Tag: alternative to filing bankruptcy

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CAN A COMPLETED CONSUMER DEBT PROPOSAL BE ANNULLED? A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING COURT AUTHORITY

a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Consumer Debt Proposal: Introduction

Welcome to Brandon’s Blog post where we will delve into the intriguing world of the consumer debt proposal and the legal framework surrounding them. Today, we will first look at what a consumer debt proposal is, why it is one of the most popular debt solutions to avoid personal bankruptcy and how to go about making one.

Then, we will take a close look at the case of Kamaljit Singh, shedding light on the authority and discretion of the courts when it comes to annulling a completed consumer proposal. Join us as we navigate the complexities of this case and gain a deeper understanding of the legal processes involved.

Consumer Debt Proposal: A Step-by-Step Guide to Financial Freedom

Dealing with debt can be overwhelming and stressful. However, there are solutions available to help manage and alleviate this burden. One such debt relief option is a consumer debt proposal, a formal agreement between you and your creditors to settle your debts for less than what you owe.

Here’s a step-by-step guide to creating a consumer debt proposal and taking control of your finances:

Assess Your Debt Situation:

Before creating a consumer debt proposal, it’s important to make a proper debt assessment. Calculate the total amount of debt you owe, including credit cards, loans, and other outstanding balances. Understanding the full scope of your debt will help you determine a realistic proposal that you can afford to pay. Any insolvent person who owes $250,000 or less (not including any debts secured by a charge on the personal residence) is eligible to make a consumer debt proposal to his or her creditors.

All types of debt qualify for this alternative to filing bankruptcy. Consumer debt, including income tax debts and if you are either a sole proprietor or partner in a business, business debts qualify for debt forgiveness.

Seek Professional Financial Advice:

Consult with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee or a non-profit credit counselling agency to discuss your options for managing your debt. They can provide valuable insights and guidance on creating a consumer debt proposal and negotiating with your creditors.

Create a Budget:

Develop a realistic budget that outlines your monthly income, expenses, and debt payments. This will help you determine how much you can afford to offer your creditors in a consumer debt proposal. Be honest and transparent about your financial situation to ensure the proposal is manageable for you.

Formalize the Consumer Debt Proposal Agreement With A Licensed Insolvency Trustee:

After the no-cost consultation, contact the Licensed Insolvency Trustee who will act as the Administrator in your consumer debt proposal. Provide the Licensed Insolvency Trustee with your list of assets, liabilities, income and expenses including the budget you prepared. The Licensed Insolvency Trustee will take this information and prepare all necessary filing documents, including, the consumer proposal. That is the formal legal agreement you the LIT will present to your creditors on your behalf to vote on.

Once you and your creditors have agreed on a consumer proposal, the Licensed Insolvency Trustee will obtain (deemed) court approval. The consumer proposal is a legally binding process after creditor acceptance and court approval. It outlines the terms of the proposal, including the total amount to be paid and payment terms, being regular monthly payments to your consumer proposal Administrator. It contains the repayment schedule and any other conditions agreed upon. Make sure to review this document carefully before signing it to begin your debt settlement program.

If both spouses are insolvent and the majority of the debts for each are the same, such as when one has co-signed for the other, then it is possible to eliminate these unsecured joint debts through a joint consumer proposal.

Negotiate the Consumer Debt Proposal with Creditors:

Once filed, the Licensed Insolvency Trustee will contact your creditors to advise of the consumer proposal. At this point, you have protection from creditors. All collection efforts, collection action and any legal action against you, including wage garnishment, must stop. The Administrator’s report will explain your financial hardship and offer a realistic monthly payment plan that you can afford.

If required, a meeting of creditors will be held where the Licensed Insolvency Trustee as Administrator will advise you on how to negotiate with creditors to reach a mutually beneficial agreement that will help you eliminate your debt in full by only paying a portion of it, while also satisfying creditor concerns.

