Tag: Prime Minister

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CERB CANADA: THE ENORMOUS DEBT PROBLEM NOW FACING CANADIANS

The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB Canada) has been closed but is not over

The government is ramping up its efforts to verify CERB Canada eligibility for payments made under the Canada pandemic support program. Many Canadians have been told to return some or all of the funds received in the past. The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and Employment and Social Development Canada are working together to ensure that those who received COVID-19 pandemic individual benefits were eligible for them. CRA also announced that they are sending out Notices of Redetermination to Canadians who were ineligible for some or all of the CERB Canada benefits they received.

The CERB Canada benefit was rolled out quickly and there was a lot of confusion about who was eligible for it. It was created to help those in Canada who the COVID-19 pandemic directly impacted. The program provided financial assistance to employees and self-employed workers. The benefit was worth a maximum of $2,000 every 4-week period for up to four months.

The issue that troubles me is that the benefit was mostly paid to people who otherwise would not have been able to afford rent or food. The CERB Canada benefit money was spent immediately and a long time ago. So if CRA and Service Canada have now determined that some people should not have gotten that benefit, what are those people supposed to do if CRA demands the money back?

In this Brandon’s Blog, I discuss what the options may be for people who receive a demand for repayment of the CERB Canada benefit.

Who was eligible for CERB Canada?

To qualify for the CERB payment from the government support program, you must have met certain conditions during the period you applied. The Government of Canada stipulated the following eligibility criteria:

  • You did not look for or receive, CERB Canada or Employment Insurance benefits from Service Canada for the same qualification period.
  • You did not stop your work willingly on your own. You were forced to stop your work by someone else.
  • You are a Canadian resident who is at least 15 years old.
  • You must have earned at least $5,000 (before taxes) in the preceding 12 months, or in 2019, from one or more of the following:
    • job income
    • self-employment income earnings
    • benefits relating to pregnancy or parental leave from the province

The program was designed to help Canadian employees and self-employed Canadians who lost their jobs or saw a significant decrease in income due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the COVID-19 lockdown order resulting in business shutdowns. The program came to an end on December 2, 2020.cerb canada

Sending your CERB Canada payment back

If you have received a letter from Service Canada asking you to repay an overpayment, the CRA says you need to follow the instructions on the letter to return the payment.

You will have the opportunity to provide more evidence to support your claim that you were entitled to the CRA’s full CERB benefit payment. Based on your responses, you may need to repay the full amount you received.

If you received any CERB Canada payments and they now say you didn’t fit into the group of eligible workers, you have the option to pay back what you owe in full right now or over time. They expect you to repay it in full either way.

Now consider this. The federal government paid nearly $12 million in CERB Canada payments to more than 1,600 people with foreign addresses during the first seven months of the pandemic! How did that happen if one of the criteria of this program was you had to be a resident of Canada?

The way the CERB Canada benefit is taxed is by taking it out of your paycheque – wasn’t that enough?

The CERB Canada benefit was not a grant or any other kind of freebie. Anyone who received it had to include it in their taxable income. That is fair because the benefit was meant to replace lost income.

In April 2020, Prime Minister Trudeau announced that the Government of Canada would be taking extensive and decisive action to support Canadians and businesses who were struggling due to the COVID-19 global pandemic through an expansion of this program.

The Prime Minister went on to say that no Canadian should have to choose between protecting their health, putting food on the table, paying for their medication or caring for a family member. He said this is why the government introduced the CERB Canada Benefit, a taxable benefit.

There have even been CRA, Employment and Social Development Canada and court decisions confirming that the CERB Canada payments are taxable and that it was definitely not a free ride. The demand for repayment of benefits from Canadians who CRA and Service Canada now feel were not eligible workers seems totally anti-social. The program was rolled out hastily and under unclear, confusing circumstances, and Canadians have been paying income tax on the benefits they received. Surely our federal government has better places to spend its time clawing back wasteful spending.cerb canada

Mom was shocked when her maternity leave benefits were cut in half due to the CERB Canada benefit

A mother was shocked to see that her most recent parental benefits instalment had been cut in half. She said that maternity and parental benefits are paid to parents so they can take time off from paid work to do another kind of work: care work.

She was receiving half of her parental leave benefits for three weeks, which were already about half of her regular earnings. The reason for the reduction was because it was determined that the CERB Canada benefit she received for every four-week period, increased her income to the point where the reduction was warranted.

Then she received a demand for repayment. She hadn’t expected to have to repay the benefit. Shortly after the COVID-19 outbreak hit in March 2020, she was let go from her work because there wasn’t enough work to go around. She thought she qualified under the eligibility requirements for the CERB Canada benefit.

