Tag: security agreement

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

PRIVATELY APPOINTED RECEIVER VS. COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER IN CANADA: THE COMPLETE GUIDE ON THE KEY DIFFERENCES AND YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS

A distressed business owner looking at documents, symbolizing the challenges of a privately appointed receiver taking control of assets in Canada.
privately apointed receiver

Building a business takes everything you’ve got—money, time, and countless sleepless nights. So, when a privately appointed receiver suddenly steps in to take control of your company’s assets secured under your loan agreement, it’s nothing short of a gut punch. Suddenly, you’re looking at the very real possibility of losing what you’ve worked so hard to create. The chaos, the sudden loss of control, and the sheer complexity of the legal process are enough to overwhelm anyone.

But you aren’t the first to go through this. As Senior Vice-President at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., I’ve sat across the desk from plenty of business owners in this exact scenario

Here in Canada, secured lenders can sometimes appoint a private receiver without ever setting foot in a courtroom. This move flips your operations upside down. Naturally, you’re going to have questions: What does this mean for the assets you’ve built up? Can the receiver really sell off your business for pennies on the dollar? And what happens if they botch the sale entirely?

We’re going to break down exactly how a privately appointed receiver operates, what your actual rights are, and how you can protect your interests. The biggest takeaway? Don’t wait until the bank has its privately appointed receiver take possession of your business assets to get professional advice. Bringing in a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) early is usually your best shot at regaining some leverage and finding a realistic path forward.

Privately Appointed Receiver Key Takeaways:

Privately appointed receivers can only be appointed by secured lenders whose security agreements allow for it to happen. This is based on the loan agreements you signed (like a General Security Agreement) and by definition, happens without a court order.

They have to act in a “commercially reasonable” manner. While they don’t have to hold out for the absolute highest imaginable price, they do have to aim for a fair market value under the circumstances.

An “improvident sale” is a legally negligent sale. If a sale of assets takes place at a price way below fair value because the receiver was sloppy or conflicted, it can be challenged—but you need hard evidence and expert valuations to prove it.

Suing a receiver is an uphill battle. It’s complex, expensive, and if they are court-appointed, you usually need a judge’s permission just to start the lawsuit.

Get expert advice immediately. Speaking with an LIT—like our team at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.—is crucial for understanding your rights and exploring alternatives before your assets are gone.

The Shock of the Appointment: What Happens if a Lender Appoints a Privately Appointed Receiver Without a Court Order?

When a business hits a financial wall, one of the scariest prospects is the arrival of a privately appointed receiver. As intimidating as it is, this is a standard and entirely legal method for a secured lender to recoup their money when loan payments stop.

What is a Privately Appointed Receiver?

In Canada, a privately appointed receiver is a third party—who by law must be a Licensed Insolvency Trustee—hired by a secured creditor, like your bank or credit union. Their primary job is to take possession of the specific assets your business pledged as collateral, manage them, and sell them off to repay that specific lender.

This is very different from a court-appointed receiver. A court-appointed receiver gets their power from a judge and acts as an officer of the court to look out for all creditors. A private receiver, on the other hand, gets their authority straight from the fine print of your loan documents (usually a General Security Agreement or a mortgage). Because of this, the privately appointed receiver primarily acts as an agent for the specific lender who hired them.

Legality and Process

Yes, a lender can absolutely appoint a private receiver without a court order, as long as the security documents you signed allow for it. These clauses are standard boilerplate in commercial lending.

However, lenders can’t just show up unannounced. They have to give you at least 10 days’ notice of their intent to enforce their security (via a formal BIA Section 244 demand letter detailing what you owe and that they intend to enforce their security).

Once that receiver is appointed, they take immediate control of the secured assets. Your ability to manage, use, or sell those items—whether it’s heavy machinery, inventory, or real estate—is suspended. While their power comes from your contract, they are still governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and provincial laws. For instance, they must notify all known creditors about the receivership within 10 days to keep things transparent.

It’s crucial to understand that a receivership doesn’t automatically mean your company is bankrupt or legally dissolved. It does, however, mean you’ve lost control over your core assets, which often brings regular business operations to a grinding halt. This is why you need someone in your corner right away. At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we know exactly how to interpret a receiver’s mandate and can help you figure out what moves you have left.

A distressed business owner looking at documents, symbolizing the challenges of a privately appointed receiver taking control of assets in Canada.
privately appointed receiver

The Asset Sale Dilemma: Can a Private Receiver Sell My Business Assets for Cheap?

One of the most common fears I hear from business owners is that the receiver is just going to fire-sale their life’s work to the first lowball bidder. It’s a valid worry, but Canadian law puts specific guardrails in place to prevent this.

Receiver’s Duty of Care

Under the law, a privately appointed receiver has a strict duty to act in a “commercially reasonable manner.” What does that actually mean? It doesn’t mean they have to hold onto assets for years waiting for a record-breaking offer. Rather, they have to run a fair, ethical, and responsible sales process that reflects current market realities.

When insolvency professionals and courts look at whether a sale was “commercially reasonable,” we look at a few main things:

  • Marketing Efforts: Did they actually try to find buyers? Slapping a “For Sale” sign on the door isn’t enough. They need to advertise in the right channels and give the market enough time to respond.
  • Market Conditions: A receiver can’t magically create a strong market if the economy is tanking. However, they are expected to adjust their sales strategy based on whether it’s a buyer’s or seller’s market.
  • Expert Valuations: Did the receiver get independent appraisals before listing the assets? Skipping this step is a massive red flag.
  • Timing and Strategy: Was there a genuine reason to sell fast (like perishable goods or a business bleeding cash)? Or did they rush a liquidation when selling the business as a “going concern” (an intact, operating business) would have brought in significantly more money?
  • Arm’s Length Transactions: Did they sell the assets to an independent buyer? If the assets were sold at a discount to someone connected to the receiver or the lender, it raises major conflict-of-interest alarms.
  • Transparency: Was the bidding process fair? Did they ignore higher offers without a good reason? What is an “Improvident Sale”? An “improvident sale” happens when a receiver sells assets for substantially less than their fair market value because they were negligent or failed to do their homework.

