Tag: Canadian Federation of Independent Business

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SMALL BUSINESSES IN CANADA ACCUMULATE MASSIVE DEBT DUE TO COVID-19

small businesses in canada
small businesses in canada

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this small businesses in Canada Brandon Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast.

Small businesses in Canada introduction

Did you know that since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak 1 year ago that small businesses in Canada racked up $135 billion worth of debt to stay afloat? Seven in 10 small businesses in Canada have actually borrowed money because of COVID-19. The average is almost $170,000 per business, according to a new survey released by the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB). In total, small businesses in Canada currently owe a cumulative $135 billion.

Out of these businesses that have increased their debt, 76% say it will take them over a year to pay it off. Eleven percent of respondents worry that they might not have the ability to repay their COVID-19 associated financial obligations ever! As far as returning to normal profitability (before the additional COVID-19 debt repayment), 40% are hoping to see it in 1 year’s time, but they really worry that it will take longer.

The purpose of this small businesses in Canada Brandon Blog is to discuss how important small business really is to the Canadian economy and what options exist for businesses and companies facing insurmountable debt challenges. Sometimes I will refer to small businesses in Canada as SMEs.

Contribution of SMEs to Canadian business

The best way to describe the contribution of SMEs to the Canadian economy is by looking at the most recent facts about small businesses in Canada reported by Statistics Canada.

How many businesses in Canada are small businesses?

The widely held definition of a small business corporation is a company that employs no more than 500 people and that has a total asset value of less than $15 million. Most of us have heard that a “small business” is one that employs fewer than 50 people — and that a “big business” has more than 500 employees. But what about businesses that fall in the middle? They are not quite small, but they’re not quite big either; they all fall into the category of SMEs.

In Canada, 91 percent of businesses fall into this in-between category, and there are roughly 3.5 million businesses in total. That’s a lot of businesses to keep up with.

What is the contribution of SMEs to exports in Canada?

Small businesses in Canada are not just small versions of large companies. They are different beasts altogether, and their individual contributions to the Canadian economy are just as important as those of their larger counterparts. In fact, SMEs contribute almost 50% of the country’s exports, and if they were taken out of the picture, exports would fall by almost 40%.

In 2018, exports of items were valued at $522.8 billion, of which 41.1 percent was attributable to SMEs. More than 50,000 Canadian companies exported goods, the huge majority of which were SMEs (97.4 percent).

How many people were employed in Canada in 2019?

In 2019, roughly 16.1 million people were employed in Canada. Private sector businesses employed 76.2% of the total number. The public sector employed the balance of 23.8%.

The definition of small businesses in Canada ranked by firm size using the number of employees are:

  • Small companies (1 – 99 workers)
  • Medium-sized businesses (100 − 499 workers)
  • SMEs (1 − 499 employees)
  • Large companies (500+ workers).

What is the distribution of employment across the private sector?

The variety of people employed defined by the business size of the employer varies significantly between the private and public sectors. In 2019, 88.5% of employed individuals in the economic sector worked for small businesses in Canada, compared with 76.2 percent of those used by public companies of the same dimension.

For the five-year period 2014-2019, Canadian employment ranks had a net gain of 1,076,100. Just over 70% of this increase is attributed to the private sector employment and less than 30% to the public sector.

How many businesses appear and disappear each year?

From these statistics, we see that the contribution of SMEs to economic growth is huge. These small and medium-sized businesses make up the majority of businesses in Canada. These key small business statistics show just how important these Canadian businesses are to the survival of the Canadian economy.

An increase or decrease in the number of businesses is the net result of the appearance or disappearance of businesses over a given period. This is often referred to as “creative destruction.” Between 2001 and 2016, the business birth rate was greater than those that died, except for two: in 2013 and in 2016, when more businesses disappeared (97,151 and 95,889) than were created (95,326 and 95,176),

There are more business births each year than those that disappear, other than for 2 years; 2013 and 2016. According to a Business Development Canada report from the Business Development Bank of Canada, there are more than a quarter of a million businesses in the country at any one time each year. More than 40,000 disappear.

The report was based on data from Statistics Canada’s Business Demography Statistics, which tracks businesses based on the number of active and inactive corporations, and Entrepreneurship in Canada, which tracks self-employed and “indeterminate” businesses. The Statistics Canada information is that business formation is on the rise, and the rate of business deaths has decreased.

This variation between the average birth rate for these two sectors can be explained by the entry cost and different levels of competition. If this is, indeed, the case, higher birth rates would be observed in sectors with a lower entry cost or with a higher level of competition than other sectors.

