Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FORM 80 NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO DISCHARGE OF BANKRUPT: OUR COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE FOR CREDITORS AND TRUSTEES

What Is The Notice of Opposition?

When an insolvent person files a bankruptcy insolvency process in Canada, the ultimate goal is to receive a discharge from their debts. However, this process isn’t always automatic. Sometimes, creditors or trustees may have valid reasons to oppose a bankrupt person’s discharge. This is where the Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt becomes crucial.

Understanding how Form 80, the prescribed form, works can make a significant difference in protecting your interests as a creditor or ensuring proper administration of the bankruptcy estate as a trustee. This comprehensive guide will walk you through everything you need to know about Form 80, from who can file it to the specific grounds for opposition.

Whether you’re a creditor concerned about a consumer debtor’s conduct during bankruptcy or a trustee identifying issues with compliance, knowing when and how to use Form 80 is essential. The bankruptcy system relies on honest disclosure and cooperation from all parties, and the Notice of Opposition serves as an important safeguard to ensure these principles are upheld.

Introduction: Understanding the Discharge Process and the Role of Opposition

The bankruptcy discharge process in Canada is designed to give honest but unfortunate debtors a fresh start while protecting the rights of creditors and maintaining the integrity of the system. However, this balance requires careful oversight, and sometimes formal opposition is necessary to address concerns about a bankrupt’s conduct or compliance.

What is Bankruptcy Discharge?

A bankruptcy discharge is the legal release of a bankrupt person from either all or most of their debts and obligations that existed at the time of filing for the bankruptcy insolvency process. When someone receives their discharge, they are no longer legally required to pay the pre-bankruptcy debts released by their bankruptcy discharge. There are some exceptions, like student loans less than seven years old, court fines, and support payments.

The discharge represents the end goal of the bankruptcy insolvency process. It allows individuals to move forward without the burden of overwhelming debt, provided they have met their obligations during the bankruptcy period. For most first-time bankrupts who comply with their duties, discharge happens automatically after nine months for individuals without or 21 months for those with surplus income requirements.

However, not all bankrupts are entitled to an automatic discharge. When there are concerns about the bankrupt’s conduct, honesty, or compliance with bankruptcy requirements, interested parties can file a Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt to bring these issues before the court.

Why is Discharge Important for a Bankrupt?

The discharge is the light at the end of the tunnel for most people going through bankruptcy. Without discharge, a person remains legally obligated to pay their pre-bankruptcy debts, even though they may have already lost their assets and gone through the bankruptcy process.

Discharge also restores many civil rights and privileges that may be suspended during bankruptcy. It allows the former bankrupt to obtain credit more easily, serve as a director of a corporation, and engage in business activities without the restrictions that apply during active bankruptcy status.

For these reasons, most bankrupts are highly motivated to comply with their obligations and obtain their discharge as quickly as possible. When problems arise that might delay or prevent discharge, they create significant consequences for the bankrupt person.

Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt guide showing a split image of a depressed woman with too much debt and the other image is the same happy woman after receiving her discharge from bankruptcy
notice of opposition

Types of Bankruptcy Discharge: Understanding Your Options and Outcomes

When facing a Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt, it’s important to understand that not all discharge outcomes are the same. The court has several options available when dealing with opposition cases, each with different implications for the bankrupt person, their trustee, and unsecured creditors. The bankruptcy discharge is a very important part of the bankruptcy administration. The discharge completely releases the bankrupt from all debts that existed at the date of bankruptcy, with limited exceptions such as student loans less than seven years old, court fines, and support payments.

Absolute Discharge: The Best Possible Outcome

An absolute discharge is the most favourable outcome for any bankrupt person. Normally, the absolute discharge is given as an automatic discharge by the trustee. However, there are occasions where a bankrupt’s application for discharge must be heard by the court. One option the court has, if the evidence shows that the consumer bankrupt did not commit any offences or other inappropriate behaviour, is to grant an absolute discharge.

When an absolute discharge is given or granted, it means the bankrupt has met all their obligations satisfactorily and there are no grounds to impose additional conditions or delays. The discharge takes effect immediately upon the court order being granted.

For the bankrupt person, an absolute discharge represents the complete fresh start that bankruptcy is designed to provide. They can immediately begin rebuilding their credit, engaging in business activities, and moving forward without the burden of pre-bankruptcy debts.

From the trustee’s perspective, an absolute discharge indicates successful administration of the bankruptcy estate. All required duties have been completed, and there are no outstanding issues requiring ongoing supervision or intervention.

Unsecured creditors must accept that their claims are extinguished upon absolute discharge. While they may not recover the full amount owed, the discharge provides certainty and finality to the bankruptcy process.

Conditional Discharge: Meeting Specific Requirements

A conditional discharge requires the bankrupt to fulfill specific conditions before the discharge becomes effective. These conditions are tailored to address particular concerns raised during the opposition process or identified by the court.

Common conditions include paying a lump sum to the estate, making monthly payments for a specified period, completing financial counselling or education programs, or providing additional disclosure about assets or transactions.

The court sets conditions based on the bankrupt’s ability to comply and the seriousness of the issues that led to the opposition. Conditions must be reasonable and achievable, considering the bankrupt’s financial circumstances.

For bankrupt individuals, conditional discharge means either fulfilling some of the normal duties of the bankrupt yet to be completed, or additional obligations beyond the normal bankruptcy requirements. However, once conditions are met, they receive the same debt relief as an absolute discharge.

Trustees play a crucial role in monitoring compliance with discharge conditions. They must verify that conditions have been satisfied before the discharge becomes effective and report to the court if the bankrupt fails to comply.

Unsecured creditors may benefit from conditional discharge orders, particularly if the conditions involve payments to the estate. These additional recoveries can increase dividend distributions to creditors.

Suspended Discharge: Waiting for the Right Time

A suspended discharge delays the effective date of discharge for a specified period. During the suspension period, the bankrupt remains in bankruptcy status and is subject to all associated restrictions and obligations.

Courts typically order suspended discharge when they want to monitor the bankrupt’s conduct for a longer period or when circumstances suggest that immediate discharge would be inappropriate.

The suspension period can range from one day to a few months to several years, depending on the severity of the issues and the court’s assessment of how long monitoring is necessary.

During the suspension period, the bankrupt must continue complying with all bankruptcy obligations. They cannot obtain certain types of credit, serve as a corporate director, or engage in other activities restricted during bankruptcy.

For trustees, suspended discharge means continued involvement in monitoring the bankrupt’s compliance. The trustee remains responsible for supervising the bankrupt throughout the suspension period.

Unsecured creditors gain additional protection through suspended discharge, as it extends the period during which the bankrupt’s activities are subject to oversight and restriction.

Refused Discharge: The Most Serious Consequence

In the most serious cases, courts may refuse to grant discharge altogether. This outcome is reserved for situations involving significant misconduct, fraud, or complete failure to comply with bankruptcy obligations.

When discharge is refused, the bankrupt remains permanently subject to bankruptcy restrictions unless they successfully apply for discharge in the future after addressing the court’s concerns.

