court appointed estate trustee Archives - Ira SmithTrustee & Receiver Inc.

Introduction

The official term for dying without a will in Ontario, or anywhere else, is that they have died intestate. The consequences of dying without a will in Ontario are significant. A recent Court decision about this famous Canadian’s Estate highlights the issue.

Toller James Montague Cranston, deceased

Toller Cranston was a popular Canadian figure skater and artist. He passed away on January 23, 2015, in Mexico where he lived for some

23 years. The departed passed away without leaving a will. His 3 siblings, Phillippa Baran, Goldie Cranston and Guy Cranston were proclaimed the sole heirs of the Estate by the Second Civil Court in San Miguel de Allende, Guanajuato, Mexico in August 2015.

Phillippa is the Estate Trustee. She was initially named “Executor” of the estate by the court in Mexico on September 2015. A Certificate of Appointment of Foreign Estate Trustee’s Nominee as Estate Trustee without a Will was issued by the Superior Court of Justice in Ottawa on December 8, 2016. This also includes a certificate of appointment of estate trustee without a will.

The assets of the Estate were located both in Canada and in Mexico. Upon his death, the Estate consisted of about 20,000 items of original art, bank accounts and other property. The initial worth of the Estate was around $6,258,520.

According to Phillippa, the unsold or unrealized property includes $429,958 in money and around $1,577,371 in the artwork. The deceased’s original artwork was placed on consignment at several art galleries for sale.

Siblings disagree on what to do with the remaining original artwork

At first, the siblings collaborated to carry out what needed to be done in the Estate. After Toller Cranston’s death, they took a trip to Mexico to deal with the Estate. Along with selling the real estate, a variety of paintings as well as other assets which were split between them.

Consequently, Goldie and Guy Cranston came to be worried regarding Phillippa’s management of the Estate. They stated that Phillippa has actually mishandled the Estate and they are worried about how she will deal with the remaining Estate assets.

Especially bothering to Guy and Goldie Cranston is Phillippa’s views on dealing with the rest of the Estate. It is the artwork that is a significant emphasis on disagreement. These are among the main reasons Goldie and Guy are asking that an Estate Trustee During Litigation be assigned right now.

Goldie and Guy were particularly disturbed over the following:

Concerning the artwork in storage, they have repeatedly requested that they receive their share of the actual artwork. They don’t want or need it to be sold. Phillippa has ignored their requests.
There was evidence that the art gallery where a major amount of artwork was placed on consignment was having financial difficulties. The concern was that the gallery may not continue in business and the artwork could be lost.
The law firm acting for Philippa also acts for the art gallery in financial trouble.
Neither Guy nor Goldie requires the paintings to be sold. In fact, Guy owns an art gallery in Nova Scotia. They do not want to lose up to 50% of the value of the artwork they are entitled to because of art gallery commissions. Therefore, Phillippa’s insisting that the artwork must be sold is an unreasonable loss for them.
Toller Cranston’s legacy. They say that Phillippa’s actions related to marketing and licensing opportunities that the artwork could yield once the passing of accounts is concluded are unreasonable. She is more focused on that, without any consultation with the other heirs, than she is in administering the assets currently in the Estate.
They are surprised that the Estate Trustee has paid herself the amount of $528,228 from the Estate. They also have issues regarding the $315,774 spent by Phillippa in legal fees.

Guy and Goldie request the appointment of an Estate Trustee During Litigation

Goldie and Guy Cranston state that Phillippa ought to be replaced as Estate Trustee in order to avoid causing incurable damage to the heirs if the artwork is sold off in the current fashion. They propose that an Estate Trustee During Litigation should be designated to protect the assets of the Estate and to disperse the artwork in-kind amongst the heirs.

They nominated a specific lawyer as the Estate Trustee During Litigation. The Court found that his credentials are not a problem and that he is capable of acting in that capacity. Phillippa opposed this request.

The Court reviewed the relevant case law. The decision also states that Phillippa’s handling of the artwork in either marketing it over the arguments of the other heirs or in creating strategies when it comes to the future rights of the artwork without notifying or speaking with Goldie or Guy is unreasonable. The Court also found that it runs opposite to her

responsibilities as an Estate Trustee to act in the best interests of the heirs. The Court concluded that Phillippa remains in a conflict of interest.

