Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONDITIONAL DISCHARGE BANKRUPTCY COMPLETE GUIDE: IRA SMITH TRUSTEE TORONTO

As a Licensed Insolvency Trustee at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., I’ve guided many people through the bankruptcy process in the Greater Toronto Area. One of the most common questions I hear is: “What happens at my discharge hearing?” Recently, a significant Ontario court decision has shed new light on this crucial aspect of bankruptcy proceedings, particularly regarding conditional discharge orders.

This case is especially relevant when considering my recent blog posts. In my previous blog posts about the Toronto condo market and current issues in the Ontario mortgage default space, I’ve discussed how many people have found themselves in similar predicaments to the woman described in this recent decision.

Filing for bankruptcy may be a viable option for many people who are on the wrong end of a shortfall claim due to a failed real estate investment. Every person thinking about bankruptcy as a way to eliminate hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt must also consider the possibility that they may not get an absolute discharge from bankruptcy. This is what this case that I describe below highlights.

Today, I want to walk you through the detailed case of Re Xianglan Li, 2025 ONSC 5812. It illustrates what can happen when things go wrong in bankruptcy – and what you can learn from it to protect yourself.

Why Not All Discharges Are Absolute: Introducing Conditional Discharge

Before diving into the case details, let’s establish some fundamentals. When you file for bankruptcy in Canada under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada), the ultimate goal is to receive a discharge from bankruptcy – your legal release from most debts. However, not everyone receives an automatic discharge.

There are four types of discharge orders under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act:

  1. Absolute Discharge – You’re immediately released from your debts that can be discharged with no conditions
  2. Conditional Discharge – You must fulfill certain conditions (usually payment obligations) before being released from your debts
  3. Suspended Discharge – Your discharge is delayed for a specific period. A suspended discharge can be combined with conditions that also must be fulfilled, if appropriate. Otherwise, the person receives an absolute discharge after the suspension period expires.
  4. Refused Discharge – The court denies your discharge entirely (rare and only used in extreme cases)

A conditional discharge typically requires the bankrupt person to pay a certain amount of money to the trustee before being released from bankruptcy. This payment goes toward creditors’ claims and demonstrates a good-faith effort to repay at least some portion of the outstanding debts.

The Real Estate Speculation Case: A Cautionary Tale

The recent Ontario Superior Court decision in Re Xianglan Li provides valuable insights into how courts determine what kind of discharge order to grant, and whether it should be a conditional discharge, what conditions to impose, or should it be a different form of discharge.

The Background Story

Ms. Li’s bankruptcy story began with a failed real estate transaction in Richmond Hill, Ontario. In July 2017, she signed an Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) to buy a property for $1,435,607.67 – a significant investment by any measure, but not unusual for a home in the GTA. She paid deposits totalling $179,810.67, including upgrades.

Here’s where things get interesting: Ms. Li signed this agreement while her husband had just purchased another property four months earlier for $955,472.87. The new property she was planning to purchase cost approximately $480,000 more than the one her husband had just bought.

The real problem? The combined total of Ms. Li’s reported taxable income and that of her husband in 2017 was less than $20,000 – yet they were trying to purchase properties for a combined cost of over two million dollars. So either they had a lot of unreported income or they could never afford what they were trying to accomplish in real estate, or both.

When the closing date arrived in November 2018, Ms. Li couldn’t complete the purchase. The developer, Arista Homes, terminated the agreement, kept all deposits, and sued for damages totalling $281,421.39.

In April 2020, before a judgment was issued, Ms. Li filed for bankruptcy. It turns out that Arista was her only creditor in the bankruptcy. That is the Reader’s Digest version of a long, sordid tale.

Why This Matters for Toronto Area Residents

If you’ve been following real estate trends in the Greater Toronto Area, this story might sound familiar. It is a similar story to my prior blogs on the Toronto condo market and current issues in the Ontario mortgage default space.

The combination of rising interest rates, cooling real estate prices, and overextended purchasers has created a perfect storm. Many individuals who signed pre-construction purchase agreements during the hot market now cannot close on their properties.

A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge

What Happened at the Discharge Hearing Before the Registrar in Bankruptcy?