Refused discharge is rare but serves as an important deterrent against abuse of the bankruptcy system. It ensures that those who act dishonestly or refuse to cooperate cannot simply walk away from their obligations.

For bankrupt persons, a refused discharge means they cannot achieve the fresh start that bankruptcy typically provides. They remain liable for their pre-bankruptcy debts and are subject to bankruptcy restrictions indefinitely.

Trustees have an obligation to bring on the bankrupt’s first application for discharge. When a discharge is refused by the court, the trustee normally then will go through the final steps to obtain the trustee’s discharge. If one day the bankrupt wishes to get their discharge from bankruptcy, the person must retain insolvency legal counsel to apply to the court for their application to be heard. The undischarged bankrupt will also need to pay a fee to the trustee for the trustee to review its records and participate in the bankrupt’s application hearing.

Unsecured creditors retain their rights to pursue collection against a bankrupt whose discharge has been refused, though the practical ability to collect may still be limited by the bankrupt’s financial circumstances. Once the trustee obtains its discharge, the stay of proceedings which prevented unsecured creditors from taking legal action against the bankrupt evaporates.

Factors Courts Consider When Determining Discharge Type

Courts consider numerous factors when deciding what type of discharge to grant in opposition cases. The bankrupt’s conduct before, during and after bankruptcy is paramount, including their honesty, cooperation with the trustee, and compliance with statutory obligations.

The nature and extent of any misconduct also influence the court’s decision. Technical violations may result in minor conditions, while fraudulent conduct could lead to suspended or refused discharge.

The bankrupt’s ability to comply with potential conditions is another important consideration. Courts won’t impose conditions that are impossible to meet, as this would effectively amount to refusing discharge.

The impact on creditors and the integrity of the bankruptcy system are also weighed. Courts must balance the bankrupt’s right to a fresh start with the need to maintain public confidence in the bankruptcy process.

The Official Receiver’s Role in the Discharge Process

The Official Receiver plays a central role in overseeing bankruptcy discharges in Canada. This government official reviews each bankruptcy file to ensure the bankrupt has complied with their obligations under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

When there are concerns about the bankrupt’s conduct, the Official Receiver has the authority to oppose the discharge by filing the prescribed Form 80.

The Official Receiver’s opposition typically focuses on ensuring the bankrupt has fully disclosed their assets, cooperated with the trustee, and met all statutory requirements. This oversight helps maintain public confidence in the bankruptcy system by ensuring dishonest consumer debtors cannot abuse it.

The Purpose of a Notice of Opposition

The Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt serves several important purposes within the bankruptcy system. First, it provides a formal mechanism for raising concerns about a bankrupt’s conduct or compliance with their obligations.

Second, it ensures that discharge decisions receive proper judicial review when there are legitimate concerns. Rather than allowing potentially problematic discharges to proceed automatically, the opposition process brings these matters before a judge who can examine the evidence and make an appropriate ruling.

Third, the opposition process serves as a deterrent against abuse of the bankruptcy system. Knowing that creditors, trustees, and the Official Receiver can oppose discharge encourages bankrupts to be honest and cooperative throughout the process.

Finally, the opposition process protects the rights of creditors who may have been harmed by fraudulent or dishonest conduct. It ensures these concerns can be formally addressed before the bankrupt receives the benefit of discharge.

Who Can File a Notice of Opposition (Form 80)?

Understanding who has the legal authority to file a prescribed Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt is crucial for anyone involved in the bankruptcy process. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act sets out specific rules about who can raise objections to a bankrupt’s discharge.

Understanding the Parties Involved: Creditors and the Trustee

In any bankruptcy proceeding, there are several key parties who may have an interest in the bankrupt’s discharge. Creditors are individuals or companies who were owed money by the bankrupt at the time of filing. These parties have a direct financial interest in ensuring the bankruptcy process is conducted properly and honestly.

The licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) (LIT) is the licensed insolvency professional appointed to administer the bankruptcy estate. Trustees have a duty to creditors and the court to ensure the bankrupt complies with all obligations and that the estate is properly administered. This fiduciary responsibility gives trustees both the authority and obligation to oppose discharge when appropriate.

The Official Receiver, as mentioned earlier, represents the public interest in ensuring the proper administration of the bankruptcy insolvency process. As a government official, the Official Receiver has broad authority to oppose discharges that may undermine public confidence in the system.

Each of these parties brings different perspectives and concerns to the discharge process. Creditors focus primarily on protecting their financial interests and ensuring they haven’t been harmed by fraudulent conduct. Trustees consider broader compliance issues and proper estate administration. The Official Receiver looks at systemic concerns and adherence to statutory requirements.

Eligibility Criteria for Filing an Opposition

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act sets out specific criteria for who may file a Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt. Generally, any creditor who has proven their claim in the bankruptcy is entitled to file an opposition. This includes both secured and unsecured creditors, provided they have followed proper procedures to establish their claim against the estate.

The LIT always has the authority to file an opposition when they identify concerns about the bankrupt’s conduct or compliance. This authority stems from the trustee’s statutory duties and fiduciary obligations to the estate and its creditors.

The Official Receiver also has broad authority to oppose discharge in appropriate circumstances. This authority is not limited to specific types of concerns but encompasses any situation where the Official Receiver believes opposition serves the public interest.

It’s important to note that the right to file an opposition is not unlimited. The party filing must have legitimate grounds based on the bankrupt’s conduct or non-compliance with statutory obligations. Frivolous or vexatious oppositions may be dismissed by the court and could result in cost awards against the opposing party.

The Bankrupt’s Own Position: Can a Bankrupt Oppose Their Own Discharge?

While it might seem counterintuitive, there are rare circumstances where a bankrupt person might want to delay their own discharge. For example, if the bankrupt discovers additional assets or income that should be disclosed to their LIT, they might prefer to address these issues properly before seeking discharge.

However, the more common situation is that bankrupts strongly desire to obtain their discharge as quickly as possible. From the bankrupt’s perspective, the Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt represents a significant obstacle that could delay their fresh start and continue the restrictions of bankruptcy status.

When facing an opposition, bankrupts have the right to respond and defend against the allegations. They can present evidence, call witnesses, and make legal arguments about why the opposition should be dismissed or why any conditions imposed should be minimal.

The court will consider all evidence from both sides before deciding on the discharge. This adversarial process helps ensure that discharge decisions are fair and based on complete information about the bankrupt’s conduct and circumstances.

Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt guide showing a split image of a depressed woman with too much debt and the other image is the same happy woman after receiving her discharge from bankruptcy
notice of opposition

Form 80: The Notice of Opposition Prescribed Form Document

The Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt is a specific legal document prescribed under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. Understanding its requirements and proper completion is essential for anyone considering filing an opposition.

What is Form 80?

Form 80 is the prescribed form document used across Canada to formally oppose a bankrupt person’s discharge. It serves as the initiating document that brings the matter before the court and sets out the specific grounds for opposition.

The form is designed to provide a clear notice to all parties about the nature of the opposition. It must contain sufficient detail about the grounds for opposition to allow the bankrupt and their counsel to understand the case they need to meet.