Keep in mind, just being disappointed with the final sale price isn’t enough to claim an improvident sale. You have to prove the receiver actively dropped the ball.

Examples of an improvident sale

  • Rushing a sale without letting competitive offers roll in.
  • Tossing aside genuinely higher bids without a solid, documented excuse.
  • Selling assets blind, without getting a professional appraisal first.
  • Selling the assets cheaply to an insider or related party.
  • Breaking up the company into parts when a buyer was willing to pay a premium to buy the business whole.

Protecting Your Interests During the Sale

Even though the receiver is in the driver’s seat, you aren’t stuck in the trunk. You can—and should—take an active role in protecting your interests:

  • Watch them closely: Keep tabs on how they are advertising the assets and communicating with the market.
  • Do your own math: Gather your own market data. If you know what similar assets are selling for, keep those records.
  • Document everything: Save every email, report, and letter. Bring them buyers: If you know people in your industry who might want to buy the assets, introduce them to the receiver. The receiver is legally obligated to consider serious offers. Your best defence, honestly, is having your own expert. Getting independent advice from a Licensed Insolvency Trustee like myself gives you someone who can look over the receiver’s shoulder. We know the exact legal benchmarks a receiver has to hit, and we can call them out if they start cutting corners.

Seeking Justice: How Do I Sue a Receiver for an Improvident Sale in Canada?

If you are certain that a privately appointed receiver negligently sold your assets for a fraction of their worth, you might be thinking about a lawsuit. While you do have legal avenues, be warned: suing a receiver in Canada is complicated, stressful, and expensive.

The Legal Basis for a Claim

If you take a receiver to court, your lawyers will usually build the case around a few core legal concepts:

  • Breach of Statutory Duty: The BIA explicitly requires receivers to be commercially reasonable. If they ignore that standard and cost you money, they’ve broken the law.
  • Negligence: Receivers have a common law duty to act prudently and in good faith. If their laziness or incompetence results in a massive undervaluation, it’s professional negligence.
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty: This is harder to prove with private receivers (since their main loyalty is to the lender), but in some specific situations, courts have found that receivers owe a duty to the debtor to maximize asset value. The goal of a lawsuit like this is damages—specifically, forcing the receiver to pay you the difference between what the assets actually sold for and what they should have sold for if the job was done right.
  • Challenges and Burden of Proof: Canadian courts don’t easily second-guess a receiver’s business decisions. The burden of proof is entirely on you, and it’s a heavy lift. You can’t just walk into court and say, “I feel like my warehouse was worth more.”
  • You need bulletproof evidence. The most critical piece is Expert Valuation Evidence. You will have to hire independent, highly qualified appraisers to testify exactly what the assets were worth, and how a proper sales process would have secured that price. You also have to prove specific failings—like showing the court that the receiver completely ignored a valid, higher bid, or intentionally bypassed standard advertising practices.
  • Leave of the Court: There’s a procedural hurdle to keep in mind here. If a receiver was appointed by a court, you can’t just sue them; you have to ask the judge for “leave” (permission) first. This stops angry parties from filing frivolous lawsuits. For a privately appointed receiver, the rules around needing “leave” are a bit murkier and vary by province, but courts will still heavily scrutinize your claim before letting it proceed.

The Process of Suing a Receiver

If you’re going down this road, prepare for a marathon:

  • Gathering Documents: You’ll need every loan agreement, demand letter, receiver report, and internal financial record.
  • Hiring Experts: You need independent appraisers immediately to establish market value.
  • Lawyering Up: You can’t use a general practice lawyer for this. You need specialized commercial litigation lawyers who know insolvency law inside and out.
  • Weighing the Costs: Litigation takes years and costs a fortune in legal and expert fees. You have to be sure the potential payout is actually worth the financial risk.
  • Importance of Proactive Measures: Honestly, it is vastly cheaper and less stressful to prevent an improvident sale than to sue over one later. Engaging an LIT before things go off the rails allows you to explore options like a Division I Proposal, which can restructure your debt and keep the receiver out of your business entirely.
A distressed business owner looking at documents, symbolizing the challenges of a privately appointed receiver taking control of assets in Canada.
privately appointed receiver

Comparison Table: Privately Appointed Receiver vs. Court-Appointed Receivership

Understanding who you are dealing with is half the battle. Here is how a privately appointed receiver and a court-appointed receiver stack up against each other:

Feature

Privately Appointed Receiver

Court-Appointed Receiver

Appointment By

Secured Creditor (e.g., Bank, Private Lender)

Court (usually upon application by a secured creditor)

Legal Basis

Security Agreement (like a GSA) and the BIA

Court Order under the Courts of Justice Act and the BIA

Primary Loyalty

The appointing Secured Creditor

The Court (and by extension, all stakeholders)

Powers

Limited strictly to the assets listed in the loan agreement

Broadly defined by the judge (often covers the whole business)

Oversight

Less formal; reports to the creditor and Superintendent of Bankruptcy

High oversight; requires court approval for major actions

Liability

Can be sued directly (though tough to win)

Usually requires court permission (“leave”) to sue

Goal

Recover the debt for that specific lender

Preserve value for all creditors and stakeholders

Notification

Must notify known creditors within 10 days

Creditors are notified of the initial court application

Privately Appointed Receiver FAQs

Q1: What exactly is a “privately appointed receiver”?

A1: It’s a Licensed Insolvency Trustee hired directly by your lender (like a bank) to seize and sell specific assets to pay off your defaulted loan. Because you signed a contract allowing this, they generally don’t need a judge’s permission to step in.

Q2: What are my rights if a private receiver takes over my business?

A2: You lose control over the collateral, but you still have the right to a fair process. The receiver legally has to act in a “commercially reasonable manner.” You also have the absolute right to hire your own insolvency expert to monitor their actions and advise you.

Q3: How can I prevent a private receiver from selling my assets for too little?

A3: You can’t physically stop a sale without a court injunction, but you can heavily influence the process. Keep detailed records, provide the receiver with lists of potential industry buyers, and hire your own LIT immediately to hold the receiver accountable to market standards.