So more small businesses in Canada appear than disappear every year according to these findings. These statistics of course were from time periods all before the coronavirus pandemic.

small businesses in canada
small businesses in canada

What proportion of new businesses survive the first 15 years?

Every year, an average of 128,000 new businesses are started in Canada. According to the CFIB, about 10% of these new businesses close their doors within the first year. By year 10, that number has risen to 25%. Those are pretty alarming statistics, no matter how you look at them.

What this means is that most new businesses are doomed to fail in their first year, and many of the rest will only survive a few years beyond that. Here are some more alarming statistics on the percent of SMEs enterprise survival rate:

  • there is a 45.8% chance that a business will survive for one year;
  • a 32.3% chance that it will survive for two years;
  • an 18.3% chance that it will survive for three years; and
  • a 9.5% chance that it will survive for five years.

How many small businesses in Canada could close permanently amid a pandemic

The number of small businesses in Canada that survive for ten years (and beyond) is quite low, so it is important to recognize those that are able to make it. So two essential business owner characteristics have to be eternal optimism and being a solid business planner when starting a new business because of the high failure rate.

Now take those long odds for a business survival rate and layer a global pandemic on top of that. The COVID-19 pandemic is nerve-wracking enough to the general public, but for many small business owners, it is downright terrifying. According to the CFIB, close to half of the country’s small businesses could close permanently. The CFIB‘s findings were based on responses from 1,800 small business owners. The CFIB called for the government to provide small business owners with the tools they need to protect themselves and keep their businesses afloat.

The Public Health Agency of Canada reported an even scarier estimate. It felt that up to 70% of small businesses in Canada could close permanently amid a pandemic. The reason? Employees and customers won’t show up. The industry sectors that will be affected the most are the ones whose employees and customers are the most mobile and those whose employees have to work in crowds, like cabs, the hospitality industry, food and beverage, and theatres.

From what we have seen so far, they are correct.

The need for government assistance for Canadian business

Given this result, the Canadian federal government is investing heavily in maintaining and creating jobs to help the struggling Canadian economy. One of its investment vehicles is Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan which I have previously written about. This program is aimed at supporting business sectors that create jobs here.

This financial help program is designed to assist businesses that are having difficulties because of the pandemic-caused state of the economy. It is intended to support businesses that create jobs. Although many of the support programs have now ended, the Economic Response Plan still has the following programs:

Saving small businesses in Canada

So before COVID-19 arrived here, the odds were always against Canadian start-up businesses having a healthy long-term survival rate. With the pandemic, credible Canadian organizations estimate that we could lose 50% (CFIB) to 70% (Public Health Agency of Canada) of small businesses in Canada.

The life support program federal and provincial governments have instituted help. Multiple lockdowns obviously do not. What is really needed is some sort of return to normal operations so that business revenue can return. Then hopefully over time, profitability will follow. But that is really outside of all of our control.

However, as a licensed insolvency trustee (Trustee), there are things we are currently doing for businesses that cannot see any short-term prospects for being able to overcome their debt problems on their own. The kinds of businesses that we are seeing fall into two categories; viable and non-viable.

The first thing I do as a Trustee is to get a good understanding from the business owner as to the history of the business and the reasons why the business owner believes the company has gotten itself into financial trouble. I also want to get a snapshot of what the assets and liabilities of the business are and I try to form an assessment as to whether the business is viable or not. Even if viable, does the entrepreneur have the energy, mindset and desire to manage a business turnaround. Finally, I need to understand the cash flow requirements of the business and is there a source of funding.

I then analyze all this information and form an opinion as to what the realistic options are for the company and its business. Depending on each situation, the range of options are:

  • The business operations and debt levels are such that they are not serious enough and the company, over time, should be able to work itself out of a short-term cash crunch through some imaginative management of the company. Perhaps even an informal restructuring of sorts.
  • The business is viable but needs to do a formal restructuring in order to keep the good parts of the business so that it can become profitable again and continue to provide jobs to Canadians. The process would be either a Division I Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA) or a Plan of Arrangement under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA).
  • If a formal restructuring is not possible, perhaps a sale of the business assets is required and the buyer will operate the assets as an operating business. In this case, a secured creditor will enforce its security in a receivership, through either a private appointment or a court appointment.
  • Finally, maybe corporate bankruptcy is required either in concert with the secured creditor enforcement or by itself if there are no secured creditors. This would allow for the necessary protection to give the time to liquidate the assets, either as a going concern sale or a pure liquidation. The funds obtained from the sale would then be paid to the creditors, in priority of their claims.