Form 80 also serves an important administrative function by ensuring that opposition matters are properly tracked within the court system. The standardized format helps court staff process these matters efficiently and ensures nothing falls through the cracks.

The form must be filed within specific time limits set out in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. Missing these deadlines can result in the loss of the right to oppose discharge, making timely and accurate completion crucial.

Essential Information Required in Form 80

Completing Form 80 properly requires careful attention to detail and accuracy. The form contains several sections that must be completed fully and correctly to ensure the opposition is valid and effective.

Bankrupt’s Name and Details

This prescribed form must include the full legal name of the bankrupt person exactly as it appears in the bankruptcy documents. This includes any aliases or business names used by the bankrupt. Accuracy is critical because errors in the bankrupt’s identification could invalidate the entire opposition.

The bankrupt’s address and other identifying information must also be included. This ensures proper service of documents and helps the court identify the correct bankruptcy proceeding.

Filing Party’s Name and Contact Information (Creditor or Trustee)

The party filing the Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt must provide complete and accurate contact information. This includes their full legal name, address, telephone number, and email address if available.

If the filing party is represented by counsel, the lawyer’s information must also be included. This ensures that all future correspondence and court notices are properly directed.

For corporate creditors, the form must indicate the proper corporate name and the authority of the person signing on behalf of the corporation. This might require providing evidence of signing authority through corporate resolutions or other documentation.

Court and Division Information

The opposition must be filed in the proper court division where the bankruptcy proceeding is taking place. Form 80 requires specific information about the court location and the bankruptcy file number.

Getting this information correct is essential because filing in the wrong court division can cause significant delays and may invalidate the opposition. The trustee’s office can provide the correct court information if there is any uncertainty.

Specific Grounds for Opposition (Detailed Explanation)

This is perhaps the most critical section of Form 80. The filing party must clearly set out the specific grounds for opposing the bankrupt’s discharge. Vague or general allegations are not sufficient; the form must contain specific facts and legal grounds.

Each ground for opposition should be described in detail, including relevant dates, amounts, and circumstances. The more specific and detailed the grounds, the stronger the opposition will be and the better the court can understand the issues.

The grounds must relate to recognized legal bases for opposition under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. Personal disputes or grievances that don’t relate to the bankrupt’s conduct during bankruptcy are not appropriate grounds for opposition.

Supporting Evidence or Statements

Form 80 must be supported by evidence that substantiates the grounds for opposition. This might include financial documents, correspondence, witness statements, or other relevant materials.

The evidence should be organized and clearly referenced in the form. Each piece of evidence should directly support one or more of the stated grounds for opposition.

Affidavit evidence may be required to support certain allegations, particularly those involving the bankrupt’s conduct or statements. These affidavits must be sworn before an authorized person and follow proper legal format requirements.

Prescribed Fees and Payment

Filing Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt requires payment of the prescribed court fees. These fees vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, so it’s important to confirm the current fee schedule with the court registry.

Payment methods accepted by the court vary by location but typically include certified cheques, money orders, or cash. Some courts may accept credit card payments or electronic transfers.

The opposition cannot proceed without proper payment of fees, so ensuring payment is included with the filing is essential. Fee waivers may be available in cases of financial hardship, but these require a separate application and approval.

The Importance of Accuracy and Completeness in Form 80

Accuracy and completeness in Form 80 cannot be overstated. Errors or omissions can result in the opposition being dismissed, delays in processing, or the loss of the right to oppose discharge altogether.

Courts take a strict approach to procedural requirements in bankruptcy matters. This means that technical errors, even if seemingly minor, can have serious consequences for the filing party’s case.

Before filing, it’s essential to carefully review every section of the form for accuracy. Having another person review the form can help catch errors that might be missed by the person who prepared it.

If errors are discovered after filing, it may be possible to amend the form, but this typically requires court approval and may cause delays. Prevention through careful initial preparation is far preferable to attempting corrections later.

Obtaining and Preparing Prescribed Form 80

Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt can be obtained from several sources. Court registries typically have copies available, and many courts provide forms on their websites for downloading and printing.

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy also provides standardized forms that can be used across Canada. These forms are regularly updated to reflect changes in legislation and court requirements.

Legal stationers and trustee offices may also have copies of Form 80 available. However, it’s important to ensure that any form obtained is the current version, as outdated forms may not be accepted by the court.

When preparing the form, consider using legal assistance if the case is complex or if you’re unfamiliar with bankruptcy procedures. LITs and lawyers specializing in bankruptcy law can provide valuable guidance on proper completion and filing procedures.

Grounds for Opposing Discharge: Why a Creditor Might Object

Understanding the legal grounds for opposing a bankrupt’s discharge is crucial for creditors considering filing Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act sets out specific circumstances where opposition may be appropriate and successful.

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act provides the legal framework for opposing discharge applications. Section 173 specifically addresses circumstances where discharge may be refused, suspended, or granted subject to conditions.

The Act recognizes that discharge is not an absolute right but rather a privilege that must be earned through honest conduct and compliance with bankruptcy obligations. When a bankrupt fails to meet these standards, creditors and other interested parties have the right to bring these failures to the court’s attention.

The legal standard for opposition is not merely dissatisfaction with the bankruptcy outcome. Instead, there must be specific conduct or circumstances that justify court intervention in the discharge process.

Courts have developed extensive case law interpreting these statutory provisions, guiding what constitutes sufficient grounds for opposition and what remedies may be appropriate in different circumstances.

Common Grounds for Opposition:

Failure to Disclose Property

One of the fundamental obligations of any bankrupt person is to fully disclose all assets and property to their trustee. This includes not only obvious assets like bank accounts and real estate but also more complex items like pending legal claims, intellectual property, crypto or interests in trusts or estates.

When a bankrupt fails to disclose assets, it deprives creditors of recoveries they might otherwise receive. This conduct undermines the entire bankruptcy system and provides strong grounds for opposing discharge.

Common examples of non-disclosure include hidden bank accounts, undisclosed business interests, transferred assets, or failure to mention inheritance expectations. Even assets that might seem minimal can be significant in the context of a bankruptcy estate.

The key issue is not necessarily the value of the undisclosed property but the fact that the bankrupt attempted to hide it from creditors and the trustee. This dishonest conduct justifies court intervention in the discharge process.

Non-Compliance with Duties of the Bankrupt (e.g., providing information, books)

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act imposes specific duties on bankrupt persons throughout the bankruptcy process. These duties include attending meetings with the trustee, providing requested information, delivering books and records, and generally cooperating with the administration of the estate.

When a bankrupt fails to comply with these duties, it can significantly impair the trustee’s ability to properly administer the estate and investigate the bankrupt’s affairs. This non-compliance provides grounds for opposing discharge.

Common examples include failure to attend required meetings, refusing to provide financial records, failing to complete required forms or questionnaires, or generally being uncooperative with the trustee’s requests.

The extent and nature of the non-compliance matters. Minor delays or technical failures may not justify opposition, but systematic non-cooperation or refusal to comply with major obligations certainly would.

Fraudulent Transactions or Intent to Defraud

Fraudulent conduct represents one of the most serious grounds for opposing discharge. This can include transactions designed to defeat creditors, false statements about financial affairs, or other dishonest conduct related to the bankruptcy.

