Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT FORMS: YOUR COMPLETE GUIDE

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms Introduction

Dealing with debt can feel overwhelming. If you are a person looking into bankruptcy or a consumer proposal in Canada, or you are a business owner putting your company into a formal financial restructuring process, you’ll need to understand the paperwork involved by the insolvency profession.

As a Licensed Insolvency Trustee who has helped many individuals, their families and companies in the Greater Toronto Area over the last 20 years, I’ll walk you through everything you need to know about the regulatory framework carried out through Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms and precedents.

What Are Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms and Precedents?

Think of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) forms as official paperwork required by the Canadian government when someone files for bankruptcy proceedings or makes a consumer debt proposal. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy creates these Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms to make sure the process is legal and fair for everyone involved. The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy is part of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee helps transform financial stress into relief through proper Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms completion in Toronto GTA
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms

These aren’t just suggestions – they’re required by law. Each form serves a specific purpose, like declaring bankruptcy, proving what creditors are owed, or reporting your monthly budget (Form 65). These necessary forms provides the Licensed Insolvency Trustee and all other stakeholders with the necessary information concerning the financial situation of the insolvent debtor, being either a person or company.

Why These Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms Matter to You

Legal Protection: Once filed, these Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms stop creditors from calling you or taking money from your paychecks.

Clear Process: They create a step-by-step path to deal with your debt.

Your Rights: The forms protect both your rights and your creditors’ rights.

Fresh Start: Completing them properly gets you closer to financial freedom.

Who Needs Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms?

  • People filing for personal bankruptcy proceedings
  • Individuals making consumer proposals
  • A business owner facing financial trouble whose company enters formal financial restructuring proceedings, including bankruptcy protection
  • Creditors are sent a notice in writing of your filing. Those who want to collect a portion of what they’re owed as a claim provable through the proof of claim process
  • A Licensed Insolvency Trustee is the only authorized person in Canada to manage the insolvency process

The Most Important Forms You’ll Encounter

Here are the key Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms most people deal with (there are over 90 in total, but you won’t need them all):

Form 21 – Assignment for Bankruptcy

  • What it does: Officially declares you bankrupt
  • Who uses it: You and your trustee
  • When: At the start of bankruptcy proceedings

Form 31 – Proof of Claim

  • What it does: Creditors use this to prove what you owe them
  • Who uses it: Your creditors who have a claim provable in your insolvency proceeding
  • When: After you file for bankruptcy or a proposal

Form 47 – Consumer Proposal

  • What it does: Your formal offer to pay creditors less than you owe
  • Who uses it: You and your trustee
  • When: If you choose a proposal instead of bankruptcy proceedings

Form 65 – Monthly Income and Expense Statement

  • What it does: Shows your income and expenses each month
  • Who uses it: You file this monthly during bankruptcy
  • When: Throughout your bankruptcy period

Form 78 – Statement of Affairs (Business/Corporate Bankruptcy/Proposal)

  • What it does: Lists everything your business owns and owes
  • Who uses it: Your company and your trustee
  • When: At the beginning of the corporate bankruptcy/proposal process

Form 79 – Statement of Affairs (Personal)

  • What it does: Lists everything you own and owe
  • Who uses it: You and your trustee
  • When: At the beginning of the process

Form 84 – Certificate of Discharge

  • What it does: Officially ends your bankruptcy
  • Who uses it: Your trustee files this for you
  • When: When you complete all bankruptcy requirements, you are entitled to a discharge certificate
Licensed Insolvency Trustee helps transform financial stress into relief through proper Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms completion in Toronto GTA
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms

Note: New versions of Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms 31, 65, 78, and 79 must be used for all cases filed after September 16, 2024.

Your Step-by-Step Journey Through the Forms

Based on my experience with hundreds of clients, here’s what happens:

Step 1: Free Consultation

We meet to discuss your situation. I will explain your options and what paperwork is involved. No Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms have been filed yet – this is just information gathering.

Step 2: Document Collection

You gather information about your debts, assets, income, and expenses. I provide you with a checklist so nothing gets missed.

Step 3: Form Preparation

Together, we complete your forms. I handle the technical aspects while you provide the financial information. Common Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms at this stage include your Assignment (Form 21) and Statement of Affairs (Form 79 for an individual or Form 78 for a Company).

Step 4: Filing with the Government

I file your completed forms electronically with the local representative for the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, known as the Official Receiver for that bankruptcy district. Once filed, creditor protection begins.

Step 5: Creditor Notification

Creditors receive notice in writing of your bankruptcy or proposal. They can then file their Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms (like Form 31) to participate.

Step 6: Ongoing Requirements

During bankruptcy, you’ll file monthly income and expense statements and may attend meetings. I guide you through each requirement.

Step 7: Completion

When you finish all duties, I will file your discharge papers (Form 84), which legally end your bankruptcy.

a schematic describing the bankruptcy and insolvency act forms process for a Canadian consumer proposal or bankruptcy
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms

Recent Changes You Should Know About

The government updated several key forms in September 2024. If you’re starting the process now, you’ll use the newest versions. These updates made some Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms clearer and added new questions about your financial situation.

Common Frequently Asked Questions About Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms

What are the common signs that indicate I might need to consider bankruptcy or a consumer proposal?

If you are experiencing persistent collection calls, constant anxiety about your bills, sleepless nights, and feel trapped by overwhelming unsecured debt, these are strong indicators that exploring options under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act could be beneficial.

What is the primary purpose of Form 79 Statement of Affairs in the bankruptcy or consumer proposal process?

Form 79, also known as the Statement of Affairs, is a crucial, government-mandated document that provides a comprehensive, sworn disclosure of your entire financial situation. This includes all your assets, debts, income, and the reasons for your financial difficulties, forming the essential basis for your debt relief plan.

What immediate relief can I expect once I file for bankruptcy or a consumer proposal?

The moment the documents are accepted by the Official Receiver of the bankruptcy district, a “stay of proceedings” comes into effect. This legal protection immediately stops direct contact from your creditors, putting an end to collection calls and significantly reducing your financial stress, allowing you to breathe again.

What is the role of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee in helping with debt?

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee is the only professional in Canada to be the legally authorized person to administer bankruptcies and consumer proposals. They serve as your guide, explaining your available options, preparing all necessary legal documents like Form 79, and managing all communications with your creditors on your behalf.

What happens if I make a mistake on a form?

Small errors can usually be corrected. Major mistakes or missing information can delay your case. That’s why working with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee is important – we catch these issues before they become problems.

Can I fill out the forms myself?

Legally, yes. Practically, it’s not recommended. In my 15+ years of practice, I’ve seen people struggle with forms that seem straightforward but have legal implications they don’t understand.

How long does the paperwork take?

For most people, we can complete the initial Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms before you arrive for our meeting to sign and file the forms. Monthly forms take about 15 minutes once you get used to them.

What kind of information do I need to provide to my Licensed Insolvency Trustee to start the process?

To begin, you will need to provide your Licensed Insolvency Trustee with full personal details, a complete list of everything you own (assets), all your debts (both secured and unsecured), the names and addresses of all your creditors, any expected future income or lump sums, and the underlying reasons for your current financial situation. Also helpful are:

  • Recent pay stubs or proof of income
  • Bank statements
  • Credit card statements
  • Loan documents
  • Property tax bills
  • List of monthly expenses
  • Any legal documents related to your debts

Why is complete honesty crucial when providing information for forms like Form 79?

Complete honesty is the absolute foundation of the entire debt relief process. Attempting to conceal assets or providing false information can lead to severe consequences, including the denial of your bankruptcy or charges of perjury, which would undermine your path to a fresh start.