Entrepreneurs are obviously scared of any formal insolvency proceeding

The idea of a formal insolvency proceeding makes an entrepreneur feel like a failure. I know they can feel discouraged, but the business isn’t in trouble because senior management did something wrong. You didn’t fail. Business conditions changed. Especially under today’s pandemic circumstances.

Now you’re ready to move forward with your business, but you need some help. That’s what the BIA and CCAA are designed to do; to help your business make a new start. Insolvency proceedings are there to provide a safety net for people and companies. It’s a tool that responsible people use to save a good business after a setback.

Don’t worry what your customers might think about you if your business goes through a formal insolvency proceeding. You won’t be the first and you won’t be the last.

Small businesses in Canada summary

I hope that you found the question posed in this small businesses in Canada Brandon Blog. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with theIra Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this coronavirus pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

CPP PREMIUMS: A SIMPLE (BUT COMPLETE) GUIDE TO 2021 HOW INCREASED CPP PREMIUMS ARE HITTING WORKERS

cpp premiums
cpp premiums

The Ira Smith Trustee Team hopes that you and your family had a restful holiday season and that you are all safe, healthy and secure.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would prefer to listen to an audio version of this CPP premiums Brandon Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click on the podcast.

CPP premiums introduction

Everyone who is an employee or is self-employed must make Canada Pension Plan (CPP) payments. The payments you make are your CPP premiums. Employers also must contribute to the CPP. If you are self-employed, then the CPP premiums you must pay each year are calculated as part of your annual income tax return filing.

In this blog, I discuss how the Canadian Government has already given a nasty surprise to Canadians for 2021. The planned increase in CPP premiums on January 1 hit some workers for their 2021 CPP contributions more than others because of the coronavirus pandemic.

The Canada Pension Plan and CPP premiums

The Canada Pension Plan (CPP) is a government-run pension plan for retired Canadians. It provides a monthly taxed retirement pension benefit that replaces part of your income when you retire. Under the CPP, you obtain the CPP retirement pension plan payments for the rest of your life. To qualify you must:

  • be least 60 years old;
  • have actually made a contribution to the CPP;

Valid contributions can be either from work you carried out in Canada or as the outcome of getting credits from a former spouse or former common-law spouse at the end of the relationship.

CPP premiums and annual maximum pensionable earnings bump-up

For this 2021 year, the earnings ceiling, called the yearly maximum pensionable earnings (YMPE), was supposed to be $60,200, an increase of $1,500 from the 2020 limit. However, the actual amount is higher at $61,600. The maximum annual employee and employer contribution amount is $3,166.45 (up from $2,898.00 in 2020). The maximum annual self-employed contribution level is now $6,332.90 (up from $5,796.00 in 2020).

Provincial finance ministers quietly prodded Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland to put a pause on planned increases in premiums workers and businesses pay into the CPP. So did various business groups. They did not feel it was appropriate this year to have the contribution rate go up. Notwithstanding the support of business groups and each province, it was to no avail.

The originally planned increase on January 1 belongs to a multi-year plan accepted by each province and the Canadian government four years ago. They agreed to improve retired life benefits through the CPP by boosting contributions over time slowly.

The very first bump was in 2019. The province finance ministers asked Finance Minister Freeland to put a pause on this year’s automatic increase. They cited the damage done to workers and businesses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. They said it isn’t a smart financial decision to take more off workers’ paycheques and also to charge businesses a lot more when so many continue to have a hard time.

cpp premiums
cpp premiums

Moratorium on CPP premiums increase requested by provinces and business groups

So many provincial finance ministers on a call with Finance Minister Freeland, and various business groups independently, asked her to put a pause on this year’s planned increase in CPP premiums and the contribution rate because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The pandemic’s effect on the labour market, which has some groups noting the impact will be felt by some workers more than others. The plan requires contributions to go up alongside the upper limit on earnings that are subject to those premiums. As I have already stated, the YMPE was supposed to be $60,200. This would have meant tax increases of $1,500 from the 2020 limit. But the actual amount is going to be higher at $61,600.

The reason is due to the pandemic’s impact on the labour market and how the YMPE is calculated. Here are the details. The formula to calculate the earnings limit relies on rises in the average weekly earnings for the 12 months finishing June 30, contrasted to the same amount during the preceding 12-month time period. Over the time of the pandemic, average weekly earnings have increased, but not because workers are making more.

Dan Kelly, president of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business said:

“That’s going to be hundreds of dollars of new CPP premiums out of paycheques of middle-income Canadians not because they got a raise, but because the formula has not had a COVID adjustment,” Kelly says. Nevertheless, the government will collect more money than it originally planned through CPP premiums.

