Tag: trustee

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES ACT CANADA: EASY FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE TO DO

administration of estates act canada

If you would rather hear an audio version of this administration of estates act Canada, please scroll down to the bottom of this page and click on the podcast.

Administration of estates act Canada: Introduction

I want to discuss with you another provincial statute that is very important for the administration of estates act Canada; the Estates Administration Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.22. It continues my series of blogs to show how it would be very natural to appoint a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or bankruptcy trustee) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) as the estate trustee (formerly called an executor or executrix) of a solvent deceased estate.

In my blog TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS, I looked at some essential matters when it involves a deceased estate and why a LIT would be extremely knowledgable and competent to act as an estate trustee of a deceased estate with those basic requirements.

In the blog, TRUSTEE OF PARENTS ESTATE: DO I REALLY HAVE TO?, I explained why many times parents try doing the proper thing by appointing their children as estate trustees and how many times it just turns out all wrong.

In ESTATES ACT ONTARIO: TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE REVEALS HIDDEN SECRET, I describe how the requirements and provisions of the Estates Act are already very familiar to a bankruptcy trustee. In fact, most of the duties required by the Estates Act are already performed in the insolvency context by a LIT.

In this and the next two blogs, I want to focus on the three more Ontario statutes that deal with the duties and responsibilities of an estate trustee of a deceased estate. The three statutes are:

  1. Estates Administration Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.22;
  2. Trustee Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.23; and
  3. Succession Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.26

As you have by now correctly guessed, in this blog, I will show how a bankruptcy trustee would be very familiar with the workings of the Estates Administration Act.

As always, since we are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

Administration of estates act Canada: Things an estate trustee must be aware of

Payment of debts out of the residuary estate

Section 5 of the Estates Administration Act states that both the personal property and the real property (subject to the rights of mortgagees) is available to pay the debts, funeral and testamentary expenses and the costs of the estate trustee in administering the deceased estate. The LIT is familiar with such a provision.

Section 136(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) prioritizes the reasonable funeral and testamentary expenses incurred by the deceased’s legal representatives. In a bankruptcy, those costs are paid as a preferred unsecured claim, behind trust and secured claims but before payment of ordinary unsecured claims.

Vesting of real estate not disposed of within 3 years

Section 9(1) of the Estates Administration Act states that real property not disposed of or conveyed within three years after the date of death is automatically vested in the persons beneficially entitled to such real property. The exception is if the personal representative or estate trustee has registered a caution on the title, then the three-year period starts from the date the last caution was registered.

The purpose and intent of the BIA is that all property of the bankrupt, not subject to a valid trust claim, security interest or is otherwise exempt, will automatically vest in the bankruptcy trustee. Section 40(1) of the BIA establishes the rules a trustee must follow to return to the debtor any property that could not be realized upon, despite the LIT’s best efforts.

Powers of executors and administrators about selling and conveying real estate

Sections 16 and 17 of the Estates Administration Act gives the power to sell real estate to a personal representative or estate trustee. It also says that additional powers are not just for paying off the debts of the deceased, but also for distributing or dividing the estate among the beneficiaries.

A LIT, either in a receivership or bankruptcy, is very familiar with and experienced in the sale of real and personal property. The LIT also ensures that the creditors are paid in the proper priority.

Protection of purchasers from personal representatives and beneficiaries

Sections 19 and 21(1) of the Estates Administration Act protects a purchaser of real property in good faith and for value from a personal representative or estate trustee. The purchaser can hold the asset free and clear from any debts or liabilities of the deceased, or any claims of the beneficiaries. The only exception would be those claims secured by a specific charge on title against the real property, such as a mortgage.

In an insolvency context, and especially in a Court-appointed receivership or bankruptcy, a purchaser would be wise to insist on the receiver or bankruptcy trustee obtaining the approval of the Court and vesting Order. The purpose would be to have Court orders approving the sale to the purchaser and vesting the assets in the purchaser.

In this way, the purchaser gains protection against any claims to the assets. The vesting Order vests out the asset(s), replacing it with the cash paid by the purchaser. Those with claims against the asset(s) now have to prove their claim against the cash. A LIT is very familiar and experienced in this aspect of selling assets.

Powers of personal representative about leasing and mortgaging

Section 22(1) of the Estates Administration Act gives the power to the personal representative or estate trustee to lease out real property to provide the deceased’s estate with income. It also allows for the mortgaging of real property to pay off the debts of the deceased.

Section 30(1) of the BIA gives various powers to a bankruptcy trustee. The leasing out of the real property and borrowing money, including giving mortgage security against real property, are two such powers. A Court-appointed receiver would get the same powers from the Order appointing the Receiver. A privately appointed receiver could also, with the permission of the secured creditor who made the private appointment, does the same thing. Therefore, a LIT is very familiar and experienced in exercising these powers and making the necessary business decisions.

Administration of estates act Canada: Summary

I hope that in this blog I have shown you that the provisions of the Estates Administration Act outlining the responsibilities of an estate trustee tracks very closely what a LIT does in either a Court-appointed receivership or bankruptcy administration.

Therefore, the LIT is used to acting as a Court officer and could very easily perform the requirements and duties of an estate trustee as described in the Estates Act Ontario.

If you have any questions about a deceased estate and the need for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

In my next blog, I am going to write a similar comparison. It will be about the requirements outlined in the Trustee Act and how a LIT is most familiar with them also.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ESTATES ACT ONTARIO: TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE REVEALS HIDDEN SECRET

Estates Act Ontario: Introduction

I am continuing my series of blogs to show how it would be very natural to appoint a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or bankruptcy trustee) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) as the estate trustee (formerly called an executor or executrix) of a solvent deceased estate under the Estates Act Ontario. In this blog, I am going to focus on that piece of provincial legislation that guides the activities of an estate trustee.

In my blog TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS, I set the stage by going over some basics when it comes to a deceased estate and why a LIT would be very comfortable with those basic requirements for an administration of a deceased estate. In the blog, TRUSTEE OF PARENTS ESTATE: DO I REALLY HAVE TO?, I described why in some cases parents trying to do the right thing by making all their children an estate trustee could turn out very wrong.

In this and the next two blogs, I want to focus on the three main Ontario statutes that govern the conduct, duties and responsibilities of an estate trustee of a deceased estate. The three statutes that I will talk about are:

  1. Estates Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21;
  2. Estates Administration Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.22; and
  3. Trustee Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.23

As you have probably guessed by now, in this blog, I will show how a bankruptcy trustee would be very familiar with the workings of the Estates Act.

Since we are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

Provisions a LIT is familiar with

Jurisdiction

Section 5 of the Estates Act Ontario states that letters of administration shall not be granted to a person not residing in Ontario. Similarly, a bankruptcy trustee must be licensed by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy in each province the LIT wishes to practice in.

Posting of security

Section 14(2) of the Estates Act Ontario requires that the administrator appointed to administer a deceased estate may be required to post security as the court might require.

Section 5(3)(c) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) states that the Superintendent of Bankruptcy can:

“…require the deposit of one or more continuing guaranty bonds or continuing suretyships as security for the due accounting of all property received by trustees and for the due and faithful performance by them of their duties in the administration of estates to which they are appointed, in any amount that the Superintendent may determine…”

The posting of security is another common area that a LIT understands well.

Court can appoint

Section 29 of the Estates Act Ontario deals with the appointment of an estate trustee. This section gives the Ontario Superior Court of Justice the authority to appoint an estate trustee where:

  • a person dies intestate;
  • the estate trustee named in the will refuses to prove the will;
  • where the named estate trustee(s) ask another person be appointed to administer the deceased’s estate; or
  • where there are special circumstances.

Section 243(1) of the BIA gives the Court the power to appoint a receiver. So, assessing the appropriateness of acting as a Court officer and providing consent to do so is something a LIT is quite familiar with.

Accounts to be rendered

Section 39 of the Estates Act Ontario requires the estate trustee to “…render a just and full account…” of the estate trustee’s activities. The LIT is fully familiar with this process. In both a Court-appointed receivership and a bankruptcy administration, the LIT must submit full and detailed accounts showing its activities, fees and disbursements for approval by the Court. This approval process is called taxation. This is another common area between the duties of an estate trustee administering a solvent deceased’s estate and the duties of a LIT.