She couldn’t repay the full amount in one shot so she tried to arrange a repayment plan with CRA. She said that she had to fax about a dozen documents and field several questions from federal government employees to prove she is experiencing “financial hardship” in order to qualify for a payment plan. I don’t understand why payment plans have to be approved rather than just being automatically set up. These are not rich people that they are demanding repayment from, so why make them jump through hoops?

The British Columbia court has ruled that the CERB Canada payment must be deducted from the damage award for wrongful dismissal

Here is another example that the CERB Canada benefit is not a tax-free payment or a non-taxable grant. In Reotech Construction Ltd. v Snider, 2022 BCSC 317 the trial judge awarded the employee damages for a 4.5-month reasonable notice period and declined to deduct his CERB Canada payments.

After reviewing the case, the Supreme Court of British Columbia decided that the original trial judge was incorrect in choosing not to reduce the damage award by the $9,000 in benefits received. The court decided that these payments should be deducted from the award.

There was no indication that the employee would have to repay the CERB Canada benefit to the government. If the CERB payments are not deducted, then the employee would be in a better position than if there had been no breach of the employment contract. The employee would not have received the benefit if he had not been dismissed, making the benefit an indemnity for the wage loss caused by the dismissal.cerb canada

How to repay the CERB Canada benefit

If you received the CERB Canada and now find out that you did not meet the eligibility requirements, as shown above, you must repay the money. There are a few different ways that you can repay the amount demanded.

The easiest way to repay the CERB Canada amount is through your online service CRA My Account. You can log into your account and select “Repay CERB” under the “My Account” tab. If you do not have a CRA online account, you can repay the amount you owe either by sending a cheque through Canada Post to the CRA mailing address you can find online. You can also pay it at your financial institution using the government-issued remittance form.

But what if you are just one of the many hard-working Canadian workers living paycheque to paycheque? What if you do not have the money to repay what they say you owe, either all at once or by taking an amount out of each of your future paycheques that CRA will agree to?

What if you cannot repay because the government stepped up its efforts to verify CERB Canada payments and made demands on you?

As stated above, if you cannot afford to repay the full amount being demanded of you all at once, you can hopefully convince CRA that you deserve a payment plan over time due to “financial hardship”. This assumes that the government is right that you were not originally entitled to the amount that you received for the CERB Canada benefit. But what if you cannot afford to repay it at all, no matter what sort of payment plan you can enter into?

The outcome will depend on if you are insolvent. Being insolvent doesn’t necessarily mean bankruptcy. Insolvency (aka financial failure) is a financial condition that occurs when a person or company doesn’t have enough assets to pay off all debts if they were to be liquidated. It also means that the person or company has stopped paying their bills on time in the normal course.

If the person is NOT insolvent, they are expected to sell assets or use cash on hand to pay their bills.

If you’re insolvent, you can take advantage of Canadian insolvency legislation, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). The debt to repay the CERB Canada benefit is an ordinary unsecured claim that will be eliminated through a successful financial restructuring under either a consumer proposal or a Division I proposal. As a last resort, you could also file for bankruptcy.

I would rather refer you back to some of my earlier Brandon’s Blogs that go over the requirements for each insolvency option, rather than go through all of them individually here. They are:

  1. Consumer proposal –CONSUMER PROPOSAL TORONTO: THE COMPLETE #1 WAY TO ELIMINATE DEBT IN ONTARIO
  2. Division I Proposal –THE EASIEST WAY TO ACTUALLY LIKE WHAT IS A DIVISION i PROPOSAL ONTARIO
  3. Personal bankruptcy – BEYOND BANKRUPTCY SERVICES: OUR BEST PERSONAL INSOLVENCY FAQ 2 JUMPSTART YOUR FINANCIAL LIFE

CERB Canada: Canadian workers now under fire

In summary, CRA now says it’s “time to pay up” for Canadians who were paid the CERB Canada benefit during the pandemic. Although CRA has a right to claw back the amount if it is correct that the person was not eligible, what CRA’s insistence means for many Canadian workers is they now have to choose between paying back their CERB or paying for food, rent or medicine.

This is so ironic because the benefit payments were designed to help those people in making those payments when their incomes dried up. The amounts were taxed so the government earned income that way. Now they are causing unneeded stress and worry to the people they aimed to help.

I hope this Brandon’s Blog was helpful to you in understanding more about this problem now facing many Canadians. If you or your company has too heavy a debt load, we understand how you feel. You’re stressed out and anxious because you can’t fix your or your company’s financial situation on your own. But don’t worry. As a government-licensed insolvency professional firm, we can help you get your personal or corporate finances back on track.

