priority Archives - Ira SmithTrustee & Receiver Inc.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency claim: Introduction

Section 227 (4) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (ITA) and the mirrored provisions in the Employment Insurance Act (Canada), create deemed trusts against the property of a tax debtor. When a tax debtor doesn’t remit employee source deductions or HST collections, a deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim arises.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency claim: Parts of the Initial Order

In every Court-supervised restructuring under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), there are several standard provisions in the Initial Order issued by the Court. In addition to the stay of proceedings provision, there’s also the need to make sure that the insolvent company has:

sufficient debtor in possession (DIP) funding to survive the restructuring process;
the Directors incentivized to stay in their capacity; and
the services of the Court-appointed Monitor and its legal counsel properly retained.

The normal way of achieving this is to give Court-ordered priority charges. Examples are for the borrowing authority, the Directors’ Charge and the Administrative Charge. This is so the lender, the Directors and the Court-appointed Monitor and its legal counsel know that there is a source of (re)payment.

Priority charges are made when certain affected parties may not be represented in Court. Therefore, a standard “comeback clause” is also in the standard Initial Order. This allows any affected party to make a motion before the Court to amend such Court-ordered priority charges.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency claim: The Canada North Group Inc. decision

A decision was recently released by the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Canada North Group Inc. (Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act), 2017 ABQB 550. The Court case reviewed several issues, but the one I found most interesting was one specific question. Can Court-ordered priority charges under a CCAA restructuring prime the deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim?

The decision goes through a very interesting analysis as to whether a deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim provides Her Majesty with the ownership of the property of the company or is merely a secured interest in the property. Section 227 (4) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the mirrored provisions in Employment Insurance Act (Canada), create deemed trusts. Section 37(2) of the CCAA explicitly preserves their operation. Specifically, can Court-ordered priority charges under a CCAA restructuring prime the deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency claim: Section 227(4.1) of the ITA

Section 227(4.1) of the ITA states:

“Extension of trust

(4.1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (except sections 81.1 and 81.2 of that Act), any other enactment of Canada, any enactment of a province or any other law, where at any time an amount deemed by subsection 227(4) to be held by a person in trust for Her Majesty is not paid to Her Majesty in the way and when provided under this Act, property of the person and property held by any secured creditor (as defined in subsection 224(1.3)) of that person that but for a security interest (as defined in subsection 224(1.3)) would be property of the person, equal in value to the amount so deemed to be held in trust is deemed

(a) to be held, from the time the amount was deducted or withheld by the person, separate and apart from the property of the person, in trust for Her Majesty whether or not the property is subject to such a security interest, and

(b) to form no part of the estate or property of the person from the time the amount was so deducted or withheld, whether or not the property has in fact been kept separate and apart from the estate or property of the person and whether or not the property is subject to such a security interest

and is property beneficially owned by Her Majesty despite of any security interest in such property and in their proceeds, and the proceeds of such property shall be paid to the Receiver General in priority to all such security interests.”

deemed trust canada revenue agency claim

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: What is the nature of Canada Revenue Agency’s interest?

The Court raised, amongst other things, the following two questions:

What is the nature of Canada Revenue Agency’s interest?
Does the statutory secured status deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim elevate it above a priority charge?

Canada Revenue Agency relied on the trust provisions in the Fiscal Statutes. It argued that it holds a proprietary and not secured interest in the debtor’s property. Key to its position under its deemed trust claim is the concluding phrase in s 227(4.1) described above.

Canada Revenue Agency asserted that these words take it beyond a mere secured creditor. They stated it was so because they do not just consider the Crown to be the owner of the interest. Rather, the statute says that it is the owner. However, previous decisions in Canada have found that the deemed trust is not in truth a real one as the subject of the trust cannot be identified from the date of creation of the trust.

The Court also stated that, in principle, the deemed trust is similar to a floating charge over all the assets of the tax debtor. This is because the tax debtor is free to deal with its property. When it does, the trust releases the disposed-of property and attaches to the proceeds of sale. To find otherwise would freeze the tax debtor’s assets and prevent it from carrying on business. The Court found that this was not a result intended by Parliament.

The Court concluded that Canada Revenue Agency’s interest is a security interest, not a proprietary interest.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: Can the statutory deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim be raised?

The Court stated that it may seem that certain sections of the CCAA conflict with the deemed trust sections in the Fiscal Statutes on a strict reading of only the above-noted section of the ITA. That is what Canada Revenue Agency did to support its interpretation.

However, the Court went on to say that one must not read these provisions in a vacuüm. The Fiscal Statutes, the BIA, and the CCAA are part of complex legislative schemes that run concurrently. They must be read in their entire context. The aims of the statutes and Parliament’s intention kept in mind.

The Court agreed with earlier cases that the purpose of the CCAA is to let the debtor to continue to carry on business and, where possible, avoid the social and economic costs of liquidating its assets. The Court also stated that the CCAA legislation is remedial in the purest sense. It provides a means whereby the devastating social and economic effects of bankruptcy or creditor initiated termination of business operations can be avoided. It allows for a Court-supervised attempt to reorganize the financial affairs of the company.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: The Supreme Court of Canada on the Indalex deemed trust

Following the Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Indalex deemed trust decision, the Court agreed that the securing of the DIP facility is a key aspect of the debtor’s ability to attempt a workout. The harsh reality is that commercial imperatives govern the lending practices of the lenders, not the interests of the policy considerations that lead the government to legislate in its favour.

