Tag: insolvent corporations

CANADIAN COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT: OUR COMPLETE GUIDE FOR STAKEHOLDERS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date February 17, 2025

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Introduction

As more Canadian companies succumb to bankruptcy, it dawned on me how crucial the role of stakeholders is during these turbulent times. The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (otherwise known as the CCAA) is federal legislation that provides a lifeline for struggling large businesses. Understanding what this means for us — whether we are employees, suppliers, or shareholders — can make or break our futures.

In this Brandon’s Blog post, we’ll explore the roles of various stakeholders in the CCAA process and the strategies we can employ to navigate this stormy sea of insolvent corporations.

Overview of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act: An Overview Of This Lifeline For Canadian Businesses

The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act is a crucial piece of legislation in Canada. It serves as a lifeline for large businesses facing financial distress and unable to meet their financial obligations. But what exactly does it mean? And why is it so important? Let’s break it down.

Definition and Purpose of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act allows a larger struggling insolvent company to restructure their debts while under legal protection. This means they can continue their operations without the immediate threat of creditors demanding payment. The primary goal is to help companies formulate a plan to repay their creditors over time. In essence, it’s about survival and recovery.

Imagine a ship caught in a storm. The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act is like a lifeboat for companies that owe $5 million or more, providing a safe space to regroup and chart a new course. It gives businesses the chance to stabilize and eventually thrive again.

How the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Differs from Other Bankruptcy Processes

Many people confuse the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act with other bankruptcy processes. However, there are key differences. Here’s a quick comparison:

Flexibility: The CCAA offers more flexibility than traditional bankruptcy proceedings under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). Companies can negotiate with creditors and create a tailored plan.
Control: Unlike a bankruptcy liquidation, where a Trustee takes control, the CCAA allows the company to maintain control of its operations during the restructuring process.
Focus on Recovery: The CCAA emphasizes recovery and rehabilitation, rather than liquidation. This is a significant shift from other processes that may prioritize asset sales.
Minimum Debt: As stated above, $5 million is the minimum debt level a company must have to avail itself of the bankruptcy protection provided by the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. If debtor companies owe less than this minimum threshold but is still a candidate to restructure, then it would use the restructuring proceedings section of the BIA.

In short, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act is designed to give businesses a fighting chance. It’s about finding solutions rather than shutting down operations.

Key Objectives of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act For Canadian Businesses

So, what are the benefits of entering CCAA proceedings? Here are a few key points:

Protection from Creditors: The CCAA provides bankruptcy protection proceedings so the insolvent company having financial diffculties can gain immediate relief from creditor actions. This allows businesses to focus on restructuring without the constant pressure of lawsuits or asset seizures.
Time to Restructure: Companies can take the time they need to develop a viable plan called a Plan of Arrangement. This is crucial for long-term success.
Opportunity to Recalibrate: As a legal expert once said,
“The CCAA is not just a path to resolution; it’s a way for companies to recalibrate their commitments to survive.”

This highlights the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act’s role in helping an insolvent company rethink its strategies and commitments.

These benefits are essential, especially in today’s economic climate. With a large increase in Canadian corporate bankruptcies in 2024, debtor companies being able to restructure under either the BIA or the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act is more relevant than ever.

Importance of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act in the Canadian Corporate Landscape

The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act plays a vital role in the Canadian corporate landscape. It’s not just a legal framework; it’s a safety net for businesses. As we see more companies facing financial challenges, understanding the CCAA becomes critical. The recent trends in business bankruptcies highlight the need for effective restructuring options.

Moreover, the success rates of businesses completing the CCAA process stand at an impressive 70%. This statistic underscores the effectiveness of the CCAA in helping companies navigate financial turmoil.

Role of Key Entities in the Companies’ Creditors Arragement Act Restructuring: The Monitor and the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy

The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act process involves several key players, each with distinct responsibilities. This section focuses on two crucial entities: the Monitor and the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB).

The Monitor’s Responsibilities: Overseeing the Process

The Monitor is a court-appointed officer who plays a central role in CCAA proceedings. They act as an independent third party, overseeing the debtor company’s restructuring efforts and ensuring fairness and transparency throughout the process. Key responsibilities of the Monitor include:

Monitoring the Company’s Business: The Monitor closely monitors the company’s financial affairs and operations during the CCAA proceedings. This includes reviewing financial statements, attending meetings, and ensuring the company complies with court orders.
Assisting in the Plan of Arrangement Development: While the company typically develops the Plan, the Monitor plays a vital role in reviewing, analyzing, and providing feedback on the proposed restructuring strategy. They may also facilitate negotiations between the company and its creditors.
Reporting to the Court and Stakeholders: The Monitor regularly reports to the court on the progress of the CCAA proceedings, including the company’s financial performance, the status of the Plan of Arrangement development, and any significant events. They also keep stakeholders informed through reports and notices.
Ensuring Compliance: The Monitor ensures that the company complies with all court orders and the provisions of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. They also help to ensure that the Plan is implemented effectively after it is sanctioned by the court.
Acting as an Impartial Facilitator: The Monitor acts as an impartial facilitator, balancing the interests of the various stakeholders involved in the CCAA process. They strive to ensure a fair and equitable outcome for all parties.
Providing Professional Expertise: Only licensed insolvency trustees (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) can be Monitors. They are experienced insolvency professionals with expertise in financial restructuring, accounting, and legal matters. They bring valuable knowledge and skills to the CCAA process.

The Role of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy: Administrative Oversight

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) is a government agency that plays an administrative role in overseeing insolvency proceedings in Canada, including CCAA cases. While the OSB’s involvement in a specific CCAA case might not be as direct as the Monitor’s, its broader oversight is important. The OSB’s key functions related to the CCAA include:

Supervising the Administration of Insolvency Matters: The OSB is responsible for the overall supervision of the insolvency system in Canada, including the administration of the CCAA. They ensure that CCAA proceedings are conducted in accordance with the legislation and regulations.
Licensing Insolvency Professionals: The OSB licenses and regulates insolvency professionals, including those who act as Monitors in CCAA cases. This helps to ensure the competence and integrity of these professionals.
Maintaining Public Records: The OSB maintains public records related to insolvency proceedings, including CCAA filings. This provides transparency and access to information for stakeholders and the public.
Investigating Complaints: The OSB investigates complaints related to insolvency proceedings, including those involving CCAA cases. This helps to ensure accountability and address any potential misconduct.
Providing Guidance and Information: The OSB provides guidance and information to stakeholders on insolvency matters, including the CCAA process. They publish resources and provide educational materials to help stakeholders understand their rights and responsibilities.

In summary, the Monitor is a key participant in the day-to-day management and oversight of a specific Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act proceeding, working closely with the company and creditors. The OSB, on the other hand, plays a broader administrative role, overseeing the insolvency system as a whole and ensuring the integrity of the process, including CCAA cases, through licensing, regulation, and public record maintenance. Both entities are essential for the effective functioning of the CCAA.

