Tag: Ira Smith Trustee

INSOLVENCY ADVISORY SERVICES: STANDOUT HELP DOES NOT NEED HORRIFYING HIGH COSTS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date December 23, 2024

This is our last blog post for 2024. We will be back with more in January. Happy Holidays and a Happy and Healthy New Year to all of our readers.

Insolvency Advisory Services: Introduction

Insolvency is a complex financial situation with significant legal and practical implications. This Brandon’s Blog post explores the key aspects of insolvency law in Canada, drawing on authoritative sources to provide a clear and informative overview.

As the pandemic-induced economic rollercoaster continues, I recently read an article in The Globe & Mail Report on Business about the world of insolvency advisory services. On the one hand, professionals like me help to fix corporate car crashes during crises, seemingly thriving off others’ misfortunes. On the other hand, our services can lead struggling businesses to a new beginning, saving jobs and families. Not just the workers or the owners, but all the businesses that rely upon that one business. Let’s dive into this fascinating landscape where financial insolvency wizardry collides with corporate despair.

What is Insolvency?

Insolvency refers to a situation in which an individual or a company is unable to fulfill their financial obligations as they become due. In Canada, the legal framework offers several mechanisms to manage insolvency, with the goal of balancing the interests of both debtors and creditors.

The Insolvency Legal Framework

Key Legislation in Canadian Insolvency Law

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) serves as the fundamental legislation governing insolvency in Canada. This federal law establishes the protocols for addressing bankruptcies and proposals, ensuring a fair and systematic approach for all parties involved.

In conjunction with the BIA, the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) offers a framework specifically designed for the restructuring of insolvent corporations, particularly those with debts exceeding $5 million. Both the BIA and CCAA are administered by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB), which operates under the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. The OSB is essential in overseeing the insolvency process, licensing insolvency professionals, and maintaining public records related to insolvency matters.

Provincial Laws and Their Impact on Insolvency

Federal legislation primarily regulates the fundamental aspects of insolvency in Canada; however, provincial laws significantly influence this area, particularly concerning property and civil rights. Specific issues addressed by provincial legislation include:

The establishment of security interests The handling of absconding debtors Regulations surrounding bulk sales Provisions related to fraudulent conveyances

This interaction between federal and provincial laws results in a comprehensive legal framework for managing insolvency in Canada.

Roles and Responsibilities

Licensed Insolvency Trustees are licensed professionals authorized by the OSB to administer bankruptcies, handle proposals, and act as monitors or receivers. Insolvency Trustees play a pivotal role in guiding debtors and creditors through the insolvency process, ensuring compliance with legal requirements.

Access to Insolvency Information

The OSB provides a searchable database of bankruptcy and insolvency records that is available to the public for a fee. This database includes detailed information on various insolvency proceedings, such as bankruptcies, proposals, receiverships, and proceedings under the CCAA. Furthermore, the publication “Insolvency Insider Canada” offers current news and legal updates on trends related to insolvency in Canada.

Insolvency Advisory Services: The Profit Motive

Have you ever thought about how much insolvency advisers bill out per hour? The article stated that downtown Bay Street bankruptcy legal counsel and licensed insolvency trustees charge up to $1,300 per hour for their services. Are these fees justified? Or are they merely a symptom of a broken system?

Understanding Senior Claims

In insolvency cases, fees charged by advisers are classified as senior claims. This means they get paid before other creditors. When a company admits insolvency and makes a filing under either the BIA or the CCAA, these advisers work hard to navigate the complex legal landscape.

But who benefits the most? According to The Globe & Mail article:

Adviser fees have been climbing steadily over the years. While companies going through insolvency struggle with debt, they may very well be paying unnecessarily high fees.

The Financial Implications

What does this mean for businesses? When firms find themselves in the dire straits of insolvency, they owe a mountain of money. The debt piles up, and the cost of hiring pricey advisers only adds to their woes. In many cases, legal and financial advisers are feasting on the carcass of struggling companies.

The Cold Reality

This narrative reveals the harsh truth: while companies drown in debt, they may very well be paying too much for their advisers. Insolvency advisers are essential for navigating bankruptcies and restructurings, but many companies may be paying too much for the help they need. No doubt there are certain regulated industries or overly complex businesses that need the minds and skills of the downtown Bay Street advisers. But that is not the majority of Canadian businesses.

Insolvency Case Study: Do Our Fees Hold Up In Court?

We are involved in the liquidation case of two companies. Certain stakeholders, including the Estate Trustees of the Estate of a deceased shareholder, disagreed with the fees we and our legal counsel charged. A court hearing concerning our fees as a court-appointed liquidator and those of our legal counsel was held in the winding-up case.

As liquidator we sought approval for substantial fees which were challenged by the respondents, shareholders of the companies, as disproportionate to the assets involved. The judge considered various factors including the complexity of the case, the time spent, and the results achieved, ultimately approving the fees, citing prior court approvals of the liquidator’s actions and rejecting the respondents’ arguments as a collateral attack. The decision highlights the principles of fairness and reasonableness in determining court officer fees.

What factors influenced the assessment of the fairness of our liquidation fees?

The court evaluated several factors to assess the fairness of the liquidation fees charged by the Liquidator and their counsel. Ultimately, the judge ruled in our favour based on the following considerations:

Nature, Extent, and Value of Assets: The Liquidator was responsible for liquidating two companies that presented moderately complex tax and accounting challenges.
Complications and Challenges Encountered: The Liquidator faced numerous obstacles, including concurrent family and estate proceedings, conflicts between the Estate Trustees and another shareholder, and multiple adjournments. Additionally, delays in court proceedings instigated by the Estate Trustees contributed to increased costs.

These delays included:

The conversion of the liquidation proceedings from voluntary to court-supervised, happened almost a year after the liquidation proceedings began.
The proposed sale of was delayed because the Estate Trustees continued accepting new orders despite the initial agreement to not accept new orders during the voluntary liquidation. They requested time to procure an offer to sell the company.
Further delays were caused when the Estate Trustees proposed to remove one of the companies from the liquidation but failed to do so. The Liquidator was then required to notify customers that business operations would cease once current orders were completed.
The Estate Trustees switched counsel, which caused adjournments and increased time spent on the case.

The degree of assistance provided by the company. The Estate Trustees were confrontational and slow to provide information, which made the Liquidator’s job more difficult.
The time spent. The liquidation proceedings were protracted due to issues between the stakeholders.
The Liquidator’s knowledge, experience, and skill. Both the Liquidator and its counsel were found to have significant knowledge and experience in corporate and insolvency matters.
Diligence and thoroughness. The Liquidator produced three comprehensive reports and affidavits for the motion. Their invoices provided a clear understanding of the thoroughness of their work.
The responsibilities assumed. The Liquidator was responsible for extensive activities, which were outlined in its reports and approved by the court. These activities included monitoring business operations, selling one of the companies’ primary assets, engaging various professionals, establishing and monitoring a claims process, and taking steps to wind down an active business.
The results of the efforts. The Liquidator successfully converted the voluntary liquidation into a court-supervised process. They managed the companies’ finances, initiated a claims process, and made interim distributions.
The cost of comparable services when performed prudently and economically. The rates charged by the Liquidator and its counsel were comparable to those charged by other providers in the Toronto market. Although the respondents argued that the fees were disproportionate to the value of the businesses, the court ultimately ruled that the fees were fair and reasonable given the factors outlined above.

The Mechanics of Corporate Insolvency

Understanding corporate insolvency and bankruptcy law can feel like navigating a maze. Why is there a need for specialized expertise in this field? Let’s dive into this complex world.

1. The Ins and Outs of Bankruptcy Law

Bankruptcy law is not just a set of rules; it’s a detailed framework designed to address financial distress. At the core is the legal process that aims to protect debtors while ensuring creditors get as much back as possible. This is where specialized knowledge comes in. It is critical to understand the nuances, strategies and strategizing, litigation processes, and the potential financial ramifications of each decision.

Think about it: would you trust someone who has only dabbled in the subject to handle a significant financial crisis? I wouldn’t. Expertise in this area enhances efficiency. A knowledgeable insolvency adviser can streamline the process and avoid costly missteps.

Also, this specialized knowledge often leads to reduced competition. But there are alternatives; there are experienced insolvency professionals who operate in lower-cost boutique firms like mine. Their offices may not be as fancy as the Bay Street crowd, but, what do you want to pay for. Their knowledge and expertise or their office furnishings and high rent?

2. A Day in the Life of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee Adviser

What does a licensed insolvency trustee adviser actually do day-to-day? Most of our time on corporate restructuring files involves analyzing company financials and negotiating with creditors. Navigating through heaps of paperwork is part of the gig, too. Advisors must also attend court hearings and meetings with various stakeholders, always looking to find the best possible outcome.

Typical Tasks Include:

Drafting essential documents and filings.
Conducting asset evaluations.
Coordinating with legal teams and financial analysts.

On any given day, a licensed insolvency trustee adviser may switch gears between solving legal puzzles and crunching numbers. It’s a mixture of law, finance, and a bit of psychology when negotiating to save distressed businesses.

3. Key Players in Corporate Insolvency

Corporate insolvency involves several key roles, each contributing to the process in distinct ways:

Legal Counsel: Legal professionals represent the interests of their clients and assist in navigating the complex legal landscape associated with insolvency proceedings. Court-
Court-Appointed Receivers/Insolvency Trustees: These individuals are tasked with managing the assets of the company during the insolvency process, ensuring proper handling and distribution according to legal guidelines.
Monitors: Monitors oversee the restructuring process to prevent the company from entering receivership or bankruptcy. They ensure that the company adheres to all legal requirements throughout the process.

Each of these roles is essential in facilitating a fair and orderly insolvency process. Together, they work towards achieving the best possible financial recovery while upholding the integrity of the legal framework.

4. Why Experience Really Matters

Experience can make or break an insolvency case. A seasoned insolvency professional will have seen various crises unfold, equipping them with the knowledge of what strategies work. They can anticipate challenges and react swiftly to changes in circumstances.

Also noteworthy is that judges usually have a high regard for seasoned practitioners. The more experienced the insolvency adviser, the more likely they will get favourable outcomes – and that’s crucial. After all, when dealing with millions on the line, would you want a novice watching your back?

Ultimately, the world of corporate insolvency is a ripe field for those with the right set of skills and experience. But remember, it’s about guiding businesses through some of the most turbulent waters they face.

The Ripple Effect of Rising Insolvency Advisories

In today’s economic climate, the rise in insolvency advisory fees is an issue that’s hard to ignore. It touches everyone – from entreprenurial businesses trying to stay afloat to investors scratching their heads over diminished returns.

Entrepreneurial Businesses and Higher Fees

As advisory fees rise, entrepreneurs are generally shut out of being able to restructure. That is one of the reasons why Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. was established. We offer the highest quality of service that rivals any Bay Street licensed insolvency trustee firm. However, due to our unique boutique formula, our hourly rates are slightly less than half of those charged by downtown Toronto Bay Street insolvency professionals.

We know that many entrepreneurs find themselves squeezed by Bay Street hourly rates, unable to afford the very advice meant to save their companies. That is why we can earn a fair return for our services in running our insolvency advisory business, without killing off the company we are trying to save because of higher fees. Downtown firms don’t think we can, but with the combined experience of Ira and Brandon Smith totalling over 60 years, we know how to and have done complex corporate restructuring. We are also one of those experienced seasoned firms that judges recognize as such. Our clients also give us 5-star reviews!

The Role of Insolvency Advisers

Despite the high costs, insolvency advisers play a crucial role in reviving struggling companies. When firms like Groupe Dynamite sought protection during tough times, savvy advisers helped them navigate those murky waters. Their expertise can mean the difference between a successful turnaround and a grim closure.

Lending and Creditworthiness

But there’s a catch. Rising advisory fees may also undermine a company’s creditworthiness. Imagine a lender reviewing a firm burdened by steep fees. They might hesitate, fearing that funds directed to advisers are funds that won’t go toward debt repayment. Essentially, high fees could close the door on future lending.

Myths Surrounding Formal Insolvency Proceedings

It is essential to clarify some misconceptions regarding the beneficiaries of formal insolvency proceedings. A common belief is that companies undergoing restructuring are guaranteed to be saved; however, this is not always the reality. Once advisers get to work, there are situations where we realize that most of the company isn’t salvageable. This emphasizes the importance of critically assessing the situation as quickly as possible so that unnecessary steps are not taken using up scarce resources.

In certain cases, such as that of Groupe Dynamite case, advisers have successfully revitalized struggling brands. Conversely, there are situations where advisers do earn fees from a business that ultimately cannot be sustained. Therefore, an effective insolvency assessment must identify these challenges from the outset in every case. It is crucial to ensure that a successful restructuring does not come at the expense of overwhelming financial burdens.

A candid and transparent dialogue between the insolvency advisor and company management is necessary before initiating any restructuring efforts. This collaboration is vital for determining the viability of the company and the best course of action moving forward.

The Ethical Dilemma In Insolvency Advisory

Navigating the complexities of insolvency involves not only strategic calculations but also significant ethical considerations. A critical question arises: at what point does one profit from another’s misfortune? The high fees charged by downtown Toronto Bay Street insolvency advisers, which can exceed $1,300 per hour, certainly prompts the question. This raises an important discussion about whether these professionals are genuinely aiding in recovery or merely capitalizing on the difficulties faced by their clients.

Insolvency advisory fees are typically structured to be front-loaded, meaning that the initial phases of an insolvency case require significantly more effort from advisers. This is necessary as they work to thoroughly understand the various issues at hand. Consequently, the execution of the devised strategy tends to be less intensive than its formulation.

This structure can exacerbate the financial strain on already struggling businesses, leading to concerns about the fairness of such practices. Therefore, transparency regarding fees is not merely a preferable quality but an essential component of ethical practice in insolvency advisory. Business owners deserve clarity to make informed decisions during challenging times.

Finding Balance

Achieving a balance between risk and reward is essential for long-term success in business. While it can be tempting to chase higher gains, it’s important to carefully consider the potential consequences. Understanding the balance between your business’s viability and the associated advisory fees is key to making informed decisions.

As we navigate the challenges ahead, let’s stay vigilant and compassionate, ensuring we take care of our businesses and those who support us in maintaining them.

I encourage you to take a moment to reflect on these points and prepare not just for success, but for stability in the ever-changing marketplace. Together, we can build a resilient foundation for the future.

Insolvency in Canada: FAQs

1. What is insolvency and how does it impact businesses in Canada?

Insolvency happens when an individual or a company is unable to fulfill their financial obligations when they are due. This situation can have important legal and practical implications, and it is guided by a detailed set of federal and provincial laws in Canada. For businesses facing insolvency, there are several potential outcomes, such as increasing debt, legal actions from creditors, and the possibility of closure. However, it’s important to remember that there are options available to help navigate this challenging situation, and seeking advice from financial professionals can be a valuable step forward.

2. What key legislation governs insolvency in Canada?

The BIA serves as the primary federal legislation governing bankruptcies and proposals in Canada. It establishes a structured process to protect the interests of all parties involved in insolvency proceedings. In contrast, the CCAA is specifically designed for the restructuring of insolvent corporations, with debts that exceed $5 million. Additionally, provincial laws contribute to the framework surrounding bankruptcy, particularly in matters related to property rights and fraudulent conveyances.

3. What role do Licensed Insolvency Trustees play in insolvency proceedings?

Licensed Insolvency Trustees are professionals authorized by the OSB to oversee bankruptcy proceedings, manage proposals, and act as receivers or monitors. Their responsibilities include offering guidance to both debtors and creditors throughout the legal processes, ensuring compliance with applicable regulations, and working to balance the interests of all parties involved.

4. Why are insolvency advisory fees considered a concern, especially for entrepreneurial smaller businesses?

Insolvency advisory services, though crucial in navigating complex legal and financial landscapes, often come with high hourly rates. This can be a significant burden for struggling businesses, particularly smaller enterprises, as these fees are prioritized as senior claims, meaning they are paid before other creditors. Some argue that these fees add to the financial strain and may not always guarantee a successful recovery.

5. What are some alternatives to high-priced Bay Street insolvency firms?

While large Bay Street firms dominate the insolvency landscape, boutique firms like ours offer comparable expertise and experience at lower hourly rates. Smaller Firms like ours prioritize practical solutions and cost-effectiveness, all delivered with a large dose of empathy. This makes us a viable alternative for businesses seeking quality advice without exorbitant fees.

6. How can businesses prepare for potential insolvency and mitigate risks?

Organizations can effectively mitigate the risks associated with insolvency by prioritizing strong financial management practices. This entails diligent monitoring of cash flow, diversifying revenue sources, maintaining adequate reserves, and establishing a contingency plan to address potential financial challenges. Timely identification of warning signs, along with seeking guidance from qualified professionals, can greatly enhance the likelihood of recovery.

7. What ethical considerations arise in the field of insolvency advisory services?

The power dynamics and the potential for substantial fees in insolvency advisory raise significant ethical considerations regarding the profit derived from a company’s financial difficulties. It is crucial to ensure transparency in fee structures and demonstrate a sincere commitment to prioritizing the client’s best interests over the pursuit of maximum profit. Such practices are essential for upholding ethical standards within the industry.

Insolvency Conclusion: Navigating the Stormy Waters Ahead

As I reflect on the unpredictability of the business world, it strikes me how everything can change in an instant. What appears stable today can be rocky tomorrow. We’ve seen thriving companies face insolvency as consumer habits shift overnight. There are many such examples. They soared high, only to crash due to rising interest rates impacting consumer spending. It’s a stark reminder that no one is immune to the tides of economic downturn.

For business owners, the key is preparation. Have you considered what your plans are if faced with potential insolvency? It’s essential to develop mitigation strategies. Keeping an eye on cash flow, diversifying income streams, and maintaining a strong financial buffer can save a business from downfall. By creating a robust financial foundation, we can cushion ourselves against unforeseen storms.

I hope you enjoyed this insolvency Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief freedom using processes that are a bankruptcy alternative.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

Tags advisory services, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy proceeding, BIA, business insolvency, CCAA, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, court appointed receiver, financial restructuring, formal insolvency proceedings, insolvency process, Ira Smith Trustee, legal advice, legal counsel, legal fees, Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, OSB, public record

Brandon Blog Post

FINANCIAL BURDENS FROM MEDICAL EXPENSES: OUR COMPREHENSIVE AND ALARMING GUIDE FOR INSOLVENCY TRUSTEES AND ALL CANADIANS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date December 16, 2024

financial burdens

Financial Burdens: Introduction

Receiving a cancer diagnosis is a life-changing experience, In addition to the emotional challenges, many people face significant financial burdens. I recently came across an inspiring story about a financial adviser from Toronto who encountered this difficult situation after being diagnosed with head and neck cancer. His journey sheds light on the often-overlooked economic impact of cancer in Canada, reminding us of the importance of support and resources during such challenging times.

Financial Burdens: Signs of Financial Distress

Financial stress can show up in many different ways, and recognizing the signs early can help you take proactive steps to manage your situation. Here are some common indicators of stress created by financial burdens to keep an eye on:

Late or missed payments: If you find yourself missing payments on bills, loans, or credit cards, it could lead to financial stress and negatively affect your credit score due to late fees.
High credit utilization: Using more than 30% of your available credit can suggest financial strain and may also impact your credit score.
Overdrafts or NSF fees: Frequently overdrawing your bank account or incurring non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees can indicate financial burdens.
Collection agency calls: Receiving calls from collection agencies can be quite stressful and may signal that you are facing financial burdens.
High-interest debt: Carrying a significant amount of high-interest debt, like credit card balances, can create financial burdens and make it tougher to pay off what you owe.
Insufficient emergency fund: Lacking a sufficient emergency fund can lead to increased financial anxiety in times of unexpected expenses.

If you notice any of these signs, it’s important to take action quickly to help alleviate financial stress and avoid further complications. Seeking assistance from a credit counselor or a licensed insolvency trustee can be a great step towards creating a manageable financial plan to reduce your financial burdens. They can help guide you in reducing stress and finding a path forward. Remember, you’re not alone in this, and there are resources available to support you.

Recognizing the sandwich generation’s challenges

The term “sandwich generation” describes adults who find themselves balancing the responsibilities of caring for their aging parents while also supporting their own children. This group typically includes individuals in their 40s, 50s, and 60s, who may experience the pressures of managing the financial and emotional needs of multiple generations. It’s important to recognize that this situation can present unique challenges that may affect their financial stability, mental health, and overall well-being. Understanding these dynamics can help in finding effective strategies and support systems to navigate this complex phase of life.

Financial Burdens

One of the most significant challenges faced by the sandwich generation are the financial burdens of caring for multiple generations. They may be responsible for:

Supporting their aging parents with living expenses, medical bills, and other costs
Paying for their children’s education, extracurricular activities, and other expenses
Managing their own household expenses, including mortgage or rent, utilities, and food

This financial burdens can lead to increased stress, anxiety, and feelings of overwhelm. The sandwich generation may need to make difficult decisions about how to allocate their resources, potentially sacrificing their own financial security and retirement savings.

Emotional Toll

Caring for aging parents and children can impose a considerable emotional burden on the sandwich generation, which encompasses individuals who simultaneously support both their elderly parents and their children. This group may experience a range of challenging emotions, including:

Guilt: They may feel inadequate for not being able to provide sufficient support to their elderly parents or children.
Overwhelm: The vast responsibility of managing caregiving duties for multiple generations can feel daunting.
Isolation: They might experience a sense of disconnection from friends and social networks due to their caregiving commitments.
Stress and Anxiety: The financial burdens and emotional demands of caregiving can lead to heightened stress levels and anxiety.