Any type of modifications to contribution rates or the YMPE would require the authorization of Parliament as well as seven provinces representing a minimum of two-thirds of the nationwide population. This is a greater bar than what is required to modify the Constitution!

The federal government response for a moratorium on the CPP premiums increase

Ottawa’s answer was not only to have them go up again but do so more than the scheduled increase. Why? The reason is specifically the calculation in the formula that the Feds and provinces signed up for, well before anyone bothered to know how to spell Wuhan!

Here at the details. The labour market got skewed (no, I did not make a spelling mistake) as job losses have hit the lower-income employees more since March 2020. Therefore, if you reduce the earnings at the lower end of the calculation range, you are left with higher wages, on average, when you do the calculation.

The Canadian government claims that is why the general increase is larger than originally scheduled. Dan Kelly calculates that anybody around the maximum limit will see a 9.3 percent rise in CPP premiums, beyond the approximately five-per-cent premium bump baked into the legislation.

A spokeswoman for Ms. Freeland stated stopping the increases agreed to in 2016 would imply reducing future retirement benefits for Canada’s current workers. The spokeswoman went on to say that the government’s leading concern is supporting Canadians, businesses and business owners who are experiencing economic difficulties as the nation weathers the COVID-19 pandemic. With a 2nd wave underway, lots of people across Canada continue to deal with tremendous unpredictability.

I am not sure what current unpredictability from COVID-19 has to do with freezing CPP premiums for each person and business from an increase for 1 or 2 years has to do with the issue, especially since the effect of freezing the increases will not be affected for decades to come, if at all. Nevertheless, that is what was said.

CPP premiums summary

I hope you enjoyed this CPP premiums Brandon Blog post. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me. It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of this seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We will get you or your business back up driving to healthy and balanced trouble-free operations and get rid of the discomfort factors in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Trustee Team hopes that you and your family had a restful holiday season and that you are all safe, healthy and secure.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

SMALL BUSINESS CANADA TAX: LIBERALS UNFAIRLY TARGET SMALL BUSINESS TAXES IN CANADA RULES

small business canada taxFull disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion on SMALL BUSINESS CANADA TAX issues. This blog must not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.

We are trying something new. At the bottom is an audiogram of this Brandon’s blog. If you would prefer to listen to it, and not read it, scroll down to the bottom and press on the play button. Let us know what you think by sending us a message in the Question box below.

Small business Canada tax: Introduction

In December 2017, our Federal Minister of Finance, Bill Morneau, disclosed some new policies he and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were thinking about. The changes Finance Minister Morneau was touting, were for toughening up the small business Canada tax scheme. It would have affected entrepreneur’s businesses, their taxes, and their households.

The main aspect of small business Canada tax that our federal government wanted to attack was the age-old concept of family business income splitting. Its more modern name that you would have seen a lot in the press is called income sprinkling. The federal government was trying to advance the theory that small business owners whose family members were shareholders in the business, but not necessarily working in the business, were somehow cheating on their taxes.

Small business Canada tax: The Federal Government’s discussion points

The discussion focussed mainly on professionals, such as doctors, lawyers, and accountants who had a professional corporation. The government was trying to advance the argument how unfair it was for a professional earning say $250,000 annually, to “sprinkle” some of the income among family members older than 18 as compared to a salaried employee earning the same total amount in salary. I find it interesting that they used a quarter of a million dollars annually as an example, and not a lesser number. Do you think that was picked on purpose to subtly portray all family business owners as being fat cats?

The government’s position was that income that might have been paid to only the manager of the business, could be redirected to other family members by way of dividends. If those family members were in a lower-income tax bracket, then they would pay less tax. The government felt that was unfair.

Small business Canada tax: How income splitting or income sprinkling works

First, in order for this to work for a professional, the laws of the Province you live in has to allow you to have household members that aren’t professionals be shareholders of your professional firm. Second, if your spouse has a high taxable income already, then you will not profit by including him or her as an owner of the business. Lastly, you must decide if you’re going to add your children more than 18 years of age, as shareholders.

Assuming you’ve marked off all those issues, it can make a difference to your family’s overall income tax bill to add your partner and/or your grown-up kids as shareholders of your business. By doing this, you can choose to distribute dividends from the business and take advantage of their lower-income tax bracket.

Paying your partner or kids a salary is not as effective as making them shareholders of the firm and paying dividends. If you pay a salary, it needs to be a sensible one, for work that you can actually prove to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). In other words, you cannot simply pay your partner $100,000 for doing bookkeeping for the firm. CRA will certainly allow an affordable wage for that function, but it would have to be justified by comparison to the marketplace for such services.

