Tag: licensed insolvency trustee

REDWATER ENERGY SUPREME COURT DECIDES

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 4, 2019

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Redwater Energy Supreme Court Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom for the podcast.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: Introduction

On January 31, 2019, the Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision was released. The 5-2 decision, in this case, Orphan Well Association v. Grant Thornton Ltd. overturned two Alberta lower Court decisions. It is now the law of the land that, before creditors receive any money, the receiver or trustee will have to spend the funds in its possession on reclamation or other environmental costs that provincial law may need.

The decision also made it clear that the receiver or trustee does not have to spend money it does not have. However, whatever money it recovers from the sale of assets, on a net basis, will first have to go to provincially mandated cleanup costs of the insolvent company’s property, before secured or unsecured creditors see a penny.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: What the decision means

In my opinion, this is an important decision. Where provincial laws require companies to spend money to take certain steps when the business ceases, the assets of the company will be available to pay such costs.

Any company which is either a provincially regulated industry, or where provincial laws such as environmental laws have a real impact, will be affected. A Province will be able to insist that when a company ceases operating or is in receivership or bankruptcy, the company and its receiver or trustee, must use up to the full net realization from the sale of assets, to do what the provincial law requires, such as remediation of the real property.

This will no doubt affect how lenders view the value of their security and how much to lend to such companies. Property owners have now also been afforded some measure of protection against a commercial or industrial tenant’s activities and environmental transgressions.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: Background

In my January 10, 2018 blog, REDWATER ENERGY CORP. – SUPREME COURT OF CANADA TO DECIDE WHO PAYS THE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP COSTS OF THE BANKRUPTCY COMPANY, I described the 2-1 Alberta Court of Appeal decision upholding the Redwater ruling of the lower Court. The lower Court decision protected, in a bankruptcy, a lender’s secured priority over provincial ecological clean-up requirements.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: The provincial environmental legislation

To work oil and gas sources in Alberta, a business requires a property interest in the oil or gas (commonly, a mineral lease with the Crown), rights and a licence issued by the Alberta Energy Regulator (Regulator). Under provincial regulation, the Regulator will certainly not provide a permit to remove, process or transport oil and gas in Alberta unless the licensee takes on end-of-life duties for plugging and capping oil wells to avoid leakages, taking apart surface area frameworks as well as restoring the surface area to its previous condition. These end-of-life responsibilities are called “abandonment” and “reclamation”.

The Licensee Liability Rating Program is one way the Regulator looks to guarantee the end-of-life commitments required of licensees. As a component of this program, the Regulator provides each business a Liability Management Rating (LMR), which is the proportion between the accumulated value assigned by the Regulator to a company’s assets under license and the accumulated liabilities determined by the Regulator to the last expense of abandoning and reclaiming those properties.

For determining the LMR, all the permits held by a business are dealt with as a bundle. A licensee’s LMR is determined monthly. Where it dips below the required ratio, the licensee is called upon to top up its LMR back up to the recommended level by paying a security deposit, executing the end-of-life responsibilities, or transferring permits with the Regulator’s authorization. If either the transferor or the transferee would have an LMR below 1.0 after such transfer, the Regulator will typically decline to authorize the permit transfer.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: The insolvency of an oil and gas company

The insolvency of oil and gas firm licensed for operation in Alberta involves Alberta’s detailed licensing regime, which is binding on firms operating in the oil and gas market. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA), is the federal government’s statute that controls the management of an insolvent’s estate and the organized and fair dealing of the insolvent’s property for the benefit of the unsecured creditors.

Alberta’s Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA) makes certain that a licensee’s regulatory responsibilities will remain to be satisfied when it goes through bankruptcy by including the trustee of a licensee in the interpretation of the term “operator” for the goals of the obligation to reclaim and by ensuring that an order to execute reclamation work can be provided to a trustee.

Nevertheless, it specifically restricts a trustee’s responsibility about such an order to the value of the assets in the insolvent estate, other than for gross negligence or willful misconduct.

The Oil and Gas Conservation Act (OGCA) and the Pipeline Act take a more common method: they merely include trustees in the meaning of “licensee”. Therefore, every power which these Acts offer the Regulator versus a licensee can in theory additionally be worked out versus a trustee.

The Regulator has entrusted the authority to reclaim and abandon “orphans”– oil and gas properties and their sites left in an incorrectly deserted or unreclaimed state by inoperative companies at the close of their insolvency process– to the Orphan Well Association (OWA), an independent non-profit entity. The OWA has no power to look for compensation of its costs, however, it might be compensated up to the amount of any security deposit held by the Regulator to the credit of the licensee of the orphans once it has actually finished its environmental cleanup.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: The Redwater receivership

Redwater, a publicly traded oil and gas firm, was initially given licenses by the Regulator in 2009. Its major assets were 127 oil and gas properties — wells, pipelines and related facilities — and their equal permits. A few of its licensed wells were still producing, yet the bulk was tapped out and strained with reclamation and abandonment obligations that surpassed their worth.

In 2013, ATB Financial, which had complete knowledge of the end-of-life responsibilities connected with Redwater’s properties, advanced funds to Redwater and, in return, was given a security interest in Redwater’s existing and after-acquired property. In mid-2014, Redwater started to experience financial problems.

ATB appointed its receiver in 2015. Back then, Redwater owed ATB roughly $5.1 million and had 84 wells, 7 facilities and 36 pipelines. Seventy-two were non-active or spent, however, considering that Redwater’s LMR did not go down below the recommended proportion until after it entered receivership, it never paid any type of security deposit to the Regulator.

Upon being informed of Redwater’s receivership, the Regulator advised the receiver that it was legitimately bound to fulfill Redwater’s abandonment commitments for all licensed properties before dispersing any funds or completing any insolvency proceeding. The Regulator cautioned that it would not accept the transfer of any one of Redwater’s licenses unless it was satisfied that both the transferee and the transferor would have the ability to carry out all governing responsibilities and that the transfer would not create deterioration in Redwater’s LMR.

The receiver determined that it could not satisfy the Regulator’s demands since the cost of completion of the end-of-life responsibilities for the spent wells would likely surpass the realizable value for the producing wells. Based upon this evaluation, the receiver notified the Regulator that it was occupying and controlling just 17 of Redwater’s most productive wells, 3 related facilities and 12 pipelines (Retained Assets). The receiver also advised that it was not occupying or controlling of any of Redwater’s various other licensed properties (Renounced Assets).

The receiver’s position was that it had no requirement to do any regulatory requirements connected with the Renounced Assets.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: The Regulator’s and the receiver’s positions

The Regulator responded by issuing orders under the OGCA and the Pipeline Act calling for Redwater to suspend and abandon the Renounced Assets (Abandonment Orders). The Regulator imposed short target dates, as it took into consideration the Renounced Assets an environmental and safety threat.

Alberta’s Regulator and the OWA applied for an affirmation that the receiver’s renunciation of the Renounced Assets was void and for orders needing it to follow the Abandonment Orders and to carry out the completion of the end-of-life responsibilities connected with Redwater’s licensed properties. The Regulator did not look to hold the receiver responsible for these responsibilities past the assets in the Redwater estate.

The receiver brought a cross-application looking for authorization to seek a sales procedure leaving out the Renounced Assets and an order directing that the Regulator cannot stop the transfer of the licenses connected with the Retained Assets based upon, inter alia:

the LMR requirements;
failure to abide by the Abandonment Orders;
refusal to take possession of the Renounced Assets; or
Redwater’s outstanding debts to the Regulator.

A bankruptcy order was made against Redwater and the receiver was appointed as trustee. The trustee invoked s.14.06(4)(a)(ii) of the BIA about the Renounced Assets. This section of the BIA allows for the abandonment of a property and to not hold the trustee personally liable for remediation costs.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: The Alberta decisions

The Alberta lower Courts concurred with the receiver and held that the Regulator’s suggested use its legal powers to impose Redwater’s conformity with reclamation and abandonment commitments in bankruptcy contravened the BIA in 2 ways:

It required the receiver the commitments of a licensee in connection with the Redwater properties disclaimed by the receiver/trustee, contrary to s. 14.06(4) of the BIA.
It ignored the priority for the distribution of a bankrupt’s assets under the BIA by requiring the provable claims of the Regulator, an unsecured creditor, be paid in advance of the claims of Redwater’s secured creditors. The dissenting Judge in the Court of Appeal would have permitted the Regulator’s appeal on the basis that there was no conflict between Alberta’s environmental laws and the BIA.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: The Redwater Energy SCC decision

The majority 5-2 Supreme Court of Canada (SCC or the Supreme Court) decision states that:

The Regulator’s use of its legal powers does not create a conflict with the BIA to trigger the doctrine of federal paramountcy.
Section 14.06(4) of the BIA deals with the personal liability of trustees and does not let a trustee to walk away from the environmental liabilities of the estate it is administering.
The Regulator is not asserting any claims provable in the bankruptcy.
The priority scheme in the BIA is not being interfered with.
No conflict is caused by the receiver’s status as a licensee under Alberta legislation. Alberta’s regulatory regime can coexist with and work with the BIA.