These emotional challenges can result in significant consequences, including burnout, depression, and anxiety, which can adversely affect mental health and overall well-being. It is essential to recognize and address these issues to support the sandwich generation in their caregiving roles.

Practical Solutions

The sandwich generation faces a unique set of challenges, but there are many practical solutions to help lighten the load. Here are some helpful strategies to consider:

Create a Budget: Take some time to outline your expenses and prioritize them. This can help ensure that everyone’s needs—yours, your children’s, and your parents’—are being met.
Seek Support: Don’t hesitate to reach out to family, friends, and community resources. Building a support network can make a significant difference in managing your responsibilities.
Consider Professional Help: Hiring caregivers or home health aides can alleviate some caregiving duties, allowing you to focus on other important areas of your life.
Practice Self-Care: Remember to take regular breaks and engage in activities that help you relax and recharge. Taking care of your own well-being is crucial for reducing stress and anxiety.
Seek Counseling: If you’re feeling overwhelmed, consider talking to a professional counselor or therapist. They can provide valuable support in navigating emotional challenges.

By recognizing the pressures of being part of the sandwich generation and exploring these practical solutions, you can better manage the demands of caring for multiple generations while also prioritizing your own health and happiness. Remember, taking care of yourself is not only important for you but also for those you care for.

*Financial Burden**s: The Financial Implications of Cancer Treatment*

Cancer isn’t just a health issue; it’s a financial crisis for many. A recent report from the Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) reveals that the economic burden of cancer care in Canada is an astonishing $37.7 billion. This staggering figure encompasses both direct treatment costs and indirect losses that can devastate families.

Cancer impacts not only health but also finances for many individuals and families. According to a recent report from the Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), the economic burden of cancer care in Canada amounts to approximately $37.7 billion. This significant figure includes both direct costs associated with treatment and indirect costs that can have a profound effect on families.

The Financial Weight on Patients and Caregivers

Patients and their caregivers bear a significant part of this burden. They cover about 20%, which equates to approximately $7.5 billion. You might wonder, what does this mean in practical terms?

Many patients face average costs nearing $33,000 each.
Costs can include lost wages, which affects the entire family’s income.
Travel expenses to treatment facilities can be unexpectedly high.
Nutritional supplements and other out-of-pocket expenses add to the financial burdens.

As Dr. Jennifer Gillis notes,

“The financial toll of cancer can be as damaging as the disease itself.”

Think about it: cancer may take away your health, but it can also take away your financial security.

The *Hidden Cost**s of Cancer Care*

When discussing cancer, we often focus purely on treatments and outcomes. But what about the hidden costs? Each year, Canada sees 247,100 new cancer cases. The first year post-diagnosis is usually the most expensive for patients. Why? Because so many expenses pile up right away.

Furthermore, the complexities of the healthcare system can lead to different coverage across provinces. For instance, while hospital treatments are covered, many patients still face out-of-pocket costs for medications, especially crucial cancer drugs. Couples in lower-income households and those living in remote areas can suffer the most. Often, they must travel great distances for medical care, adding more financial burdens.

Understanding the Data

The report’s data paints a clear picture:

$37.7 billion – total economic burden
$7.5 billion – financial responsibility of patients and caregivers
$33,000 – average cost incurred by cancer patients

Chart of Financial Impact

Category	Amount (in billions)
Total Economic Burden	$37.7
Patients’ and Caregivers’ Contribution	$7.5
Average Cost Per Patient	$0.033

Ultimately, these numbers reflect painful realities. They underscore that cancer’s impact extends beyond the individual to families and communities. You might find yourself asking, how can we better support those affected? These stories illustrate the profound need for change in how society addresses cancer care and its associated costs.

Financial Burdens: The Personal Story Reality Behind the Numbers

Every story has a unique face, and in the realm of cancer care, that face can often be seen in individuals like this inspiring financial adviser. As a survivor, his journey goes beyond simply overcoming cancer; it reveals the deep and meaningful effects the disease has on real lives. His experiences can offer valuable insights and hope to others navigating similar challenges.

His Profile

This Toronto-based financial adviser was diagnosed with head and neck cancer in 2014. His struggle wasn’t merely against cancer itself; it was against the societal and financial concerns that came with it. Imagine juggling important business meetings while undergoing outpatient treatment for Stage 4 cancer. Each day was a balancing act as he wore a suit and makeup to conceal the effects of his treatment. He lost nearly two years of income. That’s time and money he can never recover.

The Impact of Income Loss

When families experience income loss, it can feel overwhelming, and many strive to stay afloat during tough times. Dependents, such as children and family members with special needs, can be particularly affected by these changes. For instance, in families like his, where there is a spouse and a child with autism, the challenges can be even more pronounced.

As financial burdens mount and savings are depleted, it’s important to recognize that this situation goes beyond just numbers—it profoundly impacts daily life. Understanding and addressing these challenges can help families navigate through this difficult period and find support when they need it most.

Struggles with Treatments

Managing a career while receiving treatment is a massive challenge. Treatments can leave individuals exhausted, even unable to perform everyday tasks. You might ask yourself, “How does one perform at work when battling something so overwhelmingly consuming?” He persevered. But many are not as fortunate.

Emotional Toll of Financial Stress

The financial burdens of healthcare can significantly impact overall health and well-being. The emotional weight of stress can often feel overwhelming. As one individual shared, “Being told you’re cancer-free doesn’t erase the struggles that follow.”

This perspective resonates with many and underscores the important connection between health and financial stability. It’s essential to recognize that treatments extend beyond just medical procedures; they also affect quality of life, daily routines, and overall wellness.

With the average cancer patient facing costs of approximately $33,000, it’s vital to tackle these challenges head-on. Unfortunately, many individuals find themselves having to make tough choices, leading to missed appointments and unfilled prescriptions due to financial limitations. This ongoing struggle calls for greater awareness and proactive solutions.

As you reflect on this journey, consider the wider implications of cancer care in our society. It’s more than just an individual battle; it’s a shared challenge that we all need to address together. Your support and understanding can make a significant difference in the lives of those affected.

Financial Burdens: The Economic Disparities in Cancer Care

Cancer care in Canada reflects a troubling reality—economic disparities. It’s not just a health issue; it becomes financial burdens for many.

How Income Affects Access to Treatment

It’s important to recognize how income can impact the quality of medical care you receive. For those on a lower income, accessing necessary treatments can often feel out of reach, creating tough choices between essential expenses and crucial health procedures. This situation can seem quite unfair.

Many patients are on the lookout for resources to help. While about 60% of Canadians have private health insurance, this doesn’t always ensure complete coverage. If you find yourself in a lower-income bracket, you may encounter considerable out-of-pocket costs.

Challenges faced by lower-income households

Here are some challenges that lower-income households frequently face:

Transportation Issues: Limited funds can make it difficult to travel to medical appointments.
Time Off Work: Taking time off means losing wages, which can add to the financial burdens.
Access to Specialized Care: Those in remote areas may struggle to find the specialized care they need, often having to travel long distances.

For individuals living in remote communities, the journey for treatment can be particularly challenging, turning travel into a financial strain. It’s understandable to feel overwhelmed by the demands of travelling for care, as it can be physically exhausting as well.

Remember, it’s okay to seek support and explore available resources that can make navigating these challenges a bit easier. You’re not alone in this, and there are avenues available to help you access the care you need.

Travel: A Hidden Cost

Every journey to a medical appointment can take a toll. You have to consider fuel costs, accommodation, and meals. Those add up quickly. For many, this is a critical issue. It turns into a vicious cycle—missing appointments because you can’t afford to go.

Financial Constraints and Health Outcomes

Financial burdens can significantly impact health outcomes, a reality underscored by troubling statistics. Patients who cannot afford treatments are more likely to delay or forgo necessary care.

“Financial constraints can lead to worse health outcomes, a gap we must bridge.” – Dr. Jennifer Gillis

This highlights the serious implications of missed appointments or ineffective treatments, which can have severe consequences for individuals’ health.The relationship between socioeconomic status and health is crucial to understand. Recognizing these challenges can enhance empathy for those affected, particularly in contexts like cancer treatment, where financial stability is often intertwined with the ability to receive adequate care. Engaging in this conversation is essential for addressing these critical issues.

Financial Burdens: The Complexity of Cancer Drug Coverage in Canada

The issue of cancer drug coverage in Canada is complex and can be quite confusing. While it might be assumed that hospital treatments are fully covered for patients, this is not entirely accurate. Although public funding generally supports hospital care, the coverage for cancer drugs varies significantly across provinces, which can lead to substantial financial burdens for many patients.

Understanding Public Funding and Drug Coverage

In Canada, the responsibility for drug coverage lies with provincial governments. While treatments provided in hospitals are typically covered by public funds, reimbursement for cancer medications is often contingent upon the province in which a patient resides. This disparity can create frustration, particularly for patients who find that their neighbors receive different levels of support. As a result, not all individuals have equal access to essential medications.

The Role of Private Health Insurance

Around 60% of Canadians have private health insurance, which may seem reassuring. However, even with such coverage, many individuals still encounter out-of-pocket expenses for medications. The costs associated with cancer drugs can be significant, leading to financial strain for patients and their families.

Financial Burdens and Advocating for Change: The CCS’s Call to Action

You may not realize the heavy burden cancer can be. It’s not just about the diagnosis. Consider the shocking financial strains that hit patients as they navigate their treatment journey. According to the CCS, the economic impact of cancer is staggering. A whopping $37.7 billion is expected to be incurred in Canada alone. Of that, patients and their caregivers are facing a heavy burden of around $7.5 billion—that’s almost 20% of the total costs.

So, what can be done? The answer lies in making systemic changes to light the path ahead. Here are some critical proposals:

Systemic changes needed: To lessen patient financial burdens, strong reforms are needed in how cancer care is funded and managed.
Plans for a refundable caregiver tax credit: This initiative could provide substantial relief to those supporting patients.
Proposed better job protections: Ensuring that patients don’t have to choose between keeping their jobs and undergoing treatment is essential.
Support for treatment-related expenses: There should be enhanced assistance for travel, accommodation, and other costs that arise during medical care.

Community Involvement and Advocacy

The CCS is not just pointing out problems—they are actively pushing for solutions. You can get involved! Their ongoing petition efforts are essential to spark change on a larger scale. As Dr. Jennifer Gillis of CCS states,

“We must work together to confront these overwhelming financial pressures faced by cancer patients.”

This quote underscores the collaborative effort required to tackle this issue head-on.

Why should you care? Consider the numbers: With a projected 23% increase in societal costs over the next decade due to the aging population, the urgency for reforms becomes clearer. If this trend continues, how will it affect families like this Toronto financial adviser, who also experienced firsthand the devastating impact that cancer can impose on financial stability?

So, what will you do? Community support has the power to change lives. Whether you volunteer, donate, or simply spread the word, every effort counts. Engaging with advocacy initiatives can lay the groundwork for actionable solutions that alleviate financial burdens on cancer patients. Remember, your involvement could be the difference.

In conclusion, advocating for change is not just a lofty idea—it is a necessity. By supporting organizations like the Canadian Cancer Society and participating in their initiatives, you’re not just helping one person, but an entire community facing these challenges. Together, we can lighten the load for those battling cancer, fostering a society where financial burdens do not overshadow the fight for health.

Financial Burdens: Strategies for Managing Financial Distress

Tips for Managing Debt

Create a Budget: Begin by tracking your income and expenses to gain a clear understanding of your financial flow. Develop a budget that includes all essential expenses, debt payments, and savings allocations.
Prioritize Debt: Concentrate on paying off high-interest debt first, such as credit card balances. It may also be beneficial to consider consolidating multiple debts into a single loan with a lower interest rate.
Pay More Than the Minimum: Making only the minimum payments on debts can extend the payoff period and increase the total interest paid. Aim to pay more than the minimum to effectively reduce the principal balance.
Consider Debt Consolidation: If you have various debts with high interest rates, consolidating them into one loan with a lower interest rate may simplify your payments and reduce overall costs.
Cut Expenses: Review your spending habits to identify areas where you can reduce expenses. Redirect the savings towards debt repayment to expedite your journey to financial freedom.

Building a Stronger Financial Future

Start Saving: Strive to save at least 10% to 20% of your monthly income. Setting up automatic transfers to your savings account can streamline the saving process and encourage consistent contributions.

FAQ: Financial Burdens of Medical Costs

What are “pocket expenditures” in the context of healthcare?
Pocket expenditures refer to the out-of-pocket costs that individuals incur for medical care. This includes expenses such as deductibles, co-pays, and services not covered by insurance. These costs can have a significant impact on personal finances and may lead to financial burdens, particularly for individuals with chronic conditions or limited financial resources.
How do medical costs affect individuals and families?
Medical costs can impose a substantial financial burdens on both individuals and families, resulting in several key issues:
- Financial stress and anxiety: The burden of medical bills can adversely affect mental health and overall quality of life.
- Debt accumulation: High medical expenses often necessitate the use of credit cards or loans, which can lead to increased debt and potential long-term financial instability.
- Difficult financial choices: Individuals may face tough decisions between covering essential expenses such as housing, food, and utilities versus managing medical expenses.

Financial Burdens: Conclusion

I hope you enjoyed this financial burdens Brandon’s Blog and how even with universal health care in Canada cancer patients must incur out of pocket medical costs. Do you or your company have too much debt because of medical costs or any other reason? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Brandon Blog Post

NAVIGATING CORP BANKRUPTCY IN CANADA: OUR COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE FOR BUSINESS OWNERS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date December 2, 2024

corp bankruptcy

Corp Bankruptcy Introduction

Running a business can be tough. Sometimes, despite your best efforts, your company may face overwhelming financial difficulties. When business debts pile up and staying afloat seems impossible, it might be time to consider corp bankruptcy proceedings. This can be stressful and complex, but understanding your options is crucial for making the best decisions for your company and yourself.

This guide aims to demystify Canada’s different types of company insolvency proceedings. We’ll break down the intricacies of bankruptcy, Division I proposals, and receivership, providing clarity on their implications for debt resolution and your business’s future.

Understanding What Is Corp Bankruptcy

In Canada, corp bankruptcy, also known as commercial bankruptcy or business bankruptcy, is a legal process that allows the incorporated legal entity unable to pay their debts to seek relief by filing bankruptcy. It provides a framework for either liquidating the company and distributing assets to creditors or reorganizing the business to become financially stable again.

Corp bankruptcy is fundamentally different from personal bankruptcy, which pertains to individuals, including sole proprietorships and partnerships. While personal bankruptcy is designed to assist individuals in obtaining a fresh start by addressing their personal assets, corporate bankruptcy seeks to facilitate either an orderly dissolution of the company or its restructuring.

Navigating this process necessitates specialized knowledge. A Licensed Insolvency Trustee, who is a federally licensed professional, plays an essential role in guiding you through the proceedings. They ensure compliance with the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and other relevant regulations while effectively managing a variety of financial matters.

Types of Corp Bankruptcy Proceedings in Canada

Canadian law offers two primary avenues for addressing the corp bankruptcy process:

Liquidation

This involves closing down the business, selling its assets, and using the proceeds to pay creditors. It’s a final step, signifying the end of the company’s operations.

Reorganization

The objective of this initiative is to strategically restructure the company’s financial and operational frameworks, thereby ensuring its continued viability. Reorganization serves as a critical opportunity for businesses facing financial challenges, enabling them to navigate and potentially surmount their economic obstacles.

Let’s explore each type in greater detail.

Liquidation under Corp Bankruptcy

Liquidation is the process of winding up a company that can no longer meet its financial obligations. It follows a structured corporate bankruptcy process outlined in the BIA, which bears similarities to Chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code.

Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of liquidation:

Decision to File:
The board of directors makes the difficult decision to file for bankruptcy
. Assignment in Bankruptcy: A director, or the sole director, signs the required bankruptcy documents to make the company’s assignment into bankruptcy
Appointment of the Licensed Insolvency Trustee: An insolvency trustee is appointed to oversee the process.
Asset Transfer: All company assets are transferred to the Licensed Insolvency Trustee, which then manages and sells them. Distribution to Creditors: Proceeds from asset sales, after the cost of the corp bankruptcy proceedings, are distributed to creditors based on a predetermined legal priority.
Secured creditors, such as lenders with liens on company assets, generally have priority over unsecured creditors.
The company ceases to operate: Once assets are distributed, although the bankrupt corporation is not legally dissolved, it no longer operates.

Depending on whether the company is federally or provincially incorporated, eventually, the appropriate government authority will cancel the company’s charter.

Liquidation can be a challenging process, but it provides a structured way to wind down a company facing insurmountable financial difficulties and allows for a fair distribution of assets to creditors.

“The closure of a business doesn’t just impact balance sheets, it impacts lives.”

Reorganization: A Path to Recovery

Reorganization, often known as “bankruptcy protection,” provides struggling but viable businesses an opportunity to restructure their debts and operations, helping them avoid shutting down completely.

In Canada, there are two main legal options for corporate reorganization:

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA): This federal law is designed for larger corporations with debts over $5 million. The CCAA process is supervised by the court to ensure fairness and transparency.
Division I Proposal under the BIA: This option is geared towards smaller businesses that don’t meet the debt threshold required for the CCAA.

Both of these processes are similar to Chapter 11 reorganizations in the US Bankruptcy Code, offering a structured way for companies to get back on their feet.

The reorganization process generally follows these steps:

Filing for Protection: The company initiates the bankruptcy process by filing under the CCAA with the court or the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. A Licensed Insolvency Trustee is assigned to oversee the process, acting as either the Monitor for CCAA cases or the Proposal Trustee for Division I Proposals under the BIA.
Stay of Proceedings: Once the filing is done, the court grants a stay of proceedings. This means creditors are temporarily barred from starting or continuing any legal actions against the company while it works on its reorganization.
Plan Development: The company then creates a plan of arrangement (for CCAA) or a proposal (for BIA) that details how it plans to restructure its debts and operations.
Creditor Approval: The proposed plan is presented to the creditors, who must approve it. A two-thirds majority vote is needed for the plan to pass.
Court Approval: Finally, the court reviews the plan and must give its approval before the company can move forward with the implementation. This step is especially important for filings under the CCAA.

“Understanding your options is essential for financial clarity and future success.”

Division I Proposals vs. Bankruptcy: Understanding Key Legislation and the Nuances

Although both Division I proposals and bankruptcy fall under the umbrella of corp bankruptcy proceedings, they offer distinct approaches to dealing with financial distress.

Here’s a closer look at the key differences:

Feature	Division I Proposal	Bankruptcy
Eligibility	Smaller corporations (debt typically below $5	Any insolvent Any insolvent corporation
Court involvement	Less involved; primarily oversees the approval process	Potentially more involved in settling disputes
Flexibility	More flexible; allows for tailored debt restructuring plans	Less flexible; focuses on asset liquidation and distribution
Timeframe	Shorter timeframe for filing a plan	No specific timeframe
Outcome if rejected	Automatic bankruptcy	N/A
Cost	Can be more costly due to the need to restructure operations and negotiate with creditors	Cost depends on complexity and types of assets to be sold

Choosing the right path depends on your company’s specific circumstances, the severity of its financial troubles, and the potential for recovery.

Receivership: When Secured Creditors Take Action

Receivership is a legal process that empowers a receiver, which in Canada can only be a licensed insolvency practitioner, to take control of a company’s assets when it defaults on secured loans.

There are two types of receivership:

Private Receivership: The secured creditor appoints a receiver based on the terms of the security agreement, through an appointment letter.
Court-Appointed Receivership: The court appoints a receiver upon application, usually by a secured creditor.

The receiver has the authority to:

Take possession of corporate assets.
Manage the assets, potentially running the business temporarily.
Sell assets to recover the secured creditors’ debts, in order of priority.

The primary responsibility of a privately appointed receiver is to the appointing creditor. In contrast, a court-appointed receiver has a duty to all stakeholders and may be subject to court-imposed restrictions.

Receivership can be a powerful tool for secured creditors seeking to recover their funds, but it often results in the liquidation of the company. It may also occur concurrently with corp bankruptcy proceedings, especially when secured creditors hold significant claims against the company.

Corp Bankruptcy: Weighing the Pros and Cons

Each corp bankruptcy proceeding presents unique advantages and disadvantages. Let’s examine these for each option:

Advantages and Disadvantages of Liquidation

Advantages	Disadvantages
Provides a legal framework for businesses unable to pay their debts.	Results in the closure of the business.
Offers an orderly process for winding down the business.	This may lead to action taken due to personal liability for directors for specific debts.
Facilitates the fair distribution of assets to creditors based on their legal priority.	Can be a time-consuming and expensive process.
	Can negatively impact the reputation of the directors.

*Advantages and Dis**advantages of Reorganization*

Advantages	Disadvantages
Offers a chance to save the business and preserve jobs.	May not be successful, leading to eventual liquidation.
Provides an opportunity to improve profitability and efficiency.	Can negatively impact employee morale and customer confidence during the restructuring process.
Allows for the modernization of strategies and financial arrangements.	Requires a significant time investment and may cause cash flow challenges.
Can be conducted informally or formally through the BIA or CCAA.

“Reorganization aims to breathe new life into a struggling company.”