Q4: What evidence is needed to prove an improvident sale?

A4: Subjective opinions don’t cut it. You need formal, independent appraisals proving the assets were deeply undervalued, combined with paper-trail evidence that the receiver skipped crucial steps (like ignoring bids or failing to advertise).

Q5: Can I negotiate with the lender or receiver after they’ve been appointed?

A5: Absolutely. If you can put together a viable alternative—like finding fresh financing or proposing a formal restructuring plan to your creditors—lenders will often listen. Having an LIT negotiate on your behalf brings instant credibility to the table.

A distressed business owner looking at documents, symbolizing the challenges of a privately appointed receiver taking control of assets in Canada.
privately appointed receiver

Brandon’s Take On A Privately Appointed Receiver

Over the years at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., I’ve seen exactly what a sudden receivership does to a business owner. The shock is real, the anxiety is heavy, and it’s completely normal to feel like you’ve hit a dead end. Too many owners assume that once the receiver changes the locks, the fight is over.

That’s rarely the whole story.

The real secret to surviving this is speed. If you sit back and wait to see how the sale goes, you lose your leverage. But if you act quickly, understand your rights, and bring in a professional to help you navigate options like a Division I Proposal to Creditors, you can fundamentally change the outcome. We don’t judge; we just look at the math, the law, and the realities of your business to find the smartest way out of the corner.

Protect Your Legacy: Don’t Face This Alone – Dealing with a privately appointed receiver is easily one of the most high-stakes challenges you will ever face as an entrepreneur. But you are not powerless.

At Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc., we specialize in cutting through the legal jargon and giving business owners a clear, actionable game plan. Brandon Smith and Ira Smith have decades of experience dealing with corporate restructuring, receiverships, and debt solutions. We know the rules receivers have to play by, and we know how to protect your interests.

If your business is struggling, or if a lender has already pulled the trigger on a receiver, you need to act now. Visit our website or call us directly to schedule a free, confidential consultation. Let us help you take back control and find a path forward with confidence. Informational integrity was strictly maintained.

Privately Appointed Receiver Conclusion: Take Action Before Your Bank Does

Business debt doesn’t have to be a dead end. It can be a powerful turning point – an opportunity to restructure, rebuild, and emerge stronger than ever. The journey might seem daunting, and the options complex, but with the right guidance, it’s a path you can navigate successfully.

Don’t wait until it’s too late. The longer you delay, the fewer options become available, and the greater the risk to your business and your personal finances. Taking that first step to seek expert advice is the most powerful and proactive decision you can make right now.

Take action at the first sign of trouble. Before your business gets transferred into your lender’s special accounts group, as the entrepreneur and owner, you know if your business is struggling. That is the time to take action. Don’t wait for your lender to make a demand for full repayment.

Take Action Today: Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.

We are Licensed Insolvency Trustees, dedicated to providing clear, actionable, and compassionate advice to businesses across Ontario. We offer:

  • Free, Confidential Consultations: Discuss your unique situation without cost, obligation, or judgment.
  • Expert Guidance: Understand all your options for business debt restructuring, from informal negotiations to formal proposals under Canadian law.
  • A Clear Path Forward: Get a personalized, step-by-step plan tailored specifically to your business’s needs and goals.
  • Relief from Pressure: We can help you stop creditor harassment and regain control.

Let us help you lift the burden of debt and guide your business towards a sustainable, successful future. Call us now or visit our website to schedule your free consultation. Your business’s second chance starts here.

Take the first crucial step towards a brighter financial future for your business. Contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today to schedule your free initial consultation. Your business’s pivot to sustainable success starts now.

Don’t let financial uncertainty dictate your future. If you or your business is struggling with debt, losing sleep, or facing the possibility of legal action, contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today. We offer a free, confidential consultation to discuss your situation, explain your options in plain language, and help you develop a clear, actionable plan. Our team of Licensed Insolvency Trustees is dedicated to providing the compassionate, professional support you need to regain control and achieve a debt-free life. Take the first step towards a brighter financial future – call us now.

Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is licensed by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy and is a member of the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals.

——————————————————————————–

Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and is based on the cited sources and my professional expertise as a licensed insolvency trustee. The information provided does not constitute legal or financial advice for your specific circumstances.

Every situation is unique and involves complex legal and factual considerations. The outcomes discussed in this article may not apply to your particular situation. Situations are fact-specific and depend on the particular circumstances of each case.

Don’t hesitate to get in touch with Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc.

About the Author:

Brandon Smith is a Senior Vice-President at Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. and a licensed insolvency trustee serving clients across Ontario. With extensive experience in complex court-ordered receivership administration and corporate insolvency & restructuring proceedings, Brandon helps businesses, creditors, and professionals navigate challenging financial situations to achieve optimal outcomes.

Brandon stays current with landmark developments in Canadian insolvency law. He brings this cutting-edge knowledge to every client engagement, ensuring they benefit from the most up-to-date understanding of their rights and options.

A distressed business owner looking at documents, symbolizing the challenges of a privately appointed receiver taking control of assets in Canada.
privately appointed receiver
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FROM GRIPPING TAKEOVER TO DISCHARGE: HOW LONG DO RECEIVERSHIPS LAST IN TORONTO ?

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada? Introduction

In my September 2021 Brandon’s Blog, THE CANADIAN RECEIVERSHIP EASY BEGINNERS GUIDE, I provided an easy-to-understand guide to understand the receivership process. To summarize, I described that in Canada, a receivership is a legal remedy available to secured creditors to recover outstanding amounts under a secured loan if a company defaults on its loan payments. It may also be used in shareholder disputes to complete a project, liquidate assets, or sell a business.

A court may appoint a receiver to take possession of assets, oversee liquidation proceedings, and distribute the proceeds according to the applicable legal priorities as outlined in Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). Or, a secured creditor may issue a letter of appointment to the same effect.

Through a court-ordered receivership, a neutral third party—known as a receiver—is appointed to take control of assets or business operations in order to preserve value and prevent waste, misappropriation, or financial collapse. This paper examines court-ordered receivership as a strategic, procedural, and equitable remedy under Ontario law.

