Tag: executrix

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

DO YOU INHERIT DEBT IN CANADA: CRA SAYS YES TO PROPERTY TRANSFERS

Introduction

When conversations of financial obligations happen, people usually joke around and state they’ll finally be without debt upon their death. Many people who come to me for their no-cost consultation also ask, do you inherit debt in Canada? A recent decision of the Tax Court of Canada inspired me to write this Brandon’s Blog to discuss the issue.

What happens to debt when you die in Canada?

In general, what happens to debt when you die in Canada is that your Executor or Executrix (in Ontario it is called an Estate Trustee) needs to understand all of the deceased’s assets and liabilities. The Estate Trustee needs to make sure that all debts are paid off before making any distribution to the beneficiaries. Unless you have co-signed for or guaranteed someone else’s loan, you are not responsible for your spouse’s or parent’s debts upon their death. There at generally two exceptions.

The first is credit card debt where usually a spouse has a supplementary credit card on the same account. In that case, you need to look at the credit card agreement because the supplementary cardholder might be responsible for the debt. So if there are insufficient assets in the estate to pay off the credit card debt, the supplementary cardholder may have to.

Section 160(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada)

Section 160(1) of the Income Tax Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.)) (Income Tax Act), and its equivalent, S. 325 of the Excise Tax Act (Canada), can be utilized by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to assess tax obligation liability to those who received a transfer of property from persons with tax obligations at the time of the transfer. This indicates if a person offers you something of value (virtually anything), while they have a tax debt, the CRA can and will certainly pursue you. CRA’s view is that the original tax obligation debtor ought to have sold whatever was transferred, and the funds used to pay off the tax debt.

This section of the Income Tax Act (or Excise Tax Act) especially comes into play during irathe administration of a deceased Estate or in an insolvency filing.

The Court decision, released on February 10, 2020, highlights this issue that death is no excuse when it comes time to pay the taxman!

The Court case facts

The CRA assessed the two daughters of the deceased father $96,640.96 each under section 160(1) of the Income Tax Act in respect of a transfer of property from their father prior to his death. Each daughter has appealed the assessments to the Tax Court of Canada. The two appeals were heard together as the evidence and facts were identical.

The agreed statement of facts was:

  1. The father was the annuitant of a Franklin Templeton Investments life income fund (the Income Fund) and prior to his death, he designated each of his daughters as his irrevocable beneficiaries under the Income Fund.
  2. In his last will and testament, he named his daughters as Estate trustees and beneficiaries of his estate.
  3. The father died on June 8, 2011.
  4. On or about July 26, 2011, $96,640.96 was transferred to each of the daughters.
  5. Each of the daughters received the $96,640.96 distribution on July 26, 2011, in satisfaction of their beneficial interest following the father’s death.
  6. The daughters provided no consideration in regard to the transfer of the $96,640.96.
  7. On July 3, 2015, the Minister of Revenue assessed each of the daughters $96,640.96 on the basis of subsection 160( 1) of the Income Tax Act.
  8. The father had an outstanding tax liability of not less than $96,640.96 with respect to his 2011 taxation year.

Tax liability re property transferred not at arms’ length

Section 160(1) of the Income Tax Act reads as follows:

“Tax liability re property transferred not at arm’s length

160 (1) Where a person has, on or after May 1, 1951, transferred property, either directly or indirectly, by means of a trust or by any other means whatever, to

(a) the person’s spouse or common-law partner or a person who has since become the person’s spouse or common-law partner,

(b) a person who was under 18 years of age, or

(c) a person with whom the person was not dealing at arm’s length,

the following rules apply:

(d) the transferee and transferor are jointly and severally, or solidarily, liable to pay a part of the transferor’s tax under this Part for each taxation year equal to the amount by which the tax for the year is greater than it would have been if it were not for the operation of sections 74.1 to 75.1 of this Act and section 74 of the Income Tax Act, chapter 148 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1952, in respect of any income from, or gain from the disposition of, the property so transferred or property substituted for it, and

(e) the transferee and transferor are jointly and severally, or solidarily, liable to pay under this Act an amount equal to the lesser of

(i) the amount, if any, by which the fair market value of the property at the time it was transferred exceeds the fair market value at that time of the consideration given for the property, and

(ii) the total of all amounts each of which is an amount that the transferor is liable to pay under this Act (including, for greater certainty, an amount that the transferor is liable to pay under this section, regardless of whether the Minister has made an assessment under subsection (2) for that amount) in or in respect of the taxation year in which the property was transferred or any preceding taxation year,

but nothing in this subsection limits the liability of the transferor under any other provision of this Act or of the transferee for the interest that the transferee is liable to pay under this Act on an assessment in respect of the amount that the transferee is liable to pay because of this subsection.”

