Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CAN A COMPLETED CONSUMER DEBT PROPOSAL BE ANNULLED? A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING COURT AUTHORITY

Consumer Debt Proposal: Introduction

Welcome to Brandon’s Blog post where we will delve into the intriguing world of the consumer debt proposal and the legal framework surrounding them. Today, we will first look at what a consumer debt proposal is, why it is one of the most popular debt solutions to avoid personal bankruptcy and how to go about making one.

Then, we will take a close look at the case of Kamaljit Singh, shedding light on the authority and discretion of the courts when it comes to annulling a completed consumer proposal. Join us as we navigate the complexities of this case and gain a deeper understanding of the legal processes involved.

Consumer Debt Proposal: A Step-by-Step Guide to Financial Freedom

Dealing with debt can be overwhelming and stressful. However, there are solutions available to help manage and alleviate this burden. One such debt relief option is a consumer debt proposal, a formal agreement between you and your creditors to settle your debts for less than what you owe.

Here’s a step-by-step guide to creating a consumer debt proposal and taking control of your finances:

Assess Your Debt Situation:

Before creating a consumer debt proposal, it’s important to make a proper debt assessment. Calculate the total amount of debt you owe, including credit cards, loans, and other outstanding balances. Understanding the full scope of your debt will help you determine a realistic proposal that you can afford to pay. Any insolvent person who owes $250,000 or less (not including any debts secured by a charge on the personal residence) is eligible to make a consumer debt proposal to his or her creditors.

All types of debt qualify for this alternative to filing bankruptcy. Consumer debt, including income tax debts and if you are either a sole proprietor or partner in a business, business debts qualify for debt forgiveness.

Seek Professional Financial Advice:

Consult with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee or a non-profit credit counselling agency to discuss your options for managing your debt. They can provide valuable insights and guidance on creating a consumer debt proposal and negotiating with your creditors.

Create a Budget:

Develop a realistic budget that outlines your monthly income, expenses, and debt payments. This will help you determine how much you can afford to offer your creditors in a consumer debt proposal. Be honest and transparent about your financial situation to ensure the proposal is manageable for you.

Formalize the Consumer Debt Proposal Agreement With A Licensed Insolvency Trustee:

After the no-cost consultation, contact the Licensed Insolvency Trustee who will act as the Administrator in your consumer debt proposal. Provide the Licensed Insolvency Trustee with your list of assets, liabilities, income and expenses including the budget you prepared. The Licensed Insolvency Trustee will take this information and prepare all necessary filing documents, including, the consumer proposal. That is the formal legal agreement you the LIT will present to your creditors on your behalf to vote on.

Once you and your creditors have agreed on a consumer proposal, the Licensed Insolvency Trustee will obtain (deemed) court approval. The consumer proposal is a legally binding process after creditor acceptance and court approval. It outlines the terms of the proposal, including the total amount to be paid and payment terms, being regular monthly payments to your consumer proposal Administrator. It contains the repayment schedule and any other conditions agreed upon. Make sure to review this document carefully before signing it to begin your debt settlement program.

If both spouses are insolvent and the majority of the debts for each are the same, such as when one has co-signed for the other, then it is possible to eliminate these unsecured joint debts through a joint consumer proposal.

Negotiate the Consumer Debt Proposal with Creditors:

Once filed, the Licensed Insolvency Trustee will contact your creditors to advise of the consumer proposal. At this point, you have protection from creditors. All collection efforts, collection action and any legal action against you, including wage garnishment, must stop. The Administrator’s report will explain your financial hardship and offer a realistic monthly payment plan that you can afford.

If required, a meeting of creditors will be held where the Licensed Insolvency Trustee as Administrator will advise you on how to negotiate with creditors to reach a mutually beneficial agreement that will help you eliminate your debt in full by only paying a portion of it, while also satisfying creditor concerns.

The fee of the Administrator is paid out of the total amount to be paid in the consumer debt proposal. It is a Government tariff that the Licensed Insolvency Trustee is allowed to take out of your consumer proposal payments. Therefore, there is no additional cost to the insolvent debtor for professional fees of the Licensed Insolvency Trustee.