The fee of the Administrator is paid out of the total amount to be paid in the consumer debt proposal. It is a Government tariff that the Licensed Insolvency Trustee is allowed to take out of your consumer proposal payments. Therefore, there is no additional cost to the insolvent debtor for professional fees of the Licensed Insolvency Trustee.

Although every situation is different, and there are no guarantees, a consumer proposal that offers to pay about 25% of the total outstanding unsecured debts, is the going rate for consumer proposals to be accepted by the unsecured creditors. This is what sophisticated unsecured creditors like chartered banks expect to see for them to vote for acceptance.

Adhere to the Consumer Debt Proposal Payment Plan:

A consumer debt proposal is a legally binding agreement. Stick to the consumer proposal terms of the repayment schedule outlined in the consumer proposal. Make timely monthly consumer proposal payments to your Administrator over the period of time called for (no greater than a maximum term time period of 60 months) to honour the agreement and gradually eliminate your outstanding debt. Stay committed to your financial goals and prioritize debt repayment to achieve financial freedom.

If you are lucky enough to have a family member willing to lend you the total amount of your consumer proposal, this enhances the chances of a successful consumer debt proposal. It is an effective tool as creditors always look kindly on an immediate lump-sum payment, rather than having to wait up to 5 years to see their reduced amount of money.

Monitor Your Progress:

Track your progress and monitor your debt repayment journey as you make your payments on time. Celebrate each milestone as you eliminate your unsecured debts and work towards financial stability. Examples of unsecured debts that are eligible debts to be eliminated in a consumer proposal are:

  • unsecured lines of credit;
  • credit card debt;
  • personal loans;
  • vehicle loans;
  • personal income taxes; and
  • other unsecured loans;

Stay motivated and focused on your financial goals to successfully manage your consumer debt.

By following these steps and creating a consumer debt proposal, you can take control of your finances and work towards a debt-free future. Remember, seeking professional guidance and staying committed to your repayment plan are key components of a successful debt management strategy.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Can A Consumer debt proposal Be Annulled? Exploring the Case of Kamaljit Singh

In the matter of the consumer proposal of Kamaljit Singh, an important question arises: Does the court have the authority under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada (BIA) to annul a consumer proposal that has been approved by creditors and fully performed by the consumer debtor, even after the administrator has been discharged? This question, along with the subsequent determination of whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant the requested annulment, forms the crux of the case.

The first issue at hand is the authority of the court to annul a completed consumer debt proposal. According to subsection 66.3(1) of the BIA, the court does indeed possess the statutory authority to annul a fully completed consumer proposal. This crucial section allows for the annulment of a consumer proposal in cases of:

  • default
  • ineligibility of the debtor
  • injustice
  • undue delay or
  • if the court approval was obtained by fraud.

By analyzing this section in the context of the case of Kamaljit Singh, we gain insights into the court’s decision-making process.

Furthermore, it is essential to explore the factors that the court considers when exercising its discretion to annul a consumer debt proposal. In the case of Kamaljit Singh, several factors played a role in the court’s decision.

The knowledge of the debtor and their obligation to disclose potential claims, the creditor’s knowledge of all factors in considering the consumer proposal, the eligibility of the consumer debtor to file a consumer proposal, the amount and nature of the debt, the timing of the application, the interests of the debtor and creditors, and the integrity and public confidence in the bankruptcy system all weighed heavily in the court’s deliberations.

Background – Consumer Debt Proposal Proceeding

Mr. Singh’s statement of affairs dated September 16, 2019, listed unsecured liabilities totalling $81,555, and a contingent amount of $60,000 for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). An unsecured creditor, Mr. Nagra, claimed that $ 94,027.98 was owed to him under a judgment as of the date the consumer proposal was filed.