Procedural Components of The Initial Application: A Formal Request for Protection

Initial Filing Process

The process begins with the company filing an initial application with the court. This application formally requests protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. It’s a comprehensive document that outlines the company’s financial situation, the reasons for its difficulties, and the proposed restructuring plan (or at least a preliminary outline of one). Key components typically include:

Detailed Financial Statements: A clear picture of the company’s assets, liabilities, income, and expenses is crucial. This provides the court and creditors with a transparent view of the company’s financial health and the depth of its challenges.
Statement of Affairs: This document provides a snapshot of the company’s current financial position, listing assets and liabilities, and identifying secured and unsecured creditors, or at least those creditors in excess of a minimum dollar value threshold.
Reasons for Financial Distress: The application must clearly articulate the factors that led to the company’s financial difficulties. This could include market downturns, operational challenges, or unforeseen events.
Proposed Restructuring Plan (or at least an outline of a Plan of Arrangement): While a fully formed plan is rarely available at this stage, the initial application should provide a general overview of the proposed restructuring strategy. This might include debt reduction, asset sales, operational changes or a combination of all of them.
Appointment of a Monitor: A key aspect of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act process is the appointment of a Monitor. The initial application typically nominates a proposed Monitor, an independent third party licensed insolvency trustee who will oversee the restructuring process and report to the court.

The Court’s Role: Granting the Initial Order

Once the initial application is filed, the court reviews it carefully. If the court is satisfied that the company meets the criteria for Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act protection – namely, that it is a debtor company with debts exceeding $5 million and that it is in the best interests of the creditors to allow the company to restructure – it will grant an initial order.

This initial order is a powerful tool. It provides the company with a stay of proceedings, which temporarily prevents creditors from taking legal action to collect debts. This “breathing room” allows the company to focus on developing and implementing its restructuring plan without the immediate threat of asset seizure or bankruptcy. The initial order also formally appoints the monitor.

The Monitor’s Responsibilities: Oversight and Reporting

The Monitor plays a vital role in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act process. Their responsibilities include:

Overseeing the Company’s Operations: The Monitor ensures the company continues to operate responsibly and in accordance with the court’s orders.
Monitoring Cash Flow: The Monitor tracks the company’s finances and reports to the court on its financial performance.
Assisting in the Development of the Restructuring Plan: The Monitor works with the company and its stakeholders to develop a viable restructuring plan.
Reporting to the Court and Creditors: The Monitor provides regular reports to the court and creditors on the progress of the restructuring process.

What Happens Next After The Initial Application and the issuance of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Initial Order?

The granting of the initial order marks the beginning of the formal Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings. The debtor company, with the assistance of the Monitor, will then work to develop a detailed restructuring plan that will be presented to creditors for approval. This Plan of Arrangement will outline how the company proposes to address its debts and return to financial viability.

The initial application process under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act is complex and requires careful preparation. Seeking professional advice from lawyers and financial advisors experienced in insolvency and restructuring is crucial for companies considering this option. Understanding the process is equally important for creditors seeking to protect their interests during these proceedings.

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Procedural Components: Plan of Compromise or Arrangement Roadmap to Recovery

The culmination of the CCAA process is the development and implementation of a Plan of Compromise or Arrangement. Statutory requirements are that this document outlines how the company proposes to deal with its debts and restructure its business.

Development of the Plan: The Plan is typically developed by the company, often in consultation with the Monitor and creditors. It must be fair and reasonable to all stakeholders.
Classification of Creditors: Creditors are often classified into different groups based on the nature of their claims (e.g., secured creditors, unsecured creditors, employees). The Plan may propose different treatment for each class.
Key Provisions of the Plan: A Plan may include a variety of provisions, such as:
- Debt repayment schedules.
- Equity conversions.
- Asset sales.
- Operational restructuring.
Voting on the Plan: Creditors vote on the Plan at a meeting of creditors. Approval requires a majority of creditors vote in number and two-thirds in value of each class of creditors. Depending on how many classes of creditors there are and their respective interests, there could be one or more meetings of creditors by class.
Court Approval (Sanction): Even if creditors approve the Plan, it must be sanctioned by the court. The court will review the Plan to ensure it is fair and reasonable and complies with the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.
Implementation of the Plan: Once sanctioned, the Plan becomes legally binding on all stakeholders, including those who voted against it. The company then implements the Plan, working towards its financial recovery.

This section provides a general overview of the procedural components of the CCAA. It’s crucial to remember that each CCAA case is unique, and the specific procedures and outcomes can vary significantly. Consulting with legal and financial professionals is essential for anyone involved in a CCAA proceeding.

Rights and Remedies of Stakeholders: Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities in Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Proceedings

When a large insolvent company faces financial distress, it often turns to the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act for protection. This process can be complex, and various stakeholders play crucial roles. Understanding these roles is essential for navigating the CCAA landscape effectively. Let’s break down the responsibilities of board members, employees, and lenders.

1. Board Members Rights: Navigating Fiduciary Duties

Board members hold a significant responsibility during CCAA proceedings. They must navigate their fiduciary duties carefully. But what does this mean? In simple terms, fiduciary duties require board members to act in the best interest of the company and its creditors, both secured creditors and unsecured creditors, when the company is in the “zone of insolvency.” This is a critical point where their obligations shift from shareholders to creditors.

As a board member, if you find yourself in this situation, it’s vital for the Board of Directors to retain legal counsel early on before the commencement of proceedings. There is a significant gap in understanding the legal landscape. Why risk your position when you can have expert insolvency lawyer guidance?

In this zone, board members must prioritize transparency and accountability. They should regularly communicate with stakeholders to keep everyone informed about the company’s status. After all, a well-informed board can make better decisions.

2. Employee Rights: Importance of Communication

Employees are often the backbone of a company. During CCAA proceedings, they can feel anxious and uncertain. That’s why effective communication is crucial. Employees need to understand what’s happening within the company. Unfortunately, a staggering 75% of employees reported being uninformed about ongoing CCAA cases. This lack of information can lead to rumors and fear.

So, how can companies improve communication? Establishing clear channels is essential. Regular updates through internal memos, meetings, or dedicated websites can help keep employees in the loop. Remember,

“In times of crisis, clear communication is a stakeholder’s best tool.” – Crisis Management Consultant

Employees should also feel empowered to ask questions. They should know where to find information and whom to approach for clarity. This proactive approach can foster a more supportive environment during tough times.

3. Lender’s Rights: Minimizing Risks During Restructuring

Lenders play a pivotal role in CCAA proceedings. They need to minimize risks while navigating the restructuring process. First and foremost, retaining legal counsel is crucial. Lenders should stay updated on the case’s status and participate actively in discussions. This ensures they are aware of any developments that may impact their interests.

Best practices for lenders include:

Regularly reviewing case updates.
Filling out necessary forms to confirm their participation.
Engaging with legal experts to understand their rights and obligations.

By taking these steps, lenders can protect their investments and potentially recover more during the restructuring process. It’s all about being proactive and informed.

4. Unsecured Creditors’ Rights: Minimizing Risks During Restructuring While Enforcing The Rights of Creditors

Unsecured creditors, such as suppliers, are those who do not have a specific security interest in the company’s assets. As an unsecured creditor in a restructuring process, it is important to stay informed on the status of the case. Suppliers should ensure their accounting is accurate and that they understand their terms and what is outstanding. To protect their interests, unsecured creditors should take the following steps:

Ensure accurate accounting: Suppliers should ensure their accounting is accurate and understand their terms and what is outstanding. Landlords should ensure accurate accounting and confirm the debtor’s financial position regarding the lease, including whether the tenant is current or behind on rent.
Stay informed: Unsecured creditors should stay informed on the case’s status through external communications, including, a case-specific website created by the licensed insolvency trustee acting as the Monitor in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings.
Communicate with the company: Suppliers should communicate with their contact person at the business regarding the status of payment and how they will be treated not only on the debt they are owed as at the filing date, but how payment will be made for orders after the commencement of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings.
Retain insolvency legal counsel: In more complex situations, suppliers can benefit from hiring legal counsel to advise on the best strategy to protect their interests. Active lenders embroiled in a CCAA case almost always want to retain counsel to advise them throughout the process. Landlords should retain counsel to be responsive to court documents and otherwise tend to the landlord’s interest in the case. Insolvency counsel will be vigilant in ensuring the rights of creditors are respected.
Court-appointed Monitor case developments: Landlords need to stay updated on case developments since many debtor businesses often choose to resiliate or “reject” real estate leases that would prevent a successful restructuring.