Although every situation is different, and there are no guarantees, a consumer proposal that offers to pay about 25% of the total outstanding unsecured debts, is the going rate for consumer proposals to be accepted by the unsecured creditors. This is what sophisticated unsecured creditors like chartered banks expect to see for them to vote for acceptance.

Adhere to the Consumer Debt Proposal Payment Plan:

A consumer debt proposal is a legally binding agreement. Stick to the consumer proposal terms of the repayment schedule outlined in the consumer proposal. Make timely monthly consumer proposal payments to your Administrator over the period of time called for (no greater than a maximum term time period of 60 months) to honour the agreement and gradually eliminate your outstanding debt. Stay committed to your financial goals and prioritize debt repayment to achieve financial freedom.

If you are lucky enough to have a family member willing to lend you the total amount of your consumer proposal, this enhances the chances of a successful consumer debt proposal. It is an effective tool as creditors always look kindly on an immediate lump-sum payment, rather than having to wait up to 5 years to see their reduced amount of money.

Monitor Your Progress:

Track your progress and monitor your debt repayment journey as you make your payments on time. Celebrate each milestone as you eliminate your unsecured debts and work towards financial stability. Examples of unsecured debts that are eligible debts to be eliminated in a consumer proposal are:

  • unsecured lines of credit;
  • credit card debt;
  • personal loans;
  • vehicle loans;
  • personal income taxes; and
  • other unsecured loans;

Stay motivated and focused on your financial goals to successfully manage your consumer debt.

By following these steps and creating a consumer debt proposal, you can take control of your finances and work towards a debt-free future. Remember, seeking professional guidance and staying committed to your repayment plan are key components of a successful debt management strategy.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Can A Consumer debt proposal Be Annulled? Exploring the Case of Kamaljit Singh

In the matter of the consumer proposal of Kamaljit Singh, an important question arises: Does the court have the authority under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Canada (BIA) to annul a consumer proposal that has been approved by creditors and fully performed by the consumer debtor, even after the administrator has been discharged? This question, along with the subsequent determination of whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant the requested annulment, forms the crux of the case.

The first issue at hand is the authority of the court to annul a completed consumer debt proposal. According to subsection 66.3(1) of the BIA, the court does indeed possess the statutory authority to annul a fully completed consumer proposal. This crucial section allows for the annulment of a consumer proposal in cases of:

  • default
  • ineligibility of the debtor
  • injustice
  • undue delay or
  • if the court approval was obtained by fraud.

By analyzing this section in the context of the case of Kamaljit Singh, we gain insights into the court’s decision-making process.

Furthermore, it is essential to explore the factors that the court considers when exercising its discretion to annul a consumer debt proposal. In the case of Kamaljit Singh, several factors played a role in the court’s decision.

The knowledge of the debtor and their obligation to disclose potential claims, the creditor’s knowledge of all factors in considering the consumer proposal, the eligibility of the consumer debtor to file a consumer proposal, the amount and nature of the debt, the timing of the application, the interests of the debtor and creditors, and the integrity and public confidence in the bankruptcy system all weighed heavily in the court’s deliberations.

Background – Consumer Debt Proposal Proceeding

Mr. Singh’s statement of affairs dated September 16, 2019, listed unsecured liabilities totalling $81,555, and a contingent amount of $60,000 for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). An unsecured creditor, Mr. Nagra, claimed that $ 94,027.98 was owed to him under a judgment as of the date the consumer proposal was filed.

Mr. Singh states that he was not aware of the existence of the default judgment when he had discussions with the licensed insolvency trustee acting as the consumer debt proposal Administrator before filing his consumer proposal, or at the meeting of creditors. The Administrator’s report dated September 18, 2019, refers to an estimated total amount of claims of $81,555. The report also indicates that Mr. Singh’s interest in his matrimonial home was between $30,222 and $75,222 and that Mr. Singh was unable to sell or refinance the property at that time.

The minutes from the creditors meeting held on December 11, 2019 show that there was a total of $136,833.54 in voted claims, which included $75,596.40 for CRA. CRA was the sole creditor that voted in favour of the consumer proposal. The other six proven creditors voted against the consumer proposal. The Dividend Sheet prepared by the Administrator, with a declaration date of March 9, 2023, shows:

  • $162,326.40 in proven claims; and
  • $35,373.23 in dividends being paid to the creditors.