How does the process of filing for bankruptcy or a consumer proposal lead to a “fresh start”?

Licensed Insolvency Trustee helps transform financial stress into relief through proper Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms completion in Toronto GTA
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms

Guided by your Licensed Insolvency Trustee and based on the detailed financial disclosure provided in Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms like Form 79, this legal process offers a clear path to eliminate or significantly reduce your debt. This allows you to regain control of your finances, alleviate stress, and begin anew without the burden of your past financial obligations.

Tips from My Experience

After helping people through this process, here’s my advice:

Be completely honest. Hiding assets or debts can have serious legal consequences. I’ve seen cases delayed by months because someone wasn’t upfront initially.

Keep copies of everything. You’ll want records for your the files.

Ask questions. If something doesn’t make sense, speak up. Understanding the process reduces stress.

Meet deadlines. Some forms have strict timelines. Missing them can cost you money or delay your fresh start.

Stay in touch. Let me know if your financial situation changes during the process.

Red Flags: Mistakes That Can Hurt Your Case

  • Using old versions of forms after new ones are released
  • Forgetting to include all debts or assets
  • Missing required signatures
  • Providing outdated financial information
  • Waiting too long to file the required monthly reports

How Working with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee Helps

Only Licensed Insolvency Trustees are authorized persons who can file BIA forms and handle bankruptcies in Canada. Here’s what this means for you:

Expertise: We know the forms inside and out. I’ve completed thousands of these documents.

Legal Protection: Once I file your forms, creditors must stop collection activities immediately.

Government Oversight: We’re regulated by the federal government and must follow strict professional standards.

No Surprises: I explain each form and what it means for your situation.

Ongoing Support: You’re not alone in this process. I’m here to answer questions and handle complications.

Your Next Steps

If you’re in the Greater Toronto Area and considering bankruptcy or a consumer proposal:

  1. Book a free consultationCall me and we’ll discuss your specific situation and options
  2. Bring your financial documents – The more complete your information, the better I can help
  3. Ask about alternatives – Bankruptcy isn’t always the best solution
  4. Let me handle the paperwork – Focus on your future while I manage the legal requirements

Ready to take the next step? Contact me for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. Together, we’ll review your situation and determine the best path forward.

If you’re struggling with debt, don’t wait. The longer you wait, the fewer options you might have. Contact a Licensed Insolvency Trustee today for a free consultation.

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we’ve helped thousands of Canadians overcome their debt challenges, starting with honest, professional consumer credit counselling. We’ll review your complete financial situation, explain all your options, and help you choose the best path forward.

Remember: you don’t need to pay someone to access professional help. Real consumer credit counselling starts with a free consultation and continues with transparent, regulated services designed to get you back on your financial feet.

You’re not alone in this. There’s a path forward, and it starts with reaching out for the right kind of help. Take that step—you deserve it. If you’re a GTA resident dealing with overwhelming debt, don’t wait for your credit situation to get worse. As a licensed insolvency trustee serving Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton, Markham, and surrounding areas, I’m here to help you understand your options.

Free consultation available:

  • No obligation to proceed
  • Complete review of your debt and credit situation
  • Clear explanation of how debt solutions affect your credit score
  • Practical next steps you can take immediately

Remember: Your current financial situation doesn’t define your future. With the right help and information, you can overcome both debt challenges and credit score problems.

As a licensed insolvency trustee serving the Greater Toronto Area, I encourage consumers and business owners to view financial difficulties not as failures but as challenges that can be addressed with proper guidance. By understanding the warning signs of insolvency and seeking professional advice early, many people and businesses can find a path forward – whether through restructuring, strategic changes, or in some cases, an orderly wind-down that protects their future opportunities.

Remember: The earlier you seek help for company insolvency concerns, the more options you’ll have.

If you or someone you know is struggling with too much debt, remember that the financial restructuring process, while complex, offers viable solutions with the right guidance. As a licensed insolvency trustee serving the Greater Toronto Area, I help entrepreneurs understand their options and find a path forward during financial challenges.

At the Ira Smith Team, we understand the financial and emotional components of debt struggles. We’ve seen how traditional approaches often fall short in today’s economic environment, so we focus on modern debt relief options that can help you avoid bankruptcy while still achieving financial freedom.

The stress of financial challenges can be overwhelming. We take the time to understand your unique situation and develop customized strategies that address both your financial needs and emotional well-being. There’s no “one-size-fits-all” approach here—your financial solution should be as unique as the challenges you’re facing.

Your financial future is too important to leave to chance. Choose regulated, professional consumer credit counselling and take the first step toward financial freedom today.

If any of this sounds familiar and you’re serious about finding a solution, reach out to the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today for a free consultation. We’re committed to helping you or your company get back on the road to healthy, stress-free operations and recover from financial difficulties. Starting Over, Starting Now.

Licensed Insolvency Trustee helps transform financial stress into relief through proper Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act forms completion in Toronto GTA
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Forms

The information provided in this blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., and any contributors do not assume any liability for any loss or damage.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY STAY OF PROCEEDINGS, EVICTION, AND ONTARIO LAW: WHEN HUGE TENANCY TROUBLES COLLIDE

What is a Stay of Proceedings?

A stay of proceedings is like hitting the pause button on debt collection. When you file an assignment in bankruptcy, a consumer proposal or a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal in Ontario, this legal protection automatically stops most unsecured creditors from taking collection action against you. If a claim is one purely for the collection of a debt advanced by one or more unsecured creditors, otherwise known as a claim provable in a bankruptcy or consumer proposal, then the stay of proceedings applies. But what happens when the legal action is not for the collection of a debt, like when an eviction is involved? A recent Ontario court case shows how complex this can get.

Understanding Stay of Proceedings in Canada

The Basics of Stay Protection

Under Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), a stay of proceedings provides immediate relief from:

  • Debt collection lawsuits
  • Wage garnishments
  • Asset seizures
  • Harassing creditor collection calls and collection agency calls

This protection starts the moment you file for bankruptcy or a consumer proposal with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee in your bankruptcy jurisdiction.

How Long Does a Stay of Proceedings Last?

The duration depends on your filing type:

  • First-time bankruptcy: Usually 9 months (21 months with surplus income)
  • Consumer proposal: Remains active while you make payments (up to 5 years)
  • Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal: This is a preliminary filing before filing a restructuring Division One Proposal for the benefit of creditors, where you don’t qualify to make a consumer proposal. The timeline is similar to that of a consumer proposalGTA homeowner with eviction notice and judge gavel illustrating bankruptcy stay of proceedings tenant protection

Stay of Proceedings and Eviction: A Real Ontario Case

The Snaith Case: What Happened

A recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice – Ontario In Bankruptcy and Insolvency case (Re Snaith, 2025 ONSC 3413) shows what happens when bankruptcy meets eviction. Here’s the story:

Leanna Mae Snaith owed $46,250 in rent arrears by January 2025. Despite making some payments, she couldn’t catch up. The Landlord and Tenant Board ordered her eviction unless she paid $47,986 by February 28, 2025.

When Ms. Snaith couldn’t pay, she filed for bankruptcy in April 2025, hoping the stay of proceedings would stop her eviction.

Why the Stay Didn’t Stop the Eviction

The court made several key points:

  1. Eviction orders aren’t debt collection: The tenancy was already terminated before bankruptcy
  2. Post-bankruptcy rent must be paid: New rent after filing isn’t discharged in bankruptcy
  3. Prior court orders remain valid: The eviction order was made before the bankruptcy filing

When Stay of Proceedings Doesn’t Apply

Exceptions to Stay Protection

A stay of proceedings doesn’t stop everything. It doesn’t apply to:

  • Criminal court cases
  • Family support payments (child support, spousal support)
  • Some secured creditor actions
  • Eviction enforcement when the tenancy was already terminated

Getting Around Stay Protection

Creditors can ask the court to “lift the stay” in certain situations. Under the BIA, the court has the authority to lift the stay if the person requesting the authority to begin or continue their action is likely to suffer material prejudice or if it is equitable on other grounds.

