first want to get before embarking on developing a restructuring plan.

Business debt advice Canada: Informal restructuring and turnaround

If the business problems have been identified early and have not been allowed to fester, then an informal restructuring may very well work. Perhaps all that will be needed is some accommodation from the lender both in time and money. Banks are quite willing to enter into a forbearance agreement with their corporate client allowing the time (and sometimes more money) to see if the turnaround plan will work.

The bank would rather have a successful turnaround than shut you down. The bank needs to know that management has the bench strength to pull off the restructuring. If not, they will expect you to have a lawyer experienced in turnarounds and a LIT active on your team.

Companies that have relatively few trade suppliers may also be able to work out a restructuring of their unsecured debt. The fewer people you have to talk to and get onside, the higher the likelihood of success. Of course, the trust developed from earlier dealings is very important. If there is no trust, or if there are just too many suppliers, an informal restructuring will not work with them.

Business debt advice Canada: Formal restructuring

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA) are the two primary Federal statutes that govern corporate restructuring in Canada. The requirements of each statute and the exact processes themselves are weighty enough to deserve their own blog. However, the takeaways from this blog on formal restructuring are:

  • In a formal restructuring, I still go through the checklist I have identified above of issues to look into.
  • Under the BIA, the restructuring section is Part I Division III of the BIA
  • If a restructuring under the BIA does not receive the necessary creditor AND court approval, the company will automatically be bankrupt
  • In a formal restructuring, the company stays in control of its assets and business operations
  • A formal restructuring invokes a stay of proceedings so no party can begin or continue litigation or enforcement action against the company
  • A company needs to have at least $5 million in debt to restructure under the CCAA
  • A BIA restructuring will be less costly than a CCAA restructuring because the company does not have to go to Court for approval every time it wishes to do something
  • The term “bankruptcy protection” in Canada, refers to a formal restructuring under either the BIA or CCAA.

Business debt advice Canada: What to do if your company has too much debt

Is your business facing financial problems? Perhaps your company is in need of a restructuring. The Ira Smith Team can develop a restructuring plan which may or may not include the need to file for bankruptcy protection.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. Team understands the pain you are going through trying to keep your company alive while trying to negotiate with potential purchasers. We understand that you are playing beat the clock, and the pain and stress you are feeling thinking that you may just run out of time. The bankruptcy protection process can ease this stress and provide a level playing field so that no potential purchaser takes advantage of you.

The Ira Smith Team has a great deal of experience in running a stalking horse stalking horse asset purchase agreement. The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points. Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation. We can end your pain and put your company back on a healthy profitable path, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TOYS R US BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION IN CANADA: COURT AGREES WITH TOYS R US BANKRUPTCY COUNSEL NEGATIVE = POSITIVE

2 1920x1080 1

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Introduction

I want to tell you about a recent Ontario Court decision about the claims process approved in the Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd. and Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltee (Toys R Us) bankruptcy protection proceedings. The Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada began with the Court making the Initial Order on September 19, 2017. This Initial Order was made under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, as amended (CCAA).

On January 25, 2018, the Toys R Us bankruptcy lawyers attended in Court. There was a motion before the Court to extend the time that Toys “R” Us remains under bankruptcy protection to try to restructure. The motion was also for the Court to approve a draft claims process to quantify the outstanding creditor claims.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: The normal claims process

It is the claims procedure which while not novel, is also not regularly seen. That is what I want to talk about.

In a bankruptcy regulated by the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c.B-3 (BIA), creditors are required to prove their claims independently. They do so by providing to the trustee in bankruptcy sworn proof of claim forms that are accompanied by supporting invoices and other pertinent documents. The detailed treatment for creditor claims to be proven and counted is not set out in the CCAA like it is in the BIA.

The Court routinely grants claims procedure orders under the Court’s general powers under ss. 11 and 12 of the CCAA. Claims process orders generally involve developing a technique to interact with all the creditors. This is so they can file their claims. It normally creates a process to communicate to (potential) creditors. It tells them that there is a process they must follow to prove their claims by a specific date.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Why do we even need a claims process?

The claims process includes an opportunity for the company under restructuring proceedings, or its representative, to check all claims. The Monitor, or its representative, can disallow creditors’ claims, either in whole or in part. The claims procedure establishes an adjudication mechanism. If claims are not agreed upon and cannot be settled by negotiation, then the adjudication process begins. This could be either in court or first by arbitration. Decisions on the claims of creditors are then subject to an appeal to the Court.

Claims procedure orders will usually also set a claims bar date. Claims will not be accepted after this date. it is necessary to have a cut off to give the right numbers for voting and distribution purposes. Late claims won’t be allowed. In this way the Monitor achieves finality.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Who has the most up to date books and records?