Advantages and Disadvantages of Receivership

Advantages	Disadvantages
Offers a direct and efficient method for secured creditors to recover their funds.	Focuses primarily on protecting the interests of the secured creditor, potentially neglecting the interests of other stakeholders.
May facilitate the sale of the business as a going concern, preserving jobs.	The receiver may face conflicts of interest between their duty to the appointing creditor and their duty to the company.

Corporate Recovery and Restructuring: Exploring Alternatives to Corp Bankruptcy in Canada With Other Potential Recovery Options

Before resorting to corp bankruptcy proceedings, it’s essential to explore alternative solutions that might help your company recover without resorting to formal legal processes.

Here are five alternatives to consider:

Cost-Cutting and Budgeting

Implement tighter spending controls and create a realistic cash flow budget. Identifying and eliminating unnecessary expenses can free up funds to address debt obligations.

Debt Refinancing

Consider looking into refinancing options to combine your current debts into a more manageable repayment plan. This could include discussing with your lenders to secure lower interest rates or longer repayment terms.

Shareholder Investment

Consider seeking additional investment from existing shareholders. This infusion of capital can bolster the company’s financial stability and allow it to meet its obligations.

Informal Debt Settlement

Engage in direct negotiations with creditors to reach an informal debt settlement agreement. This might involve proposing a reduced payment amount or a revised payment schedule.

Asset Sales

Evaluate the possibility of selling non-core assets to raise capital. This can provide immediate cash flow to address pressing debt payments and improve the company’s overall financial health.

Informal workouts, negotiated directly with creditors, often provide a more cost-effective and faster solution than formal corp bankruptcy proceedings. However, they require cooperation and flexibility from all parties involved.

If these alternatives prove insufficient, and the company has the potential for long-term viability, restructuring through the CCAA or a Division I proposal under the BIA becomes a viable option. However, if the company is deemed not viable, receivership may be the most appropriate course of action, especially for secured creditors.

Corp bankruptcy FAQs

What is the difference between “insolvency” and “bankruptcy” in Canada?

While the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct meanings under Canadian law. Insolvency is a financial state where a debtor is unable to pay their debts as they become due. This could be due to various reasons like business downturns or personal financial mismanagement.

Bankruptcy, on the other hand, is a legal process initiated when an insolvent person’s assets are transferred to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. The insolvency trustee then distributes these assets to creditors based on a priority order set by the BIA.

In simpler terms, insolvency is the financial condition, while bankruptcy is the legal process to address it.

What are the primary laws governing insolvency and bankruptcy laws in Canada?

Canada’s insolvency framework primarily comprises two federal statutes: The BIA: This Act applies to both personal and corporate bankruptcies. It outlines the procedures for filing for bankruptcy, governs insolvency trustee licensing, and dictates the distribution of a bankrupt entity’s assets among creditors. The CCAA: This Act provides a framework for restructuring insolvent companies with debts exceeding $5 million. It allows for the creation of a Plan of Arrangement to compromise with creditors or facilitate the sale of the business under court supervision.

What does the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy (OSB) do?

The OSB is the federal agency that oversees bankruptcy processes in Canada. Its main responsibilities include:

Overseeing cases under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).
Making sure that the laws set out in the BIA and CCAA are followed.
Regulating Licensed Insolvency Trustees.
Keeping a public record of filings related to the BIA and CCAA.

4. What happens to a company’s operations when it files for bankruptcy?

Typically, day-to-day business operations cease upon filing for bankruptcy. A LIT takes control of the company’s assets, liquidates them, and distributes the proceeds to creditors based on the BIA’s priority rules.

Shareholders generally lose their investments, and directors may face personal liability for certain debts, depending on specific circumstances and provincial laws.

How does the Canadian insolvency system prioritize creditors?

The BIA establishes a specific order of priority for creditor claims:

Deemed trusts: Amounts like unremitted source deductions from employees and unremitted HST are held in trust for the Crown and are paid first.
Unpaid suppliers: Suppliers can reclaim unpaid goods delivered within a specific timeframe before bankruptcy.
Super-priorities: These include unpaid wages, pension contributions, and costs for environmental cleanup.
Secured claims: Creditors with security over specific assets are paid from the proceeds of those assets.
Preferred claims: Certain unsecured claims under section 136(1) of the BIA, such as administrative costs of the bankruptcy, are prioritized.
Ordinary unsecured claims: All other claims are paid proportionally from the remaining funds.

Can a company avoid bankruptcy in Canada?

Yes, alternatives to bankruptcy debt relief options are:

Proposal to Creditors (BIA): A company may propose a plan to restructure its debts and negotiate compromises with creditors. If this proposal is accepted by both the creditors and the court, the company can successfully avert bankruptcy.
Restructuring under the CCAA: Corporations with debts exceeding $5 million may seek court protection under the CCAA to undertake a restructuring of their operations and financial obligations.
Informal Arrangements: Companies have the option to engage in direct negotiations with creditors to establish informal agreements, which may include debt restructuring or payment deferrals.

What is receivership, and how does it relate to bankruptcy?

Receivership is a legal process where a secured creditor appoints a receiver to take control of a debtor’s assets, typically to enforce a security interest. This appointment can be made privately by the creditor or through a court order.

While receivership can happen at the same time as bankruptcy, it mainly aims to protect the interests of the secured creditor. The receiver may sell off assets to pay back the secured debt, whereas a trustee in bankruptcy oversees the distribution of assets to all creditors following the priorities set out in the BIA.

How can a foreign company with operations in Canada be affected by Canadian insolvency laws?

If a foreign company has assets or carries on business in Canada, it falls under the jurisdiction of Canadian insolvency laws like the BIA and CCAA. It can be subject to bankruptcy proceedings or restructuring efforts in Canada.

The BIA also has provisions for recognizing and cooperating with foreign insolvency proceedings, allowing for coordination between Canadian courts and foreign jurisdictions in cross-border insolvency cases.

Conclusion: Seeking Expert Guidance for Corp Bankruptcy

Navigating the complexities of corp bankruptcy in Canada demands a thorough understanding of the legal frameworks and available options. Bankruptcy, Division I proposals, and receivership each offer distinct paths with varying implications for debt resolution, business operations, and stakeholder interests.

Remember, seeking professional advice is paramount. A LIT and a qualified lawyer specializing in insolvency can provide expert guidance, ensuring you make informed decisions and protect your rights throughout the process. Early intervention and expert assistance can significantly improve the chances of a successful outcome, whether that means restructuring your company or navigating a controlled and dignified wind-down.

I hope you enjoyed this corp bankruptcy Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring due to distressed real estate or other reasons? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding the bankruptcy process. We can get you debt relief freedom using processes that are a bankruptcy alternative.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

corp bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

BECOMING BANKRUPT IN CANADA: OUR COMPLETE GUIDE FROM FILING TO FINANCIAL RECOVERY

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date November 18, 2024

becoming bankrupt

Becoming Bankrupt: Introduction

Are you struggling with overwhelming debt and considering becoming bankrupt? If so, you are not alone. Many people and businesses continue to struggle from the COVID-19 pandemic and are only now hitting the wall.

This Brandon’s Blog is a comprehensive guide exploring the intricacies of bankruptcy in Canada. I provide essential insights into the process, consequences, and alternatives. Understanding bankruptcy is crucial for any insolvent person facing financial hardship.

Becoming Bankrupt: Understanding Bankruptcy

Definition of Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy is a legal process under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, where an insolvent person or business declares their inability to repay their debts. This declaration provides legal protection from creditors while allowing individuals to work towards a fresh financial start.

Types of Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy can be categorized into different types. The most common categories include:

Personal Bankruptcy: This type pertains to individuals who are unable to manage their debts and are overwhelmed by financial obligations.
Business Bankruptcy: This category is relevant to businesses that cannot fulfill their financial commitments and seek legal relief from creditors.
becoming bankrupt

Becoming Bankrupt: Reasons for Filing for Bankruptcy

Common Causes of Personal Bankruptcy

Individuals and businesses often file for bankruptcy due to a variety of factors, such as:

Job loss: Unexpected unemployment can significantly impact an individual’s ability to manage their finances.
Medical expenses: High medical bills can lead to substantial debt, especially in countries without universal healthcare.
Business failure: Economic downturns or poor management decisions can result in business bankruptcy.
Divorce: Legal fees and the division of assets can contribute to financial strain.

Beyond the general reasons mentioned above, common causes of personal bankruptcy can include:

Overspending and accumulating high-interest debt: Excessive credit card debt, loans like lines of credit while failing to manage debt can quickly lead to a financial crisis.
Unexpected life events: Unforeseen circumstances like illness or accidents can lead to significant financial burdens.
Lack of financial literacy: Without a proper understanding of budgeting and debt management, individuals might struggle to stay financially afloat.

Business Bankruptcy Considerations

Business bankruptcy considerations extend beyond personal factors. Some key aspects include:

Economic conditions: Recessions and market fluctuations can severely impact business revenue.
Competition: The inability to compete effectively in the market can lead to declining sales and profits.
Poor financial management: Inadequate accounting practices and financial planning can contribute to business failure.

Becoming Bankrupt: The Bankruptcy Process in Canada

Initial Steps to Take

Facing the possibility of voluntary bankruptcy can be overwhelming. If you are an insolvent person and find yourself in this situation, consider these initial steps:

Assess your financial situation: Analyze your income, expenses, assets, and liabilities to understand the extent of your financial difficulties.
Seek professional advice: Consult with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. They can provide guidance on your options and help you understand the bankruptcy process.
Explore alternatives to bankruptcy: Depending on your circumstances, options like debt consolidation, consumer proposal, or credit counselling might be viable alternatives.

Role of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee

Licensed Insolvency Trustees play a crucial role in the bankruptcy process. They are licensed professionals regulated by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. Their responsibilities include:

Providing information and advice: Explaining the bankruptcy process and implications to individuals and businesses.
Administering the bankruptcy estate: Collecting assets, resolving disputes, selling assets, reviewing and admitting claims for the unsecured debts and ultimately, distributing available funds to the unsecured creditors of the bankrupt individual or business.
Ensuring compliance with bankruptcy laws: Upholding legal requirements and addressing potential misconduct.

Filing the Bankruptcy Application

The bankruptcy process formally begins with the Trustee filing the necessary bankruptcy documents with the Official Receiver, who is the local representative of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. The application includes:

Assignment in Bankruptcy: This is the document where the insolvent person, business or company declares bankruptcy.
Statement of Affairs: This document details the insolvent person’s or business’s financial situation, listing assets, debts, income, and expenses.
Statement of monthly income and expenses: Documentation verifying the insolvent person’s current income.
Filing fee: A payment is ultimately required, although it is not necessary to be paid to initiate the bankruptcy process.
becoming bankrupt

Becoming Bankrupt: Obligations of the Bankrupt Individual

Financial Disclosure Requirements

Transparency is crucial during bankruptcy. Individuals must:

Disclose all assets and liabilities: Provide a complete and accurate account of their financial situation.
Surrender assets: Non-exempt assets are turned over to the Licensed Insolvency Trustee for sale to distribute the net proceeds to creditors.
Report any changes in financial status: Inform the Trustee of any income changes, asset acquisitions, or new debts incurred.

Responsibilities During the Bankruptcy Process

Maintaining compliance with bankruptcy regulations is essential. The bankrupt insolvent person must:

Attend the meeting of creditors: The insolvent person must meet with the trustee and creditors as required.
Cooperate with the trustee: Provide necessary information and follow the Trustee’s instructions throughout the process.
Not incur new debt without disclosing that they are an undischarged bankrupt: This prevents further financial strain and ensures responsible financial behaviour.
Attend credit counselling sessions: These sessions guide budgeting, debt management, and responsible credit use.

Becoming Bankrupt: Potential Misconduct in Bankruptcy

Types of Misconduct

Engaging in dishonest or irresponsible behaviour during bankruptcy can have severe consequences. Examples of misconduct include:

Concealing assets: Hiding assets from the Trustee to avoid their distribution to creditors.
Providing false information: Submitting inaccurate financial information during the bankruptcy process.
Making fraudulent transfers: Transferring assets to family members or friends to avoid their inclusion in the bankruptcy estate.

Bankruptcy misconduct can be categorized into various types:

Fraudulent activities: Intentional deception to gain an unfair advantage during the bankruptcy process.
Non-compliance with bankruptcy laws: Failing to fulfill legal obligations outlined in bankruptcy regulations.
Breaching fiduciary duties: Violating the trust placed in the bankrupt individual by the trustee or creditors.

Reporting Misconduct

If you suspect any misconduct during a bankruptcy case, reporting it to the relevant authorities is crucial. These authorities include:

The Licensed Insolvency Trustee: The Trustee is responsible for investigating and addressing any potential misconduct.
The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy: The regulatory body overseeing bankruptcy proceedings in Canada.

Consequences of Misconduct

Engaging in misconduct during bankruptcy can lead to serious consequences:

Extension of bankruptcy: The bankruptcy period might be prolonged as a penalty for misconduct.
Denial of discharge: The court might refuse to grant a discharge, meaning debts are not eliminated, and creditors can continue pursuing repayment.
Criminal charges: In fraud or other illegal activities, criminal charges might be filed against the individual.
becoming bankrupt

Becoming Bankrupt: Exploring Case Summaries

Real-Life Examples of Opposition to Discharges

Examining real-life cases where creditors opposed the discharge of bankrupt individuals can provide valuable insights into the consequences of misconduct:

Case Study 1: A bankrupt individual concealed assets, carried out some disposition of property before filing bankruptcy and provided false information to the trustee. This resulted in the creditor’s opposition to discharge, leading to an extended bankruptcy period and the requirement to repay a portion of the debt.
Case Study 2: A business owner engaged in fraudulent transfers of assets before filing for bankruptcy. This action led to a denial of discharge and potential criminal charges for financial fraud.

Key Insights from Case Studies

The following points emphasize critical lessons learned from various case studies:

Transparency and honesty: It is essential to provide complete and accurate financial information throughout the bankruptcy process to ensure clarity and integrity..
Compliance with bankruptcy laws: Adhering to all legal requirements and cooperating with the trustee is vital for a smooth bankruptcy process.
Seeking professional guidance: Consulting with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee can assist individuals in understanding their obligations and in avoiding potential issues related to misconduct.

Becoming Bankrupt: Common Misconceptions About Bankruptcy

Debunking Myths

Several misconceptions surrounding bankruptcy often create unnecessary fear and anxiety. Some common myths include:

Myth 1: Bankruptcy ruins your credit forever.
Reality: While bankruptcy negatively impacts your credit score, it is not a permanent mark. With responsible financial behaviour, you can rebuild your credit over time.
Myth 2: You lose everything you own in bankruptcy.
Reality: Certain assets are exempt from seizure in bankruptcy, such as essential household items and a certain amount of equity in your primary residence or motor vehicle.
Myth 3: Bankruptcy is a sign of personal failure.
Reality: Bankruptcy is often a result of unforeseen circumstances, economic hardship, or poor financial decisions. It is a legal process designed to provide a fresh start and should not be viewed as a personal failing.
becoming bankrupt

Becoming Bankrupt: Strategies for Avoiding Bankruptcy

While bankruptcy might be unavoidable in some situations, the insolvent person can take proactive measures can help reduce the risk:

Financial Planning and Budgeting

Create a realistic budget: Track your income and expenses to identify areas where you can cut back and save.
Set financial goals: Establish short-term and long-term goals to stay motivated and focused on your financial well-being.
Seek financial education: Improve your financial literacy by attending workshops, reading books, or consulting with financial advisors.

Debt Management Options

Debt consolidation: Combining multiple debts into a single loan with a lower interest rate can simplify payments and reduce overall interest costs.
Credit counselling: Non-profit organizations offer credit counselling services to help individuals develop a debt management plan and negotiate with creditors.
Consumer proposal: This legally binding agreement allows individuals to repay a portion of their debt over a specific period, avoiding bankruptcy.

Becoming Bankrupt: Rebuilding Credit After Bankruptcy

Steps to Rebuild Credit Rating

While bankruptcy negatively impacts your credit score, it is possible to rebuild it over time:

Obtain a secured credit card: This type of credit card requires a security deposit, helping you establish a positive credit history.
Make all payments on time: Consistently paying your bills on time demonstrates responsible financial behaviour to lenders.
Monitor your credit report: Regularly check your credit report for errors and ensure accurate information is being reported.

Using Credit Responsibly

Avoid excessive credit card use: Limit your credit card spending and focus on using cash or debit cards whenever possible.
Maintain a low credit utilization ratio: Keep your credit card balances low compared to your available credit limit.
becoming bankrupt

Becoming Bankrupt FAQ

1. What is bankruptcy in Canada?

Bankruptcy is a legal process where individuals or businesses that are unable to repay their debts can seek relief from their financial obligations. It is a formal declaration of insolvency, signifying that an individual or business cannot meet their financial commitments.

2. What are the different types of bankruptcy?

There are several types of bankruptcy, each with its own specific rules and implications. The most common types include:

Bankruptcy (Liquidation): This involves the sale of a debtor’s non-exempt assets to repay creditors.
Consumer Proposal Financial Restructuring (Reorganization): This allows individuals with a regular income to propose a plan to repay debts over three to five years.
Proposal Financial Restructuring (Reorganization): This is typically used by businesses to restructure their debts and operations while continuing to operate.

3. What Drives Individuals to Pursue An Assignment In Bankruptcy?

Individuals may seek bankruptcy protection for a variety of reasons, including:

Loss of Employment: Sudden job loss can significantly reduce income, hindering one’s ability to fulfill financial commitments.
Medical Costs: Escalating healthcare expenses can quickly destabilize a person’s financial situation.
Separation or Divorce: The financial burden that often accompanies divorce can result in bankruptcy for one or both partners.
Business Collapse: Economic challenges or ineffective management can lead businesses to declare bankruptcy.
Excessive Debt: The accumulation of substantial debt through credit cards, loans, and other financial instruments can create an overwhelming repayment burden. Student loans also carry a burden for many, but they are more difficult to discharge in a bankruptcy.

4. What is the role of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee?

A Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) is a regulated professional authorized to administer bankruptcies and proposals in Canada. Their role includes:

Assessing the debtor’s financial situation.
Advising debtors on their options.
Filing the necessary paperwork with the court.
Administering the bankrupt estate.
Distributing funds to creditors.
Providing guidance and support to the bankrupt individual.

5. What are the obligations of someone who has filed for bankruptcy?

A bankrupt individual has several obligations, including:

Disclosing all assets and liabilities to the LIT.
Cooperating with the LIT throughout the bankruptcy process.
Attending all required meetings and hearings.
Surrendering non-exempt assets for sale.
Making payments to the LIT as required.
Reporting any changes in financial situation.

6. What are some common misconceptions about bankruptcy?

You will lose everything: While some assets may be sold to repay creditors, you are allowed to keep certain exempt assets, such as basic household goods and tools of the trade.
You can never get credit again: While bankruptcy will negatively impact your credit rating, you can take steps to rebuild your credit after discharge.
Bankruptcy is a shameful secret: Bankruptcy is a legal process designed to provide relief from overwhelming debt. It is not a reflection of your character or worth.

7. How can I rebuild my credit after becoming bankrupt?

Rebuilding credit after bankruptcy takes time and effort, but it is possible. Here are some steps you can take:

Obtain a secured credit card.
Become an authorized user on a responsible friend or family member’s credit card.
Make all payments on time and in full.
Avoid taking on new debt unless necessary.
Monitor your credit report regularly and dispute any errors.

8. Where can I find more information and support?

There are several resources available to individuals considering or going through bankruptcy:

Licensed Insolvency Trustees: LITs can provide personalized advice and guidance.
Government of Canada website: The Government of Canada website provides information about bankruptcy laws and procedures.
Credit counselling agencies: Non-profit credit counselling agencies can offer financial education and debt management advice.
Support groups: Online and in-person support groups can provide emotional support and practical tips from others who have experienced bankruptcy.

8. Can a deceased person file an assignment into bankruptcyan ?

A deceased person cannot do anything. However, if the Executor of the Estate determines that the Estate is insolvent, the Executor can make an the application to the court for the authority to put the deceased Estate into bankruptcy.

Becoming Bankrupt: Available Resources and Support Services

Various resources are available to assist individuals and businesses dealing with financial difficulties and considering bankruptcy:

Licensed Insolvency Trustees: These professionals provide guidance, support, and expertise throughout the bankruptcy process.
Credit counselling agencies: Non-profit organizations offer financial counselling, debt management plans, and educational resources.
Government websites: Websites like the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy provide valuable information on bankruptcy laws and regulations in Canada.

Remember, seeking help and taking proactive steps toward financial recovery are crucial for navigating difficult situations and rebuilding your financial well-being.

Becoming Bankrupt: Conclusion

Becoming bankrupt can be a challenging experience, but it’s crucial to remember that it’s not the end of the road. By understanding the process, obligations, and potential consequences, individuals can navigate this difficult period more effectively.

It’s important to seek guidance from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and explore resources and support services available to help rebuild financial stability and creditworthiness. Remember, becoming bankrupt offers a fresh start and an opportunity to learn from past mistakes and make informed financial decisions for a brighter future.

I hope you enjoyed this becoming bankrupt Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring due to distressed real estate or other reasons? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

Brandon Blog Post

WHAT DOES BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION MEAN? THE ABSOLUTELY IMPORTANT THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 28, 2024

what does bankruptcy protection mean

What does bankruptcy protection mean? Canada’s Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act

What does bankruptcy protection mean? Bankruptcy protection is a legal status granted to individuals or businesses under Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). This protection shields debtors from creditor actions while working towards a fresh financial start, whether through bankruptcy or a consumer proposal.