However, in eviction cases, landlords often don’t need to do this if the tenancy ended before bankruptcy.GTA homeowner with eviction notice and judge gavel illustrating bankruptcy stay of proceedings tenant protection

Stay of Proceedings: What Tenants Need to Know

Can Bankruptcy Stop My Eviction?

The short answer: probably not if you’re already facing eviction.

  • Before eviction proceedings: A stay might pause the process temporarily
  • After eviction order: The stay won’t usually stop enforcement
  • Current rent: You must keep paying rent during bankruptcy

Smart Strategies for Rent Problems

If you’re behind on rent:

  1. Act early: File for bankruptcy or a consumer proposal before eviction proceedings start
  2. Keep paying current rent: Post-filing rent isn’t protected by the stay
  3. Get professional help: Licensed Insolvency Trustees understand these complex rules

Stay of Proceedings: What Landlords Should Know

Your Rights During Tenant Bankruptcy

As a landlord, you should know:

  • Pre-bankruptcy rent arrears: These become unsecured debts in bankruptcy
  • Post-bankruptcy rent: Fully collectible and can lead to eviction
  • Eviction timing: File early to avoid stay complications

Working with Sheriff’s Offices

The Snaith case revealed confusion even among enforcement officers. Some sheriff’s offices won’t enforce evictions during bankruptcy, even when they legally can. You might need a court order confirming your right to proceed as was the case here.GTA homeowner with eviction notice and judge gavel illustrating bankruptcy stay of proceedings tenant protection

Consumer Proposals vs. Bankruptcy: Stay Differences

Consumer Proposal Stay Benefits

A consumer proposal offers a stay of proceedings while potentially providing better outcomes:

  • Keep your home (if you can afford the payments)
  • Paying a portion of your debts
  • Protection lasts for the duration of the consumer proposal as long as you are meeting your payment obligations (usually up to 5 years)

Bankruptcy Stay Limitations

Bankruptcy provides immediate stay protection, but:

  • You will lose non-exempt assets
  • Post-bankruptcy obligations remain
  • Unless there are extenuating circumstances causing a longer period, the bankrupt will normally be discharged between 9 months (first time bankruptcy and no surplus income) and 21 months (first time bankruptcy with surplus income requirement)

Professional Guidance: Why You Need a Licensed Insolvency Trustee

Expert Navigation of Stay Rules

The Snaith case shows how complex stay of proceedings rules can be. As Licensed Insolvency Trustees in the Greater Toronto Area, we help by:

  • Explaining how stays apply to your specific situation
  • Timing filings for maximum protection
  • Handling creditor communications
  • Ensuring compliance with legal requirements

Avoiding Common Mistakes

Many people misunderstand stay protection. We’ve seen clients assume bankruptcy solves everything, only to face continued problems with:

  • Housing costs
  • Post-filing obligations
  • Non-dischargeable debtsGTA homeowner with eviction notice and judge gavel illustrating bankruptcy stay of proceedings tenant protection

FAQs About Stay of Proceedings

Does a stay of proceedings stop all creditors?

No. While most creditors must stop collection, some exceptions exist. Secured creditors, family support, and certain government actions may continue.

Can I get evicted during bankruptcy?

Yes, especially if eviction proceedings started before bankruptcy or if you don’t pay current rent.

How quickly does stay protection start?

Stay of proceedings protection begins immediately upon filing bankruptcy or a consumer proposal.

What happens if I violate the stay conditions?

Courts can lift the stay, removing your protection and allowing creditor actions to resume.

Getting Help with Stay of Proceedings Issues

If you’re facing debt problems and potential eviction, don’t wait. Early action often provides better options and stronger stay of proceedings protection. The longer you wait, the fewer options you might have. Contact a Licensed Insolvency Trustee today for a free consultation.

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we’ve helped Ontario residents and companies overcome their debt challenges, starting with honest, professional advice. We’ll review your complete financial situation, explain all your options, and help you choose the best path forward.

Remember: you don’t need to pay someone to access professional help. Our help starts with a free consultation and continues with transparent, regulated services designed to get you back on your financial feet.

You’re not alone in this. There’s a path forward, and it starts with reaching out for the right kind of help. Take that step—you deserve it. If you’re a GTA resident dealing with overwhelming debt, don’t wait for your credit situation to get worse. As a licensed insolvency trustee serving Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton, Markham, and surrounding areas, I’m here to help you understand your options.

Remember: Your current financial situation doesn’t define your future. With the right help and information, you can overcome debt challenges.

As a licensed insolvency trustee serving the Greater Toronto Area, I encourage consumers and business owners to view financial difficulties not as failures but as challenges that can be addressed with proper guidance. By understanding the warning signs of insolvency and seeking professional advice early, many people and businesses can find a path forward – whether through restructuring, strategic changes, or in some cases, an orderly wind-down that protects their future opportunities.

Remember: The earlier you seek help for company insolvency concerns, the more options you’ll have.

If you or someone you know is struggling with too much debt, remember that the financial restructuring process, while complex, offers viable solutions with the right guidance. As a licensed insolvency trustee serving the Greater Toronto Area, I help entrepreneurs understand their options and find a path forward during financial challenges.

At the Ira Smith Team, we understand the financial and emotional components of debt struggles. We’ve seen how traditional approaches often fall short in today’s economic environment, so we focus on modern debt relief options that can help you avoid bankruptcy while still achieving financial freedom.

The stress of financial challenges can be overwhelming. We take the time to understand your unique situation and develop customized strategies that address both your financial needs and emotional well-being. There’s no “one-size-fits-all” approach here—your financial solution should be as unique as the challenges you’re facing.

If any of this sounds familiar and you’re serious about finding a solution, reach out to the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today for a free consultation. We’re committed to helping you or your company get back on the road to healthy, stress-free operations and recover from financial difficulties. Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., and any contributors do not assume any liability for any loss or damage.GTA homeowner with eviction notice and judge gavel illustrating bankruptcy stay of proceedings tenant protection

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM 31: ESSENTIAL TIPS TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE NEW CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY FORM 31

Form 31 Proof of Claim Introduction

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) published several amended Forms under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) to promote a more efficient and effective insolvency system, removing some outdated elements and ensuring better data integrity for all stakeholders. These amended Forms were originally set to come into force on July 15, 2024. One of those new forms is the Form 31 proof of claim. This morning, the OSB announced that the effective date has now been pushed back to September 16, 2024.

In this Brandon’s Blog, given the new proof of claim form coming into use effective July 15, I feel I need to update my October 2018 blog titled: FORM 31 PROOF OF CLAIM: HOW TO PROPERLY COMPLETE THE PROOF OF CLAIM. I will compare the new form to the old one as there are substantial changes and advise on how it should be properly completed as we walk through the new form.

Background Information on Form 31 Proof of Claim

Purpose of Form 31 Proof of Claim

Claims of creditors in bankruptcy or restructuring proposal cases are made on a very specific proof of claim form. The purpose of the form is to furnish information about the claim by the creditor against the debtor. It asks for such things as the contact details of the creditor and permission to represent it if it is a corporate body. Additionally, there are interrogatives on debt aspects like the amount due and supporting papers.

The types of claims section encompasses unsecured claims, lessor claims, secured claims, farm or wage earner claims, plan administrator’s claims, director’s liability claims and client claims against their bankrupt securities dealer.

