Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FINANCIAL BLOG CANADA: THE 10 BEST READ BRANDON BLOGS IN 2021 IN REVIEW

financial blog Canada
The Ira Smith Team wishes you and your family a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

Financial blog Canada introduction

At this time of year, I like to look back at all the blogs I wrote and tell you which ones were the most popular during the year. Regular readers would know that I regularly write about insolvency, bankruptcy, and estate matters for a different kind of financial blog Canada.

I always enjoy seeing which blogs received the most attention as the year ends. My top posts for 2021 will be of interest to many of you, I’m sure.

Financial blog Canada: A good Canadian personal finance blog should be interesting

The best financial blog Canada is interesting, informative, and useful to Canadians. By providing useful information, it should also help readers make better financial decisions. A good blog also includes video content. Blogs that are updated regularly are the best.

I hope that this year I have provided you with Brandon Blogs that are interesting and have those other qualities that make a good financial blog Canada.

financial blog canada
financial blog canada

Financial blog Canada: A Canadian finance blog should provide you with tips you can apply to your everyday life

Typical articles on a Canadian financial blog should include personal finance tips such as:

  • Tips for saving money
  • Investing
  • Debt management
  • Money management
  • Retirement planning
  • Avoiding scams
  • Protecting yourself from identity theft

It goes without saying that I do not write about how to invest wisely in my Brandon Blog concerning insolvency, bankruptcy, and estate matters. Many of my articles have dealt with debt management, whether it is personal or corporate. A common theme in my personal insolvency blogs is debt from credit cards, financial literacy and the need for proper family budgeting.

I have also written about identity theft. By following the advice I give on my personal insolvency blogs, you will be solvent and have savings as you approach retirement.

Financial blog Canada: Money blogs in Canada should speak to Canadians, eh

A Canadian finance blog should offer personal finance content that speaks to Canadians, right? Indeed. In Canada, money blogs should be written by financial bloggers who are familiar with the nuances of Canadian corporate and personal finances as well as the realities of Canadian financial life. That’s why I think Canadians write the best blogs for Canadians. Hopefully, you will find that the Brandon Blog covers issues of particular interest to Canadians and is best suited to Canadian audiences.

financial blog canada
financial blog canada

Financial blog Canada: My 10 best read Brandon Blogs in 2021 in review

Here in order from #10 through to #1 each blog post from 2021 based on total views:

10. SHARIA LAW IN CANADA: HEARTBREAKING DIVORCE, RELIGIOUS MARRIAGE CONTRACTS, COURTS AND BANKRUPTCY

In this February 24, 2021 blog, I discuss Sharia law in Canada, religious divorce claims in Ontario, bankruptcy law, and divorce in Ontario.

9. FORM 31 PROOF OF CLAIM: HOW TO PROPERLY COMPLETE THE PROOF OF CLAIM

For both personal and corporate insolvency files, I discuss why it is important to complete form 31 proof of claim completely in this October 3, 2018 blog. I explain why it needs to be done correctly. I also provide a link that you can click on to see how to properly complete the form step by step.

8. 40 PARK LANE CIRCLE, 44 PARK LANE CIRCLE TORONTO FOR SALE: ARE FINANCIAL PROBLEMS CONTAGIOUS?

The Brandon Blog from March 31, 2015 remains popular. As it seems, life on Toronto’s very exclusive Bridal Path is not always as it seems. We tend to categorize those who own these properties as “the rich and famous”, when in fact some of them are “not so rich and infamous”. A couple of Bridal Path properties have attracted quite a bit of attention: #40 Park Lane Circle, formerly owned by Mahvash Lechcier-Kimel, and #44 Park Lane Circle, formerly owned by Norma Walton and Ronauld Walton.

7. EVANDER KANE: HOW TO EXPLAIN HIS GAMBLING DEBT AND OTHER PROBLEMS BANKRUPTCY TO HIS BOSS

Evander Kane, an NHL hockey player with the San Jose Sharks, filed for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Federal Court under Chapter 7. I discuss the causes of his bankruptcy and his downfall in this January 13, 2021 blog post. As well, I mention other professional athletes who have bankrupted themselves after earning megabucks.

6. HOW LONG DOES PROBATE TAKE IN ONTARIO? 7 QUESTIONS NEWBIE ONTARIO ESTATE TRUSTEES ARE EMBARRASSED TO ASK

My Brandon Blog post on May 26, 2021, addresses the question, how long does probate take in Ontario, as well as six other frequently asked questions we are asked as an Estate Trustee in our Smith Estate Trustee Ontario business.

5. WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DIE WITHOUT A WILL IN ONTARIO? READ OUR INTENSE ANALYSIS

The goal of this August 12, 2020, Brandon’s Blog is to provide general information about what happens if you die without a will in Ontario.

4. SOMETIMES EVEN A BONA FIDE SHARK NEEDS BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY HELP

The April 8, 2019 blog is about a product that was featured on Shark Tank season 8. Fizzics is a machine that improves the taste and quality of beer through sound waves. Despite this, not even a Shark could save the company from insolvency and bankruptcy Chapter 11 protection. In other words, a wonderful and ingenious invention marketed by a Shark might not be of much interest to the public.

3. CREDIT CARD DEBT AFTER DEATH IN CANADA: WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?

This blog was published on August 7, 2019. Among other questions, this one is quite common when dealing with deceased estates in bankruptcy. So I thought it might make for an interesting blog to answer, what I have found to be, the most asked question dealing with what happens to debt when you die in Canada.

2. WHAT HAPPENS TO MORTGAGE WHEN YOU DIE CANADA: AMAZING DEBT PHILOSOPHY EXPLAINED

This blog from October 9, 2019, is still popular. As part of my Estate Trustee series, I wrote about what happens to your mortgage when you die in Canada.

1. HOW TO BEAT 407 PLATE DENIAL RULES EACH AND EVERY MONTH FOREVER

In 2021, this March 10, 2021, Brandon Blog was the most read of my blogs by a wide margin. It is about other than paying your 407ETR invoice in full, the only sure-fire way of beating the 407 plate denial rules. I wrote the blog because I thought it would be helpful to GTA residents, but I did not expect it to get the readership that it has and continues to get.

financial blog canada
financial blog canada

Financial blog Canada summary

I hope you found this financial blog Canada Brandon Blog informative. Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation or a crushing debt load and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to search out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Team wishes you and your family a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

financial blog canada
financial blog canada
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BANKRUPTCY SEARCH ULTIMATE GUIDE: WHAT KIND OF BANKRUPTCY RECORDS DO YOU WANT TO SEARCH

bankruptcy search

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

Bankruptcy search: What bankruptcy records exist in Canada?

Records of bankruptcy exist in Canada in four different forms. A party can use three of them to determine whether a specific company or person has filed for bankruptcy or some other form of insolvency.

There are, however, two methods to do a bankruptcy search that cost money, and one of those methods also requires the permission of the individual or company who is involved in the insolvency proceeding. It is not well known that there is another paid way. Only licensed insolvency trustees, attorneys, and credit grantors use it.
There is a 4th type of bankruptcy record that can only be accessed by a select few people. In this Brandon Blog, I will discuss the various ways to do a bankruptcy search, discuss each one and focus on an unreported court decision involving one of them.

If you need to file for bankruptcy or to file a consumer proposal or a full restructuring proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), you may be distressed. Their main concern is who will know about my bankruptcy and who can see my bankruptcy records? As I will explain, there is a very small probability that anyone who is not a creditor of yours will find out about an individual insolvency filing by the methods it is made public, notwithstanding they are public records.

There are 6 different kinds of official bankruptcy records that you might want to search. These include:

  1. Personal bankruptcies
  2. Business/corporate bankruptcies
  3. Corporate/business receivership.
  4. Consumer proposals
  5. Full BIA proposals
  6. Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) bankruptcy protection filings

Personal bankruptcies are those which are filed by individuals. Business bankruptcies are those which involve businesses.

Insolvency filings in Canada are available through the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Records Search database of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB). In order to search by name, enter the search criteria information you know in any order and click “Search.” If you are not entitled to a search account like a licensed insolvency trustee is, a minimum fee of $8 will be assessed for each set of 10 (or fewer) records.

A lot of people don’t know about this database. Furthermore, nosy neighbours are not going to pay $8 to do a search of bankruptcy records and spend time in front of the search screen to find out whether a person or company has filed for bankruptcy, whether a consumer proposal has been filed, whether a full BIA proposal has been filed, whether a company has filed for bankruptcy protection under the CCAA, or whether a business is in receivership. It is really only licensed insolvency trustees who need to do frequent searches. There is no other internet search tool or online search service in Canada.

bankruptcy search
bankruptcy search

Bankruptcy search type 2: How long do credit bureaus report consumer bankruptcies?

Insolvency and bankruptcy records for all Canadians maintained by the OSB can be accessed by credit reporting agencies such as Equifax and TransUnion. Additionally, they have access to the names and addresses of individuals who have declared bankruptcy. Since it pertains to consumers, they call the information they collect about insolvency filings “consumer reports” or “credit bureau records”.

If you don’t consent in writing in advance, no one can pull your credit report. Most likely, when you apply for a credit card or a loan, you authorize the credit card company or financial institution to pull your credit report. You may also authorize a credit report to be obtained when you apply for insurance or rent an apartment.

If you don’t give written permission, that person won’t be able to get your credit report. An insolvency filing on your credit report is not visible to a friend, relative or neighbour. Depending on whether it is a personal bankruptcy or another type of personal insolvency filing, these companies keep a record of the past insolvency filing on file for varying amounts of time. In the case of consumer bankruptcy, the credit report will probably show the past bankruptcy for seven years after the discharge is granted. Upon completion of a consumer proposal, it takes slightly less time.

Bankruptcy search type 3: Will my bankruptcy be published in the newspaper?

In the past, I have written about the differences between a summary administration consumer bankruptcy and an ordinary administration personal bankruptcy. Under the streamlined summary administration rules, a bankrupt person’s assets cannot have an expected liquidation value greater than $15,000.

Notice of bankruptcy does not have to be published in a summary administration bankruptcy. The Trustee must publish a notice in the prescribed form in a local newspaper as soon as possible after the bankruptcy and no later than five days before the first meeting of creditors in any ordinary administration personal bankruptcy or corporate bankruptcy (which is, by definition, an ordinary administration).