Ms. Li’s discharge hearing revealed several significant problems that led to a conditional discharge order rather than an absolute discharge.

Section 173(1) Facts: The Court’s Concerns

Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), Section 173(1) lists specific “facts” that, if proven, prevent the court from granting an absolute discharge. This section of Canada’s bankruptcy legislation lists facts for which discharge may be refused, suspended or granted conditionally. In Ms. Li’s case, the court found three such facts proven:

1. Section 173(1)(a) – Assets Not Equal to 50 Cents on the Dollar

This provision requires the bankrupt person to prove that their financial collapse arose from circumstances they cannot “justly be held responsible” for. Ms. Li couldn’t meet this burden.

The court found that Ms. Li had engaged in conduct similar to what the judge called “rash and hazardous speculation.” She had signed a $1.4 million purchase agreement without:

  • Consulting her husband
  • Considering how to finance the purchase
  • Having a reasonable income to support a mortgage qualification
  • Securing any form of financing commitment

As the court noted, she was “impulsive, naive and irresponsible in committing for a home purchase without any financial planning.”

2. Section 173(1)(e) – Rash and Hazardous Speculation

The court determined that Ms. Li’s conduct constituted “rash and hazardous speculation” under the BIA. The judge emphasized that this assessment must be made relative to the person’s financial circumstances.

For someone with Ms. Li’s paltry reported income to commit to purchasing a $1.4 million property was objectively rash and hazardous. Even if the real estate market had cooperated, there was no realistic path to securing mortgage financing with her income level.

3. Section 173(1)(o) – Failure to Perform Duties

Perhaps most damaging to Ms. Li’s case was the court’s finding that she failed to fulfill her duties as a bankrupt person. Under Section 158 of the BIA, bankrupts have various duties, including:

  • Deliver all books, records, and documents to the trustee
  • Make full disclosure of all property dispositions
  • Submit to examinations under oath
  • Aid the trustee to the utmost of their power

Ms. Li failed to complete the undertakings from her examination, leaving crucial questions unanswered about:

  • Bank account statements from relevant periods
  • Details of family loans and their sources
  • Contributions to previous mortgage payments
  • Disposition of proceeds from other property sales
  • Repaying a loan to a family in China

The court emphasized that bankrupts must “actively aid” the trustee, not “remain passive and hope that the financial storm would blow over.”

Conditional Discharge: The Doctrine of Avoiding Judgment Through Bankruptcy

One particularly important principle emerged from this case: courts don’t look favourably on people who use bankruptcy primarily to avoid paying a judgment claim.

The Supreme Court of Canada established in Kozack v. Richter, 1973 CanLII 166 (SCC), that when someone files for bankruptcy mainly to escape a judgment arising from their wrongful conduct, courts should impose meaningful payment conditions if the person can pay.

In Ms. Li’s situation, even though Arista hadn’t obtained a formal judgment before she filed for bankruptcy, it was clear that the lawsuit was the primary reason for her assignment into bankruptcy. The court considered this factor heavily in determining the appropriate conditions.

A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge

The Final Conditional Discharge Order: How the Court Decided

After reviewing all the evidence in this case, Associate Justice Ilchenko ordered a conditional discharge requiring Ms. Li to pay 10% of the proven claim, being $28,142.14, within 24 months.

This amounted to roughly 10 cents on the dollar of the total claim of $281,421.39. While this was significantly less than the 20-30% sought by Arista, it was also much more than the $5,000 recommended by the trustee.

The court balanced several competing considerations:

Factors Supporting a Lower Amount:

  • Ms. Li had already paid $179,810 in deposits that Arista kept
  • She earned a modest income as a bus driver ($64,974 in 2024)
  • She had some chronic medical conditions
  • She had tried to extend the closing date and complete the purchase

Factors Supporting a Higher Amount:

  • The proven Section 173((1) facts show poor judgment
  • The need to maintain the integrity of the bankruptcy system
  • Her failure to cooperate fully with the trustee
  • The public interest in commercial morality
  • Her age (51) and continued earning capacity

Conditional Discharge: Key Lessons for Anyone Considering Bankruptcy

This case offers several crucial lessons for anyone in the Greater Toronto Area or elsewhere in Ontario dealing with overwhelming debt:

1. Be Realistic About Real Estate Commitments

If you’re considering purchasing property – especially pre-construction condos or high-value homes – ensure you have:

  • Verified mortgage pre-approval from a qualified lender
  • Realistic assessment of your income and expenses
  • Contingency plans if market conditions change
  • Professional advice from mortgage brokers and real estate lawyers

Don’t rely on optimistic assumptions about future property value increases or income growth.