Mr. Singh states that he was not aware of the existence of the default judgment when he had discussions with the licensed insolvency trustee acting as the consumer debt proposal Administrator before filing his consumer proposal, or at the meeting of creditors. The Administrator’s report dated September 18, 2019, refers to an estimated total amount of claims of $81,555. The report also indicates that Mr. Singh’s interest in his matrimonial home was between $30,222 and $75,222 and that Mr. Singh was unable to sell or refinance the property at that time.

The minutes from the creditors meeting held on December 11, 2019 show that there was a total of $136,833.54 in voted claims, which included $75,596.40 for CRA. CRA was the sole creditor that voted in favour of the consumer proposal. The other six proven creditors voted against the consumer proposal. The Dividend Sheet prepared by the Administrator, with a declaration date of March 9, 2023, shows:

  • $162,326.40 in proven claims; and
  • $35,373.23 in dividends being paid to the creditors.

Based on a comparison of the statement of affairs and Dividend Sheet, the change from claims totaling $81,555 to $162,326.40 was due to:

CRA having proven a claim of $73,770.60; and

the proven claims of the remaining nine creditors being in aggregate, $7,000.80 higher than the amounts listed in the statement of affairs.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Consumer Debt Proposal: Factors to Consider When Exercising Discretion under Subsection 66.3(1)

The authority to annul a proposal is discretionary. In exercising such discretion, the Court should take into account the interests of the debtor and his or her creditors and balance their interests while maintaining the integrity and confidence of the public. Based on the Court’s review of applicable cases, the Court concluded that the following factors must be taken into consideration:

  1. knowledge of the debtor;
  2. the creditors’ knowledge of the consumer debt proposal;
  3. eligibility of the consumer debtor to file a consumer proposal;
  4. amount and nature of the debt;
  5. timing of the application;
  6. the interest of the debtor and creditors; and
  7. the integrity and public confidence in the BIA and the process of consumer proposals.

Test for Annulment of a Consumer Debt Proposal

The test for the annulment of a consumer proposal is set out in subsection 66.3(1), which provides that:

Where default is made in the performance of any provision in a consumer proposal, or where it appears to the court:

(a) that the debtor was not eligible to make a consumer proposal when the consumer proposal was filed,

(b) that the consumer proposal cannot continue without injustice or undue delay, or

(c) that the approval of the court was obtained by fraud,

the court may, on application, with such notice as the court may direct to the consumer debtor and, if applicable, to the administrator and the creditors, annul the consumer debt proposal.

Subsection 66.3(1) does not contain language that restricts the timing when such an application for an annulment of a consumer proposal may be made.

This differs from the language of subsection 66.3(3), which provides that a consumer proposal may be annulled after it is“accepted or approved” where the consumer debtor is afterwards convicted of any offence under the BIA.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Consumer Debt Proposal: Knowledge of the Debtor

Mr. Singh was personally served with the statement of claim. He did not take any steps to defend that claim. Mr. Singh states that even if he had been aware of the existence of the default judgment and the writ, he would not have disclosed them to the Administrator because he did not believe that he owed any amount to Mr. Nagra given the payments he and his mother had made to him.

While Mr. Singh may not have had actual knowledge of the default judgment and the registration of the writ at the time he initially met with the Administrator, he was required under the BIA to provide them with information on his financial situation. It was his obligation to inform the Administrator of any potential claims against him, even those he may dispute. The BIA consumer debt proposal process must have at its foundation that all properly secured debts and unsecured debts and liabilities will be disclosed by debtors seeking the protection of the Act.

It was open to Mr. Singh to take the position with the Administrator that Mr. Nagra’s claim should be listed as a contingent amount. This was how the claim of CRA was treated in the statement of affairs. Mr. Singh suggests that he relied on the Administrator to have performed due diligence in connection with filing his consumer proposal and that they did not discover the existence of the default judgment or the writ.

The Administrator is required to investigate or cause to be investigated, the consumer debtor’s property and financial affairs to be able to assess with reasonable accuracy the consumer debtor’s financial situation and the cause of his insolvency. Whatever the steps taken by the Administrator to investigate Mr. Singh’s affairs are, it did not absolve Mr. Singh from the requirement to notify the Administrator of the fact that he had been served with a statement of claim in the previous six months.