The Supreme Court decision goes on to say that bankruptcy is not a licence to ignore rules, and insolvency professionals are bound by and must follow valid provincial laws during bankruptcy.

They must, as an example:

adhere to non-financial responsibilities that are binding on the insolvent estate, that are not provable claims; as well as
the impacts of which do not contravene the BIA, regardless of the effects this might have for the insolvent’s secured creditors.

The SCC held that given the procedural nature of the BIA, the bankruptcy regimen counts greatly on the ongoing rules of provincial regulations. However, where there is an authentic problem between provincial statutes about property and civil liberties and bankruptcy regulations, the BIA dominates.

The SCC went on to say that the BIA has two main functions: (i) the fair distribution of the insolvent’s property among its creditors; and (ii) the insolvent’s financial rehabilitation. As Redwater is a company that will never arise from bankruptcy, just the first function matters.

The Abandonment Orders and the LMR demands are based upon legitimate provincial regulations of basic application — specifically, the type of legitimate provincial laws whereupon the BIA is constructed.

The Supreme Court of Canada decision found that there is no conflict between the Alberta regulatory scheme and s. 14.06 of the BIA, because, under s. 14.06(4), a trustee’s disclaimer of real property when there is an order to remedy any environmental condition or damage affecting that property protects the trustee from personal liability. The Supreme Court of Canada decision makes it very clear that although the BIA protects the trustee or receiver from personal liability, the ongoing liability of the bankrupt estate is unaffected.

The Supreme Court of Canada said that the end‑of‑life obligations binding on the trustee and receiver are not claims provable in the Redwater bankruptcy. Not all environmental obligations enforced by a regulator will be claims provable in bankruptcy.

The test that must be applied to decide whether a particular regulatory obligation amounts to a claim provable in bankruptcy is: (1) there must be a debt, a liability or an obligation to a creditor; (2) the debt, liability or obligation must be incurred before the debtor becomes bankrupt; and (3) it must be possible to attach a monetary value to the debt, liability or obligation. Only the first and third parts of the test are at issue in the Redwater case.

Bottom line, a court must decide whether there are enough facts indicating the existence of an environmental duty that will ripen into a financial liability owed to a regulator. In determining whether a non‑monetary regulatory obligation of a bankrupt is too remote or too speculative to be included in the bankruptcy proceeding, the court must apply the general rules that apply to future or contingent claims.

It must be sufficiently certain that the contingency will come to pass — in other words, that the regulator will enforce the obligation by performing the environmental work and seeking reimbursement.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: BIA contemplates environmental regulators will extract value

The Supreme Court of Canada also went on to say that in crafting the priority scheme of the BIA, Parliament intended to permit regulators to place a first charge on real property of a bankrupt affected by an environmental condition or damage to fund remediation. Thus, the BIA explicitly contemplates that environmental regulators will extract value from the bankrupt’s real property if that property is affected by an environmental condition or damage.

Furthermore, Redwater’s only real assets were affected by environmental conditions or damage. Accordingly, the Abandonment Orders and LMR requirements did not seek to force Redwater to fulfill end‑of‑life obligations with assets unrelated to the environmental condition or damage. In other words, recognizing that the Abandonment Orders and LMR requirements are not provable claims and do not interfere with the aims of the BIA — rather, it facilitates them.

Redwater Energy Supreme Court decision: What about your company or client?

Is your company subject to significant costs under provincial law should it stop operating for any reason, including receivership or bankruptcy? Are you a secured creditor who loaned money to such a company and are now questioning the value of your security?

If so, you need the help of a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee). Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience in the restructuring, turnaround, monitoring and liquidating insolvent companies.

Contact the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation so that we can solve your financial problems and get you back on the right path, Starting Over Starting Now.

Tags Alberta Energy, ATB Financial, bankruptcy trustee, court of appeal, Ira Smith, licensed insolvency trustee, oil and gas properties, Orphan Well Association, redwater, Redwater Energy, Redwater Energy Corp., redwater energy decision, redwater energy receiver, redwater energy scc, redwater energy supreme court, SCC, Supreme Court, Supreme Court of Canada

Brandon Blog Post

GAMBLING DEBTS HELP

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 30, 2019

Gambling debts: Introduction

The Canadian insolvency process is geared to deal with gambling debts or any debt resulting from addiction. It does not only deal with the debts caused by borrowing money to feed an addiction. The insolvency process is uniquely positioned to deal with the person’s total rehabilitation. When the person hits rock bottom with debts they cannot repay and no more credit to keep borrowing to feed the addiction, a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or Trustee) (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) is positioned to help not only with the debt issues but also the rehabilitation issues. Let me explain.

My firm has been involved in helping people out of their debt problems arising from addiction issues. The most common are gambling, alcohol and drug addictions. Professionals have referred us their family members suffering because of an addiction. In my January 31, 2018 blog, GAMBLING DEBT BANKRUPTCY: CAN GAMBLING DEBT BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY?, I discussed from a procedural view the issue of gambling debts and bankruptcy. In this blog, I want to focus on how the insolvency process, especially bankruptcy, can deal with overall rehabilitation.

I will draw on my own personal case studies and specifically refer to a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Bankruptcy and Insolvency in Donaldson (Re), 2019 NSSC 33.

Gambling debts: What the LIT is expected to do

The free consultation provided by a LIT to an insolvent person pre-filing is where a LIT would find the addiction issues. It will also be noted on the person’s initial filing documents in filing either a consumer proposal or for bankruptcy. The Canadian insolvency system is geared towards giving the honest but unfortunate consumer a fresh start.

In cases of addiction, the LIT must also point the person to community resources to aid in healing the person with the addiction to lead a sober life. This must be a pre-condition for any LIT to support the addicted person’s consumer proposal or discharge from bankruptcy. This is how my practice works. It is also the view of the Court in the Donaldson case.

Gambling debts: The Donaldson facts

Gloria Donaldson and Wayne Donaldson are fourth-time bankrupts. This is their 5th experience with the Canadian insolvency process as one of their filings was a consumer proposal. They made separate filings. The Court found that it really should have been a joint filing.

Gloria and Wayne were 65 and 73, respectively. The Court holding their discharge hearing found both Gloria and Wayne to be forthright, honest and trustworthy. Yet, this is the 4th bankruptcy and the 5th use the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c. B-3, as modified (BIA).

They declared the source of this bankruptcy as an overextension of credit on real house improvements. They did not list gambling. However, Registrar Balmanoukian found that there is no doubt on the evidence before him that gambling was a significant factor to at least speed up driving the Donaldson’s to this 5th insolvency filing.

The Donaldson’s filings spanned a duration of nearly 40 years. They are seniors. Their future income is restricted, by age and health.

Gambling debts: The bankruptcy discharge will not be easy

A 4th bankruptcy is a really major issue. Without a doubt, also for applications including third-time bankrupts the Courts have revealed an unwillingness in providing the bankrupt’s discharge. At the very least not without an extensive suspension or similar burdensome terms.

Coming to Court for a discharge as a 3rd-time bankrupt is a serious matter. The Court must be satisfied that the insolvent understands and has made enough adjustments in his/her life. The Court wants to know it won’t be possible that an additional bankruptcy will take place.

By the time a person has actually gotten in a 3rd bankruptcy, the objective, as well as the intent of the Act, changes from its restorative function of helping sympathetic yet unfortunate debtors to a shielding culture, and protecting innocent possible creditors. The most effective intents and hopes of such bankrupts is no longer the main issue. The main issue is that creditors be shielded from the insolvent’s shown economic inexperience, carelessness and negligence.