5. Shareholders Rights: You Are An Owner

Shareholders in a company undergoing CCAA proceedings need to stay informed of the situation and follow case developments to ensure they participate appropriately in the process.

Shareholders are last in line in the order of priority to be repaid for their claim in a bankruptcy, so they usually recover very little, if anything, on their claim. However, shareholders do occasionally recover money in a CCAA case, and failure to remain current and file appropriate documents can result in being ineligible for any recovery as a shareholder

Creating Your Bankruptcy Playbook: Proactive Measures for Creditors

Bankruptcy can feel like a storm. It’s chaotic, unpredictable, and often leaves creditors scrambling for safety. But what if I told you that there are proactive measures you can take to navigate these turbulent waters? By creating a bankruptcy playbook, you can affirm your interests and improve your chances of recovery. Let’s dive into the essential steps you should consider.

How Legal Counsel Can Provide Leverage

Having legal counsel by your side can be a game-changer. Here’s how:

Expert Guidance: Legal professionals understand the intricacies of bankruptcy law. They can help you navigate the complexities and ensure that your interests are protected.
Negotiation Power: A lawyer can negotiate on your behalf. This can lead to better outcomes, whether it’s securing payments or renegotiating terms.
Timely Action: Legal counsel can help you file necessary documents promptly, ensuring you don’t miss out on potential recoveries.

Statistics show that 90% of creditors who actively engaged legal counsel in CCAA cases recovered more of their investments than those who did not. This is a clear indication of the value that legal representation brings.

Examples of Successful Creditor Strategies

Learning from others can provide valuable insights. Here are some strategies that have proven effective in past CCAA cases:

Supplier Communication: Suppliers who maintained open lines of communication with the debtor often fared better. They were able to negotiate payment plans or secure priority status for their claims.
Active Participation: Creditors who participated actively in meetings and discussions had a better understanding of the proceedings. This allowed them to advocate effectively for their interests.
Document Everything: Keeping meticulous records of all transactions and communications helped creditors substantiate their claims. This was particularly important in cases where disputes arose.

These strategies highlight the importance of being proactive. If you wait for things to unfold, you might find yourself at a disadvantage.

The Risks of Inactivity During Bankruptcy Proceedings

Inactivity can be a creditor’s worst enemy. The risks are significant:

Loss of Recovery: If you don’t engage, you may miss out on recovering any of your claims. On average, creditors recovered only 30% of their claims when they were involved from the outset.
Unfavourable Terms: Without active participation, you may be subjected to unfavorable terms that could further jeopardize your financial interests.
Missed Opportunities: Opportunities to negotiate or influence the outcome may pass you by if you remain passive.

In a insolvency scenario, every moment counts. The sooner you act, the better your chances of recovery.

Frequently Asked Questions about the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

Navigating the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act can be complex. Here are some frequently asked questions to help you better understand this legislation:

1. What is the CCAA and when is it used?

The CCAA is a federal law in Canada that allows eligible companies facing financial difficulties to restructure their debts and operations with the protection of the court. It’s typically used by large companies with significant debt (at least $5 million) to avoid bankruptcy and preserve jobs. It provides a formal process for developing a plan of compromise or arrangement with creditors.

2. Who is eligible to file for CCAA protection?

A company is eligible to file under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act if it:

Is a debtor company (incorporated under the laws of Canada or a debtor company to which the Winding-up and Restructuring Act applies).
Owes at least $5 million to its creditors.

3. What is a “stay of proceedings” and why is it important?

A stay of proceedings is a court order that temporarily suspends most legal actions by creditors against the company. This includes lawsuits, foreclosures, and repossessions. It’s crucial because it gives the company breathing room to stabilize its business and develop a restructuring plan without the immediate threat of creditor actions.

4. What is a Plan of Compromise or Plan of Arrangement?

The Plan of Compromise or Plan of Arrangement is the core of the CCAA process. It’s a document that outlines how the company proposes to deal with its debts and restructure its business. It typically includes details on debt repayment, asset sales, equity conversions, and other measures.

5. How is a CCAA plan approved?

Creditors vote on the Plan. Approval usually requires a majority in number and two-thirds in value of each class of creditors. Even if creditors approve, the plan must be sanctioned (approved) by the court to become legally binding.

6. What is the role of the Monitor in a CCAA proceeding?

The Monitor is a court-appointed officer who oversees the CCAA process. They monitor the company’s finances and operations, assist in the development of the Plan, report to the court and stakeholders, and ensure compliance with court orders. They act as an impartial facilitator.

7. How does the CCAA differ from bankruptcy?

The CCAA is a restructuring process aimed at avoiding bankruptcy. It allows a company to continue operating while it works to resolve its financial problems. Bankruptcy, on the other hand, is a formal legal process where a company’s assets are liquidated to pay creditors.

8. What happens to shareholders in a CCAA process?

Shareholders are often affected by a CCAA restructuring. Their existing shares may be diluted or cancelled, and they may receive new shares in the restructured company. The specifics depend on the terms of the Plan.

9. How long does the CCAA process typically take?

The length of a CCAA process can vary significantly depending on the complexity of the case. It can take anywhere from a few months to several years.

10. Where can I find more information about the CCAA?

You can find more information about the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act on the website of the OSB which is the government agency responsible for overseeing insolvency proceedings in Canada. Consulting with a lawyer specializing in insolvency law is also highly recommended.

11. What is the difference between secured and unsecured creditors in a CCAA?

Secured creditors have a security interest in specific assets of the company (e.g., a mortgage on a building). Their claims are secured by these assets.
Unsecured creditors do not have a security interest. Their claims are not tied to any specific asset. They typically receive a lower recovery than secured creditors in a restructuring.

12. Can a CCAA plan affect employees?

Yes, a CCAA plan can affect employees. It may involve workforce reductions, changes to compensation and benefits, or modifications to collective bargaining agreements. Employee claims for wages owed are often given priority in a CCAA proceeding.

This FAQ provides a general overview of the CCAA. It’s essential to remember that each CCAA case is unique, and the specifics can vary significantly. Consulting with legal and financial professionals is crucial for anyone involved in a CCAA proceeding.

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Conclusion

Building a strategy early in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act process can significantly impact recovery outcomes for all types of creditors involved. By affirming your interests, engaging legal counsel, and learning from successful strategies, you can create a robust bankruptcy playbook. Don’t let the storm of bankruptcy catch you off guard. Take proactive measures now, and you may find yourself on the path to recovery.

I hope you enjoyed this Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern debt relief options to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief freedom using processes that are a bankruptcy alternative.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage.

Tags arrangement with creditors, bankruptcy protection proceedings, commencement of proceedings, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, Court-appointed Monitor, federal legislation, financial distress, financial statements, initial application, insolvent corporations, meeting of creditors, plan of arrangement, plan of compromise, restructuring proceedings, restructuring process, statutory requirements, trustee in bankruptcy, Winding-up and Restructuring Act

Brandon Blog Post

NAVIGATING CORP BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: OUR COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE FOR BUSINESS OWNERS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date December 2, 2024

corp bankruptcy

Corp Bankruptcy Introduction

Running a business can be tough. Sometimes, despite your best efforts, your company may face overwhelming financial difficulties. When business debts pile up and staying afloat seems impossible, it might be time to consider corp bankruptcy proceedings. This can be stressful and complex, but understanding your options is crucial for making the best decisions for your company and yourself.

