Tag: bankruptcy protection process

COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT: CREDITORS ARE NOW ABLE TO MAKE BOLD CLAIMS AGAINST LAURENTIAN

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date June 14, 2021

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

If you would like to listen to an audio version of this Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the very bottom and click play on the podcast.

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act: Facing insolvency, Laurentian University files for creditor protection

Laurentian University’s filing under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act has been reported in the media and I have written about it in previous Brandon Blogs. On February 1, 2021, Laurentian University filed for what the media calls the “bankruptcy protection process” under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. It is really a creditor protection process for a financial restructuring. A large amount of work and involving tough choices will definitely be required for Laurentian to emerge from this as a financially and operationally sound university.

This restructuring will call for difficult negotiations with its lenders, suppliers, faculty and labour unions. Laurentian will have to overhaul its academic programs and look for brand-new revenue generation opportunities to survive. As well it will require a re-evaluation of its federated colleges’ design (Laurentian is just one of 4 universities that make the Laurentian Federation; the others who are all part of the Laurentian Federation Agreement are: the University of Sudbury, the University of Thorneloe, and Huntington University).

The stay of proceedings provided by the Court gives Laurentian protection from creditors and prevents them from taking steps against Laurentian, without the prior leave of the Court. The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act filing means that Laurentian has concluded that it cannot fulfill its financial commitments as they end up being due and uses the protection supplied by this restructuring law to reduce its overall debt load without having to pay its debts in full.

FOR A FULL DESCRIPTION OF WHAT THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT IS AND HOW IT WORKS, SEE OUR BLOG:

CCAA CANADA: OUR EXTRAORDINARY GUIDE TO 2020 TROUBLED CANADIAN COMPANIES SEEKING BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION

FAQ on the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Insolvency Proceedings of Laurentian University

As I mentioned, I previously wrote three blogs so far on the Laurentian University Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act insolvency process:

Every time there has been a major event in this court-supervised restructuring, I have written about it. So far the topics I have covered are:

The filing under the Companie’s Creditors Arrangement Act.
What creditor protection is under the “Bankruptcy Protection Legislation“.
What a stay period and a stay of proceedings are.
What does CCAA mean?
The Laurentian President affidavit upon filing and what it said about the university finances.
What Laurentian has said about its day-to-day operations, the Federated University model and the need to get out of that agreement and general oversight of university affairs.
The shock and the effect on Northern Ontario’s community over Laurentian’s filing.
The potential effect on current students, both undergraduate and graduate students and the overall student experience.
The initial list of creditors, both secured and unsecured creditors, in this restructuring process filing.
The unions have lost the fight to unseal documents relating to Laurentian communications with the provincial government.
Faculty and other staff terminations.
The union represents faculty members on a new collective agreement reached by Laurentian Union Faculty Association or LUFA.
Adjustments to the benefit pension plan and health benefit plan.
The failure of the non-Laurentian parties to the Federated University agreement in appealing Laurentian’s disclaimer of the Federated University model agreement.
The status of the interim financing DIP loan in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act administration.

So as you can see, all the topics that I have covered in these 3 previous Brandon Blogs really are answers to a legal FAQ regarding Laurentian University’s CCAA filing.

Decisions about Laurentian University being made by creditors, insolvency specialists and the Ontario Court but not public

The National Union of Public and General Employees have stated that in a free and democratic society, choices regarding publicly financed institutions are expected to be made by elected officials or people who are responsible to them. That makes sure that when choices are made the demands of our communities who are funding these institutions through our tax dollars and donations are considered.

But when such organizations, like Laurentian University, are permitted to use a bankruptcy protection statute like the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, that responsibility is lost. All that matters is what the creditors either desire or are willing to accept. They want the federal government to change bankruptcy protection legislation so that this cannot happen again.

Liberal MP Paul Lefebvre introduced a bill in Parliament that aims to keep Laurentian University’s turmoil from happening at other schools. He and the Union believe that public institutions shouldn’t be allowed to use bankruptcy protection to force through cuts. I don’t believe that at this time, the bill has any traction to change bankruptcy legislation.

