Tag: Bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL STORY 4 – TRUE STORIES

Introduction

This consumer proposal story 4 Brandon’s Blog is about how four of our clients were able to enter into a government approved debt settlement program, shed their debt and restart their lives.

As I have written in previous blogs, a consumer proposal is the only government approved debt settlement plan. It is designed for people who have $250,000 or less in total debt, other than for any debts secured against their home such as a mortgage or secured home equity line of credit.

If the consumer proposal receives the (deemed) acceptance by the required majority of creditors and it also receives (deemed) court approval, then the consumer proposal is approved. The insolvent person must now make the payments to the licensed insolvency trustee who is the consumer proposal administrator.

The following four real client consumer proposal story situations of mine I believe are representative of the kind of person we help end the pain and anxiety their debts are causing them. I have changed the names of the people for this Brandon’s Blog.

Buzz

This client is a 56-year-old married male. I will call him Buzz. He has annual income, net of income tax of $100,000. He has assets with a net realizable value of $1,000. His consumer debt totalled $71,000.

In reviewing his budget and affairs, we calculated that in personal bankruptcy, he would be required to contribute surplus income for 36 months as he was previously bankrupt. His surplus income obligation in bankruptcy was just over $34,000 in equal monthly instalments of $944.44.

We advised him that since his budget had room for him to make monthly payments, he should consider a consumer proposal. We drafted and filed his consumer proposal requiring him to pay $40,000 in total over 5 years. This resulted in equal monthly payments each of $667.

Buzz’s creditors accepted his consumer proposal and he is making the payments. This way he avoided bankruptcy and ended up with an approved debt settlement plan with monthly payments he can afford.

Woody

This client is a 65-year-old single male. I will call him Woody. He has annual income, net of income tax of $27,600. He has assets with a net realizable value of $500. His consumer debt totalled $108,000.

In reviewing his budget and affairs, we calculated that in personal bankruptcy, he would be required to contribute surplus income for 9 months as he was never previously bankrupt. His surplus income obligation in bankruptcy was just over $1,880 in equal monthly instalments of $208.89.

We advised him that since his budget had room for him to make monthly payments, he should consider a consumer proposal. We drafted and filed his consumer proposal requiring him to pay $24,000 in total over 5 years. This resulted in equal monthly payments each of $400.

Woody’s creditors accepted his consumer proposal and he is making his payments. This way he avoided bankruptcy and ended up with an approved debt settlement plan with monthly payments he can afford.

Mr. & Mrs. Potato Head

Our 3rd client is a 47-year-old married man and his 43-year-old wife. I will call them Mr. & Mrs. Potato Head. Their yearly income, net of tax obligations was $51,996. Their assets had a realizable value of $953. They are collectively responsible for the exact same consumer financial debts amounting to $31,820.

In assessing their budget, we computed that in a bankruptcy, they would need to pay surplus income for 9 months as neither were bankrupt before. Their surplus income responsibility in a joint bankruptcy was $5,271 in regular monthly instalments of $585.67.

We encouraged them that given their budget plan had room to make month-to-month payments, they must take into consideration the possibility of making a consumer proposal. We prepared and filed their consumer proposal needing them to pay $7,020 over 3 years. This led to regular monthly payments each of $195.

Mr. & Mrs. Potato Head’s creditors approved the consumer proposal and they are making their payments. In this manner, they will not go bankrupt and wound up with an accepted debt negotiation strategy with month-to-month payments they can manage.

Jessie

This client is a 67-year-old married female. I will call her Jessie. She has annual income, net of income tax of $58,416. She has assets with a net realizable value of $250. Her consumer debt totalled $67,000.

In examining her budget plan, we determined that in bankruptcy, she would be called for surplus income payments for 36 months as she was once a bankrupt. Her surplus income commitment in a bankruptcy would be $17,465 in regular monthly instalments of $485.13.

Considering that her spending plan had space to make month-to-month repayments, we encouraged her to seriously think about making a consumer proposal. We composed and submitted her consumer proposal needing her to pay $21,500 over a 40 month period. This would be regular monthly payments each of $537.50.

Jessie’s creditors approved her consumer proposal and she is making her repayments. By doing this she stayed clear of bankruptcy and wound up with an approved debt negotiation strategy with regular monthly repayments she can manage.

Consumer proposal story summary

I hope these real-life consumer proposal story 4 examples gives you a better idea of the kind of people this debt settlement program strategy is meant to help. It is a way for people to shed their debt and get back on a proper footing.

Are you in financial distress? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for financial restructuring, a debt settlement plan and to AVOID bankruptcy.

As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government approved debt settlement plan to do that. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

consumer proposal story

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WILL CRA CONTACT ME IF I DO NOT PAY?

cra contact

If you would prefer to listen to the Brandon’s Blog CRA contact audio version, please scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on the podcast

Introduction

It seems that more often than not, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is a creditor in the personal or corporate insolvency matters that I get involved with. Many times the person, be they just an individual, an unincorporated business owner or the President of the company, will ask, “will CRA contact me if I do not pay?”.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I discuss the various ways CRA will contact the responsible individual, be they the taxpayer or the authorized representative of the taxpayer company.

Types of CRA debt

The following types of tax debt are the usual ones that a person in Ontario might owe:

The following types of tax debt are the usual ones that an Ontario corporation might owe:

Most likely CRA has already contacted the insolvent person or company before they come to see me for a free consultation. The reality is that when someone owes money to Revenue Canada and gets one of those unique brown envelopes in the mail, they tend to feel sick in the stomach. So, although they may keep the envelope and its contents, they certainly don’t wish to look inside it.

Let’s look at the various ways CRA has to contact a taxpayer and for CRA payment arrangements to be made.

Ways you and the taxman can communicate

Notice of Assessment or Reassessment

The first way CRA will contact you is by sending a notice of assessment or reassessment to the individual or corporate taxpayer. This is a notice that explains the reason for the (re)assessment, the calculation and the amount owing. There is no need to talk about the situation where the taxpayer pays the balance in full on time. I am talking about the situation when the taxpayer cannot afford to pay the amount owing.

Be proactive

If you cannot pay the total you owe, be proactive by getting in touch with the CRA as soon as possible. Overlooking your debt does not make it vanish. As a matter of fact, ignoring it might make things worse. This is the same whether it is a personal debt or a corporate debt.

The CRA tacks on interest at the prescribed rate compounded daily. You can’t avoid this because whether you realize it or not, CRA has become your lender for any unpaid amounts. By taking action first, you can at least ward off a much worse result. So you contacting CRA is the first and best way to make the connection.

I will discuss below what your options are concerning amounts you cannot pay off immediately, but first, I want to discuss other ways that the CRA will contact you if you first don’t contact them.

Telephone or letter

If the taxpayer does not contact CRA to work out a payment arrangement (discussed below), CRA will then communicate with the taxpayer. The amount owing is assigned to a collections officer who will contact the taxpayer by telephone, letter or both.

If the taxpayer responds to that outreach, the collections officer will attempt to obtain payment. The collections officer will also ask many more questions. If the taxpayer is a company, the collections officer may also make an appointment to go visit the company to review its financial records.

The purpose of asking the questions and reviewing corporate financial records is to attempt to determine if any money is owed to the taxpayer by third parties and where does the taxpayer maintain bank accounts.

Garnishment by a Requirement To Pay

Armed with the information obtained from the taxpayer’s tax filings and any additional information collected through discussions or reviews, the next level of CRA contact to get the taxpayer’s attention is not with the taxpayer, but rather with third parties. A Requirement To Pay (RTP) is a lawful notification that the CRA sends out to a 3rd party when:

  • the CRA thinks that the 3rd party owes or will owe money in the future to the taxpayer that has not paid their tax obligation; and
  • the CRA has not been able to collect the taxpayer’s debt or make an appropriate settlement plan with the taxpayer.

The RTP advises the 3rd party to send the money the third party owes to the taxpayer to the CRA, rather than the taxpayer. The RTP reveals the taxpayer’s name, address, and the CRA account number.

The RTP is the way the CRA uses to garnishee bank accounts, wages or any other amount owing by a third party to the taxpayer. An RTP can garnishee all sorts of repayments a 3rd party might make to a taxpayer. The more common ones are:

  • income, earnings, payments, bonus offers, or various other amounts owing by an employer to an employee;
  • repayment of expenses owed to an employee;
  • amounts due to a professional or contractor for work performed, products, or services;
  • lease or rent payments;
  • loan payments;
  • interest or dividend payments;
  • insurance claim settlements
  • amounts on deposit at a financial institution

Seizing your assets

A garnishee through an RTP is to intercept and seize payments from a third party to the taxpayer. But what if there is no such third party that exists or can be found but the taxpayer has assets?

