Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CCAA PROTECTION FAQ: 10 EASY THINGS YOU MUST KNOW TO BE FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING SAVVY

What is CCAA protection?

The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) allows insolvent companies owing creditors $5 million or more to seek CCAA protection. This can help them restructure their business and settle their debts over time. The CCAA gives such companies the ability to restructure their business affairs and financial obligations. In Canada, the CCAA operates under the authority of the federal government and is administered by the courts of each province.

If a debtor company owes less than $5 million, it can restructure under Part III Division I of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). This federal insolvency statute has streamlined procedures for handling insolvency restructuring cases. There’s no prohibition against using this statute if the company owes $5 million or more. Those larger companies just have a choice as to which statute to restructure under. This kind of restructuring is done in order to avoid liquidation through the filing of an Assignment in Bankruptcy. By successfully restructuring, the company can avoid job losses, claims by employees and the other negative effects of bankruptcy.

In this Brandon’s Blog post, I’ll be discussing CCAA protection for companies needing to go through a financial restructuring by making the Initial Application to the court. I’ll also be talking about a recent court decision that will be of interest to companies needing to restructure when their bank is demanding that all loans be repaid and they are trying to enforce their security.

Is CCAA protection the same thing as chapter 11?

Bankruptcy protection is a term closely associated with a US company filing under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. In Canada, it most likely means that the Canadian company has applied to a Canadian court to make its application for CCAA protection under the CCAA.ccaa protection

What is CCAA protection in Canada and “The Stay”?

Creditor protection under the CCAA is a process that provides companies with some relief from their creditors. This process can help them to reorganize their affairs and continue operations.

CCAA protection can provide some much-needed breathing room for companies that are struggling to stay afloat. It can give them time to restructure their affairs and come up with a plan to repay their creditors. A debtor company files its application for creditor protection in order to obtain an Initial Stay from the court. This will allow the company to begin restructuring its financial affairs.

While the CCAA protection order is in place, creditors are not allowed to take any action to recover money owed to them. They can’t try to seize the company’s property or petition the court for its bankruptcy, without the prior approval of the court. This is called the CCAA protection “stay of proceedings”.

A CCAA Canada filing is typically made when a business is insolvent and seeking to restructure its debts. The goal of the business in CCAA protection is to reach a satisfactory agreement with its creditors, which can include both secured and unsecured creditors. I will talk more about the support of secured creditors when I discuss the court case below.

Comeback hearing: Can CCAA Canada protection be extended?

Yes. Initial Order applications are often submitted on an urgent basis with prior notice only to key stakeholders such as senior lenders. Initial orders usually contain a “comeback” clause allowing stakeholders who did not receive initial notice an opportunity to attempt to change the terms of the CCAA protection order. Under the CCAA, Section 11.02(1) states that the Initial Order cannot be effective for more than 10 days.

The Canadian court system requires that there must be a “comeback hearing,” where interested parties can challenge aspects of the initial order, or even request additional relief before the order is extended. This means that the comeback hearing must be scheduled for within those 10 days. This ensures that the process moves forward promptly while protecting the interests of those involved. At the comeback hearing, the court will then assess the evidence before making a decision on whether or not to extend CCAA protection. If the court decides to extend protection, it will only do so for a limited amount of time.

The amount of time given will be at the discretion of the court and is definitely not open-ended. The company and its Monitor will be required to provide regular reports to the court detailing this progress.

The court will determine the next reporting period based on the information provided, which will allow the debtor company to continue its restructuring. The court may also be asked to make other orders, such as borrowing authority for financing the debtor company’s operations.ccaa protection

CCAA protection: What is the role of the Monitor?

The Monitor is the Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) appointed by the court to monitor the business and financial affairs of the debtor company in a CCAA proceeding. The LIT’s role is to ensure compliance with the law, court order(s), and terms of the debtor company restructuring plan.

The Court-appointed Monitor is responsible for assisting with the preparation of the restructuring plan, formally known as the Plan of Arrangement and sometimes referred to as a Plan of Compromise. Monitors act as financial advisors to the insolvent company and they also advise creditors on the claims process and oversee voting at each meeting of creditors.