The Court’s decision

The Court ordered that:

The lawyer is selected to act as the Court-appointed Estate Trustee During Litigation of the estate of Toller James Montague Cranston.
He is to act without posting an Administration Bond.
He will immediately file his written Consent with the Court and take immediate control of all properties of the Estate.
Phillippa will totally co-operate in the hand-over of the Estate property and documents
The Estate Trustee During Litigation is to examine and prepare for circulation a plan for the distribution of and liquidation of the remaining artwork.
To determine his plan, he must consult with all three heirs.

Conclusion – Dying without a will in Ontario

Dying without a will in Ontario is not helpful to anyone, especially your loved ones you wanted to have the benefit of your property when you die. There are many times where a neutral third party should be considered either to act as Estate Trustee or Estate Trustee Under Litigation. Consider these examples:

Moms and dads select all their kids to serve as Estate Trustee. Each child has a various degree of abilities, and some none, in what is called for to administer an Estate. Some children identify that either they do not have the necessary abilities or simply do not desire the obligation. Anxiousness, clashes and pain results.
Many affluent family members have disagreements over exactly how the family wealth should be handled. These fights can become very public and expensive when they resort to the courts.
A person passes away with assets yet no will. Many people think, deservedly or not, that they are entitled to the assets in the deceased’s estate.
You are a lawyer, estate planner or financial advisor. You hesitantly consented to be the Estate Trustee of the estate of the person that was the owner of your best corporate client. The person passes away and you find yourself in the middle of an illogical dispute of passion between the heirs. The problem is so extreme, it threatens your capability for maintaining the company as your client and therefore your future earnings.
As the Estate Trustee, you are not in conflict. Nonetheless, the time required to handle all the complicated estate problems is like a second full-time job. It is having a negative impact on your business as you cannot devote the necessary time to it. You have to get out, however, you do not have an option to replace yourself.
The heirs and the Estate are involved in significant expensive lawsuits. There is no end in sight. Nevertheless, there are live problems that require to be attended to in managing the Estate so that the assets are protected and do not dissipate. There is an instant need for an Estate Trustee Under Litigation.

These are all real-life examples. Nothing has been made up. This is why we started Smith Estate Trustee Ontario.

If you find yourself in the middle of an Estate problem, contact the Smith Estate Ontario Team. We will sit down with you and listen to the issues. We will provide you with a plan for moving forward and ending the pain, frustration and cost being caused by the Estate issues. There is no charge for this initial consultation.

Call the Smith Estate Trustee Ontario Team today. We will help you move forward. We do so with compassion, experience and impartiality. Call the Smith Estate Trustee Ontario Team now.

Court appointed estate trustee: Introduction

In last week’s vlog, CLAIM BANKRUPTCY IN ONTARIO CASE STUDY: SHE REALLY WANTED TO BUT WE STOPPED HER AND SOLVED HER PROBLEMS, our video provided a case study about a doctor we helped solve her pain and get her life back on track. This week, I want to tell you about another one of our cases where we acted as the court appointed estate trustee. It was a bit unusual, however, it did call on me to use my skill sets as a licensed insolvency trustee.

It seems straightforward so what do you need us for?

An estates lawyer we know contacted us to help him solve a problem for his client. His client was a single man. His mother, whose husband predeceased her, passed away. Her only assets were two pieces of real estate; one a commercial property and the other the family home. The fully leased commercial property was producing income.

On the surface, it appeared to be a very simple situation. Two pieces of real estate and the only beneficiaries were the single man and his single sister. There were no spouses or grandchildren involved. So I asked our lawyer friend the obvious question: “It seems straightforward so what do you need us for?”.

The facts

The lawyer told me that:

his client and his sister cannot agree on anything;
the sister’s lawyer is making unreasonable requests;
the sister is a hoarder, which is a mental health issue;
nobody lives in the home and the utilities turned off services a long time ago; and
the sister has hoarded so much personal property in the home you cannot get past the front door!