Admitting and disallowing claims

Sections 44 and 45 of the Estates Act Ontario deals with the rules to be followed in contesting claims made against the deceased’s estate. The LIT is very familiar with this process. Section 135 of the BIA deals with the admission and disallowance of proofs of claim and proofs of security.

The LIT is a perfect party to be able to decipher claims made against a deceased’s estate and follow the provincial statute in the allowance and disallowance of claims.

Disputes as to ownership

Section 46 of the Estates Act Ontario describes the process for handling the claim by any third party to ownership of personal property in the estate not exceeding $800 in value. There are steps in the BIA that a LIT must follow when faced with claims of ownership of property by a third party in the possession of the bankrupt. So resolving such disputes is very familiar to the LIT.

Summary

I hope that in this blog I have successfully made the case that the provisions of the Estates Act Ontario outlining the responsibilities of an estate trustee tracks very closely what a LIT does in either a Court-appointed receivership or bankruptcy administration.

Therefore, the LIT is used to acting as a Court officer and could very easily perform the requirements and duties of an estate trustee as described in the Estates Act Ontario.

If you have any questions about a deceased estate and the need for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

In my next blog, I am going to write a similar comparison. It will be about the requirements outlined in the Estates Administration Act and how a LIT is most familiar with them also.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.estates act ontario

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEE OF PARENTS ESTATE: DO I REALLY HAVE TO?

If trustee of parents estateIf you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Trustee of parents estate

Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom for the podcast.

Trustee of parents estate: Introduction

I want to talk about an issue which is all too common. I am also going to give you two real-life examples. The issue is that of children being named as the estate trustee of parents estate.

I caution that I and my firm are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

Why the children?

Many times in drafting a will, parents want their children to know that the parents trust and love them. So, they not only have their children as beneficiaries of their estate, they also make them the estate trustees (formerly known as executor or executrix). This is natural, but may not be the best choice.

The reason I say this is because the role of the estate trustee is a demanding one that requires a specific skill set. Children don’t always have the necessary skills. What if one or more of the children have great financial skills and have sound judgment, but others don’t. This can lead to differences of opinion and major arguments. In the most extreme case, it can lead to costly and lengthy litigation to dissipate estate assets. Executors must act in the best interests of all beneficiaries. If personal agendas get in the way, then everyone’s best interests can’t be met.

Adult children are probably married. Now you have daughters-in-law and sons-in-law involved in the background. This can lead to a whole host of issues that has nothing to do with the efficient administration of the parents’ estate and being even-handed with all beneficiaries.

What if some of the children have personal financial issues. There will be a temptation for self-dealing or self-enrichment. Again this can lead to major problems.

What if you have an even number of children? Two or four estate trustees can lead to many problems. With two, the estate trustees will always be deadlocked if they don’t see eye to eye. With four, not only can you have a deadlock, but too many cooks may spoil the broth!

Splitting the tasks

Sometimes parents split the tasks. One child will be the estate trustee because she has great financial acumen. The other child will be made responsible for health and living decisions if the parents first become incapacitated. Sounds great in theory. However, the way the health decider child wishes the parents to live may be at odds with the financial person seeing the estate shrinking away. Or, the health decider may make decisions for the parents to live in a way that does not shrink away from the estate, but is demeaning to the parents and does not give them a good quality of life in their final days.

So, as you can see, what started out as the parents wanting to “do right” by their children, can lead to many problems.

What an estate trustee should not do

In my last blog, TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS, I spoke about some basic elements of the role of an estate trustee. I described the process of becoming an estate trustee, and what the responsibilities are.

Now, I want to touch on some practical matters of what an estate trustee should not do.

The first is communicating with some beneficiaries and not others. As I have previously described, one of the roles and responsibilities of an estate trustee is to deal with all beneficiaries even-handedly. The estate trustee cannot tell certain details to some beneficiaries, and not others. So, all communications should be with all beneficiaries at the same time; either in writing or orally. Everyone should get the same information at the same time. The estate trustee does not wish to be accused of favouring some beneficiaries over others.

The second thing not to do is to rush to distribute smaller personal possessions of the deceased. The estate trustee may be pressured by family members to distribute certain items quickly. Possibly because the family member is the proper beneficiary of those small items and wants them as quickly as possible. Alternatively, perhaps they are not the rightful beneficiary of all the items they are claiming. However, they want to get their hands on certain items to stop other family members from getting them. Or perhaps there is a home involved that must be sold, so family members will pressure the estate trustee to clean out the home immediately so that the home can be put up for sale as soon as possible.

As tempting and easy as it might be, the estate trustee must first take steps to:

  • get a copy of the will and the deceased’s financial records
  • take possession and control of all assets
  • ensure that a proper inventory is made and that appraisals are obtained where necessary
  • make sure that all required insurance and bonding is in place

There is another reason. An estate trustee will be putting more pressure on themselves than they should bY making piecemeal distributions. Regardless of value, making a quick distribution to one of the beneficiaries will only give rise to all the other beneficiaries clamouring for their entitlements. The estate trustee may not be in a position for some time to be able to make a proper distribution to all other beneficiaries. This will only lead to headaches for the estate trustee.

Why some children may not want to be an estate trustee

There can be danger in being an estate trustee. In my last blog, I highlighted specific expertise and knowledge that an estate trustee must have. I also discussed how a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) also possesses the same skill set required of an estate trustee.

A trustee, including an estate trustee, acts in a fiduciary capacity. The estate trustee is fully accountable for all decisions made and steps were taken with respect to the assets. Not only is it important to have the necessary financial skills, but an estate trustee also has to be aware of the myriad of income tax issues. Final income tax returns must be filed. The estate trustee has a duty to ensure that all income tax legislation requirements are met, including the obtaining of clearance certificates. Any loss to the estate as a result of things an estate trustee either did or did not do, the estate trustee will be personally liable for.

The steps required in formulating an appropriate sales process for the different asset types not being directly distributed to beneficiaries is not totally scientific. There is some art to it as well. Making wrong decisions can expose the estate to loss of value, which will blow back right onto the estate trustee.

For these reasons, children may not wish to take on responsibility. The smart ones will understand that they do not have the required skill set. In other cases, the children may see the real possibility of creating family strife if they were to take on the role of an estate trustee. So what if children are named in the will as the estate trustees, but they don’t wish to take on the role. Must they anyway?

Renunciation of estate trustee Ontario

If you have not yet applied for probate or have otherwise not started to administer the estate, you do not have to be an estate trustee. There is a specific form to complete in order to renunciate your position as an estate trustee. Again, it must be done before you take any action as the estate trustee. If you have already applied for probate, or have started administering the estate and now find that you are in over your head, you cannot renunciate your position. You must make application to Court for an Order removing you as the estate trustee. I would suggest that if you are the sole estate trustee, you should have someone else lined up to succeed you. Otherwise, the Court may not allow you to be removed.

Two real-life examples

Example 1

In my blog, COURT APPOINTED ESTATE TRUSTEE CASE STUDY: IF IT WAS EASY YOU WOULDN’T NEED US, I described one of our case studies where we were appointed estate trustee to sell real estate. In that case, neither of the beneficiaries were capable of agreeing on anything. They were also incapable of carrying out the role of taking possession and control of the real property, Insuring it and selling it. Legal counsel for one of the beneficiaries made an application to Court seeking an Order appointing Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as an estate trustee.

The Court made the Order. With the approval of the Court, we listed the property for sale, obtained approval to our actions and activities, including a sale of the property. We then proposed a distribution of funds which also was approved by the Court. We made the distribution and obtained our discharge. This is a perfect example of how our skill set as a licensed insolvency trustee was recognized by the Court and allowed us to carry out the mandate in an efficient way.

Example 2

Recently, one of Ira Smith’s cousins needed to update her will and name an estate trustee. This cousin has three children. None of the children believed that they had the necessary skills and knowledge to be an estate trustee. They also agreed that it was not a good idea for any of them to take on that role.

However, there was one thing that the mother and her three children could all agree on. That was that Ira had the necessary skills to be the estate trustee. They unanimously agreed that it would be a good idea for Ira to take on that role. Ira’s cousin asked him if he would. He told his cousin that he was honoured that they all thought so highly of him. He agreed to be named in her will as the estate trustee.