In that situation, the CRA has the power to seize assets found registered in the name of the taxpayer. This is how CRA goes about doing it. The CRA can lawfully register your debt with the Federal Court of Canada. By doing so they get a certificate validating the amount you owe to the Crown. As soon as it is issued, this certification, called a memorial, has the same or even greater impact as a judgment if someone sued you.

Now that the CRA has the memorial, they can register it against any assets in your name. This includes your home and its possessions owned by the taxpayer. The CRA rarely actually takes physical possession of the assets, but in most cases, they don’t need to. It will be impossible to sell or refinance your assets with the CRA memorial registered against it under provincial law. So when that time comes, the taxpayer will have no choice but to deal with the CRA on the outstanding debt, one way or the other.

Here are different ways that you can deal with the CRA on your tax debt if you cannot pay it now in full.

Payment arrangement

This is the first and most hassle-free way of paying off your tax debt. A payment arrangement is a settlement plan you make with the CRA. It enables you to make smaller regular payments over time until you have paid your whole tax debt plus interest.

Prior to agreeing to the settlement plan, the CRA collections officer will want to know that you are paying the maximum amount you can afford. Hopefully, the amount you can pay is at least the same as the minimum monthly amount the collections officer is willing to accept.

So, the collections officer will ask you all sorts of questions and may even want you to complete a questionnaire, so that they understand your monthly budget as part of any debt settlement plan.

As part of making a payment arrangement, you should also be working with your accountant to see if any of the taxpayer relief provisions are available to you. This blog isn’t meant to be a discussion of the income tax act or taxpayer relief, so, I won’t go into any more detail than that.

Any payment arrangement has to deal with 100% of the principal amount of tax owing plus interest. Unfortunately, the collections officer does not have the authority to make a deal to accept less than full payment, absent an insolvency proceeding (further discussed below).

Insolvency proceeding

If you cannot reach a satisfactory payment arrangement with the CRA, or you have one but can no longer keep up with the payments, then, the taxpayer can consider an insolvency filing. In the case of an individual, it would be either bankruptcy or a consumer proposal. For a corporation, it would be either a Division I Proposal or bankruptcy.

Either bankruptcy or a proposal will stop CRA’s ability to issue a requirement to pay or obtain a memorial. However, if CRA has obtained and registered a memorial before the taxpayer files for either a restructuring proposal or bankruptcy, the memorial cannot be eliminated.

Similarly, for a corporation, unremitted source deductions form a deemed trust claim against the company’s assets. So in either a bankruptcy or financial restructuring proposal, this trust claim cannot be eliminated or reduced. However, for both individuals and companies, the income tax debt can be eliminated. For companies, the HST arrears will not be a trust claim in bankruptcy. Unlike a bankruptcy, HST arrears are not automatically made unsecured by the wording of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). However, current CRA policy in financial restructuring proposals results in the HST arrears being treated as an unsecured claim.

Personal or corporate income tax is an unsecured debt. As soon as you’ve declared bankruptcy or filed the financial restructuring proposal, the CRA cannot begin or continue any action against you, including wage garnishment or freezing your assets, including your bank account. Your licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) will alert CRA as soon as you submit your filing and advise it to quit any type of enforcement activity through any RTP. As I stated above, unfortunately, any memorial already registered will remain against your assets.

Do you have too much debt?

I hope you have found this CRA contact Brandon’s Blog to have useful information for you. Do you have too much debt? Are you in financial distress? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for financial restructuring, a debt settlement plan and to AVOID bankruptcy.

As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government approved debt settlement plan to do that. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA: A BLUEPRINT TO STOP BILL COLLECTORS

consumer proposal canada

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Consumer proposal Canada Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Introduction

I have written before on the concept of how a bankruptcy filing puts into place a stay of proceedings. A section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) states that creditors are not allowed to take or continue any collection or enforcement activity against a bankrupt person or company. But what about a consumer proposal Canada? I will discuss this concept for a consumer proposal and highlight a recent case on this issue.

The federal law

Under section 69.2 (1) of the BIA, with certain limited exceptions, when a consumer proposal is filed, “…no creditor has any remedy against the debtor or the debtor’s property, or shall commence or continue any action, execution or other proceedings, for the recovery of a claim provable in bankruptcy…”.

So if the claim is one that is provable in a bankruptcy, and therefore in a consumer proposal Canada, then the creditor cannot begin or continue a lawsuit or try to enforce a judgment for the amount owed.

A recent decision from the Ontario Court confirms this law where a consumer proposal Canada will stop creditors and bill collectors from starting or continuing legal action against you.

The facts of this case

The case is Yigzaw v. Ashagrie, 2019 ONSC 2474. It is about a motion to lift the stay of proceedings to permit enforcement of an order issued against the debtors who have filed a consumer proposal.

The applicants, Philipos Yigzaw and Aster Abraham, seek to appeal an order issued by the Court on February 21, 2017 (the 2017 order). The 2017 order was gotten on the basis of summary judgment on an application started by the applicants. In their application, they sought repayment of $102,500 that they had advanced to the respondents Anaketch Ashagrie and Yilma Gari to fund a business operating under the name “Telling Roses”. They also seek an accounting of how the funds had actually been spent.

The 2017 order required Ashagrie and Gari to pay $102,500 to Yigzaw and Abraham in addition to costs of $6,250. The respondents were likewise required to provide an accounting. The Court declined to issue a certificate of pending litigation against the respondents’ residence, although a writ of execution was issued. The respondents submitted a consumer proposal the very next day.

In this enforcement motion, the applicants state that the respondents have failed to adhere to the 2017 order. They look for relief that would require Ashagrie and Gari to be examined and to pay the amount of the judgment. They also want a finding that the respondents are in contempt.

The issues for the Court to consider

The Court first considered section 69.2 (1) of the BIA I spoke about above. The Court then looked at the exception I alluded to, being Section 69.4 of the BIA.

That section says that a Court may, in certain circumstances, raise the stay to allow a creditor to pursue its rights against a debtor who has filed consumer proposal. To obtain a lifting of the stay, the creditor must persuade the Court that it is most likely to be materially prejudiced by the ongoing stay, or that lifting the stay is equitable on other grounds.

Canadian courts have held that the criteria in s. 69.4 might be fulfilled where the creditor’s debt will not be released as an outcome of the insolvency process. The types of financial obligations that are not discharged are provided in s. 178( 1) of the BIA.

They consist of a debt or obligation arising out of fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity as well as a debt or obligation resulting from obtaining property or services by false pretenses or fraudulent misrepresentation. Lifting of a stay is not a routine matter.

To succeed, the applicants have to show how they are most likely to be materially prejudiced by the stay, or that there are various other equitable grounds to raise it.

In a typical motion under s. 69.4, the applicant looking to lift the stay says that it needs to have the opportunity to prove that its accusations come from an activity provided in s. 178( 1) to ensure that it may obtain a judgment against the bankrupt or insolvent person. If successful, then that claim would survive the insolvency process.

In that normal case, the Court examines the creditor’s claims to identify if the debt, if confirmed, would be released as an outcome of the bankruptcy or proposal. Sometimes, the Court may also consider evidence submitted by the creditor.

This case is uncommon because the applicants have already gotten a judgment on their claim. They are not seeking to show their claim. They are looking to enforce the Order. So the concern the Court must think about is whether that Order was made according to a cause of action listed in s. 178( 1 ). The Judge did this by reviewing the claims and evidence before the Judge who gave judgment, his analysis, and the evidence filed in this motion.

The Court’s analysis

The Court quite properly pointed out that in order to be successful for the lifting of the stay, the applicants had to show that their debt was more than just one of a contract to lend money that was not repaid.

The Court said that looking at the application in the most charitable method possible, the claims could not support a finding that the respondents obtained property from the applicants by false pretenses or fraudulent misrepresentation. The applicants state that their loan was conditional on the money being used for “Telling Roses”. They do not declare that they were induced to loan money to “Telling Roses” as an outcome of any type of illegal misstatement by the respondents. Likewise, the applicants do not allege that the respondents took part in any kind of deceitful acts that induced them to loan the funds. Therefore, the exception from the discharge of the debt in s. 178( 1 )( e) of the BIA was not advanced in the applicants’ claim.