The advantage of paying dividends to family members is that you do not need to prove it. The other benefit of paying dividends is that your firm recovers some of the business tax you’ve paid on dividends made by the firm’s financial investment portfolio. Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand (RDTOH) is the issue. Our firm does not do tax work. This is a complex topic, I will leave it up to you to research how RDTOH works.

Small business Canada tax: Tax changes effective January 1, 2018

Beginning January 1, 2018, the government changed the rules specifically to target professionals who have incorporated (specifically, doctors, lawyers, and accountants). Professionals who are gaining from reduced tax rates on what would have otherwise been fully taxed earnings at the highest marginal personal income tax rates, if not for their company.

The government is saying that these incorporate professionals aren’t adding their fair share to Canadian society by their decision to have a professional corporation. For that reason, they should not gain from the tax advantages of doing so.

So what are the changes? The Tax on Split Income (TOSI) rules has been amended to cover grown-up shareholders of private firms. Previously, TOSI rules only applied to minor children. The issue now becomes: If you’re a private company owner and pay dividends to adult family member shareholders, when can you do so without invoking the new regulations? Essentially, you need to be able to show much involvement in business.

Small business Canada tax: Clear bright line

The Federal government is putting what they’re calling a “clear bright-line”’ to exclude some relatives from the TOSI rules. The general TOSI exclusions are:

  1. The company owner’s spouse, providing they more than 65 years old.
  2. Children over 18 years old who have made a real labour contribution to the business. CRA is gauging this as an average of 20 hours a week during the year. Alternatively, there is also a test throughout any of the 5 earlier years.

The government has taken direct aim at professional corporations though. These exclusions do not apply where 90% + of the income of the corporation comes from the provision of services. Income from ownership of related businesses that earn income from the provision of services is also included in the calculation.

Inserting a trust into the ownership equation may get around this “excluded shares” provision. You need the advice of your income tax advisor to decide if it would be beneficial to you.

Small business Canada tax: Ottawa punishing small business Canada

When the federal government presented new tax rules, local business claimed they were being unjustly targeted by “punishing” measures. According to Small Business Association Canada, up to fifty percent of the country’s entrepreneurs state they’re feeling negative results.

The federal government also added changes to the passive income rules for private corporations. In the February 2018 Federal Budget, the Liberals added a grind-down mechanism for the small business tax deduction through which every dollar of investment income over $50,000 cuts profits eligible for the small business tax deduction by $5.

This has been especially challenging for organizations that use passive earnings to help in special capital funding. For example, paying for building and construction equipment or to acquire real estate used by the business.ira smith trustee

Small business Canada tax: The greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) has asked the Provinces not to follow the Federal Liberals but to support small business.

For small businesses, the greatest tax battle in decades isn’t over. Private corporations who use responsible budgeting techniques and save up their profits and invest them to earn income, to be prepared for a rainy day, are being attacked. They may be saving to smooth out cash flow problems, or they might have a big upcoming purchase. Now they are being attacked through the income tax system for earning investment income in excess of $50K annually. It is clear that CRA will be looking closely at professional corporations’ income tax returns. I would not be surprised to see more CRA audits performed. The Federal government is looking to extract more income tax revenue from private corporations.

The rules are increasingly complex. Entrepreneurs will be spending more time dealing with more punitive income tax rules and income tax audits. All of this is designed by Ottawa for private corporations to pay more income tax. It ignores the investments small business makes. Creating jobs and making capital investments allows small business to contribute in many ways to the Canadian economy. This is aside from paying income tax.

Small business Canada tax: Does your company have too much debt?

Is your company under attack because of tax obligations or for other reasons. Is your company in need of restructuring to get debt relief?

The Ira Smith Team has decades and generations of experience people and companies in financial trouble. If your company is in need of a corporate restructuring proposal debt settlement plan, we have the experience to end your stress and pain and return you and your company to a healthy productive pain-free condition.

Our approach for each case is to develop a solution where Starting Over, Starting Now happens. This starts the moment you meet with us. You’re simply one call away from taking the necessary actions to return to leading a healthy and well-balanced problem-free life. Call us today for your free appointment.

Full disclosure: Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a licensed insolvency trustee firm in Vaughan (Toronto) Ontario. It is not an income tax advisory firm and does not provide income tax services. The information contained here is merely my opinion. This blog should not be relied upon for income tax advice or replace the advice of your income tax professional.

Call a Trustee Now!