The children were smart. They knew what they didn’t know. They all agreed on the estate trustee being proposed. A huge weight was taken off of the mother’s shoulders.

Trustee of parents estate: Why not appoint a Toronto bankruptcy trustee?

I hope that you can see that the knowledge, experience, and expertise of a licensed insolvency trustee would stand him or her in good stead to act as executor, executrix or estate trustee of a deceased estate. Many times, it may be a smart move to allow an independent neutral third party act as the estate trustee. Especially one like a licensed insolvency trustee who is used to acting as the independent Court officer.

If you have any questions about a deceased estate and the need for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS

Trustee of deceased estate: Introduction

I have previously written on what happens when a person dies insolvent, i.e. their debts are greater than the value of their assets. My blogs on being a trustee of deceased estate that is insolvent are:

I am now switching a bit. Over the next few weeks, I am going to be writing a series of blogs and vlogs to explain why I believe that a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) is the professional you should be thinking of making the executor of a deceased estate and recording it in your will. I am talking about solvent estates. Those with many assets and beneficiaries. I will be making the case why over the next few weeks. I will not be on insolvent estates of deceased persons.

I repeat that these blogs and vlogs will have nothing to do with debt, insolvency or bankruptcy. However, I will show how, based on the knowledge and expertise possessed by licensed insolvency trustees, it makes them the perfect candidate to serve as an executor of a deceased estate that is rich with assets. I will also be focussing my comments on the Province of Ontario. There may be some variations from province to province.

I caution that I and my firm are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

In this blog, I wish to set the stage by going over some basics when it comes to a deceased estate.

Trustee of deceased estate: The executor/executrix or estate trustee

In Ontario, an estate trustee (also known as the executor or executrix) is the only individual with the lawful authority to handle or disperse an estate. When an individual dies they might leave items, property, real estate, cash and investments and other possessions which is called their estate.

Probate is a treatment to ask the court to:

  • provide an individual with the authority to work as the estate trustee of an estate;
  • verify the authority of an individual acting as the estate trustee named in the deceased’s will; and
  • officially accept that the deceased’s will is their legitimate last will.

You can apply for probate in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The procedure is governed by the Estates Act and the related Rules of Civil Procedure.dece

If your probate application succeeds, the court will provide a Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee, which is evidence that an individual has the lawful authority to manage the estate. If there is a will, it is also evidence that the will is valid.

Trustee of deceased estate: Must I always apply for probate?

A probate Certificate is not needed in every situation for a deceased estate. Prior to beginning an application for probate, you might want to establish whether the deceased estate actually needs a probate Certificate.

An application for a probate Certificate is normally made if:

  • the departed individual passed away without a will
  • the deceased’s will does not show an estate trustee
  • a financial institution desires evidence of an individual’s lawful authority to get the cash or financial investments of the deceased
  • the estate’s properties consist of real estate which does not pass to an individual by right of survivorship
  • there is a disagreement about who ought to be the estate trustee
  • there is a conflict or possible conflict about the legitimacy of the will; or
  • some of the beneficiaries are unable to supply legal consent.

Trustee of deceased estate: Trustee of estate responsibility

What should the estate trustee’s first steps be? Here is where the actions the estate trustee should immediately take are almost the same as when a licensed insolvency trustee is first appointed either as:

The will and financial records

Assuming the family has already made arrangements for and the funeral has taken place, the estate trustee should first find a copy of the will and any books and records of the deceased that will explain the deceased’s financial affairs. If the estate trustee cannot find a copy of the will, he or she should consult with the deceased’s family and lawyer. Hopefully one or both will have a copy.

As the licensed insolvency trustee, we must also find the books and records of the company or person, so that we can start learning about the financial affairs of the insolvent or bankrupt.

Proof of authority

The estate trustee will also require a certified copy of the death certificate, to prove the death to financial institutions and the government. The will, and/or the probate Certificate, will be proof of the estate trustee’s authority to act.

In the same way, the licensed insolvency trustee requires a copy of its Appointment Letter in a private receivership, the Court order in a Court-appointed receivership, or the Certificate of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy in a bankruptcy. These documents evidence the appointment of the licensed insolvency trustee.

Taking possession and control of the assets

The estate trustee must now take control of any assets that do not automatically by operation of law transfer to another person by right of survivorship. The estate trustee must establish physical control, take an inventory of the assets and arrange for appraisals to be performed where required. The estate trustee should establish the market value of the assets as soon as possible.

In the same way, upon being appointed as either receiver or trustee, a licensed insolvency trustee must establish control and/or possession of the assets, properties and undertakings of the insolvent/bankrupt debtor, whether in the debtor’s possession or that of a third party. The licensed insolvency trustee must make an inventory of the assets and where required, arrange for appraisals.

Insurance and bonding

The estate trustee must make sure that, in the case of real property and chattels, that the assets are properly insured. As well, if an application was made to Court for probate and the Court issued the Certificate, the Court may also require the estate trustee to get a bond for a specific value to protect the beneficiaries. The amount of the bond will have a relation to the estimated value of the assets.

In the same way, the receiver/trustee must make sure that the hard assets are properly insured. In a bankruptcy, the Superintendent of Bankruptcy sometimes requires the trustee to get a bond to protect the bankruptcy estate.

The bond will be issued by an insurance company licensed to provide such coverage in Ontario.

Trustee of deceased estate: The responsibilities of the estate trustee

In general terms, an estate trustee has the following responsibilities:

  • be impartial amongst beneficiaries
  • act in a commercially reasonable way
  • to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries
  • not make decisions for individual gain
  • keep accurate records of all decisions made and actions and activities; and
  • acting in accordance with the will if one exists

In every Court appointment, be it a receivership or bankruptcy, the licensed insolvency trustee must live up to these same standards. Rather than beneficiaries, there are stakeholders. The Court officer must be impartial and must act in the best interests of all stakeholders.

Trustee of deceased estate: Trustee vs executor of an estate

So hopefully from this blog, you can see that the knowledge, experience and expertise of a licensed insolvency trustee would stand him or her in a good position to act as executor, executrix or estate trustee of a deceased estate.

If you have any questions about a deceased estate and the need for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

In my next blog, I am going to write about a topic that is becoming more and more common in deceased estates; picking the right estate trustee. As you will see, it is much more than just finding the right skill set.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

trustee of deceased estate

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

GAMBLING DEBTS HELP

Gambling debts: Introduction

The Canadian insolvency process is geared to deal with gambling debts or any debt resulting from addiction. It does not only deal with the debts caused by borrowing money to feed an addiction. The insolvency process is uniquely positioned to deal with the person’s total rehabilitation. When the person hits rock bottom with debts they cannot repay and no more credit to keep borrowing to feed the addiction, a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or Trustee) (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) is positioned to help not only with the debt issues but also the rehabilitation issues. Let me explain.

My firm has been involved in helping people out of their debt problems arising from addiction issues. The most common are gambling, alcohol and drug addictions. Professionals have referred us their family members suffering because of an addiction. In my January 31, 2018 blog, GAMBLING DEBT BANKRUPTCY: CAN GAMBLING DEBT BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY?, I discussed from a procedural view the issue of gambling debts and bankruptcy. In this blog, I want to focus on how the insolvency process, especially bankruptcy, can deal with overall rehabilitation.

I will draw on my own personal case studies and specifically refer to a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Bankruptcy and Insolvency in Donaldson (Re), 2019 NSSC 33.

Gambling debts: What the LIT is expected to do

The free consultation provided by a LIT to an insolvent person pre-filing is where a LIT would find the addiction issues. It will also be noted on the person’s initial filing documents in filing either a consumer proposal or for bankruptcy. The Canadian insolvency system is geared towards giving the honest but unfortunate consumer a fresh start.

In cases of addiction, the LIT must also point the person to community resources to aid in healing the person with the addiction to lead a sober life. This must be a pre-condition for any LIT to support the addicted person’s consumer proposal or discharge from bankruptcy. This is how my practice works. It is also the view of the Court in the Donaldson case.

Gambling debts: The Donaldson facts

Gloria Donaldson and Wayne Donaldson are fourth-time bankrupts. This is their 5th experience with the Canadian insolvency process as one of their filings was a consumer proposal. They made separate filings. The Court found that it really should have been a joint filing.