2. Cooperate Fully With Your Trustee

If you do file for bankruptcy, complete cooperation with your Licensed Insolvency Trustee is essential. This means:

  • Providing all requested documents promptly and completely
  • Answering all questions truthfully and thoroughly
  • Attending all required meetings and examinations
  • Disclosing all assets, income sources, and property dispositions
  • Responding to undertakings and follow-up requests
  • Attending the two mandatory bankruptcy and credit counselling sessions with the Licensed Insolvency Trustee under the Insolvency Counselling Program established by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada

Failure to cooperate can transform what might have been an absolute discharge into a conditional discharge – or even a refused discharge.

3. Understand Your Duties as a Bankrupt

The BIA imposes significant duties on anyone who files for bankruptcy. You’re not just passively waiting for discharge – you have active obligations to:

  • Aid the trustee in realizing your assets
  • Submit to examinations under oath
  • File all required tax returns
  • Report material changes in your financial situation
  • Attend financial counselling sessions

These aren’t optional suggestions – they’re legal requirements that the court takes very seriously.

4. Consider Consumer Proposals as an Alternative

Many people in situations similar to Ms. Li’s might be better served by filing a consumer proposal rather than bankruptcy. A consumer proposal allows you to:

  • Negotiate a settlement with creditors for less than 100% of your debts
  • Keep control of your assets
  • Avoid some of the restrictions that apply to bankrupts
  • Make predictable monthly payments over up to five years

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we often find that consumer proposals, or for those with debts greater than $250,000, not including any mortgages or lines of credit secured against your personal residence, a Division I Proposal under the BIA, provide better outcomes for clients, particularly those arising from failed real estate transactions.

5. Document Everything

If you’re involved in property transactions that later fail, maintain meticulous records of:

  • All agreements and amendments
  • Payment receipts and bank statements
  • Communications with developers or sellers
  • Financial advice you received
  • The efforts you made to complete transactions

This documentation becomes crucial if you later need to demonstrate that your financial difficulties arose from circumstances beyond your control.

A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge

The Current Real Estate Reality in the GTA

As I discussed in my blog about mortgage default, we’re seeing increasing numbers of people facing similar challenges to Ms. Li’s situation.

The combination of:

  • Higher interest rates
  • Stricter mortgage qualification rules
  • Declining property values
  • Economic uncertainty
  • Job market volatility

…has created a situation where many pre-construction purchasers simply cannot close on their agreements.

If you signed a pre-construction purchase agreement during the hot market of 2020-2022, you may now be facing:

  • Inability to qualify for necessary mortgage financing
  • Property values below your purchase price
  • Difficulty selling your current home to fund the new purchase
  • Developer demands for additional deposits or price increases

These situations require professional guidance from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee who understands both insolvency law and real estate market realities.

Life After Conditional Discharge: Rebuilding Your Financial Future

If you receive a conditional discharge in bankruptcy, here’s what you need to know:

You Remain Bankrupt Until Conditions Are Met

A conditional discharge doesn’t release you from bankruptcy immediately. You remain an undischarged bankrupt with all associated restrictions and obligations until you fulfill the court-ordered conditions.

This means:

  • You cannot obtain credit over $1,000 without disclosing your bankruptcy
  • You cannot act as a director of a corporation
  • You may face professional restrictions depending on your occupation
  • You must continue reporting income and expenses to your trustee

Payment Terms Are Usually Flexible

Courts typically give reasonable time periods to fulfill payment conditions – often 12 to 24 months. Section 172(3) of the BIA does allow for modifying a conditional discharge order.