The lawyer went on to say that the situation cries out for an expert to intervene to get things done so that the properties can be sold and the funds distributed. Neither sibling is capable of agreeing with the other and then doing what needs to be done. The receivership fees to solve their problems would be less than the legal fees spent fighting and not solving anything.

Please don’t call me the receiver

After a thorough discussion with the lawyer, I said it sounds like what you need is a for the Court to appoint a receiver. The lawyer responded that he felt he could get the other side to agree to the appointment of a custodian, but not to any proceedings called anything remotely close to a receiver or licensed insolvency trustee.

I said to my lawyer friend, that problem is easy to solve. How about we call ourselves either an estate trustee or asset manager? He loved the asset manager title.

The agreement

We took part in a conference call with our lawyer friend and the lawyer for the sister. Everyone discussed all the issues and we pointed out our firm’s wealth of experience in acting as a receiver in complex real estate matters.

Each lawyer agreed that assuming the finer points could be worked out, the brother’s lawyer would go ahead with a motion, on consent, to have our Firm act as the court appointed asset manager.

We provided our lawyer friend with a copy of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List model receivership order. He then amended it to fit the particulars of this situation and to do a global change from receiver to the title asset manager.

The appointment

Of course, the finer points could not be agreed to. Rather than the matter proceeding on a consent basis, the motion was argued. After hearing all arguments and considering all the evidence, the Court appointed our firm as the asset manager. The commercial property did not have any problems associated with it, so other than to tell you that the property sold, the rest of this story will concentrate on the residence.

Selling the house was the easiest part

The house was not just a house. It was the entire reason for the sister’s existence. Given the mental health issues, we quickly realized that from her perspective, we were about to take away her only joy in life; being able to enter the home and see her loot. It did not matter to her that nobody could enjoy the home and that it was mold infested. This was her baby and we were about to take her baby away from her.

Given these issues, our role was as much like that of a guardian for adults as much as it was about the property in Ontario.

We first obtained quotes for the removal of all of her personal property from the home. I realized that removing the property from the house would only give us another problem as hoarders are not willing to let go of anything. We had to devise a method where the sister would choose what was garbage and what would go to storage. However, even the storage could not go on forever.

The removal plan

We presented our plan to both lawyers. All the items would be removed in front of the sister. If the brother wished to attend he could, but it was not a need. We would also prepay from the proceeds of the sale of the home for six months of storage. That way we capped the brother’s liability for expenses. As items left the house, the sister had to say “garbage” or “storage”. Both sides agreed.

The removal began. What should have taken two weeks took six! The reason was due to mental health issues getting in the way of progress. We understood this and just had to work with it. Eventually, we completed the removal of personal property. We could finally see the entire inside of the house.

We entered with a firm we use to investigate and if necessary do environmental damage remediation work; Hazmat suits and all! Surprisingly, although there was mold, we obtained a verbal report that for our purposes, the home was safe for our purposes to enter for brief periods of time for a realtor and potential purchaser to view. Therefore, we did not need to do any remediation work.

Appraise and sell

The rest of the case could now go ahead. We obtained two appraisals of the house. The house was on a great lot in Toronto in a hot housing market. We listed the house for sale. Due to the house’s condition, it would attract a developer/renovator type of buyer.

After one week on the market, we received four offers to purchase. We rejected all of them and asked for everyone’s best and final offer. The final offer we accepted, subject to Court approval, was above market value. Working with our independent legal counsel, we put our motion material together, obtained the consent of both sides and then obtained Court approval for the sale.

We completed the sale, developed our distribution plan, obtained Court approval for that, distributed the funds and got our discharge.

Court appointed estate trustee: Do you have a financial problem that needs someone else to help you solve?

I present this case study to show how, as a licensed insolvency trustee in the GTA, we can use our skills set in a way that may not seem obvious at first. We look at the entire story of each person or company that comes to us for help.

We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we dealt with this problem and devised an alternate plan for the siblings, allowed them to monetize the assets they were incapable of doing on their own and letting them get on with their lives.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get you back on the road to a healthy stress-free life and recover from the pain points in your life.