If you’re struggling with money problems, call the Ira Smith Team today. We’ll work with you to develop a personalized plan to get you back on track and stress-free, all while avoiding the bankruptcy process if at all possible.

Call us today and get back on the path to a healthy stress-free life.cerb canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SMALL BUSINESS CANADA TAX: LIBERALS UNFAIRLY TARGET SMALL BUSINESS TAXES IN CANADA RULES

small business canada taxFull disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion on SMALL BUSINESS CANADA TAX issues. This blog must not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.

We are trying something new. At the bottom is an audiogram of this Brandon’s blog. If you would prefer to listen to it, and not read it, scroll down to the bottom and press on the play button. Let us know what you think by sending us a message in the Question box below.

Small business Canada tax: Introduction

In December 2017, our Federal Minister of Finance, Bill Morneau, disclosed some new policies he and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were thinking about. The changes Finance Minister Morneau was touting, were for toughening up the small business Canada tax scheme. It would have affected entrepreneur’s businesses, their taxes, and their households.

The main aspect of small business Canada tax that our federal government wanted to attack was the age-old concept of family business income splitting. Its more modern name that you would have seen a lot in the press is called income sprinkling. The federal government was trying to advance the theory that small business owners whose family members were shareholders in the business, but not necessarily working in the business, were somehow cheating on their taxes.

Small business Canada tax: The Federal Government’s discussion points

The discussion focussed mainly on professionals, such as doctors, lawyers, and accountants who had a professional corporation. The government was trying to advance the argument how unfair it was for a professional earning say $250,000 annually, to “sprinkle” some of the income among family members older than 18 as compared to a salaried employee earning the same total amount in salary. I find it interesting that they used a quarter of a million dollars annually as an example, and not a lesser number. Do you think that was picked on purpose to subtly portray all family business owners as being fat cats?

The government’s position was that income that might have been paid to only the manager of the business, could be redirected to other family members by way of dividends. If those family members were in a lower-income tax bracket, then they would pay less tax. The government felt that was unfair.

Small business Canada tax: How income splitting or income sprinkling works

First, in order for this to work for a professional, the laws of the Province you live in has to allow you to have household members that aren’t professionals be shareholders of your professional firm. Second, if your spouse has a high taxable income already, then you will not profit by including him or her as an owner of the business. Lastly, you must decide if you’re going to add your children more than 18 years of age, as shareholders.

Assuming you’ve marked off all those issues, it can make a difference to your family’s overall income tax bill to add your partner and/or your grown-up kids as shareholders of your business. By doing this, you can choose to distribute dividends from the business and take advantage of their lower-income tax bracket.

Paying your partner or kids a salary is not as effective as making them shareholders of the firm and paying dividends. If you pay a salary, it needs to be a sensible one, for work that you can actually prove to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). In other words, you cannot simply pay your partner $100,000 for doing bookkeeping for the firm. CRA will certainly allow an affordable wage for that function, but it would have to be justified by comparison to the marketplace for such services.

The advantage of paying dividends to family members is that you do not need to prove it. The other benefit of paying dividends is that your firm recovers some of the business tax you’ve paid on dividends made by the firm’s financial investment portfolio. Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand (RDTOH) is the issue. Our firm does not do tax work. This is a complex topic, I will leave it up to you to research how RDTOH works.

Small business Canada tax: Tax changes effective January 1, 2018

Beginning January 1, 2018, the government changed the rules specifically to target professionals who have incorporated (specifically, doctors, lawyers, and accountants). Professionals who are gaining from reduced tax rates on what would have otherwise been fully taxed earnings at the highest marginal personal income tax rates, if not for their company.

The government is saying that these incorporate professionals aren’t adding their fair share to Canadian society by their decision to have a professional corporation. For that reason, they should not gain from the tax advantages of doing so.

So what are the changes? The Tax on Split Income (TOSI) rules has been amended to cover grown-up shareholders of private firms. Previously, TOSI rules only applied to minor children. The issue now becomes: If you’re a private company owner and pay dividends to adult family member shareholders, when can you do so without invoking the new regulations? Essentially, you need to be able to show much involvement in business.

Small business Canada tax: Clear bright line

The Federal government is putting what they’re calling a “clear bright-line”’ to exclude some relatives from the TOSI rules. The general TOSI exclusions are:

  1. The company owner’s spouse, providing they more than 65 years old.
  2. Children over 18 years old who have made a real labour contribution to the business. CRA is gauging this as an average of 20 hours a week during the year. Alternatively, there is also a test throughout any of the 5 earlier years.