When identifying the applicability of section 160, you need to also consider the interpretation of arm’s length in subsection 251(1) and the interpretation of related persons in subsection 251( 2 ). Subsection 251(1) defines related persons not dealing with each other at arm’s length.

It likewise considers a taxpayer and certain trusts not to deal at arm’s length. Finally, it offers that, in any other case, it is an inquiry of fact whether individuals not related to each other are, at a certain time, dealing with each other at arm’s length.

Paragraph 251(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act provides that, for the objectives of the Income Tax Act, related persons or persons related to each other are individuals linked by blood relation, marital relationship, common-law or adoption. Paragraph 251(6)(a) specifies that, for the purposes of the Income Tax Act, individuals are connected by blood relationship if one is the child or various other offspring of the other or one is the sibling of the other.

The Federal Court of Appeal

The Federal Court of Appeal had already determined that the following 4 standards must be used when taking into consideration subsection 160(1):

  1. The transferor needs to be liable to pay tax at the time of transfer;
  2. There need to be a transfer of property, either straight or indirectly, through a trust or any other method;
  3. The transferee must either be:
  • The transferor’s spouse or common-law relationship at the time of transfer or a person who has since come to be the person’s spouse or common-law partner;
  • A person who was under 18 years of age at the time of transfer; or
  • An individual with whom the transferor was not dealing at arm’s length.

4. The fair market value of the property transferred needs to be greater than the true value of the consideration given by the transferee.

The position of the parties

CRA’s position was that this was a transfer of property from the father to the daughters prior to his death at a time when he had an outstanding income tax liability.

The daughters stated that they accept that three of the four criteria set out by the Federal Court of Appeal have been satisfied. Particularly, the Appellants agree that their father indirectly transferred the property to each of them, that he owed income tax relating to the tax year in which the transfer took place or a previous tax year and that no consideration was paid by the daughters.

Accordingly, both CRA and the daughters agreed that the only issue before the Court to determine is whether the father and his daughters were dealing with each other at arms’ length.

The daughters’ position was that at the time of the actual cash transfer their father was dead. He did not exist, and for that reason, he was not a related individual within the meaning of Subsection 251(6), and therefore was not in blood relation with them.

CRA’s position was simple. First, the time of the transfer was not when the investment firm paid the cash to the daughters. Rather, it was when the father designated them as irrevocable beneficiaries. Second, the father and his daughters were related not by contract, but by blood. So, even death cannot take away that relationship.

The Court’s decision

The Court agreed totally with CRA’s position, upheld the assessments against each of the daughters and dismissed the appeals. They were found to have received the transfer of the property for no consideration at a time when the father owed income tax of a greater amount. The daughters were each liable to pay the amount of $96,640.96 to CRA. So in this case, if the daughters were asked do you inherit debt in Canada, they would have to answer a resounding YES.

Insolvent and alive

I also come across this issue when providing a no-cost consultation to an insolvent person wanting to know their options. Whenever they disclose that they have an income tax debt, I ask about transfers between the person and his or her spouse or children. I do this to see if there are may section 160(1) transfer of property issues.

If there are, an insolvency filing will merely highlight the transfer issue to CRA. When they get notice of the consumer proposal or the bankruptcy, they start their deep-dive investigation into the affairs of the bankrupt. As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), I also have to advise the creditors of any issues like a transfer between related parties for no or little consideration. Once CRA determines a transfer took place between blood relations for little or no value being given or paid, they will assess the spouse or child under section 160(1) of the Income Tax Act. The outcome will be the same as in this Court case.

Do you inherit debt in Canada summary

So alive or dead, transfers of property between blood relatives for little or no value is always troublesome when it comes to income tax debt outstanding at the time, insolvency and death. I hope you enjoyed this do you inherit debt in Canada Brandon’s Blog and that you have a better understanding that it is possible.

I am finding that I am getting involved more often in deceased estate matters. My involvement is in advising people who are the Estate Trustee of an insolvent estate. I also have acted as the licensed insolvency trustee of a bankrupt deceased estate.