Based on a comparison of the statement of affairs and Dividend Sheet, the change from claims totaling $81,555 to $162,326.40 was due to:

CRA having proven a claim of $73,770.60; and

the proven claims of the remaining nine creditors being in aggregate, $7,000.80 higher than the amounts listed in the statement of affairs.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Consumer Debt Proposal: Factors to Consider When Exercising Discretion under Subsection 66.3(1)

The authority to annul a proposal is discretionary. In exercising such discretion, the Court should take into account the interests of the debtor and his or her creditors and balance their interests while maintaining the integrity and confidence of the public. Based on the Court’s review of applicable cases, the Court concluded that the following factors must be taken into consideration:

  1. knowledge of the debtor;
  2. the creditors’ knowledge of the consumer debt proposal;
  3. eligibility of the consumer debtor to file a consumer proposal;
  4. amount and nature of the debt;
  5. timing of the application;
  6. the interest of the debtor and creditors; and
  7. the integrity and public confidence in the BIA and the process of consumer proposals.

Test for Annulment of a Consumer Debt Proposal

The test for the annulment of a consumer proposal is set out in subsection 66.3(1), which provides that:

Where default is made in the performance of any provision in a consumer proposal, or where it appears to the court:

(a) that the debtor was not eligible to make a consumer proposal when the consumer proposal was filed,

(b) that the consumer proposal cannot continue without injustice or undue delay, or

(c) that the approval of the court was obtained by fraud,

the court may, on application, with such notice as the court may direct to the consumer debtor and, if applicable, to the administrator and the creditors, annul the consumer debt proposal.

Subsection 66.3(1) does not contain language that restricts the timing when such an application for an annulment of a consumer proposal may be made.

This differs from the language of subsection 66.3(3), which provides that a consumer proposal may be annulled after it is“accepted or approved” where the consumer debtor is afterwards convicted of any offence under the BIA.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Consumer Debt Proposal: Knowledge of the Debtor

Mr. Singh was personally served with the statement of claim. He did not take any steps to defend that claim. Mr. Singh states that even if he had been aware of the existence of the default judgment and the writ, he would not have disclosed them to the Administrator because he did not believe that he owed any amount to Mr. Nagra given the payments he and his mother had made to him.

While Mr. Singh may not have had actual knowledge of the default judgment and the registration of the writ at the time he initially met with the Administrator, he was required under the BIA to provide them with information on his financial situation. It was his obligation to inform the Administrator of any potential claims against him, even those he may dispute. The BIA consumer debt proposal process must have at its foundation that all properly secured debts and unsecured debts and liabilities will be disclosed by debtors seeking the protection of the Act.

It was open to Mr. Singh to take the position with the Administrator that Mr. Nagra’s claim should be listed as a contingent amount. This was how the claim of CRA was treated in the statement of affairs. Mr. Singh suggests that he relied on the Administrator to have performed due diligence in connection with filing his consumer proposal and that they did not discover the existence of the default judgment or the writ.

The Administrator is required to investigate or cause to be investigated, the consumer debtor’s property and financial affairs to be able to assess with reasonable accuracy the consumer debtor’s financial situation and the cause of his insolvency. Whatever the steps taken by the Administrator to investigate Mr. Singh’s affairs are, it did not absolve Mr. Singh from the requirement to notify the Administrator of the fact that he had been served with a statement of claim in the previous six months.

Therefore the Court’s view of the knowledge of the debtor that a claim was being pursued by Mr. Nagra, and his failure to disclose this to the Administrator at any time during the consumer debt proposal proceeding, weighs in favour of annulling the consumer proposal.

Consumer Debt Proposal: Knowledge of the Creditor

Mr. Nagra stated that he first learned about the consumer proposal proceeding on June 9, 2023, based on correspondence received by his counsel from counsel to Mr. Singh. He says that had he been notified of the consumer proposal, he would have participated in the process and opposed the proposal. Mr. Singh claims that Mr. Nagra had been aware of the consumer debt proposal since 2019, but he provided no evidence in support of this statement.