The government has taken direct aim at professional corporations though. These exclusions do not apply where 90% + of the income of the corporation comes from the provision of services. Income from ownership of related businesses that earn income from the provision of services is also included in the calculation.

Inserting a trust into the ownership equation may get around this “excluded shares” provision. You need the advice of your income tax advisor to decide if it would be beneficial to you.

Small business Canada tax: Ottawa punishing small business Canada

When the federal government presented new tax rules, local business claimed they were being unjustly targeted by “punishing” measures. According to Small Business Association Canada, up to fifty percent of the country’s entrepreneurs state they’re feeling negative results.

The federal government also added changes to the passive income rules for private corporations. In the February 2018 Federal Budget, the Liberals added a grind-down mechanism for the small business tax deduction through which every dollar of investment income over $50,000 cuts profits eligible for the small business tax deduction by $5.

This has been especially challenging for organizations that use passive earnings to help in special capital funding. For example, paying for building and construction equipment or to acquire real estate used by the business.ira smith trustee

Small business Canada tax: The greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) has asked the Provinces not to follow the Federal Liberals but to support small business.

For small businesses, the greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over. Private corporations who use responsible budgeting techniques and save up their profits and invest them to earn income, to be prepared for a rainy day, are being attacked. They may be saving to smooth out cash flow problems, or they might have a big upcoming purchase. Now they are being attacked through the income tax system for earning investment income in excess of $50K annually. It is clear that CRA will be looking closely at professional corporations’ income tax returns. I would not be surprised to see more CRA audits performed. The Federal government is looking to extract more income tax revenue from private corporations.

The rules are increasingly complex. Entrepreneurs will be spending more time dealing with more punitive income tax rules and income tax audits. All of this is designed by Ottawa for private corporations to pay more income tax. It ignores the investments small business makes. Creating jobs and making capital investments allows small business to contribute in many ways to the Canadian economy. This is aside from paying income tax.

Small business Canada tax: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company under attack because of tax obligations or for other reasons. Is your company in need of restructuring to get debt relief?

The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience people and companies in financial trouble. If your company is in need of a corporate restructuring proposal debt settlement plan, we have the experience to end your stress and pain and return you and your company to a healthy productive pain-free condition.

Our approach for each case is to develop a solution where Starting Over, Starting Now happens. This starts the moment you meet with us. You’re simply one call away from taking the necessary actions to return to leading a healthy and well-balanced problem-free life. Call us today for your free appointment.

Full disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion. This blog should not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADA BANKING INFO COLLECTION: YOUR EXPECTATIONS VS REALITY ACCORDING TO JUSTIN TRUDEAU

Canada banking info collection: Introduction

On October 29, 2018, the Hon. Candice Bergen (Portage– Lisgar, CPC), stood in Parliament during Question Period. She talked to troubling reports this previous weekend that Statistics Canada was taking part in Canada banking info collection without the consent of the people whose info was being asked for.

Statistics Canada notified financial institutions, charge card businesses as well as credit reporting companies that it anticipates them to turn over individual financial information of a minimum of half a million Canadians without their consent or authorization. Financial institutions will not be able to tell their customers about the government demand for their financial transactions.

The noticeable issue is, that with the lengthy history of federal government personal privacy violations, Canadians are appropriately stressed over both the collection as well as the security of their individual economic deals. Ms. Bergen needed to know why the Liberals are accumulating the individual information of Canada without telling them.

Canada banking info collection: PM Justin Trudeau reacts

Our PM reacted by stating that the federal government is ensuring that the individual information of Canadians is secured. Stats Canada will certainly make use of the anonymized information for analytical functions only. No details will be revealed.

He stated that he understands (which is a way of repeating rumours or hearsay, or worse, that he truly does not understand whatsoever) that Statistics Canada is proactively involved with the Privacy Commissioner’s office, to make sure Canadians’ financial details stays safeguarded and private. High-grade and prompt information is important to guaranteeing that federal government programs stay pertinent as well as efficient for Canadians.

Canada banking info collection: Ms. Bergen had not been pleased, and neither ought to we

Ms. Bergen responded that the Liberal federal government strategies to get access to the individual details of Canadians without their knowing about it or permission. This consists of details like payments, internet purchases, charge card purchases, cash withdrawals and e-transfers between members of a family.

She wants to know if the Prime Minister will do the right thing. Will he guarantee Canadians that this invasion into their lives will be stopped?