That work has now naturally led to obtaining assignments where my skill set as a licensed insolvency trustee comes in handy in a deceased estate. Two examples are having acted as the Estate Asset Manager in selling off assets in an estate and as acting as an Estate Trustee where there is no bankruptcy involved.

Because of that work, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. has opened up a new business division called Smith Estate Trustee Ontario. In that business, as Estate Trustee, we offer options for the complicated estate concerns. We end the discomfort and irritations the stakeholders are experiencing. We use the experience and integrity that we have built up over the years, with compassion, to help the parties navigate the messy estate issues. We strive for a win for all beneficiaries, adding value by reaching the settlements and distributions they were unable to accomplish by themselves.

We provide a full range of services to provide solutions for the complex Estate issues to end the pain and frustration the stakeholders are experiencing. We apply our expertise and creative thinking to take care of all details to end your pain and achieve the goals of the beneficiaries and other stakeholders. Contact Smith Estate Trustee Ontario today for your free consultation.do you inherit debt in canada

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

ESTATE TRUSTEE ONTARIO REMOVAL ISSUES

Estate trustee

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Estate trustee Introduction

One of the most popular Brandon’s Blog article is:

WHAT HAPPENS TO DEBT WHEN YOU DIE CANADA: ARE YOU FREE OF DEBT

That led me to start looking more deeply into deceased estate matters, past the insolvency issues. So a few months ago I wrote a series of blogs on estate trustee matters. The series of blogs are:

In one blog I wrote how the duties and responsibilities of an estate trustee (formerly called either an executor or executrix) are very similar to the fiduciary duties and activities are undertaken all the time by a licensed insolvency trustee. In another, I wrote about the Court’s ability to remove and replace the estate trustee. In a third blog, I wrote about how all children are not fit to be an estate trustee.

A recent Court decision

I recently became aware of an Ontario Court decision about the removal and replacement of an estate trustee. The decision was handed down a couple of weeks after I wrote my blogs.

The recent decision is a very interesting case. Many of the issues I wrote about are all there. So, I thought it would be interesting to provide the information to you as it is a real-life example that actually took place, of many of the things I previously wrote about that could take place.

The case citation is Lanari V. Kay, 2019 ONSC 1506. It was heard in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The deceased was Patricia Anne Kay. She had eight children. Tragically, one daughter predeceased her. Of the seven remaining, in her will, three were appointed trustees. Along with the remaining four children, Ms. Kay’s granddaughter, the child of her dead daughter, was asserting that she was entitled to be a beneficiary.

The Applicant

The applicant insists five reasons to get rid of the estate trustees: (1) conflict of interest; (2) misbehaviour, violation of trust fund as well as violation of fiduciary responsibility; (3) animosity between the trustees; (4) conflicts between the trustees and the beneficiaries; and (5) delay and wastage of the assets.

The respondents

The trustees insist that:

  1. Any kind of conflict of interest can be relieved by guaranteeing the trustee with a conflict will not take part in any decision making in connection with the matter or thing where there is that conflict.
  2. There is no displeasure between the trustees, and there never was.
  3. Any bitterness between trustees and beneficiaries is not a sufficient ground to get rid of trustees.
  4. There has been no significant hold-up in the management of the estate and they have properly provided the necessary disclosure.
  5. From a functional viewpoint, the elimination of current trustees will increase expenses in this modest estate.

The Trustee Act

As I discussed in my earlier blogs, under the Trustee Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T. 23 (the Act), the court can remove trustees and select brand-new trustees.

The basic concept adhered to in an estate and trust matter by the Court for removal applications like this one is that a Court will not easily remove an estate executor, executrix or trustee picked by the testator. Nevertheless, where there is a clear instance of conflict of interest, elimination is a suitable course of action. The well-being of the beneficiaries has to be an important factor to consider. Also, conduct by the trustee that jeopardizes the estate property or that reveals a lack of honesty or absence of proper ability to carry out the trustee’s duties and obligations are a basis for removal.

The Judge and his ruling

Therefore, the Judge kept in mind that the estate trustees have actually insisted in written documents that the estate might lack sufficient property to disperse if estate litigation continues. He found that the trustees’ activities have actually resulted in unnecessary litigation. The significant legal costs which have actually been sustained are partly due to the unreasonable positions taken by the trustees. This was a major variable to think about.