It also inquires whether or not there has been any relationship between the debtor’s recent transactions with the creditor such as recent payments.

One can obtain information regarding an insolvent person’s financial condition and their application for discharge from bankruptcy. There is a caution at the end of this document concerning penalties for making fake claims or giving false statements. The creditor must sign it himself or through the representative. If an affidavit is attached thereto, then it must be sworn by a person who is authorized by law to administer oaths.

Importance of Properly Completing Form 31

The proper completion of Form 31, Proof of Claim, is crucial in the claims process for creditors with substantiated claims. This form serves as a critical document for creditors looking to assert and potentially recover owed debts. Providing accurate and thorough information on this form is essential for creditors to establish a strong foundation for their claims.

Failure to provide complete or accurate information on Form 31 can lead to delays, rejections, or the disqualification of the claim. Therefore, it is imperative for creditors to closely follow the instructions and guidelines stipulated in Form 31. By doing so, creditors can ensure that their claims are accurately documented and processed efficiently within the specified timelines.picture of woman holding a pen about to complete the form 31 proof of claim in a Canadian bankruptcy proceeding to register her claim with the licensed insolvency trustee

Section 1: Understanding the Basics of Form 31 Proof of Claim

Definition of Provable Claim

Section 2 of the BIA contains the definitions. In that section, a provable claim is defined:

includes any claim or liability provable in proceedings under this Act by a creditor

What does this mean? it means that a provable claim refers to a debt or obligation owed by a debtor that can be verified and substantiated through documentary evidence. For a claim to be considered provable, it must meet certain criteria established by the Act, including an amount that can be determined, is due and payable at the time of the bankruptcy or within a reasonable period after that, and not be contingent on some other event or unliquidated.

Difference Between Provable and Unliquidated Claims

An unliquidated claim under the BIA refers to a claim for a specific amount of money that has not yet been determined or quantified. This type of claim typically arises when the exact amount owed to a creditor is uncertain or requires further investigation to establish.

In the context of bankruptcy proceedings, unliquidated claims present a challenge as they may complicate the distribution of assets to creditors. To address this issue, mechanisms for resolving unliquidated claims include negotiations, mediation, a disallowance of the claim by the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee) (the “Trustee”) or court proceedings to determine the appropriate amount owed.

Properly handling unliquidated claims is essential for ensuring fair and efficient bankruptcy proceedings under Canadian law.

Identifying False Claims

Ensuring the validity of claims in Canadian bankruptcy proceedings is a crucial element in safeguarding the integrity of the bankruptcy system. Baseless claims hinder the fair distribution of assets to rightful creditors and undermine confidence in the process. The proliferation of meritless claims can result in delays, increased expenses, and potential financial harm to creditors.

It is essential for Trustees to thoroughly evaluate the authenticity of claims to prevent manipulation and dishonesty. Implementing rigorous verification procedures and penalties for unsubstantiated claims are essential strategies for upholding the fairness and transparency of Canadian bankruptcy proceedings.

Section 2: Required Information for Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

Completing and returning a Form 31 proof of claim is an important phase in the bankruptcy process. They are one of the documents included with the notice of bankruptcy documents sent out by the Trustee to formally notify the creditors of the bankruptcy.

Personal Details of the Creditor

For proof of claim to be properly completed, the creditor must furnish their contact information, encompassing their mailing address, fax number, and email address. Moreover, the creditor must substantiate their legitimacy as a creditor of the debtor and exhibit a thorough understanding of all pertinent details related to the claim. This takes you from the top of the new Form 31 proof of claim down to numbered paragraph #2.

Details of the Claim

It is incumbent upon the creditor to clearly outline the total sum of the outstanding debt owed by the debtor, in addition to any potential counterclaims, accompanied by relevant documentation or substantiating evidence. The new proof of claim form now requires a creditor to verify that the debt remains within the statutory limitations stipulated by the pertinent provincial laws and regulations. In other words, the claim is not statute-barred.

Those details are covered by paragraphs 3 through 5 of the form.

Priority of the Claim

Paragraph 6 is where, as an unsecured creditor, you need to insert the amount for what you believe to be your claim provable in the actual restructuring proposal to creditors or bankruptcy of the person or company. You must also declare whether you do or do not claim a right to a priority. If you do not, this means that you are an ordinary unsecured creditor.

If you are claiming a right to a priority claim as an unsecured creditor, you are stating that you are entitled to a priority of payment ahead of the ordinary unsecured creditors. The new Form 31 proof of claim requires you to identify what type of priority you are claiming.

The various types of unsecured claims that can have priority over ordinary unsecured claims, which are called preferred claims, are, in order of priority:

  • For a deceased bankrupt, reasonable funeral and testamentary costs.
  • The claims for wages by a wage earner employee for unpaid wage claims and certain other amounts treated like remuneration for services rendered during the period beginning on the day that is six months before the date of the initial bankruptcy event or the first day on which there was a receiver. This claim is limited to a maximum payment of $2,000, less any amounts paid for their services by the licensed insolvency trustee.
  • Any shortfall to a secured creditor as a result of the claim for employees’ priority above.
  • Any shortfall to a secured creditor as a result of the claim of employees paid out for unpaid amounts regarding prescribed pension plans.
  • Alimony or support payments payable by the bankrupt person under either a court order or an agreement made before the date of the initial bankruptcy event.
  • municipal taxes levied against a bankrupt’s real property within the two years immediately preceding the bankruptcy not registered as a lien against the property. This preferred claim cannot exceed the value of the bankrupt’s interest in the property.
  • A lessor for rent arrears for no more than 3 months before the date of bankruptcy and only if stipulated in the lease, a claim for accelerated rent for no more than an additional 3 months. This claim is limited to the amount realized by the Trustee from the property of the bankrupt on those premises. Further, any payment made by the licensed insolvency trustee for accelerated rent shall be credited against any amount the Trustee may owe the landlord for the Trustee’s occupation of those leased premises.
  • One bill of costs of a lawyer for a judgment creditor who is the first to have garnished or otherwise executed against the property of the bankrupt, but only to a maximum of the amount obtained by the Trustee from the realization of assets from the sale of such property.
  • Certain government debts.
  • Claims from injuries to employees of the bankrupt where workers’ compensation legislation does not apply, but only if there is an insurer or surety guaranteeing damages from injuries and up to the maximum guaranteed.picture of woman holding a pen about to complete the form 31 proof of claim in a Canadian bankruptcy proceeding to register her claim with the licensed insolvency trustee

Section 3: Additional Considerations for Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

There are also specialized claims that a creditor may qualify for.

A Claim of Lessor For Disclaimer of a Lease

In a corporate restructuring under the Proposal provisions of the BIA, the insolvent company can disclaim or resiliate a commercial lease. The insolvent debtor must be able to show that it cannot successfully restructure if it still has to be responsible for that commercial lease. Upon the disclaiming or resiliation of the commercial lease, the landlord is allowed to calculate its claim using the formula and provisions laid out in the BIA.

Valuing a Secured Claim

Secured creditors have the option, though not a mandatory requirement unless stipulated by the licensed insolvency trustee, to file their claim. This process involves the secured creditor completing the proof of claim form, where they estimate the value of the assets linked to their security. Any outstanding amount owed to the creditor beyond the assets’ value is also specified on the proof of claim, thereby converting it into an unsecured claim.

Secured creditors must exercise caution when determining the value of their secured claim. As per subsection 128(3) of the BIA, a Trustee may opt to redeem a security by reimbursing the secured creditor with the security’s assessed value, as indicated by the secured creditor in the proof of claim. A licensed insolvency trustee would only proceed with redemption if they ascertain that the actual value of the assets surpasses the value assigned by the secured creditor to its security.