The allegations in the application also do not support a finding that the participants engaged in fraudulence, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity. To meet that standard it is not nearly enough for a debt to have actually been brought on by fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation. That form of criminal activity had to have occurred in the context of a fiduciary relationship.

The applicants do not declare that the respondents had a fiduciary obligation towards them. The relationship they explain with the respondents would not follow such a claim. Fiduciary relationships are unusual in arms’ length business transaction. The applicants additionally do not clearly affirm that the respondents participated in any type of scam at any point.

In reviewing the reasons given by the Judge who made the 2017 order, and in looking at all the other evidence in this motion, the Court found that it was anything more than one party loaning funds to another to start a business. The business never made a profit, it failed and therefore, could not repay the money.

The decision

Given these facts and the Court’s analysis, the Court found that the applicants could not succeed on their motion to lift the stay. Rather, the Court confirmed that the 2017 judgment could only be used as the basis for the applicants to file a proof of claim in the consumer proposal filed.

The basis for the 2017 order was a finding that the applicants lent the respondents the amount of $102,500. There is absolutely nothing in the underlying decision, or in the accusations in the application on which judgment was obtained, or in any evidence submitted in this motion, that puts the applicants’ claim in the classification of financial debts that are not released under s. 178( 1) of the BIA.

Therefore, the applicants’ motion to lift the stay under s. 69.4 of the BIA was rejected. They failed to show that they are likely to be materially prejudiced by the ongoing operation of the stay or that there are various other equitable factors that would lead to a conclusion to lift the stay.

Do you have too much debt?

Are you in financial distress? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for financial restructuring, a debt settlement plan and to AVOID bankruptcy.

As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RBC ONLINE BANKING: DID WE NOT LEARN FROM THE RUTHLESS EQUIFAX DATA HACK?

rbc online banking sign in
rbc online banking

RBC online banking introduction

I have a story to tell you about how a Royal Bank of Canada online (RBC) customer is out of pocket after a fraud perpetrated on her. The fraud occurred after she used her RBC online banking sign in.

It is something that everybody does and possibly everyone thinks is a secure transaction. It has to do with the system to move money online made use of over a million times a day in Canada. By telling this tale of the RBC online banking hack, I wish you understand 2 points; 1. it might not be as secure as advertised; 2. you need to be alert in doing whatever you can to shield yourself from the cyberpunks.

RBC online banking: What happened

The woman had gone on vacation with a close friend. A couple of days after they got home she sends her close friend some money she owed her from the journey. Her good friend called the following early morning to claim she could not deposit the transfer. When she tried to deposit the cash, a message showed up claiming that the cash had already been transferred! The sender’s initial thought was what a funny friend she had. She cannot get an easy e-transfer and does not know how to use the system. They also laughed about it.

Her pal consistently sends out and gets money by e-transfer. She understands what she is doing. The e-transfer did not work. The lady quickly examined her savings account. The cash was gone.

rbc online banking sign in
rbc online banking

RBC online banking fraud department

They rapidly met with each other and called the RBC online banking fraud division on speakerphone. The women advised of the situation. The fraud department informed them they know the cash really did not go to the good friend. As a matter of fact, they provided the name of the person that got the cash and his email address!

They were stunned by 3 points. First, they never came across anyone with that name or email address. Second, they could not understand that over the telephone, the RBC online banking people would divulge that information. Third, the RBC online banking system did not let the Bank know the name and email address of the friend who was supposed to receive the money.

The woman then said to the RBC online banking fraud department, alright, please reimburse my account. However, RBC would not do that. They told her they couldn’t yet decide who was hacked – the RBC customer or her friend. They suggested she quickly get to her branch to sort it out. As you will read further, she quickly learned that being defrauded in a digital money transfer is not the same as if someone stole and cashed a cheque you wrote that was intercepted in the mail.

RBC online banking: Going to the Bank

She went to the Bank. Her friend went home. She reached the branch within 5 minutes of hanging up the phone. After half-an-hour of talking with the Bank people, they told her that it had not been her that was hacked. Rather, it was her good friend.

So she told her close friend what RBC said. They went together to the local police station and filed a report. She gave a duplicate of the cops’ report to both the RBC online banking fraud group and the RCMP Commercial Crime division.

RBC continues to contend that it was not their customer’s computer or email that was hacked either as part of the RBC online banking sign in or otherwise. Rather, it was her friend’s computer system and email that was hacked. To date, RBC has refunded their customer only half of the amount lost. They stated that it was only as a goodwill gesture and they are not taking any responsibility for the RBC online banking hack.

How we can protect ourselves from an RBC online banking hack?

There are a few more facts that I have saved for this section of the blog. The reason I did that is that it will show us what additional things we can do ourselves to better protect all of us. Hopefully, can all learn from this RBC online banking sign-in and Interac e-money transfer debacle.

The obvious first step is having up to date and proper anti-virus security on all of our computers. This security must also extend to our mobile devices, as so much of banking is now done that way. Many people use the RBC online banking mobile banking app. If you are not an RBC customer, I am sure that you use your Bank’s mobile banking app. For mobile, this would require us to be using a virtual private network (VPN). Consumer VPN systems are so easy to set up and inexpensive. They protect our private and sensitive information from hackers.

When someone sends an e-transfer of money, you are sending it either to someone on your approved list and therefore the money is automatically deposited. If it is to an email address not on your approved list, then you have to set a security question. The security question is either something only the person you are sending the money to would know or, you have to provide them with the answer. Without the proper answer, they cannot obtain their money.

In this case, the woman’s security question was something that her friend knew. The security question was “who is my favourite Beatle?”. Sounds simple, right? Well not if you have been hacked, there are only 4 possible answers and the e-transfer system gives you 4 tries to get it right!

So it was very simple for the hacker. The whole universe of possible correct answers was 4 and the system gives you 4 tries. The woman would not have known that the system gives you 4 attempts to answer properly. What this shows us is we need to establish a more complicated question and answer that a stranger hacker could not possibly know.

Cybercrime is an ongoing problem. The Equifax data hack is a case of a large corporation being hacked. The reality is that our home computers are so simple to protect. It is the large complicated systems that are more vulnerable. That is unless you have done nothing to protect your home computer from hackers.

RBC online banking conclusion

I hope this sad story has helped you gain a better understanding of what to do to better protect ourselves from cybercrime. Question: Have you or your company been the victim of a hacker, including identity theft? Has something like the RBC online banking data breach ever caused you to lose money and now you have trouble making your monthly payments? Is your business dealing with financial challenges that require to be addressed immediately?

Call the Ira Smith Team today if so. We have years and generations of experience helping people and businesses seeking financial restructuring or a debt negotiation strategy. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only specialists acknowledged, accredited and overseen by the federal government to supply insolvency advice and implement solutions to help you to remain free from bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can end your anxiety, anxiousness, and discomfort today. With the roadmap we establish one-of-a-kind to your scenario, we will promptly return you right into a well balanced, healthy and carefree life.

You can have a no-cost evaluation to help you to fix your credit and debt difficulties. With you, we will discover your monetary pain factors and make use of an approach to free them from your life. This will definitely enable you to start with a clean slate, Starting Over Starting Now.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BORROW WELL REVIEW GUIDE: BORROWELL REVIEW FREE CREDIT SCORE METHOD

borrow well review

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon’s Blog Borrow Well Review please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast

Introduction

Have you ever before wondered what your credit score is and what your credit history looks like? I’m certain if you ever before looked for a home mortgage, a loan, to rent a home or apartment or applied for an insurance policy, you recognize that your credit rating ends up being crucial. The loan provider, landlord or insurance provider will certainly decide on you based upon your credit history. This Brandon’s Blog is about the totally free credit report system of Borrowell Inc.; a Borrow Well review.

Inspecting your credit rating has actually generally been a really laborious job and nobody really liked to do it. With the surge of consumer FinTech over the last couple of years, two businesses have actually seen a method to produce an on the internet industry for personal loans in Canada; 1. Credit Karma Canada; and 2. Borrowell Inc. Credit Karma Canada is owned by its United States parent. Borrowell is a 100% Canadian owned firm.

Borrow Well review

I have previously blogged about Credit Karma Canada. Borrowell runs in a comparable way. Borrowell’s goal is quite straightforward. They wish to assist Canadians to make fantastic choices concerning credit and debt. They began life as a consumer lender. Borrowell thought that customers wanted personal loans. They started the firm making loans for people with excellent credit.