Gloria and Wayne were 65 and 73, respectively. The Court holding their discharge hearing found both Gloria and Wayne to be forthright, honest and trustworthy. Yet, this is the 4th bankruptcy and the 5th use the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c. B-3, as modified (BIA).

They declared the source of this bankruptcy as an overextension of credit on real house improvements. They did not list gambling. However, Registrar Balmanoukian found that there is no doubt on the evidence before him that gambling was a significant factor to at least speed up driving the Donaldson’s to this 5th insolvency filing.

The Donaldson’s filings spanned a duration of nearly 40 years. They are seniors. Their future income is restricted, by age and health.

Gambling debts: The bankruptcy discharge will not be easy

A 4th bankruptcy is a really major issue. Without a doubt, also for applications including third-time bankrupts the Courts have revealed an unwillingness in providing the bankrupt’s discharge. At the very least not without an extensive suspension or similar burdensome terms.

Coming to Court for a discharge as a 3rd-time bankrupt is a serious matter. The Court must be satisfied that the insolvent understands and has made enough adjustments in his/her life. The Court wants to know it won’t be possible that an additional bankruptcy will take place.

By the time a person has actually gotten in a 3rd bankruptcy, the objective, as well as the intent of the Act, changes from its restorative function of helping sympathetic yet unfortunate debtors to a shielding culture, and protecting innocent possible creditors. The most effective intents and hopes of such bankrupts is no longer the main issue. The main issue is that creditors be shielded from the insolvent’s shown economic inexperience, carelessness and negligence.

In a 4th bankruptcy, the Court has to pay cautious interest in creating a suitable yet custom treatment when determining what is right in the bankrupt’s application for discharge. The Bankruptcy Court is not just there to be a financial car wash. The truth is that these bankrupts are not rogues. That, however, is not enough of a reason to approve a discharge.

A 4th bankruptcy is a clarion call to the Court and its officers that these people should never come before the Bankruptcy Court again. The issues need to be fixed.

Gambling debts: The bankruptcy discharge must serve a purpose

The proof is clear that Mr. and Mrs. Donaldson did not have the possibility of having sources with which to pay any kind of meaningful amount on their much debt. The passage of time and their health and wellness have actually prevented this. Nevertheless, that does not imply that the Court can only enforce a token wag of the finger and a reprimand “do not do it ever again”.

What the Registrar decided is frankly, something that the LIT should have already done. When I am faced with potential bankrupts whose debt has arisen as a result of spending money they did not have on their addiction, this is what I tell them. I say that if they wish to have any chance of having a discharge from bankruptcy, then they need to get themselves into a rehab program immediately. Gamblers Anonymous and AA are two that we regularly refer clients to. We also tell them that for discharge purposes, they will need to have their sponsor verify to us, in writing, that they have regularly attended and continue to attend meetings to help themselves.

This way, by the time we come to Court, we can prove rehabilitation has already begun. Real rehabilitation helps the person get back on to a clean, healthy life. We have many examples of people we have helped overcome drug, alcohol and gambling addictions, as part of cleaning up their financial debts. In some cases, these people have even become leaders and sponsors themselves in the rehabilitation program that helped them so much. I have great pride in hearing years later from such former addicts I have helped when they tell me that they have saved up enough to buy a home, now have a better job and their family is in a better place because of my help.

The Donaldsons need to get themselves resolved to live within their earnings. They also must learn to stop gambling if they wish to have a chance of surviving this bankruptcy.

Gambling debts: The Registrar’s decision

So the Registrar ordered that the Donaldsons:

  • Shall attend such counselling for gambling abuse and/or addiction for such period as is necessary to get an opinion from a qualified counsellor or medical professional that both of the Donaldson’s are able to conduct themselves without going back to gambling in any way.
  • Refrain from gambling in any form, and further that they enrol and stay enrolled in the voluntary exclusion program with Casino Nova Scotia;
  • Absolutely stop obtaining credit from any lender in any form, except as approved in advance and in writing by the Trustee.
  • Disclose and subject to any provincial exemptions, turn over to the Trustee any property of either or both that comprises “property of the bankrupt” within the meaning of the BIA between the date of the Donaldson’s’ bankruptcies and their discharge.
  • Upon compliance with the foregoing for a period of at least five years from the date of the decision, the Donaldson’s may make a further application for discharge.

The Registrar’s decision is right. The Donaldsons will finally get the help they need to fight their gambling addiction. They will come clean with their LIT about handing over any non-exempt assets. They will not be able to borrow money for gambling again. Once they have been “clean” for 5 years, they may reapply to their discharge from bankruptcy. Hopefully, by then, they will be able to live a healthier life without the stress of gambling debts.

Gambling debts: Do you have too much debt?

Do you have too much debt because of an addiction or otherwise? Are you worried that the future interest rate hikes will make presently affordable commitments entirely unmanageable? Is the discomfort, tension and anxiousness presently detrimentally affecting your health and wellness as well as health?

If so, speak to the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies looking for financial restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only experts licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide insolvency services.

Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation and to make sure that we can begin assisting you to return right into a healthy, balanced, hassle-free life.

gambling debts

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FINANCIAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS: 4 STEP PLAN TO STOP FINANCIAL DISASTER

Financial disaster preparedness: Introduction

The people drowning in debt are always scared of the thought of speaking to a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee (Trustee). The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to allow me, a Trustee, to give you some basic points on financial disaster preparedness in a non-scary way. Hopefully, it can help you avoid a financial disaster.

On the 27th day of the United States Federal government closure, many federal employees that are already under money stress and anxiety are not surprisingly asking whether an insolvency proceeding is the only alternative.

These people did not ask for this. Although they will eventually receive all their back pay, that doesn’t help their cash flow today.

Some personal bankruptcies are started by events beyond somebody’s control. The US government shutdown is such an example. Alternatively, unlike the shutdown, a number are completely within an individual’s control.

Here are four ideas on just how to maintain your finances from falling off the edge right into insolvency.

Financial disaster preparedness: #1 – Keep an eye on your credit cards

Try to pay your monthly credit card bill, and all your expenses, on or before their due date. If timely payments cannot happen, pay it back asap or arrange a repayment strategy to decrease late charges as well as interest charges.

Never ever carry over a credit card balance. Attempt to pay your balances, including all your expenses, promptly.

Similarly, be conscientious what your credit history is. Almost every person will certainly have a time in their lives when they’ll need to borrow cash for some major expenditure.

Your credit score will affect the borrowing rates you are offered. Knowing one’s credit history can aid people to make a better decision on when to jump, or hold back, on a choice to borrow.

Financial disaster preparedness: #2 – Know your monthly expenses (and savings too)

When I do credit counselling and speak to people about loan basics, I discuss spending behaviours and always talk about the difference between wants and needs. I always encourage people striving for economic self-reliance to begin with a straightforward exercise: document every single expense in a month.

By mapping out all the spending, people can rank where their cash should, as well as shouldn’t, be going. For example keep an eye out for the daily latte, which is a habit because, it builds up, A more expensive specialty coffee is a want, not a need. A less expensive plain coffee could suffice.

There is one routine I always urge. Make a routine that you will set aside a particular percentage of your income for an emergency fund. The same goes for socking away, at the very least a little, to an RRSP. Work these savings into your budget.

In my experience, all consumer insolvencies commonly entail inadequate financial savings to cover the unanticipated. This is a common problem among Canadians that I have previously written about in my blogs.

Credit cards are also a significant cause of personal insolvencies. Many of our personal insolvency clients use credit cards to supplement their income. Rather than budgeting, they use their credit cards for various expenditures that they really cannot afford and are unable to pay down their credit card balances.

Financial disaster preparedness: #3 – Boost your financial literacy

There are various ways to begin early in life to prevent financial disaster problems. If these guidelines sound familiar, that’s because they are. However, yet few individuals appreciate them. That’s partly because they’re not taught it in the schools.

Canadians have a financial literacy problem. Many people think that some people are born rich and others aren’t. The reality is that those who are well off just have a more realistic understanding about spending and saving within one’s earnings.

Financial literacy, like civics education, needs to be a requirement in all elementary school, high school and university educational programs.

Financial disaster preparedness: #4 – Preserve your financial self-reliance


Those who lived through the great depression understand how fragile funds can be. Clipping coupons and looking for the most affordable prices is just part of their normal behaviour.