Fraudulent transactions might include transferring assets to family members for inadequate consideration, creating false debts to preferred parties, or disposing of assets without proper disclosure to the trustee.

Intent to defraud can be proven through the bankrupt’s actions and the circumstances surrounding them. Courts look at factors like the timing of transactions, the relationship between parties, the consideration paid, and the bankrupt’s knowledge of their financial difficulties.

Even unsuccessful attempts at fraud can provide grounds for opposition. The key is the bankrupt’s intent and conduct, not necessarily whether the fraudulent scheme succeeded.

Prior Bankruptcy or Insolvency Proceedings

A bankrupt’s history of previous insolvency proceedings can be relevant to their current discharge application. Multiple bankruptcies may suggest a pattern of financial irresponsibility or an abuse of the bankruptcy system.

The mere fact of previous bankruptcy is not automatically grounds for opposition, but it becomes relevant when combined with other factors like non-compliance or dishonest conduct.

Courts consider factors like the time between bankruptcies, the reasons for the repeat insolvency, and whether the bankrupt has learned from previous experiences and modified their behaviour accordingly.

Repeat bankruptcies may result in longer waiting periods before discharge or conditions being imposed to address underlying financial management issues.

Obtaining Credit Under False Pretenses

When a bankrupt has obtained credit through false or misleading statements, this provides strong grounds for opposing discharge. This is particularly relevant for credit obtained shortly before filing for bankruptcy.

False pretenses might include overstating income, understating debts, providing false employment information, or failing to disclose material changes in financial circumstances.

The creditor who provided credit based on false information may think that since they have a particularly strong position to oppose discharge, as the bankrupt’s dishonest conduct directly harmed them, they should. However, if they can prove the fraud in court, then that judgment they get will follow the person around for life, as certain debts arising from fraudulent conduct cannot be eliminated through a bankruptcy discharge.

So in that case, the creditor should obtain their fraud judgment and then hope the person gets their discharge from bankruptcy so that all or most other debts are discharged. The creditor whose judgment is based on fraud can then go after the person when they have amassed more assets and have less debt.

Courts take this ground seriously because it directly involves dishonesty toward creditors and undermines the trust that credit relationships require.

When considering whether to file Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt, it’s important to evaluate whether the circumstances fit within these recognized legal grounds. Having legitimate grounds supported by evidence is essential for a successful opposition.

The consequences of filing an unfounded opposition can include cost awards against the filing party, so careful consideration of the merits is essential before proceeding.

Strategic Considerations for All Parties

Understanding the different types of discharge available helps all parties make informed decisions about opposition proceedings. Creditors can assess whether the potential outcomes justify the time and expense of filing Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt.

Bankrupt persons can better understand the potential consequences of their actions and make informed decisions about how to respond to opposition proceedings.

Trustees can provide better advice to all parties by explaining the likely outcomes based on the specific circumstances of each case.

The discharge type ultimately determines how effectively the bankruptcy process achieves its goals of providing debt relief to honest debtors while protecting creditor interests and maintaining system integrity.

Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt guide showing a split image of a depressed woman with too much debt and the other image is the same happy woman after receiving her discharge from bankruptcy
notice of opposition

Frequently Asked Questions About Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt

What is Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt?

Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt is the official legal document used in Canada to formally oppose a bankrupt person’s application for discharge from bankruptcy. This form allows creditors, trustees, or the Official Receiver to bring concerns about the bankrupt’s conduct or compliance before the court.

The form serves as the starting point for court proceedings that can delay, condition, or even prevent a bankrupt’s discharge. It must contain specific information about the grounds for opposition and be filed within strict time limits.

How much does it cost to file Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt?

The cost to file Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt varies by court jurisdiction as court filing fees. Additional costs may include legal representation, which can range from $2,000 to $10,000 depending on the complexity of the case.

Some courts may waive fees in cases of financial hardship, but this requires a separate application. It’s important to confirm current fee schedules with your local court registry before filing.

Who can file Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt?

Several parties have the legal right to file Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt. Proven creditors who have filed claims in the bankruptcy can file an opposition if they have valid grounds. The LIT administering the bankruptcy estate also has the authority to file opposition when they identify compliance issues.

The Official Receiver, representing the public interest, can file an opposition in appropriate circumstances. However, not everyone can file – the party must have standing and legitimate grounds based on the bankrupt’s conduct or non-compliance with statutory obligations.

What are the time limits for filing Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt?

Time limits for filing Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt are strictly enforced under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. Generally, opposition must be filed no later than one month before the automatic discharge date or within the time specified in discharge application notices.

For first-time bankrupts, this typically means filing within eight months of the bankruptcy date. Missing these deadlines usually results in losing the right to oppose discharge, making timely action crucial.

Can a bankrupt person defend against Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt?

Yes, bankrupt persons have the right to defend against Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt. They can file responding materials, present evidence, call witnesses, and make legal arguments about why the opposition should be dismissed.

The court process is adversarial, meaning both sides present their case before a judge makes a decision. Bankrupts often benefit from legal representation when defending against opposition, especially in complex cases involving allegations of fraud or serious misconduct.

What happens after the the Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt is filed?

After Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt is filed, the court schedules a hearing where all parties can present evidence and arguments. The bankrupt person receives notice of the opposition and has the right to respond.

The hearing process can take several months to complete, during which the bankrupt remains in bankruptcy status. The judge will review all evidence before deciding whether to grant absolute discharge, conditional discharge, suspended discharge, or refuse discharge altogether.

How long does the Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt process take?

The Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt process typically takes three to twelve months from filing to final court decision. Simple cases with straightforward issues may resolve more quickly, while complex cases involving extensive evidence or multiple parties can take longer.

Factors affecting the timeline include court scheduling, the complexity of issues raised, the amount of evidence to review, and whether the parties reach any settlement agreements before the hearing.

What evidence is needed for Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt?

Evidence for Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt must directly support the specific grounds for opposition stated in the form. This might include financial documents showing undisclosed assets, correspondence demonstrating non-cooperation with the trustee, or records proving fraudulent transactions.

Witness statements, expert reports, and documentary evidence should be organized clearly and referenced specifically in the opposition form. Affidavit evidence may be required for certain types of allegations, particularly those involving the bankrupt’s conduct or statements.

Can Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt be withdrawn?

Yes, Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt can be withdrawn by the filing party at any time before the court makes its final decision. Withdrawal typically requires filing a formal notice with the court and serving it on all parties.

Parties might withdraw opposition if the bankrupt addresses their concerns, new evidence emerges that undermines their case, or they reach a settlement agreement. However, withdrawal doesn’t guarantee the court won’t consider the issues raised if other parties maintain their opposition.

What are the most common grounds for filing Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt?

The most common grounds for filing Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt include failure to disclose assets or property to the trustee, non-compliance with statutory duties like attending meetings or providing information, and fraudulent transactions designed to defeat creditors.

Other frequent grounds include obtaining credit under false pretenses before bankruptcy, having previous bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, and general lack of cooperation with the trustee’s administration of the estate.

How does Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt affect credit rebuilding?

Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt significantly delays credit rebuilding because it prevents or delays the bankrupt’s discharge. Without discharge, the person remains in bankruptcy status and cannot begin the credit rebuilding process.

Even after resolving opposition proceedings, the bankruptcy remains on credit reports for six to seven years from the discharge date. Conditional or suspended discharges may create additional reporting that further impacts credit scores and lending decisions.

Can multiple parties file Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt for the same bankrupt?

Yes, multiple parties can file separate Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt documents against the same bankrupt person. Each opposition is treated as a separate proceeding, though courts often consolidate hearings for efficiency.

Multiple oppositions can strengthen the overall case against discharge, especially if different parties raise complementary concerns about the bankrupt’s conduct. However, each filing party must have their own valid grounds and standing to oppose.

What role does the LIT play in Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt cases?

Licensed insolvency trustees play multiple roles in Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt cases. They may file opposition themselves when they identify compliance issues or misconduct during estate administration.

When other parties file opposition, trustees often provide evidence about the bankrupt’s compliance with statutory duties, cooperation levels, and any issues discovered during estate administration. Trustees must remain neutral and focus on factual evidence rather than advocacy for any particular outcome.

How much can a conditional discharge cost under Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt proceedings?

Conditional discharge costs resulting from Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt proceedings vary widely based on the bankrupt’s circumstances and the severity of issues raised. Payments to the estate can range from a few thousand dollars to tens of thousands of dollars.

Courts consider the bankrupt’s ability to pay when setting conditions, but also weigh the seriousness of misconduct and the benefit to creditors. Monthly payment plans over several years are common when lump sum payments aren’t feasible.

What happens if a bankrupt violates conditions set after Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt proceedings?

If a bankrupt violates conditions set after Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt proceedings, the trustee must report the violation to the court. This can result in the discharge being revoked or additional conditions being imposed.

Notice of Opposition Conclusion

The path to financial freedom in Canada’s current economic climate may be challenging, but it is not impossible. With the right information, a clear plan, and professional guidance, you can overcome your cost of living and debt challenges and move towards a more secure and hopeful financial future.

You’re not alone in this. There’s a path forward, and it starts with reaching out for the right kind of help. Take that step—you deserve it. If you’re a GTA resident dealing with overwhelming debt, don’t wait for your credit situation to get worse. As a licensed insolvency trustee serving Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton, Markham, and surrounding areas, I’m here to help you understand your options.

Free consultation available:

  • No obligation to proceed
  • Complete review of your debt and credit situation
  • Clear explanation of how debt solutions affect your Equifax credit score
  • Practical next steps you can take immediately

Remember: Your current financial situation doesn’t define your future. With the right help and information, you can overcome both debt challenges and credit score problems.

As a licensed insolvency trustee serving the Greater Toronto Area, I encourage consumers and business owners to view financial difficulties not as failures but as challenges that can be addressed with proper guidance. By understanding the warning signs of insolvency and seeking professional advice early, many people and businesses can find a path forward – whether through restructuring, strategic changes, or in some cases, an orderly wind-down that protects their future opportunities.

Remember: The earlier you seek help for company insolvency concerns, the more options you’ll have.

If you or someone you know is struggling with too much debt, remember that the financial restructuring process, while complex, offers viable solutions with the right guidance. As a licensed insolvency trustee serving the Greater Toronto Area, I help entrepreneurs understand their options and find a path forward during financial challenges.

At the Ira Smith Team, we understand the financial and emotional components of debt struggles. We’ve seen how traditional approaches often fall short in today’s economic environment, so we focus on modern debt relief options that can help you avoid bankruptcy while still achieving financial freedom.

The stress of financial challenges can be overwhelming. We take the time to understand your unique situation and develop customized strategies that address both your financial needs and emotional well-being. There’s no “one-size-fits-all” approach here—your financial solution should be as unique as the challenges you’re facing.

If any of this sounds familiar and you’re serious about finding a solution, reach out to the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today for a free consultation. We’re committed to helping you or your company get back on the road to healthy, stress-free operations and recover from financial difficulties. Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., and any contributors do not assume any liability for any loss or damage.

Form 80 Notice of Opposition To Discharge Of Bankrupt guide showing a split image of a depressed woman with too much debt and the other image is the same happy woman after receiving her discharge from bankruptcy
notice of opposition
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM 31: ESSENTIAL TIPS TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE NEW CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY FORM 31

Form 31 Proof of Claim Introduction

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) published several amended Forms under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) to promote a more efficient and effective insolvency system, removing some outdated elements and ensuring better data integrity for all stakeholders. These amended Forms were originally set to come into force on July 15, 2024. One of those new forms is the Form 31 proof of claim. This morning, the OSB announced that the effective date has now been pushed back to September 16, 2024.

In this Brandon’s Blog, given the new proof of claim form coming into use effective July 15, I feel I need to update my October 2018 blog titled: FORM 31 PROOF OF CLAIM: HOW TO PROPERLY COMPLETE THE PROOF OF CLAIM. I will compare the new form to the old one as there are substantial changes and advise on how it should be properly completed as we walk through the new form.

Background Information on Form 31 Proof of Claim

Purpose of Form 31 Proof of Claim

Claims of creditors in bankruptcy or restructuring proposal cases are made on a very specific proof of claim form. The purpose of the form is to furnish information about the claim by the creditor against the debtor. It asks for such things as the contact details of the creditor and permission to represent it if it is a corporate body. Additionally, there are interrogatives on debt aspects like the amount due and supporting papers.

The types of claims section encompasses unsecured claims, lessor claims, secured claims, farm or wage earner claims, plan administrator’s claims, director’s liability claims and client claims against their bankrupt securities dealer.

It also inquires whether or not there has been any relationship between the debtor’s recent transactions with the creditor such as recent payments.

One can obtain information regarding an insolvent person’s financial condition and their application for discharge from bankruptcy. There is a caution at the end of this document concerning penalties for making fake claims or giving false statements. The creditor must sign it himself or through the representative. If an affidavit is attached thereto, then it must be sworn by a person who is authorized by law to administer oaths.

Importance of Properly Completing Form 31

The proper completion of Form 31, Proof of Claim, is crucial in the claims process for creditors with substantiated claims. This form serves as a critical document for creditors looking to assert and potentially recover owed debts. Providing accurate and thorough information on this form is essential for creditors to establish a strong foundation for their claims.

Failure to provide complete or accurate information on Form 31 can lead to delays, rejections, or the disqualification of the claim. Therefore, it is imperative for creditors to closely follow the instructions and guidelines stipulated in Form 31. By doing so, creditors can ensure that their claims are accurately documented and processed efficiently within the specified timelines.picture of woman holding a pen about to complete the form 31 proof of claim in a Canadian bankruptcy proceeding to register her claim with the licensed insolvency trustee

Section 1: Understanding the Basics of Form 31 Proof of Claim

Definition of Provable Claim

Section 2 of the BIA contains the definitions. In that section, a provable claim is defined:

includes any claim or liability provable in proceedings under this Act by a creditor

What does this mean? it means that a provable claim refers to a debt or obligation owed by a debtor that can be verified and substantiated through documentary evidence. For a claim to be considered provable, it must meet certain criteria established by the Act, including an amount that can be determined, is due and payable at the time of the bankruptcy or within a reasonable period after that, and not be contingent on some other event or unliquidated.

