Tag: GST

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT IS THE POWERFUL CRA LIEN ON PROPERTY TOOL?

cra lien on property
cra lien on property

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this CRA lien on property Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of this page and click play on the podcast.

CRA lien on property: Canada Revenue Agency’s collection powers

The CRA (formerly known as Revenue Canada) assigns “collection officers” to taxpayers who fail to make timely payments or who do not pay in full. For the CRA to agree to a payment arrangement (usually monthly payments), the taxpayer must provide financial disclosure on a monthly basis (details of their expenses, their income, and their assets).

Tax debts that cannot be settled through a payment plan may be registered in Federal Court. Once the debt is certified, the certificate is equivalent to a judgment entered in court. This is called a memorial. If you own property, the CRA can create a lien on your property based on your judgment. A CRA lien on property against your interest in your home is the most common CRA lien on property they register.

This Brandon Blog discusses a recent decision from the British Columbia Supreme Court that confirms that the CRA lien on property becomes secured once they are registered.

CRA lien on property: CRA Super Priority Liens

I previously wrote a Brandon Blog about the legal case of Canada v. Toronto-Dominion Bank. By mentioning this case, I hope that my comments about the recent British Columbia Court decision below will be clearer.

Federal statutes give CRA a creditor powerful tools to collect debts. They can access avenues of collection significantly quicker than other types of creditors. It was not known to Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) that, as a sole proprietor operating a landscaping business, the borrower had collected GST in the amount of $67,854.

After selling his home, the borrower fully paid off his first mortgage with TD. TD did not lend to or deal with the proprietor’s business. Since there was no CRA lien on property against the house, TD was not aware of the outstanding GST.

The CRA has enhanced security, known as “super-priority”, over most of a tax debtor‘s real property and personal assets, by virtue of deemed trust provisions in the Income Tax Act and Excise Tax Act (ETA). CRA has priority over substantially all secured creditors under the deemed trust concept, which means that the proceeds of the sale from the property subject to the deemed trust will go to CRA. A deemed trust claim is a CRA lien on property and is obtained without any registration.

A demand letter was subsequently sent to TD demanding that a portion of the proceeds be used to satisfy the GST debt. TD refused to pay since they believed their mortgage security ranked higher than CRA’s claim for unremitted GST. Court action was taken against TD by the CRA. The Crown argued that under section 222 of the ETA, the proceeds received by TD on the repayment of the mortgage and line of credit were subject to a deemed trust in favour of the Crown.

The Federal Court held that TD had an obligation to reimburse the CRA for the debt of $67,544, plus interest, owing by the Borrower to the CRA. Super-priority interests can be enforced by the CRA without notifying the secured creditor. TD was responsible for repaying CRA amounts received from a borrower with an outstanding GST/HST bill.

cra lien on property
cra lien on property

FCA confirms CRA super-priority over secured creditors on a GST/HST debtors’ property

TD appealed the decision of the Federal Court to the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA). According to the FCA ruling in Toronto-Dominion Bank v Canada, the FCA agreed with the lower Court that TD must pay the CRA proceeds of $67,854 for unremitted GST that it received from a borrower upon the discharge of its mortgage. CRA is considered to hold in trust amounts paid to a secured creditor from a debtor who owes Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST) liabilities.

FCA affirmed the Federal Court’s finding that no triggering event was required and that the deemed trust operates continuously once GST is collected but not remitted. Further, the FCA noted that case law has distinguished between secured creditors and bona fide purchasers of value, such that the two categories are mutually exclusive.

It is best for secured creditors to review their current risk management practices and revise them both at the time of due diligence when vetting new borrowers as well as throughout the term of any secured credit agreement.

If we were talking about unremitted employee source deductions, the result would be the same.

CRA lien on property: Personal income tax debt collection

CRA is a powerful creditor when it comes to personal income tax debt collection. Above I discussed how they can get a CRA lien on property just by way of the statute for unremitted source deductions or unremitted GST/HST. But what about personal income taxes? CRA does not have an automatic lien for unpaid income taxes.

However, they can go to Federal Court and obtain a memorial and then register that CRA lien on property of the tax debtor who fell behind in their payment of taxes. Once they place that lien, they now turned their unsecured claim for unpaid taxes into a secured claim. As I already mentioned, the most common type of property they register against is real property, like the tax debtor‘s home.

If the CRA lien on property goes on the real property before the person who owes unpaid income taxes files either a consumer proposal or bankruptcy, then the CRA lien on property stays on. CRA will not try to go power of sale or foreclosure to throw the taxpayer out of their home based on this tax lien. Rather, they will just wait until the taxpayer either sells the home or tries to renew or refinance a mortgage.