If you face genuine hardship preventing payment, you can apply to the court to vary the terms. However, you must demonstrate that you’ve made reasonable efforts and that circumstances beyond your control prevent compliance. Also, you cannot even apply for such relief until at least 1 year after the date the conditional discharge order was made.

Your Credit Report Is Affected

A conditional discharge appears on your credit report differently from an absolute discharge. The bankruptcy notation expiry time period cannot even begin until you satisfy the conditions and receive your discharge certificate.

This can affect:

  • Your ability to obtain credit
  • Employment opportunities in the financial sector
  • Professional licensing in certain fields
  • Your credit score and borrowing costs

You Can Rebuild Afterward

Once you fulfill the conditions and receive your discharge, you can begin rebuilding your financial life. While the bankruptcy remains on your credit report for six to seven years from discharge, many people successfully rebuild credit within two to three years through:

  • Secured credit cards
  • Small installment loans
  • Consistent bill payment history
  • Steady employment and income
  • Financial counselling and budgeting

    A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
    conditional discharge

When to Seek Professional Help

If you’re facing financial difficulties related to real estate commitments or mounting debts for any other reason, and are considering a potential bankruptcy, don’t wait until the situation becomes critical.

Warning Signs You Need Help Now

Contact a Licensed Insolvency Trustee immediately if you’re experiencing:

  1. Inability to make mortgage or rent payments
  2. Collection calls from creditors or legal proceedings
  3. Using credit cards or loans to pay basic living expenses
  4. Considering withdrawing RRSP funds to pay debts
  5. Losing sleep or experiencing stress-related health problems due to debt
  6. Contemplating a consumer proposal or bankruptcy

What We Can Do for You

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we provide comprehensive debt relief services for individuals and businesses throughout the Greater Toronto Area, including:

  • Free Initial Consultations – We’ll review your complete financial situation and explain all available options
  • Consumer Proposals – We’ll negotiate with creditors to reduce your debt and create affordable payment plans
  • Personal Bankruptcy Filings – We’ll guide you through the entire bankruptcy process professionally and compassionately
  • Credit Counselling – We’ll help you understand what went wrong and develop strategies to avoid future problems
  • Business Restructuring – For entrepreneurs, we offer financial restructuring through commercial proposal services to save your business and the jobs you create

Our team understands the unique challenges facing Greater Toronto Area residents dealing with high housing costs, challenging economic conditions, and complex debt situations.

The Importance of Choosing the Right Trustee

Choosing an experienced, knowledgeable Licensed Insolvency Trustee matters so much. The relationship between the trustee’s recommendations and the court’s final order can significantly impact your outcome.

When selecting a trustee, look for:

  • Experience with similar cases – Has the trustee handled situations like yours?
  • Clear communication – Do they explain complex legal concepts in understandable terms?
  • Comprehensive service – Do they offer alternatives to bankruptcy like consumer proposals?
  • Local knowledge – Do they understand the specific challenges in your community?
  • Professional reputation – What do other clients and legal professionals say about them, such as in Google reviews
A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge

Moving Forward, Your Next Steps

If you’re dealing with overwhelming debt, potential mortgage default, or considering bankruptcy, here’s what to do next:

Step 1: Gather Your Financial Information

Collect documentation, including:

  • Recent pay stubs and tax returns
  • List of all debts with balances and payment terms
  • Monthly expense breakdown
  • Asset list with current values
  • Mortgage statements and property tax bills
  • Any legal documents, like demand letters or court papers
  • All of this information can be captured by completing our Debt Relief Worksheet

Step 2: Schedule a Free Consultation

Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We offer both video and in-person meetings. We’ll review your situation and explain your options clearly, including:

  • Whether bankruptcy is necessary or if alternatives exist
  • What type of discharge might you expect
  • How to avoid a conditional discharge if possible
  • Timeline and costs for each option
  • Impact on your family, employment, and future

Step 3: Make an Informed Decision

After understanding all options, you can make the choice that’s right for your situation. We’ll never pressure you – our role is to provide expert advice and support whatever decision you make.

Step 4: Take Action

Once you’ve decided on a path forward, we’ll handle all the legal requirements, court filings, and creditor communications. You’ll have experienced professionals managing every aspect of your case.