Common questions are:

How does bankruptcy protect my assets?
What is the difference between a Consumer Proposal and bankruptcy?
How does bankruptcy protect my income?
Can I file for bankruptcy if I have no assets or income?
What happens to my debts after bankruptcy?
Do I need a bankruptcy lawyer to file for bankruptcy?

In this Brandon’s Blog, I demystify the concept of bankruptcy protection, shedding light on its significance and the various forms it can take. I answer these and other questions to explain “What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean?“.

What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean? Legal Framework of Bankruptcy Protection

The legal framework of bankruptcy protection is rooted in the BIA in Canada. This act provides a structured process for individuals and business debtors facing overwhelming debt to seek relief and a fresh financial start.

Here’s a breakdown of the key elements:

Automatic Stay: Upon filing for bankruptcy or a Consumer Proposal, an automatic stay comes into effect. This legal measure serves as a shield against creditor actions. It immediately halts all collection attempts, including legal actions, wage garnishments, and asset seizures.

Exempt Assets: Contrary to the misconception that bankruptcy leads to complete asset forfeiture, provincial laws designate certain assets as exempt. These assets, encompassing essential items like household goods, a vehicle, limited home equity, tools of the trade, and certain RRSPs, are protected during bankruptcy proceedings. The specific value allowances for these exemptions vary by province.

Asset Protection Mechanisms: Even if an individual possesses assets exceeding the prescribed exemption limits, there are options to retain them. The repurchase of a person’s equity in the assets allows individuals, such as a family member, to keep an asset by paying the non-exempt portion of its value into the bankruptcy estate.

Alternatives to Bankruptcy: Consumer Proposals offer an alternative path to bankruptcy while still protecting through an automatic stay. In a Consumer Proposal, individuals negotiate a reduced debt repayment plan with their creditors, preserving their assets.

Income Protection: Bankruptcy filings protect income from creditors, effectively preventing wage garnishments and bank account freezes. This protection extends to most creditors, including the Canada Revenue Agency, with exceptions like ongoing child or spousal support payments. During bankruptcy, earned income goes directly to the individual. Depending on the income level, a person may need to pay over a portion using monthly payments for the benefit of the creditors.

It’s worth mentioning that bankruptcy protection laws can be quite complicated. It’s a good idea to consult with qualified professionals, like a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee or a trustee in bankruptcy), who can offer tailored advice and assist you in understanding the process.

What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean? Types of Bankruptcy Protection

The BIA is a federal law that covers bankruptcy protection. Provincial laws determine which assets you can keep when filing for bankruptcy. Here are the main types of bankruptcy protection in Canada:

*Canadian L**iquidation Bankruptcy (known in the United States as a Chapter 7 bankruptcy)*

This is a legal process available to both companies and individuals. The company or the person declares themselves unable to repay your debts when filing an assignment in bankruptcy. This results in a stay of proceedings that prevents creditors from taking action against you or your property. A licensed insolvency trustee will be appointed to manage your bankruptcy.

The bankrupt person or company may be required to surrender some assets to the Trustee, who will then sell them and distribute the funds to your creditors. However, for individuals, certain assets are protected under provincial law. For a first-time bankrupt person with no surplus income, you will be discharged from bankruptcy, usually within nine months, after which your debts will be wiped out, with limited exceptions.

Consumer Proposal (known in the United States as a Chapter 13 bankruptcy)

A consumer proposal is a financial restructuring bankruptcy alternative for people who owe $250,000 or less, other than for any debts registered against your principal residence. In a consumer proposal, you offer your creditors a partial repayment of your debt through a licensed insolvency trustee. If your creditors accept the proposal, your debts are consolidated into one settlement, and you make payments over some time, typically up to five years. Your assets are not affected by a consumer proposal, and you are protected from creditor actions while the proposal is in effect.

Commercial Proposal (known in the United States as a Chapter 11 bankruptcy)

Companies, or people who owe more than $250,000, can get bankruptcy protection, restructure their finances and avoid bankruptcy through the commercial proposal section of the BIA.

Restructuring under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (this is the closest we have to a US Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection filing)

Companies that owe $5 million or more, can gain bankruptcy protection and restructure their operations and finances using federal legislation called the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

All of the above bankruptcy protection alternatives require a licensed insolvency trustee to administer the process.

What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean? Key Concepts of Bankruptcy Protection

Automatic Stay

What is a stay of proceedings and how does it work? A stay of proceedings is a legal measure triggered by filing for bankruptcy or a Consumer Proposal for financial restructuring. It immediately halts all creditor actions against you, including collection calls, legal proceedings, and asset seizures. This provides relief from creditor harassment and safeguards your assets and income while navigating the process.

Debt Restructuring through bankruptcy or consumer proposal

Two primary methods for debt restructuring in Canada are bankruptcy and consumer proposals. People understand how consumer proposals are for debt restructuring because that is exactly what it does. But how can personal bankruptcy be a debt restructuring tool?

Both options provide legal protection from creditors and offer a path toward financial stability.

Bankruptcy process

Filing for bankruptcy initiates a legal process and invokes the stay of proceedings. That halts all creditor actions, including collection calls, lawsuits, and wage garnishments. This protection extends to most creditors, including government agencies like the Canada Revenue Agency, with a few exceptions, like family support payments.

A common misconception is that bankruptcy leads to the loss of all assets. However, there are provincial laws in Canada that intersect with federal bankruptcy laws. One such provincial statute is the Ontario Execution Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.24, which designates certain assets as “exempt”. These exempt assets, based on liquidation value, not original cost, are protected during bankruptcy and can include:

Household furnishings and appliances – $13,150
Equity in a vehicle – $6,600
Home equity up to $10,000
RRSPs, other than for contributions made in the 12 months before filing bankruptcy
Medical aids and devices that are required to assist with a disability or a medical or dental condition
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies where a spouse or family member is an irrevocable designated beneficiary

Even if an asset exceeds the exemption limit, options exist to retain it. These options include repurchasing the asset by paying the non-exempt value into the bankruptcy estate or including that value in calculating what you need to pay for a successful consumer proposal instead.

To file for bankruptcy, you need to owe at least $1,000. You need debts to file; it doesn’t require any assets or income to be eligible! Individuals with minimal or no assets can still file for bankruptcy and benefit from its protections.

Consumer Proposal

A consumer proposal is a formal arrangement between a debtor and their creditors, arranged through a licensed insolvency trustee. This option helps debtors combine their debts and propose to repay creditors a portion of what they owe, typically between 20% and 50% of the total debt.

Consumer proposals offer several advantages:○

You do not lose your assets, making it suitable for those with significant non-exempt assets.
Interest charges stop accruing.
Creditors are legally prevented from starting or pursuing further collection actions due to the “stay of proceedings”.
Although a consumer proposal isn’t technically bankruptcy, it provides similar legal protections and debt relief benefits.

Both bankruptcy and consumer proposals are complex legal processes. Consulting with a licensed insolvency trustee, the only professional authorized to administer these proceedings is crucial to determine the most suitable option for individual circumstances. We can assess your financial situation, explain the implications of each choice, and guide you through the process.

What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean? Rights and Responsibilities of Debtors

Rights of Debtors:

Stay of Proceedings
Asset Protection
Options For Non-Exempt Assets
Income Protection: Bankruptcy shields debtors’ income from most creditors, protecting them from wage garnishments and bank account seizures. This includes protection from the CRA. There are some specific cases where income protection is not available, such as ongoing child or spousal support payments.
Eligibility Regardless of Assets or Income
Consumer Proposals as an Alternative: Consumer proposals provide a bankruptcy alternative, allowing debtors to consolidate debts and negotiate a reduced repayment plan with their creditors10. While offering similar creditor protection through a stay of proceedings, consumer proposals do not impact assets, making them attractive for individuals with significant non-exempt equity.

Responsibilities of Debtors:

While the sources primarily focus on the rights and protections offered by bankruptcy and consumer proposals, there are certain inherent responsibilities:

Full Disclosure: Debtors are obligated to provide accurate and complete financial information to their licensed insolvency trustee, including all assets, debts, income, and expenses.
Cooperation: Debtors must cooperate with their Trustee throughout the bankruptcy or proposal process, attending meetings, providing requested documentation, and adhering to the terms of their agreement.
Compliance with Legal Requirements: Debtors must fulfill the specific legal requirements of their chosen debt relief solution, which may include attending financial counselling sessions or making agreed-upon payments.

Choosing the Right Path

Deciding between bankruptcy and a consumer proposal requires careful consideration with the guidance of a licensed insolvency trustee. The Trustee’s expertise helps determine the most suitable option based on individual circumstances, ensuring debtors understand their rights and obligations.

What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean? The Role of Bankruptcy Courts

In Canada, bankruptcy courts play a crucial role in the administration of bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings. Here are some key responsibilities of bankruptcy courts in Canada:

Hearing Bankruptcy Applications: Bankruptcy courts hear petitions filed by individuals or businesses seeking to be declared bankrupt be it personal or business bankruptcy. The court determines whether the applicant is eligible to be declared bankrupt and whether the petition is valid.
Approving Reorganization Plans: In cases where a company is seeking to restructure its debt through BIA or CCAA reorganization plans, the bankruptcy court must approve the plan. The court ensures that the plan is fair and reasonable and that it provides for the payment of creditors in a timely manner.
Approving Asset Sales: Bankruptcy courts have the authority to approve asset sales conducted by the Trustee. This ensures that the sales are conducted fairly and reasonably and that the assets are sold for a fair price under the circumstances.
Hearing Creditors Appealing the Trustee’s Disallowance of Their Claim: Bankruptcy courts hear appeals of claim disallowances against the bankrupt’s estate. The court determines if the Trustee’s decision on the validity and priority of each claim is correct or not if appealed.
Approving Settlements: Bankruptcy courts can approve settlements between the Trustee and creditors, ensuring that the settlement is fair and reasonable.
Overseeing the Administration of the Bankrupt’s Estate: Bankruptcy courts monitor the administration of the bankrupt’s estate, ensuring that the Trustee is performing their duties following the BIA and that the estate is being managed fairly and reasonably.
Making Rulings on Disputes: Bankruptcy courts make rulings on disputes that arise during the bankruptcy process, such as disputes between the Trustee and creditors, or between creditors themselves.
Providing Guidance: Bankruptcy courts can guide the Trustee, creditors, and other stakeholders on the interpretation and application of the BIA and other relevant laws in response to such a motion.
Bankrupt’s opposed discharges: The Court hears all opposed applications for discharge of the bankrupt person and rules on what kind of discharge the person is entitled to.
what does bankruptcy protection mean

What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean? The Role of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) is a federal agency that manages bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings across the country. The OSB is essential for enforcing the BIA and making sure the insolvency system runs smoothly and fairly. Here are some of the main responsibilities of the OSB:

Regulation and Oversight: The OSB regulates and oversees the activities of trustees, receivers, and other insolvency professionals to ensure that they comply with the BIA and other relevant laws.
Licensing and Registration: The OSB licenses and registers trustees, receivers, and other insolvency professionals, ensuring that they meet the necessary qualifications and standards.
Monitoring and Investigation: The OSB monitors and investigates complaints and concerns related to the administration of bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings, including allegations of misconduct or fraud.
Enforcement: The OSB enforces the BIA and other relevant laws, including issuing warnings, fines, and penalties to individuals and companies that violate the law.
Guidance and Education: The OSB provides guidance and education to stakeholders, including trustees, creditors, and debtors, on the BIA and other relevant laws and regulations.
Research and Analysis: The OSB conducts research and analysis on insolvency trends, statistics, and best practices, which help inform policy decisions and improve the effectiveness of the insolvency system.
Policy Development: The OSB develops and recommends policies to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, which helps shape the direction of the insolvency system.
Public Education: The OSB provides public education and awareness campaigns to inform Canadians about the insolvency system, the consequences of bankruptcy, and the importance of financial literacy.
Collaboration with Other Agencies: The OSB works closely with other government agencies, such as the CRA and the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC), to ensure a coordinated approach to insolvency and debt management.
Reporting and Accountability: The OSB is responsible to Parliament and reports directly to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. This structure ensures transparency and accountability in its operations and decisions.

In summary, the OSB is essential for maintaining the integrity and efficiency of Canada’s insolvency system and safeguarding the rights of creditors, debtors, and other parties involved.

What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean? Impacts of Bankruptcy Protection

Financial Relief for Debtors

Bankruptcy provides an opportunity for debt relief. While it does not require the debtor to have any assets, it might involve surrendering non-exempt assets to the bankruptcy estate. However, debtors can explore options like a family member repurchasing assets by paying the non-exempt value or filing a Consumer Proposal, which allows for debt consolidation and partial repayment to creditors without surrendering assets.

Bankruptcy allows individuals and businesses struggling with debt to restructure or eliminate their debts and rebuild a stable financial future. After the personal bankruptcy process, debtors receive a discharge, typically within nine months for a first-time bankrupt person, marking the end of their bankruptcy and the elimination of eligible debts. In corporate bankruptcies, there is not a discharge process.

Effects on Credit Scores

Filing for bankruptcy becomes a matter of public record and is reported to credit bureaus. This information remains on your credit report for a significant period, typically six to seven years in Canada, though this can vary based on provincial laws and the type of bankruptcy protection filed. This negative mark on your credit history will likely result in a significant drop in your credit score.

Lenders use credit scores to assess the risk associated with lending money. A low credit score resulting from bankruptcy makes it difficult to obtain new credit, such as loans, credit cards, or mortgages. Even if you do qualify for credit, you may face less favourable terms, including higher interest rates and lower credit limits.

While not directly related to credit scores, bankruptcy can impact other aspects of your financial life. For instance, some employers and landlords may consider credit history when making hiring or rental decisions.

What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean FAQ

Here is our what does bankruptcy protection mean FAQ:

What does “Bankruptcy Protection” mean? Bankruptcy protection refers to the legal safeguards provided to individuals or companies when they file for bankruptcy. It essentially halts all debt collection activities, legal actions, and wage garnishments by creditors. This protection is activated through an “automatic stay” upon filing for bankruptcy.
What does Bankruptcy Protection protect? Bankruptcy protection is designed to help you keep your assets safe from creditors. It provides a legal way to either reorganize your finances or sell off assets in an orderly fashion under court oversight. Many people think that filing for bankruptcy means you have to give up everything, but that’s not the case. Some laws allow you to keep important items such as your home, car, and personal possessions.
How does the automatic stay work? The automatic stay is a court order that takes effect immediately upon filing for bankruptcy. It acts as a legal shield, prohibiting creditors from taking any further action to collect debts incurred before the bankruptcy filing. This includes stopping lawsuits, wage garnishments, bank account freezes, and even harassing phone calls.
Does filing for bankruptcy mean I will lose all my assets? Not necessarily. While bankruptcy may involve liquidating some assets to repay creditors, the bankruptcy code provides exemptions that allow you to keep certain assets deemed necessary for your livelihood. These exemptions vary by state but generally include a homestead exemption for your primary residence, a vehicle exemption, and exemptions for personal property like clothing, furniture, and tools needed for your profession.
How does bankruptcy protection help me keep my assets? Bankruptcy protection helps preserve your assets in two primary ways:
Automatic Stay: It prevents creditors from seizing your assets while you reorganize your finances or create a repayment plan. Exemptions: These legal provisions shield specific assets from liquidation, ensuring you retain essential possessions.
What is the difference between Bankruptcy and a Consumer Proposal? Bankruptcy means selling off non-exempt assets to repay creditors. It’s generally an option for individuals or businesses that are struggling with low income and limited assets. On the other hand, a consumer proposal is a way for individuals with a steady income to suggest a repayment plan to their creditors that lasts up to five years. This option lets you keep your assets while getting rid of your debt.
How can I learn more about bankruptcy protection and whether it’s right for me? If you’re looking to learn more about bankruptcy protection and whether it’s the right choice for you, it’s important to talk to a licensed insolvency trustee. They can provide insights tailored to your financial situation, explain the various bankruptcy options available, clarify how it might affect your assets, and help you navigate the legal steps involved.
What are some misconceptions about bankruptcy? You will lose everything: While some assets may be liquidated, exemptions exist to protect essential belongings. It will ruin your credit forever: While bankruptcy negatively impacts credit scores, it is possible to rebuild credit over time with responsible financial management. It is a mark of shame: Bankruptcy is a legal process designed to provide individuals and businesses with a fresh financial start.

What Does Bankruptcy Protection Mean Conclusion

Navigating the world of bankruptcy protection can feel daunting, but fear not! It’s a valuable safety net designed to help both individuals and businesses get back on their feet during tough financial times. Think of it as a wonderful opportunity to reorganize debts and embrace a fresh start.

By familiarizing yourself with the different types of bankruptcy, understanding the implications of filing, and discovering how it may affect your credit score, you’ll be well-equipped to make smart choices for your financial future. While bankruptcy isn’t the perfect fit for everyone, it can truly be a lifesaver for those in need of a financial reboot. So take a deep breath and explore your options—you’ve got this!

I hope you enjoyed this what does bankruptcy protection mean Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring due to distressed real estate or other reasons? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags bankruptcy estate, bankruptcy filings, bankruptcy laws, bankruptcy lawyer, bankruptcy process, bankruptcy protection, business bankruptcy, Canada Revenue Agency, corporate bankruptcies, exempt assets, filing bankruptcy, filing for bankruptcy, Ira Smith Trustee, legal proceeding, licensed insolvency trustee, personal bankruptcies, reorganization plan, types of bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

UNLOCKING REAL ESTATE IN RECEIVERSHIP: TOP CHALLENGES & PROVEN SOLUTIONS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date October 7, 2024

Overview of In Receivership

I have just read a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dealing with an important aspect of real estate in receivership in Canada. The case is about when the Debtor/real estate owner does not believe that the court-appointed receiver has made proper decisions about the listing of the property for sale and the sale of a commercial property in receivership.

It also deals with the role of receivers and how they interact with the debtor, secured lenders and unsecured creditors.

In this Brandon’s Blog, I first provide some background of being in receivership in Canada. Then I discuss and highlight the issues found in the case of Rathcliffe Properties Inc. v. 2184698 Ontario Inc., 2024 ONSC 5077 (CanLII).

Legal Basis for In Receivership

A receivership is a legal process available to secured creditors, whereby a company’s affairs, business and property are entrusted to a receiver to manage and eventually sell the assets. Secured lenders may enforce their security to recover loans when the borrower defaults in its payment obligations relating to the secured debt. This remedy available to secured creditors is known as receivership, while the debtor is said to be “in receivership“.

If a business debtor does not make payments or otherwise defaults on a secured loan, the secured creditor would have the right to appoint a receiver to collect the money owed. Before appointing a receiver, a secured creditor must first issue a “Section 244” notice of intention to enforce security. This is a notification that secured creditors must send to defaulting debtors before appointing a receiver. Section 244 refers to that section number in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

The notice states that the security covers certain assets, that the company in default owes a specified amount to the secured creditor, and that the creditor may enforce the security after 10 days. The company in default may waive the notice period and consent to the appointment of the receiver.

Under the BIA, only a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) can be a receiver. No other party is licensed to administer the receivership process in Canada.

Types of Receivers In Receiverships

There are two types of receivers in receivership in Canada: (i) privately-appointed receivers; and (ii) Court-appointed receivers.

Privately-Appointed Receivers

A privately-appointed receiver is a licensed trustee who is appointed by a contract between the insolvency trustee and the secured creditor. A private receiver is typically used when there is no dispute to ranking among secured creditors or various claims to ownership of the company’s assets. The powers of a receiver listed in the security document give the privately appointed receiver more limited powers than a court-appointed receiver gets under a court order.

Court-Appointed Receivers

A receiver is court-appointed when the secured creditor makes an application to the court for the appointment of a receiver with more expanded powers. Like a privately-appointed receiver, a court-appointed receiver takes control of a company’s property because of financial distress and when there is a dispute among secured creditors and others regarding the ranking of secured claims and ownership of property.

Both kinds of receivers are tasked with protecting and preserving the value of the company or property and are certainly given broader powers by the court.

Duties and Responsibilities of a Receiver In Receivership

A Receiver is a licensed insolvency trustee appointed to manage and control the assets, property, or business of another person or entity, typically in a situation where the person or entity cannot manage their affairs due to financial difficulties, bankruptcy, or other reasons. In receivership in Ontario, a Receiver can be appointed either privately or through a court order.

Private Appointment

When a Receiver is appointed privately, it is typically done so through a contractual agreement between the Receiver and the secured creditor requiring the Receiver’s services. The Receiver’s duties and responsibilities may include:

Managing and controlling the assets, property, or business of the person or entity.
Collecting and managing debts, accounts receivable, and other financial obligations.
Paying bills, expenses, and other financial obligations.
Managing and overseeing the day-to-day operations of the business or property.
Identifying and realizing assets to convert them into cash.
Negotiating with creditors, suppliers, and other stakeholders to resolve disputes and improve the financial situation.
Preparing and submitting financial reports and statements to the appointing creditor and other stakeholders.
Providing advice and guidance primarily to the appointing creditor.

A privately appointed receiver needs to consult with and get approval from the appointing creditor for its proposed actions and activities. In a private appointment, the Receiver’s duty of care is mainly to the appointing creditor.