In the case of a sale, they will get their tax lien paid out of the sale proceeds. In the case of a mortgage renewal or refinancing, mortgage lenders will not do a new mortgage loan or a refinancing with the CRA lien on property. This is how they get their money.

Keep in mind that the lien is only against the taxpayer’s interest in the home. So if the tax debtor is the sole owner, it is against 100% of the home. If the taxpayer owns the home jointly with say, a spouse, then the lien is only against the 50% interest.

cra lien on property
cra lien on property

CRA lien on property: Can Canada Revenue Agency put a lien on my house?

You should now know that the answer to this question is yes. Licensed insolvency trustees know this. Nevertheless, in the British Columbia case I will describe now, the Trustee tried a novel, but an unsuccessful, approach to try to knock out CRA’s lien on property secured claim to collect taxes owed by the tax debtor. I am referring to Gidda (Re), 2021 BCSC 1460 (CanLII).

The licensed insolvency trustee appealed the decision of the Master as Bankruptcy Registrar dated February 3, 2020, reversing the Trustee’s rejection of a secured proof of claim filed by the federal Crown on behalf of the CRA in the bankruptcy. As well, the Trustee appealed the Master’s ruling that he is personally liable for the costs of the proceeding.

The CRA has taken out a memorial to attach a lien in favour of CRA to the taxpayer’s home due to unpaid income taxes. Then he filed for bankruptcy. So the lien against property holds as it came before the bankruptcy. A secured proof of claim for unpaid income tax was filed by the CRA in response to the memorial and registered tax lien. A secured claim was granted to CRA, which was not directly contested by the Trustee.

In my opinion, this claim, however, was handled by the Trustee in a novel way that wasn’t sustainable. It was so novel that the Judge took judicial notice of the submissions that such a case was never litigated before in Canada. There were also a number of judgments against the title of the property in addition to the memorial. There was no priority among the other judgments.

According to section 70(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), bankruptcy takes precedence over judgments, garnishments, and any collection action. Furthermore, no judgment takes precedence over another.

A memorial is a judgment of the Federal Court, and since all judgments are treated equally as unsecured creditors, the Trustee disallowed CRA’s secured claim. Because the memorial and its registration against the title are secured claims under other federal statutes, it has powers not given to other simple money judgments. Therefore, I believe it is a losing argument. So did the Master.

In addition, the Master believed that the Trustee ought to have been aware of this when disallowing CRA’s secured claim and causing it to appeal the Trustee’s decision. Therefore, the Master awarded the Crown costs to be paid by the Trustee personally.

On both counts, the Trustee appealed the Master’s decision. The Judge who reviewed this found that the Master was correct in upholding the CRA secured claim and dismissed this portion of the Trustee’s appeal. The Judge did, however, let the Trustee off the hook by allowing the costs portion of the appeal. According to the Judge, the costs awarded by the Master will be paid by the bankruptcy estate and not by the Trustee personally.

CRA lien on property: Say goodbye to debt stress

I hope that you found this CRA lien on property Brandon Blog informative. Unpaid taxes and a heavy debt load do not mix well. If you have too much debt, you are considered insolvent. There are several insolvency processes available to you. It may not be necessary for you to file for bankruptcy.

If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges, you need debt help and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties with debt relief options as an alternative to bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people with credit cards maxed out and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do as we know the alternatives to bankruptcy. We help many people and companies stay clear of filing an assignment in bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

cra lien on property

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY FOR INDIVIDUALS: 4 KILLER WAYS TO FULL LOAN RECOVERY

The Ira Smith Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Stay healthy, well balanced and safe and secure everyone.

Introduction

On July 4, 2018, my Brandon’s Blog MORTGAGE LENDING CRITERIA SELF EMPLOYED: BIGGEST MYTH MAY BE RIGHT, I described the case of Canada v. Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2018 FC 538 (CanLII) which was heard in Federal Court. I described where the Federal Court ruled in favour of the claim of Canada Revenue Agency for individuals running an unincorporated business either as a proprietorship or in partnerships.

The Bank appealed the decision to the Federal Court of Appeal. The case was heard on October 8, 2019, in Toronto. The judgment was released at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, 2020. I want to remind you about the facts of the case, what was decided and provide my 4 killer ways that mortgage lenders to people who also run an unincorporated business, but you don’t lend to the business, can protect themselves.

The original Canada v. Toronto-Dominion Bank case

The original case was very simple. A man had a landscape design business he ran as a sole proprietor. In 2007 and 2008, prior to becoming a customer of the Bank, he collected GST that he did not pay over totalling $67,854.