Difference Between Provable and Unliquidated Claims

An unliquidated claim under the BIA refers to a claim for a specific amount of money that has not yet been determined or quantified. This type of claim typically arises when the exact amount owed to a creditor is uncertain or requires further investigation to establish.

In the context of bankruptcy proceedings, unliquidated claims present a challenge as they may complicate the distribution of assets to creditors. To address this issue, mechanisms for resolving unliquidated claims include negotiations, mediation, a disallowance of the claim by the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) (the “Trustee”) or court proceedings to determine the appropriate amount owed.

Properly handling unliquidated claims is essential for ensuring fair and efficient bankruptcy proceedings under Canadian law.

Identifying False Claims

Ensuring the validity of claims in Canadian bankruptcy proceedings is a crucial element in safeguarding the integrity of the bankruptcy system. Baseless claims hinder the fair distribution of assets to rightful creditors and undermine confidence in the process. The proliferation of meritless claims can result in delays, increased expenses, and potential financial harm to creditors.

It is essential for Trustees to thoroughly evaluate the authenticity of claims to prevent manipulation and dishonesty. Implementing rigorous verification procedures and penalties for unsubstantiated claims are essential strategies for upholding the fairness and transparency of Canadian bankruptcy proceedings.

Section 2: Required Information for Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

Completing and returning a Form 31 proof of claim is an important phase in the bankruptcy process. They are one of the documents included with the notice of bankruptcy documents sent out by the Trustee to formally notify the creditors of the bankruptcy.

Personal Details of the Creditor

For proof of claim to be properly completed, the creditor must furnish their contact information, encompassing their mailing address, fax number, and email address. Moreover, the creditor must substantiate their legitimacy as a creditor of the debtor and exhibit a thorough understanding of all pertinent details related to the claim. This takes you from the top of the new Form 31 proof of claim down to numbered paragraph #2.

Details of the Claim

It is incumbent upon the creditor to clearly outline the total sum of the outstanding debt owed by the debtor, in addition to any potential counterclaims, accompanied by relevant documentation or substantiating evidence. The new proof of claim form now requires a creditor to verify that the debt remains within the statutory limitations stipulated by the pertinent provincial laws and regulations. In other words, the claim is not statute-barred.

Those details are covered by paragraphs 3 through 5 of the form.

Priority of the Claim

Paragraph 6 is where, as an unsecured creditor, you need to insert the amount for what you believe to be your claim provable in the actual restructuring proposal to creditors or bankruptcy of the person or company. You must also declare whether you do or do not claim a right to a priority. If you do not, this means that you are an ordinary unsecured creditor.

If you are claiming a right to a priority claim as an unsecured creditor, you are stating that you are entitled to a priority of payment ahead of the ordinary unsecured creditors. The new Form 31 proof of claim requires you to identify what type of priority you are claiming.

The various types of unsecured claims that can have priority over ordinary unsecured claims, which are called preferred claims, are, in order of priority:

  • For a deceased bankrupt, reasonable funeral and testamentary costs.
  • The claims for wages by a wage earner employee for unpaid wage claims and certain other amounts treated like remuneration for services rendered during the period beginning on the day that is six months before the date of the initial bankruptcy event or the first day on which there was a receiver. This claim is limited to a maximum payment of $2,000, less any amounts paid for their services by the licensed insolvency trustee.
  • Any shortfall to a secured creditor as a result of the claim for employees’ priority above.
  • Any shortfall to a secured creditor as a result of the claim of employees paid out for unpaid amounts regarding prescribed pension plans.
  • Alimony or support payments payable by the bankrupt person under either a court order or an agreement made before the date of the initial bankruptcy event.
  • municipal taxes levied against a bankrupt’s real property within the two years immediately preceding the bankruptcy not registered as a lien against the property. This preferred claim cannot exceed the value of the bankrupt’s interest in the property.
  • A lessor for rent arrears for no more than 3 months before the date of bankruptcy and only if stipulated in the lease, a claim for accelerated rent for no more than an additional 3 months. This claim is limited to the amount realized by the Trustee from the property of the bankrupt on those premises. Further, any payment made by the licensed insolvency trustee for accelerated rent shall be credited against any amount the Trustee may owe the landlord for the Trustee’s occupation of those leased premises.
  • One bill of costs of a lawyer for a judgment creditor who is the first to have garnished or otherwise executed against the property of the bankrupt, but only to a maximum of the amount obtained by the Trustee from the realization of assets from the sale of such property.
  • Certain government debts.
  • Claims from injuries to employees of the bankrupt where workers’ compensation legislation does not apply, but only if there is an insurer or surety guaranteeing damages from injuries and up to the maximum guaranteed.picture of woman holding a pen about to complete the form 31 proof of claim in a Canadian bankruptcy proceeding to register her claim with the licensed insolvency trustee

Section 3: Additional Considerations for Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

There are also specialized claims that a creditor may qualify for.

A Claim of Lessor For Disclaimer of a Lease

In a corporate restructuring under the Proposal provisions of the BIA, the insolvent company can disclaim or resiliate a commercial lease. The insolvent debtor must be able to show that it cannot successfully restructure if it still has to be responsible for that commercial lease. Upon the disclaiming or resiliation of the commercial lease, the landlord is allowed to calculate its claim using the formula and provisions laid out in the BIA.

Valuing a Secured Claim

Secured creditors have the option, though not a mandatory requirement unless stipulated by the licensed insolvency trustee, to file their claim. This process involves the secured creditor completing the proof of claim form, where they estimate the value of the assets linked to their security. Any outstanding amount owed to the creditor beyond the assets’ value is also specified on the proof of claim, thereby converting it into an unsecured claim.

Secured creditors must exercise caution when determining the value of their secured claim. As per subsection 128(3) of the BIA, a Trustee may opt to redeem a security by reimbursing the secured creditor with the security’s assessed value, as indicated by the secured creditor in the proof of claim. A licensed insolvency trustee would only proceed with redemption if they ascertain that the actual value of the assets surpasses the value assigned by the secured creditor to its security.

Moreover, a Trustee must seek an independent legal opinion on the security documents. That is why a Trustee will always ask for proof of security.

Claim by Farmer, Fisherman or Aquaculturist

Claims of farmers, fishermen, and aquaculturists are granted specific privileges for claims under the BIA legislation. This particular category of creditors is entitled to certain rights. In addition to the standard revindication rights, farmers, fishermen, and aquaculturists have a 30-day window following the initiation of bankruptcy proceedings or the appointment of a receiver to submit their claim for products supplied within 15 days before the bankruptcy event. Once the claim is successfully filed, these creditors are granted a primary lien on all the inventory of the insolvent debtor, excluding any inventory that may be subject to another party’s repossession rights.