Court-Appointment

When in receivership a Receiver is appointed through a court order, many of the court-appointed receiver’s duties are the same as for a privately-appointed Receiver. The main differences though are that in receivership supervised by the Court, the court-appointed receiver:

Owes a duty of care to all parties.
Must obtain the approval of the Court for its actions and activities.

Stakeholder Considerations in Receivership

Stakeholder considerations in receivership leads us perfectly into discussing the case of Rathcliffe Properties Inc. v. 2184698 Ontario Inc., 2024 ONSC 5077 (CanLII).

This case was heard in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice involving a court-appointed receiver appointed to sell real property. The Debtor (2184698 Ontario Inc.) challenged the Receiver’s real estate receivership process, alleging that it was not conducted in a commercially reasonable manner and was biased towards the lender (Rathcliffe Properties Inc.).

The Debtor’s Argument

The Debtor, being the property owner, claimed the Receiver breached its duty under s. 247 of the BIA to act in good faith and in a “commercially reasonable manner.” They alleged the Receiver set a low listing price for the real property ($4,500,000) potentially based on “liquidation basis” appraisals rather than “fair market value.” They also argued that the court-appointed receiver showed favouritism by consulting only the Lender about the realtor and listing price, denying the Debtor crucial information.

Finally, they argued that the Receiver withheld crucial information by not sharing its appraisals with the Debtor.

Receiver and Lender’s argument

They argued:

The Receiver acted properly by basing the listing price for the property in question on professional advice and independent appraisals.
Choosing not to share appraisals to avoid giving the Debtor an unfair advantage in the sale was proper.
Consulting the Lender due to their expertise and potential buyer network, while the Debtor lacked relevant information and consistently overestimated the property’s value, was also appropriate.

The Court’s Findings

The Court found it more efficient to address the substance of the motion, providing clarity and avoiding further delays. The Court dismissed the Debtor’s claims of a breach of the BIA, stating:

The Receiver was not obligated to share appraisals.
The listing price, based on professional advice from professinoals working in this kind of real estate market, did not breach the court-appointed receiver’s duties or the BIA.
Consulting the Lender was justifiable, aiming for the best interests of all stakeholders.
The Court considered the motion premature, stating concerns about the sale process can be raised at the Sale Motion, where a complete evidentiary record would be available.

Since the Court found no evidence of a breach of the BIA and dismissed the Debtor’s motion in this real estate receivership, the Court ordered the Debtor to pay costs to both the Receiver and the Lender. The Court also lifted an interim injunction the Debtor obtained stopping the Receiver from continuing the sales process.

Clashing Interests in Receivership: Lender vs. Stakeholders

The receiver’s duty to act in the best interests of all stakeholders can clash with the specific needs of the lender because the lender prioritizes recovering the debt owed to them, even if it means selling the property for a lower price. Conversely, the receiver must consider the interests of all stakeholders, including the debtor, and aim for the highest possible sale price, even if it takes longer.

Here’s how this tension plays out in this case:

The Lender’s Interest: The lender (Rathcliffe Properties Ltd.) wants to recover the $2.9 million loan it provided to the debtor (2184698 Ontario Inc.) as quickly as possible. They likely see the receivership and subsequent sale of the property as the most expedient way to recoup their investment.
The Receiver’s Dilemma: The court-appointed receiver has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of all stakeholders, not just the lender. This means they must strive to obtain the highest possible price for the property, under the circumstances, even if it delays the Lender’s recovery.
Conflicting Approaches: The debtor argued that the receiver’s listing price of $4,500,000 was too low and favoured a quick sale to satisfy the Lender’s debt. However, the court found no evidence of this, highlighting that the Receiver based the listing price on professional advice and appraisals. The court emphasized that the market ultimately determines the property’s value, not just the initial listing price.

This case demonstrates the inherent tension in receivership scenarios. While the Lender’s primary concern is recovering their debt, the receiver must balance this against the interests of all stakeholders, including maximizing the sale price for the benefit of all parties involved.

Key Takeaways From This In Receivership Case

This situation highlights the conflicting priorities often found in receivership proceedings. On one hand, financial institutions lenders are focused on getting back their money, while on the other, the Receiver has to consider the needs of all stakeholders involved, aiming to achieve the highest possible sale price to benefit everyone.

In Receivership: Conclusion

We experience these same issues whenever we act as a real estate receiver. We rely on real estate experts both for appraisals and for the receiver sale of real estate. We must rely on real estate professionals in order to show that we properly handled our duties as a real estate receiver.

I hope you enjoyed this real estate receiver in receivership Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring due to distressed real estate or other reasons? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags borrower defaults, broader powers, court-appointed receivers, financial distress, financial institutions, financial restructuring, in receivership, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed trustee, real estate receiver, receiver sale, receivership proceedings, receivership process, restructuring process, sales process, secured creditor, secured lenders, secured loan

Brandon Blog Post

CANADA TRUSTEE: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO THE VARIOUS TYPES AND ROLES

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date August 12, 2024

Canada trustee

Canada Trustee Introduction

As a Licensed Insolvency Trustee and Estate Trustee in Greater Toronto Ontario, Canada area, I have the honour of assisting individuals and families during some of the most challenging periods of their lives. Whether addressing personal bankruptcy, facilitating corporate restructuring, or managing the administration of a loved one’s estate, my role as a Canada Trustee is to offer services to individuals and businesses with debt problems through professional guidance, support, and expertise. My objective is to help clients navigate these complexities, achieve their goals, and confidently move forward.

But despite the importance of professional trustees in these situations, many people are unclear about what a licensed trustee does, trustee duties or the different types of trustees in Canada. Many Canadians are unaware of the role of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee, or that they may need one in the event of financial difficulties.

In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore the various types of Canada trustees, including Licensed Insolvency Trustees (formerly called bankruptcy trustees), Estate Trustees, and others. We’ll delve into the roles and responsibilities of each, and provide examples of the types of cases they handle. Whether you’re an individual seeking guidance on personal bankruptcy, a business owner facing financial difficulties, or a grieving family trying to navigate the complexities of estate administration, this guide is designed to provide you with a clear understanding of the different types of trustees and their roles in the Canadian legal system.

A Brief Overview of the Role of a Canada Trustee

A Canada trustee is a qualified professional tasked with the management and administration of assets on behalf of individuals or entities that are unable to oversee their financial affairs. This role encompasses a variety of situations, including assisting individuals facing financial difficulties who seek to eliminate and restructure their debts through one of the available debt relief options such as a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. Additionally, Canada trustees may manage the estates of deceased persons or oversee the winding up of companies.

The role of a Canada trustee is to serve as an impartial third party responsible for the following duties:

Managing the assets of the individual or entity.
Distributing assets following the terms outlined in a court order from a legal process or agreement.
Ensuring that all debts and obligations are settled in compliance with applicable laws.
Offering guidance and support to the individual or entity to assist them in achieving their objectives.
Canada trustee

Importance of Understanding The Different Types and Responsibilities of Canada Trustees

There are different types of Canada trustees, the main ones being:

Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT): A LIT is a professional specializing in bankruptcy and insolvency matters. A LIT is licensed by the Canadian government and is the only professional authorized to administer bankruptcies, proposals, and receiverships in Canada.
Estate Trustee: An Estate Trustee, sometimes referred to as an Executor or Executrix, is an individual, firm, or trust company designated to oversee the estate of someone who has passed away. This role can be assigned through a will or for a complicated estate where there is no will or the named estate trustee does not wish to act, they can be appointed by a court. The Estate Trustee’s main responsibility is to manage the estate’s assets and ensure they are distributed according to the deceased person’s wishes outlined in the will or, if there is no will, according to the laws governing inheritance.
Trustee for Children: A Trustee for Children is a professional who manages the assets of a minor child, usually in the context of trust funds or an estate.
Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT): A Trustee for the PGT is responsible for managing the assets and affairs of individuals who cannot manage their affairs, such as those with mental or physical disabilities.
Corporate trustees: A corporate trustee in Canada plays a crucial role in managing and administering trusts, ensuring that the trust’s objectives are met, and the beneficiaries’ interests are protected. The role and responsibilities of a corporate trustee in Canada typically include trust administration, investment management, tax compliance and beneficiary relations and management.

Qualifications for Canada Trustees

Licensed Insolvency Trustee

The Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) possesses the sole authority to issue licenses to Licensed Insolvency Trustees under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). Before granting a license, the Superintendent must ensure that candidates fulfill specific qualifications as outlined in the OSB’s Directive No. 13R8, Trustee Licensing.

Candidates must, for instance:

Demonstrate good character and reputation.
Maintain solvency.
Complete the Chartered Insolvency and Restructuring Professional (CIRP) Qualification Program (CQP), as well as the CIRP National Insolvency Exam and either the Insolvency Counsellor’s Qualification Course or the Practical Course on Insolvency Counselling.
Pass an Oral Board Examination.

The OSB is a federal government agency so the licensing is therefore a federal matter.

Estate Trustee

In Canada, Estate Trustees who are appointed to manage the estates of deceased persons fall under the jurisdiction of the provinces and territories. The qualifications for an Estate Trustee in Canada vary depending on the province or territory, but generally, an individual should have the following qualifications:

- Be at least 18 years old, as per the laws of the province or territory.
- Have the mental capacity to manage the estate, as determined by a court or a medical professional.
- Be a resident of the province or territory where the estate is located, or have a connection to the estate or the deceased.
- Be a person of good character, integrity, and reputation.
- Have some knowledge of estate administration, inheritance, and probate law.
- Have experience in managing finances, accounting, or business, which can be beneficial in managing the estate.
- Be able to manage the estate’s assets, debts, and liabilities.
- Be able to prepare and file tax returns, as required.
- Be able to resolve disputes and conflicts that may arise during the estate administration process.
- Be able to maintain confidentiality and professional discretion when dealing with sensitive information.

When we act as Estate Trustees, we seek court approval for our appointment.

Note that some provinces or territories may have additional or different requirements for Estate Trustees. It is essential to check the specific laws and regulations in the province or territory where the estate is located.

Trustee for Children

If someone is going to be a Trustee for Children, there are certain qualifications and requirements they must meet. In Canada, a Trustee for Children is typically a person appointed to manage a trust that benefits children, such as a testamentary trust or a living trust. As a Trustee for Children operates under provincial law, like an Estate Trustee, the qualifications may vary depending on the province or territory.

Generally, the qualifications to act as a Trustee for Children are just like that of an Estate Trustee.

Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT)

The PGT is licensed and registered with their respective provincial government, and its staff are authorized to act as Public Guardians and Trustees. The PGT is a provincial government agency that provides protection and support to vulnerable individuals, including those with cognitive impairments, mental health issues, or other disabilities.

Staff members have experience working in the fields of law, finance, social work, or healthcare. Some staff members have experience working with vulnerable populations, such as seniors, individuals with disabilities, or those with mental health issues. The PGT staff also have university and other professional designations as well as experience to allow them to oversee their work.

If there is insufficient staff to handle a certain aspect of PGT work, they can outsource it to a law firm or accounting firm.

Corporate trustees

A corporate trustee in Canada is subject to provincial laws and supervision. Corporate trustees are a company or organization that is licensed to act as a trustee for trusts, estates, and other financial arrangements. The necessary qualifications for a corporate trustee in Canada vary depending on the province or territory, but generally, a corporate trustee should meet the provincial licensing requirements and obtain its license, in Ontario, from the relevant regulatory body, such as the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) or the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO).

The staff at the corporate trustee administering the funds will generally have professional designations such as CPA or LLB/J.D. and have relevant experience.

Canada Trustee Obligations

In Canada, Trustees have several obligations to fulfill in their role as fiduciaries. These obligations are outlined in relevant provincial and federal legislation. Examples for Ontario are the Trustee Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.23, the Succession Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.26, the Estates Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21 and the Estates Administration Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.22 .

Some of the key obligations of Canada Trustees that are common to all include:

Duty of Loyalty: Trustees must act in the best interests of the beneficiaries and not in their interests.
Duty of Care: Trustees must follow accepted standards of practice and exercise the care, diligence, and skill that a prudent person would exercise in similar circumstances.
Duty of Confidentiality: Trustees must maintain the confidentiality of the trust and its affairs.
Duty to Act in Good Faith: A Canada trustee must act in good faith and with honesty in all their dealings with the trust and its beneficiaries.
Duty to Keep Accurate Records: Trustees must keep accurate and up-to-date records of the trust’s assets, liabilities, income, and expenses.
Duty to File Tax Returns: Trustees must file tax returns on behalf of the trust and pay any taxes owed.
Duty to Manage Trust Assets: Trustees must manage the trust’s assets prudently and follow the terms of the trust.
Duty to Make Decisions: Trustees must make decisions in the best interests of the beneficiaries and under the terms of the trust.
Duty to Report: Trustees must report to the beneficiaries and other interested parties on the status of the trust and its affairs.
Duty to Comply with Laws and Regulations: Trustees must comply with all relevant laws and regulations, including tax laws, securities laws, and other regulatory requirements.
Duty to Act Independently: Trustees must act independently and impartially in their decision-making and not be influenced by personal interests or biases.
Duty to Keep Beneficiaries Informed: Canada trustees must keep beneficiaries informed of the trust’s activities and any changes to the trust’s terms or administration.
Duty to Protect Trust Assets: Trustees must take reasonable steps to protect the trust’s assets from loss, damage, or theft.
Duty to Ensure Compliance with Trust Terms: Trustees must ensure that the trust is administered under the terms of the trust and any applicable laws and regulations.
Duty to Account for Trust Assets: Trustees must account for the trust’s assets and provide an accurate and detailed accounting of the trust’s activities and financial transactions.

Selecting and Working with a Canada Trustee

Factors to Consider

Selecting the right trustee can be a complicated task. Here are some important factors to think about:

Canada Trustee Qualifications: What qualifications and experience does the trustee have? Are they licensed and certified?
Trustee Reputation: What is the trustee’s reputation in the industry? Do they have a good track record of managing trusts and estates?
Trustee Fees: What are the trustee’s fees and costs? Are they reasonable and transparent?
Trustee Independence: Is the trustee independent and impartial, or do they have a conflict of interest?
Trustee Communication: How will the trustee communicate with you and other stakeholders? Are they responsive and transparent?
Trustee Expertise: Does the trustee have the necessary wide range of expertise and knowledge to manage your specific trust or estate?
Canada Trustee Capacity: Does the trustee have the capacity to manage your trust or estate? Are they able to handle the complexity and scope of the trust or estate?
Trustee Conflict of Interest: Does the trustee have a conflict of interest that could impact their ability to act in your best interests?
Trustee Liability: Is the trustee liable for any mistakes or errors they make while managing your trust or estate?
Trustee Succession: What happens if the trustee is unable to continue serving as the trustee? Is there a plan in place for succession?
Trustee Reporting: How will the trustee report to you and other stakeholders? Are they transparent and accountable?
Trustee Compliance: Does the trustee comply with all relevant laws and regulations? Are they up-to-date on changes to the law and regulations?
Trustee Dispute Resolution: How will disputes be resolved between the trustee and other stakeholders? Are there procedures in place for resolving disputes?
Trustee Termination: How can you terminate the trustee’s services if you are not satisfied with their performance?
Canada Trustee Replacement: How can you replace the trustee if they are unable to continue serving or if you are not satisfied with their performance?

By considering these issues, you can make an informed decision about choosing the right trustee for your needs. It’s essential to carefully evaluate the trustee’s qualifications, reputation, fees, and expertise to ensure that they are the right fit for your trust or estate.

Questions to Ask a Potential Canada Trustee

When selecting a potential Canada Trustee, it’s essential to ask the right questions to ensure that you’re making an informed decision. Here are some questions you should consider asking:

What is your experience in trust administration?
What is your expertise in the specific area of trust administration that I need (e.g. estate administration, tax planning, etc.)?
What is your approach to trust administration?
Do you have a specific philosophy or methodology that you follow?
How will you communicate with me and other stakeholders throughout the trust administration process?
What is your fee structure?
Are there any additional costs or expenses that I should be aware of?
What is your policy on conflicts of interest?
How do you handle situations where you may have a conflict of interest?
How do you ensure that you are acting in the best interests of the beneficiaries?
What is your process for managing and investing trust assets?
How do you handle disputes or disagreements between beneficiaries?
What is your policy on confidentiality and privacy?
How do you ensure that you are complying with all relevant laws and regulations?
What is your process for reporting to beneficiaries and other stakeholders?
What steps do you take if you’re no longer able to fulfill your role as trustee?
How do you address any errors or mistakes that might arise during the administration of the trust?
What is your approach to indemnification?
If any losses or damages occur during the trust administration, who is held accountable?
How do you ensure that you consistently provide excellent service to your clients?
What is your stance on receiving client feedback and handling complaints?
How do you keep yourself informed about changes in laws and regulations that impact
trust administration?
What is your commitment to ongoing education and professional development?

By asking these questions, you can get a clearer picture of a potential trustee’s qualifications, experience, and how they handle trust administration. This will help you decide if they’re a good match for your needs.

Canada Trustee FAQ

FAQs about LITs in Canada

1. What is a bankruptcy trustee?

A bankruptcy trustee, also known as a LIT, is a professional licensed by the Government of Canada to administer bankruptcies and consumer proposals. They help individuals navigate the bankruptcy process, ensuring compliance with the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and managing assets held in trust.

2. What are the main duties of a LIT?

The main duties of a LIT include:

Assessing an individual’s financial situation and providing advice on debt relief options, including bankruptcy and consumer proposals.
Administering the bankruptcy or consumer proposal process and ensuring compliance with legal requirements.
Distributing any assets to creditors as per the regulations.
Representing the interests of creditors and ensuring fairness in the process.

3. How do I find a LIT in Canada?

You can find a LIT by searching the Government of Canada’s searchable database of LITs. Additionally, local non-profit credit counselling organizations can provide referrals to reputable trustees. Please stay away from debt consultants.

4. What should I expect during a consultation with a LIT?

During a consultation, a LIT will review your financial situation, explain your debt relief options, and guide you through the bankruptcy or consumer proposal process. They will provide information about the implications of filing for bankruptcy and help you understand your rights and responsibilities.

5. Do I need a lawyer to file for bankruptcy in Canada?

No, in Canada, you do not need a lawyer to file for bankruptcy. You can file directly with a licensed trustee, who will guide you through the process. However, in certain complex cases, it may be beneficial to seek legal advice.

6. What are the costs associated with hiring a LIT?

The costs of hiring a LIT can vary depending on the complexity of your case. Generally, the fees are regulated and typically deducted from the funds collected from your assets during the bankruptcy process. Initial consultations are often free.

7. Can a LIT help with debt consolidation?

Yes, a bankruptcy trustee can provide advice on debt consolidation options and assist you in determining whether it is a viable solution for your financial situation. They consider all available debt relief options, not just bankruptcy.

8. What happens if a trustee does not perform their duties properly?

If a trustee fails to perform their duties as required by law, they may face disciplinary action from the OSB. This can include fines, suspension, or revocation of their license. If you have concerns about a trustee’s performance, you should report it to the appropriate regulatory body.

9. Can I file for bankruptcy more than once?

Yes, you can file for bankruptcy more than once in Canada. However, the implications and the length of time you must wait between filings depend on the circumstances of your financial situation and the previous bankruptcy discharge.

10. How long does the bankruptcy process take?

The bankruptcy process can vary in duration depending on individual circumstances, such as the complexity of the case and the debtor’s compliance with requirements. Typically, a straightforward first-time bankruptcy with no surplus income obligations can take about 9 months for the bankrupt person to receive their discharge.

FAQs about *Estate Trustee**s in Canada*

In acting as an Estate Trustee in the Province of Ontario, I encounter various questions from clients, family members, or beneficiaries. Here are some frequently asked questions about an Estate Trustee in the Province of Ontario, along with their answers:

1. What is the role of an Estate Trustee?

The Estate Trustee, commonly referred to as the executor, holds the responsibility of administering and distributing the estate of the deceased following the provisions outlined in the will. Their responsibilities encompass organizing the funeral, identifying and appraising assets, applying for probate, settling outstanding debts and tax obligations, and distributing the estate to the designated beneficiaries.

2. Who can be an Estate Trustee?

An Estate Trustee must be an adult who possesses the capacity to manage the associated responsibilities effectively. Suitable candidates may include a trusted family member, a close friend, or a qualified professional, such as an attorney or accountant. It is recommended to select an individual who demonstrates strong organizational skills, financial acumen, and a likelihood of longevity.

3. Do Estate Trustees get paid for their work?

Yes, Estate Trustees are entitled to reasonable compensation for their services, which can be specified in the will or determined by the trust law. The compensation may be a percentage of the estate’s value or based on the time and effort expended.

4. What happens if the Estate Trustee fails to perform their duties?

If an estate trustee doesn’t meet their obligations, the beneficiaries have the option to ask the court to remove the trustee and appoint someone else. Additionally, the original trustee could be held financially accountable for any losses that result from their negligence.

5. How do I choose an Estate Trustee?

When choosing an Estate Trustee, consider a trustworthy adult who will likely live longer than you, someone organized and knowledgeable about finances, and preferably someone who resides in Ontario. It’s also wise to discuss the role with them before naming them in your will.

6. Can I appoint more than one Estate Trustee?

Yes, you can appoint co-executors or multiple Estate Trustees to share the responsibilities. However, keep in mind that this may complicate the process since they will need to work together and make decisions collectively.

7. What qualifications should an Estate Trustee have?

While there are no formal qualifications required, an Estate Trustee should possess strong organizational skills, financial knowledge, and the ability to communicate effectively with beneficiaries and other involved parties.