A Monitor must submit regular reports to the court summarizing the debtor company’s activities and the progress of the case. This includes the claims process when they get to that point in the administration.

These reports are published online and are accessible to creditors and interested parties. One of the ongoing responsibilities of the Monitor in its reporting is to advise if, in the Monitor’s opinion, the debtor company under CCAA protection is continuing to act in good faith and carrying out its restructuring on a timely basis.

CCAA protection: The Plan of Arrangement or Compromise

The company usually begins talking with its creditors and investors right away after the initial order is made. To do this, it may end or give away unwanted and especially unprofitable contracts, fire employees, sell property, negotiate new credit terms, change its corporate structure, and take other restructuring steps to ensure the viability and profitability of the company.

The court will ultimately be asked to approve all major actions in order to allow the company to move towards a viable Plan of Arrangement it believes will garner the support of the necessary majority of creditors.

The Plan of Arrangement or Compromise is the proposal presented by a company to its creditors detailing how it intends to resolve the issues it is facing and how the amounts owed to creditors will be compromised, An arrangement is a broader term that encompasses any plan for reorganizing. The distinction between “compromise” and “arrangement” is in practice, immaterial.

Different creditors are often treated differently based on terms of priority. This affects the order and amount they will be paid under the restructuring plan.

The first step in a CCAA restructuring will be to prioritize any government claims that are considered trust claims. Next will be any new charges ordered by the court as part of the restructuring. Examples of such court-ordered charges are amounts owing under a Key Employee Retention Plan and the lender financing the company during the restructuring phase.

The pre-filing secured creditors are typically at the forefront next when it comes to recovering their funds. They may have security in the form of a general security agreement or mortgage.

Unsecured creditors are next in line for payment. These creditors have provided goods or services to the company on credit, without receiving any security in return. In retail insolvencies, the company under creditor protection has to decide as part of its business plan if it is going to treat customers who have paid deposits for items they have not yet picked up as unsecured creditors or if they will complete the sale providing value for the prior deposits.

Such differing priorities will influence how the Plan of Arrangement or Compromise is constructed.ccaa protection

CCAA protection and the financial statements of the debtor

When a company seeks CCAA protection from the court, they are required to submit a projected cash flow statement. This document projects the company’s expected revenue and expenses from ongoing business operations and any required financing over the next 12 months and is used to assess whether or not it can fund day-to-day operations and survive during the CCAA protection proceedings.

Furthermore, the company must provide copies of all financial statements issued during the one-year period prior to the date of the Initial Application. If none were issued during this time period, it should provide a copy of the most recent financial statement.

CCAA protection: Creditor approval of the Plan of Arrangement or Compromise

A company can establish separate classes of creditors to increase the chances of a favourable vote for the Plan of Compromise or Plan of Arrangement. There must be some form of shared characteristic or similarity amongst the creditors in each class in order to qualify for each such classification.

In addition to the simple majority test, the creditors in each class who are voting must vote in favour of it by at least 2/3 of the total value of the creditors voting in each class.ccaa protection

CCAA protection and court approval of the Plan of Arrangement or Compromise

The court may approve the Plan once they have been approved by each participating class of creditors. The Plan will include all negotiated compromises and arrangements that deal with any matter, including claims against directors and amendments to the articles of incorporation or letters patent incorporating the company,

A Plan cannot be approved by the court if a provision is not made for settling “super-priority” claims relating to:

  • compensation and reimbursement claims by employees other than officers and directors;
  • pension plan contributions (except where an agreement has been reached with the relevant pension regulator); and
  • unremitted employee source deductions from employee paycheques for taxes and other deductions.

Additionally, any equity claims cannot be authorized by the court through a compromise or arrangement until all other claims have been paid in full.

CCAA protection: You can access CCAA filing records and court documents through 2 sources

There are two ways to find CCAA filing records and court documents. The easiest way is to go to the Monitor’s website specifically set up for the CCAA case. All documents filed by the Monitor in court and all court orders will be there. The second source is the court file itself.