How long do receiverships last? The answer varies significantly based on each unique situation. In Canada, receiverships typically range from several months to multiple years, with no standard timeline set by law.

A receiver’s appointment concludes when they have successfully sold sufficient assets to repay the secured creditor who initiated the receivership. Once the debt is satisfied through asset liquidation, the receiver files their final report with the court, and the receivership officially terminates.

For Canadian businesses facing financial difficulties, understanding receivership timelines helps in planning and decision-making during these challenging periods.

It is essential to recognize that receivership and bankruptcy are distinct legal proceedings. Bankruptcy is a formal proceeding, regulated by the BIA, to provide debtors with debt relief when they are financially incapable of paying their unsecured creditors. Conversely, a receivership is a process available to secured creditors to recuperate outstanding debt arising from a secured loan or to address shareholder disputes.

The purpose of this Brandon’s Blog is to answer the question I am often asked: “how long do receiverships last in Canada?”.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada? Understanding what receivership is

There are two types of receiverships in Canada: court-appointed receiverships and private receiverships. Court-appointed receivers are appointed by a court to oversee the management and disposition of a debtor’s assets. Private receivers are appointed by secured creditors as part of a loan agreement and the security agreement between the debtor company and the creditor.to manage and sell a business debtor’s assets outside of the court system.

The receiver, regardless if it is a court-appointed receiver or privately appointed receiver, takes control of a company’s assets and business operations to repay outstanding debts to creditors. The receiver’s primary duty is to maximize the value of the assets and distribute the proceeds to the creditors according to their priority ranking. The receiver has the power to sell, manage, or liquidate the assets and may also negotiate with creditors to restructure the company’s debt.

Some key players in a receivership process are:

  • Borrower: The owner of the property who defaults on their loan obligations or faces financial distress.
  • Lender: The secured lender, normally a financial institution, who initiates the receivership action to protect their interest in the property and recover their debt.
  • Receiver: The neutral third party who is a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called bankruptcy trustees) and is appointed either privately or by the court to take charge of the property and manage it toward a sale or resolution.
  • Court: The judicial authority that grants or denies the receivership request, sets the terms and conditions for the receiver’s appointment and oversees the receivership process.
  • Law firm: The lawyers who are acting for the lender, the borrower and the court-appointed receiver.

The powers and duties of a receiver can vary depending on the nature of the assets or the court order appointing them. Generally, it includes taking control of the assets, managing them in a financially responsible manner, and reporting to the court and parties involved in the dispute.

The duration of receiverships in Canada can vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case, but it typically lasts for a few months to over a year.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada?

Several factors will affect the duration of receivership in Canada, including:

  • the complexity of the case;
  • the number and nature of the assets involved;
  • the cooperation of the parties involved; and
  • the efficiency of the court system.

Other factors may include the availability of qualified professionals to manage and sell the assets, the level of creditor involvement and negotiation, and the overall economic and market conditions at the time. Ultimately, the length of receivership will depend on the specific circumstances of each case.

Court supervision is the oversight provided by a court in a court-appointed receivership. The purpose of court supervision is to appoint the receiver, to allow for the receiver to obtain the approval of the court to decisions and actions the court-appointed receiver wishes to take, to ensure that the receiver acts in the best interest of all parties involved and follows the court’s orders and to allow a forum for any aggrieved party to bring their dispute to the court for adjudication.

Termination of a receivership occurs when the court is satisfied that the receiver has fulfilled their duties and objectives or when the receiver’s appointment is no longer necessary. The court terminates a receivership by court order after approving the receiver’s final report and accounts.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada? Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Navigating receiverships can be a tricky and complex situation. Asking questions like “how long do receiverships last in Canada?” is essential to any company dealing with financial hardship. Here I will cover some of the common FAQs associated with receiverships in Canada, and provide an in-depth look at the timeline of these proceedings. It is essential to have a thorough comprehension of receiverships to successfully manage this situation.

What are the differences between bankruptcy vs. receivership?

Receivership is a process to secure the rights of secured creditors, allowing for the control and eventual sale of the assets of a distressed company. Bankruptcy, on the other hand, is a legal process which allows a company in financial difficulty to reorganize its affairs or liquidate its assets under the guidance of an insolvency trustee – providing a safety net to unsecured creditors.

What happens during a receivership process in Canada?

As part of the receivership process in Canada, a receiver is appointed to handle a company’s assets and activities, facilitating the sale of these to settle the company’s debt to creditors.

How does a receiver sell a business or assets?

To sell a business or assets, a receiver has many options available. A receiver can:

  • advertise the assets for sale by running a tender bid sales process;
  • a tender bid sales process could be stand-alone or could be combined with a stalking horse sales process;
  • the assets could be liquidated through a public auction using the services of an auctioneer;
  • the receiver could hand all the assets over to a liquidator in order to sell the assets in an online auction;
  • in certain circumstances, the receiver may wish to hire a professional business broker experienced in that particular industry or assets the receiver took possession of; or
  • for retail store assets, the receiver may sell the entire package of assets and will then run a retail sale to the public.

Regardless of the process chosen, the receiver’s aim is to market and sell the assets or business and obtain the best price for the assets or business under the circumstances.

How does a creditor apply for receivership in Canada?

Secured lenders can apply for receivership in Canada by filing an application to the court under a federal or provincial statute or enforcing their security rights by appointing a receiver privately through a security instrument by way of an appointment letter. A receivership is a remedy that allows a secured creditor to take control of and sell the debtor’s property and assets to collect their secured debt through a private or court appointment process.

Can a receivership be stopped or avoided?

Receivership can sometimes be stopped or avoided through negotiation with the secured creditor(s), restructuring or refinancing of debts, or by finding alternative sources of funding. However, whether or not it can be stopped or avoided depends on the specific circumstances of each case. The cessation of receivership will not be easy unless the secured creditor is being paid out.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How does a creditor enforce a secured loan in Canada?

In Canada, a creditor can enforce a secured loan by appointing a receiver under a private contract or through the court process. Upon appointment, the receiver will seize and sell the secured assets or the assets set out in the court order to recover the amount owed.