Moreover, a Trustee must seek an independent legal opinion on the security documents. That is why a Trustee will always ask for proof of security.

Claim by Farmer, Fisherman or Aquaculturist

Claims of farmers, fishermen, and aquaculturists are granted specific privileges for claims under the BIA legislation. This particular category of creditors is entitled to certain rights. In addition to the standard revindication rights, farmers, fishermen, and aquaculturists have a 30-day window following the initiation of bankruptcy proceedings or the appointment of a receiver to submit their claim for products supplied within 15 days before the bankruptcy event. Once the claim is successfully filed, these creditors are granted a primary lien on all the inventory of the insolvent debtor, excluding any inventory that may be subject to another party’s repossession rights.

Claim by Pension Plan for the unpaid amount

I alluded to claims in respect of an unpaid pension amount above. In 2008 the BIA was amended in reaction to several high-profile corporate restructurings and bankruptcies where there were pension payment amounts deducted from employee wages but not remitted to the pension plan. When the employer went bankrupt, the employees’ pension entitlement was negatively affected (think Sears Canada). Pension entitlement is an important component of the overall employees’ remuneration.

Therefore, Parliament mandated a reform where a super-priority is created for claims for unremitted pension contributions outstanding when an employer becomes bankrupt. The kinds of amounts given this super-priority are pension payments deducted from an employee’s wages but not remitted to the pension plan administrator, amounts owed by the employer for the cost of benefits paid by the pension plan and employer contributions to a defined benefit pension plan. What is excluded from this super-priority is any amount needed to reduce an unfunded pension liability.

Claims Against Directors

This kind of claim comes into play when a BIA corporate restructuring proposal provides for the compromise of claims against directors. The kind of claims against directors that a corporate proposal can compromise must have a very specific set of characteristics:

  1. A claim against directors is being compromised in the corporate Proposal.
  2. Arose before the filing of the Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal or the Proposal itself.
  3. Relate to corporate obligations that are director liabilities by operation of law.

They do not include any corporate liabilities that one or more directors may have personally guaranteed as individuals.

Claim of a Customer of a Bankrupt Securities Firm

The BIA delineates precise protocols for the allocation and distribution of cash and securities within a securities firm customer pool fund. The intricacies of this process are highly technical and exceed the purview of this blog post on completing a Form 31 proof of claim. It is essential to understand that distinct provisions are in place for companies of this nature that have filed for bankruptcy.

Complicated or Contingent Claims

There are a variety of claims that by their very nature, produce complications. Just because a claim might be complicated, it does not mean the proof of claim should not be fully completed and filed with the Trustee. It also does not mean that the licensed insolvency trustee does not have to review it to determine if it is admissible or not.

Examples of complicated claims are unliquidated claims discussed above and contingent claims. In a Canadian insolvency case, a contingent claim is a claim that is not yet due and payable but may become due and payable in the future. Contingent claims are often referred to as “contingent debts” or “contingent liabilities.”

A contingent claim may arise in various situations, such as:

  1. A lawsuit or legal action that has not yet been resolved, but may result in a payment or settlement in the future.
  2. A contract or agreement that provides for payment or performance in the future, but only if certain conditions are met.
  3. A guarantee or indemnity that may become payable in the future if a specific event occurs.

When a contingent claim is filed in a bankruptcy or proposal case, the licensed insolvency trustee must handle it in a specific manner. Here are the key steps:

  1. Initial Review: The Trustee reviews the contingent claim to determine its validity and the likelihood of it becoming due and payable in the future.
  2. Assessment of Likelihood of Payment: The Trustee assesses the likelihood of the contingent claim becoming due and payable, considering factors such as the strength of the underlying legal claim, the likelihood of a settlement or judgment, and the potential for future payments or performance.
  3. Valuation of the Claim: The Trustee values the contingent claim, taking into account the likelihood of payment and the potential amount of the payment.
  4. Inclusion in the Statement of Affairs: The Trustee should include a contingent claim in the sworn Statement of Affairs, which is the document that outlines the insolvent debtor’s assets, liabilities, and financial affairs. The creditor would be listed as a contingent creditor. Because at this stage the Trustee has not received a proof of claim to review, it is wise to list the amount of this contingent debt either as “unknown” or with a value of just $1.
  5. Monitoring and Follow-up: The Trustee monitors the contingent claim and follows up with the creditor to ensure that any future payments or performance are made following the terms of the agreement or contract.
  6. Distribution of Funds: If the contingent claim becomes due and payable in a specific amount and the creditor has filed the proof of claim properly, the Trustee needs to include the valued claim in calculating a distribution to the unsecured creditors.

Creditors are required to furnish the licensed insolvency trustee with all essential documentation and information to substantiate their contingent claim. Subsequently, the Trustee will work with the creditor to ensure the appropriate handling of the claim.

Section 4: Procedural Requirements for Submitting Form 31 Proof of Claim

As a creditor, it’s crucial to understand the procedural requirements for submitting a Form 31 Proof of Claim in a Canadian insolvency case. In this section, we’ll delve into the key issues that creditors should be aware of when submitting their Proof of Claim.

Deadline for Submitting Proof of Claim

The deadline for submitting a proof of claim is a critical aspect of the insolvency process. In Canada, creditors have a specific timeframe to file their proof of claim. Until a creditor files a proof of claim with the Trustee, the creditor cannot participate in the insolvency process. Creditors should ensure they submit their proof of claim well within the deadline to avoid any potential issues.

The First Meeting of Creditors in bankruptcy or the Meeting of Creditors in a restructuring proposal takes place 21 days after the date of filing. If a creditor who has a provable claim wishes to vote at the meeting of creditors, then it is important to have filed the fully completed proof of claim, with all supporting backup documentation, in time for the Trustee to be able to review it.

At the meeting of creditors, it is up to the meeting chair to admit or disallow any claim for voting purposes. In a bankruptcy, the creditors vote on several matters, including the appointment of Inspectors. The Meeting of Inspectors normally immediately follows the meeting of creditors. So if a creditor wishes to nominate an Inspector, it has to have filed its claim to be able to vote. To be able to vote for or against a consumer proposal or corporate restructuring proposal, the proof of claim must be filed.

The only other real deadline to file a proof of claim is before the Trustee is going to make a distribution. A Trustee must send each creditor listed on the Statement of Affairs who has not yet filed a proof of claim notice to file a claim before making a final distribution. That notice will have a deadline in it. If the creditor misses that deadline then they are not entitled to receive any dividend from the insolvency estate.

Properly Filing the Form 31

Properly filing the Form 31 proof of claim is a critical step. Creditors must ensure they complete the form accurately and thoroughly, providing all necessary information, including the amount of the debt, the date the debt was incurred, and any relevant documentation. It’s also essential to sign and date the form, as well as attach any supporting documentation. Creditors should also ensure they file the form with the correct office, as specified in the bankruptcy notice.

Notice of IntentionTo Make A Proposal

In some cases, the insolvent individual or corporation may file a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal, which provides creditors with advance notice of the impending restructuring proposal. At the Notice of Intention stage, there is not a specific deadline for submitting a proof of claim. A proof of claim is not sent out at this notice stage. After the Proposal is filed and the Trustee sends out the Proposal package to the known creditors, in that package the proof of claim form 31 is provided. Creditors should carefully review the Proposal package and ensure they submit their proof of claim by the specified deadline.

I was involved some time ago in a corporate restructuring case where a financial institution creditor filed a proof of claim and a voting letter using their form at the notice of intention stage. The form was improperly completed and I warned the creditor that its proof of claim was not being accepted and that they must file a new one, properly and fully completed, after they receive the Proposal package from our Firm.