Borrowell discovered that it was pricey to obtain customers. Their customer acquisition cost was very high. It was a tough issue to fix. What they did was come to be the 1st business in Canada to supply credit scores absolutely free. They assumed this would be a wonderful method to obtain clients and promote what Borrowell did. They thought that it would certainly be an excellent method to make loans.

How it works

The trouble was that they were thousands of people a week inspecting their credit report, however, few of them either desired or fit the Borrowell standards for, loans. Borrowell found that people desired various financial products and not everyone had good credit. So they invested most of 2017 in developing a marketplace.

They developed an online forum for around 40 various financial institutions and other lenders. That enabled a person to get their credit score with Borrowell, and then they can after that be taken into the sales funnel. Borrowell would after that advise of products, solutions, and pointers customized for every person from their forum of lender members. Borrowell earns a fee on loans made and other financial product sales.

They wound up discovering a high level of product market fit for roughly half a million direct customers that first examine their credit report with Borrowell. Canadians now had a very easy way to regularly see their credit score and inspect their credit history.

Utilizing the Borrowell system does not influence your credit report, unlike when you apply for a loan and the potential lender performs a credit check on you. In order to ask you the setup questions, and to have the ability to provide you with your cost-free credit report and record, Borrowell acquires information from one of our two credit reporting companies, Equifax.

Borowell additionally browses particular public document data sources to try to find various other details such as:

  • Bankruptcy: A legal process used by people and companies looking for particular relief from all or some their debt.
  • Civil Judgment: A non-criminal judgment in a court, calling for the person or company to make full or partial restitution.
  • Registered Items: Other things found in public documents, like a lien against your car or truck or a home mortgage or other loan registered against your house.

Know that you are in the Borrowell sales funnel

In order to stay top of mind, Borrowell updates you on your credit rating on a monthly basis and if it has actually changed for better or for worse. This is, obviously, advantageous for any person trying to enhance their credit history. Borrowell will inform you monthly the result of the activities you are taking to boost your credit score.

Borrowell will also help you recognize what variables are affecting your credit score. In this way, they inform you what you need to do to boost your credit rating. This is particularly great for anybody trying to learn about finances and general money matters. Borrowell also provides recommendations on just how to improve your credit rating.

So their system helps you to learn about:

  • payment history
  • credit usage
  • bad comments on your credit report
  • account inquiries
  • your credit score and report
  • tips for improvement

Borrowell offers you a very easy way to see just how you’re doing financially, just how much money you have invested between credit cards and automobile and various other loans. It likewise

To learn what goes into calculating your credit score and what it all means, check out my blog, WHAT IS A GOOD CREDIT SCORE IN CANADA? THE UNTOLD CREDIT SCORE SECRETS.

Is there any drawback to the Borrowell app?

The positive side is that this is a very easy and effective method of looking into yourself in a reliable way none of our Canadian banks have actually done. Nonetheless, I likewise have some worries.

The financial partners in the Borrowell financial marketplace have to pay a fee. That charge needs to be accounted for in the price of the financial products sold. If there is competition amongst marketplace financial members, this may keep pricing consistent and competitive within the various credit score buckets. Perhaps this marketplace also gives people access to financial products they otherwise may not be able to find or get on their own.

It is safe to presume that people using this system are working on boosting their credit score. The financial partners might be costing their products for those that have actually not attained sufficient credit strength to go and negotiate the price they will be paying with any Bank. So for those with a good credit rating, this may mean that the cost of any kind of financial product via the Borrowell portal could be greater than otherwise readily available to them if they spent the time investigating.

My main concern is more generic. It would be the same as with any system like this. They maintain a great deal of highly personal and sensitive information on Canadians which they regularly update.

There are many criminals around the world who would like nothing better than to hack the Borrowell database in order to get at this information to further their devious and illegal schemes. Stealing your identity, or identity theft is, of course, the big one.

Think no further than September 7, 2017, when Equifax announced that months-long illegitimate access to its credit-report databases had led to the breach of personally identifiable information of over 148 million people, nearly all in the USA. That is the real danger I am talking about. As I mentioned, that is a danger with any computerized system storing highly sensitive information, not just a Borrowell issue.

Borrow Well Review: Do you have a negative credit report?

I hope this Borrowell review has helped you gain a better understanding. Question: Have you lost the ability to borrow because of a bad credit score? Are you having trouble making your monthly payments? Is your business dealing with financial challenges that require to be addressed immediately?

Call the Ira Smith Team today if so. We have years and generations of experience helping people and businesses seeking financial restructuring or a debt negotiation strategy. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists acknowledged, accredited and overseen by the federal government to supply insolvency advice and implement solutions to help you to remain free from bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can end your anxiety, anxiousness, and discomfort today. With the roadmap we establish one-of-a-kind to your scenario, we will promptly return you right into a well balanced, healthy and carefree life.

You can have a no-cost evaluation to help you to fix your credit and debt difficulties. With you, we will discover your monetary pain factors and make use of an approach to free them from your life. This will definitely enable you to start with a clean slate, Starting Over Starting Now.

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FINANCIAL SECURITY REPORT: HALF OF CANADIANS CAN’T MAKE ENDS MEET

Financial security Introduction

Brand-New Ipsos study findings were released on April 22, 2019, simply 2 days prior to the next Bank of Canada interest rate announcement. This brand-new survey shows exactly how Canadians really feel about their financial security or its absence. Ipsos claims almost fifty percent of Canadians cannot make ends meet on a monthly basis.

Fifty percent of Canada is worried about the effect of increasing rates of interest on their financial resources. They feel even worse about their debt load from just a couple of months back.

Canadians maxed out on debt

Canadians are maxed out on debt with 48% of Canadians on the edge of bankruptcy. They claim that they go by the end of every month to within $200 or less far from financial insolvency.

In regards to Canadians and their beliefs, people are worried about their debt levels and financial security. Forty-eight percent of those questioned claim they cannot make ends meet. They understand that they are most likely to take on even more debt at the end of each month to pay all of their expenditures. So practically fifty percent of all Canadians need to handle even more debt to satisfy their current expenses, which in part includes existing debt repayments!

It’s no longer about purchases – that ship has already sailed!

It ends up from the survey that this isn’t about the fact that we’re in a low-interest-rate atmosphere any longer. It also isn’t about people making high-end or lifestyle new purchases that are considered unnecessary.

They have actually already done all that. Especially people in Toronto and Vancouver that have stretched to buy costly houses, home furnishings and appliances. They used the low-interest rate mortgages and home equity credit lines to do it.

New debt on top of old debt

So now they understand that they better not take on even more debt. However, guess what? It is currently far too late for almost half of Canada. People are claiming they currently just cannot make ends meet. Therefore, they have no choice but to take on even more debt.

Brand-new debt to make old debt repayments! Undoubtedly, these individuals stay in a hazardous downward spiral. People are questioning whether can continue in this way and are thinking about personal bankruptcy.

It is true that the survey has a small sample size. This Ipsos survey reveals growing tension and grief. Nevertheless, personal bankruptcies remain historically low in this nation. Undoubtedly, there are local distinctions. Albertans are experiencing far more personal insolvencies as a result of the slowness in the energy market.

I think there are 2 really basic reasons for almost half of Canadians dealing with financial insolvency yet personally bankruptcy levels are down. First, financially troubled Canadians are utilizing the consumer proposal arrangements section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). This is a good thing because they are avoiding bankruptcy.

Second, people still have adequate equity in their houses. So, they are still able to borrow for brand-new debt to satisfy old debt payments other living costs. This is not a good thing. The thing Canadians do not seem to be doing yet is tightening their belts and lowering month-to-month expenses.

Bank of Canada

The Bank of Canada (BOC) increased its overnight interest rate 5 times since mid-2017. At the end of 2018, everyone, including the BOC assumed that fad was most likely to continue. Nevertheless, in its first 2019 interest rate announcement, the Bank altered its signals and currently appears completely satisfied to hold steady on the interest rate for what might be for the rest of 2019.

On April 24, 2019, the BOC announced that it was maintaining the overnight bank rate target at 1 ¾ percent. The BOC did so based on its observations of the Canadian and global economies.