Conditional Discharge Conclusion: Learning from Others’ Experiences and Embracing the Path to a Bright Financial Future

The case of Ms. Li’s conditional discharge offers important lessons for anyone struggling with debt in the Greater Toronto Area. While her situation involved failed real estate transactions, the principles apply broadly:

  • Be realistic about your financial capacity before making major commitments
  • Cooperate fully with professionals trying to help you
  • Understand your legal duties and responsibilities
  • Seek expert advice early, before problems become crises
  • Choose experienced professionals to guide you through difficult processes

A conditional discharge isn’t the end of the world – it’s a manageable step toward financial recovery. However, the best approach is avoiding situations that might lead to bankruptcy in the first place, or choosing alternatives like consumer proposals when appropriate.

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we’ve helped many individuals and families in the Greater Toronto Area successfully navigate financial difficulties and emerge with a fresh start. Whether you’re facing mortgage default, overwhelming consumer debts, failed business ventures, or other financial challenges, we’re here to help. You can also visit our Google Business Profile to learn more about our services and read client testimonials.

Don’t let financial stress control your life. Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for a free, confidential consultation. Call us at (647) 799-3312 to discuss your options with an experienced Licensed Insolvency Trustee who truly cares about your future, Starting Over Starting Now.

Remember: seeking help isn’t a sign of failure – it’s a smart step toward financial recovery and peace of mind. Let us help you find the right path forward.

The information provided in this blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., and any contributors do not assume any liability for any loss or damage.


Brandon Smith is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and Senior Vice-President at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., serving individuals and businesses throughout the Greater Toronto Area. With years of experience in insolvency cases, including financial restructuring, Brandon helps clients navigate complex financial challenges and find sustainable solutions, Starting Over Starting Now.

A male licensed insolvency trustee in smart casual attire points to financial documents, smiling encouragingly at a relieved female client, as they discuss conditional discharge in a bright Toronto office with the cityscape visible through large windows.
conditional discharge
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

COMMERCIAL TENANCIES ACT ONTARIO AND THE BANKRUPT TENANT: THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO HAPPILY LOCking IN A LANDLORD’S CLAIM

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario: Introduction

On October 28, 2020, the Court of Appeal For Ontario clarified the interplay between the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) when a commercial tenant in Ontario goes bankrupt.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I describe what the appellate court decided in the 7636156 Canada Inc. (Re), 2020 ONCA 681 (CanLII) case. I also discuss what it means for commercial landlords when one of its tenants goes bankrupt and what the relationship is between the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario and the BIA.

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario: The facts

The facts were not in dispute. On May 1, 2018, the corporate tenant filed for bankruptcy and the Trustee was appointed. On July 23, 2018, the Trustee disclaimed the lease on the commercial premises.

One of the schedules for the commercial lease required the tenant to lodge a letter of credit (LOC) in the amount of $2.5 million in favour of the landlord. The LOC was to have an initial term of one year, renewed each year on an automated basis until 60 days after the expiry of the lease’s term. It was stipulated that the LOC is to continue to stand as protection for the landlord in case the tenant ended up being bankrupt.

According to the lease, the tenant provided the LOC. It was an irrevocable standby LOC issued by The Bank Of Nova Scotia (BNS) for the $2.5 million amount in favour of the landlord. The LOC had been renewed annually before the date of bankruptcy.

To get the LOC, the tenant put up money collateral in the amount of $2.5 million to BNS which was invested in a BNS GIC. BNS took security against the company and registered a financing statement under the Personal Property Security Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.10. The security was good and valid as against the Trustee. The Trustee was in agreement that the security was valid.

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario: The landlord draws against the LOC

As of the bankruptcy date, there were no arrears of rent owing under the lease. Since the commercial tenant was bankrupt, the landlord made 3 claims on the LOC. These three claims totalled the full $2.5 million LOC value.

The initial draw, in the amount of $207,732.28, was made on May 16, 2018, before the Trustee disclaimed its interest in the commercial lease. Under the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario, the Trustee has the right to occupy the premises for 3 months from the date of bankruptcy, if it wishes. By the end of the 3 months, whether the Trustee occupied or not, it must either disclaim its interest in the lease or adopt it and assign it to a purchaser.