Newspapers publish bankruptcy notices in the legal notice section. Lawyers, trustees, and bankers are the only people who regularly look in that section. To find your name, someone would have to read all the local newspapers every day for the bankruptcy notice of you or your company. The chances of someone you know seeing the notice of bankruptcy published in the newspaper are extremely slim, but not impossible.

bankruptcy search
bankruptcy search

Bankruptcy search type 4 is only available to a select few

In contrast to the previous three types of bankruptcy searches, this type is only available to a select few. Furthermore, it is the subject of this unreported Ontario court decision I am going to tell you about. I am talking about the bankruptcy search of records and files kept by licensed insolvency trustees who handle bankruptcy filings for individuals and corporations.

Under the BIA, the Trustee must allow the OSB, the bankrupt, or any creditor access to the bankruptcy administration’s books, records, and documents. Trustees’ books and records are available only to them.

Now for the unreported decision. You may recall that I previously wrote a Brandon Blog titled “TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY: CERTAIN ACTIONS AGAINST TRUSTEE CAN BE UNLEASHED WITHOUT FIRST REQUIRING COURT PERMISSION“. During a period of 13 years, Mr. Flight filed for bankruptcy 4 times! Over and over again, he filed the same type of bankruptcy. According to him, the defendant Trustee in bankruptcy is responsible for his financial situation. In a lawsuit filed against the trustee in bankruptcy, Mr. Flight claims negligence, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and conversion. Allegations are made that the accused failed to identify and correct a fraud perpetrated by a bookkeeper for Mr. Flight’s sole proprietorship business.

Recently, they appeared in court. M. Flight’s motion was decided by the Judge on December 7, 2021. The motion was for:

  • the delivery of all the records pertaining to all four bankruptcies involving Mr. Flight, including the records related to the action commenced by the Trustee against the bookkeeper; as well as
  • to examine Mr. Flight’s Trustee to investigate the administration of the 4 bankruptcies.

Mr. Flight’s counsel claims the Trustee has returned some but not all of the documents with respect to the last bankruptcy filing in 2016. That was the focus of the hearing. Other filings occurred in 2004, 2006, and 2011, all outside the statutory period of four years during which the Trustee is obligated to keep the records.

Counsel for the Trustee asserts that copies of the records have been produced and that the request for an examination is an improper fishing expedition with the collateral purpose of bolstering a separate lawsuit brought by Mr. Fight against the Trustee.

Bankruptcy search: The Judge’s analysis

As per the Judge, a Trustee must maintain proper books and records when administering estates under the BIA. It is directed that the Trustee allow the bankrupt as well as those I mentioned to inspect and copy those books, records, and documents. A Trustee is required to retain records related to estate administration for at least four years following discharge under Rule 68 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency General Rules.

Moreover, the Judge noted that based on the Trustee’s evidence, no books or records from Mr. Flight’s first 3 bankruptcy cases are in the Trustee’s possession. The Judge found that the Trustee made an effort to provide copies of the documents sought. Due to the submissions by both sides leads to a discrepancy between the number of pages sent by the Trustee and those received by Mr. Flight, the only practical solution is to perform a review and reconciliation of what was sent by the Trustee and what is still in its possession, with those documents received by Mr. Flight.

bankruptcy search
bankruptcy search

Bankruptcy search: The Judge’s decision

Within 60 days of the court’s order, counsel for Mr. Flight or its representative may arrange and attend the Trustee’s office or as directed by Trustee’s counsel to examine the file as produced and do their bankruptcy search. The Trustee shall be permitted to designate a representative to facilitate and oversee the examination of documents.

At that time, Mr. Flight’s counsel or his representative may scan an electronic copy of the documents using a scanning device provided by Mr. Flight’s counsel or his representative. All the documents involved in the proceedings shall be made available as may be necessary to provide a complete account of the Trustee’s administration of the estate.

If the parties disagree over whether certain documents should be allowed to be viewed and copied, they can go back to court. According to the Judge, an examination of the Trustee was not appropriate at this time. A Trustee examination is premature until the final determination has been made as to whether all documentation has been provided.

As I have already stated, this kind of bankruptcy search is not one of the normal ones you think of.

Bankruptcy search: Summary

I hope you found this bankruptcy search Brandon Blog informative. Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation or a crushing debt load and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to search out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

bankruptcy search
bankruptcy search
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CONSUMER PROPOSAL STUDENT LOANS STEP-BY-STEP DEBT RESCUE: HOW TO FIX YOUR STUDENT DEBT PROBLEMS

consumer proposal student loans

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

Consumer proposal student loans: Student Loans and Consumer Proposals

In the event of student loan debt, you may be able to eliminate certain student loans through a bankruptcy or consumer proposals. Student loans are given special treatment under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). The seven-year waiting period is a requirement for consumer proposals related to student loans (by the way, the concept is similar in personal bankruptcy).

Throughout this Brandon Blog, when I refer to student loans, I am referring to loans issued under the Canada Student Loans Act, the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act, or any provincial act that provides loans or guarantees for student loans.

I am not talking about any loan debt not meeting this definition. A private loan or a loan from a financial institution that is not covered by the above-noted legislation would be examples, including other loans taken out for professional training.

Consumer proposal student loans: Filing a consumer proposal for student loan debt

In previous posts, I discussed consumer proposals and how they can be used as an alternative to bankruptcy and as a means to negotiate repayment terms of your entire debt with creditors. Canada’s only federally authorized debt settlement program is the consumer proposal. Only licensed insolvency trustees (formerly called bankruptcy trustee) can administer consumer proposal student loans or for any other kind of debt. By using consumer proposals, you can negotiate away the majority or all of your debt in return for making monthly payments for a fraction of that amount and over an extended period of time, not exceeding five years, without incurring any interest. The seven-year rule affects consumer proposal student loans under the student loan legislation.

When you submit a consumer proposal, one of the major benefits is a stay of proceedings, just as in bankruptcy. You will no longer be subject to collection efforts including collection calls, legal action and wage garnishments. Private or financial institution loans taken out while you were a student, not covered by student loan legislation, may be eliminated under the BIA without regard to the seven-year rule. Private student loan debt such as a line of credit or credit card debt incurred while you were a student would be examples.

consumer proposal student loans
consumer proposal student loans

Consumer proposal student loans: Think of insolvency waiting periods like a clock with a start date and an end date

In either personal bankruptcy or consumer proposals, student debt is treated differently under government student loan legislation than normal ordinary unsecured consumer debt. The 7-year waiting period is a mandatory waiting period set by the BIA. This is why it is so important.

Student loan debt relief under section 178(1)(g) of the BIA is not available to people who have filed for bankruptcy or a consumer proposal and have not yet ceased to be a full-time or part-time student or who are within 7 years of ceasing to be a full- or part-time student.

A consumer proposal or personal bankruptcy can be filed by insolvents after they stop being full-time or part-time students more than seven years after ceasing to be students. In that case, the student loans debt can either be discharged by bankruptcy or by consumer proposals.

Counting the 7 years may also not be as straightforward as it sounds. In most cases, students take out a series of loans for each year of college or university. Do the 7-year counts take place on a loan-by-loan basis individually, or is it treated collectively? If in doubt, group them together.

The person must consider all three aspects of the calculation in order to do the calculation correctly:

  • the date the personal bankruptcy or consumer proposal was filed;
  • When the insolvent person ceased to be a student;
  • After ceasing to be a full-time student or part-time student, the length of time the person must wait before a consumer proposal student loan compromises the debt or the loan is discharged through an absolute discharge from bankruptcy.

Consumer proposal student loans: Potential “Court-Ordered Discharge” under hardship provision where 5-year waiting period satisfied

Under section 178(1.1) of the BIA, there is a provision that only applies in bankruptcy. It does not apply for consumer proposal student loans. Since we are discussing student loan debt, I would be remiss if I did not mention it.

Under this section, the court can order that the 7-year waiting period does not apply to a bankrupt who has student loan debt under federal or provincial student loan legislation 5 years after ceasing to be a full-time or part-time student. It would then actually be only a five-year waiting period.

Only a five-year waiting period can be allowed by the court if these conditions are met:

  1. the bankrupt acted in good faith in connection with its student loan debt; and
  2. it is likely that the bankrupt will continue to face financial difficulties to such an extent that it is impossible for them to repay their student loan debts.

What does the compulsory waiting period entail? When should we choose between a 7-year and 5-year waiting period? The 7-year waiting period has already been discussed. In determining whether a bankrupt is entitled to the hardship reduction for the lower 5-Year waiting period, the court considers the following factors:

  1. How was the money used? For the purpose, it was borrowed for?
  2. Was the bankrupt honest in his or her attempt to complete the educational program?
  3. Has the bankrupt gained employment in an area directly related to his or her education?
  4. Did the bankrupt make reasonable efforts to make monthly payments or otherwise make student loan payments against the loan or did the bankrupt make an immediate assignment into bankruptcy?
  5. Are there any repayment assistance programs options for student loan debt relief that the bankrupt can take advantage of concerning the outstanding student loans, such as interest relief or loan forgiveness and has the bankrupt applied for such repayment assistance programs?
  6. Did the bankrupt overspend or behave irresponsibly with personal or family finances?
  7. When the loan applications were made, was the person’s disclosure about his or her circumstances fair and accurate?

The court decisions on obtaining financial hardship relief show that it is not easily obtained. A bankrupt normally have to show that they have exhausted all efforts, their financial hardship is not a result of their actions or inaction and that their financial situation cannot reasonably be expected to improve without the undue hardship relief.

consumer proposal student loans
consumer proposal student loans

Consumer proposal student loans: Paying Student Loans During Your Bankruptcy or Consumer Proposal

What if:

  • Your financial circumstances are you have too many unsecured debts and your unsecured creditors are taking legal action against you?
  • You have a history of rolling over payday loans and are deep in financial trouble.
  • You have to go see one of the licensed insolvency trustees in your area and ultimately use one of the debt-relief tactics of bankruptcy or consumer proposal.

If you stopped being a student:

  • 5 or 6 years ago but you know that you could not qualify for the financial hardship provision relief; or
  • the last time you went to school was less than 5 years ago; and
  • you need to start repaying your student loans.

To rebuild a solid foundation for a good financial future in such a situation, either bankruptcy or a consumer proposal would have to be filed. Despite the fact that you would not be able to eliminate or compromise your student loans, you would be able to escape the clutches of your otherwise crushing other unsecured debts.

In such a case, it may make sense to file for an insolvency process, even though you would be paying student loans during your bankruptcy or consumer proposal.

Consumer proposal student loans summary

I hope you found this consumer proposal student loans Brandon Blog informative. Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation or a crushing debt load and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to find out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

consumer proposal student loans
consumer proposal student loans
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY UPDATE: LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY SPECIAL AUDIT SIMPLY NOT GOING WELL

laurentian university update
laurentian university update

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click play on the podcast.