Their statement included, that in Canada:

  • economic development throughout the very first half of 2019 is anticipated to be slower than was forecast for in January 2019.
  • The oil price decrease and recurring transport restrictions have actually suppressed financial investment and exports in the oil industry.
  • Financial investment and exports outside the oil market, at the same time, have been adversely impacted by unpredictability and the global downturn.
  • Beyond the oil and gas market, the financial investment will be sustained by high prices of other commodities and exports will broaden with reinforcing international need.

As far as the global market, the BOC stated:

  • The global economy reduced by greater than the Bank projected in its January Monetary Policy Report.
  • Continuous unpredictability connected to trade disputes has weakened business views.
  • Stagnation throughout many countries has resulted.
  • In reaction, several reserve banks have reported a slower speed of monetary plan normalization.

As a result, the BOC kept its target for the overnight rate at 1 3/4 percent.

Financial questions for Canadians

Virtually fifty percent of Canadians currently are sorry for the debt they have. I believe what this does is brings recognition for you to have a serious discussion in your home. The discussion requires to be about:

  • Exactly how near the margin are you living?
  • What household costs could you drop?
  • Could you survive if one of you were to lose your job?
  • If not, what can you do now to prepare for that if it were to one day happen?
  • Have you filed all your income tax returns and paid all your tax obligations?
  • Did you get a tax refund and what are you most likely to do with that cash to help with your situation?
  • Are your Christmas gifts expenses all paid or are you still rolling those costs on your credit card bill every month?

Despite that the job market has seen wage strength, the Canadian economic situation has not produced great financial signals. There are spots that seem to be a little murkier. Our rising cost of living is nearing 2% on an annualized basis and we’re paying much more for gas at the pump. We’re paying a lot more for produce. So there are things that are costing us even more simple to manage. So if income is increasing a bit, costs are climbing much more.

So Canadians are currently really feeling a little sweaty. They aren’t certain what is most likely to take place. Currently, there appears to be a little bit of a rest on the interest rates.

Canadians need to set up a proper household budget

I would certainly suggest that not everybody has taken a hard look at their financial situation. There’s plenty of presumptions that can take place due to the fact that you just do not understand your numbers. I see that occurring all the time.

So perhaps people really feel a little even worse off than they actually are due to the fact that they do not understand their numbers. They understand they stay in difficulty, however, do not have the capability to assemble a roadmap for saving themselves.

A truth check is needed instantly. Most likely fifty percent of those that claim they cannot make ends meet can save themselves without turning to an insolvency process. If they just recognized their realities about their very own money situation. The other half of the half, or 25% of Canadians, probably do meet the financial insolvency definition and need professional help.

The trick might just be that Canadians need to promptly get a good handle on what their month-to-month income and expenses truly are. Share that info with the entire household and make and follow a household budget that has everybody’s agreement. Your financial security in retirement may depend upon it.

Readers of my Brandon’s Blog will know that I always state the advantages of correct budgeting. To check out this budgeting topic you can look as far back as my collection of blogs that began late in 2014 with A BALANCED BUDGET IS TO FINANCIAL HEALTH WHAT A BALANCED DIET IS TO PHYSICAL HEALTH. You can additionally check my more recent 2019 blogs, USEFUL TIPS FOR SAVING MONEY CANADA: THIS PRO ATHLETE TEACHES US and also MY BILLS ARE HIGH: 6 THINGS TO IMMEDIATELY DO.

What about you or your company?

Do you have way too much debt? Are you having difficulty making your month-to-month expenses? Is your company having a hard time handling its economic difficulties that you cannot figure how to get out of?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people and companies looking for financial restructuring or a debt settlement plan. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only experts recognized, accredited and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and carry out alternatives to aid you to stay clear of bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can end your tension, stress and anxiety that your financial problems have triggered. With the special roadmap, we develop unique for you, we will right away return you right into a healthy and well-balanced hassle-free life.

You can have a no-cost evaluation so we can help you repair your debt difficulties. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will most certainly permit you to return to a brand new healthy life, Starting Over Starting Now.financial security

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

THE HONEST TO GOODNESS TRUTH ON BANKRUPTING A CORPORATION

bankrupting a corporation

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast

Bankrupting a corporation: Introduction

I have blogged on personal and corporate insolvency matters for just over 6 years now. I have covered many topics. During a recent corporate bankruptcy consultation, I realized that I have never written about what the steps are for bankrupting a corporation. An important issue arising from this topic would be what the Directors of a corporation going into bankruptcy should know.

There are 3 ways for a company to be bankrupt

Like in all bankruptcy matters, there are three methods that result in bankrupting a corporation in Canada. The first way is being pushed, and the second way is jumping in with both feet voluntarily (I know, corporations don’t have feet!). The third way is to have the company’s creditors vote down a corporation’s attempt to restructure under a Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). In this Brandon’s Blog, I will focus on describing the first two methods.

Bankruptcy application – an involuntary bankruptcy

Being pushed means that one or more unsecured creditors, owed in total at least $1,000, has made a motion before the Court asking that a Bankruptcy Order be made against the company. The motion is called a Bankruptcy Application.

In order to do so, the unsecured creditor(s) have to:

  • retain a bankruptcy lawyer.
  • gotten the consent of a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (Trustee) to administer the corporate bankruptcy.
  • In addition to proving the debt owing, the applicant(s) also have to prove that at least one act of bankruptcy was committed by the company within the 6 months before the filing of the bankruptcy application.

There are various acts of bankruptcy listed in Section 42(1) of the BIA. Commonly seen acts of bankruptcy are fraudulent transfers of property, allowing a lawful seizure of some or all of their property by a creditor under a lawful process, and the catch-all ceasing to meet many liabilities as they come due.

Jumping in with both feet – a voluntary bankruptcy

By this term, I mean filing an Assignment in Bankruptcy. In this case, rather than someone going to Court, the Directors call a Directors’ meeting. At the meeting, the Directors resolve that the company is experiencing financial difficulty and cannot continue to run. The Directors also reserve that the company should file an assignment in bankruptcy and it gives authority to one Director to sign all the necessary documents.

The Director who has the authority to sign the bankruptcy documents is called the Designated Officer. Before the documents are ready for signing, the Trustee who is selected must get enough information to prepare the documentation.

Whether bankrupting a corporation in Ontario or elsewhere in Canada and regardless if it is a result of a Bankruptcy Order or an Assignment in Bankruptcy, the information the Trustee requires is the same.

Information and documents a Trustee needs

The Trustee requires a great deal of information before being able to properly administer a voluntary or involuntary corporate bankruptcy. Sometimes company officials can provide it and in other cases, the Trustee has to dig through the books and records of the company.

Here is the lengthy list of what is needed:

  • Exact corporate name and address of head office, details of any other locations, copy of any premises leases.
  • Minute book and corporate seal.
  • Bankruptcy Order or the resolution of the Directors.
  • Full description of the nature of the business.
  • Names of Officers and Directors and their addresses.
  • Date of incorporation of the company.
  • The date the company ceased operations, if prior to the date of bankruptcy.
  • The greatest number of employees employed in the last 12 months.
  • All employees – listing of names, addresses, social insurance number, amounts owing for each of severance, termination, wages, vacation pay, commissions and expenses.
  • Employee T4’s & ROE’s for current year employees (employer should issue to all employees for the year of bankruptcy and earlier if unissued).
  • Creditors’ listing (accounts payable) – details consisting of name, address, account number(s), and respective amounts owing classified as follows:
    • Secured – banks, leasing company, source deductions, etc.
    • Preferred – wages owing, rent to landlords, government remittances outstanding:
    • Workers Compensation Board, if applicable.
    • Municipal authorities: e.g. business taxes and realty taxes.
    • Employer’s health tax.
    • Unsecured – trade suppliers; Hydro; Bell Canada (quote telephone number(s); gas, etc.
    • Details of any unsecured private party loans, shareholder loans or advances due to the company.
  • Details of any unions, if applicable, including name, address, account number.
  • Details of contingent liabilities and pending legal action, if any.
  • Accounts receivable – aged trial balance and detailed backup documentation (invoices, delivery slips, purchase orders, etc.) to support collection efforts. From the aged trial balance, classify the accounts as good, doubtful, bad to equal the total balance.
  • Inventory – detailed information on inventory cost and the company’s assessment of estimated realizable values.
  • Machinery, equipment and plant – detailed listing providing original cost, if possible and estimated realizable value.
  • Office furniture & fixtures – detailed listing providing original cost, if possible and estimated realizable value.
  • Real estate – all details of real estate owned, including deeds, legal descriptions, original costs, appraisals (if any), an estimated fair market value.
  • Vehicles – provide descriptions including year, model, VIN, kilometres, original costs and estimated realizable value. Note if any vehicles are leased/financed and provide copies of the lease/finance documentation.
  • Other assets – details of other assets such as prepaid expenses, deposits, goodwill, intangibles, shares or any investments, patents, trademarks.
  • Bank accounts – details of all bank accounts, including name, address, account number and approximate balance in the accounts.
  • Last 12 months of accounting records, bank statements and cancelled cheques (for all accounts maintained).
  • Financial statements – most recent.
  • Corporate solicitor – name and address.
  • Listing of leased equipment (copy of leases) – vehicles, office and any other equipment.
  • Insurance policy(ies).
  • A brief narrative of management’s opinion as to cause(s) of insolvency.
  • Disclosure of any sale or disposition of assets, outside of the ordinary course of business, in the last year.