Most large businesses, including Toys R Us, have readily ascertainable payables outstanding. Sophisticated electronic systems carefully track these amounts, supervised and reviewed by the company’s senior financial staff. The electronic systems not only track purchases and payments, but also the many vendor allowances which are offsets to the accounts payable.

Such offsets include:

  • guaranteed sale provisions, which means if the product does not sell within a specific period, Toys R Us can either return the unsold items to the vendor, or take massive discounts against amounts owing for such products;
  • early payment discounts, promotional allowances, warranty fees, co-op/marketing fees and defect fees; and
  • shipping and warehousing fees

So for large companies like Toys R Us, the vendor will most likely be reconciling their books to what the company shows on its books net of the various offsets.

The recommendation to the Court was for a different type of claims process. As indicated above, the process required by the BIA is a positive one. It requires each creditor to prove the state of its outstanding claims by submitting a sworn proof of claim backed up by invoices.

The draft form of claims process submitted to the Court in the Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada proceedings was a different one. It proposed to list creditor claims from the company’s books and records and to provide each known creditor with a simple claim statement. The statement would set out the amount of the respective creditor’s claim recognized by the company. If a creditor agrees with the amount that the company says it owes, the creditor need do nothing and the listed claim will become the final proven claim at the claims bar date. I call this a negative claims process.

Creditors who disagree with the amounts set out in their claims statement can file a dispute notice with the Monitor by the claims bar date to begin a review process.

ISI 4
toys r us bankruptcy protection in canada

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Advantages of the negative option

This negative option has certain advantages in companies such as Toys R Us. These advantages include:

  • eliminating the need for filing proofs of claim and supporting evidence in the majority of cases;
  • guarantees that known claims won’t lose out if a certain percentage of creditors to fail to file their claims on a timely basis; and
  • making the claims process streamlined; and
  • making the process easier for recognizing and counting all known creditor claims

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: The negative option approved by the Court

The proposed claims process met the needs of the Court to ensure that any claims procedure is both fair and reasonable. The negative option claims process proposed in the Toys R Us case met the needs of the Court. The Court approved the negative claims process in the Order dated January 25, 2018.

Toys R Us bankruptcy protection in Canada: Does your company require restructuring?

Your company may not be as large as Toys R US, but it is the most important one to you. Your company may be facing financial challenges, and you have tried everything you can think of to solve the problems. But the red ink still flows. Many families rely on you and your company to continue for their survival. You have invested your money, your blood, sweat and tears in your company, and want to do everything possible to save it.

If you find your company in this situation, then you need the help of a professional trustee immediately. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. If we consult with you early, we could develop a restructuring and turnaround strategy. By doing this your business will once again thrive. It may not be as complex as the Toys R Us bankruptcy protection process in Canada, but it is the most significant one for you.

Our approach for every person and company is to develop an outcome where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. You’re just one telephone call away from taking the important actions to return to leading a healthy, balanced, and stress free life.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today.

TOYS R US BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA 0
toys r us bankruptcy protection in canada
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SEARS CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN SHORTFALL: MP SCOTT DUVALL COMES THROUGH ON HIS PROMISE IN CANADIAN PARLIAMENT

2

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Introduction

On November 6, 2017, Hamilton Mountain NDP MP Scott Duvall rose in the House of Commons for leave to introduce Bill C-384. It is titled “An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (pension plans and group insurance programs)”. Mr. Duvall’s motivation was the Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall introduces Private Member’s Bill C-384

Here is what Mr. Duvall said:

“Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this time to thank my seconder, my colleague who has done great work and works very hard in this House, and who has also helped me a lot on this bill.

I rise today to introduce a private member’s bill titled, an act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. This bill will amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the CCAA so that companies will have to bring any pension plan fund to 100% before paying any other secured creditors. It also makes amendments to require companies to pay any termination or severance pay owing before paying any secured creditors.

Other amendments will prevent a company from stopping the payment of any post-retirement benefits during any proceedings under the BIA or CCAA. These amendments will inject some fairness into a process that often sees the interests of workers, retirees, and their families placed behind all others.

We must fix the imbalances in current legislation and provide Canadian workers, retirees, and their families with the protection they expect and deserve. I am hopeful that all my colleagues in Parliament will put aside their partisan differences and support this bill. Canadian workers, retirees, and their families deserve no less.”

Although he did not mention it specifically by name in the House of Commons, Mr. Duvall has said that he would introduce such a Bill as a result of the Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall walks the walk

In our September 27, 2017 blog, TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION: NDP WANTS FEDERAL INSOLVENCY LAWS CHANGED SO THERE IS PENSION PLAN SECURITY WHEN FINANCIALLY TROUBLED BUSINESSES FAIL, we told you that Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall, the NDP pension plan critic, informed a group at the United Steelworkers’ Hall that he will present a private member’s bill to secure employees’ pension plans and benefits, and pressure business to offer termination or severance pay, prior to paying secured lenders.