In 2010, the Bank advanced both a mortgage loan and a home equity line of credit (HELOC) loan to the man. Security for both loans was registered against the man’s home. It was the Bank’s standard from mortgage and HELOC security documents. At the time, the Bank had no knowledge of the man’s Canada Revenue Agency for individuals’ liability for unremitted GST. There was no registration by the government against the man’s home for this outstanding tax amount either.

In late 2011, the man sold the home. His real estate lawyer issued two trust cheques to the Bank from the house sale. One paid off the mortgage and the other cheque paid off the HELOC. In return, the Bank discharged its mortgage and HELOC security charges and the house sale was completed.

In 2013 and 2015, the Canada Revenue Agency made deemed trust claims against the Bank under Section 222 of the Excise Tax Act (ETA) for the amount of the man’s collected and unremitted GST. GST or HST under the ETA and employee source deductions (amounts withheld by employers from salaries and wages paid to employees on account of income tax, the Canada Pension Plan and Employment Insurance) under the Income Tax Act, that is collected but not remitted, forms a deemed trust claim against the assets of the business.

If the business is not a company, that is unincorporated, then there is no difference between the proprietor’s or partner’s personal assets and business assets. They are just assets of the person.

Canada Revenue Agency argued that the Bank was in possession of funds from the sale of the man’s property. The Crown also submitted that when the man sold his home, he was obliged to pay his GST obligation out of the sale proceeds. He did not do that. Rather, he used part of the money from the sale to pay the Bank off. Keep in mind the Bank was a secured creditor. The Crown further argued that under this scenario, the Bank had a statutory responsibility to pay the GST tax debt out of the money it received.

The Bank argued on its behalf that the repayment of the money only applied if there was an event that triggered other events leading to the repayment, such as a secured creditor enforcing its security.

The Federal Court disagreed and ruled in favour of the taxman.

The Canada Revenue Agency for individuals claim to appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal

The Bank appealed the lower Court’s decision. The Bank’s appeal rested on three issues where they claimed that the Federal Court judge erred:

  • By finding that the deemed trust does not need an event that creates the crystallization around the assets.
  • In finding that secured creditors cannot avail themselves of the bona fide purchaser for value defence.
  • Ignored the fact that the Bank’s loans to the man had nothing to do with his business.

The Federal Court of Appeal judges went through a detailed analysis of cases and legislation. In the end, the Federal Court of Appeal did not find that the lower court judge erred in any way and dismissed the Bank’s appeal on all three grounds.

Triggering event – The Bank argued that the concept of priority can only be determined when there is an event that triggers competing claims to the priority over the assets. Since the right to a priority is essentially remedial in nature, it develops upon the enforcement action initiated by one or more creditors. When there is a competition between claimants, and it is obvious there will be a shortfall, that is when the Crown is able to assert its priority. Here, the Bank was not a secured lender at the time the Crown asserted its priority.

The appeal court decided that the lower court was correct. The relevant section of the Excise Tax Act creates a trust when there is unremitted GST or HST where the property is beneficially owned by Her Majesty in spite of any security interest in the property or in the sales proceeds thereof.

So the Bank was unsuccessful in this part of its argument.

Bona fide purchaser for value defence – This argument by the Bank is that it is a bona fide buyer for value of the cash paid to it by the debtor. Because the considered trust fund provisions of the Act do not extend to such buyers for the value the Bank submits that it is entitled to keep the funds provided in payment of the borrower’s HELOC and mortgage.

The appeal court ruled against this argument on the basis that if the bona fide purchaser for value defence was available to secured creditors who got paid off, it would render the deemed trust provision useless in probably every situation. The Court stated this was not Parliament’s intention.

The loans to the man had nothing to do with his business – This argument is that the court should distinguish between the taxpayer acting in his capacity as a business distinct from the tax debtor acting in a personal capacity. Further, it was argued that the Bank had no knowledge of the man’s business affairs.

The Court rejected this argument for two reasons. First, the statute that establishes the deemed trust states “…every person…”. It does not differentiate between different types of persons. Second, there was nothing in the evidence before the lower court that indicated what knowledge the Bank had about the man’s business.

4 killer ways to full loan recovery

So how can someone who lends money by way of a property mortgage on a personal residence of a self-employed person who runs an unincorporated business protect themselves? Here are our 4 killer ways:

  1. The mortgagee needs to ask the question on the mortgage application to determine if the person is self-employed.
  2. The proposed mortgagee must get a true copy of a statement from CRA showing that there are no amounts owing by the person on account of either unremitted HST/GST or source deductions as the employer of others. This condition should be in the term sheet for the loan being offered. The statement should be given before the lender advances the funds.
  3. Lenders should add language to their term sheet, loan and security documents and discharge or other documents issued when the loan is repaid. The new language would be an attestation by the borrower that there are no amounts owing to any government authority that would be regarded to be a deemed trust claim.
  4. Even more, the language would have to make it clear that in the event there were any kind of such claims, even if the mortgage loan was totally repaid, the borrower is still responsible to pay that additional amount to the lender. The lender would then pass on the deemed trust amount to Canada Revenue Agency for individuals.