This guide aims to demystify Canada’s different types of company insolvency proceedings. We’ll break down the intricacies of bankruptcy, Division I proposals, and receivership, providing clarity on their implications for debt resolution and your business’s future.

Understanding What Is Corp Bankruptcy

In Canada, corp bankruptcy, also known as commercial bankruptcy or business bankruptcy, is a legal process that allows the incorporated legal entity unable to pay their debts to seek relief by filing bankruptcy. It provides a framework for either liquidating the company and distributing assets to creditors or reorganizing the business to become financially stable again.

Corp bankruptcy is fundamentally different from personal bankruptcy, which pertains to individuals, including sole proprietorships and partnerships. While personal bankruptcy is designed to assist individuals in obtaining a fresh start by addressing their personal assets, corporate bankruptcy seeks to facilitate either an orderly dissolution of the company or its restructuring.

Navigating this process necessitates specialized knowledge. A Licensed Insolvency Trustee, who is a federally licensed professional, plays an essential role in guiding you through the proceedings. They ensure compliance with the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and other relevant regulations while effectively managing a variety of financial matters.

Types of Corp Bankruptcy Proceedings in Canada

Canadian law offers two primary avenues for addressing the corp bankruptcy process:

Liquidation

This involves closing down the business, selling its assets, and using the proceeds to pay creditors. It’s a final step, signifying the end of the company’s operations.

Reorganization

The objective of this initiative is to strategically restructure the company’s financial and operational frameworks, thereby ensuring its continued viability. Reorganization serves as a critical opportunity for businesses facing financial challenges, enabling them to navigate and potentially surmount their economic obstacles.

Let’s explore each type in greater detail.

Liquidation under Corp Bankruptcy

Liquidation is the process of winding up a company that can no longer meet its financial obligations. It follows a structured corporate bankruptcy process outlined in the BIA, which bears similarities to Chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code.

Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of liquidation:

Decision to File:
The board of directors makes the difficult decision to file for bankruptcy
. Assignment in Bankruptcy: A director, or the sole director, signs the required bankruptcy documents to make the company’s assignment into bankruptcy
Appointment of the Licensed Insolvency Trustee: An insolvency trustee is appointed to oversee the process.
Asset Transfer: All company assets are transferred to the Licensed Insolvency Trustee, which then manages and sells them. Distribution to Creditors: Proceeds from asset sales, after the cost of the corp bankruptcy proceedings, are distributed to creditors based on a predetermined legal priority.
Secured creditors, such as lenders with liens on company assets, generally have priority over unsecured creditors.
The company ceases to operate: Once assets are distributed, although the bankrupt corporation is not legally dissolved, it no longer operates.

Depending on whether the company is federally or provincially incorporated, eventually, the appropriate government authority will cancel the company’s charter.

Liquidation can be a challenging process, but it provides a structured way to wind down a company facing insurmountable financial difficulties and allows for a fair distribution of assets to creditors.

“The closure of a business doesn’t just impact balance sheets, it impacts lives.”

Reorganization: A Path to Recovery

Reorganization, often known as “bankruptcy protection,” provides struggling but viable businesses an opportunity to restructure their debts and operations, helping them avoid shutting down completely.

In Canada, there are two main legal options for corporate reorganization:

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA): This federal law is designed for larger corporations with debts over $5 million. The CCAA process is supervised by the court to ensure fairness and transparency.
Division I Proposal under the BIA: This option is geared towards smaller businesses that don’t meet the debt threshold required for the CCAA.

Both of these processes are similar to Chapter 11 reorganizations in the US Bankruptcy Code, offering a structured way for companies to get back on their feet.

The reorganization process generally follows these steps:

Filing for Protection: The company initiates the bankruptcy process by filing under the CCAA with the court or the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. A Licensed Insolvency Trustee is assigned to oversee the process, acting as either the Monitor for CCAA cases or the Proposal Trustee for Division I Proposals under the BIA.
Stay of Proceedings: Once the filing is done, the court grants a stay of proceedings. This means creditors are temporarily barred from starting or continuing any legal actions against the company while it works on its reorganization.
Plan Development: The company then creates a plan of arrangement (for CCAA) or a proposal (for BIA) that details how it plans to restructure its debts and operations.
Creditor Approval: The proposed plan is presented to the creditors, who must approve it. A two-thirds majority vote is needed for the plan to pass.
Court Approval: Finally, the court reviews the plan and must give its approval before the company can move forward with the implementation. This step is especially important for filings under the CCAA.

“Understanding your options is essential for financial clarity and future success.”

Division I Proposals vs. Bankruptcy: Understanding Key Legislation and the Nuances

Although both Division I proposals and bankruptcy fall under the umbrella of corp bankruptcy proceedings, they offer distinct approaches to dealing with financial distress.

Here’s a closer look at the key differences:

Feature	Division I Proposal	Bankruptcy
Eligibility	Smaller corporations (debt typically below $5	Any insolvent Any insolvent corporation
Court involvement	Less involved; primarily oversees the approval process	Potentially more involved in settling disputes
Flexibility	More flexible; allows for tailored debt restructuring plans	Less flexible; focuses on asset liquidation and distribution
Timeframe	Shorter timeframe for filing a plan	No specific timeframe
Outcome if rejected	Automatic bankruptcy	N/A
Cost	Can be more costly due to the need to restructure operations and negotiate with creditors	Cost depends on complexity and types of assets to be sold

Choosing the right path depends on your company’s specific circumstances, the severity of its financial troubles, and the potential for recovery.

Receivership: When Secured Creditors Take Action

Receivership is a legal process that empowers a receiver, which in Canada can only be a licensed insolvency practitioner, to take control of a company’s assets when it defaults on secured loans.

There are two types of receivership:

Private Receivership: The secured creditor appoints a receiver based on the terms of the security agreement, through an appointment letter.
Court-Appointed Receivership: The court appoints a receiver upon application, usually by a secured creditor.

The receiver has the authority to:

Take possession of corporate assets.
Manage the assets, potentially running the business temporarily.
Sell assets to recover the secured creditors’ debts, in order of priority.

The primary responsibility of a privately appointed receiver is to the appointing creditor. In contrast, a court-appointed receiver has a duty to all stakeholders and may be subject to court-imposed restrictions.

Receivership can be a powerful tool for secured creditors seeking to recover their funds, but it often results in the liquidation of the company. It may also occur concurrently with corp bankruptcy proceedings, especially when secured creditors hold significant claims against the company.

Corp Bankruptcy: Weighing the Pros and Cons

Each corp bankruptcy proceeding presents unique advantages and disadvantages. Let’s examine these for each option:

Advantages and Disadvantages of Liquidation

Advantages	Disadvantages
Provides a legal framework for businesses unable to pay their debts.	Results in the closure of the business.
Offers an orderly process for winding down the business.	This may lead to action taken due to personal liability for directors for specific debts.
Facilitates the fair distribution of assets to creditors based on their legal priority.	Can be a time-consuming and expensive process.
	Can negatively impact the reputation of the directors.