8. What is probate, and does every estate need to go through it?

Probate is the legal procedure that involves confirming a will and giving the Estate Trustee the power to manage and distribute the estate. However, not all estates need to go through probate. Smaller or simpler estates might be exempt based on specific criteria.

9. What if there is no will?

If an individual passes away without a will, known as dying intestate, the distribution of their estate will follow the intestacy laws of Ontario. Under these laws, the court may appoint an Estate Trustee to oversee the management of the estate. When our firm assumes the role of Estate Trustee, this appointment is formalized through a court order.

10. How long does the role of Estate Trustee last?

The tenure of an Estate Trustee can vary considerably based on the complexity of the estate, typically ranging from several months to several years. This role entails numerous responsibilities, including the distribution of assets, which can be a time-intensive process.

The appointment of an Estate Trustee is a significant decision that necessitates careful consideration. A thorough understanding of the duties, rights, and obligations associated with this role can enhance the efficiency of the estate administration process.

Canada Trustee Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding the various types of Canada trustees is essential for anyone navigating the complexities of personal bankruptcy, estate administration, or corporate financial challenges. From Licensed Insolvency Trustees to Estate Trustees, each plays a critical role in providing support and guidance through difficult times. By familiarizing yourself with their responsibilities and the specific cases they handle, you can make informed decisions that align with your circumstances.

Whether you are dealing with financial distress or managing a loved one’s estate, this comprehensive guide aims to equip you with the knowledge needed to approach these situations with confidence and clarity. As you move forward, remember that seeking professional advice is a key step toward achieving the best possible outcomes in your financial and legal matters.

I hope you enjoyed this Canada Trustee Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

Tags bankruptcy trustees, businesses with debt problems, canada trustee, complicated estate, corporate trustees, debt relief options, deceased persons, estate trustees, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, personal bankruptcy, professional trustee, standards of practice, testamentary trust, trust company, trust funds, trustee in canada, trustee obligations canada, trustee responsibilities canada

Brandon Blog Post

IF YOU DECLARE BANKRUPTCY WHAT HAPPENS? A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 8, 2024

if you declare bankruptcy what happens

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens? Introduction to Financial Hardships

In life, we often face unexpected challenges that test our resilience and determination. Such is the experience of people we help who have encountered financial hardships due to an unforeseen event outside of their control such as job loss. The burden of mounting debts and looming financial uncertainty weighs heavily on people, pushing them to explore solutions that would lead them toward a path of financial recovery.

That is who we help – the honest but unfortunate debtor. Dealing with financial hardships is a journey that tests our resilience and determination. It’s a path filled with unexpected twists and turns, challenging us to find the strength within ourselves to overcome the obstacles that come our way.

People with financial difficulties, particularly in the face of job loss, credit card debts, income tax debts and the contemplation of bankruptcy, learn valuable lessons about financial recovery, overcoming challenges, and the empowerment that comes from taking control of your financial future. That and if you declare bankruptcy what happens, is what this Brandon’s Blog is about.

Impact of That Unforeseen Event Outside Of Your Control On Your Financial Situation

The impact of that uncontrollable event such as losing your job goes beyond just the loss of income. It disrupts the stability we have worked so hard to build, leaving us feeling vulnerable and uncertain about the future. When someone becomes unemployed, they struggle to make ends meet, juggling bills and expenses with a limited budget. The stress and anxiety that come with financial insecurity can be overwhelming, but it’s during these challenging times that we discover our inner strength and resilience.

Struggles with Credit Card Payments and Bills

One of the most daunting aspects of financial hardships is the burden of credit card payments and bills that seem to pile up with each passing day. People find themselves caught in a cycle of debt, where the minimum payments barely make a dent in the overall balance. The constant worry about falling behind on payments and the fear of accumulating more debt can weigh heavily on our minds, affecting our peace of mind and overall well-being.

Considering Bankruptcy as a Viable Option

When individuals are confronted with substantial debt and limited solutions, the prospect of bankruptcy may arise as a challenging but potentially necessary step toward financial recovery. In my capacity as a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly known as a bankruptcy trustee), I assist individuals through a process of thorough research and consultation. My role involves guiding and comprehending the bankruptcy process, and its ramifications and exploring viable alternatives to bankruptcy. Opting for bankruptcy is a significant decision that individuals are supported in making through a careful evaluation of their financial circumstances, prospects, and personal aspirations.

Throughout the bankruptcy process, the individuals I work with gain invaluable insights into financial empowerment and the importance of seeking assistance when encountering financial challenges. While bankruptcy may lead to temporary implications on one’s credit rating, it also presents an opportunity for a fresh start and the possibility to rebuild a secure financial foundation. Engaging in the bankruptcy process fosters financial resilience and enhances individuals’ ability to navigate future financial decisions effectively.

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens? Exploring Options: The Role of Licensed Insolvency Trustees

A journey towards financial recovery will lead you to a consultation with a licensed insolvency trustee. This no-cost initial consultation will become a guiding light offering insights and solutions to your financial challenges.

Engaging in consultations with a licensed insolvency trustee marks a crucial juncture in your financial path. Our proficiency and empathy equip debtors to comprehend the various solutions at their disposal and make well-informed choices regarding their financial destiny. By engaging in transparent and candid dialogues, you acquire the requisite insight to navigate the intricate bankruptcy process with strength and resolve.

In your journey towards your financial empowerment, the Trustee serves as a pivotal figure in facilitating the bankruptcy application process with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (OSB) and guiding you every step of the way. By taking this initial step, you are relieved of the responsibility of making direct payments to unsecured creditors and are granted a stay of proceedings, preventing creditors from initiating or pursuing collection or legal actions against you. This offers a sense of comfort and security, shielding you from additional financial pressures.

Despite the challenges you may be facing, you will find solace in knowing that certain assets may be safeguarded by provincial and federal laws, ensuring a measure of stability during this turbulent time. The Trustee’s guidance on surplus income payments, credit counselling sessions and debt repayment strategies instills a sense of discipline, confidence and commitment toward overcoming financial obstacles.

While the journey toward financial recovery may have its hurdles, the Trustee reassures you that every step taken will lead you closer to a brighter future. Though some people may have a narrow category of debts that may not be discharged, the prospect of rebuilding your financial foundation fills you with hope and optimism.

Through this experience, will learn that resilience in finance is not just about overcoming challenges but also about embracing the opportunity for growth and renewal. As you navigate through the bankruptcy process support provided by the Trustee paves the way for a new beginning filled with hope and possibilities.

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens? What is bankruptcy?

Definition of bankruptcy

Canadian bankruptcy is a legal process where an individual, a business or a company declares they are insolvent and are unable to meet their financial obligations. They work with a licensed insolvency trustee to legally file an assignment in bankruptcy. They do so to assign their unencumbered assets to the Trustee and get relief from their overwhelming debt load.

Laws governing bankruptcy in Canada

Navigating the intricate realm of bankruptcy in Canada is a dance choreographed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA). This piece of legislation orchestrates the delicate balance between debtors, creditors, and Trustees, each playing a unique role in the bankruptcy waltz.

When a debtor takes the courageous step of filing for bankruptcy, they are required to bear their financial soul to the Trustee, laying out their assets, liabilities, and monetary intricacies. The Trustee, like a wise conductor, then ensures a harmonious distribution of the debtor’s assets among their creditors, aiming to untangle the financial web that binds them.

For individuals, bankruptcy offers a chance at rebirth, a fresh canvas on which to paint a new financial future. However, for a company or business, it may signify the final curtain call for that legal entity. Yet, there exists a glimmer of hope in the form of selling core assets to a willing successor, potentially salvaging jobs and keeping the business flame alive.

In this intricate ballet of financial redemption, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act stands as the maestro, guiding the players toward a resolution that seeks to balance the scales of financial responsibility.

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens? Who qualifies for bankruptcy?

Criteria for qualifying for bankruptcy

In Canada, debtors facing significant debt challenges and unable to meet their financial obligations to creditors may be eligible for bankruptcy relief. To qualify for bankruptcy, debtors must have a minimum of $1,000 in unsecured debt and have been residing in Canada for at least the previous six months before filing, or have a substantial connection to the country.

Alternatives to bankruptcy – Individuals

Depending on how pressing the person’s debts are, there are several alternatives to personal bankruptcy that a licensed insolvency trustee can walk you through. The most common alternatives are:

Credit counselling and budgeting assistance: Sometimes people just need help understanding where their family income comes from and how it is spent. In cases like this, going to a non-profit credit counselling service to get some tips and help in developing a monthly household budget and sticking to it is all that is necessary for the household to get back on track.
Debt consolidation: If you still can borrow money at a rate lower than the amounts you are currently being charged on high-interest-rate credit cards and payday loans, you need to look at debt consolidation. Rather than having several to many high-rate debts, if you can borrow the total amount of your debt from a bank or credit union at a much lower rate than you are currently paying and use that new loan to pay off your high-interest rate debts, that will help immensely. Now you have one lower interest rate loan to repay.
Consumer proposal: A consumer proposal is a formal filing under the BIA, however, it is not bankruptcy. It is where you make a contract with your creditors to pay less than you owe in total. It is based on your monthly income, to offer making monthly payments to the Trustee towards your debt. Normally you pay around 25% of your total debt to the Trustee. If your creditors agree, you can take up to 60 months to complete a consumer proposal. When you have finished making your payments, you get a Certificate of Full Performance and the balance of your debt is wiped away.

Alternatives to bankruptcy – Companies

Asset sales: Are there underused or redundant assets in the company that could be sold to raise needed cash to significantly reduce or eliminate corporate debt? This should first be explored.
Refinancing: Can the company refinance to take advantage of a loan opportunity that will help with its cash flow through lower interest, monthly payments or both? Retiring expensive debt and replacing it with more manageable debt is another avenue to explore.
Formal restructuring – BIA Proposal: Companies that have a viable but insolvent business can look at a formal restructuring. Although it is an alternative to avoid bankruptcy, it is commonly referred to as bankruptcy protection. A proposal under the BIA is where the company can negotiate with creditors to come up with a plan to repay its debts over some timeperiod of time. Just like in a consumer proposal, the company pays less than 100% of its debt load, but upon completion, eliminates all of its unsecured debt.
Formal restructuring – Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA): Companies that owe $5 million or more can also restructure as long as they have a viable business. The CCAA allows a company to restructure its debts and business operations under the supervision of a court-appointed monitor. It is essentially the same as a BIA Proposal, but just under a different Canadian statute.
A BIA Proposal and a CCAA restructuring a similar processes you always hear under the US bankruptcy law of bankruptcy chapter 11.

If You Declare Bankruptcy What happens to your assets, debts, and income during bankruptcy?

Going through a financial crisis can be incredibly challenging, but it’s important to remember that there is always a way forward. The people we help who go through the bankruptcy process are a testament to the resilience in finance and the power of financial empowerment as they use bankruptcy to turn their lives around.

Treatment of assets in bankruptcy

One of the concerns people have when considering bankruptcy is what happens to their assets. When someone goes bankrupt, they may not have to give up all of their assets. Let me explain as follows:

Secured debts: When you have assets where there are secured loans against those assets, such as a house or a motor vehicle, the Trustee’s interest is only the bankrupt’s equity in that asset. If there is little or no equity, and your monthly budget shows that you can afford to make the monthly loan payments and you wish to keep the asset, then you can do so. The Trustee will discuss with you ways in which the Trustee can realize the bankrupt’s equity without that asset being taken away.

Exempt assets: Certain provincial and federal laws safeguard some of your possessions when you file for bankruptcy. As provincial laws vary, you need to get the complete list from a licensed insolvency trustee in the area where you live.

Non-exempt assets: Non-exempt assets refer to assets owned by a bankrupt individual that are not protected by a secured creditor’s security interest or are exempt under provincial or federal laws. These assets fall within a category that the Trustee must liquidate to benefit the creditors involved in the bankruptcy proceedings.

Treatment of debts in bankruptcy

Once the bankruptcy application is filed with the OSB, a significant burden is lifted off the bankrupt’s shoulders. Direct payments to creditors cease, and the Trustee notifies all the creditors and there is an immediate stay of proceedings.

This means that any legal actions cannot be commenced or continued against the bankrupt and all collection activities, such as wage garnishment are put on hold. This offers the person much-needed relief from the constant financial pressure.

Some debts cannot be discharged, such as alimony, child support, valid secured loans and certain types of student loans. A Trustee in your no-cost initial consultation will look at the details of your debts and advise you if any would not be discharged from your bankruptcy estate.

While the decision to make the bankruptcy filing may seem daunting, it is a necessary step toward regaining control of your finances and eliminating the stress in your life. Knowing that your wages are protected from garnishment provides a sense of security during this challenging time.

Treatment of income during bankruptcy

While in bankruptcy, the Trustee monitors the person’s monthly income and expenses. The Trustee is required by the OSB and under the BIA, to do a calculation to determine if the bankrupt person has sufficient income to contribute towards his or her total debts by making surplus income payments to the Trustee.

The Trustee is required to do this calculation both at the time of the bankruptcy filing and throughout the time the person is an undischarged bankrupt. If the person’s income changes, either up or down, this will affect the calculation.

Although judgment creditors cannot garnish wages, it is possible that until the person gets their bankruptcy discharge, they may have to contribute something from their monthly income under the surplus income calculation. A licensed insolvency trustee can explain the calculation to you.

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens? How long does personal bankruptcy last?

Personal bankruptcy typically lasts for 9 months for a first-time bankrupt in Canada. Your first-time bankruptcy will extend to 21 months if you have to pay surplus income. If this isn’t your first bankruptcy, it will last longer.

At the end of this time, if you have fulfilled all of your bankruptcy duties and neither the Trustee nor any creditor who has proven their bankruptcy claim opposes your discharge, then you are entitled to your bankruptcy discharge. It is at the time you receive your discharge from bankruptcy, that your debts can be discharged.

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens? What Are Your Duties During Bankruptcy?

Responsibilities and obligations during bankruptcy

The primary responsibilities entail the disclosure of all assets, liabilities, income, and expenses. It is required to provide bank statements and other relevant records to support the information provided. In the event of a creditors’ meeting, attendance is mandatory.

Attendance at credit counseling sessions

Participating in the two mandatory counselling sessions is an essential component of a bankrupt’s journey toward financial recovery. Each counselling session is held with a person from the Trustee’s office who the OSB has licensed as a credit counsellor.

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens? What Is The Impact On Your Credit Score?

Impact on credit score during and after bankruptcy

Filing for bankruptcy in Canada can have a significant impact on your credit score, both during and after the bankruptcy process. Here’s a breakdown of what you can expect:

During Bankruptcy:

Initial Credit Score Decline: Upon filing for bankruptcy, it is common for individuals to experience a substantial decrease in their credit score, typically by 100-200 points or more. This decline is largely attributed to the fact that bankruptcy is a matter of public record, leading lenders to perceive it as a high-risk event.
Credit Reporting: Your credit report will reflect the bankruptcy filing and remain on your report for at least 6 years from the date of discharge (more on discharge below).
Credit Inquiries: Lenders may conduct credit inquiries to assess your creditworthiness, which can further lower your credit score.

After Bankruptcy:

Credit Score Recovery: After bankruptcy, your credit score will gradually recover over time. The rate of recovery depends on your credit habits and the steps you take to rebuild your credit (see next discussion).
Credit Reporting: The bankruptcy notation on your credit report will remain for roughly 6 years from the date of discharge. After that, it will be removed from your report.
Credit Score Objectives: Strive to attain a credit score ranging between 600 and 650 within 2-3 years post-bankruptcy. This will enhance your eligibility for improved loan conditions and interest rates.

Discharge:

In Canada, bankruptcy typically lasts for 9-21 months, depending on your financial situation and the type of bankruptcy you file for (e.g., consumer proposal or personal bankruptcy). Once you’ve completed the bankruptcy process and received a discharge, the bankruptcy notation will be removed from your credit report.

Rebuilding credit after bankruptcy

Tips for Rebuilding Credit After Bankruptcy:

Monitor your credit report: Conduct a thorough review of your credit report to verify its accuracy and pinpoint any potential areas for improvement.
Make on-time payments: It is imperative to make payments on time for all financial obligations to showcase a commendable track record of credit responsibility.
Keep credit utilization low: Maintain a disciplined approach to managing credit by ensuring your credit utilization remains low and refraining from excessive spending. Additionally, exercise caution when seeking new credit opportunities by minimizing credit inquiries and refraining from submitting multiple applications within a condensed timeframe.
Avoid new credit inquiries: Limit the number of credit applications you make and try to avoid applying for multiple credit products within a short timeframe. This will help you maintain a stable credit profile and minimize the impact of new credit inquiries on your credit score.
Credit Score Rebuilding: If you’re looking to improve your credit after facing financial challenges, some practical steps you can take include applying for a secured credit card, becoming an authorized user on a family member’s credit account, or taking out a small loan. One relatively accessible option post-bankruptcy is getting an RRSP loan, where the RRSP is held at the same financial institution you’re borrowing from.

These kinds of loans must normally be repaid within 1 year. Making all loan payments on time and doing the same thing again the following year not only will rebuild your credit, but also build your savings.

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens? What are the consequences for your spouse’s credit and assets?

Spouse’s liability for joint debts

In Canada, when one spouse files for bankruptcy, sometimes it can have consequences for the other spouse’s credit and assets, depending on the type of bankruptcy and the couple’s financial situation. Here’s a breakdown of the most common issues.

Credit Score Impact: The non-bankrupt spouse’s credit score could be affected if they are jointly liable for certain debts with the bankrupt spouse. This is because it may view the non-bankrupt spouse as being the next to default.
Joint Debts: If the couple has joint debts, such as a mortgage, car loan, or credit card, the non-bankrupt spouse will still be responsible for paying those debts. This is because joint debts are considered a shared responsibility.
Assets at Risk: Any of the non-bankrupt spouse’s assets that are jointly owned with the bankrupt spouse, will be at some level of risk. For example, if the couple owns a jointly held property, the Trustee must recover the non-exempt equity of the bankrupt spouse’s assets. In jointly held property, this will on a practical level impact and involve the non-bankrupt spouse, who is the natural purchaser of the bankrupt spouse’s equity.
Credit Reporting: The non-debtor spouse’s credit report may reflect the bankruptcy filing depending on the type of bankruptcy, the credit reporting agency and any joint debts or debts guaranteed by the non-bankrupt spouse.

Types of Bankruptcy and Their Impact on the Non-Debtor Spouse

Consumer Proposal: A consumer proposal is a debt settlement agreement between the insolvent spouse and their creditors. In this case, the non-insolvent spouse is not directly affected by the consumer proposal filing, but they may still be responsible for paying joint debts.

Personal Bankruptcy: Personal bankruptcy is a more severe type of bankruptcy that involves the liquidation of assets to pay off debts. In this case, the non-insolvent spouse’s assets may be at risk if they are jointly owned by the bankrupt spouse.

Protection of spouse’s assets during bankruptcy

The time to put plans in place to protect the assets of each spouse is upon the acquisition of each asset when neither spouse is insolvent. Any transfers of assets aiming to shield them from creditors, will not be successful. Here are some tips:

Separate Property: If the non-insolvent spouse has separate property, such as a separate bank account or a separate property, it is generally protected from the bankrupt spouse’s creditors.

Exemptions: In Ontario, individuals going through bankruptcy can keep certain assets as exempt property. These include household furnishings and appliances valued up to $14,180, livestock, tools, and other items used in farming up to $31,379 for farmers, tools of trade up to $14,405 for self-employed individuals, one motor vehicle worth up to $7,117, equity in a primary residence not exceeding $10,783, and funds in registered plans like RRSPs, RRIFs (other than contributions in the 12 months preceding the bankruptcy), and life insurance policies with designated beneficiaries such as a parent, spouse or child.

Credit Counseling: Additionally, credit counselling might be a good idea for the non-bankrupt spouse.

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens After You Are Discharged From Bankruptcy?

Discharge from bankruptcy

The effects of an absolute discharge from personal bankruptcy for the person are substantial. As soon as an outright discharge is granted, the debtor is no longer accountable for any type of unsecured debts that existed at the date of bankruptcy (with a few specific exceptions). The debtor is launched from needing to pay back debts that they took on before applying for bankruptcy.

This indicates that the debtor no longer has to stress over paying back those financial debts and can move on with their life. This supplies a clean slate for the borrower and helps them return to their feet.

There are different types of bankruptcy discharges. The one every bankrupt person wants is an absolute discharge. However, sometimes there is a reason for either a creditor, the licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy), or both, to oppose a bankrupt person’s discharge. When this happens, there must be a court hearing to determine what form of discharge the bankrupt is entitled to.

The purpose of the discharge hearing is for the court to view the evidence put forward by those opposing an absolute discharge, the bankrupt who believes they are entitled to one and to review the Trustee’s report and gain further information about the conduct of the bankrupt person, both before and during bankruptcy, and to hear about the administration of the bankruptcy.

At the discharge hearing, the court is attempting to balance the right of a bankrupt person to receive a discharge and the rights of the creditors to be paid. The court will also be concerned that the administration of the bankruptcy is not only fair to all parties but is also seen to be fair. I recently came across a decision of the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta which exemplifies this finding of balance.