This leads us to the actual court case I mentioned at the very beginning of this CCAA protection blog post. It is a decision dated October 14, 2022, by the Honourable Justice MacDonald of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador in Bankruptcy and Insolvency. The case is Edward Collins Contracting Limited (Re), 2022 NLSC 149.

It is an application by a group of companies in the construction industry seeking an Initial CCAA protection Order for the debtor company. The case is notable for one factor: the companies’ main secured creditor, the Royal Bank of Canada, is opposing the application.

The companies were operating under a forbearance agreement. However, Royal Bank claims that they were in breach of their forbearance agreement and that the Bank should be allowed to have a Court-appointed Receiver. Although they did not provide any evidence in their material, in argument, the Bank claimed the companies were not acting in good faith.

The court ruled that if the companies’ application for CCAA protection is approved, then the Royal Bank of Canada’s application for a Court-appointed receiver is moot.

The court’s entire decision and His Honour’s thought process in considering all issues can be located online. Of specific relevance to me is His Honour’s thought process and careful consideration of all the points he must consider in deciding whether or not to grant the requested relief of CCAA protection.

The court considered the following:

  • Do the companies have proper standing under the CCAA?
  • Have the companies satisfied the test to allow the granting of grant an Initial Order?
  • If so, should the company’s conduct during the prior Consent Stay period cause it to refuse the Initial Order?

The court found that the CCAA applies to the debtor company and the affiliated debtor companies as they are all insolvent corporations or have committed an act of bankruptcy and owed their creditors in excess of $5 million. The court also found that the companies were entitled to CCAA protection from creditors and even the Royal Bank of Canada notwithstanding its opposition to the Initial Application and the granting of the Initial Order. The Initial Order was made.

You can read His Honour’s lengthy analysis if you wish, as it is very detailed and provides a great deal of insight.

You Owe Money—The CCAA protection

I hope you enjoyed this Brandon’s Blog on CCAA protection.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are now worried about its economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.ccaa protection

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SMALL BUSINESS LOANS CANADA CASE STUDY: LOSING YOUR MONEY IS NOT FUNNY

1st Global Capital

Small business loans Canada: Introduction

Today I am going to be telling you a story about a US corporate bankruptcy, and then a case study of our own. The purpose is to illustrate how you need to understand all the risk factors as a private small investor in making small business loans Canada.

Small business loans Canada: 1st Global Capital bankruptcy

A $283 million corporate US bankruptcy has derailed many retirement plans. It has left many investors in a financial crisis. In one case, a small inheritance was invested. In another, a cash award granted by a Court was invested. These are just two of the investor stories coming out of the US bankruptcy case of 1st Global Capital of Hallandale Beach, Florida.

1st Global Capital describes itself this way:

1st Global Capital is an industry-leading direct funder with the professionalism, flexibility and fast turnaround you need to maximize your success. We use our years of industry experience, our funding power and our technological expertise to empower Independent Sales Organizations (ISOs) and Partner’s like you to maximize your business opportunities. Behind every 1GC deal is the expert vetting and oversight from our team of funding professionals with over 50 years of combined underwriting experience.”

Small business loans Canada: The “memorandums of indebtedness”

1st Global Capital was created 5 years ago to fund small companies. It funded loans to small businesses throughout many states in the USA. Examples of the types of businesses it funded are dining establishments, retail stores, construction businesses, healthcare, and e-commerce companies.

They raised money by issuing “memorandums of indebtedness” to people who invested with 1st Global Capital. Many used retirement savings accounts to fund their investment. 1st Global Capital used commissioned agents in many states to sell the 1st Global Capital investment opportunity. These short-term deals were supposed to pay back with interest at the end of nine months.

Small business loans Canada: The risky loan products

1st Global Capital was an alternative lender. It’s loan products included:

  • Merchant Cash Advances
  • Specialty Funding Options
  • Asset Based Lending
  • Accounts Receivable Funding

By its very nature, this was risky lending to businesses that could not obtain more traditional bank financing. The investors were wooed by promises of high returns, but I am certain they did not really understand they were making unsecured loans to a company that placed the money into risky loans.

Small business loans Canada: The small investors

Bankruptcy documents indicate greater than 4,000 1st Global Capital accounts existed across the country at the date of bankruptcy. Numerous are individual retirement accounts, each owed in between $621,000 and $922,000.