The Court also found that the priority charges aid in the restructuring process. Certain examples of such priority charges are:

Interim DIP lender’s charge providing both an incentive and guarantee to the lender the recovery of funds advanced during the restructuring.
The priority charge in favour of Directors is important. The charge keeps the captains aboard the sinking ship. Without the benefit of this charge, directors might abandon the ship.
A priority charge for administrative fees is critical to a successful restructuring. It is the only protection the Court-appointed Monitor and its legal counsel have to make sure that their bills are paid.

Further, the Court found that the Section 11.52(2) of the CCAA codifies and elaborates on priority charges. Previously, the Court used its inherent jurisdiction in granting priority charges. The Court found that this shows Parliament’s intention that secured creditors’ interests could be eroded if the Court felt the need.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: The Court’s Decision

The Court stated that Canada Revenue Agency’s position that the deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim cannot be primed, fails to reconcile that the goal of the Canadian insolvency restructuring regime and Parliament’s continued commitment to facilitating complex corporate CCAA restructurings, even if it requires erosion of security.

For this and the other reasons listed above, the Court determined that the CCAA gives the Court the ability to rank the priority charges ahead of the deemed trust Canada Revenue Agency claim and the resultant security interest.

Deemed Trust Canada Revenue Agency Claim: Is Your Company In Need of Financial Restructuring?

The CCAA’s aim is to help business survival and avoid the multiple traumas caused by business failure. The Ira Smith Team have decades of experience in both complex personal and corporate financial restructurings.

If you or your company cannot survive without a restructuring, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. NOW for a free consultation. You are just one phone call away from getting back on the road to financial health and reducing your stress levels, Starting Over, Starting Now.

UPDATE: CHECK OUT OUR NEW VLOG BY CLICKING ON:

SEARS CANADA IS CLOSING: THE #1 REASON YOU HAVE TO RUN AND NOT JUST WALK TO REDEEM YOUR GIFT CARDS AND CREDITS

deemed trust canada revenue agency claim

INSOLVENT ESTATES CANADA

Insolvent estates Canada: Introduction

We previously discussed the aspect of death and insolvency in two blog posts:

When it comes to insolvent estates Canada, among the various questions asked of us, these three questions are always asked:

What are the duties of an executor/personal representative when the estate has more liabilities than assets?
Can the executor(s) pay bills before the creditors actually file a claim?
Do executors or beneficiaries have to pay creditors out of their own pocket if the estate is insolvent?

We prepared the above video to answer these 3 questions. Below is a more detailed discussion of the last 2 questions.

Insolvent estates Canada: The loss of life of a debtor occurs; who’s responsible for the money owed?

Although some creditors may try to collect from the spouse or other relatives, money owed doesn’t transfer because of marriage or death. If the debt is “joint”, the survivor has taken on the obligation directly and is liable on the account.

Debts are normally paid out of the assets of the property of the deceased before distributions to heirs (before paying heirs, the deceased’s debts must be paid). If the estate is insolvent (the assets of the estate are not enough to pay the amounts owed), then the order of charge is commonly prescribed by way of provincial rules.

If warranted, the executors could apply to Court for an order letting them assign the deceased’s estate into bankruptcy. In that situation, then the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (“BIA”), the federal legislation, will prescribe the order of payment.

If insurance was bought to pay off a specific debt such as a bank issued mortgage or loan, then upon the death of the individual the insurance company will repay the bank and the debt will not exist in the deceased’s estate.

What are your alternatives and your responsibilities, as an executor upon the death of a debtor?

If the estate is insolvent, before or after paying the testamentary costs, you have alternatives:

Pay the money owed out of your personal resources.
Allow the estate to go bankrupt.

Emotionally you may wish to pay the money owed because you believe in your heart that it is the proper thing to do and you don’t wish to dishonour the memory of your loved one with a string of bad debts and bankruptcy. But before you decide, you need to know that there is no liability for an executor or heir to take on the debts of the deceased.

Even though there may be a stigma connected to bankruptcy, the reality is that you are not responsible for the money owed, so why should you assume this burden and in all likelihood put your family in financial jeopardy?

Bankrupting the estate makes economic sense. An executor can sidestep the minefield of issues involved in administering the deceased’s insolvent estate by bankrupting it.

What should executors and heirs be aware of?

If you and/or another family member is the executor, be aware:

The executors have a legal responsibility for all acts completed, and for all acts not accomplished that they should have.
Notwithstanding everyone’s best efforts, they may unknowingly be inviting proceedings from lenders or heirs for difficult issues. This happens when family members, who are well-intentioned but not skilled at monetary, insolvency or legal issues, are executors because she or he is named, however actually has no know-how in this region.
By putting the property into bankruptcy, which requires the previous approval of the bankruptcy court, the executors are relieving themselves of personal legal responsibility because the estate will now be administered under the BIA and all creditors by the Licensed Insolvency Trustee.
The executor will relieve him or herself of coping with collection calls.
As long as there are sufficient funds in the estate to pay the funeral costs, that can be paid out first in the case of a bankruptcy of the deceased’s estate because of S.136. (1)(a) of the BIA states:

Priority of claims

“136 (1) Subject to the rights of secured creditors, the proceeds realized from the property of a bankrupt shall be applied in priority of payment as follows:

(a) in the case of a deceased bankrupt, the reasonable funeral and testamentary expenses incurred by the legal representative or, in the Province of Quebec, the successors or heirs of the deceased bankrupt;”

It is the first debt with a preferred status that can be paid.

What should I do if I am an executor and I find that the liabilities are greater than the assets?

If you are an executor of a will and you find out that the estate is insolvent, after speaking with the estate lawyer, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as soon as possible. We will evaluate the situation and give you sound financial advice on how best protect yourself as executor and the heirs, so that you will be able to go ahead Starting Over, Starting Now.