*Advantages and Dis**advantages of Reorganization*

Advantages	Disadvantages
Offers a chance to save the business and preserve jobs.	May not be successful, leading to eventual liquidation.
Provides an opportunity to improve profitability and efficiency.	Can negatively impact employee morale and customer confidence during the restructuring process.
Allows for the modernization of strategies and financial arrangements.	Requires a significant time investment and may cause cash flow challenges.
Can be conducted informally or formally through the BIA or CCAA.

“Reorganization aims to breathe new life into a struggling company.”

Advantages and Disadvantages of Receivership

Advantages	Disadvantages
Offers a direct and efficient method for secured creditors to recover their funds.	Focuses primarily on protecting the interests of the secured creditor, potentially neglecting the interests of other stakeholders.
May facilitate the sale of the business as a going concern, preserving jobs.	The receiver may face conflicts of interest between their duty to the appointing creditor and their duty to the company.

Corporate Recovery and Restructuring: Exploring Alternatives to Corp Bankruptcy in Canada With Other Potential Recovery Options

Before resorting to corp bankruptcy proceedings, it’s essential to explore alternative solutions that might help your company recover without resorting to formal legal processes.

Here are five alternatives to consider:

Cost-Cutting and Budgeting

Implement tighter spending controls and create a realistic cash flow budget. Identifying and eliminating unnecessary expenses can free up funds to address debt obligations.

Debt Refinancing

Consider looking into refinancing options to combine your current debts into a more manageable repayment plan. This could include discussing with your lenders to secure lower interest rates or longer repayment terms.

Shareholder Investment

Consider seeking additional investment from existing shareholders. This infusion of capital can bolster the company’s financial stability and allow it to meet its obligations.

Informal Debt Settlement

Engage in direct negotiations with creditors to reach an informal debt settlement agreement. This might involve proposing a reduced payment amount or a revised payment schedule.

Asset Sales

Evaluate the possibility of selling non-core assets to raise capital. This can provide immediate cash flow to address pressing debt payments and improve the company’s overall financial health.

Informal workouts, negotiated directly with creditors, often provide a more cost-effective and faster solution than formal corp bankruptcy proceedings. However, they require cooperation and flexibility from all parties involved.

If these alternatives prove insufficient, and the company has the potential for long-term viability, restructuring through the CCAA or a Division I proposal under the BIA becomes a viable option. However, if the company is deemed not viable, receivership may be the most appropriate course of action, especially for secured creditors.

Corp bankruptcy FAQs

What is the difference between “insolvency” and “bankruptcy” in Canada?

While the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct meanings under Canadian law. Insolvency is a financial state where a debtor is unable to pay their debts as they become due. This could be due to various reasons like business downturns or personal financial mismanagement.

Bankruptcy, on the other hand, is a legal process initiated when an insolvent person’s assets are transferred to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. The insolvency trustee then distributes these assets to creditors based on a priority order set by the BIA.

In simpler terms, insolvency is the financial condition, while bankruptcy is the legal process to address it.

What are the primary laws governing insolvency and bankruptcy laws in Canada?

Canada’s insolvency framework primarily comprises two federal statutes: The BIA: This Act applies to both personal and corporate bankruptcies. It outlines the procedures for filing for bankruptcy, governs insolvency trustee licensing, and dictates the distribution of a bankrupt entity’s assets among creditors. The CCAA: This Act provides a framework for restructuring insolvent companies with debts exceeding $5 million. It allows for the creation of a Plan of Arrangement to compromise with creditors or facilitate the sale of the business under court supervision.

What does the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) do?

The OSB is the federal agency that oversees bankruptcy processes in Canada. Its main responsibilities include:

Overseeing cases under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).
Making sure that the laws set out in the BIA and CCAA are followed.
Regulating Licensed Insolvency Trustees.
Keeping a public record of filings related to the BIA and CCAA.

4. What happens to a company’s operations when it files for bankruptcy?

Typically, day-to-day business operations cease upon filing for bankruptcy. A LIT takes control of the company’s assets, liquidates them, and distributes the proceeds to creditors based on the BIA’s priority rules.

Shareholders generally lose their investments, and directors may face personal liability for certain debts, depending on specific circumstances and provincial laws.

How does the Canadian insolvency system prioritize creditors?

The BIA establishes a specific order of priority for creditor claims:

Deemed trusts: Amounts like unremitted source deductions from employees and unremitted HST are held in trust for the Crown and are paid first.
Unpaid suppliers: Suppliers can reclaim unpaid goods delivered within a specific timeframe before bankruptcy.
Super-priorities: These include unpaid wages, pension contributions, and costs for environmental cleanup.
Secured claims: Creditors with security over specific assets are paid from the proceeds of those assets.
Preferred claims: Certain unsecured claims under section 136(1) of the BIA, such as administrative costs of the bankruptcy, are prioritized.
Ordinary unsecured claims: All other claims are paid proportionally from the remaining funds.

Can a company avoid bankruptcy in Canada?

Yes, alternatives to bankruptcy debt relief options are:

Proposal to Creditors (BIA): A company may propose a plan to restructure its debts and negotiate compromises with creditors. If this proposal is accepted by both the creditors and the court, the company can successfully avert bankruptcy.
Restructuring under the CCAA: Corporations with debts exceeding $5 million may seek court protection under the CCAA to undertake a restructuring of their operations and financial obligations.
Informal Arrangements: Companies have the option to engage in direct negotiations with creditors to establish informal agreements, which may include debt restructuring or payment deferrals.

What is receivership, and how does it relate to bankruptcy?

Receivership is a legal process where a secured creditor appoints a receiver to take control of a debtor’s assets, typically to enforce a security interest. This appointment can be made privately by the creditor or through a court order.

While receivership can happen at the same time as bankruptcy, it mainly aims to protect the interests of the secured creditor. The receiver may sell off assets to pay back the secured debt, whereas a trustee in bankruptcy oversees the distribution of assets to all creditors following the priorities set out in the BIA.

How can a foreign company with operations in Canada be affected by Canadian insolvency laws?

If a foreign company has assets or carries on business in Canada, it falls under the jurisdiction of Canadian insolvency laws like the BIA and CCAA. It can be subject to bankruptcy proceedings or restructuring efforts in Canada.

The BIA also has provisions for recognizing and cooperating with foreign insolvency proceedings, allowing for coordination between Canadian courts and foreign jurisdictions in cross-border insolvency cases.

Conclusion: Seeking Expert Guidance for Corp Bankruptcy

Navigating the complexities of corp bankruptcy in Canada demands a thorough understanding of the legal frameworks and available options. Bankruptcy, Division I proposals, and receivership each offer distinct paths with varying implications for debt resolution, business operations, and stakeholder interests.

Remember, seeking professional advice is paramount. A LIT and a qualified lawyer specializing in insolvency can provide expert guidance, ensuring you make informed decisions and protect your rights throughout the process. Early intervention and expert assistance can significantly improve the chances of a successful outcome, whether that means restructuring your company or navigating a controlled and dignified wind-down.

I hope you enjoyed this corp bankruptcy Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring due to distressed real estate or other reasons? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief freedom using processes that are a bankruptcy alternative.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

corp bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

CCAA PROTECTION FAQ: 10 EASY THINGS YOU MUST KNOW TO BE FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING SAVVY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 24, 2022

What is CCAA protection?

The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) allows insolvent companies owing creditors $5 million or more to seek CCAA protection. This can help them restructure their business and settle their debts over time. The CCAA gives such companies the ability to restructure their business affairs and financial obligations. In Canada, the CCAA operates under the authority of the federal government and is administered by the courts of each province.