However, before being able to appoint the Receiver, there have to be one or more events of default as described in the loan agreement. Then, the lender must be reasonable in allowing the company borrower to cure the default. If the company in default does not remedy the default(s) and the lender has lost confidence, the lender can then make a written demand on the company to repay the entire loan, plus interest and costs and also serve the necessary statutory form on the defaulting borrower.

The lender must give the borrower a reasonable period of time to repay the secured lender’s debt. Reasonable time will vary depending on the unique circumstances of the situation. In Canada, the minimum amount of time that has to be given is 10 days, unless the borrower acknowledges in writing that they can never repay the debt and is waiving the notice period.

Legal options available to recover outstanding loan payments may include sending demand letters, filing a lawsuit, obtaining a judgment and using collection methods such as wage garnishment or asset seizure.

How long does the bankruptcy process take in Canada?

The timeline of a corporate bankruptcy process depends on the uniqueness and complexity of each individual situation. There is no typical timeline, but, it could be a year or more from the start of the bankruptcy until the licensed insolvency trustee is discharged.

How do I liquidate assets in Canada?

When seeking to divest yourself of some assets you have a plethora of choices – in the case of an asset like real estate, you can list it on the public market. Alternatively, you can try to find the right buyer on your own. Or, if you’d like some professional assistance, enlist the help of a savvy broker or financial adviser.

What are the consequences of not paying off secured loans in Canada?

In Canada, if you don’t pay back a secured loan, the lender may reclaim the collateral you put up, personal property like a car or real property such as a house. Don’t let your possessions be taken away! Be sure to make all loan payments in a timely manner.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last

How long do receiverships last in Canada? Conclusion

So I hope that you now have a good appreciation for receiverships in Canada including the answer to the question “how long do receiverships last in Canada?”. If your company or business is under financial pressure and your secured creditor is about to demand full repayment of all loans, you need immediate professional advice.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Are you worried about what your fiduciary obligations are and not sure if the decisions you are about to make are the correct ones to avoid personal liability? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are also now worried about the economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

The Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team understands that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

how long do receiverships last
how long do receiverships last
Categories
Brandon Blog Post

RECEIVERSHIP IN CANADA: THE COMPLETE STORY OF WHOSE HAPPY RECEIVER IS IT ANYWAY?

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

Receivership in Canada: What does receivership mean?

I have just read a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commerical List dealing with an important aspect of receivership in Canada. The case is concerned with what happens when two equally applicable provincial laws appear to be working at cross purposes in the context of the receivership in Canada process.

I will explain the case and the process of company receivership in Canada. By understanding the process, the case will make more sense.

Secured lenders may enforce their security to recover loans from borrowers who have defaulted. This remedy available to secured creditors when a borrower, usually a company defaults, is known as receivership.

What does going into receivership in Canada mean?

A receivership is a legal process available to secured creditors, whereby a company’s affairs, business and property are entrusted to a receiver to manage and eventually sell the assets. Secured lenders may enforce their security to recover loans from borrowers who have defaulted. This remedy available to secured creditors is known as receivership.

If a business debtor does not make payments or otherwise defaults on a secured loan, the secured creditor would have the right to appoint a receiver to collect the money owed. Before appointing a receiver, a secured creditor must first issue a “Section 244” notice of intention to enforce security. This is a notification that secured creditors must send to defaulting debtors before appointing a receiver. Section 244 refers to that section number in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

The notice states that the security covers certain assets, that the company in default owes a specified amount to the secured creditor, and that the creditor may enforce the security after 10 days. The company in default may waive the notice period and consent to the appointment of the receiver.

Under the BIA, only a licensed insolvency trustee (formerly called a trustee in bankruptcy) can be a receiver. No other party is licensed to administer a receivership in Canada.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

Receivership in Canada: What is the difference between a court-appointed receiver and a privately appointed receiver?

A privately-appointed receiver is a licensed trustee who is appointed by a contract between the insolvency trustee and the secured creditor. A private receiver is typically used when there is no dispute to ranking among secured creditors or various claims to ownership of the company’s assets. The powers of a receiver listed in the security document give the privately appointed receiver more limited powers than a court-appointed receiver gets under a court order.

A receiver is court-appointed when the secured creditor makes an application to the court for the appointment of a receiver with more expanded powers. Like a privately-appointed receiver, a court-appointed receiver takes control of a company’s property because of financial distress and when there is a dispute among secured creditors and others as to the ranking of secured claims and ownership of property.

Both kinds of receivers are tasked with protecting and preserving the value of the company or property and are certainly given broader powers by the court to do so.

How is receivership in Canada different from bankruptcy proceedings?

Many people mistakenly use the terms “receivership” and “bankruptcy” interchangeably. However, bankruptcy and receivership are two distinct legal proceedings with different implications.

Bankruptcy vs. receivership can be confusing, but once you understand the key differences between the two, it is fairly straightforward. Whether it is a private appointment or a court-appointed receiver, the differences between bankruptcy and receivership in Canada are the same.

A receivership is a legal remedy available to secured creditors to enforce their security rights against a defaulting debtor. A receiver is appointed to manage the debtor’s property and assets and sell them under a properly run and fair sales process.

The Canadian bankruptcy process is a distinct legal process. An insolvency trustee does not represent secured creditors in bankruptcy proceedings. Instead, under the bankruptcy regime, they represent the unsecured creditors of the bankrupt estate. A corporate debtor may be subject to both bankruptcy and receivership proceedings simultaneously.

One of the major differences has to do with the creditors. In a bankruptcy administration, the bankruptcy trustee must call a meeting of creditors. This is where the insolvency trustee provides its report on the affairs and conduct of the bankrupt debtor and unsecured creditors get to vote on any matters of importance. In receivership, there is no such requirement to hold a meeting of creditors.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

What are the key distinctions between receivership in Canada and liquidation?

So you know what receivership is by now. The federal BIA doesn’t govern liquidation, that’s done under the provincial Business Corporations Act or Wind-Up Act.

A liquidation is for a solvent company where the shareholders, Officers and directors decide to cease business operations. The company puts up its assets for sale and uses the proceeds to pay off its creditors with cash. Any funds left over are then distributed to the shareholders.