With his Bill C-384, Mr. Duvall has lived up to his promise.

3bestaward
sears canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: This is actually the second Bill attempting deal with this problem

In our November 1, 2017 blog, SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING, we reported that Bloc Québécois MP Marilène Gill’s Private Member’s Bill C-372, passed First Reading. That Bill is titled “An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (pension plans and group insurance plans)”. In that blog, we described the provisions included in that Bill.

Like Mr. Duvall, Ms. Gill is trying to pass legislation to avoid another Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall insolvency situation.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: What does Bill C-384 actually say

The purpose of this blog, is to describe the terms of Mr. Duvall’s Bill.

Mr. Duvall’s Private Member’s Bill C-384 passed First Reading. It is very similar to Ms. Gill’s BIll C-372. He wishes to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) as follows:

  • In order to be approved by the Court, a corporate restructuring proposal under the BIA, for a company with a prescribed pension plan, the Proposal must include payment in full of any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency. The amount is calculated at the time of the filing of the Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal (NOI) or the Proposal if there is no NOI filed.
  • New section 69. 7 be added to the BIA that in the restructuring proposal of an employer, upon filing, until the discharge of the Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT), or the insolvent employer becomes bankrupt, all amounts that the employer must contribute under any arrangement for the benefit of the employees, must continue throughout the restructuring period. This would cover any pension plan, health, injury or accident plans and group insurance coverage.
  • The unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency calculation is called “special payments” in Bill C-384. The calculation is by section 9 of the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985.
  • In a receivership, the receiver is personally liable for paying any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency. However, the receiver’s liability is only from the proceeds of the sale of current assets.
  • In either a receivership or corporate bankruptcy, the charge for any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency would rank ahead of the charge of any other secured creditor. It is interesting to note that the Bill does not attempt to provide such a security ranking to anything other than the pension liability or solvency deficiency.
  • The Officers and Directors of the company are not entitled to the benefit of this secured charge. Even if they are participants in the pension plan that has the unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency.
  • New subsection 136(1) (d. 001) to the BIA, creating an extra class of preferred creditor. A preferred creditor is an unsecured creditor who ranks ahead of the ordinary unsecured creditors and ranks after the secured creditors. The Bill states that it would say that the amount of any termination or severance pay owed to an employee by a bankrupt employer, less any amount previously paid by the LIT, would rank in priority right after the wages owed to the employee.
  • There are also proposed amendments to the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) in Bill C-384. It is to bring the same changes in that statute as those to the BIA described above. The intent is that the treatment under both statutes is the same.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Now it is up to Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party

We will now have to wait and see what happens to both Ms. Gill’s and Mr. Duvall’s Private Member’s Bills. As we previously reported, it is unusual that a Private Member’s Bill becomes real legislation. As the Liberals hold a majority in Parliament, if they don’t want it, or a revised Bill for the same purpose, to pass, it won’t.

Sears Canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall: Does your company need a restructuring and turnaround plan?

Is your company insolvent and needs to restructure? Is your business viable but can only employ people and carry on business if it can restructure its debt? Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Team. If we meet with you early on, we can create a restructuring and turnaround strategy. That way your company won’t have to be like Sears Canada closing.

sears canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall 0
sears canada defined benefit pension plan shortfall
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SEARS CANADA CLOSING: POLITICIANS WANT NEW LAWS TO PROTECT PENSIONERS DUE TO SEARS CANADA CLOSING

2

Sears Canada Closing: Introduction

Following the Sears Canada failed restructuring, is the Sears Canada closing of all stores. It is leaving 16,000 retirees unclear about the future of their underfunded pension plan. Support is expanding for brand-new laws to better protect Canadian workers during a company’s collapse.

Sears Canada Closing: What CARP has to say

CARP, a nationwide not-for-profit group formerly called the Canadian Association for Retired Persons, was recently on Parliament Hill to meet dozens of MPs as it lobbies for law adjustments.

Wanda Morris, vice-president of CARP, stated that CARP is requesting for the unfunded pension liability be provided priority position so it goes to the front of the line.

Pensioners hold no priority when it pertains to dividing up assets through a bankruptcy, and Ms. Morris wants protection for retirees for underfunded defined benefit pensions when the company goes through a restructuring or into bankruptcy.

Ms. Morris stated that along with the practically 16,000 retirees at Sears, CARP estimates that there are about 1.3 million workers in Canada that possibly could be in danger with defined advantage pension. Sears Canada closing all stores has made the plight of retirees a front and centre issue for CARP.

Sears Canada Closing: Private Member’s Bill C-372 passes First Reading

On Oct. 17, Bloc Québécois MP Marilène Gill suggested a member’s bill, C-372. The intent is to change the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

The change attempts to correct the injustice dealt with by retired workers whose pension as well as group insurance policy benefits are not secured when their company declares bankruptcy or undergoes restructuring. The changes are a result of the Sears Canada employees and retirees treatment, as a result of Sears Canada closing locations.