If a debtor company owes less than $5 million, it can restructure under Part III Division I of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). This federal insolvency statute has streamlined procedures for handling insolvency restructuring cases. There’s no prohibition against using this statute if the company owes $5 million or more. Those larger companies just have a choice as to which statute to restructure under. This kind of restructuring is done in order to avoid liquidation through the filing of an Assignment in Bankruptcy. By successfully restructuring, the company can avoid job losses, claims by employees and the other negative effects of bankruptcy.

In this Brandon’s Blog post, I’ll be discussing CCAA protection for companies needing to go through a financial restructuring by making the Initial Application to the court. I’ll also be talking about a recent court decision that will be of interest to companies needing to restructure when their bank is demanding that all loans be repaid and they are trying to enforce their security.

Is CCAA protection the same thing as chapter 11?

Bankruptcy protection is a term closely associated with a US company filing under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. In Canada, it most likely means that the Canadian company has applied to a Canadian court to make its application for CCAA protection under the CCAA.

What is CCAA protection in Canada and “The Stay”?

Creditor protection under the CCAA is a process that provides companies with some relief from their creditors. This process can help them to reorganize their affairs and continue operations.

CCAA protection can provide some much-needed breathing room for companies that are struggling to stay afloat. It can give them time to restructure their affairs and come up with a plan to repay their creditors. A debtor company files its application for creditor protection in order to obtain an Initial Stay from the court. This will allow the company to begin restructuring its financial affairs.

While the CCAA protection order is in place, creditors are not allowed to take any action to recover money owed to them. They can’t try to seize the company’s property or petition the court for its bankruptcy, without the prior approval of the court. This is called the CCAA protection “stay of proceedings”.

A CCAA Canada filing is typically made when a business is insolvent and seeking to restructure its debts. The goal of the business in CCAA protection is to reach a satisfactory agreement with its creditors, which can include both secured and unsecured creditors. I will talk more about the support of secured creditors when I discuss the court case below.

Comeback hearing: Can CCAA Canada protection be extended?

Yes. Initial Order applications are often submitted on an urgent basis with prior notice only to key stakeholders such as senior lenders. Initial orders usually contain a “comeback” clause allowing stakeholders who did not receive initial notice an opportunity to attempt to change the terms of the CCAA protection order. Under the CCAA, Section 11.02(1) states that the Initial Order cannot be effective for more than 10 days.

The Canadian court system requires that there must be a “comeback hearing,” where interested parties can challenge aspects of the initial order, or even request additional relief before the order is extended. This means that the comeback hearing must be scheduled for within those 10 days. This ensures that the process moves forward promptly while protecting the interests of those involved. At the comeback hearing, the court will then assess the evidence before making a decision on whether or not to extend CCAA protection. If the court decides to extend protection, it will only do so for a limited amount of time.

The amount of time given will be at the discretion of the court and is definitely not open-ended. The company and its Monitor will be required to provide regular reports to the court detailing this progress.

The court will determine the next reporting period based on the information provided, which will allow the debtor company to continue its restructuring. The court may also be asked to make other orders, such as borrowing authority for financing the debtor company’s operations.

CCAA protection: What is the role of the Monitor?

The Monitor is the Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) appointed by the court to monitor the business and financial affairs of the debtor company in a CCAA proceeding. The LIT’s role is to ensure compliance with the law, court order(s), and terms of the debtor company restructuring plan.

The Court-appointed Monitor is responsible for assisting with the preparation of the restructuring plan, formally known as the Plan of Arrangement and sometimes referred to as a Plan of Compromise. Monitors act as financial advisors to the insolvent company and they also advise creditors on the claims process and oversee voting at each meeting of creditors.

A Monitor must submit regular reports to the court summarizing the debtor company’s activities and the progress of the case. This includes the claims process when they get to that point in the administration.

These reports are published online and are accessible to creditors and interested parties. One of the ongoing responsibilities of the Monitor in its reporting is to advise if, in the Monitor’s opinion, the debtor company under CCAA protection is continuing to act in good faith and carrying out its restructuring on a timely basis.

CCAA protection: The Plan of Arrangement or Compromise

The company usually begins talking with its creditors and investors right away after the initial order is made. To do this, it may end or give away unwanted and especially unprofitable contracts, fire employees, sell property, negotiate new credit terms, change its corporate structure, and take other restructuring steps to ensure the viability and profitability of the company.

The court will ultimately be asked to approve all major actions in order to allow the company to move towards a viable Plan of Arrangement it believes will garner the support of the necessary majority of creditors.

The Plan of Arrangement or Compromise is the proposal presented by a company to its creditors detailing how it intends to resolve the issues it is facing and how the amounts owed to creditors will be compromised, An arrangement is a broader term that encompasses any plan for reorganizing. The distinction between “compromise” and “arrangement” is in practice, immaterial.

Different creditors are often treated differently based on terms of priority. This affects the order and amount they will be paid under the restructuring plan.

The first step in a CCAA restructuring will be to prioritize any government claims that are considered trust claims. Next will be any new charges ordered by the court as part of the restructuring. Examples of such court-ordered charges are amounts owing under a Key Employee Retention Plan and the lender financing the company during the restructuring phase.

The pre-filing secured creditors are typically at the forefront next when it comes to recovering their funds. They may have security in the form of a general security agreement or mortgage.

Unsecured creditors are next in line for payment. These creditors have provided goods or services to the company on credit, without receiving any security in return. In retail insolvencies, the company under creditor protection has to decide as part of its business plan if it is going to treat customers who have paid deposits for items they have not yet picked up as unsecured creditors or if they will complete the sale providing value for the prior deposits.

Such differing priorities will influence how the Plan of Arrangement or Compromise is constructed.

CCAA protection and the financial statements of the debtor

When a company seeks CCAA protection from the court, they are required to submit a projected cash flow statement. This document projects the company’s expected revenue and expenses from ongoing business operations and any required financing over the next 12 months and is used to assess whether or not it can fund day-to-day operations and survive during the CCAA protection proceedings.

Furthermore, the company must provide copies of all financial statements issued during the one-year period prior to the date of the Initial Application. If none were issued during this time period, it should provide a copy of the most recent financial statement.

CCAA protection: Creditor approval of the Plan of Arrangement or Compromise

A company can establish separate classes of creditors to increase the chances of a favourable vote for the Plan of Compromise or Plan of Arrangement. There must be some form of shared characteristic or similarity amongst the creditors in each class in order to qualify for each such classification.

In addition to the simple majority test, the creditors in each class who are voting must vote in favour of it by at least 2/3 of the total value of the creditors voting in each class.

CCAA protection and court approval of the Plan of Arrangement or Compromise

The court may approve the Plan once they have been approved by each participating class of creditors. The Plan will include all negotiated compromises and arrangements that deal with any matter, including claims against directors and amendments to the articles of incorporation or letters patent incorporating the company,

A Plan cannot be approved by the court if a provision is not made for settling “super-priority” claims relating to:

compensation and reimbursement claims by employees other than officers and directors;
pension plan contributions (except where an agreement has been reached with the relevant pension regulator); and
unremitted employee source deductions from employee paycheques for taxes and other deductions.

Additionally, any equity claims cannot be authorized by the court through a compromise or arrangement until all other claims have been paid in full.

CCAA protection: You can access CCAA filing records and court documents through 2 sources

There are two ways to find CCAA filing records and court documents. The easiest way is to go to the Monitor’s website specifically set up for the CCAA case. All documents filed by the Monitor in court and all court orders will be there. The second source is the court file itself.