Therefore the Court’s view of the knowledge of the debtor that a claim was being pursued by Mr. Nagra, and his failure to disclose this to the Administrator at any time during the consumer debt proposal proceeding, weighs in favour of annulling the consumer proposal.

Consumer Debt Proposal: Knowledge of the Creditor

Mr. Nagra stated that he first learned about the consumer proposal proceeding on June 9, 2023, based on correspondence received by his counsel from counsel to Mr. Singh. He says that had he been notified of the consumer proposal, he would have participated in the process and opposed the proposal. Mr. Singh claims that Mr. Nagra had been aware of the consumer debt proposal since 2019, but he provided no evidence in support of this statement.

Based on the evidence, the Court accepted Mr. Nagra’s evidence that he did not become aware of the consumer proposal until June 9, 2023, which was after the consumer proposal had been completed and the Administrator had been discharged.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Eligibility to File a Consumer Debt Proposal

At the time of the completion of the consumer debt proposal, there was $162,326.40 in proven claims, which, together with his claim of $94,027.98, exceeds the $250,000 consumer proposal threshold. Mr. Singh contests the amount he is said to owe to Mr. Nagra. However, Mr. Nagra has a judgment against Mr. Singh, and that judgment had not been set aside.

An Administrator cannot file a consumer proposal if he or she has reason to believe that the consumer debtor is not eligible to make a consumer proposal. As of September 16, 2019, if Mr.Nagra’s claim of $94,027.98 had been added to the $81,555 listed in the statement of affairs, along with the $60,000 contingent amount for the CRA, the total amount of claims would have been $235,582.98.

By the December 11, 2019 creditors meeting, CRA had a proven claim of $75,596.40, so the total amount of claims would have increased to $251,179.38. As a result, Mr. Singh would no longer have been eligible to complete a consumer debt proposal by the time of the creditors meeting if Mr. Nagra’s judgment was known to the Administrator.

A consumer proposal is not invalid by reason only that the debtor was not eligible to make the consumer proposal. If an Administrator determines, after the filing of a consumer proposal, that it should not have been filed because the consumer debtor was not eligible to make a consumer proposal, all that is required of the Administrator is that he or she shall forthwith inform the creditors of this fact. It is on the creditors to commence an application to annul the consumer proposal.

Consumer Debt Proposal: Amount and Nature of the Debt

While the amount is disputed by Mr. Singh, Mr. Nagra has a judgment for $94,027.98. That represents approximately 36.68% of the total claims proven against Mr. Singh. It is a significant claim. The nature of the claim must also be taken into account. As acknowledged by Mr. Nagra in his materials, as he is Mr.Singh’s father-in-law, they are connected by marriage and he and Mr. Singh are deemed to be related persons under the BIA.

Subsection 66.19(2) provides that a creditor who is related to the consumer debtor may vote against but not for the acceptance of the consumer debt proposal. Based on what happened at the meeting of creditors, where $75,596.40 of claims voted in favour of the consumer proposal, and $61,237.14 voted against it, had Mr.Nagra been able to file a proof of claim in an amount over $14,400 and voted against the consumer proposal, it would have failed.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Consumer Debt Proposal: Timing of the Application to Annul

There is no issue with the timing of Mr. Nagra’s motion to annul the consumer debt proposal. He learned of it on June 9, 2023, and submitted a request to the BankruptcyCourt Office to schedule the motion on July 13, 2023.

Consumer Debt Proposal: The Interest of the Debtor and the Creditors

As noted above, Mr. Singh’s proven creditors received $35,373.23 in dividends on account of $162,326.40 in claims. This amounts to a recovery of 21.79 cents on the dollar. If the proposal is annulled, these creditors, along with Mr. Nagra, will be permitted to take steps to recover additional amounts, which would include the $103,631.63 from the sale of the matrimonial home. Unsurprisingly, it would be to Mr. Singh’s detriment if the consumer debt proposal is annulled, since his creditors’ claims would be revived, and they could take steps to recover the $ 103,631.63 that he currently is entitled to keep.