They ignored my warnings and did not do so. I therefore disallowed their claim which meant their vote did not count. They appealed my decision to the Court. The Court agreed with the Trustee. Not only did their vote not count, but because they lost the appeal, they also had to pay our lawyer’s costs!

Notice of Bankruptcy Process

The bankruptcy notification is a crucial document that provides creditors with essential information about the bankruptcy proceedings, including the timeline for submitting a proof of claim. This notification is distributed by the licensed insolvency trustee managing the bankruptcy process and offers creditors a detailed overview of the procedures involved, including the deadline for submitting proof of claims.

To ensure the accurate and complete submission of the claim form, it is advisable to follow the guidelines outlined below in Section 5. Submitting a Form 31 proof of claim is a critical aspect of the bankruptcy process. Creditors must meet the submission deadline, correctly file the form, and provide all necessary information. Understanding the procedural requirements for submitting a proof of claim helps creditors protect their rights and ensure their interests are properly represented throughout the process.picture of woman holding a pen about to complete the form 31 proof of claim in a Canadian bankruptcy proceeding to register her claim with the licensed insolvency trustee

Section 5: Ensuring Accuracy in Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim – A Step-by-Step Guide to Filing a Proof of Claim

As a creditor, it’s essential to know how to complete Form 31, also known as the Proof of Claim, when dealing with bankruptcy or proposal proceedings. The only way for creditor claims to be registered properly is through the filing of a properly and fully completed proof of claim form.

Let me walk you through the step-by-step process of filling out this crucial document.

Step 1: Gather Required Information

Before starting to fill out Form 31, make sure you have the following information readily available:

  • The name of the bankrupt individual or corporation
  • The amount of the debt owed to you
  • The date the debt was incurred
  • Any relevant documentation, such as invoices or contracts

Step 2: Complete the Header Information

Begin by filling out the header section of the form, which includes:

  • The name of the bankrupt individual or corporation
  • The file number assigned to the bankruptcy proceeding

Step 3: Furnish Creditor Details

In this step, kindly provide the following details as the creditor:

  • Your full name and mailing address
  • Your business name and registered address (if applicable)
  • Your contact information, including phone number and email address

Step 4: Specify the Debt

Specify the debt you’re claiming:

  • The amount of the debt owed to you
  • The date the debt was incurred
  • A brief description of the debt, including any relevant details
  • Completing whether or not you are a secured, claiming a priority or an ordinary unsecured creditor
  • Make sure that you include the entire claim

Step 5: Provide Supporting Documentation

Attach any relevant documentation to support your claim, such as:

  • Invoices or receipts
  • Contracts or agreements
  • Bank statements or other financial records

Step 6: Sign and Date the Form

Once you’ve completed the form, including completing the proxy form section if the creditor is a corporation, sign and date it in the designated areas.

Step 7: File the Form

Submit the completed Form 31 to the professional trustee administering the bankruptcy, along with any supporting documentation. You can submit the proof of claim by fax, email, snail mail or delivery. The most important reason of course is that if there is going to be a distribution to the creditors, you want to make sure that you have submitted your claim for dividend purposes.

Additional Tips and Reminders

  • Ensure to maintain a copy of the completed form for your records.
  • If you’re unsure about any part of the process, consider consulting with a bankruptcy lawyer or the Trustee handling the bankruptcy case . In case of any uncertainties regarding any aspect of the process, it is advisable to seek advice from a bankruptcy lawyer or the Trustee overseeing the bankruptcy case.
  • File your claim on time to safeguard your rights as a creditor.

By adhering to these guidelines and furnishing precise information, you will complete Form 31 and safeguard your creditor rights throughout the bankruptcy or restructuring proceedings.

Section 6: Common Mistakes to Avoid when Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim

When engaging in the intricate process of submitting a proof of claim to the Trustee, it is imperative to steer clear of common errors that may result in delays, rejections, or potential dismissal of your claim. This section will outline three crucial errors to avoid when completing Form 31 for the proof of claim.

  • Providing incomplete or inaccurate information on your proof of claim: This can significantly hinder the processing of your claim or result in its rejection. To mitigate this risk, it is crucial to take the following steps:

By paying close attention to these details, you can enhance the accuracy and efficiency of your claim submission process.

  • Failure to include supporting documentation: This is a significant oversight that can result in the rejection or delay of your claim. To mitigate this risk, it is imperative to adhere to the following guidelines:
  • Missed Deadlines for Submission: Be sure to allocate extra time for any unforeseen delays or complications when submitting your proof of claim before the deadline. To minimize last-minute stress, make sure to submit your claim well ahead of the due date. By being proactive and avoiding these typical errors, you can streamline the filing process and increase your chances of a successful outcome. Remember to thoroughly review your details, attach all necessary documentation, and submit your claim with ample time to spare. Finally, missing deadlines for submitting your proof of claim can have severe consequences, including dismissal of your claim.

To ensure a successful filing process, it’s important to avoid these common mistakes. Make sure to thoroughly review your information, attach all necessary supporting documents, and submit your claim with ample time before the deadline.

Section 7: Form 31 Proof of Claim FAQs

In this section, we’ll address some frequently asked questions about completing Form 31 proof of claim.

Q1: What is Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A1: Form 31 Proof of Claim is a prescribed form that creditors use to indicate their claim against a bankrupt estate or in a formal restructuring under the BIA. It is a crucial step in the process, as it allows creditors to assert their rights and receive a portion of the available funds.

Q2: Where can I find Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A2: Form 31 Proof of Claim may be obtained from the office of the Trustee or downloaded from the official website of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada. Make sure you get the most up-to-date version of the form as the new one goes into effect on July 15, 2024.

Q3: What information should I include in Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A3: When completing Form 31 Proof of Claim, you should provide accurate and detailed information, including your name and address, the debtor’s name, the amount of your claim, and any supporting documentation.

Q4: Are there any specific formatting guidelines for completing Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A4: While there are no strict formatting guidelines, it’s important to ensure that your form is neat, legible, and organized. Use clear and concise language, and avoid any unnecessary details. Attach supporting documents in a logical order and label them appropriately.

Q5: Can I submit multiple claims using Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A5: Yes, you can submit multiple claims using Form 31 Proof of Claim. However, you must separate each claim clearly and provide all the necessary information and supporting documentation for each claim.

Q6: Can I make changes to my submitted Form 31 Proof of Claim?

A6: Once you have submitted your Form 31 Proof of Claim, it depends on the change. If it is something very minor, like your phone number, the Trustee will make that change for you. If it is a major change, like the amount you are claiming, it is recommended that you file an amended claim. Therefore, reviewing your form carefully before submission and ensuring its accuracy is crucial. If you need to make corrections or updates, contact the Trustee’s office immediately.

Remember, completing Form 31 Proof of Claim accurately and on time is essential to assert your rights as a creditor and receive a fair distribution from the estate. By following these tips and guidelines, you can navigate the process successfully.

Conclusion

Completing Form 31 Proof of Claim is crucial for creditors seeking to assert their rights in a bankruptcy case. By avoiding common mistakes, including providing inaccurate information, failing to include supporting documentation, and missing submission deadlines, creditors can enhance their chances of a smooth filing process. Remember to double-check all information, attach relevant supporting documents, and submit your claim on time. By doing so, you can ensure that your claim is properly considered and increase your chances of a successful outcome.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.picture of woman holding a pen about to complete the form 31 proof of claim in a Canadian bankruptcy proceeding to register her claim with the licensed insolvency trustee

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY LAW, A SHOE STORE CHAIN AND GOLF: WHAT DO THEY HAVE IN COMMON?

bankruptcy law

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this BANKRUPTCY LAW, A SHOE STORE CHAIN AND GOLF: WHAT DO THEY HAVE IN COMMON? Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Introduction

I am writing this Brandon’s Blog more as an interesting story for those that live in the GTA and enjoy golf. Although as you will see, bankruptcy law does play a major role in this tale, it really is a story about what is probably the most famous Canadian golf course.