This leads us to the actual court case I mentioned at the very beginning of this CCAA protection blog post. It is a decision dated October 14, 2022, by the Honourable Justice MacDonald of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador in Bankruptcy and Insolvency. The case is Edward Collins Contracting Limited (Re), 2022 NLSC 149.

It is an application by a group of companies in the construction industry seeking an Initial CCAA protection Order for the debtor company. The case is notable for one factor: the companies’ main secured creditor, the Royal Bank of Canada, is opposing the application.

The companies were operating under a forbearance agreement. However, Royal Bank claims that they were in breach of their forbearance agreement and that the Bank should be allowed to have a Court-appointed Receiver. Although they did not provide any evidence in their material, in argument, the Bank claimed the companies were not acting in good faith.

The court ruled that if the companies’ application for CCAA protection is approved, then the Royal Bank of Canada’s application for a Court-appointed receiver is moot.

The court’s entire decision and His Honour’s thought process in considering all issues can be located online. Of specific relevance to me is His Honour’s thought process and careful consideration of all the points he must consider in deciding whether or not to grant the requested relief of CCAA protection.

The court considered the following:

Do the companies have proper standing under the CCAA?
Have the companies satisfied the test to allow the granting of grant an Initial Order?
If so, should the company’s conduct during the prior Consent Stay period cause it to refuse the Initial Order?

The court found that the CCAA applies to the debtor company and the affiliated debtor companies as they are all insolvent corporations or have committed an act of bankruptcy and owed their creditors in excess of $5 million. The court also found that the companies were entitled to CCAA protection from creditors and even the Royal Bank of Canada notwithstanding its opposition to the Initial Application and the granting of the Initial Order. The Initial Order was made.

You can read His Honour’s lengthy analysis if you wish, as it is very detailed and provides a great deal of insight.

You Owe Money—The CCAA protection

I hope you enjoyed this Brandon’s Blog on CCAA protection.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are now worried about its economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT OF CANADA TR1ES TO GIVE EVERYONE UNDENIABLE EQUITABLE TREATMENT

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 18, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada

What is the purpose of the Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act of Canada?

With all the talk of the economy, supply chain problems and the uncertainty of the future these days, it’s no wonder that many people aren’t sure how they will end up when things become “normal” again.

For Canadian people and businesses with too much debt, an insolvency proceeding under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada might just be the answer to getting back to a healthy stress-free life. Notwithstanding that using this federal statute can be a very effective strategy for managing financial difficulties, it is a very scary one that people do not like to talk about.

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada is based on the principle of balancing fairness, equity and a fresh start. A recent court decision in Saskatchewan exemplifies these principles. In this Brandon Blog, I describe a little bit about the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada, explain the court decision and how the court used these principles in reaching its decision.

What is in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada?

Canadian citizens, businesses, and companies who run into financial difficulties can turn to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada for assistance. This federal legislation contains the laws, rules, and guidelines that all involved parties must abide by. It details how different financial options work legally, and defines the roles of the various stakeholders – the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, the Licensed Insolvency Trustees, the debtor, and the secured creditors and unsecured creditors (both preferred and ordinary).

Despite the fact that provincial legislation in Canada may overlap or affect stakeholder rights, federal bankruptcy legislation has priority over provincial legislation in insolvency matters. Therefore, provincial governments cannot do indirectly what is prohibited directly. However, there are cases where provincial laws will still apply. The laws surrounding property exemptions and enforcement of court orders differ from province to province and territory to territory. These provincial and territorial regulations continue to apply even under bankruptcy laws.

It is the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada that governs all bankruptcies and proposals (either Division I or consumer proposals) in Canada. Receiverships are also governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada. The Laws of Canada – Bankruptcy and Insolvency, are meant to give the honest but unfortunate debtor, be it a person, business or company, a fresh start in life.

bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada

Growth in consumer proposals and business proposals

A person who files for the personal bankruptcy process submits an assignment in bankruptcy and related documents to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. These documents outline the person’s assets, liabilities, income, and expenses. An insolvent person’s reason for insolvency must also be included in the documents. Individuals typically give the reason for not being able to pay their bills in a timely manner. Consumer proposals require very similar documentation as bankruptcy, except for the assignment in bankruptcy document.

In order to file a Division I Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada, insolvent companies must describe their assets and liabilities and provide a realistic cash flow statement documenting how they intend to operate under the proposed insolvency process. They must also explain how they became insolvent. Personal insolvency is less complex than corporate insolvency.

Despite a long-term decline in individual bankruptcy filings, consumer proposals have gained in popularity among individuals. The decrease in bankruptcy filings and the increase in proposals can be attributed to several different reasons. Under a proposal, a financial reorganization or restructuring is what is done. Bankruptcy is simply a liquidation.

Regardless of whether it is a consumer proposal, a Division I proposal, or bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada governs these proceedings. The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, another federal government statute, governs reorganizations of very large corporations. This is especially true if there are separate insolvent corporations under the corporate umbrella in different countries, requiring foreign proceedings.

Why does one choose a consumer proposal instead of filing for bankruptcy?

A consumer proposal has many advantages over bankruptcy proceedings. By filing a consumer proposal, you’re able to retain the property you own such as your home, car, boat, etc. and extinguish all of your debts while only paying back a portion. A consumer proposal doesn’t require any of those items to be sold, as long as you can afford them with the monthly payment made under the proposal and your other living expenses.

Changing your lifestyle can help you get out of debt more quickly with a consumer proposal. Bankruptcy means losing everything, except for some assets that are exempt under provincial laws. You have equity if you do not fully encumber your assets by way of secured loans from financial institutions, your house, car, boat, furniture, clothing, jewelry, or anything else of value. You can keep this equity in a consumer proposal, but you will lose it in bankruptcy.

The main reason why people should attempt to perform a successful consumer proposal instead of going straight into bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada is because of this. As you will see in the recent court case I am about to describe, if you don’t pay close attention to how you conduct your affairs once you declare bankruptcy, you might be exposed to another minefield even after receiving your discharge.

bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada

**The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada case**

This judgment of the Registrar in Bankruptcy of the Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan was released on October 6, 2021. It is a relatively simple case, but it described so well the equitable nature of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada.

In this legal process case, there are two unsecured creditors who are the Applicants. They jointly loaned money to an individual debtor, who is now an insolvent debtor and a bankrupt individual on an unsecured basis. They also filed their proof of claim for this debt with the insolvency trustee. They then applied for an order pursuant to s. 69.4 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada lifting the bankruptcy stay that is in effect with regard to the bankrupt.

The purpose of section 69.3 is to prevent bankruptcy creditors from initiating or continuing enforcement proceedings against a bankrupt debtor. In bankruptcy, a creditor has no recourse against the debtor or the debtor’s property, and may not commence, continue, or seek any action for the recovery of money for a claim that is provable in the bankruptcy.

Nevertheless, Section 69.4 allows a court to lift the stay if it decides that the applicant has established that the continued operation of the stay is likely to cause material harm to him or her, or if there are other equitable grounds for lifting the stay.

**The case: How the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada works for fairness and equity**

The bankruptcy process generally compromises the debt obligation of the bankrupt, resulting in creditor claims run through the bankruptcy claims process. Generally, unsecured creditors lose their right to enforce their types of debts and, as a result, realize less than 100% of their debt. Some creditors do not receive anything from an estate in bankruptcy.