4 inspectors will be chosen to work with court monitor in the claims process

This now brings us current to the last attendance in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List where Laurentian and its court monitor brought forward a claims process to be approved by the court in this Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act process.

The lawyer for TD Bank advised the Court that TD supports the making of a Claims Process Order however feels that, in the circumstances, the procedure ought to contemplate that the Monitor will disclose its analysis of the claims filed with the Pre-filing Lenders. The Bank said that Laurentian and the Monitor have acknowledged that there may very well be material claims filed, some of which will be unliquidated and/or contingent. Some may be subject to a bona fide conflict – both relative to liability as well as quantum.

The Bank proposed a modification to the Monitor’s Claims Process where material cases should be discussed with the Pre-filing Lender group so that there could be a consensual resolution of such claims. The Bank said that it is reasonable as well as proper in this case to produce a reasonable and transparent process that enhances the goals of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

Based upon information available to TD Bank at the time its factum was issued, the overall quantum of claims is unidentified, yet can sensibly be expected to include substantial claims representing: (a) the claims of the Pre-filing Lenders; (b) claims of current and also previous employees; (c) those of the federated colleges occurring from the termination and disclaimer of their contracts with Laurentian; (d) potential claims developing from the pension-related issues; as well as (e) claims of various other creditors with prefiling and also restructuring claims.

The Judge specified that he bore in mind the TD Bank submissions that it is extremely vital to move quickly, however not to rush. The Claims Process needs to be reasonable to all. He acknowledged that the Pre-filing Lenders should have some involvement in the Claims procedure. So the Judge borrowed from the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA), as there were no specific rules for this in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. He ruled that there will be a bespoke process.

Laurentian and the Monitor should modify their proposed Claims Process by assigning 4 Inspectors; 2 of which will be representatives of the Pre-filing Lender group. The remaining 2 will be drawn from the creditors from those with a claim over $5 million.

The Inspectors will:

Be selected by the Monitor who will devise an appointment process.
Act in the interests of all creditors.
Stand in a fiduciary capacity on behalf of all creditors.
Need to accomplish their duties on an impartial basis.
Are entitled to payment by following the payment structure for Inspectors set out in the BIA.
Help the Monitor in evaluating and admitting material claims.
Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

Laurentian expecting about 15 claims of more than $5M from creditors, court documents show

Laurentian reported that upon filing under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, it estimated its liabilities at $322 million. The categories of creditor groups are properly summarized by legal counsel for TD Bank recently in Court, indicated above.

The “bespoke” Claims Process approved by the Court is now underway. It is for all claims against Laurentian, but not including any form of compensation claim by any current or former employee. That type of claim has been defined by Laurentian and its Monitor as “Compensation Claims“. The Monitor advised the Court that it would soon come back to Court to get approval for a special process to establish the Compensation Claims.

The current Claims Process, not including any Compensation Claims, works like this:

Any creditor who has not received a Claims Package and who believes that he or
she has a Claim against Laurentian, under the Claims Process Order must contact the Monitor
in order to obtain a Proof of Claim form or visit the Monitor’s website.
Employees (and Former Employees) will not be receiving a Claims Package and do not need to complete a Proof of Claim at this time. Compensation Claims of Employees and Former Employees will be determined by a Court Approved Compensation Claims Methodology at a later date.
Three types of Claims qualify for this Claims Process: (i) Claims for amounts owing as at the date of Laurentian filing under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Pre-filing Claims), February 1, 2021; (ii) Claims which arose as a result of the restructuring itself (Restructuring Claims); and (iii) Claims against senior management, Directors and Officers, the Board (D&O Claims).
In order to for Claims to be considered in the Claims Process, the fully completed Proof of Claim must be received by the Monitor no later than:
- For Pre-filing Claims, 5:00 PM Toronto time on July 30, 2021 (Pre-Filing Claims Bar Date).
- For Restructuring Claims, 5:00 p.m. (Toronto Time) on, whichever is later: (i) July 30, 2021, or (ii) the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Monitor sends a Proof of Claim Document Package to the Creditor with respect to such Restructuring Claim (Restructuring Claims Bar Date).
- For D&O Claims, 5:00 PM Toronto time on July 30, 2021 (D&O Claims Bar Date).