Insolvency filings have been at their lowest point since 2007, and there are varying explanations for the decline.

During the last decade, Canadians have amassed debt. Now that interest rates are rising, it is expected that personal insolvency filings will rise. Personal insolvencies will be more a part of our world as a result of unexpected disasters and negative decisions.

Corporate bankruptcies will always be a part of the system as markets change and businesses experience threats they cannot survive.

We must all be financially vigilant. I hope these tips will help you in avoiding any form of financial distress.

Financial disaster preparedness: What about you?

Do you have excessive debt? Are you in need of financial disaster preparedness? Does your business have way too much financial debt and is in danger of shutting down? Are you concerned that the future rate of interest hikes will make currently workable financial obligations totally uncontrollable? Is the pain, stress and anxiety currently adversely influencing your health and wellness?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of helping people and businesses seeking financial restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists certified and overseen by the Federal government to offer financial restructuring solutions.

We provide a free consultation to assist you to solve your problems. We know the discomfort financial obligations causes. We can end it as soon as possible from your life. This will permit you to start a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can start helping you get back into a healthy and balanced, stress-free life.

financial disaster preparedness

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

PRIVACY BREACH LAWSUIT AGAINST LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE FAILS

privacy breach lawsuitPrivacy breach lawsuit: Introduction

A licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) and a Court appointed Receiver are both officers of the Court. As such, they have a duty of care to all stakeholders and parties. A decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia released in late 2018 deals with an application to begin a class action privacy breach lawsuit against a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or Trustee).

The case I am referring to is Netlink Computer System Inc. (re),2018 BCSC2309. Netlink Computer System Inc. (Netlink) was a British Columbia-based business that marketed computers and associated software solutions. In late 2017, Netlink went bankrupt.

Privacy breach lawsuit: The request to go ahead

As is required under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), any party wishing to initiate litigation against a bankruptcy trustee must first get the permission of the Court to do so.

In the Netlink case, a former Netlink customer wanted to start a class action lawsuit against the Trustee. The customer claimed that the Trustee breached the personal privacy of Netlink’s customers by permitting their personal details to be revealed. The unproven claim was that the Trustee sold to or, otherwise, allowed 3rd parties to get personal information of the Netlink customers.

This particular customer wished to start an action versus the Trustee for breach of privacy. If leave is approved, this customer would then seek certification of his case as a class action lawsuit.

Privacy breach lawsuit: The issue in requesting the leave of the Court

The Court’s task was to figure out whether to exercise its discretion to allow the claim to go ahead. The Court had to look at the nature and scope of the proposed claim taking into account the evidence. Leave is rarely given. If leave was granted in this case, it would be the first time in Canada a bankruptcy Trustee has been taken legal action against in a potential class action proceeding.

The BIA does not give any type of specific advice about the elements the Court ought to take into consideration in thinking about an application for leave to start an action against a LIT. These have just been developed through case-law analyzing and using s. 215 of the BIA.

For almost 150 years, Courts and legal scholars have been of the view that the bar for approving the commencement of litigation I versus a Court-appointed receiver or Trustee is not a high one. It is designed to protect the receiver or LIT against only frivolous or vexatious actions which have no basis.

The leading cases on the issue of leave to go ahead with litigation against either a Court-appointed receiver or LIT can be summarized as follows;

  • Leave to take such legal action should not be given if the action is frivolous or vexatious. Manifestly unmeritorious claims need to not be allowed to continue
  • Actions need to not be allowed to continue if the evidence submitted on behalf of the action, does not show a cause of action against the Trustee.
  • The court is not required to make a final evaluation of the benefits of the claim prior to granting leave.

This threshold tries to strike the ideal balance between the security of bankruptcy trustees and Court appointed receivers from the interruption of an insolvency administration from unimportant or simply tactical suits and preserving to the maximum degree possible the legal rights of creditors and other stakeholders.

In this privacy breach lawsuit case, the claimant states that his affidavit evidence provides proof reveals a real case against the Trustee. The Trustee says that the proposed claim and the evidence on its behalf does not satisfy the relatively reduced threshold called for to prove leave.

The claimant described in his materials, his potential claim. . He also discloses that he has already begun a claim against the auction company who sold the bankruptcy company’s assets, Netlink and Netlink’s landlord. (The action versus Netlink has remained stayed due to the fact that Netlink is in bankruptcy). The proposed claim against the LIT is exactly the same and consists of practically the same phrasing as the action already started. There is no separate accusation that the Trustee did anything different from the auctioneer, Netlink, or the landlord.

The proposed claimant’s main points were:

  1. He purchased a product from Netlink and provided personal information, including, his name, address and credit card details.
  2. The Trustee contracted with the auctioneer to sell the assets.
  3. During that process, the Trustee allowed customers’ private information, including addresses, credit card numbers, and various other sensitive information (the “Private Information”) to be exposed and offered to or otherwise acquired by 3rd parties, including criminals.
  4. The Trustee provided the auctioneer computers and Netlink servers and other records containing the Private Information.
  5. Criminals that obtained the Netlink servers offered the information to other criminals, consisting of cybercriminals and identity thieves.
  6. The trustee knew that customer details are often included in the property of such bankrupt’s estates and it took no steps to safeguard the information when taking guardianship of Netflix’s property.
  7. The Trustee’s choice to offer the Private Information, or at a minimum, the Netlink servers including the Private Information, was intended and deliberate and was made knowing that Netlink customers had not consented to their details being shared.
  8. Customers have suffered damages.

Privacy breach lawsuit: This evidence

The Court examined the claims and the evidence. Unfortunately, the claimant did not have first-hand knowledge of what the Trustee did or did not do. Rather, the claimant submitted two sworn affidavits of what he believed took place. The information contained in the two affidavits was derived mainly from blog posts and YouTube videos that the claimant believed to be true.

The Trustee submitted 2 sworn affidavits of the LIT responsible for the Netlink file. The Trustee’s evidence was mainly why the relatively low threshold for allowing a claim against a Trustee or Court appointed receiver were not met. It did not provide much information about what the Trustee actually did (or did not do).

The Court had no choice but to rule that the claimant’s evidence was mainly hearsay and not admissible. With no real evidence before the Court to support the accusations, the Court dismissed the application and leave to begin the action against the Trustee was denied.

Privacy breach lawsuit: My take

Based on my reading of this case, I believe the Trustee was very lucky that there was no real evidence against it. There is no information indicating what steps the Trustee took to make sure that all Private Information was protected prior to the assets being sold. It is imperative that privacy breaches do not take place. Once a Trustee or Court appointed receiver to take possession of assets that may contain private or sensitive information, steps must be taken to ensure that the information does not fall into the hands of 3rd parties who have no right to that information. It does not matter whether the information is stored on computer hard drives, in the cloud, or physically in books or on paper.

The claimant still has its action against the auctioneer and the landlord. My understanding is that the landlord is involved because once the auction sale was completed and the auctioneer left the premises, there were still books, records and papers that contained some or all the Private Information. The landlord disposed of such papers in a way that did not protect the Private Information.

My Firm’s standard practice is to remove hard drives that contain Private Information so that computers would be sold minus a hard drive. With respect to physical records, any documents not required that would contain Private Information, we have shredded. We do not just throw it into a dumpster intact for someone to find. These are minimum steps required to protect Private Information.

Unfortunately, in the Netlink case, the Court’s Reasons for Decision does not include any information indicating the Trustee took such steps.

Privacy breach lawsuit: What does it all mean?

What it all means is that in any insolvency assignment, the LIT needs to know what it is he or she has taken possession and control of. Decisions must be made that protect the interests of all stakeholders, as best possible. There are always competing interests. The LIT must balance them all carefully when making decisions.

Do you have too much debt because you are a victim of identity theft? Does your company have too much debt and is in danger of shutting down? Is the pain and stress of too much debt now negatively affecting your health?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies in need of financial restructuring and counselling. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide debt settlement and financial restructuring services.

We offer a free consultation to help you solve your problems. We understand your pain that debt causes. We can also end it right away from your life. This will allow you to begin a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can begin helping you and get you back into a healthy, stress-free life.privacy breach lawsuit

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

HOW BANKRUPTCIES WORK FOR BUSINESSES IN TORONTO AND VAUGHAN ONTARIO CANADA

How bankruptcies work for businesses: Introduction

how bankruptcies work for businesses

How bankruptcies work for businesses: Introduction

Recently I have written several blogs focussing on insolvency and specifically the topics of consumer proposal and personal bankruptcy. To round out the discussion, this Brandon’s Blog discusses how bankruptcies work for businesses in Canada.