Sears Canada Closing: What the NDP has to say

Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall plans to introduce his very own private member’s bill to try to solve this problem. While he notes he has actually had talks with Gill, he claimed his suggestion will be a bit different.

Mr. Duvall specifies that his bill will amend the regulations from where it’s worded currently. He wishes that when a company goes into bankruptcy protection, the pensioners will be a secured creditor. He is also responding to the process which has led to Sears Canada closing store locations,

Sears Canada Closing: Bloc MP Marilène Gill and her Bill C-372

On October 17, 2017, MP Marilène Gill rose in Parliament and stated:

“Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to introduce my first bill in the House today, a private member’s bill that seeks to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

This bill seeks to correct the injustice faced by retired workers whose pension plans and group insurance plans are not protected when their company goes bankrupt or undergoes restructuring.

I will do everything in my power to ensure that this bill receives royal assent, that way, we can help prevent retirees, like those from my riding who are here today to support me, from losing their pensions, and improve the existing legislation by giving pension plans’ unfunded liabilities preferred creditor status, among other things. I hope my colleagues will be supporting this bill.”

Sears Canada Closing: Can it get Royal Assent?

BILL C-372 which passed First Reading on October 17, 2017 is named “An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (pension plans and group insurance plans)”.

Private member’s bills such as this one rarely pass the House. However, I thought it would be useful to describe what Ms. Gill’s views are as a result of Sears Canada closing.

Below is my analysis of how BILL C-372 proposes to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA). The impetus of course is certain high-profile corporate restructurings/failures with underfunded defined benefit pension plans. With Sears Canada closing, Ms. Gill put forward her private member’s bill.

The most recent corporate failure which initiated her private member’s bill of course was a result of Sears Canada closing.

Sears Canada Closing: Bill C-372 proposed BIA and CCAA amendments

Bill C-372 wishes to amend the BIA as follows:

  • In order to be approved by the Court, a corporate restructuring proposal under the BIA, for a company with a prescribed pension plan, the Proposal must include payment in full of any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency calculated at the time of the filing of the Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal (NOI) or the Proposal if there is no NOI filed.
  • The unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency calculation is by section 9 of the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985.
  • In a receivership, the receiver is personally liable for paying any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency but only from the proceeds of the sale of current assets.
  • In either a receivership or corporate bankruptcy, the charge for any unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency would rank ahead of the charge of any other secured creditor.
  • The Officers and Directors of the company are not entitled to the benefit of this secured charge. Even if they are participants in the pension plan that has the unfunded pension liability or solvency deficiency.
  • In a corporate restructuring proposal or bankruptcy, the amount not paid under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (Canada) (WEPPA). It is the amount to adequately indemnify the beneficiaries in the event the employer ceases to take part in a group insurance plan. Such a plan is one that provides for the payment of benefits to, or in respect of, employees or former employees for, among other things, life, disability, health or dental insurance is a preferred claim. It will be a preferred, but still an unsecured claim.
  • The amount equal to the difference between any severance pay or compensation in lieu of notice owed by an employer to an employee and any amount previously paid by the trustee for that severance pay or compensation in lieu of notice.

There are also proposed amendments to the CCAA in Bill C-372. It is to bring the same changes in that statute as described above. The intent is that the treatment under both statutes is the same. I won’t repeat those again.

3bestaward
sears canada closing

Sears Canada Closing: Will Bill C-372 become law?

As I stated above, it is very rare that a private member’s bill becomes real legislation. The other reason is that the Liberals hold a majority in Parliament. If they don’t want it to pass, it won’t.

On October 25, 2017, Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains said the Liberal government has no plans to change laws to protect pensioners in the wake of Sears’ bankruptcy. That is a pretty definitive statement.

So right now it seems there is a lack of political will to make the proposed law amendments. I suspect that on a financial basis, there will also be opposition for the following reasons:

  • In most cases, it will be impossible to have a successful large corporate restructuring if 100% of unfunded pension liability must be paid. Therefore, jobs will not be saved if we have more corporate bankruptcy filings instead of restructurings.
  • Lenders will have to now ignore current assets in the borrowing base of corporations. This will make corporate borrowing much more difficult for solvent corporations with pension plans to carry on business.
  • Lenders may have to reserve the entire amount of any unfunded amounts. They will rank ahead in a receivership or bankruptcy.
  • Severance pay or compensation in lieu of notice will now be a claim ranking ahead of trade suppliers in a corporate restructuring or corporate bankruptcy. This may alter the amount of an unsecured credit line a supplier will be willing to give to a customer.
  • It will cause more chaos to normal lending and trade practices which will be a problem for any government.
  • Claims under the group health indemnity provisions may not result in any real benefit to employees of a company going through either a corporate restructuring or bankruptcy. There is rarely funds left over after the claims of secured creditors.