Canada banking info collection: PM Justin Trudeau reacts by attempting to fault the Conservatives

Our PM reacted by stating that Canadians appropriately expect that federal government agencies like Statistics Canada will collaborate with the Privacy Commissioner. He said that Stats Canada will make certain that Canadians’ exclusive lives are shielded. Good words up until we hear that CRA obtained accessibility to the info, or even worse, cyberpunks!

Then for the good part. PM Trudeau said to the House of Commons and all Canadians that it was the Conservative federal government that selected to end the long-form census as a method of protecting an individuals’ exclusive info. So our PM is saying that in some way our private financial transactions is a straight substitute for basic analytical demographics? I don’t think so.

PM Justin Trudeau after that doubled down by stating that the Conservatives’ assaults on information and privacy continue.

Canada banking info collection: Mr. Alain Rayes (Richmond– Arthabaska, CPC)

Mr. Alain Rayes also participated. He repeated that Canadians expect the federal government to secure their private details, yet the Liberals wish to gain access to private information on 500,000 Canadians without their approval. They intend to consider loan repayments, ATM withdrawals, credit card transactions, financial institution money transfers and social insurance numbers.

Exactly how can the Prime Minister warrant these activities, which are plainly an offence of Canadians’ personal privacy?

Canada banking info collection: Blah, blah, blah.

Prime Minister Trudeau responded with more of the same. He said again the government will constantly make sure (a warranty?) that the individual information of Canadians is safeguarded. He said that Stats Canada will make use of the anonymized information only for analytical goals. No details will be revealed (does analytical purposes only include analysis by Canada Revenue Agency?).

He repeated that Statistics Canada is proactively involved with the Privacy Commissioner’s workplace on this task and is dealing with it to make certain Canadians’ info continues to be secured and private.

My personal view is that the primary federal government program that would certainly most take advantage of understanding my private financial information is the income tax collection system in Canada!

Canada banking info collection: The law

The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (S.C. 2000, c. 5) (PIPEDA), Canada’s federal private sector privacy legislation, was specifically amended on the issue of privacy. Schedule I of Section 5 of PIPEDA states that:

“4.3 Principle 3 – Consent
The knowledge and consent of the individual are required for the collection, use, or disclosure of personal information, except where inappropriate.” (emphasis added).

What is one of the exceptions?

4.3 Principle 3 – Consent
“Note: In certain circumstances personal information can be collected, used, or disclosed without the knowledge and consent of the individual. For example, legal, medical, or security reasons may make it impossible or impractical to seek consent. When information is being collected for the detection and prevention of fraud or for law enforcement, seeking the consent of the individual might defeat the purpose of collecting the information.”

So, looking at the exceptions, this only bolsters my hunch. I am convinced this is not only to evaluate the viability and effectiveness of existing social programs. Rather, it will be used to evaluate and amend the effectiveness of tax investigation programs. This will provide direct new information to the Canada Revenue Agency to bolster current and start new investigations. That is why the information is being collected without Canadians’ consent to invade their privacy.

Canada banking info collection: May I have this dance?

Justin Trudeau just kept dancing and blaming Conservatives. This new invasion of privacy really doesn’t have anything to do directly with insolvency. However, if I am correct in my guess, and the information is going to be used by CRA, then it may well.

People may very well have engaged in tax evasion. I, of course, do not condone it. Criminal charges aside, Canadians who evade taxes and get caught will now have a huge income tax bill to pay. Many won’t be able to.

There will be many high tax debtors who will not be able to afford a voluntary payment with CRA. Such a voluntary payment plan will need you to pay your original income tax debt. You will not get any reduction in all penalties and interest. So you will be paying in full to Her Majesty. For those who will not be able to afford such a voluntary payment plan, bankruptcy is definitely not your first option. You would have to look at a debt settlement restructuring proposal as a first choice. Bankruptcy should be your last option.

Canada banking info collection: What about you?

If you have received legal advice that you don’t really have a case, or you can’t afford to fight it out in Court or pay the income tax debt that renders you insolvent, then you need the help of a professional trustee.

The Ira Smith Team has years of experience of negotiating with CRA on behalf of tax debtors. If you are an individual person and owe CRA and your other creditors, other than for any loans secured by your home, less than $250,000, you can enter into a consumer proposal debt settlement plan. If you owe more or are a corporation, we can still negotiate with CRA and restructure you with a restructuring proposal debt settlement plan.

Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our door. You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, recover your money and move on to the next investment opportunity.

In conclusion, call us today for your free consultation.canada banking info collection ira smith trustee

Call a Trustee Now!