To be clear, the goal for either personal bankruptcy or corporate bankruptcy is to avoid bankruptcy. We have many tools in our toolbox to help people and companies avoid bankruptcy through restructuring. It is only when the person has stewed over their personal or business problems for too long that they come to us when it is too late. When it is too late, our hands are tied for creative problem-solving.

How bankruptcies work for businesses: Where we start

When a business owner comes to our office for a free consultation, we start with some basics. The first thing we do is ask certain questions that will allow us to get a financial snapshot of the business. We need to know about the assets and liabilities of the business.

We need to understand who all the creditors are and what the assets are. Which creditors may have a deemed trust claim or a secured claim against the assets. What is the total and nature of the unsecured debts?

That information tells us what choices we may have in helping the business recover: is an informal debt settlement restructuring possible;

what do we think about the likelihood of a formal restructuring under either the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) or the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-36) (CCAA); or is the business too far gone and therefore bankruptcy or just shutting down are the only options remaining.

How bankruptcies work for businesses: The proprietorship

If the business is unincorporated, then the person is carrying on their business in the form of a proprietorship. They are conducting business in their personal name. They may use a business style, but the legal reality of a proprietorship is that the individual, in their personal capacity, is carrying on business. So, the assets and liabilities that are created in the business, is owned by and is the responsibility of the person.

So, in this situation, it will be a personal insolvency discussion. The available remedies will be:

  • an informal restructuring;
  • (consumer) proposal debt settlement plan; or
  • personal bankruptcy

If you wish to find out more about personal insolvency, or how bankruptcies work for individuals, you can read some of my previous blogs. Good examples are WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY CANADA or CANADIAN DEBT SOLUTIONS: AVOIDING THE BANKRUPTCY PROCESS MIGHT BE THE RIGHT THING.

How bankruptcies work for businesses: Incorporated businesses

So now we have gone through the starting point I just described and we have determined that we are dealing with an incorporated business. We first focus on many issues before even discussing how bankruptcies work for companies.

First, we want to know how well does management understand its own business problems. If management does not have a good handle on their business problems, then they first need to get that deep understanding. They may know that monthly when looking at the numbers, they see that losses are continuing. Management, especially in an entrepreneurial or family-owned company, may feel ashamed because they don’t feel like they’ve made good decisions. Or they are aggravated and embarrassed because family members have told you the company is finished.

If you know in your heart that if you do not do something today, you may be risking the entire business.

How bankruptcies work for businesses: Know your numbers

To restructure companies for a successful turnaround, you first need to know your numbers and what they mean. The goal is to have the company producing sufficient cash levels and for everyone in the business to be earning a fair market-based income.

Management must look at the entire business and ask:

  • Where’s the profit?.
  • Do we have the money to actually run and scale the business?
  • What is getting in the way for the business to charge the revenue its products or services are worth?
  • Do we have the necessary cash and people resources will we need for a turnaround?
  • Are there lines of business or locations that need to be shed to increase profitability?
  • What expenses can we cut without harming our core business?
  • Which contracts do we need to cut to return to profitability and growth?
  • Do we have the proper reporting systems to give us the information we need to get prompt and accurate information?
  • Can we properly analyze the business issues and take the necessary corrective action?
  • Do we have the right people to carry on the business while implementing the turnaround?
  • Are we experienced enough to carry out our own turnaround or do we need outside professionals to help us with it?
  • Do we know what the impediments are to having a successful informal restructuring or do we need to look at a formal restructuring process?

How bankruptcies work for businesses: Now that we have the information…

These are the main questions that first must be answered for any business experiencing financial difficulties and facing insolvency. This is especially true for more complex companies. New systems or techniques may need to be implemented. If management can answer these questions for themselves, we want to hear those answers. If not, then a financial advisor may need to be retained. My Firm has been regularly retained, either by a company or its lender, to answer these questions and provide our recommendations. This kind of assignment is called a Business Viability Review.

After we provide our recommendations, we then work with the company to help them decide if they can carry out the recommendations and strategies themselves, or if they need our help to do so. If management can do it on their own, many times the lender will want us to stay involved by monitoring the company’s progress and reporting back to both the company and the lender.

How bankruptcies work for businesses: What if informal restructuring isn’t possible

The aim is always to avoid bankruptcy but it’s practical to recognize what it is and when it could be suitable. Companies are complex organisms. There may be the need to shed unprofitable contracts or long-term agreements that are just too expensive to continue with. It may be that disposing of such onerous contracts, leases or agreements is crucial to have a viable ongoing business. Many times a formal restructuring process is necessary to legally end those types of agreements.

It is the largest of company restructurings that we hear about in the news. From the United States, we read about Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection filings. In Canada, we read about restructurings under the CCAA. The largest of companies do not represent the size of the majority of Canadian companies.

For the biggest of companies, they can get relief and press back on creditors. There is an old adage which says: “If you owe the bank a bit of money, they own you. If you owe the bank a huge amount of money, you own them.”. In that way, in the largest company restructurings, the business can get a long time to either sell particular assets where the cash will help them rebound. They will also get the time they need to “rightsize” their employee numbers and shed unprofitable contracts. Loan changes with their secured lender or banking syndicate is also on the table and accomplished, more often than not. Their sheer size demands it and they get it.

How bankruptcies work for businesses: The reality for the majority of Canadian companies

Canadian business is full of entrepreneur-owned companies. So, that is what I will focus on in this Brandon’s Blog. If the business owner(s) come to us early enough, then we can decide if an informal restructuring will work or if not, what needs to be done in a formal restructuring. For any business that owes less than $5 million, it will normally be a BIA restructuring debt settlement proposal. We have done many successful company restructuring proposals under the BIA.

The answers to all the questions I posted above, will tell us what the restructuring needs to look like, how long it will take, and what our projections show about the profitability and viability of the business after a successful implementation of the restructuring plan.

How bankruptcies work for businesses: Company bankruptcy

In a company bankruptcy, the Licensed Insolvency Trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (Trustee) takes possession of the assets, properties, and undertakings of the company. This assumes that there are not secured creditors who have all the assets of the company tied up. If there are, then the company may not need to go into bankruptcy. Rather, a secured creditor will take enforcement action by making a demand on the insolvent company. However, if the loan is not repaid in time, then the secured lender will appoint a receiver to take possession of the assets covered by the lender’s security. In Canada, this is normally a Chartered Bank and all the assets are secured.

Sometimes a company in receivership needs to also file for bankruptcy. The main reason would be to aid in maximizing the recovery on the assets. For example, the company is a retail chain. The only way to maximize the recovery is to run the business and sell off the assets from one or more stores. One way to guarantee quiet enjoyment of the stores the receiver needs to stay in is to have a bankruptcy. That is because, under Provincial commercial tenancy law, a trustee in bankruptcy has a certain time to stay in the premises, undisturbed, as long as the current rent is paid.

How bankruptcies work for businesses: Receivership or bankruptcy

Whether there is a receivership or bankruptcy, there are many steps that a receiver or trustee have in common. These include:

  • Determining whether or not the recovery on assets will be maximized if the business is operated by the receiver or Trustee.
  • What impediments are there in running the business?
  • What is the best way to sell off the assets? As an entire group or parcels of assets that make sense to keep together, or one by one?
  • Are there any third party assets not owned by the company on the premises or other locations?
  • Are there assets owned by the company in any other locations?
  • Is there proper insurance and physical security over the assets?
  • Once the assets are sold and the cash received, what claims are there against the funds and what is the priority of all the potential claimants?

How bankruptcies work for businesses: The entrepreneurial company reality

Most mid-size and small companies when they’re in difficulty, do not submit a formal restructuring plan or file for bankruptcy at all. They just shut down by closing the doors. The owner will get the company’s final income tax and other information returns completed and filed. They will make sure that employee wages are paid current. Hopefully, source deductions and HST are fully paid up.