Based on the evidence, the Court accepted Mr. Nagra’s evidence that he did not become aware of the consumer proposal until June 9, 2023, which was after the consumer proposal had been completed and the Administrator had been discharged.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Eligibility to File a Consumer Debt Proposal

At the time of the completion of the consumer debt proposal, there was $162,326.40 in proven claims, which, together with his claim of $94,027.98, exceeds the $250,000 consumer proposal threshold. Mr. Singh contests the amount he is said to owe to Mr. Nagra. However, Mr. Nagra has a judgment against Mr. Singh, and that judgment had not been set aside.

An Administrator cannot file a consumer proposal if he or she has reason to believe that the consumer debtor is not eligible to make a consumer proposal. As of September 16, 2019, if Mr.Nagra’s claim of $94,027.98 had been added to the $81,555 listed in the statement of affairs, along with the $60,000 contingent amount for the CRA, the total amount of claims would have been $235,582.98.

By the December 11, 2019 creditors meeting, CRA had a proven claim of $75,596.40, so the total amount of claims would have increased to $251,179.38. As a result, Mr. Singh would no longer have been eligible to complete a consumer debt proposal by the time of the creditors meeting if Mr. Nagra’s judgment was known to the Administrator.

A consumer proposal is not invalid by reason only that the debtor was not eligible to make the consumer proposal. If an Administrator determines, after the filing of a consumer proposal, that it should not have been filed because the consumer debtor was not eligible to make a consumer proposal, all that is required of the Administrator is that he or she shall forthwith inform the creditors of this fact. It is on the creditors to commence an application to annul the consumer proposal.

Consumer Debt Proposal: Amount and Nature of the Debt

While the amount is disputed by Mr. Singh, Mr. Nagra has a judgment for $94,027.98. That represents approximately 36.68% of the total claims proven against Mr. Singh. It is a significant claim. The nature of the claim must also be taken into account. As acknowledged by Mr. Nagra in his materials, as he is Mr.Singh’s father-in-law, they are connected by marriage and he and Mr. Singh are deemed to be related persons under the BIA.

Subsection 66.19(2) provides that a creditor who is related to the consumer debtor may vote against but not for the acceptance of the consumer debt proposal. Based on what happened at the meeting of creditors, where $75,596.40 of claims voted in favour of the consumer proposal, and $61,237.14 voted against it, had Mr.Nagra been able to file a proof of claim in an amount over $14,400 and voted against the consumer proposal, it would have failed.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Consumer Debt Proposal: Timing of the Application to Annul

There is no issue with the timing of Mr. Nagra’s motion to annul the consumer debt proposal. He learned of it on June 9, 2023, and submitted a request to the BankruptcyCourt Office to schedule the motion on July 13, 2023.

Consumer Debt Proposal: The Interest of the Debtor and the Creditors

As noted above, Mr. Singh’s proven creditors received $35,373.23 in dividends on account of $162,326.40 in claims. This amounts to a recovery of 21.79 cents on the dollar. If the proposal is annulled, these creditors, along with Mr. Nagra, will be permitted to take steps to recover additional amounts, which would include the $103,631.63 from the sale of the matrimonial home. Unsurprisingly, it would be to Mr. Singh’s detriment if the consumer debt proposal is annulled, since his creditors’ claims would be revived, and they could take steps to recover the $ 103,631.63 that he currently is entitled to keep.

The Court decided that, in balancing the interests between Mr. Singh and his creditors, it weighed in favour of the creditors to annul the proposal. If the consumer proposal is not annulled, Mr. Singh will be permitted to only pay $35,373.23 in dividends to his creditors and keep $103,631.63, because he did not inform the Administrator of the existence of Mr. Nagra’s claim. The Court believed that this would be an unfair result, and negatively impact the integrity of the consumer proposal process under the BIA.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Integrity and public confidence in the BIA and the process of a consumer debt proposal

Mr. Singh argued that the public confidence in the BIA and the process of a consumer debt proposal would be lost if “innocent debtors” like him could have their consumer proposals annulled. The Court felt that Mr. Singh was not “innocent” and that the integrity of the system would be undermined if a debtor was permitted to benefit from not disclosing a potential claim to his or her Administrator at the commencement of the process.

This is especially so in this case because, if the debt to Mr. Nagra was disclosed, it could have a material impact on whether a consumer proposal would be accepted by creditors. The system requires that creditors have confidence that they will be provided with proper notice of a consumer proposal and have the ability to elect to participate in the process if they so choose.