Suspension of discharge from bankruptcy: When can a bankrupt person be discharged? If you have filed for bankruptcy for the first time, you may qualify for an automatic discharge after a 9-month bankruptcy period. To qualify for this automatic discharge, you must have:

attended the two mandatory financial counselling sessions with the Trustee;
no requirement to pay surplus income, being a portion of their income is paid to the bankruptcy estate
according to guidelines set by the OSB or Official Receiver); and no opposition to his or her discharge. The only party that can authorize an
automatic discharge
in bankruptcy is the Trustee.

If you have made an assignment in bankruptcy before and so this subsequent bankruptcy is your 2nd bankruptcy, you will need to wait at least 24 months before you can receive a discharge. If you have a surplus income payment requirement, your bankruptcy will be prolonged to 36 months.

If you have filed for bankruptcy twice before, you can expect the timeline for a third bankruptcy to be the same as your 2nd. However, the Trustee or creditors may be more resistant to your discharge this time. The court may extend the timeline if it deems necessary.

Rehabilitation and rebuilding finances after bankruptcy – A Path to Financial Freedom

Rehab after personal bankruptcy entails a combination of finance management, debt administration, and as indicated above, credit rebuilding. The goal is to produce a sustainable economic strategy that permits you to manage your debt, reconstruct your credit, and achieve lasting financial security.

The key steps to rehabilitation are:

Get your bankruptcy discharge: Attend the two mandatory financial counselling sessions with your licensed insolvency trustee firm, fulfill all your other duties in the bankruptcy administration and obtain your discharge from bankruptcy
Create a Budget: Continue tracking your income and expenses to identify areas where you can cut back and allocate funds more effectively. A budget will help you prioritize your spending and make informed financial decisions.
Prioritize Debt Repayment: Focus on starting within your budget spending so that you can pay your bills every month on time in full.
Rebuild Credit: Use the tips I listed above to rebuild your credit.
Screen Credit Reports: Obtain a duplicate of your credit report and correct any type of mistakes or errors to guarantee your credit score is accurate.
Seek Professional Guidance: If you feel you need an element of accountability to help you in your rehabilitation, seek out a non-profit credit counsellor or financial coach to give you personalized guidance and support to help you navigate the rehabilitation process and achieve your financial goals.

Rehabilitation after bankruptcy can have numerous benefits, including:

Improved credit scores
Reduced debt burden
Increased financial stability
Greater financial flexibility
A fresh start
if you declare bankruptcy what happens

If You Declare Bankruptcy What Happens? Looking Towards a Brighter Future Conclusion

The people we help through personal bankruptcy for their journey of financial recovery are filled with a sense of gratitude and hope. The impact of understanding their credit rating, navigating the bankruptcy process, and embracing the steps toward recovery are profound. It not only tests their resilience in finance but also empowers them to envision a brighter future filled with possibilities through a fresh start.

I hope you enjoyed this if you declare bankruptcy what happens Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or someone with too much personal debt.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

Tags alternatives to bankruptcy, Bankruptcy, bankruptcy discharge, bankruptcy duties, bankruptcy process, bankruptcy protection, Canada, credit counsellor, debt relief, exempt assets, financial recovery, If you declare bankruptcy what happens, Ira Smith Trustee, licensed insolvency trustee, non-exempt assets, personal bankruptcy, surplus income, what happens when you declare bankruptcy

Brandon Blog Post

HUGE IMPACT OF A SOCIAL MEDIA DEFAMATION CASE RULING ON CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY: A BREAKDOWN

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date July 1, 2024

defamation case

Introduction to Chelsea Hillier’s Defamation Case

As I delve into the intriguing case of Chelsea Hillier, it becomes apparent that her background and the subsequent defamation allegations have sparked a legal battle with profound implications. Let’s explore the intricacies of this complex situation.

In this blog, I delve into the intriguing defamation case of Chelsea Hillier, a bankrupt individual who found herself amid a legal battle due to online defamation. Join me as we uncover the details of the case, the court rulings, and the aftermath that followed.

Defining A Defamation Case and Forms of Defamation

What is defamation?

In Canada, defamation is any intentional or negligent false communication, whether written or spoken, that harms a person’s reputation or exposes them to ridicule, belittling, or contempt.

Types of defamation: libel and slander

The concept of defamation can have two possible parts; libel and slander. There is a distinction between libel and slander.

Written defamation (libel)

Libel is defamation either in writing or some other permanent form. Section 298(1) of the Canadian Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46) defines a defamatory libel as any published material that is likely to injure someone’s reputation or make them the object of hatred, contempt, or ridicule, without lawful justification or excuse.

Spoken defamation (slander)

Slander is defamation that is not left permanently. Slander is more commonly associated with an oral statement. With slander, there generally will always be a fight waged between slander and freedom of speech.

The impact of defamation on individuals and organizations

Defamation is an act of harming the reputation of another person through a false statement or many of them. In the real world, defamation can lead to severe consequences, including damages to one’s reputation and livelihood. The criminal code and being found guilty of the criminal offence of criminal defamation is one thing.

But in the real world, the possibility of imprisonment is not going to provide any real satisfaction to the wronged party. The way to get compensated for the suffered damages because of the defamation of character is to start a civil suit action for a defamation claim.

In today’s digital world, the occurrence of online vilification and social media problems positions an expanding worry for people and businesses alike. The simplicity and rate at which misinformation can be distributed on the web have made it extra challenging to secure your reputation from baseless attacks.

Social network platforms, once hailed as tools for connection and interaction, have now ended up being places for disparagement and where a defamation case is born through the fast spread of disparaging and harmful stories. Consequently, people have to bear in mind the web content they share on the internet and the potential consequences of their activities in the digital age.

Understanding the legal ramifications of online defamation is crucial. While freedom of expression is a fundamental right, it is essential to remember that this right comes with obligations. Uploading or sharing false information concerning others can have seriously damaging consequences, both legally and personally.

People must exercise care and promote ethical and honest behaviour in their online interactions to prevent injury to others and find themselves on the wrong side of the law. In a world where reputations can be tainted with a single click, it is crucial to focus on respect and integrity in all online communications.

The Elements of a Defamation Claim

Probably the most publicized recent defamation case was the case study of defamation to character was the Amber Heard vs. Johnny Depp in the United States. Although I am not a lawyer and this blog is not meant as legal advice, I do wish to discuss my understanding of the elements required in a defamation case in Canada.

Making a defamatory statement

In legal terms, a defamatory statement is false and harmful to a person’s reputation. To be considered defamatory, the statement must harm the plaintiff’s character or standing in the community. This can include accusations of criminal behaviour, dishonesty, or incompetence.

It is important to note that the statement must be proven false for it to be considered defamatory. If a statement meets these criteria, the plaintiff may have grounds for a defamation lawsuit. It is crucial to exercise caution when making statements that could potentially harm someone’s reputation, as the consequences can be severe.

Identifying the statement’s recipients

In a defamation case making a defamation claim, it is imperative that the plaintiff accurately identifies the defendant as the individual or entity responsible for the defamatory statement. This process is essential in establishing the grounds for the lawsuit and ensuring that the appropriate party is held accountable for their actions.

A thorough and detailed identification of the defendant is crucial in providing clarity and direction to the legal proceedings. Failure to correctly identify the defendant can result in delays, confusion, and potential dismissal of the case. Therefore, it is paramount that the plaintiff diligently and accurately identifies the defendant to pursue a successful resolution to the claim.

Statement’s falseness and its effect on reputation

The statement must have a defamatory meaning, which is a false and harmful statement that tends to harm the plaintiff’s reputation. For a statement to be considered defamatory, one of the key elements that must be proven is publication. The defendant must have shared the defamatory statement with a third party, someone other than the plaintiff. This includes written words in a letter or publication, or even online posts on social media platforms.

The act of publication is crucial in defamation cases as it demonstrates that the harmful information was disseminated to a wider audience, potentially causing damage to the plaintiff’s reputation. Individuals need to exercise caution and responsibility when sharing information to avoid potential legal consequences.

Damage to reputation and *emotional distres**s caused*

In defamation cases, the plaintiff must establish that they have suffered harm directly caused by the defamatory statement. This harm can materialize in various forms, such as damage to the plaintiff’s needs to compile reputation, financial losses, or other detrimental effects. Without concrete proof of harm, a defamation lawsuit may not stand in a legal setting.

Therefore, the plaintiff needs to compile relevant documentation and evidence to substantiate their claim of harm, whether through witness accounts, financial records, or other verifiable means. Demonstrating damage is a fundamental aspect of proving the legitimacy of a defamation case and necessitates thorough documentation and validation to pursue legal redress.

Defenses against defamation claims

There are several possible defenses against defamation claims. Some of the most common defences include:

Truth: The defendant can argue that the statement is true, and therefore, not defamatory. The burden of proof is on the defendant to prove the truth of the statement. Fair comment: The defendant can argue that the statement is a fair comment on a matter of public interest. This defense is often used by journalists, politicians, and others who make comments about public figures or issues.
Privilege: The defendant can argue that the statement is protected by privilege, which means that it is made in a context where the speaker has a qualified privilege to make the statement. Examples of privileged statements include statements made in Parliament, in court, or a confidential communication.
Honest opinion: The defendant may assert that the statement constitutes an honest opinion, and hence, is not defamatory. This defense is commonly invoked by individuals when making subjective remarks about a person or entity. Context: The defendant can argue that the statement is not defamatory because it is made in a context that makes it clear that it is not meant to be taken literally. For example, a statement made in a joke or a metaphor may not be defamatory if it is clear that it is not meant to be taken seriously.
Absolute privilege: The defendant can argue that the statement is protected by absolute privilege, which means that it is made in a context where the speaker has absolute immunity from liability. Examples of absolute privilege include statements made in court or a confidential communication.
Qualified privilege: The defendant can argue that the statement is protected by qualified privilege , which means that it is made in a context where the speaker has a qualified privilege to make the statement. Examples of qualified privilege . Therefore include statements made in a confidential communication or a communication made in good faith. Innocent dissemination: The defendant can argue that they did not know or have reason to know that the statement was defamatory, and therefore, should not be held liable.
Innocent dissemination: The defendant can argue that they did not know or have reason to know that the statement was defamatory, and therefore, should not be held liable.
Spoliation: The defendant can argue that the plaintiff has destroyed or tampered with evidence that would have helped to prove the truth or falsity of the statement. Therefore, the plaintiff should not be able to recover damages.
Statute-barred: The defendant can argue that the plaintiff has delayed in bringing the claim, and therefore, the claim is statute-barred or should be dismissed due to the passage of time. It’s worth noting that the availability of these defences may depend on the specific circumstances of the case, and the court may consider other factors when determining whether a defense is available.

The burden of proof in a defamation case

In a defamation case within the Canadian legal system, the burden of proof typically follows these guidelines:

The plaintiff, who initiates the claim, is responsible for demonstrating that the defendant made a defamatory statement about them.
The plaintiff must also provide evidence that the statement was disseminated to a third party rather than solely being known to the plaintiff.
It is incumbent upon the plaintiff to establish that the statement carried a defamatory meaning, characterized by being both false and damaging to the plaintiff’s reputation.
The plaintiff must further substantiate that the defendant acted recklessly or negligently in making the defamatory statement.

Overview of Chelsea Hillier’s Background and the Defamation Case Allegations

Chelsea Hillier, the daughter of former MPP Randy Hillier, found herself embroiled in a legal quagmire due to her online behaviour. The saga began with a series of defamatory tweets posted on her ‘weaponized’ Twitter account, targeting her former friend, Esther Post. These tweets falsely accused Post, a sessional lecturer at Carleton University, of unethical behaviour, leading to a contentious legal battle.

In June 2022, the Honourable Madam Justice Gomery found Hillier guilty of defamation, highlighting the significant harm caused by her reckless online conduct. The court ordered Hillier to pay $85,000 in damages and additional legal fees to Post, underscoring the severe repercussions of her actions.

Relationship Between Chelsea Hillier and Esther Post Leading to the Legal Battle

The relationship between Chelsea Hillier and Esther Post dates back to 2008 when Post was Hillier’s instructor at Carleton University. What began as a close friendship deteriorated due to Hillier’s extremist views on the COVID-19 pandemic, mirroring those of her father.

The fallout culminated in a series of defamatory tweets by Hillier, including false accusations and the dissemination of private photos from Post’s wedding. Post, rightfully aggrieved by these actions, pursued legal recourse, resulting in a protracted legal battle that exposed the dark underbelly of online behaviour.

The legal ramifications of this case extend beyond mere monetary compensation, shedding light on the broader implications of social media conduct and the legal responsibilities that accompany online interactions.

Defamation Case: The Defamation Allegations

As I delve into the details of the defamation case involving Chelsea Hillier, it’s evident that the repercussions of her actions have been significant. The defamatory tweets she posted not only tarnished her reputation but also led to legal battles with severe consequences.

Details of the Defamatory Tweets

Chelsea Hillier’s tweets, posted on her Twitter account, targeted Esther Post with false accusations of drugging and inappropriate behaviour. These tweets, intended to harm Post, resulted in a ruling against Hillier for causing psychological harm through online harassment.

The tweets, weaponized to spread misinformation and malice, showcased a blatant disregard for the truth and ethical online conduct. Despite Hillier and Post’s friendship, the defamatory posts’ fallout was irreparable.

Legal Implications and Subsequent Bankruptcy Consequences

The legal ramifications of Hillier’s actions were severe. Post was successful in obtaining judgment against Hillier in the total amount of about $100,000. Facing this debt that she could not pay, Hillier filed an assignment in bankruptcy, thinking she would outsmart Post. As discussed below, it did not quite work out that way.

Esther Post’s pursuit of justice in her defamation action exemplifies the impact of social media’s legal implications and the need for accountability in online interactions. The ongoing battle for restitution underscores the long-lasting effects of defamatory actions and the importance of upholding integrity in digital communication.

Defamation Case Court Rulings and Legal Consequences

As we delve into the intricate web of court rulings and legal consequences surrounding the case of Chelsea Hillier, it becomes evident that the ramifications of her actions extend far beyond a mere declaration of bankruptcy. The analysis of the court rulings against Chelsea Hillier sheds light on the complexities of defamation cases and the enduring financial obligations that follow.

Chelsea Hillier’s journey through the legal system serves as a stark reminder of the repercussions of online behaviour and the profound impact it can have on individuals’ lives. Despite her attempts to absolve herself through bankruptcy, the courts have held her accountable for the damages inflicted on Esther Post due to defamatory statements made on social media.

Analysis of the Defamation Case Court Rulings

The court’s decision to uphold the $85,000 in damages plus additional legal fees underscores the gravity of Chelsea Hillier’s actions. The ruling of the Honourable Mr. Justice Stanley J. Kershman of the Ontario Superior Court emphasizes that bankruptcy does not serve as a shield against the consequences of intentional harm caused to others.

Post’s lawyer, David Shiller, aptly argued that bankruptcy laws are designed to protect honest debtors facing financial distress, not as an escape route for individuals evading their responsibilities. The legal system’s unwavering stance against misuse of bankruptcy in cases of deliberate harm sets a precedent for accountability and justice.

Section 178(1)(a.1)(i) of the BIA states that any award of damages by a court in civil proceedings in respect of bodily harm intentionally inflicted is not released by the bankrupt obtaining a discharge from bankruptcy. In other words, this kind of debt follows the person until the judgment is fully paid, even after bankruptcy.

This is not a novel situation. Courts across Canada have dealt with this type of issue before. Certain cases are extremely relevant to the Hillier bankruptcy case that lay out how defamation to character judgment claims are handled in the Canadian bankruptcy context and whether such a claim survives a person’s bankruptcy. The roadmap of prior cases I found are:

In short, these cases uphold the concept that civil liability for defamation from intentionally causing bodily harm is not a debt that can be discharged through bankruptcy. It also confirms that “bodily harm” includes negatively affecting the person’s mental health.

Financial Obligations Despite Declaring Bankruptcy

The saga of Chelsea Hillier brings to the forefront the stark reality that there is a limited class of debts that are not erased by declaring bankruptcy, especially in cases where harm has been inflicted intentionally. Hillier’s failure to comply with court orders and remove defamatory content led to further legal repercussions, including contempt of court charges and additional financial penalties.

Despite her bankruptcy filing, Hillier remains liable for the damages and legal costs incurred by Post, highlighting the enduring nature of this kind of legal obligation. The court’s decision to allow Post to pursue the owed amount through wage garnishment underscores the long-term consequences of failing to meet legal responsibilities.

The Bankruptcy Had No Impact On The Defamation Case

The complexities of Chelsea Hillier’s legal battle show the ramifications of declaring bankruptcy in the context of the defamation case come to light. Bankruptcy does not absolve one of financial obligations arising from the actual malice of untrue statements resulting in intentional harm caused by online behaviour.

The legal repercussions of bankruptcy in the defamation case involving Chelsea Hillier are profound. Despite her declaration of bankruptcy, the court ruled that she remains liable for the actual damages and legal fees amounting to over $100,000. This ruling underscores the principle that bankruptcy laws are designed to protect honest debtors, not to enable individuals to evade certain obligations without any penalty.

Moreover, the ongoing financial obligations for Chelsea Hillier extend beyond mere monetary payments. The impact of her online behaviour, characterized by defamatory tweets, has far-reaching consequences. These actions not only led to legal repercussions but also inflicted psychological harm on the victim, Esther Post. The court’s decision to hold Hillier accountable emphasizes the importance of upholding ethical standards in online interactions.

It is crucial to recognize that declaring bankruptcy may not erase the consequences of one’s actions. In Chelsea Hillier’s case, the legal system has made it clear that accountability transcends financial matters. The defamation case serves as a stark reminder of the social media legal implications and the need for responsible online behaviour.

Defamation Case Conclusion

Reflecting on the case of Chelsea Hillier and its aftermath, it becomes evident that social media has the power to shape not just our virtual interactions but also our real-world relationships and legal standing. As we navigate the digital landscape, it is crucial to tread carefully, mindful of the impact our online actions can have on others and ourselves.

I hope you enjoyed this defamation case Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

Brandon Blog Post

NAVIGATING THE STALKING HORSE OFFER LEGAL MAZE: THE TOOL SHED BREWING BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION EXPERIENCE

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date May 13, 2024

stalking horse offer

Stalking Horse Offer Introduction

In Brandon’s Blog post, I provide an in-depth analysis of the stalking horse offer in the context of bankruptcy protection, drawing insights from a recent ruling by the Alberta Court in the case of Tool Shed Brewing. By examining the various elements that influence court decisions regarding such offers and the intricacies of managing a stalking horse sales process, I aim to shed light on this complex legal subject.

Through an examination of Tool Shed Brewing’s situation and an ongoing stalking horse case of mine, this article offers readers a comprehensive understanding of the challenges, nuances, and legal aspects involved in navigating the complexities of bankruptcy protection.

What is a Stalking Horse Offer?

Definition and Purpose of a Stalking Horse Offer

In an insolvency or bankruptcy proceeding, a stalking horse offer serves as an initial bid on the assets of a distressed company.

This offer sets a floor price for the assets, exposed to a public marketing process, and encourages other potential buyers to submit higher bids. The company typically chooses the stalking horse bidder in financial distress and plays a crucial role in the solicitation and investment solicitation process (SISP).

Benefits of a Stalking Horse Offer

By providing a baseline offer, the stalking horse offer aims to maximize the value of the company’s assets and streamline the sale process. Understanding the nuances of stalking horse offers is essential for companies navigating bankruptcy protection cases to secure the best possible outcome.

stalking horse offer

Stalking Horse Offer: Understanding the Stalking Horse Bid Process

How a Stalking Horse Bidder is Selected

In the business world, a stalking horse bidder is often used in the context of mergers and acquisitions or an insolvency or bankruptcy process to help facilitate the sale of a company (M&A) or the company’s assets (insolvency/bankruptcy process). The party selected to make the stalking horse offer is selected by the target company’s management team to submit an initial offer for the company or its assets, to start the bidding process.

The selection of a stalking horse bidder is a strategic decision, often based on their financial stability and expertise in the industry. Many times in an insolvency process, the stalking horse bidder may already be a stakeholder of the insolvent company. It is not unusual for a secured creditor, a major investor or a group affiliated with current management to make the stalking horse offer.

The stalking horse bidder serves as a starting point for other interested parties to make their bids, hopefully driving up the value of the company or its assets and maximizing the potential sale price. Careful consideration and due diligence are taken in selecting a stalking horse bidder to ensure the best outcome for all parties involved.

Factors Considered in Choosing a Stalking Horse Bidder

When considering a stalking horse bidder, several factors must be carefully evaluated to make an informed decision. The first and most crucial factor is the bidder’s financial stability and ability to fulfill their obligations. This includes their credit rating, cash flow, and previous track record in similar transactions. Additionally, the bidder’s strategic fit with the company and their long-term goals must be taken into account.

Other important factors include their experience in the industry, their proposed purchase price, and any proposed contingencies or conditions. It is also important to thoroughly review the bidder’s proposed plans for the company or the assets post-acquisition. By carefully considering all of these factors, it ensures that the right party has been chosen to make the stalking horse offer which is not only financially capable but also aligned with achieving the goals of the stalking horse sales process.

Importance of a Stalking Horse Bid in Attracting Other Bidders

A stalking horse bid plays a crucial role in attracting other bidders in a competitive bidding process. It is a preliminary bid made by a buyer to set a minimum price for the assets being sold. This bid serves as a starting point for other potential buyers to make their offers, creating a competitive environment.

A stalking horse bid also demonstrates the seriousness and commitment of the buyer, making it more likely for other bidders to take the opportunity seriously. Moreover, it provides a benchmark for fair market value, ensuring that the insolvency process results in the estate receiving the best possible price for the assets under the circumstances. In summary, a stalking horse bid catalyzes a successful and competitive bidding process.