No doubt the Monitor, the Inspector Group and Laurentian will be very busy sorting out all the Claims.

Public institutions shouldn’t be allowed to use bankruptcy protection to force through cuts

There has been an outcry from the public service community that public institutions should not be allowed to make use of Canadian insolvency laws like any other person or company that qualifies. I doubt that movement will get much traction.

I hope that you found this Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act Brandon Blog interesting. If you are concerned because you or your business are dealing with substantial debt challenges and you assume bankruptcy is your only option, call me.

It is not your fault that you remain in this way. You have actually been only shown the old ways to try to deal with financial issues. These old ways do not work anymore.

The Ira Smith Team utilizes new modern-day ways to get you out of your debt difficulties while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you the relief you need and so deserve. Our professional advice will create for you a personalized debt-free plan for you or your company during our no-cost initial consultation.

The tension put upon you is big. We know your discomfort factors. We will check out your entire situation and design a new approach that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. We will take the weight off of your shoulders and blow away the dark cloud hanging over you. We will design a debt settlement strategy for you. We know that we can help you now.

We understand that people and businesses facing financial issues need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” method with the Ira Smith Team. Not everyone has to file bankruptcy in Canada. The majority of our clients never do. We help many people and companies stay clear of bankruptcy.

That is why we can establish a new restructuring procedure for paying down debt that will be built just for you. It will be as one-of-a-kind as the economic issues and discomfort you are encountering. If any one of these seems familiar to you and you are serious about getting the solution you need to become debt-free, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. group today.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation.

We hope that you and your family are safe, healthy and secure during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting.

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

Tags Bankruptcy Protection Legislation, bankruptcy protection process, benefit pension plan, benefit plan, bespoke process, Claims Process Order, Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, compensation claims, creditor protection, D&O claims, D&O claims bar date, day operations, Decisions about Laurentian University being made by creditors, Facing insolvency Laurentian University files for creditor protection, FAQ on the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Insolvency Proceedings of Laurentian University, Federated University, Federated University model, Federation Agreement, graduate students, Huntington University, insolvency process, Ira Smith Trustee, Laurentian, Laurentian President, Laurentian University, list of creditors, Northern Ontario's, ourt-supervised restructuring, oversight of university, pre-filing claims bar date, Pre-filing Lenders, protection from creditors, provincial government, restructuring claims, restructuring claims bar date, restructuring process, university finances, unsecured creditors, what does ccaa mean

Brandon Blog Post

COMPANY RESTRUCTURING PROCESS CASE STUDY: HOW WE USED BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING IN CANADA TO SAVE THE BUSINESS AND JOBS

Post author By Brandon Smith
Post date March 28, 2018

Company restructuring process: Introduction

Over the last two weeks, we have provided you with real case studies from our files. This week’s case study is about our involvement with a company restructuring process so its business could continue to serve its clients and maintain most of the jobs.

Two weeks ago we described a personal insolvency case study, CLAIM BANKRUPTCY IN ONTARIO CASE STUDY: SHE REALLY WANTED TO BUT WE STOPPED HER AND SOLVED HER PROBLEMS, was about the surgeon who became insolvent because of a failed business venture and a divorce. The events leading up to the doctor’s insolvency convinced her that she had to go bankrupt. We then described the steps we took to restructure her affairs so she could avoid bankruptcy. She completed a successful Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). More importantly, she regained her confidence, we eliminated her pain points and she is once again thriving emotionally, physically and financially.

Last week, we described a situation where we used our skill set in a different way. In our case study, COURT APPOINTED ESTATE TRUSTEE CASE STUDY: IF IT WAS EASY YOU WOULDN’T NEED US, we described how we ended a war between the two beneficiaries under a Will and monetized the assets for their benefit. In that situation, the Court appointed us as the court appointed estate trustee.