A liquidator can be appointed either privately by the company’s directors or by a court order. Liquidation is therefore different from both bankruptcy and receivership in Canada.

Can individuals be placed into receivership in Canada?

The answer is yes. When a secured creditor wishes to take enforcement action upon the security agreement they have against a debtor’s property, as indicated above, they have the remedy of receivership in Canada. This remedy allows them to collect as much of their secured debt as possible.

There are no restrictions as to who can go into receivership in Canada. One of our more famous (infamous?) receivership cases over the years has been the receivership of the assets, property and undertaking of Norma and Ronauld Walton.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

Receivership in Canada: Whose receiver is it anyway?

Now for the court case where two different provincial laws caused a fight amongst secured creditors over the appointment of a receiver. The case is Canadian Equipment Finance and Leasing Inc. v. The Hypoint Company Limited, 2618905 Ontario Limited, 2618909 Ontario Limited, Beverley Rockliffe and Chantal Bock, 2022 ONSC 6186. The two competing provincial statutes are the Mortgages Act and the Personal Property Security Act.

The business is conducted through two affiliated entities. One owns the property and the other operates the business. This is quite a typical arrangement.

One creditor funded the purchase of equipment and took PPSA security over it. Another creditor funded the acquisition of the real property and has a traditional mortgage security. The security agreements extend over different assets, and the outcome is usually uncomplicated.

However, when equipment that has been purchased is attached to real property, there is disagreement about whether and how it can be removed, and whether such removal will negatively affect the value of both the equipment and the real property. The question is now more complicated: which creditor’s rights should take priority over this matter?

Both the equipment lender and the mortgagee are seeking to enforce their security. The equipment lender has filed a motion with the court to appoint a receiver over both the operating company (Opco) that owns the pledged equipment and the holding company (Holdco) that owns the real estate. This would allow the receiver to manage and sell the assets of both companies in order to repay the outstanding debt.

In this case, Opco was a commercial marijuana operation that was unable to get off the ground due to its heavy debt load and startup problems.

Although the mortgagee began power of sale enforcement proceedings, they do not object to a receiver being appointed over the equipment only. The mortgagee wishes to continue its power of sale proceedings and opposes the receiver being appointed over the building. The mortgagee in possession is of the opinion that the equipment is attached to the building and cannot be removed.

The mortgagee concurred that the court has the power to assign a receiver over the property of both Opco and Holdco according to section 101 of the Ontario Courts of Justice Act. They stated that, if a receiver is appointed, the receiver needs to be a firm chosen by them.

Both the licensed insolvency trustee firm preferred by the mortgagee and the firm nominated by the equipment lender filed a consent to act with the court.

What are the conditions under which a receiver may be appointed?

The court looked at numerous factors in order to make a decision on whether or not to appoint a receiver, and if so, which one, including those that have historically in receivership in Canada cases been taken into account in such determinations:

  1. Although it is not essential for a creditor to establish irreparable harm if a receiver is not appointed where the appointment is authorized by the security documentation, the court considered if no order is made, will irreparable harm be caused?
  2. The size of the debtor company’s equity in the assets and the need for protection or safeguarding of assets during litigation are important factors to consider when assessing the risk to the security holder.
  3. The kind of property it is.
  4. The potential for the assets to be wasted or dissipated.
  5. The need to safeguard the property until a legal ruling is made.
  6. The parties’ respective balance of convenience needs to be considered when making the decision.
  7. Pursuant to the loan documentation, the creditor has the right to an appointment.
  8. Enforcing the security instrument when the security holder experiences or anticipates difficulties with the debtor.
  9. The principle of appointing a receiver should be approached with caution.
  10. The court will determine whether appointing a receiver is necessary to enable the receiver to carry out its duties efficiently.
  11. The effect a receivership order will have on the parties.
  12. The parties’ conduct.
  13. How long a receivership may last.
  14. The financial impact on the parties.
  15. The likelihood of maximizing return to the parties is increased.
  16. The goal of ensuring the smooth running of the receiver’s duties.

As everyone agreed that all assets of both Opco and Holdco should be sold to maximize recovery for all creditors, but cannot agree on the process by which that should be undertaken, resulting in the entire process being stalled, the judge was satisfied that it is just and convenient to appoint a receiver.

The court found that either proposed receiver was acceptable and decided that the receiver nominated by the mortgagee would be appointed by the court to administer all assets. The receiver would eventually come back to court with a sales plan to maximize the value of all the assets subject to the security of all stakeholders.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

How the entrepreneur can avoid receivership in Canada

As a business owner, the way to avoid the receivership process is long before financial difficulties ever become serious financial problems. Here are a few tips on how to do just that:

  • Keep a close eye on your finances. This means regularly reviewing your income and expenses, and making sure you have a good handle on your cash flow.
  • Stay current on your bills. This includes not only making timely payments but also staying on top of any changes in your billing terms or amounts.
  • Keep good records. This means having up-to-date financial statements and documentation for all of your income and expenses.
  • Make a plan. If you do find yourself in a financial bind, have a plan in place for how you’ll get out of it. This may include negotiating with creditors, seeking new financing, or making cuts to your expenses.
  • Seek professional help from a licensed insolvency trustee with commercial insolvency experience. If your business is viable and you seek help early enough, there may be many options. The most common ones are refinancing with or without financial restructuring. Reviewing your business allows us to make restructuring recommendations allowing your viable company to become healthy and profitable once again.

Receivership in Canada summary & speak with a licensed insolvency trustee

I hope you enjoyed this receivership in Canada Brandon’s Blog.

Revenue and cash flow shortages are critical issues facing entrepreneurs and their companies and businesses. Are you now worried about just how you or your business are going to survive? Those concerns are obviously on your mind. Coming out of the pandemic, we are now worried about its economic effects of inflation and a potential recession.

The Ira Smith Team understands these concerns. More significantly, we know the requirements of the business owner or the individual that has way too much financial debt. You are trying to manage these difficult financial problems and you are understandably anxious.