Claim by Pension Plan for the unpaid amount

I alluded to claims in respect of an unpaid pension amount above. In 2008 the BIA was amended in reaction to several high-profile corporate restructurings and bankruptcies where there were pension payment amounts deducted from employee wages but not remitted to the pension plan. When the employer went bankrupt, the employees’ pension entitlement was negatively affected (think Sears Canada). Pension entitlement is an important component of the overall employees’ remuneration.

Therefore, Parliament mandated a reform where a super-priority is created for claims for unremitted pension contributions outstanding when an employer becomes bankrupt. The kinds of amounts given this super-priority are pension payments deducted from an employee’s wages but not remitted to the pension plan administrator, amounts owed by the employer for the cost of benefits paid by the pension plan and employer contributions to a defined benefit pension plan. What is excluded from this super-priority is any amount needed to reduce an unfunded pension liability.

Claims Against Directors

This kind of claim comes into play when a BIA corporate restructuring proposal provides for the compromise of claims against directors. The kind of claims against directors that a corporate proposal can compromise must have a very specific set of characteristics:

  1. A claim against directors is being compromised in the corporate Proposal.
  2. Arose before the filing of the Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal or the Proposal itself.
  3. Relate to corporate obligations that are director liabilities by operation of law.

They do not include any corporate liabilities that one or more directors may have personally guaranteed as individuals.

Claim of a Customer of a Bankrupt Securities Firm

The BIA delineates precise protocols for the allocation and distribution of cash and securities within a securities firm customer pool fund. The intricacies of this process are highly technical and exceed the purview of this blog post on completing a Form 31 proof of claim. It is essential to understand that distinct provisions are in place for companies of this nature that have filed for bankruptcy.

Complicated or Contingent Claims

There are a variety of claims that by their very nature, produce complications. Just because a claim might be complicated, it does not mean the proof of claim should not be fully completed and filed with the Trustee. It also does not mean that the licensed insolvency trustee does not have to review it to determine if it is admissible or not.

Examples of complicated claims are unliquidated claims discussed above and contingent claims. In a Canadian insolvency case, a contingent claim is a claim that is not yet due and payable but may become due and payable in the future. Contingent claims are often referred to as “contingent debts” or “contingent liabilities.”

A contingent claim may arise in various situations, such as:

  1. A lawsuit or legal action that has not yet been resolved, but may result in a payment or settlement in the future.
  2. A contract or agreement that provides for payment or performance in the future, but only if certain conditions are met.
  3. A guarantee or indemnity that may become payable in the future if a specific event occurs.

When a contingent claim is filed in a bankruptcy or proposal case, the licensed insolvency trustee must handle it in a specific manner. Here are the key steps:

  1. Initial Review: The Trustee reviews the contingent claim to determine its validity and the likelihood of it becoming due and payable in the future.
  2. Assessment of Likelihood of Payment: The Trustee assesses the likelihood of the contingent claim becoming due and payable, considering factors such as the strength of the underlying legal claim, the likelihood of a settlement or judgment, and the potential for future payments or performance.
  3. Valuation of the Claim: The Trustee values the contingent claim, taking into account the likelihood of payment and the potential amount of the payment.
  4. Inclusion in the Statement of Affairs: The Trustee should include a contingent claim in the sworn Statement of Affairs, which is the document that outlines the insolvent debtor’s assets, liabilities, and financial affairs. The creditor would be listed as a contingent creditor. Because at this stage the Trustee has not received a proof of claim to review, it is wise to list the amount of this contingent debt either as “unknown” or with a value of just $1.
  5. Monitoring and Follow-up: The Trustee monitors the contingent claim and follows up with the creditor to ensure that any future payments or performance are made following the terms of the agreement or contract.
  6. Distribution of Funds: If the contingent claim becomes due and payable in a specific amount and the creditor has filed the proof of claim properly, the Trustee needs to include the valued claim in calculating a distribution to the unsecured creditors.

Creditors are required to furnish the licensed insolvency trustee with all essential documentation and information to substantiate their contingent claim. Subsequently, the Trustee will work with the creditor to ensure the appropriate handling of the claim.

Section 4: Procedural Requirements for Submitting Form 31 Proof of Claim

As a creditor, it’s crucial to understand the procedural requirements for submitting a Form 31 Proof of Claim in a Canadian insolvency case. In this section, we’ll delve into the key issues that creditors should be aware of when submitting their Proof of Claim.

Deadline for Submitting Proof of Claim

The deadline for submitting a proof of claim is a critical aspect of the insolvency process. In Canada, creditors have a specific timeframe to file their proof of claim. Until a creditor files a proof of claim with the Trustee, the creditor cannot participate in the insolvency process. Creditors should ensure they submit their proof of claim well within the deadline to avoid any potential issues.

The First Meeting of Creditors in bankruptcy or the Meeting of Creditors in a restructuring proposal takes place 21 days after the date of filing. If a creditor who has a provable claim wishes to vote at the meeting of creditors, then it is important to have filed the fully completed proof of claim, with all supporting backup documentation, in time for the Trustee to be able to review it.

At the meeting of creditors, it is up to the meeting chair to admit or disallow any claim for voting purposes. In a bankruptcy, the creditors vote on several matters, including the appointment of Inspectors. The Meeting of Inspectors normally immediately follows the meeting of creditors. So if a creditor wishes to nominate an Inspector, it has to have filed its claim to be able to vote. To be able to vote for or against a consumer proposal or corporate restructuring proposal, the proof of claim must be filed.

The only other real deadline to file a proof of claim is before the Trustee is going to make a distribution. A Trustee must send each creditor listed on the Statement of Affairs who has not yet filed a proof of claim notice to file a claim before making a final distribution. That notice will have a deadline in it. If the creditor misses that deadline then they are not entitled to receive any dividend from the insolvency estate.

Properly Filing the Form 31

Properly filing the Form 31 proof of claim is a critical step. Creditors must ensure they complete the form accurately and thoroughly, providing all necessary information, including the amount of the debt, the date the debt was incurred, and any relevant documentation. It’s also essential to sign and date the form, as well as attach any supporting documentation. Creditors should also ensure they file the form with the correct office, as specified in the bankruptcy notice.

Notice of IntentionTo Make A Proposal

In some cases, the insolvent individual or corporation may file a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal, which provides creditors with advance notice of the impending restructuring proposal. At the Notice of Intention stage, there is not a specific deadline for submitting a proof of claim. A proof of claim is not sent out at this notice stage. After the Proposal is filed and the Trustee sends out the Proposal package to the known creditors, in that package the proof of claim form 31 is provided. Creditors should carefully review the Proposal package and ensure they submit their proof of claim by the specified deadline.

I was involved some time ago in a corporate restructuring case where a financial institution creditor filed a proof of claim and a voting letter using their form at the notice of intention stage. The form was improperly completed and I warned the creditor that its proof of claim was not being accepted and that they must file a new one, properly and fully completed, after they receive the Proposal package from our Firm.

They ignored my warnings and did not do so. I therefore disallowed their claim which meant their vote did not count. They appealed my decision to the Court. The Court agreed with the Trustee. Not only did their vote not count, but because they lost the appeal, they also had to pay our lawyer’s costs!