In a 4th bankruptcy, the Court has to pay cautious interest in creating a suitable yet custom treatment when determining what is right in the bankrupt’s application for discharge. The Bankruptcy Court is not just there to be a financial car wash. The truth is that these bankrupts are not rogues. That, however, is not enough of a reason to approve a discharge.

A 4th bankruptcy is a clarion call to the Court and its officers that these people should never come before the Bankruptcy Court again. The issues need to be fixed.

Gambling debts: The bankruptcy discharge must serve a purpose

The proof is clear that Mr. and Mrs. Donaldson did not have the possibility of having sources with which to pay any kind of meaningful amount on their much debt. The passage of time and their health and wellness have actually prevented this. Nevertheless, that does not imply that the Court can only enforce a token wag of the finger and a reprimand “do not do it ever again”.

What the Registrar decided is frankly, something that the LIT should have already done. When I am faced with potential bankrupts whose debt has arisen as a result of spending money they did not have on their addiction, this is what I tell them. I say that if they wish to have any chance of having a discharge from bankruptcy, then they need to get themselves into a rehab program immediately. Gamblers Anonymous and AA are two that we regularly refer clients to. We also tell them that for discharge purposes, they will need to have their sponsor verify to us, in writing, that they have regularly attended and continue to attend meetings to help themselves.

This way, by the time we come to Court, we can prove rehabilitation has already begun. Real rehabilitation helps the person get back on to a clean, healthy life. We have many examples of people we have helped overcome drug, alcohol and gambling addictions, as part of cleaning up their financial debts. In some cases, these people have even become leaders and sponsors themselves in the rehabilitation program that helped them so much. I have great pride in hearing years later from such former addicts I have helped when they tell me that they have saved up enough to buy a home, now have a better job and their family is in a better place because of my help.

The Donaldsons need to get themselves resolved to live within their earnings. They also must learn to stop gambling if they wish to have a chance of surviving this bankruptcy.

Gambling debts: The Registrar’s decision

So the Registrar ordered that the Donaldsons:

Shall attend such counselling for gambling abuse and/or addiction for such period as is necessary to get an opinion from a qualified counsellor or medical professional that both of the Donaldson’s are able to conduct themselves without going back to gambling in any way.
Refrain from gambling in any form, and further that they enrol and stay enrolled in the voluntary exclusion program with Casino Nova Scotia;
Absolutely stop obtaining credit from any lender in any form, except as approved in advance and in writing by the Trustee.
Disclose and subject to any provincial exemptions, turn over to the Trustee any property of either or both that comprises “property of the bankrupt” within the meaning of the BIA between the date of the Donaldson’s’ bankruptcies and their discharge.
Upon compliance with the foregoing for a period of at least five years from the date of the decision, the Donaldson’s may make a further application for discharge.

The Registrar’s decision is right. The Donaldsons will finally get the help they need to fight their gambling addiction. They will come clean with their LIT about handing over any non-exempt assets. They will not be able to borrow money for gambling again. Once they have been “clean” for 5 years, they may reapply to their discharge from bankruptcy. Hopefully, by then, they will be able to live a healthier life without the stress of gambling debts.

Gambling debts: Do you have too much debt?

Do you have too much debt because of an addiction or otherwise? Are you worried that the future interest rate hikes will make presently affordable commitments entirely unmanageable? Is the discomfort, tension and anxiousness presently detrimentally affecting your health and wellness as well as health?

If so, speak to the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies looking for financial restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only experts licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide insolvency services.

Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation and to make sure that we can begin assisting you to return right into a healthy, balanced, hassle-free life.

Tags addiction, alcohol, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy court, bankruptcy trustee, Consumer Proposal, counsellor, Donaldson (Re), drugs, gambling, gambling debt, gambling debts, gambling debts help, insolvency services, Ira Smith, licensed insolvency trustee, registrar, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

TWO INCOME TRAP OF SEN. WARREN

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 28, 2019

If you would rather listen to the two income trap blog audio file, please scroll down to the end for the podcast.

Two income trap: Introduction

In the last 50 years, women have entered the labour force in real numbers. This did not result in families having a much easier time of it economically. A great number of people thought it would because a family now had two full-time income earners. Financial troubles might if anything be much more extensive among two income households today. This is called a two income trap.

Two income trap: Senator Elizabeth Warren

I recently read an article on the United States Senator Elizabeth Warren. I had not been actually familiar with her history prior to reviewing the write-up. Turns out that she was a lawyer who focussed on bankruptcy legislation. She was a professor at the Harvard Law School.

Senator Warren’s daughter, Amelia Warren Tyagi, is an entrepreneur and management consultant. They co-authored a book “The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke“. It was first released in 2003 and an updated version was released in 2016. The book is a sociological review of exactly how American households and life have developed from the 1960s to contemporary times. Although it is a testimonial of American life, I think the same concepts and conclusions can be related to Canada’s middle class too.

Two income trap: The rise in middle-class insolvencies

One reality that bothered the writers was that by the early 2000s, bankruptcies in the middle class became greater than in any other American socio-economic group. To put it simply, when considering the family members that are declaring bankruptcy, it’s not the extremely poorest or the really wealthiest. It actually has to do with the middle class and the kind of financial difficulties they meet.

The writers wished to attempt to clarify why much more middle-class households, making even more than ever previously, saw a 500% rise in individual bankruptcy filings from the very early 1980s to the very early 2000s. The writers likewise keep in mind that along with personal bankruptcies, home mortgage foreclosures were up greater than 3.5 times than in the very early 1980s. This is prior to the 2008 economic disaster mess!

Two income trap: The financial disintegration of the middle-class household

Their study began with a solitary reality. The possibility that a family with youngsters would wind up in bankruptcy is more than families without children. They uncovered that households that have youngsters in the family are almost 3 times more likely to wind up declaring bankruptcy than households that do not have children.

The writers think it is really vital to comprehend the problems triggering middle-class economic issues. This is due to the fact that they discovered that 2 out of every 3 households that applied for bankruptcy have actually had a real job loss or loss of income prior to their declaring bankruptcy.

Someone’s lost a job; a person’s had a major downturn when it comes to households where both the husband and wife work. Sometimes both of them have actually lost their job before bankruptcy. So we’re actually talking about individuals that are not just way down on the earnings side. They had no financial savings or emergency money fund to draw on when the unanticipated calamity struck. Stating it a different way, households were damaged attempting to have a middle class lifestyle!

This concern fascinated the writers. We can comprehend the young and careless declaring bankruptcy. We can also recognize a tale about seniors in debt that states decreasing health, limited revenue, no potential to make extra in the future and insufficient funds for retired life will certainly have financial issues. Nevertheless, in the case of seniors in debt, the reasons for their financial difficulties probably began a very long time ago. With restricted earnings and no financial savings to draw on, revealed the concerns which already existed.

Two income trap: The newer generation middle class

Insolvency stories about women and men working and raising children are normal today, but this was not so in the very early 1980s and earlier.

In those days, middle-class stories were not about creating debt to purchase consumable or lifestyle items they cannot afford. Stories about the current middle class in financial trouble inevitably show similar primary factors why these family members wind up bankrupt. They are attempting to spend on not only food and clothing but other costs that have become family fixed costs, such as:

home loan repayments;
additional medical insurance repayments;
daycare expenses
after school care expenses; and
auto payments

Middle-class families need to have 2 automobiles when both mother and father are in the labour force. The spread of suburban life families have out of necessity opted to get more space for the dollar and overall affordability, also demands being a 2 car family. By the time they make all their fixed cost payments, those two income households think about what was supposed to be their financial success tale.

They have much less cash left over than their one-income dads’ or grandfathers’ households had. It appears that as our society modernizes and allows people to do a lot more, the ambitions of middle-class families do not always come to fruition. The middle class has been and continues to shift. The middle-class size has reduced compared to the 1970s. Families have been either moving up or down. On a net basis, the middle class has not been growing.

This actually does not amaze me. When you have children your expenditures jump astronomically. As lately as the very early 1970s, a Canadian household had buying power on one income. It certainly gave a middle-class way of living. What took place in the 1960s and 1970s, is one income sufficed to sustain a household in what was a typical and comfortable middle-class life.