It is not your fault you can’t fix this problem on your own. The pandemic has thrown everyone a curveball. We have not been trained to deal with this. You have only been taught the old ways. The old ways do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team makes use of new contemporary ways to get you out of your debt problems while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief now.

We have helped many entrepreneurs and their insolvent companies who thought that consulting with a trustee and receiver meant their company would go bankrupt. On the contrary. We helped turn their companies around through financial restructuring.

We look at your whole circumstance and design a strategy that is as distinct as you are. We take the load off of your shoulders as part of the debt settlement strategy we will draft just for you.

We understand that people facing money problems require a lifeline. That is why we can establish a restructuring procedure for you and end the discomfort you feel.

Call us now for a no-cost consultation. We will listen to the unique issues facing you and provide you with practical and actionable ideas you can implement right away to end the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

receivership in canada
receivership in canada

 

 

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

COURT APPOINTED RECEIVERSHIPS: THE EASIEST WAY TO AVOID COSTLY MISTAKES

court appointed receiverships
court appointed receiverships

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy.

If you would prefer to listen to the audio version of this court appointed receiverships Brandon’s Blog, please scroll to the bottom and click play on the podcast.

Court appointed receiverships introduction

I have written several blogs before on receivership, be they court appointed receiverships or private appointments. The purpose of this blog is to discuss a recent court decision involving a big mistake made by a court-appointed receiver and why the court would not let them fix their error. That mistake cost them big time!

Some previous court appointed receiverships blogging

In reviewing the court case, three previous blogs of mine on court appointed receiverships came to mind:

The first one dealt with certain procedural matters in court appointed receiverships when the receiver sells real estate.

The second blog dealt with factors a court-appointed receiver must disclose to the court in seeking court approval for a sale of assets.

The third one was about what happens when a court-appointed receiver applies to the court for some relief without knowing all the details of the story they are telling the court! That is very embarrassing for receivers in court appointed receiverships!

The recent case I will shortly speak about reminded me of these three previous blogs. You will see the connection very soon, I promise.

What happens when a company goes into receivership?

When the company enters into receivership, senior management and the Directors shed most of their authority for decision making. The Directors’ general company obligations of preserving corporate records remain, yet any type of decision-making regarding the running of the business or its assets have vanished.

That is now the role of the receiver. This is true for a privately appointed receiver but it is especially so in court-appointed receiverships. That is because the court is now supervising all the company’s affairs and assets through its court officer, the receiver.

Responsibilities concerning the business in a practical sense stop upon the receiver being appointed. Their recommendations and help are only needed if requested by the receiver. They definitely will not be paid for any kind of initiative unless the receiver concurs in writing to make funds available for them in return for their services.

What are the duties of a receiver?

The receiver’s first task is to take possession of and control all of the assets, properties and undertaking covered by the secured creditor’s security in a private receivership. In court appointed receiverships, the receiver’s powers and actions come from the authority given to it by way of the court order appointing the receiver.

The receiver needs to make a decision whether it can get a greater amount for the assets if it runs the business. Conversely, the receiver may choose that the danger of operating the business is not worth it in terms of any type of upside value that may be gained from running the business.

The receiver after that creates a strategy for the running or the shuttering of the business as well as for the eventual sale of the assets. The kind of receivership appointment and the nature of the business operations and assets will dictate what approach the receiver will take. In the meantime, the receiver must protect and conserve all the assets, including making sure there is sufficient insurance coverage in place.

In a private appointment, the receiver requires to obtain the authorization of the secured creditor who appointed the receiver prior to implementing its plan and taking actions concerning the running of the business and the sale of the assets. In court appointed receiverships, the receiver requires the approval of the court.

The Court appointment case

This court case dealt with some very unique issues. The receiver was originally appointed by the court under the Courts of Justice Act (Ontario) and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). The receiver was making a motion for advice and directions about it wanting approval for its fees and disbursements since the last approval order. It also wanted approval to make an interim distribution.

That seems pretty routine. It was the receiver’s fifth report to the court. The motion was opposed by the company whose assets were seized in the receivership. There was only one problem that caused that party to oppose the receiver’s motion. However, it was a humungous problem this receiver caused itself.

The problem is that the receiver obtained approvals from the court based on the information contained in its fourth report to the court and now the receiver was asking for something different!

Court appointed receiverships: A brief history of this court-appointed receivership

The major secured creditor who made a secured loan against a real estate project under both mortgage security and a general security agreement began court proceedings by making an application to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Commercial List for the court appointment of a receiver. On June 22, 2017, Justice Conway released an Order appointing the receiver in this matter (the Receiver).

The Order followed the model receivership order format and had the usual provisions. Specifically, it mentioned in paragraph 18 that “the Receiver’s Charge shall form a first charge in priority to all security interests, trusts, liens, charges and encumbrances, statutory or otherwise, in favour of any Person….”.

The Receiver performed its duties and filed reports with the court on a timely basis and received the necessary approvals along the way. So far so good with the first three court reports.

The fourth report was OK too

In November 2019 the Receiver brought a motion for Justice Dietrich to approve its Fourth Report and also its Supplementary Fourth Report. The same stakeholder currently opposing the Receiver’s motion for advice and directions also challenged certain of the Receiver’s recommendations contained in its Fourth Report.

It turns out that from the Receiver’s efforts and sale of the real property, there was not only enough money to pay out all the secured creditors, but there were funds left over. This is a very unusual situation. So the Receiver came to court. One of the approvals it was seeking was its proposal to pay the claims of the unsecured creditors. This company opposed that relief claiming the unsecured creditors were statute-barred. The reason the company opposed this is simple. Whatever the unsecured creditors are not entitled to would presumably be available to flow to the shareholders of the company.

Justice Dietrich looked for further written materials on this issue from the parties which were received on March 16 and 31, 2020. Justice Dietrich considered all the material and released her endorsement on this issue on June 19, 2020.

court appointed receiverships
court appointed receiverships

Court appointed receiverships: Justice Dietrich’s decision

Justice Dietrich’s Order approved the Receiver’s Fourth Report and Supplementary Fourth Report (the Fourth Approval Order) as well as payment to the Receiver of its fees of $373,960.75 plus HST plus an accrual of $25,000 plus HST to finish the management of the receivership. The Order additionally authorized the Receiver’s legal fees of $85,218.23 plus HST and an accrual of $15,000 plus HST for concluding the administration of the receivership.