We will keep monitoring this important issue. We will update you when MP Scott Duvall puts forward his private member’s bill and as other matters arise.

Sears Canada Closing: What To Do If You Or Your Company Need A Financial Restructuring?

It is now Sears Canada closing time. If you’re attempting to discover a means to restructure your firm’s debt, so that you can avoid a Sears Canada closing scenario, call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. If we meet with you early on, we can create a restructuring and turnaround strategy. That way your company won’t have to be like Sears Canada closing.

Our strategy for every person is to create a result where Starting Over, Starting Now occurs, starting the minute you walk in the door. You’re simply one telephone call away from taking the crucial steps to go back to leading a healthy, balanced and tension free life.

sears canada closing 8
sears canada closing

 

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DEEMED TRUST CANADA REVENUE AGENCY CLAIM: CAN THE CANADA REVENUE AGENCY SUPER PRIORITY LIEN BE PRIMED IN A CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING?

2

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency claim: Introduction

Section 227 (4) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (ITA) and the mirrored provisions in the Employment Insurance Act (Canada), create deemed trusts against the property of a tax debtor. When a tax debtor doesn’t remit employee source deductions or HST collections, a deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim arises.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency claim: Parts of the Initial Order

In every Court-supervised restructuring under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), there are several standard provisions in the Initial Order issued by the Court. In addition to the stay of proceedings provision, there’s also the need to make sure that the insolvent company has:

  • sufficient debtor in possession (DIP) funding to survive the restructuring process;
  • the Directors incentivized to stay in their capacity; and
  • the services of the Court-appointed Monitor and its legal counsel properly retained.

The normal way of achieving this is to give Court-ordered priority charges. Examples are for the borrowing authority, the Directors’ Charge and the Administrative Charge. This is so the lender, the Directors and the Court-appointed Monitor and its legal counsel know that there is a source of (re)payment.

Priority charges are made when certain affected parties may not be represented in Court. Therefore, a standard “comeback clause” is also in the standard Initial Order. This allows any affected party to make a motion before the Court to amend such Court-ordered priority charges.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency claim: The Canada North Group Inc. decision

A decision was recently released by the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Canada North Group Inc. (Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act), 2017 ABQB 550. The Court case reviewed several issues, but the one I found most interesting was one specific question. Can Court-ordered priority charges under a CCAA restructuring prime the deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim?

The decision goes through a very interesting analysis as to whether a deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim provides Her Majesty with the ownership of the property of the company or is merely a secured interest in the property. Section 227 (4) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the mirrored provisions in Employment Insurance Act (Canada), create deemed trusts. Section 37(2) of the CCAA explicitly preserves their operation. Specifically, can Court-ordered priority charges under a CCAA restructuring prime the deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency claim: Section 227(4.1) of the ITA

Section 227(4.1) of the ITA states:

“Extension of trust

(4.1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (except sections 81.1 and 81.2 of that Act), any other enactment of Canada, any enactment of a province or any other law, where at any time an amount deemed by subsection 227(4) to be held by a person in trust for Her Majesty is not paid to Her Majesty in the way and when provided under this Act, property of the person and property held by any secured creditor (as defined in subsection 224(1.3)) of that person that but for a security interest (as defined in subsection 224(1.3)) would be property of the person, equal in value to the amount so deemed to be held in trust is deemed

(a) to be held, from the time the amount was deducted or withheld by the person, separate and apart from the property of the person, in trust for Her Majesty whether or not the property is subject to such a security interest, and

(b) to form no part of the estate or property of the person from the time the amount was so deducted or withheld, whether or not the property has in fact been kept separate and apart from the estate or property of the person and whether or not the property is subject to such a security interest

and is property beneficially owned by Her Majesty despite of any security interest in such property and in their proceeds, and the proceeds of such property shall be paid to the Receiver General in priority to all such security interests.”

3bestaward
deemed trust canada revenue agency claim

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: What is the nature of Canada Revenue Agency’s interest?

The Court raised, amongst other things, the following two questions:

  1. What is the nature of Canada Revenue Agency’s interest?
  2. Does the statutory secured status deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim elevate it above a priority charge?

Canada Revenue Agency relied on the trust provisions in the Fiscal Statutes. It argued that it holds a proprietary and not secured interest in the debtor’s property. Key to its position under its deemed trust claim is the concluding phrase in s 227(4.1) described above.

Canada Revenue Agency asserted that these words take it beyond a mere secured creditor. They stated it was so because they do not just consider the Crown to be the owner of the interest. Rather, the statute says that it is the owner. However, previous decisions in Canada have found that the deemed trust is not in truth a real one as the subject of the trust cannot be identified from the date of creation of the trust.