The Court decided that, in balancing the interests between Mr. Singh and his creditors, it weighed in favour of the creditors to annul the proposal. If the consumer proposal is not annulled, Mr. Singh will be permitted to only pay $35,373.23 in dividends to his creditors and keep $103,631.63, because he did not inform the Administrator of the existence of Mr. Nagra’s claim. The Court believed that this would be an unfair result, and negatively impact the integrity of the consumer proposal process under the BIA.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Integrity and public confidence in the BIA and the process of a consumer debt proposal

Mr. Singh argued that the public confidence in the BIA and the process of a consumer debt proposal would be lost if “innocent debtors” like him could have their consumer proposals annulled. The Court felt that Mr. Singh was not “innocent” and that the integrity of the system would be undermined if a debtor was permitted to benefit from not disclosing a potential claim to his or her Administrator at the commencement of the process.

This is especially so in this case because, if the debt to Mr. Nagra was disclosed, it could have a material impact on whether a consumer proposal would be accepted by creditors. The system requires that creditors have confidence that they will be provided with proper notice of a consumer proposal and have the ability to elect to participate in the process if they so choose.

The Court’s Disposition of this Consumer Debt Proposal Matter

The Court has the discretion to annul a consumer debt proposal under subsection 66.3(1), even where the consumer proposal was fully completed. Having considered all of the circumstances and factors listed above, Mr. Nagra satisfied the Court that his motion fits under subsection 66.3(1)(a) and that this is an appropriate case in which to exercise the Court’s discretion.

Therefore, the Court annulled Mr. Singh’s consumer proposal even though he completed it and the Administrator was discharged.

Consumer Debt Proposal: Closing Remarks

The case of Kamaljit Singh serves as a fascinating example of the authority and discretion of the courts in annulling a completed consumer proposal. By carefully considering the factors and legal principles at play, the Court ultimately decided to grant the requested annulment. This decision highlights the importance of transparency, disclosure, and fairness within the consumer debt proposal process.

As individuals navigating the complex world of personal finances, it is crucial to be aware of the legal framework surrounding consumer proposals. Understanding the authority and discretion of the courts empowers us to make informed financial decisions and ensures the integrity of the bankruptcy system.

I hope that this closer look at the case of Kamaljit Singh’s consumer proposal has shed light on the intricacies of consumer proposals and the role of the courts. As always, it is essential to consult with professionals for personalized advice regarding your specific financial circumstances.

Individuals and business owners must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties, consumer debt and company debt and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses with debt problems that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns and more associated with your company debt are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these financial health concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual who has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own and it does not mean that you are a bad person. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, to begin your debt-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSUMER PROPOSAL AND BANKRUPTCY: THE PROVEN CANADIAN WAY TO GET DEBT FREE

difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy
difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click play on the podcast.

Difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy: Know your options

Regular readers of my Brandon Blog know that there are a lot of steps you need to go through to financially reorganize your life. I have written before different blogs on various aspects of both consumer proposals and bankruptcy. The purpose of this Brandon blog is to discuss in one place, the difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy.

Many people opt for one of these options because life has thrown them a curveball, they no longer have the cash flow to pay off their debts and want to start fresh. There are some great benefits to filing bankruptcy. They include eliminating creditors and debts, getting control over your personal finances, and having a stress-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now. But if you’re considering a first-time bankruptcy, or the bankruptcy option even if you are familiar with the Canadian bankruptcy process from a prior time, you should consider the pros and cons of a consumer proposal, the only government-approved debt settlement plan in Canada. It will be good for you to know the options that I explain below.