Laurentian University update: Introduction

In February 2021, I wrote a blog about the Laurentian University cash crunch and that on February 1, 2021, it had filed for creditor protection. It stated that its application under the federal Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) was intended to allow it to continue operating its day-to-day operations during restructuring. As events unfolded in the CCAA restructuring process, I wrote six more Laurentian University update blogs.

In this Brandon Blog, I provide a Laurentian University update regarding the difference of opinion it has with the Auditor General of Ontario concerning the information and documents the Auditor General is requesting access to.

Laurentian University update: The Laurentian insolvency reflects a structural crisis in Ontario’s university system

To the court, Laurentian described itself as a public institution, bilingual and tricultural, with around 8,200 undergraduate students and 1,098 graduate students. The Ontario Minister of Colleges and Universities appointed Alan Harrison of Queen’s University as a special advisor in January. He found Laurentian had been hiding deficits since 2014.

The Laurentian debacle is the result of a structural crisis rooted in Ontario’s neoliberal university system, namely increased tuition fees and corporate management. Back then, Laurentian did not address regional enrolment issues honestly in its presentation of its financial problems.

Historically, northern universities have faced low enrolment or excess capacity in some academic programs. But most students in northern Ontario come from away. University participation rates in northern Ontario are far below those in southern Ontario, which should be a top priority, but is not.

Furthermore, there are other factors affecting northern Ontario, including rising tuition fees and student debt, as well as deteriorating employment prospects.

laurentian university update
laurentian university update

Laurentian University update: Auditor General of Ontario investigating Laurentian’s finances

The Standing Committee on Public Accounts unanimously passed a motion on April 28, 2021, asking the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) to conduct an audit of Laurentian’s value for money for the period of 2010 to 2020. The Committee discussed the motion and said they want the audit to examine what led Laurentian to enter the CCAA process, to bring transparency to the situation, and to identify lessons learned.

Moreover, the Government Committee noted that it would like the audit to focus on the future and ensure something similar does not occur at another academic institution. Considering the historical scope of the request, as well as the desire to be forward-looking, the Committee granted discretion to the OAG on the scope of the audit.

The OAG began a value-for-money audit to examine Laurentian’s governance, operations, and past financial decisions.

OAG gives a Laurentian University update on the value-for-money audit

The OAG released an interim report last week on the Laurentian audit. In it, Laurentian is not painted in a good light. The OAG says Laurentian denied it unfettered access to information it deemed absolutely necessary for the audit. The OAG states that the university has refused to provide information that its internal and external legal counsel determined was subject to solicitor-client privilege.

According to the OAG, such a comprehensive restriction of audit work is unprecedented. In addition, it is claimed that Laurentian has implemented communication and documentation protocols that discourage university employees from interacting freely with the OAG or providing the OAG with unrestricted timely access to information without repercussions. In fact, the OAG says that Laurentian has created a culture of fear surrounding the OAG’s work and having conversations with people from the OAG. It says that Laurentian has instilled a fear of reprimand within its employees.

According to the OAG, Laurentian has a mandatory obligation to provide information and records to the OAG, which entitles the OAG to free access to Laurentian’s records and information, including privileged information.

It was noted by the OAG that Laurentian had refused to provide some non-privileged documents and information on the grounds that reviewing documents to determine if the information is privileged would take too much time. Therefore, on September 29, 2021, the Auditor General applied to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for a declaration that section 10 of the Auditor General Act grants the Auditor General access to privileged information and documents.

Laurentian University is now being sued by Ontario’s Auditor General in an argument over how free and unfettered access to the university’s accounts should be defined. An Ontario court has never ruled on whether the OAG can compel audit subjects to disclose privileged information between lawyers and their clients.

laurentian university update
laurentian university update

Laurentian University update: Laurentian’s response to OAG accusations that it is withholding documents for financial audit

Laurentian for its part, responds in part by saying that it has received numerous requests for information from the OAG. Staff and directors of Laurentian have also met with the OAG delegation. In response to requests from government ministries, regulatory bodies, and governmental authorities, Laurentian has spent considerable time and effort.

In response to the OAG’s inquiries, the university says that:

  • It has provided extensive information.
  • The OAG has direct access to financial accounting and other systems at the university, therefore it is not a matter of access.
  • As part of this process, external counsel has assisted Laurentian in reviewing privileged documents and making sure the disclosure of information does not violate any court orders.
  • The university continues to supply all documents requested by the OAG, except for those subject to privilege or court-ordered confidentiality.
  • It has taken time and effort to respond to the information requests due to the limited resources at their disposal.
  • The university does not agree with the OAG’s belief that it is entitled to privileged documents, such as those that are protected by solicitor-client privilege, settlement privilege, and court-ordered confidentiality.

Laurentian University update: Auditor General seeks court hearing on access to information Laurentian deems “privileged”

As well as filing the court application last September, the OAG also informed the Standing Committee on Public Accounts of Laurentian’s restrictions on its work. The Committee then requested information from Laurentian University in connection with their motion. In the Public Accounts Committee’s opinion, the Legislative Assembly Act, Standing Orders, and Parliamentary Privilege give it the authority to command the production of documents or other items it deems necessary for its work.

Having sent three letters, Laurentian began sending the Committee documents in November 2021. Laurentian’s external legal counsel continues to tell the OAG and the Standing Committee on Public Accounts that Laurentian will not share privileged information, information subject to court-ordered confidentiality, or information implicating third parties and the CCAA process.

Thus, the hearing will proceed. The hearing is scheduled for today.

Rather than pending within the CCAA proceeding, the parties agreed that the issue of whether the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General Act:

  1. requires an auditee to disclose privileged information to the OAG; or
  2. provides the OAG with access to an auditee’s privileged information should be heard under the Rules of Civil Procedure as a Commercial List matter instead.

Chief Justice Morawetz approved the following procedure following a case conference on September 27, 2021:

  1. An application may be made for an interpretation of section 10 of the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General Act.
  2. It is only a question of interpreting section 10 of the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General Act that will be raised in the application. The application will not raise CCAA issues. The OAG”s request for privileged documents or other aspects of the audit may be subject to the right of Laurentian to seek relief.
  3. The following timetable will be followed, subject to possible changes:
      • OAG’s application record will be served by September 30, 2021;
      • Laurentian’s response application record must be served by October 15, 2021;
      • any cross-examinations must be completed by October 29, 2021;
      • OAG factums must be served by November 12, 2021;
      • the university’s factums must be served by November 26, 2021; and
      • the hearing will take place on December 6, 2021.

It will no doubt be a fascinating hearing and His Honour’s ruling will be unique and will probably motivate me to report the results in another Laurentian University update. As stated earlier, no Ontario court has ever heard such a matter.

laurentian university update
laurentian university update

Laurentian University update: Summary

I hope you found this Laurentian University update Brandon Blog informative. Are you or your company in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you embroiled in costly litigation and need a time out in order to restructure? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to find out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

laurentian university update

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

BASIC ONTARIO EMPLOYEE NON COMPETE CLAUSE ENFORCEABLE NO MORE

non compete clause enforceable

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

Non compete clause enforceable?: Introduction

It has always been tempting to ignore a non-compete agreement. Particularly if you left your job feeling that you weren’t appreciated or respected, you weren’t given proper notice, or you were owed wages or commissions. Employees tend to make poor decisions in such situations. It used to be potentially very costly to ignore a non compete clause enforceable in Ontario. In this Brandon Blog post, I describe how that has now changed in Ontario.

Monte McNaughton, Ontario’s Minister of Labour, Training and Skills Development, announced changing employment laws in Ontario with the passing of the Working for Workers Act, 2021, on November 30, 2021. I discuss what this means for employees in Ontario and especially for anyone who has a non compete clause enforceable in their employment contract or any other written agreement with their employer.

This blog does not provide legal advice since my firm is not a law firm and I am not a lawyer. Moreover, it is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice, especially legal advice from an employment lawyer or a labour lawyer. It is merely my interpretation of the new Ontario law as an insolvency trustee who advises entrepreneurs and their businesses.

What is a non compete clause and historically are non compete clauses enforceable in Canadian courts?

Employees who have signed a non-competition agreement at the time of hire are prohibited from engaging in any businesses, occupations, professions, projects, or other activities that compete with their employer’s business after the employment relationship has ended. Such clauses in an employment agreement or other employment-related agreements are an example of restrictive covenant clauses.

Employment agreements containing a non-competition clause are generally void in Canada due to the unreasonable restraint they impose upon the employee’s trade. Courts have held that it is not possible to have a non compete clause enforceable if a non-competition period, activity, or geographic scope has ambiguous language or is vague, it is unenforceable. These rulings have helped protect former employees against aggressive employers. The BC Supreme Court, the Ontario court and appellate courts have ruled this way in favour of former employees.

Generally, the Courts have only made a non compete clause enforceable if the non-competition clauses are in employment agreements in exceptional circumstances and where there is unambiguous language, especially when they are reasonable between the parties and in the public interest. Employees rarely retain a lawyer just to inquire about the enforceability of their non-competition clause. Rather, it would be part of a larger consultation before entering into an employment contract and for sure when the lawyer was hired to handle a broader wrongful dismissal/termination of employment case.

non compete clause enforceable
non compete clause enforceable

Can an insolvency proceeding under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) help you escape a judgment liability for breach of a non compete clause enforceable in Canada?

An individual ex-employee found in breach of a non-compete agreement could initiate one of the following insolvency proceedings:

  1. Consumer proposal.
  2. Division I proposal.
  3. Bankruptcy.

Sadly, it would not help in a case where the court found the non compete clause enforceable. A former employee would not be able to discharge an enforceable judgment debt obtained by the employer for breach of a non compete clause in an employment agreement or any ancillary agreements arising from employment by using an insolvency proceeding.

This is because the employer should frame the claim against the former employee as a debt resulting from the loss of profits caused by the former employee’s breach of fiduciary duty. This type of debt is not dischargeable under section 178(1) of the BIA. For such an ex-employee, an insolvency process is of no use. The judgment debt will remain with them after they discharge all their other debts and get discharged from their insolvency process.

Ontario introduces employee-friendly legislation making non compete clause enforceable no more

On October 25, 2021, the Ontario provincial government introduced Bill 27: Working for Workers Act, 2021. This new law makes changes for the banning of a non-compete agreement, needing companies of a certain minimum number of employees to have work-life plans, and also licensing temp help agencies. According to the Ontario government, these changes will certainly:

  • foster a healthy work-life balance; and
  • ban any unfair non-compete agreement that is used to limit job opportunities, suppress salary increases, and suppress wage growth to promote competitiveness.

Ontario is the first province in Canada to ban a non-competition agreement in a contract of employment. It is not entirely clear to me if this new legislation invalidates any existing non-competition agreement. According to my understanding, new laws do not apply retroactively unless they explicitly say so, which Bill 27 does not.