The Fourth Approval Order approved making payment to the unsecured creditors in the amount of $190,800.71. Those payouts were made without delay by the Receiver even prior to the appeal time for appealing the Fourth Approval Order expired. The remaining funds were to be paid out to the company who opposed the motion, or as the company may direct.

The Receiver made all the payments except for one. The funds to be paid to the company involved in the receivership, which was more than $1 million, had not been paid out to the company as of the date the Receiver came to court with its Fifth Report.

Court appointed receiverships: OOPS – We need a fifth report to court

The Fourth Approval Order was settled with the consent of all stakeholders. That order was obtained on the basis that there was not much work left to do and it would be covered off by the approved fee accruals. The Receiver and its lawyer were to finish its work and then file a certificate with the court to advise the work was finished. The Fourth Approval Order also said that when the Receiver files the certificate with the court, that is the trigger that discharges the Receiver and ends the receivership. This is all standard stuff.

There now is only one huge problem. Subsequent to the Fourth Approval Order being issued and entered, the Receiver requested more money for its fee and its legal fees, well above what it told the court already. The further amount it was seeking was pretty close to an extra $100,000.

The Receiver then delivered a Fifth Report laying out the added costs asked for and also documenting an added HST Refund and accumulated interest. The Receiver acknowledged that it made an error. The Receiver also acknowledged that it could have brought this to everyone’s attention before the Fourth Approval Order was settled, issued and entered and the appeal period already has expired.

Personally, I call that more than an error. That is a huge problem. It is a major blow to the firms’ revenue and cash flow. If not resolved in the Receiver’s favour, it will most certainly cause much angst among the partners in the licensed insolvency trustee firm.

Court appointed receiverships: The Fifth Report To Court hearing and what the two parties said

The Receiver’s position was fairly simple. They really didn’t have much they could say at this stage, other than, OOPS! The Receiver submitted that the Receivership Order appointing the Receiver is clear. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Receiver will obtain its reasonable fees and costs and those of its legal counsel. Those fees and costs are secured by a first ranking charge against the assets being administered in the receivership.

All other amounts come after this first charge. The Receiver went on to say that the Appointment Order and the Fourth Approval Order were therefore in conflict and the Appointment Order must prevail.

The company in opposing the Receiver’s motion had some pretty simple facts on its side. The court agreed with these facts. The court stated that:

  • The Receiver only brought this motion on in response to the company’s attempt to set down a date for its motion to compel the Receiver to make the $1 million-plus payment to it as directed by the Fourth Approval Order.
  • The company agreed to the settling of the Fourth Approval Order based on the Receiver’s submissions to the court that what it put in its Fourth Reports was everything and there was. There was nothing else getting in the way of making all the payments approved in the Fourth Approval Order.
  • The Fourth Approval Order was intended to be final and for that reason
    incorporates the provisions of the Appointment Order. That is, it is open to the court to find that the Receiver has no capacity to request more fees since the clear objective of the Fourth Approval Order is to wrap up all issues including the discontinuation of the receivership.

The Receiver conceded that the details pertaining to the extra fees was known at the time the Fourth Approval Order was being settled and also after that. However, the Receiver took no particular actions to request them prior to the Order being settled and entered. The only action taken by the Receiver was this Motion for Directions supplied in reply to the company’s motion request to get paid what was already approved by the court.

The Commercial List court understood that the Receiver has undoubtedly made an error. The question the court needed to answer was who should pay for it – the Receiver or the company? The court decided that it should not be the company who settled the Fourth Approval Order understanding what its terms were, including, there was nothing standing in the way of it getting its money as already approved by the court.

The easiest way to avoid costly mistakes

Court appointed receiverhips, by their very nature, are complex administrations. Being a receiver or a receiver manager is a tough role. A court-appointed receiver must be fair and neutral to all parties as an officer of the court. Everyone is scrutinizing the decisions being made. Once a court-appointed receiver serves its motion materials, everyone goes through the receiver’s report with a fine-tooth comb. And rightly so.

It is not a good place to be when you make any kind of error in a public document. It is embarrassing and it makes everyone else wonder what other mistakes have you made? It is especially tough when your mistake short changes your firm out of the money that it has earned. These are awful circumstances.

By now you probably realize that you don’t have to be a licensed insolvency trustee to know the easiest way to avoid costly mistakes. Check, double-check and triple-check everything before you sign and release the report. As my carpenter friend says, “measure twice and cut once”.

Court appointed receiverships summary

I hope you have enjoyed this court appointed receiverships Brandon’s Blog. A sick insolvent company’s business might be saved by a debt restructuring.

Do you or your company have too much debt? Are you or your company in need of financial restructuring? The financial restructuring process is complex. The Ira Smith Team understands how to do a complex restructuring. However, more importantly, we understand the needs of the entrepreneur or the person who has too much personal debt.

You are worried because you are facing significant financial challenges. It is not your fault that you are in this situation. You have been only shown the old ways that do not work anymore. The Ira Smith Team uses new modern ways to get you out of your debt troubles while avoiding bankruptcy. We can get you debt relief freedom.

The stress placed upon you is huge. We understand your pain points. We look at your entire situation and devise a strategy that is as unique as you and your problems; financial and emotional. The way we take the load off of your shoulders and devise a debt settlement plan, we know that we can help you.

We know that people facing financial problems need a realistic lifeline. There is no “one solution fits all” approach with the Ira Smith Team.

That is why we can develop a restructuring process as unique as the financial problems and pain you are facing. If any of this sounds familiar to you and you are serious about finding a solution, contact the Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. team today.

Call us now for a free consultation.

We will get you or your company back on the road to healthy stress-free operations and recover from the pain points in your life, Starting Over, Starting Now.

The Ira Smith Trustee Team is absolutely operational and Ira, in addition to Brandon Smith, is readily available for a telephone consultation or video meeting. We hope that you and your family are safe and healthy

Call a Trustee Now!