Court records indicate that 1st Global Capital stated that the cause of its bankruptcy was examinations by the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as the U.S. attorney’s office in southern Florida over alleged securities violations.

As a result, the inflow of money from investors stopped when 1st Global Capital could no longer offer its memorandums. The bankruptcy files show that as a result, the company dealt with an unexpected and intense liquidity situation. The regulatory agencies state that 1st Global Capital was selling securities and the company was subject to government registration with and oversight by government regulatory agencies.

The bankruptcy records do not indicate this but I am certain that eventually, the bankruptcy trustee will report that the investment scheme was a Ponzi scheme. If the inability to take in more loans caused the company’s bankruptcy, it is obvious that they required fresh money in order to honour their existing liabilities. New investors’ money paying back older investors is a classic definition of a Ponzi scheme.

Small business loans Canada: Our very own Canadian case study

Not understanding what you are investing in is not a story unique to the United States. Let me tell you about one of our case studies from last year called Vaughan Crossings Inc (“VCI”). We were appointed by the Court as Receiver of the assets, properties and undertaking of VCI. The main asset of VCI was 5.5 acres of owned development land located at the northwest corner of Dufferin and Centre Streets in the City of Vaughan, ON. In this receivership, our main role was to sell these lands. You can find all the Court records and public information on our webpage that we set up for VCI, so I won’t go through the history of the file in this Brandon’s Blog.

The important point in this file is that the second mortgagee was a group of investors. These investors were found through the use of commissioned agents. These agents were mainly financial advisors and insurance agents. The agents made commissions to raise funds from their clients for investment in this project. Just like in the 1st Global Capital case, the investors were mainly individuals, many of whom used funds in their RRSPs to make the loan.

Small business loans Canada: The dangers of not understanding risk

During the receivership, I had the chance to speak with many investors who called in wanting to know the status of their investments. These unsophisticated people were wooed by the promise of high returns when the project was fully built out. Just like in the 1st Global Capital case, the mortgage syndicator had to cease raising funds as they were being investigated by the Financial Services Commission of Ontario. Ultimately, the mortgage syndicator went into receivership also.

The money put in by this unsophisticated investor group was secured by way of a second mortgage. The developer ran out of cash to develop the property. The mortgage syndicator was shut down. The lands were not be developed. The plan was that the mortgage syndicator was going to do another round of financing to provide construction financing, which would be in priority to the second mortgagee! The mortgage syndicator had the authority, acting as trustee of the second mortgage, to subordinate that mortgage to the construction financing. However, that never happened.

Small business loans Canada: The receivership

Without construction financing, the development project could not continue; hence our appointment as Receiver. There two mortgages against the property and numerous construction liens filed and perfected against the property. We obtained our appraisals and ran a receivership sales process. We sold the property for much more than its appraised value. The sales price repaid the construction liens and the first mortgage. However, there was very little available for the second mortgagee investors.

The promise of a high-interest rate wooed these investors. They may not have been as focussed on the safety of their capital. Unfortunately, these small investors did not understand the risks associated with this type of loan they were making. Shame on their financial advisors who sold them this investment, knowing it was not right for most of them. The financial advisors were hungry for commissions, regardless of what harm may come to their clients.

Small business loans Canada: Is your business at risk?

If your small business is having financial problems, more small business loans alone is not the answer. You must first look at all aspects of your business. First, you should look at the viability of your business.

Are there expenses that need cutting and activities that you must do that can generate more revenue? If so, perhaps we can restructure your business. You may not need a long-term small business loan. Perhaps a short-term loan to get over the immediate financial hurdle you are facing is enough.

If you are looking for ways to restructure your corporate or personal debt call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. We understand the stress and pain your financial problems are causing you. We feel your pain and we can end it for you.

Our strategy for every single business and person is to develop a result where Starting Over, Starting Now comes true, starting the minute you walk through our door. You’re just one call away from taking the necessary actions to get your debt settlement and back on the road to leading a healthy and stress-free life. Contact the Ira Smith Team today.small business loans canada

Call a Trustee Now!