Notice of Bankruptcy Process

The bankruptcy notification is a crucial document that provides creditors with essential information about the bankruptcy proceedings, including the timeline for submitting a proof of claim. This notification is distributed by the licensed insolvency trustee managing the bankruptcy process and offers creditors a detailed overview of the procedures involved, including the deadline for submitting proof of claims.

To ensure the accurate and complete submission of the claim form, it is advisable to follow the guidelines outlined below in Section 5. Submitting a Form 31 proof of claim is a critical aspect of the bankruptcy process. Creditors must meet the submission deadline, correctly file the form, and provide all necessary information. Understanding the procedural requirements for submitting a proof of claim helps creditors protect their rights and ensure their interests are properly represented throughout the process.picture of woman holding a pen about to complete the form 31 proof of claim in a Canadian bankruptcy proceeding to register her claim with the licensed insolvency trustee

Section 5: Ensuring Accuracy in Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim – A Step-by-Step Guide to Filing a Proof of Claim

As a creditor, it’s essential to know how to complete Form 31, also known as the Proof of Claim, when dealing with bankruptcy or proposal proceedings. The only way for creditor claims to be registered properly is through the filing of a properly and fully completed proof of claim form.

Let me walk you through the step-by-step process of filling out this crucial document.

Step 1: Gather Required Information

Before starting to fill out Form 31, make sure you have the following information readily available:

  • The name of the bankrupt individual or corporation
  • The amount of the debt owed to you
  • The date the debt was incurred
  • Any relevant documentation, such as invoices or contracts

Step 2: Complete the Header Information

Begin by filling out the header section of the form, which includes:

  • The name of the bankrupt individual or corporation
  • The file number assigned to the bankruptcy proceeding

Step 3: Furnish Creditor Details

In this step, kindly provide the following details as the creditor:

  • Your full name and mailing address
  • Your business name and registered address (if applicable)
  • Your contact information, including phone number and email address

Step 4: Specify the Debt

Specify the debt you’re claiming:

  • The amount of the debt owed to you
  • The date the debt was incurred
  • A brief description of the debt, including any relevant details
  • Completing whether or not you are a secured, claiming a priority or an ordinary unsecured creditor
  • Make sure that you include the entire claim

Step 5: Provide Supporting Documentation

Attach any relevant documentation to support your claim, such as:

  • Invoices or receipts
  • Contracts or agreements
  • Bank statements or other financial records

Step 6: Sign and Date the Form

Once you’ve completed the form, including completing the proxy form section if the creditor is a corporation, sign and date it in the designated areas.

Step 7: File the Form

Submit the completed Form 31 to the professional trustee administering the bankruptcy, along with any supporting documentation. You can submit the proof of claim by fax, email, snail mail or delivery. The most important reason of course is that if there is going to be a distribution to the creditors, you want to make sure that you have submitted your claim for dividend purposes.

Additional Tips and Reminders

  • Ensure to maintain a copy of the completed form for your records.
  • If you’re unsure about any part of the process, consider consulting with a bankruptcy lawyer or the Trustee handling the bankruptcy case . In case of any uncertainties regarding any aspect of the process, it is advisable to seek advice from a bankruptcy lawyer or the Trustee overseeing the bankruptcy case.
  • File your claim on time to safeguard your rights as a creditor.

By adhering to these guidelines and furnishing precise information, you will complete Form 31 and safeguard your creditor rights throughout the bankruptcy or restructuring proceedings.

Section 6: Common Mistakes to Avoid when Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

When engaging in the intricate process of submitting a proof of claim to the Trustee, it is imperative to steer clear of common errors that may result in delays, rejections, or potential dismissal of your claim. This section will outline three crucial errors to avoid when completing Form 31 for the proof of claim.

  • Providing incomplete or inaccurate information on your proof of claim: This can significantly hinder the processing of your claim or result in its rejection. To mitigate this risk, it is crucial to take the following steps:

By paying close attention to these details, you can enhance the accuracy and efficiency of your claim submission process.

  • Failure to include supporting documentation: This is a significant oversight that can result in the rejection or delay of your claim. To mitigate this risk, it is imperative to adhere to the following guidelines:
  • Missed Deadlines for Submission: Be sure to allocate extra time for any unforeseen delays or complications when submitting your proof of claim before the deadline. To minimize last-minute stress, make sure to submit your claim well ahead of the due date. By being proactive and avoiding these typical errors, you can streamline the filing process and increase your chances of a successful outcome. Remember to thoroughly review your details, attach all necessary documentation, and submit your claim with ample time to spare. Finally, missing deadlines for submitting your proof of claim can have severe consequences, including dismissal of your claim.

To ensure a successful filing process, it’s important to avoid these common mistakes. Make sure to thoroughly review your information, attach all necessary supporting documents, and submit your claim with ample time before the deadline.

Section 7: Form 31 Proof of Claim FAQs

In this section, we’ll address some frequently asked questions about completing Form 31 proof of claim.

Q1: What is Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A1: Form 31 Proof of Claim is a prescribed form that creditors use to indicate their claim against a bankrupt estate or in a formal restructuring under the BIA. It is a crucial step in the process, as it allows creditors to assert their rights and receive a portion of the available funds.

Q2: Where can I find Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A2: Form 31 Proof of Claim may be obtained from the office of the Trustee or downloaded from the official website of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada. Make sure you get the most up-to-date version of the form as the new one goes into effect on July 15, 2024.

Q3: What information should I include in Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A3: When completing Form 31 Proof of Claim, you should provide accurate and detailed information, including your name and address, the debtor’s name, the amount of your claim, and any supporting documentation.

Q4: Are there any specific formatting guidelines for completing Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A4: While there are no strict formatting guidelines, it’s important to ensure that your form is neat, legible, and organized. Use clear and concise language, and avoid any unnecessary details. Attach supporting documents in a logical order and label them appropriately.

Q5: Can I submit multiple claims using Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A5: Yes, you can submit multiple claims using Form 31 Proof of Claim. However, you must separate each claim clearly and provide all the necessary information and supporting documentation for each claim.

Q6: Can I make changes to my submitted Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A6: Once you have submitted your Form 31 Proof of Claim, it depends on the change. If it is something very minor, like your phone number, the Trustee will make that change for you. If it is a major change, like the amount you are claiming, it is recommended that you file an amended claim. Therefore, reviewing your form carefully before submission and ensuring its accuracy is crucial. If you need to make corrections or updates, contact the Trustee’s office immediately.

Remember, completing Form 31 Proof of Claim accurately and on time is essential to assert your rights as a creditor and receive a fair distribution from the estate. By following these tips and guidelines, you can navigate the process successfully.

Conclusion

Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim is crucial for creditors seeking to assert their rights in a bankruptcy case. By avoiding common mistakes, including providing inaccurate information, failing to include supporting documentation, and missing submission deadlines, creditors can enhance their chances of a smooth filing process. Remember to double-check all information, attach relevant supporting documents, and submit your claim on time. By doing so, you can ensure that your claim is properly considered and increase your chances of a successful outcome.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.picture of woman holding a pen about to complete the form 31 proof of claim in a Canadian bankruptcy proceeding to register her claim with the licensed insolvency trustee

Call a Trustee Now!