The Court’s Disposition of this Consumer Debt Proposal Matter

The Court has the discretion to annul a consumer debt proposal under subsection 66.3(1), even where the consumer proposal was fully completed. Having considered all of the circumstances and factors listed above, Mr. Nagra satisfied the Court that his motion fits under subsection 66.3(1)(a) and that this is an appropriate case in which to exercise the Court’s discretion.

Therefore, the Court annulled Mr. Singh’s consumer proposal even though he completed it and the Administrator was discharged.

Consumer Debt Proposal: Closing Remarks

The case of Kamaljit Singh serves as a fascinating example of the authority and discretion of the courts in annulling a completed consumer proposal. By carefully considering the factors and legal principles at play, the Court ultimately decided to grant the requested annulment. This decision highlights the importance of transparency, disclosure, and fairness within the consumer debt proposal process.

As individuals navigating the complex world of personal finances, it is crucial to be aware of the legal framework surrounding consumer proposals. Understanding the authority and discretion of the courts empowers us to make informed financial decisions and ensures the integrity of the bankruptcy system.

I hope that this closer look at the case of Kamaljit Singh’s consumer proposal has shed light on the intricacies of consumer proposals and the role of the courts. As always, it is essential to consult with professionals for personalized advice regarding your specific financial circumstances.

Individuals and business owners must take proactive measures to address financial difficulties, consumer debt and company debt and promptly seek assistance when necessary. It is crucial to recognize that financial stress is a prevalent concern and seeking help is a demonstration of fortitude, rather than vulnerability. Should you encounter challenges in managing your finances and find yourself burdened by stress, do not delay in pursuing aid.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing people, entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses with debt problems that are in financial distress. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns and more associated with your company debt are obviously on your mind.

The Ira Smith Team understands these financial health concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual who has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own and it does not mean that you are a bad person. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team uses innovative and cutting-edge methodologies, to adeptly navigate you through the intricacies of your financial challenges, ensuring a resolution to your debt-related predicaments without resorting to the rigours of the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief now!

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a Trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, to begin your debt-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now.a judge sitting on the bench in court overseeing the administration of a Canadian consumer debt proposal

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DEBT MANAGEMENT IN ONTARIO PLAN: HOW TO GET A METICULOUS ONE TO WORK FOR YOU IMMEDIATELY

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

debt management in ontario
debt management in ontario

What is debt management in Ontario?

The term “debt management in Ontario” can mean a lot of things to Ontario residents. There are debt management companies that offer a range of services, from credit counselling to debt settlement. In Ontario, these organizations offer their debt management services exclusively to individuals and not to businesses. Debt management is a process that helps you manage your debt and get it under control. A debt management program can only be successful if the person also learns new behaviours in how they deal with money and debt.

WARNING: The Canadian government has put out a consumer alert. This alert, titled Consumer Alert: What you need to know when getting help to pay off debt or repair your credit, warns Canadians about unscrupulous debt settlement companies and what you need to know. In many Brandon Blogs, I have also put out that same warning. There are only two choices when seeking the right credit counsellor to review your alternatives to deal with out-of-control unsecured debt, including tax debt. Legitimate debt management services in Ontario are provided via two types of specialists: accredited community-based non-profit credit counselling agencies and federal government accredited and supervised licensed insolvency trustees.

I recognize that debt is a huge issue for many people in Ontario and all of Canada. Most individuals do not also understand the massive influence it can have on them but trust me, it is all too genuine. In this Brandon Blog post, I review the different alternatives readily available to people looking for debt management in Ontario.

What is debt management in Ontario plan?

A debt settlement plan (debt management plan or DMP) is a tool supplied by a non-profit credit counselling agency that can help you get control of your money and back on course to living the debt-free life you wish to lead. Your dedicated credit counsellor can help you identify if becoming part of a DMP is appropriate for you. If not, the non-profit credit counsellor can lay out all your available alternatives.

For hard-working people who struggle to meet their monthly bills, a debt management plan might be the answer. Under the terms of a DMP, a person consolidates all of their unsecured debt under one plan. This plan, developed by any one of the many qualified counsellors, usually involves making a single regular payment, a monthly payment, under a debt repayment program, to the credit counselling service. The non-profit accredited credit counselling agency then distributes this money to creditors.