The Court also stated that, in principle, the deemed trust is similar to a floating charge over all the assets of the tax debtor. This is because the tax debtor is free to deal with its property. When it does, the trust releases the disposed-of property and attaches to the proceeds of sale. To find otherwise would freeze the tax debtor’s assets and prevent it from carrying on business. The Court found that this was not a result intended by Parliament.

The Court concluded that Canada Revenue Agency’s interest is a security interest, not a proprietary interest.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: Can the statutory deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim be raised?

The Court stated that it may seem that certain sections of the CCAA conflict with the deemed trust sections in the Fiscal Statutes on a strict reading of only the above-noted section of the ITA. That is what Canada Revenue Agency did to support its interpretation.

However, the Court went on to say that one must not read these provisions in a vacuüm. The Fiscal Statutes, the BIA, and the CCAA are part of complex legislative schemes that run concurrently. They must be read in their entire context. The aims of the statutes and Parliament’s intention kept in mind.

The Court agreed with earlier cases that the purpose of the CCAA is to let the debtor to continue to carry on business and, where possible, avoid the social and economic costs of liquidating its assets. The Court also stated that the CCAA legislation is remedial in the purest sense. It provides a means whereby the devastating social and economic effects of bankruptcy or creditor initiated termination of business operations can be avoided. It allows for a Court-supervised attempt to reorganize the financial affairs of the company.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: The Supreme Court of Canada on the Indalex deemed trust

Following the Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Indalex deemed trust decision, the Court agreed that the securing of the DIP facility is a key aspect of the debtor’s ability to attempt a workout. The harsh reality is that commercial imperatives govern the lending practices of the lenders, not the interests of the policy considerations that lead the government to legislate in its favour.

The Court also found that the priority charges aid in the restructuring process. Certain examples of such priority charges are:

  1. Interim DIP lender’s charge providing both an incentive and guarantee to the lender the recovery of funds advanced during the restructuring.
  2. The priority charge in favour of Directors is important. The charge keeps the captains aboard the sinking ship. Without the benefit of this charge, directors might abandon the ship.
  3. A priority charge for administrative fees is critical to a successful restructuring. It is the only protection the Court-appointed Monitor and its legal counsel have to make sure that their bills are paid.

Further, the Court found that the Section 11.52(2) of the CCAA codifies and elaborates on priority charges. Previously, the Court used its inherent jurisdiction in granting priority charges. The Court found that this shows Parliament’s intention that secured creditors’ interests could be eroded if the Court felt the need.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: The Court’s Decision

The Court stated that Canada Revenue Agency’s position that the deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim cannot be primed, fails to reconcile that the goal of the Canadian insolvency restructuring regime and Parliament’s continued commitment to facilitating complex corporate CCAA restructurings, even if it requires erosion of security.

For this and the other reasons listed above, the Court determined that the CCAA gives the Court the ability to rank the priority charges ahead of the deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim and the resultant security interest.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: Is Your Company In Need of Financial Restructuring?

The CCAA’s aim is to help business survival and avoid the multiple traumas caused by business failure. The Ira Smith Team have decades of experience in both complex personal and corporate financial restructurings.

If you or your company cannot survive without a restructuring, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. NOW for a free consultation. You are just one phone call away from getting back on the road to financial health and reducing your stress levels, Starting Over, Starting Now.

UPDATE: CHECK OUT OUR NEW VLOG BY CLICKING ON:

SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS

DEEMED TRUST CANADA REVENUE AGENCY CLAIM 10
deemed trust canada revenue agency claim
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TORONTO BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY: NDP WANTS PENSION PROTECTION

320efcd005100f3ee3522fefba70f917 1

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Introduction

The federal NDP party recently met in Hamilton, just outside of the Greater Toronto Area. There was a rally to argue for federal government regulation changes to safeguard pensioners in business bankruptcy and restructuring administrations.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Proposed NDP private member’s bill

Hamilton Mountain MP Scott Duvall, the New Democrats’ pension plan critic, informed a group at the United Steelworkers’ Hall that he will certainly present a private member’s bill to secure employees’ pension plans and benefits, and pressure business to offer termination or severance pay, prior to paying secured lenders.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: The U.S. Steel Canada saga

The concern has actually been a lengthy simmering one with unions and created significant debate throughout the almost three-year, court-supervised restructuring of U.S. Steel Canada. The company exited from its business bankruptcy protection proceedings with a brand-new owner– Bedrock Industries– as well as an old name, Stelco.