The company was a social media agency. Their clients were some of the largest household names in North America. The company made sure that their clients’ websites were eye-catching, technologically advanced using leading search engine optimization (SEO) and search engine marketing (SEM) techniques. In short, their clients had to show up on page 1 of an online search and that their websites were eye-popping and functional. The company was a Canadian and North American leader.

Company restructuring process: Life got in the way

The sole shareholder and Director experienced some health issues with a family member; that required her attention. She was tending to that emergency and it took her away from the business for lengthy periods of time. Experienced senior staff ran the business in her absence. The entrepreneur felt she could deal with business matters by telephone. They established a process where she signed documents and cheques prepared by staff members using couriers.

Company restructuring process: Senior staff were not trustworthy

WRONG!! Although she trusted the senior staff, they turned out not to be trustworthy. They made mistakes and assured the owner that the documents and cheques they prepared were correct.

They also provided her status reports assuring her that all client activities and projects were all on schedule. The reality was that certain senior staff were plotting to establish their own agency, to steal clients. The sole Director felt something was not right, but she could not pinpoint from afar what the issues were. She returned to the office and discovered that her worst fears were her new reality.

Company restructuring process: How bad was it?

Things were very bad. Billings were way behind. Cash flow had dried up. As a result of the lack of cash flow, the company was now behind in rent and had collected but did not remit source deductions totalling over $300,000. The unremitted source deductions formed a trust claim over all the company’s assets, ahead of the company’s bank. Learning all this information made the bank very uneasy and unwilling to lend any more money.

Company restructuring process: The short-term steps in financial restructuring

The sole Director and shareholder of the company contacted us. She was operating in panic mode. We assessed the situation. Our preliminary assessment was that catching up on the billings and the clients paying them in the normal course, good cash flow would return. There was also a good book of projects to start on; just not as many as normal. Thankfully, no clients had left yet.

The short-term plan we developed had 7 steps:

Fire the staff involved in the attempt to start-up their own firm and steal clients. Pay their normal wages and vacation pay, but not pay in lieu of notice.
File immediately a Notice of Intention To Make a Proposal (NOI) to invoke the stay of proceedings (Stay Period) so that no creditor could take action against the company.
Immediately bill all unbilled projects and begin collection efforts on any outstanding invoices.
Reach out to all major clients to reassure them that the entrepreneur was in control after returning from the family emergency and that she would personally be supervising all work performed.
Prepare a crisis cash flow model that thankfully showed that the company could cash flow itself since the amounts owing to the unsecured creditors was not caught in the restructuring.
The company required fresh capital. Luckily, the entrepreneur had enough funds to inject.
Meet with the company’s banker to explain the situation and share the emergency cash flow to show that the company did not need any new funds from the bank and that the principal was going to inject the temporary funds necessary. This gave the banker the assurance that the bank line would not be pressed any further, and that the entrepreneur was willing to put her money where her mouth was.
company restructuring process

Company restructuring process: The long-term plan

Now that the situation was stabilized, we worked with the company to look at longer term restructuring needs. It needed a business debt restructuring process. We determined that the company had too much space. As it did not need to immediately replace the terminated staff, it now did not need as much space. Certain space could be given up without affecting the main space and the business.

The landlord of course was not happy about this, but was willing to work with the company. If the landlord was not cooperative, the backup plan was to repudiate the unnecessary space through the formal restructuring plan.

The terminated employees retained legal counsel, who made himself known. Various issues arose from this. Were they going to seek leave of the bankruptcy court to launch litigation for damages against the company? What counterclaim could the company prove? Should we agree to attempt to value what claims they may have without litigation and include them in the restructuring plan?

Company restructuring process: The need for more time

Upon the filing of the NOI, the company obtained a first 30 day stay where its creditors could not pursue it and to file the real restructuring proposal. The company had to run for at least a few weeks to assess if the real performance was similar to the cash flow forecast developed on day 1.