Wages, source deductions and/or HST that are not fully paid, are a personal liability of the Directors of the company. In the entrepreneurial companies, the owner(s) have probably personally guaranteed bank loans, premises and equipment leases or have raised funds to start and invest in the business by taking out at a mortgage against their home.

This brings us to the reality of most midsize and small businesses. The business failure leads to personal insolvency issues. Many times we advise entrepreneurs that their company filing an assignment in bankruptcy is not necessary. Rather, they should just shut down their business and then we will deal with their personal insolvency issues. This will allow the entrepreneur to get a fresh start.

Now what is required is getting a job in their field and earning a salary without the risk and challenges of running their own business. Once they get their fresh start, are back on their feet and saved up some money, they can decide if being an employee or starting a new business will be their future.

How bankruptcies work for businesses: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company insolvent and needs to restructure? Is your business viable but can only continue if it can reorganize its debt? We know your pain and understand the stress you are living with. The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience in company restructurings of all sizes.

Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Team. If we can meet with you in our free first consultation early enough, we can create and help you start a restructuring and turnaround plan. This will allow your company to continue to do business, create jobs and be profitable for many years to come.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY CANADA

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: Introduction

Encountering major money troubles is life-shattering, especially if you automatically think that bankruptcy is your only alternative. As a matter of fact, lots of people erroneously think that serious financial difficulties immediately suggest the only answer is bankruptcy. The most common question I am asked is, “what is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada”.

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: Insolvency

If you are having problems meeting your financial obligations or have stopped meeting those financial obligations as they come due you are insolvent, not bankrupt. Insolvent is a cash flow problem; bankruptcy is a legal state. You can read a detailed discussion on the definition of being insolvent in my last week’s vlog INSOLVENT DEFINITION: A NEW FOCUS FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE.

Bаnkruрtсу is a legal рrосеѕѕ under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) that helps you to resolve уоur debts if they have become unmanageable. If you have relatively few assets and low іnсоmе and dесіdе to file for bаnkruрtсу, you will probably fіlе under the streamlined Summary Administration part of the BIA.

If you have realizable assets that will produce a value greater than $10,000, then your bankruptcy would be administered under the general administrative provisions. Don’t worry about these distinctions right now. For now, just know that the summary administration rules are shortened, and the cost of the bankruptcy administration is fixed by a tariff set by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy.

In either case, you will turn over to your Licensed Insolvency Trustee (“LIT”) (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) all уоur рrореrtу that is not exempt (protected) by law. The LIT will sell your property and the proceeds will be used to рау for the bankruptcy administration and then make a distribution to уоur сrеdіtоrѕ.

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: Assets exempt in a bankruptcy in Ontario

In Ontario, where my practice is, the following assets are exempt from seizure in a personal bankruptcy:

  1. Your necessary clothing without any dollar restriction.
  2. Family furnishings and appliances up to a value of $13,150.
  3. Your tools and other personal property used to earn income from your occupation up to a value of $11,300.
  4. One vehicle with equity of no more than $6,600.
  5. Registered Retirement Savings Plan and Registered Retirement Income Fund savings, other than payments made within the 12 months immediately before the bankruptcy filing.
  6. The equity in your house if up to the amount of $10,000. Note that the current thinking is that if your equity is more than $10,000, then your exemption is zero.

If you have very little property, all of it may be рrоtесtеd so that you will not lose it.

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: Surplus income

How much уоur сrеdіtоrѕ will get in this process dереndѕ on how much уоur unрrоtесtеd property can be ѕоld fоr and whether you will be required to pay “surplus income” to your LIT. For a detailed discussion on surplus income, read my May 28, 2013 blog CAN YOU REALLY HAVE SURPLUS INCOME IF YOU’RE BANKRUPT?

Among all the things that seem to perplex many people when it involves the bankruptcy procedure is surplus income. It’s tough to get your head around the concept of surplus income when you are heading towards bankruptcy. Can that really be true if you are insolvent?

What is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency Canada: What is surplus income

Surplus income in a bankruptcy describes the amount the bankrupt must pay to the Trustee monthly. The Canadian bankruptcy system attempts to balance your right to end your debt and start over with the rights of creditors to be paid.

To permit Canadians to keep a sensible right to make a living throughout the bankruptcy administration, the federal government has established limits or standards on revenue a person can keep (after tax obligations and certain limited deductions) throughout their bankruptcy. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy establishes the limit restriction every year tied into the cost of living.

How do you figure surplus income?

The Federal Government establishes the formula used to calculate surplus income payments. The same formula is used for all of Canada.

The limits for surplus income are based off across the country “poverty line”. Surplus income has absolutely nothing to do with what you have left over monthly. It is a federal government formula that considers your revenue, specific non-discretionary costs as well as your household size.

The calculation is to find if you will need to contribute from your earnings monthly to your Trustee, for the benefit of your creditors.

Bankruptcy discharge

The final step of your bankruptcy process will be to get your discharge. Your discharge from bankruptcy acts as the trigger to discharge you from all of your debts. This means that you will not have to рау them (with possibly certain exceptions depending on your circumstances).

Whether you get an absolute discharge from your bankruptcy will depend essentially on your conduct. Before your bankruptcy, did you treat all your creditors the same? Does anyone feel aggrieved by your actions? That will decide if any of your creditors will oppose your discharge.

For an in-depth discussion of the personal bankruptcy discharge process, check out our vlog BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE: THE TOP 8 THINGS THE BANKRUPTCY COURT WILL CONSIDER ON ANYONE’S BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE APPLICATION.

Is your debt keeping you up at night?

Do you have extreme debt and have no concept of how to handle it? Are your debt woes keeping you up at night and causing you stress, pain and maybe even depression? We understand that pain and can cut it from your life.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has helped many companies and people throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) juggling too much debt in their lives that requires a blueprint for Starting Over, Starting Now. Do not delay. Help is 1 phone call away. You can fix your financial troubles while avoiding bankruptcy as long as you take swift action. Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation.what is the difference between bankruptcy and insolvency canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

INSOLVENT DEFINITION: A NEW FOCUS FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE

JUNE 17, 2019 UPDATE: The Court of Appeal for Ontario reversed this lower court decision. You can read all about it in our blog update – INSOLVENT DEFINITION RESTORED IN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Insolvent definition: Introduction

The basis of the Canadian insolvency system is to assist the honest but unfortunate person or company shed their debt (with certain limitations) and start over fresh. There are many terms defined in the Canadian insolvency legislation. The most basic one is the insolvent definition.

Last week I reviewed a decision of the Ontario bankruptcy Court that really did give me a new focus. It doesn’t change the bottom line of the advice I would give an insolvent debtor, but it did change my focus. That is one of the things I love about being a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee). I never stop learning.

Insolvent definition: Two examples

The Oxford dictionary definition is:

“insolvent

ADJECTIVE

Unable to pay debts owed.

‘the company became insolvent’”

Section 2 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA) defines an insolvent person as:

“insolvent person means a person who is not bankrupt and who resides, carries on business or has property in Canada, whose liabilities to creditors provable as claims under this Act amount to one thousand dollars, and

(a) who is for any reason unable to meet his obligations as they generally become due,

(b) who has ceased paying his current obligations in the ordinary course of business as they generally become due, or

(c) the aggregate of whose property is not, at a fair valuation, sufficient, or, if disposed of at a fairly conducted sale under legal process, would not be sufficient to enable payment of all his obligations, due and accruing due;”

Insolvent definition: The concept of net worth

Insolvent person refers to both people and companies. The BIA definition incorporates the common English definition. The BIA definition also incorporates the accounting concept of net worth. Net worth = Assets – Liabilities. If the difference is positive, you have a positive net worth. If the difference is negative, you have negative or no net worth.

For those that want to read more about the concept of net worth, look at the Addendum I wrote which is at the bottom of this blog. Since many of you already have an advanced understanding of net, I don’t want to insert it in here.

When giving our free first consultation, my advice to anyone with lots of debt but positive net worth is that in bankruptcy, they will lose their non-exempt assets. If the major asset providing the positive net worth value is their home, I advise the person that they will lose their equity in their home which is not a good outcome. So, my first advice is always to see if the person can either refinance the home or sell it. Then they can use the funds to pay off their debts. In a sale, any balance can be used as a down payment on a smaller home or can set them up nicely to rent.