It absolutely was middle class; it was right in the centre. You may have needed to clip coupons to save money, yet you were buying your food at grocery stores, not going to a food bank. Your home could have been small, yet it was your own and you had the want and ability to hive off savings from your regular employment income to pay off your only mortgage quicker.

Two income trap: So what has changed?

That generation recognized exactly how to stick to a spending plan. They were more successful than their parents’ generation. They learned lessons from their parents about: (i) money; (ii) budgeting; (iii) saving for an objective; and (iv) understanding and being OK with if you cannot pay cash now for something, you simply do not buy it.

Now with both parents in the labour force, expenditures for dining in a restaurant more often, more expensive clothing, gas for the two cars are instances of regular expenditures the modern family has. One or two generations ago families did not have the same level of those kinds of expenses. Modern families spend a lot more than simply for what was the core fundamentals. We constantly recognize that having children is costly. Yet something has taken place in a single generation. The expense of living for a family with kids has actually made what once was a common middle-class life out of reach for the ordinary typical income earner.

Nowadays, the level of a household’s fixed costs is not how an economist would look at costs as compared to the income level. Rather, it is how people today understand what a two income family’s costs realistically are at the same income level. In modern-day culture, people are dining in restaurants a lot more, have home appliances and communication devices that did not exist 1 or 2 generations earlier. Housing expenses have boosted considerably. This is the brand-new facts of life for the contemporary culture household.

Two income trap: So here is the key to release you from the trap

Canadians have a financial literacy problem. Lots of people assume that some are born rich while others are not. The fact is that in most cases, those that are well off simply have a much more reasonable understanding on costs and how to live within one’s means. They also have willpower. In the past, people thought first if they could actually afford something before they spent their money on it. They don’t just look at the interest rate and monthly payment incurring that new debt will have.

I have written several blog posts alerting Canadians about the need to budget and plan thoroughly to make sure that expenses do not surpass income. A spending plan requires to consist of savings; both for an emergency reserve and for retired life. Those that do not do so are more likely to be in financial trouble when an unforeseen occasion happens. It is because they have absolutely nothing to draw on in lean times.

There are many ways to start early in life to avoid financial disaster. If it sounds familiar, that’s due to the fact that they are. Nonetheless, yet few people value them. That’s partly due to the fact that they weren’t taught in either the home or in the schools.

Financial proficiency, like civics education and learning, requires to be a demand in all primary school, secondary school as well as university curricula.

So the key to being released from this trap is twofold:

behaviour modification; and
financial literacy being taught at all education levels

Two income trap: Are you caught in the two-income trap?

Are you caught in the two income trap? Worried that future interest rate hikes will make presently affordable debt entirely out of reach? Is the discomfort, stress, and anxiety too much debt brings on negatively affecting your health and wellness?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience helping people and companies needing financial restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only professionals licensed and supervised by the Federal government to supply financial restructuring services.

Call the Ira Smith Team today to make sure that we can begin aiding you to return right into a healthy and balanced and well-balanced, worry-free life.

We will provide a no-cost consultation to aid you to resolve your money troubles. We understand the pain debts and financial distress triggers. We can end it from your life. This will certainly allow you to begin a clean slate, Starting Over Starting Now.

Tags Bankruptcy, Canada’s middle class, ELIZABETH WARREN, financial difficulties, financial issues, financial literacy, financial restructuring services, insolvencies, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, Middle class, middle class lifestyle, Social Issues, two income trap, two-income

Brandon Blog Post

3 RECENT DEBT HEADLINES

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 23, 2019

Debt headlines: Introduction

There have been three recent debt headlines that have attracted a lot of people’s attention. In this Brandon’s Blog, I discuss all three.

Debt headlines: Bankruptcy statistics

On January 4, 2019, the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada issued its bankruptcy statistics report “Insolvency Statistics in Canada—November 2018”. In my blog, BANKRUPTCY STATISTICS CANADA 2018: SCARED OF INSOLVENCIES IN CANADA OR DEBT?, I described the statistics. Many financial writers started to forecast doom and gloom. However, in my blog, I comment that I don’t see it that way. Insolvency filings in November 2018 were down from October 2018. The business writers quoted the statistic that there was a 5.2% increase in November 2018, compared to November 2017. However, insolvency filings have been unusually low for close to 10 years. So the increase really is not a big deal.

The actual problem is not these stats. Instead, it is the historically high degree of Canadian house debt collected when rates of interest went to near almost 0%. Since we stay in a slowly boosting rates of interest environment for the near future, not every person or business will be able to carry their high debt. This will lead to more insolvency filings.

Debt headlines: 46% of Canadians on the verge of bankruptcy as rates increase: Study

I have written before about Canadians and their debt load. Personal debt loads are of some worry. There’s brand-new information that casts a brand-new alarming light on the state of Canadians’ personal balance sheets.

A current study reveals that 46% of Canadians are on the verge of bankruptcy as interest rates increase. I begin by stating a word of caution. The survey size was a small pool so I don’t want to generalize. Canadians have a great deal of debt. What does that tell us about what these people are saying?

This really did not occur overnight. These are long-lasting financial obligations that have been gathered over a long time. The weight of them is actually having an influence. These are individuals that live paycheque to paycheque.

Well, these people are claiming that 46% who answered the survey would not have enough cash or are within $200 or much less to manage their debts and expenses at the end of the month. If something shows up that can interfere with that whether its rates of interest going higher, they might lose their job, or they might have unanticipated emergency costs. So what this informs us is that practically half of Canadians that were surveyed are truly living really near to the margin.

Numerous people do live in this way. Having debt repayments that stay in the mix since that is something that is non-negotiable, will certainly increase in time if you do not resolve it. Rates of interest will certainly increase. Do we understand what percentage of these individuals is facing that? I’m going say a fair number.

The reason I say this is due to the fact that if you return to the start of the monetary crisis in 2008, the Bank of Canada decreased rates of interest in an initiative to boost the economic climate. Ten years actually. I recognize rates of interest have actually begun to go higher however when you’re in this low-interest atmosphere you can carry a lot of debt.

People have. I’m not speaking about the tiny expenses placed on a charge card. I am speaking about paying an astronomically high price for a house in a rising real estate market, not having the ability to manage those home mortgage repayments, tackling that costly debt using your charge card.

43% of those surveyed stated they are sorry for some of the debt that they incurred. They would certainly enjoy a getaway today however if you cannot pay for it that vacation credit card debt is still there.

Just how concerned do you get when you hear that rates of interest are increasing? You are most likely to need to be getting ready to get your affairs in order.

Debt headlines: Canadian financial institutions might drop by ‘a minimum of’ 50% says a US Hedge Fund

Canadians following our markets look to see what’s happening with the Canadian financial institutions. There is one short seller following the Canadian banks. Denver-based Crest Capital believes the Canadian real estate market will lead Canada into an economic downturn. Nonetheless, the huge 6 financial institutions have actually taken care of proving the cynics incorrect in the past.

Kevin Smith is the founder and CEO of Crest Capital, a hedge fund with $53 million in assets under administration. Crest Capital also has an excellent track record. He is shorting the Canadian financial institutions and thinks now is the moment. He thinks it actually boils down to China.

Kevin Smith thinks that:

there is a real estate bubble in Canada;
housing debt to GDP has been blown up and been trouble for a time;
house prices have increased for a very long time; and
the cash streaming in from China that has actually pushed up housing prices and
compelled Canadians themselves to extend to purchase real estate.

He believes the China credit bubble is ultimately going to break. China has this credit bubble which has actually been taking place for years. The cash has actually been spilling around the globe yet he believes the funding streams currently from China are truly beginning to run out and perhaps also turn around. There has actually been a lot of cash leaving China right into Canada. This is what has aided the Canadian real estate market and the economic climate.

He said that we are 10 years right into a worldwide financial cycle. He thinks Canada’s personal high debt to GDP ratio will leave the financial institutions holding the bag on this debt trouble. I do not know if he is right, yet that is what he is banking on.

Debt headlines: Can you afford your debt payments with a higher interest rate?

Do you have too much debt? Are you worried that the future interest rate hikes will make presently affordable commitments entirely unmanageable? Is the discomfort, tension and anxiousness presently detrimentally affecting your health and wellness as well as health?

Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation and to make sure that we can begin assisting you to return right into a healthy, balanced, hassle-free life. debt headlines

Tags bank of canada, bankruptcy trustee, Canada, Canadians, China, crest capital, debt headlines, Federal government, insolvency services, Ira Smith Trustee, Kevin Smith, licensed insolvency trustee, purchase real estate, real estate bubble, real estate market, US Hedge Fund

Brandon Blog Post

WHAT ARE THE BEST CORPORATE BANKRUPTCIES?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 21, 2019

If you would prefer to listen to the podcast of this corporate bankruptcies Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom of the page and click on the audio file.

Best corporate bankruptcies: Introduction

Who would think that I could write a blog about the best business failures? Corporate bankruptcy is normally associated with job loss, creditors and investors or shareholders losing out and liquidation.

This is true. But once in a while, corporate insolvency can also be used to end the life of a very financially sick corporation so that a new company can rise from the ashes and offer jobs to the affected employees of the bankrupt company. The story of the ServiCom bankruptcy is an example of the best possible outcome. Here is its story.

Best corporate bankruptcies: The ServiCom shutdown

On Thursday, December 6, 2018, the bankruptcy of the parent company of the ServiCom phone call center in Cape Breton closed it down without warning. It made 600+ Cape Bretoners immediately unemployed less than three weeks before Christmas.

Numerous people were out of a job after layoffs at the Sydney, N.S. telephone call centres over that weekend. The staff members at ServiCom expected to begin their week like they would any other Monday. On Saturday, the news broke that the company had suddenly laid off their staff members. Instead of working, they located themselves applying for unemployment and trying to find jobs.

“We were told to log off and then suddenly we don’t have a job” claimed one former employee. That Saturday, the telephone call centre notified the employees of the information that they no longer had work.

There was no notice for the layoff of this real number of employees. Accordingly, social agencies were incapable to set up conferences or job fairs to aid displaced staff members.

Best corporate bankruptcies: It was tough

Employees like Jamie Barbara were trying to stay positive in light of the problem. “Relieved, relieved now,” she said. “I can go on about my life and look for a job even harder than I was before”.

It was a tough several weeks for ServiCom employees. Many of the workers waited outside the Salvation Army to get a Christmas grocery order. Just before Christmas, that despair has transformed to delight. They obtained good news. Many people were thinking about bankruptcy.

Best corporate bankruptcies: A Christmas miracle

The workers were praying for a Christmas miracle and it arrived 13 days after ServiCom closed its doors.

An American business person, Anthony Marlowe, bought the assets of the bankrupt company for $1.5 million. The workers were thrilled that Mr. Marlowe was entering Sydney, N.S. and taking over. Mr. Marlowe started his career in outbound telemarketing as a call centre supervisor. Currently, he owns many call centre companies.

Todd Riley, the former manager of ServiCom in Sydney is now the Vice President of the new Sydney Call Centre. He claims they’ll be open for service and previous staff members are welcome. All of them will have their jobs back. There could be a couple of transfers from one program to another, however, everybody that was on the payroll will certainly be back.

Best business insolvencies: When jobs are saved

The telephone call centre now operates as the Sydney Call Centre and is owned by Mr. Marlowe’s company, MCI Canada. The excellent news is that he is seeking to expand the business.

Georgina Stuart is just one of many previous phone call center employees that were expecting to return to work in the New Year. “It’s just fantastic that we’ve got hope and work in the future, yes it absolutely does, so we’re looking forward to 2019.”.

There is now a feeling of relief. It was absolutely a roller coaster of feelings for the ServiCom employees. The Sydney Call Centre employees are thrilled to be back to continue their good work.

The building still had the ServiCom name on it when the employees returned. However, it absolutely is currently the Sydney Call Centre sustaining United States telecom AT&T as well as GM’s OnStar service, with much more business to hopefully come.

So, if anyone ever tells you that there is no such thing as best business insolvencies you can tell them this story.

Best business insolvencies: What about your company?

Does your company have excessive debt? Is the business viable but the corporate body is too sick to continue? Is your business in danger of shutting down? Will employees who have become like family be out of a job? Are the pain, stress, and anxiety currently adversely influencing your health and wellness?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of helping people and businesses seeking financial restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists certified and overseen by the Federal government to offer financial restructuring solutions.

We provide a free consultation to assist you to solve your problems. We know the discomfort financial obligations causes. The Ira Smith Team can end it as soon as possible from your life. This will permit you to start a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can start helping you get back into a healthy and balanced, stress-free life.

Tags Bankruptcy, business failures, business insolvencies, call centre employees, call centres, Cape Breton, Christmas, corporate bankruptcies, Corporate Bankruptcy, Ira Smith, laid off, licensed insolvency trustee, MCI Canada, Nova Scotia, ServiCom, story about Sydney call centre workers, Sydney Call Centre, telephone call center

Brandon Blog Post

FINANCIAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS: 4 STEP PLAN TO STOP FINANCIAL DISASTER

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 16, 2019

Financial disaster preparedness: Introduction

The people drowning in debt are always scared of the thought of speaking to a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee (Trustee). The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to allow me, a Trustee, to give you some basic points on financial disaster preparedness in a non-scary way. Hopefully, it can help you avoid a financial disaster.

On the 27th day of the United States Federal government closure, many federal employees that are already under money stress and anxiety are not surprisingly asking whether an insolvency proceeding is the only alternative.

These people did not ask for this. Although they will eventually receive all their back pay, that doesn’t help their cash flow today.

Some personal bankruptcies are started by events beyond somebody’s control. The US government shutdown is such an example. Alternatively, unlike the shutdown, a number are completely within an individual’s control.

Here are four ideas on just how to maintain your finances from falling off the edge right into insolvency.

Financial disaster preparedness: #1 – Keep an eye on your credit cards

Try to pay your monthly credit card bill, and all your expenses, on or before their due date. If timely payments cannot happen, pay it back asap or arrange a repayment strategy to decrease late charges as well as interest charges.

Never ever carry over a credit card balance. Attempt to pay your balances, including all your expenses, promptly.

Similarly, be conscientious what your credit history is. Almost every person will certainly have a time in their lives when they’ll need to borrow cash for some major expenditure.

Your credit score will affect the borrowing rates you are offered. Knowing one’s credit history can aid people to make a better decision on when to jump, or hold back, on a choice to borrow.

Financial disaster preparedness: #2 – Know your monthly expenses (and savings too)

When I do credit counselling and speak to people about loan basics, I discuss spending behaviours and always talk about the difference between wants and needs. I always encourage people striving for economic self-reliance to begin with a straightforward exercise: document every single expense in a month.

By mapping out all the spending, people can rank where their cash should, as well as shouldn’t, be going. For example keep an eye out for the daily latte, which is a habit because, it builds up, A more expensive specialty coffee is a want, not a need. A less expensive plain coffee could suffice.

There is one routine I always urge. Make a routine that you will set aside a particular percentage of your income for an emergency fund. The same goes for socking away, at the very least a little, to an RRSP. Work these savings into your budget.

In my experience, all consumer insolvencies commonly entail inadequate financial savings to cover the unanticipated. This is a common problem among Canadians that I have previously written about in my blogs.

Credit cards are also a significant cause of personal insolvencies. Many of our personal insolvency clients use credit cards to supplement their income. Rather than budgeting, they use their credit cards for various expenditures that they really cannot afford and are unable to pay down their credit card balances.

Financial disaster preparedness: #3 – Boost your financial literacy

There are various ways to begin early in life to prevent financial disaster problems. If these guidelines sound familiar, that’s because they are. However, yet few individuals appreciate them. That’s partly because they’re not taught it in the schools.

Canadians have a financial literacy problem. Many people think that some people are born rich and others aren’t. The reality is that those who are well off just have a more realistic understanding about spending and saving within one’s earnings.

Financial literacy, like civics education, needs to be a requirement in all elementary school, high school and university educational programs.

Financial disaster preparedness: #4 – Preserve your financial self-reliance

Those who lived through the great depression understand how fragile funds can be. Clipping coupons and looking for the most affordable prices is just part of their normal behaviour.

Insolvency filings have been at their lowest point since 2007, and there are varying explanations for the decline.

During the last decade, Canadians have amassed debt. Now that interest rates are rising, it is expected that personal insolvency filings will rise. Personal insolvencies will be more a part of our world as a result of unexpected disasters and negative decisions.