The new legislation includes four major elements:

  • Amends the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000 to prohibit employees and employers from entering into non-competition agreements.
  • Requires employers with at least 25 employees to institute a written policy on employees’ time off. By doing so, Ontario is prioritizing workers’ mental health and family time.
  • Introduces licensing for temporary help agencies and recruiters operating in Ontario.
  • With a few exceptions, this bill amends Ontario’s Occupational Health and Safety Act to require employers to provide washroom access to delivery personnel.

    non compete clause enforceable
    non compete clause enforceable

Non compete clause enforceable with respect to the sale of a business and other employer alternatives

A non compete clause enforceability applies in a sale of business context or a partial sale of business context if:

  • the buyer and business owner seller (or principal of the corporate seller) enter into a non-compete agreement with respect to the seller; and
  • immediately following the sale, the seller becomes an employee of the buyer.

Employers in Ontario are now prohibited from utilizing non-competition clauses or similar restrictive covenants and such clauses in employment contracts. However, it does not mean that they need to be completely exposed to having their employees rush off to a direct competitor and divulge all the employer’s trade secrets.

The HR and/or onboarding practices of Ontario employers need to be reviewed and updated where necessary. As part of this process, any restrictive covenants in employment contracts will have to be reviewed and perhaps struck or at least amended because making any new non compete clause enforceable is out of the question in Ontario. Also, for employers with 25 or more employees, a “disconnecting from work” policy will have to be rolled out to all incoming and current employees.

Even though making any new Ontario non compete clause enforceable is no longer an option, employers can still take three simple steps to protect their legitimate business interests when establishing terms of employment:

  1. At the time of hire, sign confidentiality agreements and use non-solicitation clauses. Employees can’t be prevented from working for competitors. Employers can, however, continue to prohibit their employees from asking former co-workers, current clients, and suppliers, or exerting influence over clients, to follow them to new jobs. This can be put in an employment contract to help protect the employer’s relationships with clients and others important to their business.
  2. Be careful what information you give employees with different levels of responsibility and seniority. Due to the fact that employees can work for competitors, employers should be cautious about disclosing information to employees that are not necessary for them to be able to perform their duties. Low-wage workers are the most obvious group who do not need access to what could be considered important business information that an employer would not want to get into the hands of their competitors.
  3. Differentiate amongst your employees. Those who are not defined in their employment agreement or are not in fact key employees, and especially low-wage employees should not need access to intellectual property, customer lists or client lists, supplier lists, or to the employer’s trade secrets. Therefore, they should not be given that information and especially access to trade secrets.

Non compete clause enforceable?: Summary

I hope you found this non compete clause enforceable Brandon Blog informative. Is your company or are you personally in financial distress and a debt crisis? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to find out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

non compete clause enforceable
non compete clause enforceable
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

2021 GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN CRISIS: HOW THIS TERRIBLE CRISIS CAUSED A DELICIOUS QUADRUPLING OF OUR LIQUIDATION RECOVERY

supply chain crisis
supply chain crisis

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

The audio version of this Brandon Blog can be found at the bottom of this page. Please click on the play button to listen to it.

What is a supply chain?

The supply chain refers to the facilities that enable a product and all the material it requires to be manufactured to move from one place to another. Depending on the product and its complexity, the product or its materials can pass through multiple locations. The supply chain operated smoothly for a long time. Then the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on the economy struck.

This Brandon Blog discusses the current global supply chain crisis and its impact on our recent auction liquidation sale. You might be surprised at the outcome.

Snarled supply chain: First was the Suez canal supply chain crisis

This crisis was caused by Ever Given, a 400-meter-long (1,312-foot) container ship that ran aground in the Suez Canal, Egypt, on March 23, 2021. Throughout the Suez Canal and around the Cape of Good Hope, billions of dollars in cargo were delayed due to the incident. Worldwide container shipping was impacted by five percent. Those Mediterranean ports that rely on the Suez Canal would again face cargo backlogs if the canal were to be cut off in the future.

Piraeus handled 5.4 million containers last year, making it the biggest freight port in the Mediterranean and the fourth largest in Europe, according to research firm PortEconomics. The incident has now been resolved, but it shed light on the vulnerability of how raw materials, components, and finished products are transported through chokepoints such as the Suez Canal, which may have severe implications when blocked.

As soon as the ship was freed, traffic resumed and container ships continued on their voyages.

supply chain crisis
supply chain crisis

Supply chain crisis: Port congestion in Los Angeles and Vancouver

The global supply-chain crisis is evident everywhere, from half-empty shelves in grocery stores to soaring fuel prices at the pump. Because container ships were anchored off the coast, waiting to dock and unload, San Pedro Bay near Los Angeles and Burrard Inlet just outside the Port of Vancouver were the poster children for the global supply chain crisis.

Global manufacturing and transportation systems are impacted by changes in supply and demand. Transportation prices have increased as a result of the huge demand for container shipping, and ports have found it difficult to process incoming goods.

Global supply chains have been disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in product shortages, shipping delays, manufacturing disruptions, and soaring prices that have sparked inflation concerns.

In addition, companies face an increase in labour and manufacturing costs, forcing them to decide whether to pass on the increases to customers – and possibly lose market share – or absorb losses themselves.

Raw materials, parts, and consumer goods are at risk because global supply chains are at their breaking point. It has become more difficult to operate at certain ports and terminals because vessel capacity is very limited and empty containers are hard to find.

The initial lockdown resulted in employees getting laid off. Now there are labour shortages. These line operators are now hard to hire back because many have now got better-paying jobs at other companies. There is even a shortage of truck drivers to deliver the goods from the major ports to the warehouses.

The USA’s largest container port, Los Angeles, continues to unload a backlog of container ships around the clock. However, when this machinery is broken, we can experience being out of goods and experiencing back-ordering, which means we cannot get what we want when we want it.

Due to the crowded docks and port terminals, truckers couldn’t return empty containers and pick up loaded containers scheduled for delivery.

Global supply chain crisis: Shoppers need to start early for the holidays

There are product shortages everywhere. Nutella, a shortage of semiconductors has resulted in a shortage of new cars, steeply higher gas prices, and backorders for holiday gifts such as toys, books, and furniture due to major disruptions in the global supply chain.

Holiday shoppers are warned not to leave their holiday shopping until the last minute because the shelves may be empty. Presently, there are shortages of the most popular items and stores cannot replenish their inventories for this holiday season.

What is the cause of this? People bought more goods online during the pandemic lockdown, but fewer services. Except perhaps take-out food delivered to our house, it is much harder to purchase services online. The lockdown also affected manufacturing and transportation, resulting in a global supply chain crisis.

Just-in-time music stopped and fragile supply chains stopped moving, causing the supply chain crisis. Due to startup problems, it is now impossible to get everything working smoothly again. With the lockdown over, there is also pent-up demand and consumers wanting to make the holidays normal again by getting out shopping in-person to satisfy the elevated demand.

So what does all this have to do with a liquidation? I will tell you shortly, but first, I will explain what liquidation of a company really means.

supply chain crisis
supply chain crisis

Involuntary vs. voluntary liquidation of a company

Liquidating means selling your property or assets for cash or cash equivalents on the open market. Liquidation in the world of investing is when an investor closes out their position in a securities position; exiting an investment. The process of liquidating a business or distributing its assets to claimants is termed liquidation in finance and economics.

Most people on the street would say that a liquidation process is the sale of business assets, either because the business owner is closing or going bankrupt. It is possible for businesses to do a partial liquidation of slow-moving or unnecessary assets even without facing financial hardship.

When a limited company‘s liabilities exceed its assets, or when its bills cannot be paid when they fall due, the company is insolvent. It will be forced to liquidate the assets through insolvency proceedings. Financial institutions are normally secured creditors. This allows them to enforce their security through receivership. The assets that were pledged as collateral would be taken over by a receiver, whether appointed privately or by the court.

A corporate bankruptcy filing is also an alternative, or perhaps in conjunction with a receivership. Either way, the entity is forced to convert assets to cash and cease operations through insolvency proceedings, a legal process.

A company that fails to repay creditors due to financial hardship, will end up in receivership and/or the bankruptcy process. This results in compulsory liquidation, also known as involuntary liquidation.

Alternatively, the shareholders of a non-insolvent company may decide there is now a period of time where winding up operations through voluntary liquidation proceedings makes sense. Perhaps there was an insurmountable shareholder dispute, or maybe the company’s operating genius shareholder passed away.

Besides providing the capital to start the company, other shareholders were passive. As a result, the shareholders may decide to wind down the solvent company on their own volition while there is still value for them.

Paying off creditors

In either case, after assets have been liquidated, the cash is distributed to creditors first. The shareholders are entitled to the remaining net amount after paying liquidation costs and creditor claims.

Regardless of whether the company is insolvent or solvent, in general, the priority of claims from an asset liquidation tends to fall into the following classes of claims:

  1. Trust claims – either by contract or statute.
  2. Secured creditors.
  3. Ordinary preferential creditors.
  4. Ordinary unsecured creditors.

After full payment of all outstanding debts from the liquidation of assets in their priority of claims, regardless if it was voluntary or through insolvency proceedings, the remaining funds will be distributed to the shareholders according to their share priority (preferred vs. common) and the proportion of shares they own in the company.

supply chain crisis
supply chain crisis

2021 global supply chain crisis and my liquidation story

I have so far only focused on consumer buying patterns. A similar process is occurring in the commercial and industrial sectors as well. As more people have received the Covid-19 vaccine, federal government support has essentially stopped and economic growth is coming back, it is difficult for businesses to find the inputs needed to make their products. This is the basis for the story I am going to tell you.

Shareholder resolutions appointed my firm as Liquidator of two sister companies under section 193(1) of the Ontario Business Corporations Act. A furniture manufacturer specializing in custom contract orders for commercial use. The other company owned the factory property.

As a result of an unresolved shareholder dispute, the shareholders decided that the best thing to do was to liquidate the solvent manufacturing company, while they could still obtain value for themselves. Having made that decision, it was obvious that selling the Toronto property was also a wise move in today’s market.

The manufacturing company had operated for over 50 years. The company’s equipment was fully depreciated. We contacted two auctioneers who each submitted a proposal. Each explained why they predicted a low gross recovery. Both proposals were presented to the shareholders, who chose the auctioneer they preferred us to retain.

An online auction was conducted for two weeks. Initially, neither the number of bidders nor the bids were very high. After about a week, the magic happened and we saw a surge in demand. The consequences of the supply chain crisis became apparent. As the number of bidders increased, so did the bids.