Pensioners were smarting. The court permitted the firm to put on hold health benefit repayments for a year and a half while the business was under bankruptcy protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

Generally, these advantages have been maintained by the reorganized business. Pensioners are fretting that a financing system to maintain the pension plan solvent will ultimately fail. It calls for, inter alia, extra Stelco land to be cleaned up, marketed and sold for the net sales proceeds to cover future pension plan commitments.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Sears Canada too

Duvall, with NDP leader Tom Mulcair, claimed one more instance of exactly how the regulations are unfair to employees. They cited the Sears Canada situation. Sears Canada remains in business bankruptcy protection. Its employees are encountering a potential decrease in their pension plan benefits.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Fairness for employees

They say this should have to do with justness for employees. The NDP wants to see a Canada that benefits every person as well as seeing to it that companies, including multinationals, cannot take the pension plans their employees have earned.

They state that the existing regulation permits funds that ought to go to employees’ pension plans to be given to the secured creditors instead. The NDP is especially concerned when the secured lender is the financially troubled or creditor-protected company’s parent company.

Stelco’s biggest secured lender was U.S. Steel in the United States. The $500 million restructuring saw the American firm get $130 million.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Pension plan funding should have first priority

The Duvall proposed private member’s bill would call for pension plans to be 100 percent funded prior to secured lenders being paid. Firms would certainly not be permitted to put on hold retirement benefits in court-supervised restructurings, which occurred with U.S. Steel Canada.

The NDP is calling their proposal “End Pension Theft”. It focuses on altering CCCA legislation as well as the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) to stop companies from placing investors, financial institutions and other lenders ahead of their staff members when they go into bankruptcy protection.

3bestaward
business bankruptcy

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Is there a comparable precedent for such an amendment

Yes there is – the enactment of the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA). From 1975, proposals were proactively taken into consideration for the facility of a wage protection plan for when the bankruptcy, liquidation or receivership of a company. The many choices gone over for just how this could be attained consisted of:

  1. very top priority for wages;
  2. acknowledgment of existing provincial/territorial concerns within the BIA structure;
  3. a waiver of the waiting time for EI benefits; and
  4. a wage earner protection fund financed either from basic tax revenue or as a part of the EI coverage regimen.

In November 2003, the Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce examined the background of these conversations and chose

the alternative for a super priority be taken on. Although the BIA was amended in 2005, these changes did not quickly come into force, as many technical amendments were required to be passed in 2007. The WEPPA came into force on July 7, 2008.

The reason for the timing of creating the WEPPA was a result of NDP pressure put on the minority Liberal government of Prime Minister Paul Martin. The Liberals agreed to the NDP proposal as part of obtaining continued NDP support for the minority government.

So there is precedent for a significant amendment to Canadian insolvency legislation.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: How likely is such a pension reform in restructuring proceedings to succeed?

At this time, I believe there are certain obstacles from seeing such a significant overhaul being successful. The reasons I say this include:

  1. Today there is a Liberal majority government in power, so the support of the NDP party is not required for the government to pass the legislation it wishes to.
  2. Providing a super priority for all pension shortfalls would dramatically alter the way lending is done in Canada. Banks would be required to include pension plan actuarial shortfall calculations into their borrowing base calculations. It may end up that when there is a pension plan shortfall, there is no borrowing room available at all for a business. This would increase the number of insolvencies.
  3. If the number of business insolvencies increased, that could lead to an increase in job losses. That would hurt employees which would hurt the same group the private member’s bill would be trying the protect.

However, the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has shown that it does try to play to whichever group the government feels it can gain votes from. So, it is not out of the realm of possibilities that the government would try to enact some legislation to give a limited super priority to a part of an underfunded pension plan liability. Time will tell whether such a proposal has any chance of success at this time.

Toronto business bankruptcy protection: Does your Toronto area business require restructuring proceedings to survive?

If you’re company is struggling with too much debt, give the Ira Smith Team a call. We can help with refinancing and restructuring so that your business can get back on track Starting Over, Starting Now.

UPDATE: CHECK OUT OUR NEW VLOG BY CLICKING ON:

SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS

toronto business bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SEARS CANADA NEWS TODAY: ARE THEY SABOTAGING THEIR OWN RESTRUCTURING?

2 6

 

Sears Canada news today: Introduction

“I will certainly not invest one red cent in your shop … no severance, no sale,”

A (typical comment) posted on the Sears Canada Facebook page before the company blocked new comments and made old ones vanish.

Well there has been a lot of Sears Canada News today and in the last month. The company sought bankruptcy protection only last June 22, 2017. It has been only a little over 1 month, but there has been so much media attention it seems a lot longer.

Sears Canada news today: Social media backlash

We’ve seen on social media that Sears Canada is facing a backlash when it comes to how they’re handling this liquidation. Notice that I am using the word liquidation, as opposed to restructuring. This is in spite of they are currently operating under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA). This statute is designed as a restructuring statute.

Sears Canada news today: Why KVETCH about a KERP?