Consolidation loans vs consumer proposals

What’s the distinction between a consumer proposal and a debt consolidation loan? The consumer proposal process is an insolvency procedure that allows you to resolve all the amounts you owe to your unsecured creditors via an arrangement with your creditors. It does this without needing you to file bankruptcy. A consumer proposal can only be carried out by a licensed insolvency trustee. A consumer proposal allows you to get rid of all the amount owed by repaying only a part of your financial obligations over time.

A consolidation loan means that you still have sufficient assets and income and a good enough credit score, in order to borrow the total amount you owe. The loan must carry an interest rate lower, and hopefully much lower, than the average interest rate of your combined total debt. You use the loan proceeds to repay 100% of your debts. You now have only one loan with a monthly payment you can afford. Taking out a consolidation loan is not an insolvency process.

difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy
difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

The main difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

The consumer proposal is a fundamental part of our personal insolvency system. It is an insolvency procedure controlled by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) that allows individuals who owe $250,000 or less (not including any financial debts secured against their principal home). It permits you to pay a portion of your financial debts with time, yet eliminate all of them if fully executed. It is an alternative to declaring bankruptcy. It is an alternative to bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy is also a fundamental part of our insolvency system under the BIA. However, rather than restructuring, in personal bankruptcy, the person surrenders all of their non-exempt assets to the licensed insolvency trustee for the benefit of the person’s creditors. Once the bankrupt person has fulfilled all of their duties, they are entitled to receive a discharge from bankruptcy, subject to the Trustee or a creditor opposing it.

Personal bankruptcy involves the liquidation of the bankrupt’s assets in return for the eventual elimination of their unsecured debts. It is not considered a restructuring like a consumer proposal is.

Difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy: The process of filing a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy

You start by talking to a Trustee who will provide you basic guidance on both a consumer proposal and also bankruptcy. The Trustee will likewise inform you specifically just how each process functions. If at the end of that discussion you inform the licensed bankruptcy trustee that you really feel good in wanting to take the next steps with them, the Trustee will provide you with their intake form. When the form is completed, you send it to the Trustee, including supplying any kind of backup documents asked for, the Trustee can then provide you advice for your unique financial difficulties.

If you choose a consumer proposal, the licensed insolvency trustee will prepare the necessary filing documents for you to sign. This includes assisting you with preparing the best possible proposal that works for both you and your creditors. You then meet with the Trustee to sign the documents. The Trustee then files the documents electronically with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). The OSB then issues the Certificate evidencing the filing and the formal process begins.

After seeing your completed intake sheet, the Trustee will advise on whether or not a consumer proposal would work for you, or if your best or only option is filing for bankruptcy. Similarly, in bankruptcy filings, the Trustee prepares all the required filing documents for your signature. The Trustee explains all of them to you, you sign them and the Trustee then electronically files the filing documents with the OSB. The OSB then issues its Certificate evidencing the bankruptcy and that formal process begins.

You initially meet with the licensed bankruptcy trustee, in-person, by video or phone, to share details of your personal situation, and working together, you determine whether a consumer proposal, an alternative to filing bankruptcy, or personal bankruptcy is the best option for you. With COVID-19, we have been holding all of our no-cost consultations and meetings by phone and video. We can do the sign-up process by video and email. We have found this is very convenient for our clients as they are not required to take the time to attend our office in person.

As you can see, the process of filing a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy is not that different. For filing, there is not really a difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy.

difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy
difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

Major difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

Is there a major difference between consumer proposals and bankruptcy? Yes. So far in this discussion, there have not really been major differences. But there really are as the consumer proposal is akin to filing for bankruptcy protection while the other is bankruptcy. Both provide legal protection from creditors. But a consumer proposal gives a person what the media calls filing for bankruptcy protection. When you file for bankruptcy, that calls for the liquidation of non-exempt assets.