We ended up with a gross recovery last week that quadrupled both auctioneers’ estimates. There was no doubt that the old equipment and delivery truck, which all worked fine, were in great demand. In fact, the vehicle’s black book value was much lower than its actual sale price.

Nevertheless, if you need that kind of truck and equipment and dealers do not have either new or used available, then historical trading values may be somewhat meaningless when there is only one available source.

Without a doubt, we are thrilled with the results of the liquidation auction. As soon as the buyers pay for their goods and pick them up, we will have a clean factory so that we can close the sale of the property next month.

Thank you, global supply chain crisis 2021!

Supply chain crisis summary

I hope you found this supply chain crisis Brandon Blog informative. Is your company or are you personally in financial distress and a debt crisis? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to find out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that you, your family, and your friends are safe, healthy, and secure. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is fully operational, and both Ira and Brandon Smith are readily available for phone or video consultations.

supply chain crisis

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY ONTARIO: THE BEST MODERN RULES FOR GETTING PAID

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Trustee in bankruptcy Ontario introduction

One of two reasons led you to this page:

  1. you regularly read my Brandon Blog; or
  2. you typed in a search term something like “bankruptcy trustee Ontario“, “licensed insolvency trustee Ontario“, “insolvency trustee Ontario,” “trustee in bankruptcy Ontario” or a variation of these terms.

The bankruptcy process is one of several insolvency options available to the honest but unfortunate debtor in Canada to try to get back to financial stability.

Trustee compensation is charged in one of two distinct ways. It depends on the type of insolvency proceeding, as I will explain below. Trustees are sometimes only permitted to charge a relatively fixed fee, known as a “tariff”. Trustees cannot charge time-based fees in such cases.

On other occasions, the Trustee will charge the individual levels of staff by the hour. To charge time-based remuneration, the remuneration must be approved by the court. This is called taxation. All of this is governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), which is a federal government statute.

I discuss an unreported case from Ontario in this Brandon Blog, which was the topic of a webinar I attended this week. The first thing I will do is lay the groundwork, followed by a story of how a trustee in bankruptcy Ontario did not get the entire fee being requested upon the taxation of its accounts.

Trustee in bankruptcy Ontario: What is a Licensed Insolvency Trustee?

Individuals and businesses with debt problems can seek advice and services from licensed insolvency trustees, a federally regulated profession. It used to be called a trustee in bankruptcy Ontario to refer to an insolvency trustee licensed in Ontario.

What can a trustee in bankruptcy Ontario do for you? Depending on your needs, he or she can provide you with an array of options including alternatives to bankruptcy. Government-regulated insolvency proceedings are the only Canadian government-approved way through which you can be discharged of your debts.

You can trust that, when you hire a trustee in bankruptcy Ontario, you’re dealing with someone who has demonstrated that they possess the knowledge, experience, and skills that are required to be licensed by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB).

The insolvency system in Canada is regulated by the federal government. The OSB oversees an insolvency trustee and mandates that they adhere to federal standards of practice such as the Code of Ethics for Trustees. If you are unable to resolve a problem with a trustee in bankruptcy Ontario, you can file a complaint with the OSB. All complaints are reviewed and assessed.

trustee in bankruptcy ontario
trustee in bankruptcy ontario

Trustee in bankruptcy Ontario and the OSB: Who can act as trustee in bankruptcy Canada?

According to Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), the OSB oversees the administration of bankruptcy and receivership proceedings. It also has some responsibilities regarding the restructuring of large companies covered by the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

Under each of these Canadian statutes, a person, business, or company experiencing financial difficulties may be discharged from most of their debts. Insolvency cases must be administered by a licensed insolvency trustee. On the OSB’s website, you can find contact information for all of Canada’s licensed insolvency trustees.

What does a trustee in bankruptcy Ontario cost?

Depending on the services they provide, the cost of an insolvency trustee in Ontario varies. Providing a no-cost initial consultation is standard practice for professional trustee firms. In this confidential consultation, our team collects information about your assets, liabilities, income, and expenses to gain a thorough understanding of your situation.

Then, we explain what debt relief options you or your business could benefit from, including any insolvency process. We will then explain our recommendations and provide you with a cost estimate. Insolvency costs depend on the type of insolvency proceeding. You will see why shortly.

trustee in bankruptcy ontario
trustee in bankruptcy ontario

Personal bankruptcy – summary administration

Summary administrations are consumer bankruptcy proceedings in which the realizable value of non-exempt assets (the value of non-exempt assets) after the claims of secured creditors are deducted does not exceed $15,000. For summary administrations, the professional Trustee cannot charge for their time spent. They are compensated according to a tariff. The tariff for summary administrations is:

  • 100% of cash receipts up to $975;
  • the portion exceeding $975 but not exceeding $2,000 is taxed at 35%;
  • above $2,000, 50%;
  • each of the two mandatory counselling session’s tariff fee;
  • court fees;
  • an administrative and overhead fee of $100; and
  • HST/GST.

Personal and corporate bankruptcy – ordinary administration

Personal bankruptcy is classified as an ordinary administration if the net recovery after the claims of secured creditors will be more than $15,000. Corporate bankruptcy is always an ordinary administration. Corporate bankruptcy does not currently have a streamlined version as does personal bankruptcy.

An ordinary administration bankruptcy allows the Trustee to charge by time spent, subject to approval by the Inspectors of the bankruptcy estate (if any), the OSB and taxation by the court.

Consumer proposal

As regular readers of my Brandon Blog know, a consumer proposal process is the only federal government-approved debt settlement program in Canada and is always administered by a trustee in bankruptcy Ontario or elsewhere in Canada. It is also the only consumer insolvency choice in Ontario other than for a summary administration bankruptcy. A consumer proposal is available to any individual who has $250,000 or less in debt, not including any debt registered against their home. A consumer proposal is a way of eliminating debts while avoiding bankruptcy.

A professional Trustee, acting as the Administrator in a consumer proposal, cannot charge for time spent on consumer proposals. Compensation is based on a tariff. A consumer proposal tariff is as follows:

  • $750 upon filing the consumer proposal with the OSB;
  • when the consumer proposal is approved or deemed approved, another $750;
  • 20% of the money distributed to creditors, when it is distributed:
  • the fee for each of the two mandatory credit counselling sessions;
  • court costs; and
  • HST/GST

Division I Proposal

A consumer proposal streamlines the process. Individuals with too much debt to qualify for a consumer proposal may submit a Division I proposal. Under the BIA, every corporate restructuring plan must be a Division I proposal.

Under a Division I Proposal, the Trustee can charge by the amount of time spent, subject to approval by the Inspectors (if any are allowed for and appointed), the OSB, and taxation by the court.

Receivership – private or court-appointed

Receivership is a remedy for secured creditors legal process. A trustee in bankruptcy Ontario and elsewhere in Canada can charge for time spent in a receivership. In a private appointment, there is no taxation. The secured creditor who appointed the receiver must approve the fee.

In a court-appointed receivership, there is taxation by the court. The stakeholders can approve or oppose the Receiver’s fee and costs.

The OSB is not involved in either type of appointment.

Restructuring of companies under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

Canada has a federal statute that governs large corporate restructurings, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). It is a court-led restructuring process for companies with debts of $5 million or more. A licensed trustee serves as a Monitor under the CCAA. The fee for the Monitor is determined by the amount of time spent. The court must assess its fee and costs.

Having set the background information for you, I can now discuss the unreported court decision discussed in the webinar.

trustee in bankruptcy ontario
trustee in bankruptcy ontario

The unreported court decision: Background

A trustee in bankruptcy Ontario and two Ontario insolvency lawyers presented this unreported decision in the webinar. According to the licensed trustee who presented this court ruling, it was his file. If it had been my file, I would not have been so courageous as to use it as a teaching moment for members of the Ontario insolvency community.

The insolvent person is a real estate broker who has experienced substantial income growth. She incurred significant tax liabilities as a result of poor tax planning advice. She owes $417,060 to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), her single largest creditor. Other notable creditors include two chartered banks who are owed $119,196 and $44,025, respectively.

The debtor lodged her Division I proposal with the trustee in bankruptcy Ontario which he filed on October 31, 201. The debtor offered to pay her creditors $348,000 in 60 monthly installments of $5,800 under her proposal. A meeting of creditors took place on November 21, 2019. At CRA’s request, the meeting was adjourned to allow for further examination, as is normal when CRA is a major creditor.

The debtor amended her proposal on December 11, 2019, increasing the Proposal Fund to $408,000 payable at $6,800 per month for 60 months. The Amended Proposal was presented to the reconvened meeting of creditors on December 12, 2019. Upon submitting the Amended Proposal, the requisite majority of creditors approved it.

The Amended Proposal was approved by the court on January 28, 2020. The debtor made the 3 monthly payments of $6,800 promised in the Amended Proposal between February and April 2020. In June 2020, the debtor paid a lump-sum payment of $367,600 instead of continuing with monthly payments for the remainder of the 5-year term. The Trustee issued the Certificate of Full Performance of Proposal to the debtor and prepared the documentation needed to request a comment letter from the OSB.

It was stated in the original proposal and the Amended Proposal that the Trustee’s fee would be based upon 12.5% of proceeds plus a $5,000.00 deposit paid by the debtor, plus HST. The total proceeds were $413,007.13. As a result, the Trustee calculated and claimed a fee of $56,000 (plus HST). $56,000 was calculated as an amount equal to $5,000 for the initial deposit paid by the debtor, plus 12.5% of $408,000 (or $51,000).

The unreported court decision: The taxation of the trustee in bankruptcy Ontario accounts

Taxations of this nature are done “over the counter”, unless the Associate Justice has questions. Trustees in bankruptcy prepare the necessary motion material and submit it electronically to the court. The accounts are taxed and the court order issued without the need for the Trustee to appear in court unless the Associate Justice has questions or concerns.

Taxation of the Trustee’s Final Statement of Receipts and Disbursements was conducted by the Associate Justice on July 13, 2020, in writing at which time she adjourned the taxation so that the Trustee could provide the following:

  1. The Trustee’s Report to the Court for approval of the debtor’s Amended Proposal.
  2. Time records of the Trustee.
  3. An explanation of where the proposal money came from, and how the proposal could have been completed within 6 months of filing.

    trustee in bankruptcy ontario
    trustee in bankruptcy ontario

The unreported court decision: The taxation of the trustee in bankruptcy Ontario accounts continues

The matter came back in July in writing. By letter dated July 14, 2020, the Trustee responded to the court’s requests as follows:

  • The Trustee provided the Report to the Court filed upon the approval of the
    Amended Proposal.
  • The Trustee confirmed that no time dockets were kept as the terms of the Amended Proposal provided for the calculation of fees.
  • The source of the funds to pay out the proposal was the re-financing and mortgaging of the debtor’s primary residence.