This kind of repayment plan can take normally as long as 5 years to pay off 100% of your unsecured type of debt, but it can also be the solution that allows a person to become debt-free quickly. It’s important to note that such an informal debt management in Ontario plan may not be the best option for everyone.

What to consider before you sign up for debt management in Ontario

There is one major thing to consider before you sign up for a DMP. Before you take out a DMP, you want to make sure that you are in a position that allows you to pay off your debt without the assistance of your creditors.

In a DMP, you are promising to pay your creditors 100% of the principal you owe them when entering into the debt management plan, with no reduction from the total owing. So you need to have established a realistic budget working with your credit counsellor, for the entire DMP period showing you will be able to afford to maintain the monthly payment you are promising to make.

Will creditors continue to contact me while I’m on a Debt Management Plan?

debt management in ontario
debt management in ontario

Most people view the DMP as merely a temporary solution until you have paid off all debts. But in fact, if done properly and taken seriously, it is a legitimate solution and behavioural modification program. If you learn the budgeting skills and accept the financial advice in the program and follow them as a permanent change to your money management behaviour, it will allow you not only to focus on paying down your debt load while you are in the program but teach you the necessary skills to not get into financial crisis in the future. You will have the money to make each regular payment to pay off your normal bills and live a financially healthy life.

Once you’ve signed up for a DMP, your credit counsellor will communicate with your unsecured creditors to advise that you are under their program and that payments to creditors will be coming from the non-profit credit counselling agency. Your unsecured creditors will note that in their respective files and focus their communications to be with the debt management program credit counselling agency.

Does debt management in Ontario hurt your credit?

Most people entering a program for debt management in Ontario are on the financial edge of the ledge already. If they default on their debts, it will produce a lower credit score. While a DMP will lower your credit score at first, in the long run, if you keep up with the program and stick to your payment schedule and make your debt payment plan payments on time as agreed, your credit score will eventually improve.

Do I have to give up my credit cards in debt management in Ontario Program?

The question of whether you need to give up your credit cards in a DMP is among the most common inquiries we get asked by debtors. The answer is although there is no law that says you must surrender your bank card for financial debt management in Ontario plan, you do need to quit borrowing. This includes using your existing credit cards.

However, you can still utilize a secured credit card up to the limit you set with your financial institution that issued it. More likely though, the credit card firm will certainly remove your account once they obtain notification of your DMP.

When you’ve effectively finished your financial debt management in Ontario program, you will become eligible for a normal credit card once more.

What to do during your debt management plan

The Canadian government recommends that you:

  • ask the credit counselling agency for timely written reports on the status of your plan,
  • keep good records of all amounts you pay to the agency, and
  • get receipts of all money you pay to them as well as regular reports of amounts they pay to your unsecured creditors for you.

Carefully review your records and the regular reporting you receive from the agency. Ensure they are paying your creditors on time. This will keep you clear of any type of late fees or further adverse notations on your credit report.

debt management in ontario
debt management in ontario

What are the disadvantages of debt management in Ontario plan?

There are a few possible drawbacks to hopping on a DMP. However, in my view, they are not enough to stop you from doing one if you can afford it. The disadvantages are also common to any debt settlement in Ontario plan.

In no particular order, they are:

  • It won’t cover every one of your outstanding debts. DMPs typically won’t include your secured debts and some unsecured debts, such as student loans. This is especially true if you are still in university or college, have not finished your course of study and need to continue to apply for student loans because you wish to continue either as a full-time or part-time student.
  • Credit counsellors can guide you but will have to take your secured debt payments into account when establishing your monthly budget. You’ll typically need to manage those debts on your own. If you do not have any money left over each month after accounting for secured debt payments, rent or mortgage, food, income tax and other essential monthly purchases, then a DMP will not be possible for you.
  • There could some service charges to pay for the DMP.
  • As indicated above, no real accessibility to credit.

During the initial counselling session, the credit counsellor can help you review your realistic options. Perhaps you can still qualify for an Ontario debt consolidation loan. Keep in mind that if that is an option, you will need to be mindful of the effective interest rate you will be paying on your loan, albeit at an annual rate much less than on your existing debt.