The Trustee’s job

In a corporate bankruptcy, the Trustee, with certain exceptions, takes possession of the assets of the company. If the Trustee is aware that there are deemed trust claims against the assets, or there is a secured creditor, like a Chartered Bank, the Trustee must be careful. If there are, the Trustee should have already had a conversation with those parties prior to the bankruptcy, to decide what rights, if any, the Trustee may have against such property.

Assuming there are assets not subject to the valid claim of third parties, the Trustee must at least:

  1. Establish whether the value of the assets will be enhanced if the Trustee operates the company’s business.
  2. Take into account what obstacles exist in running the business and how to reduce risk if it is beneficial or necessary to run the business.
  3. Decide what are the very best means to sell the properties? En bloc as one parcel or individually or at least several parcels?
  4. Determine if there are any 3rd party owned assets on the company’s premises?
  5. Identify if there are any company assets on the property of 3rd parties?
  6. Prepare the required reporting to Service Canada so that the former employees will be able to make their Wage Earner Protection Plan Act claims.
  7. See if there are proper insurance coverage and proper physical security over the assets?
  8. Identify any inventory been delivered in the 30 days prior to the date of bankruptcy? What rights of revindication might exist?
  9. Circularize the creditors requesting claims to be filed to understand what the depth and breadth of claims against the company are. This way, the Trustee can formulate a distribution to creditors, in priority, with the net funds available from the sale of assets.

What the Directors should be concerned about

Directors should have two concerns when contemplating bankrupting a corporation. First, they should be concerned about any decisions they have made or senior management actions they have ratified.

For example, Sears in the United States recently lodged a claim versus its previous CEO Eddie Lampert and a string of its top-level previous Directors. This includes Eddie Lampert’s previous Yale roomie Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. The allegation is that the Directors condoned and approved Eddie Lampert’s actions for presumably swiping billions of dollars from the once-storied merchant.

Second, there are various types of claims against the corporation that are also personal claims against Directors. The list includes Director liability for unpaid:

  • Wages
  • HST
  • Source deductions
  • Certain environmental offences
  • Cybersecurity risks

In general, there is a relatively short list of things Directors can be personally liable for. In many cases, there will be Director and Officer Insurance to be relied upon. Directors may also have a due diligence defence.

A Director resigning their position will not protect them against any liability that would be a personal Director liability prior to their resignation.

Are you a Corporate Director?

Are you a Director of a corporation that has too much debt? Is your company’s capital insufficient to fulfill every one of its economic responsibilities and may be insolvent? Are you worried that your firm’s major secured lender will soon pull its financing completely and demand repayment in full which the company will not be able to do?

If you responded yes to any of these questions, call the Ira Smith Team today so we can kill off the stress and anxiety that these financial troubles have activated. We will create a strategy for the Directors unique for your company’s problems so that it can avoid bankruptcy and become profitable and continue to employ many people.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience restructuring and turning around companies seeking financial restructuring or a debt negotiation strategy. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists recognized, certified and monitored by the federal government to offer insolvency guidance to save businesses.

You can have a no-cost assessment so we can fix your company’s debt problems. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will absolutely allow you to return to being efficient, healthy and balanced, Starting Over Starting Now.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

MOVE FAST TO OBJECT TO AN ONTARIO RECEIVERSHIP COURT ORDER

What is a receiver in insolvency?

A recent case heard in the Court of Appeal for Ontario clarifies what the time limit is to object to an order made in a Court-appointed receivership of a company in Ontario. The bottom line is you better move fast. Before I describe this very interesting decision, I should first remind newer readers on some receiver 101 basics.

What is it?

A receivership is a remedy for secured creditors to enforce their security. In the event, the company defaults on its loan agreement, normally by non-payment, the secured creditor. There are two types of these proceedings in Canada; 1) privately appointed or; 2) court appointed. A receiver might additionally be selected in an investor dispute to complete a task, liquidate assets or market a business.

Typically, the process begins with the secured creditor consulting with a Receiver. If it is decided that there should be a receiver appointed, the secured creditor then makes a choice. They can either appoint the receiver by written appointment letter (privately appointed) or make a motion to the Court for an Order appointing the receiver (court-appointed).

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) states that only a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) can act as a receiver. A privately appointed receiver acts on behalf of the appointing secured creditor. A court-appointed receiver has a duty of care to all creditors.

What are the duties of a receiver?

The receiver’s first duty is to take possession and control of the assets covered by the secured creditor’s security in a private appointment, or all the assets indicated in the court order in a court appointment. The receiver must decide whether it can get a higher value for the assets if it operates the business. Alternatively, the receiver may decide that the risk of operating the business is not worth it in terms of any meaningful increase in the value of the assets.

The receiver then develops a plan to on the running of the business and for the eventual sale of the assets. The type of business and the nature of the assets will dictate what approach the receiver will take. In the meantime, the receiver must inventory all the assets, protect them and make sure there is adequate insurance in place for what the receiver wishes to do in terms of running the business and selling the assets.

In a private appointment, the receiver needs to get the approval of the secured creditor before embarking on the business and asset plan. In a court appointment, the receiver requires the approval of the court.

What happens when a company goes into receivership?

When the company goes into receivership, senior management and the Directors lose most of their authority for decision making. The Directors’ general corporate duty of maintaining corporate records continues, but any decision-making about the running of the business or its assets will not be effective. This is especially true in a court appointment. The subject of Director liability is too broad to start mentioning in this Brandon’s Blog. i am planning to soon write a blog on that topic.

Management’s and employees’ responsibilities about the business in a practical sense will stop upon the appointment of the receiver. Their advice and help are only required if requested by the receiver. They certainly will not be paid for any efforts unless the receiver agrees in writing to make money available for their pay.

Court of Appeal for Ontario says you better move fast

Why the confusion? Isn’t the process for an appeal of a court order straightforward? The confusion comes about because, in the standard model Appointment Order of the Commercial List of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the court-appointed receiver is appointed under two statutes:

  1. Section 101 of the provincial Ontario Courts of Justice Act, RSO 1990, c C.43 (CJA).
  2. The federal BIA, section 243(1).

The applicant, in this case, was the purchaser of assets from a court-appointed receiver of a company. One of the standard provisions in the Appointment Order is that anyone wishing to take legal action against the receiver must first get the approval of the court to do so.

They brought an application for authorization to sue the receiver over a disagreement arising from the purchase of the assets from the receiver under the asset purchase agreement. On May 17, 2018, the lower court judge dismissed the application, finding that their allegations were not supported by the evidence. On November 8, 2018, the same judge refused their demand to resume the application based on new evidence.

The applicant filed appeals from both decisions. Its notices of appeal were on time under the provincial CJA, under which there is a 30-day time limit for commencing an appeal. They were late under the federal BIA, which imposes a 10-day time limit.

The lower court judge dismissed the appeals. He held that the BIA was the governing authority for the appeal, not the CJA. He stated that the origin of authority under which the receiver was appointed was section 243( 1) of the BIA and therefore appeals are governed by the BIA, not the CJA. He further went on to say that the appointment also under the CJA did not have the result of ousting the BIA as the source of authority. He further held that it also cannot supersede the federal BIA holds paramountcy over the provincial CJA.

receivership

Business Development Bank of Canada v. Astoria Organic Matters Ltd., 2019 ONCA 269

The Court of Appeal for Ontario decision was released on April 8, 2019. The appeal court found that this was a very narrow issue to decide so that it did not have to get into the merits of the case of the purchaser wanting to sue the receiver over a disagreement arising from the purchase of the assets from the receiver under the asset purchase agreement.