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Canada

Before getting into the interesting Greater Toronto Area golf course story, by way of background to it, I will first describe the bankruptcy law aspect.

A bankrupt shoe store chain workers lost their jobs when a Receiving Order (as a Bankruptcy Order was then called) was made putting an Ontario shoe store chain, Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd., into bankruptcy. All salaries, wages, commissions and vacation pay were paid to the date of bankruptcy. The province’s Ministry of Labour audited the company’s payroll books and records.

The Ministry’s audit determined that although the employees were all paid up to date, liability for termination or severance pay was owing to former employees under the Employment Standards Act (ESA). The Ministry delivered a proof of claim to the bankruptcy trustee (now called a Licensed Insolvency Trustee) (Trustee).

The Trustee disallowed the claim under the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3) (BIA). The Trustee’s disallowance was based on the ground that the bankruptcy of an employer acts to terminate the employment of the workers. This does not constitute termination by an employer. Therefore, no such liability for severance or termination pay exists.

The appeal of the Trustee’s disallowance

The Ministry successfully appealed the Trustee’s disallowance to the Ontario Court (General Division). The Trustee appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal. The appellate court restored the Trustee’s decision. The Ministry sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada but ultimately terminated that application.

After the discontinuance of the appeal, the Trustee paid a dividend to Rizzo’s creditors, therefore leaving much fewer funds in the bankruptcy estate.

After that, five previous staff members of Rizzo applied to set aside the discontinuance, add themselves as applicants to the Supreme Court of Canada leave to appeal. An order was made approving them to continue the appeal.

The Supreme Court of Canada decision

In a 1998 decision, the Supreme Court of Canada ultimately decided that the bankruptcy of an employer does terminate the employment of the workers. However, the Court felt that it was necessary to take a wider view of the ESA. The Court felt that one of the objects of the ESA was to protect the rights of employees when they lost their job. A finding that the severance and termination pay sections of the ESA to not apply in bankruptcy circumstances is incompatible with both the object of the ESA.

The Court went on to find that the legislature does not intend to generate ridiculous results if employees dismissed before the bankruptcy of an employer would generate a completely different result than those employees who lost their job by the bankruptcy of an employer.

Therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada found that employee rights to severance pay or termination pay is a claim provable in bankruptcy even if the dismissal occurred by the bankruptcy of the employer. This claim is an ordinary unsecured claim and does not have any priority.

The broader effect of the Supreme Court of Canada Rizzo & Rizzo decision

The obvious effect of the Rizzo & Rizzo decision is the bankruptcy law decision. However, the decision also stands for the concept that a statue must be looked at in a broader context. The Supreme Court decision in paragraph 21 states that “…statutory interpretation cannot be founded on the wording of the legislation alone”.

It goes on to say that “Today there is only one principle or approach, namely, the words of an Act are to be read in their entire context and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention of Parliament.”. This codified what can be called a modern approach to the interpretation of legislation.

So what does this have to do with a golf course?

Looking at the title of this Brandon’s Blog, I think I have now covered off the first two parts, namely, bankruptcy law and shoe store. Now for golf! On October 23, 2019, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released its decision in Oakville (Town) v. Clublink Corporation ULC, 2019 ONCA 826.

All golfers in the GTA know that Clublink owns and operates a chain of golf clubs in Ontario and Quebec, as well as Florida. The most famous and iconic golf course in the Clublink family and all of Canada is Glen Abbey in Oakville, ON. Clublink purchased this golf course in 1999.

Glen Abbey was the initial golf course solely created by Jack Nicklaus, one of the greatest professional golfers of all-time. The style of the course shows a specific focus on the viewer experience. Along with this value, the Town of Oakville believes Glen Abbey has substantial historical value. Glen Abbey has held the Canadian Open 30 times – 3 times greater than any other course in Canada. It, therefore, is connected with some of the most memorable events in Canadian golf history.

The 18th hole is significant as a result of its connection to Tiger Woods. In the final round of the 2000 Canadian Open, he hit a six-iron shot 218 yards from a bunker on the right side of the fairway to about 18 feet from the hole. The shot had to fly over a huge pond protecting the green.

On October 22, 2015, Clublink told the Town that they plan to redevelop Glen Abbey into a residential and mixed-use neighbourhood. Clublink proposed to develop 3,000 to 3,200 residences and 140,000 to 170,000 square feet of office and retail space. If Clublink’s plan to build succeeds, the word “four” will no longer be yelled out on the property!

The Court case

In November 2016, Clublink submitted applications to change the Town’s Official Plan and zoning by-laws and looked for authorization of a plan of subdivision, in connection with its redevelopment plan of Glen Abbey. In 2017, the Town recognized Glen Abbey as a considerable cultural heritage property under s. 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). This notification stated the property’s cultural heritage value according to the provincial requirements of the OHA.

Clublink did not object to the heritage designation. Rather, they made an application to the Town under section 34 of the OHA to demolish and remove Glen Abbey. The Town alerted Clublink that their s. 34 application was legally beyond the range of a section 34 OHA application but was correctly within the range of s. 33 of the OHA which permits an owner to relate to altering a designated property.

Clublink commenced its very own application in the Superior Court for an affirmation that they could make an application under s. 34 of the OHA “for the demolition and removal of buildings and structures on the lands municipally known as 1313 and 1333 Dorval Drive … including but not limited to the tees, greens, hazards, fairways and cart paths”. Clublink was successful in its application and the Town of Oakville appealed the decision to the Ontario Court of Appeal.

What is the difference?

A study of the OHA is not why I am writing this Brandon’s Blog. The important point to know is that under s. 33 of the OHA, the owner may appeal to the Conservation Review Board. The Conservation Review Board holds a hearing and produces a report, in which it is to recommend whether the application must or ought to not be authorized. The Conservation Review Board’s report is not binding on the metropolitan council.

Unlike s. 33, if the metropolitan council rejects the owner’s application under s. 34, the owner of the property can appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). The local council is bound by the LPAT decision.

So as you can see, Clublink needs the Court ruling to stand that its s. 34 application is the correct one.

Is a golf course a structure?

In order to be successful, Clublink needs to prove that a golf course is a structure. The application judge found that Glen Abbey is both composed of structures as well as the golf course itself is a structure for the objective of s. 34 of the OHA. Clublink had actually correctly mounted its application under s. 34.

The application judge reached this decision because of the uncontroverted evidence before him was that Glen Abbey was the product of substantial engineering, design and construction. Relying on judicial and also administrative decisions from other contexts, he decided up that a golf course fits within the meaning of a “structure” as being a “thing constructed”.

After a very lengthy analysis, the Ontario Court of Appeal, with one Judge dissenting, confirmed the lower court’s decision.

So what does this have to do with Canadian bankruptcies laws?

The majority decision relied upon the Rizzo & Rizzo case. The Ontario Court of Appeal followed the confirmation in the bankruptcy law case by the Supreme Court of Canada that a strict dictionary or common usage interpretation of the word “structure” was inappropriate. A “…statutory interpretation cannot be founded on the wording of the legislation alone”.

Rather, a wider modern law approach must be used. The “…words of an Act are to be read in their entire context and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention…”. Therefore, finding that a golf course has detailed engineering, design and construction, it is a structure and Clublink was correct.