The opportunity to sell the lease would happen if the rented commercial premises are in a sought after location and the lease has value in it. A lease can have value if it is at a rental rate below the market rent at the date of bankruptcy.

The 2nd draw, in the amount of $1,709,768.40, occurred on December 4, 2018. The 3rd claim against the LOC, in the amount of $582,499.32, was made on April 2, 2019.

The LOC draws covered the losses asserted by the landlord as follows:

  • $207,732.28 being the rent for May 2018;
  • $1,621,160.72 for rent for the months of August 2018 to April 2019, inclusive;
  • $368,479 for the unamortized cost for the landlord allowance as included in the lease, inclusive of interest; and
  • $302,628 for restoring the premises, as allowed for in the lease.

In support of each demand against the LOC, the landlord gave BNS the required certificate verifying the debt of the tenant under the lease. The landlord was the beneficiary under the LOC for the debt of the tenant, for which repayment was demanded from the tenant and not paid.

BNS accepted the landlord’s draw claims under the LOC and paid the complete amount of the LOC to the landlord. BNS never asked the landlord to return the funds paid.

The landlord believed that it was entitled to the funds under the lease drawn up in accordance with the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario. BNS also believed that the landlord fulfilled its requirements to receive payment under the LOC from BNS.

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario: The landlord’s proof of claim

The landlord knew how to complete form 31 proof of claim and filed it with the Trustee. The landlord filed for a preferred claim in the amount of $623,196.84. The preferred claim was for 3 months’ accelerated rent: May, June, and July 2018. The landlord’s proof of claim also attached a schedule showing the calculations.

In Ontario, a landlord’s preferred claim for rent in case of a commercial tenant’s bankruptcy is limited: a maximum of 3 months’ pre-bankruptcy arrears as well as for accelerated rent, a 3-month post-bankruptcy claim.

The right to accelerated rent must be stipulated in the lease. Further, the landlord’s entire preferred claim is limited to the value of the bankrupt company’s property on the premises, after the claims of trust claimants or secured creditors.

All these rights are laid out in the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario.

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario: The Trustee’s disallowance of the landlord’s proof of claim

The Trustee disallowed the landlord’s proof of claim, stating that the landlord’s preferred claim for three months’ accelerated rent had been paid by the landlord’s draws against the LOC.

The disallowance also stated that:

  • the funds used to pay the landlord from the LOC originated from funds that came from the bankrupt tenant;
  • the LOC was to be reduced prior to the date of bankruptcy; and
  • the landlord did not include proper support for its case for further damages in regard to the tenant’s obligations under the commercial lease.

The Trustee’s position that the LOC should have been reduced in amount is not important for the purpose of this Brandon’s Blog. I won’t spend any time on it other than to tell you that the court did not agree with the Trustee’s position.

commercial tenancies act ontario
commercial tenancies act ontario

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario: The landlord appeals

The landlord appealed the disallowance to the Registrar in Bankruptcy. The Registrar permitted the landlord’s appeal partly. She held that considering that the landlord had drawn on the LOC for the May 2018 rent, the Trustee appropriately disallowed the preferred claim for the month of May.

However, she further determined that the landlord was correct in its accelerated rent claim for the other two months. The landlord could look for payment from the bankruptcy estate or from the LOC. According to the Registrar, the Trustee therefore incorrectly refused the preferred claim for those other two months.

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario: The Trustee’s motion to a judge

The Trustee wasn’t finished debating about the landlord’s rights to claim against the entire LOC given the Trustee’s disclaimer of the lease, the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario and the BIA. The Trustee made a motion to the court to determine what amount from the LOC the landlord was entitled to. The Trustee’s position was that the landlord was not entitled to the full amount of the LOC. Since the security for the LOC was funding from the company, any excess not required by BNS should be paid to the Trustee.

The parties’ positions that they laid out in their respective materials were largely what was already before the Master. The motion judge concluded that the landlord was only entitled to make use of the LOC for the 3 months’ accelerated rent.