Both bankruptcy and a consumer proposal can be excellent options for somebody who is experiencing a challenging financial position. A consumer proposal is an excellent choice for individuals who have the ability to make monthly payments to their creditors totalling less than the amount they owe, yet eliminating all their debts, while keeping the equity they have in assets they wish to keep. Bankruptcy is an excellent choice for those who are bewildered by their financial obligations, and who don’t have a consistent income, making it actually hard or impossible to manage making payments at any level to their creditors.

While both bankruptcy, as well as a consumer proposal, can supply a financial clean slate, there are a few vital distinctions.

In a consumer proposal, you normally get to keep all of your assets. In a bankruptcy, if you have equity in assets that you want to keep, you or someone friendly to you has to pay that equity to your Trustee for the benefit of your creditors. Otherwise, you need to surrender all non-exempt assets to the Trustee for the Trustee to sell them and then put the cash towards the claims of your creditors. The assets covered by your bankruptcy exemptions do not need to be surrendered.

In bankruptcy, you also have the issue of needing to obtain your bankruptcy discharge. If either the Trustee or one or more creditors object to your discharge, then you will not get your automatic bankruptcy discharge and you will have a discharge hearing in Court. You may also be subject to surplus income payments in a bankruptcy, which you will need to make to your Trustee (21 months for a first time bankrupt, 36 months for a second time or more bankruptcy).

The amount to offer your creditors in a consumer proposal has to be a better amount than they would receive from your bankruptcy. After doing the calculations I spoke about above, including any surplus income obligation, you will better understand what amount needs to be offered to your creditors.

Another difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy is that there is a benefit of a consumer proposal in that you can spread the monthly payments for the amount determined over a term of up to 60 months, interest-free. In a bankruptcy, you are typically required to make any required payments over the term of your bankruptcy, which is much shorter than in a proposal. Therefore the consumer proposal allows you to term out a slightly higher settlement over a longer period of time. This makes the monthly repayment less complicated on your cash flow as well as your budget plan.

Once your consumer proposal is (deemed) accepted by the creditors and (deemed) approved by the Court, you just need to make your promised monthly payments to the Trustee. The Trustee handles making payments at regular intervals to your creditors. Once you have completed the payment promised under the consumer proposal, you receive your Certificate from the Trustee showing that you completed the consumer proposal. That is it. No discharge hearing can be opposed and no extra surplus income payments. It is already accounted for in the amount offered to your creditors in your consumer proposal.

The cost difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

When doing a consumer proposal, the fee of the licensed insolvency trustee is included in the payment you negotiate with your creditors. As I mentioned above, the calculation of what to offer in a consumer proposal does not include what the fee and costs are. Rather, it is compared to what the unsecured creditors can expect in bankruptcy.

However, if you were to file bankruptcy, the fee is based on the surplus income you may have to pay (based upon a criterion that includes income and family size) and also any assets that you are required to assign over to the Trustee. You might also have to make month-to-month contributions to cover the fee and costs if your income and non-exempt assets are insufficient to pay for the bankruptcy proceedings.

If there is no surplus income or assets, you, or someone on your behalf, will need to pay the bankruptcy fee which will be approximately $1,800 plus HST.

difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy
difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy

Difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy: What’s worse? Credit rating impact of a bankruptcy vs consumer proposal

Both a consumer proposal and bankruptcy are insolvency proceedings under the BIA. Therefore both will negatively affect your credit rating. In a consumer proposal, your credit rating will show as an R9 on your credit report while you are making payments. Once you have completed your consumer proposal, your credit rating will be an R7 for 3 years after completion.

For a first-time bankrupt, if you were to file for bankruptcy, your credit report will show an R9 rating for 6-7 years after being discharged.

The difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy summary

I hope that you found this difference between consumer proposal and bankruptcy Brandon Blog interesting. Problems will arise when you are cash-starved and in debt. There are several insolvency processes available to a person or company with too much debt.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as alternatives to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Call a Trustee Now!