On July 29, 2020, the Associate Justice adjourned the taxation so that it could proceed by video conference. The Associate Justice ordered the Trustee to give notice of the taxation to the debtor, the
creditors and the OSB. The Associate Justice also directed the Trustee to be prepared to speak to whether
the fee claimed was fair given the 5-year debt restructuring plan took only 6 months to complete.

Neither the creditors nor the OSB attended the video taxation hearing. Therefore it was unopposed to the taxation and the fee claimed by the Trustee.

The unreported court decision: The court’s analysis

As a result, the court considered both positive and negative factors in deciding whether to approve the $56,000 fee for the Trustee.

FOR:

  • by virtue of their approval of the Amended Proposal, the creditors have accepted the Trustee’s fee claim;
  • The Amended Proposal and fee were approved by the court;
  • unsecured creditors will receive a substantial dividend of 54.1% on the ordinary unsecured claims proven;
  • they will receive their dividends much sooner than expected;
  • The Trustee has sent a copy of the Final Statement to all creditors with proven claims and all creditors have been notified of the taxation; no creditors have objected to the fee sought by the Trustee or opposed the approval of the taxation; and
  • the clean OSB comment letter supports taxation and approval of the fee claimed by the Trustee and the OSB did not attend this hearing.

AGAINST:

  • A time docket was not kept by the Trustee to justify the fees claimed in the administration of the estate. There is no record of the hours spent by each level of staff at their normal hourly rate to prove the Trustee’s efforts.
  • Compensation for work not performed by the Trustee is neither fair nor justifiable because it was not done or was not necessary.
  • About five and a half years before the deadline, the debtor made full payment of the Amended Proposal. However, the trustee did not investigate the source of the funds. Although the Trustee claimed that the funds were proceeds from the debtor’s re-financing of her principal residence, he could not provide any additional information.
  • According to the sworn statement of affairs, the debtor had a 50% interest in the principal residence with resulting equity of $47,000 and total equity from the debtor’s interests in two other properties totalling $95,000. Even so, the debtor managed to raise $408,000 through allegedly refinancing only the principal residence. She raised more money against this one asset than the equity listed in all her assets in her sworn statement of affairs!
  • Would the ordinary unsecured creditors have accepted the Amended Proposal if they were aware of more assets available?

The Associate Justice held that the court still has the right to supervise the administration of the estate, and the BIA obligates the court to tax the fee requested by the Trustee. Further, taxation by the court is not a rubber stamp.

trustee in bankruptcy ontario
trustee in bankruptcy ontario

The unreported court decision: The court’s decision and the aftermath

The lack of time dockets made it difficult for the court to determine an appropriate level of compensation. The court would have been able to assess whether the $56,000 fee was reasonable and justified if the Trustee had kept time records. According to the Associate Justice, the trustee in bankruptcy Ontario had not discharged his responsibility for proving that the fee is justified.

Taking everything into account, the court reduced the Trustee’s fee by $15,000 from what was claimed. Accordingly, the court approved a fee of $41,000 plus HST.

As a result, the Trustee sought legal advice. An appeal was filed by the Trustee to a Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List appealing the Associate Justice’s decision. The appeal was dismissed. The judge deferred to the experience and discretion of the Associate Justice, who taxes Trustee accounts regularly.

Trustee in bankruptcy Ontario: The moral of this story

I said at the beginning that, had I been in charge of the case, I would not have been so courageous as this Trustee in turning it into a webinar for my colleagues. There is a simple lesson here. The trustee in bankruptcy in Ontario and the rest of Canada must also be a good timekeeper for every insolvency file for which no tariff applies. The Trustee must also be a good record keeper so that questions from the OSB or the court can be adequately answered. Lastly, if something doesn’t make sense, like how you can raise $400,000 from assets that are only worth $142,000, find out why.

Trustee in bankruptcy Ontario summary

I hope you found this trustee in bankruptcy Ontario Brandon Blog informative. Are you in financial distress and a debt crisis? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to find out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are? Is your company in financial hot water?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

trustee in bankruptcy ontario
trustee in bankruptcy ontario
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

WHAT IS A STALKING HORSE: A COMPLETE PROCESS THE CHEF NEEDED TO USE TO SUCCEED

what is a stalking horse
what is a stalking horse

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click play on the podcast.

What is a stalking horse bid?

In the 16th century, the term originated. It originally was a replica of a horse or something that looked like a horse, that was set out by hunters in an area they wished to hunt in. By hiding behind it, the hunters wouldn’t have to worry about scaring away whatever was being hunted.

Today, it means anything that is put forward or proposed, to test the waters or mask the true nature of the proposal. It is much more recent to think about a stalking horse bid. Its name comes from the fact that it is a way to draw other bidders out of the woods and test their level of seriousness in participating in a sale process and making a bid for the assets being sold.

In this Brandon Blog, I describe an Ontario court decision denying the request of a company under bankruptcy protection to sell its assets and if the company only had known what is a stalking horse bid and used it.

The company of celebrity chef Mark McEwan files for creditor protection

On September 28, 2021, McEwan Enterprises Inc. (MEI), a premier hospitality company based in Toronto, Ontario, obtained protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) with a list of more than $10 million in liabilities. The company was founded by chef Mark McEwan.

In his early career, Chef McEwan worked as an executive chef at Toronto’s Sutton Place Hotel. In addition to mentoring budding chefs in his kitchens, Chef McEwan is also a judge on Food Network’s hit series Top Chef.

MEI at one time ran multiple dining establishments, and gourmet grocery stores, in addition to a catering service. Due to the negative impact on the hospitality industry of the coronavirus, MEI experienced significant losses and business challenges and found itself filing for bankruptcy protection under the CCAA.

what is a stalking horse
what is a stalking horse

The owner of the Bloor-Yonge location opposes CCAA restructuring by celebrity chef Mark McEwan

MEI’s restructuring plan presented for bankruptcy court approval would involve Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd and McEwan repurchasing the business under a specific asset purchase agreement by a new numbered company. With fewer grocery and restaurant locations, the business would retain its 268 employees and reduce lease obligations. The company’s restructuring plan in the CCAA proceedings focuses on effecting a going-concern sale transaction. That is, selling and transferring substantially all of its assets and many of its liabilities to a new entity formed by MEI’s current shareholders, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and Chef McEwan.

One of MEI’s creditors, the landlord of the Bloor-Yonge grocery store, opposed the plan. Based on its analysis of the situation, the court found that the proposed transaction did not meet the CCAA’s requirements for approval. Consequently, the sale, the centrepiece of the restructuring plan, failed to get bankruptcy court approval from the bankruptcy judge.

What is a stalking horse? Why did MEI’s proposed bankruptcy sale process fail?

MEI’s legal and financial advisers are excellent. They probably told Chef McEwan the MEI restructuring plan as presented to the court had little chance of success. It would shock me if they didn’t. Because I am not involved in the MEI CCAA proceeding, I can only guess that Chef McEwan ignored his advisors’ counsel, ignored financial and legal advice, rolled the dice, and lost.

Chef McEwan swore affidavits as part of MEI’s court application. According to him:

  • MEI’s value and success are dependent upon his continued involvement;
  • the MEI brand has become synonymous with his personal brand and television projects;
  • by inference, he implied that he would not cooperate with any third-party buyer, who would therefore not have his involvement; and
  • in his view, a third-party sales process was not necessary and could negatively affect the company’s operations.

I think it is never wise to go into court with a smug attitude or threaten non-cooperation with a third party, in addition to the legal issues I will explain shortly. If MEI had used a real bankruptcy auction process and a higher bidder was able to pay the amount of the purchase, the court would not care whether Chef McEwan would work for the new owner if it was not a condition of the potential purchaser’s offer.

Section 36(4) of the CCAA was at issue. Section 36(3) refers to the factors that a court should consider when considering a specific sale transaction. They are:

  • a reasonable process led to the proposed sale or disposition in the circumstances;
  • did the monitor approve the process;
  • is the monitor submitting a report to the court indicating that a sale or disposition would be more beneficial to the creditors than a sale or disposition under a pure bankruptcy liquidation;
  • to what extent have the creditors been consulted;
  • how the proposed sale or disposition will affect creditors and other interested parties;
  • considering their market value, determine whether the consideration to be received for the assets is reasonable and fair.

In this case, the purchaser was to a related party as described in section 36(4) of the CCAA. According to the law, a court may grant authorization only if it is satisfied that:

  • the assets were tried to be sold or otherwise disposed of to non-related parties in good faith;
  • in accordance with the process leading to the proposed sale or disposition, it offers a greater consideration than any other offer.

This was not the case with MEI. I won’t go into all the reasons for MEI’s CCAA bankruptcy sale failure in this what is a stalking horse Brandon Blog, as you can read all about them here. The bankruptcy judge determined that the facts of the case do not meet the requirements of section 36(4), thus the proposed transaction cannot be approved.

Accordingly, it was dismissed.

what is a stalking horse
what is a stalking horse

What is a stalking horse? The competitive bidding process Chef McEwan should have used

The fatal flaw in MEI’s application for approval of the offer was their inability to prove to the court that there was not an even better offer in the marketplace because there was no sales process, possibly being an auction process. Chef McEwan should have used his offer as a stalking horse bid in a competitive auction process. He would have sought court approval for a court-supervised auction-type process. As long as they were fair, he could have set the bidding procedures, the bidding process timelines, and the bidding range through his stalking horse offer, and have the court approve it all at the bidding procedures hearing.

His offer would be exposed to the market, and he might be outbid. However, he was still in control of setting his offer. In terms of his approach, he chose to put MEI under the CCAA process, but once there, he had to adhere to the rules of that process. How could a stalking horse bidding process possibly work? Let’s find out.

What is a stalking horse? A court-supervised auction for bankruptcy sales

Typically, the debtor executes a binding stalking horse agreement with a purchaser against which higher and better offers can be solicited, and which stipulates that the stalking horse will be considered the highest and best offer if no competing bids are received. In order to achieve that goal, the debtor will ask the bankruptcy court to approve a competitive auction process and related bidding procedures.

An organization in distress can use the stalking horse bid method to avoid receiving low bids when selling its assets. Stalking horse bids are initial bids on insolvent company assets. Setting a low-end bidding bar prevents other bidders from underbidding the purchase price. Those wishing to participate in the stalking horse bid process and submit an offer after performing due diligence must submit a better offer than the stalking horse bid.

what is a stalking horse
what is a stalking horse

What is a stalking horse and what are the advantages and disadvantages of a stalking horse bid?