The Judge stated that:

  1. Bitterness between a beneficiary and a trustee might not be sufficient to cut a trustee.
  2. When that displeasure influences the management of the estate, it is a significant problem.
  3. If the animosity has actually been created by the failure to supply disclosure, it increased the time spent by the respective lawyers on behalf of the trustees and the beneficiaries.
  4. The additional time spent as a result of the lack of disclosure is matched by a matching boost in legal costs which might be the obligation of the estate.

The Judge felt that the problems in this situation have and remains to raise the costs associated with the estate management. He additionally stated that bitterness between the trustees might also exist.

Ultimately, the Judge determined that he was satisfied that the estate trustees have to be removed and he ordered that. The Judge assigned an independent person as the alternative estate trustee and approved a specific hourly rate to be billed by the brand-new trustee. Trustee compensation, just like that of a licensed insolvency trustee acting in Court matters, is subject to taxation by the Court.

Finally, the Judge referred to the various other disputes between the parties back to the Judge seized with this estate litigation.

Our role in estate matters

As I mentioned in one of the earlier blogs, my Firm had successfully completed a mandate as Court-appointed Estate Asset Manager. In that file we had to find common ground between two beneficiaries who could not agree on anything. We were able to do that. So, on consent, our plan to prepare for sale and then sell the assets and distribute the cash to the beneficiaries, on consent, was done. Our fee and that of our lawyer was also approved by the Court without any objection from the beneficiaries.

We were recently appointed by the Court in another estate matter. We will be receiving funds from a party purchasing the only real asset in the estate and attempting to find a missing beneficiary. Based on the results of our hunting, we will then prepare a distribution plan for the Court to approve.

As I have previously written and state above, a licensed insolvency trustee is an officer of the Court. We have the necessary skill set to act as either an estate trustee or perform many potential roles in estate matters. This is in addition to our normal work in the insolvency field.

If you are involved in a messy estate matter, call the Ira Smith Team today. We work cooperatively with lawyers and other professionals.

As a licensed insolvency trustee, we are natural problem solvers. We will be able to create a plan unique to your circumstances so that we can end the pain, stress and anxiety that you are feeling. This will allow you to reduce your overall costs and return to living a stress-free life.

Call the Ira Smith Team today for your free consultation. We will reduce your overall costs and end your pain points, Starting over Starting Now.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEE OF DECEASED ESTATE: WHAT A TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE KNOWS

Trustee of deceased estate: Introduction

I have previously written on what happens when a person dies insolvent, i.e. their debts are greater than the value of their assets. My blogs on being a trustee of deceased estate that is insolvent are:

I am now switching a bit. Over the next few weeks, I am going to be writing a series of blogs and vlogs to explain why I believe that a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee) is the professional you should be thinking of making the executor of a deceased estate and recording it in your will. I am talking about solvent estates. Those with many assets and beneficiaries. I will be making the case why over the next few weeks. I will not be on insolvent estates of deceased persons.

I repeat that these blogs and vlogs will have nothing to do with debt, insolvency or bankruptcy. However, I will show how, based on the knowledge and expertise possessed by licensed insolvency trustees, it makes them the perfect candidate to serve as an executor of a deceased estate that is rich with assets. I will also be focussing my comments on the Province of Ontario. There may be some variations from province to province.

I caution that I and my firm are not lawyers, and I am by no means providing in this and upcoming Brandon’s Blogs advice on wills or estate planning matters. For that, you must consult your lawyer.

In this blog, I wish to set the stage by going over some basics when it comes to a deceased estate.

Trustee of deceased estate: The executor/executrix or estate trustee

In Ontario, an estate trustee (also known as the executor or executrix) is the only individual with the lawful authority to handle or disperse an estate. When an individual dies they might leave items, property, real estate, cash and investments and other possessions which is called their estate.

Probate is a treatment to ask the court to:

  • provide an individual with the authority to work as the estate trustee of an estate;
  • verify the authority of an individual acting as the estate trustee named in the deceased’s will; and
  • officially accept that the deceased’s will is their legitimate last will.

You can apply for probate in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The procedure is governed by the Estates Act and the related Rules of Civil Procedure.dece

If your probate application succeeds, the court will provide a Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee, which is evidence that an individual has the lawful authority to manage the estate. If there is a will, it is also evidence that the will is valid.

