Categories
Brandon Blog Post

FINANCIAL INFIDELITY IN MARRIAGE LEADS TO DIVORCE

FINANCIAL INFIDELITY IN MARRIAGE LEADS TO DIVORCE

Financial infidelity in marriage: Introduction

Financial infidelity in marriage is a recurring problem. Couples heading to divorce argue about many things – the kids, sex, in-laws, the house, division of labour – but a study from Utah State University and recent statistical findings from online divorce service MyDivorcePapers.com (MDP) have re-confirmed that the cause of money, not sex, is the top predictor of divorce. The study and the data show that couples who engage in financial infidelity in marriage routinely argue about their finances are setting a steady course for divorce. Many studies echo these findings, including a 2012 longitudinal study that found that money is the number one cause of tension in relationships and as a result, it’s also the top predictor of divorce.

Financial infidelity in marriage: Our definition

Financial infidelity in marriage occurs when a spouse commits to serious spending that affects the entire household without first consulting their mate. To avoid becoming a statistic couples should be doing a lot of talking about finances before saying I Do and throughout the marriage. It may not be romantic but avoiding the conversation may doom your relationship to failure. You are no doubt discussing your compatibility in many areas of life. You are more than likely not discussing your financial compatibility. The likelihood of financial infidelity in marriage may be increased as a result.

Financial infidelity in marriage: Some important considerations

Have you considered:

  • How you’re planning to pay for your lifestyle?
  • Saving for retirement?
  • If your spending habits are compatible?
  • What your financial priorities are?
  • Your assets?
  • Your debts?
  • A prenup?

Financial discussions need to be frank and transparent. The health of your marriage may depend on your financial health. If in the course of your financial discussions you uncover serious debt issues, it’s better to deal with the debt sooner than later.; stay away from divorce by not committing financial infidelity in marriage.

Financial infidelity in marriage: We can help you

Start your life off debt free and with a go forward plan to stay that way. For sound professional help and advice contact Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. today. We can’t guarantee you a happy marriage but Starting Over, Starting Now we can help you deal with serious debt issues and put you on a path to living a debt free life.

Categories
Brandon Blog Post

PARK LANE CIRCLE-PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES CAN’T CHANGE THE RULES

40 Park Lane Circle, a mansion located in Toronto, was for sale in a proposed auction and has become quite the source of notoriety these days, although nothing and no one can rival Mayor Rob Ford in the headline grabbing department. Pictured below, it’s being referred to as the Bridle Path’s own Palace of Versailles. Located at 40 Park Lane Circle, it was most recently listed for$13.98 million.

PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES CAN’T CHANGE THE RULES TO SUIT THEM-40 PARK LANE CIRCLE

40 Park Lane Circle, Toronto

COURTESY: CONCIERGE AUCTIONS

In the 40 Park Lane Circle case at hand (which our Firm was not involved in), the Receiver two months earlier made application to Court and obtained Court approval to conduct an auction of the main asset, a luxury home worth millions of dollars at 40 Park Lane Circle which is in a very fancy neighbourhood of Toronto. After the fact the Receiver was presented with an offer for the Property from a set of purchasers. Unfortunately the Receiver’s report did not explain how the offer came about, specifically whether the offerors were aware of the Court-approved auction process at the time they made the offer. The Receiver made a motion to discontinue an auction sale process and approve an offer to purchase the 40 Park Lane Circle real property. After the recent decision of the Honourable Mr. Justice Brown of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) in HSBC Bank Canada v. Mahvash Lechcier-Kimel, 2013 ONSC 7241, the Receiver’s motion was denied and the auction was allowed to proceed. According to the latest reports the bidding is now closed and the sale is pending.

As Court Officers, we live in glass houses. Every action we take is on display for all to see. All stakeholders to the process are watching how we conduct the administration, and invariably, a party who thought they should be obtaining a better result for themselves will not be satisfied. Accordingly, the sales process has to be seen to be fair, even handed and transparent. The case of 40 Park Lane Circle is very interesting as it highlights that a fair, open and transparent marketing process in accordance with the seminal “Soundair” case is more important in the eyes of the Court, than what might be thought of as the highest potential offer.

What is the “Soundair” case and why is it so important? The criteria to be applied when considering the approval of a sale recommended by a receiver were first set out by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Royal Bank vs Soundair Corp. and hence referred to as the “Soundair principles” which are used when deciding whether a receiver who wishes Court approval to sell a property has acted properly, a Court is to consider and determine:

a) whether the receiver has made a sufficient effort to get the best price and has not acted improvidently;

b) the interests of all parties;

c) the efficacy and integrity of the process by which offers were obtained; and

d) whether there has been unfairness in the working out of the process.

As Trustees & Receivers, we are often asked when selling an individual’s or a corporation’s assets in a Court supervised administration, why can’t the Receiver or Trustee deviate from the Court approved process, or why can’t the Receiver or Trustee share with the party paying the costs of the administration the appraisal information. The answer, which we have always known to be the case, is that the Court and its Officer, be it a Receiver or Trustee, must ensure the integrity of the sales process. By the decision of the Court, the 40 Park Lane Circle property sale is no different.

Our firm has been involved in numerous cases where assets were sold in a Court supervised process. Ira Smith Trustee & Receiver Inc. is a full service insolvency and financial restructuring practice serving companies and individuals throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) facing financial crisis or bankruptcy that need a plan for Starting Over, Starting Now. We pride ourselves on our openness, transparency and maintaining the integrity of the process. Contact us today.

Call a Trustee Now!