If neither a DMP nor a debt consolidation program are viable debt consolidation options or debt settlement options for you, then you will need to explore with a licensed insolvency trustee the other debt relief options of either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy to eliminate your unsecured debt.

How long can you legally be chased for debt in Ontario?

The answer is two years. A Judge of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice In Bankruptcy and Insolvency recently released a decision. It was an appeal from the decision of a Master sitting in the same court. The case was about the issue of a claim which is statute-barred under the Ontario Limitations Act.

Section 4 of this Act says that you cannot enforce an outstanding debt for a claim the creditor has after 2 years from when the claim was discovered. This includes the day on which a creditor initially should have recognized they had a claim which called for enforcement.

This case was about a creditor filing a proof of claim in a debtor’s personal bankruptcy. The licensed insolvency trustee disallowed the claim because the claim was statute-barred. The creditor appealed the Trustee’s decision to the Master sitting in bankruptcy court. The creditor argued that although legal action cannot be taken on the debt, it does not mean that the debt still does not exist. The Master dismissed the creditor’s appeal and upheld the Trustee’s decision.

The creditor then appealed the Master’s decision to a Judge sitting in the same court. The Judge reviewed the matter and upheld the Master’s decision.

What this decision says is that not only can a debtor not be chased for a debt if no legal action was commenced within the 2 year period, they can’t even file a proof of claim in the debtor’s consumer proposal or bankruptcy!

However, keep in mind that just because it is no longer a legal debt, the creditor would have made a notation with the credit bureau for your credit report before the two-year period ended. So the damage to your credit score has already taken place.

Can a Trustee do a debt management plan?

The answer is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee can do for you the equivalent of a DMP. Consumer proposals can only be administered by a Trustee. Consumer proposals are also the only federal government-approved debt settlement plan in Canada. To be equal to the result of a DMP, you would offer to your unsecured creditors to pay them 100% of all the unsecured debt that you owe. Remember, above I stated that a DMP pays 100% of your unsecured debt.

There are many similarities between a consumer proposal and a DMP if you offer 100%. But as I indicate below, you can still have a successful consumer proposal by offering less than 100% to settle all of your unsecured debts. For details on how a consumer proposal works, check out my Brandon Blog, CONSUMER PROPOSAL FAQ: ANSWERS TO 10 TANTALIZING CONSUMER PROPOSAL QUESTIONS.

debt management in ontario
debt management in ontario

Which is better? A debt management plan In Ontario vs consumer proposal

Everyone’s financial situation is unique. A DMP will not be as harmful to your credit score as with a consumer proposal, nor will it jeopardize any of your assets as with bankruptcy. You’ll also gain money management skills that can help you in the long term and avoid debt in the future. But if you cannot get an Ontario debt consolidation service loan or a debt management plan is not appropriate for you, then there is another formal option that avoids bankruptcy.

In a consumer proposal, you will also gain money management skills. In addition to your no-cost initial consultation, there are also 2 mandatory credit counselling sessions with an accredited credit counsellor in the Trustee’s office. In a DMP, you need to pay 100% of your unsecured debt. In a consumer proposal, the amount you need to pay is calculated against what your unsecured creditors can expect to receive from your bankruptcy. In most cases, it will be much less than 100%. On average, you can expect to only repay about 25% of your total outstanding unsecured debt, including any tax debt.

A consumer proposal is for any person that owes $250,000 or less, other than for any loans secured against your principal residence. If you owe more than this limit, or your company owes too much debt, then you can still get debt relief under a different proposal section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

Bankruptcy is of course the very last option anyone should consider. This should be considered only if you do not have the necessary cash flow to successfully complete any debt management plan.

So what is best for you? Give me a phone call and I will let you know whether debt management in Ontario plan or a proposal under the BIA is better for you. I will tell you at no cost to you.

Debt management in Ontario summary

I hope that you found this debt management in Ontario Brandon Blog informative. Many people feel that they are trapped in a cycle of credit card debts, unsecured lines of credit, tax debt and generally an unmanageable level of debt. You may want to do something about those debts but you aren’t sure what to do.

If you have any debts they can be overwhelming because they are so much money and you don’t know how to deal with them. There are various debt management plans available that can help you reduce the amount of money you owe and help you deal with your debts.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, Contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Call a Trustee Now!