In setting the floor price, the licensed insolvency trustee needs to be able to justify that price, amongst all the other details of the stalking horse offer. The use of appraisals will help the Trustee in justifying the stalking horse offer price as well as the ultimate sales price when seeking the approval of the court for both the SISP and the ultimate sale.

Stalking Horse Offer: Stalking Horse Bid Agreement

Contents and Terms of a Stalking Horse Bid Agreement

A stalking horse bid agreement is a legal document that outlines the terms and conditions of a potential acquisition or sale of a company’s assets. The contents of a stalking horse bid agreement include a detailed description of the assets being sold, the purchase price, and any conditions or contingencies that must be met for the sale to be completed. It also outlines the responsibilities and obligations of both the buyer and the seller. Additionally, the agreement may include confidentiality and non-disclosure terms to protect sensitive information. This agreement serves as a framework for the bidding and negotiation process, providing structure and protection for all parties involved.

In a court-appointed receivership I am involved in right now, we are using the stalking horse offer process in the court-approved SISP. The agreement we obtained court approval for is in a typical format used in insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings to facilitate the sale of a distressed company’s assets.

To give you a better idea of the content and terms in a stalking horse bid agreement, the main headings in the stalking horse offer asset purchase agreement we developed with our legal counsel are:

ASSETS TO BE SOLD AND PURCHASED

Assumed Liabilities
Assignments Requiring Consent
Purchase Price
Allocation of
Purchase Price
Bid and Auction Procedures

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

Receiver’s Representations and Warranties
Purchaser’s Representations and Warranties
“As Is, Where Is”

COVENANTS

Covenants of the Receiver
Covenants of the Purchaser

CONDITIONS AND TERMINATION

Conditions for the Benefit of the Purchaser
Conditions for the Benefit of the Receiver
Waiver of Condition
Termination
Effect of Termination

CLOSING ARRANGEMENTS

Closing
Receiver’s Closing Deliveries
Purchaser’s Closing Deliveries
Confidentiality
Delivery of Receiver’s Certificate

COMPETING BIDS AND SALES PROCESS

The Sale Process
Break Fee

stalking horse offer

Stalking Horse Offer: Agreement for Expense Reimbursement and Breakup Fee

In a stalking horse offer, the seller may agree to cover certain expenses incurred by the stalking horse purchaser during the negotiation process. The seller always offers a breakup fee if the party making the stalking horse offer turns out not to be the buyer because the SISP produces a better offer.

This agreement for expense reimbursements and breakup fees, which are also called topping fees, is a common practice in the world of mergers and acquisitions and insolvency/bankruptcy process stalking horse sales, as it protects both parties involved. The potential buyer can gain a competitive advantage by being the first to make an offer while being compensated for incurring the time and expense of doing its due diligence and exposing its offer to the marketplace if the deal does not go through.

This type of agreement is typically negotiated carefully and is an important aspect of the overall SISP.

Stalking Horse Offer: The Importance of a Court-Approved Stalking Horse Agreement

A Court-Approved Stalking Horse Agreement and a Court-Approved SISP, are crucial tools in the process of a bankruptcy sale. The agreement allows a potential buyer, known as the “stalking horse,” to set a floor purchase price for the assets being sold. This not only ensures a fair and transparent bidding process but also provides a level of protection for the debtor’s estate. By setting a minimum bid, the stalking horse agreement prevents lowball offers and encourages competitive bidding, ultimately maximizing the value of the assets for the benefit of creditors. Furthermore, obtaining bankruptcy court approval for this agreement enhances the validity and credibility of the SISP.

Therefore, a Court-Approved Stalking Horse Agreement and SISP are of utmost importance in facilitating a successful bankruptcy sale.

Stalking Horse Offer: The Auction Process and Other Bidders

In the court-appointed receivership SISP I am running, using this sales process resulted in competition among bidders. We ended up having two Qualified Bidders (as defined in the SISP documents); the stalking horse bidder and one of the other parties who made an offer. Following the terms of the SISP bidding procedures, both Qualified Bidders were given the limited time allowed for in the sales process to advise if they wished to participate in an auction process. Both Qualified Bidders advised they would participate.

I held the auction on the day and time stated in the SISP documents. The result was that the price got bid up to a point where the stalking horse bidder dropped out of the auction.

As I am in court tomorrow seeking approval of a sale to the other bidder and not the stalking horse transaction, I can’t provide any specific details in this blog. What I can say is:

This buyer originally made a low-ball offer before we were in a position to offer the assets for sale
. For many reasons, the offer was rejected.
The stalking horse offer price is 2.75 times the offer we rejected. The price achieved through the auction process is 1.5 times the stalking horse bid price.

The details contained herein and in our court material prove that the stalking horse sales process worked well in this case.

Stalking Horse Offer: Introduction to Tool Shed Brewing Company Inc.

Now let me take you on a journey through another real-life case through the fascinating world of Tool Shed Brewing Company Inc. (Tool Shed). This company ran a craft beer brewery and a restaurant.

Tool Shed had financial struggles that ultimately led to its bankruptcy protection filing. Despite their creative endeavours in the craft beer industry, Tool Shed found themselves grappling with substantial debts and financial obligations.

Tool Shed’s operations revolve around the production and distribution of both alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages to various retailers and restaurants. The valuable assets were non-assignable licenses and permits issued by the Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission. Tool Shed considered these assets as the pillars of their business.

stalking horse offer

Stalking Horse Offer: The Bankruptcy Protection Filing Through A Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal

In January 2024 the CRA took legal action against Tool Shed, highlighting the pressing financial crisis. Faced with the stark reality of its financial obligations, Tool Shed took a decisive step by filing a Notice of Intention To Make A Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), appointing a licensed insolvency trustee as their proposal trustee.

With the weight of financial distress looming over them, Tool Shed sought avenues for recovery, leading to the approval of a stalking horse bid by 2582568 Alberta Inc., a company owned by Tool Shed’s CEO, James Costello. However, this move faced opposition from individual investors and secured creditors, John Donovan and Juliana Bourne, who presented a competing bid through 2594617 Alberta Ltd.

February 12, 2024, played a crucial role in setting the stage for the ensuing developments. Tool Shed went to the Alberta court seeking an order not only to extend the timeline for filing a proposal but also for the approval of the interim financing by the Costello Company, and initiating the sales process, including the approval of the 2582568 Alberta Inc. offer. Despite the objections of the Donovan group, the court approved the relief requested by Tool Shed, including the SISP and the Costello offer approval.

The Stalking Horse Bid and Approval Application

The proposal trustee ran the SISP and then applied to court As the narrative unfolded, intense deliberations ensued, as Tool Shed faced the impending threat of bankruptcy. The contentious discussions revolving around the SISP transaction application brought to the fore the divergent viewpoints of stakeholders, including the Donovan Group and the Costello Company.

The Donovan Group raised many issues in opposing the approval of the sale to the Costello Company. There were also many issues affecting the court process, some of which were outside of the control of the stakeholders.

The road to approval is rarely smooth, and Tool Shed’s case is no exception. With opposing voices from the Donovan Group, who also were investors in Tool Shed, the Approval Application process became a battleground of conflicting interests.

As the clock ticked towards the crucial hearing date, scheduling issues and the need for more time loomed large. The delicate dance of legal procedures and the strategic moves of involved parties heightened the drama surrounding the fate of Tool Shed and the Stalking Horse Bid.

The twists and turns in the Approval Application process serve as a testament to the intricate nature of financial dealings and the resilience required to navigate through turbulent waters. With each challenge faced head-on, Tool Shed’s fate teeters on a knife-edge, awaiting the final verdict on the Stalking Horse Bid.

stalking horse offer

Stalking Horse Process: The Challenges Faced During the Approval Application Process

Standing of the Parties

The issue of standing was raised, where the Costello investors and the Donovan Group asserted their standing as secured creditors. The application continued on the basis that they had standing, as there was no objection from Tool Shed.

Issues of Fairness and Integrity

In a previous case, the court considered the situation where the losing bidder had no standing to raise concerns about fairness and integrity in the bidding process.

It was suggested that objections should be given to the court-appointed monitor, but in that specific case, the monitor had already submitted its report and did not address the objections.

In this case, the Proposal Trustee in their correspondence and reports addressed the issues raised by the Donovan Group and the Costello Investors. The Costello Investors and Donovan Group asserted that while the SISP Order was final, the implementation of the SISP Process was unfair and lacked integrity.

The SISP Process established specific requirements for a bid to be considered qualified, including timing, sale proposal, unconditional bid, and being a superior offer. The process also incorporated a definition of assumed liabilities and outlined the assessment and determination of qualified bids.

There appeared to be inconsistencies in the drafting of the SISP Process, specifically in requirements for a qualified bid to be a superior offer and the authority to waive non-compliance. The court interpreted the requirements and determined the reasonable assessment of qualified bids based on the process.

Determination of Superior Offer

The determination of a superior offer was defined based on the credibility, financial viability, and terms of the offer in comparison to the Stalking Horse Agreement. If no qualified bid was a superior offer, the Stalking Horse Bid would be declared the successful bid.

Principles for Disposition Approval

Tool Shed submitted that the factors for approval of the disposition had been met, ensuring the successful assessment of the principles outlined in the leading case for any insolvency or bankruptcy sale process, Royal Bank of Canada v. Soundair Corp., 1991 CanLII 2727 (ON CA) (Soundair). The Donovan Group contested that the Soundair principles had not been met and argued against approval of the Stalking Horse Bid.

Stalking Horse Offer: Final Rulings and Approval of the Stalking Horse Bid

Understanding the context leading to these final rulings and approvals is crucial. Tool Shed sought approval for a reverse vesting order for the Stalking Horse Bid. The reverse vesting order process was part of the SISP. This method had to be used to preserve the non-transferable licenses that were so valuable.

Throughout the process, Tool Shed’s financial situation and attempts to restructure debt were under scrutiny. The involvement of various parties, including creditors and investors, added complexity to the proceedings. The court considered crucial factors such as assets, debts, and the impact on all stakeholders.

The court is required to ensure the integrity of the process without delving into the minutiae of operational decisions. Review in receiverships focuses on procedural fairness rather than questioning business decisions.

Consideration of SISP Order The court carefully considered the implementation and compliance with the Sale and Investment Solicitation Process (SISP) order in evaluating the Stalking Horse Bid. The SISP order is a crucial component of the bankruptcy proceedings as it ensures a fair and transparent process for all parties involved.

The court always needs to ensure the integrity of the process without delving into the minutiae of operational decisions. A court review in receivership or bankruptcy cases focuses on procedural fairness rather than questioning business decisions. Here is what the court must consider when asked to approve a sale.

Challenging the SISP Order in the Approval Application

The court ruled that during the Approval Application, the Donovan Group cannot challenge the SISP Order granted on February 12, 2024. Secured creditors were notified per s.65.13(3) of the BIA and the SISP Order granted was not appealed. As a valid and subsisting court order, the Donovan Group cannot now attack the SISP Order.

Reasonableness of Sale Process

The implementation by the Proposal Trustee rather than the structure of the SISP Process was under scrutiny. The court’s role was to ensure fair negotiations and the bidding process. Notwithstanding some glitches in the way the Proposal Trustee carried out the SISP, the court interpreted the results as consistent with the aims of the SISP and found the SISP to have been run reasonably.

Consultation with Creditors

No consultation with creditors was required in the SISP implementation. The court found that the integrity of the process was maintained without creditor involvement.

Effects of Proposed Sale

Parties had prior knowledge of the SISP Process and Stalking Horse Agreement. Consideration of the sale process fairness was previously determined as was the proposed sale under the stalking horse offer. Therefore, it was not a primary concern in the Approval Application.

Soundair Principles

Soundair principles involve specific inquiries by the court. The court performed the applicable analysis for the NOI Proceedings and Approval Application context. The court found that the Soundair principles were met.

Efforts for Best Price

The court found that proper steps were taken to encourage interest in Tool Shed for the best price. No issues were raised regarding the advertising process for the sale.

Access to Information

Concerns were raised by Donovan Group about timely and full access to Tool Shed information. Issues were highlighted regarding asymmetrical access to information due to dual roles. The court did not find that there were any impediments to access to information.

Inadequate Due Diligence Information

Due to resource constraints, certain inquiries from the Donovan Group were unfulfilled. However, the Donovan Group was satisfied with the information passed on by the Proposal Trustee. The court did not feel this impacted the Donovan Group’s ability to make a meaningful bid.

Evaluation of Bid Information

Donovan Group failed to demonstrate they were denied access to different or better information for the Stalking Horse Bid. Considerations by the Alberta Court of Appeal were highlighted for bid evaluation.

Extension of Bid Deadline

The initial bid deadline was set for March 11, 2024, with a requested two-week extension by Donovan Group. The Proposal Trustee granted a three-day extension till March 14, 2024. The court did not find that Donovan Group was prejudiced in any way.

Submission of Preliminary Bid

Donovan Group submitted a conditional bid on March 14, 2024. The bid was rejected for various reasons including conditional nature and incomplete payment obligations.

Rejection of Revised Donovan Bid

Donovan Group submitted an unconditional bid on March 22, 2024. The Proposal Trustee originally rejected the bid citing contraventions of the process and insufficient benefit to stakeholders.

The Donovan Group further revised the bid to satisfy the Proposal Trustee’s concerns. The Proposal Trustee later reviewed and accepted the Revised Donovan Bid.

The court decided that it did not need to deal with the Donovan Group’s complaints regarding the Trustee’s prior rejection reasons as they were not applicable or relevant post-acceptance.

Efforts to Get the Best Price

The Proposal Trustee extended the deadline twice for the Donovan Group, showing fairness. The court found that the Proposal Trustee made efforts to secure the best price without acting improvidently.

Consideration of All Parties’ Interests

The court held that the interests of the losing bidder (Donovan Group), the proponent of the Stalking Horse Bid (Costello Company), and the creditors were all taken into account.

Tool Shed’s interests were also considered by the SISP and the SISP Order.

Assessment of Qualified Bid and Superior Offer

The Revised Donovan Bid diverged from the SISP in the required Assumed Liabilities. The Revised Donovan Bid was therefore not considered either a Qualified Bid or a Superior Offer by the Proposal Trustee.

The court concurred with the Proposal Trustee’s assessment and confirmed that the Donovan Group had no stake in the Sale Approval Process due to its bid not meeting all of the required qualifications.

An image of a stormy dark sky with a ray of light shining through with professional advisors in the foreground to represent corporate financial problems but the hope for a successful restructuring using a stalking horse offer. — *stalking horse offer*

Stalking Horse Offer: The Court’s decision

After the parties finished navigating the legal maze and after the Court’s careful consideration of all arguments and submissions, the Court rendered its decision. The court found that:

The SISP Process was approved and implemented with integrity.

Overall, there was no identified unfairness in the working of the SISP Process.

No unfair actions were attributed to the Proposal Trustee.

The test of the Soundair principles was met.

The Court approved the Stalking Horse Bid as it met the necessary criteria outlined in the SISP. Concerns raised were thoroughly assessed, leading to a decision in favour of the approved bid.

Stalking Horse Offer FAQs

What is a stalking horse bid?

A stalking horse bid refers to an initial overture intended to acquire assets from a financially distressed company, typically one undergoing bankruptcy or seeking bankruptcy protection. The primary objective behind employing a stalking horse bid is to establish a baseline price for the said asset, unveiling the first bid publicly and instigating a competitive bidding procedure.

Where does the term “stalking horse” come from?

The term “stalking horse” originally referred to a horse or an object that hunters would hide behind to approach their prey without being noticed. In the context of business, it now means an initial bidder who sets the groundwork for subsequent bidders in a sale process.

What is a stalking horse candidate in a bankruptcy proceeding?

In a bankruptcy proceeding, a stalking horse candidate is an interested buyer of a bankrupt company that is chosen by the company and presented to the bankruptcy court for approval. The stalking horse candidate sets the initial bid, which other interested bidders cannot go below, essentially dividing the opposition in the bidding process.

What are the benefits of being a stalking horse bidder?

Being a stalking horse bidder allows for control over many aspects of the bidding process and includes fail-safe fees if the bid doesn’t win. However, there are higher initial costs associated with being a stalking horse bidder, such as negotiations and conducting due diligence, which other bidders can then leverage in their bids.

How does a stalking horse sale process work?

In a stalking horse sale process, an initial bidder negotiates a purchase agreement with a distressed or bankrupt company to purchase its assets. The initial bidder sets the terms of the transaction, conducts due diligence on the assets, and establishes a minimum purchase price for other interested parties to bid on. This process aims to maximize the value of the company’s assets in a fair, efficient, and transparent manner.

Stalking Horse Offer Conclusion

In conclusion, navigating the legal maze of stalking horse offers in bankruptcy cases is crucial for companies seeking protection and restructuring. Understanding the intricacies of the process, including the factors considered by the court for approval and the running of a stalking horse sales process, is essential for a successful outcome.

The Tool Shed bankruptcy protection experience serves as a valuable case study, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities presented by stalking horse offers. By seeking expert legal and licensed insolvency trustee counsel and following strategic approaches, companies can effectively navigate the complexities of stalking horse offers and emerge stronger from the bankruptcy protection process.

I hope you have enjoyed this stalking horse offer Brandon’s Blog. Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The information provided in this Brandon’s Blog is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional advice regarding their specific situations. The content of this Brandon’s Blog should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional guidance or consultation. The author, Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. as well as any contributors to this Brandon’s Blog, do not assume any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information provided herein.

Tags auction process, bankruptcy court approval, bankruptcy process, bankruptcy sale, bankruptcy sale process, bidding procedures, breakup fee, competitive bidding process, distressed company, initial bidder, investment solicitation process, Ira Smith Trustee, stalking horse, stalking horse bid, stalking horse bidder, stalking horse offer, subsequent bidders, Tool Shed Brewing

Insolvency Advisory Services: Introduction

What is Insolvency?

The Insolvency Legal Framework

Key Legislation in Canadian Insolvency Law

Provincial Laws and Their Impact on Insolvency

Roles and Responsibilities

Access to Insolvency Information

Insolvency Advisory Services: The Profit Motive

Understanding Senior Claims

The Financial Implications

The Cold Reality

Insolvency Case Study: Do Our Fees Hold Up In Court?

What factors influenced the assessment of the fairness of our liquidation fees?

The Mechanics of Corporate Insolvency

1. The Ins and Outs of Bankruptcy Law

2. A Day in the Life of a Licensed Insolvency Trustee Adviser

Typical Tasks Include:

3. Key Players in Corporate Insolvency

4. Why Experience Really Matters

The Ripple Effect of Rising Insolvency Advisories

Entrepreneurial Businesses and Higher Fees

The Role of Insolvency Advisers

Lending and Creditworthiness

Myths Surrounding Formal Insolvency Proceedings

The Ethical Dilemma In Insolvency Advisory

Finding Balance

Insolvency in Canada: FAQs

Insolvency Conclusion: Navigating the Stormy Waters Ahead

Financial Burdens: Introduction

Financial Burdens: Signs of Financial Distress

Recognizing the sandwich generation’s challenges

Financial Burdens

Emotional Toll

Practical Solutions

Financial Burdens: The Financial Implications of Cancer Treatment

The Financial Weight on Patients and Caregivers

The Hidden Costs of Cancer Care

Understanding the Data

Chart of Financial Impact

Financial Burdens: The Personal Story Reality Behind the Numbers

His Profile

The Impact of Income Loss

Struggles with Treatments

Emotional Toll of Financial Stress

Financial Burdens: The Economic Disparities in Cancer Care

How Income Affects Access to Treatment

Challenges faced by lower-income households

Travel: A Hidden Cost

Financial Constraints and Health Outcomes

Financial Burdens: The Complexity of Cancer Drug Coverage in Canada

Understanding Public Funding and Drug Coverage

The Role of Private Health Insurance

Financial Burdens and Advocating for Change: The CCS’s Call to Action

Community Involvement and Advocacy

Financial Burdens: Strategies for Managing Financial Distress

Tips for Managing Debt

Building a Stronger Financial Future

FAQ: Financial Burdens of Medical Costs

Financial Burdens: Conclusion

Corp Bankruptcy Introduction

Understanding What Is Corp Bankruptcy

Types of Corp Bankruptcy Proceedings in Canada

Liquidation

Reorganization

Liquidation under Corp Bankruptcy

Reorganization: A Path to Recovery

Division I Proposals vs. Bankruptcy: Understanding Key Legislation and the Nuances

Receivership: When Secured Creditors Take Action

Corp Bankruptcy: Weighing the Pros and Cons

Advantages and Disadvantages of Liquidation

Advantages and Disadvantages of Reorganization

Advantages and Disadvantages of Receivership

Corporate Recovery and Restructuring: Exploring Alternatives to Corp Bankruptcy in Canada With Other Potential Recovery Options

Cost-Cutting and Budgeting

Debt Refinancing

Shareholder Investment

Informal Debt Settlement

Asset Sales

Corp bankruptcy FAQs

Conclusion: Seeking Expert Guidance for Corp Bankruptcy

*Financial Burden**s: The Financial Implications of Cancer Treatment*

The *Hidden Cost**s of Cancer Care*

*Advantages and Dis**advantages of Reorganization*

*Canadian L**iquidation Bankruptcy (known in the United States as a Chapter 7 bankruptcy)*