The Court of Appeal rejected the applicant’s appeal and did not find that the chambers judge made any errors. They said that when the order sought to be appealed was made in reliance on jurisdiction under the BIA, the proper appeal path is the BIA.

The lower court, the Ontario Superior Court Justice Commercial List, rejected the purchaser’s demand to sue the receiver, which is the decision the applicant wishes to appeal. The requirement to get leave of the court to sue the receiver comes from the Appointment Order. The court’s authority to include that arrangement order comes from the statutory power to appoint a receiver under s. 243( 1) of the BIA.

The Court of Appeal agreed that the legal power to appoint a receiver is also found in s. 101 of the CJA. But considering that authority for the leave to take legal action against the receiver comes from the BIA in spite of that the receiver was appointed under both laws, the appeal is governed by the BIA as a matter of paramountcy.

Therefore the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the applicant’s appeal and awarded costs against them.

Does your company need to move fast?

Does your company have way too much debt? Is your company’s cash flow not enough to meet all of its financial obligations? Are you afraid that your company’s main secured creditor is about to demand repayment of its loan in full and you just can’t move fast enough to save your company?

If you answered yes, call the Ira Smith Team today so we can end the tension and anxiousness that these financial problems have triggered. We will develop a plan special for your company, to save it from extinction.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of experience restructuring and saving companies looking for financial restructuring or a debt settlement approach. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only professionals acknowledged, accredited and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice to save companies.

You can have a no-cost analysis to aid you so we can repair your company’s debt problems. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to get back to Starting Over Starting Now.

receivership

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CAN YOU FILE BANKRUPTCY AND KEEP YOUR HOME AND CAR? [2019 CAR EDITION]

Can you file bankruptcy and keep your home and car? Introduction

We are often asked the question, can you file bankruptcy and keep your home and car? In my last Brandon’s Blog, I described the circumstances to answer the question can you keep your house if you file bankruptcy in Canada. Here is the link to the blog, IF I FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY ONTARIO WILL I LOSE MY HOME? [2019 EDITION]. In this blog, I will tell you what happens to your automobile when you file bankruptcy.

Can you file bankruptcy and keep your home and car? Do they take your car if you file bankruptcy?

Can I keep my car if I file bankruptcy in Ontario is also a common question. The answer is if you need to or want to and can afford to, then yes. Let me explain. The most common range of situations involving a person filing for bankruptcy and their car are:

If the wheels are owned by an employer, then there is no issue. If you file for bankruptcy, the employment continues and access to the company automobile also does.

If the auto is owned by your spouse, then it is not your asset and is not directly impacted by your bankruptcy. In the case of a leased automobile, the vehicle is owned by the lessor, not you. So again, a leased car is not directly impacted by your bankruptcy.

However, if the car is leased, do you really need that specific car? Can you keep up with your lease payments? If you fall behind in payments, the lessor can retrieve its vehicle, bankruptcy or no bankruptcy.

In the case of where your car is financed, whether it is owned by you or your spouse, the same question remains. Can you afford to keep up the payments as part of the household budget? Do you need that specific vehicle?

Can you file bankruptcy and keep your home and car? Can you file bankruptcy on car loans?

This may seem like an odd question, but in a way of speaking, the answer is yes. The same is true if the car is leased by you.

If you have decided that you can no longer afford the financing or lease payments and you don’t need that specific vehicle, it is possible to return the car to the lessor or lender and have the fallout from that termination count in the debts caught in the bankruptcy proceedings. That is what I call filing bankruptcy on car loans. However, to do so, you must follow certain steps very carefully.

What I always advise people who cannot afford to keep the car payments and are going to lose it anyway, is to return the car BEFORE they file either a consumer proposal or for bankruptcy. Then you must wait to receive notice of default from the lessor or lender and that they are accelerating their claim for the breach of the lease or the shortfall from the sale of the vehicle.

The reason you have to wait is if you file a consumer proposal or for bankruptcy before they make this demand on you, they could take the position that their debt crystallized after you filed. The last thing you want is for their debt to be a post-filing claim. A post-filing claim is payable in full by you. So with some planning and patience, it can be a pre-filing claim, caught in your consumer proposal or bankruptcy.

If your spouse has guaranteed payment of the car lease or car loan, then this strategy may not be the best for you. The lessor or lender, in this case, would have the right to demand full payment from the guarantor. So, you may not have accomplished anything by doing this.

If you choose to do this, but you do require a car, then you, your spouse, a good friend or your employer will have to arrange for a new auto for you that your family budget shows you can afford to pay for. As you can see, the decision is not a simple one. You must very carefully analyze this situation before taking any action.

Will I lose my car if I declare bankruptcy if I want to keep the car I own?

Not automatically. In bankruptcy, like with your home, the Trustee is not entitled to the car. What the Trustee is really entitled to is the equity in the auto. The Trustee would rather receive cash representing the car’s equity, and not taking possession of your car.

Think about it. By taking possession the Trustee has to store and insure the car and then sell the used car. It is much easier for a Trustee to just accept cash; either a one-time payment or in regular monthly installments.

The equity in a car is calculated as follows:

  1. Find the car’s current market or black book value. The price you paid for the car is not the current value of the auto. A Trustee always runs a black book desktop appraisal of a car and can tell you what that number is.
  2. If you have a car loan and the lender registered security against the auto, you have to deduct the current amount outstanding on that loan. If you don’t have any such financing, then you would not deduct anything. After performing this part of the calculation, move on to step 3 below.
  3. In Ontario, under the regulations to the Ontario Execution Act, RSO 1990, c. E.24, a person is entitled to an exemption of $6,600 for one vehicle. So you need to deduct $6,600 from the amount you arrived at in your calculation in number 2 above. If you end up with a negative number, there is no equity. If you get a positive number, that is the equity you have in the car.

As I mentioned before, the Trustee would rather make arrangements with you to get that value in cash during your bankruptcy administration, rather than taking possession of your auto. Don’t get me wrong. If you have a high-end valuable car, or you can’t come up with the cash over time to pay the Trustee your equity, the Trustee will have no hesitation to take possession of your car. It just isn’t the Trustee’s first choice to do so.

So I hope that by now you understand why I say the answer to the question, will I lose my car if I declare bankruptcy, is if you need to or want to and can afford to, then yes!

What Will filing for bankruptcy do?

As I have written many times in earlier Brandon’s Blog articles, bankruptcy should be the last choice. Bankruptcy will allow the honest but unfortunate person to get financial rehabilitation. It will allow that insolvent person to reenter society as a person free from their debts.

Do you have way too much debt? Are you having trouble making your month-to-month expenses? Is your business having a difficult time managing its financial challenges that you simply can not figure the escape of?

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can end your stress and anxiety that your monetary troubles have caused. With the unique roadmap, we establish special for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced trouble-free life.

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of experience helping people and companies searching for financial restructuring or a debt settlement strategy. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists acknowledged, certified and supervised by the federal government to offer insolvency advice and options to assist you to avoid bankruptcy.

You can have a no-cost assessment now to assist you so we can fix your debt troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will most definitely allow you to get back to Starting Over Starting Now.

can you file bankruptcy and keep your home and car

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WILL BANKRUPTCY VS CONSUMER PROPOSAL EVER GO TO THE DOGS?

Bankruptcy vs consumer proposal: Introduction

In this Brandon’s Blog, we discuss the issues about bankruptcy vs consumer proposal. We will use a real-life case study involving a woman and her pet, to show the reasons why consumer proposals are better than bankruptcies.

First, I should provide a very brief outline of how a dog or cat pet medical insurance works. A pet medical insurance policy runs just like those for humans. They typically have a yearly insurance deductible, need you to pay regular monthly costs and include you filing a claim for benefits after paying your vet for pet care.

When a family pet isn’t acting normal, the last thing you need is to be fretting over is just how you’re most likely be spending a lot of money for their emergency treatment. That’s why pet medical insurance coverage intends to exist. They cover your pet’s treatment when it comes to an unforeseen illness. This way you do not need to select between your pet’s health and wellbeing and your savings.

With pet medical insurance, you are financially in charge of paying your vet for all services and treatments. Like human medical insurance coverage, you then file a claim with the insurance company. They pay your claim for all eligible expenses, subject to any deductible in your policy.