There are two major objectives of bankruptcy (and consumer proposal or commercial proposal) proceedings under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada. For one thing, it provides an equitable system for distributing the proceeds from the estate in bankruptcy among the bankrupt’s unsecured creditors. According to the laws Of Canada – bankruptcy and insolvency, unsecured creditors are expected to be treated predictably and fairly. However, it does not guarantee that creditors will receive a dividend in all cases.

Secondly, it is intended to give an honest but unfortunate bankrupt an opportunity to be freed from the crushing burden of debt and receive financial rehabilitation to become a contributing member of society. That is one reason why every person who does an insolvency filing must attend two financial counselling sessions.

In bankruptcy, an automatic stay allows the bankrupt to re-establish himself or herself financially and restart his or her financial affairs so that he or she can meet his or her credit obligations moving forward without being hampered by debt enforcement proceedings.

bankruptcy and insolvency act of canada

**The case: Role of unsecured creditors trying to lift the stay of proceedings**

The Registrar, in this case, followed the reasoning of a 2001 decision from the Court of Appeal for Ontario. It is far from routine to lift the stay, and therefore the court has to make sure that the reasons for lifting the stay are sound and consistent with the objectives of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada.

In the case of Mcculloch (Re), 2021 SKQB 259 (CanLII), the two creditors were alleging that Ms. Mcculloch induced them to loan her the money on a fraudulent basis. It was their argument that they should be allowed to continue legal action against the bankrupt so that they could prove in a separate court action that the debt was a result of fraud and that, therefore, their claim would survive the bankruptcy and her discharge. In addition, they stated that they would be more severely affected than the commercial creditors if the bankruptcy stay bars them from taking action against McCulloch.

According to the Registrar:

Bankruptcy often disproportionately affects individual creditors over commercial creditors. Generally, creditor relationships are based more on trust than on cost-benefit analysis. When advancing a loan, the commercial creditor such as a credit card company, unpaid suppliers, or a sophisticated secured creditor, generally assesses the risk and determines whether it can absorb the loss in the event of default. Individual lenders do not usually do this.
If this form of prejudice is sufficient to support lifting the stay, other individual creditors may be able to apply to lift the stay merely on the basis of relative disadvantage to individual creditors. Lifting the stay on this basis is inappropriate.
The Trustee objects to this application on the grounds that it will significantly increase the costs of bankruptcy administration at the expense of other creditors. In this case, the Registrar sided with the Trustee.
According to the lawyer representing the bankrupt, the creditors have not established any material prejudice or other equitable grounds for lifting the stay. The Registrar agreed.
Due to the potential cost increases to other creditors, the equities are opposed to lifting the stay.
However, these 2 creditors still have rights in the bankruptcy. The court still has the right to hear their submissions at the discharge hearing. Additionally, they continue to have the right to pursue Ms. McCulloch once the bankruptcy proceedings are over.
At this time, lifting the stay would not benefit the applicants or their creditor claims since during the bankruptcy, Ms. McCulloch’s either the bankruptcy vests her assets in the Trustee for the benefit of the creditors or remain exempt from execution under Saskatchewan law. This disposition of property makes it simply impossible for these creditors to realize much from this stage, prior to the bankrupt’s discharge.
In this case, the equity does not support the court’s exercise of its authority to declare that the bankruptcy stay, established under section 69.3 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada, does not apply to this litigation.

As a result, the Registrar denied the applicant’s request for what they thought was their legal rights in lifting the stay. Clearly, the Registrar was guided by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada‘s aims of fairness and equity to all stakeholders.

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada summary

I hope you enjoyed this Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada Brandon Blog post. Are you worried because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option? Call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Introduction

Overview of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act: An Overview Of This Lifeline For Canadian Businesses

Definition and Purpose of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

How the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Differs from Other Bankruptcy Processes

Key Objectives of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act For Canadian Businesses

Importance of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act in the Canadian Corporate Landscape

Role of Key Entities in the Companies’ Creditors Arragement Act Restructuring: The Monitor and the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy

The Monitor’s Responsibilities: Overseeing the Process

The Role of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy: Administrative Oversight

Procedural Components of The Initial Application: A Formal Request for Protection

Initial Filing Process

The Court’s Role: Granting the Initial Order

The Monitor’s Responsibilities: Oversight and Reporting

What Happens Next After The Initial Application and the issuance of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Initial Order?

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Procedural Components: Plan of Compromise or Arrangement Roadmap to Recovery

Rights and Remedies of Stakeholders: Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities in Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Proceedings

1. Board Members Rights: Navigating Fiduciary Duties

2. Employee Rights: Importance of Communication

3. Lender’s Rights: Minimizing Risks During Restructuring

4. Unsecured Creditors’ Rights: Minimizing Risks During Restructuring While Enforcing The Rights of Creditors

5. Shareholders Rights: You Are An Owner

Creating Your Bankruptcy Playbook: Proactive Measures for Creditors

How Legal Counsel Can Provide Leverage

Examples of Successful Creditor Strategies

The Risks of Inactivity During Bankruptcy Proceedings

Frequently Asked Questions about the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

1. What is the CCAA and when is it used?

2. Who is eligible to file for CCAA protection?

3. What is a “stay of proceedings” and why is it important?

4. What is a Plan of Compromise or Plan of Arrangement?

5. How is a CCAA plan approved?

6. What is the role of the Monitor in a CCAA proceeding?

7. How does the CCAA differ from bankruptcy?

8. What happens to shareholders in a CCAA process?

9. How long does the CCAA process typically take?

10. Where can I find more information about the CCAA?

11. What is the difference between secured and unsecured creditors in a CCAA?

12. Can a CCAA plan affect employees?

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Conclusion

Corp Bankruptcy Introduction

Understanding What Is Corp Bankruptcy

Types of Corp Bankruptcy Proceedings in Canada

Liquidation

Reorganization

Liquidation under Corp Bankruptcy

Reorganization: A Path to Recovery

Division I Proposals vs. Bankruptcy: Understanding Key Legislation and the Nuances

Receivership: When Secured Creditors Take Action

Corp Bankruptcy: Weighing the Pros and Cons

Advantages and Disadvantages of Liquidation

Advantages and Disadvantages of Reorganization

Advantages and Disadvantages of Receivership

Corporate Recovery and Restructuring: Exploring Alternatives to Corp Bankruptcy in Canada With Other Potential Recovery Options

Cost-Cutting and Budgeting

Debt Refinancing

Shareholder Investment

Informal Debt Settlement

Asset Sales

Corp bankruptcy FAQs

Conclusion: Seeking Expert Guidance for Corp Bankruptcy

What is CCAA protection?

Is CCAA protection the same thing as chapter 11?

What is CCAA protection in Canada and “The Stay”?

Comeback hearing: Can CCAA Canada protection be extended?

CCAA protection: What is the role of the Monitor?

CCAA protection: The Plan of Arrangement or Compromise

CCAA protection and the financial statements of the debtor

CCAA protection: Creditor approval of the Plan of Arrangement or Compromise

CCAA protection and court approval of the Plan of Arrangement or Compromise

CCAA protection: You can access CCAA filing records and court documents through 2 sources

You Owe Money—The CCAA protection

What is the purpose of the Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act of Canada?

What is in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada?

Growth in consumer proposals and business proposals

Why does one choose a consumer proposal instead of filing for bankruptcy?

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada case

The case: How the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada works for fairness and equity

The case: Role of unsecured creditors trying to lift the stay of proceedings

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada summary

*Advantages and Dis**advantages of Reorganization*

**The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada case**

**The case: How the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act of Canada works for fairness and equity**

**The case: Role of unsecured creditors trying to lift the stay of proceedings**