This is how bankruptcy law ties into a bankrupt Ontario shoe store chain and a golf course. It took a bit of a journey to piece it all together, but I am so glad that you stuck with me.

Summary

As you can see, not everything necessarily is how it appears at first blush. When I look out onto a golf course, I would never say, “what a marvellous structure”, but it is.

In the same way, financial decisions that we make along the way do not always turn out as we once thought it would be. Sometimes these decisions are forced upon us by life getting in the way, and sometimes they are voluntary. Nevertheless, when financial hardships strike, you need to find a way to solve your financial problems.

Do you have way too much debt? Before you reach the phase where you can’t stay afloat and where financial restructuring is no longer a viable alternative, contact the Ira Smith Team. We know full well the discomfort and tension excessive debt can create. We can help you to eliminate that pain and address your financial issues supplying timely, realistic and easy to implement action steps in finding the optimal strategy created just for you.

Call Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today. Make a free appointment to visit with one of the Ira Smith Team for a totally free, no-obligation assessment. You can be on your path to a carefree life Starting Over, Starting Now. Give us a call today so that we can help you return to an anxiety-free and pain-free life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL CANADA: A BLUEPRINT TO STOP BILL COLLECTORS

consumer proposal canada

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Consumer proposal Canada Brandon’s Blog, please scroll down to the bottom and click on the podcast.

Introduction

I have written before on the concept of how a bankruptcy filing puts into place a stay of proceedings. A section of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) states that creditors are not allowed to take or continue any collection or enforcement activity against a bankrupt person or company. But what about a consumer proposal Canada? I will discuss this concept for a consumer proposal and highlight a recent case on this issue.

The federal law

Under section 69.2 (1) of the BIA, with certain limited exceptions, when a consumer proposal is filed, “…no creditor has any remedy against the debtor or the debtor’s property, or shall commence or continue any action, execution or other proceedings, for the recovery of a claim provable in bankruptcy…”.

So if the claim is one that is provable in a bankruptcy, and therefore in a consumer proposal Canada, then the creditor cannot begin or continue a lawsuit or try to enforce a judgment for the amount owed.

A recent decision from the Ontario Court confirms this law where a consumer proposal Canada will stop creditors and bill collectors from starting or continuing legal action against you.

The facts of this case

The case is Yigzaw v. Ashagrie, 2019 ONSC 2474. It is about a motion to lift the stay of proceedings to permit enforcement of an order issued against the debtors who have filed a consumer proposal.

The applicants, Philipos Yigzaw and Aster Abraham, seek to appeal an order issued by the Court on February 21, 2017 (the 2017 order). The 2017 order was gotten on the basis of summary judgment on an application started by the applicants. In their application, they sought repayment of $102,500 that they had advanced to the respondents Anaketch Ashagrie and Yilma Gari to fund a business operating under the name “Telling Roses”. They also seek an accounting of how the funds had actually been spent.

The 2017 order required Ashagrie and Gari to pay $102,500 to Yigzaw and Abraham in addition to costs of $6,250. The respondents were likewise required to provide an accounting. The Court declined to issue a certificate of pending litigation against the respondents’ residence, although a writ of execution was issued. The respondents submitted a consumer proposal the very next day.

In this enforcement motion, the applicants state that the respondents have failed to adhere to the 2017 order. They look for relief that would require Ashagrie and Gari to be examined and to pay the amount of the judgment. They also want a finding that the respondents are in contempt.

The issues for the Court to consider

The Court first considered section 69.2 (1) of the BIA I spoke about above. The Court then looked at the exception I alluded to, being Section 69.4 of the BIA.

That section says that a Court may, in certain circumstances, raise the stay to allow a creditor to pursue its rights against a debtor who has filed consumer proposal. To obtain a lifting of the stay, the creditor must persuade the Court that it is most likely to be materially prejudiced by the ongoing stay, or that lifting the stay is equitable on other grounds.

Canadian courts have held that the criteria in s. 69.4 might be fulfilled where the creditor’s debt will not be released as an outcome of the insolvency process. The types of financial obligations that are not discharged are provided in s. 178( 1) of the BIA.

They consist of a debt or obligation arising out of fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity as well as a debt or obligation resulting from obtaining property or services by false pretenses or fraudulent misrepresentation. Lifting of a stay is not a routine matter.

To succeed, the applicants have to show how they are most likely to be materially prejudiced by the stay, or that there are various other equitable grounds to raise it.

In a typical motion under s. 69.4, the applicant looking to lift the stay says that it needs to have the opportunity to prove that its accusations come from an activity provided in s. 178( 1) to ensure that it may obtain a judgment against the bankrupt or insolvent person. If successful, then that claim would survive the insolvency process.

In that normal case, the Court examines the creditor’s claims to identify if the debt, if confirmed, would be released as an outcome of the bankruptcy or proposal. Sometimes, the Court may also consider evidence submitted by the creditor.

This case is uncommon because the applicants have already gotten a judgment on their claim. They are not seeking to show their claim. They are looking to enforce the Order. So the concern the Court must think about is whether that Order was made according to a cause of action listed in s. 178( 1 ). The Judge did this by reviewing the claims and evidence before the Judge who gave judgment, his analysis, and the evidence filed in this motion.

The Court’s analysis

The Court quite properly pointed out that in order to be successful for the lifting of the stay, the applicants had to show that their debt was more than just one of a contract to lend money that was not repaid.

The Court said that looking at the application in the most charitable method possible, the claims could not support a finding that the respondents obtained property from the applicants by false pretenses or fraudulent misrepresentation. The applicants state that their loan was conditional on the money being used for “Telling Roses”. They do not declare that they were induced to loan money to “Telling Roses” as an outcome of any type of illegal misstatement by the respondents. Likewise, the applicants do not allege that the respondents took part in any kind of deceitful acts that induced them to loan the funds. Therefore, the exception from the discharge of the debt in s. 178( 1 )( e) of the BIA was not advanced in the applicants’ claim.

The allegations in the application also do not support a finding that the participants engaged in fraudulence, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity. To meet that standard it is not nearly enough for a debt to have actually been brought on by fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation. That form of criminal activity had to have occurred in the context of a fiduciary relationship.

The applicants do not declare that the respondents had a fiduciary obligation towards them. The relationship they explain with the respondents would not follow such a claim. Fiduciary relationships are unusual in arms’ length business transaction. The applicants additionally do not clearly affirm that the respondents participated in any type of scam at any point.

In reviewing the reasons given by the Judge who made the 2017 order, and in looking at all the other evidence in this motion, the Court found that it was anything more than one party loaning funds to another to start a business. The business never made a profit, it failed and therefore, could not repay the money.

The decision

Given these facts and the Court’s analysis, the Court found that the applicants could not succeed on their motion to lift the stay. Rather, the Court confirmed that the 2017 judgment could only be used as the basis for the applicants to file a proof of claim in the consumer proposal filed.

The basis for the 2017 order was a finding that the applicants lent the respondents the amount of $102,500. There is absolutely nothing in the underlying decision, or in the accusations in the application on which judgment was obtained, or in any evidence submitted in this motion, that puts the applicants’ claim in the classification of financial debts that are not released under s. 178( 1) of the BIA.

Therefore, the applicants’ motion to lift the stay under s. 69.4 of the BIA was rejected. They failed to show that they are likely to be materially prejudiced by the ongoing operation of the stay or that there are various other equitable factors that would lead to a conclusion to lift the stay.

Do you have too much debt?

Are you in financial distress? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due?

If so, call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for financial restructuring, a debt settlement plan and to AVOID bankruptcy.

As a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a bankruptcy trustee), we are the only professionals accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles. Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

Call a Trustee Now!