Therefore, the company’s lawyers went to bankruptcy court to seek a 45 day extension for the company to file its bankruptcy protection restructuring plan. As Trustee, we had to prepare and file our report with the court to attest to the fact that:

an extension of the Stay Period is required to enable the company to continue to run in the ordinary course and complete its restructuring proposal;
the company continues to act in good faith and with due diligence; and
no creditor would be materially prejudiced by the extension of the Stay Period.

The Court granted the extension for this company restructuring process.

Company restructuring process: The corporate debt restructuring process

We could now finish the real corporate restructuring proposal through this bankruptcy protection process. Given the unknown of the final valuation of the terminated employees’ claims, if any, we had to build in further protection for the company. We decided that the company’s bankruptcy protection plan would be what is known as a “basket proposal”. The amount of funds available for the unsecured creditors would be a fixed amount. So, whatever the claims ended up being, the size of the pot never changed.

Under the bankruptcy laws in Canada for a corporation undergoing a corporate restructuring, we had to ensure that there were sufficient funds for the unsecured creditors to share in “the pot”. The amount had to be realistic, to get the required majority of unsecured creditors voting in favour of the corporate restructuring plan. We also had to ensure that the bank was not being compromised in the proposal and that we communicated that clearly to the bank.

Company restructuring process: The government trust claim

As stated above, the unremitted source deductions were a trust claim. The restructuring bankruptcy laws in Canada state that such a claim has to be repaid in full within 6 months of Court approval of the restructuring proposal. We revisited the company’s cash flow. Although the company was on track, over the next year, money was needed to reinvest in the business.

The entrepreneur had no more money from her own resources. Therefore, after allowing for operations and the payment of the past unremitted source deduction amount of about $300,000, we could only offer the unsecured creditors roughly 5 cents on the dollar of the proven claims from future operations. The company promised to pay that amount within 6 months of retiring the government trust claim amount. So, within 1 year of Court approval, the unsecured creditors would get their money from the corporate restructuring plan.

Company restructuring process: Solving the terminated employee claims

Seeing this, the terminated employee group did not wish to spend funds on litigation, only to receive 5% of whatever claim they may have from the restructuring plan. We ended up agreeing to a very modest amount to represent their claims in the proposal.

The meeting of creditors was held and we obtained the required majority of creditors voting in favour of the business restructuring proposal. The creditors realized it was a better outcome than if they voted the company into bankruptcy. They voted in favour of the company restructuring process. We then obtained the necessary Court approval.

Company restructuring process: The result

The company turned its operations around. It survived the coup by the terminated employees. The company produced enough cash profits to retire the government trust claim debt within 6 months of court approval. It also paid the proposal fund amount to us as Trustee on time, to be distributed to the unsecured creditors.

The company successfully restructured and operated profitably afterwards. The entrepreneur was able to sell her company several years later and retire.

Company restructuring process: The financial restructuring process

The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex corporate restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur. You are worried because your company is facing significant financial challenges. Your business provides income not only for your family. Many other families rely on you and your company for their well-being.

The stress placed upon you due to your company’s financial challenges is enormous. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your company’s problems; financial and emotional. The way we dealt with this problem and devised a corporate restructuring plan, we know that we can help you and your company too.

We know that companies facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team. That is why we can develop a company restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain it is facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious in finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation. We will get your company back on the road to healthy stress free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

COMPANY RESTRUCTURING PROCESS 11 — company restructuring process

Tags Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, bankruptcy court, bankruptcy laws in Canada, bankruptcy laws in Canada for a corporation, bankruptcy protection, bankruptcy protection process, bankruptcy protection restructuring plan, basket proposal, business debt restructuring process, business restructuring in canada, cash flow, cash flow forecast, cash flow model, company restructuring process, corporate debt restructuring process, corporate restructuring, corporate restructuring plan, corporate restructuring proposal, debt restructuring process, financial restructuring, financial restructuring process, financial restructuring process is complex, formal restructuring plan, Ira Smith Trustee, meeting of creditors, noi, notice of intention to make a proposal, restructuring, restructuring bankruptcy laws, restructuring bankruptcy laws in Canada, restructuring plan, stay period, unremitted source deductions, unsecured creditors