It comes just as the company began its liquidation sales at those fifty-nine stores they’re looking to close. There is a boycott in Canada that is gaining some traction on social media. People are upset with Sears Canada’s senior management. They obtained on the first Court application, approval from the Court on their plan to pay themselves retention bonuses. These bonuses would be paid under the terms of what is commonly called in complex corporate restructurings a “Key Employee Retention Plan” (KERP).

The retailer introduced that, as part of a Court-supervised restructuring procedure. It is shutting 59 of its 255 shops and letting go 2,900 workers. None of them will get severance pay. Sears also will stop payments to the employees’ defined benefit pension plan. The retailer recently accepted to delay that pension plan payment issue till September 30th.

Sears also accepted the compromise with the former employees to maintain paying health benefits for an extra 3 months until the end of September. This is so the people could have that time to get alternate coverage. It is still not great though. The employee pension plan will remain underfunded. The employees will have to look for a new health plan. To date, there is no provision for former staff to receive any sort of package.

Sears Canada news today: What exactly is a KERP?

It is normal in complex corporate restructurings to set up a KERP. The concept of a KERP began in US corporate restructurings in the 1990’s. The theory is that to have a successful restructuring, senior management have specific knowledge and ability. If they walked away from the company in bankruptcy protection, such as to accept a senior position elsewhere, the company would have a much more difficult and costly time in restructuring. Hence the idea was born that those essential managers should be promised a bonus to create the most value possible in the restructuring for the stakeholders. This is in addition to their normal compensation.

Often KERPs are now viewed as either:

  1. a standard item that senior management expects to receive; or,
  2. a greedy money grab negatively affecting other stakeholders.

I have not yet read any material to show why the Sears Canada bankruptcy protection case is so complex. I have not read how Sears Canada could not liquidate without existing senior management. It is earlier and current senior management who have not created a retail vision niche for Sears Canada for years.

Sears Canada news today: Time to “come back”

Thankfully, all CCAA protection orders have a standard “come back” clause. The reason for this is that not every stakeholder receives notice of the company applying for the bankruptcy protection order. Any stakeholder can come back to Court to oppose any part of the original order they did not receive notice of. They could not tell the Court of their position, and now want to come to Court with their complaints.

The Court appointed a law firm to represent the interests of the employees and former employees. As part of their motion material filed with the Court, they are asking the Court to amend the Sears Canada KERP. They state:

  1. the amounts are excessive under the circumstances; and
  2. the KERP does not incentivize senior management to enhance the value of Sears Canada.

It will be very interesting to follow this.

Sears Canada news today: It didn’t have to be this way

You may recall that Target Canada took a slightly different route towards its former employees when it decided to liquidate and leave Canada. It also liquidated under the CCAA. In our blog “TARGET CANADA CLOSING: $5.4 BILLION AND COUNTING”, we told you about the liquidation and that Target US established a trust fund for payment of the Target Canada obligations to its employees. For sure personal hardships occurred. At least they tried to soften the blow.

So now, while Sears Canada wants customers to come and buy at the liquidation sale, they have a PR nightmare on their hands.

Sears Canada news today: No comments please

It is so bad, that Sears Canada is not permitting public messages on its Facebook page. Most the messages from the public so far are negative against the company. CBC News recently noted that Sears Canada’s Facebook page was riddled with remarks from Canadians objecting exactly to what was happening to the company’s employees. Sears Canada has removed those comments from its Facebook page as well as blocking new comments.

sears canada facebook comments layoffs
Picture courtesy of CBC News

Sears Canada news today: Certainly a funny way to stay in business

You must wonder if Sears Canada really wants to restructure, or if they are just liquidating their inventory. They are also trying to sell whatever other assets they can. If it was a true restructuring, you would think that senior management would want to see more customers who would be loyal to (the new) Sears Canada when it would exit bankruptcy protection.

So instead of growing a loyal customer base, Sears Canada’s actions have spawned a strong and growing “Boycott Sears” momentum. They’re going to have to deal with that. It’s going to be interesting to see exactly how this plays out while Sears Canada currently is shopping for a buyer.

According to Sears Canada, the unhappy remarks did not motivate it to close the public articles or to remove many of the bitter statements. Regardless, the former employees are still faced with now with the question “how do you collect salary owed to you from an employer that goes out of business”.

Sears Canada news today: What to do if you or your company have too much debt

If your company or you are experiencing financial problems, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. We’re here to tell you on your restructuring and other options to avoid bankruptcy. If necessary, we can also talk to you about your bankruptcy options.

We can help you put your financial house back in order and set you on a path to debt free-living. You’ll be amazed at the difference one phone call to Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. can make.

Contact us today. We are a licensed insolvency trustee and will listen to your issues and offer compassionate, professional assistance to aid you to avoid bankruptcy.

With our help, you can regain control of your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

UPDATE: CHECK OUT OUR NEW VLOG BY CLICKING ON:

SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS

SEARS CANADA CLOSING DOWN 1

Call a Trustee Now!