Summary

I hope you found this CRA deemed trust claim case review helpful. It should be of particular interest to contractors, developers and builders in Ontario.

The Ira Smith Team family hopes that you and your family members are remaining secure, healthy and well-balanced. Our hearts go out to every person that has been affected either via misfortune or inconvenience.

We all must help each other to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing and self-quarantining are sacrifices that are not optional. Families are literally separated from each other. We look forward to the time when life can return to something near to typical and we can all be together once again.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has constantly used clean, safe and secure ways in our professional firm and we continue to do so.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. This is especially true these days.

If anyone needs our assistance, or you just need some answers for questions that are bothering you, feel confident that Ira or Brandon can still assist you. Telephone consultations and/or virtual conferences are readily available for anyone feeling the need to discuss their personal or company situation.

The Ira Smith Team is fully functional and Ira, together with Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone or video meeting no-cost strategy session.

Continue to be healthy, well balanced and protected everybody.canada revenue agency for individuals

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: SADLY IN E-COMMERCE TAXLAND

corporate bankruptcy in canadaCorporate bankruptcy in Canada: Introduction

A brand-new report from PwC Canada discloses that in 2018, Canadians anticipate spending an average of $1,563, up 6.7% over last year. Men are expected outspend women by almost $400. That got me to start thinking about what the most complex issue for corporate bankruptcy in Canada is when an online business fails?

The report finds that the majority of Canadians still prefer the in-store experience. Nearly two-thirds consider brick-and-mortar retail for their primary holiday season shopping. The rest is online shopping. Unsurprisingly, most millennials (51%) think of online purchasing first, which is in line with United States consumers overall (50%).

E-commerce, like any other industry, has its startups and more mature companies. There will be winners and losers. The fulfilment of online digital products is done online. The fulfilment of physical goods orders bought online more often than not will be done by a third party. That third party may not necessarily be fulfilling orders from Canada.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: The most complex issue for an e-commerce business, IMO

With that said, the retail vendor’s inventory, computer hardware and software value are relatively easy to determine. But to my way of thinking, the #1 issue for corporate online vendors, both solvent and viable or insolvent and not viable, is the area of sales tax.

In attempting to abide by tax laws for your e-business, you might find yourself falling down the rabbit-hole, going through the looking glass, and attending a Mad Tea-Party.

Sound judgment, logic, and fairness never did apply totally to the field of taxation, however, this is specifically true of e-commerce deals.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: Canada Customs Welcomes You to Canada!

Considering that I’m situated in Canada, let’s start here. To keep things simpler, but certainly not simple, I will review this issue strictly from a Federal tax collection perspective, i.e. Harmonized Sales Tax (HST).

Canada has what you may call a nationwide sales tax or a value included tax (VAT). This Goods and Services Tax (GST) of seven percent is applicable to lots of Canadian transactions.

Not just is it critical to identify whether a taxable sale was made in Canada or not, but also where in Canada. If it was made (or deemed to be made) in any of the HST provinces, a higher rate applies. This is due to the fact that those provinces have allowed Canada to gather their provincial sales taxes for them, as follows:

 

ProvinceHST % rate
New Brunswick15
Newfoundland and Labrador15
Nova Scotia15
Ontario13
Prince Edward Island15


Each province and territory has its own guidelines. Ontario charges 8 percent retail sales tax on numerous common internet deals whereas Alberta has no provincial sales tax.

Obviously, this is just scratching the surface. This entire blog by necessity is an oversimplification of an extremely complicated topic. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), I would certainly require the advice of a professional tax advisor to help me through e-commerce Taxland.

Since I am not a tax professional, you should also seek the advice of a tax professional. This is merely one bankruptcy trustee’s view of the issues in the insolvency of an e-commerce business.what does a court appointed receiver doCorporate bankruptcy in Canada: When Exports Aren’t Exports!

In Canada, exports are “zero-rated” sales for GST purposes. This means that when you ship a product to someone outside Canada, you don’t charge GST. Yet, you get to claim (or subtract from the GST collected by you) all the “input tax credits” (GST that you spent for business functions) to make that export.

However, if you export items aside from physical products, beware! There are lots of mistakes to look out for.