Bankruptcy vs consumer proposal: Case study dog facts

When our potential client came to our office for a free first consultation, she provided us with a list of all of her assets, including her pet dog. Her dog was not a “Best in Show” winner of any prestigious dog shows. Therefore, the dog’s value was emotional to the owner but had no real financial value. Therefore, under Ontario law, technically speaking, the dog, along with her other personal property, was exempt from seizure by a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (Trustee) in a bankruptcy!

She also listed as an asset, a health benefit claim. In our discussion, she advised that this was a pet medical insurance claim she filed for vet services for her dog and she was awaiting payment. The amount was significant to this woman and it got me thinking.

If the woman was insolvent, how did she pay the vet? Did she use a credit card that had room on it that will never be repaid? The woman told me that she is single. Did a friend or relative pay the vet on her behalf and when the insurance claim comes in, she will give them the money?

Bankruptcy vs consumer proposal: Case study issues

These seemingly innocuous facts contain various issues in bankruptcy versus a consumer proposal. Here are the various issues that I was pawing around with.

Paid by credit card and DID RECEIVE insurance claim proceeds before filing

If she paid by credit card and received the insurance claim payment before filing for bankruptcy, that is not a problem. This was actually the case. Any amount received not used to live on would presumably be a balance in her bank account. That cash balance would have to be accounted for in her bankruptcy.

In her case, based on the information she told me, there was a very small amount of cash on hand and no other non-exempt assets for a Trustee to seize. The surplus income calculation also showed that she had none. Therefore, in that case, there would not be any dividend paid from her bankruptcy estate to the unsecured creditors.

As you will recall from earlier Brandon’s Blogs, other than for exempt assets, upon bankruptcy, the assets of the insolvent person vest in the Trustee. The Trustee then sells the assets and distributes the money in the order established by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). Surplus income, is a calculation set by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy that a Trustee must do, to decide what amount of an insolvent person’s income they must contribute to their bankruptcy estate if any.

You may have a moral issue with the fact that she was repaid for the vet cost she put on her credit card and the credit card company will not receive a payment. However, in bankruptcy, there is no legal issue. The credit card company may choose to oppose her discharge from bankruptcy for this or other reasons. If they did, she could not receive an automatic discharge from bankruptcy. The matter would go to Court for a discharge hearing.

In a consumer proposal, it is a non-issue. The creditors must vote either in favour of or oppose the consumer proposal. The consumer proposal, by definition, has to be a better offer to the creditors than what they would receive in bankruptcy. In this case, in bankruptcy, they would receive nothing. In a consumer proposal, the creditors would receive a payment. If the required majority of creditors voted or were deemed to have voted in favour of the consumer proposal, the Court (was deemed to have) approved it and the insolvent person fully paid the entire amount promised, the creditors are better off with their choice.

Paid by credit card and DID NOT receive insurance claim proceeds before filing

If this was the situation, and the woman filed for bankruptcy, then it is really simple. The amount receivable from the insurance company under her claim would be an asset of the bankruptcy estate, payable to the Trustee. The Trustee would have to put the insurance company on notice of the bankruptcy, and demand that the insurance company pay the claim to the Trustee. When paid, those funds become part of the Bankruptcy Estate.

In a consumer proposal, the value of this asset must be taken into account when formulating the offer to creditors. As previously mentioned, a consumer proposal must offer a better alternative for the creditors.

A friend or relative pay the vet on her behalf and she DID NOT REPAY the person before filing

In this situation, the person who paid the vet bill is an unsecured creditor of the woman. In either a bankruptcy or a consumer proposal, the person would have the right to file a proof of claim in the insolvency proceeding. If the claim was approved by the Trustee, which it would be if submitted with proper proof of payment, the person would be entitled to any dividend to be paid. This is a very simple situation.

A friend or relative pay the vet on her behalf and she DID REPAY the person before filing

In the bankruptcy of the woman, this is a big problem for the friend or relative. The reason the repayment would have been made prior to filing is simple. The money was owed, and the insolvent woman did not want to see her friend or relative go unpaid before filing. The issue is that there are other creditors too, and they are being treated differently than this friend or relative.

Section 141 of the BIA states “…all claims proved in bankruptcy shall be paid rateably”. The corollary is that all ordinary unsecured creditors should be treated equally. The friend or relative who made the payment to the vet on behalf of the insolvent woman, who is an ordinary unsecured creditor, must be treated the same as the rest of them. So how is this to be done?

Sections 95 and 96 of the BIA are the sections which deal with how to enforce this principle of the BIA. Section 95 deals with Preferences. Section 96 deals with any transfer of property by the insolvent person at undervalue (Transfer at undervalue). In this example, the preference section comes into play.

A preference is defined as the transfer of any property, including a cash payment, made by the insolvent person to any creditor who is dealing either at arms’ length or non-arms’ length with the insolvent person. The transaction must be one that has the intention of preferring that creditor over the others. In this example, the definition certainly fits.

Such transactions, limited only in time, are attackable by the Trustee in bankruptcy. If the friend or relative is dealing at arms’ length with the insolvent person, then the Trustee can challenge any transactions which occurred within the 3 months before the date of the first bankruptcy event and ending on the date of the bankruptcy. If the friend or relative was deemed to not be dealing at arms’ length with the woman, then the time period is extended from 3 months to 12 months.

An initial bankruptcy event for a person is essentially the first day an insolvency proceeding started. For a person, the most likely initial bankruptcy events would be the date on which one of the following filings occurred:

How would the Trustee challenge it? The challenge starts with a letter to and a conversation with the bankrupt person and the friend or relative. The Trustee would outline the powers of the Trustee to get a Court order against the friend or relative for the repayment to the Trustee of the insurance repayment in question. The Trustee would make a demand for payment on the friend or relative. There should be evidence of the payment being demanded in the Trustee’s files. We wouldn’t want the Trustee to be barking up the wrong tree.

If the friend or relative pays the amount over to the Trustee, then it is over. The Trustee has recovered the funds intended to prefer the friend or relative over the other unsecured creditors. The Trustee now has the funds so that all ordinary unsecured creditors can be treated equally.

Should the Trustee’s demand goes unpaid, the Trustee could then make application to Court for an order against the friend or relative declaring that a preference was given and that the funds must be paid over to the Trustee. The evidentiary bar for the Trustee is not set high at all. As long as the transaction has the effect of giving the friend or relative a preference, it is assumed to have been a preference. It is up to the friend or relative to have to prove by way of evidence to the contrary, that it was not a preference.

As I mentioned previously, a consumer proposal must offer the creditors a better alternative than in the case of the person’s bankruptcy. So, the preference payment must be taken into account in assessing what type of consumer proposal to offer. This includes the total payment to be made by the insolvent woman to the Trustee to pay a dividend to the unsecured creditors.

For best practices in the consumer proposal administration, the Trustee should add a clause in the consumer proposal that states that the provisions of the preference section of the BIA do not come into play. The reason for doing so is to make it clear that the Trustee, acting as Administrator in the consumer proposal, has no right to demand payment from the friend or relative. The reason is that the amount was already taken into account in formulating the total amount paid under the consumer proposal.

It also acts as a signal to the unsecured creditors, to highlight the issue of the preference. The Trustee should explain the issues to the creditors and show how the amount of the preference has already been taken into account. In this way, full disclosure has been accomplished.

Bankruptcy vs consumer proposal: Is a consumer proposal a good idea

A successful consumer proposal is one of the bankruptcy alternatives. It is always a good idea to avoid bankruptcy if you can. There are many reasons why consumer proposals are better than bankruptcies. By having a successful consumer proposal, you will avoid:

  • having to file monthly income and expense statements;
  • being subject to a surplus income recalculation;
  • a bankruptcy on your credit record;
  • bankruptcy negatively affecting your credit score;
  • having a discharge process that could be opposed; and
  • a court discharge hearing

Bankruptcy vs consumer proposal: What about you?

Do you have excessive debt? Are you having trouble making your month-to-month payments? Is your business not taking care of financial challenges that you simply cannot figure out how to escape from?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of experience assisting people and companies trying to find a financial restructuring or a debt negotiation strategy. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only professionals identified, accredited and monitored by the Federal government to give insolvency help and services to assist you to avoid bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can finish with the tension and anxiousness debt issues produce. With the unique roadmap, we establish special to you, we will quickly return you right into a healthy and balanced worry-free life.

You can have a no-cost assessment to help you so we can fix your debt issues. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will certainly allow you to return to being productive and healthy, Starting Over Starting Now.bankruptcy vs consumer proposal

 

 

Call a Trustee Now!