Corporate bankruptcies will always be a part of the system as markets change and businesses experience threats they cannot survive.

We must all be financially vigilant. I hope these tips will help you in avoiding any form of financial distress.

Financial disaster preparedness: What about you?

Do you have excessive debt? Are you in need of financial disaster preparedness? Does your business have way too much financial debt and is in danger of shutting down? Are you concerned that the future rate of interest hikes will make currently workable financial obligations totally uncontrollable? Is the pain, stress and anxiety currently adversely influencing your health and wellness?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have years and generations of helping people and businesses seeking financial restructuring. As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are the only specialists certified and overseen by the Federal government to offer financial restructuring solutions.

We provide a free consultation to assist you to solve your problems. We know the discomfort financial obligations causes. We can end it as soon as possible from your life. This will permit you to start a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can start helping you get back into a healthy and balanced, stress-free life.

Tags bankruptcy trustee, consumer insolvencies, corporate bankruptcies, credit card, credit counselling, credit history, credit score, emergency fund, financial disaster, financial disaster preparedness, government shutdown, insolvency, insolvency filings, Ira Smith, licensed insolvency trustee, personal bankruptcies, personal insolvencies, savings, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY STATISTICS CANADA 2018: SCARED OF INSOLVENCIES IN CANADA OR DEBT?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 14, 2019

bankruptcy statistics

If you would rather listen to the Bankruptcy statistics Canada 2018 blog audio file, please scroll down to the end for the podcast.

Bankruptcy statistics: Introduction

On January 4, 2019, the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada issued its bankruptcy statistics report “Insolvency Statistics in Canada—November 2018”. Most of the headlines on this report quoted that Canadian insolvencies rose 5.2% in November 2018. While true, that headline alone could create the impression that we now have runaway bankruptcies in Canada. Nothing could be further from the truth. Let me explain.

Bankruptcy statistics: The latest numbers

Total insolvencies in November 2018 was 5.2% higher than total insolvencies in November 2017. That is what the press has quoted. However, that statistic by itself is meaningless. The complete number of insolvency filings (proposals and bankruptcies) in Canada lowered by 2.5% in November 2018 contrasted to the previous month.

For the 12-months ending November 30, 2018, total insolvencies boosted by 2.0% compared with the 12-month period ending November 30, 2017. This is a fairly modest total increase. Keep in mind that insolvencies in Canada have been at historically low levels for the last 9 years! A total annual increase of 2% from a historic low number is hardly an epidemic.

Consumer insolvencies for the 12-months ending November 30, 2018, increased by 2.0% compared to the 12-months ending November 30, 2017. Consumer personal bankruptcies were down by 5.0%, while consumer proposals were up by 8.4%. The percentage of proposals in consumer insolvencies increased to 55.7% during the 12-month period finishing November 30, 2018, up from 52.4% throughout the 12-months ending November 30, 2017. This means that over half of those Canadians who made an insolvency filing in this time period avoided bankruptcy. This is a good thing.

Business insolvencies for the 12-month period ending November 30, 2018, decreased by 0.6% compared to the 12-month period ending November 30, 2017. The industries with the largest decrease in insolvencies were mining and oil and gas. The industries with the largest increase in insolvencies were building and construction and retail.

Bankruptcy statistics: What is the real issue

The real issue is not these statistics. Rather, it is the historic high level of Canadian household debt amassed when interest rates were at near zero percent levels. Now that we are in a gradually increasing interest rate environment for the foreseeable future, not every person or company carrying high debt will be able to continue meeting their obligations and will have to resort to an insolvency proceeding.

I have written about the dangers of carrying too much debt for many years now. We are now entering the period where the rubber meets the road. Stephen Poloz, Governor of the Bank of Canada, feels the Canadian economy is doing sufficiently well to slowly boost rates of interest. Mr. Poloz believes to be tightening up that a bit. At the exact very same time, the latest insolvency statistics show that the marketplace now tells a story that there may be room for some actual pessimism about the Canadian economy.

Previous Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney and the former Finance Minister, the late Jim Flaherty, warned the Canadian consumer to place the economy on their back and march it up a high hill. We did and it worked. This is now the outcome of it.

Bankruptcy statistics: Canadian household debt

There’s a good deal of conversation on what that suggests specifically for Canadians. It isn’t that the warnings have actually not been there for a while. The most recent statistics show that Canadian household debt is around 170 percent of disposable income. The regular Canadian owes $1.70 for every single buck of revenue made each year, after tax.

Twenty years ago, the proportion was 100%. So as you can see, there has been a stable climb in Canadians’ cravings for more financial debt. We have among the greatest financial obligation percentage of any of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development participant nations. For those carrying high debt, it is now time to buckle your seat belts as interest rates will continue to rise.

There were indications that the Canadian consumer was thinking of their budgeting. Statistics Canada previously reported that retail sales were slowing down. Now in the latest insolvency statistics, we see that retail is one of the industry sectors that had an increase in corporate insolvency filings.

With rates of interest increasing, so does the cost of borrowing and the cost of maintaining variable rate loans. Fixed rate loans that mature will need to be refinanced at higher interest rates if the loan cannot be repaid in full.

Bankruptcy statistics: Debt in a rising interest rate environment

Do you have too much debt? Does your company have too much debt and is in danger of shutting down? Are you concerned that future interest rate hikes will make currently manageable debt totally unmanageable? Are the pain and stress now negatively affecting your health?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies in need of financial restructuring and counselling. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide debt settlement and financial restructuring services.

We offer a free consultation to help you solve your problems. We understand your pain that debt causes. We can also end it right away from your life. This will allow you to begin a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can begin helping you and get you back into a healthy, stress-free life.

Tags bank of canada, bankruptcy statistics, bankruptcy trustee, Canada, Consumer Proposal, financial restructuring services, insolvencies, insolvency, Ira Smith Trustee, Jim Flaherty, licensed insolvency trustee, Mark Carney, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, personal bankruptcy, stephen poloz

Brandon Blog Post

PRIVACY BREACH LAWSUIT AGAINST LICENSED INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE FAILS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 9, 2019

Privacy breach lawsuit: Introduction

A licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) and a Court appointed Receiver are both officers of the Court. As such, they have a duty of care to all stakeholders and parties. A decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia released in late 2018 deals with an application to begin a class action privacy breach lawsuit against a licensed insolvency trustee (LIT or Trustee).

The case I am referring to is Netlink Computer System Inc. (re),2018 BCSC2309. Netlink Computer System Inc. (Netlink) was a British Columbia-based business that marketed computers and associated software solutions. In late 2017, Netlink went bankrupt.

Privacy breach lawsuit: The request to go ahead

As is required under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), any party wishing to initiate litigation against a bankruptcy trustee must first get the permission of the Court to do so.

In the Netlink case, a former Netlink customer wanted to start a class action lawsuit against the Trustee. The customer claimed that the Trustee breached the personal privacy of Netlink’s customers by permitting their personal details to be revealed. The unproven claim was that the Trustee sold to or, otherwise, allowed 3rd parties to get personal information of the Netlink customers.

This particular customer wished to start an action versus the Trustee for breach of privacy. If leave is approved, this customer would then seek certification of his case as a class action lawsuit.

Privacy breach lawsuit: The issue in requesting the leave of the Court

The Court’s task was to figure out whether to exercise its discretion to allow the claim to go ahead. The Court had to look at the nature and scope of the proposed claim taking into account the evidence. Leave is rarely given. If leave was granted in this case, it would be the first time in Canada a bankruptcy Trustee has been taken legal action against in a potential class action proceeding.

The BIA does not give any type of specific advice about the elements the Court ought to take into consideration in thinking about an application for leave to start an action against a LIT. These have just been developed through case-law analyzing and using s. 215 of the BIA.

For almost 150 years, Courts and legal scholars have been of the view that the bar for approving the commencement of litigation I versus a Court-appointed receiver or Trustee is not a high one. It is designed to protect the receiver or LIT against only frivolous or vexatious actions which have no basis.

The leading cases on the issue of leave to go ahead with litigation against either a Court-appointed receiver or LIT can be summarized as follows;

Leave to take such legal action should not be given if the action is frivolous or vexatious. Manifestly unmeritorious claims need to not be allowed to continue
Actions need to not be allowed to continue if the evidence submitted on behalf of the action, does not show a cause of action against the Trustee.
The court is not required to make a final evaluation of the benefits of the claim prior to granting leave.