As one example, think about digitized products that you may offer from Canadian sites, such as e-books, downloadable software application, or subscriptions to a material. You would be considered to be selling “intangible personal property”. Unless your item is also thought about “copyright” (such as software or e-books that you produced or have gotten the rights for), you will need to charge GST. The reason, according to the Canada Revenue Agency, is that it could be utilized inside Canada, even if it isn’t.

Say you sold a subscription for accessing digitized content (from various sources) on your Canadian site to a client in the United States. Given that there are no restrictions regarding where the intangible personal property might be used, and the property is not considered copyright (nor the provision of a service), the American client goes through GST, even if he never comes to Canada.

Strangely, the same logic doesn’t apply when an American buys a routine book (or an automobile) which he could bring into Canada with him and utilize here. It holds true that it is much easier for Canada to assess such products at the border than in the online world. However, I have not heard of any cases of Americans being taxed on the cars and trucks or books they bring with them when they come to reside in Canada for a part of the year.

As a Canadian registrant, one way you might legally avoid this ridiculous March Hare is to clearly mention on your website and invoice that utilize of such intangible personal effects in Canada is restricted (or requires an extra charge and the payment of GST).

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: When imports Aren’t imports

Goods shipped to Canada are subject to GST on importation. Such tax is often assessed at the border. What if you are a Canadian registered for GST, selling to a Canadian customer but your provider is in a foreign country?

Pretend that your Canadian consumer has bought a book from you from your Canadian website. Your dropship supplier is located in the United States and is signed up for GST. You send your order to the American business, and they, in turn, ship the book for you (total with Customs Declaration and their GST Business Number).

Since they paid the GST, you wouldn’t think you would need to charge it again, would you? “Wrong!”, smiles the Cheshire cat. Since you are a registrant located in Canada, you need to charge and remit the GST. But you are entitled to input tax credits, aren’t you? In many cases, the answer is “No”.

It might be very tough for you to satisfy the documentary and other technical requirements. As an example, it is not uncommon for American providers to absolutely refuse to provide an invoice breaking down the GST or to enable you to be the importer of record. This complicates their life unnecessarily and they just don’t require the aggravation.

There are easing tax provisions covering drop shipping, sales agencies, and other situations. In most cases, sadly, the most practical option is to permit the tax to be paid twice.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: When you are subject to tax where you’re not subject to tax

It makes sense that countries impose a tax on sales and earnings made in their own jurisdiction. Does it make sense for Germany to tax sales made in the United States?

Starting July 1, 2003, the European Union actually did just that by enforcing an online sales tax.

This implies that if somebody from England buys an e-book from somebody in the United States, the American should submit this tax. Naturally, If the sale was to someone in Germany, the tax rate would be more complicated.

The reasoning behind this is as follows: Since countries can’t gather sales tax on internet deals at their borders, the only method they can collect it (other than a self-assessment system) is with an online sales tax. Even more, it is claimed that companies in the European Union suffer a significant competitive disadvantage due to the fact that they need to gather Value Added Tax but others don’t.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: But that isn’t all


So that is just a “scratching of the surface” description of the issue for Canadian companies selling online when it comes to HST. But if the company is insolvent, and will go into either receivership or bankruptcy, the story gets worse.

For every insolvent company in receivership, an HST liability is a trust claim against the assets of the company. So in a liquidation, the HST liability would have to be paid before a secured creditor, normally a chartered bank, recovers any money. What this means for the owner(s) who guaranteed the bank debt, is that they have additional exposure for any shortfall of the bank debt by the amount of the HST liability.

In a bankruptcy though, the HST liability is not a trust claim, but rather an unsecured claim. So, the good news is that it does not come ahead of the bank debt the owners have probably guaranteed payment for. However, the bad news is that the HST liability is always a Director liability. So in a bankruptcy, there are always insufficient funds to pay off the unsecured creditors 100%. So, the Directors of the bankrupt company will be on the hook for any unremitted HST.

Corporate bankruptcy in Canada: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company, either a traditional retailer, online retailer or both, experiencing financial difficulties? If yes, call the Ira Smith Team. Our approach for each file is to create an end result where Starting Over, Starting Now takes place. This starts the minute you are at our front door.

The earlier you contact us, the more options we will have to implement. Whether it is a corporate restructuring or personal debt settlement through a consumer proposal, the goal is to avoid bankruptcy. However, if bankruptcy turns out to be the best option, we can assist there too.

You’re simply one phone call away from taking the necessary steps to get back to leading a healthy, balanced hassle-free life, ending the pain and stress you are feeling forever. Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today for your free consultation.

Call a Trustee Now!