Trustee of deceased estate: Must I always apply for probate?

A probate Certificate is not needed in every situation for a deceased estate. Prior to beginning an application for probate, you might want to establish whether the deceased estate actually needs a probate Certificate.

An application for a probate Certificate is normally made if:

  • the departed individual passed away without a will
  • the deceased’s will does not show an estate trustee
  • a financial institution desires evidence of an individual’s lawful authority to get the cash or financial investments of the deceased
  • the estate’s properties consist of real estate which does not pass to an individual by right of survivorship
  • there is a disagreement about who ought to be the estate trustee
  • there is a conflict or possible conflict about the legitimacy of the will; or
  • some of the beneficiaries are unable to supply legal consent.

Trustee of deceased estate: Trustee of estate responsibility

What should the estate trustee’s first steps be? Here is where the actions the estate trustee should immediately take are almost the same as when a licensed insolvency trustee is first appointed either as:

The will and financial records

Assuming the family has already made arrangements for and the funeral has taken place, the estate trustee should first find a copy of the will and any books and records of the deceased that will explain the deceased’s financial affairs. If the estate trustee cannot find a copy of the will, he or she should consult with the deceased’s family and lawyer. Hopefully one or both will have a copy.

As the licensed insolvency trustee, we must also find the books and records of the company or person, so that we can start learning about the financial affairs of the insolvent or bankrupt.

Proof of authority

The estate trustee will also require a certified copy of the death certificate, to prove the death to financial institutions and the government. The will, and/or the probate Certificate, will be proof of the estate trustee’s authority to act.

In the same way, the licensed insolvency trustee requires a copy of its Appointment Letter in a private receivership, the Court order in a Court-appointed receivership, or the Certificate of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy in a bankruptcy. These documents evidence the appointment of the licensed insolvency trustee.

Taking possession and control of the assets

The estate trustee must now take control of any assets that do not automatically by operation of law transfer to another person by right of survivorship. The estate trustee must establish physical control, take an inventory of the assets and arrange for appraisals to be performed where required. The estate trustee should establish the market value of the assets as soon as possible.

In the same way, upon being appointed as either receiver or trustee, a licensed insolvency trustee must establish control and/or possession of the assets, properties and undertakings of the insolvent/bankrupt debtor, whether in the debtor’s possession or that of a third party. The licensed insolvency trustee must make an inventory of the assets and where required, arrange for appraisals.

Insurance and bonding

The estate trustee must make sure that, in the case of real property and chattels, that the assets are properly insured. As well, if an application was made to Court for probate and the Court issued the Certificate, the Court may also require the estate trustee to get a bond for a specific value to protect the beneficiaries. The amount of the bond will have a relation to the estimated value of the assets.

In the same way, the receiver/trustee must make sure that the hard assets are properly insured. In a bankruptcy, the Superintendent of Bankruptcy sometimes requires the trustee to get a bond to protect the bankruptcy estate.

The bond will be issued by an insurance company licensed to provide such coverage in Ontario.

Trustee of deceased estate: The responsibilities of the estate trustee

In general terms, an estate trustee has the following responsibilities:

  • be impartial amongst beneficiaries
  • act in a commercially reasonable way
  • to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries
  • not make decisions for individual gain
  • keep accurate records of all decisions made and actions and activities; and
  • acting in accordance with the will if one exists

In every Court appointment, be it a receivership or bankruptcy, the licensed insolvency trustee must live up to these same standards. Rather than beneficiaries, there are stakeholders. The Court officer must be impartial and must act in the best interests of all stakeholders.

Trustee of deceased estate: Trustee vs executor of an estate

So hopefully from this blog, you can see that the knowledge, experience and expertise of a licensed insolvency trustee would stand him or her in a good position to act as executor, executrix or estate trustee of a deceased estate.

If you have any questions about a deceased estate and the need for an estate trustee, whether it is solvent or insolvent, contact the Ira Smith Team. We have decades and generations of experience in helping people and companies overcome their financial problems. You don’t need to suffer; we can end your pain.

In my next blog, I am going to write about a topic that is becoming more and more common in deceased estates; picking the right estate trustee. As you will see, it is much more than just finding the right skill set.

In the meantime, if you have any questions at all, contact the Ira Smith Team.

trustee of deceased estate

 

Call a Trustee Now!