This threshold tries to strike the ideal balance between the security of bankruptcy trustees and Court appointed receivers from the interruption of an insolvency administration from unimportant or simply tactical suits and preserving to the maximum degree possible the legal rights of creditors and other stakeholders.

Privacy breach lawsuit: This Netlink application

In this privacy breach lawsuit case, the claimant states that his affidavit evidence provides proof reveals a real case against the Trustee. The Trustee says that the proposed claim and the evidence on its behalf does not satisfy the relatively reduced threshold called for to prove leave.

The claimant described in his materials, his potential claim. . He also discloses that he has already begun a claim against the auction company who sold the bankruptcy company’s assets, Netlink and Netlink’s landlord. (The action versus Netlink has remained stayed due to the fact that Netlink is in bankruptcy). The proposed claim against the LIT is exactly the same and consists of practically the same phrasing as the action already started. There is no separate accusation that the Trustee did anything different from the auctioneer, Netlink, or the landlord.

The proposed claimant’s main points were:

He purchased a product from Netlink and provided personal information, including, his name, address and credit card details.
The Trustee contracted with the auctioneer to sell the assets.
During that process, the Trustee allowed customers’ private information, including addresses, credit card numbers, and various other sensitive information (the “Private Information”) to be exposed and offered to or otherwise acquired by 3rd parties, including criminals.
The Trustee provided the auctioneer computers and Netlink servers and other records containing the Private Information.
Criminals that obtained the Netlink servers offered the information to other criminals, consisting of cybercriminals and identity thieves.
The trustee knew that customer details are often included in the property of such bankrupt’s estates and it took no steps to safeguard the information when taking guardianship of Netflix’s property.
The Trustee’s choice to offer the Private Information, or at a minimum, the Netlink servers including the Private Information, was intended and deliberate and was made knowing that Netlink customers had not consented to their details being shared.
Customers have suffered damages.

Privacy breach lawsuit: This evidence

The Court examined the claims and the evidence. Unfortunately, the claimant did not have first-hand knowledge of what the Trustee did or did not do. Rather, the claimant submitted two sworn affidavits of what he believed took place. The information contained in the two affidavits was derived mainly from blog posts and YouTube videos that the claimant believed to be true.

The Trustee submitted 2 sworn affidavits of the LIT responsible for the Netlink file. The Trustee’s evidence was mainly why the relatively low threshold for allowing a claim against a Trustee or Court appointed receiver were not met. It did not provide much information about what the Trustee actually did (or did not do).

The Court had no choice but to rule that the claimant’s evidence was mainly hearsay and not admissible. With no real evidence before the Court to support the accusations, the Court dismissed the application and leave to begin the action against the Trustee was denied.

Privacy breach lawsuit: My take

Based on my reading of this case, I believe the Trustee was very lucky that there was no real evidence against it. There is no information indicating what steps the Trustee took to make sure that all Private Information was protected prior to the assets being sold. It is imperative that privacy breaches do not take place. Once a Trustee or Court appointed receiver to take possession of assets that may contain private or sensitive information, steps must be taken to ensure that the information does not fall into the hands of 3rd parties who have no right to that information. It does not matter whether the information is stored on computer hard drives, in the cloud, or physically in books or on paper.

The claimant still has its action against the auctioneer and the landlord. My understanding is that the landlord is involved because once the auction sale was completed and the auctioneer left the premises, there were still books, records and papers that contained some or all the Private Information. The landlord disposed of such papers in a way that did not protect the Private Information.

My Firm’s standard practice is to remove hard drives that contain Private Information so that computers would be sold minus a hard drive. With respect to physical records, any documents not required that would contain Private Information, we have shredded. We do not just throw it into a dumpster intact for someone to find. These are minimum steps required to protect Private Information.

Unfortunately, in the Netlink case, the Court’s Reasons for Decision does not include any information indicating the Trustee took such steps.

Privacy breach lawsuit: What does it all mean?

What it all means is that in any insolvency assignment, the LIT needs to know what it is he or she has taken possession and control of. Decisions must be made that protect the interests of all stakeholders, as best possible. There are always competing interests. The LIT must balance them all carefully when making decisions.

Do you have too much debt because you are a victim of identity theft? Does your company have too much debt and is in danger of shutting down? Is the pain and stress of too much debt now negatively affecting your health?

If so, contact the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of helping people and companies in need of financial restructuring and counselling. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals licensed and supervised by the Federal government to provide debt settlement and financial restructuring services.

We offer a free consultation to help you solve your problems. We understand your pain that debt causes. We can also end it right away from your life. This will allow you to begin a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can begin helping you and get you back into a healthy, stress-free life. privacy breach lawsuit

Tags Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, Canada, court appointed receiver, cyber criminal, Debt, identity theft, Ira Smith Trustee, Lawsuit, leave, licensed insolvency trustee, LIT, Netlink Computer System Inc., privacy breach lawsuit, receiver, trustee

Brandon Blog Post

FINANCIAL NEW YEAR’S RESOLUTIONS 2019: WILL YOU KEEP YOUR FINANCIAL NEW YEAR’S RESOLUTIONS 2019?

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date January 7, 2019

If you would prefer to listen to the audio of this financial new year’s resolutions 2019 version of this Brandon’s Blog (with an introduction from a celebrity guest), please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Financial New Year’s resolutions 2019: Introduction

The New Year has arrived. I wish all of my readers a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year. By now, many people have made themselves promises on how they will improve in 2019. Many people make New Year’s resolutions, including financial new year’s resolutions 2019. In this Brandon’s Blog, I explore what are many of the common resolutions people make and what the chances are on people actually carrying them out.

Financial New Year’s resolutions 2019: The 8 most common resolutions

Other than the first one, in no particular order, the 8 most common New Year’s resolutions are:

Lose Weight. The Number 1 New Year’s Resolution is to drop weight. We’ve all seen it, or become aware of it. Many resolve to lose weight, but few truly complete it in the long-term. That is why January every year is when the weight loss programs, gyms and workout products advertise heavily.

Do Better Than Last Year. Often, life is simply hard. In between family members, good friends, your work, and all the various other stress and anxieties that life can toss at you, it simply appears sometimes that absolutely nothing can go right. And also some years are simply a plain draw. So, after a year of grinding via the days, weeks, and months, you’re prepared for a do-over. You’re prepared to do anything to make sure that the following year begins the very best way it can. So, this resolution is to merely attempt to have a better year than the last one.

Exercise. One of the most usual New Year’s resolutions has to do with ones very own health and wellness. Among the many health and wellness promises, is working out. When you consider it, it’s not just wishing to slim down (which is the number 1 resolution), it’s in fact about wishing to be more powerful, quicker and generally in better shape.

When your body is in peak condition, it does do far better. An in shape body functions far better, provides you with much more power, boosts your mind’s abilities and a lot more. DON’T try to push your body in the beginning to do more than it can handle. Any personal trainer will tell you to begin slowly and work yourself up from there. Set realistic goals for yourself.

Save More/Spend Less. Cash is what people need and the most common of all the financial New Year’s resolutions 2019 is to make sure that we have more of it in the New Year. This is especially true for most Canadians, who are living paycheque to paycheque.

The best way to start your financial plan for the New Year is to first look at what happened in the year that just ended. Reflect on your year. I’m certain you’ll realize some things about your immediate past financial behaviour. Some items that you wish you had not purchased or lost money on. Or, if you understood then what you currently know, you would certainly have done things in a different way and saved yourself a couple of bucks in the process.

In other words, look at your income and expenses carefully and budget properly for the New Year. Your proper budget must include saving a certain amount from each paycheque to put away in an emergency savings fund for when there is an unexpected, well, emergency. Your budget will also hopefully allow for other savings to be able to invest for the longer term.

Use the start of the brand-new year to begin preparing just how you could invest your new savings. In your personal financial plan or budget, concentrate on things you NEED versus the many things you WANT. By doing this one simple thing, you will find you will have more in your savings account. This is the best way to stay on track to meet your financial New Year’s resolutions 2019.

Get More Sleep. Depending upon the researcher you listen to, the body requires between 6-8 hours of rest. Our bodies can work on much less, yes, yet it’s not something that a lot of medical professionals advise. This is another one of the resolutions fitting into the health and wellness category.