The judge’s reasoning was:

  • a disclaimer of the lease by a trustee in bankruptcy is the same as a voluntary abandonment of the lease by the occupant under the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario with the consent of the landlord. This snuffs out all obligations of the tenant under the commercial lease;
  • he turned down the landlord’s submissions that the independent obligation of BNS to it under the LOC meant that the funds coming from the LOC were not the property of the bankrupt and therefore not payable to the Trustee;
  • that upon the disclaimer of a lease by a Trustee, a bankrupt commercial tenant does not owe any amounts to the landlord. Therefore, the landlord cannot make use of the LOC for any claim other than the 3 months of rent arrears and the 3 months of accelerated rent; and
  • that the obligation of BNS, under the LOC, to make payment to the landlord beneficiary is limited to the amount owing by the commercial tenant under the lease. As he ruled that from the disclaimer the tenant’s only obligation was for the rent arrears and the accelerated rent, therefore, the landlord could not claim any other amounts against the LOC.

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario: The landlord appeals to the Court of Appeal For Ontario

The question before the appellate court that I want to discuss is, did the judge err in holding that, upon the disclaimer of the lease by the Trustee, the landlord was not qualified to make use of the LOC other than for the amount of its preferred claim?

The decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in considering this case and the interplay between the BIA and the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario clarified exactly what it means when a Trustee issues a disclaimer of lease and what the contractual relationship around the LOC means.

The Trustee argued that when it disclaimed the lease, the landlord was thereupon stopped from making use of the LOC for any amount other than the amount of its preferred claim. The Trustee contended that such a concept of insolvency legislation overrides the autonomy principle for a LOC and therefore limits the lawful amount the landlord could draw.

The Court of Appeal For Ontario made certain findings relating to a disclaimer of lease by a Trustee as follows:

  • The disclaimer under the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario is for the sole benefit of the bankrupt commercial tenant.
  • While a disclaimer operates to finish the bankrupt tenant’s responsibilities under the lease, the disclaimer cannot be interpreted to be a consensual surrender for all purposes (emphasis added).
  • A Trustee’s disclaimer of a bankrupt tenant’s lease ends the legal rights of the landlord against the bankrupt tenant’s estate relative to the unexpired term of the lease, aside from the three months’ accelerated rent claim under the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario and the BIA.

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario: The landlord has a LOC on things

The appellate court recognized that the ability of the landlord to rely upon the LOC for more than just its preferred claim depends on the wording of the lease. In this case, the lease stated that the LOC functions as safety and security for indemnification of the landlord for losses:

“resulting from any termination, surrender, disclaimer or repudiation of this lease … in connection with any insolvency and bankruptcy or otherwise” and that the Landlord’s rights in respect of the LOC were not affected by the disclaimer of the Lease in any bankruptcy proceeding but would “continue with respect to the periods prior thereto and thereafter as if the Lease had not been surrendered, disclaimed, repudiated or terminated.”

Further, one of the terms of the LOC was that it will not be released, discharged or affected by the bankruptcy of the commercial tenant or the disclaimer of the lease.

The appellate court also went on to state that the motion judge’s decision runs counter to a standard principle relevant to LOCs. That is that providing financial institutions, such as BNS, have an independent responsibility to make a settlement to the beneficiary. The LOC is a contract between BNS and the landlord. It is regulated by the principle of the freedom or autonomy of LOCs, not by the BIA or the Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario.

Under the freedom principle, the issuer needs to pay the beneficiary upon appropriate qualification, subject to the minimal exemption for fraud which was not found in this case.

So with a properly worded lease and a properly worded LOC as security, the landlord can call on the LOC for all claims against the bankrupt commercial tenant after a Trustee disclaims its interest in the lease. With these facts, the landlord was successful in being able to claim everything it was owed, up to the limit of the LOC.

Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario summary

I hope you have enjoyed this Commercial Tenancies Act Ontario Brandon’s Blog. A sick insolvent company’s business can be saved by a debt restructuring.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

commercial tenancies act ontario
commercial tenancies act ontario
Call a Trustee Now!