There are certain advantages for a stalking horse bidder. Since the stalking horse bidder is the opening offer that sets the floor price for the assets or company, the insolvent company usually provides several incentives. To begin with, the stalking horse bidder has the opportunity to negotiate the legal and financial terms of an asset purchase agreement with the debtor that will serve as the floor price. Thus, the stalking horse bidder does not simply enter into an agreement negotiated by someone else that might not be exactly what it needs.

In addition, the stalking horse bidder may negotiate bidding options that discourage competitors from bidding, although the entire process needs to be fair to all parties. Thirdly, a stalking horse bidder gets to perform its due diligence first. The due diligence process involves verifying, investigating, or auditing all relevant facts and financial information of a potential deal or investment opportunity.

However, there is still a chance that someone else may outbid the stalking horse offer and, if they want the assets badly enough, they may even bid more than the liquidation value. In the MEI case, MEI failed to prove that accepting its offer would be better than liquidation through a receivership or bankruptcy proceeding. This was another MEI flaw.

Even if that were to happen, stalking horse offers always contain a break fee. When someone else wins, this money will be awarded to the stalking horse bidder. It must be possible to pay the break fee and still have a better offer than what the stalking horse bidder offered. As part of the stalking horse bidding process, the break fee is meant to compensate the stalking horse bidder for the time spent and as an expense reimbursement for the professional fees spent on doing their due diligence and allowing their offer to sit out there for everyone to see.

All the remaining steps follow a typical auction where the highest bidder wins the distressed company‘s assets.

What is a stalking horse recent well-known Canadian example?

Thanks for asking. The court-supervised auction of insolvent entertainment company Cirque du Soleil was conducted based on an offer made by Cirque du Soleil’s secured creditors. That creditor proposal replaced a shareholder offer as the stalking horse bid, which set the minimum requirements for potential rival bids. Also included in the successful bid was Cirque’s commitment to maintaining its headquarters in Montreal for at least five years.

The stalking horse sales process is well known in Canada bankruptcy courts, as you can see. In this process, the stalking horse bidder gains certain advantages while the distressed company and its assets are exposed to the market. After a public auction sale, the court is able to determine if there is or is not a better offer out there under a previous bankruptcy court-approved sales process. So I hope that you can now answer the question, what is a stalking horse?

what is a stalking horse
what is a stalking horse

What next for the chef?

I guess it’s time to start fresh. Most of the time and money spent so far has been in vain. If MEI wants to make another shareholder offer, it will have to prove to the court that it met all the CCAA requirements.

What is a stalking horse summary?

I hope you found this what is a stalking horse Brandon Blog informative. Are you in financial distress and a debt crisis? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to find out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

what is a stalking horse

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RESTRUCTURING OF COMPANY: SOMETIMES AN UNPOPULAR CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY IS NEEDED TO RESTRUCTURE YOUR COMPANY TO IMPROVE PROFITS

restructuring of company

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Restructuring of company introduction

Following its bankruptcy, Canadian retailer Le Château announced that it would relaunch online under new ownership. Although extreme, in certain unique circumstances, corporate bankruptcy could be used to restructure a company’s debt and operations.

Often, companies realize they need to restructure too late when fewer options remain and saving the company is more challenging. A restructuring process started on a voluntary basis can generate greater value than a company restructuring done under the imminent threat of bankruptcy.

A restructuring plan is more likely to succeed when managers understand the fundamental business/strategic challenges their company faces. In a corporate restructuring, creditors are often required to make significant concessions, which have significant implications for them as well as for the company.

Using the Le Château case as an example, this Brandon Blog discusses certain aspects of the restructuring of company debt, assets, and operations.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company

Restructuring of company: Le Château relaunches online following bankruptcy

Following its filing for bankruptcy protection last year, Le Château, now run by Suzy’s Inc., announced its comeback from bankruptcy by launching an eveningwear collection online before the holidays. YM Inc., which owns many brands including Suzy Shier, acquired the intellectual property assets and certain merchandise and other assets.

Herschel Segal founded Le Château Inc. in 1959 as “Le Chateau Men’s Wear”, a menswear store in downtown Montreal’s Victoria Square. Le Château began selling imported clothes from Europe when it added women’s clothing in 1962. As time passed, Le Château sold more fashionable imports to young people instead of its original traditional clothing style. Since then, Le Château has designed, imported, and retailed apparel, accessories, and footwear for women and men.

Its 240 locations at its peak made the Canadian retailer a staple of nearly every mall and shopping district in the country. Le Château Inc. (and its US subsidiary Château Stores Inc.) filed for bankruptcy protection in October 2020 under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”). It also announced it would close all 123 stores in Canada. The Court granted the companies permission to run a liquidation process in November 2020. It used the CCAA to liquidate its assets rather than for the restructuring of company operations and finances.

To adapt to new retail industry trends, the company implemented efforts to right-sized its brick-and-mortar locations. 122 of its 243 stores were closed during the eight years prior to filing for bankruptcy. The Company’s right-sizing efforts and its important investment in its e-commerce platform helped mitigate the decline in brick-and-mortar revenue, but not enough to compensate. During the three fiscal years prior to its insolvency filing, the Company lost about $130 million in net income. As COVID-19 arrived in March 2020, the end of Le Château was sealed. Proms, weddings, galas, and parties were cancelled, decimating the retailer’s dress sales.

Le Château began liquidating its 121 stores in November 2020, as well as its transactional website. In December 2020, the licensed insolvency trustee acting as CCAA Monitor was also appointed Receiver because all assets were secured by loans to various financial institutions. A court granted the Company’s request to approve a sale transaction with Suzy’s Inc. in June 2021. Le Château’s intellectual property, merchandise, furniture, fixtures, equipment, and signage were purchased by Suzy’s. At that point, the inventory liquidation was completed. Before the Canadian company filed for bankruptcy, the companies changed their names to plain numbered companies as part of the sale of the intellectual property.

A bankruptcy filing was made by the company formerly known as Le Château Inc. on September 2, 2021. Le Château, now run by Suzy’s Inc., has announced its comeback from bankruptcy with the launch of an eveningwear collection ahead of the holidays.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company

Restructuring of company: Reasons for corporate restructuring

If the company is both insolvent and not viable in its existing form, the normal insolvency process would be receivership, bankruptcy or both. Instead of using the provisions of the CCAA to liquidate a major retailer, a Court-appointed receiver appointed under Quebec law as well as the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) would have accomplished the same thing as the CCAA process used.

In the example of Le Château, selling assets out of a financially sick corporation to a new owner who will operate the assets in a similar business is actually a form of restructuring of company operations. Because the old corporation has too much debt and too many operational problems, it cannot continue. However, as Suzy Shier has shown, there was a good business reason for them to buy certain assets, and they now plan to run a new Le Château business. A new owner was responsible for the restructuring of company operations and finances.

As a result of a financial crisis, a company may undergo restructuring to change the financial or operational aspects of its business. Restructuring can occur for several reasons, including:

  • deteriorating financial fundamentals;
  • a lack of profitability;
  • disappointing sales revenue;
  • debt that is too high; and
  • an industry with too much competition or the company is no longer competitive.

Under financial duress, a company engages in restructuring when it makes significant changes to its financial or operational structure. In reorganizing internally, a company’s operations, processes, departments, or ownership may change, enabling it to be more integrated and profitable. If shareholders and creditors reach an agreement on a reorganization of assets, issuance of equity to reduce debt, or bankruptcy as long as the business maintains operations, the company may sell its assets.

Restructuring a company usually involves cutting costs, such as payroll, or shrinking the company through asset sales. After restructuring is completed, the business operations should become smoother and more economically sound.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company

Restructuring of Company: The company restructuring process

Restructuring a company has many benefits, as well as many reasons for a company to restructure. The benefits of corporate reorganization can be summarized in two words: survival and success. The right financial advisory firm can help business owners deal with these challenging issues, whether they are reorganizing for survival or strategic repositioning for the future.

Your company should select restructuring professionals who are experienced in your specific industry as well. As soon as major problems are discovered, the company should begin restructuring its operations and finances. Early diagnosis allows a company to fully evaluate its options and avoid being cornered.

Corporate business restructuring can be divided into several stages:

  • assessing the organizational restructuring needed;
  • implementing the organizational restructuring;
  • identification of weaknesses;
  • developing detailed plans to correct these weaknesses through restructuring;
  • calculating and securing funding;
  • raising private equity to help improve operations and balance sheet;
  • evaluating the impact of implemented strategies and amending them as necessary;
  • comparing actual financial results to the budget to ensure the restructuring remains on track; and
  • making necessary corrections.

Companies often do not allow enough time to plan and implement restructurings. A successful restructuring of a company’s finances and operations depends on how much upfront assessment work was done, how detailed the plan is, and how well the restructuring strategy is implemented.

Reorganizations can take a long time depending on whether they are reactive or proactive. An example of a reactionary restructuring is when bankruptcy proceedings force a company to make changes within a specified period. A corporate executive officer who recognizes a change in consumer preferences and positions their company to be a leader in tomorrow’s market is an example of being proactive.

In today’s economy, companies face many challenges, and company restructuring can be a short- and long-term answer to maintaining company viability. Company restructuring concerns vendors and consumers, stockholders and financial relationships, employees and inventory, quality control and environmental impact, equipment and technology, and management and marketing.

In addition to the reasons for restructuring, every major restructuring has some of these common elements:

  • an improved balance sheet;
  • reduced tax obligations;
  • divesting underproductive assets;
  • Outsourcing some functions that can be more cost-effectively done by outside suppliers rather than by company employees;
  • reducing debt loads;
  • relocating operations;
  • restructuring marketing, sales, and distribution;
  • renegotiating employment contracts;
  • refinancing debts; and
  • changing the company’s public image.

Restructuring company operations and finances are expected to result in long-term survival, profitability, and viability, regardless of the reasons and the specific steps taken.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company

Restructuring of company summary

I hope this restructuring of company Brandon Blog post was helpful for you. Are you worried about your financial situation because you are dealing with substantial debt challenges as a business owner or as an individual? Call me if you have too much debt. It is not your fault. To deal with financial problems, you have actually only been shown the old ways. These old methods no longer work.

The Ira Smith Team employs new modern methods to get you out of debt while avoiding bankruptcy. Let us help you obtain the relief you deserve.

You are under a lot of pressure. We understand your discomfort. A new approach will be designed for you that is as unique as you and your issues, both financial and emotional. Your burden will be lifted and the dark cloud hanging over you will be blown away. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We are confident that we can assist you right away.