Get A New Hobby/Skill. Whether we intend to confess or otherwise, most of us wish to be our best selves. We do not simply intend to be the individual that undergoes the movements, we intend to have something we can expect each week, and even take pride in.

So, with a brand-new year, comes a chance to learn new skills or do something different in our lives than just the “same old, same old”. For some, it, in fact, implies attempting to get new skills for getting a better paying job. For others, they see it as a possibility to handle a new pastime or discover something that they’ve always intended to do or learn.

Quit Smoking/Drinking. Humans are animals of routine, yet in some cases, those behaviours are actually, REALLY negative for you. Two of the ones that cover the “negative for you” checklist is alcohol consumption to such an excess that it is an addiction and smoking cigarettes. Like any addiction, this is very tough to do and many times requires the help of trained professionals.

Volunteer. While practically every one of these resolutions is created to aid oneself in one fashion or another, this one helps both the self and others. One of the best ways to help others is to volunteer your time. Volunteer to what? To help any place you can certainly. In some cases, it’s at a homeless shelter, or to assist a close friend in need. There are many opportunities to help the less fortunate. However the crucial point is that you place yourself 2nd, and the needs of others first. Spreading a little happiness can go a long way for a person. Therefore if you wish to assist others, do not hesitate to ask, “What do you need?”. You may be amazed by simply just how much you can help somebody.

Financial New Year’s resolutions 2019: Why do we do it?

We cannot forecast the future. In some cases, it’s tough to anticipate what will take place in the following couple of hours, not to mention the following 12 months. Why do we do it? Well, it’s mainly since we intend to think that we have some power over the future. If we can state to ourselves, “This year will certainly be different, this will certainly be the year I will make changes for me”, it’ll place us in the best attitude to get down to business and do things. The feeling that we have control over our lives is exceptional.

Financial New Year’s resolutions 2019: Will we keep our resolutions?

It begins straightforward. We look in the mirror, see what we don’t like and resolve to make the changes that probably should have been made a long time ago. We will establish worthy ventures to do simply that thing or things. However, most people will drop off the wagon within a short period of time. What? I’m not being mean, I’m being genuine. Making significant changes in your life is hard.

We are hyped for the New Year. We are. so tired of what occurred in the previous year that we are ready to make the changes we promised ourselves we would make. We may also have invested a lot of time informing other people what changes we will make in the New Year. But then life gets in the way and we fall short.

Financial New Year’s resolutions 2019: Falling short is OK

It does not matter that I fell short all my resolutions actually. I need to so that I can ensure that I can improve further! Of course, I should not try to fail them, but it is normal to fall short. No one is perfect. As long as you see that you have made improvements in the right direction, that is what really counts.

So, make sure that your goals are realistic. Even if you fall short, you have improved immensely and that will be your new starting point for the next New Year’s resolutions. I hope all of you improve your life in some area this year, and that will be your new starting point when 2019 comes to an end. This includes your financial New Year’s resolutions.

Do you need professional help to meet your financial goals?

As I stated above, sometimes professional help is required to meet a New Year’s resolution. We may not have all the skills required. Improving your financial situation may be one of those areas where professional help is required. Maybe you only need a coach to keep you focussed on performing your financial new year’s resolutions 2019. Perhaps on a personal level, you might require only some credit counselling or debt consolidation. On a more formal basis, you may need a debt restructuring plan in the form of a consumer proposal in order to eliminate your debts and get back on the right financial path. In some extreme cases, personal bankruptcy may be what is needed.

Perhaps your company is in need of financial restructuring. Perhaps your lender is threatening receivership or bankruptcy so you are in need of a financial advisor skilled in insolvency matters. A licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) is the only professional licensed and supervised by the Canadian Federal government skilled in both personal and corporate insolvency matters If you or your company have too much debt, call the Ira Smith Team for your free consultation. We understand your pain, and we have the prescription to end your pain forever. Call the Ira Smith Team today, so that you can begin your improved life for this New Year 2019, Starting Over, Starting Now!

Tags 2019, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy trustee, brandon’s blog, Consumer Proposal, Debt, financial advisor, financial new year's resolution 2019, financial new year's resolutions 2019, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, New Year's Day, New Year's resolution, new year’s resolutions, personal bankruptcy, personal trainer, receivership, workout products

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY BLOG REVIEW: A LOOK AT MY TOP 2018 BANKRUPTCY BLOGS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date December 26, 2018

Bankruptcy blog review: Introduction

I hope that you are all enjoying quality family time together over the holidays. As 2018 is nearly over, I thought that it would be interesting to do a bankruptcy blog review on my Brandon’s Blog. So here is a review of the 7 most viewed blogs over the past year.

Bankruptcy blog review: The 7 most viewed blogs in 2018

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT: COURT MAY NOT LISTEN TO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE

This blog was about a very interesting case decided in the Court of Appeal of British Columbia. The bankrupt’s creditors applied to have the transactions reviewed under section I00 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (“BIA”). One of the areas of contention was that the judge in the lower court found he could not rely on the bankruptcy trustee’s opinion of value in the circumstances.

MORTGAGE LENDING CRITERIA SELF EMPLOYED: BIGGEST MYTH MAY BE RIGHT

In this Brandon’s Blog, I wrote about mortgage lending criteria self-employed, I discussed a Court decision that shows when it comes to a self-employed person’s mortgage, if there is a deemed trust claim by Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), you cannot solely rely upon the registry system.

STALKING HORSE CREDIT BID: WE NEED COURT APPROVAL BEFORE STARTING A COURT SUPERVISED SALES PROCESS

This bankruptcy blog review post came from our corporate case files. I discussed the decision making process the Court goes through when being asked to approve a stalking horse sales process and the stalking horse credit bid being recommended by the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee).

CREDIT KARMA CANADA REVIEW: IS IT REALLY FREE AND LEGITIMATE?

Since 2007, Credit Karma USA has attempted to simplify credit and finance for more than 60 million Credit Karma members. They advertise very heavily on US television to attract new members. Becoming a member is free, and it allows any member to get access to their free credit score and credit report, with the option to update every single week. Credit Karma also provides financial education to put credit into context.

Credit Karma Canada arrived this past year from the United States. Its website is creditkarma.ca. The purpose of this blog was to describe what Credit Karma Canada is and to let you decide if it would be helpful or not for you or someone you know.

IS GOODWILL A NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION? ARE YOU SCARED BECAUSE YOUR COMPANY HAS TURNED INTO ONE?

The Goodwill Toronto bankruptcy confused and astonished many people. After all, how can Goodwill, a non-profit organization, go bankrupt? Isn’t the very nature of a non-profit or not-for-profit that it doesn’t have to make a profit? This Brandon’s Blog discussed the issues.

FILING FOR BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: MENTAL HEALTH & DISCHARGED BANKRUPTCY

This bankruptcy blogspot dealt with filing for bankruptcy in Canada and the bankruptcy discharge process when mental health issues are involved.

POOR CREDIT PERSONAL LOANS GUARANTEED APPROVAL CANADA: REDUCE AND DON’T INCREASE DEBT TO IMPROVE YOUR CREDIT SCORE

This Brandon’s Blog was a discussion about and a warning against being seduced by ads from companies for poor credit personal loans guaranteed approval. We pointed out the pitfalls of the products being offered. We also showed how people with poor credit can go about settling their debts and improving their credit score.

Bankruptcy blog review: Conclusion

These are my 7 top viewed Brandon’s Blogs in 2018. Four are about personal debt issues or personal bankruptcy blog items and three are about corporate insolvency issues. Three are about a review of a then-recent court case.

I hope that the year 2019 will be a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year for you and your families.

Have you taken on too much debt in 2018 or the years before? Is the pain and stress of too much debt now negatively affecting your health?

We offer a free consultation to help you solve your problems. We understand your pain that debt causes. We can also eliminate it right away from your life. This will allow you to begin a fresh start, Starting Over Starting Now. Call the Ira Smith Team today so that we can begin helping you and get you back into a healthy, stress-free life. bankruptcy blog review

Tags Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy blog, bankruptcy blog review, bankruptcy blogspot, bankruptcy trustee, BIA, Canada, Canada Revenue Agency, court of appeal, CRA, Credit Karma, financial restructuring services, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, personal bankruptcy blog, toronto