I normally don’t think of part (c) of the BIA insolvent definition as being mutually exclusive. However, after reading the Court decision and looking again at the BIA definition, I am reminded that it really is. Let me describe the Court’s decision to explain.

Insolvent definition: Kormos v. Fast, 2018 ONSC 6044 (CanLII)

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos got a judgment against their neighbours, Mr. and Mrs. Fast. The Small Claims Court at St. Catherines issued the judgment for $25,565.64. This judgment comes about from problems arising from flooding in their home which was triggered by the Fasts.

After the judgment was given, the Fasts were contacted by Mr. Kormos’ licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee). The Trustee advised that Mr. Fast had submitted a consumer proposal under the BIA many months previously, on August 24, 2016. Mr. Fast did not previously mention anything about his consumer proposal or his later filing of an assignment in bankruptcy.

Fifteen days after the Kormos plaintiffs started enforcement of the judgment by serving a notice of examination on Mrs. Fast, she made an assignment in bankruptcy under the BIA on April 25, 2017.

In their different bankruptcy filings, each of the Fasts attested in their respective sworn Statement of Affairs, that their home in Queenston, Ontario (Home) was worth $630,000.

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos provided evidence by way of an expert witness appraisal who also testified in Court, showing that the Home was considerably underestimated in the BIA filings by Mr. Fast on August 24, 2016, and Mrs. Fast on April 25, 2017, when she made an assignment in bankruptcy.

The Kormos’ lawyer stated that when a reasonable value is designated to the Home, neither Mr. Fast nor Mrs. Fast was insolvent when their corresponding filings were made under the BIA. They were obviously relying on the fact that each of Mr. and Mrs. Fast really had a positive net worth.

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos were looking for an Order under the BIA (i) annulling Mr. Fast’s consumer proposal as well as, if required, his 2014 bankruptcy; as well as (ii) annulling Mrs. Fast’s bankruptcy.

Insolvent definition: The Court’s analysis

Mr. and Mrs. Kormos wanted:

  1. An Order according to s. 66.3(1) of the BIA annulling the consumer proposal submitted by Mr. Fast.
  2. Since an outcome of such an annulment would be that Mr. Fast is considered to make an assignment in bankruptcy under s. 66.3(5) of the BIA, they also were looking for an annulment of his bankruptcy on the ground that Mr. Fast is not presently insolvent.
  3. An order according to ss. 181(1) as well as 187(5) of the BIA annulling the bankruptcy of Mrs. Fast.
  4. An Order according to Rule 60.07 of the Rules of Civil Procedure issuing a writ of seizure and sale of the Home.

The Fasts did not challenge the expert appraisal opinion. The Court accepted the expert’s appraisal as being the value of the Home on the relevant dates of Mr. and Mrs. Fast’s respective filings under the BIA.

The Court looked at the insolvent definition in the BIA, which again is:

“insolvent person means a person who is not bankrupt and who resides, carries on business or has property in Canada, whose liabilities to creditors provable as claims under this Act amount to one thousand dollars, and

(a) who is for any reason unable to meet his obligations as they generally become due,

(b) who has ceased paying his current obligations in the ordinary course of business as they generally become due, or

(c) the aggregate of whose property is not, at a fair valuation, sufficient, or, if disposed of at a fairly conducted sale under legal process, would not be sufficient to enable payment of all his obligations, due and accruing due;”

In her bankruptcy filing, Mrs. Fast filed her statement of monthly income and expenses. According to the statement, her monthly expenses exceed her monthly income by $2,010. When looking at the definition of an insolvent, the Court concluded that Mrs. Fast was unable to meet her obligations and had stopped paying her current obligations. Notwithstanding that the Court found that Mrs. Fast probably understated the value of her interest in the Home, the Court was not persuaded to annul her bankruptcy as she met the definition of an insolvent person.

As for Mr. Fast, the Court decided it would not annul his consumer proposal. The Judge went on to say that even if he was persuaded to do so, Mr. Fast was still a bankrupt and the Judge had no evidence for the proposition that his bankruptcy should also be annulled.

So, the Judge did not grant the application, the Fasts are under their respective BIA proceedings and Mr. and Mrs. Kormos can file their claim with the Fasts’ Trustee.

Insolvent definition: The Trustee

Now the Trustee has an interesting situation. The Trustee is now aware of the expert valuation of the Home. The Trustee will have to use that information to decide if the Fasts have equity in their home. If yes, then as far as Mrs. Fast, her equity will have to be realized upon because she is bankrupt. Her equity in the Home devolves to the Trustee as an asset (if it is more than the minuscule provincial exemption).

Is Mr. Fast’s consumer proposal has already been (deemed) accepted by the creditors and (deemed) approved by the Court. If yes, then he will just have to keep making the agreed payments to fully complete his consumer proposal and get out of bankruptcy. If not, the Trustee will now have to take his real equity in the Home into account. The Trustee will have to decide if the consumer proposal can still be recommended to the creditors, or if it must be improved because of the increased total asset value.

Insolvent definition: Are you insolvent?

Are you unable to pay your debts as they come due? Are your bills past due and you don’t know how you are going to pay them? If so, then you are insolvent, and we can help end your pain.

Licensed Insolvency Trustees (formerly called bankruptcy trustees) are the only experts accredited, licensed and supervised by the federal government to handle debt restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee, our personalized strategy will assist you to know all your alternatives. The alternative you choose based on our recommendations will take away the stress and pain you are feeling because of your debt problems.

The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience people and companies in financial trouble. Whether it is a consumer proposal debt settlement plan, a larger personal or corporate restructuring proposal debt settlement plan, or as a last resort, bankruptcy, we have the experience.

Our approach for each file is to create a result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life. Call us today for your free consultation.

Insolvent definition: NET WORTH ADDENDUM

Regularly monitoring your finances reveals invaluable lessons. A most important aspect of building wealth is to find it. People that constantly increase their net worth track it to direct it. So, the starting point is understanding what the net worth definition for a person is.

Seeing the measurable results of your spending and investing decisions is the first step to take control of them. Contrarily, people in the worst monetary shape have no concept where their money is spent and are too afraid to know what their net worth might be since it will not be pretty.

Which extreme more closely matches your mindset? You can’t handle what you don’t measure. Consider it: if you were seriously rich, you’d invest a long time weekly handling some element of your finances.

A beginner variation of a financial tracking approach is needed to begin improving your financial condition.. In addition, the more money you build up, the more financial assets and liabilities to keep an eye on. I ‘d wager that you won’t own them for long if you don’t have your financial tracking system set up before you acquire them. If you don’t see and feel the gains and losses of your monetary choices–you are playing the complex money-game of life without any scorecard.

This is how so many people with good income still find their way into financial trouble. You need to have navigation reference points to know if you are going toward developing wealth or ruining wealth. It is by monitoring your net worth that you’ll begin to discover the monetary impact and effects of your decisions.

The beginning point for financial measuring is a simple statement of net worth (or balance sheet). It is a list of the current market price of whatever you own and what you owe to others. Your net worth is the difference between these 2 numbers. This is the number that you want to measure and increase every month. As with a business, as soon as you start determining the monetary repercussions of your habits you can begin making your own individual financial guidance. Basic insights and rules like these will help increase your net worth. This will lead to bigger insights and develop into bigger gains.

If you find that you have a lot of debt that is reducing your net worth, or possibly a negative net worth, then what guidance about debt are you going to develop for yourself? Think about including a guideline to read a new personal finance book each year. Your money rules and net worth statements can be as advanced or as basic as you wish to make them.

When you have computed your calculation of net worth, you begin having the ability to plan for purchases and payments. As an easy example, if your auto insurance coverage costs get paid annually, you can calculate just how much cash that you must to set aside monthly to easily pay it when the bill arrives. Or if you are getting a new car, you’ll be a lot better prepared for the first costs before you get squeezed at the end of the month and wind up paying a couple of bills late.

After you get comfortable with a net worth statement, you can move on to an income & expense sheet. How much net worth will you need by when? The answer is based upon the financial routines, tools and education you will establish. However, it can all start with your very first net worth statement.

JUNE 17, 2019 UPDATE: The Court of Appeal for Ontario reversed this lower court decision. You can read all about it in our blog update – INSOLVENT DEFINITION RESTORED IN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO insolvent definition

 

 

Call a Trustee Now!