People and businesses facing financial troubles need a realistic lifeline. There is no one-size-fits-all approach with the Ira Smith Team. Even though we are licensed insolvency trustees, we have found that not everyone has to declare bankruptcy in Canada. Most of our clients never declare bankruptcy. We help people and companies avoid bankruptcy.

This is why we can create a new restructuring process for paying off debt that will be custom-built for you. You’ll have a unique experience, just like the economic difficulties and discomfort you are experiencing. If any of these describe you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. Let us get you or your business back on track, driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and eliminating the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

restructuring of company
restructuring of company
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

THE LUCRATIVE RESP BANKRUPTCY PLAN TO DEBT RELIEF

resp bankruptcy
resp bankruptcy

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this Brandon Blog, please scroll to the very bottom of the page and click play on the podcast.

RESP bankruptcy introduction

Parents contribute to their child’s Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) in order to save for their children’s post-secondary education. In contrast to Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs), RESP contributions, or the total amount of all contributions made by the parent(s), is a property that is available for seizure in bankruptcy of the owner of the RESP.

In this Brandon Blog, I explain why an RRSP, unlike an RESP, is mostly exempt from seizure in bankruptcy. RRSPs and a Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF) are exempt from seizure based on a balancing act between federal and provincial laws. The RESP bankruptcy is not exempt. Since I practice in Ontario, I will only comment on the situation there.

Will I lose my RRSP in bankruptcy?

An RRSP’s exemption from seizure in bankruptcy was determined solely by provincial law before 2008. The bankruptcy treatment of RRSPs was not outlined in federal insolvency law. The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), being the federal bankruptcy law in Canada, other than the exception described in the next section, exempted assets contained in either an RRSP or an RRIF from seizure as of July 2008.

Inequality among RRSPs was the reason for changing the BIA. If your RRSP was held at a financial institution, it would not be exempt from seizure if you filed for bankruptcy. But if you held it:

  • at an insurance company; AND
  • the beneficiary designation of your plan was irrevocable as your spouse, child, parent, or grandchild in the event of your death

under the Ontario Insurance Act, the entire RRSP or RRIF was exempt from seizure.

The reason for amending the BIA was twofold:

  • all RRSPs and RRIFs should be treated the same, regardless of which institution holds them; and
  • retirement income should not be lost as a result of financial problems for Canadians who have gone bankrupt, since their fresh start is made possible by the bankruptcy system.

In other words, before July 2008, people who were going to file for bankruptcy and who had a sizeable RRSP with a chartered bank would transfer the RRSP to an insurance company and designate one or more beneficiaries accordingly. In Canada, bankruptcy courts heard many cases about transactions designed to save an RRSP from seizure in bankruptcy.

An insolvency trustee or bankruptcy trustee could replace the named beneficiary of an insurance policy or retirement investment, including RRSPs or RRIFs, with the Estate and then collapse the plan so as to obtain the funds if the beneficiary designation of the policy was revocable. Trustees cannot collapse investments if the beneficiary is irrevocable; such plans constitute exempt assets. A Trustee would have to use it as one of the reasons for opposing a bankrupt’s discharge. Since the person, aware of their insolvency, transferred the asset for no value, the creditors are unable to pursue them. This was is known as a settlement.

The leading case on this issue, which was eventually followed by other jurisdictions, including Ontario, is Royal Bank of Canada v. North American Life Assurance Co., 1992 CanLII 4696 (SK CA), also known as the Ramgotra case. Dr. Ramgotra was bankrupt. A lower court decision regarding what should be done with the RRSP funds, turned into an RRIF, prior to his bankruptcy but when he knew he was in financial trouble, was appealed by the Royal Bank of Canada, having received Court approval to appeal the case instead of the Trustee appealing. The Court of Appeal found that the property had an irrevocable interest in Mrs. Ramgotra despite the transfer of the RRSP being a settlement.

So effective July 2008, the Canadian government amended the BIA so that regardless of which of the financial institutions an RRSP was held, only the contributions made within 12 months of the date of bankruptcy were subject to being lost to the licensed insolvency trustee in bankruptcy.

resp bankruptcy
resp bankruptcy

Registered Education Savings Plans (RESP) and bankruptcy: RESP bankruptcy is not exempt

It is fairly simple to understand why RESP contribution funds are not exempt from seizure in bankruptcy. Since the parent can collapse the plan before maturity, the child does not receive a property interest in the RESP funds. There is therefore no trust or transfer of property to the child. In an RESP bankruptcy, the bankrupt parent’s Trustee can therefore collapse their RESP.

A Trustee must make satisfactory arrangements with the parent, or another relative, to have them pay the Trustee the equivalent amount of funds in the RESP at the date of bankruptcy. This way the Trustee will have recovered on the asset for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate and the bankrupt’s creditors. The bankrupt parent will have done what is necessary in order to avoid the RESP collapsing, losing the government contributions money and not having the plan value go forward for the child.

MP Dan Albas introduced his private member’s bill, An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (property of bankrupt registered education savings plans), on June 3, 2019. In this bill, the purpose was to amend section 67(1)(b.3) of the BIA, so that RESPs receive the same treatment as RRSPs and RRIFs. Like many other private member’s bills that die, this bill has not made any progress.

The thrust is obviously to make sure that other than for contributions made in the 12 months before the date of bankruptcy, a parent should not lose the RESP benefits for their child’s post-secondary school education because of their bankruptcy.

No matter how well-intentioned, one societal reason this Bill C-453 initiative will fail is that an elementary or high school student’s college tuition differs from that of a retiree whose earning years are behind him or her. So to date, there is no federal law that provides creditor protection for a Registered Education Savings Plan.

How to preserve an RESP bankruptcy

Your RESP’s liquidation cash value can be determined by contacting the financial institution holding the funds. The liquidation value does not include the government grant portion of the funds that are only available if the child attends a qualified educational institution.

You can instruct your Trustee to contact the financial institution holding the RESP funds to have the plan cashed out and remit the proceeds (net of government contributions) to the Trustee. This way the asset of the bankruptcy estate will go for the benefit of your creditors if you are not interested in keeping your RESP, which is unlikely in almost every case.

Preserving an RESP bankruptcy can be achieved in two ways. The first is to avoid bankruptcy. No, I don’t mean to tell you not to deal with your financial problems because like it or not, you are in an insolvency scenario. Just don’t use bankruptcy. If your debts not secured by your primary residence are $250,000 or less, you should consider a consumer proposal. You may use the large debtor proposal provisions of the BIA if the debts exceed this amount.

Second, the nonbankrupt spouse, or another relative, can buy the Trustee’s right, title, and interest in the RESP for an amount equal to its liquidation cash value. Thus, the purchaser becomes the owner of the RESP, and the child will continue to benefit from it. In acting in the best interests of unsecured creditors, the Trustee will have recovered the liquidation cash value.

resp bankruptcy
resp bankruptcy

RESP bankruptcy: A very recent divorce example

Having just dealt with this issue last week in one of our personal bankruptcy filings, I am writing about the RESP bankruptcy treatment today. I am the insolvency trustee in a bankruptcy filed by a divorced mother who is now on her own. The failure of her restaurant caused by the COVID-19 pandemic caused her to go bankrupt because of her high debt load.

Her ex-husband and she owned a registered education savings plan for their only child. As part of the no-cost session I provide to anyone contemplating insolvency, I discussed what might happen to an RESP bankruptcy if a bankruptcy is filed.

It was an upsetting experience for the mother. It was clear that she was upset at the prospect of losing half the liquidation proceeds if the plan collapsed. In addition, it was part of the divorce agreement that the jointly owned RESP would be continued for the benefit of the child. We had to create a plan to keep the RESP afloat in the event of RESP bankruptcy. I had no trouble coming up with the plan. What was tricky were the technical details.

This is what we came up with. First, we told her to contact the financial institution where the funds were held and obtain a written statement of the plan’s liquidation cash value. After receiving the written statement from the financial institution, we told her to pass it along to us. She did, and it turned out that the total liquidation value was approximately $26,000. She, therefore, had a half-interest valued at $13,000. We then got her permission to contact her ex-husband and explain the situation.

The ex-husband was informed that his ex-wife would be filing for bankruptcy by us. There would be an RESP bankruptcy. He knew that he had to maintain the RESP. When his ex-wife went bankrupt, we told him that if he purchased our right, title, and interest in the RESP, he would become the sole owner, and the fund would be preserved in an RESP bankruptcy and they could continue contributing to it. It was no problem for him, thankfully.

Because she had actually not yet filed for personal bankruptcy, we had not yet been designated as the licensed insolvency trustee. Our objective was to make sure there wouldn’t be a change of mind despite the divorce condition. Based on Canadian bankruptcy legislation, we scheduled the ex-husband to offer a $13,000 third-party cash guarantee to cover the costs of carrying out the personal bankruptcy.

Furthermore, we agreed that upon the bankruptcy, subject to the approval of the Inspectors, if any were appointed in this summary administration bankruptcy, we would then convert this third-party guarantee into the right, title, and interest as the licensed insolvency trustee of the RESP.

A bill of sale would be issued to him, and we would confirm jointly with the financial institution that he is now the sole owner of the RESP, and they would need to amend their records accordingly. This RESP bankruptcy would have been fully realized as we had gotten the full value of the mother’s half-interest in the RESP. It was a win-win situation for everyone involved.

resp bankruptcy
resp bankruptcy

RESP bankruptcy: What about you?

Hopefully, you see from this Brandon Blog, there are ways to deal with an RRSP both in bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy situations. I hope you found this RESP bankruptcy Brandon Blog informative. Are you in financial distress and a debt crisis? Are you worried about any RRSP or RESP contributions? Do you not have adequate funds to pay your financial obligations as they come due? Are you worried about what will happen to you in retirement? Do you need to find out what your debt relief options and realistic debt relief solutions for your family debt are?

Call the Ira Smith Team today. We have decades and generations of experience assisting people looking for life-changing debt solutions through a debt settlement plan and AVOID the bankruptcy process.

As licensed insolvency professionals, we are the only people accredited, acknowledged and supervised by the federal government to provide insolvency advice and to implement approaches to help you remain out of personal bankruptcy while eliminating your debts. A consumer proposal is a government-approved debt settlement plan to do that. It is an alternative to bankruptcy. We will help you decide on what is best for you between a consumer proposal vs bankruptcy.

Call the Ira Smith Team today so you can eliminate the stress, anxiety, and pain from your life that your financial problems have caused. With the one-of-a-kind roadmap, we develop just for you, we will immediately return you right into a healthy and balanced problem-free life.

You can have a no-cost analysis so we can help you fix your troubles.

Call the Ira Smith Team today. This will allow you to go back to a new healthy and balanced life, Starting Over Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

resp bankruptcy

Call a Trustee Now!